| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 1 611 295 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
13.05.2009 Bulletin 2009/20 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 31.03.2004 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC):
|
| (86) |
International application number: |
|
PCT/FI2004/000194 |
| (87) |
International publication number: |
|
WO 2004/090253 (21.10.2004 Gazette 2004/43) |
|
| (54) |
STEEL BEAM
STAHLTRÄGER
POUTRE D'ACIER
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR
|
| (30) |
Priority: |
10.04.2003 FI 20030145 U
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
04.01.2006 Bulletin 2006/01 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: Peikko Group Oy |
|
15170 Lahti (FI) |
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- TUOMINEN, Kari
FI-15900 Lahti (FI)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Valkeiskangas, Tapio Lassi Paavali |
|
Kolster Oy Ab
Iso Roobertinkatu 23
P.O. Box 148 00121 Helsinki 00121 Helsinki (FI) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
EP-A1- 0 086 966 EP-A2- 0 292 449 WO-A1-03/100187 US-A- 5 560 176
|
EP-A1- 1 416 101 WO-A1-90/12173 US-A- 4 018 055
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The invention relates to a steel beam arranged to act together with concrete as a
supporting composite structure for different slab systems, the composite structure
being arranged to be supported at least at supporting points at the area of the ends
and comprising two web parts and horizontal cantilever parts extending outside thereof,
the web parts being arranged adjacent at a distance from each other and interconnected
at one edge of each web part by means of a horizontal upper part, the web parts and
the horizontal upper part being arranged to constitute a space that can be filled
with concrete.
[0002] Steel beams of the above type, so-called steel composite beams, have long been known
in the construction industry. During installation, these steel composite beams act
as a steel beam for .installation-time loads. After the concreting, which takes place
following the installation of the slabs, the beam acts as a composite structure together
with the concrete. In said concreting, the beam is cast full of concrete in connection
with the joint grouting of the slabs and a possible topping.
[0003] Several different solutions for steel composite beams have been developed over the
years. Examples of previously known solutions include the solutions disclosed in the
Finnish patent publications
85745 (see
WO 90/12173) and
92089.
[0004] In particular
US-A-5 560 176, family member of the latter, discloses as steel beam in accordance with the preamble
of claim 1.
[0005] Steel composite beams are either single-span or plural-span beams. This means that
the beam is supported either at its ends, i.e. in the area of the supporting points
in the area of its ends or, alternatively, it comprises intermediate supports such
that the beam also includes supporting points between the supporting points in the
area of its ends. This is why it is not practical to make the beam similar over its
entire length, but additional steel parts are fastened to the basic cross-section
according to stresses.
[0006] Typically, the beam is subjected to a high shearing stress in the vicinity of the
support arranged in the supporting point. In previous solutions, this high shearing
stress has been received by welding a chamfered plate inside the beam in the vicinity
of the supporting point.
[0007] The drawback in the above structure is that the plate increases the weight of the
beam and thereby its price. The plate is also difficult to fasten on a production
line because the welding position is unfavourable since, in practice, the labourer
has to bend and at the same time reach upwards. Typically, the shearing force decreases
linearly from the end of the beam towards the middle. However, the plate is of uniform
section, its thickness being determined according to the highest value of the shearing
force. Thus, part of the capacity of the plate is unnecessary and remains unutilized.
[0008] The object of the invention is to provide a steel beam allowing the drawbacks of
prior art to be eliminated. This is achieved with a steel beam of the invention. The
steel beam of the invention is characterized in that at least one peg member whose
one end is fastened to the lower surface of the upper part and whose other end is
provided with an anchoring expansion or widening section is arranged inside the space
defined by the web parts and the horizontal upper part, in the area of the supporting
points.
[0009] An advantage of the invention over prior art is that the peg members are light and
their number can be changed very easily over the length of the beam. Accordingly,
superfluous capacity and weight are not created in the beam. An additional advantage
of the invention is that the peg members are much easier to fasten to the beam than
the previously used plate. The peg members can be fastened to the plate constituted
by the upper part of the beam from the top, i.e. the welding can be carried out from
above for instance by placing the peg member into a hole provided in the plate. This
eliminates the inconvenient working position caused by the welding of the previously
used plate.
[0010] In the following, the invention will be described in detail by means of an exemplary
embodiment described in the accompanying drawing, wherein
Figure 1 shows a steel beam according to the invention seen in the longitudinal direction
of the beam, and
Figure 2 is a perspective view of a beam according to the invention.
[0011] Figures 1 and 2 show an embodiment of the steel beam according to the invention.
The steel beam comprises two web parts 1 and horizontal cantilever parts 2 extending
outside thereof. The web parts 1 are arranged adjacent at a distance from each other
and interconnected at one edge of each web part 1 by means of a horizontal upper part
3. The web parts 1 and the horizontal upper part 3 are arranged to constitute a space
4 that can be filled with concrete.
[0012] In the example of the figures, the lower edges of the web parts 1 are interconnected
by means of a horizontal lower part 5. The web parts 1 are provided with openings
6 enabling the feed of concrete into the space 4.
[0013] The above facts are evident to a person skilled in the art, and they are therefore
not described in any detail herein. As for the above facts, reference is made to the
previously mentioned Finnish patent publication
85745.
[0014] In accordance with the essential idea of the steel beam of the invention, peg members
whose ends comprise an expansion or widening section acting as an anchoring are used
in the vicinity of a supporting point. As the figures show, at least one peg member
7 is arranged inside the space 4 defined by the web parts 1 and the horizontal upper
part 3, in the area of the supporting points. One end of the peg member 7 is fastened
to the lower surface of the upper part, as shown particularly clearly in Figure 1.
The other end of the peg member 7 is provided with an expansion or widening section
8 that helps the anchoring.
[0015] The number of peg members 7 over the length of the beam may change, avoiding unnecessary
capacity. Accordingly, there may be either one or more peg members 7 according to
the need, and the number may also change e.g. in the longitudinal direction of the
beam. The peg members 7 may be placed in either one or more lines. Figure 1 shows
a solution wherein the peg members are in two lines. The peg members 7 are placed
in the area of the supporting points, i.e. at the ends of the beam and, if need be,
also in the area of the supporting points between the ends of the beam.
[0016] The peg members can be made either from a smooth bar or from a ribbed bar. The shape
of the expansion or widening section 8 acting as the anchoring end is optional as
long as it constitutes an anchoring member. The shape of the anchoring end can be
e.g. round, oval, etc.
[0017] The expansion or widening section acting as the anchoring end can be implemented
by using any suitable technique. However, an implementation wherein the peg members
7 are made from jolt pegs has been found to be particularly advantageous.
[0018] The embodiment of the invention described above is in no way intended to restrict
the invention, but the invention can be modified freely within the scope of the claims.
It is therefore evident that the steel beam of the invention or its details no not
necessarily have to be exactly as shown in the figures, but also other solutions are
feasible.
1. A steel beam arranged to act together with concrete as a supporting composite structure
for different slab systems, the composite structure being arranged to be supported
at least at supporting points at the area of the ends and comprising two web parts
(1) and horizontal cantilever parts (2) extending outside thereof, the web parts (1)
being arranged adjacent at a distance from each other and interconnected at one edge
of each web part (1) by means of a horizontal upper part (3), the web parts (1) and
the horizontal upper part (3) being arranged to constitute a space (4) that can be
filled with concrete, characterized in that at least one peg member (7) whose one end is fastened to the lower surface of the
upper part (3) and whose other end is provided with an anchoring expansion or widening
section (8) is arranged inside the space (4) defined by the web parts (1) and the
horizontal upper part (3), in the area of the supporting points.
2. A steel beam as claimed in claim 1, characterized in that there are several peg members (7).
3. A steel beam as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the peg members (7) are arranged in one line.
4. A steel beam as claimed in claim 2, characterized in that the peg members (7) are arranged in several lines.
5. A steel beam as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the peg members (7) are made from a smooth bar.
6. A steel beam as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 4, characterized in that the peg members (7) are made from a ribbed bar.
7. A steel beam as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the peg members (7) are jolt pegs.
1. Stahlträger, der vorgesehen ist, zusammen mit Beton als eine stützende Verbundkonstruktion
für unterschiedliche Plattensysteme zu fungieren, wobei die Verbundkonstruktion vorgesehen
ist, zumindest an Stützstellen an den Endbereichen gestützt zu werden, und zwei Stegteile
(1) und sich ausserhalb von diesen erstreckende, horizontale Kragträgerteile (2) aufweist,
wobei die Stegteile (1) in einem Abstand voneinander nebeneinander angeordnet und
an einem Rand jedes Stegteils (1) durch einen horizontalen Oberteil (3) miteinander
verbunden sind, wobei die Stegteile (1) und der horizontale Oberteil (3) vorgesehen
sind, einen Raum (4) zu bilden, der mit Beton gefüllt werden kann, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass zumindest ein Zapfenelement (7), dessen eines Ende an der Unterfläche des Oberteils
(3) befestigt ist und dessen anderes Ende mit einem verankernden Ausdehnungs- oder
Verbreitungsabschnitt (8) versehen ist, innerhalb des durch die Stegteile (1) und
den horizontalen Oberteil (3) definierten Raums (4) im Bereich der Stützstellen angeordnet
ist.
2. Stahlträger nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass mehrere Zapfenelemente (7) vorgesehen sind.
3. Stahlträger nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zapfenelemente (7) in einer Reihe angeordnet sind.
4. Stahlträger nach Anspruch 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zapfenelemente (7) in mehreren Reihen angeordnet sind.
5. Stahlträger nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zapfenelemente (7) aus einer glatten Stange hergestellt sind.
6. Stahlträger nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zapfenelemente (7) aus einer Rippenstange hergestellt sind.
7. Stahlträger nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Zapfenelemente (7) Stauchzapfen sind.
1. Poutre d'acier conçue pour coopérer avec du béton pour former une structure porteuse
composite pour différents systèmes de dalle, cette structure composite étant disposée
de manière à être soutenue au moins au niveau des points d'appui situés au niveau
des extrémités et comprenant deux âmes (1) et des éléments horizontaux (2) en débordement
extérieur de celles-ci, les âmes (1) étant disposées de manière adjacente, à distance
l'une de l'autre et reliées entre elles au niveau d'un bord de chaque âme (1) par
un élément supérieur horizontal (3), les âmes (1) et l'élément supérieur horizontal
(3) étant disposés de manière à délimiter un espace (4) pouvant être rempli de béton,
caractérisée en ce qu'au moins une tige (7) dont une extrémité est fixée à la face inférieure de l'élément
supérieur (3) et dont l'autre extrémité est dotée d'un tronçon d'ancrage de plus forte
section ou largeur (8) est disposée, dans la zone des points d'appui, à l'intérieur
de l'espace (4) défini par les âmes (1) et l'élément supérieur horizontal (3).
2. Poutre d'acier selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce qu'il est prévu une pluralité de tiges (7).
3. Poutre d'acier selon la revendication 2, caractérisée en ce que les tiges (7) sont disposées sur une ligne.
4. Poutre d'acier selon la revendication 2, caractérisée en ce que les tiges (7) sont disposées sur plusieurs lignes.
5. Poutre d'acier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisée en ce que les tiges (7) sont réalisées à partir d'une barre lisse.
6. Poutre d'acier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisée en ce que les tiges (7) sont réalisées à partir d'une barre nervurée.
7. Poutre d'acier selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6, caractérisée en ce que les tiges (7) sont des tiges refoulées.

REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only.
It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has
been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and
the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Patent documents cited in the description