[0001] The present invention relates to an ink jet recording element containing a stabilizer
and a printing method using the element.
[0002] In a typical ink jet recording or printing system, ink droplets are ejected from
a nozzle at high speed towards a recording element or medium to produce an image on
the medium. The ink droplets, or recording liquid, generally comprise a recording
agent, such as a dye or pigment, and a large amount of solvent. The solvent, or carrier
liquid, typically is made up of water and an organic material such as a monohydric
alcohol, a polyhydric alcohol or mixtures thereof.
[0003] An ink jet recording element typically comprises a support having on at least one
surface thereof an ink-receiving or image-receiving layer, and includes those intended
for reflection viewing, which have an opaque support, and those intended for viewing
by transmitted light, which have a transparent support.
[0004] An important characteristic of ink jet recording elements is their need to dry quickly
after printing. To this end, porous recording elements have been developed which provide
nearly instantaneous drying as long as they have sufficient thickness and pore volume
to effectively contain the liquid ink. For example, a porous recording element can
be manufactured by coating in which a particulate-containing coating is applied to
a support and is dried.
[0005] When a porous recording element is printed with dye-based inks, the dye molecules
penetrate the coating layers. However, there is a problem with such porous recording
elements in that the optical densities of images printed thereon are lower than one
would like. The lower optical densities are believed to be due to optical scatter
which occurs when the dye molecules penetrate too far into the porous layer. Another
problem with a porous recording element is that atmospheric gases or other pollutant
gases readily penetrate the element and lower the optical density of the printed image
causing it to fade.
[0006] EP 1 016 543 relates to an ink jet recording element containing aluminum hydroxide
in the form of boehmite. However, there is a problem with this element in that it
is not stable to light and exposure to atmospheric gases.
[0007] EP 0 965 460A2 relates to an ink jet recording element containing aluminum hydrate
having a boehmite structure and a non-coupling zirconium compound. However, there
is no specific teaching of a metal oxy(hydroxide) complex as described herein.
[0008] U.S. Patent 5,372,884 relates to ink jet recording elements containing a hydrous
zirconium oxide. However, there is a problem with such elements in that they tend
to fade when subjected to atmospheric gases, as will be shown hereafter.
[0009] It is an object of this invention to provide an ink jet recording element that, when
printed with dye-based inks, provides superior optical densities, good image quality
and has an excellent dry time.
[0010] Still another object of the invention is to provide a printing method using the above
described element.
[0011] This and other objects are achieved in accordance with the invention which comprises
an ink jet recording element comprising a support having thereon an image-receiving
layer, the ink jet recording element containing a metal(oxy)hydroxide complex,

wherein
M is at least one metal ion;
n is 3 or 4;
A is an organic or inorganic ion;
pis 1, 2 or 3; and
x is equal to or greater than 0;
with the proviso that when n is 3, then a, b and c each comprise a rational number
as follows: 0 ≤ a < 1.5; 0 < b < 3; and 0 ≤ pc < 3, so that the charge of the M
3+ metal ion is balanced;
and when n is 4, then a, b and c each comprise a rational number as follows: 0
≤ a < 2; 0 < b < 4; and 0 ≤ pc < 4, so that the charge of the M
4+ metal ion is balanced.
[0012] By use of the invention, an ink jet recording element is obtained that, when printed
with dye-based inks, provides superior optical densities, good image quality and has
an excellent dry time.
[0013] Another embodiment of the invention relates to an ink jet printing method comprising
the steps of:
A) providing an ink jet printer that is responsive to digital data signals;
B) loading the printer with an ink jet recording element described above;
C) loading the printer with an ink jet ink composition; and
D) printing on the ink jet recording element using the ink jet ink
composition in response to the digital data signals.
[0014] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the stabilizer complex described above
is located in the image-receiving layer. In another preferred embodiment, M in the
above formula is a Group IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB metal or a lanthanide group metal of
the periodic chart, such as tin, titanium, zirconium, aluminum, silica, yttrium, cerium
or lanthanum or mixtures thereof. In another preferred embodiment, the stabilizer
described above is in a particulate form or is in an amorphous form. In another preferred
embodiment, n is 4; a, b and c each comprise a rational number as follows: 0 ≤ a <
1; 1 < b < 4; and 1 ≤ pc < 4, so that the charge of the M
4+ metal ion is balanced. In still another preferred embodiment, a is 0, n is 4, and
b+pc is 4. In yet still another preferred embodiment, a is 0, n is 3, and b+pc is
3.
[0015] In yet still another preferred embodiment of the invention, A
p- is an organic anion such as R-COO
-, R-O
-, R-S0
3-, R-OSO
3- or R-O-PO
3- where R is an alkyl or aryl group. In another preferred embodiment, A
P- is an inorganic anionic such as I
-, Cl
-, Br
-, F
-, ClO
4-, NO
3-, CO
32- or SO
42-. The particle size of the complex described above is less than 1 µm, preferably less
than 0.1 µm.
[0016] Metal (oxy)hydroxide complexes employed herein may be prepared by dissolving a metal
salt in water and adjusting the concentration, pH, time and temperature to induce
the precipitation of metal (oxy)hydroxide tetramers, polymers or particulates. The
conditions for precipitation vary depending upon the nature and concentrations of
the counter ion(s) present and can be determined by one skilled in the art. For example,
soluble complexes suitable for preparation of the zirconium (oxy)hydroxide particulates
include, but are not limited to, ZrOCl
2·8H
2O, and the halide, nitrate, acetate, sulfate, carbonate, propionate, acetylacetonate,
citrate and benzoate salts; and hydroxy salts with any of the above anions. It is
also possible to prepare the complexes employed in the invention via the hydrolysis
of organically soluble zirconium complexes such as zirconium alkoxides, e.g., zirconium
propoxide, zirconium isopropoxide, zirconium ethoxide and related organometallic zirconium
compounds.
[0017] The hydrolyzed zirconium oxyhydroxides,

may exist as tetrameric zirconia units or as polymeric complexes of tetrameric zirconia,
wherein zirconium cations are bridged by hydroxy and/or oxo groups. In general, hydrolyzed
zirconia salts are amorphous and may exist predominantly in the α form. However, depending
upon the experimental conditions (solvents, pH, additives, aging and heating conditions),
the hydrolyzed product may contain significant number of "oxo" bridges.
[0018] It is often difficult to ascertain the precise composition of "oxo" and "hydroxy"
groups in hydrolyzed metal salts. Therefore, the usage of definitive numbers for these
functional groups in metal (oxy)hydroxide compositions was avoided. Any number of
oligomeric or polymeric units of metal complexes may be condensed via hydrolysis reactions
to form larger particulates ranging in size from 3 nm to 500 nm.
[0019] It is further possible to age or heat treat suspensions of the complexes to obtain
particulates ranging in size from 0.500 µm to 5.0 µm. Preferred particles sizes are
in the range from 5 nm to 1000 nm. Calcination of amorphous metal (oxy)hydroxide leads
to the formation of crystalline polymorphs of metal oxides.
[0020] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the image-receiving layer is porous and
also contains a polymeric binder in an amount insufficient to alter the porosity of
the porous receiving layer. In another preferred embodiment, the polymeric binder
is a hydrophilic polymer such as poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), gelatin,
cellulose ethers, poly(oxazolines), poly(vinylacetamides), partially hydrolyzed poly(vinyl
acetate/vinyl alcohol), poly(acrylic acid), poly(acrylamide), poly(alkylene oxide),
sulfonated or phosphated polyesters and polystyrenes, casein, zein, albumin, chitin,
chitosan, dextran, pectin, collagen derivatives, collodian, agar-agar, arrowroot,
guar, carrageenan, tragacanth, xanthan, rhamsan and the like. In still another preferred
embodiment of the invention, the hydrophilic polymer is poly(vinyl alcohol), hydroxypropyl
cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, or a poly(alkylene oxide). In yet still
another preferred embodiment, the hydrophilic binder is poly(vinyl alcohol).
[0021] In addition to the image-receiving layer, the recording element may also contain
a base layer, next to the support, the function of which is to absorb the solvent
from the ink. Materials useful for this layer include particles, polymeric binder
and/or crosslinker.
[0022] The support for the ink jet recording element used in the invention can be any of
those usually used for ink jet receivers, such as resin-coated paper, paper, polyesters,
or microporous materials such as polyethylene polymer-containing material sold by
PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania under the trade name of Teslin ®, Tyvek
® synthetic paper (DuPont Corp.), and OPPalyte® films (Mobil Chemical Co.) and other
composite films listed in U.S. Patent 5,244,861. Opaque supports include plain paper,
coated paper, synthetic paper, photographic paper support, melt-extrusion-coated paper,
and laminated paper, such as biaxially oriented support laminates. Biaxially oriented
support laminates are described in U.S. Patents 5,853,965; 5,866,282; 5,874,205; 5,888,643;
5,888,681; 5,888,683; and 5,888,714. These biaxially oriented supports include a paper
base and a biaxially oriented polyolefin sheet, typically polypropylene, laminated
to one or both sides of the paper base. Transparent supports include glass, cellulose
derivatives, e.g., a cellulose ester, cellulose triacetate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose
acetate propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate; polyesters, such as poly(ethylene
terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene terephthalate),
poly(butylene terephthalate), and copolymers thereof; polyimides; polyamides; polycarbonates;
polystyrene; polyolefins, such as polyethylene or polypropylene; polysulfones; polyacrylates;
polyetherimides; and mixtures thereof. The papers listed above include a broad range
of papers, from high end papers, such as photographic paper to low end papers, such
as newsprint. In a preferred embodiment, polyethylene-coated paper is employed.
[0023] The support used in the invention may have a thickness of from 50 to 500 µm, preferably
from 75 to 300 µm. Antioxidants, antistatic agents, plasticizers and other known additives
may be incorporated into the support, if desired.
[0024] In order to improve the adhesion of the ink-receiving layer to the support, the surface
of the support may be subjected to a corona-discharge treatment prior to applying
the image-receiving layer.
[0025] Coating compositions employed in the invention may be applied by any number of well
known techniques, including dip-coating, wound-wire rod coating, doctor blade coating,
gravure and reverse-roll coating, slide coating, bead coating, extrusion coating,
curtain coating and the like. Known coating and drying methods are described in further
detail in Research Disclosure no. 308119, published Dec. 1989, pages 1007 to 1008.
Slide coating is preferred, in which the base layers and overcoat may be simultaneously
applied. After coating, the layers are generally dried by simple evaporation, which
may be accelerated by known techniques such as convection heating.
[0026] In order to impart mechanical durability to an ink jet recording element, crosslinkers
which act upon the binder discussed above may be added in small quantities. Such an
additive improves the cohesive strength of the layer. Crosslinkers such as carbodiimides,
polyfunctional aziridines, aldehydes, isocyanates, epoxides, polyvalent metal cations,
and the like may all be used.
[0027] To improve colorant fade, UV absorbers, radical quenchers or antioxidants may also
be added to the image-receiving layer as is well known in the art. Other additives
include inorganic or organic particles, pH modifiers, adhesion promoters, rheology
modifiers, surfactants, biocides, lubricants, dyes, optical brighteners, matte agents,
antistatic agents, etc. In order to obtain adequate coatability, additives known to
those familiar with such art such as surfactants, defoamers, alcohol and the like
may be used. A common level for coating aids is 0.01 to 0.30 % active coating aid
based on the total solution weight. These coating aids can be nonionic, anionic, cationic
or amphoteric. Specific elements are described in MCCUTCHEON's Volume 1: Emulsifiers
and Detergents, 1995, North American Edition.
[0028] The ink receiving layer employed in the invention can contain one or more mordanting
species or polymers. The mordant polymer can be a soluble polymer, a charged molecule,
or a crosslinked dispersed microparticle. The mordant can be non-ionic, cationic or
anionic.
[0029] The coating composition can be coated either from water or organic solvents, however
water is preferred. The total solids content should be selected to yield a useful
coating thickness in the most economical way, and for particulate coating formulations,
solids contents from 10-40% are typical.
[0030] Ink jet inks used to image the recording elements of the present invention are well-known
in the art. The ink compositions used in ink jet printing typically are liquid compositions
comprising a solvent or carrier liquid, dyes or pigments, humectants, organic solvents,
detergents, thickeners, preservatives, and the like. The solvent or carrier liquid
can be solely water or can be water mixed with other water-miscible solvents such
as polyhydric alcohols. Inks in which organic materials such as polyhydric alcohols
are the predominant carrier or solvent liquid may also be used. Particularly useful
are mixed solvents of water and polyhydric alcohols. The dyes used in such compositions
are typically watersoluble direct or acid type dyes. Such liquid compositions have
been described extensively in the prior art including, for example, U.S. Patents 4,381,946;
4,239,543 and 4,781,758.
[0031] The following examples are provided to illustrate the invention.
Example 1
Dye Stability Evaluation Tests
[0032] The dye used for testing was a magenta colored ink jet dye having the structure shown
below. To assess dye stability on a given substrate, a measured amount of the ink
jet dye and solid particulates or aqueous colloidal dispersions of solid particulates
(typically 10%-20.0% by weight solids) were added to a known amount of water such
that the concentration of the dye was 10
-5 M. The solid dispersions containing dyes were carefully stirred and then spin coated
onto a glass substrate at a speed of 1000-2000 rev/min. The spin coatings obtained
were left in ambient atmosphere with fluorescent room lighting (0.5 K1ux) kept on
at all times during the measurement. The fade time was estimated by noting the time
required for complete disappearance of magenta color as observed by the naked eye
or by noting the time required for the optical absorption to decay to less than 0.03
of the original value.

Comparative Coatings C-1 to C-13 (Non-metal(oxy)hydroxide salts)
[0033] Inorganic particles of Al
2O
3, SiO
2, TiO
2, ZnO, MgO, ZrO
2, Y
2O
3, CeO
2, CaCO
3, BaS0
4, Zn(OH)
2, laponite and montmorillonite were purchased from commercial sources as fine particles
or as colloidal particulate dispersions and were used to evaluate the stability of
ink jet dyes in comparison with the materials employed in the present invention. The
compositions and chemical identity of the samples was confirmed using powder X-ray
diffraction techniques. The particulates were then coated and tested as described
above.
Inventive Coatings I-1 to I-16
[0034] I-I. To a 5.0 g of 1M solution of Al(NO
3)
3•6H
2O, 6.3 g of an approximately 2.9% aqueous ammonia solution was added at room temperature
with stirring. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH about 5.5 was then coated
and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
[0035] I-2. To a 4.8 g of 1M solution of AlCl
3•6H
2O, 10.2 g of a 1 M sodium hydroxide was added at room temperature with stirring. The
resultant colloidal dispersion with pH = 4.7 was then coated and tested as described
above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
[0036] I-3. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of CeCl
3, 2.4 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide was added at room temperature with stirring. The
resultant colloidal dispersion with pH = 7.3 was then coated and tested as described
above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
[0037] I-4. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of Ce(CH
3COO)
3•H
2O, 1.1 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide was added slowly at room temperature, while stirring
the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH = 7.5 was then coated
and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
[0038] I-5. To a 5.0 g of 0.5 M solution of Ce(NO
3)
3•xH
2O, 0.8 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
7.0 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0039] I-6. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of La(CH
3COO)
3•xH
2O, 0.12 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
7.6 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0040] I-7. To a 5.0 g of 0.5 M solution of La(NO
3)
3•xH
2O, 0.8 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
7.7 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0041] I-8. To a 5.0 g of 0.5 M solution of YCl
3•6H
2O, 0.7 ml of a 2.8-3.0% ammonia solution was added slowly at room temperature, while
stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH = 6.6 was
then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
[0042] I-9. To a 5.0 g of 0.5 M solution of Y(NO)
3•6H
2O, 3.1 ml of a 0.1 M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
6.4 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0043] I-10. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of Y(CH
3COO)
3•xH
2O, 1.5 ml of a 2.8-3.0% solution of ammonia hydroxide was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
9.6 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0044] I-11. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of Gd(CH
3COO)
3•xH
2O, 3.5 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
7.5 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0045] I-12. To a 5.0 g of 0.25 M solution of Sm(CH
3COO)
3•xH
2O, 3.7 ml of a 0.2M sodium hydroxide solution was added slowly at room temperature,
while stirring the reaction mixture. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH =
7.5 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table 1
below.
[0046] I-13. A 10% colloidal dispersion of zirconium(iv)acetate hydroxide was made by adding 1.0
g of the salt in 9 ml of distilled water at room temperature. The resultant dispersion
with pH
ca. 4.1 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table
1 below.
[0047] I-14. To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 8.3 ml oflM sodium acetate was gradually added and vigorously stirred at room temperature.
The final colloidal dispersion with
(ca. 14% solids) pH
ca. 3.0 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table
1 below.
[0048] I-15. To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 1.7 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion
(ca. 19% solids) with pH 3.6 was then coated and tested as described above and the results
shown in Table 1 below.
[0049] I-16. To a 5.0 ml of 20% solution of Si(CH
3COO)
4, 4.6 ml of 1M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring at room
temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 4.8 was then coated and tested
as described above and the results shown in Table 1 below.
Table 1
Coating |
Particle |
Fade Time |
Hue Change |
C-1 |
Al2O3 |
18 hours |
No |
C-2 |
SiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-3 |
TiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-4 |
ZnO |
2 days |
No |
C-S |
MgO |
18 hours |
No |
C-6 |
ZrO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-7 |
Y2O3 |
7 days |
No |
C-8 |
CeO2 |
7 days |
No |
C-9 |
CaCO3 |
5 days |
Yes |
C-10 |
BaSO4 |
6 days |
Yes |
C-11 |
Zn(OH)2 |
5 days |
Yes |
C-12 |
Laponite |
4 days |
No |
C-13 |
Montmorillonite |
18 hours |
Yes |
I-1 |
Al(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-2 |
Al(O)a(OH)b(Cl)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-3 |
Ce(O)a(OH)b(Cl)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-4 |
Ce(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-5 |
Ce(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-6 |
La(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-7 |
La(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-8 |
Y(O)a(OH)b(Cl)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-9 |
Y(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-10 |
Y(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-11 |
Gd(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-12 |
Sm(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•x H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I- 13 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c(H2O, b+c=4 |
> 30 days |
No |
I-14 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3CH2COO)0.83•(Cl)1.17H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-15 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(Cl)1.83H2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-16 |
Si(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
[0050] The above results show that the complexes employed in the present invention provide
superior image stability and stabilize the ink jet dye against fade and hue changes,
particularly when compared to the control materials. The above results further show
that the materials employed in the present invention can be prepared from various
three and four valent metal ions, and from an assortment of inorganic and organic
anions.
Example 2
[0051] Coatings were made and tested as in Example 1 using the materials described below.
The results are shown in Table 2 below.
Comparative Coatings C-14 to C-18 (Non-metal(oxy)hydroxide salts)
[0052] Metal oxides, Al
2O
3, SiO
2, TiO
2, ZnO and ZrO
2, were purchased from commercial sources as nanoparticulate colloidal dispersions
and were used to evaluate the stability of ink jet dyes in comparison with zirconium
(oxy)hydroxides employed in the present invention. The particle size of the commercial
colloids was typically in the range from 50 -500 nm. The pH of the colloids varied
as shown in Table 2 below.
Inventive Coatings I-17 to I-37
[0053] I-17: Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c: A 10% solution of zirconium(iv)acetate hydroxide was made by dissolving 1.0 g of
the salt in 9 ml of distilled water at room temperature. The final dispersion with
pH
ca. 4.1 was used for evaluating the stability of ink jet dyes as described above.
[0054] I-18. The composition of OH groups in I-17 was increased by the addition of 0.7 ml of 0.5
M NaOH to 10 ml of 10% I-17. The final dispersion with pH
ca. 6.7 was used for evaluating the stability of ink jet dyes as described above.
[0055] I-19: The composition of OH groups in I-17 was farther increased by the addition of 1.1
ml of 0.5 M NaOH to 10 ml of 10% I- 17. The final dispersion with pH
ca. 9.0 was used for evaluating the stability of ink jet dyes as described above.
[0056] I-20: In order to enhance the composition of acetate groups in I-17 (i.e. with lower pH),
zirconium acetate solution
(ca. 16%) in dilute acetic acid with pH 3.0 was used to evaluate the stability of ink
jet dyes as described above.
[0057] I-21: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
0.83•(Cl)
1.17•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 8.3 ml of 1M sodium acetate was gradually added and vigorously stirred at room
temperature. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
ca. 3.0 was used for evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0058] I-22: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3COO)•(Cl)•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
20, 10.0 ml of 1M sodium acetate was gradually added and vigorously stirred at room
temperature. The final colloidal dispersion with pH around 4.0 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0059] I-23: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
2.5•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 25.0 ml of 1M sodium acetate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at room
temperature. The resultant thick gel like colloidal dispersion with pH 5.5 was used
for evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0060] I-24: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3CH
2COO)
1.5•(Cl)
0.5•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 15.0 ml of 1M sodium propionate was gradually added, while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 3.25 was used for
evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0061] I-25: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3CH
2COO)
3.0•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 30.0 ml of 1M sodium propionate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at
room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 5.2 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above. A small amount of chloride anions
may also bind to zirconium (oxy)hydroxides.
[0062] I-26: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(C
6H
5COO)
1.75•(Cl)
0.25•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 35.0 ml of 0.5 M sodium benzoate was gradually added, while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant thick gel like colloidal dispersion with pH 3.3
was used for evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0063] I-27: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(C
6H
5COO)
2.5•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 50.0 ml of 0.5 M sodium benzoate was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant thick gel like colloidal dispersion with pH 5.4
was used for evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above. A small
amount of chloride anions may also bind to zirconium (oxy)hydroxides.
[0064] I-28: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(Cl)
1.83•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 1.7 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 3.6 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0065] I-29: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(Cl)
1.79•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 2.1 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 6.1 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0066] I-30: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(Cl)
c•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 5.0 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 12.9 was used for
evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above. Above pH 7.0, the
composition of OH groups in zirconium complexes may dominate due to base hydrolysis
and a small percentage of chloride anions may bind to zirconium (oxy)hydroxides.
[0067] I-31: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CO
3)
0.7(Cl)
1.3•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 7.0 ml of 1 M sodium carbonate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at
room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 3.4 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0068] I-32: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CO
3)
c(Cl)d•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 15.0 ml of 1 M sodium carbonate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at
room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 7.7 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above. Above pH 7.0, the composition
of OH groups in zirconium complexes may dominate due to base hydrolysis and a small
percentage of "carbonate" and "chloride" anions may bind to zirconium (oxy)hydroxides.
[0069] I-33: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(NO
3)
1.87•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrO(NO
3)
2.xH
2O, 1.3 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 3.0 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0070] I-34: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(NO
3)
c•nH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrO(NO
3)
2.xH
2O, 2.2 ml of 0.5 M NaOH was gradually added while vigorously stirring at room temperature.
The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 11.3 was used for evaluating the stability
of the ink jet dyes as described above. Above pH 7.0, the composition of OH groups
in zirconium complexes may dominate due to base hydrolysis and a small percentage
of nitrate anions may bind to the polycationic complexes of zirconium (oxy)hydroxides.
[0071] I-35: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(NO
3)
1.52(CO
3)
0.48•nH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrO(NO
3)
2.xH
2O, 2.4 ml of 1 M sodium carbonate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at
room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 3.1 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0072] I-36: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(NO
3)
c(CO
3)
d•nH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrO(NO
3)
2.xH
2O, 6.0 ml of 1 M sodium carbonate was gradually added while vigorously stirring at
room temperature. The resultant colloidal dispersion with pH 9.2 was used for evaluating
the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
[0073] I-37: Zr(OH)
4: A 10% solution of zirconium(iv)hydroxide was made by dissolving 1.0 g of Zr(OH)
4 in 9 ml of distilled water at room temperature. The resultant solution with pH 7.9
was used for evaluating the stability of the ink jet dyes as described above.
Table 2
Coating |
Particle |
Fade Time |
Hue Change |
C-14 |
Al2O3 |
18 hours |
No |
C-15 |
ZrO2 |
24 hours |
No |
C-16 |
SiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-17 |
ZnO |
2 days |
No |
C-18 |
TiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
I-17 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O, b+c=4 |
> 30 days |
No |
I-18 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O, b+c=4, b > c |
> 30 days |
No |
I-19 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O, b+c =4, b >> c |
> 30 days |
Yes |
I-20 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O, b+c =4, b < c |
> 30 days |
No |
I-21 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)0.83•(Cl)1.17•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-22 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)•(Cl)•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I237 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3COO)2.5•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-24 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3CH2COO1.5•(Cl)0.5•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-25 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3CH2COO)3.0•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-26 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(C6H5COO)1.75•(Cl)0.25•xH2O |
> 25 days |
No |
I-27 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(C6H5COO)2.5•xH2O |
> 25 days |
No |
I-28 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(Cl)1.83•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-29 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(Cl)1.79•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-30 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(Cl)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
Yes |
I-31 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CO3)0.7(Cl)1.3•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-32 |
Zr(0)a(0H)b(CO3)c(Cl)d•xH2O |
> 30 days |
Yes |
I-33 |
Zr(0)a(OH)b(NO3)1.87•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-34 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c•xH2O |
> 30 days |
Yes |
I-35 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(NO3)1.52(CO3)0.48•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-36 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(NO3)c(CO3)d•xH2O |
> 30 days |
Yes |
I-37 |
Zr(OH)4.xH2O |
12 days |
Yes |
[0074] The above results show that the anion stabilized, complex zirconium oxyhydroxide
particulates employed in the invention provide considerable stability for a magenta
ink jet dye when compared with the control materials. The data further show that the
materials of the current invention are superior to "hydrous" zirconia, Zr(OH)
4xH
2O, in imparting stability to ink jet dyes.
Example 3
Element 1
[0075] A coating composition was prepared from 72.0 wt. % of a 20 wt. % solids aqueous colloidal
suspension of zirconia (oxy)hydroxides stabilized by nitrate (Zrl 00/20 purchased
from Nyacol® Nano Technologies, Inc), 3.6 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (Airvol
203 ® from Air Products), and 24.4 wt. % water. (The relative proportion of zirconia
to PVA is therefore 80/20 by weight). The solution was coated onto a base support
comprised of a polyethylene resin coated photographic paper stock, which had been
previously subjected to corona discharge treatment, using a calibrated coating knife,
and dried to remove substantially all solvent components to form the ink receiving
layer.
Element 2
[0076] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 74.0 wt. % of an aqueous colloidal suspension of zirconium (oxy)hydroxide stabilized
by acetate (20 wt. % from Alfa Aesar, 0.005-0.01 micron particles, powder X-ray diffraction
analysis indicated that the suspension contained an amorphous particulate.), 2.2 wt.
% poly(vinyl alcohol) (Gohsenol® GH-17 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 23.8 wt. % water.
(The relative proportion of zirconia to PVA is therefore 87/13 by weight).
Comparative Element C-1
[0077] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 53.3 wt. % of a fumed Zirconia (a 30 wt. % aqueous suspension from Degussa, lot
# 007-80, ID # 1TM106, powder X-ray diffraction analysis indicated that the suspension
contained a crystalline ZrO
2 particulates), 4.0 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol) (Airvol 203® from Air Products), and
42.7 wt. % water. (The relative proportion of zirconia to PVA is therefore 80/20 by
weight).
Comparative Element C-2
[0078] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 60.0 wt. % of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension ofNalco2329® (75
nm silicon dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 6.0 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol)
(Airvol 203® from Air Products), and 34.0 wt. % water. (The relative proportion of
silica to PVA is therefore 80/20 by weigh).
Comparative Element C-3
[0079] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 60.0 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse®
PG003 from Cabot Corporation), 6.0 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol) (Airvol 203® from Air
Products), and 34.0 wt. % water. (The relative proportion of alumina to PVA is therefore
80/20 by weight).
Comparative Element C-4
[0080] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 64.0 wt. % of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension ofNalco2329® (75
nm silicon dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 4.5 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol)
(Airvol 203® from Air Products), and 31.5 wt. % water. (The relative proportion of
silica to PVA is therefore 85/15 by weight.
Comparative Element C-5
[0081] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 31.9 wt. % of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension of Nalco2329®(75
nm silicon dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 2.25 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol)
(Gohsenol® GH-17 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 65.85wt. % water. (The relative proportion
of silica to PVA is therefore 85/15 by weight).
Printing and dye stability testing
[0082] The above elements were printed using a Lexmark Z51 ink jet printer and a cyan ink
jet ink, prepared using a standard formulation with a copper phthalocyanine dye (Clariant
Direct Turquoise Blue FRL-SF), and a magenta ink, prepared using a standard formulation
with Dye 6 from U.S. Patent 6,001,161, as illustrated above. The red channel density
(cyan) patches and green channel density (magenta) patches at D-max (the highest density
setting) were read using an X-Rite ® 820 densitometer. The printed elements were then
subjected to 4 days exposure to a nitrogen flow containing 5 ppm ozone. The density
of each patch was read after the exposure test using an X-Rite ® 820 densitometer.
The % dye retention was calculated as the ratio of the density after the exposure
test to the density before the exposure test. The results for cyan and magenta D-max
are reported in Table 3.
Table 3
Element |
Material |
% dye retention magenta D-max |
% dye retention cyan D-max |
1 |
Amorphous ZrO(OH)NO3 |
100 |
92 |
2 |
Amorphous ZrO(OH)acetate |
96 |
100 |
C-1 |
Crystalline ZrO2 |
14 |
68 |
C-2 |
Silica |
5 |
82 |
C-3 |
Alumina |
5 |
57 |
C-4 |
Silica |
3 |
64 |
C-5 |
alumina |
6 |
88 |
[0083] The above results show that with a porous layer containing particulate complex zirconium
oxyhydroxides, dye stability towards environmental gases is excellent, however, with
a porous layer comprising crystalline zirconia or fine-particle silica or fine particle
alumina, dye stability towards environmental gases such as ozone remains poor.