Cross reference to related applications
Field of the invention
[0002] This invention relates to the treatment of textiles by a fluoropolymer - branched
silicone polyether composition. The fluoropolymer - branched silicone polyether compositions
are prepared by combining a fluoropolymer and a branched silicone polyether. The resulting
compositions improve the hand or feel of the fabric without significantly diminishing
oil repellency nor stain release properties associated with fluoropolymers. The branched
silicone polyethers can be used alone to improve the feel of fabrics, without diminishing
the hydrophilicity of the fabric.
Background of the invention
[0003] Silicones are used as textile treatments to impart a variety of properties, but in
particular are used for improving the feel or hand of treated fabrics. For example,
reference may be had to
US Patent 4,781,844 (November 1, 1988),
US Patent 4,978,462 (December 18, 1960), and
US 6,171,515 (January 9, 2001), for a description of the general state of the art. The '515 patent in particular
provides a detailed overview on the use of various silicones in the textile industry.
[0004] Fluorocarbons are extensively used in the textile industry to impart water and oil
repellency to fabrics. They are also used to provide stain release properties. However,
one of the major drawbacks of fluorocarbon treatments is the harsh feel imparted to
the fabric surface. The increasing use of fluoropolymers in apparel fabrics and garments
demands a higher level of softness.
[0005] There have been several attempts to combine various fluorocarbons and silicones into
a single textile treatment to offer the combined benefits of each. However, such attempts
have usually resulted in comprising one or more fabric attributes. For example, the
addition of a silicone to a fluorocarbon treatment composition may improve the hand
of the fabric, but the oil repellency of the combined treatment is often much worse
when compared to the fluorocarbon treated fabrics. Thus, there is a need to identify
fluorocarbon based textile treating compositions that maintain the attributes associated
with fluorocarbon treatments, but improve the deficiencies, such as poor hand.
[0006] The present inventor has discovered certain silicones, namely branched silicone polyethers,
when combined with fluoropolymers, provide textile treatments that provide the positive
attributes of fluoropolymers, while providing improved hand of the treated fabrics.
Summary of the invention
[0007] The present invention provides a composition comprising;
- A) a fluoropolymer, and
- B) a branched silicone polyether.
[0008] The invention further relates to a method of treating fibers or textiles comprising;
- I) combining
- A) a fluoropolymer,
- B) a branched silicone polyether, and
- II) applying the product of step I on fibers or textiles.
Detailed description of the invention
[0009] The present invention provides a composition comprising;
- A) a fluoropolymer, and
- B) a branched silicone polyether.
[0010] Component A) is a fluoropolymer. The fluoropolymer can be any fluorocarbon polymer,
either used neat, or alternatively in an emulsion form, that is known in the art for
treating fibers, fabrics, or textiles. Typically, the fluoropolymer is selected from
a fluoroakyl acrylate copolymer, a fluorinated polyurethane, an emulsion of a fluoroalkyl
acrylate copolymer, or an emulsion of a fluorinated polyurethane.
[0011] A fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer is illustrated by the formula shown below.

In the above structure, R1 is hydrogen or an alkyl group such as methyl; R2 represents
a fluorocarbon group such as -(CH
2)
m(CF
2)
nCF
3; R3 represents an alkyl group such as - (CH
2)
nCH
3; m is 0-5; n is 2-19; and x and y have values dependent upon the desired chain length.
[0012] Emulsions containing fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymers are commercially available from
companies such as Daikin Industries Ltd., Osaka, Japan, under their trademark Noveon
Inc., Charlotte, North Carolina, under the trade mark UNIDYNE™ such as UNIDYNE™ TG-532
and UNIDYNE™ TG-992; and Ciba Specialty Chemicals Corp, High Point, North Carolina
under their trademark ZONYL
® such as ZONYL® CO. Emulsions containing fluorinated polyurethanes are commercially
available from companies such as E.I. DuPont de Nemours, Wilmington, Delaware, under
their trademark ZONYL® such as Zonyl® 7910.
[0013] Component B) is a branched silicone polyether. As used herein, a "branched silicone
polyether", (abbreviated herein as BSPE) is a cross-linked organopolysiloxane polymer
having at least one polyoxyalkylene group. This class of compounds has been generally
described by Bahr et.al. in
U.S. Patent Nos. 4,853,474 and
5,136,068, to teach cross-linked organopolysiloxane polymers suitable as Component B). Compounds
suitable as component B) include organopolysiloxane-polyoxyalkylene polymer molecules
which are intentionally cross-linked through a cross-linking agent joined thereto
by nonhydrolyzable bonds and being free of internal hydrolyzable bonds.
[0014] Component B) may be obtained by a method comprising preparing a cross-linked organopolysiloxane
polymer and combining a polyoxyalkylene group therewith or by a method comprising
preparing a linear polyorganosiloxane having a polyoxyalkylene group combined therewith
and cross-linking the same.
[0016] In the present invention, typically component B) is a compound having a viscosity
of 100 to 100,000 mm
2/s at 25°C and having the unit formula:

wherein R
8 is a monovalent hydrocarbon group, A is a group having its formula selected from
(CH
2)
q-(R
102SiO)
rSi(CH
2)
s or O(R
102SiO)
rSiO wherein R
10 denotes a monovalent hydrocarbon group, q has a value of 2 to 10, r has a value of
1 to 5000, s has a value of 2 to 10, R
9 denotes a group having its formula selected from the group consisting of:

and

wherein R
11 is selected from a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an aryl group, or an acyl group,
t has a value of 0 to 6, u has a value of from greater than zero to 150, v has a value
of from greater than zero to 150, and w has a value of from greater than zero to 150,
e has a value of 1 to 1000, f has a value of from greater than zero to 30, g has a
value of 1 to 1000, h has a value of 1 to 1000, i has a value of from greater than
zero to 30, p has a value of 1 to 1000. In the formula hereinabove EO, PO, and BO
denote ethylene oxide, propylene oxide, and butylene oxide groups, respectively. The
groups R
8 and R
10 can be the same or different as desired and are preferably alkyl groups or aryl groups
and it is highly preferred that they are both methyl.
[0017] In the formulae hereinabove, e has a value of 1 to 500 or alternatively a value of
1 to 250, f has a value of from greater than zero to 20, or alternatively from 1 to
15, g has a value of 1 to 100 or alternatively 1 to 50, h has a value of 1 to 500
or alternatively 1 to 250, i has a value of from greater than zero to 20 or alternatively
1 to 15, p has a value of 1 to 100, or alternatively 1 to 50, q has a value of 2 to
6, r has a value of 1 to 2500, or alternatively 20 to 1000, s has a value of 2 to
6, t has a value of 0 to 3, u has a value of from 1 to 100 or alternatively 5 to 50,
v has a value of from 1 to 100 or alternatively 5 to 50, w has a value of from 1 to
100 or alternatively 1 to 50.
[0018] Typically the cross-linked organopolysiloxane polymer of component B) is triorganosiloxy
endblocked at each terminal of the polymer, and it is highly preferred that the polymer
is trimethylsiloxy endblocked at each terminal of the cross-linked polymer.
[0019] A specific example of the method for producing the crosslinked organopolysiloxane
polymers will now be described. Preparation of a crosslinked organopolysiloxane polymer
can be done through the following steps: (I) a charging step in which a linear polysiloxane
having hydrogen atoms in its side chains, a polysiloxane having vinyl groups and a
catalyst for promoting the reaction, particularly platinum catalysts such as an isopropanol
solution of H
2PtCl
66H
2O with a 2% methanol solution of sodium acetate are put in a reactor, (II) an agitation/heating
step in which agitation is conducted, for example, at 40°C for 30 minutes, (III) an
input step in which a polyoxyalkylene and a solvent (isopropanol) are put in the reactor,
(IV) a reflux step in which the isopropanol is refluxed, for example, at 80°C for
1.5 to 2 hours while monitoring the reaction rate of Si-H, (V) a stripping step in
which the isopropanol is stripped, for example, at 130°C under a reduced pressure
of 25 mmHg, and (VI) a final step in which the reduced pressure condition of step
(V) is released and the reaction mixture is cooled to 60°C to obtain a final product.
[0020] An example of a linear polysiloxane having hydrogen atoms in its side chains suitable
for step (I) is a polysiloxane having its formula selected from:

or

wherein Me hereinafter denotes methyl and e, f, g, h, i, and p are as defined above.
An example of a polysiloxane having vinyl groups suitable for step (I) is a polysiloxane
having the formula:

wherein Me denotes methyl, Vi hereinafter denotes vinyl, and r is as defined above.
The , reaction of these two compounds in step (II) results in a cross-linked siloxane
polymer having the formula

[0021] Introduction of a polyoxyalkylene group into the obtained crosslinked organopolysiloxane
polymer (steps III-VI) can be accomplished by reacting the crosslinked polymer with
a polyoxyalkylene compound having its formula selected from the group consisting of
Vi - CH
2 - O (EO)
u - (PO)
v - (BO)
w - H
Vi - CH
2 - O (EO)
u - (PO)
v - H,
Vi - CH
2 - O (EO)
u - (BO)
w - H,
Vi - CH
2 - O (PO)
v - (BO)
w - H,
Vi-CH
2-O-(EO)
u-H,
Vi-CH
2-O-(BO)
w-H,and
Vi - CH
2 - O (PO)
v - H,
wherein Vi, EO, PO, and BO are as denoted hereinabove, and u, v, and w are as defined
above.
The resulting compounds are cross-linked organopolysiloxane polymers having the formula

wherein Me, EO, PO, BO, e, f, g, h, i, p, and r are as defined hereinabove, u has
a value of 0 to 150, v has a value of 0 to 150, and w has a value of 0 to 150, with
the proviso that the value of u+v+w is at least one.
[0022] The compositions of the present invention are prepared by combining components A)
and B), either before adding them to the finishing bath, by adding them separately
into the finishing bath using any conventional mixing techniques, or by adding them
in separate sequential steps onto the fibrous substrate. Typically, components A)
and B) are combined such that the weight ratio of component A)/component B) is from
1/99 to 99/1.
[0023] The invention further provides a method of treating fibers or textiles comprising;
- I) combining,
- A) a fluoropolymer,
- B) a branched silicone polyether, and
- II) applying the product of step I on fibers or textiles.
[0024] The first step of the method is mixing a fluoropolymer and a branched silicone polyether
either before adding them to the finishing bath or by adding them separately into
the finishing bath or by adding them through separate sequential steps onto the fibrous
substrate. The fluoropolymer A) and the branched silicone polyether B) are the same
as described supra. Finishing bath may also include additional components such as,
but not limited to, durable press reactants, such as dimethyloldihydroxyethylene urea
(DMDHEU), reactant catalysts such as Magnesium Chloride/Citric Acid, softeners such
as polyethylene emulsions, process aids such as wetting agents and other. Mixing can
be performed by any conventional known techniques such as milling, blending, homogenizing,
sonolating or stirring. These mixing procedures can be conducted either in a batch
or continuous process.
[0025] The second step of the method comprises applying to fibers or textiles the product
resulting from combining components A) and B), also referred herein as the treatment
composition or the separate components A) and B) in sequential steps. The amount applied
is a "hand improving" effective amount of the treatment composition and is applied
to the fiber and/or textile by any convenient method. For example, the treatment composition
can be applied by padding, dipping, spraying or exhausting. When the treatment composition
comprises more than one solution, dispersion, or emulsion; the solutions, dispersions,
and emulsions can be applied simultaneously or sequentially to the textiles. After
the treatment composition is applied to the fiber and/or fabric, it can be dried by
heat
[0026] The fiber/textile treatment composition can be applied to the fiber and/or textile
during making the fibers or textiles, or later such as during laundering textiles.
After application, carriers (if any) can be removed from the treatment composition
for example by drying the composition at ambient or elevated temperature. The amount
of treatment composition applied to the fibers and textiles is typically sufficient
to provide 0.1 to 15 weight percent of the composition on the fibers and textiles,
based on their dry weight, preferably in an amount of 0.2 to 5 weight percent based
on the dry weight of the fiber or textile.
[0027] Fibers and textiles that can be treated with the treatment composition include natural
fibers such as cotton, silk, linen, and wool; regenerated fibers such as rayon and
acetate; synthetic fibers such as polyesters, polyamides, polyacrylonitriles, polyethylenes,
and polypropylenes; combinations, and blends thereof. The form of the fibers can include
threads, filaments, tows, yarns, woven fabrics, knitted materials, non-woven materials,
paper, carpet, and leather.
[0028] The treatment composition of this invention has advantages such that it can impart
combined benefits of attributes associated with silicones and fluorocarbons. Silicones
generally provide superior hand to fabrics, whereas fluorocarbons contribute water
repellency, oil repellency, and stain release to textiles.
Hand for purposes of the invention means the softness and smoothness of the fabric. The
present compositions and methods provide oil repellency properties to fibers or textiles,
but without a significant detriment to the hand of treated fibers.
EXAMPLES
[0029] The following examples are presented to further illustrate the compositions and methods
of this invention, but are not to be construed as limiting the invention, which is
delineated in the appended claims. All parts and percentages in the examples are on
a weight basis and all measurements were obtained at about 23°C, unless indicated
to the contrary.
Treatment of Textiles and Test Methods
[0030] Fabrics were obtained from Testfabrics Incorporated, Pittston, Pennsylvania, and
included a 100 percent cotton twill Tribecka series khaki, and a No. 7409 Dacron 54
/Cotton (65/35) Bleached Broadcloth and Interlock cotton knit style 460, as the standardized
fabrics for use. Neither fabric had any prefinished treatment.
Oil Repellency: Hydrocarbon Resistance Test Protocol- American Association of Textile
Chemists & Colorists (AATCC) Test Method 118-1997
[0031] In this test method, a series of oils are designated with numbers 1 thru 8. The surface
tension of the oil decreases as the number of the oil increases, i.e., the number
1 oil has the highest surface tension whereas the number 8 oil has a lowest surface
tension. Each fabric is tested with the number oil (Kaydol) up to the number 8 oil
(n-heptane), and the wetting or wicking into the fabric is noted. Values based on
a rating scale of A, B, C, and D, are assigned to each oil as an indication of the
contact angle of the oil applied to the surface, and at a C value, wicking and wetting
of the fabric is noted, with full wicking being a rating of D. Value A is the best,
value B is passing, value C indicates failure, and value D is the worst. The test
protocol consists of placing 5 drops of each oil on the test fabric, waiting 30 +/-2
seconds, and then assigning a score for the oil. If the score is B or better, the
next higher numbered oil is tested. A score of 8A is considered the best score since
it would indicate that there was no or little if any wicking and/or wetting of the
fabric even with the oil having the lowest surface tension.
Water Repellency: Spray Test - AATCC Test Method 22-1996
[0032] An AATCC spray tester was used for this test. The tester included a stand with a
45 °incline, above which a separatory funnel was mounted having an attached spray
nozzle hanging above it. Fabric samples are fastened into a metal hoop, and placed
on the incline, and the nozzle head is positioned 6 inches above it. Then, 250 milliliter
of distilled water is allowed to play down onto the fabric. The wetting pattern is
compared to a standard rating scale. A rating of 100 indicates no sticking or wetting
of the upper surface; a rating of 90 indicates a slight random sticking or wetting
of the upper surface; a rating of 80 indicates a wetting of the upper surface at the
spray points; a rating of 70 indicates a partial wetting of the whole of upper surface;
a rating of 50 indicates a complete wetting of the whole of the upper surface; a rating
of 0 indicates a complete wetting of the whole of the upper and lower surfaces.
Water/IPA Drop Test
[0033] This method was used to evaluate the water repellency of the interlock cotton knit.
In this method, solutions with ratios of water and isopropyl alcohol (IPA) from 100:0
to 0:100 are prepared, and 5 drops of each solution are placed on the surface to observe
whether penetration occurs within 10 seconds. The higher the ratio of IPA in the solution,
the lower the surface tension, the more difficult to repel and therefore the higher
rating given, e.g. a fabric repelling 100% IPA was given a rating of 100.
Hand Testing
[0034] A panel of expert evaluators rated the fabric softness using a scale of 1 to 5. A
value of 5 was used for the softest fabric and a value of 1 was given to the least
soft fabric.
Finishing Procedure
[0035] Four different fluoropolymer emulsions were used in the design of the finishing formulations.
Three emulsions were compositions containing a fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymers, and
the other emulsion was a composition containing a fluorinated polyurethane. The emulsions
containing the fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymers were obtained from Noveon Corporation,
sold as Unydine® TG-532 and Unidyne® TG-992, Daikin Industries, sold as Unydine® 571
and Ciba Specialty Chemicals, sold as Zonal® CO. The emulsion containing the fluorinated
polyurethane was obtained from E.I. Dupont de Nemours, Wilmington, Delaware, sold
as ZONYL® 7910. All these compositions are known to provide good stain repellency
and/or stain release to textile substrates made of all types of fibers and fiber blends.
The required amount of the emulsion components was added to the water finishing bath
in order to deposit the specified amount of solids on fabric. Swatches of test fabric
were cut from single bolts of fabric into square measuring 15" X 15".
[0036] Finishing bath was applied to the fabric by padding where it is impregnated with
the bath liquor followed by squeezing through a nip to leave a specific quantity of
liquor on the substrate. After padded, the fabric was dried and cured in a laboratory
stenter at 170°C, for 90 sec.
Materials
[0037] The following materials were used in the examples, as detailed below.
BSPE 1 = Dow Corning® 2-5563 a branched silicone polyether (Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, MI)
BSPE 2 = Dow Corning® 2-5785 a branched silicone polyether (Dow Corning Corporation, Midland, MI)
[0038] Solutions of each were prepared and applied in a stain repellent and release fabric
finish formulations to different fabric substrates. The representative finishing systems
were based on either fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymers or a fluorinated urethanes.
Typical Stain Repellent Finish Formulation
| Product |
wt % |
| Branched Silicone Polyether Solution (20% Actives) |
2-8 |
| Fluoropolymer Emulsion (20-30% Solids) |
4-8 |
| Durable Press Reactant |
12.0 |
| Durable Press Resin Catalyst |
3.0 |
| Non Re-wettable Surfactant |
0.1 |
| Water |
Balance |
Example 1
[0039] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Unidyne® TG-532 System (Noveon Inc.)on 100%
Khaki Cotton Twill, 1% Silicone, 1% Fluoropolymer
[0040] Unidyne®-532 is a fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer emulsion (aprox 19% actives, 25%
solids) from Noveon Inc. Table 1 below shows that both BSPE 1 and BSPE 2 had and minimum
impact or even improved the oil repellency in the Unidyne TG-532 system. In this fabric,
which was treated with 1% Si, hand for BSPE 1 was perceived better than BSPE 2. As
shown, branched spe's were compared with a commercially available amino-functional
silicone, commonly used for fiber treatment.
Table 1
| Oil Repellency(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
B |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
A |
Unidyne® TG-532 &
BSPE I |
C |
B |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
A |
Unidyne® TG-532 &
BSPE II |
B |
A- |
A |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
| Unidyne® TG-532 & Aminofunctional Silicone |
C |
C |
C+ |
B- |
B+ |
A- |
A |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B -Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG I |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG II |
Unidyne® TG-532 & Aminofunctional Silicone |
| Rating |
1 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
4.25 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest. |
Example 2
[0041] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Unidyne® TG-532 System (Noveon Inc.) on 65/
35 polycotton woven, 1% Silicone, 1 % Fluoropolymer Solids
[0042] On polycotton both Branched spe's had a minimum impact on the oil repellency provided
by the fluoropolymer while providing very good softness to the treated fabric. Softness
for branched spe's was similar and perceived as mid-range among all the silicones
evaluated (evaluation included conventional amino-functional silicones as well). Both
branched spe's showed no impact on water repellency for polycotton. Results are shown
in the tables below:
| Oil Repellency(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
B- |
B- |
A |
A |
A |
A |
A |
| Unidyne® TG-532 & BSPE I |
B- |
B- |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
| Unidyne® TG-532 & BSPE II |
B- |
B |
B |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
| Unidyne® TG-532 & Aminofunctional Silicone |
C |
C+ |
C+ |
B- |
B- |
A- |
A |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Water Repellency, Spray Rating (AATCC-22) |
| Treatment |
Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG I |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG II |
Unidyne® TG-532 & Aminofunctional Silicone |
| Rating |
100 |
100 |
100 |
80 |
| Hand Rafing(1) |
| Treatment |
Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG I |
Unidyne® TG-532 & SBG II |
Unidyne® TG-532 & Aminofunctional Silicone |
| Rating |
1 |
3 |
3 |
5 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest. |
Example 3
[0043] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Unidyne® TG-532 System (Noveon Inc.) on 100%
Cotton knit, 0. 7% Silicone , 1.4% FC
[0044] The branched silicone polyethers were evaluated on a 100% cotton knit, using 0.7%
silicone and 1.4% fluorocarbon, following the procedures of example 1. The results
are summarized in Table 3 below.
Table 3
| Oil Repellency(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
B+ |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
A |
| Unidyne® TG-532 & BSPE I |
B+ |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
A |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Unidyne® TG-532 Only |
Unidyne® TG-532 & BSPE |
|
| Rating |
1 |
4 |
|
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest |
Example 4
[0045] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Zonyl® CO System (Ciba Specialty Chemicals
Corp.) on Polycotton fabric, at 0.5% Silicone, 1% Fluoropolymer Zonyl® CO is described as a perfluoroalkyl acrylic copolymer with average of 16%
actives (13-19% actives according to MSDS).
[0046] In polycotton, all the materials tested, except the competitive, performed well showing
no impact on oil repellency. As far as water repellency BSPE 1 does not show any impact.
Regarding softness, the BSPE provided good to this type of fabric when compared to
the aminofunctional silicone included in the testing.
Table 4
| Oil Repelleney(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Zonyl® CO Only |
B- |
B- |
B |
A |
A |
A |
A |
| Zonyl®CO & BSPE I |
B- |
B- |
B |
A- |
A- |
A |
A |
| Zonyl® CO & Aminofunctional |
B- |
B- |
B |
B |
A- |
A |
A |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Water Repellency, Spray Rating (AATCC-22) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® CO Only |
Zonyl® CO & BSPE I |
Zonyl® CO & Aminofunctional |
| Rating |
100 |
100 |
100 |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® CO Only |
Zonyl® CO & BSPE I |
Zonyl® CO & Aminofunctional |
| Rating |
1 |
3.75 |
4.5 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest, |
Example 5
[0047] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Zonyl® CO System (Ciba Specilaty Chemicals
Corp.) on Cotton Khaki, at 0.5% Silicone, 1% Fluropolymer
| Oil Repellency (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Zonyl® CO Only BSPE II |
B- |
B |
A- |
A- |
A |
A |
A |
| Zonyl® CO & Aminofunctional |
D |
C |
C |
B- |
A- |
A |
A |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® CO Only |
Zonyl® CO & BSPE II |
Zonyl® CO & Aminofunctional |
| Rating |
1 |
4 |
4.3 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest |
Example 6
[0048] Evaluation of BSPE's/
fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Zonyl® CO System (Ciba Specilaty Chemicals
Corp.) on Cotton Khaki, 1% Silicone, 1% FC
| Oil Repellency(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Zonyl® CO Only |
B- |
B- |
B |
B+ |
A- |
A |
A |
| Zonyl® CO & BSPE I |
B- |
B- |
B- |
B |
A- |
A |
A |
| Zonyl® CO & Other Silicone |
- |
- |
- |
C |
B- |
B |
A- |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Water Repellency, Spray Rating (AATCC-22) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® CO Only |
Zonyl® CO & BSPE |
Zonyl® CO & Other Silicone |
| Rating |
100 |
85 |
75 |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® CO Only |
Zonyl® CO & BSPE I |
Zonyl® CO & Other Silicone |
| Rating |
1 |
4 |
5 |
| Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least soft,
5 is the softest. |
Example 7
Evaluation of BSPE's/fluoropolymer fabric treatment based on Zonyl® 7910 Stain Release fabric treatment
on Khaki Cotton Twill, 1% Silicone 1.0 % FC
[0049] Zonyl® 7910 is described as a fluorinated urethane with 30-35% solids content. Performance
of BSG I was compared with an epoxy/polyether functional silicone which is a material
normally recommended in this application
| Oil Repellency(1) (Hydrocarbon Resistance Test-AATCC 118-1992) |
| Treatment /Oil |
7 |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
| Zonyl® 7910 Only |
- |
|
|
|
C |
B+ |
B+ |
| Zonyl® 7910 & BSPE I |
- |
- |
B- |
B |
B |
B+ |
B+ |
| Zonyl® 7910 & BSPE II |
- |
- |
B- |
B |
B |
B+ |
B+ |
| Zonal® 7910 and Epoxy/polyether functional silicone |
|
|
C |
B- |
B- |
B |
B+ |
| (1) Ratings: A - Pass, B - Borderline pass, C & D fail |
| Stain Release Rating(1) (AATCC 130-2000) |
| Treatment /Oil |
Vegetable Oil |
Mineral Oil |
Dirty Motor Oil |
| Zonyl® 7910 Only |
4.2 |
3.5 |
1 |
| Zonyl® 7910 & BSPE I |
4.4 |
3.9 |
2.3 |
| Zonyl® 7910 & BSPE II |
4.5 |
3.8 |
2.5 |
| Zonyl® 7910 & Epoxy/polyether functional silicone |
4.3 |
4.0 |
2.1 |
| (1) Rating: Best - 5, Worst -1 |
| Hand Rating (1) |
| Treatment |
Zonyl® 7910 Only |
Zonyl® 7910& BSPE I |
Zonyl® 7910 & BSPE II |
Zonyl® 7910 & Epoxy/polyether Silicone |
| Rating |
1 |
4.5 |
5 |
4.0 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest |
Example 8
Evaluation of BSPE's/fluoropolymer fabric treatment in Stain Release Systems
[0050] UnidyneTM TG-992 is described as a fluoroacrylate copolymer emulsion with 20-25%
solids. Performance of BSG I was compared with an epoxy/polyether functional silicone
which is the standard material used in this application
| Stain Release Rating(1) (AATCC 130-2000) |
| Treatment /Oil |
Mineral Oil |
Dirty Motor Oil |
| Unidyne TG-992 Only |
4 |
1.2 |
| Unidyne TG-992 & BSPE I |
3.75 |
1.6 |
| Unidyne TG-992 & Epoxy/polyether functional Silicone |
3.5 |
1.7 |
| |
|
|
| (1) Rating: Best-5, Worst-1 |
| Hand Rating(1) |
| Treatment |
Unidyne Only |
Unidyne & Epoxy/polye ther silicone |
Unidyne & BSPE I |
|
| Rating |
1 |
2.5 |
3.6 |
|
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators:1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest |
Example 9
Branched spe's as Hydrophilic Textile Finishes
[0051] Branched spe's have shown that can provided very good softness to textile substrates
with minimum impact on their natural absorbency.
| Absorbency, sec(1) (AATCC) |
| Treatment /Oil |
Cotton Knit |
Cotton Terry |
| Untreated |
< 1 |
< 1 |
| BSPE I |
<1 |
<1 |
| BSPE II |
<1 |
<1 |
| Premium Silicone Hydrophilic Softener |
2.7 |
10 sec |
| Hand Ratings(1) |
| Treatment |
Untreated |
BSPE I |
BSPE II |
Premium Silicone Hydrophilic Softener |
| Cotton Knit |
1 |
3.5 |
4.5 |
5 |
| Cotton Towel |
1 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
| (1) Relative Hand Rating obtained from a panel of expert evaluators: 1 is the least
soft, 5 is the softest. |
| Whiteness Index(1) |
| Treatment |
Untreated |
BSPE I |
BSPE II |
Premium Silicone Hydrophilic Softener |
| Cotton Knit |
79.9 |
79.7 |
79.6 |
77.9 |
| Cotton Towel |
123.6 |
123.2 |
123.1 |
118.2 |
| (1) Hunter Lab Colorimeter. Fabric dried at 170C for 2 min. |
1. A fabric treatment composition comprising;
A) a fluoropolymer,
B) a branched silicone polyether.
2. The fabric treatment composition according to Claim 1, wherein the branched silicone
polyether is a organopolysiloxane comprising the unit formula:
wherein R8 is a monovalent hydrocarbon group,
A is a group having its formula selected from (CH2)q-(R102SiO)rSi(CH2)s or O(R102SiO)r-SiO wherein R10 denotes a monovalent hydrocarbon group,
q has a value of 2 to 10,
r has a value of 1 to 5000,
s has a value of 2 to 10,
R9 denotes a group having its formula selected from the group consisting of:




- (CH2)t-O-(CH2CH2O)u-R11,

and

wherein R11 is selected from a hydrogen atom, an alkyl group, an aryl group, or an acyl group,
t has a value of 0 to 6,
u has a value of from greater than zero to 150,
v has a value of from greater than zero to 150,
w has a value of from greater than zero to 150,
e has a value of 1 to 1000,
f has a value of from greater than zero to 30,
g has a value of 1 to 1000, h has a value of 1 to 1000,
i has a value of from greater than zero to 30, and p has a value of 1 to 1000.
3. The fabric treatment composition according to Claim 1, wherein the branched silicone
polyether is a organopolysiloxane having the formula:

wherein Me denotes methyl, EO denotes ethylene oxide, PO denotes propylene oxide,
BO denotes butylene oxide, e has a value of 1 to 1000, f has a value of from greater
than zero to 30, g has a value of 1 to 1000, h has a value of 1 to 1000, i has a value
of from greater than zero to 30, p has a value of 1 to 1000, r has a value of 1 to
5000, u has a value of 0 to 150, v has a value of 0 to 150, and w has a value of 0
to 150, with the proviso that the value of u+v+w is at least one.
4. The fabric treatment composition according to Claim 1, 2 or 3, wherein the fluoropolymer
is selected from a fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer, a fluorinated polyurethane, an
emulsion of a fluoroalkyl acrylate copolymer, or an emulsion of a fluorinated polyurethane.
5. A method of treating fibers or textiles comprising;
I) combining,
A) a fluoropolymer,
B) a branched silicone polyether, and
II) applying the product of step I on fibers or textiles.
1. Faserbehandlungszusammensetzung enthaltend:
A) ein Fluorpolymer,
B) einen verzweigten Siliconpolyether.
2. Faserbehandlungszusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei der verzweigte Siliconpolyether
ein Organopolysiloxan ist, das die Einheitenformel:
aufweist, worin R8 eine einbindige Kohlenwasserstoffgruppe ist,
A eine Gruppe ist, deren Formel ausgewählt ist aus (CH2)q-(R102SiO)rSi(CH2)s oder O(R102SiO)r-SiO, worin R10 für eine einbindige Kohlenwasserstoffgruppe steht,
q einen Wert von 2 bis 10 aufweist,
r einen Wert von 1 bis 5000 aufweist,
s einen Wert von 2 bis 10 aufweist,
R9 für eine Gruppe steht, deren Formel ausgewählt ist aus der Gruppe bestehend aus:




- (CH2)t-O-(CH2CH2O)u-R11,

und

worin R11 ausgewählt ist aus einem Wasserstoffatom, einer Alkylgruppe,
einer Arylgruppe oder einer Acylgruppe,
t einen Wert von 0 bis 6 aufweist,
u einen Wert von größer als null bis 150 aufweist,
v einen Wert von größer als null bis 150 aufweist,
w einen Wert von größer als null bis 150 aufweist,
e einen Wert von 1 bis 1000 aufweist,
f einen Wert von größer als null bis 30 aufweist,
g einen Wert von 1 bis 1000 aufweist,
h einen Wert von 1 bis 1000 aufweist,
i einen Wert von größer als null bis 30 aufweist und
p einen Wert von 1 bis 1000 aufweist.
3. Faserbehandlungszusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei der verzweigte Siliconpolyether
ein Organopolysiloxan mit der Formel:

ist, worin Me für Methyl steht, EO für Ethylenoxid steht, PO für Propylenoxid steht,
BO für Butylenoxid steht, e einen Wert von 1 bis 1040 aufweist, f einen Wert von größer
als null bis 30 aufweist, g einen Wert von 1 bis 1000 aufweist, h einen Wert von 1
bis 1000 aufweist, i einen Wert von größer als null bis 30 aufweist, p einen Wert
von 1 bis 1000 aufweist,
r einen Wert von 1 bis 5000 aufweist, u einen Wert von 0 bis 150 aufweist, v einen
Wert von 0 bis 150 aufweist und w einen Wert von 0 bis 150 aufweist, unter der Voraussetzung,
dass der Wert von u+v+w wenigstens eins ist.
4. Faserbehandlungszusammensetzung nach Ansprüchen 1, 2 oder 3, wobei das Fluorpolymer
ausgewählt ist aus Fluoralkyl-Acrylat-Copolymer, einem fluorierten Polyurethan, einer
Emulsion eines Fluoralkyl-Acrylat-Copolymers oder einer Emulsion eines fluorierten
Polyurethans.
5. Verfahren zur Behandlung von Fasern oder Textilien umfassend:
I) Vereinigen von
A) einem Fluorpolymer,
B) einem verzweigten Siliconpolyether und
II) Aufbringen des Produkts aus Schritt I auf Fasern oder Textilien.
1. Composition pour le traitement de textiles comprenant :
A) un fluoropolymère,
B) un silicone polyéther ramifié.
2. Composition pour le traitement de textiles selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle
le silicone polyéther ramifié est un organopolysiloxane comprenant la formule d'unité
:
dans laquelle R8 est un groupe hydrocarboné monovalent,
A est un groupe présentant sa formule choisie parmi (CH2)q-(R102SiO)rSi(CH2)s ou O(R102SiO)r-SiO où R10 indique un groupe hydrocarboné monovalent,
q présente une valeur de 2 à 10,
r présente une valeur de 1 à 5 000,
s présente une valeur de 2 à 10,
R9 indique un groupe présentant sa formule choisie dans le groupe constitué de :




-(CH2)t-O-(CH2CH2O)uR11.

et

où R11 est choisi parmi un atome d'hydrogène, un groupe alkyle, un groupe aryle ou un groupe
acyle,
t présente une valeur de 0 à 6,
u présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 150,
v présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 150,
w présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 150,
e présente une valeur de 1 à 1 000,
f présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 30,
g présente une valeur de 1 à 1 000, h présente une valeur de 1 à 1 000,
i présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 30, et p présente une valeur de 1
à 1 000.
3. Composition pour le traitement de textiles selon la revendication 1, dans laquelle
le silicone polyéther ramifié est un organopolysiloxane présentant la formule :

dans laquelle Me indique le groupe méthyle, EO indique l'oxyde d'éthylène, PO indique
l'oxyde de propylène, BO indique l'oxyde de butylène, e présente une valeur de 1 à
1 000, f présente une valeur supérieure à zéro jusqu'à 30, g présente une valeur de
1 à 1 000, h présente une valeur de 1 à 1 000, i présente une valeur supérieure à
zéro jusqu'à 30, p présente une valeur de 1 à 1 000, r présente une valeur de 1 à
5 000, u présente une valeur de 0 à 150, v présente une valeur de 0 à 150 et w présente
une valeur de 0 à 150, à condition que la valeur de u+v+w est au moins égale à 1.
4. Composition pour le traitement de textiles selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, dans
laquelle le fluoropolymère est choisi parmi un copolymère d'acrylate de fluoroalkyle,
un polyuréthane fluoré, une émulsion d'un copolymère d'acrylate de fluoroalkyle ou
une émulsion d'un polyuréthane fluoré.
5. Procédé pour le traitement de fibres ou de textiles comprenant les étapes consistant:
1) à combiner,
A) un fluoropolymère,
B) un silicone polyéther ramifié, et
II) à appliquer le produit de l'étape I sur des fibres ou des textiles.