Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a low flame-spreading cigarette paper, and particularly,
to a cigarette paper exhibiting both a low flame-spreading property and a low C/T
ratio.
Background Art
[0002] For example, a cigarette paper provided with bands formed of a flame retardant substance
coated on a base cigarette paper is proposed (Jpn. Pat. Appln. KOKAI Publication
No. 7-300795), in order to hardly cause the flame to spread from the kindling to, e.g., the floor
when the cigarette is dropped on the floor through, for example, the carelessness
of the smoker. This technique is based on the idea that when regions having a high
combustibility and regions having a low combustibility are formed on a cigarette paper,
the ordinary smoking can be performed at the region having a high combustibility,
but, if a substance is brought into contact with the cigarette at the regions having
a low combustibility, the cigarette is self-extinguished.
[0003] However, where a cigarette is manufactured by using the conventional low-flame spreading
cigarette paper noted above, the carbon monoxide/tar ratio (C/T ratio) per cigarette
is not sufficiently low.
Disclosure of Invention
[0004] Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a cigarette paper
exhibiting a low flam-spreading property and achieving a low C/T ratio.
[0005] According to the present invention, there is provided a cigarette paper exhibiting
a low flame-spreading property, comprising, on one surface of a base cigarette paper
containing a filler in an amount of 2 to 6 g/m
2 and having a basis weight of 16 to 22 g/m
2, burn-suppressing regions coated with a burn-suppressing agent, provided spaced apart
from each other, wherein a total coating amount of the burn-suppressing agent corresponds
to 0.2 to 1.8 g per m
2 of the coated portion.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0006] The single figure is a schematic oblique view, partly broken away, exemplifying a
construction of a cigarette wrapped with a cigarette paper according to one embodiment
of the present invention.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0007] The present invention will now be described in more detail.
[0008] In the cigarette paper of the present invention, burn-suppressing regions coated
with a burn-suppressing agent are formed apart from each other on one surface of a
base cigarette paper.
[0009] The base cigarette paper is based on an ordinary pulp such as flax pulp that is generally
used for cigarette papers. However, the base cigarette paper contains a filler in
an amount of 2 to 6 g/m
2, and has a basis weight of 16 to 22 g/m
2.
[0010] As the filler, use may be made of materials that are used generally including, for
example, carbonates such as calcium carbonate and potassium carbonate, and hydroxides
such as calcium hydroxide and magnesium hydroxide.
[0011] A burn adjusting agent such as citric acid or a salt thereof (sodium salt or potassium
salt) may be added to the cigarette paper. These burn-adjusting agents, if added,
may be used in an amount of up to 2% by weight in the base cigarette paper.
[0012] On one surface of the base cigarette paper, burn-suppressing regions, which are formed
by coating of a burn-suppressing agent, are provided apart from each other. The burn-suppressing
regions may be provided in the form of a plurality of stripes such that when a tobacco
rod is wrapped with the cigarette paper, they extend in the longitudinal direction
of the tobacco rod and are spaced apart from each other in the circumferential direction
of the tobacco rod. Alternatively, the burn-suppressing regions may be provided in
the form of a plurality of annular rings such that they extend in the circumferential
direction of the tobacco rod and are spaced apart from each other in the longitudinal
direction of the tobacco rod. In any case, the total coating amount of the burn-suppressing
agent (dry basis) corresponds to 0.2 to 1.8 g/m
2 per m
2 of the coated region.
[0013] As the burn-suppressing agent, use may be preferably made of, for example, proteins
such as gelatin, casein, albumin, and gluten; polysaccharides exhibiting a viscosity-increasing
property such as starch, xanthan gum (echo gum), locust bean gum, guar gum (guar pack),
tragacanth gum, tamarind seed polysaccharide (glyroid), karaya gum, gum arabic, pullulan,
dextrin, cyclo dextrin (Oligoseven), and gutty; polysaccharides exhibiting a gelling
property such as carrageenan, curdlan, agar-agar, gelatin, farselran, pectin, juran
gum, and Kelco Gel; a lipid such as lecithin; natural polymer derivatives such as
sodium alginate, carboxymethyl cellulose, methyl cellulose, propylene glycol alginate
ester, and processed starch (such as starch phosphate); synthesized polymeric compounds
such as sodium polyacrylate and various polymeric emulsifying agents; inorganic ammonium
salts such as ammonium chloride, ammonium phosphate, ammonium hydrogen phosphate,
ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, ammonium bromide and ammonium sulfate; inorganic hydroxides
such as barium hydroxide, calcium hydroxide,, and aluminum hydroxide; an inorganic
salt flame retardant such as sodium borate, boric acid, zinc chloride, magnesium chloride,
calcium chloride, and sodium sulfate. Also, finely pulverized cellulose, microcrystalline
cellulose, flax pulp, and wood pulp have similar effects. These burn-suppressing agents
can be used singly or in combination of two or more of these. Sodium alginates having
various degrees of polymerization are commercially available. In the present invention,
sodium alginate having a polymerization degree of 500 to 900 is preferred. Sodium
alginate having such a high degree of polymerization exhibits a high burn-suppressing
effect even when used in a small amount.
[0014] In the present invention, the low flame-spreading property and the low C/T ratio
can be exhibited at the same time by setting the amount of the filler in the base
cigarette paper, the basis weight of the base cigarette paper, and the total coating
amount of burn-suppressing agent within the ranges described above.
[0015] The low flame-spreading cigarette paper of the present invention is used to wrap
a tobacco rod formed of, for example, tobacco shreds, and generally, the surface on
which the burn-suppressing agent is coated is brought into contact with the tobacco
rod.
[0016] FIG. 1 illustrates a cigarette wrapped with a cigarette paper on which a burn-suppressing
agent is coated in the form of annular rings.
[0017] Referring to FIG. 1, a cigarette 10 comprises a tobacco rod 11 consisting of a tobacco
filler 13 that is wrapped with a base cigarette paper 12 in the form of a column.
The base cigarette paper 12 may have an inherent air permeability of about 10 to 100
CORESTA units. In general, the tobacco rod 11 has a circumference of 17 to 26 mm and
a length of 49 to 90 mm. An ordinary filter 18 may be attached to the proximal end
portion (i.e., downstream edge portion in the inhaling direction) of the tobacco rod
11 by using a chip paper 17 according to the ordinary method.
[0018] An annular region 14 coated with a burn-suppressing agent is formed on the base cigarette
paper 12, defining a burn-suppressing region. Where a plurality of annular burn-suppressing
regions 14 are formed as illustrated in FIG. 1, these annular regions 14 are formed
apart from each other in the longitudinal direction of the tobacco rod.
[0019] An ordinary burn region 15 that is not coated with a burn-suppressing agent is formed
between adjacent annular burn-suppressing regions 14. Since the region 15 is constituted
by a part of the base cigarette paper 12, it can burn under the ordinary smoking state
like the base cigarette paper 12 itself. It follows that the region 15 acts as an
ordinary burn region. For example, it is possible to form 1 to 3 annular burn-suppressing
regions 14. Also, the annular burn-suppressing region 14 may have a width of 4 to
7 mm in the longitudinal direction and generally have a thickness of 0.1 to 5 µm.
Where a plurality of burn-suppressing regions 14 are formed, distance between the
adjacent burn-suppressing regions 14 is preferably 18 to 25 mm.
[0020] In the cigarette shown in FIG. 1, a region 16 covering a distance d from the tip
is not coated with a burn-suppressing agent. This section at the tip portion, which
is not coated with the burn-suppressing agent, also constitutes an ordinary burn region,
and can correspond to the region that is combusted by one puff or two puffs in the
ordinary cigarette. Incidentally, where a plurality of burn-suppressing regions 14
are provided, the ordinary burn region 16 may not be formed (d = 0). However, where
a single burn-suppressing region 14 is provided, the distance d from the tip 11a of
the tobacco rod can be set at 10 to 25 mm. It is not particularly necessary to form
a burn-suppressing region 14 on the inner surface of the cigarette paper corresponding
to that portion of the cigarette paper 12 which is covered with the chip paper 17.
[0021] When the cigarette 10 is ignited at the tip 11a and inhaled to be burnt, the cigarette
can burn at the ordinary burn region 15 like an ordinary cigarette and the flavor
and taste can be enjoyed. However, if the cigarette 10 under the ignited state is
put on a combustible material such as a carpet, a tatami mat, a wooden article, cloths,
or clothing, the burn-suppressing region 14 extending in the combusting direction,
the heat absorption by the combustible substance, and the expanded tobacco shreds
collectively serve to extinguish the cigarette 10, and prevent the combustible substance
from catching fire. Also, the cigarette wrapped with the cigarette paper of the present
invention is low in the C/T ratio in the mainstream smoke.
[0022] The present invention will be described by way of Examples below. However, the present
invention is not limited by these Examples.
Examples 1 to 13 and Comparative Examples 1 to 12
[0023] A base paper (width 27 mm; length 1.500m) of the specification shown in Table 1 was
coated (printed) with an aqueous solution of sodium alginate of various concentrations
(0.5 to 20% by weight) at a constant width of 7 mm in the longitudinal direction and
a constant spacing of 20 mm in the form of stripes by a direct gravure method, forming
a total of 56 burn-suppressing agent-coated regions. For the cigarette paper thus
obtained, the total coating amount of sodium alginate was measured according to the
procedures described below. The results are shown also in Table 1. As shown in Table
1, the total coating amount of the burn-suppressing agent per m
2 of the region coated with the burn-suppressing agent (sodium alginate) corresponded
to 0.2 to 1.8g in the papers of Examples 1 to 13. This coating amount of the burn-suppressing
agent can be converted to the amount of the burn-suppressing agent per area of the
cigarette paper by being multiplied by 7/27, yielding 0.05 to 0.47 g/m
2, Incidentally, sodium alginate used in each of Examples 5, 8 and 11 was I-S manufactured
by KIMIKA (registered trademark) (polymerization degree: 650 to 670; viscosity of
its 3% by weight aqueous solution at 25°C: 29976.9 cP), and sodium alginate used in
each of the other Examples was IL-2 manufactured by KIMIKA (registered trademark)
(polymerization degree: 30 to 180; viscosity of its 3% by weight aqueous solution
at 25°C: 907.2 cP).
[0024] A tobacco rod consisting of American blend of tobacco shreds (tar amount without
a filter: 19 to 20 mg) was wrapped with the cigarette paper obtained above, and was
cut such that the first coated region was arranged 5 mm spaced apart from the burn
edge of the cigarette. Each cigarette was 59 mm long, and had two burn-suppressing
agent-coated regions.
[0025] The cigarette thus obtained was subjected to a burn test in accordance with ASTM
E-2187-04 so as to measure the value of PFLB (percent full-length burn). Also, the
CO amount in the mainstream smoke, the number of puffs and the tar amount for each
cigarette sample were measured by the methods described below in respect of these
cigarette samples. The results are shown in Table 2.
<Measurement of Total Coating Amount of Sodium Alginate>
[0027] The cigarette paper coated with the burn-suppressing agent (1.5000m; width 27 mm)
(about 1.0g) was cut into pieces each sized at 5 mm square. Then, 40 mL of a 1% by
weight aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate was added thereto, and heated
for 5 minutes in a warm water bath at 60°C. Then, the mixture was sufficiently mixed,
stirred, and subjected to centrifugal separation (3,500 rotations, 10 minutes; the
same applies to the following) to give a supernatant liquor (extracted liquid). The
extraction residue was similarly subjected again to the extraction to give a supernatant
liquor (extracted liquid). In addition, 20 mL of a 1% by weight aqueous solution of
sodium hydrogen carbonate was added to and mixed sufficiently with the extraction
residue to give supernatant liquor (extracted liquid). These three extracted liquid
were combined, and a 1% by weight aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate was
added to 100 mL, which was used as a test solution.
[0028] 2 mL of copper-hydrochloric acid solution (8.5M hydrochloric acid containing 0.05%
by weight of copper sulfate) and 1 mL of a naphtoresorcinol solution (0.4% by weight
aqueous solution of 1,3-dihydroxynaphthalene) were added to each of 1 mL of a sodium
alginate standard solution (1% by weight aqueous solution of sodium hydrogen carbonate
containing sodium alginate at a concentration of 0 to 0.2 mg/mL) and 1 mL of the test
solution noted above. Then, each mixture was heated for 65 minutes in a boiling water
bath, and then cooled in ice water, to which 4 mL of butyl acetate was added. The
mixture was shaken and subjected to centrifugal separation.
[0029] 1 mL was taken from the supernatant liquor after the centrifugal separation, diluted
by adding 3 mL of butyl acetate and subjected to a colorimetric at 566 nm, and the
total coating amount was calculated.
<Measurement of CO Amount and the Number of Puffs>
[0030] For measuring the CO amount, the tobacco smoke was collected by using an 8-port linear
smoking machine (SM 342) manufactured by FILTRONA Inc. For the burn of the cigarette,
the suction of 35 mL/2 seconds was carried out at an interval of 60 seconds according
to the ISO standards, and the smoke passing through the glass fiber filter was collected
in a gas bag. The suction of the cigarette sample was stopped when the sample reached
the standard burn length (51 mm from the ignition edge of the cigarette (8 mm apart
from the tip side as measured from the boundary between the cigarette paper and the
chip paper)). The number of puffs at this point was counted and recorded. After the
burning, the igniting portion was removed and, then, blank puffing was performed three
times so as to collect the gas remaining in the cigarette. In this fashion, the gas
of the cigarette sample was collected in the gas bag, and the total particulate matter
(TPM) was collected at the glass fiber filter.
[0031] The CO amount per cigarette sample was measured with a CO measuring apparatus manufactured
by FILTRONA Inc., using the gas collected in the gas bag and
<Measurement of Tar Amount>
[0032] From the particulate components collected at the glass fiber filter in measuring
the CO amount, the crude tar amount was weighed, and then the filter was put in a
serum bottle and vigorously shaken together with 10 mL of 2-propanol (GC grade, manufactured
by Wako Junyaku K.K.). The extracted liquor was filtered and poured into a vial. Then,
the extracted liquor was applied to a chromatograph so as to measure the water amount
and the nicotine amount. The quantitative determination was carried out by the internal
standard method, and the tar amount was obtained by subtracting the water amount and
the nicotine amount from the crude tar amount.
Table 1: Specification of cigarette paper
| Example |
Base cigarette paper |
Total coating amount of burn-suppressing agent (g/m2) |
| Filler (g/m2) |
Basis weight (g/m2) |
Burn-adjusting agent (% by weight) |
Air permeability (CORESTA) |
| Comp. Ex. 1 |
7.7 |
25 |
0.3 |
35 |
0 |
| Comp. Ex. 2 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
0 |
| Comp. Ex. 3 |
4.1 |
21 |
0.3 |
35 |
0 |
| Comp. Ex. 4 |
2.5 |
20 |
0.3 |
37 |
0 |
| Comp. Ex. 5 |
2.1 |
19 |
0.3 |
31 |
0 |
| Comp. Ex. 6 |
7.7 |
26 |
0.3 |
35 |
1.8 |
| Comp. Ex. 7 |
7.7 |
26 |
1.0 |
35 |
1.8 |
| Comp. Ex. 8 |
7.7 |
26 |
0.3 |
35 |
2.2 |
| Comp. Ex. 9 |
7.7 |
26 |
1.0 |
35 |
2.2 |
| Comp. Ex. 10 |
2.1 |
19 |
0.3 |
31 |
2.3 |
| Comp. Ex. 11 |
2.1 |
26 |
0.3 |
32 |
0.5 |
| Comp. Ex. 12 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
2.0 |
| Ex. 1 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
0.3 |
| Ex. 2 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
1.2 |
| Ex. 3 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
1.6 |
| Ex. 4 |
5.2 |
21 |
0.3 |
45 |
1.8 |
| Ex. 5 |
4.1 |
21 |
0.3 |
35 |
0.3 |
| Ex. 6 |
4.1 |
21 |
0.3 |
35 |
1.0 |
| Ex. 7 |
4.1 |
21 |
0.3 |
35 |
1.8 |
| Ex. 8 |
2.5 |
21 |
0.3 |
37 |
0.2 |
| Ex. 9 |
2.5 |
20 |
0.3 |
37 |
0.7 |
| Ex. 10 |
2.5 |
20 |
0.3 |
37 |
1.8 |
| Ex. 11 |
2.1 |
19 |
0.3 |
31 |
0.2 |
| Ex. 12 |
2.1 |
19 |
0.3 |
31 |
0.6 |
| Ex. 13 |
2.1 |
19 |
0.3 |
31 |
1.0 |
Table 2: Test results
| Example |
PFLB (%) |
Tar amount per cig. (mg) |
CO amount per cig. (mg) |
C/T ratio |
Puff number |
Remarks |
| Comp. Ex. 1 |
100 |
19.6 |
16.0 |
0.82 |
7.4 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 2 |
81-95 |
21.0 |
15.2 |
0.72 |
7.6 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 3 |
87-99 |
21.8 |
16.0 |
0.73 |
7.8 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 4 |
81-95 |
23.2 |
16.2 |
0.70 |
8.1 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 5 |
20-40 |
23.7 |
16.8 |
0.71 |
8.2 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 6 |
20-40 |
21.1 |
18.4 |
0.87 |
8.2 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 7 |
20-40 |
21.2 |
19.3 |
0.91 |
8.4 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 8 |
0-5 |
21.6 |
19.0 |
0.88 |
8.4 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 9 |
0-5 |
21.1 |
19.2 |
0.91 |
8.2 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 10 |
0-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Impossible to measure; the cigarette went out |
| Comp. Ex. 11 |
0-5 |
22.9 |
20.6 |
0.90 |
8.5 |
|
| Comp. Ex. 12 |
0-5 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
Impossible to measure; the cigarette went out |
| Ex. 1 |
0-5 |
21.4 |
15.6 |
0.73 |
7.8 |
|
| Ex. 2 |
0-5 |
22.3 |
16.5 |
0.74 |
8.2 |
|
| Ex. 3 |
0-5 |
22.8 |
17.0 |
0.75 |
8.4 |
|
| Ex. 4 |
0-5 |
23.0 |
17.2 |
0.75 |
8.5 |
|
| Ex. 5 |
0-5 |
22.0 |
16.3 |
0.74 |
7.9 |
|
| Ex. 6 |
0-5 |
23.0 |
17.4 |
0.76 |
8.4 |
|
| Ex. 7 |
0-5 |
23.5 |
17.9 |
0.76 |
8.6 |
|
| Ex. 8 |
0-5 |
23.4 |
16.4 |
0.70 |
8.2 |
|
| Ex. 9 |
0-5 |
23.8 |
16.8 |
0.71 |
8.4 |
|
| Ex. 10 |
0-5 |
25.1 |
18.1 |
0.72 |
9.0 |
|
| Ex. 11 |
0-5 |
25.0 |
17.8 |
0.71 |
8.7 |
|
| Ex. 12 |
0-5 |
25.3 |
18.2 |
0.72 |
8.9 |
|
| Ex. 13 |
0-5 |
25.9 |
18.8 |
0.73 |
9.1 |
|
[0033] From the results shown in Table 2, it can be seen that the cigarette papers (Examples
1-13) in which a burn-suppressing agent is coated spaced from each other on a base
cigarette paper containing a filler in an amount of 2 to 6 g/m
2 and having a basis weight of 16 to 22 g/m
2 such that the total coating amount corresponds to 0.2 to 1.8 g/m
2 exhibit a low flame-spreading property and a low C/T ratio.
[0034] As has been described above, the present invention provides a cigarette paper which
exhibits a low flame-spreading property and achieves a low C/T ratio.