[0001] The present invention relates to an ink jet recording element containing a stabilizer
and a printing method using the element.
[0002] In a typical ink jet recording or printing system, ink droplets are ejected from
a nozzle at high speed towards a recording element or medium to produce an image on
the medium. The ink droplets, or recording liquid, generally comprise a recording
agent, such as a dye or pigment, and a large amount of solvent. The solvent, or carrier
liquid, typically is made up of water and an organic material such as a monohydric
alcohol, a polyhydric alcohol or mixtures thereof.
[0003] An ink jet recording element typically comprises a support having on at least one
surface thereof an ink-receiving or image-receiving layer, and includes those intended
for reflection viewing, which have an opaque support, and those intended for viewing
by transmitted light, which have a transparent support.
[0004] An important characteristic of ink jet recording elements is their need to dry quickly
after printing. To this end, porous recording elements have been developed which provide
nearly instantaneous drying as long as they have sufficient thickness and pore volume
to effectively contain the liquid ink. For example, a porous recording element can
be manufactured by coating in which a particulate-containing coating is applied to
a support and is dried.
[0005] When a porous recording element is printed with dye-based inks, the dye molecules
penetrate the coating layers. However, there is a problem with such porous recording
elements in that the optical densities of images printed thereon are lower than one
would like. The lower optical densities are believed to be due to optical scatter
that occurs when the dye molecules penetrate too far into the porous layer. Another
problem with a porous recording element is that atmospheric gases or other pollutant
gases readily penetrate the element and lower the optical density of the printed image
causing it to fade. Still another problem occurs from microcracking of the surface
of the coated layer that leads to a nonhomogeneous coverage of ink in the ink receiving
layer. It would be desirable that such coated elements have high gloss, waterfastness
and high ink capacity.
[0006] EP 1 016 543 relates to an ink jet recording element containing aluminum hydroxide
in the form of boehmite. However, there is a problem with this element in that it
is not stable to light and exposure to atmospheric gases.
[0007] EP 0 965 460A2 relates to an ink jet recording element containing aluminum hydrate
having a boehmite structure and a non-coupling zirconium compound. However, there
is no specific teaching of a metal oxy(hydroxide) complex as described herein.
[0008] U.S. Patent 5,372,884 relates to ink jet recording elements containing a hydrous
zirconium oxide. However, there is a problem with such elements in that they tend
to fade when subjected to atmospheric gases, as will be shown hereafter.
[0009] It is an object of this invention to provide an ink jet recording element that, when
printed with dye-based inks, provides superior optical densities, good image quality
and has an excellent dry time.
[0010] Still another ojbect of this invention is to provide a printing method using the
above-described element.
[0011] These and other objects are achieved in accordance with the invention which comprises
an ink jet recording element comprising a support having thereon an image-receiving
layer, the ink jet recording element containing finely divided particulate material
and a metal(oxy)hydroxide complex,
M
n+(O)
a(OH)
b(A
p-)
c•xH
2O,
wherein
M is at least one metal ion;
n is 3 or 4;
A is an organic or inorganic ion;
p is 1, 2 or 3; and
x is equal to or greater than 0;
with the proviso that when n is 3, then a, b and c each comprise a rational number
as follows: 0 ≤ a < 1.5; 0 < b < 3; and 0 ≤ pc < 3, so that the charge of the M
3+ metal ion is balanced;
and when n is 4, then a, b and c each comprise a rational number as follows: 0
≤ a < 2; 0 < b < 4; and 0 ≤ pc < 4, so that the charge of the M
4+ metal ion is balanced
[0012] By use of the invention, an ink jet recording element is obtained that, when printed
with dye-based inks, provides superior optical densities, good image quality and has
an excellent dry time and image stability.
[0013] Another embodiment of the invention relates to an ink jet printing method comprising
the steps of:
A) providing an ink jet printer that is responsive to digital data signals;
B) loading the printer with the ink jet recording element described above;
C) loading the printer with an ink jet ink composition; and
D) printing on the ink jet recording element using the ink jet ink composition in
response to the digital data signals.
[0014] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the stabilizer complex described above
is located in the image-receiving layer. In another preferred embodiment, M in the
above formula is a Group IIIA, IIIB, IVA, IVB metal or a lanthanide group metal of
the periodic chart, such as tin, titanium, zirconium, aluminum, silica, yttrium, cerium
or lanthanum or mixtures thereof. In another preferred embodiment, the stabilizer
described above is in a particulate form or is in an amorphous form. In another preferred
embodiment, n is 4; a, b and c each comprise a rational number as follows: 0 ≤ a <
1; 1 < b < 4; and 1 ≤ pc < 4, so that the charge of the M
4+ metal ion is balanced. In still another preferred embodiment, a is 0, n is 4, and
b+pc is 4. In yet still another preferred embodiment, a is 0, n is 3, and b+pc is
3.
[0015] In yet still another preferred embodiment of the invention, A
p- is an organic anion such as R-COO
-, R-O
-, R-SO
3-, R-OSO
3- or R-O-PO
3- where R is an alkyl or aryl group. In another preferred embodiment, A
p- is an inorganic anionic such as I
-, Cl
-, Br
-, F
-, ClO
4-, NO
3-, CO
32- or SO
42-. The particle size of the complex described above is less than 1 µm, preferably less
than.0. 1 µm.
[0016] Metal (oxy)hydroxide complexes employed herein may be prepared by dissolving a metal
salt in water and adjusting the concentration, pH, time and temperature to induce
the precipitation of metal (oxy)hydroxide tetramers, polymers or particulates. The
conditions for precipitation vary depending upon the nature and concentrations of
the counter ion(s) present and can be determined by one skilled in the art. For example,
soluble complexes suitable for preparation of the zirconium (oxy)hydroxide particulates
include, but are not limited to, ZrOCl
2·8H
2O, and the halide, nitrate, acetate, sulfate, carbonate, propionate, acetylacetonate,
citrate and benzoate salts; and hydroxy salts with any of the above anions. It is
also possible to prepare the complexes employed in the invention via the hydrolysis
of organically soluble zirconium complexes such as zirconium alkoxides, e.g., zirconium
propoxide, zirconium isopropoxide, zirconium ethoxide and related organometallic zirconium
compounds.
[0017] The hydrolyzed zirconium oxyhydroxides,
Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(AP
-)
c*xH
2O
may exist as tetrameric zirconia units or as polymeric complexes of tetrameric zirconia,
wherein zirconium cations are bridged by hydroxy and/or oxo groups. In general, hydrolyzed
zirconia salts are amorphous and may exist predominantly in the α form. However, depending
upon the experimental conditions (solvents, pH, additives, aging and heating conditions),
the hydrolyzed product may contain significant number of "oxo" bridges.
[0018] It is often difficult to ascertain the precise composition of "oxo" and "hydroxy"
groups in hydrolyzed metal salts. Therefore, the usage of definitive numbers for these
functional groups in metal (oxy)hydroxide compositions was avoided. Any number of
oligomeric or polymeric units of metal complexes may be condensed via hydrolysis reactions
to form larger particulates ranging in size from 3 nm to 500 nm.
[0019] It is further possible to age or heat treat suspensions of the complexes to obtain
particulates ranging in size from 0.500 µm to 5.0 µm. Preferred particles sizes are
in the range from 5 nm to 1000 nm. Calcination of amorphous metal (oxy)hydroxide leads
to the formation of crystalline polymorphs of metal oxides.
[0020] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the finely divided particulate material
is a water-insoluble inorganic solid or polymeric material, such as a metal oxide
or an inorganic mineral. Examples of water-insoluble inorganic solids include any
inorganic oxide, such as silica, colloidal silica, fumed silica, alumina, hydrous
alumina, colloidal alumina, fumed alumina, calcium carbonate, kaolin, talc, calcium
sulfate, natural or synthetic clay, barium sulfate, titanium dioxide, zinc oxide,
or mixtures thereof.
[0021] Examples of polymeric materials which can be used in the invention as particulate
materials include latex particles and core-shell latex particles, such as polyolefins,
polyethylene, polypropylene, polystyrene, poly(styrene-co-butadiene), polyurethane,
polyester, poly(acrylate), poly(methacrylate), copolymers of n-butylacrylate and ethylacrylate,
copolymers of vinylacetate and n-butylacrylate, copolymers of methyl methacrylate
and sodium 2-sulfo-1,1-dimethylethyl acrylamide, and copolymers of ethyl acrylate,
vinylidene chloride and sodium 2-sulfo-1,1-dimethylethyl acrylamide or mixtures thereof.
These polymers can be internally crosslinked or uncrosslinked. It is preferable that
uncrosslinked latex particles have a film formation temperature above 25 °C.
[0022] The polymeric particles and inorganic particles useful in the invention can be of
any size. In a preferred embodiment, the mean particle diameter is less than 1 µm.
Mixtures of organic and inorganic particles may also be used.
[0023] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the image-receiving layer is porous and
also contains a polymeric binder in an amount insufficient to alter the porosity of
the porous receiving layer. In another preferred embodiment, the polymeric binder
is a hydrophilic polymer such as poly(vinyl alcohol), poly(vinyl pyrrolidone), gelatin,
cellulose ethers, poly(oxazolines), poly(vinylacetamides), partially hydrolyzed poly(vinyl
acetate/vinyl alcohol), poly(acrylic acid), poly(acrylamide), poly(alkylene oxide),
sulfonated or phosphated polyesters and polystyrenes, casein, zein, albumin, chitin,
chitosan, dextran, pectin, collagen derivatives, collodian, agar-agar, arrowroot,
guar, carrageenan, tragacanth, xanthan, rhamsan and the like. In still another preferred
embodiment of the invention, the hydrophilic polymer is poly(vinyl alcohol), hydroxypropyl
cellulose, hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose, or a poly(alkylene oxide). In yet still
another preferred embodiment, the hydrophilic binder is poly(vinyl alcohol).
[0024] In addition to the image-receiving layer, the recording element may also contain
a base layer, next to the support, the function of which is to absorb the solvent
from the ink. Materials useful for this layer include particles, polymeric binder
and/or crosslinker.
[0025] The support for the ink jet recording element used in the invention can be any of
those usually used for ink jet receivers, such as resin-coated paper, paper, polyesters,
or microporous materials such as polyethylene polymer-containing material sold by
PPG Industries, Inc., Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania under the trade name of Teslin ®, Tyvek
® synthetic paper (DuPont Corp.), and OPPalyte® films (Mobil Chemical Co.) and other
composite films listed in U.S. Patent 5,244,861. Opaque supports include plain paper,
coated paper, synthetic paper, photographic paper support, melt-extrusion-coated paper,
and laminated paper, such as biaxially oriented support laminates. Biaxially oriented
support laminates are described in U.S. Patents 5,853,965; 5,866,282; 5,874,205; 5,888,643;
5,888,681; 5,888,683; and 5,888,714. These biaxially oriented supports include a paper
base and a biaxially oriented polyolefin sheet, typically polypropylene, laminated
to one or both sides of the paper base. Transparent supports include glass, cellulose
derivatives, e.g., a cellulose ester, cellulose triacetate, cellulose diacetate, cellulose
acetate propionate, cellulose acetate butyrate; polyesters, such as poly(ethylene
terephthalate), poly(ethylene naphthalate), poly(1,4-cyclohexanedimethylene terephthalate),
poly(butylene terephthalate), and copolymers thereof; polyimides; polyamides; polycarbonates;
polystyrene; polyolefins, such as polyethylene or polypropylene; polysulfones; polyacrylates;
polyetherimides; and mixtures thereof. The papers listed above include a broad range
of papers, from high end papers, such as photographic paper to low end papers, such
as newsprint. In a preferred embodiment, polyethylene-coated paper is employed.
[0026] The support used in the invention may have a thickness of from 50 to 500 µm, preferably
from 75 to 300 µm. Antioxidants, antistatic agents, plasticizers and other known additives
may be incorporated into the support, if desired.
[0027] In order to improve the adhesion of the ink-receiving layer to the support, the surface
of the support may be subjected to a corona-discharge treatment prior to applying
the image-receiving layer.
[0028] Coating compositions employed in the invention may be applied by any number of well
known techniques, including dip-coating, wound-wire rod coating, doctor blade coating,
gravure and reverse-roll coating, slide coating, bead coating, extrusion coating,
curtain coating and the like. Known coating and drying methods are described in further
detail in Research Disclosure no. 308119, published Dec. 1989, pages 1007 to 1008.
Slide coating is preferred, in which the base layers and overcoat may be simultaneously
applied. After coating, the layers are generally dried by simple evaporation, which
may be accelerated by known techniques such as convection heating.
[0029] In order to impart mechanical durability to an ink jet recording element, crosslinkers
that act upon the binder discussed above may be added in small quantities. Such an
additive improves the cohesive strength of the layer. Crosslinkers such as carbodiimides,
polyfunctional aziridines, aldehydes, isocyanates, epoxides, polyvalent metal cations,
and the like may all be used.
[0030] To improve colorant fade, UV absorbers, radical quenchers or antioxidants may also
be added to the image-receiving layer as is well known in the art. Other additives
include inorganic or organic particles, pH modifiers, adhesion promoters, rheology
modifiers, surfactants, biocides, lubricants, dyes, optical brighteners, matte agents,
antistatic agents, etc. In order to obtain adequate coatability, additives known to
those familiar with such art such as surfactants, defoamers, alcohol and the like
may be used. A common level for coating aids is 0.01 to 0.30 % active coating aid
based on the total solution weight. These coating aids can be nonionic, anionic, cationic
or amphoteric. Specific elements are described in MCCUTCHEON's Volume 1: Emulsifiers
and Detergents, 1995, North American Edition.
[0031] The ink receiving layer employed in the invention can contain one or more mordanting
species or polymers. The mordant polymer can be a soluble polymer, a charged molecule,
or a crosslinked dispersed microparticle. The mordant can be non-ionic, cationic or
anionic.
[0032] The coating composition can be coated either from water or organic solvents, however
water is preferred. The total solids content should be selected to yield a useful
coating thickness in the most economical way, and for particulate coating formulations,
solids contents from 10-40% are typical.
[0033] Ink jet inks used to image the recording elements of the present invention are well-known
in the art. The ink compositions used in ink jet printing typically are liquid compositions
comprising a solvent or carrier liquid, dyes or pigments, humectants, organic solvents,
detergents, thickeners, preservatives, and the like. The solvent or carrier liquid
can be solely water or can be water mixed with other water-miscible solvents such
as polyhydric alcohols. Inks in which organic materials such as polyhydric alcohols
are the predominant carrier or solvent liquid may also be used. Particularly useful
are mixed solvents of water and polyhydric alcohols. The dyes used in such compositions
are typically watersoluble direct or acid type dyes. Such liquid compositions have
been described extensively in the prior art including, for example, U.S. Patents 4,381,946;
4,239,543 and 4,781,758.
[0034] The following examples are provided to illustrate the invention.
Example 1
Dye Stability Evaluation Tests
[0035] The dye used for testing was a magenta colored ink jet dye having the structure shown
below. To assess dye stability on a given substrate, a measured amount of the ink
jet dye and solid particulates or aqueous colloidal dispersions of solid particulates
(typically about 10%-20.0% by weight solids) were added to a known amount of water
such that the concentration of the dye was about 10
-5 M. The solid dispersions containing dyes were carefully stirred and then spin coated
onto a glass substrate at a speed of 1000-2000 rev/min. The spin coatings obtained
were left in ambient atmosphere with fluorescent room lighting (about 0.5 Klux) kept
on at all times during the measurement. The fade time was estimated by noting the
time required for complete disappearance of magenta color as observed by the naked
eye or by noting the time required for the optical absorption to decay to less than
0.03 of the original value.

Comparative Coatings C-1 to C-13 (Non-metal(oxy)hydroxide salts)
[0036] Inorganic particles of Al
2O
3, SiO
2, TiO
2, ZnO, MgO, ZrO
2, Y
2O
3, CeO
2, CaCO
3, BaSO
4, Zn(OH)
2, laponite and montmorillonite were purchased from commercial sources as fine particles
or as colloidal particulate dispersions and were used to evaluate the stability of
ink jet dyes in comparison with the materials employed in the present invention. The
compositions and chemical identity of the samples was confirmed using powder X-ray
diffraction techniques. The particulates were then coated and tested and the results
are shown in Table 1.
Comparative Coatings C-14 to C-16 (No additional particulates)
[0037] C-14. Zr1: Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O: A 10% colloidal dispersion of zirconium(iv)acetate hydroxide was made by adding
1.0 g of the salt in 9 ml of distilled water at room temperature. The resulting colloid
is hereafter referred to as "Zr1". The resultant dispersion with pH
ca. 4.1 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table
1 below.
[0038] C-15. Zr2: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
0.83(Cl)
1.17•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 1M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 8.3 ml of 1M sodium acetate was gradually added and vigorously stirred at room
temperature. The resulting colloid is hereafter referred to as "Zr2". The final colloidal
dispersion with
(ca. 14% solids) pH
ca. 3.0 was then coated and tested as described above and the results shown in Table
1 below.
[0039] C-16. Zr3: Zr(O)
a(OH)
b(Cl)
1.83•xH
2O: To a 10.0 ml solution of 0.5 M ZrOCl
2.8H
2O, 1.7 ml of 0.5 M sodium hydroxide was gradually added while vigorously stirring
at room temperature. The resulting colloid is hereafter referred to as "Zr3". The
resultant colloidal dispersion
(ca. 19% solids) with pH 3.6 was then coated and tested as described above and the results
shown in Table 1 below.
Inventive Coatings I-1 to I-34
[0040] The following dispersions were coated and tested as described above. The results
are shown in Table 1 below.
[0041] I-1. To a 2.0 g of 40% silica dispersion, 0.04 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 5.1 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0042] I-2. To a 2.0 g of 40% silica dispersion, 0.08 g of Zr(OH)b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.8 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0043] I-3. To a 2.0 g of 40% silica dispersion, 0.160 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.7 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0044] I-4. To a 2.0 g of 40% colloidal silica dispersion, 0.240 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.5 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0045] I-5. To a 2.0 g of 40% colloidal silica dispersion, 1.0 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added
while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
4.7 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0046] I-6. To a 2.0 g of 40% colloidal silica dispersion, 0.16 g of Zr3 complex was added while
vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.0 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0047] I-7. To a 2.0 g of 40% fumed alumina dispersion, 0.04 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.7 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0048] I-8. To a 2.0 g of 40% fumed alumina dispersion 0.08 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.2 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0049] I-9. To a 2.0 g of 40% fumed alumina dispersion, 0.16 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.2 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0050] I-10. To a 2.0 g of 40% fumed alumina dispersion 0.240 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.2 was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0051] I-11. To a 2.0 g of 40% fumed alumina dispersion 1.0 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added
while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
4.3 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0052] I-12. To a 2.0 g of fumed alumina dispersion 0.16 g of Zr3 complex dissolved in 2.0 ml
of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final
colloidal dispersion with pH 5.0 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet
dyes.
[0053] I-13. To a 0.4 g of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex dissolved in 2.0 ml of distilled water was added while vigorously stirring
solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 4.4was used for evaluating
the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0054] I-14. To a 0.4 g of titanium dioxide nanoparticles, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added
while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
4.4 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0055] I-15. To a 0.4 g of zinc oxide nanoparticles, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 6.6 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0056] I-16. To a 0.4 g of zinc dioxide nanoparticles, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while
vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 6.8 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0057] I-17. To a 0.4 g of magnesium oxide fine particulates, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion containing with pH 9.9 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet
dyes.
[0058] I-18. To a 0.4 g of magnesium oxide fine particulates, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was
added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with
pH 9.9 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0059] I-19. To a 0.4 g of calcium carbonate fine particulates, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 7.0 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0060] I-20. To a 0.4 g of calcium carbonate fine particulates, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was
added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with
pH 6.7 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0061] I-21. To a 2.0 g of 36% barium sulfate dispersion, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 5.4 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0062] I-22. To a 2.0 g of 36% barium sulfate dispersion, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added
while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
4.8 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0063] I-23. To a 2.0 g of 30% crystalline zirconia dispersion, 0.05 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
with pH 5.0 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0064] I-24. To a 2.0 g of 30% zirconia dispersion, 0.45 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while
vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 5.0 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0065] I-25. To a 0.4 g of yttria fine particulates, 0.1 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
with pH 9.2 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0066] I-26. To a 0.4 g of yttria fine particulates, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while
vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 9.5 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0067] I-27. To a 0.6 g of cerium oxide fine particulates, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 4.8 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0068] I-28. To a 0.6 g of cerium oxide fine particulates, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added
while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH
4.5 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0069] I-29. To a 0.4 g of laponite clay, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 7.6 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0070] I-30. To a 0.4 g of laponite clay, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while vigorously
stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion with pH 7.7 was used for
evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0071] I-31. To a 0.4 g of montmorillonite clay, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 4.5 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0072] I-32. To a 0.4 g of montmorillonite clay, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while vigorously
stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion containing with pH 4.2 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0073] I-33. To a 0.4 g of zinc hydroxide, 0.10 g of Zr(OH)
b(CH
3COO)
c•xH
2O complex was added while vigorously stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal
dispersion with pH 6.0 was used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
[0074] I-34. To a 0.4 g of zinc hydroxide, 0.8 g of 14% Zr2 dispersion was added while vigorously
stirring solid dispersion. The final colloidal dispersion containing with pH 5.7 was
used for evaluating the stability of the inkjet dyes.
Table 1
Coating |
Particle(s) |
Fade Time |
Hue Change |
C-1 |
Al2O3 |
18 hours |
No |
C-2 |
SiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-3 |
TiO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-4 |
ZnO |
2 days |
No |
C-5 |
MgO |
18 hours |
No |
C-6 |
ZrO2 |
18 hours |
No |
C-6 |
Y2O3 |
7 days |
No |
C-8 |
CeO2 |
7 days |
No |
C-9 |
CaCO3 |
5 days |
Yes |
C-10 |
BaSO4 |
6 days |
Yes |
C-11 |
Zn(OH)2 |
5 days |
Yes |
C-12 |
Laponite |
4 days |
No |
C-13 |
Montmorillonite |
18 hours |
Yes |
C-14 |
Zr(OH)b(CH3COO)c•xH2O, b+c=4 |
> 30 days |
No |
C-15 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(CH3CH2COO)0.83•(Cl)1.17•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
C-16 |
Zr(O)a(OH)b(Cl)1.83•xH2O |
> 30 days |
No |
I-1 |
SiO2:Zr1 (20:1) |
16 days |
No |
I-2 |
SiO2:Zr1 (10:1) |
18 days |
No |
I-3 |
SiO2:Zr1 (5:1) |
18 days |
No |
I-4 |
SiO2:Zr1 (3.33:1) |
18 days |
No |
I-5 |
SiO2:Zr2 (5.7:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-6 |
SiO2:Zr3 (5:1) |
15 days |
Yes |
I-7 |
Al2O3:Zr1 (20:1) |
10 days |
No |
I-8 |
Al2O3:Zr1 (10:1) |
15 days |
No |
I-9 |
Al2O3:Zr1 (5:1) |
15 days |
No |
I-10 |
Al2O3:Zr1 (3.33:1) |
15 days |
No |
I-11 |
Al2O3:Zr2 (5.7:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-12 |
Al2O3:Zr3(5:1) |
10 days |
Yes |
I-13 |
TiO2:Zr1 (4:1) |
7 days |
No |
I-14 |
TiO2:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
25 days |
No |
I-15 |
ZnO:Zr1(4:1) |
7 days |
No |
I-16 |
ZnO:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-17 |
MgO:Zr1 (4:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-18 |
MgO:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-19 |
CaCO3:Zr1 (4:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-20 |
CaCO3:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-21 |
BaSO4:Zr1 (7.2:1) |
25 days |
No |
I-22 |
BaSO4:Zr2 (6.4:1) |
10 days |
No |
I-23 |
ZrO2:Zr1 (12:1) |
9 days |
No |
I-24 |
ZrO2:Zr2 (9.5:1) |
7 days |
No |
I-25 |
Y2O3:Zr1 (4:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-26 |
Y2O3: Zr2 (3.6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-27 |
CeO2:Zr1 (6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-28 |
CeO2:Zr2 (5.3:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-29 |
Laponite:Zr1 (10:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-30 |
Laponite:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
> 30 days |
No |
I-31 |
Montmorillonite:Zr(1 4:1) |
15 days |
Yes |
I-32 |
Montmorillonite:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
15 days |
Yes |
I-33 |
Zn(OH)2:Zr1 (4:1) |
18 days |
No |
I-34 |
Zn(OH)2:Zr2 (3.6:1) |
30 days |
No |
[0075] The above results show that the mixture of particulates and complexes employed in
the present invention provide superior image stability and stabilize the ink jet dye
against fade and hue changes, particularly when compared to the control materials
C-1 through C-13.
Example 2
Element 1
[0076] A coating composition was prepared from 20.9 wt. % of an aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate
(a 20 wt. % aqueous dispersion from Alfa Aesar, lot # D03K29; 0.005-0.01 µm particles),
41.8 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003
from Cabot Corporation), 3.1 wt. % poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) (Gohsenol® GH-23 from
Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 34.2 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia to
alumina are 20/80, and the amount of PVA is 13.0 wt % of all solids]. The solution
was metered to a slot-die coating apparatus and coated onto a stationary base support
comprised of a polyethylene resin coated photographic paper stock, which had been
previously subjected to corona discharge treatment, and dried to remove substantially
all solvent components to form the ink receiving layer.
Element 2
[0077] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 13.1 wt. % of Zr100/20 (a 20 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension of zirconia nitrate
(from Nyacol® Nano Technologies, Inc), 26.1 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40
wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003 from Cabot Corporation), 1.9 wt. % PVA,
(Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 58.9 wt. % water. [The relative proportions
of zirconia to alumina are 20/80, and the amount of PVA is 13.0 wt % of all solids].
Element 3
[0078] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 61.2 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 3.3 wt.
% of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension of Nalco2329® (75 nm silicon
dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from
Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 33.1 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia to
silica are 90/10, and the amount of PVA is 15.0 wt % of all solids].
Element 4
[0079] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 54.3 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 6.8 wt.
% of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension of Nalco2329® (75 nm silicon
dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from
Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 36.5 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia to
silica are 80/20, and the amount of PVA is 15.0 wt % of all solids].
Element 5
[0080] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 6.8 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 30.7 wt.
% of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003 from
Cabot Corporation), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 60.1
wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia to alumina are 10/90, and the amount
of PVA is 15.0 wt % of all solids].
Element 6
[0081] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 13.7 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 27.2 wt.
% of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003 from
Cabot Corporation), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 56.7
wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia to alumina are 20/80, and the amount
of PVA is 15.0 wt % of all solids].
Comparative Element C-1
[0082] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 15.7 wt. % of a fumed Zirconia (a 30 wt. % aqueous suspension from Degussa, lot
# 007-80, ID # 1TM106), 47.0 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in
water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003 from Cabot Corporation), 3.5 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23
from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 33.8 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of zirconia
to alumina are 20/80, and the amount of PVA is 13.0 wt % of all solids].
Comparative Element C-2
[0083] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
63.1 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse® PG003
from Cabot Corporation), 3.8 wt. % PVA (Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and
33.1 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of alumina to PVA are therefore 87/13
by weight].
Comparative Element C-3
[0084] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 74.0 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 2.2 wt.
% PVA (Gohsenol® GH-17 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 23.8 wt. % water. [The relative
proportions of zirconia to PVA are therefore 87/13 by weight].
Comparative Element C-4
[0085] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 34.0 wt. % of silica (a 40 wt. % aqueous colloidal suspension of Nalco2329® (75
nm silicon dioxide particles) from Nalco Chemical Co.), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol®
GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 63.6 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of
silica to PVA are 85/15].
Comparative Element C-5
[0086] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 68.0 wt. % of the aqueous dispersion of zirconium(oxy)hydroxyacetate, 2.4 wt.
% PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei Co.), and 29.6 wt. % water. [The relative
proportions of zirconia to PVA are 85/15].
Comparative Element C-6
[0087] This element was prepared the same as Element 1 except that the coating composition
was 34.0 wt. % of a fumed alumina solution (40 wt. % alumina in water, Cab-O-Sperse®
PG003 from Cabot Corporation), 2.4 wt. % PVA, (Gohsenol® GH-23 from Nippon Gohsei
Co.), and 63.6 wt. % water. [The relative proportions of alumina to PVA are 85/15].
Printing and dye stability testing
[0088] The above elements and control elements of Example 1 were printed using a Lexmark
Z51 inkjet printer and a cyan inkjet ink, prepared using a standard formulation with
a copper phthalocyanine dye (Clariant Direct Turquoise Blue FRL-SF), and a magenta
ink, prepared using a standard formulation with Dye 6 from U.S. Patent 6,001,161.
(This is the same dye as shown in the structure at the beginning of the examples).
The red channel density (cyan) patches and green channel density (magenta) patches
at D-max (the highest density setting) were read using an X-Rite ® 820 densitometer.
The printed elements were then subjected to 4 days exposure to a nitrogen flow containing
5 ppm ozone. The density of each patch was read after the exposure test using the
X-Rite ® 820 densitometer. The % dye retention was calculated as the ratio of the
density after the exposure test to the density before the exposure test. The results
for cyan and magenta D-max are reported in Table 2.
Table 2
Element |
Composition of Image Receiving Layer |
Cracking |
% dye retention magenta D-max |
% dye retention cyan D-max |
1 |
17.4 % ZrO(OH)acetate,
69.6 % Al2O3
13 % PVA |
Moderate |
64 |
82 |
2 |
17.4 % ZrO(OH)nitrate
69.6 % Al2O3
13 % PVA |
None |
55 |
71 |
3 |
ZrO(OH)acetate/ silica 90/10 |
Moderate |
99 |
100 |
4 |
ZrO(OH)acetate/ silica 80/20 |
Severe |
99 |
100 |
5 |
ZrO(OH)acetate/ alumina 10/90 |
None |
99 |
99 |
6 |
ZrO(OH)acetate/ alumina 20/80 |
Slight |
98 |
100 |
C-1 |
17.4 % crystalline ZrO2
69.6 % Al2O3
13 % PVA |
None |
4 |
46 |
C-2 |
87%Al2O3
13 % PVA |
None |
3 |
53 |
C-3 |
87 % ZrO(OH)acetate
13 % PVA |
Severe |
96 |
100 |
C-4 |
Silica |
None |
6 |
77 |
C-5 |
ZrO(OH)acetate, |
Severe |
98 |
100 |
C-6 |
alumina |
None |
13 |
83 |
[0089] The above results show that the elements of the invention had acceptable physical
properties and superior dye retention as compared to the control elements that had
either severe cracking or poor dye retention.