[0001] The present invention relates to a closure for a container of carbonated soft drinks
or other such products, which are packaged under pressure or produce overpressure
after packaging.
[0002] Closures for use with containers of carbonated soft drinks (CSD) have to be designed
in a particular way to address the peculiarities of such contents. For example, the
closure must maintain the pressure within the container so that the drink does not
go flat. Further, the closure must not missile during the rapid release of pressure
that occurs on opening. Further still, the closure must be easy to open and preferably
be of lightweight construction.
[0003] One known way of maintaining pressure inside a container is by use of a so-called
"pressure block" within the closure. This pressure block is an approximately rectangular
shaped annulus lying around the circumference of the closure at the junction between
the skirt and the top plate thereof. The pressure block presses against the rim of
an associated container when the closure is screwed onto, or otherwise affixed, to
the container.
[0004] One problem with this type of system is that it is relatively difficult to unscrew
the closure from the container due to friction between the block and the container
rim. To overcome this problem liners are often used. These lie between the pressure
block in the closure shell and the rim of the container. The liner helps reduce the
friction between the closure and the container and thus increases the ease with which
the closure may be unscrewed from the container. Such liners often incorporate slip-additives
such as erucimides, which can detrimentally affect the taste of the contents of the
container.
[0005] Other problems incurred by the use of pressure blocks is that they are relatively
inflexible and they increase the overall weight of the closure and accordingly the
amount of material used to form such closures. Furthermore, two separate pieces are
needed, the closure shell and the liner. This obviously increases cost and time required
to produce the closure by introducing extra steps into the manufacturing process.
[0006] To address the problems outlined above, an alternative closure has been proposed,
as shown in
WO 2005039996. This closure has a projection on the inner radial surface of the skirt and a sealing
strip depending from the top plate. When the closure is applied to the neck of a container,
the sealing strip slides around the external radius on the container rim and thereafter
is pinched between the projection and the container neck to form a gas tight seal
and to decrease friction therebetween.
[0007] However, such closures also have associated problems. For instance, the sealing strip
is typically very thin in cross-section (of the order of less than 0.5mm). Thus, the
mould used to produce the projection and the sealing strip has to be quite intricate.
Accordingly, the moulds are both difficult to produce and costly. Furthermore, such
moulds are difficult to keep clean and because of the intricate nature of the moulding,
there are many flaws in the finished closure, leading to rejects during the production
process.
[0008] Accordingly it would be desirable to have a closure which effectively seals a container
containing a CSD but which requires relatively less material, needs only one part
(i.e. with no liner) and is simple to mould thus ensuring considerably fewer rejects
than may occur with more intricate mouldings.
[0009] According to one embodiment, the present invention provides a closure for sealing
a container, the closure comprising a top plate and a skirt, characterised in that
a stepped portion is provided at the junction of the top plate and the skirt, and
the radial wall thickness within the stepped portion is reduced, thereby increasing
the flexibility of the skirt to provide improved sealing.
[0010] An advantage of this closure is that it requires no liner to reduce friction. The
stepped portion of the closure shell may act as a hinge. The hinge isolates the skirt
from movement of the top plate, such as may be caused by doming of the top plate on
overpressure in the container. Thus, the skirt continues to maintain sealing contact
with the neck of the container, even when the top plate domes.
[0011] Furthermore, the closure requires no intricately moulded parts within its shell,
which reduces the cost of the moulds and also reduces the amount of wastage due to
faulty mouldings. Further still, the closure uses less material due to the thinned
stepped portion and lack of a conventional pressure block.
[0012] The present invention will now be described, by way of example only, by reference
to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0013] Figure 1 shows an external side view of a package comprising a container neck and
a closure according to a first embodiment of the invention.
[0014] Figure 2 shows a cross section through an embodiment of a closure according to the
invention;
[0015] Figure 3 shows a cross section through the package shown in Figure 1;
[0016] Figure 4 shows a cross section through a package comprising a second embodiment of
the closure attached to a jar-like container, and
[0017] Figure 5 shows an enlarged view of a portion of Figure 4.
[0018] In Figure 1, a closure 10 comprises a top plate 20 and a skirt 30. The skirt is shown
with ribbing 40 to provide improved grip. At the underside of the closure a tamper
evident band 50 is shown. This is connected to the lower edge of the skirt 30 by frangible
bridges 60. The neck of the container is indicated by reference numeral 15.
[0019] In Figure 2, the closure 10 is shown in cross section. The top plate 20, skirt 30,
tamper evident band 50 and frangible bridges 60 may be seen. Further, internal threads
35 and an olive seal 25 are shown. The olive seal 25 depends from the underside of
the top plate 20. The olive seal has a bulge 26 on its outer radial surface.
[0020] With reference to the tamper evident band 50, it may be seen that on the inner radial
surface of this tamper evident band a projection 55 is formed. Further detailed explanation
of this projection will be given below.
[0021] The outer shell of the closure 10 has a step 70 at the shoulder portion (i.e. at
the junction between the skirt 30 and the top plate 20). By the presence of this step
in the shell, it is immediately obvious that less material has been used than in the
previously described pressure block type closures. The wall thickness of conventional
closures of this type lies in the range 1 to 1.2 mm. However, the present closure
has a wall thickness of only about 0.6 mm.
[0022] Furthermore, the wall thickness is reduced at the step (70). Typically, the wall
thicknesses of the step (70) is 30% - 70% that of the remainder of the closure shell
and preferably, the wall thickness of the step (70) is about 50% that of the remainder
of the closure shell. This reduced wall thickness ensures that the step (70) is flexible
relative to the remainder of the closure shell. The significance of the step 70 is
not only related to the reduction in weight (approximately 10% of the weight of the
total closure) but also an improvement in performance as will be discussed with reference
to Figure 3.
[0023] Figure 3 is similar to Figure 2 but in addition to the cross-section of the closure
also show a cross section of a container neck 15. This combination demonstrates how
the closure 10 and container neck 15 interact. The container neck 15 has a thread
17, which permits the closure 10 to be screwed on by means of corresponding thread
35. Although threads are shown, other means of attaching the closure to the container
neck are also possible such as snap beads.
[0024] The container neck 15 also includes a projection 18. The projection 55 of the tamper
evident band 50 of the closure 10 fits underneath the projection 18 in a well understood
manner so that when the closure is removed for the first time the frangible bridges
60 will break leaving behind the tamper evident band 50.
[0025] It can be seen that the olive seal 25 and the bulge 26 are forced slightly inward
by the container neck 15 to ensure a good seal between the rim 16 of the container
neck 15 and the olive seal 25. A further sealing effect is produced by the sealing
portion 80, which lies on the inner radial surface of the closure 10, pressing against
the outer radial surface of the container rim 16.
[0026] In use it is typical for the top plate of closures to "dome" due to the pressure
of the carbonated soft drinks within the container. This doming is characterised by
the central portion of the top plate 20 rising away from the container (upwardly in
the figures). By this doming action the skirt 30 is pulled inward towards the container
neck 15. This is because the reduced thickness/step portion 70 acts as a hinge.
[0027] Moreover, the seal portion 80 of the skirt 30 is pulled radially inward towards the
rim 16 of the container neck 15. Accordingly, the rim 16 of the container neck 15
is squeezed between the bulge 26 of the olive seal 25 and the sealing portion 80 of
the closure 10. Consequently, the container is more effectively sealed by the closure
10. Further, the closure is thus more firmly affixed to the container neck, which
helps to prevent missiling of the closure 10.
[0028] Figure 4 shows an alternative embodiment wherein instead of a closure for a bottle,
a closure 110 for a container such as a jar is shown. The closure 110 may be seen
to be formed from a ring 120 and a skirt 130. The top plate of the closure 124 is
in fact formed of a metal disk 122. Such closures are well known in the art. The metal
top plate 122 has a so-called and well known "safety button" 124 in the central portion.
This button is a form of tamper evidence in that it is only released when the closure
has been opened initially and cannot easily be reset.
[0029] The closure 110 has a threaded fitting 135 and may include a further tamper evident
band 156. This closure 110 also has a stepped and portion of reduced wall thickness
170 at the junction between the ring 120 and the skirt 130. This stepped portion/reduction
in thickness 170 acts in the same way as described above with regard to Figures 1
to 3.
[0030] Figure 5 shows an enlarged view of one part of the closure of Figure 4. This drawing
clearly shows the stepped portion 170 and the metal top plate 122. It may also be
seen that the ring portion 120 has a nose portion 121. This nose portion 121 extends
around the entire circumference of the ringed portion 120. The nose portion 121 seals
against the upper part of the metal top plate 122, thus preventing water ingress into
space 190 between the metal top plate 122 and the underside of the plastic ring 120.
This prevents rusting of the metal plate 122 and also helps to prevent other undesired
effects of water entering this space 190.
[0031] It may be seen that the closure 110 has similar features to the closure 10 described
above with reference to Figures 1 to 3. For instance, closure 110 also has a sealing
portion 180 and a stepped portion 170 which may act as a hinge. Again, if the closure
domes due to overpressure in the container, the stepped portion which acts as a hinge
will transfer the upward doming effect of the metal top plate 122 such that the skirt
130 is pulled more tightly in towards the neck 115 of the associated container. Accordingly,
the sealing portion 180 is pressed more firmly against the rim 116 of the container
neck 115 to ensure a greater seal.
[0032] The doming described above with regard to both embodiments may of course occur for
other reasons such as fermentation of the product in the container or reduction of
pressure in the surrounding environment. It is seen how both closures 10, 110 reduce
the effect of missiling due to overpressure. Further, both closures may be seen to
have less material than in similar types of closures, which have a so-called "pressure
block". Further still, no liner is required in either closure to reduce the coefficient
of friction between the closure and the neck so as to reduce the torque required to
open the closure. In other words, less torque is required to remove the present closures
from the container neck without the need for a liner. Finally, the mould shape is
less intricate than other linerless types of closures.
1. A closure (10,110) for sealing a container (15), the closure comprising a top plate
(20,120) and a skirt (30,130),
characterised in that
a stepped portion (70,170) is provided at the junction of the top plate (20,120) and
the skirt (30,130), and the radial wall thickness within the stepped portion (70,170)
is reduced, thereby increasing the flexibility of the skirt (30,130) to provide improved
sealing.
2. A closure (10,110) according to claim 1, wherein the stepped portion (70, 170) has
a flexible sealing portion (80, 180), which is adapted to press against the outer
radial surface of a container neck (16).
3. A closure (10,110) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the stepped portion
(80,180) is adapted to act as a hinge, isolating the skirt (30,130) from movement
of the top plate (20,120).
4. A closure (10,110) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the thickness
of the stepped portion (70, 170) is reduced by 30% - 70%.
5. A closure (10,110) according to claim 4, wherein the thickness of the stepped portion
(70, 170) is reduced by 50%.
6. A closure (110) according to any of the preceding claims, wherein the top plate (120)
is provided by a disk and the skirt (130) is provided by a separate ring adapted to
secure the top plate (130) in the closure (110).
7. A closure (110) according to claim 6, wherein the top plate (120) is made of metal.
8. A package comprising a closure according to any of the preceding claims and a container
containing a carbonated soft drink.