| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 1 894 881 B1 |
| (12) |
EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
02.01.2013 Bulletin 2013/01 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 14.09.2006 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC):
|
|
| (54) |
Load control device for a crane
Laststeuersystem für Kran
Dispositif de controle de charge pour une grue
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE
SI SK TR |
| (30) |
Priority: |
29.08.2006 US 511502
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
05.03.2008 Bulletin 2008/10 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: ABB AB |
|
721 83 Västerås (SE) |
|
| (72) |
Inventor: |
|
- HENRIKSSON, Björn
72355 Västerås (SE)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Lundqvist, Alida Maria Therése et al |
|
ABB AB
Intellectual Property
Ingenjör Bååths Gata 11 721 83 Västerås 721 83 Västerås (SE) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
EP-A1- 0 638 510 JP-A- 2003 267 660 US-A- 5 617 964 US-A1- 2005 232 733
|
WO-A1-91/14644 US-A- 3 874 516 US-A- 6 145 680
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
TECHNICAL FIELD.
[0001] The invention relates to a device and a method for transferring freight containers.
The invention concerns a device and a method for moving a container by means of a
crane such that the position and movement of the container or spreader is controlled
accurately while transporting, picking up or landing a container or empty spreader.
In particular it is a device and a method to measure and control displacement and
oscillations of the container about one or more orthogonal axes of the container.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] A great and growing volume of freight is shipped around the world in standard shipping
containers. Transshipment has become a critical function in freight handling. At each
point of transfer from one transport means to another, from ship to shore in ports
and harbours for example. There is usually a tremendous number of containers that
must be unloaded, transferred to a temporary stack, and later loaded on to another
ship, back onto the same ship or loaded instead onto another form of transport. Loading
and unloading containers to and from a ship takes a great deal of time. The development
of automated cranes has improved loading and unloading and made the productivity more
predictable, and also eliminated many situations in which port workers have been exposed
to danger and injury.
[0003] The technical demands of handling containers accurately are great. A container may
be handled by a stationary crane or by crane moving on rails or moveable in any other
way. Each crane has a lifting device usually incorporating a spreader of some kind
that directly contacts a container, to grip it, lift it, lower it and release it.
In this description the term spreader is used to denote a part of a lifting device
that is in direct contact with a container. Spreaders are normally designed to handle
more than one size of container, for example 20-40ft or 20-40-45ft long containers.
The spreader is suspended from the boom of a crane from a moveable device known as
a trolley, which moves along the boom of the crane, in a direction usually referred
to as the X direction. The position of the trolley is measured and/or calculated during
operations. The position of the spreader and the container underneath it may be monitored
by use of a camera observing a light source or marker on the spreader. It is of great
importance for accurate operation, and especially for automatically controlled operations,
that the position of the container is accurately known during pick-up and during landing
of a container.
[0004] Accuracy during pick-up is necessary for the spreader to grip the container properly
at the first attempt. Accuracy during landing is important not only to land the container
at the first attempt, but also because if an error in stacking containers one on top
of each other that can lead to a cumulative error which may be unacceptable. When
a 5-high stack of containers is not stable it presents a potential for containers
to be damaged. An unstable stack also demands greater ground area and more clearance
space around it for lifting operations.
[0005] Cranes may be operated automatically in many phases of each operation. However a
crane operator is usually required to drive the crane to deal with situations that
are not handled by existing automated operations. For example, when a container is
lowered for landing there is often a torsional movement of the container, known as
a skew. With a skew problem, when the long axis of the container swings around a vertical
axis in a skew (torsional) direction, it can take many seconds, perhaps up to a minute,
before the skew oscillations die down enough for the container to be lowered on to
a truck, container or other target. The container cannot be landed accurately if it
is not accurately lined up above the landing target. When unloading a ship with perhaps
many hundreds of containers, the cumulative effect of unloading time lost due to skew
oscillation is considerable. Manual adjustments may be made by the crane operator
to cancel out a skew moment by steering the spreader against the moment or by operating
auxiliary adjustment devices. However the effectiveness of manual intervention is
operator dependent and does not reliably reduce the time lost to skew oscillation.
[0006] Application
JP2001322796 entitled Vibration control device for a load, to Mitsubishi, describes a device suspending
a conventional spreader fitted with four tension sensors to measure rope tension in
the load ropes. A tension sensor is fitted to each lifting rope near a point where
the rope is fixed, arranged so that there are two sensors on one side of the spreader
and two on the other side. At the non-fixed end two main winding drums are arranged
for lifting the load, to wind in or wind out, so as to lift, lower the container.
A skew cylinder mechanism is arranged connected to sheaves arranged on each side near
the winding drums so as to exert a greater tension force on the load ropes on one
side of the spreader and a corresponding lesser tension on the load ropes on the other
side of the spreader, so as to counteract an error in skew angle. Measurements of
rope tension on each end of the container are compared. A skew angle θ (theta) is
calculated from the measurements of rope tension combined with calculations of a distance
between trolley and spreader based on measurements of the rotational frequency and
angle of rotation of the winding drums. An online automatic translation of the description
of
JP2001322796 explains that use of tension sensors provides a way to detect skew which may be better
than more expensive optical means. However, the described device depends on comparable
measurements of tension for each end of the container which makes the device liable
to error in cases where weight distribution inside the container is uneven and one
end of the container is heavier than the other. It is also somewhat problematic to
rely on tension sensors normally of the load cell type. These are usually large and
heavy analogue devices that require calibration at frequent intervals to maintain
the level of relative accuracy such load cells can provide. Similarly, the abstract
of
JP10017268, to Mitsui, entitled Skew swing preventive method and device of crane suspending cargo, describes
a device that includes the use of tension sensors in the load ropes. Optical detection
means for determining a skew angle are also described. This device or system uses
measurement of tensile forces in the lifting ropes, together with measurement of angular
velocity and skew angle by means of a CCD camera, to find or calculate an angular
skew error and a skew oscillation period. A natural oscillation period is calculated
from a calculated moment of inertia by a computer for the hanging container. Rope
tension is then applied to one or other end of a loading rope by means of an actuator
arranged at each end of each loading rope. The driving force required by the actuator
is reduced by the directional changes of the loading ropes and addition of extra sheaves,
and tension balancing sheaves, so that the load of the hanging container does not
act directly on the actuators. A computer is used to apply counter tension by means
of actuators mounted on both sides of the trolley until the skew error is found to
be zero. However, like
JP2001322796 (above) the described system relies principally on measurements of rope tension.
Rope tension is also influenced by forces other than a diagonal or skew movement of
the container, including forces due to uneven weight distribution in the container.
Rope tension is more of measure of some of the forces acting on a container rather
than a direct measure of container position. Accurate measurement of angular velocity
of rotation using a camera may be somewhat difficult in practice, especially when
the angular/rotational velocity of a container varies, or is combined with other non-skew
movements. Accuracy of load cells as tension sensors tends depends on calibration
at intervals. A disadvantage with this approach is that although calculations may
be carried out to compensate for skew angle error due to stretching of the ropes under
load, spreader-load calculations based on a dynamically changing rope tension may
include errors that are hard to predict and thus difficult to compensate for.
[0007] In
EP 0638510 is disclosed a load control device in accordance with the preamble of claim 1. It
discloses a damping and positioning arrangement for actively damping the oscillations
of suspended loads during traversing movements of the suspension point, having guide
ropes, running between a crane or suspension-rail conveying system and the load, for
damping the oscillating movement of the load. At least two guide ropes are provided
for each pendular oscillation plane, and guide-rope drums are arranged on a frame
hung on the crane or the suspension-rail conveying system and they are subjected to
a tensile force which always acts against the oscillation of the load. The tensile
force is produced via a drive unit, the output force or moment of which is controlled
independently of the rotational speed of the guide-rope drums. The length of the guide
ropes can be varied independently of one another and also during the operation of
the crane or the suspension-rail conveying system.
[0008] As well as skew deflection in which the long orthogonal axis of the container rotates
or oscillates, the short side of the container may be displaced or may oscillate,
giving rise to a movement about the long orthogonal axis of the container, a movement
called a list. This may be caused by inertia during acceleration, uneven winds etc,
or uneven loading inside the container, or a combination. When the short axis of a
container is deflected or rotated about the long axis in a list movement then one
long edge of bottom of the container is lower than the other. When a container is
listing the actual position of the bottom of the container may not be predicted accurately.
A consequence of this is that the bottom of the low side of the container will touch
down inaccurately, sometimes by up to 10-25 centimetres or so away from the intended
target. Such inaccurate placement gives rise to an unstable or even dangerous stack
when containers are stacked in piles of 5 high. It means that manual intervention
by the crane operator is necessary to maneuver the container to solve the problem
of inaccurate landing due to a list of the container.
[0009] There is a similar and third type of container deflection which can arise during
loading or unloading in which one end of the long axis of the container may hang down
lower than the other end, a movement, displacement or deflection called trim. A trim
problem can occur for example when loads inside a container are unevenly distributed,
so that when lifted, one end container tends to hangs down lower than the other. This
type of error can also lead to inaccurate loading or stacking, as the position of
the ends of a container with a trim error are not directly vertically underneath the
spreader, and thus not accurately predicted. A trim error can also cause errors of
position during landing and usually requires manual intervention by the crane operator
to prevent causes error in placement of containers, for example on a truck and in
the stacking of containers, for example in a yard or on a ship.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The aim of the present invention is to remedy one or more of the above mentioned
problems. This and other aims are obtained by a load control device, and a method
as characterised by the attached independent claims.
[0011] Advantageous embodiments are described in sub-claims to the above independent claims.
[0012] According to another embodiment of the invention the load control device comprises
at least one actuator comprising a screw drive powered by a motor arranged so that
the actuator pulls or releases a load line so causing the load line to move in a substantially
straight line. The actuator preferably further comprises a screw device arranged for
linearly extending or withdrawing a shaft arranged attached to a load line at the
end of the crane farthest from the motor house.
[0013] According to the invention the load control device comprises an optical sensor arranged
in line-of-sight of two or more light sources arranged on the spreader in a first
straight line relative to an orthogonal axis of the container.
[0014] Preferably the light sources are active light sources such as IR emitting diodes
or the like, but they may also in some part comprise passive sources such as reflectors,markers,
high-contrast patterns.
[0015] According to another embodiment of the invention the method comprises determining
a linear position of at least one actuator of the load control device, and sending
a signal to at least two said actuators to draw in and/or reel out at least one load
line in order to move at least one said suspension point closer to or farther away
from a said imaginary centre line.
[0016] According to another embodiment of the invention the method comprises continuously
determining a position of at least one actuator by use of a sensor means. The sensor
means preferably provides a digital out-signal to facilitate continuous or high frequency
monitoring.
[0017] According to another embodiment of the invention the method comprises comparing a
first actuator position and actuator movement limits with at least one second actuator
position and movement limits and determining which actuator or actuators shall be
moved to correct a linear displacement error causing an error of skew, list and/or
trim.
[0018] According to the invention the method comprises measuring with the optical sensor
a distance to two or more light sources arranged in a first straight line on the spreader
and measuring any linear deviation from the orthogonal axis in an X or Y direction
and measuring with the optical sensor a distance to at least one third light source,
arranged on a line perpendicular to the first straight line wherein the at least one
third light source is arranged on the spreader at a vertical distance from the light
sources of the first straight line.
[0019] Measurement of distance to the third light source provides measurement of any vertical
displacement from the orthogonal centre lines that may cause a container to list or
to have a trim error.
[0020] Another object of the present invention is to provide an improved computer program
product and a computer readable medium having a program recorded thereon, for controlling
a load control device of a crane.
[0021] In addition, further and advantageous aspects of the invention are described in relation
to an independent claim for a graphical user interface. This invention claims priority
from an
application US 60/694436.
[0022] The main advantage is that load control device and the device enables fast recovery
from a skew error. This has the result that delays due to swinging and oscillation
of a suspended loading during unloading are minimised. The use of absolute encoder
type sensors give a continuous linear position readout on the actuators, so that a
faster response than prior art systems is made possible. This is also an advantage
when dealing with faster acting forces, for example if there is a sudden gust of wind,
or a shift in the load inside a container, and the like. It also enables recovery
from list error or trim error and any or all three recovery methods and actions may
occur at the same time.
[0023] Another advantage is that correction of skew or list or trim errors provide for accurate
positioning for a container to be landed, on a truck for example. The optical transmitters
and CCD cameras of the preferred embodiment function with reliable accuracy in all
weathers, thus providing dependable throughput in respect of automatic lifting and
landing of containers. Finally, the device is not restricted to any particular STS
crane type or manufacturer, but may be fitted or retrofitted to any new or existing
crane.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0024] A more complete understanding of the method and the device of the present invention
may be had by reference to the following detailed description when taken in conjunction
with the accompanying drawings wherein:
Figure 1 shows in a schematic diagram a simplified arrangement for a ship-to-shore
(STS) crane.
Figure 2 shows a diagram of positional error of skew, trim and list with respect to
the orthogonal axes of a container,
Figure 3 shows a layout for a load control device according to an embodiment of the
invention,
Figure 4 shows schematically an optical target, such as an optical transmitter comprising
two or more light sources, Figure 5 shows the arrangement of the optical target on
a container and in relation to a skew-type position error,
Figure 6 shows a development of the optical target according to another embodiment
of the invention, and Figure 7 shows an arrangement of the developed optical target
on a container and in relation to a list error,
Figure 8 shows show schematically a flowchart for a computer program to carry out
a method according to an embodiment of the invention to rectify a skew-type error,
Figure 9 a flowchart for a computer program to operate a method to rectify a list
error and Figure 10 a flowchart for a computer program to operate a method to rectify
a trim error.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0025] Figure 1 shows a simplified schematic diagram of a ship-to-shore (STS) crane 1 arranged
on a quayside for loading or unloading containers from a ship. The motor house mounted
on the boom of the crane is arranged with main lifting motors and winding drums 2
which reel in or reel out ropes or load lines for lifting or lowering a container
20. The main lifting action takes place between the sheaves nearest the motor house
and the boom tip 3 indicated as one end of the boom. Container 20 is held by a spreader
15 suspended from a trolley 21 which moves in the direction of arrow X forward (+ve)
and back (-ve) along the boom. The load lines arranged on trolley 21 are also connected
to actuators A (16-19) arranged at or near the tip 3 of the boom. The actuators, spreader,
trolley and load lines are shown in more detail in Figure 2.
[0026] Figure 2 shows an arrangement according to an embodiment of the invention. The figure
shows the container 20 held by a spreader 15 suspended from a trolley 21. The container
is lifted and lowered by main winding drums 2, housed in the motor house (Fig 1).
On the other side of the container nearest the tip of the boom the load lines are
arranged with actuators 16-19 which lengthen or shorten the load lines at that point.
The spreader 15 is suspended from the trolley by load lines arranged at four points
generally corresponding with the corners of the spreader 4a-4d. Trolley 21 is arranged
with a sensor 5, preferably a CCD camera, which is aimed down at an optical target
7, which comprises two or more targets 8, 9 which preferably are light sources.
[0027] Figure 3 shows three principal orthogonal axes with respect to a container 20, and
shows three imaginary centre lines for the container with respect to the orthogonal
axes. The figure also shows diagrammatically a skew error S as a rotation about a
vertical axis V
H, a list error L with which a container tends to list around its long axis and rotate
about the axis Y
W, and a trim error T with which one of the ends of the container along the long axis
hangs lower, shown as a rotation about the imaginary centre line axis X
L.
[0028] Figure 4 shows a light source 7. This comprises at least two light sources, which
are preferably arranged as two large light sources 8, and two smaller sources 9. Measurements
of two smaller light sources may be discarded when the spreader is very low, ie is
at a great distance from the trolley. Correspondingly measurements of two larger light
sources may be discarded when the spreader is close to the trolley (when the spreader
is high).
[0029] The load control equipment consists of one CCD camera 5 and at least two of a plurality
of optical transmitters 8, and/or 9. Optical transmitters 8 and 9 are of different
size or light intensity. The CCD camera 5 is mounted under the boom preferably on
the trolley, and the optical targets are mounted on the spreader. Thus an optical
target (comprising at least two optical targets) aligned with the spreader moves as
the container moves, and is arranged in a clear line of sight from camera 5. Measurements
from camera 5 are taken continuously and distances calculated between the trolley
and the spreader. For example when the spreader has a skew error and is rotated around
its vertical axis V in the direction S of Figures 2, 3, then the spreader is positioned
at an angle to orthogonal direction Y which, in concrete terms, means that at least
one corner 4a-4d of the container has a distance error and is positioned too far from
the boom tip and at least one other corner has a position error and is to close to
the boom tip. To correct a distance error one or more actuators 16-19 are controlled
so as to drive a load line, and thus a corner of the spreader 4a-4d, towards or away
from the boom tip. In the case of a skew error a pair of actuators arranged on load
lines and corresponding to the same X-direction side of the container are applied.
For example actuator 18 can reel out a load line and 19 reel in to move corner 4a
nearer to the tip of the boom. Similarly or as well, 16 could be reeled out and 17
reeled in to move corner 4c further away from the boom tip.
[0030] Preferably in of a pair of actuators 16 and 17, (or 19 and 18) the load line is reeled
in by one actuator and reeled out by the other actuator by the same amount, same distance,
to correct a linear error due to skew. The distance from the trolley to each of the
optical targets on the spreader is measured, and the position of the optical targets
relative an orthogonal axis is measured, so that one or more linear errors of position
in an X or Y direction are calculated. When a linear error, such as a skew-type error,
has been determined by measurement the actuators are moved a calculated distance in
a linear direction to lengthen and/or shorten load lines arranged at one or more corners
4a-4d of the spreader. In this way the spreader is directly moved in a chosen linear
direction by a measured amount by controlling the actuators, in order to minimize
a measured or a measured and calculated linear error of spreader position.
[0031] In order to provide accurate error and fast correction the relative position of the
spreader must be determined accurately and continuously. A continuous measurement
means on one or more actuators is used to determine the position of each actuator
at all times. An optical absolute encoder is preferred, such as the type in which
the measuring system consists of a light source, a code disc mounted in a precision
bearing and an opto-electronic scanning device. A light source, preferably an LED,
illuminates the code disc and projects a pattern known as a track on the code disk
onto the opto-array. At every position as the code disk rotates disk the opto-electronic
array is partially covered by the dark track markings on the code disk. The light
source transmitted through the code disk is interrupted and the code on the disc is
transformed in the opto array into electronic signals. If necessary, fluctuations
in the intensity of the light source may measured by additional components and/or
phototransistors. The electronic signals are then amplified, converted and output
for evaluation. One or more single turn encoder suitably positioned may be used, and
a best mode may be practiced using a multi-turn encoder. The multi-turn encoder may
be used because more than one turn of the actuator shaft may be expected during an
adjustment of the length of the load rope or load line. A multi-turn encoder may comprise
several single turn encoders coupled together using a means such as a reduction gear.
[0032] Figure 8 shows a flowchart or block diagram describing the steps that a computer
program may execute in order to make a computer or processor carry out a method for
load control according to an embodiment of the invention. Distance from the trolley
to the spreader is measured 70, preferably continuously. When spreader position deviates
from a predetermined position under the trolley, a linear deviation is calculated.
If the linear deviation is determined to be a skew error, e
s then the present positions of the actuators is checked and at least one pair of actuators,
such as 18 and 19, or 17 and 16, is move 78. Which is to say that in the case or a
rotated error, a skew error, one actuator of each pair reels out and the other one
reels in. This pulls at least one corner of the spreader in a linear direction to
reduce the error. This is best achieved by sending a signal of the same magnitude
to each actuator of the selected pair, but of a different sign. Thus each actuator
is driven over the same distance but in opposite directions. Measurements by the camera
continue and when the present skew error has gone to zero, or another predetermined
value, the movement by actuators for load control position stops. The combination
of actuators used to correct a linear error in a skew direction is as described that
each actuator pair parallel with the same long side moves, but in opposite directions.
This may be summarized in a table form as:
| Pair |
Pair |
Skew error |
| 19, 16 |
18, 17 |
Error direction |
| Reel out |
Reel in |
+ |
| Reel in |
Reel out |
- |
[0033] In contrast to the opposed movement of specific actuators for a skew error, above,
a list error for a container is corrected by application of each actuator pair parallel
with the same long side moving (reeling out or reeling in) in the same direction:
| Pair |
Pair |
List error |
| 18, 16 |
19, 17 |
Error direction |
| Reel in |
Reel out |
+ |
| Reel out |
Reel in |
- |
[0034] A trim error is remedied by applying each actuator pair corresponding to each short
side moving (reeling out or reeling in) in the same direction:
| Pair |
Pair |
Trim error |
| 17, 16 |
18, 19 |
Error direction |
| Reel in |
Reel out |
+ |
| Reel out |
Reel in |
- |
[0035] Figure 7 shows a list error, in which one side of the container is rotated below
the centre line by a linear distance of e
L The corrections for errors of any of a skew, trim or list type may be applied together
of subsequently. Preferably the trim or list correction is applied at a slower rate,
using a lesser signal amplification in a proportional P-type loop.
[0036] Figure 9 and Figure 10 each show a similar flowchart for a computer program to control
as that shown in Figure 8, for skew correction. Figure 9 for correcting a trim error
specifies in contrast to the skew method shown in Figure 8 that the at least two actuators
corresponding to the same long side of a spreader, eg 4a-4c or 4b-4d, both of them
move in the same direction, +ve or -ve. The skew correction method mapped in Figure
8 points out that actuators move in opposition, ie one +ve and the other of the pair
-ve. Figure 10 shows a flowchart for correcting a list error. The actuator pairs also
move in the same direction, in this case each pair corresponding to the short sides,
ie 4a-4b and/or 4c-4d.
[0037] In the preferred embodiment, at least one camera member is a CCD camera. However
other optical instruments may also be used, such as a laser scanner or laser range
finder. In the preferred embodiment at least one optical target is an Infra Red (IR)
transmitter. However other optical targets may be provided, such as: LCD diodes, fluorescent
lamps or reflective targets such as reflectors, markings, patterns or high contrast
surfaces on the spreader.
[0038] In another preferred embodiment the light source 7 comprises optical targets arranged
in two directions. A T-shaped or even cross shaped arrangement of light sources may
be used. In particular for measuring a list error, according to the invention, one
part of the arrangement, such as 7' of Figure 4, 6 has a part T arranged at a different
height to the main linear part, as shown by the side elevation elements of Figure
6. The difference in height between the main light sources and the light sources of
the T part enable the CCD camera scanning to measure the list error more accurately
because the vertical distance between the first light sources and the light sources
of the T shape are already known.
[0039] In another embodiment an incremental encoder may be used as a simpler and cheaper
sensor for finding actuator position. Preferably an incremental encoder or a combination
of incremental encoders are used in situations where re-starts or re-configurations
due, for example, to unexpected power loss or error situations are extremely rare.
[0040] One or more microprocessors (or processors or computers) comprise a central processing
unit CPU performing the steps of the methods according to one or more aspects of the
invention, as described for example with reference to Figures 3-7. The comparator
may be comprised as a processor, or it may be comprised as a standard computer or
processor or other device or a dedicated analogue or digital device or on one or more
specially adapted computers or processors, FPGAs (field programmable gate arrays)
or ASICs (application specific integrated circuits) or other devices such as simple
programmable logic devices (SPLDs), complex programmable logic devices (CPLDs), field
programmable system chips (FPSCs). The method or methods, such as those described
in relation to the figures, especially to Figures 4-7, are performed with the aid
of one or more computer programs, which are stored at least in part in memory accessible
by the one or more processors.
[0041] The computer program comprises computer program code elements or software code portions
that make the computer, processor or other device perform the methods using equations,
algorithms, recursive algorithms, wireless communications parameter data, stored values,
calculations and statistical or pattern recognition methods previously described,
for example in relation to Figures 1 and Figs 8-10.
[0042] A part of the program may be stored in a processor, but also or instead in a ROM,
RAM, PROM, EPROM or EEPROM chip or similar memory means. The program in part or in
whole may also be stored locally (or centrally) on, or in, other suitable computer
readable medium such as a magnetic disk, CD-ROM or DVD disk, hard disk, magneto-optical
memory storage means, in volatile memory, in flash memory, as firmware, or stored
on a data server. Other known and suitable media, including removable memory media
such as Sony memory stick (TM) and other removable flash memories, hard drives etc.
may also be used. The program may also in part be supplied from a data network, including
a public network such as the Internet. The computer programs described may also be
arranged in part as a distributed application capable of running on several different
computers or computer systems at more or less the same time.
[0043] A graphical user interface (GUI) may be used to display one or more of the values
obtained using the device and methods described above during the calculation of the
position of the load of the crane. In a simple form, one or more readouts of parameters
for the present container load such as speed in an X (or Y) horizontal direction,
speed in a vertical direction are displayed on a screen in numerical and/or graphical
representations. In particular, one or more such GUIs may be used to display relative
positions of crane 1, load 15 and landing or lifting target relative to a real or
graphical representation of the crane, load, landing position, truck etc in a part
of a freight yard or container port. A selection action such as right-click with a
computer mouse, or other computer input/selection member, on parts of the representation
of the GUI may result in a display of any of: live real-time values for displacement
errors of trim, list or skew type, or list or trim or visual representation of container
orientation; stored values for errors in load position; configuration screens where
it is possible to set or change predetermined values used in the determination of
a position error, determination of a skew or list or trim error, calculation of load
position. In one development of the GUI, one or more parts of the GUI may be combined
on a screen together with a display of part of the operations provided by a video
camera. Thus one or more parts of the GUI may be provided to give a visual readout
which is superimposed over live pictures of the lifting or landing operations. In
other words one or more graphical and/or numerical values for load position, trim
error, list or skew error etc. may be superimposed on a live video picture while the
load is being handled.
[0044] It should be noted that while the above describes exemplifying embodiments of the
invention, there are several variations and modifications which may be made to the
disclosed solution without departing from the scope of the present invention as defined
in the appended claims.
1. A load control device for controlling movement of a suspended load of a container
crane, said crane comprising a trolley (21), a spreader (15) and load lines arranged
in a four point suspension (4a-4d) for lifting a load and an optical sensor (5) for
sensing a deflection position of an orthogonal axis (X, Y, V) of a container suspended
under the spreader with reference to an imaginary centre line (XL, Yw, VH) of a said orthogonal axis of the container, wherein two or more actuators (16-19)
are arranged attached to at least one load line, and arranged for moving at least
one said suspension point (4a-d) closer to or farther away from said imaginary centre
line (XL, Yw, VH) by shortening and/or lengthening the at least one load line, and a sensor means
is arranged on at least one said actuator for detecting actuator position and thereby
any change of length of the at least one load line, characterised in that the optical sensor is arranged in line-of-sight of two or more light sources (7)
arranged on the spreader in a first straight line relative to an orthogonal axis of
the container, that the optical sensor is also arranged in line of sight of at least
one third light source (T) arranged on the spreader on a line which is perpendicular
to the first straight line, and that the at least one third light source (T) is arranged
on the spreader at a vertical distance from the light sources (7) of the first straight
line.
2. A device according to claim 1, wherein at least one first actuator (16, 18) is arranged
to reel in one first part of a first load line and, at the same time, at least one
second actuator (17, 19) is arranged to let out one second part of a first load line.
3. A device according to claim 1, wherein at least one said actuator comprises a device
arranged for movement in a forward or reverse direction for reeling in or letting
out part of a load line.
4. A device according to claim 3, wherein at least one said actuator comprises a device
arranged for movement in a straight line in a forward or reverse direction.
5. A device according to claim 1, wherein at least one actuator comprises a screw drive
powered by a motor for moving a load line in a substantially straight line.
6. A device according to claim 5, with at least one said actuator that comprises a screw
device arranged for extending or withdrawing a shaft.
7. A device according to claim 1, which comprises means for comparing a first actuator
position and movement limits with a second actuator position and movement limits and
determining which actuator shall be moved.
8. A device according to claim 1, which comprises a control unit with a control loop
for adjusting a detected deflection error to a given reference using a loop comprising
input from a sensed position of at least one said actuator (16-19).
9. A device according to claim 8, wherein which control unit comprises an input for a
continuous value for a position of at least one actuator.
10. A device according to claim 8, wherein which control unit comprises an input for a
value for an actuator position sampled with respect to a time period or a movement
increment.
11. A device according to claim 1, wherein said load control device comprises four said
actuators arranged on the same side of a spreader.
12. A device according to claim 1, wherein said load control device comprises four said
actuators arranged on the boom-tip side of a spreader.
13. A device according to claim 1, wherein said load control device comprises at least
one rotary electric motor arranged as drive means for at least one actuator to lengthen
or shorten a load line.
14. A device according to claim 1, wherein at least one actuator is powered by a motor
and comprises a transmission a drive for moving a load line from any of the list of:
worm gear, bevel drive, rack-and-pinion.
15. A device according to claim 1, wherein one or more hydraulically powered devices are
arranged as drive means or as an actuator for moving a load line and so thus lengthening
or shortening the load line.
16. A device according to claim 1, wherein the optical sensor (5) is any from the list
of CCD camera, laser scanner, laser rangefinder.
17. A method for controlling a container crane with a suspended load by means of a load
control device, said crane comprising a trolley, a spreader and load lines arranged
in a four point suspension for lifting a load, and an optical sensor arranged on the
trolley, comprising
- sensing with the optical sensor a deflection position of an orthogonal axis (X,
Y, V) of a container (1) (or spreader) about an imaginary centre line (XL, YW, VH) of a said orthogonal axis, optically sensing a deflection, wherein the optical sensor
is arranged in line-of-sight of two or more light sources (7) arranged on the spreader
in a first straight line relative to the orthogonal axis of the container, wherein
the optical sensor is also arranged in line of sight of at least one third light source
(T) arranged on the spreader on a line which is perpendicular to the first straight
line, and wherein the at least one third light source (T) is arranged on the spreader
at a vertical distance from the light sources (7) of the first straight line,
- determining a linear position of at least one said actuator, and sending a signal
to at least two said actuators to move at least one said suspension point (4a-d) closer
to or farther away from a said imaginary centre line (XL, Yw, VH).
18. A method according to claim 17, further comprising comparing a first actuator position
and actuator movement limits with at least one second actuator position and movement
limits and determining which actuator or actuators shall be moved.
19. A method according to claim 17, further comprising reeling in one first part of a
first load line and, at the same time, letting out one second part of the first load
line and so shortening or lengthening a part of the first load line.
20. A method according to claim 19, further comprising the step of that two actuators
of a pair of actuators corresponding to one same side of the spreader reeling in in
the same positive or negative direction.
21. A method according to claim 20, further comprising the step of that two actuators
of a pair of actuators corresponding to one same side of the spreader letting out
a load line both in the same positive or negative direction.
22. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of driving at least one
actuator with a motor arranged with a screw device.
23. A method according to claim 22, further comprising the step of driving at least one
actuator with a motor arranged with a screw device for extending, withdrawing a shaft
arranged attached to a load line.
24. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of continuously determining
a position of at least one actuator.
25. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of determining a position
of at least one actuator by means of samples dependent on a time period or a movement
increment.
26. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of measuring with the
optical sensor a distance to two or more light sources arranged on the spreader in
a first straight line relative to the orthogonal axis of the container.
27. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of measuring with the
optical sensor a distance to two or more light sources arranged in a first straight
line on the spreader and measuring any linear deviation from the orthogonal axis in
an X or Y direction.
28. A method according to claim 27, further comprising the step of measuring with the
optical sensor a distance to at least one third light source (T) arranged on a line
perpendicular to the first straight line and determining a list error.
29. A method according to claim 28, further comprising the step of determining a distance
to the at least one third light source, calculating a list deflection of the container,
and determining a common movement of a pair one or more said suspension points (4a-4c,
4b-4d) to correct the list error.
30. A method according to claim 17, further comprising the step of measuring a distance
to each of the light sources from the optical sensor, measuring a linear deflection,
a trim error of the spreader and determining a common movement of a pair of one or
more said suspension points (4a-4b, 4c-4d) to correct the trim error.
31. A method according to any of claims 17-30, further comprising controlling said container
crane by means of running one or more computer programs in at least one computer or
processor.
32. A computer program which when read into a computer or processor will cause the computer
or processor to carry out a method according to the steps of any of claims 17-30.
33. A computer readable medium comprising a computer program which when read into a computer
or processor will cause the computer or processor to carry out a method according
to the steps of any of claims 17-30.
1. Laststeuervorrichtung zum Steuern der Bewegung einer hängenden Last eines Containerkrans,
wobei der Kran eine Laufkatze (21), einen Spreader (15) und Laststränge, die in einer
Vier-Punkt-Aufhängung (4a-4d) zum Heben einer Last angeordnet sind, sowie einen optischen
Sensor (5) zum Detektieren einer Abweichungsposition einer orthogonalen Achse (X,
Y, V) eines Containers, der unter dem Spreader hängt, in Bezug auf eine imaginäre
Mittellinie (XL, YW, VH) der orthogonalen Achse des Containers umfasst, wobei zwei oder mehr Aktoren (16-19)
an mindestens einem Laststrang befestigt angeordnet sind und zum Bewegen von mindestens
einem Aufhängungspunkt (4a-d) näher hin zu oder weiter weg von der imaginären Mittellinie
(XL, XW, VH) durch Verkürzen und/oder Verlängern des mindestens einen Laststrangs angeordnet
sind, und wobei ein Sensormittel an mindestens einem Aktor zum Detektieren der Aktorposition
und dadurch von irgendeiner Änderung der Länge des mindestens einen Laststrangs angeordnet
ist, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass der optische Sensor in einer Blicklinie von zwei oder mehr Lichtquellen (7) angeordnet
ist, die an dem Spreader in einer ersten geraden Linie relativ zu einer orthogonalen
Achse des Containers angeordnet sind, dass der optische Sensor ebenfalls in einer
Blicklinie mindestens einer dritten Lichtquelle (T) angeordnet ist, die an dem Spreader
auf einer Linie angeordnet ist, welche im rechten Winkel zu der ersten geraden Linie
verläuft, und dass die mindestens eine dritte Lichtquelle (T) in einem vertikalen
Abstand von den Lichtquellen (7) der ersten geraden Linie an dem Spreader angeordnet
ist.
2. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei mindestens ein erster Aktor (16, 18) angeordnet
ist, um einen ersten Teil eines ersten Laststrangs einzurollen, und zugleich mindestens
ein zweiter Aktor (17, 19) angeordnet ist, um einen zweiten Teil eines ersten Laststrangs
auszurollen.
3. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei mindestens ein Aktor eine Vorrichtung umfasst,
die zur Bewegung in eine Vorwärts- oder Rückwärtsrichtung zum Einrollen oder Ausrollen
eines Teils eines Laststrangs angeordnet ist.
4. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 3, wobei mindestens ein Aktor eine Vorrichtung umfasst,
die zur Bewegung in einer geraden Linie in einer Vorwärts- oder Rückwärtsrichtung
angeordnet ist.
5. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei mindestens ein Aktor einen von einem Motor angetriebenen
Spindelantrieb zum Bewegen eines Laststrangs in einer im Wesentlichen geraden Linie
umfasst.
6. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 5 mit mindestens einem Aktor, welcher eine Spindelvorrichtung
umfasst, die zum Ausfahren oder Einfahren einer Welle angeordnet ist.
7. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, welche Mittel zum Vergleichen einer Position und von
Bewegungsgrenzen eines ersten Aktors mit einer Position und Bewegungsgrenzen eines
zweiten Aktors und zum Bestimmen, welcher Aktor bewegt werden soll, umfasst.
8. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, welche eine Steuerung mit einem Steuerkreis zum Korrigieren
eines detektierten Abweichungsfehlers gemäß einem vorgegebenen Referenzwert mittels
eines Kreises, der einen Eingang von einer detektierten Position des mindestens einen
Aktors (16-19) umfasst.
9. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 8, wobei die Steuerung einen Eingang für einen kontinuierlichen
Wert für eine Position von mindestens einem Aktor umfasst.
10. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 8, wobei die Steuerung einen Eingang für einen Wert für
eine Aktorposition umfasst, die in Bezug auf einen Zeitraum oder einen Bewegungsschritt
abgetastet wird.
11. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Laststeuervorrichtung vier Aktoren umfasst,
die auf derselben Seite eines Spreaders angeordnet sind.
12. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Laststeuervorrichtung vier Aktoren umfasst,
die an der Auslegerspitzenseite eines Spreaders angeordnet sind.
13. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei die Laststeuervorrichtung mindestens einen elektrischen
Drehmotor umfasst, der als Antriebsmittel für mindestens einen Aktor angeordnet ist,
um einen Laststrang zu verlängern oder zu verkürzen.
14. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei mindestens ein Aktor durch einen Motor angetrieben
wird und ein Getriebe oder einen Antrieb zum Bewegen eines Laststrangs von einem beliebigen
aus der Liste umfassend Schneckentrieb, Kegelradtrieb und Zahnstangentriebe umfasst.
15. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei eine oder mehrere hydraulisch angetriebene Vorrichtungen
als Antriebsmittel oder als Aktor zum Bewegen eines Laststrangs angeordnet sind und
auf diese Weise den Laststrang verlängern oder verkürzen.
16. Vorrichtung nach Anspruch 1, wobei der optische Sensor (5) ein beliebiger aus der
Liste umfassend CCD-Kameras, Laserscanner und Laserentfernungsmesser ist.
17. Verfahren zum Steuern eines Containerkrans mit einer hängenden Last mittels einer
Laststeuervorrichtung, wobei der Kran eine Laufkatze, einen Spreader und Laststränge,
die in einer Vier-Punkt-Aufhängung zum Heben einer Last angeordnet sind, sowie einen
optischen Sensor, der an der Laufkatze angeordnet ist, umfasst, umfassend
- Detektieren einer Abweichungsposition einer orthogonalen Achse (X, Y, V) eines Containers
(1) (oder Spreaders) um eine imaginäre Mittellinie (XL, YW, VH) der orthogonalen Achse mit dem optischen Sensor, optisches Detektieren einer Abweichung,
wobei der optische Sensor in einer Blicklinie von zwei oder mehr Lichtquellen (7)
angeordnet ist, die an dem Spreader in einer ersten geraden Linie relativ zu der orthogonalen
Achse des Containers angeordnet sind, wobei der optische Sensor ebenfalls in einer
Blicklinie mindestens einer dritten Lichtquelle (T) angeordnet ist, die an dem Spreader
auf einer Linie angeordnet ist, welche im rechten Winkel zu der ersten geraden Linie
verläuft, und wobei die mindestens eine dritte Lichtquelle (T) in einem vertikalen
Abstand von den Lichtquellen (7) der ersten geraden Linie an dem Spreader angeordnet
ist,
- Bestimmen einer linearen Position von mindestens einem der Aktoren und Senden eines
Signals zu mindestens zwei der Aktoren, um mindestens einen Aufhängungspunkt (4a-d)
näher hin zu oder weiter weg von einer bzw. der imaginären Mittellinie (XL, XW, VH) zu bewegen.
18. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend das Vergleichen einer Position und von
Aktorbewegungsgrenzen eines ersten Aktors mit mindestens einer Position und Bewegungsgrenzen
eines zweiten Aktors und das Bestimmen, welcher Aktor oder welche Aktoren bewegt werden
sollen.
19. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend das Einrollen eines ersten Teils eines
ersten Laststrangs und zugleich das Ausrollen eines zweiten Teils des ersten Laststrangs
und auf diese Weise das Verkürzen oder Verlängern eines Teils des ersten Laststrangs.
20. Verfahren nach Anspruch 19, ferner umfassend den Schritt, dass zwei Aktoren eines
Paares von Aktoren, die einer selben Seite des Spreaders entsprechen, in derselben
positiven oder negativen Richtung einrollen.
21. Verfahren nach Anspruch 20, ferner umfassend den Schritt, dass zwei Aktoren eines
Paares von Aktoren, die einer selben Seite des Spreaders entsprechen, einen Laststrang
jeweils in dieselbe positive oder negative Richtung ausrollen.
22. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Antreibens von mindestens
einem Aktor mit einem Motor, der mit einer Spindelvorrichtung angeordnet ist.
23. Verfahren nach Anspruch 22, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Antreibens von mindestens
einem Aktor mit einem Motor, der mit einer Spindelvorrichtung angeordnet ist, zum
Ausfahren bzw. Einfahren einer Welle, die an einen Laststrang befestigt angeordnet
ist.
24. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des kontinuierlichen Bestimmens
einer Position von mindestens einem Aktor.
25. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Bestimmens einer Position
von mindestens einem Aktor mittels Abtastungen in Abhängigkeit von einem Zeitraum
oder einem Bewegungsschritt.
26. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Messens eines Abstands
zu zwei oder mehr Lichtquellen, die an dem Spreader in einer ersten geraden Linie
relativ zu der orthogonalen Achse des Containers angeordnet sind, mit dem optischen
Sensor.
27. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Messens eines Abstands
zu zwei oder mehr Lichtquellen, die in einer ersten geraden Linie an dem Spreader
angeordnet sind, mit dem optischen Sensor und des Messens von irgendeiner linearen
Abweichung von der orthogonalen Achse in einer X- oder Y-Richtung.
28. Verfahren nach Anspruch 27, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Messens eines Abstands
zu mindestens einer dritten Lichtquelle (T), die auf einer Linie angeordnet ist, welche
im rechten Winkel zu der ersten geraden Linie verläuft, mit dem optischen Sensor und
des Bestimmens eines Schräglagenfehlers.
29. Verfahren nach Anspruch 28, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Bestimmens eines Abstands
zu der mindestens einen dritten Lichtquelle, des Berechnens einer Schräglagenabweichung
des Containers und des Bestimmens einer gemeinsamen Bewegung eines oder mehrerer Paare
der Aufhängungspunkte (4a-4c, 4b-4d), - um den Schräglagenfehler zu korrigieren.
30. Verfahren nach Anspruch 17, ferner umfassend den Schritt des Messens eines Abstands
zu jeder der Lichtquellen von dem optischen Sensor, des Messens der linearen Abweichung,
eines Trimmfehlers des Spreaders und des Bestimmens einer gemeinsamen Bewegung eines
Paars von einem oder mehreren der Aufhängungspunkte (4a-4b, 4c-4d), um den Trimmfehler
zu korrigieren.
31. Verfahren nach einem beliebigen der Ansprüche 17-30, ferner umfassend das Steuern
des Containerkrans durch Anwenden eines oder mehrerer Rechnerprogramme in mindestens
einem Rechner oder Prozessor.
32. Rechnerprogramm, welches, wenn es in einen Rechner oder Prozessor eingelesen wird,
bewirkt, dass der Rechner oder Prozessor ein Verfahren gemäß den Schritten von beliebigen
der Ansprüche 17-30 ausführt.
33. Rechnerlesbares Medium, welches ein Rechnerprogramm umfasst, welches, wenn es in einen
Rechner oder Prozessor eingelesen wird, bewirkt, dass der Rechner oder Prozessor ein
Verfahren gemäß den Schritten von beliebigen der Ansprüche 17-30 ausführt.
1. Dispositif de commande de charge pour commander un déplacement d'une charge suspendue
d'une grue de conteneur, la grue comprenant un chariot (21) transporteur, un cadre
(15) de préhension et des lignes de charge montées suivant une suspension (4a à 4d)
à quatre points pour soulever une charge et un capteur (5) optique pour détecter une
position de déviation d'un axe (X, Y, V) orthogonal d'un conteneur suspendu sous le
cadre de préhension par rapport à une ligne (XL, YW, VH) de centre imaginaire de l'axe orthogonal du conteneur, dans lequel deux actionneurs
(16 à 19) ou plus sont adjoints à au moins une ligne de charge et sont agencés pour
déplacer au moins un point (4a-d) de suspension en le rapprochant ou en l'éloignant
de la ligne (XL, YW, VH) de centre imaginaire en raccourcissant et/ou en allongeant la au moins une ligne
de charge, et un moyen à capteur est monté sur au moins un actionneur pour détecter
la position de l'actionneur et ainsi tout changement de longueur de la au moins une
ligne de charge, caractérisé en ce que le capteur optique est monté dans la visibilité directe de deux ou plusieurs sources
(7) lumineuses montées sur le cadre de préhension suivant une première ligne droite
par rapport à un axe orthogonal du conteneur, en ce que le capteur optique est monté aussi dans la visibilité directe d'au moins une troisième
source (T) lumineuse montée sur le cadre de préhension sur une ligne qui est perpendiculaire
à la première ligne droite et en ce que la au moins une troisième source (T) lumineuse est montée sur le cadre de préhension
à une distance verticale des sources (7) lumineuses de la première ligne droite.
2. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins un premier actionneur
(16, 18) est agencé pour enrouler une première partie d'une première ligne de charge
et en même temps au moins un deuxième actionneur (17, 19) est agencé pour relâcher
une deuxième partie d'une première ligne de charge.
3. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins un actionneur comprend
un dispositif agencé pour se déplacer dans un sens vers l'avant ou en sens contraire
pour enrouler ou relâcher une partie d'une ligne de charge.
4. Dispositif suivant la revendication 3, dans lequel au moins un actionneur comprend
un dispositif agencé pour un déplacement en ligne droite vers l'avant ou en sens contraire.
5. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins un actionneur comprend
un entraînement par vis, actionné par un moteur, pour déplacer une ligne de charge
sensiblement en ligne droite.
6. Dispositif suivant la revendication 5, ayant au moins un actionneur qui comprend un
dispositif à vis, agencé pour déployer ou retirer un arbre.
7. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, qui comprend des moyens de comparaison d'une
première position d'actionneur et de limites de déplacement à une deuxième position
d'actionneur et de limites de déplacement et pour déterminer l'actionneur qui doit
être déplacé.
8. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, qui comprend une unité de commande ayant une
boucle de commande pour ajuster une erreur de déviation détectée à une référence donnée,
en utilisant une boucle comprenant une entrée en provenance d'une position détectée
d'au moins un actionneur (16 à 19).
9. Dispositif suivant la revendication 8, dans lequel l'unité de commande comprend une
entrée d'une valeur continue d'une position d'au moins un actionneur.
10. Dispositif suivant la revendication 8, dans lequel l'unité de commande comprend une
entrée d'une valeur d'une position d'actionneur échantillonnée par rapport à un laps
de temps ou à un incrément de déplacement.
11. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel le dispositif de commande de charge
comprend quatre actionneurs montés du même côté du cadre de préhension.
12. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel le dispositif de commande de charge
comprend quatre actionneurs montés du côté de la pointe de flèche d'un cadre de préhension.
13. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel le dispositif de commande de charge
comprend au moins un moteur électrique tournant, monté comme moyen d'entraînement
d'au moins un actionneur pour allonger ou raccourcir une ligne de charge.
14. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins un actionneur est actionné
par un moteur et comprend une transmission pour déplacer une ligne de charge choisie
parmi l'un de la liste de : vis sans fin, commande par engrenage conique, mécanisme
à crémaillère.
15. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel un ou plusieurs dispositifs actionnés
hydrauliquement sont montés comme moyen d'entraînement ou comme actionneur pour déplacer
une ligne de charge et ainsi allonger ou raccourcir la ligne de charge.
16. Dispositif suivant la revendication 1, dans lequel le capteur (5) optique est l'un
parmi la liste de caméra CCD, d'explorateur laser, de télémètre laser.
17. Procédé de commande d'une grue de conteneur ayant une charge suspendue au moyen d'un
dispositif de commande de charge, la grue comprenant un chariot transporteur, un cadre
de préhension et des lignes de charge montées suivant une suspension à quatre points
pour soulever une charge et un capteur optique monté sur le chariot transporteur,
dans lequel :
- on détecte par le capteur optique une position de déviation d'un axe (X, Y, V) orthogonal
d'un conteneur (1) (ou d'un cadre de préhension) par rapport à une ligne (XL, YW, VH) de centre imaginaire de cet axe orthogonal, on détecte optiquement une déviation,
le capteur optique étant monté dans la visibilité directe de deux ou de plusieurs
sources (7) lumineuses, montées sur le cadre de préhension suivant une première ligne
droite par rapport à l'axe orthogonal du conteneur, le capteur optique étant monté
aussi dans la visibilité directe d'au moins une troisième source (T) lumineuse, montée
sur le cadre de préhension sur une ligne qui est perpendiculaire à la première ligne
droite et la au moins une troisième source (T) lumineuse est montée sur le cadre de
préhension à une distance verticale des sources (7) lumineuses de la première ligne
droite,
- on détermine une position linéaire d'au moins un actionneur, et on envoie un signal
au au moins deux actionneurs pour rapprocher au moins un point (4a-d) de suspension
de la ligne (XL, YW, VH) de centre imaginaire ou pour l'en éloigner.
18. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, dans lequel en outre on compare une première
position d'actionneur et de limites de mouvement d'actionneur à au moins une deuxième
position d'actionneur et de limites de déplacement et on détermine celui de l'actionneur
ou des actionneurs qui sera à déplacer.
19. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, dans lequel en outre on enroule une première
partie d'une première ligne de charge et en même temps on relâche une deuxième partie
de la première ligne de charge et ainsi on raccourcit ou on allonge une partie de
la première ligne de charge.
20. Procédé suivant la revendication 19, comprenant en outre le stade suivant lesquels
deux actionneurs d'une paire d'actionneurs correspondant à un même côté du cadre de
préhension enroulent dans le même sens positif ou négatif.
21. Procédé suivant la revendication 20, comprenant en outre le stade suivant lequel deux
actionneurs d'une paire d'actionneurs, correspondant au même côté du cadre de préhension,
relâchent une ligne de charge à la fois dans le même sens positif ou négatif.
22. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on entraîne
au moins un actionneur par un moteur pourvu d'un dispositif à vis.
23. Procédé suivant la revendication 22, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on entraîne
au moins un actionneur par un moteur muni d'un dispositif à vis pour déployer, retirer
un arbre adjoint à une ligne de charge.
24. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on détermine
continuellement une position d'au moins un actionneur.
25. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on détermine
une position d'au moins un actionneur au moyen d'échantillons en fonction d'un laps
de temps ou d'un incrément de déplacement.
26. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on mesure
par le capteur optique une distance à deux ou plusieurs sources lumineuses, montées
sur le cadre de préhension suivant une première ligne droite, par rapport à l'axe
orthogonal du conteneur.
27. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on mesure
par le capteur optique une distance à deux ou plusieurs sources lumineuses, montées
suivant les premières lignes droites sur le cadre de préhension et on mesure toute
déviation linéaire par rapport à l'axe orthogonal dans une direction X ou Y.
28. Procédé suivant la revendication 27, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on mesure
par le capteur optique une distance à au moins une troisième source (T) lumineuse,
montée sur une ligne perpendiculaire à la première ligne droite et on détermine une
erreur d'inclinaison.
29. Procédé suivant la revendication 28, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on détermine
une distance à la au moins une troisième source lumineuse, on calcule une déviation
d'inclinaison du conteneur et on détermine un mouvement commun d'une paire d'un ou
de plusieurs des points (4a-4c, 4b-4d) de suspension pour corriger l'erreur d'inclinaison.
30. Procédé suivant la revendication 17, comprenant en outre le stade dans lequel on mesure
une distance du capteur optique à chacune des sources lumineuses, on mesure une déviation
linéaire, une erreur d'assiette du cadre de préhension et on détermine un mouvement
commun d'une paire d'un ou de plusieurs des points (4a-4b, 4c-4d) de suspension pour
corriger l'erreur d'assiette.
31. Procédé suivant l'une quelconque des revendications 17 à 30, dans lequel, en outre,
on commande la grue de conteneur en faisant passer un ou plusieurs programmes d'ordinateur
dans au moins un ordinateur ou un processeur.
32. Programme d'ordinateur qui, lorsqu'il est exploité dans un ordinateur ou dans un processeur,
fera que l'ordinateur ou le processeur effectue un procédé suivant les stades de l'une
quelconque des revendications 17 à 30.
33. Support pouvant être exploité par un ordinateur et comprenant un programme d'ordinateur
qui, lorsqu'il est exploité dans un ordinateur ou dans un processeur, fera que l'ordinateur
ou le processeur effectuera un procédé suivant les stades de l'une quelconque des
revendications 17 à 30.
REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only.
It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has
been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and
the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Patent documents cited in the description