[0001] The invention relates to an inductive loop detector arranged for receiving first
detection signals from a first loop and second detection signals from a second loop.
[0002] The invention further relates to a detection system comprising such an inductive
loop detector and a vehicle park, such as a parking lot, a parking garage or a parking
place, either paid or unpaid and either public or private, employing such a detection
system.
[0003] Many parking lots have limited space available for parking cars. Frequently money
is charged for occupying parking places in said parking lots by cars. Accordingly
access and exit of such parking lots should be controlled to avoid unpaid and/or unauthorised
usage of the parking places. Access and exit control, however, may also be suitable
for purposes other than safeguarding payment, e.g. for a private parking place. Access
and exit control is typically obtained by employing a vehicle barrier, such as a speed
gate, a door, a rising step or a bollard etc.
[0004] These barriers are often activated by inductive loops deployed in a plane which is
roughly parallel to the surface of the roadway into which they are embedded or onto
which they are provided. An oscillator of a loop detector connected to such an inductive
loop generates an alternating signal to provide a detection field for detecting passing
vehicles. A vehicle entering this detection field causes a change of the resonance
frequency of the loop which detection signal is detected by the loop detector. The
loop detector subsequently may generate a control signal in response to the detection
signal for activating the barrier. Such a loop detector has been disclosed in GB 2
231 188.
[0005] Various solutions have been proposed for avoiding vehicles to accidentally activate
the barrier by entering the detection field. Obviously, sufficient space can be left
between the parking places and the barrier to prevent vehicles from manoeuvring in
and out of parking places near the inductive loops. However, this solution is disadvantageous
as potential parking place is lost.
[0006] As an alternative solution, a combination of three inductive loops and two loop detectors
is employed as displayed in Fig. 2. The first and second inductive loops are connected
to a dual channel vehicle detector that is programmed to only activate a vehicle barrier
if a vehicle approaches the inductive loops correctly, i.e. approach control. The
third loop is provided at the vehicle barrier and connected to a single loop detector
programmed to avoid that the barrier resumes its initial position while a vehicle
is still in its way, i.e. presence control.
[0007] A disadvantage of the latter solution is the complexity of the system as it requires
three loops and two detectors.
[0008] It is an object of the invention to provide a less complex inductive loop detector
and a system using such an inductive loop detector.
[0009] This object is achieved by providing an inductive loop detector comprising a microprocessor
and a first output, a second output and a third output, wherein said microprocessor
is adapted to provide a first control signal triggered in response to said first detection
signal for said first output, a second control signal triggered in response to said
second detection signal for said second output and a third control signal triggered
in response to said first detection signal and second detection signal for said third
output.
[0010] This object is further achieved by providing a system comprising such an inductive
loop detector and a first and second loop arranged to provide said first and second
detection signals when a vehicle passes.
[0011] The inductive loop detector and system according to the invention enable to perform
the approach control and presence control functions employing only two loops and a
single loop detector. Accordingly, complexity of the detection system is reduced thereby
diminishing the installation costs. Further, only one loop detector is required which
reduces expenses to be made for the system. Moreover, multiple loop detectors may
interfere with each other, which effect is prevented by the invention. It should be
noted that the detection system and loop detector can also be employed for detection
of other metal objects than vehicles.
[0012] In a preferred embodiment of the invention, the system further comprises a vehicle
barrier and said second loop is provided at said vehicle barrier. Preferably, this
second loop has a shape and/or area different from said first loop. One of the loops
may e.g. have a parallelogram shape or a diamond shape. In an embodiment of the invention
the second loop is arranged at the vehicle barrier such that a larger part of the
area of this loop is at the side of the barrier from which the vehicle approaches.
Accordingly, the second loop is suitably arranged to have the loop detector to perform
both the approach control and the presence control function.
[0013] In an embodiment of the invention, the system further comprises an input unit, wherein
said input unit is arranged to be activated after triggering of one or more of said
control signals. Such an input unit, e.g. a card reader, is inactive if no vehicle
is present which reduces chances of fraud at this input unit.
[0014] The invention and advantages thereof will be further illustrated and described with
reference to the attached drawings, which schematically show preferred embodiments
according to the invention. It will be understood that the invention is not in any
way restricted to these specific and preferred embodiments.
[0015] In the drawings:
Fig. 1 shows a schematic illustration of a parking lot;
Fig. 2 shows a schematic illustration of a detection system according to the prior
art;
Fig. 3 shows a schematic illustration of a detection system and inductive loop detector
according to an embodiment of the invention;
Fig. 4 shows a timing diagram of the detection signals and control signals of the
inductive loop detector depicted in Fig. 3, and
Figs. 5A-5C show alternative embodiments of the loop detector and detection system.
[0016] Fig. 1 shows a parking lot 1 with multiple parking places 2 for vehicles 3. The parking
lot 1 has an entrance 4 and an exit 5 both barred by a vehicle barrier 6. The parking
lot 1 may be multi-storeyed. It should however be appreciated that the invention has
alternative applications, such as for garage boxes for only a few cars or for railroad
crossings. The vehicle barrier 6 may be any type of barrier able to block or hinder
passage of the vehicles 3 through the entrance 4 or exit 5, including but not limited
to a speed gate, a door, a rising step or a bollard.
[0017] Parking lots as shown in Fig. 1 are typically employed with a detection system 10
as shown in Fig. 2. The detection system 10 of the prior art comprises a dual channel
detector 11 connected to a loop 12 and a loop 13 arranged in the road surface of the
exit 5. The dual channel detector 11 further comprises a first output 14 and a second
output 15 to control the vehicle barrier 6. As an example, Never-Fail Systems, Inc.
markets a LD200 dual channel detector. Other examples include the PD 230 dual channel
detector of Nortech International, VEK M2A, VEK M2B, VEK M2E and VEK M2H detectors
of FEIG Electronic GmbH, the IG325/2 detector of Weiss Electronic GmbH and the AGD520
detector of AGD Systems. The detection system 10 further comprises a third loop 16
connected to a single channel detector 17 with a single output 18. As an example,
Never-Fail International markets a LD100 single channel detector. The above mentioned
companies also market single channel detector. The third loop 16 is provided under
the vehicle barrier 6.
[0018] The vehicle barrier 6 typically comprises a control module 7 for controlling the
electromotor, the hydraulic and/or pneumatic components to move the vehicle barrier
6. Further, the vehicle barrier 6 may comprise electronics to process the output signals
from the outputs 14, 15, 18 of the loop detector 11, 17.
[0019] In operation, the dual channel detector 11 generates a signal to obtain a detection
field above the road surface at the loops 12, 13. If a vehicle 3 exits the parking
lot 1 correctly it enters the detection field of the loops 12 and 13 in that sequence.
The dual channel loop detector 11 receives a first detection signal for loop 12 and
a second detection signal for loop 13 and in response generates a control signal at
the outputs 14, 15 to open the vehicle barrier 6. This function is referred to as
approach control. Further, the single channel loop detector 17 also provides a detection
field at the third loop 16. The single loop detector 17 outputs a control signal for
the vehicle barrier 6 to prevent closing of the vehicle barrier 6 as long as a vehicle
3 is in its way. This function is referred to as presence control.
[0020] Fig. 3 shows a schematic illustration of a detection system 20 and an inductive loop
vehicle detector 30 according to an embodiment of the invention. The detection system
20 comprises a first loop A and a second loop B connected to a dual channel inductive
loop detector 30. The first loop A and second loop B are arranged in or on the road
surface of the exit 5 of the parking lot 1. As an example, the dimensions of loop
A are 2 meters in width, i.e. perpendicular to the driving direction of the vehicle
3 and a length, i.e. in the driving direction of the vehicle 3 of 1 meter. Loop B
has different dimensions, e.g. a width of 2 meters and a length of 1,75 meters. The
second loop B is arranged at the vehicle barrier 6 such that a larger part of the
area of this loop B is at the side of the barrier 6 from which the vehicle 3 approaches.
The separation between loop A and B in the driving direction is e.g. 0,8 meters. It
is noted that the exact dimensions depend on the situation wherein the loops A and
B should function.
[0021] The loops A and B are connected with cables 21, also referred to as feeders, to the
loop detector 30. These feeders 21 may be twisted to prevent the feeders from forming
a further loop.
[0022] The detection system may further comprise an input unit 22, such as a card reader
or ticket dispenser, for receiving input information of the driver of the vehicle
3.
[0023] The loop detector 30 comprises a microprocessor 31, a memory 32 comprising operating
instructions for the microprocessor 31, a setting portion 33 and three outputs O1,
O2 and O3, operated by the microprocessor, for outputting control signals C1, C2 and
C3 for the vehicle barrier 6. The setting portion 33 conventionally employs switches,
such as DIP-switches or DIL-switches, or jumpers to set various functions of the detector
30. As an example, these switches or jumpers can be used to set the sensitivity level
of the detection field or the duration pulses of the control signals C1, C2 or C3.
Typically such a pulse duration is between 150-250 ms. Variation of the pulse duration,
preferably in this range, may be relevant for the loop detector 30, as the control
electronics 7 for the vehicle barrier 6 may require longer pulses than 150 ms. The
outputs O1, O2 and O3 can be realised in various alternatives, such as relays, transistors
or other suitable solid state devices, opto-couplers etc. Typically, the loop detector
components are housed in a housing (not shown). Relays provide universal connection
options to the loop detector 30 having such a housing. However, the loop detector
components may also be arranged on a printed circuit board without a housing. In such
a situation, opto-couplers are typically used for loop detectors 30 to couple the
loop detector 30 with the (connector of) the control module 7 for the vehicle barrier
6. It should be appreciated that the loop detector 30 may be part of the control module
7 for the vehicle barrier 6.
[0024] Further, the loop detector 31 has an oscillator 34 and a multiplexer 35. The oscillator
34 outputs a signal with a frequency in the range of 10-150 kHz to provide the detection
field above the loops A and B. The multiplexer 31 reduces or eliminates crosstalk
between the nearby loops A and B by connecting the loop detector 30 to loop A and
loop B in turns.
[0025] The loop detector 30 is powered by power supply 36. Power may be obtained from a
DIN-rail socket or can advantageously be obtained from the power source for the vehicle
barrier 6.
[0026] The loop detector 30 may employ a 11-pin 86CP11 connector from Nortech International
with the following pin lay-out as described in the below table.
| Pin |
Designation |
| 1 |
power supply |
| 2 |
power supply |
| 3 |
relay O3 NO |
| 4 |
relay O2 NC |
| 5 |
relay O1 COMMON |
| 6 |
relay O1 NC/NO |
| 7 |
loop A |
| 8 |
common loop (A and B) |
| 9 |
loop B |
| 10 |
relay O3 COMMON |
| 11 |
relay O2 COMMON |
[0027] In this table, the conventions NC and NO mean 'normally closed' respectively 'normally
open'. It is noted that for the invention, the initial state of the relays O1, O2
and O3 is not relevant. The relays O1, O2 and O3 should only change their state, either
from NC to NO or vice versa, to provide the control signals C1, C2 and C3. It should
further be noted that the change of state of an output not necessarily lasts, but
may be only temporarily. Finally, it should be appreciated that other connectors may
be used as well. Sometimes, only a connection strip is provided.
[0028] Further, the relays O1, O2 and O3 may operate in various modes, such as the modes
"presence" and "pulse" generally known in the art. Briefly, in the presence mode,
a relay O1, O2, O3 provides a control signal C1, C2, C3 as long as a metallic object,
such as vehicle 3, is over a loop A, B. In the pulse mode, a relay O1, O2, O3 generates
a pulsed control signal C1, C2, C3, i.e. a control signal of limited duration, either
on entry or on exit of the vehicle 3 from the detection field of the loop A, B.
[0029] It should be appreciated that the loop detector 30 may have other features, including
protection features to protect the detector from high electrical currents, e.g. induced
by lightning, and signalling features, such as LED's, to indicate the state of the
detection system 20 or the loop detector 30. Also power fail measures, including the
provision of a power fail memory, may have been taken.
[0030] In operation, with reference to the signal-time diagram Fig. 4, the oscillator 34
provides signals to loops A and B to obtain a detection field for the exit 5. It is
noted that the time diagrams of Fig. 4 depend e.g. on the dimensions of the loops
and the length of the vehicle 3. The length of vehicles can be accounted for by employing
automatic sensitivity boost generally known in the art.
[0031] The characteristics of these detection fields have been set by employing the switches
of the setting portion 33 and the instructions stored in the memory 32 for the microprocessor
31. The relays O1 and O2 are in the mode "presence" whereas the relay O3 is in the
mode "pulse".
[0032] When the vehicle 3 enters the detection field of loop A at time t
1, the loop detector 30 receives a first detection signal indicated as D(A) in Fig.
4. At this moment the microprocessor 31 generates a control signal C1 at the output
O1 in response to the signal D(A). It is noted that typically a delay of the order
of approximately 100 milliseconds is found between the receipt of D(A) and the generation
of C1 at the output O1. As the first relay O1 is set in the mode "presence", the relay
O1 is energized as long as the vehicle 3 is over the loop A, i.e. during the interval
between t
1 and t
4.
[0033] When the vehicle 3 moves on, subsequently it enters the detection field of loop B
at time t
2 to yield a second detection signal D(B). At t
2 the microprocessor 31 energizes the output O2 to obtain a control signal C2 in response
to the second detection signal D(B). As the second relay O2 is set in the mode "presence",
the relay 02 is energized as long as the vehicle 3 is in the loop B, i.e. during the
interval between t
2 and t
5.
[0034] However, as the vehicle 3 is also still in the detection field of loop A, the microprocessor
31 further provides a control signal C3 at the output O3. In other words, the third
control signal C3 is triggered in response to the first detection signal D(A) and
the second detection signal D(B). The relay O3 is set in the mode "pulse", such that
relay O3 is energized for only a limited duration, i.e. between t
2 and t
3. The duration of this interval is e.g. in the range of 150-250 milliseconds, dependent
on the control module 7.
[0035] To provide the approach control as previously described the vehicle barrier 6 is
only opened, as shown in the bottom diagram of Fig. 4, if the vehicle 3 first enters
loop A and subsequently loop B. In other words, the vehicle barrier 6 is only opened
if output O3 provides a control signal C3. For this reason, the loop B preferably
has an extended loop portion towards the first loop A to open the vehicle barrier
6 sufficiently early.
[0036] Further, the vehicle barrier 6 remains open as long as output O2 is energized, i.e.
until t
5, to avoid closing of the vehicle barrier 6 with a vehicle present in loop B. Accordingly,
the detection system 20 and loop detector 30 enable presence control. Moreover, as
output O1 is in the presence mode, drive back security can be provided, which is e.g.
important for parking lots 1 wherein the road of the entrance 4 or exit 5 is sloped.
If the vehicle 3 drives back, but remains in the detection field of loop A, the vehicle
barrier 6 does not close.
[0037] As a special application, if the vehicle 3 enters loop A, the detection signal D(A)
may trigger control signal C1 to activate the card reader 22. Accordingly, the driver
of the vehicle 3 may only from that moment on use the card reader 22.
[0038] Although in Fig. 3, individual lines are shown from the outputs O1, O2 and O3 to
the control module 7 of the vehicle barrier 6, it is noted that the detector 30 may
have a decision module 40 to process the control signals C1, C2, C3. In other words,
outputs O1, O2 and O3 provide access to the control signals from the microprocessor
31, but these control signals are not necessarily directly available outside the detector
30. Examples are shown in Figs. 5A-5C, wherein only some relevant components of the
detection system 20 are depicted.
[0039] In Fig. 5A, the microprocessor 31 of the loop detector 30 provides control signals
C1, C2 and C3 at outputs O1, O2 and O3. These control signals C1, C2, C3 are input
to the decision module 40. This decision module 40 subsequently makes available a
closing signal Cc or an opening signal Co for the vehicle barrier 6. Obviously, the
control module 7 should be able to interpret these signals.
[0040] In Fig. 5B, the same arrangement is applied as for Fig. 5A, however, the decision
module 40 only outputting one signal for the control module 7 of the vehicle barrier
6. This output is e.g. a presence signal Cp, as long as the vehicle barrier should
remain open.
[0041] In Fig. 5C, the loop detector 30 is identical to that shown in Fig. 3. A decision
module 40 is applied intermediately between the detector 30 and the control module
7 to convert the control signals C1, C2 and C3 of the outputs O1, O2 and O3. Evidently,
the decision module 40 may be implemented at the control module 7.
[0042] It should be acknowledged that the present invention is not limited to the above-described
embodiments, since the function of the loop detector 30 according to the invention
can be achieved in many alternative ways, including both digital and analogue solutions,
all of which fall under the scope of the invention. A gist of the invention relates
to adding a third output to a dual channel loop detector, e.g. the LD200 of Never-Fail,
the PD 230 of Nortech International, the VEK M2A, VEK M2B, VEK M2E or VEK M2H of FEIG
Electronic GmbH, the IG325/2 detector of Weiss Electronic GmbH or the AGD520 detector
of AGD Systems and adapting the microprocessor to provide control signals at the three
outputs allowing to fulfil both the approach control function and the presence control
function. A further gist of the invention relates to providing a system comprising
a loop detector and detection loops of different arrangements, i.e. dimensions and/or
shapes.
[0043] Further, it should be appreciated that the invention can also be applied for other
type of sensors or detectors than inductive loop detectors, e.g. magnetic field detectors,
pneumatic, hydraulic detectors or optical detectors. A magnetic field detector generates
a signal on a substantial variation of the earth magnetic field as a consequence of
e.g. passing of a metallic object, such as a vehicle. For pneumatic detectors, pressure
pulses are detected when objects pass over air tubes. For hydraulic detectors, pulses
are generated when objects pass over liquid filled tubes. Optical detectors detect
variation of optical properties of optical fibre cables when vehicles drive over.
1. An inductive loop detector (30) arranged to receive first detection signals (D(A))
from a first loop (A) and second detection signals (D(B)) from a second loop (B),
a microprocessor (31) and a first output (O1), a second output (O2) and a third output
(O3), wherein said microprocessor (31) is adapted to provide a first control signal
(C1) triggered in response to said first detection signal (D(A)) for said first output
(O1), a second control signal (C2) triggered in response to said second detection
signal (D(B)) for said second output (O2) and a third control signal (C3) triggered
in response to said first detection signal (D(A)) and said second detection signal
(D(B)) for said third output (O3).
2. The inductive loop detector (30) according to claim 1, wherein at least one of said
first, second and third outputs are relays and/or optocouplers.
3. The inductive loop detector (30) according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said loop detector
(30) further comprises a decision module (40) for receiving said control signals (C1,
C2, C3) and outputting further signals (Cc,Co;Cp) on the basis of said control signals
(C1, C2, C3).
4. The inductive loop detector (30) according to one or more of the preceding claims,
wherein said microprocessor (31) is adapted to trigger said first, second and/or third
control signal as a pulse signal.
5. The inductive loop detector (30) according to claim 4, wherein said detector is adapted
to vary the duration of said pulse signal, preferably in the range 150-250 milliseconds.
6. A detection system (20) comprising an inductive loop detector (30) according to one
or more of the preceding claims and a first and second loop (A,B) arranged to provide
said first and second detection signals (D(A),D(B)) when a vehicle (3) passes.
7. The detection system (20) according to claim 6, wherein said system further comprises
a vehicle barrier (6), said vehicle barrier being controllable by or via said first,
second and third control signals (C1,C2,C3).
8. The detection system (20) according to claim 6 or 7, wherein said system further comprises
a vehicle barrier (6) and said second loop (B) is provided at said vehicle barrier
(6).
9. The detection system (20) according to claim 6, 7 or 8, wherein said second loop (B)
has a shape and/or area different from said first loop (A).
10. The detection system (20) according to one or more of the claims 5-9, wherein said
system further comprises an input unit (22), wherein said input unit is arranged to
be activated after triggering of one or more of said control signals.
11. A vehicle park (1) comprising a detection system (20) according to one or more of
the claims 5-9.
12. A detector (30), such as a magnetic field detector, a pneumatic or hydraulic detector
or an optical detector, arranged to receive first detection signals (D(A)) from a
first detection arrangement (A) and second detection signals (D(B)) from a second
detection arrangement (B), a microprocessor (31) and a first output (O1), a second
output (O2) and a third output (O3), wherein said microprocessor (31) is adapted to
provide a first control signal (C1) triggered in response to said first detection
signal (D(A)) for said first output (O1), a second control signal (C2) triggered in
response to said second detection signal (D(B)) for said second output (O2) and a
third control signal (C3) triggered in response to said first detection signal (D(A))
and said second detection signal (D(B)) for said third output (O3).