Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a method of manufacturing a regenerated tobacco
material.
Background Art
[0002] Tobacco materials such as natural tobacco leaves, cut tobacco, midribs, stems and
roots contain various components including nicotine, nitrosamines, hydrocarbons and
proteins. In the process of manufacturing regenerated tobacco materials, these components,
extracted from a natural tobacco material, are put back to a regenerated tobacco web
manufactured from a residue of the extraction. Some of these natural tobacco material
components should desirably be reduced in amount or removed, while other ones should
not be removed or even increased in amount, for a reason of smoking flavor or some
other reason.
[0003] For example,
International Publication WO 02/28209 discloses a method in which an extract solution obtained by extracting tobacco with
a solvent is brought into contact with an adsorbent such as activated carbon or zeolite
in order to reduce tobacco-specific nitrosamines (TSNAs). This patent document 1 further
discloses that an extract solution reduced in nitrosamines is added to a regenerated
tobacco material.
[0004] For example,
U.S. Patent 5,810,020 discloses that nitrosamines are removed by a liquid-liquid extraction treatment using
a great amount of crown ether.
[0005] International Publication WO 01/65954 discloses that tobacco is treated with supercritical carbon dioxide to extract nitrosamines
and the extract is subjected to a nitrosamine removing process.
[0006] Nitrosamines, TSNAs in particular, contained in natural tobacco materials are substances
which should desirably be eliminated. However, TSNAs are similar in structure to nicotine,
which is a useful component, and therefore it is very difficult to remove TSNAs selectively
without removing nicotine. With the conventional technique, it is therefore difficult
to prepare a regenerated tobacco material which contains a significant amount of nicotine,
but is substantially freed of TSNAs, by using the extract solution obtained from the
natural tobacco material and a fibrous component, which is an extraction residue.
[0007] More specifically, with the method of
International Publication WO 02/28209, it is possible to separate TSNAs from nitric acid or saccharides, but nicotine is
adsorbed and removed together with TSNAs by the adsorbent.
[0008] Further, the method of
U.S. Patent No. 5810020 is not desirable in terms of safety since it uses a great amount of crown ether.
Further, the method of
International Publication WO 01/65954 involves a supercritical extraction process which is costly, and therefore its practical
utility is not high.
Disclosure of Invention
[0009] Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a method of manufacturing
a regenerated tobacco material that contains a significant amount of nicotine but
substantially freed of TSNAs, by separating nicotine and TSNAs in an extract solution
obtained from a natural tobacco material in a relatively simple manner.
[0010] The present invention provides a method of manufacturing a regenerated tobacco material
using an extract solution obtained by extraction from a natural tobacco material with
an aqueous extracting solvent, and an extraction residue.
[0011] The inventors of the present invention pay attention to a highly hydrophobic adsorbent
such as activated carbon as simple means for separating nicotine and TSNAs in an extract
solution obtained from a natural tobacco material by extraction with an aqueous extracting
solvent. A strongly hydrophobic adsorbent such as activated carbon has a tendency
of adsorbing TSNAs together with nicotine. However, the inventors of the present invention
has found that TSNAs can be significantly removed while suppressing the amount of
adsorption of nicotine to a minimum level by controlling the adsorption time and the
amount of the adsorbent employed. The present invention is based on these findings.
[0012] Thus, according to the present invention, there is provided a method of manufacturing
a regenerated tobacco material, comprising (a) extracting a natural tobacco material
with an aqueous extracting solvent to obtain an extract solution containing components
of the natural tobacco material, and an extraction residue, (b) subjecting the extract
solution to an adsorption separation operation using an adsorbent to reduce an amount
of nitrosamines, (c) preparing a regenerated tobacco web using the extraction residue,
and (d) adding at least a part of the extract solution, in which the amount of nitrosamines
has been reduced, to the regenerated tobacco web, wherein the adsorbent is a strongly
hydrophobic adsorbent, and the adsorption separation operation is carried out within
60 minutes, using the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent in an amount corresponding to
10 to 110% of the weight of soluble components in the extract solution.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0013] The single figure is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a regenerated
tobacco material according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0014] The present invention will be described below in more detail with reference to various
embodiments.
[0015] The present invention is a method of manufacturing a regenerated tobacco material
by substantially removing TSNAs (N'-nitrosonornicotine (NNN), 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanone
(NNK), N'-nitrosoanatabine (NAT), etc.) from an extract solution obtained by extracting
a natural tobacco material with an aqueous extracting solvent while suppressing loss
of nicotine as much as possible, and adding the extract solution to a regenerated
tobacco web prepared by using the extraction residue.
[0016] FIG. 1 is a flow diagram illustrating a method of manufacturing a regenerated tobacco
material according to an embodiment of the present invention.
[0017] As shown in FIG. 1, first, a natural tobacco material 11 is subjected to an extraction
treatment S1 by mixing and stirring the natural tobacco material 11 and an extracting
solvent 12.
[0018] As the natural tobacco material 11, tobacco leaves, cut tobacco, midribs, stems,
roots and a mixture of these can be used. As the extracting solvent, an aqueous solvent
can be used. The aqueous extracting solvent such as water may be alkaline or acidic.
It is also possible to use, as the aqueous extracting solvent, a mixture of water
and a water-miscible organic solvent as well. Examples of such an organic solvent
are alcohols such as ethanol. An inorganic salt such as sodium hydroxide may be dissolved
in these extracting solvents. The extraction treatment S1 is carried out usually at
a temperature of 50 to 100°C for 5 minutes to 6 hours.
[0019] After fishing the extraction treatment S1, the extraction mixture obtained is subjected
to a separation operation S2 such as filtration to separate it into an extract solution
13 and an extraction residue 14. The extract solution 13 contains watersoluble components
in the natural tobacco material, such as nicotine and TSNAs.
[0020] The extraction residue 14 consists essentially of fibers. A regenerated tobacco web
15 is manufactured by an ordinary method, using the extraction residue 14. The regenerated
tobacco web 15 may be partially or entirely constituted by the extraction residue
14.
[0021] On the other hand, the extract solution 13 obtained from the separation operation
S2 is subjected to an adsorption treatment operation S4 using a strongly hydrophobic
adsorbent. In the present invention, the adsorption separation operation S4 can be
carried out by bringing the extract solution 13 into contact with the strongly hydrophobic
adsorbent. The strongly hydrophobic adsorbent is an adsorbent generally known to have
a high hydrophobicity. Examples thereof are activated carbon, a styrene-based porous
resin, and an adsorbent in which a modifying group that further enhances the hydrophobic
property (hydrophobic group), for example, bromine, is introduced to a styrene-based
porous resin. With use of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent, TSNAs can be significantly
eliminated while suppressing the loss of nicotine from the tobacco extract.
[0022] The contact between the extract solution 13 and the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent
can be achieved by adding particles of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent to the extract
13, followed by stirring. Alternatively, the contact between the extract 13 and the
strongly hydrophobic adsorbent can be achieved by passing the extract solution 13
through an adsorbent bed filled with particles of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent.
[0023] The amount of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent used is that corresponds to 10 to
110% of the weight of the soluble components in the extract solution 13. If the amount
of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent is less than 10%, TSNAs in the extract solution
cannot be sufficiently removed. On the other hand, if the amount of the adsorbent
exceeds 110%, the amount of nicotine adsorbed significantly increases. It is preferable
that the amount of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent correspond to 10 to 50% of the
weight of the soluble components in the extract 13. It should be noted that the amount
of the soluble components in the extract can be determined by the freeze-dry method.
[0024] The contact time between the extrac solution 13 and the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent
is within 60 minutes. When the contact time is within 60 minutes, TSNAs can be eliminated
while significantly suppressing the adsorption of nicotine. The contact time is preferably
5 to 60 minutes, and more preferably, 5 to 30 minutes.
[0025] In order to suppress the adsorption of nicotine and enhance the adsorption of TSNAs,
the pH value of the extract when brought into contact with the strongly hydrophobic
adsorbent is preferably more than 2 but less than 10, and more preferably, more than
4 but less than 10 in the present invention. The pH value can be adjusted by adding
acid or alkali. Further, the temperature of the extract solution is preferably 0 to
100°C, and more preferably 20 to 60°C.
[0026] The extract that has been subjected to adsorption/separation is separated (S5) from
the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent (spent adsorbent 17). Where the contact between
the extract and the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent are carried out by adding the adsorbent
to the extract and stirring, this separation can be carried out by filtration. On
the other hand, when the contact between the extract and the strongly hydrophobic
adsorbent is carried out by passing the extract through the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent
bed, the extract after the adsorption process is, needless to mention, is flowed out
of the bed of the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent in the state separated from the adsorbent.
The thus obtained extract 16 already subjected to the adsorption treatment is added
(S5) partially or entirely to the regenerated tobacco web 15 after concentrating or
without concentrating the extract, and thus a regenerated tobacco material 18 can
be obtained. A cigarette manufactured using the regenerated tobacco material 18 thus
obtained exhibits a significantly reduced amount of TSNAs in the smoke when it is
burned.
[0027] The above description is provided as embodiments of the present invention, and the
invention is not limited to these embodiments. Needless to say, the above various
embodiments can be combined together.
[0028] The present invention will now be described with reference to various Examples, but
the invention is not limited to these Examples either.
[0029] In the following Examples, the amount of TSNAs was measured according to the method
of measuring TSNAs in the cut tobacco of Arista (Official Method T-309, Determination
of Nitrosamines in Whole Tobacco, made by the Department of Health, dated December
31, 1999). More specifically, for the measurement, the tobacco extract or adsorbent-treated
liquid was subjected to LC-MS/MS. The amount of nicotine was measured by a method
incompliance with German Institute for Normalization DIN 10373. More specifically,
sodium hydroxide was added to the tobacco extract or adsorbent-treated liquid to make
it alkaline, and then hexane was further added thereto. The resultant was mixed to
make nicotine to transfer to the hexane phase, and the hexane phase alone was subjected
to GC/FID for measurement.
Examples 1 - 8
[0030] At a temperature of 25°C, 100g of cut tobacco leaves (X-KL1) was mixed with 1000
mL of water and the mixture was stirred, thereby performing the extraction of the
cut tobacco. Thus obtained extraction mixture was filtrated to separate it into an
extract solution and an extraction residue. A regenerated tobacco web was made from
the extraction residue.
[0031] On the other hand, activated carbon (average particle diameter: 1100 µm; specific
surface area: 1638 m
2/g) was added to the extract solution (pH: 6.0) in amounts (%) indicated in TABLE
1 with respect to the amount of soluble components of the extract solution, stirred
for time periods (adsorption treatment times) indicated in TABLE 1 at a temperature
of 25°C, and then filtrated. The total amount of TSNAs and amount of nicotine contained
in the extract solution (filtrate) after the adsorption treatment were analyzed. The
results are also indicated in TABLE 1. TABLE 1 further indicates the rate of change
in total TSNA and nicotine. In the TABLE 1, "untreated" indicates the extract that
was not subjected to the adsorption treatment (The same applies to TABLES 2 to 6 below).
TABLE 1
| |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
30.5 |
23.4 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 1 |
13 |
15 |
11.8 |
17.2 |
-61% |
-26% |
-35% |
| Ex. 2 |
13 |
30 |
10.0 |
16.4 |
-67% |
-30% |
-37% |
| Ex. 3 |
13 |
60 |
8.9 |
14.1 |
-71% |
-39% |
-31% |
| Ex. 4 |
13 |
120 |
8.5 |
14.0 |
-72% |
-40% |
-32% |
| Ex. 5 |
25 |
15 |
7.7 |
21.3 |
-75% |
-9% |
-66% |
| Ex. 6 |
25 |
30 |
4.1 |
17.6 |
-86% |
-25% |
-62% |
| Ex. 7 |
25 |
60 |
2.6 |
15.0 |
-91% |
-36% |
-56% |
| Ex. 8 |
50 |
5 |
6.2 |
15.5 |
-80% |
-34% |
-46% |
[0032] From the results shown in TABLE 1, it can be seen that when the adsorbent (activated
carbon) was used in an amount corresponding to 10 to 50% of the amount of the soluble
components in the extract and the adsorption treatment was carried out for 5 to 60
minutes, TSNAs were decreased by 60% or more while suppressing the decrease rate of
the amount of nicotine within less than 40% (Examples 1 - 3 and 5 - 8). In particular,
when the amount of the adsorbent employed was equivalent to 25% of that of the soluble
components in the extract and the adsorption treatment was carried out for 15 to 30
minutes, the difference between the rate of change in the total TSNA and the rate
of change in nicotine was as much as -62 to -66%, and indicating that the TSNA-selective
removability becomes high (Examples 5 - 6.)
[0033] The extracts subjected to the adsorption treatment in Examples 1 - 3 and 5 - 6 were
added to the regenerated tobacco webs, respectively, preparing regenerated tobacco
materials.
Examples 9 to 11
[0034] The same operations were carried out as in Examples 1 - 8 except that a bromine chemically
bonded styrene resin-based synthetic adsorbent (SP 207 available from Mitsubishi Chemical
Corporation) was used as the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent in respective amounts
indicated in TABLE 2, and stirred together with the extract for respective time periods
indicated in TABLE 2. The results of the analysis of the total amount of TSNAs and
amount of nicotine contained in the extract (filtrate) after the adsorption treatment
were also indicated in TABLE 2.
TABLE 2
| |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
32.3 |
20.4 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 9 |
50 |
15 |
8.7 |
18.9 |
-73% |
-7% |
-66% |
| Ex. 10 |
50 |
30 |
7.2 |
18.1 |
-78% |
-11% |
-66% |
| Ex. 11 |
50 |
60 |
5.9 |
15.9 |
-82% |
-22% |
-60% |
[0035] From the results shown in TABLE 2, it can be seen that the total amount of TSNAs
was decreased by 70% or more while suppressing the decrease rate of the amount of
nicotine within 25% in any of the Examples. In particular, when the amount of the
adsorbent employed was equivalent to 50% of that of the soluble components in the
extract and the adsorption treatment was carried out for 15 to 30 minutes, the difference
between the rate of change in the total TSNAs and the rate of change in nicotine was
much as -66%, and indicating that the TSNA-selective removability becomes high (Examples
9 - 10.)
[0036] The extracts subjected to the adsorption treatment in Examples 9 - 11 were added
to the regenerated tobacco webs, respectively, preparing regenerated tobacco materials.
Examples 12 - 14
[0037] The same operations were carried out as in Examples 1 - 8 except that activated carbon
having an average particle diameter of 150 µm and a specific surface area of 1140
m
2/g was used as the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent in respective amounts indicated
in TABLE 3, and stirred together with the extract for respective time periods indicated
in TABLE 3. The results of the analysis of the total amount of TSNAs and amount of
nicotine contained in the extract (filtrate) after the adsorption treatment were also
indicated in TABLE 3.
TABLE 3
| |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
30.5 |
23.4 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 12 |
50 |
15 |
3.9 |
22.6 |
-87% |
-3% |
-84% |
| Ex. 13 |
50 |
30 |
2.8 |
19.3 |
-91% |
-17% |
-73% |
| Ex. 14 |
50 |
60 |
1.9 |
15.3 |
-94% |
-35% |
-59% |
[0038] From the results shown in TABLE 3, it can be seen that the total amount of TSNAs
was decreased by 70% or more while suppressing the decrease rate of the amount of
nicotine within 35% in any of the Examples. In particular, when the amount of the
adsorbent employed was equivalent to 50% of that of the soluble components in the
extract and the adsorption treatment was carried out for 15 to 30 minutes, the difference
between the rate of change in the total TSNAs and the rate of change in nicotine was
much as -73 to -84%, indicating that the TSNA-selective removability becomes high
(Examples 12 - 13).
[0039] The extracts subjected to the adsorption treatment in Examples 12 - 14 were added
to the regenerated tobacco webs, respectively, preparing regenerated tobacco materials.
Examples 15 to 20
[0040] The cut tobacco was extracted in accordance with the procedures of Examples 1 - 8,
and the extracts thus obtained were adjusted to a pH of 2.0 or 10.0 by adding acid
(acetic acid) or alkali (sodium hydroxide). The extracts were treated with activated
carbon used in Examples 12 - 14 under respective conditions indicated in TABLE 4.
The results of the analysis of the total amount of TSNAs and amount of nicotine contained
in the extract (filtrate) after the adsorption treatment were also indicated in TABLE
4.
TABLE 4
| |
pH of extract solution |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
|
- |
- |
30.5 |
23.4 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 15 |
2.0 |
50 |
15 |
23.8 |
23.3 |
-22% |
0% |
-22% |
| Ex. 16 |
2.0 |
50 |
30 |
23.4 |
22.9 |
-23% |
-2% |
-21% |
| Ex. 17 |
2.0 |
50 |
60 |
24.1 |
22.5 |
-21% |
-4% |
-17% |
| Ex. 18 |
10.0 |
50 |
15 |
1.3 |
3.0 |
-96% |
-87% |
-9% |
| Ex. 19 |
10.0 |
50 |
30 |
0.8 |
1.5 |
-97% |
-93% |
-4% |
| Ex. 20 |
10.0 |
50 |
60 |
0.9 |
1.1 |
-97% |
-95% |
-2% |
[0041] As can be seen from TABLE 4, when the pH value of the extract was 2.0, both of TSNAs
and nicotine were not easily adsorbed (Examples 15 - 17), whereas when the pH value
of the extract is 10.0, about 90% or more of both of TSNAs and nicotine were removed
(Examples 18 - 20). In consideration of the cases of Examples 12 to 14, in which the
pH value of the extract was 6.0 and the TSNA-selective adsorption property was excellent,
it can be seen that the pH value of the extract is preferably more than 2 but less
than 10. The results were considered to be due to the fact that the pKa of TSNAs was
4 and pKa of nicotine was 10. Thus, it is preferable for a higher TSNA-selective removal
by adsorption that the pH value of the extract be higher than 4.0 where TSNAs are
ionized, but lower than 10 where nicotine is ionized.
Examples 21 - 38
[0042] The same procedures were followed as in Examples 1 - 8 except that activated carbon
was used under different conditions as indicated in TABLE 5. The results of the analysis
of the total amount of TSNAs and amount of nicotine contained in the extract (filtrate)
after the adsorption treatment were also indicated in TABLE 5.
TABLE 5
| |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
30.5 |
23.4 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 21 |
2 |
15 |
26.2 |
20.4 |
-14% |
-13% |
-2% |
| Ex. 22 |
2 |
30 |
27.9 |
19.6 |
-9% |
-16% |
7% |
| Ex. 23 |
2 |
60 |
27.7 |
19.3 |
-9% |
-18% |
8% |
| Ex. 24 |
2 |
120 |
24.8 |
19.1 |
-19% |
-18% |
0% |
| Ex. 25 |
5 |
15 |
27.4 |
18.2 |
-10% |
-22% |
12% |
| Ex. 26 |
5 |
30 |
24.5 |
18.1 |
-20% |
-22% |
3% |
| Ex. 27 |
5 |
60 |
22.3 |
16.2 |
-27% |
-31% |
4% |
| Ex. 28 |
5 |
120 |
16.6 |
16.1 |
-45% |
-31% |
-14% |
| Ex. 29 |
50 |
120 |
3.7 |
3.3 |
-88% |
-86% |
-2% |
| Ex. 30 |
125 |
30 |
2.2 |
0.2 |
-93% |
-99% |
7% |
| Ex. 31 |
250 |
5 |
0.1 |
4.2 |
-100% |
-82% |
-18% |
| Ex. 32 |
250 |
15 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
-94% |
-93% |
-1% |
| Ex. 33 |
250 |
30 |
1.1 |
0.6 |
-96% |
-98% |
1% |
| Ex. 34 |
250 |
60 |
1.0 |
0.7 |
-97% |
-97% |
0% |
| Ex. 35 |
500 |
5 |
0.0 |
1.4 |
-100% |
-94% |
-6% |
| Ex. 36 |
500 |
15 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
-99% |
-98% |
-1% |
| Ex. 37 |
500 |
30 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-100% |
-100% |
0% |
| Ex. 38 |
500 |
60 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
-100% |
-100% |
0% |
[0043] As can be seen from the results shown in TABLE 5, when the amount of the adsorbent
used and the adsorption time period fall out of the ranges specified by the present
invention, it is not possible to achieve the advantageous effect of enhancing the
adsorption of TSNAs while suppressing the adsorption of nicotine.
Examples 39 - 47
[0044] The same operations were carried out as in Examples 1 to 8 except that active alumina,
which is a hydrophilic adsorbent, was used as the adsorbent in respective amounts
indicated in TABLE 6, and stirred together with the extract for a respective time
period indicated in TABLE 6. The results of the analysis of the total amount of TSNAs
and amount of nicotine contained in the extract (filtrate) after the adsorption treatment
were also indicated in TABLE 6.
TABLE 6
| |
Amount of adsorbent (%) |
Adsorption treatment time (min) |
Total amount of TSNAs (µg/g) |
Amount of nicotine (mg/g) |
Rate of change in total TSNAs (a) |
Rate of change in nicotine (b) |
Difference (a-b) |
| Untreated |
- |
- |
33.7 |
25.1 |
- |
- |
- |
| Ex. 39 |
50 |
15 |
30.7 |
22.9 |
-9% |
-9% |
0% |
| Ex. 40 |
50 |
30 |
30.7 |
23.5 |
-9% |
-6% |
-3% |
| Ex. 41 |
50 |
60 |
33.3 |
24.4 |
-1% |
-3% |
2% |
| Ex. 42 |
250 |
15 |
31.8 |
23.2 |
-6% |
-8% |
2% |
| Ex. 43 |
250 |
30 |
32.8 |
22.8 |
-3% |
-9% |
6% |
| Ex. 44 |
250 |
60 |
32.6 |
23.7 |
-3% |
-6% |
2% |
| Ex. 45 |
500 |
15 |
32.2 |
24.4 |
-5% |
-3% |
-2% |
| Ex. 46 |
500 |
30 |
33.3 |
24.7 |
-1% |
-1% |
0% |
| Ex. 47 |
500 |
60 |
33.1 |
25.0 |
-2% |
0% |
-2% |
[0045] As can be seen from TABLE 6, when the hydrophilic adsorbent is used, TSNAs are not
substantially eliminated.
[0046] As described above, according to the present invention, it is possible to separate
nicotine and TSNAs from an extract solution obtained from a natural tobacco material
in a relatively simple manner, and to manufacture a regenerated tobacco material substantially
freed of TSNAs while suppressing the loss of nicotine as much as possible.
1. A method of manufacturing a regenerated tobacco material, comprising:
(a) extracting a natural tobacco material with an aqueous extracting solvent to obtain
an extract solution containing components of the natural tobacco material and an extraction
residue;
(b) subjecting the extract solution to an adsorption separation operation using an
adsorbent to reduce an amount of nitrosamines;
(c) preparing a regenerated tobacco web using the extraction residue; and
(d) adding at least a part of the extract solution in which the amount of nitrosamines
has been reduced, to the regenerated tobacco web,
wherein the adsorbent is a strongly hydrophobic adsorbent, and the adsorption separation
operation is carried out within 60 minutes using the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent
in an amount corresponding to 10 to 110% of a weight of soluble components of the
extract solution.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the adsorbent is a styrene-based porous resin,
a activated carbon or an adsorbent in which a hydrophobic group is bonded to a surface
of the adsorbent.
3. The method according to claim 1, wherein the strongly hydrophobic adsorbent is used
in an amount corresponding to 15 to 60% of a weight of the soluble components of the
extract solution.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein a pH value of the extract solution is more
than 2 but less than 10.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein a pH value of the extract is more than 4
but less than 10.
6. The method according to claim 1, wherein the adsorption separation operation is carried
out at a temperature of 0 to 100°C.