TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to an apparatus in a door which comprises a roll operator
and two frame profiles which laterally define a door opening and which display guide
grooves along their mutually facing sides, a door leaf secured in the roll operator
by means of which the door leaf may be rolled up, the opposing edge portions of the
door leaf being accommodated in the guide grooves of the frame profiles, the edge
portions having locking sections that prevent the door leaf from being pulled out
of the guide grooves.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Doors, in particular sliding or roll-up doors, used in factories exist in numerous
different variations. The doors may be employed externally at loading bays, internally
in industrial premises as partitions, for example for noise protection, or as boundary
markers for automatically controlled machines such as robot stations etc.
[0003] One prior art door which is shown in Fig. 1 has a roll operator 2 which opens and
closes a door leaf 3. The roll operator 2 is secured to vertical frame profiles 4
which have guide grooves 5 running throughout their entire length. In the guide grooves
4, the preferably planar door leaf 3 runs without friction, as shown in Fig. 2 when
the door 1 is opened and closed. In the event of minor outer stresses, for example
from wind pressure or mechanical action, a door 1 of this design behaves well.
[0004] In the event of larger external stresses, for example in the event of powerful gusts
of wind, in partial vacuum occurring in a laboratory environment, when a truck reverses
into such a door or on mounting of the door 1 in front of an automatically controlled
machine,, personnel may, for one reason or another, come into contact with the door
leaf 3 and the door leaf 3 may be subjected to large external forces. On the application
of forces of this type, the door leaf 3 bulges outwards as shown by the broken line
in position 6 shown in Fig. 2. In the worst case scenario, this outward bulging may
be so great that, as a result, the door leaf 3 is disengaged from the guide grooves
5 in the frame profiles 4, whereafter the door 1 is unintentionally opened. For this
reason, the frame profiles 4 have been made wide so that wide edge areas 13 on the
door leaf may be accommodated therein. If the door leaf 3 is disengaged from the frame
profile 4 when the door 1 is mounted in front of an automatically controlled machine,
the personnel working nearby may put their hands in the machine and this can give
rise to serious personal injury.
[0005] Another solution to this problem is to provide the door leaf 3 with straight, transverse
reinforcements that run across the entire width of the door leaf. For example, such
reinforcements may consist of thin metal or plastic profiles which are integrated
in the door leaf 3. the width of the reinforcement profiles preferably corresponds
to the width of the guide grooves 5 so that they can run without friction therein.
The drawback inherent in this variation is that if it is exposed to major external
stresses, the profiles are deformed, in which event the deformation persists after
the external force has been lifted, in which event it becomes impossible to roll up
the door leaf 3 on the roll operator 2 and open the door, since the reinforcements
are no longer straight. Another drawback is that the profiles take up space on the
roll operator 2, in which event the thickness of the roll operator 2 is increased.
On rolling up and rolling down of the door leaf 3, the profiles cause wear on the
door leaf 3 which reduces the service life of the door.
[0006] Another variation that has been tested in order to retain the door leaf 3 in the
guide grooves 5 is, int. al. longitudinal strips 15 which are secured on the longitudinal
edges 13 of the door leaf 3, as shown in Fig. 3, these strips forming counter abutments.
The strips 15 may preferably be several in number and are thus fixed on one another
in order to form wider counter abutments.
[0007] The counter abutments are wider in form than the guide grooves 5. The drawback inherent
in this solution is that, in the event of large stresses, the guide grooves 5 of the
frame profiles 4 "yawn" and the counter abutment wedges into and out of the guide
groove 5, whereafter the door leaf 3 becomes disengaged. This also entails that the
door leaf 3 will be unintentionally opened. Another drawback in this solution is that,
on opening of the door leaf 3, this is rolled up on the roll operator 2, in which
event the thickness of the roll will be larger out at the edges than in the centre,
which may cause problems.
[0008] A roll-up door in industry must withstand large pressure differences and also withstand
being collided with by a truck without being deformed, becoming dislocated or breaking
apart, and the above-outlined variations cannot meet these requirements. The roll-up
doors must also withstand being used often, several times a minute, without the service
life of the roll-up door being appreciably affected.
PROBLEM STRUCTURE
[0009] The present invention has for its object to design the apparatus in a door intimated
by way of introduction such that it obviates the drawbacks in the prior art technology.
In particular, the present invention has for its object to design the apparatus so
that this has means for preventing the door leaf from being disengaged from its operative
positions in the frame profiles. The present invention further has for its object
to make for narrower door frame profiles. Finally, the present invention has for its
object to be able to be used often and withstand rapid closing and opening movements.
SOLUTION
[0010] The objects forming the basis of the present invention will be attained if the apparatus
is characterised in that the locking sections include strip-shaped formations which
are disposed along opposing edge portions of the door leaf and which have portions
free from the door leaf extending towards one another in a direction towards the central
region of the door leaf, the portions of the locking sections free from the door leaf
in engagement with inner surfaces in the frame profiles being disposed to prevent
the door leaf from being pulled out from the profiles.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCOMPANYING DRAWINGS
[0011] The present invention will now be described in greater detail hereinbelow, with reference
to the accompanying Drawings. In the accompanying Drawings:
- Fig. 1
- is a front elevation of a roll-up door;
- Fig. 2
- is a sectional view taken along the line A-A in Fig. 1 showing the prior art technology;
- Fig. 3
- is a part of a sectional view taken along the line A-A in Fig. 1, showing the prior
art technology;
- Fig. 4
- is a sectional view showing the apparatus according to the present invention in an
unloaded state;
- Fig. 5
- is a sectional view showing the apparatus according to the present invention in a
loaded state;
- Fig. 6
- is a sectional view of an alternative embodiment of the apparatus according to the
present invention; and
- Fig. 7
- is a sectional view of another alternative embodiment of the device according to the
present invention.
DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0012] Fig. 1 shows a roll-up door 1 with a roll operator 2 supported by two frame profiles
4. The roll operator 2 defines a door opening 7 in the vertical direction and the
frame profiles 4 define the door opening 7 in the lateral direction against a surrounding
building façade or wall. The casing and frame profiles 4 of the roll operator 2 are
preferably rectangular profiles of aluminium, manufactured by extrusion, or consisting
of other durable material.
[0013] Each frame profile 4 has a guide groove 5 disposed on one of its sides 8 which extends
along the entire length of the frame profile 4. The frame profiles 4 are mounted so
that the sides 8 with the guide grooves 5 are turned to face towards one another in
towards the central region of the door 1.
[0014] The door 1 has a door leaf 3 which is secured in the roll operator 2 by means of
which the door leaf 3 may be rolled up. The door leaf 3 covers the door opening 7
in the closed position of the door 1 and is rolled up on the roll operator 2 in the
open position of the door 1. The door leaf 3 is preferably laminated and manufactured
from plastic coated fibre fabrics and/or transparent plastic.
[0015] The opposing edge portions 13 of the door leaf 3 are accommodated in the guide grooves
5 of the frame profiles 4. The edge portions 13 of the door leaf 3 have locking sections
9 which prevent the door leaf 3 from being pulled out of the guide grooves 5 on use
and on the action of outer forces such as powerful gusts of wind. The locking sections
9 have strip-shaped formations 10 which are disposed on the door leaf 3 along the
vertical opposing edge portions 13. The strip-shaped formations may be continuous
in one piece or be shorter intermittent sections.
[0016] The locking sections 9 have portions 11 which are free from the door leaf and which
extend towards one another in towards the central region of the door leaf 3, as shown
in Fig. 4. When the free portions 11 of the locking sections 9 are, on outer stresses,
in engagement with the inner surfaces 12 of the frame profiles 4, they are disposed
to prevent the door leaf 3 from being pulled out of the frame profiles 4, as shown
in Fig. 5. The locking sections 9 extend, in one major embodiment, unbroken throughout
the entire length of the side edges 13 of the door leaf 3 and distribute the active
forces throughout the entire frame profile 4.
[0017] The guide grooves 5 have walls 14 inwardly directed towards the centre of the frame
profile 4. The walls 14 are separated from one another by the guide groove 5 whose
width at least corresponds to the thickness of the door leaf 3. The walls 14 have
rounded ends in order to create minimal abutment surfaces against the free portions
11 of the locking sections 9, which generates slight frictional forces on opening
and closing of the door 1. The walls 14 are also funnel-like arranged inwards at an
angle towards one another in order readily to come into engagement with the locking
sections 9.
[0018] The guide grooves 5 may preferably be provided with sealing bristles which function
as guide means for the door leaf 3.
[0019] The free portions 11 of the locking sections 9 are of a length which is longer than
the length of the inwardly directed walls 14 which define the guide groove 5. On opening
and closing, the free portions 11 of the locking sections 9 are in contact with the
inner surfaces 12 of the frame profiles 4 as well as width the rounded ends 16 of
the walls 14. This formation of the free portions 11 and the walls 14 contributes
to the door leaf 3 running freely in the guide groove 5 without wedging fast.
[0020] The strip-shaped formations 10 are free standing and combined with the door leaf
3 to form a unit. The door leaf 3 and the formations 10 can be phased together by
gluing or heat treatment such as vulcanisation in order to realise minimum material
thickness in the joints between the different parts. When the door leaf 3 and the
strip-shaped formations 10 are combined, the locking sections 9 for V-shaped recesses.
In this embodiment, the material composed of the door leaf 3 and the formations 10
will have at most double the material thickness in the edges 13.
[0021] The strip-shaped formations 10 may also be formed from the door leaf 3 in that longitudinal
non-penetrating incisions 17 are provided on one side of the door leaf 3 whereafter
the edges 18 in the incision form the free portions 11 as shown in Fig. 6, V-shaped
recesses being formed. On strip-shaped formations of the above-mentioned type, the
door leaf 3 realises less than double thickness, preferably only single material thickness,
out in the edges of the roll operator 2 when the door leaf 3 is rolled up.
[0022] The strip-shaped formations 10 may also be formed from the door leaf 3 in that the
longitudinal edges 13 on the door leaf are folded in over the door leaf 3 as shown
in Fig. 7, whereafter the formations 10 are fixed against the door leaf 3 by means
of heat treatment. In this embodiment, the material composed of the door leaf 3 and
the formations 10 will have at most double material thickness in the edges 13.
[0023] In those cases where the strip-shaped formations 10 are glued or vulcanised on the
door leaf, they may possibly be of lesser material thickness than the door leaf 3
proper.
1. An apparatus in a door which comprises a roll operator (2) and two frame profiles
(4) which laterally define a door opening (7) and which display guide grooves (5)
along their mutually facing sides (8), a door leaf (3) secured in the roll operator
(2) by means of which the door leaf (3) may be rolled up, the opposing edge portions
(13) of the door leaf (3) being accommodated in the guide grooves (5) of the frame
profiles (4), the edge portions having locking sections (9) that prevent the door
leaf (3) from being pulled out of the guide grooves (5), characterised in that the locking sections (9) include strip-shaped formations (10) which are disposed
along opposing edge portions (13) of the door leaf (3) and which have portions (11)
free from the door leaf (3) extending towards one another in a direction towards the
central region of the door leaf (3), the portions (11) of the locking sections (9)
free from the door leaf (3) in engagement with inner surfaces (12) in the frame profiles
(4) being disposed to prevent the door leaf (3) from being pulled out therefrom.
2. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 1, characterised in that the locking sections (9) extend throughout the entire length of the side edges (13)
of the door leaf (3).
3. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the guide grooves (5) have walls (14) inwardly directed towards the centre of the
frame profiles (4) and provided with rounded ends (16).
4. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 3, characterised in that the walls (14) are disposed to be funnel-shaped inwards at an angle to one another.
5. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 1 or 2, characterised in that the free portions (11) are longer than the inwardly directed walls (14) which define
the guide grooves (5).
6. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, characterised in that the strip-shaped formations (10) are phased together with the door leaf (3) into
a unit, V-profiles thus being formed.
7. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, characterised in that the strip-shaped formations (10) are formed from the door leaf (3) in that longitudinal, non-penetrating incisions (17) are made on the one side of the door
leaf (3).
8. The apparatus as claimed in Claim 5, characterised in that the strip-shaped formations (10) are formed from the door leaf (3).