BACKGROUND
1. Technical Field
[0001] The present disclosure is directed to electrosurgical systems, and, more particularly,
to a method and system for transmitting data across isolation barrier, wherein the
data is used for controlling electrosurgical generators.
2. Background of Related Art
[0002] Electrosurgical generators are employed by surgeons in conjunction with electrosurgical
instruments to perform a variety of surgical procedures including tissue division.
An electrosurgical generator generates and modulates electrosurgical energy which
is applied to the tissue by an electrosurgical instrument. Generators operate in a
plurality of modes, e.g., cut, coagulation, or blend. These modes are accomplished
by using different current waveforms. Using a constant waveform, the generator allows
a surgeon to vaporize or cut tissue since a constant waveform produces heat very rapidly.
Using an intermittent waveform causes the generator's duty cycle to be reduced to
coagulate tissue. A blended current allows for a mixture of the two above-mentioned
waveforms to achieve intermediate results.
[0003] Conventionally, the capability of changing operating modes and output power has been
provided by controls located at a keyboard or control panel of the generator. However,
this method is very inconvenient for the surgeon, since to make any modifications
to the operating current, the surgeon has to return to the control panel of the generator,
which is outside the sterile field. This requires the surgeon to divert attention
away from the operative site. To provide for better control mechanisms which could
be used within the sterile field, electrosurgical systems have later included a hand
piece designed to be held by the surgeon with controls disposed thereon. The hand
piece allowed the surgeon to change the mode of operation and the power output of
the generator without leaving the sterile field and without diverting their attention
from the operative site.
[0004] Conventional hand pieces included a plurality of switches and transmitted control
signals corresponding to switch positions across an isolation patient barrier. The
barrier separated circuitry connected to the patient from the circuitry connected
to the generator to prevent accidental electrical shocks to the patient. Control signals
crossed this barrier by a variety of means, including magnetic coupling, optical coupling,
and capacitive coupling. However, current hand pieces utilize resistive element networks
to provide for greater range of control selection with fewer wires, instead of relying
on switch activation signals which required corresponding wiring.
[0005] Therefore there is a need for a method and system to transmit analog voltage produced
by resistive element networks across a patient isolation barrier without using expensive
analog components while preserving the safety barrier.
SUMMARY
[0006] Disclosed are systems and methods for controlling an electrosurgical generator through
a patient isolation barrier. The system includes a hand piece in electrical communication
with the generator. The hand piece includes controls for controlling and/or adjusting
operational functions of the generator, including the operating mode and the intensity
of the output energy. The controls include one or more input device(s) coupled to
a resistor assembly which is connected to a DC voltage source to supply control current.
Activation of the input device adjusts the resistance of the resistor assembly thereby
adjusting the voltage. The voltage is converted into a corresponding frequency by
a voltage-to-frequency converter and is then transmitted across the patient isolation
barrier through an optical coupler. The frequency is either converted directly into
a control signal or back into voltage which is then converted into the control signal.
The control signal is received by a microprocessor, which then adjusts the generator
based on the control signal.
[0007] According to one embodiment of the present disclosure, a system for controlling an
electrosurgical generator through a patient isolation barrier is disclosed. The system
includes a control assembly disposed within a surgical hand piece configured to control
the generator. The control assembly has one or more input devices and one ore more
resistor assemblies in electrical communication with a DC voltage source which supplies
a control current. The input devices are configured to adjust resistance of the resistor
assemblies and voltage of the control current passing therethrough. The system also
includes an isolation barrier transmitter having a voltage-to-frequency converter
which converts the voltage passing through the resistor assembly into a corresponding
frequency. The transmitter transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier.
The system further includes an isolation barrier receiver configured to receive the
frequency and to convert the frequency into a control signal and a microprocessor
which processes the control signal and controls the generator based on the control
signal.
[0008] Another aspect of the present disclosure relates to a method for controlling an electrosurgical
generator through a patient isolation barrier. The method includes the step of activating
one or more input devices disposed within a surgical hand piece configured to control
the generator. The hand piece includes one or more resistor assemblies in electrical
communication with a DC voltage source which supplies a control current. The input
devices are configured to adjust resistance of the one or more resistor assemblies
and voltage of the control current passing therethrough. The method also includes
the steps of converting the voltage into a corresponding frequency through a voltage-to-frequency
converter, transmitting the frequency across the patient isolation barrier transmitter.
The method further includes the steps of converting the frequency into a control signal
and transmitting the control signal to a microprocessor which is configured to control
the generator based on the control signal.
[0009] A further aspect of the present disclosure relates to an electrosurgical instrument.
The instrument includes a control assembly disposed within a surgical hand piece configured
to control an electrosurgical generator. The control assembly has one or more input
devices and one ore more resistor assemblies in electrical communication with a DC
voltage source which supplies a control current. The input devices are configured
to adjust resistance of the resistor assemblies and voltage of the control current
passing therethrough. The instrument also includes an isolation barrier transmitter
having a voltage-to-frequency converter which converts the voltage passing through
the resistor assembly into a corresponding frequency. The transmitter transmits the
frequency across the patient isolation barrier. The instrument further includes an
isolation barrier receiver configured to receive the frequency and to convert the
frequency into a control signal readable by a microprocessor.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0010] Various embodiments will be described herein below with reference to the drawings
wherein:
Fig. 1 is a block diagram illustrating in general an electrosurgical system;
Fig. 2 is a block diagram of a hand piece and an electrosurgical generator in accordance
with the present disclosure;
Fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of illustrative circuitry in accordance with the present
disclosure; and
Fig. 4 is a flow diagram of a method for transmitting control data across a patient
isolation barrier.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0011] Reference should be made to the drawings where like reference numerals refer to similar
elements throughout the various figures. Embodiments of the present disclosure are
described herein below with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the following
description, well-known functions or constructions are not described in detail to
avoid obscuring the present disclosure in unnecessary detail.
[0012] The present disclosure provides a system and method for controlling an electrosurgical
generator through a hand piece, and more specifically, for passing input signals across
a patient isolation barrier, where the input signals are in the form of analog and/or
variable voltage. The hand piece includes an input device connected to a resistor
assembly (e.g., a resistor network) which is in electrical communication with a DC
voltage source. The DC voltage source supplies control current which upon passing
through the resistor assembly is modified. The resistance of the resistor assembly
varies depending on the inputs of the input device. The resistance modifies the voltage
of the control current which thereafter is converted to a corresponding frequency
by a voltage-to-frequency converter. The frequency is then transmitted across the
patient isolation barrier through an optical coupler. The frequency is then either
converted into a digital control signal by an analog-to-digital converter or back
into voltage which is then subsequently converted into the digital control signal.
The digital control signal is then relayed to a microprocessor which controls the
generator based on the control signal.
[0013] Fig. 1 shows an electrosurgical system including a generator 10 and a hand piece
12 having an active electrode 14 which is brought in contact with a patient P to effect
a cut and/or coagulation procedure depending upon the operating mode selected. Attached
to the patent P is a return electrode 16 which returns the electrosurgical current
from the patient P to the generator 10.
[0014] Referring to Fig. 2, the generator 10 and the hand piece 12 are shown in more detail.
The generator 10 also includes a keyboard and/or control panel (not shown) for adjusting
functions thereof. The hand piece 12 is connected to the generator 10 by a cable 18
which includes a plurality of wires for transmitting electrical energy. One of the
wires conducts electrosurgical current from the generator 10 to the active electrode
14, hereafter referred to as the active line. The active line also conducts DC voltage
from the generator 10 which is employed by the hand piece 12 to transmit input signals
back thereto. A DC voltage source may be used to transmit a control current which
is used by the hand piece 12 to transmit input signals to the generator 10. Using
DC voltage to transmit input signals is well known in the art and is described in
commonly owned
U.S. Patents Nos. 3,699,967 and
3,801,800, both of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.
[0015] The hand piece 12 includes a control assembly 20 having a plurality of input devices
(e.g., buttons, switches, etc.) for adjusting intensity of the electrosurgical energy
and selecting the operating mode (e.g., cut, coagulation, blend). The control assembly
20 provides complementary and/or redundant controls for the generator 10 which may
be used to adjust the intensity of the energy output by the generator, change the
operating mode (e.g., cut, coagulate, blend). The control assembly 20 includes a plurality
of resistive elements coupled to the inputs so that the inputs correspond to specific
resistances. This allows for fewer wires to be used within the control assembly 20
since different input signals (e.g., corresponding voltage) can be transmitted along
a single wire by varying the resistance thereby varying the voltage of the control
current.
[0016] The hand piece 12 also includes an isolation barrier transmitter 22 which creates
a physical isolation barrier between the hand piece 12 and the generator 10. The transmitter
22 receives the voltage signals from the control assembly 20 and converts the variable
voltage (e.g., based on variable resistance) into a corresponding frequency. The frequency
is then communicated across a patient isolation barrier optically, magnetically or
capacitively and transmitted to the generator 10 along one of the wires within the
cable 18. The patient isolation barrier refers to a physical gap in the electrical
connections between the control assembly 20 of the hand piece 12 and the generator
10 to prevent accidental electrical shock to the patient. Transmittal of control signals
across the physical gap may, therefore, be accomplished by using optical couplers
and or magnetic couplers which are within the purview of those skilled in the art.
[0017] Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the transmitter 22 may be disposed
within the generator 10 or another device, since the patient isolation barrier would
still exist, although at a different location. The control assembly 20 may be disposed
within the hand piece 12 so that the surgeon has convenient access to input mechanisms
for controlling the generator 10.
[0018] The generator 10 includes an isolation barrier receiver 24 which receives the frequency
corresponding to the input voltage from the control 20 and converted by the transmitter
22. The receiver 24 transmits the frequency signal to an analog-to-digital (A/D) converter
26, which then converts the analog frequency signal into a control signal and transmits
the digital control signals to a microprocessor 28. The microprocessor 28 is responsible
for controlling functions of the generator 10 (e.g., adjusting energy output, receiving
control signals, analyzing sensor outputs, etc.). More specifically, the microprocessor
28, upon receiving digital input signals makes corresponding adjustments within the
generator 10.
[0019] It is envisioned that the receiver 24 may also convert the frequency into voltage
using a frequency-to-voltage converter and then transmit voltage signal to the analog-to-digital
(A/D) converter 26, which then transmits the control signal to a microprocessor 28.
[0020] Fig. 3 shows an electrical schematic of the hand piece 12 having the control assembly
20 and the transmitter 22. The control assembly 20 provides input for one of a plurality
of input categories, such as mode selection, intensity, etc. It is envisioned that
each of the input categories would include corresponding controls and isolation barrier
transmitters. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the number of controls
and transmitters may correspond to the amount of input categories (e.g., one set of
controls and transmitters for intensity controls, another set of controls for operating
mode selectors, etc.). However, it is also possible to include only one instance of
controls and a corresponding transmitter to provide signals for a plurality of input
categories. In that instance, it is envisioned that the A/D converter 26 is also configured
to differentiate among a wide range of resistances.
[0021] As discussed above, the input signals are communicated by using variable resistance.
A DC power supply (not shown) communicates DC voltage +Viso through a connection 29
to the control assembly 20. The control assembly 20 includes a switch assembly 30
which includes a plurality of switches (e.g., switches 32, 33, 34). The control assembly
20 may include input mechanisms for controlling any of the properties of the generator
10. For instance, the control assembly 20 may adjust the intensity of the energy supplied
by the generator 10. The intensity may be controlled by adjusting the intensity by
a specified percentage (e.g., 10%). It should be noted, in accordance with the present
disclosure, the increase in power is not a ten percent increase in the current power
but rather the increase is ten percent of the power last set at the keyboard or control
panel of the generator 10. If the power were increased by ten percent of the current
power, certain difficulties could arise. For example, if the initial power setting
is 100 watts and the increments are ten percent of the current output power, the first
increase would increment the output power to 110 watts. The next increment would increase
it to 121 watts. If the power were now decremented by ten percent, it would be decreased
to about 109 watts and a further decrement would decrease it to about 98 watts. Hence,
it can be seen that, although the initial power was 100 watts, the power, after two
increases of ten percent each and two decreases of ten percent, is 98 watts. The operator
would expect the power to return to the initial power after such a sequence and not
to jump to a different value.
[0022] To avoid this difficulty, the procedure of the present disclosure is employed where
the last output power set at the control panel of the generator is employed as a reference
point for subsequent changes in power. Although these changes have been described
in terms of ten percent increments or decrements, the percentage change may be, of
course, other than ten percent. Further, the percentage change may vary from step
to step if so desired.
[0023] In summary, if the initial power setting from the keyboard or control panel of the
generator is 100 watts and the surgeon increases that power from the hand switch to
150 watts by five ten percent increments, no further increases from the hand piece
12 are possible and the surgeon must return to the keyboard to change the power setting
thereat. Assume the surgeon changes the setting to 200 watts at the control panel.
If he then subsequently increments the power by a ten percent factor, the power increase
will be 20 watts since the last output power set at the control panel was 200 watts.
It will not be 10 watts which is ten percent of the original output power setting
at the control panel.
[0024] Referring back to Fig. 3 and in reference to the above example where the control
assembly 20 adjusts the intensity of the energy, the closing of the switch 32 corresponds
to an input configured to increase the intensity by 10%, the closing of the switch
33 corresponds to a decrease the intensity by 10%, and the closing of the switch 34
corresponds to energy shut off. Depending on which of the switches 32, 33, 34 are
closed the voltage passing through the resistor assembly 36 having resistors 37, 38,
39, 40 will vary.
[0025] More specifically, closing of the switch 32 results in a resistance R
1. Similarly, closing of the switch 33 results in a resistance R
2 and closing of the switch 34 results in resistance R
3. By varying the resistance within the resistor assembly 36, the control assembly
20 modifies the DC voltage passing through the resistor assembly 36. More simply put,
each of the inputs at the control assembly 20 closes one of the corresponding switches
32, 33, 34 thereby setting one of the resistances R
1, R
2, R
3 at the resistor assembly 36 and modifying the DC voltage passing therethrough so
that the voltage changes accordingly. Thus, each of the inputs has a corresponding
voltage (e.g., V
1, V
2, V
3).
[0026] The corresponding voltage passes to the transmitter 22 which converts the voltage
into frequency and transmits the frequency across the physical isolation barrier.
The transmitter 22 includes a voltage-to-frequency converter (VFC) 42 connected to
an optical coupler 44. An exemplary voltage-to-frequency converter may be the Precision
VFC model no. LM331, manufactured by National Semiconductor Corp. located at 2900
Semiconductor Drive, P.O. Box 58090, Santa Clara, California. The circuitry schematic
of the VFC model No. LM331 and the operation thereof is provided in its product manual
which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. The manual can be
found on the National Semiconductor Corp's website at cache.national.com/ds/LM/LM231.pdf.
[0027] The VFC 42 converts the input voltage corresponding to the inputs at the control
assembly 20 to a proportional frequency (e.g., f
1, f
2, f
3). The frequency is then transmitted to the optical coupler 44 which transfers the
frequency signals from the transmitter 22 to the receiver 24 across the physical isolation
barrier. The receiver 24 then relays the control frequency signal to the A/D converter
26 which converts the frequency signal into a digital control signal. The microprocessor
28 receives the corresponding control signal and analyzes it to determine a corresponding
input command. For instance, frequency f
1 corresponds with increasing the intensity by 10% and adjusts the energy output of
the generator 10 accordingly.
[0028] It is envisioned that the receiver 24 may include a frequency-to-voltage converter
(not shown) to convert the frequency signal back into voltage. The receiver 24 then
transmits the voltage signal to the A/D converter 26 which converts the frequency
signal into a control signal. The microprocessor 28 thereafter issues a control command
to the generator 10.
[0029] It is also envisioned that the switches 32, 33, 34 can be pressed continuously (e.g.,
pressing the switch 32 increases the intensity by 10% every half-second that the switch
32 is pressed). This does not deviate from the spirit of the disclosure since the
corresponding voltage V
1 is still maintained and is later converted into the corresponding control signal.
[0030] It is further envisioned that the A/D converter 26 and the VFC 42 can be substituted
by a frequency counting circuit (not shown) which measures the corresponding frequency
and transmits a corresponding signal to the microprocessor 28 across the optical coupler
44 for determining the associated input command.
[0031] Fig. 4 is a flow diagram of a method for transmitting control data across a patient
isolation barrier. In step 100, the surgeon inputs adjustments into the control assembly
20 (e.g., increasing the intensity by 10%) by pressing corresponding buttons and/or
activating switches. In step 102, the pressing of buttons activates corresponding
switches (e.g., one or more switches 32, 33, 34) which in turn modifies the resistance
within the resistor assembly 36. The resistance adjusts the DC voltage passing through
the resistor assembly 36 which corresponds to inputs at the control assembly 20.
[0032] In step 104, the modified DC voltage is converted by the VFC 42 into frequency and
in step 106 the frequency is transmitted across the patient isolation barrier to the
receiver 24. In optional step 108, the receiver 24 converts the frequency back into
voltage using a frequency-to-voltage converter. The D/A converter, in step 110, converts
the frequency or the voltage signals (if frequency was converted back into voltage)
into a control signal and transmits the control signal to the microprocessor 28 in
step 112. The microprocessor 28 matches the control signal with a corresponding input
command and adjusts the generator 10 accordingly in step 114. For instance, in the
above example, the surgeon increased the intensity by 10% therefore the microprocessor
28 would adjust the intensity correspondingly.
[0033] While several embodiments of the disclosure have been shown in the drawings, it is
not intended that the disclosure be limited thereto, as it is intended that the disclosure
be as broad in scope as the art will allow and that the specification be read likewise.
Therefore, the above description should not be construed as limiting, but merely as
exemplifications of preferred embodiments. Those skilled in the art will envision
other modifications within the scope and spirit of the claims appended hereto.
1. A system for controlling an electrosurgical generator through a patient isolation
barrier, the system comprising:
a control assembly disposed within a surgical hand piece configured to control the
generator, the control assembly having at least one input device and at least one
resistor assembly in electrical communication with a DC voltage source which supplies
a control current, the at least one input device configured to adjust resistance of
the at least one resistor assembly and voltage of the control current passing therethrough;
an isolation barrier transmitter having a voltage-to-frequency converter which converts
the voltage passing through the resistor assembly into a corresponding frequency,
the transmitter transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier;
an isolation barrier receiver configured to receive the frequency and to convert the
frequency into a control signal; and
a microprocessor which processes the control signal and controls the generator based
on the control signal.
2. A system as in claim 1, further comprising:
an analog-to-digital converter configured to convert the frequency into a digital
control signal.
3. A system as in claim 1, wherein the isolation barrier transmitter includes a optical
coupler which transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier.
4. A system as in claim 1, wherein the isolation barrier transmitter includes a capacitor
which transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier.
5. A system as in claim 1, wherein the isolation barrier transmitter includes a magnetic
coupling device which transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier.
6. A system as in claim 1, wherein the input device adjusts an operational mode of the
generator.
7. A system as in claim 1, wherein the input device adjusts an output intensity of the
generator.
8. A system as in claim 1, further comprising:
a frequency-to-voltage converter which converts the frequency into the voltage, wherein
the isolation barrier is further configured to convert the voltage into a control
signal; and wherein the analog-to-digital converter is configured to convert the voltage
into a digital control signal.
9. An electrosurgical instrument comprising:
a control assembly disposed within a surgical hand piece configured to control an
electrosurgical generator, the control assembly having at least one input device and
at least one resistor assembly in electrical communication with a DC voltage source
which supplies a control current, the at least one input device configured to adjust
resistance of the at least one resistor assembly and voltage of the control current
passing therethrough;
an isolation barrier transmitter having a voltage-to-frequency converter which converts
the voltage passing through the resistor assembly into a corresponding frequency,
the transmitter transmits the frequency across the patient isolation barrier; and
an isolation barrier receiver configured to receive the frequency and to convert the
frequency into a control signal readable by a microprocessor.