[0001] This invention relates to the preparation of metallic-alloy articles, specifically
martensitic iron-base alloy articles, without melting of the metallic alloy.
[0002] Martensitic steels having a martensitic microstructure are one important class of
the ferritic steels. The martensitic steels have wide application in the aircraft
propulsion industry and are also used in other industries such as the automotive industry.
Metallic articles made of martensitic steels are fabricated by any of a number of
techniques, as may be appropriate for the nature of the metal and the article. In
one common approach, metal-containing ores are refined to produce molten metal, which
is thereafter cast. Ore refinement may take place separately for each of the major
alloying elements, or in combination for more than one element. Elements and combinations
of elements may take many intermediate forms before being melted to form the final
alloy. The metal is refined as necessary to remove or reduce the amounts of undesirable
minor elements. The composition of the refined metal may also be modified by the addition
of desirable alloying elements. These refining and alloying steps may be performed
during the initial melting process or during remelting. After a desired martensitic
composition is produced, it may be used in the as-cast form for some compositions
(i.e. cast martensitic steels), or it may be cast and further worked to form the metal
to the desired shape for other compositions (i.e. wrought martensitic steels). It
may instead be atomized to form fine powder and subsequently consolidated and, in
some cases, further worked (i.e. powder metallurgy martensitic steels). In any case,
further processing such as heat treating, machining, surface coating, and the like
may be employed.
[0003] Regardless of the processing route, all of these forms involve melt processing and
are, as a result, subject to restrictions imposed by such processes. The melting of
martensitic-composition steels is typically accomplished using multiple melt processes
for premium-quality material in order to refine undesirable residual element content,
to homogenize the overall composition, and to adjust the alloy content; or by single-melt
processes and subsequent ladle modifications for standard-quality material. In either
case, the melt is cast to produce the final ingot or article. In multiple melt processes,
intermediate cast electrodes are produced which serve as the input stock to the subsequent
melting step. Melting processes include those which are not performed under vacuum
such as electroslag remelting, air melting, basic-oxygen-furnace melting, open-hearth-furnace
melting, and electric-arc-furnace melting followed by argon-oxygen decarburization,
and those which are performed under vacuum such as vacuum induction melting, vacuum
arc remelting, and vacuum oxygen decarburization. Non-vacuum processes require the
use of refining and protecting slags during the melting process. In any case, additional
chemistry modifications may take place in the ladle to refine impurity content and
to add additional alloying elements.
[0004] Additional limitations are also imposed as a result of the melting process for martensitic
steels because of their composition. Alloy composition and resulting segregation issues
during solidification impose practical limits on the melting rate and the maximum
electrode or ingot diameters, which can be produced without gross irregularities.
In order to reduce the incidence of melt-related irregularities, strict melt controls
are imposed so as to monitor and control melt rate, heat input, melt temperature,
electrode-to-crucible clearance, and other critical parameters. Inadequate control
of these parameters can result in material with significant solidification-related
irregularities which, in turn, can reduce yield and increase production costs. In
melting procedures, such as vacuum induction melting and other processes, which require
vessels with refractory linings, where one alloy is melted in the ceramic melt crucible,
and then a second alloy of a different composition is to be subsequently melted in
the same vessel, an intermediate "wash heat" may be required in order to minimize
alloying element contamination from one alloy to the next which may result from residual
alloy material remaining on the crucible wall. This requirement adds to the overall
cost of producing high-quality martensitic steel.
[0005] Irregularities may result from melting processes or as a result of subsequent forming
operations. Melt-related irregularities include those related to segregation as well
as those resulting from extrinsic contaminants such as air and crucible ceramics.
Melting of martensitic steels is subject to significant solidification segregation
that can result in the formation of irregularities such as freckles, eutectic nodules,
white spots, and banding. Freckles are the result of alloying-element partitioning
during solidification, and are most prevalent in those materials that are highly alloyed
to achieve improved properties. White spots, likewise, are a result of alloying-element
segregation, but can also be associated with extrinsic contamination from crucible
ceramics or remnant slag inclusions (dirty white spots). Inclusions such as sulfides
and carbosulfides may also form as a result of high sulfur contents in the melts.
These melt-related irregularities can significantly degrade the fatigue resistance
and/or toughness of the martensitic steel. Melt-related irregularities can also contribute
to forging-related irregularities such as cracking. Some highly alloyed materials
are also more difficult to form as a result of inheriting the coarse cast structure,
which can lead to additional forging-related irregularities.
[0006] Some martensitic steels are produced using powder metallurgy processes to circumvent
these segregation irregularity issues, particularly for large-diameter ingots, and
to reduce the size of extrinsic contaminants resulting from the multiple melt process.
The current powder metallurgy processes, however, require the martensitic steel composition
to first be melted to produce alloy ingot, and then remelted and atomized to produce
powder. These powder metallurgy processes add great expense and can still result in
extrinsic contamination from crucible ceramics and slag. In addition, powder metallurgy
processes are subject to concerns related to inert gas entrapment in powder particles
during the atomization process, which can lead to residual porosity in the resulting
billet or component. These irregularities can degrade the fatigue and/or toughness
properties of articles produced by the current powder metallurgy process.
[0007] The production of some desirable compositions of martensitic steels may be complicated
by the differences in the thermophysical properties of the metals being combined to
produce the alloy. The interactions and reactions due to these thermophysical properties
of the metals may cause undesired results. To cite one example, the iron base metal
is, in some cases, melted in a vacuum to ensure low contents of interstitial elements
(e.g., oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur) in the final alloys. In the work leading to the
present invention, the inventors have realized that the necessity to melt under a
vacuum makes it difficult to utilize some desirable alloying elements due to their
relative vapor pressures in a vacuum environment. The difference in the vapor pressures
is one of the thermophysical properties that must be considered in alloying such base
metals. In other cases, the alloying elements may be thermophysically melt incompatible
with the molten base metal because of other thermophysical characteristics such as
miscibilities, melting points, densities, and chemical reactivities or may have limitations
in alloy content due to solidification reactions which form undesirable phase morphologies.
Some of the incompatibilities may be overcome with the use of expensive master alloys,
but this approach is not applicable in other cases.
[0008] Thus, melting processes impose significant limitations on the resulting article.
Incremental performance improvements resulting from processing modifications and incremental
improvements in production cost reduction are still possible in a number of areas.
However, the present inventors have recognized in the work leading to the present
invention that in other instances the fabrication approach involving multiple melt
steps imposes fundamental performance limitations that cannot be overcome at any reasonable
cost. They have recognized a need for a departure from the conventional thinking in
fabrication technology, which will overcome many of these fundamental limitations.
The present invention fulfils this need, and further provides related advantages.
[0009] The present invention provides a method for preparing a martensitic article made
of an alloy of iron with a thermophysically melt-incompatible alloying element, in
which the metal is never melted. Prior fabrication techniques require melting the
metal at some point in the processing. The melting operation, which often involves
multiple melting and solidification steps, is costly and imposes some fundamental
limitations on the alloy content and hence the mechanical properties of the final
martensitic-composition articles. The method circumvents problems, which cannot be
avoided in melting practice or are circumvented only with great difficulty and expense.
The present approach permits a uniform alloy to be prepared without subjecting the
constituents to the circumstance, which leads to the incompatibility, specifically
the melting process. Unintentional oxidation of the reactive metals and the alloying
elements is also avoided. The present approach permits the preparation of articles
with compositions that may not be otherwise readily prepared in commercial quantities.
Master alloys are not used.
[0010] A martensitic-composition article of iron-base metal alloyed with an alloying element
is prepared by mixing a chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound
of the iron-base metal and a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor
compound of an alloying element to form a compound mixture. The base metal, which
is present in the alloy in an amount greater than any other element by weight, is
iron. At least one alloying element is thermophysically melt incompatible with the
base metal, but both thermophysically melt incompatible and thermophysically melt
compatible alloying elements may be present. The method further includes chemically
reducing the compound mixture to a metallic alloy, without melting the metallic alloy,
and thereafter consolidating the metallic alloy to produce a consolidated metallic
article, without melting the metallic alloy and without melting the consolidated metallic
article, to produce a martensitic steel metallic article.
[0011] "Martensitic steel" as used herein is defined as having a composition of an iron-base
alloy, wherein iron is present in an amount of at least about 50 percent by weight,
which possesses a continuous body-centered cubic (BCC) or body-centered tetragonal
(BCT) crystal structure matrix phase. At least about 75 percent by volume of the BCC
or BCT matrix phase is present in an acicular phase morphology in the service condition,
which develops as a result of a diffusionless phase transformation from the austenitic
(face centered cubic, FCC) phase through nonequilibrium accelerated cooling (i.e.,
quenching). The martensite may or may not be tempered prior to service. The matrix
may also contain additional phases in various phase morphologies in the as-quenched
condition or after additional heat treatment or heat treatments. Phases such as austenite
or ferrite, precipitates such as metal carbides and metal nitrides, and intermetallic
compounds such as Ni
3Mo, FeTi, and Fe
2Mo may be present. The present approach first produces a "martensitic-composition"
material which does not necessarily have the martensitic microstructure but which
is capable to being heat treated to produce the martensitic microstructure, and this
martensitic-composition material is thereafter heat treated to produce the martensitic
steel. Typical steels falling within the definition used herein include martensitic
stainless steels (e.g., M152 and 410), martensitic precipitation hardening stainless
steels (e.g., 17-4PH), semiaustenitic precipitation hardening stainless steels (e.g.,
AM350 and AM355), maraging steels (e.g., Marage 250 and GE1014), and martensitic low
alloy steels (e.g., 4340 and 52100).
[0012] The nonmetallic precursor compounds may be solid, liquid, or gaseous. The chemical
reduction is preferably performed by solid-phase reduction, such as fused salt electrolysis
of the precursor compounds in a finely divided solid form such as an oxide of the
element; or by vapor-phase reduction, such as contacting vapor-phase halides of the
base metal and the alloying element(s) with a liquid alkali metal or a liquid alkaline
earth metal. The final article has more iron than any other element.
[0013] The mixture of the nonmetallic precursor compounds may be provided in any operable
physical form. For example, the mixture may be furnished as a compressed mass of particles,
powders, or pieces of the nonmetallic precursor compounds, which typically has larger
external dimensions than a desired final metallic article. The compressed mass may
be formed by pressing and sintering. In another example, the mixture of the nonmetallic
precursor compounds may be finely divided particulate or powder, and not compressed
to a specific shape. In another example, the mixture may be a mixture of vapors of
the precursor compounds.
[0014] In another embodiment, a method for preparing a martensitic iron-base article made
of iron-base metal and alloyed with an alloying element comprises the steps of providing
a chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound of the iron-base
metal, and providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor
compound of an alloying element that is thermophysically melt incompatible with the
iron-base metal. The base-metal precursor compound and the alloying-element precursor
compound are thereafter mixed together to form a compound mixture. The method further
includes chemically reducing the compound mixture to produce a metallic alloy, without
melting the metallic alloy, and thereafter consolidating the metallic alloy to produce
a martensitic-composition consolidated metallic article, without melting the metallic
alloy and without melting the martensitic-composition consolidated metallic article.
Other compatible features described herein may be used with this embodiment.
[0015] The thermophysical melt incompatibility of the alloying element with the iron base
metal may be any of several types, and some examples follow. Specific examples of
thermophysical melt incompatibility for iron-base alloys are given. In the alloys,
there are one or more thermophysically melt incompatible elements. Additionally, there
may be, and usually are, one or more elements that are not thermophysically melt incompatible
with the base metal. Some elements are not thermophysically melt incompatible when
present in a "compatible" composition range (usually but not necessarily smaller amounts),
but are thermophysically melt incompatible when present in an "incompatible" composition
range (usually but not necessarily larger amounts). As used herein, such elements
are considered to be thermophysically melt incompatible elements only when present
in an amount within the incompatible composition range, and are not considered to
be thermophysically melt incompatible elements when present in an amount outside the
incompatible composition range.
[0016] One such thermophysical melt incompatibility is in the vapor pressure, as where the
alloying element has an evaporation rate of greater than about 10 times that of the
base metal at a melt temperature, which is preferably a temperature just above (i.e.,
50°C above) the liquidus temperature of the alloy. Examples of such alloying elements
for iron-base alloys include barium, calcium, cadmium, cesium, lithium, magnesium,
manganese, and zinc.
[0017] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs when the melting point of
the alloying element is too high or too low to be compatible with that of the iron-base
metal, as where the alloying element has a melting point different from (either greater
than or less than) that of the iron-base metal of more than about 400°C (720°F). Examples
of such alloying elements for iron-base alloys include aluminum, arsenic, cerium,
copper, hafnium, lanthanum, manganese, molybdenum, tin, tantalum, tungsten, and zinc.
Some of these elements may be furnished in master alloys whose melting points are
closer to that of the iron-base metal, but the master alloys are often expensive.
[0018] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs when the density of the alloying
element is so different from that of the iron base metal that the alloying element
physically separates in the melt, as where the alloying element has a density difference
with the base metal of greater than about 0.5 gram per cubic centimeter. Examples
of such alloying elements for iron-base alloys include tantalum, tungsten, and niobium.
[0019] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs when the alloying element,
or a chemical compound formed between the alloying element and the base metal, chemically
reacts with the base metal in the liquid phase. Examples of such alloying elements
for iron-base alloys include boron, gadolinium, hafnium, niobium, phosphorus, rhenium,
silicon, tantalum, thorium, yttrium, zirconium, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur.
[0020] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility is where the alloying element exhibits
a miscibility gap with the iron-base metal in the liquid phase. Examples of such alloying
elements for iron-base alloys include silver, indium, magnesium, and oxygen.
[0021] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs due to elemental segregation
during solidification, which causes an unacceptable distribution of the alloying element
in the solidified ingot. The degree of segregation may be reduced in melted-and-cast
product by lowering the melting power, reducing the ingot diameter, using long post-casting
homogenization heat treatments, and the like, but these prior approaches increase
cost and limit the type of product that may be produced. In the present process, this
type of segregation is avoided because the alloy is never melted and solidified. Examples
of such segregating alloying elements for iron-base alloys include arsenic, beryllium,
antimony, scandium, and titanium.
[0022] Another thermophysical incompatibility is not strictly related to the nature of the
base metal, but instead is related to the crucibles or environment in which the base
metal is melted. Base metals may require the use of a particular crucible material
or melting atmosphere, and some potential alloying elements may react with those crucible
materials or melting atmospheres, and therefore not be candidates as alloying elements
for that particular base metal. Examples of such incompatible alloying elements for
iron-base alloys include hafnium, calcium, and cerium.
[0023] These and other types of thermophysical melt incompatibilities lead to difficulty
or impossibility in forming acceptable martensitic alloys of these elements in a conventional
melting practice. The present approach, in which the metals are not melted at all
during production or processing, circumvents the thermophysical melt incompatibility
to produce good quality, homogeneous alloys.
[0024] Some additional processing steps may be included in the present process. In some
cases, it is preferred that the compound mixture be compacted, after the step of mixing
and before the step of chemical reduction. The result is a compacted mass which, when
chemically reduced, produces a compressed powder or a spongy metallic material. After
the chemical reduction step, the metallic alloy is consolidated to produce a consolidated
metallic article, without melting the metallic alloy and without melting the consolidated
metallic article. This consolidation may be performed with any physical form of the
metallic alloy produced by the chemical reduction, but the approach is particularly
advantageously applied to consolidating of the pre-compacted spongy material. Consolidation
is preferably performed by hot pressing or hot isostatic pressing, or extrusion, but
without melting in each case. Solid state diffusion of the alloying elements may also
be used to achieve the consolidation.
[0025] Optionally, prior to the step of consolidating, a mixture of the metallic material
and an "other additive constituent" may be produced to make the martensitic-alloy
composition.
[0026] The consolidated metallic article may be used in the as-consolidated form. In appropriate
circumstances, it may be formed to other shapes using known forming techniques such
as rolling, forging, extrusion, and the like. It may also be post-processed by known
techniques such as machining, heat treating, surface coating, and the like.
[0027] The present approach may be used to fabricate articles from the precursor compounds,
entirely without melting. As a result, the characteristics of the alloying elements
which lead to thermophysical melt incompatibility, such as excessive evaporation due
to high vapor pressure, overly high or low melting point, overly high or low density,
excessive chemical reactivity, strong segregation tendencies, and the presence of
a miscibility gap, may still be present but do not normally lead to inhomogeneities
or irregularities in the final metallic alloy. The present approach thus produces
the desired alloy composition of good quality, but without interference from these
thermophysical melt incompatibilities that otherwise would prevent the formation of
an acceptable alloy.
[0028] The present approach differs from prior approaches in that the metal is not melted
on a gross scale. Melting and its associated processing such as casting are expensive
and also produce large-cast-grain-size microstructures and occasionally microstructures
with local/long-range segregation such as eutectic nodules, white spots, and freckles
that either are unavoidable or can be altered only with additional expensive processing
modifications. Undesirable second phases which precipitate in the melt or during solidification
of liquid, which are stable and cannot be dissolved in subsequent solid state processing,
are avoided. These second phases are a detriment to fatigue strength and/or toughness,
and cannot be modified by subsequent processing. However, second phases may be introduced
in a more-desirable dispersed form by the present meltless approach. The present approach
reduces cost and avoids large grain sizes, detrimental coarse second phases, and irregularities
associated with melting and casting, to improve the mechanical properties of the final
metallic article. It also results in some cases in an improved ability to fabricate
specialized shapes and forms more readily, and to inspect those articles more readily.
[0029] The preferred form of the present approach also has the advantage of being based
in a powder-form precursor. Starting with a powder of the nonmetallic precursor compounds
avoids a cast structure with its associated irregularities such as elemental segregation
on a nonequilibrium microscopic and macroscopic level, a cast microstructure with
a range of grain sizes and morphologies that must be homogenized in some manner for
many applications, gas entrapment, and contamination. The present approach produces
a uniform, fine-grained, homogeneous, pore-free, gas-pore-free, and low-contamination
final product.
[0030] The fine-grain structure of the metallic material provides an excellent starting
point for subsequent consolidation and metalworking procedures such as forging, hot
isostatic pressing, rolling and extrusion. Conventional cast starting material must
be worked to modify and reduce the scale of the microstructure, and such working is
not necessary with the present approach.
[0031] Another important benefit of the present approach is improved inspectability as compared
with cast-and-wrought product. The martensitic steel articles produced by the present
approach are of a fine microstructural size and are free of microstructures discussed
previously that inhibit inspectability. As a result, they exhibit a significantly
reduced noise level during ultrasonic inspection, and permit inspection for smaller
irregularities. The reduction in size of irregularities that may be detected allows
larger articles to be fabricated and inspected, thus permitting more economical fabrication
procedures to be adopted, and/or the detection of smaller irregularities. By reducing
the noise associated with the inspection procedure, larger diameter intermediate-stage
articles may be processed and inspected. Processing steps and costs are reduced, and
there is greater confidence in the inspected quality of the final product. The final
article that contains fewer and smaller irregularities also results in improved mechanical
properties.
[0032] The present approach also offers important benefits when used to make alloys of iron-base
metal with conventional alloying elements that are not thermophysically incompatible
with the base metal. Conventional melting-and-casting technology of commercial-scale
heats of alloys, starting from ores of the metals, inevitably results in levels of
impurity elements in the alloys. In some cases, the presence of the impurity elements
produces highly undesirable effects on the properties of the alloys in service. In
some cases the adverse effects of minor amounts of these elements has become evident
only as the applications of the alloys becomes ever-more demanding. The present approach
reduces, and in some cases eliminates entirely, the presence of such minor levels
of impurity elements, due to the low-impurity nature of the starting materials and
the low processing temperatures that are used, which limits the migration of impurity
elements into the alloy. As a result, the strength, fatigue properties, and oxidation/sulfidization/corrosion
resistance of the alloys are improved, as compared with the nominally same alloys
produced by conventional techniques.
[0033] The present approach thus allows the production of new alloys that cannot be made
with the present melting-and-casting technology because of thermophysical incompatibility.
It also allows the production of existing alloys that can be made by melting-and-casting
technology, but at lower cost and better quality than possible with the existing melting-and-casting
technology, and with a more-desirable phase distribution.
[0034] The present approach is advantageously applied to make martensitic steel articles.
Contamination and other impurity elements that are almost unavoidable in conventional
casting practice, and which may have major adverse effects on the properties of the
material, may be eliminated with the present approach. The structure is more uniform
and homogeneous than may be produced by conventional casting and working techniques.
For the material produced by the present approach that replaces conventionally cast
material, there is a reduced incidence of irregularities such as those produced by
segregation and inclusions (e.g., white spots, freckles, eutectic nodules, and banding)
during conventional casting operations, and those associated with remelted/recycled
material. The cost is also reduced due to the elimination of processing steps associated
with casting. The reduction in the cost of the final product achieved by the present
approach also makes the martensitic steels more economical. Properties are also improved.
Material made by the present approach that is a replacement for conventional wrought
articles realizes these same benefits. Additionally, large-sized specialty articles,
whose size is limited only by compaction capability, may be made while avoiding microsegregation
and macrosegregation. Reduced thermomechanical work is required to produce fine microstructures,
and there is reduced loading on the mechanical working equipment. More complex processing
may be used, because of the initially fine microstructure.
[0035] Other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent from the
following more detailed description of the preferred embodiment, taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings, which illustrate, by way of example, the principles
of the invention, and in which:
Figure 1 is a perspective view of a metallic article prepared according to the present
approach;
Figure 2 is a block flow diagram of an approach for practicing the invention; and
Figure 3 is a perspective view of a spongy mass of the metallic material.
[0036] The present approach may be used to make a wide variety of metallic articles 20,
such as a gas turbine shaft 22 of Figure 1. The shaft 22 is only one example of the
types of articles 20 that may be fabricated by the present approach. Some other examples
include other gas turbine parts such as stationary seals, bearing components, rings,
cases, and frames, automobile parts, biomedical articles, and structural members such
as airframe parts. There is no known limitation on the types of articles that may
be made by this approach.
[0037] Figure 2 illustrates a preferred approach for an article of a base metal and a thermophysically
melt-incompatible alloying element. The method includes providing a chemically reducible
nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound, step 40, and providing a chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of an alloying element that is thermophysically
melt incompatible with the base metal, step 42. "Nonmetallic precursor compounds"
are nonmetallic compounds of the metals that eventually constitute the metallic article
20. Any operable nonmetallic precursor compounds may be used. Reducible oxides of
the metals are the preferred nonmetallic precursor compounds in solid-phase reduction,
but other types of nonmetallic compounds such as sulfides, carbides, halides, and
nitrides are also operable. Reducible halides of the metals are the preferred nonmetallic
precursor compounds in vapor-phase reduction. The preferred base-metal precursor compound
is iron oxide for solid-phase reduction or iron chloride for vapor-phase reduction.
The alloying element may be any element that is available in the chemically reducible
form of the precursor compound. Mixtures of different types of precursor compounds
may be used, as long as they are operable in the subsequent chemical reduction.
[0038] The martensitic-steel composition produced by the present approach is an iron-base
alloy that may be heat treated to produce a martensitic-microstructure steel. The
base-metal compound is present in an amount such that, after the chemical reduction
to be described subsequently, there is more of the iron base metal present in the
metallic alloy than any other element. An "iron-base" alloy is defined as having more
of the element iron than any other single element, and in many cases has more than
50 percent by weight of iron. The nonmetallic precursor compounds are selected to
provide the necessary elements in the final metallic article, and are mixed together
in the proper amounts to yield the necessary proportions of these metals in the final
metallic article. For example, the final article may have a composition comparable
to that of 17-4PH martensitic steel but with added cerium in an amount of more than
about 1 weight percent. The cerium in this martensitic steel desirably combines with
and getters oxygen and sulfur. If such a composition is melted, however, intermetallic
compounds are formed in the melt to produce undesirable inclusions in the final material.
The iron-cerium system has a low melting composition that results in an undesirable
phase distribution upon solidification. There is also a concern with the presence
of small particles of the furnace-refractory material. These potential problems are
avoided by using the present non-melting approach. The cerium-modified 17-4 PH martensitic
steel used for this example has a nominal major-element content of about 17 weight
percent chromium, about 4 weight percent nickel, about 4 weight percent copper, about
0.3 percent niobium, about 1.5 percent cerium, balance iron, the nonmetallic precursor
compounds would collectively contain these elements in the ratio of about 17 parts
chromium to about 4 parts nickel to about 4 parts copper to about 0.3 parts niobium
to about 1.5 parts cerium to about 73.2 parts iron, by weight. Other and minor alloying
elements may also be provided in these and additional precursor compounds. The precursor
compounds are furnished and mixed together in the correct proportions such that the
ratio of the desired elements in the mixture of precursor compounds is that required
to form the metallic martensitic steel in the final article. Nonmetallic precursor
compounds that serve as a source of more than one of the metals in the final metallic
article may also be used. Similar principles apply for other martensitic steels.
[0039] The nonmetallic precursor compounds are furnished in any operable physical form.
The nonmetallic precursor compounds used in solid-phase reduction are preferably initially
in a finely divided form to ensure that they are chemically reacted in the subsequent
step. Such finely divided forms include, for example, powder, granules, flakes, or
pellets that are readily produced and are commercially available. The nonmetallic
precursor compounds in this finely divided form may be processed through the remainder
of the procedure described below. In a variation of this approach, the finely divided
form of the nonmetallic precursor compounds may be compressed together, as for example
by pressing and sintering, to produce a preform that is processed through the remainder
of the procedure. In the latter case, the compressed mass of nonmetallic precursor
compounds is larger in external dimensions than a desired final metallic article,
as the external dimensions are reduced during the subsequent processing.
[0040] The present approach is utilized in conjunction with thermophysically melt incompatible
alloying elements. "Thermophysical melt incompatibility" and related terms refer to
the basic concept that any identified thermophysical property of an alloying element
is sufficiently different from that of the base metal to cause detrimental effects
in the melted final product. These detrimental effects include phenomena such as chemical
inhomogeneity (detrimental micro-segregation, macro-segregation, and gross segregation
from vaporization or immiscibility), inclusions of the alloying elements such as high-density
inclusions, and the like. Thermophysical properties are intrinsic to the elements,
and combinations of the elements, which form alloys, and are typically envisioned
using equilibrium phase diagrams, vapor pressure versus temperature curves, curves
of densities as a function of crystal structure and temperature, and similar approaches.
Although alloy systems may only approach predicted equilibrium, these envisioning
data provide information sufficient to recognize and predict the cause of the detrimental
effects as thermophysical melt incompatibilities. However, the ability to recognize
and predict these detrimental effects as a result of the thermophysical melt incompatibility
does not eliminate them. The present approach provides a technique to minimize and
desirably avoid the detrimental effects by the elimination of melting in the preparation
and processing of the alloy.
[0041] Thus, "thermophysical melt incompatible" and related terms mean that the alloying
element or elements in the alloy to be produced do not form a well mixed, homogeneous
alloy with the base metal in a production melting operation in a stable, controllable
fashion. In some instances, a thermophysically melt incompatible alloying element
cannot be readily incorporated into the alloy at any compositional level, and in other
instances the alloying element can be incorporated at low levels but not at higher
levels. For example, some elements do not behave in a thermophysically melt incompatible
manner when introduced at low levels, and homogeneous alloys of such alloying additions
may be prepared using a melting process. However, if there is an attempt to introduce
greater levels of such elements, they tend to segregate strongly in the melt and thus
behave in a thermophysically melt incompatible manner so that homogeneous alloys can
only be prepared with great difficulty or not at all.
[0042] The thermophysical melt incompatibility of the alloying element with iron-base metal
may be any of several types, and some examples follow.
[0043] One such thermophysical melt incompatibility is in the vapor pressure, as where the
alloying element has an evaporation rate of greater than about 10 times that of the
base metal at a melt temperature, which is preferably a temperature just above the
liquidus temperature of the alloy. Examples of such alloying elements for iron-base
alloys include barium, calcium, cadmium, cesium, lithium, magnesium, manganese, and
zinc. Where the vapor pressure of the alloying element is too high, it will preferentially
evaporate, as indicated by the evaporation rate values, when comelted with iron-base
metals under a vacuum in conventional melting practice. An alloy will be formed, but
it is not stable during melting and continuously loses the alloying element so that
the percentage of the alloying element in the final alloy is difficult to control.
In the present approach, because there is no vacuum melting, the high melt vapor pressure
of the alloying element is not a concern.
[0044] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs when the melting point of
the alloying element is too high or too low to be compatible with that of the iron-base
metal, as where the alloying element has a melting point different from (either greater
than or less than) that of the base metal of more than about 400°C (720°F). Examples
of such alloying elements for iron-base alloys include aluminum, arsenic, cerium,
copper, hafnium, lanthanum, manganese, molybdenum, tin, tantalum, tungsten, and zinc.
Some of these elements may be furnished in master alloys whose melting points are
closer to that of the iron-base metal, but the master alloys are often expensive.
If the melting point of the alloying element is too high, it is difficult to melt
and homogenize the alloying element into the melt in conventional vacuum melting practice.
The segregation of such alloying elements may result in the formation of high-density
inclusions containing that element. If the melting point of the alloying element is
too low, it will likely have an excessively high vapor pressure at the temperature
required to melt the base metal. In the present approach, because there is no vacuum
melting, the overly high or low melting points are not a concern.
[0045] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs when the density of the alloying
element is so different from that of the iron-base metal that the alloying element
physically separates in the melt, as where the alloying element has a density difference
with the base metal of greater than about 0.5 gram per cubic centimeter. Examples
of such alloying elements for iron-base alloys include tantalum, tungsten, and niobium.
In conventional melting practice, the overly high or low density leads to gravity-driven
segregation of the alloying element. In the present approach, because there is no
melting there can be no gravity-driven segregation.
[0046] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility is where the alloying element, or
a chemical compound formed between the alloying element and the base metal or another
alloying element, chemically reacts with the base metal in the liquid phase. Examples
of such alloying elements for iron-base alloys include boron, gadolinium, hafnium,
niobium, phosphorus, rhenium, silicon, tantalum, thorium, yttrium, and zirconium.
In conventional melting practice, the chemical reactivity of the alloying element
with the base metal leads to the formation of intermetallic compounds including the
base metal and the alloying element, and/or other deleterious phases in the melt,
which are retained after the melt is solidified. These phases often have adverse effects
on the properties of the final alloy due to their large size and morphology. In the
present approach, because the metals are not heated to the point where these reactions
occur, the compounds are not formed or, if formed at lower temperatures, the morphologies
cause minimal impact on the mechanical properties.
[0047] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility is where the alloying element exhibits
a miscibility gap with the base metal in the liquid phase. In conventional melting
practice, a miscibility gap leads to a segregation of the melt into the compositions
defined by the miscibility gap. The result is inhomogeneities in the melt, which are
retained in the final solidified article. The inhomogeneities lead to variations in
properties throughout the final article. In the present approach, because the elements
are not melted, the miscibility gap is not a concern. Examples of such alloying elements,
which exhibit a miscibility gap, for iron-base alloys include silver, indium, magnesium,
and oxygen.
[0048] Another such thermophysical melt incompatibility occurs due to elemental segregation
during solidification, which causes an unacceptable distribution of the alloying element
in the solidified ingot. The degree of segregation may be reduced in melted-and-cast
product by lowering the melting power, reducing the ingot diameter, using long post-casting
homogenization heat treatments, and the like, but these prior approaches increase
cost and limit the type of product that may be produced. In the present process, this
type of segregation is avoided because the alloy is never melted and solidified. Examples
of such segregating alloying elements for iron-base alloys include arsenic, beryllium,
antimony, scandium, and titanium. The segregation of elements in conventional melting-and-casting
practice results in adverse effects on mechanical properties as well as physical properties
such as corrosion, oxidation, and sulfidization resistance.
[0049] Another thermophysical incompatibility is not strictly related to the nature of the
base metal, but instead to the crucibles or environment in which the base metal is
melted. Base metals may require the use of a particular crucible material or melting
atmosphere, and some potential alloying elements may react with those crucible materials
or melting atmospheres, and therefore not be candidates as alloying elements for that
particular base metal. Examples of such incompatible alloying elements for iron-base
alloys include hafnium, calcium, and cerium.
[0050] These and other types of thermophysical melt incompatibilities lead to difficulty
or impossibility in forming acceptable alloys of these elements in conventional production
vacuum melting. Their adverse effects are avoided in the present meltless approach.
[0051] The base-metal compound and the alloying compound are mixed to form a uniform, homogeneous
compound mixture, step 44. The mixing is performed by conventional procedures used
to mix powders or form mixed oxides in other applications, for solid-phase reduction,
or by the mixing of the vapors, for vapor-phase reduction.
[0052] Optionally, for solid-phase reduction of solid precursor compound powders the compound
mixture is compacted to make a preform, step 46. This compaction is conducted by cold
or hot pressing of the finely divided compounds, but not at such a high temperature
that there is any melting of the compounds. The compacted shape may be sintered in
the solid state to temporarily bind the particles together. The compacting desirably
forms a shape similar to, but larger in dimensions than, the shape of the final article.
[0053] The mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds is thereafter chemically reduced by
any operable technique to produce a metallic material, without melting the metallic
material, step 48. As used herein, "without melting", "no melting", and related concepts
mean that the material is not macroscopically or grossly melted, so that it liquefies
and loses its shape. There may be, for example, some minor amount of localized melting
as low-melting-point elements melt and are diffusionally alloyed with the higher-melting-point
elements that do not melt. Even in such cases, the gross shape of the material remains
unchanged.
[0054] In one approach, termed solid-phase reduction because the nonmetallic precursor compounds
are furnished as solids, the chemical reduction may be performed by fused salt electrolysis.
Fused salt electrolysis is a known technique that is described, for example, in published
patent application WO 99/64638. Briefly, in fused salt electrolysis the mixture of
nonmetallic precursor compounds is immersed in an electrolysis cell in a fused salt
electrolyte such as a chloride salt at a temperature below the melting temperature
of the martensitic steel that forms from the nonmetallic precursor compounds. The
mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds is made the cathode of the electrolysis
cell, with an inert anode. The elements combined with the metals in the nonmetallic
precursor compounds, such as oxygen in the preferred case of oxide nonmetallic precursor
compounds, are removed from the mixture by chemical reduction (i.e., the reverse of
chemical oxidation). The reaction is performed at an elevated temperature. The cathodic
potential is controlled to ensure that the reduction of the nonmetallic precursor
compounds will occur, rather than other possible chemical reactions such as the decomposition
of the molten salt. The electrolyte is a salt, preferably a salt that is more stable
than the equivalent salt of the metals being refined and ideally very stable to remove
the oxygen or other gas to a low level. The chlorides and mixtures of chlorides of
barium, calcium, cesium, lithium, strontium, and yttrium are preferred as the molten
salt. The chemical reduction may be carried to completion, so that the nonmetallic
precursor compounds are completely reduced.
[0055] In another approach, termed vapor-phase reduction because the nonmetallic precursor
compounds are furnished as vapors or gaseous phase, the chemical reduction may be
performed by reducing mixtures of halides of the base metal and the alloying elements
using a liquid alkali metal or a liquid alkaline earth metal. In one embodiment, a
mixture of appropriate gases in the appropriate amounts is contacted to molten sodium,
so that the metallic halides are reduced to the metallic form. The metallic martensitic
steel is separated from the sodium. This reduction is performed at temperatures below
the melting point of the metallic martensitic steel, so that the martensitic steel
is not melted. The approach is described more fully in U.S. Patents 5,779,761 and
5,958,106.
[0056] In this vapor-phase reduction approach, a nonmetallic modifying element or compound
presented in a gaseous form may be mixed into the gaseous nonmetallic precursor compound
prior to its reaction with the liquid alkali metal or the liquid alkaline earth metal.
In one example, a carbon-containing gas may be mixed with the gaseous nonmetallic
precursor compound(s) to increase the level of carbon in the martensitic steel. Similarly,
elements such as sulfur, nitrogen, and boron may be added using appropriate gaseous
compounds of these elements. Complex combinations of such gaseous elements may be
provided and mixed together, such as gaseous compounds of nitrogen, sulfur, carbon,
phosphorus, and/or boron, leading to precursor compound phase dissolution of such
additive elements or to the formation of chemically more-complex second phases.
[0057] The physical form of the metallic material at the completion of step 48 depends upon
the physical form of the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds at the beginning
of step 48. If the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds is free-flowing, finely
divided particles, powders, granules, pieces, or the like, the metallic material is
also in the same form, except that it is smaller in size and typically somewhat porous.
If the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds is a compressed mass of the finely
divided particles, powders, granules, pieces, or the like, then the final physical
form of the metallic material is typically in the form of a somewhat porous metallic
sponge 60, as shown in Figure 3. The external dimensions of the metallic sponge are
smaller than those of the compressed mass of the nonmetallic precursor compound due
to the removal of the oxygen and/or other combined elements in the reduction step
48. If the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds is a vapor, then the final physical
form of the metallic material is typically fine powder that may be further processed.
[0058] Some constituents, termed "other additive constituents", may be difficult to introduce.
For example, suitable nonmetallic precursor compounds of the constituents may not
be available, or the available nonmetallic precursor compounds of the other additive
constituents may not be readily chemically reducible in a manner or at a temperature
consistent with the chemical reduction of other nonmetallic precursor compounds. It
may be necessary that such other additive constituents ultimately be present as elements
in solid solution in the article, as compounds formed by reaction with other constituents
of the article, or as already-reacted, substantially inert compounds dispersed through
the article. These other additive constituents or precursors thereof may be introduced
from the gas, liquid, or solid phase, as may be appropriate, using one of the four
approaches subsequently described or other operable approaches.
[0059] In a first approach, the other additive constituents are furnished as elements or
compounds and are mixed with the precursor compounds prior to or concurrently with
the step of chemically reducing. The mixture of precursor compounds and other additive
constituents is subjected to the chemical reduction treatment of step 48, but only
the precursor compounds are actually reduced and the other additive constituents are
not reduced.
[0060] In a second approach, the other additive constituents in the form of solid particles
are furnished but are not subjected to the chemical reduction treatment. Instead,
they are mixed with the initial metallic material that results from the chemical reduction
step, but after the step of chemically reducing 48 is complete. This approach is particularly
effective when the step of chemically reducing is performed on a flowing powder of
the precursor compounds, but it also may be performed on a pre-compacted mass of the
precursor compounds, resulting in a spongy mass of the initial metallic material.
The other additive constituents are adhered to the surface of the powder or to the
surface of, and into the porosity of, the spongy mass.
[0061] In a third approach, the precursor compounds are first produced as powder particles
by compacting the precursor compounds of the metallic elements. The particles are
then chemically reduced. The other additive constituent is thereafter produced at
the surfaces of the particles from the gaseous phase. In one technique, a gaseous
precursor (e.g., methane) is flowed over the surface of the particles to deposit the
element onto the surface from the gas.
[0062] A fourth approach is similar to the third approach, except that the other additive
constituent is deposited from a liquid rather than from a gas. The precursor is first
produced as powder particles by compacting the precursor compounds of the metallic
elements. The particles are then chemically reduced. The other additive constituent
is thereafter produced at the surfaces of the particles by deposition from the liquid.
In one technique, the particulate is dipped into a liquid solution of a precursor
compound of the other additive constituent to coat the surfaces of the particles.
The precursor compound of the other additive constituent is second chemically reacted
to leave the other additive constituent at the surfaces of the particles. In an example,
lanthanum may be introduced into the material by coating the surfaces of the reduced
particles with lanthanum chloride. The coated particles are thereafter heated and/or
exposed to vacuum to drive off the chlorine, leaving lanthanum at the surfaces of
the particles.
[0063] Whatever the reduction technique used in step 42 and however the other additive constituent
is introduced, the result is a mixture that comprises the desired composition.
[0064] The chemical composition of the metallic alloy is determined by the types and amounts
of the metals in the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds furnished in steps
40 and 42. The relative proportions of the metallic elements are determined by their
respective ratios in the mixture of step 44 (not by the respective ratios of the compounds,
but the respective ratios of the metallic element). Here, the metallic alloy has more
iron than any other element, producing an iron-base metallic alloy.
[0065] At this stage, the metallic martensitic-composition material is in a form that is
not structurally useful for most applications. Accordingly, the metallic martensitic
steel is thereafter consolidated to produce a consolidated metallic article, without
melting the metallic martensitic steel and without melting the consolidated metallic
article, step 50. The consolidation removes porosity from the metallic martensitic
steel, desirably increasing its relative density to or near 100 percent. Any operable
type of consolidation may be used. Preferably, the consolidation 50 is performed by
hot isostatic pressing the metallic martensitic steel under appropriate conditions
of temperature and pressure, but at a temperature less than the melting points of
the metallic martensitic steel and the consolidated metallic article (which melting
points are typically the same or very close together). Pressing and solid-state sintering
or extrusion of a canned material may also be used, particularly where the martensitic
steel is in the form of a powder. The consolidation reduces the external dimensions
of the mass of metallic martensitic steel, but such reduction in dimensions is predictable
with experience for particular compositions. The consolidation processing 50 may also
be used to achieve further alloying of the metallic article with alloying elements
such as nitrogen and carbon.
[0066] The consolidated metallic article, such as that shown in Figure 1, may be used in
its as-consolidated form. Instead, in appropriate cases the consolidated metallic
article may optionally be post processed, step 52. The post processing may include
forming by any operable metallic forming process, as by forging, extrusion, rolling,
and the like. Some metallic compositions are amenable to such forming operations,
and others are not. The martensitic steel article consolidated by the present approach
will be much more amenable to forming operations than its equivalent conventionally
prepared (i.e., cast or cast-and-wrought) composition due to its finer grain size
and potential for superplastic forming. The consolidated metallic article may also
or instead be optionally post-processed by other conventional metal processing techniques
in step 52. Such post-processing may include, for example, heat treating, surface
coating, machining, and the like. The post-processing, when performed, may include
one or more of such individual post-processing operations.
[0067] One important post-processing step 52 is heat treating to produce an acicular phase
morphology characteristic of a martensitic microstructure. The material produced to
this point in the processing is of a composition that forms a martensitic microstructure,
but it will not generally have a martensitic microstructure until properly heat treated
(although there may be martensite coincidentally present). Such heat treatments are
known in the art for the various compositions produced by other techniques, but generally
involve heating above a required temperature, known for each composition, and then
a relatively rapid cooling (i.e., quenching) to produce the martensitic structure.
The same heat treatment procedures used for martensitic-composition steels produced
by other techniques are used with the martensitic-composition steels produced by the
present meltless approach. The heat treating may be performed at this point prior
to other post-processing, after other post-processing, or between individual post-processing
procedures.
[0068] The martensitic steel is never heated above its melting point. Additionally, it may
be maintained below specific temperatures that are themselves below the melting point,
such as various precipitate (e.g., non-metallic particles such as carbides, or intermetallic
particles) solvus temperatures. Such temperatures are known in the art for the specific
compositions.
[0069] In other cases, it is desirable to heat the martensitic steel above a particular
solvus temperature in order to achieve a specific type of microstructure. Such temperatures
are known in the art for the specific compositions.
[0070] The microstructural type, morphology, and scale of the article is determined by the
starting materials and the processing. The grains of the articles produced by the
present approach generally correspond to the morphology and size of the powder particles
of the starting materials, when the solid-phase reduction technique is used. In the
present approach, the metal is never melted and cooled from the melt, so that the
coarse grain structure associated with the solidified structure never occurs. In conventional
melt-based practice, subsequent metalworking processes are designed to break up and
reduce the coarse grain structure associated with solidification. Such processing
is not required in the present approach.
[0071] The present approach processes the mixture of nonmetallic precursor compounds to
a finished metallic form without the metal of the finished metallic form ever being
heated above its melting point. Consequently, the process avoids the costs associated
with melting operations, such as controlled-atmosphere or vacuum furnace costs. The
microstructures associated with melting, typically large-grained structures, casting
irregularities, and segregation-related irregularities (e.g., freckles, white spots,
and eutectic nodules), are not found. Without such irregularities, the reliability
of the articles is improved. The greater confidence in the irregularity-free state
of the article, achieved with the better inspectability discussed above, also leads
to a reduction in the extra material that must otherwise be present. Mechanical properties
such as static strength, fatigue strength, and toughness may be improved, potentially
allowing the articles to be lighter in weight. Inspectability is improved, and the
product has reduced cost, irregularities, and porosity, as compared with the product
of other powder metallurgy processing.
[0072] For completeness, various aspects of the invention are set out in the following numbered
clauses:
1. A method for preparing an article (20) of iron base metal alloyed with an alloying
element, comprising the steps of
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound of the
iron base metal;
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of an alloying element, wherein the alloying element is thermophysically melt incompatible
with the iron base metal; thereafter
mixing the base-metal precursor compound and the alloying-element precursor compound
to form a compound mixture; thereafter
chemically reducing the compound mixture to a metallic alloy, without melting the
metallic alloy; and thereafter
consolidating the metallic alloy to produce a consolidated metallic article (20),
without melting the metallic alloy and without melting the consolidated metallic article
(20), wherein the consolidated iron-base metallic article (20) is a martensitic-composition
steel.
2. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound includes the step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound in
a finely divided solid form, and
wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element
precursor compound includes the step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
in a finely divided solid form.
3. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound includes the step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound in
a gaseous form, and
wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element
precursor compound includes the step of
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
in a gaseous form.
4. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic
base-metal precursor compound includes the step of
providing a chemically reducible base-metal oxide.
5. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound further includes the step of
providing a further alloying-element precursor compound of a further alloying element,
wherein the alloying element is not thermophysically melt incompatible with the iron
base metal.
6. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing a chemically reducible alloying-element oxide.
7. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of chemically reducing includes the step
of
chemically reducing the compound mixture by solid-phase reduction.
8. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of chemically reducing includes the step
of
chemically reducing the compound mixture by fused salt electrolysis.
9. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of chemically reducing includes the step
of
chemically reducing the compound mixture by vapor-phase reduction.
10. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of chemically reducing includes the step
of
chemically reducing the compound mixture by contact with a liquid selected from
the group consisting of a liquid alkali metal and a liquid alkaline earth metal.
11. The method of clause 1, including an additional step, after the step of consolidating,
of
post-processing the consolidated metallic article (20).
12. The method of clause 1, including an additional step, after the step of consolidating,
of
post-processing the consolidated metallic article (20) by heat treating the consolidated
metallic article (20) to form a martensitic article (20).
13. The method of clause 1, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element, if melted, chemically reacts
with a crucible material or a melting atmosphere.
14. A method for preparing an article (20) made of iron base metal alloyed with an
alloying element, comprising the steps of
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic base-metal precursor compound of the
iron base metal;
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of an alloying element that is thermophysically melt incompatible with the iron base
metal; thereafter
mixing the base-metal precursor compound and the alloying-element precursor compound
to form a compound mixture; thereafter
chemically reducing the compound mixture to produce a metallic alloy, without melting
the metallic alloy; thereafter
consolidating the metallic alloy to produce a consolidated metallic article (20),
without melting the metallic alloy and without melting the consolidated metallic article
(20), wherein the consolidated iron-base metallic article (20) is a martensitic-composition
steel; and
post-processing the consolidated metallic article (20) by heat treating the consolidated
metallic article (20) to form a martensitic article (20).
15. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element has a vapor pressure of greater
than about 10 times a vapor pressure of the iron base metal in a melt of the iron
base metal, both measured at a melt temperature.
16. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element has a melting point different
from that of the iron base metal by more than about 400°C.
17. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element has a density difference with
the iron base metal of greater than about 0.5 gram per cubic centimeter.
18. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element chemically reacts with the iron
base metal or another element in a liquid phase to form a chemical compound including
the alloying element.
19. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of providing the chemically reducible
nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound of the alloying element includes the
step of
providing the chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element precursor compound
of the alloying element, wherein the alloying element exhibits a miscibility gap with
the iron base metal in the liquid phase.
20. The method of clause 14, including an additional step, after the step of mixing
and before the step of chemically reducing, of
compacting the compound mixture.
21. The method of clause 14, wherein the step of chemically reducing includes the
step of
chemically reducing the compound mixture to produce the metallic alloy in the form
of a spongy mass.
22. The method of clause 14, including an additional step, prior to the step of mixing,
of
providing a chemically reducible nonmetallic alloying-element compatible precursor
compound of an alloying element that is not thermophysically melt incompatible with
the iron base metal, and
wherein the step of mixing includes the step of
mixing the base-metal precursor compound, the alloying-element precursor compound,
and the alloying-element compatible precursor compound to form a compound mixture.