[0001] This invention relates to a method for treating sheeted base materials containing
organic natural fibres or regenerated fibres, and to a sheeted base material meant
for use as a facing for wallboard, particularly gypsum board.
[0002] By "sheeted base materials", this application refers to materials which have a flat
form, i.e. ones whose thickness is very small in relation to their width and length.
Cardboard is one example of a sheeted base material. Sheeted base materials may be
provided in sheet or web form for production purposes.
[0003] Many structural boards use facings with several separate or simultaneous functions.
By "structural boards", this application refers to boards made of gypsum, wood fibre,
concrete, cement or other materials, for which the use of facings is recommended due
to their characteristics or production methods. Generally, these facings are based
on paper or other fibres. The facing described in this invention is intended for indoor
and outdoor use.
[0004] US patent 6,638,356 describes a gypsum board protected against the generation of hydrogen sulphide in
the presence of sulphate-reducing bacteria. The solution uses anthraquinone or its
compounds, accounting for approximately 100 ppm of the gypsum's weight.
US patent 6,680,127 (Temple-Inland Forest Products) proposes antifungal protection for gypsum boards
in the form of cetylpyridinium chloride. The fungicide agents can either be freely
present or be encapsulated in order to release their chemical properties over time.
Anthraquinone is a typical, known oxidation and reduction catalyst.
US patent 6,773,822 (Temple-Inland Forest Products) further describes how a fungicide can release the
active agent in a controlled fashion while being mainly encapsulated into the gypsum
itself. Some 200 compounds are listed as fungicides, including ones which are toxic
to living organisms.
US patent 6,770,354 by G-P Gypsum Corporation describes the production of moisture-tolerant gypsum panels
or boards. Here, the panel is faced with a mat consisting of glass fibres, pigments,
mineral binder and a polymer latex adhesive binder. Further, the publication defines
that the mat must allow water to evaporate from the gypsum during drying. This is
achieved by binding the facing and its fibres with a binder which apparently contains
sufficient inorganic adhesive, such as cement, and only a limited amount of polymer
adhesive, and by ensuring that this binder binds the mat fibres so that essentially
all fibres are covered.
[0005] US patent 6,833,137 describes a treatment of the cardboard facing for gypsum board against termites and
other insects, with CIF amino-sulphinylpyrazole. These agents are toxic to humans.
[0006] US patent 6,800,361 describes a gypsum board faced with nonwoven fabric with a certain resistance level.
The idea is that the nonwoven fabric is polymer-based, so that it cannot act as a
nutrient medium to fungi, as paper can.
US patent 6,893,752 describes a fungicide solution where the treatment agent is pyrithione, which is
mixed into the gypsum, forming calcium salts at a concentration of at least 100 ppm.
[0007] Publication
6,767,647 addresses the same issue - mould prevention - with a gypsum board faced with nonwoven
fabric and containing at least two different agents in the gypsum. These agents include
for instance propiconazole and sodium pyrithione. They are used at concentrations
of 50-1,200 ppm in the facing or 80-1,200 ppm in the gypsum core.
[0008] The above description shows that mould prevention and other protective measures are
considered very important in relation to gypsum board products.
[0009] Previously, gypsum boards and other boards have routinely been faced with cardboard
with a weight of 180-210 g/m
2. The cardboard used in this cardboard-only solution is so porous that the water vapour
formed during drying is easily released from the gypsum.
US patent 6,770,354, referred to above, says that "said coated mat has a porosity which allows water
to evaporate from the gypsum core during preparation of the panel", but does not explain
this. As we can see from the patents listed above, these products have problems in
relation to mould prevention and the sufficient porosity of the facing.
[0010] Methods of mould prevention which do not involve agents that are toxic to humans
do exist, and they are described in this invention. The water-repelling properties
of the board facing are an important factor. At the same time, the board should be
porous, not only during production but optimally also at other times. The board and/or
its facing must have fungicidal properties without being toxic to humans.
[0011] Our understanding is that buildings should not contain any structures which release
toxic substances, because these might come into contact with humans.
[0012] The solution described in this invention is such that no changes are required to
normal gypsum board production lines in order to achieve a water-repellent, breathable
facing with long-term antifungal protection.
The facing protects the boards, increases their bending resistance, prevents dust
formation, can be painted or printed on, and protects the boards from denting. This
kind of facing is particularly important for gypsum board. Suitable surface friction
properties are required for the facing process at the production plant, for transport
and when the boards are moved at the installation site. Further, the boards must have
antifungal protection on their surface and, optimally, the facing must in many cases
be porous to water vapour so that excess water can be evaporated out of the core material
behind the facing, for instance in the case of gypsum and cement boards. In the case
of gypsum board, the hydration process increases the board's temperature to at least
+66 °C, while drying increases it further to over 100 °C, so mould contaminations
always come from the outside.
[0013] Also, the friction coefficient between the boards' surfaces should be optimal. In
board-to-board contact, air should be allowed to escape from between the boards to
prevent sliding. The friction coefficient must be high enough to hold a pile of boards
steady during transport, but low enough that it is easy to remove boards from the
pile at the installation site. The prevention of water absorption reduces damage caused
by mould and keeps fungicides that have not been encapsulated into the product from
being washed out of the board.
[0014] Our invention, which applies mainly to gypsum and cement boards but can apply to
any boards that are manufactured by casting the core on top of a facing and from which
excess moisture must be removed, solves the abovementioned problems, among others,
affordably and without being toxic to humans. Further, the facing described in this
invention can be used as a coating for various fibreboards. The board facing described
in this invention also allows various moisture barriers, particularly ones consisting
of water-emulsion polymer binders, to be spread on top of the facing. Such boards
are used underneath tiles in wet rooms.
[0015] According to the invention, a base material produced of wood or chemical pulp fibre,
or a combination of the two, typically 250-350 µm and optimally approximately 300
µm in thickness, is treated with an antimicrobial agent such as sodium benzoate, which
is a sodium salt of benzoic acid. In addition to the aforementioned wood or chemical
pulp fibres, the base material may include regenerated fibres such as viscose.
[0016] As is widely known, benzoic acid is a natural preservative that prevents fungal growth,
present for instance in lingonberries and cranberries. Benzoic acid (E210) and its
salts (E211, E213) are widely used as preservatives in foods. In wood and pulp fibre
structures, sodium benzoate causes swift absorption of water and more expansion of
the fibres than the use of pure water does. In the invention, the antimicrobial agent,
e.g. benzoate, is added at the same time as the binding agent (which can be e.g. an
acrylic polymer emulsion adhesive), typically at a rate of 2-4 g/m
2. Mould prevention tests have indicated that the fungicidal properties of benzoic
acid salts work best when the pH of the surface of the paper facing has first been
reduced to 3-6.5 using e.g. sulphuric acid, boric acid, alum, phosphoric acid, adipic
acid, tartaric acid, citric acid or another similar acid, optimally with mild sulphuric
acid at a concentration of <1 % by weight or with alum or boric acid at a concentration
of 1-3 % by weight. Optimally, the acidulation treatment should be completed before
the treatment with the antimicrobial agent and binder. The acidulation treatment can
also be left out of the process, because the product will be functional without it.
[0017] It is evident that the polymer binder can be any other kind of binder that emulsifies
in water, such as polyvinyl acetate. Pigments and one or more fungicides can be mixed
in with the polymer binder. In order to work properly, their HLB (hydrophile-lypophile
balance) value must be within a certain range. On a scale of 1-20 (related to how
many per cent of polyethylene oxide are needed for emulsification or dissolution),
polymer binders may, depending on the manufacturer, have HLB values ranging between
8 and 12. According to the invention, the optimal joint HLB value for the polymer
binder and pigment compound should be between 8 and 11 (equivalent to values of 28-32
g/m
2, optimally approx. 30 g/m
2, obtained using the Cobb
60 method) . Then, the pigment will not dissolve from the polymer into the water, and
a second water-repellent layer may be applied on top of this layer.
[0018] After the process described above is complete, a new layer, typically containing
1/3-1/5 parts microcrystalline wax, is spread on the surface. The molecular structure
of microcrystalline was is mainly that of a branched hydrocarbon wax. Typically, the
melting point of microcrystalline wax is 60-100 °C. In addition to microcrystalline
wax, the layer may include linear wax and/or compounds formed between these and typical
polymer binders. Hereafter, this layer will be referred to as the "wax layer". Suitable
linear waxes include paraffin wax.
[0019] The purpose of the wax layer is to make the surface UV- and ozone-resistant and suitably
water-repellent. After spreading on the wax layer, any excess wax is scraped off with
a sharp doctor blade and the wax layer is absorbed using the same method as that used
for the previous acrylate+benzoate+pigment layer, such that the surface temperature
of the drying cylinder is optimally 125-130 °C. By "suitably water-repellent" we mean
that the surface should not be so water-repellent that a moisture-proofing layer consisting
of a water emulsion, required for use under tiles in wet rooms, cannot be spread or
applied onto it.
[0020] The wax layer penetrates the board to a depth of 90-150 µm. Approximately 12 g/m
2 of wax is applied or allowed to penetrate. Typically, the wax layer is scraped at
a temperature of 125-130 °C. A new layer which is properly porous to air and water
vapour is formed. After scraping, there is no "free" wax on the surface as a continuous
layer. According to the invention, the correct HLB value for the wax layer is between
10 and 12 (cf. Figure 1, which shows loose fibres). The penetration of the wax layer
to the other side can be stopped by cooling the web so that its temperature optimally
falls to below 30 °C. Cooling can be achieved using one or more cooling cylinders.
[0021] The permeability of water vapour is nearly the same in the finished product as in
the original cardboard, i.e. ∼300 g/m
2, 23 C, RH 50 % = sd <0.1 m (ISO 2428:1995). The durability of the surface (Dennison/KCL
129:65) improves by about 15%.
[0022] If a typical paper product, used to manufacture the product in accordance with the
invention, has water absorption levels of 20-25 g/m
2 (measured with the Cobb
60 method, ISO 535:1991), this level increases typically to 50-60 g/m
2 during the acrylate+benzoate treatment, and decreases to approx. 12-14 g/m
2 in the final product, after the "waxing" treatment.
[0023] The air permeance of paper or cardboard, measured with a Guerley device (ISO 5636-5:1986),
is approximately 60-70 µ/Pa·s for base papers, and approx. 200 µ/Pa·s after the benzoate+acrylate
treatment. The benzoate attaches to the acrylic polymer in the treatment described
above. In typical conditions, the sodium benzoate penetrates a fibrous product to
a depth of 50-60 µm. These typical conditions are created when the fibrous product
is dried immediately after the acrylic+benzoate is spread on, by putting it into direct
contact with the surface of a drying cylinder so that the treated surface is against
the hot surface of the cylinder. The swift release of steam (30% acrylate and benzoate
+ ∼70% water) makes the surface porous.
[0024] In optimal conditions e.g. sodium benzoate is present at a concentration of 2-4 g/m
2, optimally 3 g/m
2, and present in the surface layer at a level of 7-9% of the weight of the surface
layer. A surprising observation has been that an identical board, manufactured and
faced in the same way but without sodium benzoate, produces a significantly lower
friction coefficient, meaning that the products do not stay piled up very well and
are therefore difficult to transport. With the addition of sodium benzoate, the friction
increases to the desired value.
[0025] This is explained by the fact that the sodium benzoate improves the penetration of
water into the fibres, which causes the fibres to swell and the surface to roughen.
Naturally, this can be achieved with other known chemicals that cause fibres to swell.
Optimally it should be one which also has fungicidal properties.
[0026] Although the cardboard used in experiments was calendered, the benzoate treatment
caused the surface to roughen more than a simple water treatment did. Clearly, a similar
roughening might be achieved with other substances which simply reduce the surface
tension. The static friction coefficient for base cardboard was 0.36; for "waxed"
cardboard without a sodium benzoate treatment it was 0.28; for "waxed" cardboard treated
with sodium benzoate (3 g/m
2) it was 0.36 (friction values measured using an Instron 4665 device in accordance
with the applicant's quality manual).
[0027] The above descriptions make good figures in practice, but those skilled in the art
will see that they are not necessarily optimal, and that many variations may be made.
Such variations include replacing the sodium benzoate with its derivative parabens
and their sodium, potassium and calcium salts, or with known paraben esters. These
parabens are para-hydroxybenzoic acids (numbers E214-E219 in the list of food-grade
additives). Examples of suitable substances are: ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate; the sodium,
potassium or calcium salts of ethyl-p-hydroxybenzoate; propyl-p-hydroxybenzoate; the
sodium, potassium or calcium salts of propyl-p-hydroxybenzoate; methyl-p-hydroxybenzoate;
and the sodium, potassium or calcium salts of methyl-p-hydroxybenzoate. Further suitable
substances for use as antimicrobial agents are hexamethylenetetramine; ortho-phenylphenol;
the salts, e.g. sodium, potassium or calcium salts, of ortho-phenylphenol; and thiabendazole.
Compounds of the substances listed above may also be used as antimicrobial agents.
[0028] The invention consists of many separate factors, which are described in the text
above. However, there are certain major factors which are essential to the invention,
such as the use of benzoic acid salts or their derivatives, or other substances listed
in this application, as fungicides; and the treatment of a binder such as an acrylate
polymer, and a wax layer on a hot surface so that the surface onto which the substance
has been applied comes into direct contact with the hot cylinder surface.
This text refers to acrylic polymers, but any polymers which emulsify in water achieve
the same ends in principle. Such polymers include polyvinyl acetate and the ammoniacal
form of polyethylene terephthal sulphone (e.g. EvCote, Asia Pacific Specialty Chemicals,
USA). As there are many viable polymers, they must be used together with additives
which provide optimal HLB values. Hundreds of such additives are listed in bibliography.
[0029] The finished cardboard is attached to a gypsum board with gypsite, after which the
finished boards are dried. This process further improves the cardboard's steam permeability
and friction. Further, it has been observed that during drying, the wax penetrates
deeper into the gypsum board, which improves the water tolerance of the cardboard/gypsum
boundary layer. In practice this is a great advantage, as wax cannot be applied to
the cardboard on the side to be attached to the gypsum board prior to the attachment
to the gypsum board, because it would cause the adhesion of the gypsum board to the
cardboard to deteriorate.
[0030] Below are descriptions of figures, in which
- Figure 1
- illustrates the surface of a product manufactured in accordance with the invention,
and
- Figure 2
- illustrates the hydrophobic qualities of a product manufactured in accordance with
the invention.
[0031] Figure 1 shows the surface of the product. A notable factor is that there are many
free, vertical fibres. Figure 2 is a photograph of a gypsum board, onto which a drop
of water has been applied. Although there are free fibres on the surface, the water's
angle of contact is >90°. It is also notable, that these samples were approximately
one year old and had been stored in sunlight in the laboratory. Typically, waxes and
oils become oxidised, which causes the moistening angle to decrease. In the examples
produced for this invention, this problem has been addressed with branched microwaxes,
which are known radical inhibitors, protecting the surface against ozone and UV rays.
Those skilled in the art will see that other radical inhibitors, such as acrylated
bisphenols and lactones, can also be used.
[0032] The text mentions that sodium benzoate passes into the surface layer during drying.
Benzoic acid derivatives and other salts behave similarly. On the basis of experiments,
we have observed that water cannot flush benzoic acid or its derivatives out of the
surface if its temperature is less than ∼60°C and its HLB values are as described
above.
[0033] The acidulation of the paper product, mentioned above, means that its pH is reduced
to <7 but ≥3, because the fungicidal effects of sodium benzoate and its derivatives
appear in acidic conditions but are very limited in neutral conditions. The aqueous
solution of sodium benzoate is naturally slightly alkaline. At a pH of <3, the paper
begins to hydrolyze into sugars too quickly, also weakening in other ways. Any acids
can be used which do not evaporate or break down, but sulphuric acid is the cheapest,
while boric acid significantly improves fire-proofing and is a particularly good antimicrobial
agent. Non-toxic substances such as melamine sulphate or zinc borate can also be used
to improve fire-retardant qualities.
[0034] The waxing procedure used in the invention to waterproof the surface means that the
fungicide agents attached to the polymer binder cannot be washed away as easily. Further,
the lipophile balance of the surface and of the layer underneath the surface is improved
e.g. by an acrylic binder, which also prevents the fungicidal agents from being washed
away. The methods described in the technique, and the given basis weight and penetration
depths are important parameters, because they cause e.g. the gypsum board side of
the cardboard to stay in its original form, which binds the gypsum. At the initial
stage of manufacture of the product, where e.g. the cardboard is acidulated slightly,
suitable additives for use as fire retardants include zinc borate and melamine sulphate.
[0035] The calorimetric fuel value of a facing in accordance with the invention is <4 MJ/m
2, taking into account all additives, if the pulling resistance of the base cardboard
in the machine direction is at times at least 12-13 kN/m. In these conditions, the
cardboard will typically be 190 g/m
2 in weight, fulfilling the normal requirements regarding durability.
[0036] By "wax" we mean a combination of waxes and/or polymers, whose characteristics include
the HLB value mentioned above, and which contain radical inhibitors, i.e. agents which
improve resistance to UV rays and ozone. They can also be other agents than the branched
microwax mentioned above. Further, the joint HLB value of the polymer layer and the
pigment and fungicide contained in it must be suitable, as described above, in order
to allow the wax layer, which is applied later, to penetrate the surface as desired.
The polymer layer and its additives can favourably be applied using known methods
such as gravure coating, offset gravure coating, rod coating, airbrush coating, treating
with a surface-size press, curtain coating, or controlled lick coating, feeding polymer
emulsion onto the cardboard's surface from below.
[0037] The facing in accordance with the invention can be manufactured on the same production
line as the base material. In other words, the treatment of the base material can
be carried out using a paper or board machine. The liquid substance, containing an
antimicrobial agent and a binder, can be spread onto the base material for instance
using a surface-size press. The wax layer can be spread at an elevated temperature,
after which any excess is removed with a scraping method such as a trailing blade.
[0038] Finished surfaces can also be printed e.g. with logos using common printing techniques,
as long as the HLB value of the printing ink is approx. 10.
[0039] The finished facing is attached to the surface of the construction board. If the
board contains gypsum, this is done using gypsite. Usually, both sides of the construction
board are faced.
1. Method for treating sheeted base materials containing organic natural fibres or regenerated
fibres, in which method:
- a base material, consisting of a first side and a second side, is firstly treated
on its first side using a liquid treatment containing an antimicrobial agent and a
binder;
- the base material is dried;
- a layer containing wax is formed on the first side of the base material in a second
treatment; and
- the layer containing wax is absorbed into the base material at temperatures of 100-145
°C.
2. A method in accordance with patent claim 1, characterised in that the antimicrobial agent is a benzoic acid salt, benzoic acid, a paraben, a paraben
salt, a paraben ester, hexamethylenetetramine, ortho-phenylphenol, an ortho-phenylphenol
salt, thiabendazole, or a compound of these.
3. A method in accordance with patent claim 2, characterised in that the benzoic acid salt or ortho-phenylphenol salt is a sodium, potassium or calcium
salt.
4. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the binder contains an acrylic acid derivative such as acrylate, the ammoniacal form
of polyethylene terephthal sulphone or polyvinyl acetate.
5. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the base material is dried such that its first side comes into contact with the surface
of the drying cylinder.
6. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the layer containing wax contains linear wax and microcrystalline wax.
7. A method in accordance with patent claim 6, characterised in that the linear wax is a paraffin wax.
8. A method in accordance with patent claim 6, characterised in that the layer containing wax contains at least 20% by weight of microcrystalline wax.
9. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the layer containing wax contains acrylated bisphenols or lactones.
10. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the pH of the cardboard is adjusted to between 3 and 6.5 before the first treatment.
11. A method in accordance with patent claim 10, characterised in that sulphuric acid, boric acid, alum or phosphoric acid is used to adjust the pH.
12. A method in accordance with patent claims 10 or 11,
characterised in that fire retardant is absorbed into the cardboard in conjunction with the adjustment
of the pH.
13. A method in accordance with patent claim 12, characterised in that the fire retardant consists of melamine sulphate and/or zinc borate.
14. A method in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the base material is cardboard.
15. A method in accordance with patent claim 14, characterised in that the basis weight of the cardboard is 180-210 g/m2.
16. A method in accordance with patent claim 14, characterised in that the cardboard is treated on the production line on which it is produced.
17. A base material treated in accordance with one of the patent claims above, characterised in that the base material contains one of the following antimicrobial agents: potassium benzoate,
sodium benzoate, benzoic acid, paraben, a sodium, potassium or calcium salt of paraben,
a paraben ester, hexamethylenetetramine, ortho-phenylphenol, a sodium, potassium or
calcium salt of ortho-phenylphenol, thiabendazole, or a compound of these.
18. The use of the base material in accordance with patent claim 17 as a facing for a
board containing gypsum.