TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a mechanical component composed of a steel and surface-hardened
by nitriding, and a method of fabricating the same, and in more detail, relates to
a mechanical component which is surface-hardened and, at the same time, imparted both
with strength and bending straightening property, and a method of fabricating the
same.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] There are high levels of demands on wear resistance and fatigue property for mechanical
components such as gear, bearing, shaft, crank shaft and connecting rod. Fabrication
of these mechanical components generally involves surface hardening for raising strength
such as wear resistance and fatigue property. The surface hardening is typically carried
out after a material to be forged composed of a carbon steel or an alloyed steel for
manufacturing mechanical structures is hot-forged, annealed typically for normalizing,
and further machined into a predetermined geometry desired for various mechanical
components. After the surface hardening, the material is finished typically through
bend straightening, to thereby given as a final product of the mechanical component.
[0003] The surface hardening is carried out by nitriding such as salt bath nitriding and
gas soft nitriding. It is generally known that the nitriding causes only a small post-processing
distortion as compared with that possibly occurs after surface hardening such as cementation,
and is recognized as a particularly effective method (as found in Japanese Laid-Open
Patent Publication "Tokkaihei" No.
09-324258, for example).
[0004] The surface hardening through nitriding may, however in some cases, result in an
unallowable level of generated distortion, and as a consequence often needs bend straightening
after the surface hardening. The bend straightening is carried out so as to straighten
the bend to a level allowable by the product, wherein easiness of the process, or
bend straightening property depends on the surface hardness achieved after the surface
hardening. The lower the surface hardness becomes, the bend straightening property
improves. On the other hand, the lower the surface hardness becomes, the component
strength such as wear resistance and fatigue property of the mechanical components
degrades. Larger surface hardness is therefore preferable for the purpose of raising
component strength of the mechanical components. As is known from the above, it is
preferable to sufficiently raise the surface hardness by the surface hardening from
the viewpoint of component strength of the mechanical components, and it is preferable
to suppress as possible the surface hardness achieved by the surface hardening from
the viewpoint of bend straightening property, because a larger surface hardness will
degrade the bend straightening property and will be more likely to cause micro-cracks
on the surface during the bend straightening.
[0005] As described in the above, it is not easy for the mechanical components to harmonize
excellent component strength and bend straightening property after being surface-hardened.
It is, however, a critical issue to carry out the surface hardening in order to ensure
desirable quality of the fabricated mechanical components and to improve the yield
ratio of the products, and to improve the component strength and bend straightening
property of the mechanical components provided as the products after the surface hardening.
The present invention is indeed conceived after considering the above-described problems,
and an object thereof resides in providing a mechanical component and a method of
fabricating the same, which involve surface hardening by nitriding, and are capable
of improving both of component strength and bend straightening property.
[0006] US-A 6 083 455 relates to a method of manufacturing of nitrided steel parts with high strength,
high fatigue strength and excellent bending toughness, such as crank shafts, etc...
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
[0007] A mechanical component aimed at solving the above-described problems is composed
of a steel and surface-hardened by nitriding according to claim 1,
having a Vickers hardness of the surficial portion measured at a reference position
corresponded to a 50 µm depth from the surface of the mechanical component of 340
to 460 HV, having a Vickers hardness of the inner portion being not affected by the
nitriding and showing a nearly constant hardness of 190 to 260 HV, and having an effective
depth of hardened layer measured from the component surface, where a Vickers hardness
of 270 HV is achieved, of 0.3 mm or more.
[0008] A method of fabricating a mechanical component aimed at solving the above-described
problems is a method according to claim 3 of fabricating a mechanical component composed
of a steel and surface-hardened by nitriding,
wherein the nitriding is carried out so as to adjust Vickers hardness of the surficial
portion measured at a reference position corresponded to a 50 µm depth from the surface
of the mechanical component to 340 to 460 HV, so as to adjust Vickers hardness of
the inner portion being not affected by the nitriding and showing a nearly constant
hardness to 190 to 260 HV, and so as to adjust an effective depth of hardened layer
measured from the component surface, where a Vickers hardness of 270 HV is achieved,
to 0.3 mm or more.
[0009] The above-described mechanical component is targeted at those composed of a steel
and surface-hardened by nitriding. The nitriding is a treatment allowing nitrogen
component to diffuse from the surface towards the inner portion of the mechanical
component so as to nitrify the surficial portion of the mechanical component, to thereby
raise the hardness of the surficial portion including the component surface. An essential
point in the present invention is not only to improve the surface hardness by nitriding,
but also to impart the mechanical component, to be provided after the treatment as
the product, both with an excellent component strength and bend straightening property.
The foregoing paragraphs have already discussed that the surface hardness of the surficial
portion of the mechanical component can be improved by the nitriding. Increase in
the surface hardness results in increase in the component strength of the mechanical
components such as wear resistance and fatigue property. On the other hand, increase
in the surface hardness results in decrease in the bend straightening property which
indicates degree of process easiness in the bend straightening carried out after the
nitriding. The decrease in the bend straightening property results in generation of
nonconformities such as micro-cracks in the component surface, and this fails in product
making of desirable mechanical components, and is causative of a lowered yield ratio
of the products in the manufacturing.
[0010] As described in the above, carrying-out of the nitriding and achievement of excellent
component strength and bend straightening property of the mechanical products seem
to result in an inevitable dilemma so far as the treatment is to be conducted. The
present inventors, however, derived a conclusion after extensive experiments and discussion
that both of excellent strength and bend straightening property can be imparted to
the mechanical components even after nitriding, by optimizing a hardness distribution
to be imparted by the nitriding in the depth-wise direction from the component surface,
or in other words, by optimizing a hardness distribution in the depth-wise direction
in the surficial portion of the mechanical component to be provided as the product
after nitriding, and by optimizing hardness of the inner portion not affected by the
nitriding and showing a nearly constant hardness.
[0011] The mechanical component of the present invention is therefore such as being surface-hardened
by nitriding, and having a Vickers hardness of the surficial portion measured at a
reference position corresponded to a 50 µm depth from the surface of the mechanical
component (referred to as "surficial reference position", hereinafter) of 340 to 460
HV, having a Vickers hardness of the inner portion being not affected by the nitriding
and showing a nearly constant hardness (simply referred to as "inner portion", hereinafter)
of 190 to 260 HV, and having an effective depth of hardened layer measured from the
component surface, where a Vickers hardness of 270 HV is achieved, of 0.3 mm or more.
[0012] First, a Vickers hardness at the surficial reference position of less than 340 HV
may result in only a small surface hardness, and may fail in making the component
useful and excellent in the component strength. On the other hand, a Vickers hardness
exceeding 460 HV may result in a large surface hardness, may become more likely to
induce nonconformities such as causing micro-cracks during bend straightening, and
may fail in making the component useful and excellent in the bend straightening property.
Next, a Vickers hardness of the inner portion of less than 190 HV may fail in imparting
a desired hardness up to a position of a sufficient depth from the component surface,
even if the component is subjected to the nitriding so as to adjust the Vickers hardness
at the surficial reference position to a desirable range, and this consequently results
in only a small surface hardness, and may fail in making the component useful and
excellent in the component strength. On the other hand, a Vickers hardness of the
inner portion exceeding 260 HV may result in an excessive increase in the hardness
of the surficial portion imparted by the nitriding, even if the component is subjected
to the nitriding so as to adjust the Vickers hardness at the surficial reference position
to a desirable range, and this makes an amount of increase in the hardness of the
surficial portion too large, and consequently results in a large surface hardness,
and may fail in making the component useful and excellent in the bend straightening
property.
[0013] During diffusion of nitrogen component in the depth-wise direction from the component
surface, diffusion concentration of the nitrogen component decreases in the increasing
direction of depth, and reaches the inner portion which is not affected by the nitriding
and therefore shows an almost constant hardness, and this indicates an end of the
diffusion of the nitrogen component. In other words, the amount of increase in the
hardness given by the nitriding decreases in the increasing direction of depth from
the component surface towards the inner portion. The rate of decrease in the amount
of increase in the hardness can arbitrarily vary depending on species and contents
of constituent elements of the steel composing the mechanical components, and on temperature
and process time of the nitriding. It is therefore insufficient to optimize the hardness
distribution in the depth-wise direction in the surficial portion after the nitriding
only by specifying ranges for the surficial reference position and hardness of the
inner portion. Therefore the mechanical component of the present invention is further
given with a condition describing that the effective depth of hardened layer (also
simply referred to as "effective hardening depth", hereinafter) measured from the
component surface, where a Vickers hardness of 270 HV is achieved, is adjusted to
0.3 mm or more. This condition means moderation of the rate of decrease in the amount
of increase in the hardness given by the nitriding, which occurs so as to decrease
in the depth-wise direction from the component surface towards the inner portion,
and this consequently makes it possible to provide the surficial portion of the mechanical
component after the nitriding with a larger hardness over a range from the component
surface towards a deeper position. More specifically, an effective depth of hardening
from the component surface, where a Vickers hardness of 270 HV is achieved, of less
than 0.3 mm may result in a too sharp decrease in the hardness distribution in the
depth-wise direction in the surficial portion of the mechanical component, and may
sometimes fail in obtaining the surface hardness necessary for making the component
useful and excellent in the strength.
[0014] As described in the above, the mechanical component can be made excellent both in
the strength and bend straightening property, by appropriately specifying hardness
at the surficial reference position, hardness of the inner portion and effective hardening
depth, and by optimizing hardness distribution in the depth-wise direction from the
component surface.
[0015] Therefore in the method of fabrication, it is made possible to adjust the surficial
reference position, hardness of the inner portion and effective hardening depth within
the above-described ranges, and to make the mechanical component excellent both in
the strength and bend straightening property, by adjusting flow rate of nitrogen component
over the surface of the component, temperature and process time of the nitriding,
in a manner appropriately adapted to composition of a steel composing the component.
[0016] Next, the mechanical component of the present invention is characterized by having
compositions of the individual constituent elements adjusted so as to limit Cr[eq.]
to 0.72% or more and 1.0% or less, and C[eq.] to 0.65% or more and 0.86% or less,
under definitions of

and

and
having a hardness distribution profile H(x), which is given by plotting, on the H-x
plane, Vickers hardness H measured in the depth-wise direction x as viewed from the
component surface, fallen in region Z expressed by the equation (1) below:

where,
Cr[eq.]: chromium equivalence described in the above
C[eq.]: carbon equivalence described in the above;

Do: 1.13×10
-6 
R: 8.314;
Si : Si content (wt%)
Mn: Mn content (wt%); and
region Z is defined as a region in which H'(x) expressed by the equation (1) can move
on the H-x plane while satisfying a condition of H'(0.3×10-3)≧270, when t varies from 3.6×103 to 18×103 and T varies from 500 to 650.
[0017] In the nitriding, degree of hardening of the surficial layer is affected by composition
of a steel material composing the mechanical component. For the purpose of making
hardness at the surficial reference position, hardness of the inner portion and effective
hardening depth fall within the above-specified ranges in a more reliable manner,
an effective method may be such as optimizing steel composition effectively contributable
to hardness of the inner portion corresponded to the hardness of the surficial portion
before the nitriding, and steel composition effectively contributable to the nitriding.
For this purpose, first in the steel material for composing the mechanical component,
chromium equivalence Cr[eq.], defined as

is adjusted to 0.72% or more and 1.0% or less in % by weight. The Cr[eq.] herein
is understood as an index of compositional components capable of effectively raising
hardness at the surficial reference position. Compositional components capable of
effectively raising hardness at the surficial reference position of the mechanical
component after the nitriding were found to be Cr, C, Mn and Si, enumerated in a decreasing
order of the effect. The constant terms expressing degrees of such effect are measured
values determined by extensive measurements. A value of thus-defined Cr[eq.] of less
than 0.72% may sometimes fail in raising Vickers hardness at the surficial reference
position of the mechanical component to as high as 340 HV or more even after the nitriding,
and on the other hand, a value of Cr[eq.] exceeding 1.0% may sometimes fail in suppressing
Vickers hardness at the surficial reference position of the mechanical component to
as low as 460 HV or less due to an excessive hardening of the surficial portion during
the nitriding.
[0018] Next, in the steel material for composing the mechanical component, carbon equivalence
C[eq.], defined as

is adjusted to 0.65% or more and 0.86% or less in % by weight. The C[eq.] herein
is understood as an index of compositional components capable of effectively raising
hardness of the inner portion. Compositional components capable of effectively raising
hardness of the inner portion of the mechanical component were found to be C, Cr,
Cu, Ni, Mn and Si, enumerated in a decreasing order of the effect. The constant terms
expressing degrees of such effect are values determined by extensive measurements,
similarly to as described in the above. A value of thus-defined C[eq.] of less than
0.65% may sometimes fail in raising Vickers hardness of the inner portion of the mechanical
component to as high as 190 HV or more, and on the other hand, a value of C[eq.] exceeding
0.86% may sometimes fail in suppressing Vickers hardness of the inner portion of the
mechanical component to as low as 260 HV or less due to an excessive hardening of
the inner portion.
[0019] The mechanical component is also characterized by having a hardness distribution
profile H(x), which is given by plotting, on the H-x plane, Vickers hardness H measured
in the depth-wise direction x as viewed from the component surface, fallen in region
Z expressed by the equation (1) below:

where,
Cr[eq.]: chromium equivalence described in the above
C[eq.]: carbon equivalence described in the above;

Do: 1.13×10
-6 
R: 8.314;
Si : Si content (wt%)
Mn: Mn content (wt%); and
region Z is defined as a region in which H'(x) expressed by the equation (1) can move
on the H-x plane while satisfying a condition of H'(0.3×10-3)≧270, when t varies from 3.6×103 to 18×103 and T varies from 500 to 650.
[0020] The nitriding is a treatment allowing nitrogen component to diffuse in the depth-wise
direction from the component surface. Diffusion equation C(x) expressing diffusion
concentration C of the nitrogen component with respect to the depth-wise direction
x can generally be given by the equation (2) below:

where,
D: dffusion coefficient and
t: time elapsed from start of diffusion
According to the equation (2), and assuming now that concentration of the nitrogen
component in a region of x>0 (x=0 is the surface of the component, and the depth-wise
direction x as viewed from the component surface defined as positive) at time t=0
(start time of the nitriding) as C0 (C0=0 in this nitriding), C(0) at x=0 is understood
as an equation expressing changes in diffusion concentration of the nitrogen component
in the depth-wise direction x as viewed from the surface (x=0) of the component, assuming
that the surface of the component always has a constant nitrogen component concentration
C1. A basic concept of the present invention is to adopt the equation in an approximated
manner, so as to optimize the hardness distribution in the depth-wise direction in
the surficial portion of the mechanical component.
[0021] The nitriding is a treatment allowing nitrogen component to diffuse in the depth-wise
direction from the component surface so as to harden the surficial portion through
nitriding. Diffusion concentration of the nitrogen component at a certain depth from
the component surface is, therefore, closely related to a degree of hardness attained
at the depth by the nitriding, and allows an approximated substitution. First, C(x)
in the equation (2) is substituted by hardness distribution H'(x) in the depth-wise
direction x as viewed from the component surface after the nitriding. Next, C0 in
the equation (2) is substituted by H'0 expressing hardness of the inner portion of
the mechanical component, that is, hardness of the surficial portion at the start
time of the nitriding is assumed as hardness of the inner portion. H'0 is further
defined as H'0= C[eq.]x254+33.8, to which, together with C[eq.], a measured value
based on results of hardness measurement is adopted. Next, C1 in the equation (2)
is substituted by H'1 expressing hardness at the surficial reference position of the
mechanical component, wherein H'1 is supposed to have a value expressing hardness
at the surficial reference position of the mechanical component because the hardness
of the true surface of the mechanical component cannot be measured. H'1 is further
defined as H'1= Cr[eq.]×392+65.8, to which, together with Cr[eq.], a measured value
based on results of hardness measurement is adopted. This mode of approximated use
of the equation (2) gives the equation (1).
[0022] D in the equation (1) is a diffusion coefficient in metal or alloy, and is generally
expressed as D=D
0×exp(-Q/(R×(T+273))), where Do is a term of number of vibration frequency, Q is activation
energy, R is the gas constant, and T is temperature in degrees centigrade. In the
present invention, diffusion coefficient D was determined assuming that nitrogen as
a diffusing element diffuses in a pure Fe, because the mechanical component is composed
of a steel, and content of a major component Fe contained therein is supposed to be
at least 50 wt% or more. Specific values adopted herein are values described in a
literature (Metal Data Book, 3rd Edition, published by Maruzen; p.21), defined for
the case where N as a diffusing element diffuses in α-δ-Fe, which are D
0=1.13×10
-6, Q=83×(1-14.03/(T+273))×1000 and R=8.314.
[0023] Next, α in the equation (1), not found in the equation (2), is a correction diffusion
coefficient correcting diffusion coefficient D used in the equation (1). The correction
diffusion coefficient α herein was defined as α=exp(-1.47×Si-0.918×Mn+0.998). The
correction diffusion coefficient α is used for incorporating any influences of constituent
elements other than Fe contained in the steel exerted on the diffusion of N into H'(x).
Again α is a measured value based on results of extensive hardness measurement. What
is worth attracting an attention is that Si and Mn contained in the steel, in particular
Si, are constituent elements suppressing the diffusion of N. In other words, α sharply
decreases as the contents of Si and Mn increase. Optimization of the Si content is,
therefore, understood as one essential point in reliably optimizing the hardness distribution
in the depth-wise direction of the surficial portion of the mechanical component.
It is preferable to adjust the Si and Mn contents so as to make α fall within a range
from 0.3 to 1.6, for example.
[0024] In H'(x), t represents process time of the nitriding, and a value thereof generally
falls within a range from 3.6×10
3 to 18×10
3 seconds. T represents process temperature of the nitriding, and a value thereof generally
falls within a range from 500 to 650°C.
[0025] H'(x) is determined as described in the above. The H'(x) is a function having arbitrary
variables of t and T with respect to process conditions of the nitriding, given when
a composition of the steel used for composing the mechanical component is uniquely
determined. Hardness distribution profile, which is obtained by plotting, on the H-x
plane, Vickers hardness H measured in the depth-wise direction x as viewed from the
component surface, is now given as H(x). H(x) is restricted to reside only in region
Z, wherein the region Z is defined as a region in which H'(x) can move on the H-x
plane when t is arbitrarily varied from 3.6×10
3 to 18×10
3 and T is arbitrarily varied from 500 to 650, while satisfying a condition that a
Vickers hardness of 270 HV is attained at a depth from the component surface of 0.3
mm or more, or in other words, under a condition that a position of 0.3 mm deep from
the component surface will show a hardness of 270 HV or more as expressed by H'(0.3×1
-3)≧270. A region of the hardness distribution H(x) as viewed from the surface of the
mechanical component restricted to as described in the above makes it possible to
reliably optimize the hardness distribution in the depth-wise direction in the surficial
portion of the mechanical component, and to impart both of excellent component strength
and bend straightening property to the mechanical component. The region of H(x) restricted
herein in the region Z means that all requirements on the composition of the steel
material for the mechanical component, such as Cr[eq.], C[eq.], Si content and Mn
content, are optimized within ranges for general process conditions of the nitriding.
This mode of optimization of the composition of the steel material makes it possible
to more reliably impart excellent strength and bend straightening property to the
mechanical component.
[0026] In the method of fabrication, it is made possible to more reliably impart excellent
strength and bend straightening property to the mechanical component, by adjusting
the ranges of Cr[eq.] and C[eq.] to the ranges similar to those described in the above,
and also by adjusting the nitriding conditions to those described in the next. The
nitriding conditions adopted to gas soft nitriding or salt bath nitriding include
a process time of 3.6×0
3 to 18×10
3 seconds and nitriding temperature of 500 to 650°C. Other nitriding conditions adopted
herein are same as those adopted by the general gas soft nitriding or salt bath nitriding.
A nitriding temperature of less than 500°C may sometimes excessively reduce the diffusion
of the nitrogen component, and may consequently fail in imparting, by the nitriding,
a desired profile of surface hardness in the depth-wise direction to the mechanical
component. On the contrary, a nitriding temperature exceeding 650°C may excessively
accelerate the diffusion of the nitrogen component, and may sometimes excessively
raise the surface hardness than desired. Next, as for the process time, a time less
than 3.6×10
3 seconds, or one hour, may sometimes fail in imparting, by the nitriding, a desirable
surface hardness profile in the depth-wise direction to the mechanical component.
On the contrary, a process time of the nitriding exceeding 18×10
3 seconds, or five hours, may sometimes result in a too large surface hardness than
desired. Ranges of the process time and process temperature of the nitriding are thus
set in consideration of these situations, wherein these ranges can be said as more
general ones than those set from viewpoints such as operation efficiency in the manufacture.
The conditions for the nitriding are set based on these reasons, and this is consequently
successful in imparting excellent strength and bend straightening property to the
mechanical component in a more reliable manner.
[0027] Next, the mechanical component of the present invention is characterized by having
the composition as defined by claim 1.
[0028] Major component thereof is therefore Fe. As one of the constituent elements other
than Fe, C is contained in an amount of 0.35 to 0.5% by weight. C is an element useful
for effectively raising the hardness in the inner portion and at the surficial reference
position of the mechanical component, wherein a content of 0.35% or more makes the
effect more distinct. On the contrary, the content exceeding 0.5% may sometimes result
in an excessive effect, and may fail in adjusting the hardness of the surficial layer
of the mechanical component to a desired level. It may also be causative of degradation
in the machinability when the mechanical component is machined into a desired geometry,
for example when a forged material composed of a steel is machined. Next, Si is contained
in an amount of 0.01 to 0.3% by weight. Si is used as a deoxidizer element in steel
melting, so that it is necessarily contained at least in an amount of 0.01% or more.
Si is, however, also a constituent element suppressing the N diffusion in the nitriding.
In view of reliably imparting a desired hardness profile to the mechanical component,
it is preferable to suppress the content thereof to as low as 0.3% or less. Next,
Mn is contained in an amount of 0.6 to 1.8% by weight. Mn is an element useful for
effectively raising the hardness of the inner portion and at the surficial reference
position, wherein a content of 0.6% or more makes the effect more distinct. On the
contrary, the content exceeding 1.8% may sometimes result in generation of bainite
during operations such as hot forging and normalizing before the nitriding. Also Mn
is a constituent element suppressing the N diffusion in the nitriding, although to
a lesser degree as compared with Si. Also from this point of view, the content of
Mn is preferably suppressed to as small as 1.8% or less.
[0029] Both of Cu and Ni are contained in an amount of 0.01 to 0.5% by weight. Both of Cu
and Ni are contained as inevitable impurities in an amount of 0.01% or more, and are
useful for effectively raising the hardness of the inner portion of the mechanical
component. The content exceeding 0.5% may, however, be disadvantageous from an economical
point of view, and may raise cost of the mechanical component, so that the content
is adjusted to 0.5% or less. Next, Cr is contained in an amount of 0.01 to 0.5% by
weight. Cr is an element useful for effectively raising the hardness of the inner
portion and at the surficial reference position of the mechanical component. The content
adjusted to 0.01% or more is successful in making the effect more distinct. On the
contrary, the content exceeding 0.5% may sometimes result in an excessive effect,
and may fail in adjusting the hardness of the surficial layer of the mechanical component
to a desired level. Next, Al is contained in an amount of 0.001 to 0.01% by weight.
Similarly to Si, also Al is used as a deoxidizer element in steel melting, so that
it is necessarily contained at least in an amount of 0.001 % or more. However in some
cases, Al may excessively raise the hardness at the surficial reference position of
the mechanical component, so that the content thereof is preferably limited to 0.01%
or less. Next, N is contained in an amount of 0.005 to 0.025% by weight. N is an element
useful for effectively suppressing crystal grain growth of the steel component typically
during hot forging, through formation of nitride with Al. The content thereof is preferably
set to as much as 0.005% or more, but a content of 0.025% may be enough for the upper
limit thereof, because the effect saturates above 0.025%.
[0030] The mechanical component of the present invention is further characterized by containing
any one species, or two or more species of constituent elements with the individual
contents, in % by weight, of Pb: 0.30% or less, S: 0.20% or less, Ca: 0.01% or less,
Bi: 0.30% or less, Ti: 0.02 or less, Zr: 0.02% or less and Mg: 0.01% or less.
[0031] Pb, S, Ca and Bi described in the above are elements useful for effectively improving
machinability when a forged material composed of a steel is machined into a desired
geometry. Without a desirable level of machinability, an excessive machining distortion
or the like may generate on the surface of the component during machining, and may
fail in reliably imparting a desired level of bend straightening property to the mechanical
component. As for the individual contents of Pb, S, Ca and Bi, any contents exceeding
the above-described upper limits may degrade the hot workability or component strength
such as fatigue property of the mechanical component, so that it is preferable to
adjust, in % by weight, Pb to 0.30% or less, S to 0.20% or less, Ca to 0.01% or less
and Bi to 0.30% or less. Next, Ti, Zr and Mg are known to promote micro-dispersion
of MnS and so forth in steel melting, through formation of their oxides. The effect
also makes it possible to improve the machinability in the machining, and to micronize
a crystal texture of the steel after annealing such as normalizing in the succeeding
step of hot forging, for example, and further to reliably impart necessary component
strength and bend straightening property to the mechanical component. As for the individual
contents of Ti, Zr and Mg, any contents exceeding the above-described upper limits
may saturate the effect, so that it is preferable to adjust, in % by weight, Ti to
0.02% or less, Zr to 0.02% or less, and Mg to 0.01 % or less.
[0032] The foregoing paragraphs have described the essential points of the mechanical component
of the present invention to which both of strength and bend straightening property
should be imparted. Mechanical component targeted at by the present invention is not
specifically limited, and is applicable to any publicly-known mechanical components
such as gear, bearing, shaft, crank shaft and connecting rod. Among others, a special
limitation is placed on crank shaft. This is because the crank shaft is a mechanical
component used under high-speed rotation and needs a precise control of decentering
by bend straightening. The crank shaft can improve its usefulness by being applied
with the mechanical component of the present invention which can be made excellent
both in strength and bend straightening property.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033]
Fig. 1 is a schematic side elevation of one embodiment of the mechanical component
of the present invention;
Fig. 2 is a sectional view taken along line II-II in Fig. 1; and
Fig. 3 is a drawing showing hardness profiles based on measured results and theoretical
calculation.
BEST MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0034] The following paragraphs will explain a best embodiment of the mechanical component
of the present invention referring to the attached drawings.
[0035] Fig. 1 is a schematic side elevation of a fillet portion of one essential portion
of a crank shaft, which is one embodiment of the mechanical component. Fig. 2 is a
schematic sectional view of the fillet portion taken along line II-II in Fig. 1. In
the drawing, the fillet portion 1 is understood as a mechanical component 1. Because
the crank shaft is formed by assembling separately-manufactured constituents, assumption
of the fillet portion as the mechanical component of the present invention will never
depart from the spirit of the present invention. The fillet portion 1 is composed
of a steel and is nitrided. As shown in Fig. 2, the fillet portion 1 comprises a surficial
portion 2 raised in the surface hardness by the nitriding, and an inner portion 3
not affected by the nitriding and showing a nearly constant hardness. In the surficial
portion 2, the hardness decreases in the depth-wise direction from a component surface
4 towards the inner portion 3. The inner portion 3 is adjusted to have a Vickers hardness
of 190 to 260 HV, the surficial portion 2 is adjusted to have a Vickers hardness of
340 to 460 HV at the reference position corresponded to a 50 µm depth from the component
surface, and is further adjusted to have an effective depth of hardened layer measured
from the component surface 4, where a Vickers hardness of 270 HV is achieved, of 0.3
mm or more. This way of adjustment of the hardness distribution in the surficial portion
2 in the depth-wise direction from the component surface 4 makes it possible to improve
component strength of the mechanical component 1, such as wear resistance and fatigue
property, and to improve the bend straightening property in bend straightening in
the succeeding step of the nitriding.
[0036] By imparting both of excellent strength and bend straightening property to the mechanical
component as described in the above, it is made possible to effectively suppress generation
of micro-cracks in bend straightening, and to make the mechanical component excellent
in the strength.
[0037] Next paragraphs will explain an exemplary method of fabricating the mechanical component
of the present invention, including the fillet portion shown in Fig. 1. First, a steel
material having a predetermined composition is prepared by melting so as to attain
a steel composition necessary for the mechanical component, and is then hot-forged
to yield a forged material. The forged material composed of the steel is then thermally
refined by annealing such as normalizing, quenching and tempering, and is machined
according to a desired geometry of the mechanical component. After the machining,
the mechanical component is subjected to surface hardening by nitriding to so as to
improve the strength. Next, bend straightening is carried out in order to make any
bend, including those ascribable to distortion generated by the nitriding, fall within
a desired allowable range. After a series of such manufacturing steps, the mechanical
component is provided as a product. For any mechanical components composed of two
or more types of constituents manufactured in a separate manner, each of the constituents
is assumed as the mechanical component, respectively manufactured according to the
above-described process flow, and assembled to thereby obtain the mechanical component
of a desired geometry. In this sense, the mechanical component of the present invention
is essentially targeted at publicly-known mechanical components such as gear, bearing,
shaft, crank shaft and connecting rod, but any of those composed of two or more constituents
can be assumed that each of the constituents is understood as the mechanical component
of the present invention.
[0038] It is to be noted that the above-described fabrication method is only one example,
and the present invention also allows a non-refining process from which the refining
by annealing after hot forging is omitted. An essential point is that any fabrication
method can be adopted as the fabrication method so far as it involves at least surface
hardening by nitriding, which is followed by bend straightening to thereby finish
the mechanical component as a product. The nitriding may be carried out by publicly-known
method such as salt bath nitriding and gas soft nitriding. Appropriate adjustment
of conditions for the nitriding, such as process temperature, process time and flow
rate of nitrogen to be supplied to the component surface, makes it possible to achieve
a desired depth-wise hardness distribution in the surficial portion of the mechanical
component.
[0039] Next paragraphs will describe embodiments as confirmation of the effects of the present
invention.
(Embodiment)
[0040] Steels having chemical compositions (in wt%) listed in Table 1 were melted, and hot-forged
to thereby fabricate rod-formed forged materials of 40 mm in diameter. The forged
materials were then kept under heating at 880°C for 60 minutes, and then normalized
by allowing them to cool down to room temperature. The forged materials were then
machined into a geometry of the fillet portion of the crank shaft shown in Fig. 1.
The machined fillet portions were nitrided by gas soft nitriding. Conditions adopted
herein include a process time of 2 hours (7.2×10
3 seconds) and a process temperature of 600°C, which fall in general ranges. Thus-fabricated
embodied products 1 to 10 and comparative products 1 to 12 were subjected to measurements
shown below. Table 1 shows also chromium equivalence Cr[eq.] and carbon equivalence
C[eq.] of the individual steels composing the individual test pieces. Table 1 still
also shows calculated results of H'(0.3×10
-3), which are values of Vickers hardness at a 0.3 mm deep from the component surface
based on the theoretical formula H'(x) given as the equation (1) in the above.
Table 1
| |
C |
Si |
Mn |
Cu |
Ni |
Cr |
Al |
N |
Others |
Cr[eq.] |
C[eq.] |
H'(0.3×10-3) |
| Embodied product 1 |
0.4 |
0.05 |
1.45 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.2 |
0.005 |
0.023 |
|
0.75 |
0.69 |
273 |
| Embodied product 2 |
0.35 |
0.28 |
0.65 |
0.45 |
0.45 |
0.48 |
0.002 |
0.012 |
|
0.85 |
0.73 |
312 |
| Embodied product 3 |
0.5 |
0.12 |
1.75 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.04 |
0.008 |
0.008 |
|
0.72 |
0.85 |
282 |
| Embodied product 4 |
0.45 |
0.1 |
1.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.45 |
0.002 |
0.02 |
|
0.97 |
0.78 |
330 |
| Embodied product 5 |
0.4 |
0.08 |
1.48 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
Pb:0.18, S:0.062 |
0.76 |
0.72 |
277 |
| Embodied product 6 |
0.42 |
0.1 |
1.44 |
0.08 |
0.08 |
0.18 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
S:0.121, Ca:0.0025 |
0.74 |
0.72 |
275 |
| Embodied product 7 |
0.41 |
0.12 |
1.45 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.21 |
0.004 |
0.004 |
Bi:0.1, S:0.052, Ca:0.0042 |
0.77 |
0.73 |
279 |
| Embodied product 8 |
0.42 |
0.09 |
1.51 |
0.07 |
0.08 |
0.19 |
0.006 |
0.006 |
S:0.065, Ca:0.0026, Ti:0.006 |
0.77 |
0.73 |
279 |
| Embodied product 9 |
0.39 |
0.12 |
1.49 |
0.14 |
0.15 |
0.21 |
0.003 |
0.003 |
S:0.068, Ca:0.0031, Zr.0.005 |
0.77 |
0.73 |
278 |
| Embodied product 10 |
0.41 |
0.11 |
1.45 |
0.11 |
0.12 |
0.2 |
0.005 |
0.005 |
S:0.055, Mg:0.0025 |
0.76 |
0.73 |
278 |
| Comparative product 1 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.004 |
0.021 |
|
0.72 |
0.62 |
254 |
| Comparative product 2 |
0.54 |
0.11 |
1.43 |
0.11 |
0.11 |
0.21 |
0.005 |
0.022 |
|
0.82 |
0.86 |
309 |
| Comparative product 3 |
0.41 |
0.75 |
1.42 |
0.08 |
0.09 |
0.2 |
0.004 |
0.021 |
|
0.86 |
0.76 |
260 |
| Comparative product 4 |
0.41 |
0.12 |
2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.004 |
0.018 |
|
0.9 |
0.81 |
290 |
| Comparative product 5 |
0.42 |
0.15 |
1.5 |
0.15 |
0.15 |
0.75 |
0.003 |
0.023 |
|
1.34 |
0.87 |
383 |
| Comparative product 6 |
0.41 |
0.12 |
1.43 |
0.12 |
0.11 |
0.21 |
0.015 |
0.02 |
|
0.77 |
0.73 |
279 |
| Comparative product 7 |
0.42 |
0.25 |
1.53 |
0.23 |
0.22 |
0.45 |
0.003 |
0.021 |
|
1.06 |
0.85 |
329 |
| Comparative product 8 |
0.35 |
0.1 |
0.8 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.45 |
0.004 |
0.022 |
|
0.83 |
0.59 |
295 |
| Comparative product 9 |
0.4 |
0.11 |
1.45 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.19 |
0.005 |
0.021 |
Pb:0.32, S:0.21 |
0.75 |
0.71 |
273 |
| Comparative product 10 |
0.41 |
0.09 |
1.4 |
0.09 |
0.09 |
0.18 |
0.004 |
0.023 |
S:0.215, Ca:0.032 |
0.73 |
0.71 |
271 |
| Comparative product 11 |
0.4 |
0.1 |
1.48 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.21 |
0.005 |
0.021 |
Bi:0.31, S:0.051, Ca:0.0021 |
0.77 |
0.72 |
278 |
| Comparative product 12 |
0.48 |
0.25 |
0.8 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.15 |
0.004 |
0.008 |
|
0.61 |
0.67 |
255 |
(Sectional Hardness)
[0041] Sectional hardness of the test pieces was measured by a 0.1 mm pitch in the depth-wise
direction over an 1 mm depth from the component surface to the inner portion, using
a Vickers hardness tester under a load of 2.9 kN and a test period of 15 seconds.
It is noted herein that hardness of the real component surface cannot be measured,
so that Vickers hardness measured at a position 50 µm deep from the component surface
was assumed as the hardness of the component surface (depth=0 mm).
(Fatigue Property)
[0042] The test pieces were subjected to fatigue test using an Ono-type rotating-bending
fatigue tester, and measured values of fatigue strength (MPa) were used as indices
of fatigue property as component strength.
(Bend Straightening Property)
[0043] The test pieces were subjected to three-point bending test using a universal testing
machine, wherein measured values of amount of indentation (mm) causative of cracks
in the component surface were used as indices of the bend straightening property.
[0044] Table 2 shows results of these measurements which include Vickers hardness at the
surficial reference position (at a position 50 µm deep from the component surface),
Vickers hardness at a position 0.3 mm deep from the component surface (referred to
as "effective hardening depth position", hereinafter), fatigue strength as an index
of the fatigue property, and amount of indentation as an index of the bend straightening
property. It is to be noted that the individual measurements for the sectional hardness,
fatigue property and bend straightening property were made using separate test pieces
individually fabricated under the same conditions.
[0045] Evaluation was also made on the machinability in machining such as being carried
out for fabricating the test pieces. Steels having chemical compositions listed in
Table 1 were melted similarly to as described in the above, hot-forged to thereby
obtain rod-formed forged materials of 40 mm in diameter, kept under heating at 880°C
for 60 minutes, and then normalized by allowing them to cool down to room temperature.
Machinability of thus-normalized products was evaluated by subjecting them to machining
test using a carbide tool. The machining test was carried out under a cutting speed
of 200 m/minute, a feed speed of 2 mm/rotation and a cutting width of 2 mm, wherein
cutting time elapsed before the wear width of the side clearance surface of the carbide
tool reached 0.2 mm was measured. Assuming now that measured cutting time of the normalized
product corresponded to embodied product 1 as 100, based on which the measured values
of the cutting time of the other normalized products corresponded to other test pieces
were standardized and listed in Table 2 as cutting efficiency expressing the machinability.
Table 2
| |
Vickers hardness (HV) |
Fatigue property |
Bend straightening property |
Machinability |
| Surficial reference position |
Inner portion |
Depth of effective hardening |
Fatigue strength (MPa) |
Amount of indentation (mm) |
Cutting efficiency |
| Embodied product 1 |
355 |
211 |
271 |
432 |
5.7 |
100 |
| Embodied product 2 |
407 |
212 |
306 |
504 |
3.8 |
100 |
| Embodied product 3 |
350 |
249 |
283 |
431 |
5.9 |
87 |
| Embodied product 4 |
448 |
231 |
334 |
539 |
2.6 |
94 |
| Embodied product 5 |
364 |
225 |
274 |
462 |
4.8 |
120 |
| Embodied product 6 |
347 |
221 |
271 |
450 |
5.7 |
853 |
| Embodied product 7 |
375 |
220 |
282 |
445 |
4.5 |
723 |
| Embodied product 8 |
369 |
225 |
277 |
448 |
5.2 |
1065 |
| Embodied product 9 |
365 |
224 |
275 |
433 |
5.2 |
1002 |
| Embodied product 10 |
367 |
220 |
278 |
434 |
5.3 |
913 |
| Comparative product 1 |
357 |
188 |
246 |
390 |
5.1 |
125 |
| Comparative product 2 |
388 |
252 |
305 |
491 |
4.2 |
68 |
| Comparative product 3 |
402 |
224 |
264 |
398 |
3.8 |
92 |
| Comparative product 4 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
- |
| Comparative product 5 |
586 |
265 |
391 |
617 |
0.5 |
78 |
| Comparative product 6 |
471 |
212 |
273 |
447 |
1.5 |
100 |
| Comparative product 7 |
482 |
249 |
337 |
551 |
0.8 |
86 |
| Comparative product 8 |
385 |
185 |
296 |
398 |
3.8 |
145 |
| Comparative product 9 |
364 |
211 |
273 |
413 |
5.1 |
212 |
| Comparative product 10 |
360 |
220 |
271 |
415 |
4.7 |
1680 |
| Comparative product 11 |
375 |
221 |
278 |
421 |
4.1 |
1129 |
| Comparative product 12 |
296 |
206 |
249 |
358 |
6.3 |
103 |
[0046] As shown in Table 1 and Table 2, embodiment products 1 to 10 showed values of Vickers
hardness at the surficial reference positon of 340 to 460 HV, Vickers hardness of
the inner portion of 190 to 260 HV, and Vickers hardness at the effective hardning
depth position of 270 HV or above. They where confirmed to be excellent both in the
fatigue property and bend straightening property. It is to be noted herein that in
the present embodiment, the mechanical components excellent both in the strength and
bend straightening property are defined as those having a fatigue strength which gives
an index of fatigue property of 400 MPa or above, and an amount of indentation which
gives an index of bend straightening property of 2 mm or more. In the steel compositions
listed in Table 1, the residual portion other than those listed therein is essentially
composed of Fe.
[0047] On the contrary, comparative product 1 showed a hardness of the inner portion of
less than 190 HV, and a hardness at the effective hardening depth position is less
than 270 HV, although the hardness at the surficial reference position was maintained
at 355 HV. This consequently resulted in only an insufficient surface hardness of
the surficial portion, and in considerably lowered fatigue strength as compared with
that of the embodied products, in other words, this failed in obtaining a desirable
level of component strength. As discussed from the viewpoint of steel composition,
comparative product 1 has C[eq.] smaller than that of the embodied products, due to
the C content. The present embodiment adopts process conditions (process temperature,
process time) of nitriding which fall in general ranges, and this reaches a conclusion
that C[eq.] is adjusted to 0.65 or more in view of reliably adjusting hardness at
the surficial reference position and at the effective hardening depth position to
desirable levels, and raising the hardness of the inner portion, which is necessary
for ensuring a sufficient level of the component strength. As for the C content, it
is adjusted to 0.35 wt% or more (see embodied product 2).
[0048] Next, comparative product 8 showed a hardness of the inner portion of less than 190
HV, and showed hardness both at the surficial reference position and at the effective
hardening depth position of the desired levels, but a reduction rate of the hardness
towards the inner portion was high similarly to comparative product 1, and this consequently
resulted in only an insufficient surface hardness of the surficial portion, and in
considerably lowered fatigue strength as compared with that of the embodied products.
As discussed from the viewpoint of steel composition of comparative product 8, C[eq.]
is adjusted to 0.65 or more in view of reliably raising the hardness of the inner
portion, which is necessary for ensuring a sufficient level of the component strength,
based on the same reason with comparative product 1.
[0049] Comparative product 3 showed desirable level of hardness values at the surficial
reference position and of the inner portion, but showed a hardness at the effective
hardening depth position of less than 270 HV, proving a large reduction rate of the
hardness towards the inner portion, and this consequently resulted in only an insufficient
surface hardness of the surficial portion, and in considerably lowered fatigue strength
as compared with that of the embodied products. As discussed from the viewpoint of
steel composition of comparative product 3, it can be said that the reduction rate
of the hardness towards the inner portion was excessively increased because the Si
content thereof became excessively large as compared with those of the embodied products.
In view of reliably raising the hardness at the effective hardening depth position
necessary for ensuring a sufficient level of the component strength, the Si content
is adjusted to 0.3 wt% or less (see embodied product 2), for example.
[0050] Comparative product 12 showed a desired hardness for the inner portion, but showed
hardness smaller than desired for the surficial reference position and effective hardening
depth position. This consequently resulted in only an insufficient surface hardness
of the surficial portion, and in considerably lowered fatigue strength as compared
with that of the embodied products. As discussed from the viewpoint of steel composition
of comparative product 12, Cr[eq.] is adjusted to 0.72 or more in view of reliably
raising the surface hardness required for ensuring a sufficient level of the component
strength.
[0051] Comparative product 5 showed a hardness of the inner portion exceeding 260 HV, and
a desirable level of hardness at the effective hardening depth position of as high
as 270 HV, but also showed a hardness at the surficial reference position exceeding
460 HV. This resulted in an excessively large surface hardness of the surficial portion,
an amount of indentation considerably lowered from that of the embodied products,
and consequently resulted in only an insufficient bend straightening property. As
discussed from the viewpoint of steel composition of comparative product 5, the excessively
large surface hardness of the surficial portion was supposed to be ascribable to the
Cr[eq.] larger than that of the embodied products, due to the Cr content. Cr[eq.]
is therefore adjusted to 1.0 or less in view of reliably obtaining a desired level
of surface hardness at the surficial reference position required for ensuring a sufficient
level of bend straightening property. Another possible reason for the excessively
large surface hardness was also supposed to be the large Cr content, which was ascribable
to the large C[eq.] and the hardness of the inner portion larger than desired. It
is therefore necessary to limit C[eq.] to as low as 0.86 or less in view of reliably
ensuring a sufficient level of bend straightening property. From the viewpoint of
Cr content, it is adjusted to 0.5 wt% or less (see embodied product 2).
[0052] Comparative products 6 and 7 showed desirable levels of hardness of the inner portion
and at the effective hardening depth position, but showed hardness values exceeding
460 HV at the surficial reference position. This resulted in an excessively large
surface hardness, an amount of indentation considerably lowered from that of the embodied
products, and consequently resulted in only an insufficient bend straightening property.
From the viewpoint of steel composition, comparative product 7 was supposed to be
excessively raised in the surface hardness of the surficial portion due to Cr[eq.]
larger than that of the embodied products. It is therefore necessary to limit Cr [eq.]
to 1.0 or less in view of reliably obtaining a desired level of hardness at the surficial
reference position required for ensuring a sufficient level of bend straightening
property. Comparative product 6 was supposed to be excessively raised in the surface
hardness due to an excessively large Al content. It is therefore necessary to limit
the Al content to 0.01 wt% or less (see embodied product 3) in view of reliably obtaining
a desired level of bend straightening property.
[0053] Next paragraphs will describe the machinability. Comparative product 2 was found
to be excellent both in the component strength and bend straightening property, but
suppressed in the machinability due to a large C content. For the case where there
are demands for an improved machinability, and for both of excellent component strength
and bend straightening property, it is therefore necessary to limit the C content
to, 0.5 wt% or less (see embodied product 3). Embodied products 5 to 10 contain any
one or more of Pb, S, Ca, Bi, Ti, Zr and Mg which are machinability-improving elements.
Embodied products 5 to 10 are thus successfully raised in the machinability as compared
with the others. Addition of the machinability-improving elements to the steel composition
is understood as an effective measure, because suppression of the machinability may
sometimes result in the component strength. It was found from comparison, for example,
between embodied products 1 and 6 that the both showed an equivalent amount of indentation,
but embodied product 6 containing the machinability-improving elements certainly showed
a larger fatigue limit.
[0054] Also comparative products 9 to 11 were found to be excellent both in the component
strength and bend straightening property, similarly to the embodied products. The
machinability-improving elements are contained in these steel compositions. The fatigue
limit as an index for the component strength was, however, conversely lowered from
those of the embodied products, due to large contents of these machinability-improving
elements. It is therefore necessary to limit the contents such as Pb: 0.30 wt% or
less, S: 0.20 wt% or less, Ca: 0.01 wt% or less, Bi: 0.30 wt% or less, Ti: 0.02 or
less, Zr: 0.02 wt% or less and Mg: 0.01 wt% or less.
[0055] Comparative product 4 showed an excessive generation of bainite due to an excessively
large Mn content in the steel composition. Comparative product 4 was found to be inappropriate
as a product as early as when it was made into a forged material. It is therefore
necessary to limit the Mn content to 1.8 wt% or less.
[0056] From the discussion referring to Table 1 and Table 2, it was confirmed that adjustment
of Vickers hardness individually at the surficial reference position, effective hardening
depth position and inner portion so as to fall them within the optimized ranges of
the present invention is essential for making the component strength and bend straightening
property excellent. Next, in relation to Claim 2, data obtained based on the above-described
equation (1) will be shown in Fig. 3.
[0057] The individual data points in Fig. 3 express results of the measurement of the sectional
hardness of the representative test pieces, selected from those of the individual
test pieces. The individual curves (broken lines) almost fitted to the individual
data points were obtained based on the equation (1). It is obvious that the equation
(1) is a good approximate expression based on a better reflection of the measured
values of the sectional hardness. As is clear from the drawing, the sectional hardness
reduces from the component surface towards the inner portion, and reaches plateau
at the inner portion. It is to be noted herein that the inner portion is defined by
a region 1 mm deep or more from the component surface. The individual curves based
on the equation (1) shown in the drawing are obtained under T=600°C, which corresponds
to the nitriding temperature, and t=7.2×10
3 seconds, which corresponds to the process time.
[0058] In Fig. 3, filled plots represent the embodied products, and blank plots represent
the comparative products. A region surrounded by the data points of the embodied products
(vertical hatched region in the drawing) is included in region Z defined by using
the equation (1). More specifically, further increase in the process temperature and
process time of the nitriding for embodied product 1 results in increase in the sectional
hardness so as to come closer to that of embodied product 4. On the other hand, decrease
in the process temperature and process time of the nitriding for embodied product
4 results in decrease in the sectional hardness so as to come closer to that of embodied
product 1. It is accordingly obvious that adjustment of the measured hardness distribution
profile so as to fall within region Z defined by using the equation (1) makes the
mechanical component excellent both in the component strength and bend straightening
property. A numerical range of H'1 in the equation (1), expressing hardness at the
surficial reference position, is based on Cr[eq.], showing a range of Vickers hardness
defined thereby from 348 HV to 458 HV, and on the other hand, a numerical range of
H'0, expressing hardness of the inner portion, is based on C[eq.], showing a range
of Vickers hardness defined thereby from 199 HV to 252 HV. In other words, by making
the measured hardness distribution profile fall within the region Z defined by the
equation (1), both of the component strength and bend straightening property are made
excellent. It is made possible to obtain desired levels of component strength and
bend straightening property by appropriately varying the hardness distribution profile
within the region Z.
[0059] The above-described results proved that the effects and desired ends of the present
invention can successfully be achieved. It is to be noted that the above-described
embodiment and examples are only for the purpose of exemplification, by which the
present invention is never limited, allowing any modifications to be included within
a concept of the present invention without departing from the claims.