FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to an aluminum alloy extruded tube material, which
can be used as a structural member to be applied to a heat exchanger in which a refrigerating
cycle using a natural refrigerant as typified by carbon dioxide (CO
2) as a refrigerant is incorporated, such as a gas conditioner (condenser) for cooling
a high temperatures and pressures gas refrigerant which has been heated and compressed
in a car air-conditioner. In particular, the present invention relates to an aluminum
alloy extruded tube material having a plurality of refrigerant-flowing holes.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] In recent years, for non-using of flons in refrigerators, refrigerators each using
a natural refrigerant as typified by carbon dioxide as a refrigerant have been under
development. Air conditioners employing such refrigerators using carbon dioxide as
their refrigerants will have to respond to new requests different from those in using
a flon as a conventionally usual refrigerant.
[0003] In other words, an air conditioner using carbon dioxide as a refrigerant has higher
working pressures as well as higher refrigerant temperatures when compressed, as compared
with those when a flon is employed. For example, in a gas conditioner for cooling
a carbon dioxide refrigerant which has been compressed on the downstream of a compressor,
the refrigerant may be heated up to a temperature as high as 130 to 200°C at the inlet
of the conditioner. Therefore, when carbon dioxide is used as a refrigerant, the conditioner
requires better durability at high temperatures and pressures than that in the case
where a flon is used as a refrigerant.
[0004] The conventional, usual heat exchangers employ tube materials having refrigerant-flowing
holes for allowing refrigerants to flow through it, particularly aluminum alloy extruded
tube materials. Among them, in many cases, pure aluminum-based alloys as typified
by an inexpensive JIS 1050 alloy excellent in extrudability are used. Such a pure
aluminum-based alloy has a significantly lowering in mechanical strength under high
temperature conditions of 150°C or higher. For compensating for a decrease in strength
when carbon dioxide is used as a refrigerant, a tube may be provided with enhanced
pressure resistance (pressure-resisting strength) at high temperature by making the
wall of the tube much thicker than the case of using a flon.
[0005] However, the thick aluminum alloys as described above have not coped with the demands
on reductions in weight and thickness of a car air conditioner in recent years. For
improving mechanical strength while coping with the demands on reductions in weight
and thickness, attempts have been conducted to obtain an extruded tube material high
in pressure resistance at high temperature while having a thinner wall, by adding
an element contributing to improvement in material strength, that is a reinforcing
element, to an aluminum alloy to be used in an extruded tube material, thereby to
enhance mechanical strength of the aluminum alloy itself for the tube material particularly,
the high-temperature strength. Herein, examples of the reinforcing element for the
aluminum alloy include Cu, Mn, Si, Fe, Ti, and V. Among them, an element for easily
reinforcing the material may be Cu that contributes to improvement in strength by
forming a solid solution. Hitherto, therefore, attempts have been conducted to use
an aluminum alloy for an extruded tube material with the addition of a larger amount
of Cu than the conventional one.
[0006] For making an aluminum alloy extruded tube material for a heat exchanger reduced
in weight and thickness, which uses carbon dioxide as a refrigerant as described in
the above, the content of Cu as an alloy element in an aluminum alloy for the tube
material may be increased, thereby to easily improve the mechanical strength of such
a tube material. In other words, pressure resistance at high temperature required
for the tube material can be easily enhanced.
[0007] However, the following problem can be found when the content of Cu is simply raised.
That is, when an aluminum alloy having a large amount of Cu is subjected to a high
refrigerant temperature of 130 to 200°C as described above, the amount of solid-solution
Cu around a grain boundary decreases as a Cu-Al-series intermetallic compound precipitates
in the grain boundary, thereby causing a Cu-shortage layer. When such a material is
placed in a corrosive environment, an electric potential difference may be caused
between a portion having a high Cu content (Cu-rich portion) in the grain boundary
and a Cu-shortage layer of the grain boundary, so occurrence of corrosion at the grain
boundary is apt to occur. Thus, the aluminum alloy added with a large amount of Cu
has difficulty in retaining its corrosion resistance satisfactorily, as well as difficulty
in obtaining good extrudability.
[0008] On the other hand, measures for obtaining the strength properties while avoiding
the problem of corrosion at the grain boundary due to a large amount of Cu added as
described above, include the addition of Si without adding Cu (see, for example,
JP-A-7-41894 ("JP-A" means unexamined published Japanese patent application)).
[0009] However, when Si is added as described, another problem may be caused in that crystallized
Si conspicuously shortens the operable life of an extrusion die even though the strength
can be enhanced. Further, when the aluminum alloy added with Si in such a manner is
subjected to high refrigerant temperatures of 130 to 200°C as described above, the
strength may conspicuously reduce in comparison with the strength at room temperature
before the alloy is subjected to such temperatures. In addition, there is another
problem in that the high-temperature strength in the high temperature region of higher
than 130°C also conspicuously reduces.
[0010] The document
JP-A-2000-087168 discloses an aluminium alloy clad material excellent in corrosion resistance in an
alkaline environment which is used in automotive heat exchanger or the like for refrigerant
flowing passage. The core material is composed of an Al alloy consisting of, in weight%:
0.5 to 2.5% Mn and 0.4 to 1.5% Fe, optionally one or two kinds of 0.1 to 1.2% Si and
0.1 to 0.7% Cu, optionally one or two or more kinds of 0.05 to 0.2% Ti, 0.05 to 0.2%
Zr, 0.05 to 0.15% Cr, 0.05 to 0.15% V and 0.05 to 0.2% Mg, balance Al with inevitable
impurities. The core material is clad with a sacrificial anode surface material.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0011] The present invention is defined in claim 1.
[0012] Other and further features and advantages of the invention will appear more fully
from the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawing.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0013]
Fig. 1 is a schematic side view that illustrates a test piece provided as an assembly
of a tube material and a fin material in Example 1.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0014] For solving the conventional problems as described above, the inventors of the present
invention have conducted experiments and studies in detail with respect to the correlation
of corrosion resistance, mechanical strength, and strength after thermal history,
with the composition of the alloy elements of the aluminum alloy extruded tube material.
Consequently, the inventors of the present invention found that high pressure resistance
at high temperature as well as high strength after thermal history can be obtained
while sufficient corrosion resistance is retained, when the amounts of Si, Fe, Mn,
Cu, Ti, and V as alloy elements to be added are appropriately adjusted, particularly
the appropriate amounts of Cu, Ti, and V are simultaneously added. The present invention
has been attained based on the above finding.
[0015] Preferred embodiments for carrying out the invention will be described in detail
hereinafter.
[0016] At first, the reasons for restricting the elements of the aluminum alloy extruded
tube material of the present invention for a heat exchanger using a natural refrigerant
will be described.
[0017] In the present invention, the content of manganese (Mn) is 0.5 to 1.5% by mass.
[0018] Mn may be crystallized or precipitated as an Al-Mn-series intermetallic compound
and contribute to enhancement in mechanical strength after brazing. Further, Mn is
an element which is coexistent with Si to generate an Al-Mn-Si-series intermetallic
compound, to thereby enhance the mechanical strength. Further, the addition of Mn
makes an electric potential of the aluminum alloy noble, and the electric potential
difference with a fin can be increased by previously adding Mn in a tube material
when the fin is provided on the outer surface of the tube material, thereby enhancing
external-corrosion resistance. For surely attaining those effects, Mn should be added
in an amount of 0.5% by mass or more, preferably 0.7% by mass or more. Further, if
a large amount of Mn is added, extrudability may be lowered. However, in the case
of the tube material of the present invention as described below, the addition of
Si prevents lowering of extrudability, so that Mn in an amount of 0.5% by mass or
more, or 0.7% by mass or more, may cause no particular trouble. In contrast, when
the content of Mn exceeds 1.5% by mass, lowering of extrudability may be inevitable
even though the material contains Si. For this reason, the upper limit of the Mn content
is defined as 1.5% by mass.
[0019] In the present invention, the content of silicon (Si) is 0.1 to 0.5% by mass.
[0020] As described above, a crystallized or precipitated product of an Al-Mn-series intermetallic
compound (an Al compound containing only Mn, e.g. Al
6Mn), which can be generated by the addition of Mn, may contribute to improvement in
mechanical strength after brazing. On the other hand, the crystallized or precipitated
product of the Al-Mn-series intermetallic compound can conspicuously lower extrudability
by raising an extrusion contact pressure. However, the addition of Si allows the generation
of an Al-Mn-Si-series intermetallic compound, as a consequence the generation of an
Al-Mn-series intermetallic compound too much as compared to a necessary amount can
be prevented, and the extrusion contact pressure can be lowered. Therefore, the addition
of Si in conjunction with the addition of Mn can prevent lowering of extrudability.
Further, Si can be provided in a solid-solution state in a matrix or generate an Al-Mn-Si-series
intermetallic compound, thereby exhibiting an enhancing effect on the mechanical strength
after brazing. For attaining those effects of Si addition, the tube material should
contain Si in an amount of 0.1 % by mass or more. In addition, particularly in view
of improving extrudability, the content of Si is preferably 0.2% by mass or more,
more preferably 0.3% by mass or more. On the other hand, when Si is contained excessively,
Si, which is solely crystallized, may conspicuously shorten the operable life of an
extrusion die and may lower the melting point of the alloy, thereby melting the material
at the time of brazing. Besides, the formation of a crystallized product may lower
the extrudability. Further, when the alloy is subjected to a high refrigerant temperature
of about 130 to 200°C, the strength at room temperature may significantly reduce in
comparison with one before the alloy is subjected to that high temperature. In addition,
the high-temperature strength in a high-temperature region of higher than 130°C can
be significantly reduced. For avoiding an adverse effect caused by the addition of
Si in an excess amount, the upper limit of Si content should be 0.5% by mass.
[0021] In the present invention, the content of iron (Fe) is 0.3 to 0.8% by mass.
[0022] Fe can be crystallized or precipitated as an intermetallic compound, to improve the
mechanical strength after brazing. In addition, Fe can improve the extrudability by
forming an Al-Mn-Fe-series or Al-Mn-Fe-Si-series intermetallic compound. For attaining
the effects of Fe addition, the content of Fe should be 0.1 % by mass or more, preferably
0.3% by mass or more. In contrast, if an excess amount of Fe is contained, a Fe-containing
intermetallic compound may be crystallized from the surface of the tube material and
accelerate the rate of corrosion, thereby lowering the extrudability. For preventing
an adverse effect due to the addition of such an excess amount of Fe, the content
of Fe should be 0.8% by mass or less.
[0023] In the present invention, the tube material contains 0.05 to 0.25% by mass of cupper
(Cu), 0.1 to 0.25% by mass of titanium (Ti), and 0.05 to 0.30% by mass of vanadium
(V), respectively.
[0024] Various effects can be exerted even by adding Cu or Ti alone. In the present invention,
particularly, excellent corrosion resistance can be retained while enhance of mechanical
strength is achieved, by simultaneously adding Cu, Ti, and V. At first, the effects
of singly adding Cu or Ti will be described.
[0025] The addition of Cu alone may enhance the strength after brazing by allowing Cu to
be in a solid-solution state in a matrix; and further, it may make an electric potential
of the tube material noble, to enlarge the electric potential difference between the
tube material and a fin when the fin material is provided on the outer surface of
the tube material, to remarkably enhance the external corrosion resistance. For attaining
such effects, the amount of Cu to be added should be 0.05% by mass or more. For attaining
particularly sufficient effects, the amount of Cu to be added is preferably 0.1 %
by mass or more.
[0026] On the other hand, the addition of Ti alone may contribute to enhance corrosion resistance,
particularly pitting corrosion resistance. That is, Ti added to an aluminum alloy
can be distributed into high-concentration regions and low-concentration regions on
its concentration, which are distributed in a layered structure in which the regions
are laminated in alternation in the direction along the sheet thickness. Then, a low-Ti
concentration region can be preferentially corroded, compared with a high-Ti concentration
region, thereby allowing the formation of corrosion into a layered structure to prevent
the progress of corrosion in the direction along the sheet thickness. As a result,
pitting corrosion resistance is improved. For sufficiently attaining such improving
effect on pitting corrosion resistance, the content of Ti should be 0.1% by mass or
more.
[0027] As described above, the addition of Cu in an amount of 0.05% by mass or more may
lead to a conspicuous lowering of corrosion resistance, because of an increase in
sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion when the alloy is subjected to a high temperature
of 130 to 200°C after heating for brazing. In contrast, in the present invention,
Ti and V are added together with the addition of Cu in an amount of 0.05% by mass
or more, and it is possible not only to improve pitting corrosion resistance but also
to suppress the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion due to the addition of Cu.
The reason that an inhibitory effect on the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion
can be obtained by simultaneously adding Ti and V when Cu is added, will be considered
as follows.
[0028] That is, as previously described, when Ti is added, the alloy is in a state of a
layered structure in which high-Ti concentration layers (Ti-rich layers) and low-Ti
concentration layers are laminated one after another. The simultaneous addition of
V allows V to be incorporated into the Ti-rich layer, thereby causing a TiN rich layer.
The TiN rich layer comes across the grain boundary, and the grain boundary within
the range being traversed by the TiN rich layer can be of a noble electric potential
due to the Ti/V rich layers. In contrast, as described above, when Cu is added alone,
the grain boundary can be of a Cu shortage phase to cause an ignoble potential, thereby
causing increase in the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion. However, as described
above, the Ti/V rich layer alters the grain boundary so that the boundary has a noble
electric potential. Thus, the grain boundary corrosion becomes difficult to progress,
and the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion may be thus prevented.
[0029] For attaining the preventing effects on the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion
as described above, Ti should be added in an amount of 0.1% by mass or more. In addition,
V should be added in an amount of 0.05% by mass or more. On the other hand, if the
amount of Ti to be added exceeds 0.25% by mass, the extrudability of the material
is prohibited by the formation of a giant compound upon casting, thereby resulting
in difficulty in obtaining a healthy material for extrusion. Further, when the amount
of V to be added exceeds 0.30% by mass, the extrudability of the material is prohibited
by the formation of a giant compound upon casting, thereby resulting in difficulty
in obtaining a healthy material for extrusion and also prohibiting the corrosion resistance
of the resultant extruded tube material. Further, when the content of Cu exceeds 0.25%
by mass, the preventing effects on the sensitivity to grain boundary corrosion by
Ti and V cannot be obtained. Moreover, the room temperature strength after the material
is subjected to refrigerant temperatures (130 to 200°C) for a long period of time
is conspicuously reduced, as compared with the room temperature strength before the
material is subjected to the refrigerant temperatures.
[0030] From the viewpoints of above, the tube material contains 0.1 to 0.25% by mass of
Ti, 0.05 to 0.30% by mass of V, and 0.05 to 0.25% by mass of Cu.
[0031] Further, the balance other than the respective elements described above may be Al
and an unavoidable impurity(s).
[0032] In the production of the aluminum alloy extruded tube material of the present invention,
an aluminum alloy molten liquid is provided in a usual manner to attain the element
composition described above, and then the resultant molten liquid is subjected to
casting in a usual manner, and the method is not particularly limited. For producing
an extruded tube material using the thus-obtained ingot (billet), the ingot is preferably
subjected to a homogenization treatment in advance. Afterwards, at least before extruding,
a soaking treatment may be carried out, and followed by extruding. Further, heating
methods or heating conditions, structures of heating furnaces, and the like for the
above homogenization treatment and soaking treatment are not particularly limited.
Further, in the above extruding, the form after extruded is not particularly limited,
and any of appropriate extruded forms can be selected depending on, for example, the
shape of a heat exchanger to which the resultant tube is applied. For the extrusion,
since the extrudability of the material is good, a multiple hollow die in the form
of a hollow may be used for the extrusion in a favorable manner. In addition, an extrusion
method (system) for extruding is not particularly limited, and any of usual methods
can be suitably applied in combination with the shape after extruded and the like.
[0033] The extruded material that can be obtained, for example, in the manner as described
above, can be used as a material for a heat exchanger, and it can be generally used
as a material for a tube for flowing a refrigerant (heat medium) through it. Such
an extruded tube material may be generally assembled with other members (e.g., a fin
material and a header) and then brazed by brazing when used as a part of a heat exchanger.
Herein, the conditions of atmosphere, heat temperature, time period, and the like
upon brazing are not particularly limited, and also the brazing method is not particularly
limited. The heat exchanger thus obtained can be efficiently manufactured because
its tube material has good extrudability, and the exchanger has high pressure resisting
property and good corrosion resistance. Therefore, the heat exchanger can exhibit
good durability even in a car or the like, for example, when used under a severe corrosive
environment.
[0034] Further, the extruded tube material of the present invention may be directly used
in a heat exchanger as it is. A sacrificial material made of a material having an
ignoble electric potential compared with that of the tube material is provided on
the outer surface of the extruded tube material, to further improve corrosion resistance,
thereby forming a tube having a sacrificial material, which can also be used in heat
exchangers. In that case, examples of the sacrificial materials that can be used include
metal Zn, and an Al-Zn alloy. Further, a concrete method of forming the sacrificial
material on the surface of an extruded tube material, and the thickness or the like
of the sacrificial material, are not particularly limited, and they may be determined
similarly to those of the usual aluminum alloy tube material having a sacrificial
material for heat exchangers.
[0035] Further, the extruded tube material of the present invention for a heat exchanger
is not limited to one having a single hole as a refrigerant-flowing hole, but it may
be in the form to give a multi-hole tube having a plurality of refrigerant-flowing
holes. As described above, the tube material of the present invention is excellent
in extrudability, and a multi-hole extruded tube material can be prepared in an easy
manner.
[0036] The aluminum alloy extruded tube material of the present invention for a heat exchanger
using a natural refrigerant can exhibit remarkably excellent corrosion resistance
even in a corrosive environment, as well as high pressure resistance at high temperature,
while showing high room-temperature strength after thermal history applied. Therefore,
the tube material of the present invention can provide a tube for flowing a refrigerant
in a heat exchanger, which uses a natural refrigerant as typified by carbon dioxide,
and which has a thinner wall and sufficient durability. Therefore, the tube material
of the present invention is preferable as a tube material for a heat exchanger subjected
to severe corrosive environments such as a car air-conditioner.
[0037] The present invention will be described in more detail based on the following examples,
but the invention is not intended to be limited thereto.
EXAMPLES
(Example 1)
[0038] Each of Al alloys having the respective element composition as shown by Nos. 1 to
19 in Table 1 below, was molten and then subjected to casting in a usual manner, to
cast into a billet of diameter 200 mm. The resultant billet was subjected to a homogenization
treatment under the conditions of retaining at 610°C for 4 hours, followed by cutting
into a length of 1,000 mm, to give a billet for extrusion. The thus-obtained billet
was again heated to 500°C and then extruded through a mandrel die, thereby preparing
a multi-hole tube material having 20 holes.
[0039] The surface of the thus-obtained multi-hole tube was subjected to a sandblasting
method, to make it rough with approximately 10 µm in a center line average roughness
(height) (Ra). Then, metal Zn as a sacrificial material was sprayed onto the resultant
surface. The method of spraying was an electric arc spraying method, under the spraying
conditions of thermal source temperature 4,000°C and particle velocity 75 m/s. The
amount of metal Zn covered was adjusted to about 9 g/m
2. In this way, the extruded multi-hole tube covered with the metal Zn was obtained,
followed by cutting into a piece of length 100 mm.
[0040] Separately, a clad fin (thickness 0.1 mm) that was prepared by cladding a JIS 4343
alloy in a cladding amount of 10% by mass on a JIS 3003 alloy added with 2% by mass
of Zn, was corrugated, and followed by assembling with the multi-hole tube, to give
an assemble having a shape as shown in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, reference numerals 1 and
2 each represent a multi-hole tube, and 3 represents a fin corrugated. The thus-assembled
test piece was subjected to brazing by heating at 600°C for 3 minutes, under a nitrogen
atmosphere. After that, an additional thermal history of 180°C x 48 hours was applied
thereto, to prepare a test piece for corrosion.
[0041] For the test piece for corrosion, the CASS test was carried out for 1,500 hours according
to JIS H8601. After the CASS test, a fin was cut off from the test piece, and then
the corrosion product on the tube was removed, followed by measuring the depth of
pitting corrosion of the tube material with an optical microscope. Further, for the
pitting corrosion cite, the cross section of the tube was observed with an optical
microscope. Table 1 shows grain boundary corrosion, if observed, and the results of
the CASS test. Further, the tube material obtained as described above was examined
for mechanical strength, and evaluated for extrudability. The results are shown in
Table 1.
Table 1
| Classification |
No. |
Element composition of tube material (mass%) |
Extrudability |
Mechanical strength
(MPa) |
CASS test results
(µm) |
Grain boundary corrosion |
| Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Ti |
V |
Al |
| This invention |
1* |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Balance |
○ |
134 |
70 |
None |
| 2 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
137 |
75 |
None |
| 3 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.19 |
0.27 |
Balance |
○ |
145 |
50 |
None |
| 4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
135 |
70 |
None |
| 5* |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
142 |
90 |
None |
| 6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.25 |
Balance |
○ |
138 |
75 |
None |
| 7 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
Balance |
○ |
141 |
80 |
None |
| 8 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
143 |
90 |
None |
| 9 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
Balance |
○ |
142 |
70 |
None |
| 10 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.12 |
Balance |
○ |
139 |
80 |
None |
| 11 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
Balance |
○ |
146 |
60 |
None |
| Comparative example |
12 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0 |
0.32 |
Balance |
× |
- |
- |
- |
| 13 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
Balance |
○ |
132 |
Penetration due to grain boundary corrosion |
Observed |
| 14 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.27 |
0.03 |
Balance |
○ |
135 |
190 |
None |
| 15 |
0.2 |
0.9 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.3 |
0.35 |
Balance |
× |
- |
- |
- |
| 16 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
0 |
0.04 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
Balance |
○ |
80 |
80 |
None |
| 17 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
0.03 |
0.35 |
Balance |
× |
- |
- |
- |
| 18 |
0.6 |
0.9 |
0.3 |
1.8 |
0.3 |
0.03 |
Balance |
× |
- |
- |
- |
| Conventional example |
19 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0 |
0 |
Balance |
○ |
95 |
Penetration due to grain boundary corrosion |
Observed |
Note) Evaluation for extrudability: "○" good; "×" poor
* Alloys 1 and 5 are outside the scope of the invention. |
[0042] It was confirmed that each of the multi-hole tube materials of Nos. 2 to 4 and 6
to 11 of Examples according to the present invention exhibited good corrosion resistance
even after 1,500 hours from the CASS test, and inhibited grain boundary corrosion.
Contrary to the above, in Comparative Example No. 13, grain boundary corrosion occurred,
to cause penetration through the tube walls. Further, in Comparative Example No. 14,
since the contents of Fe and Ti each were too high over the ranges defined in the
present invention, pitting corrosion resistance was poor. Further, in Comparative
Examples Nos. 12 and 15, since the content of V was too high over the range defined
in the present invention, the extrusion could not be conducted. Further, in Comparative
Examples Nos. 16 to 18, since the contents of Si, Fe, Cu, Mn, Ti, and V were outside
of the range defined in the present invention, the mechanical strength was insufficient
or the extrusion could not be carried out. Further, in Conventional Example No. 19,
the grain boundary corrosion occurred, to cause penetration through the tube walls.
(Example 2)
[0043] Each of Al alloys having the respective element composition as shown by Nos. 21 to
36 in Table 2 below, was molten and then subjected to casting in a usual manner, to
cast into a billet of diameter 200 mm. The resultant billet was subjected to a homogenization
treatment under the conditions of retaining at 610°C for 4 hours, followed by cutting
into a length of 1,000 mm, to give a billet for extrusion. The thus-obtained billet
was again heated to 500°C and then extruded through a mandrel die, thereby preparing
a multi-hole tube material having 20 holes.
[0044] The thus-obtained tube materials were subjected to brazing by heating at 600°C for
3 min under a nitrogen atmosphere, followed by applying thermal history 180°C, for
any time period of 24 hours, 150 hours, 500 hours, 700 hours, 1,000 hours, or 2,000
hours, thereby to prepare test pieces for evaluation of mechanical strength properties.
After each thermal history, the room-temperature strength was measured in a state
after each material was left standing to cool to the room temperature. The results
are shown in Table 3.
Table 2
| Classification |
No. |
Element composition of tube material (mass%) |
Extrudability |
| Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Ti |
V |
Al |
| This invention |
21* |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Balance |
○ |
| 22 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 23 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.27 |
Balance |
○ |
| 24 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
| 25* |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 26 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.25 |
Balance |
○ |
| 27 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
Balance |
○ |
| 28 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
| 29 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
Balance |
○ |
| 30 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.12 |
Balance |
○ |
| 31 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
Balance |
○ |
| Comparative example |
32 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○
(Large scratches on the die) |
| 33 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○
(Large scratches on the die) |
| 34 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 35 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| Conventional example |
36 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
Balance |
○ |
Note) Evaluation for extrudability: "○" good; "×" poor
* Alloys 21 and 25 are outside the scope of the invention. |
Table 3
| Classification |
No. |
Mechanical strength
(MPa) *1 |
Room-temp. strength after thermal history at 180°C (MPa) |
Decrease in room-temp. strength
(MPa) *2 |
| 24hr |
150hr |
500hr |
700hr |
1,000hr |
2,000hr |
| This invention |
21* |
134 |
134 |
135 |
133 |
136 |
135 |
132 |
2 |
| 22 |
137 |
137 |
137 |
136 |
137 |
135 |
136 |
1 |
| 23 |
145 |
143 |
144 |
142 |
141 |
144 |
144 |
1 |
| 24 |
135 |
135 |
135 |
133 |
134 |
134 |
135 |
0 |
| 25* |
142 |
142 |
144 |
143 |
145 |
145 |
142 |
0 |
| 26 |
138 |
138 |
137 |
136 |
137 |
138 |
139 |
1 |
| 27 |
141 |
142 |
141 |
143 |
143 |
142 |
140 |
1 |
| 28 |
143 |
143 |
142 |
142 |
142 |
142 |
141 |
2 |
| 29 |
142 |
141 |
142 |
143 |
144 |
140 |
140 |
2 |
| 30 |
139 |
139 |
140 |
138 |
137 |
138 |
140 |
1 |
| 31 |
146 |
145 |
144 |
145 |
145 |
146 |
147 |
1 |
| Comparative example |
32 |
142 |
140 |
138 |
137 |
133 |
129 |
122 |
20 |
| 33 |
144 |
143 |
137 |
135 |
132 |
129 |
125 |
19 |
| 34 |
143 |
141 |
135 |
135 |
133 |
130 |
126 |
17 |
| 35 |
146 |
144 |
136 |
135 |
134 |
131 |
126 |
20 |
| Conventional example |
36 |
95 |
90 |
86 |
85 |
75 |
70 |
70 |
25 |
*1: This represents the room-temperature strength in a state of no heated temperature
history applied.
*2: This represents the difference between the room-temperature strength in a state
of no heated temperature history applied and the room-temperature strength after applying
thermal history at 180°C for 2,000 hrs.
* Alloys 21 and 25 are outside the scope of the invention |
[0045] As shown in Table 3, the multi-hole tube materials of Nos. 22 to 24 and 26 to 31
of Examples according to the present invention did not show any decrease in the room-temperature
strength even after a thermal history for 24 to 2,000 hours at 180°C. In contrast,
in each of Nos. 32 and 33 of Comparative Examples, since the contents of Si and Cu
were too high over the ranges defined in the present invention, a conspicuous decrease
in the room-temperature strength was observed when the heating time was long. Further,
in each of Nos. 34 and 35 of Comparative Examples, since the contents of Cu and Mn
were too high over the ranges defined in the present invention, a conspicuous decrease
in the room-temperature strength was observed when the heating time was long, similarly.
Further, in Conventional Example No. 36, the mechanical strength was conspicuously
insufficient, regardless of before or after applying the thermal history.
(Example 3)
[0046] Each of Al alloys having the respective element composition as shown by Nos. 41 to
56 in Table 4 below, was molten and then subjected to casting in a usual manner, to
cast into a billet of diameter 200 mm. The resultant billet was subjected to a homogenization
treatment under the conditions of at 610°C for 4 hours, followed by cutting into a
length of 1,000 mm, to give a billet for extrusion. The thus-obtained billet was again
heated to 500°C and then extruded through a mandrel die, thereby preparing a multi-hole
tube material having 20 holes.
[0047] The thus-obtained tube materials were subjected to brazing by heating at 600°C for
3 min under a nitrogen atmosphere, to prepare test pieces for evaluation of high-temperature
strength. Then, each of the test pieces was heated to any temperature at 80°C, 100°C,
130°C, 150°C, or 180°C, followed by retaining for 15 minutes, and the mechanical strength
was measured for each sample at said temperature. The results are shown in Table 5.
Table 4
| Classification |
No. |
Element composition of tube material (mass%) |
Extrudability |
| Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Ti |
V |
Al |
| This invention |
41* |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
Balance |
○ |
| 42 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 43 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.27 |
Balance |
○ |
| 44 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.06 |
0.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
| 45* |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.05 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 46 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.25 |
Balance |
○ |
| 47 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.2 |
0.8 |
0.15 |
0.2 |
Balance |
○ |
| 48 |
0.5 |
0.8 |
0.25 |
1.5 |
0.25 |
0.15 |
Balance |
○ |
| 49 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.05 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
0.23 |
Balance |
○ |
| 50 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.12 |
Balance |
○ |
| 51 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.15 |
1.1 |
0.15 |
0.3 |
Balance |
○ |
| Comparative example |
52 |
1.2 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○
(Large scratches on the die) |
| 53 |
1.4 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○
(Large scratches on the die) |
| 54 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.4 |
1.5 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| 55 |
0.2 |
0.7 |
0.6 |
1.6 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
Balance |
○ |
| Conventional example |
56 |
0.2 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.3 |
0 |
0 |
Balance |
○ |
Note) Evaluation for extrudability: "○" good; "×" poor
* Alloys 41 and 45 are outside the scope of the invention |
Table 5
| Classification |
No. |
Mechanical strength
(MPa) *3 |
High-temperature strength at each retention temperature (MPa) |
Decrease in strength after high-temperature retention (MPa) *4 |
| 80°C |
100°C |
130°C |
150°C |
180°C |
| This invention |
41* |
134 |
130 |
128 |
125 |
124 |
114 |
20 |
| 42 |
137 |
135 |
132 |
130 |
126 |
116 |
21 |
| 43 |
145 |
140 |
138 |
136 |
135 |
123 |
22 |
| 44 |
135 |
132 |
130 |
129 |
128 |
116 |
19 |
| 45* |
142 |
138 |
136 |
134 |
132 |
119 |
23 |
| 46 |
138 |
134 |
133 |
131 |
129 |
116 |
22 |
| 47 |
141 |
137 |
135 |
131 |
128 |
114 |
27 |
| 48 |
143 |
139 |
137 |
133 |
124 |
115 |
28 |
| 49 |
142 |
139 |
136 |
130 |
126 |
122 |
20 |
| 50 |
139 |
136 |
131 |
130 |
130 |
117 |
22 |
| 51 |
146 |
139 |
136 |
133 |
131 |
119 |
27 |
| Comparative example |
52 |
142 |
138 |
122 |
115 |
97 |
87 |
55 |
| 53 |
144 |
140 |
134 |
120 |
101 |
90 |
54 |
| 54 |
143 |
138 |
128 |
118 |
99 |
86 |
57 |
| 55 |
146 |
140 |
127 |
119 |
98 |
86 |
60 |
| Conventional example |
56 |
95 |
79 |
78 |
62 |
45 |
38 |
57 |
*3: This represents the room-temperature strength in a state of no retention under
heating.
*4: This represents the difference between the room-temperature strength in a state
of no retention under heating, and the high-temperature strength in a state of retention
at 180°C for 15 min.
* Alloys 41 and 45 are outside the scope of the invention |
[0048] As shown in Table 5, each of the multi-hole tube materials of Nos. 42 to 44 and 46
to 51 of Examples according to the present invention showed a slight decrease in the
high-temperature strength at each retention temperature of 130, 150, and 180°C. Contrary
to the above, in Comparative Example Nos. 52 and 53, since the contents of Si and
Cu were too high over the ranges defined in the present invention, a conspicuous reduction
in the high-temperature strength at each of the above temperatures was observed. Further,
in Comparative Example Nos. 54 and 55, since the contents of Cu and Mn were too high
over the ranges defined in the present invention, a conspicuous reduction in the high-temperature
strength at each of the above temperatures was observed, similarly. Further, in Conventional
Example No. 56, in addition to the insufficient room-temperature strength from the
beginning, the reduction in the high-temperature strength at each temperature was
conspicuous.
[0049] Having described our invention as related to the present embodiments, it is our intention
that the invention not be limited by any of the details of the description, unless
otherwise specified, but rather be construed within the scope as set out in the accompanying
claims.