CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION
[0001] This application claims priority to Provisional Patent Application No. 60/223,072,
filed August 4, 2000, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for
all purposes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Microfluidic systems have advanced to the point where they are beginning to supplant
conventional technologies in biological, chemical and biochemical analyses. For example,
routine separation based analyses, e.g., nucleic acid separations, protein sizing
separations, and the like are now routinely performed in microfluidic systems, e.g.,
the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer and Caliper LabChip® systems. Similarly, high throughput
analytical operations, e.g., pharmaceutical screening, high throughput genetic analysis,
and the like, are also being transitioned from multi-well formats into microfluidic
formats, such as the Caliper HTS sipper chip systems. These microfluidic systems have
allowed for increases in throughput while requiring substantially smaller volumes
of reagents, smaller equipment footprint, and having more reproducible, automatable,
integratable operations.
[0003] As with any advancing technology however, the miniaturization of analytical chemistries
introduces a number of additional considerations. For example, in conventional scale
chemical or biochemical analyses, problems associated with interaction between reagents
and reaction vessels are kept to a minimum by virtue of the overwhelming volume of
reagents used. Similarly, the nature of the reaction vessels used in conventional
technologies, while illustrating the advantages of microfluidic systems, also obviate
some of the potential problems of microfluidic systems. For example, because these
reaction vessels are typically configured as discrete wells or test tubes, there is
little or no issue of interaction between discrete reactions that are being analyzed.
Similarly, the open-top nature of these vessels allows the evolution of other interfering
components, which is not reasonably practicable in sealed microfluidic channels.
[0004] In enclosed microfluidic systems, however, the channel surface to volume ratio is
substantially increased over conventional technologies, increasing the effects that
those surfaces have on the contents of those channels. Further, because of their enclosed
nature, one cannot readily access and control the reactions as they progress through
the system. In addition, the sealed nature of these systems can result in the accumulation
of evolved gasses from the fluid reagents of a system, where such gases would dissipate
into the atmosphere in conventional assay formats.
[0005] A number of stop-gap measures have been employed in attempts to address some of these
potential problems of microfluidic systems. For example, U.S. Patent No. 5,880,071
describes methods of reducing effects of electrokinetic biasing of reagents within
electrically driven microfluidic channel systems. Similarly, U.S. Patent No. 6,043,080
to Lipshutz et al., describes the use of gas venting membranes within a miniature
chamber, to permit degassing of fluids within a miniature fluidic environment.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0006] The present invention is generally directed to methods of controlling environmental
conditions within a fluidic system, where such environmental conditions can affect
the operation of the system in its desired function, and fluidic channels, devices
and systems that are used in practicing these methods. Such environmental conditions
are generally directed to the fluids themselves, the movement of such fluids through
these systems, and the interaction of these fluids with other components of the system,
e.g., other fluids or solid components of the system.
[0007] In a first aspect, the present invention is directed to a method of moving a volume
of a reaction mixture. The method comprises flowing a volume of a first fluid through
a first channel segment, where the first fluid region comprises an environmental control
reagent. A first volume of a second fluid is flowed into the first channel segment
immediately before or after the step of flowing the volume of the first fluid through
the first channel segment.
[0008] In a related aspect, the invention provides microscale channels that comprise a first
fluid region disposed therein, the first fluid region comprising at least one environmental
or operation control reagent. A second fluid region is also typically disposed therein,
where the second fluid region comprises at least a first reactant.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0009]
Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of serial fluid plugs in a fluidic channel, in
accordance with certain aspects of the invention.
Figure 2 is a schematic illustration of an exemplary microfluidic device structure.
Figure 3 is a schematic representation of a microfluidic assay device and reagent
source used in conjunction with high-throughput applications of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
I. General
[0010] The present invention generally provides methods for optimizing the operation of
microscale channel based systems through the use of environmental or operation control
reagents within the fluids that are being transported through the capillary channels.
In optionally preferred aspects of the invention, the environmental or operation control
reagents are transported in fluid regions that are different from fluid regions that
contain the reagents of interest for a given analysis, although such reagents may
optionally be disposed within the fluid regions that contain the reagents of interest.
[0011] As used herein, the phrase "environmental control reagent" or "operation control
reagent" refers to a reagent that typically is not involved directly in the reaction
of interest, but instead modifies, controls or provides an indication of the state
of the environment within a microscale channel in which a reaction of interest is
taking place, so as to control that environment or provide the user with information
as to the state of that environment such that external controls may be applied. Some
specific and preferred examples of environmental controls include modifying the surface
characteristics of the microscale channel, adjusting the viscosity and/or the channel
flow resistance, and reducing the potential for gas evolution within the channel.
Operation control reagents that are used as indicators or diagnostic reagents typically
include, e.g., pH indicators, redox indicators, conductivity indicators, and any of
a variety of dyes or labels that indicate the presence or absence of particular species,
e.g., proteins, nucleic acids, etc. Because the environmental control reagents are
flowed through the microscale channels, either as a constant stream, or in periodic
pulses, they continually modify and control the environment within those channels
or provide constant indicators as to the state of that environment. This is a particularly
useful function where one or more environmental conditions within a microscale channel
can change over time or deteriorate with respect to the performance of the reaction
of interest.
[0012] The methods, devices and systems described herein are particularly useful in performing
serially oriented microfluidic analyses, e.g., where analytes are separately and serially
introduced into a microscale channel. The serial processing is also multiplexed using
multiple separate channels, e.g., where a large number of different analytes are subjected
to analysis by serially introducing each into a separate one of multiple parallel
channels. In such serially processed analyses, it is often desirable, although not
always necessary, to space serially introduced analytes from each other. This is primarily
to provide an ease of identification of the different analyte regions within a channel,
as well as preventing intermixing of analytes and its potential deleterious effects
on the analysis being carried out. These spacer fluid regions are ideal vehicles for
the environmental control reagents described herein. In particular, conditions for
a given analytical reaction can be optimized without having to account for the presence
of the environmental control reagent within the reaction fluid region. Alternatively,
a wide variety of different analytes can be tested without having to mix them with
these environmental control reagents.
[0013] Figure 1 is a schematic illustration of a serial process analysis that includes multiple
reaction fluid regions interspersed with spacer fluid regions that include environmental
control reagents. Specifically, reaction fluid regions 104, 108 and 112 are flowed
through a microscale channel segment 102. Spacer fluid regions 106, 110 and 114, which
include the environmental control reagents, are interspersed between the reaction
fluid regions. The spacer fluid regions 106, 110 and 114 include the environmental
control reagents as described herein. Although the reaction fluid regions optionally
include the environmental control reagents, in preferred aspects the environmental
control reagents are primarily contained within the spacer fluid regions. This allows
the use of a single source of environmental control reagents, e.g., in a spacer fluid
reservoir, rather than requiring mixing of each of the different reaction fluids with
those reagents. Additionally, to the extent environmental control reagents might have
any effect on the reactions that are being carried out in the reaction fluid regions,
they are kept substantially separated. Further, as each spacer fluid region passes
through the microscale channel segment, it performs the particular function or functions
for which the reagent is intended. In this manner, the spacer plugs perform somewhat
of a "housekeeping" function in the microfluidic channel systems.
[0014] In certain preferred aspects, the environmental control reagent is flowed through
the channel segment immediately following each region of reaction fluid, e.g., such
that the fluid region containing the environmental control reagent(s) are interspersed
among reaction regions. In certain aspects, the environmental control reagent region
is adjacent to and abutting the reaction fluid region, to optimize the environmental
control function that those reagents perform. However, in those instances where environmental
control functions are not necessary on as routine a basis, the period between environmental
control reagent additions can be increased, e.g., after 2, 5, 10 or even 20 or more
reaction fluid regions, and their optionally associated spacer fluid regions, have
passed through the particular channel segment. Conversely, in some cases, an environmental
control reagent may be transported through a channel only once or a few times for
the lifetime use of a given channel structure, and may increase the useful lifetime
of a channel network.
II. Surface Modifying Reagents
[0015] As noted above, one exemplary environmental control reagent type is a channel surface
modifying reagent. In microscale fluidic systems, the nature of the surface of the
microscale channel through which materials are being transported can have a significant
effect on the operations that are being performed. For example, surfaces can have
properties, e.g., surface charges, hydrophobicity, etc., which promotes the sticking
of proteins, cells or other reaction materials to those surfaces. This accumulation
of material can subsequently interfere with material flowing or other aspects of a
reaction of interest. Similarly, in electrically driven microscale channel systems,
the existence of charged functional groups on the channel surface can give rise to
electrokinetic movement of fluids within channels, where such movement may be more
or less desired.
[0016] Accordingly, in many microscale fluidic systems it is desirable to treat the surfaces
of the channels to mask unfavorable characteristics or provide or accentuate favorable
characteristics. Previously, such surface treatments have focused upon pretreating
the channel surfaces through coating processes that involved complex chemical treatments
to covalently attach chemical modifying agents to those channel surfaces. In certain
applications, e.g., where a channel is used a single time, dynamic coating materials
have been described, where a solution of the surface modifying agent is disposed within
the channel in order to perform the analysis of interest. While these dynamic coatings
are useful in a variety of applications, e.g., where the entire channel segment where
the analysis is being performed is filled with the dynamic coating material, their
non-permanent nature can be a significant drawback to their use in a number of other
applications, e.g., applications where such materials can adversely effect the reaction
of interest, as the channel surface properties will change over time as the dynamic
coatings are washed from the channel surfaces.
[0017] It is these latter situations that are particularly advantageously addressed by the
methods of the present invention. Specifically, in applications where one is introducing
reaction fluid regions into a microscale channel, surface modifying reagents can be
introduced into the channel in a separate fluid region that is flowed through the
channel before and/or after the reaction fluid region. This can be repeated each time
a new reaction fluid region is introduced into the microscale cannel segment or at
pre-selected intervals, e.g., regularly spaced intervals. As these spacer fluid regions
or plugs flow through the channel, they continually coat or re-coat the surface of
the channels for a following reaction fluid region.
[0018] A wide variety of different materials are useful as surface modification reagents
in accordance with the present invention. For example, as noted above, dynamic coatings
that are typically comprised of surface adsorbing polymer solutions are used as the
surface modifying reagent. Examples of such polymer solutions include linear, e.g.,
non-crosslinked cellulose polymers, agarose polymers, acrylic polymers, e.g., polyacrylamides,
and the like. Particularly preferred polymers include linear polyacrylamide polymers,
and more particularly linear polydimethylacrylamide polymers (PDMA) and copolymers
of these, e.g., PDMA co-acrylic acid polymers as described in U.S. Patent No. 5,948,227,
which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes, monovalent
or bivalent compounds that interact with the surface and present different environments
to the fluids within the microchannel, e.g., charged groups, hydrophobic moieties,
affinity binding moieties, or the like, for use in chromatographic analyses, and the
like. A variety of these latter reagents have been described in detail in the art,
and could be readily employed in the present invention.
[0019] In accordance with this aspect of the invention and with reference to Figure 1, above,
the surface modifying reagent is provided in a first fluid region that is transported
through a particular microscale channel, whereupon the reagent within the first fluid
region modifies the surface of the channel. A second fluid region is preferably introduced
into the channel following the first fluid region. As the channel surfaces have been
previously modified, the influence of those channel surfaces on the reaction is controlled
as desired, e.g., minimized, reduced, increased, or otherwise altered for desired
effect. In preferred aspects, an additional first fluid region, e.g., containing the
surface modifying reagent, is then transported through the channel after the reaction
fluid region, to re-coat the channel surfaces. This ensures a consistent level of
environmental control among different, serially introduced reaction fluid mixtures.
[0020] In a closely related aspect, the environmental control reagents of the invention
can be used to counteract build-up of other reagents within a microscale channel by
performing cleaning functions within the channel. For example, as noted above, microscale
channels, and particularly uncoated microscale channels are very susceptible to deposition
and accumulation of material within a flowing system, e.g., as a result of the surface
charge or hydrophobicity of the channel surface. Such accumulation can affect the
continued operation of a microfluidic system by affecting the concentration of reagents,
interfering with detection techniques, etc. Accordingly, in accordance with the present
invention, environmental control reagents that are flowed through the channels of
the device include "cleaning" agents to remove any accumulated material from channel
walls. In its simplest form, such cleaning agents include acids (e.g., HCl), bases
(e.g., NaOH), detergents, high salt solutions (NaCl, NH
4SO
4, and the like), zwitterionic solutions, e.g., amino acid solutions, nondetergent
sulfobetaine (NDSB), and others. Acid or base solutions are typically used at concentrations
of greater than 1 mM and preferably greater than about 10 mM, and in some cases greater
than 50 mM. In such cases, the environmental control reagents may be separated from
sample material containing fluids by a strongly buffered spacer fluid region, e.g.,
to avoid damaging the sample material. Salt concentrations will generally vary depending
upon the nature of the cleaning operation to be carried out and may be in excess of
10 mM and often in excess of 20 or even 50 mM. Similarly, in the case of detergents,
a variety of detergents are commercially available and may be employed as desired
as an environmental control reagent.
III. Viscosity/Flow Resistance Adjusting Reagents
[0021] Environmental control, as used in conjunction with the present invention may also
include control of the overall or average fluidic characteristics of a microscale
channel or channel network. For example, in pressure driven fluidic systems, e.g.,
systems where fluid flow is controlled by application of pressure differentials across
channels, the rate of flow within channels is dictated, at least in part, by the level
of flow resistance within a particular channel. Flow resistance of a channel can be
manipulated by adjusting the structural characteristics of the channel, e.g., its
length, width and or depth. However, such manipulations are typically carried out
at the time of manufacturing of the channel system and are not readily altered.
[0022] Flow resistance can also be altered by altering the characteristics of the fluid
flowing through the channels. In particular, by adjusting the viscosity of fluids
flowing through channels, one can alter the overall flow resistance of those fluids.
In accordance with the present invention, certain fluid regions, e.g., spacer fluid
regions, can be viscosity adjusted to achieve an overall change in flow resistance
through the channel. Implicit in this description is the optional situation where
certain fluid regions are not adjusted for viscosity. This can result from an inability
to practically adjust viscosity in some of the fluids, due to their numbers, etc.,
or can be a result of negative interactions between the viscosity adjusting reagents
and those other fluids, e.g., reaction components.
[0023] A variety of viscosity adjusting reagents may be used in accordance with the present
invention, including polymeric reagents, e.g., cellulose, agarose, gelatin, polyacrylamides,
i.e., PDMA and co-polymers thereof, PEGs and other polyalcohols, Ficoll, hydrogels,
and the like.
IV. Reagents for Controlling Gas Evolution
[0024] Another environmental characteristic that can pose potential problems in microfluidic
channel systems, and for which the present invention is particularly suited is the
variation in dissolved gases within fluids flowing through the channels of the system.
In particular, where fluids in microfluidic systems have the potential to evolve dissolved
gases, such gases can create substantial problems in microscale channels, including
blocking or otherwise restricting flows in channel networks, which can substantially
disrupt the efficient operation of those systems. In analytical reactions, the potential
for gas evolution is increased where, as in many bioanalytical operations, temperatures
are maintained at elevated levels to optimize assay conditions. Similarly, many microfluidic
operations involve the use of pressure gradients to manipulate fluids within microscale
channel networks. Substantial changes in pressures can lead to outgassing within the
channel system. For example, often fluid flow is driven by an applied vacuum, where
the pressure drop across the channel network can result in substantial degassing of
fluids within the channel networks, where those fluids are sufficiently saturated.
[0025] In accordance with the present invention, an environmental control reagent comprises
a fluid reagent that is capable of controlling dissolved gas levels within the channel
system at levels that do not result in gas evolution within the channels under the
conditions of operation. In the simplest aspect, the environmental control reagent
in this context is a fluid reagent, e.g., buffer, water, etc., that has a dissolved
gas level that is far below the level where gas evolution would be expected in the
operation that is being carried out, e.g., at the temperatures and pressures or vacuums
involved within the microscale channel systems. Typically, this gas control fluid
also has a dissolved gas level that is sufficiently below that of most, if not all
of the other fluids that are used in the particular analytical operation, e.g., the
reaction fluids, spacer fluids, etc. such that when all of the fluids are mixed, the
resulting solution will not evolve gas under the operating conditions of the particular
operation.
[0026] Because the gas control fluid has such a low level of dissolved gas, it can serve
to scavenge excess dissolved gases from the other fluid regions within the channel
networks, e.g., the reaction fluid regions, where a degassing operation may not have
been reasonably practicable and as a result may have dissolved gas levels that could
result in gas evolution within the microscale channel system. In particular, for many
operations, e.g., high throughput analytical operations, it is not reasonably practicable
to de-gas all of the different sample materials that one is analyzing. Further, in
many cases, sample materials are subjected to numerous in-process, but out-of-channel
manipulations, e.g., dilutions, mixing, etc. which would effectively negate any attempts
at degassing. By maintaining certain fluids within a channel system at dissolved gas
levels that are well below saturation, one can balance the effects of higher gas concentrations
in other fluids used in the operation. As used herein, the term "saturation" refers
to the gas saturation point of a given fluid under the then current conditions within
a microscale channel. As a result, the saturation point, or gas solubility, of a particular
fluid at one temperature and pressure will be different from the saturation point
of the fluid at another temperature and/or pressure.
[0027] The reduced level of dissolved gas within the gas control reagents, as described
herein, is generally dependent upon the particular operation that is to be carried
out, rather than being an absolute characteristic. In particular, where desired operation
is to be carried out within a microchannel structure at lower temperatures, higher
absolute concentrations or levels of dissolved gas can be tolerated without evolution.
Conversely, where a particular operation is carried out at higher temperatures, lower
dissolved gas concentrations are tolerated. Similarly, where negative pressures are
applied to fluids within a channel, e.g., as compared to ambient pressure of the fluids
prior to their introduction into the channel system, it is generally required that
such fluids have lower dissolved gas concentrations in order to avoid outgassing within
the channels. Conversely, positively pressurized channels are generally capable of
supporting fluids with higher dissolved gas concentrations.
[0028] From the particular conditions of a given operation, one can readily determine the
level of acceptable dissolved gas, in order to avoid any problems associated with
gas evolution within the channels, e.g., bubble formation. For example, where one
knows the temperature at which the fluid is maintained within the channel system,
the amount of dissolved gas in some of the fluid reagents, and the amount of applied
vacuum in a given channel, one can determine the acceptable level of dissolved gas
within a spacer fluid, as well as the relative amount of that spacer fluid needed,
to counter any potential of outgassing within the channel. Specifically, one can provide
a sufficient amount of a spacer fluid within a channel, where that spacer fluid has
a sufficiently low level of dissolved gas, such that any excessive gas concentrations
of any of the remaining fluid reagents is absorbable by the spacer fluids without
outgassing under the conditions of the operation.
[0029] By way of example, where a microfluidic channel network is operated at -2 psi vacuum
to cause fluid flow, while the device and all of the reagents are at room temperature,
and where the environmental control reagent makes up 40% of the overall fluid volume
within the channels of the device, then the environmental control reagent must be
at or below 75% saturation with air at room temperature and 1 atmosphere pressure.
[0030] Typically, the gas control reagents are only required to be at a saturation level
that is at or below that necessary to prevent outgassing of a given system under that
system's operating conditions. In accordance with this principle, the degassing fluid
need only have somewhat less. However, in general, this results in the gas control
reagents having a dissolved gas concentration that is less than 90% of the saturation
concentration for any portion of the operation that is to be carried out within the
microscale channel system. In preferred aspects, the gas control reagent has a dissolved
gas concentration that is less than 80%, more preferably, less than 60%, more preferably,
less than 50%, and often less than 40%, 30% or even 20% of the saturation level of
dissolved gas in any portion of the operation being carried out.
[0031] Although described above in terms of the use of a degassing reagent or fluid within
a microfluidic channel system, it is also an aspect of the invention to operate microfluidic
systems under conditions that prevent such outgassing, e.g., using any or all fluids
within the channel network to prevent outgassing. In particular, as noted above, the
conditions which prevent outgassing will generally depend upon other conditions of
the system, e.g., the applied pressure, the gas saturation level of the fluids within
the channels and the gas saturation level of the fluids prior to entering the channel.
Gas saturation is highly temperature dependent, e.g., colder fluids can dissolve larger
amounts of oxygen than warmer fluids. Similarly, fluids maintained at a lower pressure
will evolve more gas than fluids kept at higher pressure. Accordingly, by adjusting
one or more of the temperatures of the fluids before and after entering a microfluidic
channel network, and/or the pressure or vacuum applied to a system, one can ensure
that the system operates under non-out-gassing conditions.
[0032] In particularly preferred aspects, the applied pressure is determined by the desired
flow rate through the system, e.g., resulting from desired throughput or reaction
times. Accordingly, prevention of outgassing is typically a matter of adjusting one
or more of the temperatures of the fluids prior to entering the channels and after
entering the device. By way of example, a fluid that is maintained at a first temperature,
but which is heated upon entering the channel network poses a substantial risk of
bubble generation within the channels. This is particularly true where the flow of
fluids in the channels is driven by vacuum. Accordingly, to remedy this issue, prior
to drawing fluids into the channel network, one can (1) maintain all of the fluids
at a temperature that is at or above the temperature of the channel network; (2) elevate
the temperature of some portion of fluids (e.g., environmental control/degassing fluids)
above the temperature of the channel network; or (3) cool the channel network to a
temperature below that of the outside fluids. Finally, one could also perform any
of these adjustments in conjunction with changes in the level of applied pressure
to the channel system. As channel temperatures are often optimized for the particular
analysis, it is generally preferable that most of the temperature adjustments be made
to the fluids prior to their entering the channel networks. This is typically a simple
matter of providing a heating element to the sources of these fluids, e:g., multiwell
plates, reagent troughs, or the like. Again, as described above, relative temperatures
of fluids inside and outside the channel networks are dependent upon the nature of
the overall conditions. Typically, however, fluids are maintained at least 1
°C over the temperature of the microscale channel network (also referred to as the
chip temperature), and preferably, more than 5°C. This is particularly the case where
only a portion of the fluids to be introduced into the chip are provided outside the
chip at elevated temperatures. In some cases higher temperature differentials are
desirable and may be 10, 20, 30
°C or more, e.g., the temperature of the fluids prior to entering the channel network
is 10, 20 or 30°C higher than the chip temperature. Alternatively or additionally,
one can adjust the pressures to which the fluids are subjected so as to prevent bubble
formation within a microchannel. For example, in one aspect, one can subject fluids
to a low pressure environment, e.g., below ambient, by applying a vacuum to the fluids
to degas those fluids prior to introducing them into the channels of the system. Alternatively,
or additionally, one can maintain the pressures within the channels at levels that
prevent such degassing, e.g., above ambient or the pressure at which the fluids were
kept prior to introduction into the channels.
[0033] In preferred aspects, because fluids are often flowed through microchannels under
an applied vacuum, the latter alternative is not optimally applicable in all situations.
As such, where pressure adjustments are used to prevent degassing within the microchannel,
it is typically applied as a preloading step, e.g., fluids are subjected to vacuum
prior to loading into a channel.
[0034] In particularly preferred aspects, the fluids to be introduced are subjected to either
one or both of an elevated temperature or reduced pressure environment immediately
prior to introducing those fluids into the channels, to prevent re-equilibration of
the fluids at atmospheric temperatures, and so as not to necessitate complex sealed
bottle systems. As used herein, "immediately prior to introduction" means 5 minutes
or less before fluid introduction, preferably 1 minute or less, and often 30 seconds
or less. In certain systems, a trough of fluids is continuously recirculated and subjected
to elevated temperatures.
[0035] Although the preferred gas control reagents comprise fluids having sufficiently low
dissolved gas concentrations, e.g., buffers, water etc., it will be appreciated that
gas absorbing additives may also be used in conjunction with this aspect of the present
invention, in order to reduce the potential for outgassing during a given operation.
For example, in certain embodiments, it may be useful to employ liquids that have
very high oxygen saturation levels, i.e., fluorocarbons and perfluorocarbons.
V. Other Operational Control Reagents
[0036] In addition to the environmental control reagents described above, intermediate fluid
slugs in microfluidic channels can be put to a variety of other useful functions in
microfluidics based analyses. For example, spacer fluid slugs optionally incorporate
signaling components, e.g., dyes, labels, etc., so as to provide an indicator component
of the spacer slugs versus the sample slugs. Such indicators may be varied in terms
of the nature of the label, e.g., in the case of fluorescent labels, via it's wavelength
of excitation, emission, intensity or the like, to provide the ability to distinguish
between spacer slugs at different points in an operation. By way of example, a spacer
slug early in an assay run may have a first signaling component, e.g., fluorescing
at a first wavelength or combination of wavelengths, whereas later spacer slugs fluoresce
at a different wavelength or combination of wavelengths. Depending upon the nature
of the spacer slug's label, one can determine where the system is in a given operation,
in order to identify intermediate steps in an operation, or match analysis data with
exogenously introduced reagent slugs, e.g., allowing identification of the particular
reagent slug. Such different labels can be provided by sampling spacer fluids from
different sources at different time points in an operation, or by constantly adjusting
the signal component make-up of a single source of spacer fluid. For example, a trough
of spacer fluid may be slowly, but constantly supplemented with a new labeled signaling
component, so as to produce an increasing level of signal in later sampled spacer
fluid slugs.
[0037] Spacer slugs containing signaling components may also be used as calibrators for
detection systems used in conjunction with the devices and methods described herein.
In particular, a known concentration of signaling component can be used to set detection
system so as to optimally detect assay results.
[0038] In addition to the foregoing, signaling components of spacer slugs can be used as
indicators or diagnostics of other environmental conditions within a microscale channel
system. For example, temperature sensitive signaling components may be used to monitor
temperature within such systems over the course of an assay run, while pH sensitive
signaling components may be used to indicate intrachannel pH or changes therein. Additionally,
ion specific indicators, or generic conductivity indicators may be used. A variety
of temperature sensitive signaling components may be used in conjunction with this
aspect of the invention, including molecular beacons, self hybridizing nucleic acid
sequences that become fluorescent when heated above their melting temperatures. Similarly,
pH indicating labels or dyes are widely available from commercial sources, including,
e.g., Molecular Probes, Inc. (Eugene, OR). Dyes or labels can also be provided to
indicate the level of macromolecular buildup within channels, which buildup might
affect the functions of the channels, or their usefulness in a given analysis. Such
dyes include protein indicators, nucleic acid indicators, and the like.
VI. Microscale Channels and Systems
[0039] As noted repeatedly above, the present invention is most useful in the context of
analytical operations that are carried out within a sealed microscale channel environment.
In its simplest form, such an environment includes a simple channel, e.g., a capillary,
tube or other enclosed conduit through which fluid materials are flowed. However,
in preferred aspects, the operations in question are carried out within more complex
networks of microscale fluid channels, e.g., in microfluidic devices. Typically, such
devices include at least two different microscale channels disposed within the same
single body structure. Often, the at least two microchannels will be in fluid communication
with each other, e.g., at a channel junction, to form an integrated channel network.
In general, microfluidic devices incorporating complex channel geometries have been
previously described in, e.g., U.S. Patent Nos. 5,869,004, 5,942,443, 5,976,336, 6,042,709
and 6,068,752, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for
all purposes. As used herein, the term microchannel typically refers to a channel
conduit that has at least one cross-sectional dimension between 0.1 and 500µm. Preferably,
at least one cross-sectional dimension of a microchannel is between about 1 and about
100 µm.
[0040] While microfluidic devices may be fabricated as an aggregate of different parts,
e.g., capillaries and chambers, pieced together in a desired orientation, in preferred
aspects, such devices are fabricated in a monolithic format, integrated in solid substrates.
In particular, microscale channels and channel networks are typically fabricated as
grooves into a surface of at least one planar substrate layer. The first substrate
layer is then overlaid with a second substrate layer, which is bonded to the first,
to seal and enclose the grooves as microscale channels. Reservoirs or access ports
are optionally provided in one or both of the substrate layers to provide access to
the channels from the outside world. Additional substrate layers are optionally added
to increase to the complexity of channel networks that may be produced. Similarly,
individual channel networks may be duplicated within one or more different body structures,
in order to multiplex operations, and gaining the consequent improvements in throughput.
Figure 2 provides a schematic illustration of the assembly of a layered microfluidic
device. As shown, the device 10 includes a lower planar substrate 12 having a plurality
of grooves fabricated into its surface. An upper substrate layer 18 is also provided
that includes a plurality of apertures disposed through it. The apertures are positioned
so as to be in communication with the grooves when the upper layer is placed upon
and bonded to the lower substrate. This bonding also seals the grooves as enclosed
channels or conduits. Although illustrated as grooves on the lower substrate and apertures
through the upper substrate, it will be appreciated that grooves and apertures may
be disposed in either and/or both substrates depending upon the desired nature of
the finished microfluidic device.
[0041] Methods for manufacturing microfluidic devices have been previously described, and
include techniques commonly employed in the integrated circuit industries, e.g., photolithography
and wet chemical etching, for silica based solid substrates, as well as other well
known microfabrication techniques for other materials, e.g., injection molding and
embossing techniques for polymer-based materials (see, e.g., U.S. Patent No. 5,885,470).
[0042] Generally, such devices are mounted on an instrument that includes fluid transport
systems, as well as detection systems, whereby the instrument interfaces with the
microfluidic device to control fluid movement and detect assay results within the
channels of the microfluidic device. Such instruments are exemplified by, e.g., the
Agilent Technologies 2100 Bioanalyzer and the Caliper Technologies HTS "Sipper" platform,
as described at www.calipertech.com and www. Agilent.com, the contents of which are
hereby incorporated herein by reference in their entirety for all purposes. Microfluidic
devices, methods and systems that include serially introduced fluidic regions, e.g.,
as described in the preferred embodiments of the invention, are described in substantial
detail in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,942,443, and 6,042,709, each of which is incorporated
herein by reference in its entirety for all purposes.
[0043] The devices and methods of the invention may be employed in conjunction with appropriate
instrumentation depending upon the nature of the analysis that is to be performed.
For example, for lower throughput operations, microfluidic devices are readily configured
for operation on commercially available controller/detector instrument, e.g., an Agilent
2100 Bioanalyzer that is equipped with at least one pressure/vacuum source. Similarly,
higher throughput operations are readily configured to operate on sipper systems that
are available from Caliper Technologies Corp. Such systems are described in detail
at www.agilent.com and www.calipertech.com and in U.S. Patent Nos. 5,955,028, 6,042,709
and 6,071,478, each of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety for
all purposes, as well as the patents described elsewhere herein, and incorporated
herein by reference.
VII. Examples
[0044] The degassing functions of the present invention were modeled and applied in a high-throughput
screening system that incorporates a microfluidic channel network. A simplified schematic
illustration of the microfluidic device and overall system is shown in Figure 3. As
shown, the microfluidic device 300 includes a planar body structure 302 that includes
a channel network disposed within its interior. The channel network includes a main
analysis channel 304 that is coupled at one end to an external capillary element 306,
via inlet 308. At the other end, the main channel 304 is fluidly connected to reservoir/port
310. Two side channels 312 and 314 intersect and are in fluid communication with the
main channel 304. These channels provide a connection between the main channel 304
and reagent reservoirs 316 and 318, respectively. In the examples described below,
sample material is sampled into the main analysis channel through the external capillary
306 by dipping the open end of the capillary into a source of sample material 320
and applying a vacuum at reservoir/port 310. The applied vacuum draws a slug of sample
material into the capillary element 306 and moves it into the analysis channel 304.
In the system shown, a spacer fluid is introduced after the sample material slug,
in order to space the sample material from subsequent sample materials. The spacer
buffer is sampled into the system the same way that the sample is drawn in. Specifically,
the capillary element is placed into contact with the trough 322 of spacer buffer
and a slug of spacer fluid is drawn into the system. Within main channel 304, additional
reagents needed for a given analysis are brought into the main channel 304 from the
side channels 312 and 314. Movement of reagents into channel 304 from these side channels
is driven by the same vacuum used to draw materials in through the capillary element.
In the context of the present example, the spacer fluid constituted the degassing
fluid.
[0045] Degassing parameters were calculated for a system having the attributes described
with reference to Figure 3. In particular, a number of physical and temporal parameters
of the operation of a microfluidic device are dictated by the particular analysis
to be carried out therein. Those parameters were then used to calculate the maximal
allowable level of oxygen within the spacer fluid in order for that fluid to function
as a degassing reagent. In order to achieve this oxygen level, therefore, a minimum
spacer fluid trough temperature was calculated, e.g., to provide spacer fluid at an
acceptable oxygen level. By providing the spacer fluid below maximal oxygen levels,
substantial reductions in bubble formation and channel blockage have been observed.
Exemplary calculations are provided below.
[0046] In one exemplary analysis, sample compounds are sipped for 2 seconds, while spacer
fluids are sipped for 1 second. Transit time between the sample well 320 and the spacer
fluid trough 322 is 1.5 seconds. For the particular example chip/channel configuration,
flow into main channel 304 from the side channels is 50% of the total flow, e.g.,
25% from each side channel. The temperature of the sample material is assumed to be
room temperature or 22°C, while the device temperature is elevated to 28°C. This elevated
temperature is generally desirable to accelerate analysis chemistries within the device.
Finally, a vacuum of -0.3 psi is applied to reservoir/port 310 to drive fluid flow
through the channels of the device. These parameters were then used to calculate the
maximal level of oxygen within the spacer fluid in order to avoid any degassing or
bubble formation within the channels of the device, e.g., under the temperature and
pressure conditions applied. In carrying out the calculations, two alternate scenarios
were assumed. The first case is where a hanging droplet of fluid at the end of the
capillary element does not equilibrate with air during the transit time from the sample
to the trough. The second case assumes that the droplet becomes fully equilibrated
with air during transit. Given that the radius of the water droplet is 0.018 cm and
the diffusion constant for oxygen in water is 2 X 10
-5 cm
2/s, giving a diffusion time of 8.1 seconds, the droplet should not equilibrate during
a typical transit time, e.g., 1.5 seconds. The calculations are set forth below:
Input Parameters |
Parameter |
ID |
Value |
Sample plate sip time (s) |
PST |
2 |
Trough sip time (s) |
TST |
1 |
Sipper transit time (s) |
STT |
1.5 |
Side channel flow (fraction) |
SAF |
0.5 |
Sample plate temperature (°C) |
PT |
22 |
Chip temperature (°C) |
CT |
28 |
Applied vacuum (psi) |
V |
0.3 |
Calculated Parameters |
Parameter |
ID |
Case 1 |
Case 2 |
Sample plate flow (%) |
FP |
29.2 |
41.7 |
Trough flow (fraction) |
FT |
20.8 |
8.3 |
[O2] in plate |
OP |
4.17X10-3 |
4.17X10-3 |
[O2] in side channel reservoirs |
OS |
3.71X10-3 |
3.71X10-3 |
[O2] allowable in chip |
OAC |
3.63X10-3 |
3.63X10-3 |
[O2] allowable in trough |
OAT |
2.7X10-3 |
2.7X10-3 |
Minimum trough temp. |
MTT |
50 |
94 |
% Saturation in trough |
%O2 |
65 |
12 |
[0047] The calculations used to calculate these parameters were as follows:
FP1=[(PST+STT)/(PST+TST+2*STT)][1-SAF]
FP2=[(PST+2*STT)/(PST+TST+2*STT)][1-SAF]
FT1=[(TST+STT)/(PST+TST+2*STT)] [1-SAF]
FT2=[TST/(PST+TST+2*STT)] [1-SAF]
[O2] in grams of gas/100 grams of water at atmospheric pressure and temperature T is
[O2]=13417e-5*(T)-1.301 e-8*(T-58.04)^3+4.310e-3
OAC=OS*((14.7-V)/14.7)
OAT=(OAC-OP*FP(n)-)S*SAF)/FT(n) where (n) is 1 or 2 depending on the case.
MTT=(100-6.628e4*(O2) + 1.5e7(O2)^2-1.084e9(O2)^3)/1-5.703e2(O2)+1.443e5(O2)^2-2.563e7(O2)^3+3.298e9(O2))
%O2=(OAT/OP)*100
[0048] As noted above, when the trough is maintained above the calculated minimum trough
temperature for a given operation, channel plugs resulting from outgassing within
channels is substantially reduced.
[0049] All publications and patent applications are herein incorporated by reference to
the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically
and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference. Although the present invention
has been described in some detail by way of illustration and example for purposes
of clarity and understanding, it will be apparent that certain changes and modifications
may be practiced within the scope of the appended claims.