FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to bimodal gear lubricant formulations having improved
industrial and automotive fuel economy properties.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The primary function of a gear lubricant is to provide a high degree of reliability
and durability in the service life of gear equipment. Gear lubricants may also contribute
to improving the fuel economy of vehicles by improving the axle efficiency. See, for
example, O'Connor et al.,
The Relationship Between Laboratory Axle Efficiency and Vehicle Fuel Consumption (SAE Paper No. 811206).
[0003] A key performance need for modem axle fluids, especially those used in truck and
sport utility vehicle applications, is the ability to handle high stress load under
towing conditions. Conventional axle fluids, including both mineral oil and synthetic
oil, cannot typically handle these severe trailer towing conditions during the break-in
period without experiencing elevated temperatures and potential damage to the axle
and fluid.
[0004] In the paper by O'Connor et al., entitled
Axle Efficiency - Response to Synthetic Lubricant Components (SAE Paper No. 821181), the authors state that "[i]nvestigations with both partial-
and full-synthetic base formulations have shown improvements compared to conventional
petroleum base gear oils. Maximum benefits are gained with total synthetic base type
formulations."
[0005] United States Patent No. 4,370,247 discloses a semi-synthetic gear and axle oil composition
comprising (a) 5 to 50 mass % of a conventional gear/axle grade mineral oil; (b) 5
to 30 mass % of a polyoxyalkylene glycol; and (c) 25 to 60 mass % of at least one
di-C
8 to C
12 alkyl ester of a dicarboxylic acid. The '247 patent fails to teach or reasonably
suggest the petroleum based bimodal gear oil formulations of the present invention.
[0006] United States Patent Nos. 5,843,874; 5,763,372; and 5,547,596 relate to lubricant
oil for gear and limited slip differential, but fail to solve the problem of achieving
low axle temperature and high fuel economy.
[0007] All patents, patent applications, and articles referenced herein are fully incorporated
by reference.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] The bimodal distribution approach (BDA) of the present invention for formulating
about 13 to about 24 cSt. viscosity hypoid axle gear lubricants is an alternate method
to meet desired viscosity ranges or grades that provide fuel economy as measured by
axle efficiency. Furthermore, the present invention provides temperature reduction
in axles lubricated with the compositions of the present invention, especially under
severe break-in conditions. The finished fluid formulation described herein provides
proper axle conditioning of green axles under severe duty trailer-towing break-in
conditions. The system is formulated to reduce the peak and continuous operating temperatures
in green axles under trailer towing conditions.
[0009] The approach described herein uses a low viscosity base oil of about 2 cSt to about
8 cSt in combination with an undiluted viscosity index improver (VII) with a viscosity
in the range of from about 600 cSt to about 45,000 cSt at 100°C. The preferred mix
in one embodiment uses a 4 cSt base oil (preferably a Group II-IV base oil or mixture
thereof) in combination with (a) a VII selected from an olefin copolymer (OCP) and/or
with polymethacrylate (PMA) with a MW of about 12,000 or a polyisobutylene (PIB) with
a MW of about 2,000 to 2,400; (b) an antiwear additive that is in one embodiment an
amine derivative salt of dialkyldithiophosphoric acid; and (c) a friction modifier
selected from the group consisting of the reaction products of a C
5 to C
60 carboxylic acid and at least one amine selected from the group consisting of (i)
guanidine, urea and thiourea compounds, (ii) C
1 to C
20 hydrocarbyl or hydroxy-substituted hydrocarbyl (A) mono-amines, (B) alkylene diamines,
and (C) polyalkylene polyamines; and (iii)
N-alkyl glycine.
[0010] In an axle operating under a variety of speed and load conditions typifying consumer
driving patterns, gear lubricants blended using the BDA of the present invention have
shown lower operating temperatures and improved hypoid axle efficiencies, compared
to the temperatures and efficiencies observed in hypoid axles lubricated with commercially
available conventional gear lubricants. A feature of the present invention is to provide
a bimodal hypoid axle gear lubricant formulation which addresses the vehicular fuel
economy problems of gear lubricants of the prior art. More specifically, the present
invention provides a bimodal gear lubricant formulation which provides improved and
unexpected performance, particularly improved vehicular fuel economy performance,
in gear lubricant applications relative to the vehicular fuel economy performance
of conventional, non-bimodal gear lubricants.
[0011] The BDA formulations of the present invention also allow formulators the ability
to increase viscosity of their finished lubricant and yet have comparable or better
fuel economy than low or lower viscosity competitive gear lubricants. One significant
benefit of gear lubricants based on BDA of the present invention is meeting the otherwise
impossible task of improving fuel economy and reducing axle temperatures under severe
towing conditions. Conventional low viscosity gear lubricants provide improved fuel
economy but do not provide adequate relief under high loads observed during towing.
BDA gear lubricants of the present invention blended to a higher viscosity by comparison
provide both better fuel economy and lower axle temperatures.
[0012] By "bimodal" herein is meant gear lubricant formulations which generate a gel permeation
chromatogram ("GPC") curve having at least two distinct peaks, one of which GPC peaks
is representative of a base oil in the gear lubricant formulation, and the other of
which GPC peaks is representative of a VII. Bimodal distributions have been demonstrated
to be important to improving fuel economy by improving the churning losses in the
low EHD region.
[0013] The bimodal gear lubricant formulations of the present invention have a finished
oil viscosity of from about thirteen centistokes to about twenty-four centistokes,
more preferably of from about fifteen centistokes to about nineteen centistokes, and
most preferably about seventeen centistokes when measured at 100°C.
[0014] Therefore, a preferred base oil in an embodiment of the present invention can include
a natural or synthetic oil or mixture thereof having a viscosity range of from about
two centistokes to about eight centistokes, and preferably about four centistokes,
plus or minus about a ten percent variation.
[0015] Another feature is to provide enhanced durability of hardware and lubricant as a
direct consequence of lower operating temperatures.
[0016] A further feature of the present invention is to provide a method of improving the
fuel economy of a vehicle whose hypoid gears and/or transmission are/is lubricated
with a bimodal gear lubricant formulation of the present invention, or a lubricating
oil containing the bimodal gear lubricant formulation of the present invention.
[0017] It is to be understood that the following detailed description is explanatory only
and is intended to provide further explanation of the present invention.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0018]
Fig. 1 is a graph showing wind tunnel performance comparisons of the present invention
versus a 75W-90 hypoid axle oil currently used in factory fill applications.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0019] A preferred embodiment of the present invention provides a bimodal hypoid gear lubricant
formulation including a sufficient amount of a base oil of a lubricating viscosity,
and a VII, friction modifier and antiwear additive. The desire is to achieve an acceptable
finished lubricating oil of proper viscosity by combining a low viscosity base oil
with a high viscosity polymeric thickener. In addition, a balanced friction modifier
and antiwear system provide proper axle conditioning of green axles under severe duty
trailer-towing break-in conditions.
[0020] In a more preferred embodiment, the present invention includes a base oil having
a viscosity of from about two to about eight centistokes, more preferred from about
three to about five centistokes, and most preferred about four centistokes.
[0021] A preferred VII in an embodiment of the present invention is selected from the group
consisting of OCP, PIB, and PMA, wherein the undiluted VII has a viscosity in the
range of from about 600 cSt to about 45,000 cSt. The bimodal gear formulations of
the present invention have a finished oil viscosity of about 17 centistokes, but exhibit
significantly improved fuel economy relative to conventional, non-bimodal gear lubricant
formulations.
[0022] In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the lubricating oil useful in
the BDA formulations is selected from base oils known in the lubricant art and including
mineral oils, synthetic oils, PAO oils, PMA oils, polyolefin oils such as polybutenes,
polyisobutenes or PIB, and copolymers, mixtures and oligomers thereof.
[0023] If the base oil used in the present invention has a viscosity which is too low, more
polymer is required, or a higher MW polymer, is required to achieve the desired finished
lubricant oil viscosity of about 17 cSt. However, such alterations can create shear
stability problems. If the base oil has too low viscosity, a broader distribution
of GPC results and problems in the gear box are observed.
[0024] Oils of lubricating viscosity contemplated for use in the present invention include
natural lubricating oils, synthetic lubricating oils and mixtures thereof. Suitable
lubricating oils also include basestocks obtained by isomerization of synthetic wax
and slack wax, as well as basestocks produced by hydrocracking the aromatic and polar
components of the crude. In general, both the natural and synthetic lubricating oils
will each have a kinematic viscosity ranging from about 1 to about 40 mm
2/s (cSt) at 100° C, although typical applications will require each of the base oils
to have a viscosity ranging from about 1 to about 12, preferably 2 to 8, mm
2/s (cSt) at 100° C.
[0025] Natural lubricating oils include animal oils, vegetable oils (e.g., castor oil and
lard oil), petroleum oils, mineral oils, and oils derived from coal or shale. A preferred
natural lubricating oil herein is mineral oil.
[0026] The mineral oils useful in this invention include all common mineral oil base stocks.
This would include oils that are naphthenic or paraffinic in chemical structure. Oils
that are refined by conventional methodology using acid, alkali, and clay or other
agents such as aluminum chloride, or extracted oils produced, for example, by solvent
extraction with solvents such as phenol, sulfur dioxide, furfural, dichlorodiethyl
ether, etc. They may be hydrotreated or hydrorefined, dewaxed by chilling or catalytic
dewaxing processes, or hydrocracked. The mineral oil may be produced from natural
crude sources or be composed of isomerized wax materials or residues of other refining
processes. In a preferred embodiment, the oil of lubricating viscosity is a hydrotreated,
hydrocracked and/or iso-dewaxed mineral oil having a Viscosity Index (VI) of greater
than 80, preferably greater than 90; greater than 90 volume % saturates and less than
0.03 wt. % sulfur.
[0027] Group II and Group III basestocks are particularly suitable for use in the present
invention, and are typically prepared from conventional feedstocks using a severe
hydrogenation step to reduce the aromatic, sulfur and nitrogen content, followed by
dewaxing, hydrofinishing, extraction and/or distillation steps to produce the finished
base oil. Group II and III basestocks differ from conventional solvent refined Group
I basestocks in that their sulfur, nitrogen and aromatic contents are very low. As
a result, these base oils are compositionally very different from conventional solvent
refined basestocks. The American Petroleum Institute has categorized these different
basestock types as follows: Group I, >0.03 wt. % sulfur, and/or <90 vol% saturates,
viscosity index between 80 and 120; Group II, ≤ 0.03 wt. % sulfur, and ≥ 90 vol% saturates,
viscosity index between 80 and 120; Group III, ≤ 0.03 wt. % sulfur, and ≥ 90 vol%
saturates, viscosity index > 120; Group IV, poly-alpha-olefins. Hydrotreated basestocks
and catalytically dewaxed basestocks, because of their low sulfur and aromatics content,
generally fall into the Group II and Group III categories.
[0028] There is no limitation as to the chemical composition of the various basestocks used
in the present invention. For example, the proportions of aromatics, paraffinics,
and naphthenics in the various Group I, Group II and Group III oils can vary substantially.
The degree of refining and the source of the crude used to produce the oil generally
determine this composition.
[0029] In a preferred embodiment, the base oil comprises a mineral oil having a VI of at
least 110.
[0030] The lubricating oils may be derived from refined, re-refined oils, or mixtures thereof.
Unrefined oils are obtained directly from a natural source or synthetic source (e.g.,
coal, shale, or tar sands bitumen) without further purification or treatment. Examples
of unrefined oils include shale oil obtained directly from a retorting operation,
petroleum oil obtained directly from distillation, or an ester oil obtained directly
from an esterification process, each of which is then used without further treatment.
Refined oils are similar to the unrefined oils except that refined oils have been
treated in one or more purification steps to improve one or more properties. Suitable
purification techniques include distillation, hydrotreating, dewaxing, solvent extraction,
acid or base extraction, filtration, and percolation, all of which are known to those
skilled in the art. Re-refined oils are obtained by treating used oils in processes
similar to those used to obtain the refined oils. These re-refined oils are also known
as reclaimed or reprocessed oils and are often additionally processed by techniques
for removal of spent additives and oil breakdown products.
[0031] Synthetic lubricating oils include hydrocarbon oils and halo-substituted hydrocarbon
oils such as oligomerized, polymerized, and interpolymerized olefins; alkylbenzenes;
polyphenyls; and alkylated diphenyl ethers, alkylated diphenyl sulfides, as well as
their derivatives, analogs, and homologs thereof, and the like. Preferred synthetic
oils are oligomers of α-olefins, particularly oligomers of 1-decene, having a viscosity
ranging from about 1 to about 12, preferably 2 to 8, mm
2/s (cSt) at 100° C. These oligomers are known as poly-α-olefins or PAOs.
[0032] Synthetic lubricating oils also include alkylene oxide polymers, interpolymers, copolymers,
and derivatives thereof where the terminal hydroxyl groups have been modified by esterification,
etherification, etc. This class of synthetic oils is exemplified by polyoxyalkylene
polymers prepared by polymerization of ethylene oxide or propylene oxide; the alkyl
and aryl ethers of these polyoxyalkylene polymers (e.g., methylpolyisopropylene glycol
ether having an average molecular weight of 1000, diphenyl ether of polypropylene
glycol having a molecular weight of 100-1500); and mono- and polycarboxylic esters
thereof (e.g., the acetic acid esters, mixed C
3-C
8 fatty acid esters, and C
12 oxo acid diester of tetraethylene glycol).
[0033] Another suitable class of synthetic lubricating oils comprises the esters of dicarboxylic
acids (e.g., phthalic acid, succinic acid, alkyl succinic acids and alkenyl succinic
acids, maleic acid, azelaic acid, subric acid, sebasic acid, fumaric acid, adipic
acid, linoleic acid dimer, malonic acid, alkylmalonic acids, alkenyl malonic acids,
etc.) with a variety of alcohols (e.g., butyl alcohol, hexyl alcohol, dodecyl alcohol,
2-ethylhexyl alcohol, ethylene glycol, diethylene glycol monoethers, propylene glycol,
etc.). Specific examples of these esters include dibutyl adipate, di(2-ethylhexyl)
sebacate, di-n-hexyl fumarate, dioctyl sebacate, diisooctyl azelate, diisodecyl azelate,
dioctyl isothalate, didecyl phthalate, dieicosyl sebacate, the 2-ethylhexyl diester
of linoleic acid dimer, and the complex ester formed by reacting one mole of sebasic
acid with two moles of tetraethylene glycol and two moles of 2-ethyl-hexanoic acid,
and the like. A preferred type of oil from this class of synthetic oils are adipates
of C
4 to C
12 alcohols.
[0034] Esters useful as synthetic lubricating oils also include those made from C
5 to C
12 monocarboxylic acids and polyols and polyol ethers such as neopentyl glycol, trimethylolpropane
pentaeythritol, dipentaerythritol, tripentaerythritol, and the like.
[0035] Silicon-based oils (such as the polyalkyl-, polyaryl-, polyalkoxy-, or polyaryloxy-siloxane
oils and silicate oils) comprise another useful class of synthetic lubricating oils.
These oils include tetra-ethyl silicate, tetra-isopropyl silicate, tetra-(2-ethylhexyl)
silicate, tetra-(4-methyl-2-ethylhexyl) silicate, tetra-(p-
tert-butylphenyl) silicate, hexa-(4-methyl-2-pentoxy)-disiloxane, poly(methyl)-siloxanes
and poly (methylphenyl) siloxanes, and the like. Other synthetic lubricating oils
include liquid esters of phosphorus containing acids (e.g., tricresyl phosphate, trioctylphosphate,
and diethyl ester of decylphosphonic acid), polymeric tetra-hydrofurans, poly-alpha-olefins,
and the like.
[0036] The base oil should have a limited molecular weight range effective to provide the
desired viscosity and shear stability for a gear lubricant. If the viscosity of the
base oil used is too low, an excessive and undesirable high amount of polymer in the
VII is required to sufficiently increase the finished oil viscosity, or a VII polymer
with a higher molecular weight is required. These potential solutions to low viscosity
of base oil, however, can lead to shear stability problems. If the viscosity of the
base oils is too high, an undesirably wide molecular weight distribution of the polymer
can result which creates problems of lubricant fluid movement within the gear box.
[0037] The VIIs useful in the bimodal gear lubricant formulations of the present invention
can include OCP, PIB, and PMA. Preferred examples of VIIs useful herein include PIB
with a MW of about 2,400, and OCP with a MW of about 12,000.
[0038] The preferred VIIs useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to,
olefin copolymers, polymethacrylates, and polyisobutylenes.
[0039] The antiwear additive may, in one embodiment, be selected from the class of amine
derivative salts of dialkyldithiophosphoric acids. The amine portion of the salt may
be derived from primary alkyl amines, tertiary alkyl amines, heterocyclic amines,
anilines, alkoxy amines, amides, and derivatives of amine compounds produced by reaction
of the amine compound with an additional oil soluble acidic organic compound. Examples
of these derivatives of amine compounds include oil-soluble ashless dispersants having
a basic nitrogen and/or at least one hydroxyl group in the molecule. Suitable dispersants
include alkenyl succinimides, alkenyl succinic ester-amides, Mannich bases, hydrocarbyl
polyamines, or polymeric polyamines. An important feature of the amine compound is
that it have a basicity sufficient to produce a salt when contacted with the dialkyldithiophosphoric
acid.
[0040] The dialkyldithiophosphoric acid portion of the salt may be selected from the class
of compounds produced by reacting primary or secondary alcohol, or phenols with diphosphorous
pentasulfides. These dialkyldithiophosphoric acids can be derived from primary alcohols,
secondary alcohols, phenolic alcohols, or mixtures thereof.
[0041] The preferred antiwear compounds can include dialkyl dithiophosphates, alkyl phosphites,
alkyl thiosphosphites; and alkyl phosphates. A more preferred embodiment is a dialkyl
dithiophosphate derived from primary alcohols, secondary alcohols, or a mixture of
primary and secondary alcohols. The most preferred embodiment is the reaction product
of phosphorous pentasulfide with a mixture of isopropanol, isobutanol, and 2-ethylhexanol.
In a preferred embodiment, the reaction product is about 1 mole of phosphorous pentasulfide
mixed with about 4 moles of the alcohol mixture. More particularly, within the mixed
alcohols, the preferred molar ratio is about 0.4 moles of isopropanol: about 0.4 moles
isobutanol: about 0.2 moles 2-ethylhexanol.
[0042] The friction modifier useful in this invention may include the reaction products
of a C
5 to C
60 carboxylic acid and at least one amine selected from the group consisting of (i)
guanidine, urea and thiourea compounds, (ii) C
1 to C
20 hydrocarbyl or hydroxy-substituted hydrocarbyl (a) mono-amines, (b) alkylene diamines,
and (c) polyalkylene polyamines; and (iii)
N-alkyl glycine. Other friction modifiers useful in the present invention include alkyl
amines, alkyl amides, alkyl imides; polyol esters, and imidazolines.
[0043] The salts of antiwear and friction modifiers can include transition metal salts of
the dialkyl dithiophosphates, amine derivative salts of the dialkyl dithiophosphates;
carboxylic acid salts of alkyl amines, carboxylic acid salts of polyamines; and carboxylic
acid salts of polyamines and amides.
[0044] The optional dispersants useful in the present invention include oil-soluble ashless
dispersant having a basic nitrogen and/or at least one hydroxyl group in the molecule.
Suitable dispersants include alkenyl succinimides, alkenyl succinic acid esters, alkenyl
succinic ester-amides, Mannich bases, hydrocarbyl polyamines, or polymeric polyamines.
[0045] The bimodal gear lubricant formulations of the present invention can further include
a gear additive package which typically contains one or more additives selected from
the group consisting of dispersants, corrosion inhibitors, extreme pressure additives,
rust inhibitors, antioxidants, deodorizers, defoamers, demulsifiers, dyes, fluorescent
coloring agents and pour point depressants. The gear additive package may be, although
it does not have to be, a fully-formulated gear additive package, such as a package
meeting the requirements for API GL-5 and/or API MT-1 and/or MIL-PRF-2105E and/or
AGMA 9005-D94. The components present in the gear additive package will depend on
the intended final use of the product.
[0046] The bimodal gear lubricant formulations of the present invention are particularly
suitable for use in automotive hypoid axle gear applications such as final drives,
power-dividers or axles in light and heavy-duty vehicles.
[0047] Preferred finished lubricant formulations for automotive gear applications utilize
components proportioned such that the lubricant formulations preferably have an SAE
Viscosity Grade of at least SAE 70W, and preferably at least 75W, according to SAE
J306 JUL98. The lubricant formulations may also have multi-grade ratings including
SAE 75W-80, 75W-90, 80W-140. It is critical that the components used for formulating
the lubricant formulations of the present invention are selected such that the formulated
oil will not shear out of grade according to SAE J306 requirements when subjected
to the 20-hour taper bearing shear test (CEC-L45-T-93). Preferably, the lubricant
compositions of the present invention have a viscosity loss at 100 °C of less than
about 15% in the 20-hour taper bearing shear test.
[0048] Preferred finished lubricant formulations for industrial gear applications utilize
components proportioned such that the lubricant formulations have a viscosity classification
of ISO 32 or higher according to AGMA 9005-D94.
[0049] The effectiveness of this bimodal gear lubricant can be evaluated under laboratory
dynamometer rig testing conditions. An axle rig test is run under various pinion speed
and load conditions and the torque transfer to the load cells located at each wheel
end is measured. The axle's percentage efficiency (i.e. the percentage of power transferred
to the wheels through the axle) is calculated as follows:
[0050] The test is allowed to stabilize at the specified conditions until the temperature
change is less than 0.6 degrees Fahrenheit per minute. The efficiency of the axle
was calculated using a 30 second (prior 30s data) running average of the pinion torque.
Efficiency#1 (%) =
(LRPMx LLoad + RRPMx RLoad) x 2.62 x 100 /
(Pinion Torque x Pinion RPM)
2.62 is the dynamometer load arm constant
[0051] The axle efficiency testing can be run at a variety of speeds and loads to simulate
different driving conditions. Typically, a new axle is run through a 50-60 hour break-in
sequence. The break-in fluid is then drained and replaced with the test fluid, which
is run through a set of speed and load conditions. The speeds and loads at both wheels
are measured on the dynamometers as well as the input speed and load on the pinion.
One representative set of conditions is composed of fourteen stages:
- Stage 1: 40 ft-lbs pinion torque; 1150 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 2: 55 ft-lbs pinion torque; 2400 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 3: 50 ft-lbs pinion torque; 1000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 4: 50 ft-lbs pinion torque; 2000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 5: 50 ft-lbs pinion torque; 3000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 6: 100 ft-lbs pinion torque; 500 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 7: 200 ft-lbs pinion torque; 500 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 8: 200 ft-lbs pinion torque; 1000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 9: 200 ft-lbs pinion torque; 2000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 10: 200 ft-lbs pinion torque; 3000 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 11: 300 ft-lbs pinion torque; 500 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 12: 300 ft-lbs pinion torque; 1500 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 13: 400 ft-lbs pinion torque; 500 rpms pinion speed
- Stage 14: 400 ft-lbs pinion torque; 1000 rpms pinion speed
[0052] An important feature of this invention is the ability of this fluid to control the
temperature increase in automotive, light truck, and SUV axles under trailer towing
break-in conditions. Handling high load and heat stresses during the first several
thousand miles of axle operation, commonly referred to, as the axle break-in period
is crucial to the long-term operation of the axle and fluid. Severe duty break-in
situations are defined as vehicle operations and towing of loads without prior conditioning
of the new ("green") axle. The operating circumstances can include pinion gear speeds
of between 1000 - 3000 rpms in combination with pinion torque loads of 180 - 400 ft-lbs,
for extended periods of at least 60 minutes of continuous operation. Unless the green
axle has been properly conditioned at lower speeds and loads for a sufficient time
to break-in the axle, such extreme trailer-towing conditions can result in overheating
of the axle and fluid and damage to both the equipment and the integrity of the fluid
properties.
[0053] The effectiveness of a fluid's ability to reduce the axle temperature under break-in
conditions has been tested in a dynamometer axle rig test designed to simulate the
trailer towing break-in conditions in the field. This test has been referred to as
the Wind Tunnel Test.
Wind Tunnel Test:
Testing Apparatus:
[0054] American Axle & Manufacturing non-lubricated iron beam axle with a 8.6 inch ring
gear.
Dynamometers capable of handling the required loads [Mid-west Dynamometers model
3232].
Engine and transmission capable of producing the proper speed and torque required
for the test.
An enclosed box structure surrounding the axle to simulate the airflow conditions
encountered during trailer towing at various speeds. Box dimensions are: 30" high
x 30" wide x 72" deep with an opening in the rear of the box where the fan is placed.
A fan to pull air across the axle during the test capable of delivering 1500 ft/min
of airflow.
A data acquisition system to record the following information:
- Sump temperature [Temprel J-type thermocouple]
- Pinion torque [Himmelstein model 18000 in-lb 2661T (18-3)]
- Left/Right axle torque [BLH Load Cell model U3G1]
- Pinion speed [Himmelstein model 18000 in-lb 2661T (18-3)]
- Left/Right axle speed.
Procedure:
[0055] The test axle is filled with 1930 grams of the test lubricant and placed on the dynamometer
rig, and enclosed in the wind tunnel box. The fan is started to produce airflow in
the wind tunnel of 1500 ft/min. The engine is started and the speed is set to produce
an axle pinion speed of 2835 rpms at a pinion torque of 204 ft-lbs. These conditions
are maintained for 90 minutes and data is acquired at 1.66 Hz for the sump temperature,
pinion speed, pinion torque, left axle speed, left axle load, right axle speed, and
right axle load. The maximum temperature recorded is noted along with the end of test
temperature and the shape of the temperature profile. In addition, the efficiency
of the axle under these conditions may be calculated using the following method:
[0056] The efficiency of the axle is calculated using a 30 second (prior 30s data) running
average of the pinion torque.

2.62 is the dynamometer load arm constant.
EXAMPLES
[0057] The following examples further illustrate aspects of the present invention but do
not limit the present invention.
| Inventive Sample A: |
| Component |
Wgt % |
| Fully formulated gear additive package |
8.75 |
| meeting MIL-PRF-2105-E requirements Succinimide dispersant |
3.00 |
| Phosphorylated, boronated succinimide dispersant |
2.00 |
| Polyacrylate antifoamant |
0.10 |
| Amide Friction modifier |
0.75 |
| Ester seal swell agent |
10.0 |
| olefin copolymer VII |
14.7 |
| 4 cSt PAO |
57.7 |
| Akyl amine salt of dialkyl dithiophosphate |
1.50 |
| Succinimide dispersant salt of dialkyl dithiophosphate |
1.50 |
| Inventive Sample B: |
| Component |
Wgt % |
| Fully formulated gear additive package |
8.75 |
| meeting MIL-PRF-2105-E requirements Succinimide dispersant |
5.00 |
| Polyacrylate antifoamant |
0.10 |
| Amide Friction modifier |
0.75 |
| Ester seal swell agent |
10.0 |
| olefin copolymer VII |
14.7 |
| 4 cSt PAO |
57.7 |
| Akyl amine salt of dialkyl dithiophosphate |
1.50 |
| Succinimide dispersant salt of dialkyl dithiophosphate |
1.50 |
[0058] Table 1 shows the axle efficiency comparisons of Inventive Sample B versus a 75W-90
hypoid axle oil currently used in factory fill applications. The stages shown in this
table correlate to the representative set of conditions discussed herein. As shown
in Table 1, the Inventive Sample B provided improved axle efficiency at every measured
stage, relative to the axle efficiency of the conventional factory fill 75W-90 axle
lubricant. Overall, about a 1% improvement in axle efficiency has been observed. This
typically translates to 0.1-0.2 miles per gallon fuel economy improvement in the Coporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFÉ) rating.
Table 1
| Stage |
% Efficiency 75W-90 |
% Efficiency Sample B |
| 1 |
87.9 |
92.4 |
| 2 |
90.4 |
92.1 |
| 3 |
88.8 |
93.0 |
| 4 |
91.4 |
92.7 |
| 5 |
90.6 |
91.6 |
| 6 |
94.2 |
93.3 |
| 7 |
94.5 |
95.0 |
| 8 |
95.4 |
95.8 |
| 9 |
96.0 |
96.5 |
| 10 |
95.9 |
96.6 |
| 11 |
95.3 |
96.3 |
| 12 |
96.2 |
96.8 |
| 13 |
95.1 |
95.8 |
| 14 |
95.9 |
96.6 |
[0059] Table 2 and Figure 1 both show wind tunnel performance comparisons of Inventive Samples
A & B versus a 75W-90 hypoid axle oil currently used in factory fill applications.
The graph and shape of the curve demonstrate the significantly improved temperature
reduction properties of the invention under green axle break-in conditions. Such temperature
reduction, combined with improved fuel economy and axle efficiency are novel and unexpected,
but highly desired properties in an axle lubricant. The composition of the present
invention lowers the maximum axle operating temperature during break-in by at least
20°F, and lowers the stabilize axle operating temperature during severe break-in conditions
by at least 70°F.
Table 2
| |
75W-90 |
Inventive Sample A |
Inventive Sample B |
| Maximum Temperature (°F) |
389.7 |
355.4 |
343.5 |
| End of Test Temperature (°F) |
382.0 |
252.5 |
256.2 |
[0060] Molecular weight values quoted herein are number average molecular weights.
[0061] Other embodiments of the present invention will be apparent to those skilled in the
art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed
herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary
only. The patentee does not intend to dedicate any disclosed embodiments to the public,
and to the extent any disclosed modifications or alterations may not literally fall
within the scope of the claims, they are nevertheless considered to be part of the
invention.
1. A hypoid axle bimodal gear lubricant formulation comprising (a) a base oil of lubricating
viscosity, (b) at least one viscosity index improver, (c) a friction modifier, and
(d) an antiwear additive, wherein:
said bimodal gear lubricant formulation produces a gel permeation chromatogram having
at least a first peak representative of the base oil and at least a second peak representative
of the viscosity index improver;
said base oil has a viscosity in the range of from about 2 centistokes to about 8
centistokes at 100°C; and
said undiluted viscosity index improver has a viscosity in the range of from about
600 centistokes to about 45,000 centistokes at 100°C.
2. The formulation of claim 1, wherein the base oil has a viscosity in the range of from
about 3 centistokes to about 5 centistokes at 100°C.
3. The formulation of claim 1 or 2, wherein the base oil is a Group II or Group III mineral
oil according to the classification of the American Petroleum Institute and is hydrotreated,
hydrocracked and/or iso-dewaxed.
4. The formulation of any preceding claim, wherein the viscosity index improver is an
olefin copolymer, polymethacrylate or polyisobutylene.
5. The formulation of any of claims 1-3, wherein the viscosity index improver is an olefin
copolymer of molecular weight about 12,000.
6. The formulation of any of claims 1-3, wherein the viscosity index improver is a polyisobutylene
of molecular weight about 2400.
7. The formulation of any preceding claim, wherein said friction modifier is selected
from the reaction products of a C5 to C60 carboxylic acid and at least one amine selected from (i) guanidine, urea and thiourea
compounds, (ii) C1 to C20 hydrocarbyl or hydroxy-substituted hydrocarbyl (a) mono-amines, (b) alkylene diamines,
and (c) polyalkylene polyamines; and (iii) N-alkyl glycine.
8. The formulation of any preceding claim, wherein said antiwear additive is an amine
derivative salt of dialkyldithiophosphoric acid.
9. The formulation of claim 8, wherein said amine is selected from primary alkyl amines,
tertiary alkyl amines, heterocyclic amines, anilines, alkoxy amines, amides, and derivatives
of amine compounds produced by reaction of the amine compound with an additional oil
soluble acidic organic compound.
10. The formulation of claim 9, wherein said derivative of an amine compound is selected
from the group consisting of an oil-soluble ashless dispersant having a basic nitrogen,
an oil-soluble ashless dispersant having at least one hydroxyl group, and an oil soluble
ashless dispersant having a basic nitrogen and at least one hydroxyl group.
11. The formulation of claim 10, wherein said dispersant is selected from the group consisting
of alkenyl succinimides, alkenyl succinic ester-amides, Mannich bases, hydrocarbyl
polyamines, and polymeric polyamines.
12. The formulation of any of claims 8-11, wherein said dialkyldithiophosphoric acid is
the reaction product of diphosphorous pentasulfides and at least one primary alcohol,
secondary alcohol, phenol or mixture thereof.
13. The formulation of any preceding claim, wherein the viscosity of the formulation is
from about 13 centistokes to about 24 centistokes at 100°C.
14. The formulation of claim 13, wherein the viscosity of the formulation is from about
15 centistokes to about 19 centistokes at 100°C.
15. The formulation of claim 14, wherein the viscosity of the formulation is about 17
centistokes at 100°C.
16. A lubricating oil comprising a formulation of any preceding claim.
17. A gear, vehicular transmission or vehicle having a vehicular transmission lubricated
with the formulation of any of claims 1-15 or with the lubricating oil of claim 16.
18. A method of lubricating a gear box, differential, or transmission comprising adding
to a gear box, differential, or transmission the lubricant formulation of any of claims
1-15 or the lubricating oil of claim 16.
19. Use of the formulation of any of claims 1-15 for the lubrication of an axle and gear
assembly to achieve any of the effects set out below:
reduction in the operating temperature in said axle relative to the operating temperature
in a comparable axle not lubricated with the lubricant formulation; and/or improving
the fuel economy of a vehicle with the axle and gear assembly; and/or improving the
axle efficiency of a vehicle with the axle and gear assembly.
20. A lubricant composition comprising (a) a base oil of lubricating viscosity, (b) at
least one viscosity index improver, (c) a friction modifier, and (d) an antiwear additive,
wherein the base oil has a viscosity in the range of from about 2 centistokes to about
8 centistokes at 100°C; and the undiluted viscosity index improver has a viscosity
in the range of from about 600 centistokes to about 45,000 centistokes at 100°C.