This invention relates to the field of plant biology, and to compositions and methods for modifying the phenotype of a plant.

A plant's traits, such as its biochemical, developmental, or phenotypic characteristics, may be controlled through a number of cellular processes. One important way to manipulate that control is through transcription factors - proteins that influence the expression of a particular gene or sets of genes. Transformed and transgenic plants comprise cells having altered levels of at least one selected transcription factor, and may possess advantageous or desirable traits. Strategies for manipulating traits by altering a plant cell's transcription factor content can therefore result in plants and crops with new and/or improved commercially valuable properties.

Transcription factors can modulate gene expression, either increasing or decreasing (inducing or repressing) the rate of transcription. This modulation results in differential levels of gene expression at various developmental stages, in different tissues and cell types, and in response to different exogenous (e.g., environmental) and endogenous stimuli throughout the life cycle of the organism.

Because transcription factors are key controlling elements of biological pathways, altering the expression levels of one or more transcription factors can change entire biological pathways in an organism. For example, manipulation of the levels of selected transcription factors may result in increased expression of economically useful proteins or biomolecules in plants or improvement in other agriculturally relevant characteristics. Conversely, blocked or reduced expression of a transcription factor may reduce biosynthesis of unwanted compounds or remove an undesirable trait. Therefore, manipulating transcription factor levels in a plant offers tremendous potential in agricultural biotechnology for modifying a plant's traits.

EP 1 033 405 A discloses a sequence which has about 53.6% identity to SEQ ID NO:328 of the present disclosure. EMBL Database accession no. AP000604 is an Arabidopsis thaliana genomic DNA, chromosome 3, sequence which corresponds to SEQ ID NO:327 of the present disclosure.

We have identified polynucleotides encoding transcription factors, developed numerous transgenic plants using these polynucleotides, and have analyzed the plants for a variety of important traits. In so doing, we have identified important polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences for producing commercially valuable plants and crops as well as the methods for making them and using them. Other aspects and embodiments of the invention are described below and can be derived from the teachings of this disclosure as a whole.

The present invention provides a transgenic plant that over-expresses a recombinant polynucleotide, wherein said transgenic plant has improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant or wild-type plant, wherein the recombinant polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide that has at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of SEQ ID NO:328, said polypeptide providing for improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant that does not over-express the polypeptide.

In one aspect, the polypeptide comprises a conserved domain which has at least 80% sequence identity with the conserved domain of residues 5-50 of the polypeptide of SEQ ID NO:328.

In one aspect, said polypeptide comprises SEQ ID NO:328.

In one embodiment, in the transgenic plant of the invention, the recombinant polynucleotide comprises a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter operably linked to said polynucleotide sequence.

The invention further provides a host plant cell comprising an expression cassette that over-expresses a recombinant polynucleotide which encodes a polypeptide, wherein said polypeptide is as defined above.

In another aspect, the transgenic plant of the invention comprises longer hypocotyls and elongated petioles compared to a non-transgenic plant or wild-type plant.

The transgenic plant of the invention may be selected from the group consisting of: soybean, potato, cotton, oilseed rape, canola, sunflower, alfalfa, clover, banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, raspberry, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant, grapes, honeydew, lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas, peppers, pineapple, pumpkin, spinach, squash, tobacco, tomato, tomatillo, watermelon, rosaceous fruits, fruit trees, brassicas, barley; wheat, corn, sweet corn, rice, rye; sugarcane, turf; millet; sorghum; currant; avocado; citrus fruits, oranges, lemons, grapefruit, tangerines, artichoke, cherries; walnut, peanut; endive; leek; arrowroot, beet, cassava, turnip, radish, yam, sweet potato; beans, pine, poplar, eucalyptus, and mint.

The invention further provides a plant part of the transgenic plant of the above-defined invention comprising an expression cassette that comprises the recombinant polynucleotide, wherein the plant part is selected from fruit, leaf, root, plant tissue including vascular or ground tissue, or plant cells. The invention further provides a seed of the transgenic plant of the above defined invention, wherein said seed comprises an expression cassette that comprises the recombinant polynucleotide.

The invention further provides a method for producing a transgenic plant of the preceding claims, the method steps comprising: (a) producing an expression cassette comprising a recombinant polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide that has at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of SEQ ID NO:328; (b) introducing the expression cassette into the plant; and (c) identifying and selecting a plant with improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant or wild-type plant.

The invention also provides a method for producing a transgenic plant having the altered trait of improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant or wild-type plant, the method steps comprising: (a) providing an expression vector comprising: (i) a recombinant polynucleotide that the recombinant polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide that has at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of SEQ ID NO:328; and (ii) at least one regulatory element flanking the polynucleotide sequence, said at least one regulatory element being effective in controlling expression of said recombinant polynucleotide in a target plant; (b) introducing the expression vector into a plant cell, thereby producing a transgenic plant cell; (c) growing the transgenic plant cell into a transgenic plant and allowing the transgenic plant to over-express a polypeptide encoded by the recombinant polynucleotide, said polypeptide having the property of improved yield in a plant as compared to a non-transgenic plant that does not over-express the polypeptide; and (d) identifying at least one transgenic plant with said improved yield by comparing said transgenic plant with at least one non-transgenic plant that does not over-express the polypeptide.

The invention further provides the use of a recombinant polynucleotide that the recombinant polynucleotide encodes a polypeptide that has at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of SEQ ID NO:328, for producing a transgenic plant having improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant or wild-type plant, said polypeptide providing for improved yield as compared to a non-transgenic plant that does not over-express the polypeptide. Optionally, the polynucleotide comprises a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter operably linked to said polynucleotide sequence.

The Sequence Listing provides exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences. The traits associated with the use of the sequences are included in the Examples.

• Figure 1 shows a conservative estimate of phylogenetic relationships among the orders of flowering plants (modified from Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 1-49). Those plants with a single cotyledon (monocots) are a monophyletic clade nested within at least two major lineages of dicots; the eudicots are further divided into rosids and asterids. Arabidopsis is a rosid eudicot classified within the order Brassicales; rice is a member of the monocot order Poales. Figure 1 was adapted from Daly et al. ((2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333).
• Figure 2 shows a phylogenic dendogram depicting phylogenetic relationships of higher plant taxa, including clades containing tomato and Arabidopsis; adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and Chase et al. (1993) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.

In an important aspect, the present invention relates to the use of polynucleotides and polypeptides, for example, for modifying phenotypes of plants. Throughout this disclosure, various information sources are referred to. The information sources include scientific journal articles, patent documents, textbooks, and World Wide Web browser-inactive page addresses, for example. The contents and teachings of each and every one of the information sources can be relied on and used to make and use embodiments of the invention.

It must be noted that as used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" include plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, a reference to "a plant" includes a plurality of such plants, and a reference to "a stress" is a reference to one or more stresses and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth.

The polynucleotide sequences described herein encode polypeptides that are members of well-known transcription factor families, including plant transcription factor families, as disclosed in Tables 4 - 9. Generally, the transcription factors encoded by the present sequences are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation and the regulation of growth. Accordingly, one skilled in the art would recognize that by expressing the present sequences in a plant, one may change the expression of autologous genes or induce the expression of introduced genes. By affecting the expression of similar autologous sequences in a plant that have the biological activity of the present sequences, or by introducing the present sequences into a plant, one may alter a plant's phenotype to one with improved traits. The sequences may also be used to transform a plant and introduce desirable traits not found in the wild-type cultivar or strain. Plants may then be selected for those that produce the most desirable degree of over- or under-expression of target genes of interest and coincident trait improvement.

The sequences may be from any species, particularly plant species, in a naturally occurring form or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant. The sequences of may also include fragments of the present amino acid sequences. Where "amino acid sequence" is recited to refer to an amino acid sequence of a naturally occurring protein molecule, "amino acid sequence" and like terms are not meant to limit the amino acid sequence to the complete native amino acid sequence associated with the recited protein molecule.

As one of ordinary skill in the art recognizes, transcription factors can be identified by the presence of a region or domain of structural similarity or identity to a specific consensus sequence or the presence of a specific consensus DNA-binding site or DNA-binding site motif (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) Science 290: 2105-2110). Plant transcription factors may belong to one of the following transcription factor families: the AP2 (APETALA2) domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1998) Biol. Chem. 379: 633-646); the MYB transcription factor family (ENBib; Martin and Paz-Ares (1997) Trends Genet. 13: 67-73); the MADS domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1997) Biol. Chem. 378: 1079-1101); the WRKY protein family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet. 244: 563-571); the ankyrin-repeat protein family (Zhang et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4: 1575-1588); the zinc finger protein (Z) family (Klug and Schwabe (1995) FASEB J. 9: 597-604); Takatsuji (1998) Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 54:582-596); the homeobox (HB) protein family (Buerglin (1994) in Guidebook to the Homeobox Genes, Duboule (ed.) Oxford University Press); the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) Genes Dev. 3: 1166-1178); the squamosa promoter binding proteins (SPB) (Klein et al. (1996) Mol. Gen. Genet. 1996 250: 7-16); the NAM protein family (Souer et al. (1996) Cell 85: 159-170); the IAA/AUX proteins (Abel et al. (1995) J. Mol. Biol. 251: 533-549); the HLH/MYC protein family (Littlewood et al. (1994) Prot. Profile 1: 639-709); the DNA-binding protein (DBP) family (Tucker et al. (1994) EMBO J. 13: 2994-3002); the bZIP family of transcription factors (Foster et al. (1994) FASEB J. 8: 192-200); the Box P-binding protein (the BPF-1) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1993) Plant J. 4: 125-135); the high mobility group (HMG) family (Bustin and Reeves (1996) Prog. Nucl. Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 54: 35-100); the scarecrow (SCR) family (Di Laurenzio et al. (1996) Cell 86: 423-433); the GF14 family (Wu et al. (1997) Plant Physiol. 114: 1421-1431); the polycomb (PCOMB) family (Goodrich et al. (1997) Nature 386: 44-51); the teosinte branched (TEO) family (Luo et al. (1996) Nature 383: 794-799); the ABI3 family (Giraudat et al. (1992) Plant Cell 4: 1251-1261); the triple helix (TH) family (Dehesh et al. (1990) Science 250: 1397-1399); the EIL family (Chao et al. (1997) Cell 89: 1133-44); the AT-HOOK family (Reeves and Nissen (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265: 8573-8582); the S1FA family (Zhou et al. (1995) Nucleic Acids Res. 23: 1165-1169); the bZIPT2 family (Lu and Ferl (1995) Plant Physiol. 109: 723); the YABBY family (Bowman et al. (1999) Development 126: 2387-96); the PAZ family (Bohmert et al. (1998) EMBO J. 17: 170-80); a family of miscellaneous (MISC) transcription factors including the DPBF family (Kim et al. (1997) Plant J. 11: 1237-1251) and the SPF1 family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) Mol. Gen. Genet. 244: 563-571); the GARP family (Hall et al. (1998) Plant Cell 10: 925-936), the TUBBY family (Boggin et al (1999) Science 286 : 2119-2125), the heat shock family (Wu (1995) Annu. Rev. Cell Dev, Biol. 11: 441-469), the ENBP family (Christiansen et al. (1996) Plant Mol. Biol. 32: 809-821), the RING-zinc family (Jensen et al. (1998) FEBS Letters 436: 283-287), the PDBP family (Janik et al. (1989) Virology 168: 320-329), the PCF family (Cubas et al. Plant J. (1999) 18: 215-22), the SRS (SHI-related) family (Fridborg et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 1019-1032), the CPP (cysteine-rich polycomb-like) family (Cvitanich et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 8163-8168), the ARF (auxin response factor) family (Ulmasov et al. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 96: 5844-5849), the SWI/SNF family (Collingwood et al. (1999) J. Mol. Endocrinol. 23: 255-275), the ACBF family (Seguin et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35: 281-291), PCGL (CG-1 like) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 921-924) the ARID family (Vazquez et al. (1999) Development 126: 733-742), the Jumonji family (Balciunas et al. (2000), Trends Biochem. Sci. 25: 274-276), the bZIP-NIN family (Schauser et al. (1999) Nature 402: 191-195), the E2F family (Kaelin et al. (1992) Cell 70: 351-364) and the GRF-like family (Knaap et al. (2000) Plant Physiol. 122: 695-704). As indicated by any part of the list above and as known in the art, transcription factors have been sometimes categorized by class, family, and sub-family according to their structural content and consensus DNA-binding site motif, for example. Many of the classes and many of the families and sub-families are listed here. The list provided here is merely an example of the types of transcription factors and the knowledge available concerning the consensus sequences and consensus DNA-binding site motifs that help define them as known to those of skill in the art. A transcription factor may include, but is not limited to, any polypeptide that can activate or repress transcription of a single gene or a number of genes. This polypeptide group includes, but is not limited to, DNA-binding proteins, DNA-binding protein binding proteins, protein kinases, protein phosphatases, protein methyltransferases, GTP-binding proteins, and receptors, and the like.

In addition to methods for modifying a plant phenotype by employing one or more polynucleotides and polypeptides described herein, the polynucleotides and polypeptides have a variety of additional uses. These uses include their use in the recombinant production (i.e., expression) of proteins; as regulators of plant gene expression, as diagnostic probes for the presence of complementary or partially complementary nucleic acids (including for detection of natural coding nucleic acids); as substrates for further reactions, e.g., mutation reactions, PCR reactions, or the like; as substrates for cloning e.g., including digestion or ligation reactions; and for identifying exogenous or endogenous modulators of the transcription factors.

"Nucleic acid molecule" refers to a oligonucleotide, polynucleotide or any fragment thereof. It may be DNA or RNA of genomic or synthetic origin, double-stranded or single-stranded, and combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).

"Polynucleotide" is a nucleic acid molecule comprising a plurality of polymerized nucleotides, e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized nucleotides, optionally at least about 30 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 50 consecutive nucleotides. A polynucleotide may be a nucleic acid, oligonucleotide, nucleotide, or any fragment thereof. In many instances, a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation initiation site, 5' or 3' untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like. The polynucleotide can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA. The polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone. The polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like. The polynucleotide can be combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA). The polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientations. "Oligonucleotide" is substantially equivalent to the terms amplimer, primer, oligomer, element, target, and probe and is preferably single stranded.

"Gene" or "gene sequence" refers to the partial or complete coding sequence of a gene, its complement, and its 5' or 3' untranslated regions. A gene is also a functional unit of inheritance, and in physical terms is a particular segment or sequence of nucleotides along a molecule of DNA (or RNA, in the case of RNA viruses) involved in producing a polypeptide chain. The latter may be subjected to subsequent processing such as splicing and folding to obtain a functional protein or polypeptide.. A gene may be isolated, partially isolated, or be found with an organism's genome. By way of example, a transcription factor gene encodes a transcription factor polypeptide, which may be functional or require processing to function as an initiator of transcription.

Operationally, genes may be defined by the cis-trans test, a genetic test that determines whether two mutations occur in the same gene and which may be used to determine the limits of the genetically active unit (Rieger et al. (1976) Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics: Classical and Molecular, 4th ed., Springer Verlag. Berlin). A gene generally includes regions preceding ("leaders"; upstream) and following ("trailers"; downstream) of the coding region. A gene may also include intervening, non-coding sequences, referred to as "introns", located between individual coding segments, referred to as "exons". Most genes have an associated promoter region, a regulatory sequence 5' of the transcription initiation codon (there are some genes that do not have an identifiable promoter). The function of a gene may also be regulated by enhancers, operators, and other regulatory elements.

A "recombinant polynucleotide" is a polynucleotide that is not in its native state, e.g., the polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence not found in nature, or the polynucleotide is in a context other than that in which it is naturally found, e.g., separated from nucleotide sequences with which it typically is in proximity in nature, or adjacent (or contiguous with) nucleotide sequences with which it typically is not in proximity. For example, the sequence at issue can be cloned into a vector, or otherwise recombined with one or more additional nucleic acid.

An "isolated polynucleotide" is a polynucleotide whether naturally occurring or recombinant, that is present outside the cell in which it is typically found in nature, whether purified or not. Optionally, an isolated polynucleotide is subject to one or more enrichment or purification procedures, e.g., cell lysis, extraction, centrifugation, precipitation, or the like.

A "polypeptide" is an amino acid sequence comprising a plurality of consecutive polymerized amino acid residues e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, optionally at least about 30 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, at least about 50 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues. In many instances, a polypeptide comprises a polymerized amino acid residue sequence that is a transcription factor or a domain or portion or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polypeptide may comprise 1) a localization domain, 2) an activation domain, 3) a repression domain, 4) an oligomerization domain, or 5) a DNA-binding domain, or the like. The polypeptide optionally comprises modified amino acid residues, naturally occurring amino acid residues not encoded by a codon, non-naturally occurring amino acid residues.

"Protein" refers to an amino acid sequence, oligopeptide, peptide, polypeptide or portions thereof whether naturally occurring or synthetic.

"Portion", as used herein, refers to any part of a protein used for any purpose, but especially for the screening of a library of molecules which specifically bind to that portion or for the production of antibodies.

A "recombinant polypeptide" is a polypeptide produced by translation of a recombinant polynucleotide. A "synthetic polypeptide" is a polypeptide created by consecutive polymerization of isolated amino acid residues using methods well known in the art. An "isolated polypeptide," whether a naturally occurring or a recombinant polypeptide, is more enriched in (or out of) a cell than the polypeptide in its natural state in a wild-type cell, e.g., more than about 5% enriched, more than about 10% enriched, or more than about 20%, or more than about 50%, or more, enriched, i.e., alternatively denoted: 105%, 110%, 120%, 150% or more, enriched relative to wild type standardized at 100%. Such an enrichment is not the result of a natural response of a wild-type plant. Alternatively, or additionally, the isolated polypeptide is separated from other cellular components with which it is typically associated, e.g., by any of the various protein purification methods herein.

"Homology" refers to sequence similarity between a reference sequence and at least a fragment of a newly sequenced clone insert or its encoded amino acid sequence.

"Hybridization complex" refers to a complex between two nucleic acid molecules by virtue of the formation of hydrogen bonds between purines and pyrimidines.

"Identity" or "similarity" refers to sequence similarity between two polynucleotide sequences or between two polypeptide sequences, with identity being a more strict comparison. The phrases "percent identity" and "% identity" refer to the percentage of sequence similarity found in a comparison of two or more polynucleotide sequences or two or more polypeptide sequences. "Sequence similarity" refers to the percent similarity in base pair sequence (as determined by any suitable method) between two or more polynucleotide sequences. Two or more sequences can be anywhere from 0-100% similar, or any integer value therebetween. Identity or similarity can be determined by comparing a position in each sequence that may be aligned for purposes of comparison. When a position in the compared sequence is occupied by the same nucleotide base or amino acid, then the molecules are identical at that position. A degree of similarity or identity between polynucleotide sequences is a function of the number of identical or matching nucleotides at positions shared by the polynucleotide sequences. A degree of identity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of identical amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences. A degree of homology or similarity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences.

The term "amino acid consensus motif" refers to the portion or subsequence of a polypeptide sequence that is substantially conserved among the polypeptide transcription factors listed in the Sequence Listing.

"Alignment" refers to a number of DNA or amino acid sequences aligned by lengthwise comparison so that components in common (i.e., nucleotide bases or amino acid residues) may be readily and graphically identified. The number of components in common is related to the homology or identity between the sequences. Alignments may be used to identify "conserved domains" and relatedness within these domains. An alignment may suitably be determined by means of computer programs Known in the art, such as MacVector (1999) (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, CA).

A "conserved domain" or "conserved region" as used herein refers to a region in heterologous polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences where there is a relatively high degree of sequence identity between the distinct sequences.

With respect to polynucleotides encoding presently disclosed transcription factors, a conserved region is preferably at least 10 base pairs (bp) in length.

A "conserved domain", with respect to presently disclosed polypeptides refers to a domain within a transcription factor family that exhibits a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least 80% sequence identity, and even more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% amino acid residue sequence identity of a polypeptide of consecutive amino acid residues. A fragment or domain can be referred to as outside a conserved domain, outside a consensus sequence, or outside a consensus DNA-binding site that is known to exist or that exists for a particular transcription factor class, family, or sub-family. In this case, the fragment or domain will not include the exact amino acids of a consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site of a transcription factor class, family or sub-family, or the exact amino acids of a particular transcription factor consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site. Furthermore, a particular fragment, region, or domain of a polypeptide, or a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide, can be "outside a conserved domain" if all the amino acids of the fragment, region, or domain fall outside of a defined conserved domain(s) for a polypeptide or protein. Sequences having lesser degrees of identity but comparable biological activity are considered to be equivalents.

As one of ordinary skill in the art recognizes, conserved domains may be identified as regions or domains of identity to a specific consensus sequence (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) supra). Thus, by using alignment methods well known in the art, the conserved domains of the plant transcription factors for each of the following may be determined: the AP2 (APETALA2) domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1998) supra; the MYB transcription factor family (ENBib; Martin and Paz-Ares (1997) supra); the MADS domain transcription factor family (Riechmann and Meyerowitz (1997) supra; Immink et al. (2003) supra); the WRKY protein family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) supra); the ankyrin-repeat protein family (Zhang et al. (1992) supra); the zinc finger protein (Z) family (Klug and Schwabe (1995) supra; Takatsuji (1998) supra); the homeobox (HB) protein family (Buerglin (1994) supra); the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) supra); the squamosa promoter binding proteins (SPB) (Klein et al. (1996) supra); the NAM protein family (Souer et aI. (1996) supra); the IAA/AUX proteins (Abel et al. (1995) supra); the HLH/MYC protein family (Littlewood et al. (1994) supra); the DNA-binding protein (DBP) family (Tucker et al. (1994) supra); the bZIP family of transcription factors (Foster et al. (1994) supra); the Box P-binding protein (the BPF-1) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1993) supra); the high mobility group (HMG) family (Bustin and Reeves (1996) supra); the scarecrow (SCR) family (Di Laurenzio et al. (1996) supra); the GF14 family (Wu et al. (1997) supra); the polycomb (PCOMB) family (Goodrich et al. (1997) supra); the teosinte branched (TEO) family (Luo et al. (1996) supra); the ABI3 family (Giraudat et al. (1992) supra); the triple helix (TH) family (Dehesh et al. (1990) supra); the EIL family (Chao et al. (1997) Cell supra); the AT-HOOK family (Reeves and Nissen (1990 supra); the S1FA family (Zhou et al. (1995) supra); the bZIPT2 family (Lu and Ferl (1995) supra); the YABBY family (Bowman et al. (1999) supra); the PAZ family (Bohmert et al. (1998) supra); a family of miscellaneous (MISC) transcription factors including the DPBF family (Kim et al. (1997) supra) and the SPF1 family (Ishiguro and Nakamura (1994) supra); the GARP family (Hall et al. (1998) supra), the TUBBY family (Boggin et al. (1999) supra), the heat shock family (Wu (1995 supra), the ENBP family (Christiansen et al. (1996) supra), the RING-zinc family (Jensen et al. (1998) supra), the PDBP family (Janik et al. (1989) supra), the PCF family (Cubas et al. (1999) supra), the SRS (SHI-related) family (Fridborg et al. (1999) supra), the CPP (cysteine-rich polycomb-like) family (Cvitanich et al. (2000) supra), the ARF (auxin response factor) family (Ulmasov et al. (1999) supra), the SWI/SNF family (Collingwood et al. (1999) supra), the ACBF family (Seguin et al. (1997) supra), PCGL (CG-1 like) family (da Costa e Silva et al. (1994) supra) the ARID family (Vazquez et al. (1999) supra), the Jumonji family, (Balciunas et al. (2000) supra), the bZIP-NIN family (Schauser et al. (1999) supra), the E2F family Kaelin et al. (1992) supra) and the GRF-like family (Knaap et al (2000) supra).

The conserved domains of SEQ ID NO: 328 is listed in Table 5.

"Complementary" refers to the natural hydrogen bonding by base pairing between purines and pyrimidines. For example, the sequence A-C-G-T (5' -> 3') forms hydrogen bonds with its complements A-C-G-T (5' -> 3') or A-C-G-U (5' -> 3'). Two single-stranded molecules may be considered partially complementary, if only some of the nucleotides bond, or "completely complementary" if all of the nucleotides bond. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands affects the efficiency and strength of the hybridization and amplification reactions. "Fully complementary" refers to the case where bonding occurs between every base pair and its complement in a pair of sequences, and the two sequences have the same number of nucleotides.

The terms "highly stringent" or "highly stringent condition" refer to conditions that permit hybridization of DNA strands whose sequences are highly complementary, wherein these same conditions exclude hybridization of significantly mismatched DNAs. Polynucleotide sequences capable of hybridizing under stringent conditions with the polynucleotides of the present disclosure may be, for example, variants of the disclosed polynucleotide sequences, including allelic or splice variants, or sequences that encode orthologs or paralogs of presently disclosed polypeptides. Nucleic acid hybridization methods are disclosed in detail by Kashima et al. (1985) Nature 313:402-404, and Sambrook et al. (1989) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2nd Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y ("Sambrook"); and by Haymes et al., "Nucleic Acid Hybridization: A Practical Approach", IRL Press, Washington, D.C. (1985), which references are incorporated herein by reference.

In general, stringency is determined by the temperature, ionic strength, and concentration of denaturing agents (e.g., formamide) used in a hybridization and washing procedure (for a more detailed description of establishing and determining stringency, see below). The degree to which two nucleic acids hybridize under various conditions of stringency is correlated with the extent of their similarity. Thus, similar nucleic acid sequences from a variety of sources, such as within a plant's genome (as in the case of paralogs) or from another plant (as in the case of orthologs) that may perform similar functions can be isolated on the basis of their ability to hybridize with known transcription factor sequences. Numerous variations are possible in the conditions and means by which nucleic acid hybridization can be performed to isolate transcription factor sequences having similarity to transcription factor sequences known in the art and are not limited to those explicitly disclosed herein. Such an approach may be used to isolate polynucleotide sequences having various degrees of similarity with disclosed transcription factor sequences, such as, for example, transcription factors having 60% identity, or more preferably greater than about 70% identity, most preferably 72% or greater identity with disclosed transcription factors.

The term "equivalog" describes members of a set of homologous proteins that are conserved with respect to function since their last common ancestor. Related proteins are grouped into equivalog families, and otherwise into protein families with other hierarchically defined homology types. This definition is provided at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) world wide web (www) website, " tigr.org " under the heading "Terms associated with TIGRFAMs".

The term "variant", as used herein, may refer to polynucleotides or polypeptides, that differ from the presently disclosed polynucleotides or polypeptides, respectively, in sequence from each other, and as set forth below.

With regard to polynucleotide variants, differences between presently disclosed polynucleotides and polynucleotide variants are limited so that the nucleotide sequences of the former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, differences between the former and latter nucleotide sequences o may be silent (i.e., the amino acids encoded by the polynucleotide are the same, and the variant polynucleotide sequence encodes the same amino acid sequence as the presently disclosed polynucleotide. Variant nucleotide sequences may encode different amino acid sequences, in which case such nucleotide differences will result in amino acid substitutions, additions, deletions, insertions, truncations or fusions with respect to the similar disclosed polynucleotide sequences. These variations result in polynucleotide variants encoding polypeptides that share at least one functional characteristic. The degeneracy of the genetic code also dictates that many different variant polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing.

Also described herein is a variant of a transcription factor nucleic acid listed in the Sequence Listing, that is, one having a sequence that differs from the one of the polynucleotide sequences in the Sequence Listing, or a complementary sequence, that encodes a functionally equivalent polypeptide (i.e., a polypeptide having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differs in sequence from the sequence in the Sequence Listing, due to degeneracy in the genetic code. Included within this definition are polymorphisms that may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding polypeptide, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding polypeptide.

"Allelic variant" or "polynucleotide allelic variant" refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations may be "silent" or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. "Allelic variant" and "polypeptide allelic variant" may also be used with respect to polypeptides, and in this case the term refer to a polypeptide encoded by an allelic variant of a gene.

"Splice variant" or "polynucleotide splice variant" as used herein refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation naturally occurs as a result of alternative sites being spliced within a single transcribed RNA molecule or between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several different forms of mRNA transcribed from the same gene. This, splice variants may encode polypeptides having different amino acid sequences, which may or may not have similar functions in the organism. "Splice variant" or "polypeptide splice variant" may also refer to a polypeptide encoded by a splice variant of a transcribed mRNA.

As used herein, "polynucleotide variants" may also refer to polynucleotide sequences that encode paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences. "Polypeptide variants" may refer to polypeptide sequences that are paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences.

Differences between presently disclosed polypeptides and polypeptide variants are limited so that the sequences of the former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical. Presently disclosed polypeptide sequences and similar polypeptide variants may differ in amino acid sequence by one or more substitutions, additions, deletions, fusions and truncations, which may be present in any combination. These differences may produce silent changes and result in a functionally equivalent transcription factor. Thus, it will be readily appreciated by those of skill in the art, that any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences is capable of encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides. A polypeptide sequence variant may have "conservative" changes, wherein a substituted amino acid has similar structural or chemical properties. Deliberate amino acid substitutions may thus be made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of the residues, as long as the functional or biological activity of the transcription factor is retained. For example, negatively charged amino acids may include aspartic acid and glutamic acid, positively charged amino acids may include lysine and arginine, and amino acids with uncharged polar head groups having similar hydrophilicity values may include leucine, isoleucine, and valine; glycine and alanine; asparagine and glutamine; serine and threonine; and phenylalanine and tyrosine (for more detail on conservative substitutions, see Table 2). More rarely, a variant may have "non-conservative" changes, e.g., replacement of a glycine with a tryptophan. Similar minor variations may also include amino acid deletions or insertions, or both. Related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues. Guidance in determining which and how many amino acid residues may be substituted, inserted or deleted without abolishing functional or biological activity may be found using computer programs well known in the art, for example, DNASTAR software (see USPN 5,840,544).

"Ligand" refers to any molecule, agent, or compound that will bind specifically to a complementary site on a nucleic acid molecule or protein. Such ligands stabilize or modulate the activity of nucleic acid molecules or proteins and may be composed of at least one of the following: inorganic and organic substances including nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and lipids.

"Modulates" refers to a change in activity (biological, chemical, or immunological) or lifespan resulting from specific binding between a molecule and either a nucleic acid molecule or a protein.

The term "plant" includes whole plants, shoot vegetative organs/structures (e.g., leaves, stems and tubers), roots, flowers and floral organs/structures (e.g., bracts, sepals, petals, stamens, carpels, anthers and ovules), seed (including embryo, endosperm, and seed coat) and fruit (the mature ovary), plant tissue (e.g., vascular tissue, ground tissue, and the like) and cells (e.g., guard cells, egg cells, and the like), and progeny of same. The class of plants that can be used in the method of the invention is generally as broad as the class of higher and lower plants amenable to transformation techniques, including angiosperms (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants), gymnosperms, ferns, horsetails, psilophytes, lycophytes, bryophytes, and multicellular algae. (See for example, Figure 1, adapted from Daly et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333; Figure 2, adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and see also Tudge in The Variety of Life, Oxford University Press, New York, NY (2000) pp. 547-606).

A "transgenic plant" refers to a plant that contains genetic material not found in a wild-type plant of the same species, variety or cultivar. The genetic material may include a transgene, an insertional mutagenesis event (such as by transposon or T-DNA insertional mutagenesis), an activation tagging sequence, a mutated sequence, a homologous recombination event or a sequence modified by chimeraplasty. Typically, the foreign genetic material has been introduced into the plant by human manipulation, but any method can be used as one of skill in the art recognizes.

A transgenic plant may contain an expression vector or cassette. The expression cassette typically comprises a polypeptide-encoding sequence operably linked (i.e., under regulatory control of) to appropriate inducible or constitutive regulatory sequences that allow for the expression of polypeptide. The expression cassette can be introduced into a plant by transformation or by breeding after transformation of a parent plant. A plant refers to a whole plant as well as to a plant part, such as seed, fruit, leaf, or root, plant tissue, plant cells or any other plant material, e.g., a plant explant, as well as to progeny thereof, and to in vitro systems that mimic biochemical or cellular components or processes in a cell.

"Control plant" refers to a plant that serves as a standard of comparison for testing the results of a treatment or genetic alteration, or the degree of altered expression of a gene or gene product. Examples of control plants include plants that are untreated, or genetically unaltered (i.e., wild-type).

"Wild type", as used herein, refers to a cell, tissue or plant that has not been genetically modified to knock out or overexpress one or more of the presently disclosed transcription factors. Wild-type cells, tissue or plants may be used as controls to compare levels of expression and the extent and nature of trait modification with cells, tissue or plants in which transcription factor expression is altered or ectopically expressed, e.g., in that it has been knocked out or overexpressed.

"Fragment", with respect to a polynucleotide, refers to a clone or any part of a polynucleotide molecule that retains a usable, functional characteristic. Useful fragments include oligonucleotides and polynucleotides that may be used in hybridization or amplification technologies or in the regulation of replication, transcription or translation. A polynucleotide fragment" refers to any subsequence of a polynucleotide, typically, of at least about 9 consecutive nucleotides, preferably at least about 30 nucleotides, more preferably at least about 50 nucleotides, of any of the sequences provided herein. Exemplary polynucleotide fragments are the first sixty consecutive nucleotides of the transcription factor polynucleotides listed in the Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments that comprise a region that encodes a conserved domain of a transcription factor.

Fragments may also include subsequences of polypeptides and protein molecules, or a subsequence of the polypeptide. Fragments may have uses in that they may have antigenic potential. In some cases, the fragment or domain is a subsequence of the polypeptide which performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA-binding site or domain that binds to a DNA promoter region, an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions, and may initiate transcription. Fragments can vary in size from as few as 3 amino acids to the full length of the intact polypeptide, but are preferably at least about 30 amino acids in length and more preferably at least about 60 amino acids in length. Exemplary polypeptide fragments are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of a mammalian protein encoded by are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of the transcription factor polypeptides listed in the Sequence Listing. Exemplary fragments also include fragments that comprise a conserved domain of a transcription factor.

The present disclosure also encompasses production of DNA sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor derivatives, or fragments thereof, entirely by synthetic chemistry. After production, the synthetic sequence may be inserted into any of the many available expression vectors and cell systems using reagents well known in the art. Moreover, synthetic chemistry may be used to introduce mutations into a sequence encoding transcription factors or any fragment thereof.

"Derivative" refers to the chemical modification of a nucleic acid molecule or amino acid sequence. Chemical modifications can include replacement of hydrogen by an alkyl, acyl, or amino group or glycosylation, pegylation, or any similar process that retains or enhances biological activity or lifespan of the molecule or sequence.

A "trait" refers to a physiological, morphological, biochemical, or physical characteristic of a plant or particular plant material or cell. In some instances, this characteristic is visible to the human eye, such as seed or plant size, or can be measured by biochemical techniques, such as detecting the protein, starch, or oil content of seed or leaves, or by observation of a metabolic or physiological process, e.g, by measuring uptake of carbon dioxide, or by the observation of the expression level of a gene or genes, e.g., by employing Northern analysis, RT-PCR, microarray gene expression assays, or reporter gene expression systems, or by agricultural observations such as stress tolerance, yield, or pathogen tolerance. Any technique can be used to measure the amount of, comparative level of, or difference in any selected chemical compound or macromolecule in the transgenic plants, however.

"Trait modification" refers to a detectable difference in a characteristic in a plant of the present invention ectopically expressing a polynucleotide or polypeptide relative to a plant not doing so, such as a wild-type plant. In some cases, the trait modification can be evaluated quantitatively. For example, the trait modification can entail at least about a 2% increase or decrease in an observed trait (difference), at least a 5% difference, at least about a 10% difference, at least about a 20% difference, at least about a 30%, at least about a 50%, at least about a 70%, or at least about a 100%, or an even greater difference compared with a wild-type plant. It is known that there can be a natural variation in the modified trait. Therefore, the trait modification observed entails a change of the normal distribution of the trait in the plants compared with the distribution observed in wild-type plants.

The term "transcript profile" refers to the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell in a particular state, particularly by comparison with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a cell of the same type in a reference state. For example, the transcript profile of a particular transcription factor in a suspension cell is the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell overexpressing that transcription factor compared with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a suspension cell that has normal levels of that transcription factor. The transcript profile can be presented as a list of those genes whose expression level is significantly different between the two treatments, and the difference ratios.. Differences and similarities between expression levels may also be evaluated and calculated using statistical and clustering methods.

"Ectopic expression or altered expression" in reference to a polynucleotide indicates that the pattern of expression in, e.g., a transgenic plant or plant tissue, is different from the expression pattern in a wild-type plant or a reference plant of the same species. The pattern of expression may also be compared with a reference expression pattern in a wild-type plant of the same species. For example, the polynucleotide or polypeptide is expressed in a cell or tissue type other than a cell or tissue type in which the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by expression at a time other than at the time the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by a response to different inducible agents, such as hormones or environmental signals, or at different expression levels (either higher or lower) compared with those found in a wild-type plant. The term also refers to altered expression patterns that are produced by lowering the levels of expression to below the detection level or completely abolishing expression. The resulting expression pattern can be transient or stable, constitutive or inducible. In reference to a polypeptide, the term "ectopic expression or altered expression" further may relate to altered activity levels resulting from the interactions of the polypeptides with exogenous or endogenous modulators or from interactions with factors or as a result of the chemical modification of the polypeptides.

The term "overexpression" as used herein refers to a greater expression level of a gene in a plant, plant cell or plant tissue, compared to expression in a wild-type plant, cell or tissue, at any developmental or temporal stage for the gene. Overexpression can occur when, for example, the genes encoding one or more transcription factors are under the control of a strong expression signal, such as one of the promoters described herein (e.g., the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcription initiation region). Overexpression may occur throughout a plant or in specific tissues of the plant, depending on the promoter used, as described below.

Overexpression may take place in plant cells normally lacking expression of polypeptides functionally equivalent or identical to the present transcription factors. Overexpression may also occur in plant cells where endogenous expression of the present transcription factors or functionally equivalent molecules normally occurs, but such normal expression is at a lower level.. Overexpression thus results in a greater than normal production, or "overproduction" of the transcription factor in the plant, cell or tissue.

The term "phase change" refers to a plant's progression from embryo to adult, and, by some definitions, the transition wherein flowering plants gain reproductive competency. It is believed that phase change occurs either after a certain number of cell divisions in the shoot apex of a developing plant, or when the shoot apex achieves a particular distance from the roots. Thus, altering the timing of phase changes may affect a plant's size, which, in turn, may affect yield and biomass.

"Tolerance" results from specific, heritable characteristics of a host plant that allow a pathogen to develop and multiply in the host while the host, either by lacking receptor sites for, or by inactivating or compensating for the irritant secretions of the pathogen, still manages to thrive or, in the case of crop plants, produce a good crop. Tolerant plants are susceptible to the pathogen but are not killed by it and generally show little damage from the pathogen (Agrios (1988) Plant Pathology, 3rd ed. Academic Press, N.Y., p. 129).

"Resistance", also referred to as "true resistance", results when a plant contains one or more genes that make the plant and a potential pathogen more or less incompatible with each other, either because of a lack of chemical recognition between the host and the pathogen, or because the host plant can defend itself against the pathogen by defense mechanisms already present or activated in response to infection (Agrios (1988)) Plant Pathology, 3rd ed. Academic Press, N.Y., p. 125).

A "sample" with respect to a material containing nucleic acid molecules may comprise a bodily fluid; an extract from a cell, chromosome, organelle, or membrane isolated from a cell; genomic DNA, RNA, or cDNA in solution or bound to a substrate; a cell; a tissue; a tissue print; a forensic sample; and the like. In this context "substrate" refers to any rigid or semi-rigid support to which nucleic acid molecules or proteins are bound and includes membranes, filters, chips, slides, wafers, fibers, magnetic or nonmagnetic beads, gels, capillaries or other tubing, plates, polymers, and microparticles with a variety of surface forms including wells, trenches, pins, channels and pores. A substrate may also refer to a reactant in a chemical or biological reaction, or a substance acted upon (e.g., by an enzyme).

"Substantially purified" refers to nucleic acid molecules or proteins that are removed from their natural environment and are isolated or separated, and are at least about 60% free, preferably about 75% free, and most preferably about 90% free, from other components with which they are naturally associated.

Trait modifications of particular interest include those to seed (such as embryo or endosperm), fruit, root, flower, leaf, stem, shoot, seedling or the like, including: enhanced tolerance to environmental conditions including freezing, chilling, heat, drought, water saturation, radiation and ozone; improved tolerance to microbial, fungal or viral diseases; improved tolerance to pest infestations, including insects, nematodes, mollicutes, parasitic higher plants or the like; decreased herbicide sensitivity; improved tolerance of heavy metals or enhanced ability to take up heavy metals; improved growth under poor photoconditions (e.g., low light and/or short day length), or changes in expression levels of genes of interest. Other phenotype that can be modified relate to the production of plant metabolites, such as variations in the production of taxol, tocopherol, tocotrienol, sterols, phytosterols, vitamins, wax monomers, anti-oxidants, amino acids, lignins, cellulose, tannins, prenyllipids (such as chlorophylls and carotenoids), glucosinolates, and terpenoids, enhanced or compositionally altered protein or oil production (especially in seeds), or modified sugar (insoluble or soluble) and/or starch composition. Physical plant characteristics that can be modified include cell development (such as the number of trichomes), fruit and seed size and number, yields of plant parts such as stems, leaves, inflorescences, and roots, the stability of the seeds during storage, characteristics of the seed pod (e.g., susceptibility to shattering), root hair length and quantity, internode distances, or the quality of seed coat. Plant growth characteristics that can be modified include growth rate, germination rate of seeds, vigor of plants and seedlings, leaf and flower senescence, male sterility, apomixis, flowering time, flower abscission, rate of nitrogen uptake, osmotic sensitivity to soluble sugar concentrations, biomass or transpiration characteristics, as well as plant architecture characteristics such as apical dominance, branching patterns, number of organs, organ identity, organ shape or size.

Expression of genes that encode transcription factors that modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins are well known in the art. In addition, transgenic plants comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins. Examples include Peng et al. (1997, Genes Development 11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999, Nature, 400: 256-261). In addition, many others have demonstrated that an Arabidopsis transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See, for example, Fu et al. (2001, Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et al. (2000, Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995, Nature 377: 482-483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).

In another example, Mandel et al. (1992, Cell 71-133-143) and Suzuki et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 409-418) teach that a transcription factor expressed in another plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response of the endogenous sequence, as often predicted in earlier studies of Arabidopsis transcription factors in Arabidopsis (see Mandel et al. 1992, supra; Suzuki et al. 2001, supra).

Other examples include Miller et al. (2001, Plant J. 28: 169-179); Kim et al. (2001, Plant J. 25: 247-259); Kyozuka and Shimamoto (2002, Plant Cell Physiol. 43: 130-135); Boss and Thomas (2002, Nature, 416: 847-850); He et al. (2000, Transgenic Res. 9: 223-227); and Robson et al. (2001, Plant J. 28:619-631).

In yet another example, Gilmour et al. (1998, Plant J. 16: 433-442) teach an Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factor, CBF1, which, when overexpressed in transgenic plants, increases plant freezing tolerance. Jaglo et al. (2001, Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917) further identified sequences in Brassica napus which encode CBF-like genes and that transcripts for these genes accumulated rapidly in response to low temperature. Transcripts encoding CBF-like proteins were also found to accumulate rapidly in response to low temperature in wheat, as well as in tomato. An alignment of the CBF proteins from Arabidopsis, B. napus, wheat, rye, and tomato revealed the presence of conserved consecutive amino acid residues, PKK/RPAGRxKFxETRHP and DSAWR, that bracket the AP2/EREBP DNA binding domains of the proteins and distinguish them from other members of the - AP2/EREBP protein family. (See Jaglo et al. supra.)

Transcription factors mediate cellular responses and control traits through altered expression of genes containing cis-acting nucleotide sequences that are targets of the introduced transcription factor. It is well appreciated in the Art that the effect of a transcription factor on cellular responses or a cellular trait is determined by the particular genes whose expression is either directly or indirectly (e.g., by a cascade of transcription factor binding events and transcriptional changes) altered by transcription factor binding. In a global analysis of transcription comparing a standard condition with one in which a transcription factor is overexpressed, the resulting transcript profile associated with transcription factor overexpression is related to the trait or cellular process controlled by that transcription factor. For example, the PAP2 gene (and other genes in the MYB family) have been shown to control anthocyanin biosynthesis through regulation of the expression of genes known to be involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Bruce et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 65-79; and Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 2383-2393). Further, global transcript profiles have been used successfully as diagnostic tools for specific cellular states (e.g., cancerous vs. non-cancerous; Bhattacharjee et al. (2001) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 13790-13795; and Xu et al. (2001) Proc Natl Acad Sci, USA 98: 15089-15094). Consequently, it is evident to one skilled in the art that similarity of transcript profile upon overexpression of different transcription factors would indicate similarity of transcription factor function.

Described herein among other things, transcription factors (TFs), and transcription factor homolog polypeptides, and isolated or recombinant polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides, or novel sequence variant polypeptides or polynucleotides encoding novel variants of transcription factors derived from the specific sequences provided here. These polypeptides and polynucleotides may be employed to modify a plant's characteristics.

Exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides were identified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. In addition, further exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides were identified in the plant GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. Polynucleotide sequences meeting such criteria were confirmed as transcription factors.

Additional polynucleotides were identified by screening Arabidopsis thaliana and/or other plant cDNA libraries with probes corresponding to known transcription factors under low stringency hybridization conditions. Additional sequences, including full length coding sequences were subsequently recovered by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) procedure, using a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Where necessary, multiple rounds of RACE are performed to isolate 5' and 3' ends. The full-length cDNA was then recovered by a routine end-to-end polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific to the isolated 5' and 3' ends. Exemplary sequences are provided in the Sequence Listing.

The polynucleotides can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor or knockout plants and the changes in the characteristic(s) or trait(s) of the plants observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to improve the characteristics of plants.

The polynucleotides can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor plant cells and the changes in the expression levels of a number of genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of the plant cells observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to change expression levels of a genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of plants.

The polynucleotides include sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides and sequences complementary thereto, as well as unique fragments of coding sequence, or sequence complementary thereto. Such polynucleotides can be, e.g., DNA or RNA, e.g., mRNA, cRNA, synthetic RNA, genomic DNA, cDNA synthetic DNA, oligonucleotides, etc. The polynucleotides are either double-stranded or single-stranded, and include either, or both sense (i.e., coding) sequences and antisense (i.e., non-coding, complementary) sequences. The polynucleotides include the coding sequence of a transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog polypeptide, in isolation, in combination with additional coding sequences (e.g., a purification tag, a localization signal, as a fusion-protein, as a pre-protein, or the like), in combination with non-coding sequences (e.g., introns or inteins, regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, and the like), and/or in a vector or host environment in which the polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide is an endogenous or exogenous gene_.

A variety of methods exist for producing the polynucleotides described herein. Procedures for identifying and isolating DNA clones are well known to those of skill in the art, and are described in, e.g., Berger and Kimmel, Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques, Methods in Enzymology, vol. 152 Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, CA ("Berger"); Sambrook et al. Molecular Cloning - A Laboratory Manual (2nd Ed.), Vol. 1-3, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, 1989 ("Sambrook") and Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, Ausubel et al. eds., Current Protocols, a joint venture between Greene Publishing Associates, Inc. and John Wiley & Sons, Inc., (supplemented through 2000) ("Ausubel").

Alternatively, polynucleotides can be produced by a variety of in vitro amplification methods adapted to the present disclosure by appropriate selection of specific or degenerate primers. Examples of protocols sufficient to direct persons of skill through in vitro amplification methods, including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the ligase chain reaction (LCR), Qbeta-replicase amplification and other RNA polymerase mediated techniques (e.g., NASBA), e.g., for the production of the homologous nucleic acids are found in Berger (supra), Sambrook (supra), and Ausubel (supra), as well as Mullis et al. (1987) PCR Protocols A Guide to Methods and Applications (Innis et al. eds) Academic Press Inc. San Diego, CA (1990) (Innis). Improved methods for cloning in vitro amplified nucleic acids are described in Wallace et al. US Pat. No. 5,426,039. Improved methods for amplifying large nucleic acids by PCR are summarized in Cheng et al. (1994) Nature 369: 684-685 and the references cited therein, in which PCR amplicons of up to 40kb are generated. One of skill will appreciate that essentially any RNA can be converted into a double stranded DNA suitable for restriction digestion, PCR expansion and sequencing using reverse transcriptase and a polymerase. See, e.g., Ausubel, Sambrook and Berger, all supra.

Alternatively, polynucleotides and oligonucleotides can be assembled from fragments produced by solid-phase synthesis methods. Typically, fragments of up to approximately 100 bases are individually synthesized and then enzymatically or chemically ligated to produce a desired sequence, e.g., a polynucleotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor. For example, chemical synthesis using the phosphoramidite method is described, e.g., by Beaucage et al. (1981) Tetrahedron Letters 22: 1859-1869; and Matthes et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3: 801-805. According to such methods, oligonucleotides are synthesized, purified, annealed to their complementary strand, ligated and then optionally cloned into suitable vectors. And if so desired, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be custom ordered from any of a number of commercial suppliers.

Sequences homologous to SEQ ID NO:328, i.e. those that have at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of SEQ ID NO:328 derived from Arabidopsis thaliana or from other plants of choice, may also be used in the plants, methods and uses of the invention.

Homologous sequences can be derived from any plant including monocots and dicots and in particular agriculturally important plant species, including but not limited to, crops such as soybean, wheat, corn (maize), potato, cotton, rice, rape, oilseed rape (including canola), sunflower, alfalfa, clover, sugarcane, and turf; or fruits and vegetables, such as banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, and raspberry, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant, grapes, honeydew, lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas, peppers, pineapple, pumpkin, spinach, squash, sweet corn, tobacco, tomato, tomatillo, watermelon, rosaceous fruits (such as apple, peach, pear, cherry and plum) and vegetable brassicas (such as broccoli, cabbage, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts, and kohlrabi). Other crops, including fruits and vegetables, whose phenotype can be changed and which comprise homologous sequences include barley; rye; millet; sorghum; currant; avocado; citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, grapefruit and tangerines, artichoke, cherries; nuts such as the walnut and peanut; endive; leek; roots such as arrowroot, beet, cassava, turnip, radish, yam, and sweet potato; and beans. The homologous sequences may also be derived from woody species, such pine, poplar and eucalyptus, or mint or other labiates. In addition, homologous sequences may be derived from plants that are evolutionarily-related to crop plants, but which may not have yet been used as crop plants. Examples include deadly nightshade (Atropa belladona), related to tomato; jimson weed (Datura strommium), related to peyote; and teosinte (Zea species), related to corn (maize).

Homologous sequences as described above can comprise orthologous or paralogous sequences. Several different methods are known by those of skill in the art for identifying and defining these functionally homologous sequences. Three general methods for defining orthologs and paralogs are described; an ortholog, paralog or homolog may be identified by one or more of the methods described below.

Orthologs and paralogs are evolutionarily related genes that have similar sequence and similar functions. Orthologs are structurally related genes in different species that are derived by a speciation event. Paralogs are structurally related genes within a single species that are derived by a duplication event.

Within a single plant species, gene duplication may cause two copies of a particular gene, giving rise to two or more genes with similar sequence and often similar function known as paralogs. A paralog is therefore a similar gene formed by duplication within the same species. Paralogs typically cluster together or in the same clade (a group of similar genes) when a gene family phylogeny is analyzed using programs such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 266: 383-402). Groups of similar genes can also be identified with pair-wise BLAST analysis (Feng and Doolittle (1987) J. Mol. Evol. 25: 351-360). For example, a clade of very similar MADS domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis all share a common function in flowering time (Ratcliffe et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 126: 122-132), and a group of very similar AP2 domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis are involved in tolerance of plants to freezing (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442). Analysis of groups of similar genes with similar function that fall within one clade can yield sub-sequences that are particular to the clade. These sub-sequences, known as consensus sequences, can not only be used to define the sequences within each clade, but define the functions of these genes; genes within a clade may contain paralogous sequences, or orthologous sequences that share the same function (see also, for example, Mount (2001), in Bioinformatics: Sequences and Genome Analysis Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, page 543.)

Speciation, the production of new species from a parental species, can also give rise to two or more genes with similar sequence and similar function. These genes, termed orthologs, often have an identical function within their host plants and are often interchangeable between species without losing function. Because plants have common ancestors, many genes in any plant species will have a corresponding orthologous gene in another plant species. Once a phylogenic tree for a gene family of one species has been constructed using a program such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) supra) potential orthologous sequences can be placed into the phylogenetic tree and their relationship to genes from the species of interest can be determined. Orthologous sequences can also be identified by a reciprocal BLAST strategy. Once an orthologous sequence has been identified, the function of the ortholog can be deduced from the identified function of the reference sequence.

Transcription factor gene sequences are conserved across diverse eukaryotic species lines (Goodrich et al. (1993) Cell 75: 519-530; Lin et al. (1991) Nature 353: 569-571; Sadowski et al. (1988) Nature 335: 563-564). Plants are no exception to this observation; diverse plant species possess transcription factors that have similar sequences and functions.

Orthologous genes from different organisms have highly conserved functions, and very often essentially identical functions (Lee et al. (2002) Genome Res. 12: 493-502; Remm et al. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052). Paralogous genes, which have diverged through gene duplication, may retain similar functions of the encoded proteins. In such cases, paralogs can be used interchangeably with respect to certain embodiments of the instant invention (for example, transgenic expression of a coding sequence). An example of such highly related paralogs is the CBF family, with three well-defined members in Arabidopsis and at least one ortholog in Brassica napus (SEQ ID NOs: 2238, 2240, 2242, and 2244, respectively), all of which control pathways involved in both freezing and drought stress (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442; Jaglo et al. (1998) Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917).

The following references represent a small sampling of the many studies that demonstrate that conserved transcription factor genes from diverse species are likely to function similarly (i.e., regulate similar target sequences and control the same traits), and that transcription factors may be transformed into diverse species to confer or improve traits.

1. (1) The Arabidopsis NPR1 gene regulates systemic acquired resistance (SAR); over-expression of NPR1 leads to enhanced resistance in Arabidopsis. When either Arabidopsis NPR1 or the rice NPR1 ortholog was overexpressed in rice (which, as a monocot, is diverse from Arabidopsis), challenge with the rice bacterial blight pathogen Xanthomonas oryzae pv. Oryzae, the transgenic plants displayed enhanced resistance (Chern et al. (2001) Plant J. 27: 101-113). NPR1 acts through activation of expression of transcription factor genes, such as TGA2 (Fan and Dong (2002) Plant Cell 14: 1377-1389).
2. (2) E2F genes are involved in transcription of plant genes for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Plant E2Fs share a high degree of similarity in amino acid sequence between monocots and dicots, and are even similar to the conserved domains of the animal E2Fs. Such conservation indicates a functional similarity between plant and animal E2Fs. E2F transcription factors that regulate meristem development act through common cis-elements, and regulate related (PCNA) genes (Kosugi and Ohashi, (2002) Plant J. 29: 45-59).
3. (3) The ABI5 gene (ABA insensitive 5) encodes a basic leucine zipper factor required for ABA response in the seed and vegetative tissues. Co-transformation experiments with ABI5 cDNA constructs in rice protoplasts resulted in specific transactivation of the ABA-inducible wheat, Arabidopsis, bean, and barley promoters. These results demonstrate that sequentially similar ABI5 transcription factors are key targets of a conserved ABA signaling pathway in diverse plants. (Gampala et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 1689-1694).
4. (4) Sequences of three Arabidopsis GAMYB-like genes were obtained on the basis of sequence similarity to GAMYB genes from barley, rice, and L. temulentum. These three Arabadopsis genes were determined to encode transcription factors (AtMYB33, AtMYB65, and AtMYB101) and could substitute for a barley GAMYB and control alpha-amylase expression (Gocal et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1682-1693).
5. (5) The floral control gene LEAFY from Arabidopsis can dramatically accelerate flowering in numerous dictoyledonous plants. Constitutive expression of Arabidopsis LEAFY also caused early flowering in transgenic rice (a monocot), with a heading date that was 26-34 days earlier than that of wild-type plants. These observations indicate that floral regulatory genes from Arabidopsis are useful tools for heading date improvement in cereal crops (He et al. (2000) Transgenic Res. 9: 223-227).
6. (6) Bioactive gibberellins (GAs) are essential endogenous regulators of plant growth. GA signaling tends to be conserved across the plant kingdom. GA signaling is mediated via GAI, a nuclear member of the GRAS family of plant transcription factors. Arabidopsis GAI has been shown to function in rice to inhibit gibberellin response pathways (Fu et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802).
7. (7) The Arabidopsis gene SUPERMAN (SUP), encodes a putative transcription factor that maintains the boundary between stamens and carpels. By over-expressing Arabidopsis SUP in rice, the effect of the gene's presence on whorl boundaries was shown to be conserved. This demonstrated that SUP is a conserved regulator of floral whorl boundaries and affects cell proliferation (Nandi et al. (2000) Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218).
8. (8) Maize, petunia and Arabidopsis myb transcription factors that regulate flavonoid biosynthesis are very genetically similar and affect the same trait in their native species, therefore sequence and function of these myb transcription factors correlate with each other in these diverse species (Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 2383-2394).
9. (9) Wheat reduced height-1 (Rht-B 1/Rht-D1) and maize dwarf-8 (d8) genes are orthologs of the Arabidopsis gibberellin insensitive (GAI) gene. Both of these genes have been used to produce dwarf grain varieties that have improved grain yield. These genes encode proteins that resemble nuclear transcription factors and contain an SH2-like domain, indicating that phosphotyrosine may participate in gibberellin signaling. Transgenic rice plants containing a mutant GAI allele from Arabidopsis have been shown to produce reduced responses to gibberellin and are dwarfed, indicating that mutant GAI orthologs could be used to increase yield in a wide range of crop species (Peng et al. (1999) Nature 400: 256-261).

At the nucleotide level, the sequences will typically share at least about 40% nucleotide sequence identity, preferably at least about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80% sequence identity, and more preferably about 85%, about 90%, about 95% or about 97% or more sequence identity to one or more of the listed sequences, or to a listed sequence but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or outside one or all conserved domain. The degeneracy of the genetic code enables major variations in the nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide while maintaining the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein. Conserved domains within a transcription factor family may exhibit a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least at least 80% sequence identity, and more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% sequence identity. Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed sequences should share at least 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of the polypeptide or the homolog.

Percent identity can be determined electronically, e.g., by using the MEGALIGN program (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, Wis.). The MEGALIGN program can create alignments between two or more sequences according to different methods, for example, the clustal method. (See, for example, Higgins and Sharp (1988) Gene 73: 237-244.) The clustal algorithm groups sequences into clusters by examining the distances between all pairs. The clusters are aligned pairwise and then in groups. Other alignment algorithms or programs may be used, including FASTA, BLAST, or ENTREZ, FASTA and BLAST, and which may be used to calculate percent similarity. These are available as a part of the GCG sequence analysis package (University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis.), and can be used with or without default settings. ENTREZ is available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. In one embodiment, the percent identity of two sequences can be determined by the GCG program with a gap weight of 1, e.g., each amino acid gap is weighted as if it were a single amino acid or nucleotide mismatch between the two sequences (see USPN 6,262,333).

Other techniques for alignment are described in Methods in Enzymology, vol. 266, Computer Methods for Macromolecular Sequence Analysis (1996), ed. Doolittle, Academic Press, Inc., San Diego, Calif., USA. Preferably, an alignment program that permits gaps in the sequence is utilized to align the sequences. The Smith-Waterman is one type of algorithm that permits gaps in sequence alignments (see Shpaer (1997) Methods Mol. Biol. 70: 173-187). Also, the GAP program using the Needleman and Wunsch alignment method can be utilized to align sequences. An alternative search strategy uses MPSRCH software, which runs on a MASPAR computer. MPSRCH uses a Smith-Waterman algorithm to score sequences on a massively parallel computer. This approach improves ability to pick up distantly related matches, and is especially tolerant of small gaps and nucleotide sequence errors. Nucleic acid-encoded amino acid sequences can be used to search both protein and DNA databases.

The percentage similarity between two polypeptide sequences, e.g., sequence A and sequence B, is calculated by dividing the length of sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence B, into the sum of the residue matches between sequence A and sequence B, times one hundred. Gaps of low or of no similarity between the two amino acid sequences are not included in determining percentage similarity. Percent identity between polynucleotide sequences can also be counted or calculated by other methods known in the art, e.g., the Jotun Hein method. (See, e.g., Hein (1990) Methods Enzymol. 183: 626-645.) Identity between sequences can also be determined by other methods known in the art, e.g., by varying hybridization conditions (see US Patent Application No. 20010010913).

The percent identity between two conserved domains of a transcription factor DNA-binding domain consensus polypeptide sequence can be as low as 16%, as exemplified in the case of GATA1 family of eukaryotic Cys₂/Cys₂-type zinc finger transcription factors. The DNA-binding domain consensus polypeptide sequence of the GATA1 family is CX₂CX₁₇CX₂C, where X is any amino acid residue. (See, for example, Takatsuji, supra.) Other examples of such conserved consensus polypeptide sequences with low overall percent sequence identity are well known to those of skill in the art.

Thus, described herein are methods for identifying a sequence similar or paralogous or orthologous or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence. In the methods, a sequence database is provided (locally or across an internet or intranet) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.

In addition, one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to search against a BLOCKS (Bairoch et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 217-221), PFAM, and other databases which contain previously identified and annotated motifs, sequences and gene functions. Methods that search for primary sequence patterns with secondary structure gap penalties (Smith et al. (1992) Protein Engineering 5: 35-51) as well as algorithms such as Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul (1993) J. Mol. Evol. 36: 290-300; Altschul et al. (1990) supra), BLOCKS (Henikoff and Henikoff (1991) Nucleic Acids Res. 19: 6565-6572), Hidden Markov Models (HMM; Eddy (1996) Curr. Opin. Str. Biol. 6: 361-365; Sonnhammer et al. (1997) Proteins 28:405-420), and the like, can be used to manipulate and analyze polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences encoded by polynucleotides. These databases, algorithms and other methods are well known in the art and are described in Ausubel et al. (1997; Short Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, unit 7.7) and in Meyers (1995; Molecular Biology and Biotechnology, Wiley VCH, New York, NY, p 856-853).

A further method for identifying or confirming that specific homologous sequences control the same function is by comparison of the transcript profile(s) obtained upon overexpression or knockout of two or more related transcription factors. Since transcript profiles are diagnostic for specific cellular states, one skilled in the art will appreciate that genes that have a highly similar transcript profile (e.g., with greater than 50% regulated transcripts in common, more preferably with greater than 70% regulated transcripts in common, most preferably with greater than 90% regulated transcripts in common) will have highly similar functions. Fowler et al. (2002) Plant Cell 14: 1675-79) have shown that three paralogous AP2 family genes (CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3), each of which is induced upon cold treatment, and each of which can condition improved freezing tolerance, have highly similar transcript profiles. Once a transcription factor has been shown to provide a specific function, its transcript profile becomes a diagnostic tool to determine whether putative paralogs or orthologs have the same function.

Furthermore, methods using manual alignment of sequences similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to identify regions of similarity and conserved domains. Such manual methods are well-known of those of skill in the art and can include, for example, comparisons of tertiary structure between a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide which comprises a known function with a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide sequence which has a function not yet determined. Such examples of tertiary structure may comprise predicted alpha helices, beta-sheets, amphipathic helices, leucine zipper motifs, zinc finger motifs, proline-rich regions, cysteine repeat motifs, and the like.

Orthologs and paralogs of presently disclosed transcription factors may be cloned using compositions provided by the present disclosure according to methods well known in the art. cDNAs can be cloned using mRNA from a plant cell or tissue that expresses one of the present transcription factors. Appropriate mRNA sources may be identified by interrogating Northern blots with probes designed from the present transcription factor sequences, after which a library is prepared from the mRNA obtained from a positive cell or tissue. Transcription factor-encoding cDNA is then isolated using, for example, PCR, using primers designed from a presently disclosed transcription factor gene sequence, or by probing with a partial or complete cDNA or with one or more sets of degenerate probes based on the disclosed sequences. The cDNA library may be used to transform plant cells. Expression of the cDNAs of interest is detected using, for example, methods disclosed herein such as microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in expression. Genomic clones may be isolated using similar techniques to those.

Polynucleotides homologous to the sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing and tables can be identified, e.g., by hybridization to each other under stringent or under highly stringent conditions. Single stranded polynucleotides hybridize when they associate based on a variety of well characterized physical-chemical forces, such as hydrogen bonding, solvent exclusion, base stacking and the like. The stringency of a hybridization reflects the degree of sequence identity of the nucleic acids involved, such that the higher the stringency, the more similar are the two polynucleotide strands. Stringency is influenced by a variety of factors, including temperature, salt concentration and composition, organic and non-organic additives, solvents, etc. present in both the hybridization and wash solutions and incubations (and number thereof), as described in more detail in the references cited above.

Encompassed by the disclosure are polynucleotide sequences that are capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide sequences, including any of the transcription factor polynucleotides within the Sequence Listing, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency (See, for example, Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399-407; and Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511). In addition to the nucleotide sequences listed in Tables 4-9, full length cDNA, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be identified and isolated using well-known methods. The cDNA libraries, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be screened using hybridization methods to determine their utility as hybridization target or amplification probes.

With regard to hybridization, conditions that are highly stringent, and means for achieving them, are well known in the art. See, for example, Sambrook et al. (1989) "Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual" (2nd ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory); Berger and Kimmel, eds., (1987) "Guide to Molecular Cloning Techniques", In Methods in Enzymology:152: 467-469; and Anderson and Young (1985) "Quantitative Filter Hybridisation." In: Hames and Higgins, ed., Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, A Practical Approach. Oxford, IRL Press, 73-111.

Stability of DNA duplexes is affected by such factors as base composition, length, and degree of base pair mismatch. Hybridization conditions may be adjusted to allow DNAs of different sequence relatedness to hybridize. The melting temperature (T_m) is defined as the temperature when 50% of the duplex molecules have dissociated into their constituent single strands. The melting temperature of a perfectly matched duplex, where the hybridization buffer contains formamide as a denaturing agent, may be estimated by the following equations:

1. (I) DNA-DNA: $${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{m}}\left(\mathrm{°C}\right)\mathrm{=}\mathrm{81.5}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{16.6}\left(\log \left[\mathrm{Na}\mathrm{+}\right]\right)\mathrm{+}\mathrm{0.41}\left(\mathrm{\%}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{C}\right)\mathrm{-}\mathrm{0.62}\left(\%\mathrm{formamide}\right)-500/L$$
2. (II) DNA-RNA: $${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{m}}\left(\mathrm{°C}\right)\mathrm{=}79.8\mathrm{+}18.5\left(\log \left[\mathrm{Na}\mathrm{+}\right]\right)\mathrm{+}0.58\left(\mathrm{\%}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{C}\right)+0.12{\left(\mathrm{\%}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{C}\right)}^2-0.5\left(\%\mathrm{formamide}\right)-820/L$$
3. (III) RNA-RNA: $${\mathrm{T}}_{\mathrm{m}}\left(\mathrm{°C}\right)\mathrm{=}79.8\mathrm{+}18.5\left(\log \left[\mathrm{Na}\mathrm{+}\right]\right)\mathrm{+}0.58\left(\mathrm{\%}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{C}\right)+0.12{\left(\mathrm{\%}\mathrm{G}\mathrm{+}\mathrm{C}\right)}^2-0.35\left(\%\mathrm{formamide}\right)-820/L$$

Hybridization experiments are generally conducted in a buffer of pH between 6.8 to 7.4, although the rate of hybridization is nearly independent of pH at ionic strengths likely to be used in the hybridization buffer (Anderson et al. (1985) supra). In addition, one or more of the following may be used to reduce non-specific hybridization: sonicated salmon sperm DNA or another non-complementary DNA, bovine serum albumin, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), polyvinylpyrrolidone, ficoll and Denhardt's solution. Dextran sulfate and polyethylene glycol 6000 act to exclude DNA from solution, thus raising the effective probe DNA concentration and the hybridization signal within a given unit of time. In some instances, conditions of even greater stringency may be desirable or required to reduce non-specific and/or background hybridization. These conditions may be created with the use of higher temperature, lower ionic strength and higher concentration of a denaturing agent such as formamide.

Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, or to highly similar fragments such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. The stringency can be adjusted either during the hybridization step or in the post-hybridization washes. Salt concentration, formamide concentration, hybridization temperature and probe lengths are variables that can be used to alter stringency (as described by the formula above). As a general guidelines high stringency is typically performed at T_m-5° C to T_m-20° C, moderate stringency at T_m-20° C to T_m-35° C and low stringency at T_m-35° C to T_m-50°C for duplex >150 base pairs. Hybridization may be performed at low to moderate stringency (25-50° C below T_m), followed by post-hybridization washes at increasing stringencies. Maximum rates of hybridization in solution are determined empirically to occur at T_m-25° C for DNA-DNA duplex and T_m-15° C for RNA-DNA duplex. Optionally, the degree of dissociation may be assessed after each wash step to determine the need for subsequent, higher stringency wash steps.

High stringency conditions may be used to select for nucleic acid sequences with high degrees of identity to the disclosed sequences. An example of stringent hybridization conditions obtained in a filter-based method such as a Southern or northern blot for hybridization of complementary nucleic acids that have more than 100 complementary residues is about 5°C to 20°C lower than the thermal melting point (T_m) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH. Conditions used for hybridization may include about 0.02 M to about 0.15 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% to about 5% casein, about 0.02% SDS or about 0.1% N-laurylsarcosine, about 0.001 M to about 0.03 M sodium citrate, at hybridization temperatures between about 50° C and about 70° C. More preferably, high stringency conditions are about 0.02 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% casein, about 0.02% SDS, about 0.001 M sodium citrate, at a temperature of about 50° C. Nucleic acid molecules that hybridize under stringent conditions will typically hybridize to a probe based on either the entire DNA molecule or selected portions, e.g., to a unique subsequence, of the DNA.

Stringent salt concentration will ordinarily be less than about 750 mM NaCl and 75 mM trisodium citrate. Increasingly stringent conditions may be obtained with less than about 500 mM NaCl and 50 mM trisodium citrate, to even greater stringency with less than about 250 mM NaCl and 25 mM trisodium citrate. Low stringency hybridization can be obtained in the absence of organic solvent, e.g., formamide, whereas high stringency hybridization may be obtained in the presence of at least about 35% formamide, and more preferably at least about 50% formamide. Stringent temperature conditions will ordinarily include temperatures of at least about 30° C, more preferably of at least about 37° C, and most preferably of at least about 42° C with formamide present. Varying additional parameters, such as hybridization time, the concentration of detergent, e.g., sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) and ionic strength, are well known to those skilled in the art. Various levels of stringency are accomplished by combining these various conditions as needed.

The washing steps that follow hybridization may also vary in stringency; the post-hybridization wash steps primarily determine hybridization specificity, with the most critical factors being temperature and the ionic strength of the final wash solution. Wash stringency can be increased by decreasing salt concentration or by increasing temperature. Stringent salt concentration for the wash steps will preferably be less than about 30 mM NaCl and 3 mM trisodium citrate, and most preferably less than about 15 mM NaCl and 1.5 mM trisodium citrate.

Thus, hybridization and wash conditions that may be used to bind and remove polynucleotides with less than the desired homology to the nucleic acid sequences or their complements that encode the present transcription factors include, for example:

• 6X SSC at 65° C;
• 50% formamide, 4X SSC at 42° C; or
• 0.5X SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C;

A person of skill in the art would not expect substantial variation among polynucleotide species encompassed within the scope of the present disclosure because the highly stringent conditions set forth in the above formulae yield structurally similar polynucleotides.

If desired, one may employ wash steps of even greater stringency, including about 0.2x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C and washing twice, each wash step being about 30 min, or about 0.1 x SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C and washing twice for 30 min. The temperature for the wash solutions will ordinarily be at least about 25° C, and for greater stringency at least about 42° C. Hybridization stringency may be increased further by using the same conditions as in the hybridization steps, with the wash temperature raised about 3° C to about 5° C, and stringency may be increased even further by using the same conditions except the wash temperature is raised about 6° C to about 9° C. For identification of less closely related homologs, wash steps may be performed at a lower temperature, e.g., 50°C.

An example of a low stringency wash step employs a solution and conditions of at least 25° C in 30 mM NaCl, 3 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Greater stringency may be obtained at 42° C in 15 mM NaCl, with 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1 % SDS over 30 min. Even higher stringency wash conditions are obtained at 65° C -68° C in a solution of 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS. Wash procedures will generally employ at least two final wash steps. Additional variations on these conditions will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art (see, for example, US Patent Application No. 20010010913).

Stringency conditions can be selected such that an oligonucleotide that is perfectly complementary to the coding oligonucleotide hybridizes to the coding oligonucleotide with at least about a 5-10x higher signal to noise ratio than the ratio for hybridization of the perfectly complementary oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding a transcription factor known as of the filing date of the application. It may be desirable to select conditions for a particular assay such that a higher signal to noise ratio, that is, about 15x or more, is obtained. Accordingly, a subject nucleic acid will hybridize to a unique coding oligonucleotide with at least a 2x or greater signal to noise ratio as compared to hybridization of the coding oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding known polypeptide. The particular signal will depend on the label used in the relevant assay, e.g., a fluorescent label, a colorimetric label, a radioactive label, or the like. Labeled hybridization or PCR probes for detecting related polynucleotide sequences may be produced by oligolabeling, nick translation, end-labeling, or PCR amplification using a labeled nucleotide.

Encompassed by the disclosure are polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides capable of regulating transcription, said polynucleotide sequences being capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide sequences, including those listed in the Sequence Listing, or polynucleotides that encode the polypeptides listed in the Sequence Listing, and specifically SEQ ID NOs: 1-2237, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency. (See, e.g., Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399-407; Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511.) Estimates of homology are provided by either DNA-DNA or DNA-RNA hybridization under conditions of stringency as is well understood by those skilled in the art (Hames and Higgins, Eds. (1985) Nucleic Acid Hybridisation, IRL Press, Oxford, U.K.). Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments, such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, to highly similar fragments, such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms. Post-hybridization washes determine stringency conditions.

In addition to hybridization methods, transcription factor homolog polypeptides can be obtained by screening an expression library using antibodies specific for one or more transcription factors. With the provision herein of the disclosed transcription factor, and transcription factor homolog nucleic acid sequences, the encoded polypeptide(s) can be expressed and purified in a heterologous expression system (e.g., E. coli) and used to raise antibodies (monoclonal or polyclonal) specific for the polypeptide(s) in question. Antibodies can also be raised against synthetic peptides derived from transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog, amino acid sequences. Methods of raising antibodies are well known in the art and are described in Harlow and Lane (1988), Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Such antibodies can then be used to screen an expression library produced from the plant from which it is desired to clone additional transcription factor homologs, using the methods described above. The selected cDNAs can be confirmed by sequencing and enzymatic activity.

It will readily be appreciated by those of skill in the art, that any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences are capable of encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides discussed herein. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, many different polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing. Nucleic acids having a sequence that differs from the sequences shown in the Sequence Listing, or complementary sequences, that encode functionally equivalent peptides (i.e., peptides having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differ in sequence from the sequence shown in the Sequence Listing due to degeneracy in the genetic code, are also contemplated.

Altered polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides include those sequences with deletions, insertions, or substitutions of different nucleotides, resulting in a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide with at least one functional characteristic of the instant polypeptides. Included within this definition are polymorphisms which may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding the instant polypeptides, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding the instant polypeptides.

Allelic variant refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations can be silent (i.e., no change in the encoded polypeptide) or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term allelic variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by an allelic variant of a gene. Splice variant refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation arises naturally through use of alternative splicing sites within a transcribed RNA molecule, or less commonly between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several mRNAs transcribed from the same gene. Splice variants may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. The term splice variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by a splice variant of an mRNA transcribed from a gene.

cDNAs generated from alternatively spliced mRNAs, which retain the properties of the transcription factor are included within the scope of the present disclosure, as are polypeptides encoded by such cDNAs and mRNAs. Allelic variants and splice variants of these sequences can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms or tissues according to standard procedures known in the art (see USPN 6,388,064).

Related nucleic acid molecules also include nucleotide sequences encoding a polypeptide comprising or consisting essentially of a substitution, modification, addition and/or deletion of one or more amino acid residues compared to the polypeptides as set forth in the Sequence Listing. Such related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues.

For example, Table 1 illustrates, e.g., that the codons AGC, AGT, TCA, TCC, TCG, and TCT all encode the same amino acid: serine. Accordingly, at each position in the sequence where there is a codon encoding serine, any of the above trinucleotide sequences can be used without altering the encoded polypeptide. Amino acid Possible Codons Alanine Ala A GCA GCC GCG GCU Cysteine Cys C TGC TGT Aspartic acid Asp D GAC GAT Glutamic acid Glu E GAA GAG Phenylalanine Phe F TTC TTT Glycine Gly G GGA GGC GGG GGT Histidine His H CAC CAT Isoleucine Ile I ATA ATC ATT Lysine Lys K AAA AAG Leucine Leu L TTA TTG CTA CTC CTG CTT Methionine Met M ATG Asparagine Asn N AAC AAT Proline Pro P CCA CCC CCG CCT Glutamine Gln Q CAA CAG Arginine Arg R AGA AGG CGA CGC CGG CGT Serine Ser S AGC AGT TCA TCC TCG TCT Threonine Thr T ACA ACC ACG ACT Valine Val V GTA GTC GTG GTT Tryptophan Trp W TGG Tyrosine Tyr Y TAC TAT

Sequence alterations that do not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide are termed "silent" variations. With the exception of the codons ATG and TGG, encoding methionine and tryptophan, respectively, any of the possible codons for the same amino acid can be substituted by a variety of techniques, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, available in the art. Accordingly, any and all such variations of a sequence selected from the above table are a feature of the invention.

In addition to silent variations, other conservative variations that alter one, or a few amino acids in the encoded polypeptide, can be made without altering the function of the polypeptide, these conservative variants are, likewise, a feature of the disclosure.

For example, substitutions, deletions and insertions introduced into the sequences provided in the Sequence Listing, are also envisioned. Such sequence modifications can be engineered into a sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Wu (ed.) Methods Enzymol. (1993) vol. 217, Academic Press) or the other methods noted below. Amino acid substitutions are typically of single residues; insertions usually will be on the order of about from 1 to 10 amino acid residues; and deletions will range about from 1 to 30 residues. In preferred embodiments, deletions or insertions are made in adjacent pairs, e.g., a deletion of two residues or insertion of two residues. Substitutions, deletions, insertions or any combination thereof can be combined to arrive at a sequence. The mutations that are made in the polynucleotide encoding the transcription factor should not place the sequence out of reading frame and should not create complementary regions that could produce secondary mRNA structure. Preferably, the polypeptide encoded by the DNA performs the desired function.

Conservative substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 2 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein. Table 2 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as conservative substitutions. Residue Conservative Substitutions Ala Ser Arg Lys Asn Gln; His Asp Glu Gln Asn Cys Ser Glu Asp Gly Pro His Asn; Gln Ile Leu, Val Leu Ile; Val Lys Arg; Gln Met Leu; Ile Phe Met; Leu; Tyr Ser Thr; Gly Thr Ser; Val Trp Tyr Tyr Trp; Phe Val Ile; Leu

Similar substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 3 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein. Table 3 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as structural and functional substitutions. For example, a residue in column 1 of Table 3 may be substituted with a residue in column 2; in addition, a residue in column 2 of Table 3 may be substituted with the residue of column 1. Residue Similar Substitutions Ala Ser; Thr; Gly; Val; Leu; Ile Arg Lys; His; Gly Asn Gln; His; Gly; Ser; Thr Asp Glu, Ser; Thr Gln Asn; Ala Cys Ser; Gly Glu Asp Gly Pro; Arg His Asn; Gln; Tyr; Phe; Lys; Arg Ile Ala; Leu; Val; Gly; Met Leu Ala; Ile; Val; Gly; Met Lys Arg; His; Gln; Gly; Pro Met Leu; Ile; Phe Phe Met; Leu; Tyr; Trp; His; Val; Ala Ser Thr; Gly; Asp; Ala; Val; Ile; His Thr Ser; Val; Ala; Gly Trp Tyr; Phe; His Tyr Trp; Phe; His Val Ala; Ile; Leu; Gly; Thr; Ser; Glu

Substitutions that are less conservative than those in Table 2 can be selected by picking residues that differ more significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain. The substitutions which in general are expected to produce the greatest changes in protein properties will be those in which (a) a hydrophilic residue, e.g., seryl or threonyl, is substituted for (or by) a hydrophobic residue, e.g., leucyl, isoleucyl, phenylalanyl, valyl or alanyl; (b) a cysteine or proline is substituted for (or by) any other residue; (c) a residue having an electropositive side chain, e.g., lysyl, arginyl, or histidyl, is substituted for (or by) an electronegative residue, e.g., glutamyl or aspartyl; or (d) a residue having a bulky side chain, e.g., phenylalanine, is substituted for (or by) one not having a side chain, e.g., glycine.

In addition to generating silent or conservative substitutions as noted, above, the present disclosure optionally includes methods of modifying the sequences of the Sequence Listing. In the methods, nucleic acid or protein modification methods are used to alter the given sequences to produce new sequences and/or to chemically or enzymatically modify given sequences to change the properties of the nucleic acids or proteins.

Thus, in one embodiment, given nucleic acid sequences are modified, e.g., according to standard mutagenesis or artificial evolution methods to produce modified sequences. The modified sequences may be created using purified natural polynucleotides isolated from any organism or may be synthesized from purified compositions and chemicals using chemical means well know to those of skill in the art. For example, Ausubel, supra, provides additional details on mutagenesis methods. Artificial forced evolution methods are described, for example, by Stemmer (1994) Nature 370: 389-391, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 10747-10751, and US Patents 5,811,238, 5,837,500, and 6,242,568. Methods for engineering synthetic transcription factors and other polypeptides are described, for example, by Zhang et al. (2000) J. Biol. Chem. 275: 33850-33860, Liu et al. (2001) J Biol. Chem. 276: 11323-11334, and Isalan et al. (2001) Nature Biotechnol. 19: 656-660. Many other mutation and evolution methods are also available and expected to be within the skill of the practitioner.

Similarly, chemical or enzymatic alteration of expressed nucleic acids and polypeptides can be performed by standard methods. For example, sequence can be modified by addition of lipids, sugars, peptides, organic or inorganic compounds, by the inclusion of modified nucleotides or amino acids, or the like. For example, protein modification techniques are illustrated in Ausubel, supra. Further details on chemical and enzymatic modifications can be found herein. These modification methods can be used to modify any given sequence, or to modify any sequence produced by the various mutation and artificial evolution modification methods noted herein.

Accordingly, the disclosure provides for modification of any given nucleic acid by mutation, evolution, chemical or enzymatic modification, or other available methods, as well as for the products produced by practicing such methods, e.g., using the sequences herein as a starting substrate for the various modification approaches.

For example, optimized coding sequence containing codons preferred by a particular prokaryotic or eukaryotic host can be used e.g., to increase the rate of translation or to produce recombinant RNA transcripts having desirable properties, such as a longer half-life, as compared with transcripts produced using a non-optimized sequence. Translation stop codons can also be modified to reflect host preference. For example, preferred stop codons for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals are TAA and TGA, respectively. The preferred stop codon for monocotyledonous plants is TGA, whereas insects and E. coli prefer to use TAA as the stop codon.

The polynucleotide sequences can also be engineered in order to alter a coding sequence for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, alterations which modify the sequence to facilitate cloning, processing and/or expression of the gene product. For example, alterations are optionally introduced using techniques which are well known in the art, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, to insert new restriction sites, to alter glycosylation patterns, to change codon preference, to introduce splice sites, etc.

Furthermore, a fragment or domain derived from any of the polypeptides can be combined with domains derived from other transcription factors or synthetic domains to modify the biological activity of a transcription factor. For instance, a DNA-binding domain derived from a transcription factor can be combined with the activation domain of another transcription factor or with a synthetic activation domain. A transcription activation domain assists in initiating transcription from a DNA-binding site. Examples include the transcription activation region of VP16 or GAL4 (Moore et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 376-381; Aoyama et al. (1995) Plant Cell 7: 1773-1785), peptides derived from bacterial sequences (Ma and Ptashne (1987) Cell 51: 113-119) and synthetic peptides (Giniger and Ptashne (1987) Nature 330: 670-672).

Typically, polynucleotide sequences are incorporated into recombinant DNA (or RNA) molecules that direct expression of polypeptides in appropriate host cells, transgenic plants, in vitro translation systems, or the like. Due to the inherent degeneracy of the genetic code, nucleic acid sequences which encode substantially the same or a functionally equivalent amino acid sequence can be substituted for any listed sequence to provide for cloning and expressing the relevant homolog.

The transgenic plants of the present invention comprising recombinant polynucleotide sequences are generally derived from parental plants, which may themselves be non-transformed (or non-transgenic) plants. Overexpressing transgenic "progeny" plants will exhibit greater mRNA levels, wherein the mRNA encodes a transcription factor, that is, a DNA-binding protein that is capable of binding to a DNA regulatory sequence and inducing transcription, and preferably, expression of a plant trait gene. Preferably, the mRNA expression level will be at least threefold greater than that of the parental plant, or more preferably at least ten-fold greater mRNA levels compared to said parental plant, and most preferably at least fifty-fold greater compared to said parental plant.

The present disclosure includes recombinant constructs comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences herein. The constructs typically comprise a vector, such as a plasmid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus (e.g., a plant virus), a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC), or the like, into which a nucleic acid sequence has been inserted, in a forward or reverse orientation. In a preferred aspect of this embodiment, the construct further comprises regulatory sequences, including, for example, a promoter, operably linked to the sequence. Large numbers of suitable vectors and promoters are known to those of skill in the art, and are commercially available.

General texts that describe molecular biological techniques useful herein, including the use and production of vectors, promoters and many other relevant topics, include Berger, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra. Any of the identified sequences can be incorporated into a cassette or vector, e.g., for expression in plants. A number of expression vectors suitable for stable transformation of plant cells or for the establishment of transgenic plants have been described including those described in Weissbach and Weissbach (1989) Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Academic Press, and Gelvin et al. (1990) Plant Molecular Biology Manual Kluwer Academic Publishers. Specific examples include those derived from a Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, as well as those disclosed by Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) Nature 303: 209, Bevan (1984) Nucleic Acids Res. 12: 8711-8721, Klee (1985) Bio/Technology 3: 637-642, for dicotyledonous plants.

Alternatively, non-Ti vectors can be used to transfer the DNA into monocotyledonous plants and cells by using free DNA delivery techniques. Such methods can involve, for example, the use of liposomes, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment, silicon carbide whiskers, and viruses. By using these methods transgenic plants such as wheat, rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technology 9: 957-962) and corn (Gordon-Kamm (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618) can be produced. An immature embryo can also be a good target tissue for monocots for direct DNA delivery techniques by using the particle gun (Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102: 1077-1084; Vasil (1993) Bio/Technology 10: 667-674; Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant Physiol. 104: 37-48, and for Agrobacterium-mediated DNA transfer (Ishida et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 745-750).

Typically, plant transformation vectors include one or more cloned plant coding sequence (genomic or cDNA) under the transcriptional control of 5' and 3' regulatory sequences and a dominant selectable marker. Such plant transformation vectors typically also contain a promoter (e.g., a regulatory region controlling inducible or constitutive, environmentally-or developmentally-regulated, or cell- or tissue-specific expression), a transcription initiation start site, an RNA processing signal (such as intron splice sites), a transcription termination site, and/or a polyadenylation signal.

A potential utility for the transcription factor polynucleotides disclosed herein is the isolation of promoter elements from these genes that can be used to program expression in plants of any genes. Each transcription factor gene disclosed herein is expressed in a unique fashion, as determined by promoter elements located upstream of the start of translation, and additionally within an intron of the transcription factor gene or downstream of the termination codon of the gene. As is well known in the art, for a significant portion of genes, the promoter sequences are located entirely in the region directly upstream of the start of translation. In such cases, typically the promoter sequences are located within 2.0 kb of the start of translation, or within 1.5 kb of the start of translation, frequently within 1.0 kb of the start of translation, and sometimes within 0.5 kb of the start of translation.

The promoter sequences can be isolated according to methods known to one skilled in the art.

Examples of constitutive plant promoters which can be useful for expressing the TF sequence include: the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313: 810-812); the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 88: 547-552); and the octopine synthase promoter (Fromm et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 977-984).

A variety of plant gene promoters that regulate gene expression in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, developmental signals, and in a tissue-active manner can be used for expression of a TF sequence in plants. Choice of a promoter is based largely on the phenotype of interest and is determined by such factors as tissue (e.g., seed, fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.), inducibility (e.g., in response to wounding, heat, cold, drought, light, pathogens, etc.), timing, developmental stage, and the like. Numerous known promoters have been characterized and can favorably be employed to promote expression of a polynucleotide in a transgenic plant or cell of interest. For example, tissue specific promoters include: seed-specific promoters (such as the napin, phaseolin or DC3 promoter described in US Pat. No. 5,773,697), fruit-specific promoters that are active during fruit ripening (such as the dru 1 promoter (US Pat. No. 5,783,393), or the 2A11 promoter (US Pat. No. 4,943,674) and the tomato polygalacturonase promoter (Bird et al. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol. 11: 651-662), root-specific promoters, such as those disclosed in US Patent Nos. 5,618,988, 5,837,848 and 5,905,186, pollen-active promoters such as PTA29, PTA26 and PTA13 (US Pat. No. 5,792,929), promoters active in vascular tissue (Ringli and Keller (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 977-988), flower-specific (Kaiser et al. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 231-243), pollen (Baerson et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26: 1947-1959), carpels (Ohl et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 837-848), pollen and ovules (Baerson et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 255-267), auxin-inducible promoters (such as that described in van der Kop et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 979-990 or Baumann et al., (1999) Plant Cell 11: 323-334), cytokinin-inducible promoter (Guevara-Garcia (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 743-753), promoters responsive to gibberellin (Shi et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1053-1060, Willmott et al. (1998) Plant Molec. Biol. 38: 817-825) and the like. Additional promoters are those that elicit expression in response to heat (Ainley et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 13-23), light (e.g., the pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 471-478, and the maize rbcS promoter, Schaffner and Sheen (1991) Plant Cell 3: 997-1012); wounding (e.g., wunI, Siebertz et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 961-968); pathogens (such as the PR-1 promoter described in Buchel et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 387-396, and the PDF1.2 promoter described in Manners et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1071-1080), and chemicals such as methyl jasmonate or salicylic acid (Gatz (1997) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 89-108). In addition, the timing of the expression can be controlled by using promoters such as those acting at senescence (Gan and Amasino (1995) Science 270: 1986-1988); or late seed development (Odell et al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106: 447-458).

Plant expression vectors can also include RNA processing signals that can be positioned within, upstream or downstream of the coding sequence. In addition, the expression vectors can include additional regulatory sequences from the 3'-untranslated region of plant genes, e.g., a 3' terminator region to increase mRNA stability of the mRNA, such as the PI-II terminator region of potato or the octopine or nopaline synthase 3' terminator regions.

Specific initiation signals can aid in efficient translation of coding sequences. These signals can include, e.g., the ATG initiation codon and adjacent sequences. In cases where a coding sequence, its initiation codon and upstream sequences are inserted into the appropriate expression vector, no additional translational control signals may be needed. However, in cases where only coding sequence (e.g., a mature protein coding sequence), or a portion thereof, is inserted, exogenous transcriptional control signals including the ATG initiation codon can be separately provided. The initiation codon is provided in the correct reading frame to facilitate transcription. Exogenous transcriptional elements and initiation codons can be of various origins, both natural and synthetic. The efficiency of expression can be enhanced by the inclusion of enhancers appropriate to the cell system in use.

The present invention also relates to host cells which are transduced with vectors of the invention, and the production of polypeptides (including fragments thereof) by recombinant techniques. Host cells are genetically engineered (i.e., nucleic acids are introduced, e.g., transduced, transformed or transfected) with the vectors of this disclosure, which may be, for example, a cloning vector or an expression vector comprising the relevant nucleic acids herein. The vector is optionally a plasmid, a viral particle, a phage, a naked nucleic acid, etc. The engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting transformants, or amplifying the relevant gene. The culture conditions, such as temperature, pH and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art and in the references cited herein, including, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra.

The host cell can be a eukaryotic cell, such as a yeast cell, or a plant cell, or the host cell can be a prokaryotic cell, such as a bacterial cell. Plant protoplasts are also suitable for some applications. For example, the DNA fragments are introduced into plant tissues, cultured plant cells or plant protoplasts by standard methods including electroporation (Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 5824-5828, infection by viral vectors such as cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) (Hohn et al. (1982) Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors Academic Press, New York, NY, pp. 549-560; US 4,407,956), high velocity ballistic penetration by small particles with the nucleic acid either within the matrix of small beads or particles, or on the surface (Klein et al. (1987) Nature 327: 70-73), use of pollen as vector (WO 85/01856), or use of Agrobacterium tumefaciens or A. rhizogenes carrying a T-DNA plasmid in which DNA fragments are cloned. The T-DNA plasmid is transmitted to plant cells upon infection by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, and a portion is stably integrated into the plant genome (Horsch et al. (1984) Science 233: 496-498; Fraley et al. (1983) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 80: 4803-4807).

The cell can include a nucleic acid that encodes a polypeptide, wherein the cell expresses a polypeptide. The cell can also include vector sequences, or the like. Furthermore, cells and transgenic plants that include any polypeptide or nucleic acid above or throughout this specification, e.g., produced by transduction of a vector of the disclosure, are an additional feature.

For long-term, high-yield production of recombinant proteins, stable expression can be used. Host cells transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide are optionally cultured under conditions suitable for the expression and recovery of the encoded protein from cell culture. The protein or fragment thereof produced by a recombinant cell may be secreted, membrane-bound, or contained intracellularly, depending on the sequence and/or the vector used. As will be understood by those of skill in the art, expression vectors containing polynucleotides encoding mature proteins can be designed with signal sequences which direct secretion of the mature polypeptides through a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell membrane.

Polypeptides may contain one or more modified amino acid residues. The presence of modified amino acids may be advantageous in, for example, increasing polypeptide half-life, reducing polypeptide antigenicity or toxicity, increasing polypeptide storage stability, or the like. Amino acid residue(s) are modified, for example, co-translationally or post-translationally during recombinant production or modified by synthetic or chemical means.

Non-limiting examples of a modified amino acid residue include incorporation or other use of acetylated amino acids, glycosylated amino acids, sulfated amino acids, prenylated (e.g., famesylated, geranylgeranylated) amino acids, PEG modified (e.g., "PEGylated") amino acids, biotinylated amino acids, carboxylated amino acids, phosphorylated amino acids, etc. References adequate to guide one of skill in the modification of amino acid residues are replete throughout the literature.

The modified amino acid residues may prevent or increase affinity of the polypeptide for another molecule, including, but not limited to, polynucleotide, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and lipid derivatives, and other organic or synthetic compounds.

A transcription factor provided by the present disclosure can also be used to identify additional endogenous or exogenous molecules that can affect a phentoype or trait of interest. On the one hand, such molecules include organic (small or large molecules) and/or inorganic compounds that affect expression of (i.e., regulate) a particular transcription factor. Alternatively, such molecules include endogenous molecules that are acted upon either at a transcriptional level by a transcription factor to modify a phenotype as desired. For example, the transcription factors can be employed to identify one or more downstream genes that are subject to a regulatory effect of the transcription factor. In one approach, a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog is expressed in a host cell, e.g., a transgenic plant cell, tissue or explant, and expression products, either RNA or protein, of likely or random targets are monitored, e.g., by hybridization to a microarray of nucleic acid probes corresponding to genes expressed in a tissue or cell type of interest, by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of protein products, or by any other method known in the art for assessing expression of gene products at the level of RNA or protein. Alternatively, a transcription factor can be used to identify promoter sequences (such as binding sites on DNA sequences) involved in the regulation of a downstream target. After identifying a promoter sequence, interactions between the transcription factor and the promoter sequence can be modified by changing specific nucleotides in the promoter sequence or specific amino acids in the transcription factor that interact with the promoter sequence to alter a plant trait. Typically, transcription factor DNA-binding sites are identified by gel shift assays. After identifying the promoter regions, the promoter region sequences can be employed in double-stranded DNA arrays to identify molecules that affect the interactions of the transcription factors with their promoters (Bulyk et al. (1999) Nature Biotechnol. 17: 573-577).

The identified transcription factors are also useful to identify proteins that modify the activity of the transcription factor. Such modification can occur by covalent modification, such as by phosphorylation, or by protein-protein (homo or-heteropolymer) interactions. Any method suitable for detecting protein-protein interactions can be employed. Among the methods that can be employed are co-immunoprecipitation, cross-linking and co-purification through gradients or chromatographic columns, and the two-hybrid yeast system.

The two-hybrid system detects protein interactions in vivo and is described in Chien et al. ((1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 9578-9582) and is commercially available from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.). In such a system, plasmids are constructed that encode two hybrid proteins: one consists of the DNA-binding domain of a transcription activator protein fused to the TF polypeptide and the other consists of the transcription activator protein's activation domain fused to an unknown protein that is encoded by a cDNA that has been recombined into the plasmid as part of a cDNA library. The DNA-binding domain fusion plasmid and the cDNA library are transformed into a strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that contains a reporter gene (e.g., lacZ) whose regulatory region contains the transcription activator's binding site. Either hybrid protein alone cannot activate transcription of the reporter gene. Interaction of the two hybrid proteins reconstitutes the functional activator protein and results in expression of the reporter gene, which is detected by an assay for the reporter gene product. Then, the library plasmids responsible for reporter gene expression are isolated and sequenced to identify the proteins encoded by the library plasmids. After identifying proteins that interact with the transcription factors, assays for compounds that interfere with the TF protein-protein interactions can be preformed.

In addition to the intracellular molecules described above, extracellular molecules that alter activity or expression of a transcription factor, either directly or indirectly, can be identified. For example, the methods can entail first placing a candidate molecule in contact with a plant or plant cell. The molecule can be introduced by topical administration, such as spraying or soaking of a plant, or incubating a plant in a solution containing the molecule, and then the molecule's effect on the expression or activity of the TF polypeptide or the expression of the polynucleotide monitored. Changes in the expression of the TF polypeptide can be monitored by use of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, gel electrophoresis or the like. Changes in the expression of the corresponding polynucleotide sequence can be detected by use of microarrays, Northerns, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in mRNA expression. These techniques are exemplified in Ausubel et al. (eds.) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons (1998, and supplements through 2001). Changes in the activity of the transcription factor can be monitored, directly or indirectly, by assaying the function of the transcription factor, for example, by measuring the expression of promoters known to be controlled by the transcription factor (using promoter-reporter constructs), measuring the levels of transcripts using microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, etc. Such changes in the expression, levels can be correlated with modified plant traits and thus identified molecules can be useful for soaking or spraying on fruit, vegetable and grain crops to modify traits in plants.

Essentially any available composition can be tested for modulatory activity of expression or activity of any nucleic acid or polypeptide herein. Thus, available libraries of compounds such as chemicals, polypeptides, nucleic acids and the like can be tested for modulatory activity. Often, potential modulator compounds can be dissolved in aqueous or organic (e.g., DMSO-based) solutions for easy delivery to the cell or plant of interest in which the activity of the modulator is to be tested. Optionally, the assays are designed to screen large modulator composition libraries by automating the assay steps and providing compounds from any convenient source to assays, which are typically run in parallel (e.g., in microtiter formats on micrometer plates in robotic assays).

In one embodiment, high throughput screening methods involve providing a combinatorial library containing a large number of potential compounds (potential modulator compounds). Such "combinatorial chemical libraries" are then screened in one or more assays, as described herein, to identify those library members (particular chemical species or subclasses) that display a desired characteristic activity. The compounds thus identified can serve as target compounds.

A combinatorial chemical library can be, e.g., a collection of diverse chemical compounds generated by chemical synthesis or biological synthesis. For example, a combinatorial chemical library such as a polypeptide library is formed by combining a set of chemical building blocks (e.g., in one example, amino acids) in every possible way for a given compound length (i.e., the number of amino acids in a polypeptide compound of a set length). Exemplary libraries include peptide libraries, nucleic acid libraries, antibody libraries (see, e.g., Vaughn et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 309-314 and PCT/US96/10287), carbohydrate libraries (see, e.g., Liang et al. Science (1996) 274: 1520-1522 and US Patent 5,593,853), peptide nucleic acid libraries (see, e.g., US Patent 5,539,083), and small organic molecule libraries (see, e.g., benzodiazepines, in Baum Chem. & Engineering News Jan 18, 1993, page 33; isoprenoids, US Patent 5,569,588; thiazolidinones and metathiazanones, US Patent 5,549,974; pyrrolidines, US Patents 5,525,735 and 5,519,134; morpholino compounds, US Patent 5,506,337) and the like.

Preparation and screening of combinatorial or other libraries is well known to those of skill in the art. Such combinatorial chemical libraries include, but are not limited to, peptide libraries (see, e.g., US Patent 5,010,175; Furka, (1991) Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res. 37: 487-493; and Houghton et al. (1991) Nature 354: 84-88). Other chemistries for generating chemical diversity libraries can also be used.

In addition, as noted, compound screening equipment for high-throughput screening is generally available, e.g., using any of a number of well known robotic systems that have also been developed for solution phase chemistries useful in assay systems. These systems include automated workstations including an automated synthesis apparatus and robotic systems utilizing robotic arms. Any of the above devices are suitable for use with this aspect of the disclosure, e.g., for high-throughput screening of potential modulators. The nature and implementation of modifications to these devices (if any) so that they can operate as discussed herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art.

Indeed, entire high-throughput screening systems are commercially available. These systems typically automate entire procedures including all sample and reagent pipetting, liquid dispensing, timed incubations, and final readings of the microplate in detector(s) appropriate for the assay. These configurable systems provide high throughput and rapid start up as well as a high degree of flexibility and customization. Similarly, microfluidic implementations of screening are also commercially available.

The manufacturers of such systems provide detailed protocols the various high throughput. Thus, for example, Zymark Corp. provides technical bulletins describing screening systems for detecting the modulation of gene transcription, ligand binding, and the like. The integrated systems herein, in addition to providing for sequence alignment and, optionally, synthesis of relevant nucleic acids, can include such screening apparatus to identify modulators that have an effect on one or more polynucleotides or polypeptides described herein.

In some assays it is desirable to have positive controls to ensure that the components of the assays are working properly. At least two types of positive controls are appropriate. That is, known transcriptional activators or inhibitors can be incubated with cells or plants, for example, in one sample of the assay, and the resulting increase/decrease in transcription can be detected by measuring the resulting increase in RNA levels and/or protein expression, for example, according to the methods herein. It will be appreciated that modulators can also be combined with transcriptional activators or inhibitors to find modulators that inhibit transcriptional activation or transcriptional repression. Either expression of the nucleic acids and proteins herein or any additional nucleic acids or proteins activated by the nucleic acids or proteins herein, or both, can be monitored.

In an embodiment, the present disclosure sets forth a method for identifying compositions that modulate the activity or expression of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the disclosure. For example, a test compound, whether a small or large molecule, is placed in contact with a cell, plant (or plant tissue or explant), or composition comprising the polynucleotide or polypeptide of interest and a resulting effect on the cell, plant, (or tissue or explant) or composition is evaluated by monitoring, either directly or indirectly, one or more of: expression level of the polynucleotide or polypeptide, activity (or modulation of the activity) of the polynucleotide or polypeptide. In some cases, an alteration in a plant phenotype can be detected following contact of a plant (or plant cell, or tissue or explant) with the putative modulator, e.g., by modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide. Modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide may also be caused by molecular elements in a signal transduction second messenger pathway and such modulation can affect similar elements in the same or another signal transduction second messenger pathway.

Also described herein are uses of polynucleotides, also referred to herein as oligonucleotides, typically having at least 12 bases, preferably at least 15, more preferably at least 20, 30, or 50 bases, which hybridize under at least highly stringent (or ultra-high stringent or ultra-ultra-high stringent conditions) conditions to a polynucleotide sequence described above. The polynucleotides may be used as probes, primers, sense and antisense agents, and the like, according to methods as noted supra.

Subsequences of the polynucleotides, including polynucleotide fragments and oligonucleotides are useful as nucleic acid probes and primers. An oligonucleotide suitable for use as a probe or primer is at least about 15 nucleotides in length, more often at least about 18 nucleotides, often at least about 21 nucleotides, frequently at least about 30 nucleotides, or about 40 nucleotides, or more in length. A nucleic acid probe is useful in hybridization protocols, e.g., to identify additional polypeptide homologs including protocols for microarray experiments. Primers can be annealed to a complementary target DNA strand by nucleic acid hybridization to form a hybrid between the primer and the target DNA strand, and then extended along the target DNA strand by a DNA polymerase enzyme. Primer pairs can be used for amplification of a nucleic acid sequence, e.g., by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other nucleic-acid amplification methods. See Sambrook, supra, and Ausubel, supra.

In addition, described herein is an isolated or recombinant polypeptide including a subsequence of at least about 15 contiguous amino acids encoded by the recombinant or isolated polynucleotides. For example, such polypeptides, or domains or fragments thereof, can be used as immunogens, e.g., to produce antibodies specific for the polypeptide sequence, or as probes for detecting a sequence of interest. A subsequence can range in size from about 15 amino acids in length up to and including the full length of the polypeptide.

An expressed polypeptide which comprises such a polypeptide subsequence performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide. For example, a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA binding domain that activates transcription, e.g., by binding to a specific DNA promoter region an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions.

The polynucleotides of the disclosure are favorably employed to produce transgenic plants with various traits, or characteristics, that have been modified in a desirable manner, e.g., to improve the seed characteristics of a plant. For example, alteration of expression levels or patterns (e.g., spatial or temporal expression patterns) of one or more of the transcription factors (or transcription factor homologs) as compared with the levels of the same protein found in a wild-type plant, can be used to modify a plant's traits. An illustrative example of trait modification, improved characteristics, by altering expression levels of a particular transcription factor is described further in the Examples and the Sequence Listing.

Arabidopsis thaliana is the object of rapidly growing attention as a model for genetics and metabolism in plants. Arabidopsis has a small genome, and well-documented studies are available. It is easy to grow in large numbers and mutants defining important genetically controlled mechanisms are either available, or can readily be obtained. Various methods to introduce and express isolated homologous genes are available (see Koncz et al., eds., Methods in Arabidopsis Research (1992) World Scientific, New Jersey, NJ, in "Preface"). Because of its small size, short life cycle, obligate autogamy and high fertility, Arabidopsis is also a choice organism for the isolation of mutants and studies in morphogenetic and development pathways, and control of these pathways by transcription factors (Koncz supra, p. 72). A number of studies introducing transcription factors into A. thaliana have demonstrated the utility of this plant for understanding the mechanisms of gene regulation and trait alteration in plants. (See, for example, Koncz supra, and US Patent Number 6,417,428).

Homologous genes that may be derived from any plant, or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant, and that share significant sequence identity or similarity to those provided herein, may be introduced into plants, for example, crop plants, to confer desirable or improved traits. Consequently, transgenic plants may be produced that comprise a recombinant expression vector or cassette with a promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. The promoter may be, for example, a plant or viral promoter.

The invention thus provides for methods for preparing transgenic plants, and for modifying plant traits as defined in the claims. These methods include introducing into a plant a recombinant expression vector or cassette comprising a functional promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. Plants and kits for producing these plants that result from the application of these methods are also encompassed by the present invention.

Currently, the existence of a series of maturity groups for different latitudes represents a major barrier to the introduction of new valuable traits. Any trait (e.g. disease resistance) has to be bred into each of the different maturity groups separately, a laborious and costly exercise. The availability of single strain, which could be grown at any latitude, would therefore greatly increase the potential for introducing new traits to crop species such as soybean and cotton.

For many of the specific effects, traits and utilities listed in Table 4 and Table 6 that may be conferred to plants, one or more transcription factor genes may be used to increase or decrease, advance or delay, or improve or prove deleterious to a given trait. More than one transcription factor gene may be introduced into a plant, either by transforming the plant with one or more vectors comprising two or more transcription factors, or by selective breeding of plants to yield hybrid crosses that comprise more than one introduced transcription factor.

A listing of specific effects and utilities that the presently disclosed transcription factor genes have on plants, as determined by direct observation and assay analysis, is provided in Table 4. Table 4 shows the polynucleotides identified by SEQ ID NO; Gene ID No. (GID); and if the polynucleotide was tested in a transgenic assay. The first column shows the polynucleotide SEQ ID NO; the second column shows the GID; the third column shows whether the gene was overexpressed (OE) or knocked out (KO) in plant studies; the fourth column shows the category of modified trait resulting from the knock out or overexpression of the polynucleotide in the transgenic plant; and the fifth column ("Experimental Observations"), includes specific observations made with respect to the polynucleotide of the respective first column. SEQ ID NO: GID OE/K O Category Experimental Observations 327 G198 8 OE Nutrient; Tolerance to low N Better growth on low nitrogen plus glutamine, better growth on low phosphate; long hypocotyl, long petiole, early flowering Nutrient; Tolerance to low PO₄ Flowering time Light response; Long petiole Light response; Long hypocotyl

Table 5 shows the polypeptides identified by SEQ ID NO; Gene ID (GID) No; the transcription factor family to which the polypeptide belongs, and conserved domains of the polypeptide. The first column shows the polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the third column shows the transcription factor family to which the polynucleotide belongs; and the fourth column shows the amino acid residue positions of the conserved domain in amino acid (AA) coordinates. Polypeptide SEQ ID NO: GID No. Family Conserved Domains in Amino Acid Coordinates 328 G1988 5-50 Z-CO-like

Examples of some of the utilities that may be desirable in plants, and that may be provided by transforming the plants with the presently disclosed sequences, are listed in Table 6. Many of the transcription factors listed in Table 6 may be operably linked with a specific promoter that causes the transcription factor to be expressed in response to environmental, tissue-specific or temporal signals. For examples of other tissue-specific, temporal-specific or inducible promoters, see the above discussion under the heading "Vectors, Promoters, and Expression Systems". Trait Category Phenotypic alteration(s) Transcription factor genes that impact traits Utility Abiotic stress Nitrogen stress Less sensitive to N limitation G1988 Improved yield and nutrient stress tolerance, decreased fertilizer usage Phosphate stress Less sensitive to PO₄ limitation G1988 Improved yield and nutrient stress tolerance, decreased fertilizer usage Growth regulator Altered C/N sensing G1988 Alteration or control of assimilate partitioning Flowering time Early flowering G1988 Faster generation time; synchrony of flowering; additional harvests within a growing season, shortening of breeding programs Development and morphology Altered hypocotyl shape, color, development G1988 Ornamental applications; altered light response (see "Light Response", below) Light response/shade avoidance Altered hypocotyl G1988 Increased planting densities and yield enhancement Altered petiole G1988 Abbreviations: N=nitrogen P=phosphate ABA=abscisic acid C/N=carbon/nitrogen balance

The following descriptions of traits and utilities associated with the present transcription factors offer a more comprehensive description than that provided in Table 6.

Plant transcription factors can modulate gene expression, and, in turn, be modulated by the environmental experience of a plant. Significant alterations in a plant's environment invariably result in a change in the plant's transcription factor gene expression pattern. Altered transcription factor expression patterns generally result in phenotypic changes in the plant. Transcription factor gene product(s) in transgenic plants then differ(s) in amounts or proportions from that found in wild-type or non-transformed plants, and those transcription factors likely represent polypeptides that are used to alter the response to the environmental change. By way of example, it is well accepted in the art that analytical methods based on altered expression patterns may be used to screen for phenotypic changes in a plant far more effectively than can be achieved using traditional methods.

Nutrient uptake and utilization: nitrogen and phosphorus. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes introduced into plants provide a means to improve uptake of essential nutrients, including nitrogenous compounds, phosphates, potassium, and trace minerals. The enhanced performance of, for example, G1988, and other overexpressing lines under low nitrogen conditions or G1988, under low phosphorus conditions indicate that these genes and their homologs could be used to engineer crops that could thrive under conditions of reduced nutrient availability. Phosphorus, in particular, tends to be a limiting nutrient in soils and is generally added as a component in fertilizers. Young plants have a rapid intake of phosphate and sufficient phosphate is important for yield of root crops such as carrot, potato and parsnip.

The effect of these modifications is to increase the seedling germination and range of ornamental and crop plants. The utilities of presently disclosed transcription factor genes conferring tolerance to conditions of low nutrients also include cost savings to the grower by reducing the amounts of fertilizer needed, environmental benefits of reduced fertilizer runoff into watersheds; and improved yield and stress tolerance. In addition, by providing improved nitrogen uptake capability, these genes can be used to alter seed protein amounts and/or composition in such a way that could impact yield as well as the nutritional value and production of various food products.

Growth regulator: carbon and nitrogen balance. A number of the transcription factor-overexpressing lines, including, G1988, may be used to produce plants with altered C/N sensing. These plants may, for example, make less anthocyanin on high sucrose plus glutamine, indicating that these genes can be used to modify carbon and nitrogen status, and hence assimilate partitioning (assimilate partitioning refers to the manner in which an essential element, such as nitrogen, is distributed among different pools inside a plant, generally in a reduced form, for the purpose of transport to various tissues).

Flowering time: early and late flowering. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes that accelerate flowering, which include could have valuable applications in such programs, since they allow much faster generation times. In a number of species, for example, broccoli, cauliflower, where the reproductive parts of the plants constitute the crop and the vegetative tissues are discarded, it would be advantageous to accelerate time to flowering. Accelerating flowering could shorten crop and tree breeding programs. Additionally, in some instances, a faster generation time would allow additional harvests of a crop to be made within a given growing season. A number of Arabidopsis genes have already been shown to accelerate flowering when constitutively expressed. These include LEAFY, APETALA1 and CONSTANS (Mandel et al. (1995) Nature 377: 522-524; Weigel and Nilsson (1995) Nature 377: 495-500; Simon et al. (1996) Nature 384: 59-62).

By regulating the expression of potential flowering using inducible promoters, flowering could be triggered by application of an inducer chemical. This would allow flowering to be synchronized across a crop and facilitate more efficient harvesting. Such inducible systems could also be used to tune the - flowering of crop varieties to different latitudes. At present, species such as soybean and cotton are available as a series of maturity groups that are suitable for different latitudes on the basis of their flowering time (which is governed by day-length). A system in which flowering could be chemically controlled would allow a single high-yielding northern maturity group to be grown at any latitude. In southern regions such plants could be grown for longer periods before flowering was induced, thereby increasing yields. In more northern areas, the induction would be used to ensure that the crop flowers prior to the first winter frosts.

Presently disclosed transcription factors that extend flowering time have utility in engineering plants with longer-lasting flowers for the horticulture industry, and for extending the time in which the plant is fertile.

Development and morphology: cotyledon, hypocotyl. The morphological phenotypes shown by plants overexpressing several of the transcription factor genes in Table 6 indicate that these genes, including those that produce altered hypocotyls (G1988), can be used to manipulate light responses such as shade avoidance. As these genes also alter plant architecture, they may find use in the ornamental horticulture industry.

Light response/shade avoidance: altered cotyledon, hypocotyl, petiole development, altered leaf orientation, constitutive photomorphogenesis, photomorphogenesis in low light. Presently disclosed transcription factor genes, including G1988, and its equivalogs that can modify a plant's response to light may be useful for modifying plant growth or development, for example, photomorphogenesis in poor light, or accelerating flowering time in response to various light intensities, quality or duration to which a non-transformed plant would not similarly respond. Examples of such responses that have been demonstrated include leaf number and arrangement, and early flower bud appearances. Elimination of shading responses may lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement. As these genes may also alter plant architecture, they may find use in the ornamental horticulture industry.

In addition to expression of the nucleic acids of the invention as gene replacement or plant phenotype modification nucleic acids, the nucleic acids are also useful for sense and anti-sense suppression of expression, e.g. to down-regulate expression of a nucleic acid of the disclosure, e.g. as a further mechanism for modulating plant phenotype. That is, the nucleic acids of the invention, or subsequences or anti-sense sequences thereof, can be used to block expression of naturally occurring homologous nucleic acids. A variety of sense and anti-sense technologies are known in the art, e.g. as set forth in Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997) Antisense Technology: A Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K. Antisense regulation is also described in Crowley et al. (1985) Cell 43: 633-641; Rosenberg et al. (1985) Nature 313: 703-706; Preiss et al. (1985) Nature 313: 27-32; Melton (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 144-148; Izant and Weintraub (1985) Science 229: 345-352; and Kim and Wold (1985) Cell 42: 129-138. Additional methods for antisense regulation are known in the art. Antisense regulation has been used to reduce or inhibit expression of plant genes in, for example in European Patent Publication No. 271988. Antisense RNA may be used to reduce gene expression to produce a visible or biochemical phenotypic change in a plant (Smith et al. (1988) Nature, 334: 724-726; Smith et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14: 369-379). In general, sense or anti-sense sequences are introduced into a cell, where they are optionally amplified, e.g. by transcription. Such sequences include both simple oligonucleotide sequences and catalytic sequences such as ribozymes.

For example, a reduction or elimination of expression (i.e., a "knock-out") of a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide in a transgenic plant, e.g., to modify a plant trait, can be obtained by introducing an antisense construct corresponding to the polypeptide of interest as a cDNA. For antisense suppression, the transcription factor or homolog cDNA is arranged in reverse orientation (with respect to the coding sequence) relative to the promoter sequence in the expression vector. The introduced sequence need not be the full length cDNA or gene, and need not be identical to the cDNA or gene found in the plant type to be transformed. Typically, the antisense sequence need only be capable of hybridizing to the target gene or RNA of interest. Thus, where the introduced sequence is of shorter length, a higher degree of homology to the endogenous transcription factor sequence will be needed for effective antisense suppression. While antisense sequences of various lengths can be utilized, preferably, the introduced antisense sequence in the vector will be at least 30 nucleotides in length, and improved antisense suppression will typically be observed as the length of the antisense sequence increases. Preferably, the length of the antisense sequence in the vector will be greater than 100 nucleotides. Transcription of an antisense construct as described results in the production of RNA molecules that are the reverse complement of mRNA molecules transcribed from the endogenous transcription factor gene in the plant cell.

Suppression of endogenous transcription factor gene expression can also be achieved using RNA interference , or RNAi. RNAi is a post-transcriptional, targeted gene-silencing technique that uses double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to incite degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA) containing the same sequence as the dsRNA (Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36). Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs are produced in at least two steps: an endogenous ribonuclease cleaves longer dsRNA into shorter, 21-23 nucleotide-long RNAs. The siRNA segments then mediate the degradation of the target mRNA (Zamore, (2001) Nature Struct. Biol., 8:746-50). RNAi has been used for gene function determination in a manner similar to antisense oligonucleotides (Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36). Expression vectors that continually express siRNAs in transiently and stably transfected have been engineered to express small hairpin RNAs (shRNAs), which get processed in vivo into siRNAs-like molecules capable of carrying out gene-specific silencing (Brummelkamp et al., (2002) Science 296:550-553, and Paddison, et al. (2002) Genes & Dev. 16:948-958). Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded RNA is discussed in further detail by Hammond et al. (2001) Nature Rev Gen 2: 110-119, Fire et al. (1998) Nature 391: 806-811 and Timmons and Fire (1998) Nature 395: 854. Vectors in which RNA encoded by a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog cDNA is over-expressed can also be used to obtain co-suppression of a corresponding endogenous gene, e.g., in the manner described in US Patent No. 5,231,020 to Jorgensen. Such co-suppression (also termed sense suppression) does not require that the entire transcription factor cDNA be introduced into the plant cells, nor does it require that the introduced sequence be exactly identical to the endogenous transcription factor gene of interest. However, as with antisense suppression, the suppressive efficiency will be enhanced as specificity of hybridization is increased, e.g., as the introduced sequence is lengthened, and/or as the sequence similarity between the introduced sequence and the endogenous transcription factor gene is increased.

Vectors expressing an untranslatable form of the transcription factor mRNA, e.g., sequences comprising one or more stop codon, or nonsense mutation) can also be used to suppress expression of an endogenous transcription factor, thereby reducing or eliminating its activity and modifying one or more traits. Methods for producing such constructs are described in US Patent No. 5,583,021. Preferably, such constructs are made by introducing a premature stop codon into the transcription factor gene. Alternatively, a plant trait can be modified by gene silencing using double-strand RNA (Sharp (1999) Genes and Development 13: 139-141). Another method for abolishing the expression of a gene is by insertion mutagenesis using the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. After generating the insertion mutants, the mutants can be screened to identify those containing the insertion in a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog gene. Plants containing a single transgene insertion event at the desired gene can be crossed to generate homozygous plants for the mutation. Such methods are well known to those of skill in the art (See for example Koncz et al. (1992) Methods in Arabidopsis Research, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., River Edge, NJ).

Alternatively, a plant phenotype can be altered by eliminating an endogenous gene, such as a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, e.g., by homologous recombination (Kempin et al. (1997) Nature 389: 802-803).

A plant trait can also be modified by using the Cre-lox system (for example, as described in US Pat. No. 5,658,772). A plant genome can be modified to include first and second lox sites that are then contacted with a Cre recombinase. If the lox sites are in the same orientation, the intervening DNA sequence between the two sites is excised. If the lox sites are in the opposite orientation, the intervening sequence is inverted.

The polynucleotides and polypeptides of this disclosure can also be expressed in a plant in the absence of an expression cassette by manipulating the activity or expression level of the endogenous gene by other means, such as, for example, by ectopically expressing a gene by T-DNA activation tagging (Ichikawa et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science 274: 982-985). This method entails transforming a plant with a gene tag containing multiple transcriptional enhancers and once the tag has inserted into the genome, expression of a flanking gene coding sequence becomes deregulated. In another example, the transcriptional machinery in a plant can be modified so as to increase transcription levels of a polynucleotide (See, e.g., PCT Publications WO 96/06166 and WO 98/53057 which describe the modification of the DNA-binding specificity of zinc finger proteins by changing particular amino acids in the DNA-binding motif).

The transgenic plant can also include the machinery necessary for expressing or altering the activity of a polypeptide encoded by an endogenous gene, for example, by altering the phosphorylation state of the polypeptide to maintain it in an activated state.

Transgenic plants (or plant cells, or plant explants, or plant tissues) incorporating the polynucleotides of the disclosure and/or expressing the polypeptides of the disclosure can be produced by a variety of well established techniques as described above. Following construction of a vector, most typically an expression cassette, including a polynucleotide, e.g., encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, standard techniques can be used to introduce the polynucleotide into a plant, a plant cell, a plant explant or a plant tissue of interest. Optionally, the plant cell, explant or tissue can be regenerated to produce a transgenic plant.

The plant can be any higher plant, including gymnosperms, monocotyledonous and dicotyledenous plants. Suitable protocols are available for Leguminosae (alfalfa, soybean, clover, etc.), Umbelliferae (carrot, celery, parsnip), Cruciferae (cabbage, radish, rapeseed, broccoli, etc.), Curcurbitaceae (melons and cucumber), Gramineae (wheat, corn, rice, barley, millet, etc.), Solanaceae (potato, tomato, tobacco, peppers, etc.), and various other crops. See protocols described in Ammirato et al., eds., (1984) Handbook of Plant Cell Culture -Crop Species, Macmillan Publ. Co., New York, NY; Shimamoto et al. (1989) Nature 338: 274-276; Fromm et al. (1990) BiolTechnol. 8: 833-839; and Vasil et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 429-434.

Transformation and regeneration of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells is now routine, and the selection of the most appropriate transformation technique will be determined by the practitioner. The choice of method will vary with the type of plant to be transformed; those skilled in the art will recognize the suitability of particular methods for given plant types. Suitable methods can include, but are not limited to: electroporation of plant protoplasts; liposome-mediated transformation; polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated transformation; transformation using viruses; micro-injection of plant cells; micro-projectile bombardment of plant cells; vacuum infiltration; and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation. Transformation means introducing a nucleotide sequence into a plant in a manner to cause stable or transient expression of the sequence.

Successful examples of the modification of plant characteristics by transformation with cloned sequences which serve to illustrate the current knowledge in this field of technology, and which are herein incorporated by reference, include: US Patent Nos. 5,571,706; 5,677,175; 5,510,471; 5,750,386; 5,597,945; 5,589,615; 5,750,871; 5,268,526; 5,780,708; 5,538,880; 5,773,269; 5,736,369 and 5,610,042.

Following transformation, plants are preferably selected using a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the transformation vector. Typically, such a marker will confer antibiotic or herbicide resistance on the transformed plants, and selection of transformants can be accomplished by exposing the plants to appropriate concentrations of the antibiotic or herbicide.

After transformed plants are selected and grown to maturity, those plants showing a modified trait are identified. The modified trait can be any of those traits described above. Additionally, to confirm that the modified trait is due to changes in expression levels or activity of the polypeptide or polynucleotide can be determined by analyzing mRNA expression using Northern blots, RT-PCR or microarrays, or protein expression using immunoblots or Western blots or gel shift assays.

Additionally, described herein is an integrated system, i.e. a computer or computer readable medium that comprises an instruction set for determining the identity of one or more sequences in a database. In addition, the instruction set can be used to generate or identify sequences that meet any specified criteria. Furthermore, the instruction set may be used to associate or link certain functional benefits, such improved characteristics, with one or more identified sequence.

For example, the instruction set can include, e.g., a sequence comparison or other alignment program, e.g., an available program such as, for example, the Wisconsin Package Version 10.0, such as BLAST, FASTA, PILEUP, FINDPATTERNS or the like (GCG, Madison, WI). Public sequence databases such as GenBank, EMBL, Swiss-Prot and PIR or private sequence databases such as PHYTOSEQ sequence database (Incyte Genomics, Palo Alto, CA) can be searched.

Alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted by the local homology algorithm of Smith and Waterman (1981) Adv. Appl. Math. 2: 482-489, by the homology alignment algorithm of Needleman and Wunsch (1970) J. Mol. Biol. 48: 443-453, by the search for similarity method of Pearson and Lipman (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 85: 2444-2448, by computerized implementations of these algorithms. After alignment, sequence comparisons between two (or more) polynucleotides or polypeptides are typically performed by comparing sequences of the two sequences over a comparison window to identify and compare local regions of sequence similarity. The comparison window can be a segment of at least about 20 contiguous positions, usually about 50 to about 200, more usually about 100 to about 150 contiguous positions. A description of the method is provided in Ausubel et al. supra.

A variety of methods for determining sequence relationships can be used, including manual alignment and computer assisted sequence alignment and analysis. This later approach is a preferred approach, due to the increased throughput afforded by computer assisted methods. As noted above, a variety of computer programs for performing sequence alignment are available, or can be produced by one of skill.

One example algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410. Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available, e.g., through the National Library of Medicine's National Center for Biotechnology Information (ncbi.nlm.nih; see at world wide web (www) National Institutes of Health US government (gov) website). This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al. supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to fmd longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always > 0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always < 0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=-4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff and Henikoff (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919). Unless otherwise indicated, "sequence identity" here refers to the % sequence identity generated from a tblastx using the NCBI version of the algorithm at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter "off" (see, for example, NIH NLM NCBI website at ncbi.nlm.nih, supra).

In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g. Karlin and Altschul (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 5873-5787). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P(N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. For example, a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence (and, therefore, in this context, homologous) if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.1, or less than about 0.01, and or even less than about 0.001. An additional example of a useful sequence alignment algorithm is PILEUP. PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments. The program can align, e.g., up to 300 sequences of a maximum length of 5,000 letters.

The integrated system, or computer typically includes a user input interface allowing a user to selectively view one or more sequence records corresponding to the one or more character strings, as well as an instruction set which aligns the one or more character strings with each other or with an additional character string to identify one or more region of sequence similarity. The system may include a link of one or more character strings with a particular phenotype or gene function. Typically, the system includes a user readable output element that displays an alignment produced by the alignment instruction set.

The above methods can be implemented in a localized or distributed computing environment. In a distributed environment, the methods may implemented on a single computer comprising multiple processors or on a multiplicity of computers. The computers can be linked, e.g. through a common bus, but more preferably the computer(s) are nodes on a network. The network can be a generalized or a dedicated local or wide-area network and, in certain preferred embodiments, the computers may be components of an intra-net or an internet.

Thus, the disclosure provides methods for identifying a sequence similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence. In the methods, a sequence database is provided (locally or across an inter or intra net) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.

Any sequence herein can be entered into the database, before or after querying the database. This provides for both expansion of the database and, if done before the querying step, for insertion of control sequences into the database. The control sequences can be detected by the query to ensure the general integrity of both the database and the query. As noted, the query can be performed using a web browser based interface. For example, the database can be a centralized public database such as those noted herein, and the querying can be done from a remote terminal or computer across an internet or intranet.

Any sequence herein can be used to identify a similar, homologous, paralogous, or orthologous sequence in another plant. This provides means for identifying endogenous sequences in other plants that may be useful to alter a trait of progeny plants, which results from crossing two plants of different strain. For example, sequences that encode an ortholog of any of the sequences herein that naturally occur in a plant with a desired trait can be identified using the sequences disclosed herein. The plant is then crossed with a second plant of the same species but which does not have the desired trait to produce progeny which can then be used in further crossing experiments to produce the desired trait in the second plant. Therefore the resulting progeny plant contains no transgenes; expression of the endogenous sequence may also be regulated by treatment with a particular chemical or other means, such as EMR. Some examples of such compounds well known in the art include: ethylene; cytokinins; phenolic compounds, which stimulate the transcription of the genes needed for infection; specific monosaccharides and acidic environments which potentiate vir gene induction; acidic polysaccharides which induce one or more chromosomal genes; and opines; other mechanisms include light or dark treatment (for a review of examples of such treatments, see, Winans (1992) Microbiol. Rev. 56: 12-31; Eyal et al. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 589-599; Chrispeels et al. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 279-290; Piazza et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128: 1077-1086).

Table 7 lists sequences discovered to be orthologous to a number of representative transcription factors of the present disclosure. The column headings include the transcription factors listed by (a) the SEQ ID NO: of the Arabidopsis sequence that was used to discover the non-Arabidopsis orthologous sequence; (b) the GID sequence identifier of the Arabidopsis sequence; (c) the Sequence Identifier or GenBank Accession Number of the orthologous sequence;(d) the species from which the orthologous sequence is derived; (e) the SEQ ID NO: of the non-Arabidopsis orthologous sequence, and (e) the smallest sum probability pairwise comparison of each orthologous sequence to the similar Arabidopsis sequence determined by BLAST analysis. SEQ ID NO: of Arabidopsis Sequence Used to Discover Ortholog GID No. Species from Which Ortholog is Derived Sequence Identifier or Accession Number SEQ ID NO: of Orthologous Sequence Smallest Sum Probability to Ortholog, When Known 327 G1988 Glycine max GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER75453_1 1098 327 G1988 Glycine max GLYMA-28NOV01-CLUSTER75453 2 1099 327 G1988 Oryza sativa ORYSA-22JAN02-CLUSTER153439 2 1100 327 G1988 Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER10890_1 1101 327 G1988 Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER10890_3 1102 327 G1988 Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER201962_1 1103 327 G1988 Zea mays ZEAMA-08NOV01-CLUSTER3040 3 1104 327 G1988 Oryza sativa Os_S91481 1601 327 G1988 Lycopersicon esculentum SGN-UNIGENE-SINGLET-5090 2045 328 G1988 Brassica oleracea BH478747 5.00E-23 328 G1988 Populus balsamifera subsp. trichocarpa BU873581 7.00E-22 328 G1988 Citrus unshiu C95300 2.00E-18 328 G1988 Lycopersicon esculentum AW034552 2.00E-18 328 G1988 Oryza sativa (indica cultivar-group) AAAA01000340 1.00E-17 328 G1988 Beta vulgaris BQ594583 1.00E-16 328 G 1988 Zea mays CC655765 2.00E-15 328 G1988 Glycine max BI469275 8.00E-15 328 G1988 Prunus persica BU046688 7.00E-14 328 G1988 Vitis vinifera CD719941 2.00E-13 328 G1988 Malus x domestica gi4091806 2.60E-07 328 G1988 Brassica napus gi30984027 1.10E-06 328 G1988 Brassica nigra gi22854920 1.10E-06 328 G1988 Raphanus sativus gi3341723 2.70E-06 328 G1988 Oryza sativa (japonica cultivar-group) gi32488104 4.80E-06 328 G1198 Ipomoea nil gi10946337 5.10E-06 328 G1988 Oryza sativa gi11094211 2.20E-05 328 G1988 Hordeum vulgare gi21667475 4.50E-05 328 G1988 Hordeum vulgare subsp. vulgare gi21655168 0.00018 328 G1988 Pinus radiata gi4557093 0.0016

Table 9 lists the gene identification number (GID) and relationships for homologous (found using analyses according to Example IX) and variant sequences for the sequences of the Sequence Listing. SEQ ID NO: GID DNA or Protein (PRT) Species from which Sequence is Derived Relationship 1098 DNA Glycine max Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1099 DNA Glycine max Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1100 DNA Oryza sativa Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1101 DNA Zea mays Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1102 DNA Zea mays Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1103 DNA Zea mays Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1104 DNA Zea mays Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 1601 DNA Oryza sativa Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988 2045 DNA Lycopersicon esculentum Predicted polypeptide sequence is orthologous to G1988

The invention, now being generally described, will be more readily understood by reference to the following examples, which are included merely for purposes of illustration of certain aspects and embodiments of the present invention and are not intended to limit the invention. It will be recognized by one of skill in the art that a transcription factor that is associated with a particular first trait may also be associated with at least one other, unrelated and inherent second trait which was not predicted by the first trait.

The complete descriptions of the traits associated with each polynucleotide of the invention are fully disclosed in Table 4 and Table 6. The complete description of the transcription factor gene family and identified conserved domains of the polypeptide encoded by the polynucleotide is fully disclosed in Table 5.

Putative transcription factor sequences (genomic or ESTs) related to known transcription factors were identified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using the tblastn sequence analysis program using default parameters and a P-value cutoff threshold of -4 or -5 or lower, depending on the length of the query sequence. Putative transcription factor sequence hits were then screened to identify those containing particular sequence strings. If the sequence hits contained such sequence strings, the sequences were confirmed as transcription factors.

Alternatively, Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA libraries derived from different tissues or treatments, or genomic libraries were screened to identify novel members of a transcription family using a low stringency hybridization approach. Probes were synthesized using gene specific primers in a standard PCR reaction (annealing temperature 60°C) and labeled with ³²P dCTP using the High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (now Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN). Purified radiolabelled probes were added to filters immersed in Church hybridization medium (0.5 M NaPO₄ pH 7.0, 7% SDS, 1% w/v bovine serum albumin) and hybridized overnight at 60°C with shaking. Filters were washed two times for 45 to 60 minutes with 1xSCC, 1% SDS at 60° C.

To identify additional sequence 5' or 3' of a partial cDNA sequence in a cDNA library, 5' and 3' rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) was performed using the MARATHON cDNA amplification kit (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA). Generally, the method entailed first isolating poly(A) mRNA, performing first and second strand cDNA synthesis to generate double stranded cDNA, blunting cDNA ends, followed by ligation of the MARATHON Adaptor to the cDNA to form a library of adaptor-ligated ds cDNA.

Gene-specific primers were designed to be used along with adaptor specific primers for both 5' and 3' RACE reactions. Nested primers, rather than single primers, were used to increase PCR specificity. Using 5' and 3' RACE reactions, 5' and 3' RACE fragments were obtained, sequenced and cloned. The process can be repeated until 5' and 3' ends of the full-length gene were identified. Then the full-length cDNA was generated by PCR using primers specific to 5' and 3' ends of the gene by end-to-end PCR.

The sequence was amplified from a genomic or cDNA library using primers specific to sequences upstream and downstream of the coding region. The expression vector was pMEN20 or pMEN65, which are both derived from pMON316 (Sanders et al. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15:1543-1558) and contain the CaMV 35S promoter to express transgenes. To clone the sequence into the vector, both pMEN20 and the amplified DNA fragment were digested separately with SAlI and NotI restriction enzymes at 37° C for 2 hours. The digestion products were subject to electrophoresis in a 0.8% agarose gel and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. The DNA fragments containing the sequence and the linearized plasmid were excised and purified by using a QIAQUICK gel extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia CA). The fragments of interest were ligated at a ratio of 3:1 (vector to insert). Ligation reactions using T4 DNA ligase (New England Biolabs, Beverly MA) were carried out at 16° C for 16 hours. The ligated DNAs were transformed into competent cells of the E. coli strain DH5alpha by using the heat shock method. The transformations were plated on LB plates containing 50 mg/l kanamycin (Sigma Chemical Co. St. Louis MO). Individual colonies were grown overnight in five milliliters of LB broth containing 50 mg/l kanamycin at 37° C. Plasmid DNA was purified by using Qiaquick Mini Prep kits (Qiagen).

After the plasmid vector containing the gene was constructed, the vector was used to transform Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells expressing the gene products. The stock of Agrobacterium tumefaciens cells for transformation were made as described by Nagel et al. (1990) FEMSMicrobiol Letts. 67: 325-328. Agrobacterium strain ABI was grown in 250 ml LB medium (Sigma) overnight at 28°C with shaking until an absorbance over 1 cm at 600 nm (A₆₀₀) of 0.5 -1.0 was reached. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 15 min at 4° C. Cells were then resuspended in 250 µl chilled buffer (1 mM HEPES, pH adjusted to 7.0 with KOH). Cells were centrifuged again as described above and resuspended in 125 µl chilled buffer. Cells were then centrifuged and resuspended two more times in the same HEPES buffer as described above at a volume of 100 µl and 750 µl, respectively. Resuspended cells were then distributed into 40 µl aliquots, quickly frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80° C.

Agrobacterium cells were transformed with plasmids prepared as described above following the protocol described by Nagel et al. (supra). For each DNA construct to be transformed, 50 - 100 ng DNA (generally resuspended in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) was mixed with 40 µl of Agrobacterium cells. The DNA/cell mixture was then transferred to a chilled cuvette with a 2mm electrode gap and subject to a 2.5 kV charge dissipated at 25 µF and 200 µF using a Gene Pulser II apparatus (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). After electroporation, cells were immediately resuspended in 1.0 ml LB and allowed to recover without antibiotic selection for 2 - 4 hours at 28° C in a shaking incubator. After recovery, cells were plated onto selective medium of LB broth containing 100 µg/ml spectinomycin (Sigma) and incubated for 24-48 hours at 28° C. Single colonies were then picked and inoculated in fresh medium. The presence of the plasmid construct was verified by PCR amplification and sequence analysis.

After transformation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with plasmid vectors containing the gene, single Agrobacterium colonies were identified, propagated, and used to transform Arabidopsis plants. Briefly, 500 ml cultures of LB medium containing 50 mg/l kanamycin were inoculated with the colonies and grown at 28° C with shaking for 2 days until an optical absorbance at 600 nm wavelength over 1 cm (A₆₀₀) of > 2.0 is reached. Cells were then harvested by centrifugation at 4,000 x g for 10 min, and resuspended in infiltration medium (1/2 X Murashige and Skoog salts (Sigma), 1 X Gamborg's B-5 vitamins (Sigma), 5.0% (w/v) sucrose (Sigma), 0.044 µM benzylamino purine (Sigma), 200 µl/l Silwet L-77 (Lehle Seeds) until an A₆₀₀ of 0.8 was reached.

Prior to transformation, Arabidopsis thaliana seeds (ecotype Columbia) were sown at a density of ~10 plants per 4" pot onto Pro-Mix BX potting medium (Hummert International) covered with fiberglass mesh (18 mm X 16 mm). Plants were grown under continuous illumination (50-75 µE/m²/sec) at 22-23° C with 65-70% relative humidity. After about 4 weeks, primary inflorescence stems (bolts) are cut off to encourage growth of multiple secondary bolts. After flowering of the mature secondary bolts, plants were prepared for transformation by removal of all siliques and opened flowers.

The pots were then immersed upside down in the mixture of Agrobacterium infiltration medium as described above for 30 sec, and placed on their sides to allow draining into a 1' x 2' flat surface covered with plastic wrap. After 24 h, the plastic wrap was removed and pots are turned upright. The immersion procedure was repeated one week later, for a total of two immersions per pot. Seeds were then collected from each transformation pot and analyzed following the protocol described below.

Seeds collected from the transformation pots were sterilized essentially as follows. Seeds were dispersed into in a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 (Sigma) and sterile water and washed by shaking the suspension for 20 min. The wash solution was then drained and replaced with fresh wash solution to wash the seeds for 20 min with shaking. After removal of the ethanol/detergent solution, a solution containing 0.1% (v/v) Triton X-100 and 30% (v/v) bleach (CLOROX; Clorox Corp. Oakland CA) was added to the seeds, and the suspension was shaken for 10 min. After removal of the bleach/detergent solution, seeds were then washed five times in sterile distilled water. The seeds were stored in the last wash water at 4° C for 2 days in the dark before being plated onto antibiotic selection medium (1 X Murashige and Skoog salts (pH adjusted to 5.7 with 1M KOH), 1 X Gamborg's B-5 vitamins, 0.9% phytagar (Life Technologies), and 50 mg/l kanamycin). Seeds were germinated under continuous illumination (50-75 µE/m²/sec) at 22-23° C. After 7-10 days of growth under these conditions, kanamycin resistant primary transformants (T1 generation) were visible and obtained. These seedlings were transferred first to fresh selection plates where the seedlings continued to grow for 3-5 more days, and then to soil (Pro-Mix BX potting medium).

Primary transformants were crossed and progeny seeds (T₂) collected; kanamycin resistant seedlings were selected and analyzed. The expression levels of the recombinant polynucleotides in the transformants varies from about a 5% expression level increase to a least a 100% expression level increase. Similar observations are made with respect to polypeptide level expression.

The screening of insertion mutagenized Arabidopsis collections for null mutants in a known target gene was essentially as described in Krysan et al. (1999) Plant Cell 11: 2283-2290. Briefly, gene-specific primers, nested by 5-250 base pairs to each other, were designed from the 5' and 3' regions of a known target gene. Similarly, nested sets of primers were also created specific to each of the T-DNA or transposon ends (the "right" and "left" borders). All possible combinations of gene specific and T-DNA/transposon primers were used to detect by PCR an insertion event within or close to the target gene. The amplified DNA fragments were then sequenced which allows the precise determination of the T-DNA/transposon insertion point relative to the target gene. Insertion events within the coding or intervening sequence of the genes were deconvoluted from a pool comprising a plurality of insertion events to a single unique mutant plant for functional characterization. The method is described in more detail in Yu and Adam, US Application Serial No. 09/177,733 filed October 23, 1998.

Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited modified biochemical characteristics. Among the biochemicals that were assayed were insoluble sugars, such as arabinose, fucose, galactose, mannose, rhamnose or xylose or the like; prenyl lipids, such as lutein, beta-carotene, xanthophyll-1, xanthophyll-2, chlorophylls A or B, or alpha-, delta- or gamma-tocopherol or the like; fatty acids, such as 16:0 (palmitic acid), 16:1 (palmitoleic acid), 18:0 (stearic acid), 18:1 (oleic acid), 18:2 (linoleic acid), 20:0 , 18:3 (linolenic acid), 20:1 (eicosenoic acid), 20:2, 22:1 (erucic acid) or the like; waxes, such as by altering the levels of C29, C31, or C33 alkanes; sterols, such as brassicasterol, campesterol, stigmasterol, sitosterol or stigmastanol or the like, glucosinolates, protein or oil levels.

Fatty acids were measured using two methods depending on whether the tissue was from leaves or seeds. For leaves, lipids were extracted and esterified with hot methanolic H₂SO₄ and partitioned into hexane from methanolic brine. For seed fatty acids, seeds were pulverized and extracted in methanol:heptane:toluene:2,2-dimethoxypropane:H₂SO₄ (39:34:20:5:2) for 90 minutes at 80°C. After cooling to room temperature the upper phase, containing the seed fatty acid esters, was subjected to GC analysis. Fatty acid esters from both seed and leaf tissues were analyzed with a SUPELCO SP-2330 column (Supelco, Bellefonte, PA).

Glucosinolates were purified from seeds or leaves by first heating the tissue at 95°C for 10 minutes. Preheated ethanol:water (50:50) is added and after heating at 95°C for a further 10 minutes, the extraction solvent is applied to a DEAE SEPHADEX column (Pharmacia) which had been previously equilibrated with 0.5 M pyridine acetate. Desulfoglucosinolates were eluted with 300 ul water and analyzed by reverse phase HPLC monitoring at 226 nm.

For wax alkanes, samples were extracted using an identical method as fatty acids and extracts were analyzed on a HP 5890 GC coupled with a 5973 MSD. Samples were chromatographically isolated on a J&W DB35 mass spectrometer (J&W Scientific Agilent Technologies, Folsom, CA).

To measure prenyl lipid levels, seeds or leaves were pulverized with 1 to 2% pyrogallol as an antioxidant. For seeds, extracted samples were filtered and a portion removed for tocopherol and carotenoid/chlorophyll analysis by HPLC. The remaining material was saponified for sterol determination. For leaves, an aliquot was removed and diluted with methanol and chlorophyll A, chlorophyll B, and total carotenoids measured by spectrophotometry by determining optical absorbance at 665.2 nm, 652.5 nm, and 470 nm. An aliquot was removed for tocopherol and carotenoid/chlorophyll composition by HPLC using a Waters µBondapak C18 column (4.6 mm x 150 mm). The remaining methanolic solution was saponified with 10% KOH at 80° C for one hour. The samples were cooled and diluted with a mixture of methanol and water. A solution of 2% methylene chloride in hexane was mixed in and the samples were centrifuged. The aqueous methanol phase was again re-extracted 2% methylene chloride in hexane and, after centrifugation, the two upper phases were combined and evaporated. 2% methylene chloride in hexane was added to the tubes and the samples were then extracted with one ml of water. The upper phase was removed, dried, and resuspended in 400 ul of 2% methylene chloride in hexane and analyzed by gas chromatography using a 50 m DB-5ms (0.25 mm ID, 0.25 um phase, J&W Scientific).

Insoluble sugar levels were measured by the method essentially described by Reiter et al. (1999), Plant J. 12: 335-345. This method analyzes the neutral sugar composition of cell wall polymers found in Arabidopsis leaves. Soluble sugars were separated from sugar polymers by extracting leaves with hot 70% ethanol. The remaining residue containing the insoluble polysaccharides was then acid hydrolyzed with allose added as an internal standard. Sugar monomers generated by the hydrolysis were then reduced to the corresponding alditols by treatment with NaBH4, then were acetylated to generate the volatile alditol acetates which were then analyzed by GC-FID. Identity of the peaks was determined by comparing the retention times of known sugars converted to the corresponding alditol acetates with the retention times of peaks from wild-type plant extracts. Alditol acetates were analyzed on a Supelco SP-2330 capillary column (30 m x 250 µm x 0.2 µm) using a temperature program beginning at 180° C for 2 minutes followed by an increase to 220° C in 4 minutes. After holding at 220° C for 10 minutes, the oven temperature is increased to 240° C in 2 minutes and held at this temperature for 10 minutes and brought back to room temperature.

To identify plants with alterations in total seed oil or protein content, 150mg of seeds from T2 progeny plants were subjected to analysis by Near Infrared Reflectance Spectroscopy (NIRS) using a Foss NirSystems Model 6500 with a spinning cup transport system. NIRS is a non-destructive analytical method used to determine seed oil and protein composition. Infrared is the region of the electromagnetic spectrum located after the visible region in the direction of longer wavelengths. 'Near infrared' owns its name for being the infrared region near to the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum. For practical purposes, near infrared comprises wavelengths between 800 and 2500 nm. NIRS is applied to organic compounds rich in O-H bonds (such as moisture, carbohydrates, and fats), C-H bonds (such as organic compounds and petroleum derivatives), and N-H bonds (such as proteins and amino acids). The NIRS analytical instruments operate by statistically correlating NIRS signals at several wavelengths with the characteristic or property intended to be measured. All biological substances contain thousands of C-H, O-H, and N-H bonds. Therefore, the exposure to near infrared radiation of a biological sample, such as a seed, results in a complex spectrum which contains qualitative and quantitative information about the physical and chemical composition of that sample.

The numerical value of a specific analyte in the sample, such as protein content or oil content, is mediated by a calibration approach known as chemometrics. Chemometrics applies statistical methods such as multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least squares (PLS), and principle component analysis (PCA) to the spectral data and correlates them with a physical property or other factor, that property or factor is directly determined rather than the analyte concentration itself. The method first provides "wet chemistry" data of the samples required to develop the calibration.

Calibration of NIRS response was performed using data obtained by wet chemical analysis of a population of Arabidopsis ecotypes that were expected to represent diversity of oil and protein levels.

The exact oil composition of each ecotype used in the calibration experiment was performed using gravimetric analysis of oils extracted from seed samples (0.5 g or 1.0 g) by the accelerated solvent extraction method (ASE; Dionex Corp, Sunnyvale, CA). The extraction method was validated against certified canola samples (Community Bureau of Reference, Belgium). Seed samples from each ecotype (0.5 g or 1g) were subjected to accelerated solvent extraction and the resulting extracted oil weights compared to the weight of oil recovered from canola seed that has been certified for oil content (Community Bureau of Reference). The oil calibration equation was based on 57 samples with a range of oil contents from 27.0 % to 50.8 %. To check the validity of the calibration curve, an additional set of samples was extracted by ASE and predicted using the oil calibration equation. This validation set counted 46 samples, ranging from 27.9 % to 47.5 % oil, and had a predicted standard error of performance of 0.63 %. The wet chemical method for protein was elemental analysis (%N X 6.0) using the average of 3 representative samples of 5 mg each validated against certified ground corn (NIST). The instrumentation was an Elementar Vario-EL III elemental analyzer operated in CNS operating mode (Elementar Analysensysteme GmbH, Hanau, Germany).

The protein calibration equation was based on a library of 63 samples with a range of protein contents from 17.4 % to 31.2 %. An additional set of samples was analyzed for protein by elemental analysis (n = 57) and scanned by NIRS in order to validate the protein prediction equation. The protein range of the validation set was from 16.8 % to 31.2 % and the standard error of prediction was 0.468 %.

NIRS analysis of Arabidopsis seed was carried out on between 40-300 mg experimental sample. The oil and protein contents were predicted using the respective calibration equations.

Data obtained from NIRS analysis was analyzed statistically using a nearest-neighbor (N-N) analysis. The N-N analysis allows removal of within-block spatial variability in a fairly flexible fashion, which does not require prior knowledge of the pattern of variability in the chamber. Ideally, all hybrids are grown under identical experimental conditions within a block (rep). In reality, even in many block designs, significant within-block variability exists. Nearest-neighbor procedures are based on assumption that environmental effect of a plot is closely related to that of its neighbors. Nearest-neighbor methods use information from adjacent plots to adjust for within-block heterogeneity and so provide more precise estimates of treatment means and differences. If there is within-plot heterogeneity on a spatial scale that is larger than a single plot and smaller than the entire block, then yields from adjacent plots will be positively correlated. Information from neighboring plots can be used to reduce or remove the unwanted effect of the spatial heterogeneity, and hence improve the estimate of the treatment effect. Data from neighboring plots can also be used to reduce the influence of competition between adjacent plots. The Papadakis N-N analysis can be used with designs to remove within-block variability that would not be removed with the standard split plot analysis ((Papadakis (1973) Inst. d'Amelior. Plantes Thessaloniki (Greece) Bull. Scientif. No. 23; Papadakis (1984) Proc. Acad. Athens 59: 326-342).

Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited modified sugar sensing. For such studies, seeds from transformants were germinated on media containing 5% glucose or 9.4% sucrose which normally partially restrict hypocotyl elongation. Plants with altered sugar sensing may have either longer or shorter hypocotyls than normal plants when grown on this media. Additionally, other plant traits may be varied such as root mass.

Experiments may be performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited an improved pathogen tolerance. For such studies, the transformants are exposed to biotropic fungal pathogens, such as Erysiphe orontii, and necrotropic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum. Fusarium oxysporum isolates cause vascular wilts and damping off of various annual vegetables, perennials and weeds (Mauch-Mani and Slusarenko (1994) Molec Plant-Microbe Interact. 7: 378-383). For Fusarium oxysporum experiments, plants are grown on Petri dishes and sprayed with a fresh spore suspension of F. oxysporum. The spore suspension is prepared as follows: A plug of fungal hyphae from a plate culture is placed on a fresh potato dextrose agar plate and allowed to spread for one week. Five ml sterile water is then added to the plate, swirled, and pipetted into 50 ml Armstrong Fusarium medium. Spores are grown overnight in Fusarium medium and then sprayed onto plants using a Preval paint sprayer. Plant tissue is harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 48 hours post-infection.

Erysiphe orontii is a causal agent of powdery mildew. For Erysiphe orontii experiments, plants are grown approximately 4 weeks in a greenhouse under 12 hour light (20°C, ~30% relative humidity (rh)). Individual leaves are infected with E. orontii spores from infected plants using a camel's hair brush, and the plants are transferred to a Percival growth chamber (20°C, 80% rh.). Plant tissue is harvested and frozen in liquid nitrogen 7 days post-infection.

Botrytis cinerea is a necrotrophic pathogen. Botrytis cinerea is grown on potato dextrose agar under 12 hour light (20°C, ~30% relative humidity (rh)). A spore culture is made by spreading 10 ml of sterile water on the fungus plate, swirling and transferring spores to 10 ml of sterile water. The spore inoculum (approx. 105 spores/ml) is then used to spray 10 day-old seedlings grown under sterile conditions on MS (minus sucrose) media. Symptoms are evaluated every day up to approximately 1 week.

Sclerotinia sclerotiorum hyphal cultures are grown in potato dextrose broth. One gram of hyphae is ground, filtered, spun down and resuspended in sterile water. A 1:10 dilution is used to spray 10 day-old seedlings grown aseptically under a 12 hour light/dark regime on MS (minus sucrose) media. Symptoms are evaluated every day up to approximately 1 week.

Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola (Psm) strain 4326 and pv maculicola strain 4326 was inoculated by hand at two doses. Two inoculation doses allows the differentiation between plants with enhanced susceptibility and plants with enhanced resistance to the pathogen. Plants are grown for 3 weeks in the greenhouse, then transferred to the growth chamber for the remainder of their growth. Psm ES4326 may be hand inoculated with 1 ml syringe on 3 fully-expanded leaves per plant (4 1/2 wk old), using at least 9 plants per overexpressing line at two inoculation doses, OD=0.005 and OD=0.0005. Disease scoring is performed at day 3 post-inoculation with pictures of the plants and leaves taken in parallel.

In some instances, expression patterns of the pathogen-induced genes (such as defense genes) may be monitored by microarray experiments. In these experiments, cDNAs are generated by PCR and resuspended at a final concentration of ~ 100 ng/ul in 3X SSC or 150mM Na-phosphate (Eisen and Brown (1999) Methods Enzymol. 303: 179-205). The cDNAs are spotted on microscope glass slides coated with polylysine. The prepared cDNAs are aliquoted into 384 well plates and spotted on the slides using, for example, an x-y-z gantry (OmniGrid) which may be purchased from GeneMachines (Menlo Park, CA) outfitted with quill type pins which may be purchased from Telechem International (Sunnyvale, CA). After spotting, the arrays are cured for a minimum of one week at room temperature, rehydrated and blocked following the protocol recommended by Eisen and Brown (1999; supra).

Sample total RNA (10 µg) samples are labeled using fluorescent Cy3 and Cy5 dyes. Labeled samples are resuspended in 4X SSC/0.03% SDS/4 µg salmon sperm DNA/2 µg tRNA/ 50mM Napyrophosphate, heated for 95°C for 2.5 minutes, spun down and placed on the array. The array is then covered with a glass coverslip and placed in a sealed chamber. The chamber is then kept in a water bath at 62°C overnight. The arrays are washed as described in Eisen and Brown (1999, supra) and scanned on a General Scanning 3000 laser scanner. The resulting files are subsequently quantified using IMAGENE, software (BioDiscovery, Los Angeles CA).

RT-PCR experiments may be performed to identify those genes induced after exposure to biotropic fungal pathogens, such as Erysiphe orontii, necrotropic fungal pathogens, such as Fusarium oxysporum, bacteria, viruses and salicylic acid, the latter being involved in a nonspecific resistance response in Arabidopsis thaliana. Generally, the gene expression patterns from ground plant leaf tissue is examined.

Reverse transcriptase PCR was conducted using gene specific primers within the coding region for each sequence identified. The primers were designed near the 3' region of each DNA binding sequence initially identified.

Total RNA from these ground leaf tissues was isolated using the CTAB extraction protocol. Once extracted total RNA was normalized in concentration across all the tissue types to ensure that the PCR reaction for each tissue received the same amount of cDNA template using the 28S band as reference. Poly(A+) RNA was purified using a modified protocol from the Qiagen OLIGOTEX purification kit batch protocol. cDNA was synthesized using standard protocols. After the first strand cDNA synthesis, primers for Actin 2 were used to normalize the concentration of cDNA across the tissue types. Actin 2 is found to be constitutively expressed in fairly equal levels across the tissue types we are investigating.

For RT PCR, cDNA template was mixed with corresponding primers and Taq DNA polymerase. Each reaction consisted of 0.2 µl cDNA template, 2 µl 10X Tricine buffer, 2 µl 10X Tricine buffer and 16.8 µl water, 0.05 µl Primer 1, 0.05 µl, Primer 2, 0.3 µl Taq DNA polymerase and 8.6 µl water.

The 96 well plate is covered with microfilm and set in the thermocycler to start the reaction cycle. By way of illustration, the reaction cycle may comprise the following steps:

• Step 1: 93° C for 3 min;
• Step 2: 93° C for 30 sec;
• Step 3: 65° C for 1 min;
• Step 4: 72° C for 2 min;
• Steps 2, 3 and 4 are repeated for 28 cycles;
• Step 5: 72° C for 5 min; and
• STEP 6 4° C.

To amplify more products, for example, to identify genes that have very low expression, additional steps may be performed: The following method illustrates a method that may be used in this regard. The PCR plate is placed back in the thermocycler for 8 more cycles of steps 2-4.

• Step 2 93° C for 30 sec;
• Step 3 65° C for 1 min;
• Step 4 72° C for 2 min, repeated for 8 cycles; and
• Step 5 4° C.

Eight microliters of PCR product and 1.5 µl of loading dye are loaded on a 1.2% agarose gel for analysis after 28 cycles and 36 cycles. Expression levels of specific transcripts are considered low if they were only detectable after 36 cycles of PCR. Expression levels are considered medium or high depending on the levels of transcript compared with observed transcript levels for an internal control such as actin2. Transcript levels are determined in repeat experiments and compared to transcript levels in control (e.g., non-transformed) plants.

Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited an improved environmental stress tolerance. For such studies, the transformants were exposed to a variety of environmental stresses. Plants were exposed to chilling stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8° C), heat stress (6 hour exposure to 32-37° C), high salt stress (6 hour exposure to 200 mM NaCl), drought stress (168 hours after removing water from trays), osmotic stress (6 hour exposure to 3 M mannitol), or nutrient limitation (nitrogen, phosphate, and potassium) (nitrogen: all components of MS medium remained constant except N was reduced to 20 mg/l of NH₄NO₃; phosphate: all components of MS medium except KH2PO₄, which was replaced by K₂SO₄; potassium: all components of MS medium except removal of KNO₃ and KH₂PO₄, which were replaced by NaH₄PO₄).

Experiments were performed to identify those transformants or knockouts that exhibited a modified structure and development characteristics. For such studies, the transformants were observed by eye to identify novel structural or developmental characteristics associated with the ectopic expression of the polynucleotides or polypeptides of the invention.

Flowering time was measured by the number of rosette leaves present when a visible inflorescence of approximately 3 cm is apparent. Rosette and total leaf number on the progeny stem are tightly correlated with the timing of flowering (Koornneef et al. (1991) Mol. Gen. Genet. 229: 57-66). The vernalization response was also measured. For vernalization treatments, seeds were sown to MS agar plates, sealed with micropore tape, and placed in a 4°C cold room with low light levels for 6-8 weeks. The plates were then transferred to the growth rooms alongside plates containing freshly sown non-vernalized controls. Rosette leaves were counted when a visible inflorescence of approximately 3 cm was apparent.

Modified phenotypes observed for particular overexpressor or knockout plants are provided in Table 4. For a particular overexpressor that shows a less beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to select a plant with a decreased expression of the particular transcription factor. For a particular knockout that shows a less beneficial characteristic, it may be more useful to select a plant with an increased expression of the particular transcription factor.

The sequences of the Sequence Listing or those in Tables 4 - 9, or those disclosed here, can be used to prepare transgenic plants and plants with altered traits. The specific transgenic plants listed below are produced from the sequences of the Sequence Listing, as noted. Tables 4 and 6 provide exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences of the invention.

Examples of genes and homologs that confer significant improvements to knockout or overexpressing plants are noted below. Experimental observations made by us with regard to specific genes whose expression has been modified in overexpressing or knock-out plants, and potential applications based on these observations, are also presented.

This example provides experimental evidence for increased biomass and abiotic stress tolerance controlled by the transcription factor polypeptides and polypeptides of the invention.

Salt stress assays are intended to find genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt. Evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement and salt accumulation in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt concentration of in the whole soil profile. Plants differ in their tolerance to NaCl depending on their stage of development, therefore seed germination, seedling vigor, and plant growth responses are evaluated.

Osmotic stress assays (including NaCl and mannitol assays) are intended to determine if an osmotic stress phenotype is NaCl-specific or if it is a general osmotic stress related phenotype. Plants tolerant to osmotic stress could also have more tolerance to drought and/or freezing.

Drought assays are intended to find genes that mediate better plant survival after short-term, severe water deprivation. Ion leakage will be measured if needed. Osmotic stress tolerance would also support a drought tolerant phenotype.

Temperature stress assays are intended to find genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or plant growth under temperature stress (cold, freezing and heat).

Sugar sensing assays are intended to find genes involved in sugar sensing by germinating seeds on high concentrations of sucrose and glucose and looking for degrees of hypocotyl elongation. The germination assay on mannitol controls for responses related to osmotic stress. Sugars are key regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis. Sucrose is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships). Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division and repression of "famine" genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate cycles).

Germination assays followed modifications of the same basic protocol. Sterile seeds were sown on the conditional media listed below. Plates were incubated at 22° C under 24-hour light (120-130 µEin/m²/s) in a growth chamber. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor was conducted 3 to 15 days after planting. The basal media was 80% Murashige-Skoog medium (MS) + vitamins.

For salt and osmotic stress germination experiments, the medium was supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol. Growth regulator sensitivity assays were performed in MS media, vitamins, and either 0.3 µM ABA, 9.4% sucrose, or 5% glucose.

Temperature stress cold germination experiments were carried out at 8 °C. Heat stress germination experiments were conducted at 32 °C to 37° C for 6 hours of exposure.

For stress experiments conducted with more mature plants, seeds were germinated and grown for seven days on MS + vitamins + 1% sucrose at 22 °C and then transferred to chilling and heat stress conditions. The plants were either exposed to chilling stress (6 hour exposure to 4-8° C), or heat stress (32° C was applied for five days, after which the plants were transferred back 22 °C for recovery and evaluated after 5 days relative to controls not exposed to the depressed or elevated temperature).

G1988 (At3g21150) is in P1 clone MSA6 (GenBank accession number AP000604) and was identified based on its sequence similarity within the conserved domain to other CONSTANS-like related proteins in Arabidopsis. There is no published or public information about the function of G1988.

The function of G1988 was studied using transgenic plants in which the gene was expressed under the control of the 35S promoter. Evidence from physiological and morphological assays indicates that G1988 may play a role in developmental processes regulated by light; 35S::G1988 seedlings displayed longer hypocotyls, elongated petioles, and a number of lines flowered early.

When grown on limited phosphate, all lines appeared larger and had more root growth than controls. Seedlings germinated on plates that contained limited nitrogen (supplemented with glutamine) appeared less stressed than controls.

Based on the results from physiological assays, G1988 might be used to engineer plants that show enhanced growth and survivability in low nutrient environments.

G1988 could also have a role in modulating developmental processes regulated by light, such as shade avoidance. Eliminating shading responses could lead to increased planting densities with subsequent yield enhancement. The gene might also be useful in manipulating flowering time.

This example describes identification of genes that are orthologous to Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors from a computer homology search.

Homologous sequences, including those of paralogs and orthologs from Arabidopsis and other plant species, were identified using database sequence search tools, such as the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410; and Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acid Res. 25: 3389-3402). The tblastx sequence analysis programs were employed using the BLOSUM-62 scoring matrix (Henikoff and Henikoff (1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919). The entire NCBI GenBank database was filtered for sequences from all plants except Arabidopsis thaliana by selecting all entries in the NCBI GenBank database associated with NCBI taxonomic ID 33090 (Viridiplantae; all plants) and excluding entries associated with taxonomic ID 3701 (Arabidopsis thaliana).

These sequences are compared to sequences representing genes of the Sequence Listing, using the Washington University TBLASTX algorithm (version 2.0a19MP) at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter "off". For each of these gene sequences, individual comparisons were ordered by probability score (P-value), where the score reflects the probability that a particular alignment occurred by chance. For example, a score of 3.6e-40 is 3.6 x 10-40. In addition to P-values, comparisons were also scored by percentage identity. Percentage identity reflects the degree to which two segments of DNA or protein are identical over a particular length. Examples of sequences so identified are presented in Tables 7, and 9. Paralogous or orthologous sequences were readily identified from proprietary databases and in GenBank. The percent sequence identity among these sequences can be as low as 47%, or even lower sequence identity.

Candidate paralogous sequences were identified among Arabidopsis transcription factors through alignment, identity, and phylogenic relationships. Candidate orthologous sequences were identified from proprietary unigene sets of plant gene sequences in Zea mays, Glycine max and Oryza sativa based on significant homology to Arabidopsis transcription factors. These candidates were reciprocally compared to the set of Arabidopsis transcription factors. If the candidate showed maximal similarity in the protein domain to the eliciting transcription factor or to a paralog of the eliciting transcription factor, then it was considered to be an ortholog. Identified non-Arabidopsis sequences that were shown in this manner to be orthologous to the Arabidopsis sequences are provided in Tables 7 and 9.

The "one-hybrid" strategy (Li and Herskowitz (1993) Science 262: 1870-1874) is used to screen for plant cDNA clones encoding a polypeptide comprising a transcription factor DNA binding domain, a conserved domain. In brief, yeast strains are constructed that contain a lacZ reporter gene with either wild-type or mutant transcription factor binding promoter element sequences in place of the normal UAS (upstream activator sequence) of the GALL promoter. Yeast reporter strains are constructed that carry transcription factor binding promoter element sequences as UAS elements are operably linked upstream (5') of a lacZ reporter gene with a minimal GAL1 promoter. The strains are transformed with a plant expression library that contains random cDNA inserts fused to the GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-ACT) and screened for blue colony formation on X-gal-treated filters (X-gal: 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-D-galactoside; Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad CA). Alternatively, the strains are transformed with a cDNA polynucleotide encoding a known transcription factor DNA binding domain polypeptide sequence.

Yeast strains carrying these reporter constructs produce low levels of beta-galactosidase and form white colonies on filters containing X-gal. The reporter strains carrying wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequences are transformed with a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide comprising a plant transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to the acidic activator domain of the yeast GAL4 transcription factor, "GAL4-ACT". The clones that contain a polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to GLA4-ACT can bind upstream of the lacZ reporter genes carrying the wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequence, activate transcription of the lacZ gene and result in yeast forming blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters.

Upon screening about 2 x 10⁶ yeast transformants, positive cDNA clones are isolated; i.e., clones that cause yeast strains carrying lacZ reporters operably linked to wild-type transcription factor binding promoter elements to form blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters. The cDNA clones do not cause a yeast strain carrying a mutant type transcription factor binding promoter elements fused to LacZ to turn blue. Thus, a polynucleotide encoding transcription factor DNA binding domain, a conserved domain, is shown to activate transcription of a gene.

The presence of a transcription factor comprising a DNA binding domain which binds to a DNA transcription factor binding element is evaluated using the following gel shift assay. The transcription factor is recombinantly expressed and isolated from E. coli or isolated from plant material. Total soluble protein, including transcription factor, (40 ng) is incubated at room temperature in 10 µl of 1 x binding buffer (15 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM DTT) plus 50 ng poly(dl-dC):poly(dl-dC) (Pharmacia, Piscataway NJ) with or without 100 ng competitor DNA. After 10 minutes incubation, probe DNA comprising a DNA transcription factor binding element (1 ng) that has been ³²P-labeled by end-filling (Sambrook et al. (1989) supra) is added and the mixture incubated for an additional 10 minutes. Samples are loaded onto polyacrylamide gels (4% w/v) and fractionated by electrophoresis at 150V for 2h (Sambrook et al. supra). The degree of transcription factor-probe DNA binding is visualized using autoradiography. Probes and competitor DNAs are prepared from oligonucleotide inserts ligated into the BamHI site of pUC118 (Vieira et al. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 153: 3-11). Orientation and concatenation number of the inserts are determined by dideoxy DNA sequence analysis (Sambrook et al. supra). Inserts are recovered after restriction digestion with EcoRI and HindIII and fractionation on polyacrylamide gels (12% w/v) (Sambrook et al. supra).

Any of the transcription factor sequences of the invention listed in the Sequence Listing, and paralogous, and orthologous sequences, may be recombined into pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors and then are transformed into a plant for the purpose of modifying plant traits. The cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacteriurn tumefaciens-mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants using most dicot plants (see Weissbach and Weissbach, (1989) supra; Gelvin et al. (1990) supra; Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) supra; Bevan (1984) supra; and Klee (1985) supra). Methods for analysis of traits are routine in the art and examples are disclosed above.

Cereal plants such as, but not limited to, corn, wheat, rice, sorghum, or barley, may also be transformed with the present polynucleotide sequences in pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors for the purpose of modifying plant traits. For example, pMEN020 may be modified to replace the NptII coding region with the BAR gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that confers resistance to phosphinothricin. The KpnI and BglII sites of the Bar gene are removed by site-directed mutagenesis with silent codon changes.

The cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants of most cereal crops (Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937) such as corn, wheat, rice, sorghum (Cassas et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 11212-11216, and barley (Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant Physiol. 104:37-48. DNA transfer methods such as the microprojectile can be used for corn (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839); Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618; Ishida (1990) Nature Biotechnol. 14:745-750), wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084), rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218). For most cereal plants, embryogenic cells derived from immature scutellum tissues are the preferred cellular targets for transformation (Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218; Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937).

Vectors according to the present invention may be transformed into corn embryogenic cells derived from immature scutellar tissue by using microprojectile bombardment, with the A188XB73 genotype as the preferred genotype (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). After microprojectile bombardment the tissues are selected on phosphinothricin to identify the transgenic embryogenic cells (Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). Transgenic plants are regenerated by standard corn regeneration techniques (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618).

The plasmids prepared as described above can also be used to produce transgenic wheat and rice plants (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218) that coordinately express genes of interest by following standard transformation protocols known to those skilled in the art for rice and wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; and Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084), where the bar gene is used as the selectable marker.

Orthologs to Arabidopsis genes may identified by several methods, including hybridization, amplification, or bioinformatically. This example describes how one may identify homologs to the Arabidopsis AP2 family transcription factor CBF1 (polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 2238, encoded polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 2239), which confers tolerance to abiotic stresses (Thomashow et al. (2002) US Patent No. 6,417,428), and an example to confirm the function of homologous sequences. In this example, orthologs to CBF1 were found in canola (Brassica napus) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

Degenerate primers were designed for regions of AP2 binding domain and outside of the AP2 (carboxyl terminal domain):

• Mol 368 (reverse) 5'- CAY CCN ATH TAY MGN GGN GT -3' (SEQ ID NO: 2246)
• Mol 378 (forward) 5'- GGN ARN ARC ATN CCY TCN GCC -3' (SEQ ID NO: 2247)
• (Y: C/T, N: A/C/G/T, H: A/C/T, M: A/C, R:A/G)

Primer Mol 368 is in the AP2 binding domain of CBF1 (amino acid sequence: His-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Arg-Gly-Val) while primer Mol 378 is outside the AP2 domain (carboxyl terminal domain) (amino acid sequence: Met-Ala-Glu-Gly-Met-Leu-Leu-Pro).

The genomic DNA isolated from B. napus was PCR-amplified by using these primers following these conditions: an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 93° C; 35 cycles of 93° C for 1 min, 55°C for 1 min, and 72° C for 1 min ; and a final incubation of 7 min at 72° C at the end of cycling.

The PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel and transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with the AT CBF1 probe prepared from Arabidopsis genomic DNA by PCR amplification. The hybridized products were visualized by colorimetric detection system (Boehringer Mannheim) and the corresponding bands from a similar agarose gel were isolated using the Qiagen Extraction Kit (Qiagen). The DNA fragments were ligated into the TA clone vector from TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) and transformed into E. coli strain TOP10 (Invitrogen).

Seven colonies were picked and the inserts were sequenced on an ABI 377 machine from both strands of sense and antisense after plasmid DNA isolation. The DNA sequence was edited by sequencer and aligned with the AtCBF1 by GCG software and NCBI blast searching.

The nucleic acid sequence and amino acid sequence of one canola ortholog found in this manner (bnCBF1; polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 2244 and polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 2245) identified by this process is shown in the Sequence Listing.

The aligned amino acid sequences show that the bnCBF1 gene has 88% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence in the AP2 domain region and 85% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence outside the AP2 domain when aligned for two insertion sequences that are outside the AP2 domain.

Similarly, paralogous sequences to Arabidopsis genes, such as CBF1, may also be identified.

Two paralogs of CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana: CBF2 and CBF3. CBF2 and CBF3 have been cloned and sequenced as described below. The sequences of the DNA SEQ ID NO: 2240 and 2242 and encoded proteins SEQ ID NO: 2241 and 2243 are set forth in the Sequence Listing.

A lambda cDNA library prepared from RNA isolated from Arabidopsis thaliana ecotype Columbia (Lin and Thomashow (1992) Plant Physiol. 99: 519-525) was screened for recombinant clones that carried inserts related to the CBF1 gene (Stockinger et al. (1997) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 94:1035-1040). CBF1 was ³²P-radiolabeled by random priming (Sambrook et al. supra) and used to screen the library by the plaque-lift technique using standard stringent hybridization and wash conditions (Hajela et al. (1990) Plant Physiol. 93:1246-1252; Sambrook et al. supra) 6 X SSPE buffer, 60° C for hybridization and 0.1 X SSPE buffer and 60° C for washes). Twelve positively hybridizing clones were obtained and the DNA sequences of the cDNA inserts were determined. The results indicated that the clones fell into three classes. One class carried inserts corresponding to CBF1. The two other classes carried sequences corresponding to two different homologs of CBF1, designated CBF2 and CBF3. The nucleic acid sequences and predicted protein coding sequences for Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 are listed in the Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs:2238, 2240, 2242 and SEQ ID NOs: 2239, 2241, and 2243, respectively). The nucleic acid sequences and predicted protein coding sequence for Brassica napus CBF ortholog is listed in the Sequence Listing (SEQ ID NOs: 2244 and 2245, respectively).

A comparison of the nucleic acid sequences of Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicate that they are 83 to 85% identical as shown in Table 11. Percent identity^a DNA^b Polypeptide cbf1/cbf2 85 86 cbf1/cbf3 83 84 cbf2/cbf3 84 85 ^a Percent identity was determined using the Clustal algorithm from the Megalign program (DNASTAR, Inc.).
^b Comparisons of the nucleic acid sequences of the open reading frames are shown.

Similarly, the amino acid sequences of the three CBF polypeptides range from 84 to 86% identity. An alignment of the three amino acidic sequences reveals that most of the differences in amino acid sequence occur in the acidic C-terminal half of the polypeptide. This region of CBF1 serves as an activation domain in both yeast and Arabidopsis (not shown).

Residues 47 to 106 of CBF1 correspond to the AP2 domain of the protein, a DNA binding motif that to date, has only been found in plant proteins. A comparison of the AP2 domains of CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicates that there are a few differences in amino acid sequence. These differences in amino acid sequence might have an effect on DNA binding specificity.

After identifying homologous genes to CBF1, canola was transformed with a plasmid containing the Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3 genes cloned into the vector pGA643 (An (1987) Methods Enzymol. 253: 292). In these constructs the CBF genes were expressed constitutively under the CaMV 35S promoter. In addition, the CBF1 gene was cloned under the control of the Arabidopsis COR15 promoter in the same vector pGA643. Each construct was transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Transformed Agrobacteria were grown for 2 days in minimal AB medium containing appropriate antibiotics.

Spring canola (B. napus cv. Westar) was transformed using the protocol of Moloney et al. ((1989) Plant Cell Reports 8: 238) with some modifications as described. Briefly, seeds were sterilized and plated on half strength MS medium, containing 1% sucrose. Plates were incubated at 24° C under 60-80 µE/m²s light using a16 hour light/ 8 hour dark photoperiod. Cotyledons from 4-5 day old seedlings were collected, the petioles cut and dipped into the Agrobacterium solution. The dipped cotyledons were placed on co-cultivation medium at a density of 20 cotyledons/plate and incubated as described above for 3 days. Explants were transferred to the same media, but containing 300 mg/l timentin (SmithKline Beecham, PA) and thinned to 10 cotyledons/plate. After 7 days explants were transferred to Selection/Regeneration medium. Transfers were continued every 2-3 weeks (2 or 3 times) until shoots had developed. Shoots were transferred to Shoot-Elongation medium every 2-3 weeks. Healthy looking shoots were transferred to rooting medium. Once good roots had developed, the plants were placed into moist potting soil.

The transformed plants were then analyzed for the presence of the NPTII gene/ kanamycin resistance by ELISA, using the ELISA NPTII kit from 5Prime-3Prime Inc. (Boulder, CO). Approximately 70% of the screened plants were NPTII positive. Only those plants were further analyzed.

From Northern blot analysis of the plants that were transformed with the constitutively expressing constructs, showed expression of the CBF genes and all CBF genes were capable of inducing the Brassica napus cold-regulated gene BN115 (homolog of the Arabidopsis COR15 gene). Most of the transgenic plants appear to exhibit a normal growth phenotype. As expected, the transgenic plants are more freezing tolerant than the wild-type plants. Using the electrolyte leakage of leaves test, the control showed a 50% leakage at -2 to -3° C. Spring canola transformed with either CBF1 or CBF2 showed a 50% leakage at -6 to -7° C. Spring canola transformed with CBF3 shows a 50% leakage at about -10 to -15° C. Winter canola transformed with CBF3 may show a 50% leakage at about -16 to -20° C. Furthermore, if the spring or winter canola are cold acclimated the transformed plants may exhibit a further increase in freezing tolerance of at least-2° C.

To test salinity tolerance of the transformed plants, plants were watered with 150 mM NaCl, Plants overexpressing CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3 grew better compared with plants that had not been transformed with CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3.

These results demonstrate that homologs of Arabidopsis transcription factors can be identified and shown to confer similar functions in non-Arabidopsis plant species.

Promoters are isolated from transcription factor genes that have gene expression patterns useful for a range of applications, as determined by methods well known in the art (including transcript profile analysis with cDNA or oligonucleotide microarrays, Northern blot analysis, semi-quantitative or quantitative RT-PCR). Interesting gene expression profiles are revealed by determining transcript abundance for a selected transcription factor gene after exposure of plants to a range of different experimental conditions, and in a range of different tissue or organ types, or developmental stages. Experimental conditions to which plants are exposed for this purpose includes cold, heat, drought, osmotic challenge, varied hormone concentrations (ABA, GA, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, brassinosteroid), pathogen and pest challenge. The tissue types and developmental stages include stem, root, flower, rosette leaves, cauline leaves, siliques, germinating seed, and meristematic tissue. The set of expression levels provides a pattern that is determined by the regulatory elements of the gene promoter.

Transcription factor promoters for the genes disclosed herein are obtained by cloning 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb of genomic sequence immediately upstream of the translation start codon for the coding sequence of the encoded transcription factor protein. This region includes the 5'-UTR of the transcription factor gene, which can comprise regulatory elements. The 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb region is cloned through PCR methods, using primers that include one in the 3' direction located at the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence), and one in the 5' direction located from 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb upstream of the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence). The desired fragments are PCR-amplified from Arabidopsis Col-0 genomic DNA using high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase to minimize the incorporation of point mutation(s). The cloning primers incorporate two rare restriction sites, such as Not1 and Sfi1, found at low frequency throughout the Arabidopsis genome. Additional restriction sites are used in the instances where a Not1 or Sfi1 restriction site is present within the promoter.

The 1.5-2.0 kb fragment upstream from the translation start codon, including the 5'-untranslated region of the transcription factor, is cloned in a binary transformation vector immediately upstream of a suitable reporter gene, or a transactivator gene that is capable of programming expression of a reporter gene in a second gene construct. Reporter genes used include green fluorescent protein (and related fluorescent protein color variants), beta-glucuronidase, and luciferase. Suitable transactivator genes include LexA-GAL4, along with a transactivatable reporter in a second binary plasmid (as disclosed in US patent application 09/958,131, incorporated herein by reference). The binary plasmid(s) is transferred into Agrobacterium and the structure of the plasmid confirmed by PCR. These strains are introduced into Arabidopsis plants as described in other examples, and gene expression patterns determined according to standard methods know to one skilled in the art for monitoring GFP fluorescence, beta-glucuronidase activity, or luminescence.

The promoter region for G1753 is obtained from Arabidopsis chromosome 2 clone F1011 (AC006919), gene At2g36450, from position 43906-45410 of the genomic clone. The complement of this sequence is the promoter oriented in the 5'-3' direction, with the translation start codon for G1753 the complement of positions 43903-43905.

The present invention is not limited by the specific embodiments described herein.

• <110> Mendel Biotechnology, Inc.
• <120> Polynucleotides and Polypeptides in Plants
• <130> AHB/FP6293542
• <140> EP 10178358.7
  <141> 2003-09-18
• <150> EP 03779082.1
  <151> 2003-09-18
• <150> PCT/US2003/030292
  <151> 2003-09-18
• <150> US 60/411,837
  <151> 2002-09-18
• <150> US 60/434,166
  <151> 2002-12-17
• <150> US 60/465,809
  <151> 2003-04-24
• <160> 2247
• <170> PatentIn version 3.2
• <210> 1
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 1
  000
• <210> 2
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 2
  000
• <210> 3
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 3
  000
• <210> 4
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 4
  000
• <210> 5
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 5
  000
• <210> 6
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 6
  000
• <210> 7
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 7
  000
• <210> 8
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 8
  000
• <210> 9
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 9
  000
• <210> 10
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 10
  000
• <210> 11
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 11
  000
• <210> 12
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 12
  000
• <210> 13
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 13
  000
• <210> 14
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 14
  000
• <210> 15
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 15
  000
• <210> 16
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 16
  000
• <210> 17
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 17
  000
• <210> 18
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 18
  000
• <210> 19
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 19
  000
• <210> 20
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 20
  000
• <210> 21
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 21
  000
• <210> 22
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 22
  000
• <210> 23
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 23
  000
• <210> 24
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 24
  000
• <210> 25
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 25
  000
• <210> 26
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 26
  000
• <210> 27
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 27
  000
• <210> 28
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 28
  000
• <210> 29
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 29
  000
• <210> 30
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 30
  000
• <210> 31
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 31
  000
• <210> 32
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 32
  000
• <210> 33
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 33
  000
• <210> 34
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 34
  000
• <210> 35
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 35
  000
• <210> 36
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 36
  000
• <210> 37
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 37
  000
• <210> 38
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 38
  000
• <210> 39
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 39
  000
• <210> 40
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 40
  000
• <210> 41
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 41
  000
• <210> 42
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 42
  000
• <210> 43
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 43
  000
• <210> 44
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 44
  000
• <210> 45
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 45
  000
• <210> 46
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 46
  000
• <210> 47
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 47
  000
• <210> 48
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 48
  000
• <210> 49
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 49
  000
• <210> 50
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 50
  000
• <210> 51
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 51
  000
• <210> 52
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 52
  000
• <210> 53
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 53
  000
• <210> 54
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 54
  000
• <210> 55
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 55
  000
• <210> 56
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 56
  000
• <210> 57
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 57
  000
• <210> 58
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 58
  000
• <210> 59
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 59
  000
• <210> 60
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 60
  000
• <210> 61
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 61
  000
• <210> 62
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 62
  000
• <210> 63
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 63
  000
• <210> 64
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 64
  000
• <210> 65
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 65
  000
• <210> 66
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 66
  000
• <210> 67
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 67
  000
• <210> 68
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 68
  000
• <210> 69
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 69
  000
• <210> 70
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 70
  000
• <210> 71
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 71
  000
• <210> 72
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 72
  000
• <210> 73
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 73
  000
• <210> 74
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 74
  000
• <210> 75
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 75
  000
• <210> 76
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 76
  000
• <210> 77
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 77
  000
• <210> 78
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 78
  000
• <210> 79
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 79
  000
• <210> 80
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 80
  000
• <210> 81
  <211>
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 81
  000
• <210> 82
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 82
  000
• <210> 83
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 83
  000
• <210> 84
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 84
  000
• <210> 85
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 85
  000
• <210> 86
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 86
  000
• <210> 87
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 87
  000
• <210> 88
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 88
  000
• <210> 89
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 89
  000
• <210> 90
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 90
  000
• <210> 91
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 91
  000
• <210> 92
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 92
  000
• <210> 93
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 93
  000
• <210> 94
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 94
  000
• <210> 95
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 95
  000
• <210> 96
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 96
  000
• <210> 97
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 97
  000
• <210> 98
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 98
  000
• <210> 99
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 99
  000
• <210> 100
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 100
  000
• <210> 101
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 101
  000
• <210> 102
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 102
  000
• <210> 103
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 103
  000
• <210> 104
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 104
  000
• <210> 105
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 105
  000
• <210> 106
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 106
  000
• <210> 107
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 107
  000
• <210> 108
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 108
  000
• <210> 109
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 109
  000
• <210> 110
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 110
  000
• <210> 111
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 111
  000
• <210> 112
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 112
  000
• <210> 113
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 113
  000
• <210> 114
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 114
  000
• <210> 115
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 115
  000
• <210> 116
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 116
  000
• <210> 117
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 117
  000
• <210> 118
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 118
  000
• <210> 119
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 119
  000
• <210> 120
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 120
  000
• <210> 121
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 121
  000
• <210> 122
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 122
  000
• <210> 123
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 123
  000
• <210> 124
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 124
  000
• <210> 125
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 125
  000
• <210> 126
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 126
  000
• <210> 127
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 127
  000
• <210> 128
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 128
  000
• <210> 129
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 129
  000
• <210> 130
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 130
  000
• <210> 131
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 131
  000
• <210> 132
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 132
  000
• <210> 133
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 133
  000
• <210> 134
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 134
  000
• <210> 135
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 135
  000
• <210> 136
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 136
  000
• <210> 137
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 137
  000
• <210> 138
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 138
  000
• <210> 139
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 139
  000
• <210> 140
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 140
  000
• <210> 141
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 141
  000
• <210> 142
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 142
  000
• <210> 143
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 143
  000
• <210> 144
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 144
  000
• <210> 145
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 145
  000
• <210> 146
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 146
  000
• <210> 147
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 147
  000
• <210> 148
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 148
  000
• <210> 149
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 149
  000
• <210> 150
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 150
  000
• <210> 151
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 151
  000
• <210> 152
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 152
  000
• <210> 153
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 153
  000
• <210> 154
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 154
  000
• <210> 155
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 155
  000
• <210> 156
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 156
  000
• <210> 157
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 157
  000
• <210> 158
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 158
  000
• <210> 159
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 159
  000
• <210> 160
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 160
  000
• <210> 161
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 161
  000
• <210> 162
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 162
  000
• <210> 163
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 163
  000
• <210> 164
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 164
  000
• <210> 165
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 165
  000
• <210> 166
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 166
  000
• <210> 167
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 167
  000
• <210> 168
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 168
  000
• <210> 169
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 169
  000
• <210> 170
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 170
  000
• <210> 171
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 171
  000
• <210> 172
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 172
  000
• <210> 173
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 173
  000
• <210> 174
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 174
  000
• <210> 175
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 175
  000
• <210> 176
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 176
  000
• <210> 177
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> _Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 177
  000
• <210> 178
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 178
  000
• <210> 179
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 179
  000
• <210> 180
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 180
  000
• <210> 181
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 181
  000
• <210> 182
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 182
  000
• <210> 183
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 183
  000
• <210> 184
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 184
  000
• <210> 185
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 185
  000
• <210> 186
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 186
  000
• <210> 187
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 187
  000
• <210> 188
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 188
  000
• <210> 189
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 189
  000
• <210> 190
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 190
  000
• <210> 191
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 191
  000
• <210> 192
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 192
  000
• <210> 193
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 193
  000
• <210> 194
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 194
  000
• <210> 195
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 195
  000
• <210> 196
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 196
  000
• <210> 197
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 197
  000
• <210> 198
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 198
  000
• <210> 199
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 199
  000
• <210> 200
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 200
  000
• <210> 201
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 201
  000
• <210> 202
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 202
  000
• <210> 203
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 203
  000
• <210> 204
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 204
  000
• <210> 205
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 205
  000
• <210> 206
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 206
  000
• <210> 207
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 207
  000
• <210> 208
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 208
  000
• <210> 209
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 209
  000
• <210> 210
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 210
  000
• <210> 211
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 211
  000
• <210> 212
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 212
  000
• <210> 213
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 213
  000
• <210> 214
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 214
  000
• <210> 215
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 215
  000
• <210> 216
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 216
  000
• <210> 217
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 217
  000
• <210> 218
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 218
  000
• <210> 219
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 219
  000
• <210> 220
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 220
  000
• <210> 221
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 221
  000
• <210> 222
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 222
  000
• <210> 223
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 223
  000
• <210> 224
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 224
  000
• <210> 225
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 225
  000
• <210> 226
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 226
  000
• <210> 227
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 227
  000
• <210> 228
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 228
  000
• <210> 229
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 229
  000
• <210> 230
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 230
  000
• <210> 231
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 231
  000
• <210> 232
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 232
  000
• <210> 233
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 233
  000
• <210> 234
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 234
  000
• <210> 235
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 235
  000
• <210> 236
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 236
  000
• <210> 237
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 237
  000
• <210> 238
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 238
  000
• <210> 239
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 239
  000
• <210> 240
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 240
  000
• <210> 241
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 241
  000
• <210> 242
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 242
  000
• <210> 243
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 243
  000
• <210> 244
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 244
  000
• <210> 245
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 245
  000
• <210> 246
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 246
  000
• <210> 247
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 247
  000
• <210> 248
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 248
  000
• <210> 249
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 249
  000
• <210> 250
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 250
  000
• <210> 251
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 251
  000
• <210> 252
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 252
  000
• <210> 253
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 253
  000
• <210> 254
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 254
  000
• <210> 255
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 255
  000
• <210> 256
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 256
  000
• <210> 257
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 257
  000
• <210> 258
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 258
  000
• <210> 259
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 259
  000
• <210> 260
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 260
  000
• <210> 261
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 261
  000
• <210> 262
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 262
  000
• <210> 263
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 263
  000
• <210> 264
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 264
  000
• <210> 265
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 265
  000
• <210> 266
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 266
  000
• <210> 267
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 267
  000
• <210> 268
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 268
  000
• <210> 269
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 269
  000
• <210> 270
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 270
  000
• <210> 271
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 271
  000
• <210> 272
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 272
  000
• <210> 273
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 273
  000
• <210> 274
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 274
  000
• <210> 275
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 275
  000
• <210> 276
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 276
  000
• <210> 277
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 277
  000
• <210> 278
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 278
  000
• <210> 279
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 279
  000
• <210> 280
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 280
  000
• <210> 281
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 281
  000
• <210> 282
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 282
  000
• <210> 283
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 283
  000
• <210> 284
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 284
  000
• <210> 285
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 285
  000
• <210> 286
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 286
  000
• <210> 287
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 287
  000
• <210> 288
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 288
  000
• <210> 289
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 289
  000
• <210> 290
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 290
  000
• <210> 291
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 291
  000
• <210> 292
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 292
  000
• <210> 293
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 293
  000
• <210> 294
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 294
  000
• <210> 295
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 295
  000
• <210> 296
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 296
  000
• <210> 297
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 297
  000
• <210> 298
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 298
  000
• <210> 299
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 299
  000
• <210> 300
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 300
  000
• <210> 301
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 301
  000
• <210> 302
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 302
  000
• <210> 303
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 303
  000
• <210> 304
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 304
  000
• <210> 305
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 305
  000
• <210> 306
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 306
  000
• <210> 307
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 307
  000
• <210> 308
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 308
  000
• <210> 309
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 309
  000
• <210> 310
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 310
  000
• <210> 311
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 311
  000
• <210> 312
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 312
  000
• <210> 313
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 313
  000
• <210> 314
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 314
  000
• <210> 315
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 315
  000
• <210> 316
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 316
  000
• <210> 317
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 317
  000
• <210> 318
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 318
  000
• <210> 319
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 319
  000
• <210> 320
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 320
  000
• <210> 321
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 321
  000
• <210> 322
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 322
  000
• <210> 323
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 323
  000
• <210> 324
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 324
  000
• <210> 325
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 325
  000
• <210> 326
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 326
  000
• <210> 327
  <211> 678
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 327
• <210> 328
  <211> 225
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 328
• <210> 329
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 329
  000
• <210> 330
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 330
  000
• <210> 331
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 331
  000
• <210> 332
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 332
  000
• <210> 333
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 333
  000
• <210> 334
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 334
  000
• <210> 335
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 335
  000
• <210> 336
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 336
  000
• <210> 337
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 337
  000
• <210> 338
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 338
  000
• <210> 339
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 339
  000
• <210> 340
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 340
  000
• <210> 341
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 341
  000
• <210> 342
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 342
  000
• <210> 343
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 343
  000
• <210> 344
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 344
  000
• <210> 345
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 345
  000
• <210> 346
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 346
  000
• <210> 347
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 347
  000
• <210> 348
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 348
  000
• <210> 349
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 349
  000
• <210> 350
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 350
  000
• <210> 351
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 351
  000
• <210> 352
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 352
  000
• <210> 353
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 353
  000
• <210> 354
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 354
  000
• <210> 355
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 355
  000
• <210> 356
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 356
  000
• <210> 357
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 357
  000
• <210> 358
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 358
  000
• <210> 359
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 359
  000
• <210> 360
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 360
  000
• <210> 361
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 361
  000
• <210> 362
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 362
  000
• <210> 363
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 363
  000
• <210> 364
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 364
  000
• <210> 365
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 365
  000
• <210> 366
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 366
  000
• <210> 367
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 367
  000
• <210> 368
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 368
  000
• <210> 369
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 369
  000
• <210> 370
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 370
  000
• <210> 371
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 371
  000
• <210> 372
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 372
  000
• <210> 373
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 373
  000
• <210> 374
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 374
  000
• <210> 375
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 375
  000
• <210> 376
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 376
  000
• <210> 377
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 377
  000
• <210> 378
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 378
  000
• <210> 379
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 379
  000
• <210> 380
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 380
  000
• <210> 381
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 381
  000

• <210> 382
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 382
  000
• <210> 383
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 383
  000
• <210> 384
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 384
  000
• <210> 385
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 385
  000
• <210> 386
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 386
  000
• <210> 387
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 387
  000
• <210> 388
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 388
  000
• <210> 389
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 389
  000
• <210> 390
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 390
  000
• <210> 391
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 391
  000
• <210> 392
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 392
  000
• <210> 393
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 393
  000
• <210> 394
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 394
  000
• <210> 395
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 395
  000
• <210> 396
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 396
  000
• <210> 397
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 397
  000
• <210> 398
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 398
  000
• <210> 399
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 399
  000
• <210> 400
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 400
  000
• <210> 401
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 401
  000
• <210> 402
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 402
  000
• <210> 403
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 403
  000
• <210> 404
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 404
  000
• <210> 405
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 405
  000
• <210> 406
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 406
  000
• <210> 407
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 407
  000
• <210> 408
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 408
  000
• <210> 409
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 409
  000
• <210> 410
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 410
  000
• <210> 411
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 411
  000
• <210> 412
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 412
  000
• <210> 413
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 413
  000
• <210> 414
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 414
  000
• <210> 415
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 415
  000
• <210> 416
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 416
  000
• <210> 417
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 417
  000
• <210> 418
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 418
  000
• <210> 419
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 419
  000
• <210> 420
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 420
  000
• <210> 421
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 421
  000
• <210> 422
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 422
  000
• <210> 423
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 423
  000
• <210> 424
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 424
  000
• <210> 425
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 425
  000
• <210> 426
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 426
  000
• <210> 427
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 427
  000
• <210> 428
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 428
  000
• <210> 429
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 429
  000
• <210> 430
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 430
  000
• <210> 431
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 431
  000
• <210> 432
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 432
  000
• <210> 433
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 433
  000
• <210> 434
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 434
  000
• <210> 435
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 435
  000
• <210> 436
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 436
  000
• <210> 437
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 437
  000
• <210> 438
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 438
  000
• <210> 439
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 439
  000
• <210> 440
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 440
  000
• <210> 441
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 441
  000
• <210> 442
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 442
  000
• <210> 443
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 443
  000
• <210> 444
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 444
  000
• <210> 445
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 445
  000
• <210> 446
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 446
  000
• <210> 447
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 447
  000
• <210> 448
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 448
  000
• <210> 449
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 449
  000
• <210> 450
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 450
  000
• <210> 451
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 451
  000
• <210> 452
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 452
  000
• <210> 453
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 453
  000
• <210> 454
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 454
  000
• <210> 455
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 455
  000
• <210> 456
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 456
  000
• <210> 457
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 457
  000
• <210> 458
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 458
  000
• <210> 459
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 459
  000
• <210> 460
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 460
  000
• <210> 461
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 461
  000
• <210> 462
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 462
  000
• <210> 463
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 463
  000
• <210> 464
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 464
  000
• <210> 465
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 465
  000
• <210> 466
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 466
  000
• <210> 467
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 467
  000
• <210> 468
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 468
  000
• <210> 469
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 469
  000
• <210> 470
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 470
  000
• <210> 471
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 471
  000
• <210> 472
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 472
  000
• <210> 473
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 473
  000
• <210> 474
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 474
  000
• <210> 475
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 475
  000
• <210> 476
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 476
  000
• <210> 477
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 477
  000
• <210> 478
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 478
  000
• <210> 479
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 479
  000
• <210> 480
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 480
  000
• <210> 481
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 481
  000
• <210> 482
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 482
  000
• <210> 483
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 483
  000
• <210> 484
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 484
  000
• <210> 485
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 485
  000
• <210> 486
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 486
  000
• <210> 487
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 487
  000
• <210> 488
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 488
  000
• <210> 489
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 489
  000
• <210> 490
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 490
  000
• <210> 491
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 491
  000
• <210> 492
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 492
  000
• <210> 493
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 493
  000
• <210> 494
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 494
  000
• <210> 495
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 495
  000
• <210> 496
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 496
  000
• <210> 497
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 497
  000
• <210> 498
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 498
  000
• <210> 499
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 499
  000
• <210> 500
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 500
  000
• <210> 501
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 501
  000
• <210> 502
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 502
  000
• <210> 503
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 503
  000
• <210> 504
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 504
  000
• <210> 505
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 505
  000
• <210> 506
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 506
  000
• <210> 507
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 507
  000
• <210> 508
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 508
  000
• <210> 509
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 509
  000
• <210> 510
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 510
  000
• <210> 511
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 511
  000
• <210> 512
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 512
  000
• <210> 513
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 513
  000
• <210> 514
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 514
  000
• <210> 515
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 515
  000
• <210> 516
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 516
  000
• <210> 517
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 517
  000
• <210> 518
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 518
  000
• <210> 519
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 519
  000
• <210> 520
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 520
  000
• <210> 521
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 521
  000
• <210> 522
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 522
  000
• <210> 523
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 523
  000
• <210> 524
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 524
  000
• <210> 525
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 525
  000
• <210> 526
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 526
  000
• <210> 527
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 527
  000
• <210> 528
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 528
  000
• <210> 529
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 529
  000
• <210> 530
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 530
  000
• <210> 531
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 531
  000
• <210> 532
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 532
  000

• <210> 533
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 533
  000
• <210> 534
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 534
  000
• <210> 535
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 535
  000
• <210> 536
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 536
  000
• <210> 537
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 537
  000
• <210> 538
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 538
  000
• <210> 539
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 539
  000
• <210> 540
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 540
  000
• <210> 541
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 541
  000
• <210> 542
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 542
  000
• <210> 543
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 543
  000
• <210> 544
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 544
  000
• <210> 545
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 545
  000
• <210> 546
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 546
  000
• <210> 547
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 547
  000
• <210> 548
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 548
  000
• <210> 549
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 549
  000
• <210> 550
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 550
  000
• <210> 551
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 551
  000
• <210> 552
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 552
  000
• <210> 553
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 553
  000
• <210> 554
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 554
  000
• <210> 555
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 555
  000
• <210> 556
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 556
  000
• <210> 557
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 557
  000
• <210> 558
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 558
  000
• <210> 559
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 559
  000
• <210> 560
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 560
  000
• <210> 561
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 561
  000
• <210> 562
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 562
  000
• <210> 563
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 563
  000
• <210> 564
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 564
  000
• <210> 565
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 565
  000
• <210> 566
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 566
  000
• <210> 567
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 567
  000
• <210> 568
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 568
  000
• <210> 569
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 569
  000
• <210> 570
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 570
  000
• <210> 571
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 571
  000
• <210> 572
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 572
  000
• <210> 573
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 573
  000
• <210> 574
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 574
  000
• <210> 575
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 575
  000
• <210> 576
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 576
  000
• <210> 577
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 577
  000
• <210> 578
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 578
  000
• <210> 579
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
• <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 579
  000
• <210> 580
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 580
  000
• <210> 581
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 581
  000
• <210> 582
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 582
  000
• <210> 583
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 583
  000
• <210> 584
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 584
  000
• <210> 585
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 585
  000
• <210> 586
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 586
  000
• <210> 587
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 587
  000
• <210> 588
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 588
  000
• <210> 589
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 589
  000
• <210> 590
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 590
  000
• <210> 591
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 591
  000
• <210> 592
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 592
  000
• <210> 593
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 593
  000
• <210> 594
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 594
  000
• <210> 595
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 595
  000
• <210> 596
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 596
  000
• <210> 597
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 597
  000
• <210> 598
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 598
  000
• <210> 599
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 599
  000
• <210> 600
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 600
  000
• <210> 601
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 601
  000
• <210> 602
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 602
  000
• <210> 603
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 603
  000
• <210> 604
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 604
  000
• <210> 605
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 605
  000
• <210> 606
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 606
  000
• <210> 607
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 607
  000
• <210> 608
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana

• <400> 608
  000
• <210> 609
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 609
  000
• <210> 610
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 610
  000
• <210> 611
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 611
  000
• <210> 612
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 612
  000
• <210> 613
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 613
  000
• <210> 614
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 614
  000
• <210> 615
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 615
  000
• <210> 616
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 616
  000
• <210> 617
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 617
  000
• <210> 618
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 618
  000
• <210> 619
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 619
  000
• <210> 620
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 620
  000
• <210> 621
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 621
  000
• <210> 622
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 622
  000
• <210> 623
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 623
  000
• <210> 624
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 624
  000
• <210> 625
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 625
  000
• <210> 626
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 626
  000
• <210> 627
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 627
  000
• <210> 628
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 628
  000
• <210> 629
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 629
  000
• <210> 630
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 630
  000
• <210> 631
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 631
  000
• <210> 632
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 632
  000
• <210> 633
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 633
  000
• <210> 634
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 634
  000
• <210> 635
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 635
  000
• <210> 636
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 636
  000
• <210> 637
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 637
  000
• <210> 638
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 638
  000
• <210> 639
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 639
  000
• <210> 640
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 640
  000
• <210> 641
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 641
  000
• <210> 642
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 642
  000
• <210> 643
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 643
  000
• <210> 644
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 644
  000
• <210> 645
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 645
  000
• <210> 646
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 646
  000
• <210> 647
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 647
  000
• <210> 648
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 648
  000
• <210> 649
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 649
  000
• <210> 650
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 650
  000
• <210> 651
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 651
  000
• <210> 652
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 652
  000
• <210> 653
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 653
  000
• <210> 654
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 654
  000
• <210> 655
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 655
  000
• <210> 656
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 656
  000
• <210> 657
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 657
  000
• <210> 658
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 658
  000
• <210> 659
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 659
  000
• <210> 660
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 660
  000
• <210> 661
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 661
  000
• <210> 662
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 662
  000
• <210> 663
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 663
  000
• <210> 664
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 664
  000
• <210> 665
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 665
  000
• <210> 666
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 666
  000
• <210> 667
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 667
  000
• <210> 668
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 668
  000
  <210> 669
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 669
  000
• <210> 670
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Arabidopsis thaliana
• <400> 670
  000
• <210> 671
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 671
  000
  <210> 672
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
  <400> 672
  000
• <210> 673
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 673
  000
• <210> 674
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 674
  000
• <210> 675
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 675
  000
• <210> 676
  <211> 0
• <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 676
  000
• <210> 677
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 677
  000
• <210> 678
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 678
  000
• <210> 679
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 679
  000
• <210> 680
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 680
  000
• <210> 681
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 681
  000
• <210> 682
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 682
  000
• <210> 683
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 683
  000
  <210> 684
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays

• <400> 684
  000
• <210> 685
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 685
  000
• <210> 686
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 686
  000
• <210> 687
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 687
  000
• <210> 688
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 688
  000
• <210> 689
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 689
  000
• <210> 690
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 690
  000
• <210> 691
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 691
  000
• <210> 692
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 692
  000
• <210> 693
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 693
  000
• <210> 694
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 694
  000
• <210> 695
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 695
  000
• <210> 696
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 696
  000
• <210> 697
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 697
  000
• <210> 698
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 698
  000
• <210> 699
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 699
  000
• <210> 700
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 700
  000
• <210> 701
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 701
  000
• <210> 702
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 702
  000
• <210> 703
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 703
  000
• <210> 704
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 704
  000
• <210> 705
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 705
  000
• <210> 706
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 706
  000
• <210> 707
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 707
  000
• <210> 708
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 708
  000
• <210> 709
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 709
  000
• <210> 710
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 710
  000
• <210> 711
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 711
  000
• <210> 712
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 712
  000
• <210> 713
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 713
  000
• <210> 714
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 714
  000
• <210> 715
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 715
  000
• <210> 716
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 716
  000
• <210> 717
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 717
  000
• <210> 718
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 718
  000
• <210> 719
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 719
  000
• <210> 720
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 720
  000
• <210> 721
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 721
  000
• <210> 722
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 722
  000
• <210> 723
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 723
  000
• <210> 724
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 724
  000
• <210> 725
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 725
  000
• <210> 726
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 726
  000
• <210> 727
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 727
  000
• <210> 728
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 728
  000
• <210> 729
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 729
  000
• <210> 730
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 730
  000
• <210> 731
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 731
  000
• <210> 732
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 732
  000
• <210> 733
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 733
  000
• <210> 734
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 734
  000
• <210> 735
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 735
  000
• <210> 736
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 736
  000
• <210> 737
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 737
  000
• <210> 738
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 738
  000
• <210> 739
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 739
  000
• <210> 740
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 740
  000
• <210> 741
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 741
  000
• <210> 742
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 742
  000
• <210> 743
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 743
  000
• <210> 744
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 744
  000
• <210> 745
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 745
  000
• <210> 746
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 746
  000
• <210> 747
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 747
  000
• <210> 748
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 748
  000
• <210> 749
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 749
  000
• <210> 750
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 750
  000
• <210> 751
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 751
  000
• <210> 752
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 752
  000
• <210> 753
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 753
  000
• <210> 754
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 754
  000
• <210> 755
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 755
  000
• <210> 756
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 756
  000
• <210> 757
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 757
  000
• <210> 758
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 758
  000
• <210> 759
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa

• <400> 759
  000
• <210> 760
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 760
  000
• <210> 761
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 761
  000
• <210> 762
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 762
  000
• <210> 763
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 763
  000
• <210> 764
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 764
  000
• <210> 765
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 765
  000
• <210> 766
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 766
  000
• <210> 767
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 767
  000
• <210> 768
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 768
  000
• <210> 769
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 769
  000
• <210> 770
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 770
  000
• <210> 771
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 771
  000
• <210> 772
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 772
  000
• <210> 773
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 773
  000
• <210> 774
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 774
  000
• <210> 775
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 775
  000
• <210> 776
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 776
  000
• <210> 777
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 777
  000
• <210> 778
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 778
  000
• <210> 779
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 779
  000
• <210> 780
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 780
  000
• <210> 781
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 781
  000
• <210> 782
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 782
  000
• <210> 783
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 783
  000
• <210> 784
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 784
  000
• <210> 785
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 785
  000
• <210> 786
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 786
  000
• <210> 787
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 787
  000
• <210> 788
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 788
  000
• <210> 789
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 789
  000
• <210> 790
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 790
  000
• <210> 791
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 791
  000
• <210> 792
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 792
  000
• <210> 793
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 793
  000
• <210> 794
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 794
  000
• <210> 795
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 795
  000
• <210> 796
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 796
  000
• <210> 797
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 797
  000
• <210> 798
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 798
  000
• <210> 799
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 799
  000
• <210> 800
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 800
  000
• <210> 801
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 801
  000
• <210> 802
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 802
  000
• <210> 803
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 803
  000
• <210> 804
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 804
  000
• <210> 805
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 805
  000
• <210> 806
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 806
  000
• <210> 807
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 807
  000
• <210> 808
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 808
  000
• <210> 809
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 809
  000
• <210> 810
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 810
  000
• <210> 811
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 811
  000
• <210> 812
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 812
  000
• <210> 813
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 813
  000
• <210> 814
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 814
  000
• <210> 815
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 815
  000
• <210> 816
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 816
  000
• <210> 817
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 817
  000
• <210> 818
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 818
  000
• <210> 819
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 819
  000
• <210> 820
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 820
  000
• <210> 821
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 821
  000
• <210> 822
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 822
  000
• <210> 823
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 823
  000
• <210> 824
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 824
  000
• <210> 825
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 825
  000
• <210> 826
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 826
  000
• <210> 827
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 827
  000
• <210> 828
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 828
  000
• <210> 829
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 829
  000
• <210> 830
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 830
  000
• <210> 831
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 831
  000
• <210> 832
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 832
  000
• <210> 833
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 833
  000
• <210> 834
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 834
  000
• <210> 835
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max

• <400> 835
  000
• <210> 836
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 836
  000
• <210> 837
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 837
  000
• <210> 838
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 838
  000
• <210> 839
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 839
  000
• <210> 840
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 840
  000
• <210> 841
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 841
  000
• <210> 842
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 842
  000
• <210> 843
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 843
  000
• <210> 844
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 844
  000
• <210> 845
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 845
  000
• <210> 846
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 846
  000
• <210> 847
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 847
  000
• <210> 848
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 848
  000
• <210> 849
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 849
  000
• <210> 850
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 850
  000
• <210> 851
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 851
  000
• <210> 852
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 852
  000
• <210> 853
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 853
  000
• <210> 854
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 854
  000
• <210> 855
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 855
  000
• <210> 856
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 856
  000
• <210> 857
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 857
  000
• <210> 858
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 858
  000
• <210> 859
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 859
  000
• <210> 860
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 860
  000
• <210> 861
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 861
  000
• <210> 862
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 862
  000
• <210> 863
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 863
  000
• <210> 864
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 864
  000
• <210> 865
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 865
  000
• <210> 866
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 866
  000
• <210> 867
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 867
  000
• <210> 868
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 868
  000
• <210> 869
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 869
  000
• <210> 870
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 870
  000
• <210> 871
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 871
  000
• <210> 872
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 872
  000
• <210> 873
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 873
  000
• <210> 874
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 874
  000
• <210> 875
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 875
  000
• <210> 876
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 876
  000
• <210> 877
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 877
  000
• <210> 878
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 878
  000
• <210> 879
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 879
  000
• <210> 880
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 880
  000
• <210> 881
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 881
  000
• <210> 882
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 882
  000
• <210> 883
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 883
  000
• <210> 884
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 884
  000
• <210> 885
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 885
  000
• <210> 886
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 886
  000
• <210> 887
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 887
  000
• <210> 888
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 888
  000
• <210> 889
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 889
  000
• <210> 890
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 890
  000
• <210> 891
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 891
  000
• <210> 892
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 892
  000
• <210> 893
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 893
  000
• <210> 894
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 894
  000
• <210> 895
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 895
  000
• <210> 896
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 896
  000
• <210> 897
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 897
  000
• <210> 898
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 898
  000
• <210> 899
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 899
  000
• <210> 900
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 900
  000
• <210> 901
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 901
  000
• <210> 902
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 902
  000
• <210> 903
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 903
  000
• <210> 904
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 904
  000
• <210> 905
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 905
  000
• <210> 906
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Glycine max
• <400> 906
  000
• <210> 907
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 907
  000
• <210> 908
  <211> 0
  <212> PRT
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 908
  000
• <210> 909
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Oryza sativa
• <400> 909
  000
• <210> 910
  <211> 0
  <212> DNA
  <213> Zea mays
• <400> 910
  000