[0001] The present invention relates to a refrigerator comprising a compressor having a
variable cooling capacity and control means for controlling such compressor in response
to the temperature inside the refrigerator, as well as to a method for automatically
speeding up the cooling time of the food stored in a refrigerator without user interaction
and with limited energy consumption. With the term "refrigerator" as used in the description
and in the appended claims we mean any kind of domestic refrigerator and freezer.
With the term compressor having variable cooling capacity we mean all kind of compressors
having the possibility of changing the output, either by changing displacement of
the compressor (for instance with the so called free piston compressor) or by changing
the speed of the compressor (in case of fixed displacement) either continuously or
stepwise. In general, modern freezers and refrigerators have a fast freezing or fast
cooling feature. This feature must be activated by the user and consists in keeping
the compressor running at its maximum cooling capacity for an appropriate fixed time
(i.e. 24 hours). Such a known technique guarantees the maximum cooling speed and is
suitable for the fast cooling of large amounts of food. When the amount of food is
not very large, it leads to unnecessary food over-cooling and energy waste. On the
other hand, the user often forgets to activate the function or he doesn't consider
the amount of food large enough to manually activate the function. As a consequence
in these cases, the cooling process is relatively slow.
[0002] A refrigerator having the features listed in the appended claims solves the above
problem.
[0003] The present invention provides a control algorithm able to estimate the amount of
warm food inserted into the refrigerator or freezer. On the basis of this estimation,
the algorithm automatically tunes the compressor response in order to speed-up the
cooling process without wasting any energy for unnecessary over-cooling.
[0004] In this way the user is not required to activate manually the fast cooling function,
and any waste of energy, due to over-cooling, is avoided.
[0005] The above mentioned and other features and objects of the present invention, and
the manner of attaining them, will become more apparent and the invention itself will
be better understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings in which:
- Figure 1 shows a typical temperature trend inside a freezer when the user puts a quantity
of warm food inside the cavity without any "Fast-Freezing" function,
- Figures 2a and 2b show a comparison between a warm food recovery without any "Fast
Freezing" function (prior art) and a warm food recovery according to the present invention
respectively, highlighting how the present invention allows a higher speed in the
warm food recovery,
- Figure 3 shows the behavior of the control including the proposed invention in response
to three different insertions of warm food quantities,
- Figures 4a and 4b show a comparison between a warm food recovery with the known "Fast-Freezing"
function activated and a recovery according to the present invention respectively,
highlighting how the traditional fast freezing function can cause an excessive and
unnecessary food "under-cooling",
- Figure 5 shows a comparison between energy consumption vs. time obtained with the
known fast freezing function (in the working condition shown in fig. 4a) and the energy
consumption obtained with a refrigerator according to the present invention (in the
working condition of fig. 4b),
- Figures 6 and 7 show the main parameters of the probe temperature trend that can be
used in the estimation of the amount of food and, by consequent, in controlling the
compressor cooling capacity.
[0006] With reference to the drawings, in which experimental data were obtained with a Whirlpool
side by side refrigerator model
s25brww20-a/
g, figure 1 shows a typical and well-known temperature trend inside a freezer when
the user puts a quantity of warm food inside the cavity. In the first instants the
probe temperature rapidly increases its detected value. When the user closes the door,
the temperature starts going down thanks to the traditional temperature control action,
based on a consequent increase of the cooling capacity of the compressor (in the example
the speed of the variable speed compressor increases from 1500 rpm to 4000 rpm). The
higher is the amount of warm food inside the freezer, the slower the probe temperature
tends to go down. According to the gist of the present invention, the refrigerator
control system, receiving inputs from the probe temperature inside the freezer and
possibly inputs related to the working condition of the compressor, can estimate the
amount of warm food (warm thermal mass) by correlating the behavior (for instance
the slope) of the probe temperature with the actual compressor capacity. The food
cooling speed is then increased by increasing the compressor capacity proportionally
to the estimated warm thermal mass and substantially independently on the actual temperature
reached by the probe after such compressor capacity has been increased.
[0007] Figures 2a and 2b show two ways of warm food recoveries: the first one (fig. 2.a)
is the result obtained by a traditional control (no warm food estimation and no fast
freezing activated by the user), the second one is obtained by a control that implements
the method according to the invention. It can be noticed how the known control doesn't
perform any probe "under-cooling": as the temperature probe reaches the cut-off temperature,
the compressor is shut down but the food is not yet completely cooled. On the contrary,
the proposed algorithm performs an appropriate probe "under-cooling" by running the
compressor at high speed and for a time depending on the previous estimation of the
amount of food loaded into the freezer. Also the speed at which the compressor runs
may be set by the control system on the basis of the above estimation. As a further
result of the method according to the invention, the compressor may be shut down when
the package is completely cooled. The probe "under-cooling", in which the usual control
based on cut-off temperature is "overruled", is represented by the area named A2 in
the figure 2b. After the package loaded into the freezer is sufficiently cooled, the
usual method of controlling the compressor, in which the compressor is switched off
when the cut off temperature is reached, is resumed.
[0008] Referring to figure 6, a possible technique for estimating the amount of warm food
and to carry out an appropriated probe "under-cooling" is based on the estimation
of the A1 area, i.e. the integral of the curve representing the increase of temperature
above a steady state average temperature Tg. If A1 is the probe temperature area caused
by the warm package insertion, the control algorithm drives the compressor to an appropriate
speed in order to guarantee an "under-cooling" area A2 that is proportional to the
area A1, i.e. A2=k·A1. The parameter k may depend on the type of appliance. Furthermore,
on the same appliance, this parameter may be constant or changed with the working
conditions (i.e. external temperature, temperature set by the user etc), and fuzzy
logic may be used for this purpose.
[0009] An alternative technique consists in having an area A2 based on time derivative of
the probe temperature, i.e. with A2 in inverse proportion to such derivative: the
lower is the derivative, the higher must be A2.
[0010] Additional information to decide the "under-cooling" area A2 can be obtained considering
the probe temperature value T
x when the user closes the door (after the insertion of the food) and by analyzing
the consequent interval time Dt
x, the temperature difference DT
x and the area A
x as shown in figure 7. In general, the higher is the amount of warm food, the higher
these 3 parameters are. Nevertheless other parameters (in addition to the amount of
warm food) may affect these parameters (DT
x Dt
x and A
x) and one of these is the external temperature. For this reason, if an external temperature
sensor is available in addition to the usual internal temperature sensor, the measure
of the above three parameters can be correlated with the measure of external temperature
sensor to improve the warm food temperature estimation.
[0011] The same techniques described in the previous paragraphs can be used also to decide
an appropriated interval time Dt in which the compressor must be forced to run at
an appropriated level of power (for instance at the maximum one).
[0012] Of course any combination of the previous techniques can be used.
[0013] A possible practical implementation of these control techniques can be carried out
by a temperature control algorithm based on the PID (Proportional-derivative-integral)
technique.
[0014] With such a kind of algorithm, the compressor cooling capacity u(t) (in general the
compressor speed) will depend on the error temperature e(t) according to the following
formula:

[0015] Where the temperature error
e(t) is defined as:
e(t)= Tprobe-Target, Ti is the integral time, Td is the derivative time and Kp is a predetermined parameter.
[0016] The integral component plays the main role in adapting the cooling capacity to the
amount of warm food. In fact it is proportional to the area of the error
e(t) along the time axes. During a recovery, this area is significantly affected by the
amount of warm food: the higher is the amount of warm food, the longer
e(t) tends to be "high" (>0) with a consequent increasing of its area (see area A1 in
fig 2a ,2b). This condition leads to a progressive increasing of the compressor capacity
u(t). Furthermore, the integrative component guarantees an appropriate probe "under-cooling"
to compensate the positive area caused by the insertion of the warm food.
[0017] The integral time Ti, the derivative time Td and the predetermined parameter Kp are
adjusted according to data related to opening door switch (i.e. according to frequency
and/or time of door aperture) or, if such data are not available, from a sudden rising
temperature detection to speed up the food cooling time. Such adjustment can act together
or replacing the well known "anti wind-up" technique in which the integrative part
of the temperature error may or not be saturated to a predetermined value.
[0018] Figure 3 shows the capability of the control algorithm to adapt the compressor response
to the warm thermal mass. In particular it is shown the reaction to the insertion
of high, medium and small food quantities . In each of these three conditions the
control gives a compressor capacity increase that is proportional to the warm thermal
mass. As a consequence of the increased cooling capacity, the temperature probe is
proportionally "under-cooled" as well. In particular figure 3 highlights the different
probe under-cooling for each warm food quantity (see the different "under-cooling"
areas A
1, A
2, A
3). For this reason, one of the main characteristics of the control algorithm according
to the present invention consists in the fact that the compressor switch-off is not
based on a predetermined cut-off temperature (or a set of predetermined cut-off temperatures):
the compressor is switched off on the basis of the estimated amount of warm food that
the user has put inside the freezer cavity. In the example shown in fig. 3, the compressor
was switched off at different temperatures T
off1, T
off2, T
off3.
[0019] The main advantages of the present invention are as follows. The algorithm adapts
the compressor response to the warm thermal mass avoiding any waste of energy for
unnecessary over-cooling. In particular, fig. 4a shows the effects of the traditional
fast freezing function manually activated by the user: in this case a medium load
quantity of warm food has been inserted into the freezer. The traditional fast freezing
function keeps the compressor running at its maximum capacity for 24 hours with a
consequent under cooling of the food with a consequent waste of energy. Figure 4b
shows the automatic fast freezing performed by the method according to the present
invention in the same working condition of figure 4b: without any user interaction
the same amount of warm food is rapidly recovered without unnecessary food "under-cooling".
Figure 5 shows the comparison between the energy consumption in the two above cases.
[0020] The method according to the invention is completely automatic, this means that the
user is not required to activate any function. So the risk of a slow temperature recovery,
when the user forgets to activate the fast freezing function present in known refrigerators,
is avoided.
1. A refrigerator comprising a compressor having a variable cooling capacity and control
means for controlling such compressor in response to the temperature inside the refrigerator,
characterized in that the control means are adapted to detect the variation of temperature inside the refrigerator
due to the loading of a food item, and to adjust the cooling capacity of the compressor
accordingly.
2. A refrigerator according to claim 1, characterized in that the control means are adapted to increase the cooling capacity of the compressor
proportionally to the estimated thermal mass of the food item.
3. A refrigerator according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the compressor is a variable speed compressor
4. Method for controlling the variable cooling capacity of a compressor in a refrigerator
having a variable cooling capacity compressor, in which such control is based on temperature
signal from a temperature sensor inside the refrigerator, characterized in that the variation of temperature due to the loading of a food item is detected and the
cooling capacity of the compressor is adjusted accordingly in order to have a quicker
cooling of such food item.
5. Method according to claim 4,
characterized in that it comprises the following step:
- detecting any variation of temperature above a predetermined average temperature
value due to the loading of a food item inside the refrigerator,
- estimating the integral of said temperature variation vs. time,
- increasing the cooling capacity of the compressor so that the integral of the variation
of temperature below said predetermined average temperature, due to the increased
cooling capacity of the compressor, is proportional to the integral of the variation
of temperature above said predetermined value.
6. Method according to claim 4,
characterized in that it comprises the following steps:
- detecting any variation of temperature above an average predetermined value due
to the loading of a food item inside the refrigerator,
- estimating the derivative of temperature vs. time in the decrease of temperature
due to the intervention of the control,
- increasing the cooling capacity of the compressor so that the integral of the variation
of temperature below said average predetermined temperature value, due to the increased
cooling capacity of the compressor, is in inverse proportion to the integral of the
variation of temperature above said predetermined value.
7. Method according to claim 4,
characterized in that the cooling capacity u(t) of the compressor is adjusted with a control algorithm
based on a PID technique according to the following formula:

where the temperature error
e(t) is defined as:
e(t)= Tprobe-Target, Ti is the integral time, Td is the derivative time and Kp is a predetermined parameter.
8. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that the integral time Ti, the derivative time Td and the predetermined parameter Kp are
adjusted according to the opening door switch or, if not available, from a sudden
rising temperature detection.
9. Method according to claim 7, characterized in that the cooling capacity of the compressor is adjusted by changing its speed u(t).