Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to a process for removing sulfur-containing impurities from
olefin-containing hydrocarbon mixtures. More particularly, the process involves converting
the feedstock to an intermediate product of reduced bromine number, separating the
intermediate product into fractions of different boiling point, and subjecting the
high boiling fraction to hydrodesulfurization, and the intermediate boiling fraction
to selective hydrotreating.
Background of the Invention
[0002] The fluidized catalytic cracking process is one of the major refining processes which
is currently employed in the conversion of petroleum to desirable fuels such as gasoline
and diesel fuel. In this process, a high molecular weight hydrocarbon feedstock is
converted to lower molecular weight products through contact with hot, finely-divided,
solid catalyst particles in a fluidized or dispersed state. Suitable hydrocarbon feedstocks
typically boil within the range from about 205° C to about 650° C, and they are usually
contacted with the catalyst at temperatures in the range from about 450° C to about
650° C. Suitable feedstocks include various mineral oil fractions such as light gas
oils, heavy gas oils, wide-cut gas oils, vacuum gas oils, kerosenes, decanted oils,
residual fractions, reduced crude oils and cycle oils which are derived from any of
these as well as fractions derived from shale oils, tar sands processing, and coal
liquefaction. Products from a fluidized catalytic cracking process are typically based
on boiling point and include light naphtha (boiling between about 10° C and about
221° C), heavy naphtha (boiling between about 10° C and about 249° C), kerosene (boiling
between about 180° C and about 300° C), light cycle oil (boiling between about 221°
C and about 345° C), and heavy cycle oil (boiling at temperatures higher than about
345° C).
[0003] Naphtha from a catalytic cracking process comprises a complex blend of hydrocarbons
which includes paraffins (also known as alkanes), cycloparaffins (also known as cycloalkanes
or naphthenes), olefins (as used herein, the term olefin includes all acyclic and
cyclic hydrocarbons which contain at least one double bond and are not aromatic),
and aromatic compounds. Such a material typically contains a relatively high olefin
content and includes significant amounts of sulfur-containing aromatic compounds,
such as thiophenic and benzothiophenic compounds, as impurities. For example, a light
naphtha from the fluidized catalytic cracking of a petroleum derived gas oil can contain
up to about 60 wt. % of olefins and up to about 0.7 wt. % of sulfur wherein most of
the sulfur will be in the form of thiophenic and benzothiophenic compounds. However,
a typical naphtha from the catalytic cracking process will usually contain from about
5 wt. % to about 40 wt. % olefins and from about 0.07 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % sulfur.
[0004] Not only does the fluidized catalytic cracking process provide a significant part
of the gasoline pool in the United States, it also provides a large proportion of
the sulfur that appears in this pool. The sulfur in the liquid products from this
process is in the form of organic sulfur compounds and is an undesirable impurity
which is converted to sulfur oxides when these products are utilized as a fuel. The
sulfur oxides are objectionable air pollutants. In addition, they can deactivate many
of the catalysts that have been developed for the catalytic converters which are used
on automobiles to catalyze the conversion of harmful engine exhaust emissions to gases
which are less objectionable. Accordingly, it is desirable to reduce the sulfur content
of catalytic cracking products to the lowest possible levels.
[0005] Low sulfur products are conventionally obtained from the catalytic cracking process
by hydrotreating either the feedstock to the process or the products from the process.
The hydrotreating process involves treatment of the feedstock with hydrogen in the
presence of a catalyst and results in the conversion of the sulfur in the sulfur-containing
impurities to hydrogen sulfide, which can be separated and converted to elemental
sulfur. The hydrotreating process can result in the destruction of olefins in the
feedstock by converting them to saturated hydrocarbons through hydrogenation. This
destruction of olefins by hydrogenation is usually undesirable because: (1) it results
in the consumption of expensive hydrogen, and (2) the olefins are usually valuable
as high octane components of gasoline. As an example, a typical naphtha of gasoline
boiling range from a catalytic cracking process has a relatively high octane number
as a result of a large olefin content. Hydrotreating such a material causes a reduction
in the olefin content in addition to the desired desulfurization, and the octane number
of the hydrotreated product decreases as the degree or severity of the desulfurization
increases.
[0006] U.S. Patent No. 5,865,988 (Collins et al.) is directed to a two step process for
the production of low sulfur gasoline from an olefinic, cracked, sulfur-containing
naphtha. The process involves: (a) passing the naphtha over a shape selective acidic
catalyst, such as ZSM-5 zeolite, to selectively crack low octane paraffins and to
convert some of the olefins and naphthenes to aromatics and aromatic side chains;
and (2) hydrodesulfurizing the resulting product over a hydrotreating catalyst in
the presence of hydrogen. It is disclosed that the initial treatment with the shape
selective acidic catalyst removes the olefins which would otherwise be saturated in
the hydrodesulfurization step.
[0007] International Patent Application No. WO 98/30655 (Huff et al.), published under the
Patent Cooperation Treaty, discloses a process for the production of a product of
reduced sulfur content from a feedstock wherein the feedstock is comprised of a mixture
of hydrocarbons and contains organic sulfur compounds as unwanted impurities. This
process involves converting at least a portion of the sulfur-containing impurities
to sulfur-containing products of a higher boiling point by treatment with an alkylating
agent in the presence of an acid catalyst and removing at least a portion of these
higher boiling products by fractionation on the basis of boiling point.
[0008] U.S. Patent Nos. 5,298,150 (Fletcher et al.); 5,346,609 (Fletcher et al.); 5,391,288
(Collins et al.); and 5,409,596 (Fletcher et al.) are all directed to a two step process
for the preparation of a low sulfur gasoline wherein a naphtha feedstock is subjected
to hydrodesulfurization followed by treatment with a shape selective catalyst to restore
the octane which is lost during the hydrodesulfurization step.
[0009] U.S. Patent No. 5,171,916 (Le et al.) is directed to a process for upgrading a light
cycle oil by: (1) alkylating the heteroatom containing aromatics of the cycle oil
with an aliphatic hydrocarbon having at least one olefinic double bond through the
use of a crystalline metallosilicate catalyst; and (2) separating the high boiling
alkylation product by fractional distillation. It is disclosed that the unconverted
light cycle oil has a reduced sulfur and nitrogen content, and the high boiling alkylation
product is useful as a synthetic alkylated aromatic functional fluid base stock.
[0010] U.S. Patent No. 5,599,441 (Collins et al.) discloses a process for removing thiophenic
sulfur compounds from a cracked naphtha by: (1) contacting the naphtha with an acid
catalyst in an alkylation zone to alkylate the thiophenic compounds using the olefins
present in the naphtha as an alkylating agent; (2) removing an effluent stream from
the alkylation zone; and (3) separating the alkylated thiophenic compounds from the
alkylation zone effluent stream by fractional distillation. It is also disclosed that
the sulfur-rich high boiling fraction from the fractional distillation may be desulfurized
using conventional hydrotreating or other desulfurization processes.
[0011] U.S. Patent No. 5,863,419 (Huff, Jr. et al.) discloses a catalytic distillation process
for the production of a product of reduced sulfur content from a feedstock wherein
the feedstock is comprised of a mixture of hydrocarbons which contains organic sulfur
compounds as unwanted impurities. The process involves carrying out the following
process steps simultaneously within a distillation column reactor: (1) converting
at least a portion of the sulfur-containing impurities to sulfur-containing products
of a higher boiling point by treatment with an alkylating agent in the presence of
an acid catalyst; and (2) removing at least a portion of these higher boiling products
by fractional distillation. It is also disclosed that the sulfur-rich high boiling
fraction can be efficiently hydrotreated at relatively low cost because of its reduced
volume relative to that of the original feedstock.
[0012] More recently, U.S. Patent No. 6,024,865 in the name of Bruce D. Alexander, George
A. Huff, Vivek R. Pradhan, William J. Reagan and Roger H. Cayton disclosed a product
of reduced sulfur content which is produced from a feedstock which is comprised of
a mixture of hydrocarbons and includes sulfur-containing aromatic compounds as unwanted
impurities. The process involves separating the feedstock by fractional distillation
into a lower boiling fraction which contains the more volatile sulfur-containing aromatic
impurities and at least one higher boiling fraction which contains the less volatile
sulfur-containing aromatic impurities. Each fraction is then separately subjected
to reaction conditions which are effective to convert at least a portion of its content
of sulfur-containing aromatic impurities to higher boiling sulfur-containing products
by alkylation with an alkylating agent in the presence of an acidic catalyst. The
higher boiling sulfur-containing products are removed by fractional distillation.
It is also stated that alkylation can be achieved in stages with the proviso that
the conditions of alkylation are less severe in the initial alkylation stage than
in a secondary stage, e.g., through the use of a lower temperature in the first stage
as opposed to a higher temperature in a secondary stage.
[0013] U.S. Patent No. 6,059,962 in the name of Bruce D. Alexander, George A. Huff, Vivek
R. Pradhan, William J. Reagan and Roger H. Clayton disclosed a product of reduced
sulfur content wherein the product is produced in a multiple stage process from a
feedstock which is comprised of a mixture of hydrocarbons and includes sulfur-containing
aromatic compounds as unwanted impurities. The first stage involves: (1) subjecting
the feedstock to alkylation conditions which are effective to convert a portion of
the impurities to higher boiling sulfur-containing products, and (2) separating the
resulting products by fractional distillation into a lower boiling fraction and a
higher boiling fraction. The lower boiling fraction is comprised of hydrocarbons and
is of reduced sulfur content relative to the feedstock. The higher boiling fraction
is comprised of hydrocarbons and contains unconverted sulfur-containing aromatic impurities
and also the higher boiling sulfur-containing products. Each subsequent stage involves:
(1) subjecting the higher boiling fraction from the preceding stage to alkylation
conditions which are effective to convert at least a portion of its content of sulfur-containing
aromatic compounds to higher boiling sulfur-containing products, and (2) separating
the resulting products by fractional distillation into a lower boiling hydrocarbon
fraction and a higher boiling fraction which contains higher boiling sulfur-containing
alkylation products. The total hydrocarbon product of reduced sulfur content from
the process is comprised of the lower boiling fractions from various stages.
[0014] Another approach to reducing the sulfur-containing organic impurities content of
a feedstock comprised of a normally liquid mixture of hydrocarbons which includes
olefins is disclosed in International Publication Number WO 01/53432, A1. This approach
involves (a) contacting the feedstock with an olefin-modification catalyst in an olefin-modification
reaction zone under conditions which are effective to produce a product having a bromine
number which is lower than that of the feedstock; (b) fractionating the product from
the olefin-modification reaction zone to produce: (
i) a first fraction which comprises sulfur-containing organic impurities and has a
distillation endpoint which is in the range from about 135° C to about 221° C; and
(ii) a second fraction which is higher boiling than the first fraction and comprises sulfur-containing
organic impurities; and (c) contacting the first fraction with a hydrodesulfurization
catalyst in the presence of hydrogen in a hydrodesulfurization reaction zone under
conditions which are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in the
sulfur-containing impurities of the first fraction to hydrogen sulfide.
[0015] It has now been discovered that the sulfur-containing organic impurities while undergoing
reaction in the olefin-modification zone form refractive sulfur compounds. The formation
of these refractive compounds is undesirable because they can only be treated by conventional
hydrodesulfurization means which results in undesirable concomitant octane loss. These
refractive sulfur compounds cannot be removed via a selective hydrotreating process.
It has further been discovered that these refractive sulfur compounds concentrate
in the fraction of the olefin-modification reaction zone product having a boiling
range above about 200° C. The removal of these compounds can only be achieved through
conventional hydrodesulfurization that results in the saturation of olefins and the
loss of octane. Trace amounts of olefin-modification catalyst are also leached off
of the catalyst in the olefin modification reaction zone and pass into the olefin-modification
zone product. There is a potential for these compounds or components containing the
leached olefin-modification catalyst to cause both catalyst deactivation and pressure
drop in any downstream units such as downstream hydrotreaters. Additionally it has
been discovered that these compounds like the refractive sulfur compounds tend to
concentrate in the 200° C plus boiling range fraction.
[0016] By utilizing the process of the present invention the problems associated with refractive
sulfur compounds and compounds or components containing leached olefin-modification
catalyst can be ameliorated by fractionating the product from the olefin-modification
zone into at least three fractions. The advantage of splitting the olefin-modification
zone product into at least three fractions is that the refractive compounds and leached
catalyst containing compounds or components can be recovered in a relatively small
volume stream of the highest boiling fraction of the olefin modification zone product.
The remainder of the olefin-modification zone product is split into at least two fractions
wherein the lowest boiling fraction is relatively desulfurized and can be passed directly
to the gasoline pool, and the intermediate boiling fraction can be passed to a selective
hydrotreating zone, wherein the octane number is retained while the sulfur-containing
organic impurities are converted to hydrogen sulfide. Although not preferred alternatively,
the intermediate fraction can be passed to a conventional hydrotreater and subsequently
to a reformer to upgrade the octane of this fraction. In accordance with the process
of the invention the bulk of the olefin-modification zone effluent, e.g. 90 vol. %
to 98 vol. %, can be split into two fractions containing a paucity of refractive sulfur
and leached olefin modification catalyst and not be subjected to an octane reducing
hydrodesulfurization step.
[0017] The highest boiling fraction, ideally, can be routed to a conventional diesel or
naphtha hydrotreater or back to the fluidized catalytic cracking unit for removal
of both the refractive and non-refractive sulfur compounds. The leached olefin-modification
compounds or components can be removed with activated aluminum via conventional means
known to those skilled in the art prior to being passed to the hydrotreater.
Summary of the Invention
[0018] Hydrocarbon liquids which boil at standard pressure over either a broad or a narrow
range of temperatures within the range from about 10° C to about 345° C are referred
to herein as "hydrocarbon liquids." Such liquids are frequently encountered in the
refining of petroleum and also in the refining of products from coal liquefaction
and the processing of oil shale or tar sands, and these liquids are typically comprised
of a complex mixture of hydrocarbons, and these mixtures can include paraffins, cycloparaffins,
olefins and aromatics. For example, light naphtha, heavy naphtha, gasoline, kerosene
and light cycle oil are all hydrocarbon liquids.
[0019] Hydrocarbon liquids which are encountered in a refinery frequently contain undesirable
sulfur-containing impurities which must be at least partially removed. Hydrotreating
procedures are effective and are commonly used for removing sulfur-containing impurities
from hydrocarbon liquids. Unfortunately, conventional hydrotreating processes are
usually unsatisfactory for use with highly olefinic hydrocarbon liquids because such
processes result in significant conversion of the olefins to paraffins which are usually
of lower octane. In addition, the hydrogenation of the olefins results in the consumption
of expensive hydrogen.
[0020] in accordance with International Publication Number WO 01/53432, A1 organic sulfur
compounds can be removed from hydrocarbon liquids by a multiple step process which
comprises (a) contacting the feedstock with an olefin-modification reaction zone under
conditions which are effective to produce a product having a bromine number which
is lower than that of the feedstock;(b) fractionating the product into two fractions:
namely a first fraction having a distillation endpoint of 135 C to 221 C and a higher
boiling fraction; and (c) carrying out a hydrodesulfurization reaction with the lower
boiling fraction.
[0021] Unfortunately such a process results in undesirable octane loss because the first
fraction is subjected to conventional hydrotreating which serves to reduce octane
via olefin saturation. Additionally such a process does not address or present a solution
to the problems associated with converting refractive sulfur compounds to hydrogen
sulfide while retaining octane. Further, such a process does not address the difficulties
presented downstream of the olefin-modification zone by the leached catalyst compounds
or components such as increased pressure drop and catalyst deactivation in downstream
units.
[0022] Accordingly, there is a need for a process which can achieve a substantially complete
removal of sulfur-containing impurities from olefin-containing hydrocarbon liquids
which: (1) is relatively inexpensive to carry out, (2) results in little if any octane
loss; and (3) addresses the problems associated with refractive sulfur compounds and
leached catalyst compounds or components. For example, there is a need for such a
process which can be used to remove sulfur-containing impurities from hydrocarbon
liquids, such as products from a fluidized catalytic cracking process, which are highly
olefinic and contain relatively large amounts of sulfur-containing organic materials
such as mercaptans, thiophenic compounds, and benzothiophenic compounds as unwanted
impurities.
[0023] It has now been discovered that such an improved process involves modifying the olefin
content of the feedstock over an olefin-modification catalyst in an olefin-modification
step, fractionating the products from the olefin-modification step into at least three
fractions on the basis of boiling point, selectively hydrotreating the intermediate
boiling fraction, and hydrodesulfurizing the highest boiling of the resulting fractions.
The olefin-modification step results in a reduction of the olefinic unsaturation of
the feedstock, as measured by bromine number. As a consequence of the olefin-modification
step, a sulfur-lean product is obtained from the subsequent selective hydrotreating
step which has little loss of octane relative to that of the feedstock to the olefin-modification
step. In addition, the reduction of olefinic unsaturation in the olefin-modification
step results in a corresponding reduction of hydrogen consumption in the respective
selective hydrotreating and hydrodesulfurization steps since there is a reduced number
of olefinic double bonds to consume hydrogen in hydrogenation reactions.
[0024] One embodiment of the invention is a process for producing a product of reduced sulfur
content from a feedstock, wherein said feedstock contains sulfur-containing organic
impurities and is comprised of a normally liquid mixture of hydrocarbons which includes
olefins, said process comprising:
(a) contacting the feedstock with an olefin-modification catalyst in an olefin-modification
reaction zone under conditions which are effective to produce a product having a bromine
number which is lower than that of the feedstock;
(b) fractionating the product from said olefin-modification reaction zone to produce:
(i) a first fraction which comprises sulfur-containing organic impurities and has a
distillation endpoint which is less than about 140° C;
(ii) a second fraction which is higher boiling than the first fraction which comprises
sulfur-containing organic impurities and has a distillation endpoint which is less
than about 240° C; and
(iii) a third fraction which is higher boiling than the second fraction and comprises
sulfur-containing organic impurities and refractive sulfur compounds;
(c) contacting the second fraction with a selective hydrotreating catalyst in the
presence of hydrogen in a selective hydrotreating reaction zone under conditions which
are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in said sulfur-containing
impurities of the second fraction to hydrogen sulfide; and
(d) contacting the third fraction with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen in a hydrodesulfurization reaction zone under conditions which are effective
to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in said sulfur-containing impurities of
the third fraction to hydrogen sulfide.
[0025] Another embodiment of the invention is a process for producing products of reduced
sulfur content from a feedstock, wherein said feedstock contains sulfur-containing
organic impurities and is comprised of -a normally liquid mixture of hydrocarbons
which includes olefins, said process comprising:
(a) contacting the feedstock with an olefin-modification catalyst in an olefin-modification
reaction zone under conditions which are effective to produce a product which has
a lower bromine number than that of the feedstock, wherein said olefin-modification
catalyst is an acid catalyst;
(b) fractionating the product from said olefin-modification reaction zone to produce:
(i) a first fraction which comprises sulfur-containing organic impurities and has a
distillation endpoint which is less than about 120° C;
(ii) a second fraction which is higher boiling than the first fraction which comprises
sulfur-containing organic impurities and has a distillation endpoint which is less
than about 200° C; and;
(iii) a third fraction which is higher boiling than the second fraction and comprises
sulfur-containing organic impurities and refractive sulfur compounds;
(c) contacting the second fraction with a selective hydrotreating catalyst in the
presence of hydrogen in a selective hydrotreating reaction zone under conditions which
are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in said sulfur-containing
impurities of the second fraction to hydrogen sulfide; and
(d) contacting the third fraction with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen in a hydrodesulfurization reaction zone under conditions which are effective
to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in said sulfur-containing impurities of
the third fraction to hydrogen sulfide.
[0026] In another embodiment although not preferred, the second fraction can be passed to
a hydrodesulfurization zone followed by a reforming zone to increase the octane number
of the fraction which was reduced in the hydrodesulfurization zone.
[0027] An object of the invention is to provide an improved process for the removal of sulfur-containing
impurities from a hydrocarbon liquid which contains a significant olefin content.
[0028] Another object of the invention is to provide an improved method for the efficient
removal of sulfur-containing impurities from an olefinic cracked naphtha.
[0029] A further object of the invention is to provide an improved method for desulfurizing
an olefinic cracked naphtha which yields a product of substantially unchanged octane.
[0030] Yet another object of the invention is to provide an improved method for handling
problems associated with refractive sulfur compounds and leached catalyst compounds
or components in a process for removing sulfur-containing impurities in a hydrocarbon
liquid.
Brief Description of the Drawing
[0031] The drawing is a schematic representation of an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0032] A process for the production of a product of reduced sulfur content from an olefin-containing
distillate hydrocarbon liquid which contains sulfur-containing impurities has been
discovered. The process can be used to produce a product which is substantially free
of sulfur-containing impurities, has a reduced olefin content, and has an octane which
is similar to that of the feedstock.
[0033] The invention involves contacting the feedstock with an olefin-modification catalyst
in a reaction zone under conditions which are effective to produce an intermediate
product which has a reduced amount of olefinic unsaturation relative to that of the
feedstock as measured by bromine number. The intermediate product is then separated
into at least three fractions of different volatility. The fraction of highest volatility
(i.e., the lowest boiling fraction) is relatively free of sulfur-containing organic
impurities i.e. generally below 20 parts per million by weight sulfur and therefore
can be passed directly to the gasoline pool. The second fraction or intermediate boiling
range fraction, is contacted with a selective hydrotreating catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under conditions effective to convert at least a portion of its sulfur-containing
organic impurities to hydrogen sulfide. The hydrogen sulfide can be easily removed
by conventional methods to provide a product of substantially reduced sulfur content
relative to the feedstocks. The third fraction or highest boiling fraction is contacted
with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in the presence of hydrogen under conditions
which are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur-containing organic
impurities and refractive sulfur compounds to hydrogen sulfide. The hydrogen sulfide
can be easily removed by conventional methods to provide a product of substantially
reduced sulfur content relative to the feedstocks.
[0034] Aromatic sulfur-containing impurities in the feedstock, such as thiophenic and benzothiophenic
compounds, undergo conversion, at least in part, within the olefin-modification reaction
zone to higher boiling sulfur-containing products some of which can be characterized
as refractive sulfur compounds as further defined hereinafter. This conversion is
believed to be a result of alkylation of the aromatic sulfur-containing impurities
by olefins which is catalyzed by the olefin-modification catalyst. Upon fractionation
of the effluent from the olefin-modification reaction zone, most of these high boiling
sulfur-containing materials including the refractive sulfur compounds appear in the
third boiling fraction or highest boiling fraction, and the first or lowest boiling
fraction and the intermediate boiling fraction have a reduced sulfur content relative
to that of the feedstock to the olefin-modification zone.
[0035] In a highly preferred embodiment, the second fraction is contacted with a selective
hydrotreating catalyst in the presence of hydrogen under conditions which are effective
to convert at least a portion of the fraction's sulfur-containing impurities to hydrogen
sulfide. This can be accomplished by utilizing one of the selective hydrotreating
processes that are presently being licensed such as the SCANfining process licensed
by ExxonMobil Research and Engineering Company and the PRIME-G+ process licensed by
IFP North America Inc. or by operating a conventional hydrotreating process at selective
hydrotreating conditions that are relatively less severe such that the desulfurization
occurs while limiting olefin saturation. Such selective hydrotreating processes are
also disclosed in U.S. Patent No. 6,007,704 (Chapus et al.), U.S. Patent No. 5,821,397
(Joly et al.), and U.S. Patent No. 6,255,548 (Didillon et al.)
[0036] The third fraction is contacted with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under conditions which are effective to convert at least a portion of
its sulfur-containing impurities including refractive sulfur compounds to hydrogen
sulfide. A large portion of the sulfur-containing impurities of the higher boiling
fraction or fractions will frequently be comprised of aromatic sulfur-containing compounds,
such as thiophenic and benzothiophenic compounds and refractive sulfur compounds,
which are more difficult to remove by hydrodesulfurization than mercaptans and thiophenic
compounds. Accordingly, a preferred embodiment of the invention will comprise the
use of more vigorous hydrodesulfurization conditions.
[0037] Feedstocks which can be used in the practice of this invention are comprised of normally
liquid hydrocarbon mixtures which contain olefins and boil over a range of temperatures
within the range from about 10° C to about 345° C as measured by the ASTM D 2887 -
97a procedure (which can be found in the 1999 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section
5, Petroleum Products, Lubricants, and Fossil Fuels, Vol. 05.02, page 200, and said
procedure is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or by conventional
altemative procedures. In addition, suitable feedstocks will preferably include a
mixture of hydrocarbons which boils in the gasoline range. If desired, such feedstocks
can also contain significant amounts of lower volatility hydrocarbon components which
have a higher boiling point than said high volatility fraction. The feedstock will
be comprised of a normally liquid mixture of hydrocarbons which desirably has a distillation
endpoint which is about 345° C or lower, and is preferably about 249° C or lower.
Preferably, the feedstock will have an initial boiling point which is below about
79° C and a distillation endpoint which is not greater than about 345° C. Suitable
feedstocks include any of the various complex mixtures of hydrocarbons which are conventionally
encountered in the refining of petroleum, such as natural gas liquids, naphthas, light
gas oils, heavy gas oils, and wide-cut gas oils, as well as hydrocarbon fractions
which are derived from coal liquefaction and the processing of oil shale or tar sands.
Preferred feedstocks are comprised of olefin-containing hydrocarbon mixtures which
are derived from the catalytic cracking or the coking of hydrocarbon feedstocks.
[0038] Catalytic cracking products are highly preferred as a source of feedstock hydrocarbons
for use in the subject invention. Materials of this type include liquids which boil
below about 345° C, such as light naphtha, heavy naphtha and light cycle oil. However,
it will also be appreciated that the entire output of volatile products from a catalytic
cracking process can be utilized as a source of feedstock hydrocarbons for use in
the practice of this invention. Catalytic cracking products are a desirable source
of feedstock hydrocarbons because they typically have a relatively high olefin content
and they usually contain substantial amounts of organic sulfur compounds as impurities.
For example, a light naphtha from the fluidized catalytic cracking of a petroleum
derived gas oil can contain up to about 60 wt. % of olefins and up to about 0.7 wt.
% of sulfur wherein most of the sulfur will be in the form of thiophenic and benzothiophenic
compounds. In addition, the sulfur-containing impurities will usually include mercaptans
and organic sulfides. A preferred feedstock for use in the practice of this invention
will be comprised of catalytic cracking products and will contain at least 1 wt. %
of olefins. A preferred feedstock will be comprised of hydrocarbons from a catalytic
cracking process and will contain at least 10 wt. % of olefins. A highly preferred
feedstock will be comprised of hydrocarbons from a catalytic cracking process and
will contain at least about 15 wt. % or 20 wt. % of olefins.
[0039] In one embodiment of the invention, the feedstock for the invention will be comprised
of a mixture of low molecular weight olefins with hydrocarbons from a catalytic cracking
process. For example, a feedstock can be prepared by adding olefins which contain
from 3 to 5 carbon atoms to a naphtha from a catalytic cracking process.
[0040] In another embodiment of the invention, the feedstock for the invention will be comprised
of a mixture of a naphtha from a catalytic cracking process with a source of volatile
aromatic compounds, such as benzene and toluene. For example, a feedstock can be prepared
by mixing a light reformate with a naphtha from a catalytic cracking process. A typical
light reformate will contain from about 0 to about 2 vol. % olefins, from about 20
to about 45 vol. % aromatics, and will have distillation properties such that the
10% distillation point ("T10") is no greater than about 160° F (71° C), the 50% distillation
point ("T50") is no greater than about 200° F. (93° C), and the 90% distillation point
("T90") is no greater than about 250° F. (121° C.). It will be understood that these
distillation points refer to a distillation point obtained by the ASTM D 86-97 procedure
(which can be found in the 1999 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 5, Petroleum
Products, Lubricants, and Fossil Fuels, Vol. 05.01, page 16, and said procedure is
hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) or by conventional alternative
procedures. A typical light reformate will contain from about 5 to about 15 vol. %
of benzene.
[0041] Another embodiment of the invention involves the use of a feedstock which is comprised
of a mixture of: (1) hydrocarbons from a catalytic cracking process; (2) a source
of volatile aromatic compounds; and (3) a source of olefins which contain from 3 to
5 carbon atoms.
[0042] Suitable feedstocks for the invention will contain at least 1 wt. % of olefins, preferably
at least 10 wt. % of olefins, and more preferably at least about 15 wt. % or 20 wt.
% of olefins. If desired, the feedstock can have an olefin content of 50 wt. % or
more. In addition, suitable feedstocks can contain from about 0.005 wt. % up to about
2.0 wt. % of sulfur in the form of organic sulfur compounds. However, typical feedstocks
will generally contain from about 0.05 wt. % up to about 0.7 wt. % sulfur in the form
of organic sulfur compounds.
[0043] Feedstocks which are useful in the practice of this invention, such as naphtha from
a catalytic cracking process, will occasionally contain nitrogen-containing organic
compounds as impurities in addition to the sulfur-containing impurities. Many of the
typical nitrogen-containing impurities are organic bases and, in some instances, can
cause a relatively rapid deactivation of the olefin-modification catalyst of the subject
invention. In the event that such deactivation is observed, it can be prevented by
removal of the basic nitrogen-containing impurities before they can contact the olefin-modification
catalyst. Accordingly, when the feedstock contains basic nitrogen-containing impurities,
a preferred embodiment of the invention comprises removing these basic nitrogen-containing
impurities from the feedstock before it is contacted with the olefin-modification
catalyst. In another embodiment of the invention, a feedstock is used which is substantially
free of basic nitrogen-containing impurities (for example, such a feedstock will contain
less than about 50 ppm by weight of basic nitrogen). A highly desirable feedstock
is comprised of a treated naphtha which is prepared by removing basic nitrogen-containing
impurities from a naphtha produced by a catalytic cracking process.
[0044] Basic nitrogen-containing impurities can be removed from the feedstock or from a
material that is to be used as a feedstock component by any conventional method. Such
methods typically involve treatment with an acidic material, and conventional methods
include procedures such as washing with an aqueous solution of an acid or passing
the material through a guard bed. In addition, a combination of such procedures can
be used. Guard beds can be comprised of materials which include but are not limited
to A-zeolite, Y-zeolite, L-zeolite, mordenite, fluorided alumina, fresh cracking catalyst,
equilibrium cracking catalyst and acidic polymeric resins. If a guard bed technique
is employed, it is often desirable to use two guard beds in such a manner that one
guard bed can be regenerated while the other is in service. If a cracking catalyst
is utilized to remove basic nitrogen-containing impurities, such a material can be
regenerated in the regenerator of a catalytic cracking unit when it has become deactivated
with respect to its ability to remove such impurities. If an acid wash is used to
remove basic nitrogen-containing compounds, the treatment will be carried out with
an aqueous solution of a suitable acid. Suitable acids for such use include but are
not limited to hydrochloric acid, sulfuric acid and acetic acid. The concentration
of acid in the aqueous solution is not critical, but is conveniently chosen to be
in the range from about 0.1 wt. % to about 30 wt. %. For example, a 5 wt. % solution
of sulfuric acid in water can be used to remove basic nitrogen containing impurities
from a heavy naphtha produced by a catalytic cracking process.
[0045] The process of this invention is highly effective in removing sulfur-containing organic
impurities of all types from the feedstock. Such impurities will typically include
aromatic, sulfur-containing, organic compounds which include all aromatic organic
compounds which contain at least one sulfur atom. Such materials include thiophenic
and benzothiophenic compounds, and examples of such materials include but are not
limited to thiophene, 2-methylthiophene, 3-methylthiophene, 2,3-dimethylthiophene,
2,5-dimethylthiophene, 2-ethylthiophene, 3-ethylthiophene, benzothiophene, 2-methylbenzothiophene,
2,3-dimethylbenzothiophene, and 3-ethylbenzothiophene. Other typical sulfur-containing
impurities include mercaptans and organic sulfides and disulfides.
[0046] The olefin-modification catalyst of the invention can be comprised of any material
which is capable of catalyzing the oligomerization of olefins. Desirably, the olefin-modification
catalyst will be comprised of a material which is also capable of catalyzing the alkylation
of aromatic organic compounds by olefins. Conventional alkylation catalysts are highly
suitable for use as the olefin-modification catalyst of this invention because they
typically have the ability to catalyze both olefin oligomerization and the alkylation
of aromatic organic compounds by olefins. Although liquid acids, such as sulfuric
acid can be used, solid acidic catalysts are particularly desirable, and such solid
acidic catalysts include liquid acids which are supported on a solid substrate. The
solid catalysts are generally preferred over liquid catalysts because of the ease
with which the feed can be contacted with such a material. For example, the feed can
simply be passed through one or more fixed beds of solid particulate catalyst at a
suitable temperature. Alternatively, the feed can be passed through an ebulated bed
of solid particulate catalyst.
[0047] Olefin-modification catalysts which are suitable for use in the practice of the invention
can be comprised of materials such as acidic polymeric resins, supported acids, and
acidic inorganic oxides. Suitable acidic polymeric resins include the polymeric sulfonic
acid resins which are well-known in the art and are commercially available. Amberlyst®
35, a product produced by Rohm and Haas Co., is a typical example of such a material.
[0048] Supported acids which are useful as olefin-modification catalysts include but are
not limited to Brönsted acids (examples include phosphoric acid, sulfuric acid, boric
acid, HF, fluorosulfonic acid, trifluoromethanesulfonic acid, and dihydroxyfluoroboric
acid) and Lewis acids (examples include BF
3, BCl
3, AlCl
3, AlBr
3, FeCl
2, FeCl
3, ZnCl
2, SbF
5, SbCl
5 and combinations of AlCl
3 and HCl) which are supported on solids such as silica, alumina, silica-aluminas,
zirconium oxide or clays. When supported liquid acids are employed, the supported
catalysts are typically prepared by combining the desired liquid acid with the desired
support and drying. Supported catalysts which are prepared by combining a phosphoric
acid with a support are highly preferred and are referred to herein as solid phosphoric
acid catalysts. These catalysts are preferred because they are both highly effective
and low in cost. U.S. Patent No. 2,921,081 (Zimmerschied et al.), which is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety, discloses the preparation of solid phosphoric
acid catalysts by combining a zirconium compound selected from the group consisting
of zirconium oxide and the halides of zirconium with an acid selected from the group
consisting of orthophosphoric acid, pyrophosphoric acid and triphosphoric acid. U.S.
Patent No. 2,120,702 (Ipatieff et al.), which is incorporated herein by reference
in its entirety, discloses the preparation of solid phosphoric acid catalysts by combining
a phosphoric acid with a siliceous material. Finally, British Patent No. 863,539,
which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety, also discloses the preparation
of a solid phosphoric acid catalyst by depositing a phosphoric acid on a solid siliceous
material such as diatomaceous earth or kieselguhr.
[0049] With respect to a solid phosphoric acid that is prepared by depositing a phosphoric
acid on kieselguhr, it is believed that the catalyst contains: (1) one or more free
phosphoric acids (such as orthophosphoric acid, pyrophosphoric acid and triphosphoric
acid) supported on kieselguhr; and (2) silicon phosphates which are derived from the
chemical reaction of the acid or acids with the kieseiguhr. While the anhydrous silicon
phosphates are believed to be inactive as an olefin-modification catalyst, it is also
believed that they can be hydrolyzed to yield a mixture of orthophosphoric and polyphosphoric
acids which is active as an olefin-modification catalyst. The precise composition
of this mixture will depend upon the amount of water to which the catalyst is exposed.
In order to maintain a solid phosphoric acid alkylation catalyst at a satisfactory
level of activity when it is used as an olefin-modification catalyst with a substantially
anhydrous feedstock, it is conventional practice to add a small amount of an alcohol,
such as isopropyl alcohol, to the feedstock to maintain the catalyst at a satisfactory
level of hydration. It is believed that the alcohol undergoes dehydration upon contact
with the catalyst, and that the resulting water then acts to hydrate the catalyst.
If the catalyst contains too little water, it tends to have a very high acidity which
can lead to rapid deactivation as a consequence of coking and, in addition, the catalyst
will not possess a good physical integrity. Further hydration of the catalyst serves
to reduce its acidity and reduces its tendency toward rapid deactivation through coke
formation. However, excessive hydration of such a catalyst can cause the catalyst
to soften, physically agglomerate, and create high pressure drops in fixed bed reactors.
Accordingly, there is an optimum level of hydration for a solid phosphoric acid catalyst,
and this level of hydration will be a function of the reaction conditions. Although
the invention is not to be so limited, with solid phosphoric acid catalysts, we have
found that a water concentration in the feedstock which is in the range from abut
50 to about 1,000 ppm by weight will generally maintain a satisfactory level of catalyst
hydration. If desired, this water can be provided in the form of an alcohol such as
isopropyl alcohol which is believed to undergo dehydration upon contact with the catalyst.
[0050] Acidic inorganic oxides which are useful as olefin-modification catalysts include
but are not limited to aluminas, silica-aluminas, natural and synthetic pillared clays,
and natural and synthetic zeolites such as faujasites, mordenites, L, omega, X, Y,
beta, and ZSM zeolites. Highly suitable zeolites include beta, Y, ZSM-3. ZSM-4, ZSM-5,
ZSM-18, and ZSM-20. If desired, the zeolites can be incorporated into an inorganic
oxide matrix material such as a silica-alumina.
[0051] Olefin-modification catalysts can comprise mixtures of different materials, such
as a Lewis acid (examples include BF
3, BCl
3, SbF
5 and AlCl
3), a nonzeolitic solid inorganic oxide (such as silica, alumina and silica-alumina),
and a large-pore crystalline molecular sieve (examples include zeolites, pillared
clays and aluminophosphates).
[0052] In the event that a solid olefin-modification catalyst is used, it will desirably
be in a physical form which will permit a rapid and effective contacting with feed
in the olefin-modification reaction zone. Although the invention is not to be so limited,
it is preferred that a solid catalyst be in particulate form wherein the largest dimension
of the particles has an average value which is in the range from about 0.1 mm to about
2 cm. For example, substantially spherical beads of catalyst can be used which have
an average diameter from about 0.1 mm to about 2 cm. Alternatively, the catalyst can
be used in the form of rods which have a diameter in the range from about 0.1 mm to
about 1 cm and a length in the range from about 0.2 mm to about 2 cm.
[0053] In the practice of the invention, the feedstock is contacted with an olefin-modification
catalyst in an olefin-modification reaction zone under conditions which are effective
to produce a product having a bromine number which is lower than that of the feedstock
without causing any significant cracking of any paraffins in the feedstock. It will
be understood that the "bromine number" referred to herein is preferably determined
by the ASTM D 1159-98 procedure, which can be found in the 1999 Annual Book of ASTM
Standards, Section 5, Petroleum Products, Lubricants, and Fossil Fuels, Vol. 05.01,
page 407, and said procedure is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
However, other conventional analytical procedures for the determination of bromine
number can also be used. The bromine number of the product from the olefin-modification
reaction zone will desirably be no greater than 80% that of the feedstock to said
reaction zone, preferably no greater than 70% that of said feedstock, and more preferably
no greater than 65% that of said feedstock.
[0054] The reaction zone can consist of one or more fixed bed reactors containing the same
or different catalysts. A fixed reactor can also comprise a plurality of catalyst
beds. The plurality of catalyst beds in a single fixed bed reactor can also comprise
the same or different catalysts.
[0055] The conditions utilized in the olefin-modification reaction zone are also preferably
selected so that at least a portion of the olefins in the feedstock is converted to
products which are of a suitable volatility to be useful as components of fuels, such
as gasoline and diesel fuels.
[0056] Although the invention is not to be so limited, it is believed that the olefins in
the feedstock to the olefin-modification reaction zone are at least partially consumed
in a variety of chemical reactions upon contact of the feedstock with the olefin-modification
catalyst in said zone. And it is believed that the specific chemical reactions will
depend upon the composition of the feedstock. These chemical processes are believed
to indude olefin polymerization and the alkylation of aromatic compounds by olefins.
[0057] The condensation reaction of an olefin or a mixture of olefins over an olefin-modification
catalyst to form higher molecular weight products is referred to herein as a polymerization
process, and the products can be either low molecular weight oligomers or high molecular
weight polymers. Oligomers are formed by the condensation of 2, 3 or 4 olefin molecules
with each other, while polymers are formed by the condensation of 5 or more olefin
molecules with each other. As used herein, the term "polymerization" is used to broadly
refer to a process for the formation of oligomers and/or polymers. Olefin polymerization
results in a consumption of olefinic unsaturation. For example, the simple condensation
of two molecules of propene results in the formation of a six carbon olefin which
has only a single olefinic double bond (2 double bonds in the starting materials have
been replaced by 1 double bond in the product). Similarly, the simple condensation
of three molecules of propene results in the formation of a nine carbon olefin which
has only a single olefinic double bond (3 double bonds in the starting materials have
been replaced by 1 double bond in the product).
[0058] Although olefin polymerization is a simple model for understanding the reduction
in bromine number that occurs in the olefin-modification reaction zone, it is believed
that other processes are also important. For example, the initial products of simple
olefin condensation can undergo isomerization in the presence of the olefin-modification
catalyst to yield highly branched monounsaturated olefins. In addition, polymerization
reactions may occur to yield polymers which subsequently undergo fragmentation in
the presence of the olefin-modification catalyst to yield highly branched products
which are of a lower molecular weight than the initial polymerization product. Although
the invention is not to be so limited, it is believed that the following transformations
occur within the olefin-modification reaction zone: (1) olefins in the feedstock which
are of low molecular weight are converted to olefins of higher molecular weight which
are both highly branched and within the gasoline boiling range; and (2) unbranched
or modestly branched olefins in the feedstock are isomerized to highly branched olefins
which are within the gasoline boiling range.
[0059] The alkylation of aromatic compounds is also an important chemical process which
can occur in the olefin-modification reaction zone and acts to reduce the bromine
number of the feedstock. The alkylation of an aromatic organic compound by an olefin,
which contains a single double bond, results in the destruction of the double bond
of the olefin and results in the substitution of an alkyl group for a hydrogen atom
on the aromatic ring system of the substrate. This destruction of the olefinic double
bond of the olefin contributes to the formation of a product in the olefin-modification
reaction zone which has a reduced bromine number relative to that of the feedstock.
However, aromatic organic compounds vary widely in their reactivity as alkylation
substrates. For example, the relative reactivities of some representative aromatic
compounds toward alkylation by 1-heptene at 204° C over a solid phosphoric acid catalyst
are set forth in Table I, wherein each rate constant was derived from the slope of
the line obtained by plotting experimental data in the form of In(1-x) as a function
of time where x is the substrate concentration.
[0060] As used herein, the term "sulfur-containing aromatic compound" and "sulfur-containing
aromatic impurity" refer to any aromatic organic compound which contains at least
one sulfur atom in its aromatic ring system. Such materials include thiophenic and
benzothiophenic compounds.
[0061] Sulfur-containing aromatic compounds are usually alkylated more rapidly than aromatic
hydrocarbons. Accordingly, the sulfur-containing aromatic impurities can, to a limited
degree, be selectively alkylated in the olefin-modification reaction zone. However,
if desired, the reaction conditions in the reaction zone can be selected so that significant
alkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons does take place. This embodiment of the invention
can be very useful if the feedstock contains volatile aromatic hydrocarbons, such
as benzene, and it is desired to destroy such material by conversion to higher molecular
weight alkylation products. This embodiment is particularly useful when the feedstock
contains significant amounts of low molecular weight olefins, such as olefins which
contain from 3 to 5 carbon atoms. The products from mono- or dialkylation of benzene
with such low molecular weight olefins will contain from 9 to 16 carbon atoms and,
accordingly, will be of sufficient volatility to be useful as components of gasoline
or diesel fuels.
TABLE I.
| Alkylation Rate Constants for Various Aromatic Substrates upon Reaction with 1-Heptene
at 204° C over a Solid Phosphoric Acid Catalyst. |
| Compound |
Rate Constant, min-1 |
| Thiophene |
0.077 |
| 2-Methylthiophene |
0.046 |
| 2,5-Dimethylthiophene |
0.004 |
| Benzothiophene |
0.008 |
| Benzene |
0.001 |
| Toluene |
0.002 |
[0062] The alkylation of sulfur-containing aromatic impurities in the feedstock to the olefin-modification
reaction zone results in the formation of higher boiling sulfur-containing products.
Accordingly, such materials can be removed by fractionation of the reaction zone effluent
on the basis of boiling point. As a very crude approximation, each carbon atom in
the side chain of a monoalkylated thiophene adds about 25° C to the 84° C boiling
point of thiophene. As an example, 2-octylthiophene has a boiling point of 259° C,
which corresponds to a boiling point increase of 23° C over that of thiophene for
each carbon atom in the eight carbon alkyl group. Accordingly, monoalkylation of thiophene
with a C
7 to C
15 olefin in the olefin-modification reaction zone will usually yield a sulfur-containing
alkylation product which has a high enough boiling point to be easily removed by fractional
distillation as a component of a high boiling fraction which has an initial boiling
point of about 210° C.
[0063] The alkylation of a sulfur-containing aromatic compound by an olefin is illustrated
by the mono-alkylation of thiophene with propene to yield either 2-isopropylthiophene
or 3-isopropylthiophene. The higher molecular weight of such an alkylation product
is reflected by a higher boiling point relative to that of the starting material.
In one embodiment of the invention, reaction conditions in the olefin-modification
reaction zone are selected so that a major portion of any sulfur-containing aromatic
impurities in the feedstock are converted to higher boiling sulfur-containing products.
[0064] Mercaptans are a class of organic sulfur-containing compounds which frequently appear
in significant quantity as impurities in the hydrocarbon liquids which are conventionally
encountered in the refining of petroleum. For example, straight run gasolines, which
are prepared by simple distillation of crude oil, will frequently contain significant
amounts of mercaptans and sulfides as impurities. In addition, benzothiophenic compounds
and some multisubstituted thiophenes, such as certain 2,5-dialkylthiophenes, will
also be relatively unreactive under the conditions employed in the olefin-modification
reaction zone. Accordingly, a large proportion of the mercaptans in the feedstock
and significant amounts of certain relatively unreactive sulfur-containing aromatic
compounds can survive the reaction conditions in the olefin-modification reaction
zone.
[0065] In the practice of this invention, the feedstock is contacted with the olefin-modification
catalyst within the olefin-modification reaction zone at a temperature and for a period
of time which are effective to result in the desired reduction of the feedstock's
olefinic unsaturation as measured by bromine number. The contacting temperature will
be desirably in excess of about 50° C, preferably in excess of 100° C and more preferably
in excess of 125° C. The contacting will generally be carried out at a temperature
in the range from about 50° C to about 350° C, preferably from about 100° C to about
350° C, and more preferably from about 125° C to about 250° C. It will be appreciated,
of course, that the optimum temperature will be a function of the olefin-modification
catalyst used, the olefin concentration in the feedstock, the type of olefins present
in the feedstock, and the type of aromatic compounds in the feedstock that are to
be alkylated.
[0066] The feedstock can be contacted with the olefin-modification catalyst in the olefin-modification
reaction zone at any suitable pressure. However, pressures in the range from about
0.01 to about 200 atmospheres are desirable, and a pressure in the range from about
1 to about 100 atmospheres is preferred. When the feedstock is simply allowed to flow
through a catalyst bed, it is generally preferred to use a pressure at which the feed
will be a liquid.
[0067] In a highly preferred embodiment of the invention, the conditions utilized in the
olefin-modification reaction zone are selected so that no significant cracking of
paraffins in the feedstock takes place. For example, desirably less than 10% of the
paraffins in the feedstock will be cracked, preferably less than 5% of the paraffins
will be cracked, and more preferably less than 1% of the paraffins will be cracked.
It is believed that any significant cracking of paraffins will result in the formation
of undesirable by-products, for example, the formation of low molecular weight compounds
which results in gasoline volume loss.
[0068] In the practice of the invention, the effluent from the olefin-modification reaction
zone is fractionated on the basis of volatility into at least three fractions.
[0069] The distillation initial boiling point of the highest boiling third fraction is desirably
greater than about 200° C.
[0070] This fraction will contain a concentration of various compounds that can cause rapid
catalyst deactivation in downstream selective and conventional hydrotreaters. Specifically,
in the olefin-modification reaction zone, refractive sulfur species are created. These
refractive sulfur compounds concentrate in the 200° C plus fraction of the olefin-modification
zone product. The removal of these compounds can only be accomplished via conventional
hydrotreating or hydrodesulfurization which also detrimentally results in the saturation
of olefins causing octane loss.
[0071] It is believed these refractive sulfur compounds have the following structure:

[0072] Where R2 and R1 must have two or more carbons, e.g. C2H5, C3H7 etc. and one chain
must have more than five carbons, e.g. C5H11, C6H13, etc.
[0073] Thus examples of refractive sulfur compounds are:

[0074] It is believed refractive sulfur is a thiophene containing seven or more alkyl carbons.
[0075] Additionally, trace amounts of the olefin-modification catalyst can be leached off
in the olefin-modification zone and enter the olefin-modification zone product. This
leached catalyst can cause catalyst deactivation and/or pressure drop difficulties
in any downstream selective hydrotreater or hydrodesulfurization reactor. This leached
catalyst tends to concentrate in the 200° C plus boiling fraction.
[0076] Other undesirable compounds that concentrate in the 200° C plus boiling range fraction
include nitrogen- containing compounds and dienes.
[0077] The advantage of the process of the invention is that these compounds can be recovered
in the relative small volume of the 200° C plus fraction. The volume of this fraction
can range from 2 volume percent to 10 volume percent of the olefin-modification zone
product. Preferably, this volume percent can range from 2 volume percent to 6 volume
percent.
[0078] Thus the bulk, e.g., 90-98 volume percent, of the olefin-modification product, can
be split into two fractions. The 140° C minus, or more preferably the 120 ° C minus
boiling range first or lowest boiling fraction can be routed directly to gasoline.
The lowest boiling range first fraction is typically sulfur free such that it contains
less than about 50 parts per million by weight sulfur and preferably less than 30
parts per million by weight sulfur and most preferably less than 20 parts per million
by weight, and can therefore be directly used as blending stock for gasoline.
[0079] The intermediate fraction or second boiling fraction, preferably has a distillation
end point of less than about 240 °C and most preferably less than about 200
° C. The intermediate or second boiling fraction is passed to a selective hydrotreating
zone that removes sulfur compounds while retaining the octane.
[0080] The highest boiling fraction, which has a boiling range higher than the intermediate
fraction, from fractionation of the product from the olefin-modification reaction
zone is contacted with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst in the presence of hydrogen
under conditions which are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in
its sulfur-containing organic impurities including the refractive sulfur compounds
to hydrogen sulfide. In a highly preferred embodiment, at least a portion of the higher
boiling fraction or fractions are also contacted with a hydrodesulfurization catalyst
in the presence of hydrogen under conditions which are effective to convert at least
a portion of the sulfur in its sulfur-containing organic impurities to hydrogen sulfide.
Alternatively the highest boiling fraction can be recycled to the fluidized catalytic
cracking unit.
[0081] The hydrodesulfurization catalyst can be any conventional catalyst, for example,
a catalyst comprised of a Group VI and/or a Group VIII metal which is supported on
a suitable substrate. The Group VI metal is typically molybdenum or tungsten, and
the Group VIII metal is typically nickel or cobalt. Typical combinations include nickel
with molybdenum and cobalt with molybdenum. Suitable catalyst supports include, but
are not limited to, alumina, silica, titania, calcium oxide, magnesia, strontium oxide,
barium oxide, carbon, zirconia, diatomaceous earth, and lanthanide oxides. Preferred
catalyst supports are porous and include alumina, silica, and silica-alumina.
[0082] The particle size and shape of the hydrodesulfurization catalyst will typically be
determined by the manner in which the reactants are contacted with the catalyst. For
example, the catalyst can be used as a fixed bed catalyst or as an ebulating bed catalyst.
[0083] The hydrodesulfurization reaction conditions used in the practice of this invention
are conventional in character. For example, the pressures can range from about 15
to about 1500 psi (about 1.02 to about 102.1 atmospheres); the temperature can range
from about 50° C to about 450° C, and the liquid hourly space velocity can range from
about 0.5 to about 15 LHSV. The ratio of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed in the hydrodesulfurization
reaction zone will typically range from about 200 to about 5000 standard cubic feet
per barrel. The extent of hydrodesulfurization will be a function of the hydrodesulfurization
catalyst and reaction conditions selected and also the precise nature of the sulfur-containing
organic impurities in the feed to the hydrodesulfurization reaction zone. However,
the hydrodesulfurization process conditions will be desirably selected so that at
least about 50% of the sulfur content of the sulfur-containing organic impurities
is converted to hydrogen sulfide, and preferably so that the conversion to hydrogen
sulfide is at least about 75% or more.
[0084] After removal of hydrogen sulfide, the product from hydrodesulfurization of the highest
boiling fraction from the olefin-modification reaction zone will have a sulfur content
which is desirably less than 50 ppm by weight, preferably less than 30 ppm by weight,
and more preferably less than 10 ppm by weight. The octane of this hydrodesulfurization
product will be desirably at least 90% that of the feedstock to the olefin-modification
reaction zone, preferably at least 95% that of said feedstock, and more preferably
at least 97% that of said feedstock. Unless otherwise specified, the term octane as
used herein refers to an (R+M)/2 octane, which is the sum of a material's research
octane and motor octane divided by 2.
[0085] The intermediate boiling second fractionation product of the effluent from the olefin-modification
reaction zone is contacted with a selective hydrotreating catalyst in the presence
of hydrogen under conditions which are effective to selectively convert at least a
portion of the sulfur in its sulfur-containing organic impurities to hydrogen sulfide
with minimum hydrogenation of olefins.
[0086] One such selective hydrotreating process called SCANfining™ is licensed by ExxonMobil
Research and Engineering Company. The SCANfining Process is a catalytic desulfurization
process that utilizes a catalyst designated as RT 225 to selectively remove sulfur
from fluidized catalytic cracking naphtha with minimum hydrogenation of olefins, hereby
preserving octane. Yet another selective hydrotreating process is called PRIME-G+™
and is licensed by IFP North America, Inc. This process enables over 98% desulfurization
of FCC naphtha while maximizing octane barrel by limiting olefin saturation. Another
method for effecting the selective hydrotreating process in accordance with the process
of the present invention is to contact the intermediate boiling second fraction with
conventional hydrotreating catalyst at selective hydrotreating zone conditions which
are generally less severe or milder than conventional hydrotreating conditions. The
selective hydrotreating zone conditions include a temperature in the range of form
about 100° C to about 300° C, a pressure range form about 300 psig to about 600 psig,
and a liquid hourly space velocity in the range of about 3 to about 10. The ratio
of hydrogen to hydrocarbon feed in the selective hydrotreating zone will range from
about 700 to about 2000 standard cubic feet per barrel of feed.
[0087] After the carrying out the selective hydrotreating step and removing hydrogen sulfide,
the intermediate boiling fraction will have a sulfur content which is desirably less
than about 50 ppm by weight, preferably less than 30 ppm by weight, and more preferably
less than 10 by weight. The octane of this intermediate fraction selective hydrotreating
process will desirably be at least 95 percent of that of the feedstock to the olefin-modification
zone, preferably at least 97 percent and most preferably 98 percent of that of the
subject feedstock.
[0088] One embodiment of the invention is schematically illustrated in the drawing. With
reference to the drawing, total catalytic naphtha from a fluidized catalytic cracking
process is passed through line
1 into pretreatment vessel
2. The naphtha feedstock is comprised of mixture hydrocarbons which include olefins,
paraffins, naphthenes, and aromatics, and the olefin content is in the range from
about 10 wt. % to about 60 wt. %. In addition, the naphtha feedstock contains from
about 0.2 wt. % to about 0.5 wt. % sulfur in the form of sulfur-containing organic
impurities, which include thiophene, thiophene derivatives, benzothiophene and benzothiophene
derivatives, mercaptans, sulfides and disulfides. The feedstock also contains from
about 5 to about 200 ppm by weight of basic nitrogen containing impurities.
[0089] The basic nitrogen containing impurities are removed from the feedstock in pretreatment
vessel 2 through contact with an acidic material, such as an aqueous solution of sulfuric
acid, under mild contacting conditions which do not cause any significant chemical
modification of the hydrocarbon components of the feedstock.
[0090] Effluent from pretreatment vessel
2 is passed through line
3 and is introduced into olefin-modification reactor
4, which contains an olefin-modification catalyst. The feed to reactor
4 passes through the reactor where it contacts the olefin-modification catalyst under
reaction conditions which are effective to produce a product having a bromine number
which is lower than that of the feed from line
3. In addition, a substantial portion of the thiophenic and benzothiophenic impurities
are converted to higher boiling sulfur-containing material including refractive sulfur
compounds through alkylation by the olefins in the feed.
[0091] The products from olefin-modification reactor
4 are discharged through line
5 and are passed to distillation column
6 where these products are fractionally distilled. A high boiling fraction, which comprises
a hydrocarbon mixture which contains alkylated sulfur-containing impurities including
refractive sulfur compounds and leached catalyst compounds or components, is withdrawn
from distillation column
6 through line
7. An intermediate boiling fraction, which is of reduced sulfur content relative to
the sulfur content of the original heavy naphtha feedstock and has a distillation
endpoint less than about 240 C, is withdrawn from distillation column
6 through line
8. The lowest boiling fraction is withdrawn from distillation column
6 through line
9.
[0092] The highest boiling third fraction from distillation column 6 is passed through line
7 and is introduced into hydrodesulfurization reactor 11, and hydrogen is introduced
into reactor 11 through line 10. This third fraction is contacted with a hydrodesulfurization
catalyst within reactor 11 in the presence of hydrogen under conditions which are
effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in the sulfur-containing impurities
of the feed from line 7 to hydrogen sulfide. A product is withdrawn from reactor 11
through line 12 which, after removal of hydrogen sulfide, has a reduced sulfur content
relative to that of the feed from line 7. The sulfur content of this product will,
typically, be less than about 30 ppm by weight.
[0093] The intermediate boiling fraction from distillation column 6 is passed through line
8 and is introduced into selective hydrotreating reactor 14, and hydrogen is introduced
into reactor 14 through line 13. The intermediate fraction is contacted with a selective
hydrotreating catalyst within reactor 14 in the presence of hydrogen under conditions
which are effective to convert at least a portion of the sulfur in the sulfur-containing
impurities of the feed from line 8 to hydrogen sulfide. A product is withdrawn from
reactor 14 through line 15 which, after removal of hydrogen sulfide, has a reduced
sulfur content relative to both the heavy naphtha feedstock to the process and the
feed from line 8. The sulfur content of this product will, typically, be less than
about 30 ppm by weight.
[0094] The lowest boiling first fraction is withdrawn from the distillation column 6 through
line 9. The sulfur content of this fraction will typically be 10 ppm by weight.
[0095] The following examples are intended only to illustrate the invention and is not to
be construed as imposing limitations on the invention.
Example 1
[0096] A naphtha feedstock having the following analysis was contacted in an olefin-modification
zone in accordance with the present invention.
Table 11
| S, ppm |
580 |
| Basic N, ppm |
less than 5 |
| Total N, ppm |
10 |
| Mercaptan S, ppm |
53 |
| RVP, psia |
7.41 |
| RON |
92.4 |
| MON |
79.8 |
| R+M/2 |
86.1 |
| ASTM D86 Distillation |
|
| IBP °C |
102.7 |
| FBP °C |
269.9 |
| Peak Group Information, ppm Thiophene |
117.55 |
| C1 Thiophene |
253.58 |
| C2 + Thiophenes |
128.6 |
[0097] The olefin-modification zone consisted of two stages of fixed bed of solid phosphoric
acid (obtained from Sud Chemie and sold under the name C84-5-01) and was operated
at a temperature of 172° C in the first stage and 122° C in the second stage, a pressure
of 500 psig and a liquid hourly space velocity of 1.5 LHSV.
[0098] The resulting olefin-modification reaction zone product was fractionally distilled
into three fractions in accordance with the process of the invention and two fractions
for comparative purposes.
[0099] Distillations of the olefin-modification zone products were carried out on a Fischer
800 Bench-scale semi-automatic distillation unit in accordance with the ASTM D2892
method.
[0100] The sample was heated in a three-liter flask with magnetic stirrer, under a Nitrogen
bleed.
[0101] Fractionation took place in a column of 18mm diameter packed with 4mm Pro-pak gauze
packing to give an efficiency of 15 theoretical plates.
[0102] The vapor was liquefied on a condenser chilled to -20C, and the distillate taken-off
at a ratio of 20:4 via a timed reflux divider into a chilled receiver.
[0103] The temperature cut point was determined by measuring the vapor temperature with
a resistance thermometer and associated electronic meter.
[0104] The unit had the capacity to distil under vacuum, but in this case samples were distilled
at atmospheric pressure, with temperatures corrected to 760mm.
[0105] Distillation products were purged with nitrogen and stored under refrigeration prior
to further testing.
[0106] The following Table III shows the relative amounts olefin-modification catalyst ("phosphorous"),
total sulfur in comparative boiling range fractions: 100°C-, and 100°C+ and the three
boiling range fractions in accordance with the present invention: 100°C-, 100°C to
200°C, and 200°C+.
Table III
| Two Cut Splitter vs. Three Cut Splitter Product Contaminants |
| |
Total Sulfur (ppm) |
Normal Sulfur (ppm) |
Refractive Sulfur (ppm) |
Phosphorous (ppm) |
Nitrogen (ppm) |
Bromine No. |
Yields Wt% |
| Feed |
580 |
580 |
0 |
<0.2 |
10 |
84.9 |
100 |
| Two Cut Splitter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OVHD: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (IBP/100° C) |
10.6 |
10.6 |
0 |
<0.2 |
<0.3 |
62.3 |
49.9 |
| Bottoms: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (100° C +) |
1140 |
440 |
700 |
13.6 |
7.1 |
83.8 |
50.1 |
| Three Cut Splitter |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| OVHD: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (IBP/100°C) |
158 |
155 |
3 |
<0.2 |
<0.3 |
62.3 |
49.9 |
| Sidedraw: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (100°C/200°C) |
359 |
352 |
7 |
<0.2 |
0.5 |
64.8 |
39.1 |
| Bottoms: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| (200°C) |
3970 |
651 |
3319 |
61.1 |
33 |
117 |
11 |
[0107] As can be observed form the above table the phosphorus and refractive sulfur is preferentially
concentrated in the highest boiling range fraction when the olefin modification zone
effluent is split into three fractions in accordance with the present invention. This
highest boiling range is of relatively small volume, i.e., 11 % wt. % yield and therefore
permits a much smaller fraction of the olefin modification zone product to being treated
by the octane reducing, hydrodesulfurization process. Note in the comparative bottoms
fraction, the yield is 50.1 wt. % which means that one half of the olefin-modification
stream effluent would have to be hydrotreated nonselectively to remove refractive
sulfur resulting in undesirable octane loss for one-half of the stream versus 11 %
of the stream in accordance with the process of the invention.
Example 2
[0108] A naphtha feedstock having the following analysis was contacted in an olefin-modification
zone in accordance with the present invention.
Table IV
| S, ppm |
450 |
| Basic N, ppm |
less than 5 |
| Total N, ppm |
13 |
| Mercaptan S. ppm |
4 |
| RVP |
11.12 |
| RON |
94.4 |
| MON |
80.1 |
| R+M/2 |
87.3 |
| ASTM D86 Distillation |
|
| IBP °C |
87.6 |
| FBP °C |
255.8 |
| Peak Group Information, ppm Thiophene |
156.43 |
| C1 Thiophenes |
179.91 |
| C2 + Thiophenes |
37.4 |
[0109] The above feedstock was contacted in an olefin modification zone comprising fixed
bed of solid phosphoric acid (obtained from Sud Chemie and sold under the name C84-5-01).
The olefin-modification zone was operated at a temperature of 193° C, a pressure of
250 psig and a liquid hourly space velocity of 1.5.
[0110] The reaction zone product was fractionated into three fractions in accordance with
the present invention and two fractions for comparative purposes in a unit having
the following characteristics:
| pot volume |
- 1500 gallons |
| column height |
34'6" |
| column diameter |
12" with structured packing |
| number of theoretical plates |
33 |
[0111] With respect to the three fractions, the product was atmospherically distilled to
a head temperature of 100° C. The take-off ratios were 33 percent until head temperature
equaled 80° C, 14 percent until head temperature equaled 90° C, 8 percent until head
temperature equaled 100° C. The system was then set for total reflux return. The receiver
containing the IBP-100° C fraction was cut. The system was then pulled under vacuum
to 55 mmHG and take-off initiated. The take-off ratios were between 5 percent and
8 percent during the 100-200° C cut. The system was shutdown when the head temperature
reached 106° C at 55 mmHG. The 100-200° C fraction, pot fraction 200-FBP and vacuum
trap fraction were cut.
[0112] The comparative two fraction splitting was carried out in an analogous way resulting
in a IBP to 100° C fraction and a 100° C + fraction.
[0113] The following table shows the sulfur distribution in the respective three fractions
prepared in accordance with the present invention. It should be noted that the fractionation
that was carried out was less than ideal, because the IBP -100° C fraction shows the
presence of C3 + thiophenes which would ordinarily not be present in this fraction.
Table V
| Sulfur Distribution Per Fraction |
| Components |
IBP - 100°C |
100 °C - 200 °C |
200°C + |
| H2S |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Mercaptans+1 Coeluting Unknown |
17.81 |
0 |
0 |
| Sulfides |
3.17 |
6.33 |
0 |
| Disulfides |
0.72 |
0 |
0 |
| Sulfoxides/Sulfones |
0 |
0 |
0 |
| Thiophene |
11.16 |
0 |
0 |
| Tetrahydrothiophene & Me-Thiophene |
1.45 |
20.08 |
0 |
| C1 Thiophene |
6.59 |
31.38 |
0 |
| C2 Thiophene |
2.58 |
66.14 |
0 |
| C3 + C4 Thiophenes |
2.33 |
75.02 |
0.63 |
| C5 Thiophene |
3.72 |
179.93 |
12.39 |
| C6 Thiophene |
5.24 |
35.74 |
919.06 |
| C7 Thiophene |
3.77 |
2.18 |
412.21 |
| C8 + C9 Thiophene |
2 |
0.25 |
410.2 |
| C10 Thiophene |
2.19 |
0 |
549.25 |
| C11 Thiophene |
1.34 |
0 |
477.88 |
| C12 Thiophene |
0.74 |
0 |
743.41 |
| Unknowns |
1.62 |
3.44 |
0 |
[0114] The comparative 100° C + fraction was subjected to conventional hydrotreating at
the following conditions:
318° C
450 psig
3 LHSV
[0115] The side-cut or 100° C to 200° C fraction obtained in accordance with the present
invention was subjected to a hydrotreating step at selective hydrotreating conditions
including:
307° C
450 psig
3 LHSV
[0116] The hydrotreating unit was a fixed bed, downflow hydrotreating pilot plant configured
for once-through processing of naphtha or distillate feeds at hydrogen pressures up
to 2000 psig, hydrogen flows to 5 scfh, liquid feed rates to 600 cc/hr and temperatures
to 800 deg. F. The reactor was approximately .96" id x 18" long and can hold up to
a 120 cc of catalyst charge and is heated by a salt bath. The internal catalyst bed
temperature was monitored by a programmable traversing single point thermocouple.
An LDC ConstaMetric 3200 precision metering pump pumps the feed in and hydrogen flow
into the unit through a Brooks mass flow meter. The combined liquid and gas flows
were passed through the downflow reactor and are separated in a Strahman sight gage
glass. The offgas pressure is controlled via a Rosemount pressure transmitter and
Badger control valve where the offgas flow goes through a caustic scrubber and is
measured downstream at atmospheric pressure via an Alexander Wright wet test meter.
The liquid product in the separator had a level control via Rosemount differential
transmitter and a Badger control valve. The product was cooled via a tube in tube
heat exchanger and collected in a refrigerator through an automated valve manifold,
sequenced by computer control into one of three product receivers. The computer control/data
collection was done via Analog Devices uMac 6000 and automated safeguard shutdowns
were controlled via a Siemens Simatic TI505 PLC.
[0117] Table VI below shows the octane retention afforded by the invention while effecting
deep desulfurization. Note that the sulfur level in the combined overhead "OVHD" and
intermediate fraction "Sidedraw" would have been significantly lower had the fractionation
been carried out ideally. Specifically, the combined first and second fractions ("OVHD"
and "Sidedraw") show an octane loss of 87.3 to 84.5 with a desulfurization of down
to 50 ppm, wt, while the comparative process only desulfurizes to 60 ppmw for a similar
octane loss. The results would have been more significant had the fractionation been
more ideal. Further, in order to achieve the product sulfur in the comparative combined
fraction, the hydrodesulfurization conditions would have to be substantially more
severe and would be:
332 °C
450 psig
1.5 LHSV
[0118] These more severe conditions would result in further octane loss on 33.1 % of the
stream.
Table VI
| Two Cut Splitter vs. Three Cut Splitter Octane Retention |
| |
Sulfur (ppm) |
Octane |
Wt.% Yields |
| Feed |
450 |
87.3 |
100 |
| Two Cut Splitter |
|
|
|
| OVHD: (IBP/100 °C) |
69 |
86.1 |
66.9 |
| Bottoms: (100 °C +) |
70 |
82.4 |
33.1 |
| Combined Product |
69 |
84.9 |
100 |
| Three Cut Splitter |
|
|
|
| OVHD: (IBP/100 °C) |
69 |
86.1 |
66.9 |
| Sidedraw: (100 °C/200 °C) |
15 |
80 |
24.6 |
| Bottoms: (200 °C) |
|
|
8.5 |
| OVHD/SD Combined Product |
50 |
84.5 |
91.5 |
1. Ein Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Produkts mit verringertem Schwefelgehalt aus einem
Einsatzmaterial, wobei das Einsatzmaterial schwefelhaltige organische Verunreinigungen
enthält und eine normalerweise flüssige Mischung von Kohlenwasserstoffen umfasst,
die Olefine einschließt, wobei das Verfahren Folgendes umfasst:
(a) In-Kontakt-Bringen des Einsatzmaterials mit einem Olefinmodifikationskatalysator
in zumindest einer Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone unter Bedingungen, die wirksam
sind, um ein Produkt mit einer Bromzahl herzustellen, die geringer als die des Einsatzmaterials,
und wobei das Produkt refraktive Schwefelverbindungen enthält;
(b) Fraktionieren des Produkts aus der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone zur Herstellung:
(i) einer ersten Fraktion, die schwefelhaltige organische Verunreinigungen umfasst
und einen Destillationsendpunkt aufweist, der geringer als ungefähr 140 °C ist;
(ii) einer zweiten Fraktion, die höher siedet als die erste Fraktion, welche schwefelhaltige
organische Verunreinigungen umfasst und einen Destillationsendpunkt aufweist, der
geringer als ungefähr 240 °C ist; und
(iii) einer dritten Fraktion, die höher siedet als die zweite Fraktion und schwefelhaltige
organische Verunreinigungen und refraktive Schwefelverbindungen umfasst;
(c) In-Kontakt-Bringen der zweiten Fraktion mit einem selektiven Hydrotreatingkatalysator
in der Gegenwart von Wasserstoff in einer selektiven Hydrotreatingreaktionszone unter
Bedingungen, die wirksam sind, um zumindest einen Teil der schwefelhaltigen Verunreinigungen
in der zweiten Fraktion zu Schwefelwasserstoff umzuwandeln; und
(d) In-Kontakt-Bringen der dritten Fraktion mit einem Hydroentschwefelungskatalysator
in der Gegenwart von Wasserstoff in einer Hydroentschwefelungsreaktionszone unter
Bedingungen, die wirksam sind, um zumindest einen Teil des Schwefels in den schwefelhaltigen
Verunreinigungen der dritten Fraktion zu Schwefelwasserstoff umzuwandeln.
2. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Einsatzmaterial Paraffine enthält und wobei
die Bedingungen in der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone wirksam sind, um ein Produkt
mit einer Bromzahl herzustellen, die geringer als die des Einsatzmaterials ist, und
wobei weniger als 10 % der Paraffine in dem Einsatzmaterial gekrackt werden.
3. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, das zusätzlich ein Entfernen von Schwefelwasserstoff
aus dem Ausfluss der selektiven Hydrotreatingreaktionszone umfasst, um ein entschwefeltes
Produkt zu ergeben, das gewichtsbezogen weniger als ungefähr 50 ppm an Schwefel enthält.
4. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, bei dem das Octan des entschwefelten Produkts mindestens
95 % von dem des Einsatzmaterials zu der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone beträgt.
5. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial von ungefähr 0,05 Gew.-%
bis ungefähr 0,7 Gew.-% an Schwefel in der Form von organischen Schwefelverbindungen
enthält.
6. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, das zusätzlich ein Entfernen von Schwefelwasserstoff
aus dem Ausfluss der Hydroentschwefelungsreaktionszone umfasst, um ein entschwefeltes
Produkt zu ergeben, das gewichtsbezogen weniger als ungefähr 50 ppm an Schwefel enthält.
7. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 6, bei dem das Octan des entschwefelten Produkts mindestens
90 % von dem des Einsatzmaterials zu der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone beträgt.
8. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial Verunreinigungen, die basischen
Stickstoff enthalten, enthält und das Verfahren zusätzlich ein Entfernen der Verunreinigungen,
die basischen Stickstoff enthalten, aus dem Einsatzmaterial umfasst, bevor es mit
dem Olefinmodifikationskatalysator in Kontakt gebracht wird.
9. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 8, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial Kohlenwasserstoffe aus
einem katalytischen Krackverfahren umfasst.
10. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial im Wesentlichen frei von
Verunreinigungen, die basischen Stickstoff enthalten, ist.
11. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei das Einsatzmaterial eine Mischung aus Kohlenwasserstoffen
umfasst, die im Benzinbereich siedet.
12. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial behandeltes Naphtha umfasst,
welches hergestellt wird durch Entfernen von Verunreinigungen, die basischen Stickstoff
enthalten, aus einem Naphtha, das durch ein katalytisches Krackverfahren hergestellt
wird.
13. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem die dritte Fraktion von 2 bis 10 Vol.-% des
Produkts aus der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone reicht.
14. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial einen Anfangssiedepunkt
aufweist, der unterhalb von ungefähr 79 °C liegt, und einen Destillationsendpunkt
aufweist, der nicht größer ist als ungefähr 345 °C.
15. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem der Olefinmodifikationskatalysator aus der
Gruppe ausgewählt ist, die aus allen festen Säurekatalysatoren besteht, und bei dem
(i) die erste Fraktion, welche schwefelhaltige organische Verunreinigungen umfasst,
einen Destillationsendpunkt aufweist, der geringer als ungefähr 120 °C ist;
(ii) die zweite Fraktion, welche höher siedet als die erste Fraktion, welche schwefelhaltige
organische Verunreinigungen umfasst, einen Destillationsendpunkt aufweist, der geringer
als ungefähr 200 °C ist; und
(iii) die dritte Fraktion, welche höher siedet als die zweite Fraktion, schwefelhaltige
organische Verunreinigungen und refraktive Schwefelverbindungen umfasst.
16. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, das zusätzlich ein Entfernen von Schwefelwasserstoff
aus dem Ausfluss der selektiven Hydrotreatingreaktionszone umfasst, um ein entschwefeltes
Produkt zu ergeben, das ein Octan aufweist, welches mindestens 98 % von dem des Einsatzmaterials
zu der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone ist.
17. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, das zusätzlich ein Entfernen von Schwefelwasserstoff
aus dem Ausfluss der Hydroentschwefelungsreaktionszone umfasst, um ein entschwefeltes
Produkt zu ergeben, das ein Octan aufweist, welches mindestens 97 % von dem des Einsatzmaterials
zu der Olefinmodifikationsreaktionszone ist.
18. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial Kohlenwasserstoffe aus
einem katalytischen Krackverfahren umfasst.
19. Das Verfahren nach Anspruch 15, bei dem das Einsatzmaterial ein behandeltes Naphtha
umfasst, das hergestellt wird durch Entfernen von Verunreinigungen, die basischen
Stickstoff enthalten, aus einem Naphtha, das durch ein katalytisches Krackverfahren
hergestellt wird.
1. Procédé de production d'un produit à teneur en soufre réduite à partir d'une charge
d'alimentation, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation contient des impuretés organiques
contenant du soufre et est composée d'un mélange normalement liquide d'hydrocarbures
qui comprennent des oléfines, ledit procédé comprenant :
(a) la mise en contact de la charge d'alimentation avec un catalyseur de modification
d'oléfines dans au moins une zone de réaction de modification d'oléfines dans des
conditions qui sont efficaces pour produire un produit ayant un indice de brome qui
est inférieur à celui de la charge d'alimentation et où le produit contient des composés
réfractifs du soufre ;
(b) le fractionnement du produit provenant de ladite zone de réaction de modification
d'oléfines pour produire :
(i) une première fraction qui comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre
et a un point final de distillation qui est inférieur à environ 140°C ;
(ii) une deuxième fraction qui a un point d'ébullition supérieur à celui de la première
fraction qui comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre et a un point final
de distillation qui est inférieur à environ 240°C ; et
(iii) une troisième fraction qui a un point d'ébullition supérieur à celui de la deuxième
fraction et comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre et des composés
réfractifs du soufre ;
(c) la mise en contact de ladite deuxième fraction avec un catalyseur d'hydrotraitement
sélectif en présence d'hydrogène dans une zone de réaction d'hydrotraitement sélectif
dans des conditions qui sont efficaces pour convertir au moins une partie des impuretés
contenant du soufre dans la deuxième fraction en sulfure d'hydrogène ; et
(d) la mise en contact de ladite troisième fraction avec un catalyseur d'hydrodésulfuration
en présence d'hydrogène dans une zone de réaction d'hydrodésulfuration dans des conditions
qui sont efficaces pour convertir au moins une partie du soufre dans lesdites impuretés
contenant du soufre de la troisième fraction en sulfure d'hydrogène.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la charge d'alimentation contient des
paraffines et dans lequel les conditions dans ladite zone de réaction de modification
d'oléfines sont efficaces pour produire un produit ayant un indice de brome qui est
inférieur à celui de la charge d'alimentation, et moins de 10% des oléfines dans la
charge d'alimentation sont craqués.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1, qui comprend de plus l'élimination du sulfure d'hydrogène
de l'effluent de ladite zone de réaction d'hydrotraitement sélectif pour fournir un
produit désulfuré qui contient moins d'environ 50 parties par million en poids de
soufre.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel l'octane du produit désulfuré représente
au moins 95% de celui de la charge d'alimentation dirigée vers la zone de réaction
de modification d'oléfines.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la charge d'alimentation contient d'environ
0,05% en poids à environ 0,7% en poids de soufre sous la forme de composés organiques
du soufre.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 1, qui comprend de plus l'élimination du sulfure d'hydrogène
de l'effluent de ladite zone d'hydrodésulfuration pour fournir un produit désulfuré
qui contient moins d'environ 50 parties par million en poids de soufre.
7. Procédé selon la revendication 6, dans lequel l'octane du produit désulfuré représente
au moins 90% de celui de la charge d'alimentation dirigée vers la zone de réaction
de modification d'oléfines.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation contient
des impuretés basiques contenant de l'azote et ledit procédé comprend de plus l'élimination
desdites impuretés basiques contenant de l'azote de la charge d'alimentation avant
sa mise en contact avec le catalyseur de modification d'oléfines.
9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation est composée
d'hydrocarbures provenant d'un traitement de craquage catalytique.
10. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation est substantiellement
dépourvue d'impuretés basiques contenant de l'azote.
11. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation est composée
d'un mélange d'hydrocarbures dont la gamme de points d'ébullition est celle de l'essence.
12. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la charge d'alimentation est composée
d'un naphta traité qui est préparé par élimination d'impuretés basiques contenant
de l'azote provenant d'un naphta produit par un traitement de craquage catalytique.
13. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la troisième fraction représente de
2 à 10% en volume du produit provenant de la zone de réaction de modification d'oléfines.
14. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la charge d'alimentation a un point
d'ébullition initial qui est inférieur à environ 79°C et un point de distillation
final qui ne dépasse pas environ 345°C.
15. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel ledit catalyseur de modification d'oléfines
est choisi dans le groupe consistant en tous les catalyseurs acides solides ; et dans
lequel :
(i) ladite première fraction qui comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre,
a un point de distillation final qui est inférieur à environ 120°C ;
(ii) ladite deuxième fraction qui a un point d'ébullition supérieur à celui de la
première fraction qui comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre, a un
point de distillation final qui est inférieur à environ 200°C ; et
(iii) ladite troisième fraction qui a un point d'ébullition supérieur à celui de la
deuxième fraction comprend des impuretés organiques contenant du soufre et des composés
réfractifs du soufre.
16. Procédé selon la revendication 15, qui comprend de plus l'élimination de sulfure d'hydrogène
de l'effluent de ladite zone d'hydrotraitement sélectif pour fournir un produit désulfuré
ayant un octane qui représente au moins 98% de celui de la charge d'alimentation dirigée
vers la zone de réaction de modification d'oléfines.
17. Procédé selon la revendication 15, qui comprend de plus l'élimination de sulfure d'hydrogène
de l'effluent de ladite zone d'hydrodésulfuration pour fournir un produit désulfuré
ayant un octane qui représente au moins 97% de celui de la charge d'alimentation dirigée
vers la zone de réaction de modification d'oléfines.
18. Procédé selon la revendication 15, dans lequel ladite charge d'alimentation est composée
d'hydrocarbures provenant d'un traitement de craquage catalytique.
19. Procédé selon la revendication 15, dans lequel la charge d'alimentation est composée
d'un naphta traité qui est préparé par élimination d'impuretés basiques contenant
de l'azote provenant d'un naphta produit par un traitement de craquage catalytique.