FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to a polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit for use in
vehicles, particularly to a polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit comprising metal separators
free from deterioration in electric generation performance.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Fuel cells are attracting much attention as new-generation generators, and widely
developed, because they efficiently convert fuel to energy without discharging toxic
substances such as SOx and NOx and greenhouse gases such as CO
2. Among them, a fuel cell called "ion-exchange polymer membrane fuel cell" or "polymer
electrolyte fuel cell" operable in a temperature range not higher than 150°C is suitable
for small power sources for use at home or in vehicles, because of a high power density.
Accordingly, the polymer electrolyte fuel cell has been extensively researched and
developed recently with expectation of commercial use.
[0003] The polymer electrolyte fuel cell usually comprises an ion-exchange fluororesin membrane
such as Nafion® having a sulfonic group as a polymer electrolyte membrane. A fuel
electrode and an oxygen (air) electrode are attached to the opposing surfaces of the
electrolyte membrane to provide a single cell. Each electrode typically comprises
carbon black, and water-repellent PTFE particles and precious metal particles as a
catalyst dispersed therein. A fuel cell stack is formed by stacking the cells with
separator plates having gas-flowing grooves, such that the fuel gas and air are uniformly
supplied onto both surfaces of each cell (see Fig. 1).
[0004] In the operation of the polymer electrolyte fuel cell with such structure, a hydrogen
gas is oxidized to protons, discharging electrons. Protons reach the polymer electrolyte,
where they are combined with water molecules to generate H
3O
+, and move toward the anode. The electrons generated by the oxidization of the hydrogen
gas flow into the anode through an external circuit. Oxygen acquires these electrons
at the anode to become O
2- ions, which are then combined with H
3O
+ to produce water. This reaction proceeds continuously, allowing electrical energy
to be continuously extracted.
[0005] Though the theoretical electromotive force of a cell unit is 1.2 V, the polarization
of electrodes, a reaction gas crossover, by which a fuel gas penetrates through a
polymer electrolyte to an air electrode, and the ohmic resistance of electrodes and
collectors cause the voltage to drop, so that the output voltage is practically about
0.6 V to 0.8 V. Therefore, several tens of cells should be stacked in series via separators
to provide an output at a practical level.
[0006] As is seen from the above principles of electric generation, large amounts of H
+ ions in the polymer electrolyte membrane turn the polymer electrolyte membrane and
the vicinity of the electrodes highly acidic. Oxygen reduced at the anode is combined
with H
+ to produce water, though it may form hydrogen peroxide depending upon the operational
state of the cell. Separators exposed to this environment should possess electrochemical
stability (corrosion resistance) in addition to conductivity and gas-tightness.
[0007] Most conventional separators for fuel cells are made of graphite and manufactured
by mechanical working. While graphite has low electric resistance and high corrosion
resistance, it has low mechanical strength and is costly to work. Particularly when
fuel cells are used for vehicles, materials constituting the fuel cells should have
high mechanical strength. In this respect, graphite separators are difficult to use.
[0008] Recently, a method has been proposed to produce a graphite separator by forming a
homogeneous mixture of graphite powder and a resin into a separator shape and then
baking it at high temperatures. In some cases, a mixture of graphite powder and a
resin is molded and used as a separator without being baked. In any case, the resulting
graphite separator is disadvantageous in electric resistance, gas-tightness, mechanical
strength, and thermal conductivity.
[0009] Other than carbon separators, metal separators are investigated. Metals are extremely
advantageous over carbon materials in electric resistance, gas-tightness, and mechanical
strength. It is easy to provide light metal separators because they can be made thinner.
However, metals are more vulnerable to corrosion than carbon materials. In addition,
metal ions produced by corrosion may migrate into the polymer electrolyte membrane,
lowering its ion conductivity and thus affecting the electric generation performance
of the fuel cell.
[0010] To solve this problem, JP 11-162478 A, for example, proposes a method of improving
the corrosion resistance of such a metal separator by plating the entire surface of
the separator with a noble metal. Though this method is effective in performance,
the separator suffers from high production cost by this corrosion-resistant coating,
unsuitable for practical use.
[0011] To reduce the cost, separators of corrosion-resistant metals such as stainless steel
and nickel alloys have been considered. These metals have very thin oxide films on
their surfaces, turning them into a passive state and thus preventing corrosion. However,
the oxide film on the surface increases contact resistance, lowering the electric
generation of the fuel cell.
[0012] To solve this problem, JP 10-308226 A proposes a method of lowering contact resistance
by forming a noble metal coating or a metal or resin coating containing carbon particles
on a surface of a separator made of a corrosion-resistant material in contact with
the electrode. To reduce the weight of the fuel cell, an aluminum separator has also
been investigated (see, for example, JP 10-255823 A).
[0013] Because of poor corrosion resistance, however, an aluminum separator should be coated
with a corrosion-resistant metal. Metals for the corrosion-resistant coating are usually
noble metals such as Au (gold). However, noble metals such as Au are expensive, inevitably
making aluminum separators coated with noble metals very expensive. To reduce the
cost, the noble metal coating should be as thin as possible, though thinner noble
metal coatings have lower corrosion resistance, failing to have sufficient durability.
[0014] Even if a metal coating with enough corrosion resistance is formed on a metal separator,
the coating may be damaged when assembling a fuel cell, resulting in corroding a metal
separator substrate and increasing its contact resistance.
[0015] As described above, fuel cell units having metal separators, particularly separators
of aluminum or its alloy have reduced electric generation performance because of poor
corrosion resistance of the separators. Therefore, metal separators have failed to
provide practically satisfactory fuel cells at low cost.
OBJECT OF THE INVENTION
[0016] Accordingly, an object of the present invention is to provide a low-cost polymer
electrolyte fuel cell unit comprising a metal separator having a structure capable
of providing high corrosion resistance and durability.
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0017] As a result of intense research in view of the above object, the inventors have paid
attention to the fact that the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating on the metal
separator is damaged when a graphite collector is pressed thereto, deteriorating the
performance of a fuel cell by corrosion in the coating, and thus found that (1) a
conductive, corrosion-resistant coating on the metal separator can be protected by
providing a buffer layer in the form of fibers or a foamed sheet having corrosion
resistance, flexibility, conductivity, and gas permeability between the collector
and the metal separator, or by forming a corrosion-resistant, conductive buffer coating
on the collector, instead of placing the collector for the gas diffusion electrode
in direct contact with the metal separator; that (2) the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating as thin as 0.01 to 10 µm, which covers at least a surface of the metal separator
in contact with the buffer layer, has excellent corrosion resistance, in a case where
it has a polarization current of 10 µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method; and that
a combination of (1) and (2) provides a fuel cell with drastically improved durability
at a low cost. The present invention has been completed based on these findings.
[0018] Thus, the polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit of the present invention comprises (a)
a polymer electrolyte membrane, (b) a pair of gas-diffusible electrodes attached to
both surfaces of the polymer electrolyte membrane, (c) a pair of porous, gas-diffusible,
conductive graphite collectors in contact with the outside of the electrodes, and
(d) a pair of metal separators for introducing a fuel gas and an oxygen-containing
gas separately into the electrodes; the fuel cell unit further comprising a porous,
conductive buffer layer having flexibility and gas permeability between the metal
separator and the graphite collector; and the metal separator being provided with
a conductive, corrosion-resistant coating having a thickness of 0.01 to 10 µm, whose
polarization current is 10 µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method, at least
on a surface in contact with the porous, conductive buffer layer.
[0019] Because the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating may be formed at least on the
surface of the metal separator in contact with the porous, conductive buffer layer,
the entire surface of the metal separator or part of its surface in contact with the
porous, conductive buffer layer may be provided with the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating.
[0020] The buffer layer is preferably a woven or non-woven fabric of conductive fibers made
of a metal, carbon or a conductive resin, or a foamed sheet with penetrating pores
having gas permeability. The porosity of the buffer layer is preferably 20 to 90%.
The buffer layer may be disposed between the collector and the metal separator, or
a buffer coating may be formed on a surface of the collector in contact with the metal
separator. The thickness of the buffer layer, if any, is preferably 0.05 to 1.0 mm,
more preferably 0.1 to 0.2 mm. The thickness of the buffer coating, if any, is preferably
5 to 50 µm, more preferably 10 to 20 µm.
[0021] At least a surface of the buffer layer in contact with the metal separator is preferably
coated with a metal, a conductive resin or a conductive ceramic to such an extent
that it does not deprive the buffer layer of porosity. The conductive fibers forming
the buffer layer are preferably coated with a metal or a conductive resin.
[0022] The conductive coating of the buffer layer preferably has a thickness of 0.01 to
10 µm, which is preferably at least one selected from the group consisting of Au,
Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Ir, Ag, Ti, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, Co, Fe and alloys thereof. The conductive
coating may be formed at least on a surface of the buffer layer in contact with the
metal separator, and may be formed on the entire surface of the buffer layer as long
as the porosity of the buffer layer is kept. When the entire surface of the buffer
layer is coated with the conductive coating, the method of forming the conductive
coating is not particularly limited but may be sputtering, vacuum deposition, electroplating,
or electroless plating. When only a surface of the buffer layer in contact with the
metal separator is coated with the conductive coating, the method of forming the conductive
coating is preferably sputtering.
[0023] To prevent moisture in a fuel gas or an oxidizing gas from clogging the buffer layer
to decrease its gas permeability, a water-repellent coating may be formed on the buffer
layer. Teflon® is usually used as a water-repellent coating. The water-repellent coating
may be directly formed on the buffer layer or on the above-mentioned conductive coating
on the buffer layer.
[0024] The conductive, corrosion-resistant coating formed at least on a surface of the metal
separator in contact with the buffer layer preferably has a thickness of 0.01 to 10
µm and a polarization current of 10 µA/cm
2 or less measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method. The thickness
of the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is preferably 0.1 to 3 µm, and the
polarization current is preferably 7 µA/cm
2 or less. Further, the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is preferably made
of metals or alloys, particularly made of at least one selected from the group consisting
of Au, Pt, Ag, Pd, Rh, Ru, Ir, Ni, Cr and alloys thereof.
[0025] A metal separator substrate is preferably made of aluminum or its alloy, titanium
or its alloy, stainless steel, Ni-Fe alloys, etc., more preferably aluminum having
purity as high as 99.9% or more.
[0026] As long as the above-mentioned conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is obtained,
any forming method may be used, though metal plating is particularly preferable. After
etching the separator substrate, it is repeatedly subjected to a zincate conversion
treatment four times or more, which comprises washing with an acid and immersion in
a zincate bath, and then to metal plating, to obtain a thin, conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating having excellent corrosion resistance. The metal separator substrate before
etching preferably has a surface roughness of 0.02 to 0.3 µm at least on a surface,
on which the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is formed.
[0027] In one preferable embodiment of the present invention, a graphite collector also
serves as a buffer layer. When a pair of porous, gas-diffusible, conductive graphite
collectors attached to the outside of the electrodes have flexibility and gas permeability,
functioning as porous, conductive buffer layers, no buffer layer need be disposed
separately. In this case, too, the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is formed
at least on a surface of the metal separator in contact with the porous, conductive
graphite collector, as in the case of having the porous, conductive buffer layer.
The same layer as the conductive coating covering the buffer layer is preferably formed
at least on a surface of the porous, conductive graphite collector in contact with
the metal separator.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0028]
Fig. 1 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing the layer structure of a fuel cell
unit according to one embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing the layer structure of a fuel cell
unit according to another embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 3 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing the layer structure of a fuel cell
unit according to a further embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 4 is a schematic cross-sectional view showing an example of the layer structure
of a conventional fuel cell unit;
Fig. 5 is a graph showing the electric generation performance before electric generation
and after 100 hours of electric generation in Example 1 and Comparative Examples 1
to 3;
Fig. 6 is a graph showing the electric generation performance before electric generation
and after 100 hours of electric generation in Examples 1 to 3;
Fig. 7 is a graph showing the electric generation performance before electric generation
and after 100 hours of electric generation in Examples 1 and 4;
Fig. 8 is a graph showing the electric generation performance before electric generation
and after 100 hours of electric generation in Examples 1, 5 and 6; and
Fig. 9 is a graph showing the electric generation performance before electric generation
and after 100 hours of electric generation in Examples 1, 7 and 8.
THE BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0029] The conventional polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit 1 shown in Fig. 4 comprises a
polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3 and an anode 4 formed on both sides of
the electrolyte membrane 2, collectors 5, 5 disposed on both electrodes 3, 4, and
metal separators 7, 7 each in contact with the collector 5, 5.
[0030] On the other hand, the polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit 1 of the present invention
shown in Fig. 1 comprises a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3 and an anode
4 formed on both sides of the electrolyte membrane 2, collectors 5, 5 disposed on
both electrodes 3, 4, buffer layers 6, 6 disposed outside the collectors 5, 5, and
metal separators 7, 7 each in contact with the buffer layer 6, 6, conductive, corrosion-resistant
coatings 9, 9 being formed on surfaces of the metal separators 7, 7 in contact with
the buffer layers 6, 6. Each buffer layer 6, 6 disposed between each collector 5,
5 and each metal separator 7, 7 is constituted by fibers or a foamed sheet having
excellent flexibility, electric conductivity and gas permeability. Each conductive,
corrosion-resistant coating 9, 9 formed on a surface of each metal separator 7, 7
in contact with each buffer layer 6, 6 has a thickness of 0.01 to 10 µm, and its polarization
current is 10 µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method. With
such structure, even if the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating formed on the
metal separator is a thin film, it is not damaged by contact with the collector 5,
exhibiting extremely high corrosion resistance.
[0031] The polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit 1 according to another preferred embodiment
of the present invention shown in Fig. 2 comprises a polymer electrolyte membrane
2, a cathode 3 and an anode 4 formed on both sides of the electrolyte membrane 2,
collectors 5, 5 disposed on both electrodes 3, 4, buffer layers 6, 6 disposed outside
the collectors 5, 5, each of which has a conductive coating 10, 10 formed on a surface
in contact with the separator, and metal separators 7, 7 having conductive, corrosion-resistant
coatings 9, 9 formed on surfaces in contact with the buffer layers 6, 6. The formation
of a conductive coating 10 on a surface of the buffer layer 6 in contact with the
metal separator 7 reduces their contact resistance and improves the resistance of
the metal separator 7 to corrosion due to the damage of the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating 9, thereby extremely improving the electric generation characteristics and
durability of the cell unit.
[0032] The polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit 1 according to a further embodiment of the
present invention shown in Fig. 3 comprises a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode
3 and an anode 4 formed on both sides of the electrolyte membrane 2, collectors 5,
5 disposed on both electrodes 3, 4, and metal separators 7, 7 having conductive, corrosion-resistant
coatings 9, 9 formed on surfaces in contact with the collectors 5, 5. In this embodiment,
because each collector 5, 5 disposed outside each electrode 3, 4 has flexibility and
gas permeability, functioning as a porous, conductive buffer layer, it is not necessary
to provide a buffer layer 6 separately.
[0033] When the collectors 5, 5 act as buffer layers, the entire collectors 5, 5 need not
have porosity, flexibility, etc., which are required for the buffer layers, but a
layer of each collector 5, 5 as deep as several tens of micrometers from a surface
in contact with the separator 7 need only meet conditions as the buffer layer. For
instance, a collector integrally comprising a hard porous layer with small porosity
(on the side in contact with the electrode), and a porous layer with large porosity
and flexibility (on the side in contact with the metal separator), or a collector
having continuously increasing porosity and flexibility from a surface in contact
with the electrode to a surface in contact with the metal separator may be used. Such
structure makes it unnecessary to dispose the buffer layer separately, thereby simplifying
the structure of the fuel cell unit, and reducing the electric resistance of the collectors
5, 5.
[0034] Among the constituents of the polymer electrolyte fuel cell, the polymer electrolyte
2, the cathode 3 and the anode 4 may be the same as those in the conventional cell
units, and therefore will not be described in detail. The buffer layer, the conductive
coating formed on the buffer layer, the separator, and the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating formed on the separator will be described in detail below.
[1] Buffer layer
[0035] The buffer layer 6 should have high conductivity to electrically connect the metal
separator 7 to the graphite collector 5. To alleviate any impact when the graphite
collector 5 comes into contact with the metal separator 7, the buffer layer 6 should
be highly flexible. In addition, the buffer layer 6 should have high thermal conductivity
and corrosion-resistant for use in fuel cells.
[0036] The buffer layer 6 having such characteristics is preferably constituted by a woven
or non-woven fabric of metal fibers, carbon fibers or conductive resin fibers, a foamed
sheet of conductive materials, or a carbon paper. The metal fibers may be fibers of
stainless steel, nickel, etc. Carbon fibers are preferably used because they are conductive
and resistant to corrosion. Commercially available carbon fibers may be used. The
conductive resin fibers may be fibers of polyolefin resins, polyester resins, fluororesins,
etc., which contain powder of metal or carbon. These fibers preferably have an average
diameter of about 0.5 µm to about 20 µm.
[0037] When the conductive coating of metals, conductive resins, etc. is formed on the surface
of the resin fibers or the foamed sheet, the resin fibers or the foamed sheet per
se may not be conductive. Examples of the non-conductive resins are natural fibers,
nylon-based resins, polypropylene resins, or polyester resins, etc. The natural fibers
may be made of cellulose etc. The average diameter of the fibers is preferably from
about 0.5 µm to about 20 µm.
[0038] Carbon paper sheets are preferably produced by a combination of a papermaking process
and a graphitizing process, etc. In one example, papers made from cellulose fibers
with a pulp wastewater, polyvinyl alcohol, etc. as a binder, or commercially available
cellulose filter papers with controlled pore size are baked at a temperature of 1000°C
to 1800°C to produce the carbon papers.
[0039] As is clear from Fig. 1, because a gas passes through the gas-flowing grooves 7a
of each separator 7 to an interface between each electrode 3, 4 and the polymer electrolyte
2 in the fuel cell, the gas should also pass through each buffer layer 6. Accordingly,
the buffer layer 6 should have high gas permeability. Because large resistance of
the gas passing through the buffer layers 6 affects the current output characteristic
of the fuel cell, the buffer layer 6 preferably has low resistance to the passage
of a gas. The porosity of the buffer layer 6 is preferably 20% to 90%, more preferably
30% to 80%. When the porosity of the buffer layer 6 is less than 20%, the buffer layer
6 has insufficient gas permeability and insufficient flexibility (shock absorbability)
to alleviate impact when the graphite collector 5 and the metal separator 7 come to
contact with each other. When the porosity of the buffer layer 6 is more than 90%,
the buffer layer 6 does not have sufficient mechanical strength, it is made thinner
by a pressing force at the time of stacking the cell units.
[0040] Though the buffer layer is disposed between the collector and the metal separator
in Fig. 1, the buffer layer may be replaced by the buffer coating formed on a surface
of the collector in contact with the metal separator.
[0041] The thickness of the buffer layer 6, if any, is preferably 0.05 to 1.0 mm, more preferably
0.1 to 0.2 mm, though it varies depending on the porosity. When the thickness of the
buffer layer 6 is less than 0.05 mm, it is difficult to produce and dispose the buffer
layer on the collector. When the thickness of the buffer layer 6 is more than 1.0
mm, not only is electric resistance too large between the metal separator 7 and the
graphite collector 5, but also the cell unit is too thick, making it difficult to
provide a compact fuel cell stack.
[0042] In the case of the buffer coating, its thickness is preferably 5 to 50 µm, more preferably
10 to 20 µm. When the thickness of the buffer coating is less than 5 µm, sufficient
flexibility (shock absorbability) is not obtained. The buffer coating may be formed
by spraying, dipping, plating, etc.
[0043] To increase the conductivity of the buffer layer 6, a surface of the buffer layer
6 (at least on the side in contact with the separator 7) or surfaces of the conductive
fibers forming the buffer layer 6 are preferably provided with conductive coatings
made of corrosion-resistant metals or conductive resins or ceramics. The metal forming
the conductive coating is preferably at least one selected from the group consisting
of Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Ir, Ag, Ti, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, Co, Fe and alloys thereof. At least
one metal selected from the group consisting of Au, Pt, Ir, Ag, Pb, Co and alloys
thereof is particularly preferable in terms of conductivity and corrosion resistance.
When the conductive coating is formed by the same metal as in the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating formed at least on a surface of the metal separator 7 (described later) in
contact with the buffer layer 6, contact resistance between the conductive coating
and the separator 7 is extremely lowered, providing excellent electric generation
performance.
[0044] Examples of the conductive resins forming the conductive coating include, for instance,
polyolefins, polyesters, fluororesins, etc., in which powder of metals or carbon is
dispersed. Specific examples of the conductive ceramics include indium tin oxide (ITO),
etc.
[0045] The conductive coating formed on the buffer layer 6 preferably has a thickness of
0.01 to 10 µm. When the thickness of the conductive coating is less than 0.01 µm,
sufficient conductivity is not obtained. When the thickness of the conductive coating
is more than 10 µm, the conductivity does not improve proportionately, simply raising
the cost. The conductive coating may be formed on the buffer layer 6 by sputtering,
physical vapor deposition, plating, etc.
[2] Separator
[0046] Though not particularly restrictive, materials for the metal separator 7 may be aluminum
or its alloy, titanium or its alloy, stainless steel, Ni-Fe alloys, etc. The separator
made of these materials has excellent mechanical strength, and electric and thermal
conductivity. Aluminum or its alloy is particularly preferable because it is light
in weight and excellent in workability. Though not particularly restrictive, aluminum
or its alloy may be, for instance, aluminum alloys of A1100, A5052, A6063, etc. as
well as high-purity aluminum (JIS H4170, 1N99). Aluminum having a purity of 99.9%
or more is preferable, because it can be uniformly formed, likely to be free from
pinholes in the coating.
[0047] Formed at least on a surface of the metal separator 7 in contact with the buffer
layer 6 is a conductive, corrosion-resistant coating having a thickness of 0.01 to
10 µm, whose polarization current is 10 µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method. Materials
for the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating are preferably metals or alloys, particularly
at least one selected from the group consisting of Au, Pt, Ag, Pd, Rh, Ru, Ir, Ni,
Cr and alloys thereof. Among them, Au, Ag, Pt or their alloys are preferable to form
the conductive coating having excellent conductivity and corrosion resistance.
[0048] The thickness of the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is 0.01 to 10 µm. When
the thickness of the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is less than 0.01 µm,
sufficient corrosion resistance is not obtained. On the other hand, when the thickness
of the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating exceeds 10 µm, the corrosion resistance
does not improve proportionately, simply raising the cost.
[0049] With the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating having polarization current of 10
µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method, sufficient
corrosion resistance can be obtained even if it is thin. When the polarization current
is higher than 10 µA/cm
2, the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating has defects such as pinholes on a surface,
causing corrosion, which lowers a cell output performance. The polarization current
of the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is more preferably 7 µA/cm
2 or less. A combination of the buffer layer 6 and the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating drastically improves the corrosion resistance of the metal separator 7, thereby
making the fuel cell stack inexpensive and providing it with improved durability.
[0050] The polarization current is measured by the electrochemical polarization evaluation
method described below. Specifically, a sample is immersed in an electrolytic solution
such as an aqueous acetic acid solution, etc. in opposite to a platinum electrode,
while a reference electrode of silver /silver chloride is immersed in a saturated
potassium chloride solution, such that the sample is connected to the saturated potassium
chloride solution by a salt bridge, with a potentiostat connected to the sample, the
platinum counter electrode and the silver / silver chloride electrode, to scan the
potential of the sample from a spontaneous electrode potential to an oxygen-generating
potential relative to the silver / silver chloride electrode on the anode side, thereby
measuring a peak current flowing through the sample electrode as a polarization current.
[0051] The method of forming the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is not restrictive,
as long as it can provide the above-described film characteristics (thickness and
polarization current). Though it may be sputtering, physical vapor deposition, plating,
etc., a plating method is particularly preferable. To obtain the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating having the above-described structure, it is important that the coating has
as small surface defects such as pinholes, etc. as possible. Surface defects such
as pinholes, etc. can be suppressed by a method of repeating the on/off of current
supply in plating pluralities of times, or a known pinhole-sealing method.
[0052] A particularly effective method for forming the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating
is a method of etching a metal separator substrate, repeating a zincate conversion
treatment comprising washing with acid and immersion in a zincate bath 4 times or
more, and plating a metal on the substrate. This method can provide a conductive,
corrosion-resistant coating substantially free from surface defects such as pinholes,
etc., thereby having extremely excellent corrosion resistance even if it is thin.
This method of forming the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating will be described
below in detail.
[0053] Before an etching treatment, at least a surface of the metal separator substrate,
on which the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is formed, is subjected to a
polishing treatment, such that it has a surface roughness of preferably 0.02 to 0.3
µm, more preferably 0.03 to 0.2 µm according to JIS B 0601(2001). When the surface
roughness of the metal separator substrate before the etching treatment is more than
0.3 µm, surface defects such as pinholes, etc. are generated on the conductive coating
due to recesses on the separator substrate surface, so that the metal separator 7
has a low corrosion resistance. On the other hand, when the surface roughness of the
separator substrate is less than 0.02 µm, the resultant conductive coating undesirably
has low adhesion to the separator surface, so that the conductive coating is likely
to peel from the separator by contact with the electrode during using the fuel cell.
[0054] Methods for adjusting the surface roughness of the metal separator substrate are
not particularly restrictive, but may be properly selected depending on the materials.
The surface-polishing treatment may be, for instance, an electrolytic polishing treatment,
a mechanical polishing treatment, a buffing treatment, a blast-polishing treatment,
a barrel-polishing treatment and combinations thereof, etc., the electrolytic polishing
treatment, the mechanical polishing treatment, the buffing treatment, the blast polishing
treatment and these combinations being preferable, and the electrolytic polishing
treatment being more preferable.
[0055] The ground separator substrate is degreased and then etched under the following conditions.
The etching treatment comprises the immersion of the separator substrate in an etching
liquid. The etching liquid may be an aqueous alkaline solution of sodium hydroxide,
potassium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, etc., or an aqueous acid solution such as an
aqueous solution of sulfuric acid and phosphoric acid, etc.
[0056] When the aqueous alkaline solution is used, its concentration is preferably 20 to
200 g/L, more preferably 50 to 150 g/L. The immersion temperature is preferably 30
to 70°C, more preferably 40 to 60°C. The immersion time is preferably 0.5 to 5 minutes,
more preferably 1 to 3 minutes.
[0057] On the other hand, when the aqueous sulfuric acid-phosphoric acid solution is used
as the aqueous acid solution, the concentration of sulfuric acid is preferably 10
to 500 g/L, more preferably 30 to 300 g/L. The concentration of phosphoric acid is
preferably 10 to 1200 g/L, more preferably 30 to 500 g/L. The immersion temperature
is preferably 30 to 110°C, more preferably 55 to 75°C. The immersion time is preferably
0.5 to 15 minutes, more preferably 1 to 6 minutes.
[0058] In the zincate conversion treatment conducted after the etching treatment, the acid-washing
step uses an acid-washing bath comprising nitric acid, sulfuric acid, or hydrochloric
acid, etc. in a concentration of 5 to 50% by mass. The acid-washing bath is preferably
an aqueous nitric acid solution in a concentration of 10 to 40% by mass, more preferably
an aqueous nitric acid solution in a concentration of 25 to 30% by mass. The immersion
temperature is preferably 15 to 30°C, more preferably 20 to 25°C. The immersion time
is preferably 5 to 120 seconds, more preferably 15 to 60 seconds. By acid washing
under the above conditions, the zincate conversion layer can be efficiently removed.
[0059] In the immersion step in a zincate bath, the zincate bath comprises an aqueous alkaline
zinc oxide solution, in which the concentration of zinc oxide is preferably 1.5 to
60 g/L, more preferably 3.5 to 50 g/L, and the concentration of an alkali such as
sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, etc. is preferably 40 to 400 g/L, more preferably
80 to 200 g/L. The immersion temperature is preferably 15 to 30°C, more preferably
20 to 25°C. The immersion time is preferably 5 to 120 seconds, more preferably 15
to 50 seconds. When the concentration of zinc oxide in the zincate bath is lower than
1.5 g/L, the resultant zincate conversion layer is non-uniform. On the other hand,
when it is higher than 60 g/L, the resultant plating layer is non-uniform. When the
alkali concentration is lower than 40 g/L, the zincate conversion layer has low adhesion.
On the other hand, when it is higher than 400 g/L, the zinc layer has increased surface
roughness.
[0060] To form the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating on the metal separator 7, it
is preferable to repeat the zincate conversion treatment comprising the above acid
washing and then immersion in the zincate at least 4 times. When this zincate conversion
treatment is 3 times or less, the plating layer may have pinholes, making it unlikely
that the resultant plating surely does not have surface defects.
[0061] After conducting the zincate conversion treatment 4 times or more, a plating treatment
is carried out to have a thickness of 0.01 to 10 µm. The plating treatment method
may be electroless plating, substitution plating, electroplating, or electro-strike
plating, etc. The composition of the plating bath may be the same as in conventional
ones. The plating conditions may be properly selected from conventional ones depending
on the type of a metal to be plated. In the case of plating gold, for instance, it
is preferable that the bath temperature is 50 to 75°C, and that the current density
is 0.1 to 0.5 A/dm
2.
[0062] Because the metal per se is light in weight and excellent in workability and electric
conductivity, having low contact resistance with the collector 5 free from corrosion
by contact, the fuel cell stack comprising metal separators 7 each provided with a
thin, conductive, corrosion-resistant coating substantially free from defects has
an improved electric generation performance and long durability, meeting the demand
of reducing weight and cost. Further, the metal separator 7 provided with the conductive,
corrosion-resistant coating has excellent mechanical strength, electric conductivity
and thermal conduction.
[0063] The present invention will be described in more detail with reference to Examples,
though it is not limited to these Examples.
Example 1
[0064] A 5-mm-thick aluminum plate was pressed and formed into a separator shape for a fuel
cell. The resultant aluminum separator substrate was immersed in a degreasing bath
comprising 25 g of sodium hydroxide, 25 g of sodium carbonate, 25 g of sodium phosphate,
1.5 g of a surfactant and about 1 litter of water at 60°C, for 5 minutes to carry
out a degreasing treatment. After washed with water, the aluminum separator substrate
was immersed in a sodium hydroxide solution (concentration: 50 g/L) at 50°C for 3
minutes, to carry out an etching treatment. The surface roughness of the separator
substrate before etching was 0.35 µm.
[0065] After the etched aluminum separator substrate was immersed in an aqueous nitric acid
solution (concentration: 30% by mass) at 50°C for 90 seconds for acid washing, it
was immersed in a zincate bath comprising 100 g of sodium hydroxide, 50 g of zinc
oxide, 1 g of ferric chloride and 10 g/L of a Rochelle salt in about 1 litter of water
at room temperature for 30 seconds. A zincate conversion treatment comprising washing
with acid and immersion in a zincate bath was conducted 4 times in total.
[0066] Next, electroplating was conducted in a gold-plating bath comprising 10 g of potassium
gold cyanide, 30 g of potassium cyanide, 30 g of potassium carbonate and 30 g of potassium
secondary phosphate in about 1 litter of water at 55°C, at a current density of 0.5
A/dm
2, to form a 0.5-µm-thick, uniform gold plating layer with a polarization current of
6 µA/cm
2 as a conductive, corrosion-resistant coating on the entire surface of the aluminum
separator.
[0067] The aluminum separators 7 provided with the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating
were assembled with a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3, an anode 4, collectors
5, 5 and buffer layers 6, 6 in the order shown in Fig. 1, and fastened by bolts to
form a cell unit. The polymer electrolyte membrane 2 was made of Nafion® as thick
as 170 µm, the cathode 3 and the anode 4 were constituted by carbon black carrying
a Pt catalyst, each of the collectors 5, 5 was constituted by a 250-µm-thick carbon
paper with a porosity of about 50%. Further, a pair of 0.2-mm-thick carbon cloths
with a porosity of about 80% were used for the buffer layers 6, 6.
[0068] The output current of the fuel cell unit was measured at a temperature of 60°C and
at a voltage of 0.65 V. Then, the cell unit was operated to generate electricity for
100 hours and the output current at a voltage of 0.65 V was again measured. The results
are shown in Figs. 5 to 9. The results in this Example revealed that the output current
did not substantially change after 100 hours of electric generation. Also, the measurement
of time (cell unit life), until which the electromotive force of the cell decreased
by 10% from the level at the start of electric generation, revealed that the cell
unit life was 300 days or more in Example 1, extremely improved than that of the conventional
cell unit.
Comparative Example 1
[0069] Using a 5-mm-thick aluminum plate to form separator substrates for a fuel cell, a
degreasing treatment, water washing, an etching treatment, a zincate conversion treatment,
and an electroplating treatment in a gold-plating bath were conducted in the same
manner as in Example 1 except that the zincate conversion treatment comprising washing
with acid and a zincate immersion treatment was conducted 3 times. A 0.5-µm-thick
gold plating layer with a polarization current of 110 µA/cm
2 was formed on the entire surface of the aluminum separator.
[0070] The resultant aluminum separators were brought into direct contact with the collectors
5, 5 as shown in Fig. 4, assembled with the polymer electrolyte membrane 2, the cathode
3 and the anode 4, and fastened by bolts to form a cell unit. All of the polymer electrolyte
membrane 2, the cathode 3, the anode 4 and the collectors 5, 5 were the same as in
Example 1.
[0071] The output current of the fuel cell unit was measured under the same conditions as
in Example 1. The results are shown in Fig. 5. In this Comparative Example, the output
current was lower than in Example 1 at the start of electric generation, and it significantly
dropped after 100 hours of electric generation. The cell unit life was 20 days, extremely
shorter than in Example 1.
Comparative Example 2
[0072] A 5-mm-thick aluminum plate was used to form separator substrates for a fuel cell.
After carrying out a degreasing treatment, water washing and an etching treatment
in the same manner as in Example 1, a zincate conversion treatment comprising washing
with acid and a zincate immersion treatment was conducted 4 times, followed by an
electroplating treatment in a gold-plating bath. The resultant gold plating layer
was as thick as 0.5 µm and had a polarization current of 6.0 µA/cm
2 as in Example 1.
[0073] The resultant aluminum separators were brought into direct contact with the collectors
5, 5 as shown in Fig. 4, and assembled with the polymer electrolyte membrane 2, the
cathode 3 and the anode 4, and fastened by bolts to form a cell unit. All of the polymer
electrolyte membrane 2, the cathode 3, the anode 4 and the collectors 5, 5 were the
same as in Example 1.
[0074] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the same conditions
as in Example 1. The results are shown in Fig. 5. In this Comparative Example, the
output current significantly dropped after 100 hours of electric generation, though
it was substantially the same as in Example 1 at the start of electric generation.
The cell unit life in this Comparative Example was 120 days, longer than in Comparative
Example 1, but extremely shorter than in Example 1.
Comparative Example 3
[0075] Using a 5-mm-thick aluminum plate to form separator substrates for a fuel cell, a
gold plating layer was formed in the same manner as in Comparative Example 1, except
that a zincate conversion treatment comprising washing with acid and a zincate immersion
treatment was conducted 3 times. The resultant gold plating layer was as thick as
0.5 µm and had a polarization current of 110 µA/cm
2 as in Comparative Example 1.
[0076] The aluminum separators each provided with a gold plating layer were assembled with
a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3, an anode 4, collectors 5, 5 and buffer
layers 6, 6 in the order shown in Fig. 1, and fastened by bolts to form a cell unit.
All of the polymer electrolyte membrane 2, the cathode 3, the anode 4, the collectors
5, 5 and the buffer layers 6, 6 were the same as in Example 1.
[0077] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the same conditions
as in Example 1. The results are shown in Fig. 5. In this Comparative Example, though
the output current at the start of electric generation is substantially the same as
that in Example 1, the output current significantly dropped after 100 hours of electric
generation. The cell unit life in this Comparative Example was 120 days, longer than
in Comparative Example 1, but extremely shorter than in Example 1.
Example 2
[0078] A 5-mm-thick aluminum plate was pressed and formed into separator substrates for
a fuel cell. Each aluminum separator substrate was provided with a 0.5-µm-thick Au
layer having a polarization current of 6 µA/cm
2 through the same treatment steps as in Example 1. Each 0.2-mm-thick carbon cloth
piece having a porosity of about 80% for the buffer layers 6, 6 was provided with
an Ag coating as thick as about 0.1 µm on a surface in contact with the separator.
These parts were assembled with a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3, an
anode 4 and collectors 5, 5 as shown in Fig. 2, and fastened by bolts to form a cell
unit. All of the polymer electrolyte membrane 2, the cathode 3, the anode 4 and the
collectors 5, 5 were the same as in Example 1.
[0079] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the conditions of a
temperature of 60°C and a voltage of 0.65 V. After 100 hours of electric generation,
the output current was measured again at a voltage of 0.65 V. The results are shown
in Fig. 6. The comparison between this Example and Example 1 revealed that the formation
of the conductive coating on a surface of the buffer layer 6, 6 in contact with the
separator increased output current at the start of electric generation. This seems
to be due to the fact that the formation of the conductive coating decreases contact
resistance between the buffer layer 6 and the separator 7. The output current did
not substantially change after 100 hours of electric generation. The cell unit in
this Example had a cell unit life of 350 days or more, higher than in Example 1.
Example 3
[0080] An Au coating was formed on the surface of the separator for a fuel cell formed by
a 5-mm-thick aluminum plate in the same manner as in Example 2. An Au layer having
a thickness of about 0.1 µm was formed by a sputtering method on a surface of a 0.2-mm-thick
carbon cloth having a porosity of about 80% for the buffer layers 6, 6 in contact
with the separator. A fuel cell unit was assembled completely in the same manner as
in Example 2 except that the Au layer was formed for the buffer layers 6, 6.
[0081] The output current of the fuel cell unit was measured under the same conditions as
in Example 2 before and after electric generation. The results are shown in Fig. 6.
In this Example, the output current was higher than in Example 2 at the start of electric
generation, indicating the effect obtained by using the same metal for the conductive
coating covering the buffer layer and the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating
covering the separator. The output current did not substantially change after 100
hours of electric generation. The cell unit in this Example had a cell unit life of
360 days or more, higher than in Example 1.
Example 4
[0082] An Au layer was formed on a surface of a separator formed by a 5-mm-thick aluminum
plate for a fuel cell in the same manner as in Example 1. A 0.2-mm-thick carbon cloth
having a porosity of about 80% for a buffer layer was immersed in a polytetrafluoroethylene
(PTFE) solution and treated at a temperature of 280°C to have water repellency. A
fuel cell unit was assembled completely in the same manner as in Example 1 except
that a PTFE layer was formed for the buffer layer.
[0083] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the conditions of a
temperature of 60°C and a voltage of 0.65 V. After 100 hours of electric generation,
the output current was measured again at voltage of 0.65 V. The results are shown
in Fig. 7. The results in this Example revealed that the output current change before
and after 100 hours of electric generation was smaller than in Example 1, indicating
that the formation of a water-repellent coating on the buffer layer suppressed the
corrosion of the separator. The cell unit in this Example had a cell unit life of
350 days or more, meaning improved durability than in Example 1.
Example 5
[0084] An Au coating was formed on the surface of the separator for a fuel cell made of
a 5-mm-thick aluminum plate in the same manner as in Example 1. A 250-µm-thick carbon
paper having a porosity of about 50% was used as a collector, and a 10-µm-thick Ag
layer was formed by a sputtering method only on a surface of the collector in contact
with the separator. The sputtering conditions were as follows:
Atmosphere: Ar at 20 Torr,
Temperature: 60°C,
Sputtering time: 2 hours, and
RF power: 100 W.
[0085] The resultant Ag coating had a porosity of 20%. A fuel cell unit was assembled in
the same manner as in Example 1, except that the collectors each provided with such
a buffer coating were thermally bonded to the electrodes.
[0086] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the conditions of a
temperature of 60°C and a voltage of 0.65 V. After 100 hours of electric generation,
the output current was measured again at voltage of 0.65 V. The results are shown
in Fig. 8. In this Example, in which the buffer coating was formed on the collector,
current change was extremely small between before and after 100 hours of electric
generation as in Example 1 having the buffer layer, indicating that the corrosion
of the separator was suppressed. The cell unit in this Example had a cell unit life
of 290 days or more, substantially the same as in Example 1.
Example 6
[0087] An Au layer was formed on a surface of a separator for a fuel cell formed by a 5-mm-thick
aluminum plate in the same manner as in Example 1. A 250-µm-thick carbon paper having
a porosity of about 50% was used as a collector in contact with the electrode, and
a slurry comprising carbon black powder, polypropylene and toluene was applied to
a surface of the collector in contact with the separator and dried. The resultant
buffer coating had a thickness of 15 µm and a porosity of 40%. A fuel cell unit was
assembled in the same manner as in Example 1, except that the collector having the
buffer coating was thermally bonded to the electrode.
[0088] The output current of this fuel cell unit was measured under the conditions of a
temperature of 60°C and a voltage of 0.65 V. After 100 hours of electric generation,
the output current was measured again at voltage of 0.65 V. The results are shown
in Fig. 8. In this Example, in which the buffer coating was formed on the collector,
current change was extremely small between before and after 100 hours of electric
generation as in Example 1 having the buffer layer, indicating that the corrosion
of the separator was suppressed. The cell unit in this Example had a cell unit life
of 280 days or more, substantially the same as in Example 1.
Examples 7 and 8
[0089] A conductive, corrosion-resistant coating was formed in the same manner as in Example
1, except that a 5-mm-thick aluminum plate was pressed to the shape of a separator
for a fuel cell, and subjected to electrolytic polishing (Example 7) and chemical
polishing (Example 8) under the following conditions as a surface-polishing treatment
before an etching treatment.
(1) Electrolytic polishing (Example 7)
[0090] The degreased separator substrate was immersed in an electrolytic polishing bath
containing 220 ml/L of perchloric acid and 780 ml/L of acetic anhydride. With the
separator substrate as an anode and the platinum plate as a cathode, the electrolytic
polishing treatment was conducted at a current density of 10 µA/cm
2 for 5 minutes, washed with water and then dried. The electrolytically ground separator
had a surface roughness of 0.08 µm. After forming a conductive, corrosion-resistant
Au coating on this separator in the same manner as in Example 1, it had a polarization
current of 4 µA/cm
2 or less.
(2) Chemical polishing (Example 8)
[0091] The separator substrate was immersed in a chemical polishing agent comprising 75%
by volume of phosphoric acid, 20% by volume of nitric acid and 5% by volume of water
at 90°C for 5 minutes, washed with water and then dried. The chemically ground separator
had a surface roughness of 0.08 µm. After forming a conductive, corrosion-resistant
Au coating on this separator in the same manner as in Example 1, it had a polarization
current of 4 µA/cm
2 or less.
[0092] Each separator provided with the conductive, corrosion-resistant coating was assembled
with a polymer electrolyte membrane 2, a cathode 3, an anode 4, collectors 5, 5, and
buffer layers 6, 6, and fastened by bolts to form a cell unit.
[0093] The output current of each cell unit before and after electric generation was measured
under the same conditions as in Example 1. The results are shown in Fig. 9. In Examples
7 and 8, the output current at the start of electric generation was substantially
the same as in Example 1, but the decrease of the output current after 100 hours of
electric generation was smaller than in Example 1. This indicates that the corrosion
resistance of the separator is improved by making the surface roughness of the separator
substrate smaller to some extent. The cell unit life was 360 days or more in Example
7, and 350 days or more in Example 8, longer than in Example 1.
APPLICABILITY IN INDUSTRY
[0094] As described above, the polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit of the present invention
comprising the buffer layer with electric conductivity, gas permeability and flexibility
between the metal separator and the collector, and the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating having a thickness of 0.01 to 10 µm, whose polarization current is 10 µA/cm
2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method, formed
on a surface of the metal separator in contact with the buffer layer, is inexpensive,
with drastically improved corrosion resistance in the metal separator, thereby making
the fuel cell maintain the performance of generating electricity for a long period
of time. In addition, the formation of a conductive coating on a surface of the buffer
layer in contact with the separator further reduces their contact resistance, thereby
improving the corrosion resistance of the metal separator and thus the performance
of the fuel cell of generating electricity.
1. A polymer electrolyte fuel cell unit comprising (a) a polymer electrolyte membrane,
(b) a pair of gas-diffusible electrodes attached to both surfaces of said polymer
electrolyte membrane, (c) a pair of porous, gas-diffusible, conductive graphite collectors
in contact with the outside of said electrodes, and (d) a pair of metal separators
for introducing a fuel gas and an oxygen-containing gas separately into said electrodes;
wherein it further comprises a porous, conductive buffer layer having flexibility
and gas permeability between said metal separator and said graphite collector; and
wherein said metal separator is provided with a conductive, corrosion-resistant coating
having a thickness of 0.01 to 10 µm, whose polarization current is 10 µA/cm2 or less when measured by an electrochemical polarization evaluation method, at least
on a surface in contact with said porous, conductive buffer layer.
2. The cell unit according to claim 1, wherein said buffer layer is constituted by a
woven fabric or a non-woven fabric of conductive fibers made of a metal, carbon or
a conductive resin, or a foamed sheet with penetrating pores having gas permeability.
3. The cell unit according to claim 1 or 2, wherein at least a surface of said buffer
layer in contact with said metal separator is coated with a metal or a conductive
resin to such an extent that it does not deprive the buffer layer of porosity.
4. The cell unit according to claim 3, wherein the metal covering the surface of said
buffer layer is at least one selected from the group consisting of Au, Pt, Pd, Ru,
Rh, Ir, Ag, Ti, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, Co, Fe and alloys thereof.
5. The cell unit according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said buffer layer is constituted
by a woven fabric or a non-woven fabric of conductive fibers, and wherein said conductive
fibers are coated with a metal or a conductive resin.
6. The cell unit according to claim 5, wherein the metal covering said conductive fibers
is at least one selected from the group consisting of Au, Pt, Pd, Ru, Rh, Ir, Ag,
Ti, Cu, Pb, Ni, Cr, Co, Fe and alloys thereof.
7. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein said buffer layer has
a porosity of 20 to 90%.
8. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said buffer layer has
a thickness of 0.05 to 1.0 mm.
9. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 7, wherein said buffer layer is
a buffer coating having a thickness of 5 to 50 µm, which is formed on a surface of
said graphite collector in contact with said metal separator.
10. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 9, wherein the conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating formed on at least a surface of said metal separator in contact with said
porous, conductive buffer layer is at least one selected from the group consisting
of Au, Pt, Ag, Pd, Rh, Ru, Ir, Ni, Cr and alloys thereof.
11. The cell unit according to claim 10, wherein said conductive, corrosion-resistant
coating is formed on the surface of said metal separator by etching a metal separator
substrate, repeating a zincate conversion treatment comprising a washing treatment
with acid and an immersion treatment in a zincate bath 4 times or more, and then plating
said metal thereto.
12. The cell unit according to claim 11, wherein said metal separator substrate before
said etching treatment has a surface roughness of 0.02 to 0.3 µm at least on a surface,
on which said conductive, corrosion-resistant coating is formed.
13. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 12, wherein said metal separator
substrate is made of aluminum or its alloy.
14. The cell unit according to claim 13, wherein said metal separator substrate is made
of high-purity aluminum having a purity of 99.9% or more.
15. The cell unit according to any one of claims 1 to 14, wherein said graphite collector
acts as said buffer layer.