| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 1 868 880 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
19.05.2010 Bulletin 2010/20 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 03.04.2006 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC):
|
| (86) |
International application number: |
|
PCT/NL2006/000171 |
| (87) |
International publication number: |
|
WO 2006/104386 (05.10.2006 Gazette 2006/40) |
|
| (54) |
SHIP WITH LIQUID TRANSPORT TANKS PROVIDED WITH DEFORMATION ABSORBERS
SCHIFF MIT DEFORMATIONSDÄMPFERN VERSEHENEN FLÜSSIGKEITSTRANSPORTBEHÄLTERN
NAVIRE COMPRENANT DES CITERNES POURVUES D'AMORTISSEURS EMPECHANT LES DEFORMATIONS
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE
SI SK TR |
|
Designated Extension States: |
|
HR YU |
| (30) |
Priority: |
01.04.2005 NL 1028679
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
26.12.2007 Bulletin 2007/52 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: Orca V.O.F. |
|
7521 AM Enschede (NL) |
|
| (72) |
Inventors: |
|
- KOOLE, Jacobus
NL-1871 AT Schoorl (NL)
- VAN POPPELEN, Martijn, Pieter
NL-7521 AG Enschede (NL)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Riemens, Roelof Harm et al |
|
Exter Polak & Charlouis B.V.
P.O. Box 3241 2280 GE Rijswijk 2280 GE Rijswijk (NL) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
DE-U1- 9 309 433 US-B1- 6 167 827
|
NL-C1- 1 011 836
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The invention relates to a ship with one or more liquid transport tanks which are
provided in a ship's hull for transporting liquid media.
[0002] The current mode of transporting liquid media, such as chemicals, oil and agricultural
products, is mainly in tankers which are equipped with rectangular cargo tanks that
are integral with the ship, so-called parcel tankers. The cargo tanks are part of
the ship's structure, in which the tank walls are formed by the ship's hull, profiled
cross bulkheads and longitudinal bulkheads placed therein, and the ship's deck.
[0003] The disadvantage here is that cracks can occur in the tank walls through deformations
of the ship in heavy seas and through temperature differences. The abovementioned
deformations cause high stress concentrations in the tanks, particularly on the corner
points, which can result in the formation of cracks. If this happens, an opening can
develop between two adjacent tanks, with the result that undesirable mixing of the
stored products can occur. In the current regulations it has already been stipulated
for many products that adjacent tanks must not be filled with different products,
this being to prevent the risk of cross-contamination and to avoid a dangerous situation.
Owing to the fact that different products can be transported in the tanks, the tanks
have to be carefully cleaned after delivery, in order to ensure that a product to
be transported after that is not contaminated. However, the tanks are difficult to
clean. This is partly because of the fact that the walls are of a partially profiled
design in order to make them sufficiently rigid, and the fact that they have corner
points. This means that a relatively large quantity of flushing water is needed for
cleaning the tanks, which is expensive and undesirable from an environmental point
of view because the flushing water sometimes has to be discharged as chemical waste.
In addition, a slight degree of contamination remaining in the tank cannot always
be detected by a routine check, with the result that damage can occur to the products
subsequently transported. Owing to the fact that the tanks are more difficult to insulate,
greater temperature differences can occur in the stored products. It is also necessary
to heat to a higher temperature in order to be able to maintain a desired temperature
in the tank. The higher temperatures can cause deterioration of the product.
[0004] In the art a search has been going on for alternatives for quite some time now, one
idea being, for example, to place several cylindrical storage tanks in the ship's
hull. See, for example,
US-6,167,827 or
DE-U-93.09.433, and
US 61 67 827, which is considered to be the closest prior art and has the features of the preamble
of claim 1.
[0005] A ship according to the pre-characterizing clause of claim 1 is known from
NL-C-1011836. This publication discloses a ship with a cylindrical transport tank placed in the
ship's hull. In this case the bottom of the tank is supported on the ship's hull and
is connected to a cylindrical tank circumferential wall. Spring means are provided
between the lower side of the tank circumferential wall and the ship's hull. The spring
means serve to limit a movement of the tank circumferential wall upwards and downwards.
This means that cargo in the transport tank is supported via the bottom of the tank
directly on the ship's hull, while the tank circumferential wall can move slightly
relative to the ship's hull within the limits formed by the spring means.
[0006] It is a disadvantage here that the tank circumferential wall has to be of a relatively
thick-walled design. Furthermore, it is a disadvantage that a relatively heavy tank
roof is necessary. As a result of this, the total weight of the transport tank is
relatively high. The possibilities for scaling up are limited, while the spring means
are fragile and require maintenance. Deck passages for the tank have to be flexible.
[0007] The object of the present invention is to provide a ship with one or more liquid
transport tanks placed in a ship's hull, in which the abovementioned disadvantages
are at least partially overcome, or to provide a usable alternative. In particular,
the object of the invention is to provide a great saving on material for liquid transport
tanks which are to be placed in a ship, with the transport tanks being sturdy and
being insensitive to sustained heavy ship movements and deformations. More particularly,
it is an object to make scaling up possible and to provide a simple construction requiring
little to no maintenance.
[0008] This object is achieved according to the present invention by a ship with one or
more liquid transport tanks according to claim 1 provided in the ship's hull. Each
transport tank comprises a tank roof and a tank bottom which is supported on a lower
deck of the ship's hull or is integral therewith. The tank circumferential wall extending
between the above two parts is in particular of a substantially cylindrical design,
but it can also be of another shape, for example oval, square, multi-lobed with partitions,
or polygonal. The tank circumferential wall is connected by its lower end to a first
deformation absorber, which in turn is connected directly or indirectly to a lower
deck of the ship's hull. Furthermore, the tank circumferential wall is connected by
its upper end to a second deformation absorber, which in turn is directly or indirectly
connected to an upper deck of the ship's hull. The tank circumferential wall is therefore
suspended by its upper and lower ends from the deformation absorbers between an upper
and lower deck of the ship's hull. The deformation absorbers are designed in such
a deformable manner that deformations, for example as a result of deformations of
the ship's hull, can be absorbed by a suitable deformation of the absorbers without
causing deformation of or placing an undue load upon the tank circumferential wall
in the process. The lower deformation absorber extends in the circumferential direction
around the entire circumference of the tank circumferential wall, forms part of the
tank wall, and forms a continuous sealing connection between the tank circumferential
wall and the bottom of the tank.
[0009] According to the invention, one of the main functions of the deformation absorbers
is to reduce axial stresses in the tank circumferential wall. Reducing axial pressure
stresses in the tank circumferential wall reduces the chance of crumpling of the tank
circumferential wall. The axial rigidity of the deformation absorbers can be selected
in such a way that advantageously no rigidity need be added to the tank circumferential
wall in order to prevent axial crumpling. The necessary wall thickness of the tank
circumferential wall can therefore advantageously be kept low. The necessary wall
thickness is now substantially determined by the internal pressure of the stored liquid,
axial crumpling stresses as a result of bending moments, shearing stresses and producibility.
[0010] Horizontal loads will be transmitted to the ship on the lower side and upper side
of the tank circumferential wall by way of the deformation absorbers substantially
by means of shearing forces. This can be achieved by a relatively great rigidity of
the deformation absorbers in the circumferential direction of the tank circumferential
wall. The deformation absorbers then, as it were, retain the tank circumferential
wall in the circumferential direction. The deformation absorbers can even be made
of a substantially rigid design in the abovementioned circumferential direction and
are then well suited for transmitting the horizontal loads to the ship, and for holding
the tank circumferential wall in position.
[0011] According to the invention, the tank circumferential wall can retain its shape and
will not crumple. Acceleration forces on the liquid medium stored in the tank will
result in relatively small reaction forces on the upper and lower side of the transport
tank. A maximum moment as a result of this play of forces now occurs substantially
halfway up the tank. This maximum moment is also relatively small. The stresses are
well distributed over the tank circumferential wall, the maximum axial stresses occurring
substantially at the position halfway down the tank circumferential wall, and the
maximum shearing stresses occurring at the position of the connection to the deformation
absorbers. The minimum wall thickness of the tank circumferential wall can consequently
be kept advantageously low. The circumferential wall can even be, as it were, in a
membrane-like form, in particular if said wall is cylindrical.
[0012] The rigidities of the deformation absorbers in the axial direction and in the circumferential
direction can be influenced by varying the shape and wall thickness of the deformation
absorbers.
[0013] Owing to the fact that horizontal forces on the transport tank are transmitted to
the ship both on the lower side and on the upper side, a uniform load occurs on the
ship's hull. No additional supporting structures are needed halfway along the ship's
hull. Passages through the upper deck for loading and unloading need not be flexibly
connected to the tank. The thin tank wall can be well insulated, which produces a
saving in energy and a high product quality after transportation. The service life
of the transport tank will be long, and the transport tank will require virtually
no maintenance. The risk of the tank wall cracking in the event of a collision will
be reduced. The deformation absorbers and the tank wall can absorb some of the deformation
as a result of the collision. Finally, the deformation absorbers are also suitable
for absorbing the expansion or shrinkage of the tank wall occurring depending on the
temperature of the cargo.
[0014] Owing to the fact that the tank circumferential wall is, as it were, suspended between
two springs (the deformation absorbers), the tank circumferential wall will sink slightly
under the influence of gravity. The degree of sinkage or movement is determined here
by the spring rigidity of the deformation absorbers in the axial direction and the
mass of the tank circumferential wall. Limiting the spring rigidity of the deformation
absorbers in the upward direction will cause the tank circumferential wall to sink
significantly after placing between the deformation absorbers, thus compressing or
extending the deformation absorbers. Preferred embodiments for this sinkage or movement
are described in claims 2-7.
[0015] In an advantageous embodiment the deformation absorbers are designed in the circumferential
direction of the tank circumferential wall with a rigidity that is greater than or
equal to 1/3
rd of the rigidity of a reference wall which is straight all the way down, is made of
the same material, and has the same wall thickness curve as the tank circumferential
wall with the deformation absorbers.
[0016] In a further advantageous embodiment the deformation absorbers are designed in the
axial direction of the tank circumferential wall in such a way that the ratio of the
spring rigidity in the axial direction of a reference wall which is straight all the
way down, is made of the same material, and has the same wall thickness curve as the
tank circumferential wall together with the deformation absorbers, is greater than
2 relative to the tank circumferential wall together with the deformation absorbers.
[0017] It is preferable for both of the abovementioned conditions for the spring rigidity
to be met. In this way the tank circumferential wall is suspended between the two
deformation absorbers on the ship's hull.
[0018] The tank roof can form an integral part of an upper deck of the ship's hull.
[0019] If, however, the tank bottom and/or the tank roof are designed separately, they can
follow the deformations of the ship's hull without undue resistance, and the wall
thicknesses of the tank bottom and the tank roof can advantageously be kept low. All
of this together makes it possible for considerable savings on material to be achieved.
[0020] In particular, the upper deformation absorber also extends over substantially the
entire circumference of the tank circumferential wall. This continuous connection
ensures that local stress concentrations are prevented.
[0021] More particularly, the upper deformation absorber also forms part of the tank wall
and is accommodated at the position of the transition between the tank circumferential
wall and the tank roof. The deformation absorber forms a continuous sealing connection
between said circumferential wall and said tank roof.
[0022] Separate deformable support elements can be provided for supporting the tank circumferential
wall in the axial direction and/or for the partial absorption of the liquid pressure.
The deformation absorbers can then be designed so as to be substantially freely movable
in the axial direction, in other words without undue resistance. It is, however, also
possible to make the deformation absorbers so rigid in the axial direction of the
tank that the two deformation absorbers together can partially or even fully support
the tank circumferential wall. In the latter case the tank circumferential wall is
ultimately, as it were, suspended between the deformation absorbers without additional
support elements having to be provided.
[0023] The deformation absorbers are advantageously rigid at least in the circumferential
direction of the transport tank. This can be achieved by a suitable ratio between
the shape, wall thickness, strength and rigidity in the various directions of the
deformation absorbers. Since the deformation absorbers are rigid in the circumferential
direction, in other words under load they retain their shape in the circumferential
direction, they hold the tank circumferential wall in place.
[0024] Further preferred embodiments of the ship are described in the subclaims.
[0025] The invention further relates to a transport tank for a ship according to the invention,
to a method for placing such a transport tank in a ship, and to a use of such a ship.
[0026] The invention will be explained in greater detail with reference to the appended
drawings, in which:
Fig. 1 is a diagrammatic partial view in cross section of an embodiment of a cylindrical
transport tank according to the invention placed in a ship's hull;
Fig. 2 is a diagrammatic view in cross section of a ship with a variant of a transport
tank placed therein;
Fig. 3 shows a series of variants of embodiments of deformation absorbers which can
be used;
Fig. 4 is a front view of a variant of Fig. 2;
Fig. 5 shows the variant in Fig. 4 in a deformed state;
Fig. 6 is a partial view in cross section of Fig. 4;
Fig. 7 is a cut-away view in perspective of a ship's hull with several transport tanks
according to Fig. 4 placed therein;
Figs. 8 - 14 show variants of Fig. 6;
Fig. 15 shows a variant with slanting tank bottom;
Figs. 16 - 18 show variants with an upper deformation absorber provided fully or partially
outside the tank wall;
Figs. 19 and 20 show variants with an additional skirt construction; and
Fig. 21 shows diagrammatically the variant of Fig. 6 with parameters indicated therein.
[0027] In Fig. 1 the transport tank is indicated in its entirety by the reference numeral
1. The transport tank 1 consists of a tank bottom 2, a cylindrical tank circumferential
wall 3 and a tank roof 4. The tank bottom 2 is of a flat design and, with the interposition
of an insulating layer 6, is connected to a lower deck 7 of a hull of a ship not shown
in any greater detail. The tank roof 4 is connected to an upper deck 9 of the ship's
hull, with the interposition of an insulating layer 8. The tank circumferential wall
3 is partially supported towards the bottom by deformable support means 12. The support
means 12 engage upon the bottom part of the tank circumferential wall 3. Deformation
absorbers 15, 16 are accommodated in the tank wall. The deformation absorbers 15,
16 are formed here as sections which are quadrantal-shaped (shaped like a quarter
circle) in cross section and extend between the tank bottom 2 or the tank roof 4 and
the tank circumferential wall 3 respectively. The deformation absorbers 15, 16 extend
around the entire tank 1 and are of a design that is rigid in the circumferential
direction of the tank 1. In addition, the absorbers 15, 16 are designed to be deformable
in the radial and axial direction of the tank 1 in such a way that, under the influence
of deformations of the upper deck relative to the lower deck, the deformation absorbers
can assume a different shape. In the embodiment shown this means that the quadrantal-shaped
sections can extend or bulge. By dimensioning the deformation absorbers 15, 16 sufficiently
accurately, it can be ensured that said deformation absorbers fully absorb the ship's
hull deformations that are to be expected. This means that it is advantageously possible
for deformations of the ship's hull to be substantially absorbed by suitable deformations
of the deformation absorbers 15, 16, without the tank circumferential wall 3 being
placed under a significant load and/or becoming deformed. The tank circumferential
wall 3 can consequently be of a thin-walled design, without crumpling or cracking
occurring.
[0028] The tank bottom 2 and the tank roof 4 are advantageously of a thin-walled design,
so that they can easily follow deformations or movements of the lower and upper deck
7, 9.
[0029] The support means 12 provide a support in the axial direction of the tank circumferential
wall 3.
[0030] The deformation absorbers, like the other parts of the tank wall, can be made of
steel, in particular stainless steel, for example Duplex 2205 or stainless steel 304.
Plastic, in particular fibre-reinforced plastic, could also be used.
[0031] During fitting, the deformation absorbers advantageously can be connected under pre-tension,
for example can be welded, to the other tank wall parts. This can result in an advantageous
load upon the deformation absorbers. It is also conceivable to provide a pre-tension
and spring travel limitation in the support means.
[0032] The tank bottom, the tank roof and the tank circumferential wall, if made of, for
example, ordinary steel or stainless steel, can be made thinner than the general thickness
of 25 mm, in particular can be approximately 5 - 15 mm thick. The thickness of the
deformation absorbers can be approximately 5 - 15 mm. This will be dependent partly
on the height-diameter ratio and the material. Partly thanks to this thin-walled design
of the tank walls, a saving on material for the transport tanks can be achieved according
to the invention.
[0033] Fig. 2 shows a ship 20 with a transport tank 21 placed in a hull of said ship. On
the lower side the tank 21 is connected by its tank bottom 22 to the bottom of the
ship's hull. On the upper side a tank roof 23 of the tank 21 is suspended from an
upper deck 24 of the ship's hull. The tank wall further comprises a cylindrical tank
circumferential wall 25. Deformation absorbers 26 are accommodated in the tank wall,
designed here as bellows-shaped deformation absorbers with two folds extending in
the axial direction. The folds extend on either side of an imaginary plane through
the tank circumferential wall 25. This has the advantage that the deformation absorber
lies symmetrically relative to the tank circumferential wall 25, so that at the position
of the deformation absorber no resultant of the liquid pressure occurs in the downward
direction. Separate support elements are omitted here.
[0034] A number of other variants of embodiments of deformation absorbers are shown in Fig.
3. In the case of each of the variants the designer can play as desired with a mutual
coordination of wall thickness and choice of material (strength and modulus of elasticity).
The five variants at the bottom are provided with means for absorbing pressure forces
from the cargo which are exerted upon the deformation absorber. These means are formed
here by compressible support elements disposed on the outside of the deformation absorber.
Examples here are preformed rubber support blocks, springs, insulating material with
limited compressibility, a liquid bag etc. The deformation absorber can be made thinner
as a result of this, so that it can absorb even greater deformations.
[0035] Fig. 3 also shows a variant in which the deformation absorbers are formed by wall
parts of the tank circumferential wall or the tank bottom or the tank roof which connect
substantially at right angles to each other. If desired, a slight rounding can be
provided at the position of the connection. Deformations of the ship's hull can also
be absorbed in particular by designing the wall part of the deformation absorber near
the connection to the tank bottom or the tank roof in such a way that said wall part
can move up and down slightly, for example by making it thin-walled at that point.
Near the connection, spring means can also be provided, which spring means can in
particular be under pre-tension, and in particular operate in the axial direction
of the tank.
[0036] In Figs. 4 - 6 a tank circumferential wall 40 is suspended directly by means of two
deformation absorbers 41, 42 from an upper deck 43 and a lower deck 44 of a ship's
hull 45. The tank bottom and the tank roof here form an integral part of the lower
deck 44 and upper deck 43 respectively. The deformation absorbers 41, 42 are both
of a bellows-shaped design, extend in the circumferential direction along the entire
tank circumferential wall 40, and form a continuous sealing connection between the
tank circumferential wall 40 and the tank bottom and the tank roof respectively. The
tank circumferential wall 40 is of a cylindrical design here. Fig. 5 shows clearly
that if there is a deformation of the ship's hull 45, in this case a combination of
a twisting and a bending of the lower deck, the walls and the upper deck of said ship,
this deformation is fully absorbed by the deformation absorbers 41, 42. Said deformation
absorbers are compressed or extended locally in the axial direction, in other words
parallel to the centre line 47 of the tank circumferential wall 40. The tank circumferential
wall 40 is subjected to little or no extra load by this and can consequently retain
substantially its original shape.
[0037] Fig. 7 shows several transport tanks 70 according to the invention provided in a
ship's hull 71. The tanks 70 have different dimensions and can consequently utilize
the free space in the ship's hull 71 to the full. In addition, the tanks 70 are disposed
with their circumferential walls clear of each other and of the ship's hull. It can
be seen clearly that the deformation absorbers 72 extend around the entire tank and
form an integral part of the tank wall.
[0038] In the following figures identical and similar parts are indicated by the same reference
numerals as far as possible.
[0039] Fig. 8 shows a variant of Fig. 6 in which the tank bottom 80 and the tank roof 81
are designed as separate parts. Both are fully supported on the lower and upper decks
44 and 43 respectively. The deformation absorbers 42, 41 are permanently connected
to the tank bottom 80 and the tank roof 81 respectively and/or to the lower and upper
decks 44 and 43 respectively.
[0040] Fig. 9 shows a variant of Fig. 8 in which the tank bottom 80 is supported by way
of a slightly compressible layer 90, for example a cork layer or a sandwich layer,
on the lower deck 44. The lower deformation absorber 42 is connected both to the tank
bottom 80 and to the lower deck 44. The tank roof 81 is supported on the upper deck
43 by means of sections 91. The upper deformation absorber 41 is connected here both
to the tank roof 81 and to the upper deck 43.
[0041] Fig. 10 shows a variant of Fig. 9 in which the tank bottom 80 is now supported on
the lower deck 44 by means of sections 100, while the tank roof is connected by means
of a slightly compressible layer 101 to the upper deck 43.
[0042] Fig. 11 shows a variant in which both the tank bottom 80 and also the tank roof 81
are supported on a compressible layer 110. The deformation absorbers 111 are formed
here by double semi-circular deformation sections.
[0043] Fig. 12 shows a variant in which a tank circumferential wall 120 is suspended between
upper and lower semi-circular deformation sections 121. In addition, yet further deformation
absorbers 122 are integral with the tank circumferential wall 120. Said deformation
absorbers are of the same shape here as the deformation sections 121.
[0044] Fig. 13 shows a variant in which the lower and upper deformation absorbers 130 comprise
semi-circular section parts 131, which merge into straight section parts 132 in the
direction of the lower and upper deck respectively.
[0045] Fig. 14 shows a variant in which the entire tank circumferential wall 140 is made
up of interconnecting bellows-shaped section parts. Upper and lower section parts
here form the deformation absorbers 141, 142 between which the tank circumferential
wall 140 is suspended.
[0046] Fig. 15 shows a variant of Fig. 10 in which a tank bottom 150 which slants down towards
the centre is supported by way of sections 151 on the lower deck 44. The tank bottom
150 here has an angle of inclination of, for example, 5 degrees relative to the lower
deck 44. The advantage of this is that the tank is easier to empty and clean.
[0047] Fig. 16 shows a variant of Fig. 9 in which a rigid tank roof 160 is supported on
the tank circumferential wall 40. The tank circumferential wall 40 and the tank roof
160 are suspended by means of a deformation absorber 161 from the upper deck 43. The
deformation absorber 161 thus does not form part of the tank wall which has to bound
the liquid in the tank. Furthermore, one or more separate support elements 162 are
provided, by means of which movement of the tank circumferential wall 40 upwards can
be limited. This movement upwards can occur, for example, as a result of liquid pressure
against the tank roof 160.
[0048] Fig. 17 shows a variant of Fig. 16 in which the tank roof is formed by a dome-shaped
roof 170 which is supported directly on the tank circumferential wall 40. The lower
deformation absorber 171 is formed by a quadrantal-shaped section. The support elements
162 are omitted here. However, the lower end of the tank circumferential wall is connected
to support elements 172. The support elements 172 preferably comprise tension and
compression springs in order to prevent compression of the deformation absorber 171
as a result of liquid pressure upon it, and in order to minimize movements of the
tank circumferential wall 40 upwards as a result of liquid pressure on the tank roof
170.
[0049] Fig. 18 shows a variant in which the tank roof 81 is suspended from the upper deck
43 by means of sections 180. The tank circumferential wall 40 is suspended between
the lower deformation absorber 171 and an upper deformation absorber 181. The upper
deformation absorber 181 is partially integral with the tank wall and extends partially
beyond it between the tank and the upper deck 43. The integral part comprises a quadrantal-shaped
deformation section 183 and a horizontal part 184. The part lying outside the tank
wall comprises a semi-circular deformation section 185. The support element 172 is
designed here with rubber blocks or a continuous rubber connection 186.
[0050] Fig. 19 shows a variant in which the deformation absorbers 190, 191 each comprise
a double semi-circular deformation section part 192, 193 and a straight wall part
194, 195, both forming part of the tank wall. In addition, skirt walls 196, 197 are
provided, said skirt walls on one side being connected to the deformation absorbers
190, 191 and on the other side being fixed to the lower and upper deck respectively,
so that expansion in the radial direction of the tank wall as a result of temperature
differences can be absorbed. This is necessary here because the tank bottom and the
tank roof are supported in the axial direction on sections 198, 199 which can slide
in the horizontal direction relative to the lower deck and the upper deck. Likewise,
the lower and upper sides respectively of the deformation absorbers 190, 191 are not
connected in a fixed, but in a slidable manner to the lower and upper decks respectively.
In the horizontal direction the tank in this variant is supported only by the skirt
walls 196, 197. The skirt walls 196, 197 preferably extend around the entire circumference
of the tank.
[0051] Fig. 20 shows a variant of Figure 19, in which the skirt walls 201, 202 are designed
in such a way that they can absorb deformations in the radial and axial direction
and can support the tank wall in the axial direction. With proper dimensioning of
the rigidity in the axial direction, no additional support means are then needed.
In the circumferential direction the skirt walls 201, 202 are again relatively rigid,
so that they can hold the tank in place. The deformation absorbers are further formed
here by quadrantal-shaped sections 203, 204 incorporated in the tank wall. Just as
in Fig. 19, the tank bottom and the tank roof here too are supported so as to be slidable
in the horizontal direction on the lower and upper decks respectively.
[0052] In the following numeric example with reference to Fig. 21 we assume a cylindrical
stainless steel tank, with the following data:
| Tank height |
h = |
7000 mm |
| Tank radius |
r = |
5000 mm |
| Wall thickness of tank circumferential wall |
tw = |
5 mm |
| Density of stainless steel |
ρstainless steel = |
7950 kg/mm3 |
| Modulus of elasticity of stainless steel |
E = |
200000 N/mm2 |
| Gravitational acceleration |
g = |
9.81 m/s2 |
| Permissible tension of stainless steel |
σtoe = |
240 N/mm2 |
[0053] The two deformation absorbers are of the same shape and have the following dimensions:
| Height of deformation absorber |
hop = |
1000 mm |
| Breadth of deformation absorber |
bop = |
100 mm |
| Wall thickness of deformation absorber |
top = |
4 mm |
| Height of tank circumferential wall |
htw = |
5000 mm |
[0054] The following characteristics of a single deformation absorber have been determined
by means of a FEM calculation:

[0055] The theoretical sinkage of the tank wall at the position halfway up, disregarding
the rigidity of the tank wall itself, is:

[0056] With:
- Gtw
- = Weight of tank circumferential wall in N per mm circumference
- Cp
- = Rigidity of one deformation absorber in N/mm/mm

[0057] The minimum sinkage of the tank wall according to the formula from claim 2 should
be:

[0058] The tank wall therefore sinks more than 15 times further than the minimum value according
to claim 2.
[0059] Since the rigidity in the axial direction of the deformation absorbers is the same,
these deformation absorbers absorb equal deformation when there is movement of the
upper deck relative to the lower deck. The deformation capacity of the total wall,
disregarding the deformation capacity of the tank circumferential wall, is then:

[0060] The tank circumferential wall together with the deformation absorbers according to
claim 5 should then be able to withstand a movement of the upper deck relative to
the lower deck of at least: Y*h/1000 = 1*7000/1000 = 7 mm. The tank circumferential
wall together with the deformation absorbers can therefore absorb at least 3.4 times
more deformation than the minimum value according to claim 5.
[0061] The axial rigidity of the tank circumferential wall together with the deformation
absorbers is compared below with that of a reference wall. Said reference wall:
- is straight all the way down;
- is made of the same material as the circumferential wall of the tank and the deformation
absorbers;
- has the same wall thickness curve as the circumferential wall of the tank and the
deformation absorbers.
[0062] In general, it can be said that the axial rigidity of the reference wall can be determined
as follows:

With:
- Cw =
- Rigidity of the reference wall in the axial direction expressed in Newton per millimetre
of compression per millimetre of circumference. [N/mm2]
- N =
- Edge load expressed in Newton per mm of circumference [N/mm]
- δw =
- Compression of the reference wall at particular edge load in millimetres [mm].
[0063] If the tank circumferential wall and the deformation sections are made of a uniform
material and all have an equal and uniform wall thickness, the rigidity of the reference
wall is equal to:

With:
Cw = Rigidity of the reference wall in the axial direction [N/mm2]
- E =
- Modulus of elasticity in [N/mm2]
- tw =
- thickness of the (uniform) reference wall in [mm]
- hw =
- Height of the reference wall in [mm] is equal to the tank height.
[0064] If the tank circumferential wall and the deformation sections have different wall
thicknesses and are made of different materials, the following applies as regards
the axial rigidity of the reference wall:

[0065] The reference wall in that case is divided into N cylindrical wall parts, each with
its own wall thickness, its own height and its own modulus of elasticity. This means
that we can determine the rigidity of the reference wall according to the numeric
example as follows:

[0066] The rigidity of the tank circumferential wall with the deformation absorbers is C
wp. This rigidity is defined as follows:

[0067] The rigidity can be calculated as follows:

[0068] This makes the ratio between the axial spring rigidity of the reference wall and
that of the tank circumferential wall with deformation absorbers:

[0069] The minimum value of this ratio according to claim 8 is greater than or equal to
2, so that the rigidity ratio in this example is over 100 times greater.
[0070] According to claim 16, the rigidity of at least one of the deformation absorbers
is lower than or equal to 20 N/mm/mm. The rigidity of both deformation absorbers is
1.22 N/mm/mm here, and is therefore less than 20.
[0072] The wall thickness of the tank circumferential wall is 5 mm and is therefore less
than 23.6 mm.
[0073] Depending on the material selected for the deformation absorbers, depending on whether
or not they form an integral part of the tank wall, and depending on the cargo to
be transported, said absorbers can further be clad with a chemical-resistant coating
or lining, such as a layer of stainless steel.
[0074] Many variants are possible apart from the embodiments shown. For example, the various
aspects from the figures can be combined further with each other. The tank bottom
or the tank roof can be of a shape other than flat, for example dome-shaped or conical.
Other embodiments are also conceivable for the deformation absorbers, so long as they
continue to meet the requirements set for deformability in the axial and circumferential
directions respectively, and in this way advantageously take the load off the tank
circumferential wall. The support elements can also be in a controllable form and,
for example, be in the form of a number of hydraulic piston-cylinder systems distributed
around the circumference. In particular, measuring sensors can be provided here, in
order to control the support elements depending on the current measured value.
[0075] The transport tanks according to the invention are intended for transporting liquids,
and in particular liquids which have to be transported under ambient pressure. The
transport tank is in particular designed for storage of the liquid medium therein
under a maximum of substantially 1 bar excess pressure above liquid level.
[0076] The deformation absorbers can be made up of several layers, in the case of which
in particular the multiple layers are not connected to each other and can therefore
move relative to each other. This gives the deformation absorbers great flexibility.
[0077] In this way the invention provides a very advantageous design for a transport tank
and its support in a ship's hull, which makes very great savings on material possible
because of the fact that a tank circumferential wall is suspended between an upper
and a lower deck, in combination with the use of deformation absorbers on the underside
and upper side of the tank circumferential wall. The manufacturing and transport costs
will be correspondingly low as a result, while a high level of safety and reliability
of the transport is ensured, even in the event of a collision. The transport tanks
can advantageously be constructed in factory conditions, and can then be connected
in an insulated state or otherwise to the ship's hull. Insulation, means, if present,
can be provided on the outside of the tanks. The tanks are easy to clean, and the
cleaning can even be automated.
1. Ship with one or more liquid transport tanks (1) arranged in an upright position in
a ship's hull, said transport tanks having an axial direction and a circumferential
direction, and each transport tank comprising:
- a tank bottom (2);
- a tank circumferential wall (3);
- a tank roof (4);
the tank bottom being supported on or forming part of a lower deck (7) of the ship's
hull,
characterized in that
the tank circumferential wall (3) is suspended by its lower and upper ends by means
of deformable deformation absorbers (12) between the lower deck (7) and an upper deck
(9) of the ship's hull, which deformation absorbers (12) are designed so as to absorb
deformations between the ship's hull and the tank circumferential wall (3) at least
in the abovementioned axial direction, at least the lower deformation absorber (12)
extending in the circumferential direction around substantially the entire circumference
of the tank circumferential wall (3), and at least the lower deformation absorber
(12) forming part of the tank wall and being accommodated at the position of the transition
between the tank circumferential wall (3) and the tank bottom (2) so as to form a
continuous sealing connection between them.
2. Ship according to claim 1, in which, after suspension between the deformation absorbers,
the tank wall sinks down in the abovementioned axial direction under the influence
of gravity, at the same time deforming the deformation absorbers, and in which the
deformation absorbers are of such rigidity that the following equation applies to
the sinkage in the abovementioned axial direction of the tank circumferential wall,
which sinkage is measured at the position of half way up the tank circumferential
wall:

with: C >= 1e
-7, h = height of the tank in millimetres, and r = average radius of the tank circumferential
wall in millimetres.
3. Ship according to claim 2, in which C >= 2e-7.
4. Ship according to claim 3, in which C >= 10e-7.
5. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank circumferential wall
together with the deformation absorbers can absorb a movement of the upper deck relative
to the lower deck in the axial direction of at least Y*h/1000, with Y >= 1, and h
= height of the tank in millimetres, without the deformation absorbers and/or the
tank circumferential wall becoming plastically deformed, without the permissible elasticity
in the deformation absorbers and/or in the tank circumferential wall being exceeded,
and/or without the tank circumferential wall crumpling.
6. Ship according to claim 5, in which Y>= 2.
7. Ship according to claim 5, in which Y>= 4.
8. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the following applies for
the ratio of the spring rigidity Cwp in the abovementioned axial direction of the
tank circumferential wall together with the deformation absorbers relative to the
spring rigidity Cw in the abovementioned axial direction of a reference wall which
is straight all the way up, is made of the same material, and has the same wall thickness
curve:
9. Ship according to claim 8, in which Cw/Cwp >= 25.
10. Ship according to claim 9, in which Cw/Cwp >= 50.
11. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers has a rigidity in the abovementioned circumferential direction which is
greater than or equal to 1/3rd of the rigidity in the abovementioned circumferential direction of a reference wall
which is straight all the way up, is made of the same material, and has the same wall
thickness curve as the tank circumferential wall with the deformation absorbers.
12. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the deformation absorbers
are arranged so as to be elastically deformable, so that at least in the abovementioned
axial direction through substantially elastic deformation they absorb deformations
between the ship's hull and the tank circumferential wall.
13. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the upper deformation absorber
extends in the circumferential direction around substantially the entire circumference
of the tank circumferential wall.
14. Ship according to claim 13, in which the tank roof is supported on or forms part of
an upper deck of the ship's hull, and in which the upper deformation absorber forms
part of the tank wall and is accommodated at the position of the transition between
the tank circumferential wall and the tank roof in order to form a continuous sealing
connection between them.
15. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers extends partially in the axial direction and partially in the radial direction.
16. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the spring rigidity of at
least one of the deformation absorbers in the abovementioned axial direction is less
than or equal to 20 Newton per millimetre of compression per millimetre of circumference.
17. Ship according to claim 16, in which the abovementioned spring rigidity in the abovementioned
direction is less than or equal to 15 Newton per millimetre of compression per millimetre
of circumference.
18. Ship according to claim 17, in which the abovementioned spring rigidity in the abovementioned
direction is less than or equal to 10 Newton per millimetre of compression per millimetre
of circumference.
19. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the following applies for
the wall thickness of the tank circumferential wall:
wall thickness in millimetres <= X,
and in which the following applies for X:
X = maximum of:

and Z,
with: K >= 0.15, Z >= 10, σtoe= the permissible tensile stress in the tank circumferential wall in N/mm2, h = height of the tank in millimetres, and D = the diameter of the tank circumferential
wall in millimetres.
20. Ship according to claim 19, in which K >= 0.13 and Z >= 9.
21. Ship according to claim 19, in which K >= 0.11 and Z >= 8.
22. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank bottom is supported
on the lower deck and has a maximum angle of inclination of 5° relative to the lower
deck.
23. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank roof is supported
on the tank circumferential wall, and in which the upper deformation absorber extends
between the upper end of the tank circumferential wall and the ship's hull.
24. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers is rigid in the circumferential direction of the transport tank.
25. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers in the axial direction of the transport tank is designed for at least partial
support of the tank circumferential wall.
26. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which support means are provided
for supporting the tank circumferential wall at least in the axial direction.
27. Ship according to claim 26, in which the support means comprise separate deformable
support elements which extend between the ship's hull and the tank circumferential
wall.
28. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers is designed as a section which is substantially quadrantal-shaped in cross
section.
29. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers is designed as a bellows-shaped deformation section.
30. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers comprises stainless steel.
31. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers comprises fibre-reinforced plastic.
32. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the inner side of the deformation
absorbers is provided with a chemically resistant lining.
33. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank bottom and/or the
tank roof is (are) supported on the lower and upper deck respectively by means of
an insulating layer.
34. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the deformation absorber consists
partially of a straight wall extending in the axial direction.
35. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank circumferential wall
is connected to the ship by means of a skirt construction on the upper and/or the
lower side.
36. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the transport tank is designed
for storage of the liquid medium therein with an excess pressure above liquid level
of less than substantially 1 bar.
37. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which at least one of the deformation
absorbers is designed with multiple walls.
38. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank circumferential wall
is substantially cylindrical.
39. Ship according to one of the preceding claims, in which the tank circumferential wall
comprises one or more deformation absorbers between its lower and upper ends.
40. Ship according to claim 39, in which the one or more deformation absorbers in the
tank circumferential wall are designed to be of substantially the same shape as the
deformation absorbers by means of which the tank circumferential wall is suspended
by its lower and/or upper end from the lower deck and the upper deck of the ship's
hull.
41. Liquid transport tank for a ship according to one of the preceding claims.
42. Method for placing a liquid transport tank according to claim 41 in a ship.
43. Method according to claim 42, in which at least one of the deformation absorbers is
connected under pre-tension to the tank circumferential wall, the tank bottom, the
tank roof and/or the ship's hull.
44. Use of a ship with one or more liquid transport tanks according to one of claims 1
- 40 placed in the ship's hull for the transportation therein of liquid media.
1. Schiff mit einem oder mehreren Flüssigkeitstransporttanks (1), die in einer aufrechten
Stellung in einem Schiffskörper angeordnet sind, wobei die Transporttanks eine Axialrichtung
und eine Umfangsrichtung haben und jeder Transporttank enthält:
- einen Tankboden (2);
- eine Tankumfangswand (3);
- eine Tankdecke (4);
wobei der Tankboden auf dem Unterdeck (7) des Schiffskörpers ruht oder einen Teil
desselben bildet,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass die Tankumfangswand (3) an ihren unteren und oberen Enden mit Hilfe verformbarer
Verformungsdämpfer (12) zwischen dem Unterdeck (7) und einem Oberdeck (9) des Schiffskörpers
aufgehängt ist, wobei die Verformungsdämpfer (12) so beschaffen sind, dass sie Verformungen
zwischen dem Schiffskörper und der Tankumfangswand (3) wenigstens in der oben erwähnten
Axialrichtung dämpfen, sich wenigstens der untere Verformungsdämpfer (12) in der Umfangsrichtung
um im wesentlichen den gesamten Umfang der Tankumfangswand (3) erstreckt und wenigstens
der untere Verformungsdämpfer (12) einen Teil der Tankwand bildet und an der Position
des Übergangs zwischen der Tankumfangswand (3) und dem Tankboden (2) derart aufgenommen
ist, dass er eine kontinuierliche Dichtungsverbindung zwischen beiden herstellt.
2. Schiff nach Anspruch 1, bei dem nach der Aufhängung zwischen den Verformungsdämpfern
die Tankwand infolge der Schwerkraftwirkung in der oben erwähnten Axialrichtung herabsinkt,
wobei sie gleichzeitig die Verformungsdämpfer verformt, und bei dem die Verformungsdämpfer
eine derartige Starrheit haben, dass die folgende Gleichung für das Sinken in der
oben erwähnten Axialrichtung der Tankumfangswand gilt, wobei das Sinken an der Position
der Hälfte der Höhe der Tankumfangswand gemessen wird:

wobei C ≥ 1e
-7 ist, h = die Höhe des Tankes in mm ist und r = der Durchschnittsradius der Tankumfangswand
in mm ist.
3. Schiff nach Anspruch 2, bei dem C ≥ 2e-7 ist.
4. Schiff nach Anspruch 3, bei dem C ≥ 10e-7 ist.
5. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Tankumfangswand zusammen
mit den Verformungsdämpfern eine Bewegung des Oberdecks relativ zum Unterdeck in der
Axialrichtung von wenigstens Y*h/1000 dämpfen kann, wobei Y ≥ 1 und h = die Höhe des
Tanks in mm ist, ohne dass die Verformungsdämpfer und/oder die Tankumfangswand plastisch
verformt werden, ohne dass die zulässige Elastizität der Verformungsdämpfer und/oder
der Tankumfangswand überschritten wird, und ohne dass die Tankumfangswand gestaucht
wird.
6. Schiff nach Anspruch 5, bei dem Y ≥ 2 ist.
7. Schiff nach Anspruch 5, bei dem Y ≥ 4 ist.
8. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem das Folgende für das Verhältnis
der Federhärte Cwp in der oben erwähnten Axialrichtung der Tankumfangswand zusammen
mit den Verformungsdämpfern relativ zur Federhärte Cw in der oben erwähnten Axialrichtung
einer Bezugswand gilt, die über die gesamte Höhe gerade ist, aus demselben Material
besteht und dieselbe Wanddickenkurve hat:
9. Schiff nach Anspruch 8, bei dem Cw/Cwp ≥ 25 ist.
10. Schiff nach Anspruch 9, bei dem Cw/Cwp ≥ 50 ist.
11. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
eine Starrheit in der oben erwähnten Umfangsrichtung hat, die größer oder gleich 1/3
der Starrheit in der oben erwähnten Umfangsrichtung einer Bezugswand ist, die über
die gesamte Höhe gerade ist, aus demselben Material besteht und dieselbe Wanddickenkurve
hat, wie die Tankumfangswand mit den Verformungsdämpfern.
12. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Verformungsdämpfer so
beschaffen sind, dass sie elastisch verformbar sind, so dass sie wenigstens in der
oben erwähnten Axialrichtung durch im wesentlichen elastische Verformung Verformungen
zwischen dem Schiffskörper und der Tankumfangswand dämpfen.
13. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem sich der obere Verformungsdämpfer
in der Umfangsrichtung um im wesentlichen den gesamten Umfang der Tankumfangswand
erstreckt.
14. Schiff nach Anspruch 13, bei dem die Tankdecke auf einem Oberdeck des Schiffkörpers
ruht oder einen Teil desselben bildet, und bei dem der obere Verformungsdämpfer einen
Teil der Tankwand bildet und an der Position des Übergangs zwischen der Tankumfangswand
und der Tankdecke angebracht ist, um eine kontinuierliche Dichtungsverbindung zwischen
beiden herzustellen.
15. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem sich wenigstens einer der
Verformungsdämpfer teilweise in der Axialrichtung und teilweise in der Radialrichtung
erstreckt.
16. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Federhärte wenigstens
eines der Verformungsdämpfer in der oben erwähnten Axialrichtung kleiner oder gleich
20 N/mm Kompression je mm Umfang ist.
17. Schiff nach Anspruch 16, bei dem die oben erwähnte Federhärte in der oben erwähnten
Richtung kleiner oder gleich 15 N/mm Kompression je mm Umfang ist.
18. Schiff nach Anspruch 17, bei dem die oben erwähnte Federhärte in der oben erwähnten
Richtung kleiner oder gleich 10 N/mm Kompression je mm Umfang ist.
19. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem das Folgende für die Wanddicke
der Tankumfangsfläche gilt:
Wanddicke in mm ≤ X
und bei dem das Folgende für X gilt:
X = Maximum von:

und Z,
wobei: K ≥ 0,15 ist, Z ≥ 10 ist, σtol = die zulässige Zugspannung in der Tankumfangswand in N/mm2 ist, h = die Höhe des Tanks in mm ist und D = der Durchmesser der Tankumfangswand
in mm ist.
20. Schiff nach Anspruch 19, bei dem K ≥ 0,13 und Z ≥ 9 ist.
21. Schiff nach Anspruch 19, bei dem K ≥ 0,11 und Z ≥ 8 ist.
22. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem der Tankboden auf dem Unterdeck
ruht und einen maximalen Neigungswinkel von 5° im Bezug auf das Unterdeck hat.
23. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Tankdecke auf der Tankumfangswand
ruht und bei dem sich der obere Verformungsdämpfer zwischen dem oberen Ende der Tankumfangswand
und dem Schiffskörper erstreckt.
24. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
in der Umfangsrichtung des Transporttanks starr ist.
25. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
in der Axialrichtung des Transporttanks dazu eingerichtet ist, die Tankumfangswand
wenigstens teilweise zu tragen.
26. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem Halteeinrichtungen vorgesehen
sind, die die Tankumfangswand wenigstens in Axialrichtung halten.
27. Schiff nach Anspruch 26, bei dem die Halteeinrichtungen separate, verformbare Halteelemente
enthalten, die sich zwischen dem Schiffskörper und der Tankumfangswand erstrecken.
28. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
als ein Abschnitt ausgebildet ist, der einen im wesentlichen quadratischen Querschnitt
hat.
29. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
als balgförmiger Verformungsabschnitt ausgebildet ist.
30. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
Edelstahl enthält.
31. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
einen faserverstärkten Kunststoff enthält.
32. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Innenseite der Verformungsdämpfer
mit einem chemisch widerstandsfähigen Belag versehen ist.
33. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem der Tankboden und/oder die
Dankdecke auf dem Unterdeck bzw. auf dem Oberdeck mit Hilfe einer Isolierschicht gehalten
sind.
34. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem der Verformungsdämpfer teilweise
aus einer geraden Wand besteht, die sich in Axialrichtung erstreckt.
35. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Tankumfangswand mit dem
Schiff mittels einer Schürzenkonstruktion auf der Ober- und/oder Unterseite verbunden
ist.
36. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem der Transporttank für die
Aufbewahrung des flüssigen Mediums mit einem Überdruck über Flüssigkeitspegel von
weniger als im wesentlichen 1 bar eingerichtet ist.
37. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer
mit mehreren Wänden ausgebildet ist.
38. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Tankumfangswand im wesentlichen
zylindrisch ist.
39. Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, bei dem die Tankumfangswand wenigstens
einen Verformungsdämpfer zwischen ihren oberen und unteren Enden enthält.
40. Schiff nach Anspruch 39, bei dem der wenigstens eine Verformungsdämpfer in der Tankumfangswand
so beschaffen ist, dass er die im wesentlichen selbe Form wie die Verformungsdämpfer
hat, mit deren Hilfe die Tankumfangswand an ihren oberen und/oder unteren Enden an
dem Unterdeck und dem Oberdeck des Schiffskörpers aufgehängt ist.
41. Flüssigkeitstransporttank für ein Schiff nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche.
42. Verfahren zum Anordnen eines Flüssigkeitstransporttanks nach Anspruch 41 in einem
Schiff.
43. Verfahren nach Anspruch 42, bei dem wenigstens einer der Verformungsdämpfer unter
Vorspannung mit der Tankumfangswand, dem Tankboden, der Tankdecke und/oder dem Schiffskörper
verbunden ist.
44. Verwendung eines Schiffes mit wenigstens einem Flüssigkeitstransporttank nach einem
der Ansprüche 1 bis 40, der in dem Schiffskörper angeordnet ist, um in diesem flüssige
Medien zu transportieren.
1. Navire avec une ou plusieurs citernes de transport de liquide (1) disposées en position
debout dans la coque d'un navire, lesdites citernes de transport ayant un sens axial
et un sens circonférentiel, et chaque citerne de transport comprenant :
- un fond (2) de citerne;
- une paroi circonférentielle (3) de citerne;
- un toit (4) de citerne;
le fond de citerne étant supporté sur ou faisant partie d'un pont inférieur (7) de
la coque du navire,
caractérisé en ce que
la paroi circonférentielle (3) de citerne est suspendue par ses extrémités inférieure
et supérieure au moyen d'absorbeurs de déformation déformables (12) entre le pont
inférieur (7) et un pont supérieur (9) de la coque du navire, lesquels absorbeurs
de déformation (12) sont conçus de façon à absorber les déformations entre la coque
du navire et la paroi circonférentielle (3) de citerne au moins dans le sens axial
susmentionné, au moins l'absorbeur de déformation inférieur (12) s'étendant dans le
sens circonférentiel sur sensiblement toute la circonférence de la paroi circonférentielle
(3) de citerne, et au moins l'absorbeur de déformation inférieur (12) faisant partie
de la paroi de citerne et étant aménagé au point de transition entre la paroi circonférentielle
(3) de citerne et le fond (2) de citerne de façon à former un raccord d'étanchéité
continu entre eux.
2. Navire selon la revendication 1, dans lequel, une fois suspendue entre les absorbeurs
de déformation, la paroi de citerne s'accroupit dans le sens axial susmentionné sous
l'influence de la gravité, déformant en même temps les absorbeurs de déformation,
et dans lequel les absorbeurs de déformation ont une rigidité telle que l'équation
suivante s'applique à l'accroupissement dans le sens axial susmentionné de la paroi
circonférentielle de citerne, lequel accroupissement est mesuré au point de mi-hauteur
de la paroi circonférentielle de citerne :
accroupissement en millimètres>

avec : C >= 1e-7, h = hauteur de la citerne en millimètres, et r = rayon moyen de la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne en millimètres.
3. Navire selon la revendication 2, dans lequel C >= 2e-7.
4. Navire selon la revendication 3, dans lequel C >= 10e-7.
5. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne, conjointement avec les absorbeurs de déformation, peut absorber un mouvement
du pont supérieur par rapport au pont inférieur dans le sens axial d'au moins Y*h/1000,
avec Y >= 1 et h = hauteur de la citerne en millimètres, sans que les absorbeurs de
déformation et/ou la paroi circonférentielle de citerne ne devienne(nt) plastiquement
déformé(e)s, sans que l'élasticité admissible dans les absorbeurs de déformation et/ou
dans la paroi circonférentielle de citerne ne soit dépassée, et/ou sans que la paroi
circonférentielle de citerne ne se froisse.
6. Navire selon la revendication 5, dans lequel Y>= 2.
7. Navire selon la revendication 5, dans lequel Y>= 4.
8. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ce qui suit s'applique
pour le rapport de la rigidité de ressort Cwp dans le sens axial susmentionné de la
paroi circonférentielle de citerne avec les absorbeurs de déformation par rapport
à la rigidité de ressort Cw dans le sens axial susmentionné d'une paroi de référence
qui est droite sur toute la hauteur, est constituée du même matériau et a la même
courbe d'épaisseur de paroi :
9. Navire selon la revendication 8, dans lequel Cw/Cwp >= 25.
10. Navire selon la revendication 9, dans lequel Cw/Cwp >= 50.
11. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation a une rigidité dans le sens circonférentiel susmentionné qui est supérieure
ou égale à un tiers de la rigidité dans le sens circonférentiel susmentionné d'une
paroi de référence qui est droite sur toute la hauteur, est constituée du même matériau
et a la même courbe d'épaisseur de paroi que la paroi circonférentielle de citerne
avec les absorbeurs de déformation.
12. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel les absorbeurs de déformation
sont agencés de façon à être élastiquement déformables, de sorte qu'au moins dans
le sens axial susmentionné par une déformation sensiblement élastique, ils absorbent
les déformations entre la coque du navire et la paroi circonférentielle de citerne.
13. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'absorbeur de déformation
supérieur s'étend dans le sens circonférentiel sur sensiblement toute la circonférence
de la paroi circonférentielle de citerne.
14. Navire selon la revendication 13, dans lequel le toit de citerne est supporté sur
ou fait partie d'un pont supérieur de la coque du navire, et dans lequel l'absorbeur
de déformation supérieur fait partie de la paroi de citerne et est aménagé au point
de transition entre la paroi circonférentielle de citerne et le toit de citerne afin
de former un raccord d'étanchéité continu entre eux.
15. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation s'étend en partie dans le sens axial et en partie dans le sens radial.
16. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la rigidité de ressort
d'au moins un des absorbeurs de déformation dans le sens axial susmentionné est inférieure
ou égale à 20 Newton par millimètre de compression par millimètre de circonférence.
17. Navire selon la revendication 16, dans lequel la rigidité de ressort susmentionnée
dans le sens susmentionné est inférieure ou égale à 15 Newton par millimètre de compression
par millimètre de circonférence.
18. Navire selon la revendication 17, dans lequel la rigidité de ressort susmentionnée
dans le sens susmentionné est inférieure ou égale à 10 Newton par millimètre de compression
par millimètre de circonférence.
19. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel ce qui suit s'applique
pour l'épaisseur de paroi de la paroi circonférentielle de citerne :
épaisseur de paroi en millimètres <= X,
et dans lequel ce qui suit s'applique pour X :
X = maximum de :

et Z,
avec : K >= 0,15, Z >= 10, σ
toe = la résistance à la traction dans la paroi circonférentielle de citerne en N/mm
2, h = hauteur de la citerne en millimètres, et D = le diamètre de la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne en millimètres.
20. Navire selon la revendication 19, dans lequel K >= 0,13 et Z >= 9.
21. Navire selon la revendication 19, dans lequel K >= 0,11 et Z >= 8.
22. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le fond de citerne
est supporté sur le pont inférieur et a un angle d'inclinaison maximal de 5° par rapport
au pont inférieur.
23. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le toit de citerne
est supporté sur la paroi circonférentielle de citerne, et dans lequel l'absorbeur
de déformation supérieur s'étend entre l'extrémité supérieure de la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne et la coque du navire.
24. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation est rigide dans le sens circonférentiel de la citerne de transport.
25. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation dans le sens axial de la citerne de transport est conçu pour le support
au moins partiel de la paroi circonférentielle de citerne.
26. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel des moyens de support
sont prévus pour supporter la paroi circonférentielle de citerne au moins dans le
sens axial.
27. Navire selon la revendication 26, dans lequel les moyens de support comprennent des
éléments de support déformables distincts qui s'étendent entre la coque du navire
et la paroi circonférentielle de citerne.
28. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation est conçu sous forme de section qui a une forme sensiblement quadrantale
en coupe.
29. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation est conçu sous forme de section de déformation en forme de soufflet.
30. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation comprend de l'acier inoxydable.
31. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation comprend du plastique renforcé de fibres.
32. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le côté intérieur des
absorbeurs de déformation est doté d'un revêtement résistant aux produits chimiques.
33. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel le fond de citerne
et/ou le toit de citerne est (sont) supporté(s) sur le pont respectivement inférieur
et supérieur au moyen d'une couche isolante.
34. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel l'absorbeur de déformation
est composé en partie d'une paroi droite s'étendant dans le sens axial.
35. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne est reliée au navire au moyen d'une construction à jupe sur le côté supérieur
et/ou inférieur.
36. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la citerne de transport
est conçue pour le stockage de la substance liquide dans celle-ci avec une surpression
au-dessus du niveau de liquide inférieure à sensiblement 1 bar.
37. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs
de déformation est conçu avec des parois multiples.
38. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne est sensiblement cylindrique.
39. Navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes, dans lequel la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne comprend un ou plusieurs absorbeurs de déformation entre ses extrémités
inférieure et supérieure.
40. Navire selon la revendication 39, dans lequel les un ou plusieurs absorbeurs de déformation
dans la paroi circonférentielle de citerne sont conçus pour avoir sensiblement la
même forme que les absorbeurs de déformation au moyen desquels la paroi circonférentielle
de citerne est suspendue par son extrémité inférieure et/ou supérieure depuis le pont
inférieur et le pont supérieur de la coque du navire.
41. Citerne de transport de liquide pour un navire selon l'une des revendications précédentes.
42. Procédé pour placer une citerne de transport de liquide selon la revendication 41
dans un navire.
43. Procédé selon la revendication 42, dans lequel au moins un des absorbeurs de déformation
est relié sous prétension à la paroi circonférentielle de citerne, au fond de citerne,
au toit de citerne et/ou à la coque du navire.
44. Utilisation d'un navire avec une ou plusieurs citernes de transport de liquide selon
l'une des revendications 1 à 40 placées dans la coque du navire pour le transport
dans celles-ci de substances liquides.
REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only.
It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has
been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and
the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Patent documents cited in the description