| (19) |
 |
|
(11) |
EP 1 903 667 B9 |
| (12) |
CORRECTED EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION |
|
Note: Bibliography reflects the latest situation |
| (15) |
Correction information: |
|
Corrected version no 1 (W1 B1) |
|
Corrections, see Description |
| (48) |
Corrigendum issued on: |
|
11.06.2014 Bulletin 2014/24 |
| (45) |
Mention of the grant of the patent: |
|
19.03.2014 Bulletin 2014/12 |
| (22) |
Date of filing: 21.09.2007 |
|
| (51) |
International Patent Classification (IPC):
|
|
| (54) |
Operating electrical machines from a DC link
Betrieb elektrischer Maschinen von einer DC-Verbindung aus
Commande de machines électriques à partir d'une liaison CC
|
| (84) |
Designated Contracting States: |
|
DE FR GB IT |
| (30) |
Priority: |
22.09.2006 GB 0618751
|
| (43) |
Date of publication of application: |
|
26.03.2008 Bulletin 2008/13 |
| (60) |
Divisional application: |
|
13185637.9 / 2688194 |
| (73) |
Proprietor: Nidec SR Drives Ltd. |
|
Harrogate
North Yorkshire HG3 1PR (GB) |
|
| (72) |
Inventors: |
|
- Fulton, Norman Neilson
Harrogate
HG3 1RJ (GB)
- Mayes, Peter Richard
Bradford
BD10 8WL (GB)
|
| (74) |
Representative: Hale, Peter et al |
|
Kilburn & Strode LLP
20 Red Lion Street London WC1R 4PJ London WC1R 4PJ (GB) |
| (56) |
References cited: :
EP-A- 0 752 753 WO-A-2006/098703 DE-A1- 10 261 739 US-A1- 2004 027 105
|
EP-A- 0 982 194 DE-A1- 3 223 786 US-A- 4 263 535 US-A1- 2005 105 897
|
|
| |
|
|
- RADUN A: "Generating with the switched reluctance motor" APPLIED POWER ELECTRONICS
CONFERENCE AND EXPOSITION, 1994. APEC '94. CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS 1994., NINTH ANNUAL
ORLANDO, FL, USA 13-17 FEB. 1994, NEW YORK, NY, USA,IEEE, 13 February 1994 (1994-02-13),
pages 41-47, XP010118593 ISBN: 0-7803-1456-5
|
|
| |
|
| Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European
patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to
the European patent
granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall
not be deemed to
have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent
Convention).
|
[0001] The present invention generally relates to a system and method for operating a plurality
of electrical machines from a DC link. More particularly, though not exclusively,
the present invention relates to the stability of such a DC link on which electronically
switched machines are required to operate together.
[0003] Figure 1 of the accompanying drawings shows a typical switched reluctance drive in
schematic form, where the switched reluctance machine 12 is connected to a load 19.
The DC power supply 11 can be either a battery or rectified and filtered AC mains
or some other form of energy storage. The DC voltage provided by the power supply
11 is switched across the phase windings 16 of the machine 12 by a power converter
13 under the control of the electronic control unit 14. The switching must be correctly
synchronised to the angle of rotation of the rotor for proper operation of the drive,
and a rotor position detector 15 is typically employed to supply signals corresponding
to the angular position of the rotor. The rotor position detector 15 may take many
forms, including that of a software algorithm, and its output may also be used to
generate a speed feedback signal. The presence of the position detector and the use
of an excitation strategy which is completely dependent on the instantaneous position
of the rotor leads to the generic description of "rotor position switched" for these
machines.
[0004] Many different power converter topologies are known for this type of machine, several
of which are discussed in the Stephenson paper cited above. One of the most common
configurations is shown for a single phase of a polyphase system in Figure 2, in which
the phase winding 16 of the machine is connected in series with two switching devices
21 and 22 across the busbars 26 and 27. Busbars 26 and 27 are collectively known as
the "DC link" of the converter. Energy recovery diodes 23 and 24 are connected to
the winding to allow the winding current to flow back to the DC link when the switches
21 and 22 are opened. A low-value resistor 28 may be connected in series with the
lower switch to act as a current-sense resistor. A capacitor 25, known as the "DC
link capacitor", is connected across the DC link to source or sink any alternating
component of the DC link current (ie the so-called "ripple current") which cannot
be drawn from, or returned to, the supply. In practical terms, the capacitor 25 may
comprise several capacitors connected in series and/or parallel and, where parallel
connection is used, some of the elements may be distributed throughout the converter.
[0005] Figure 3 shows typical waveforms for an operating cycle of the circuit shown in Figure
2 when the machine is in the motoring mode. Figure 3(a) shows the voltage being applied
at the "on angle" (θ
on) for the duration of the conduction angle θ
c when the switches 21 and 22 are closed. Figure 3(b) shows the current in the phase
winding 16 rising to a peak and then falling. At the end of the conduction period,
the "off angle" (θ
off) is reached, the switches are opened and the current transfers to the diodes, placing
the inverted link voltage across the winding and hence forcing down the flux and the
current to zero. At zero current, the diodes cease to conduct and the circuit is inactive
until the start of a subsequent conduction period. The current on the DC link reverses
when the switches are opened, as shown in Figure 3(c), and the returned current represents
energy being returned to the supply. The shape of the current waveform varies depending
on the operating point of the machine and on the switching strategy adopted. As is
well-known and described in, for example, the Stephenson paper cited above, low-speed
operation generally involves the use of current chopping to contain the peak currents,
and switching off the switches non-simultaneously gives an operating mode generally
known as "freewheeling".
[0006] As is well known in the art, switched reluctance machines can be operated in the
generating mode, in which the phase currents are mirror images (in time) of the motoring
currents. Such systems are discussed in, for example, "
Generating with the switched reluctance motor", Radun, Proceedings of the IEEE 9th
Applied Power Electronics Conference, Orlando, Florida, 13-17 Feb 1994, pp 41 - 47. Figure 4(a) illustrates a current waveform when the system is motoring and Figure
4(b) illustrates the corresponding current waveform for generating. It will be seen
from Figure 4(b) that the machine requires a "priming" or magnetising flux to be established
(along with the necessary current to support this flux) before the larger current
is returned to the DC link. In other words, some electrical energy is required from
the DC link to prime the machine before it is able to convert the larger amount of
mechanical energy back to the DC link. Part of the function of the DC link capacitor
is to supply the ripple component of this current.
[0007] The waveforms shown in Figures 3 and 4 are of the "single-pulse" type, usually associated
with high speed operation. Chopping waveforms are shown in Figures 5 and 6 for motoring
operation. Figure 5(a) shows a phase current waveform where the conduction period
begins in the centre of the minimum inductance region and ends at the centre of the
maximum inductance region. During the conduction period, a suitable current controller
maintains the current in a hysteresis band defined by I
u and I
l. When the upper current I
u is reached, the controller opens both switches and the current and flux fall under
the action of the reverse voltage until the lower current I
l is reached, whereupon the chopping cycle begins again. The phase current of Figure
5(a) corresponds to the supply current of Figure 5(b), where it will be seen that
the ripple current is high, with spikes of returned current each time the top of the
hysteresis band is reached.
[0008] The effect of introducing freewheeling into this chopping regime is shown in Figure
6(a), where only one switch is opened when the upper current limit is reached. The
rate of flux decay, and hence current decay is now much less, so the chopping frequency
is reduced. Current is only returned to the supply at the end of the conduction period,
when both switches are opened. This reduction in the ripple current associated with
the supply current allows a reduction in the size of the DC link capacitor, and is
often one of the main factors in deciding to use a freewheeling strategy of this type.
Of course, the peak current drawn from the link at θ
on is unchanged, so any reduction in capacitor size will lead to an increase in the
voltage dip in the bus at θ
on. With a single drive operating on its own DC link, this increased voltage ripple
is generally of little consequence and is tolerated for the sake of the cost saving
in capacitor size.
[0009] The voltage ripple on the DC link can be significant, however, when two or more drive
systems are operated together. For example, Figure 7 shows a system where a prime
mover 70 (e.g. an internal combustion engine) is mechanically coupled to and drives
a switched reluctance machine 72 which operates in generating mode. The generator
has its own power converter 74 and control electronics 75. The output of this generator
appears on the DC bus 76 and is supplied to the power converter 77 of a second switched
reluctance machine 78 which has a controller 79 and operates as a motor driving a
load 80. Such a system could be found in, e.g., a marine application or in a hybrid
electric vehicle. The DC link capacitor 82 is effectively the capacitor serving both
power converters 74 and 77, though in practice it would be distributed between the
converters in order to suppress transient effects associated with self-inductance
of the layout of the components. The motoring and generating systems are now linked
by a common DC bus, so features in the electrical waveform imposed on the bus by one
system will be experienced by the other.
[0010] It will be appreciated that there is no requirement for the machines to operate at
the same speed. The speed of the motor 78 will be a function of the load 80 and the
performance demanded by the user. The speed of the generator 72 is determined by the
prime mover 70. The speed of the prime mover is determined by the system designer,
who can program the speed and torque so as to most efficiently provide the power required
by the load 80. Thus the speeds of the generator and the motor are not linked in any
simple way.
[0011] As described above, the generator draws its excitation from the DC bus at the beginning
of each cycle of phase conduction. In order to generate the required output, the flux
in the machine must reach the appropriate level before the switches open and energy
return begins. Since the flux is the integral over time of the applied voltage, the
exact level of DC link voltage at the moment of excitation is now important for correct
operation of the generator. If the voltage dips because a phase of the motor has just
been switched on and the DC link capacitor is unable to supply sufficient energy to
maintain the link voltage, the excitation of the generator will be less than expected
and the output from the generator in the second part of the cycle will be correspondingly
less. This may lead to a longer depression of the DC link voltage, requiring the control
system 75 of the generator to intervene and adjust the conduction angles to restore
the output of the generator. There is clearly the potential for an instability to
set in, requiring care in the design of the parameters of the control system, particularly
the bandwidth, and in sizing the DC link capacitor.
[0012] Since the two machines are not in any way linked in terms of the frequency of one
with respect to the other (i.e. they are 'frequency wild'), it is very difficult to
test every combination of machine speeds and loads to ascertain correct system performance.
[0013] While the system is generally tolerant of small perturbations, aided by the energy
stored by virtue of the inertia of the rotating parts, there are situations where
the disturbance can be high on random occasions. For example, in the excitation pattern
frequently used in high-output motors, two or more phases can have their conduction
periods overlapping. The chopping action in these phases is effectively frequency
wild, since the frequency will change through the conduction period. This additional
pattern is superimposed on the existing complex voltage appearing on the DC link.
If two phases are switched on together, there will be a much larger voltage dip on
the DC link as energy is drawn from the DC link capacitor. This problem is magnified
in arrangements where the generator feeds a plurality of drives, e.g. as shown in
Figure 8. In Figure 8, the DC link now supplies a series of converters 77a, 77b, 77c
which serve motors 78a, 78b, 78c driving loads 80a, 80b,80c. Unless these loads are
mechanically linked, the motors will be frequency wild with respect to each other,
so there is now a random chance of coincidence of a large number of phases being switched
onto the DC link simultaneously. In this event, the voltage on the DC link will exhibit
a severe dip and the generator may fail to receive any significant amount of excitation
from the link when it next requires it. The DC link voltage will therefore collapse
and the system will stall. This is extremely serious in many applications, especially
where the loads are safety critical.
[0014] The only prior art solution to this problem is to add more and more capacitance to
the DC link to support the voltage and suppress the voltage ripple. This has drawbacks.
Firstly, the extra capacitance is costly to install, and needs extra space to house
it. In many applications, space is not available and, in any case, the extra cost
is unwelcome. Such capacitors have a finite life, unlike most other parts of the drive
system, so the capacitors need to be renewed on a regular basis to maintain the integrity
of the drive, and this represents a further cost associated with maintaining the drive.
Secondly, the increased capacitance is now distributed among the generator and traction
drives, linked by cables that have significant self-inductance. This introduces the
likelihood of parasitic oscillations being generated on the DC link, which can themselves
produce damaging effects and can lead to shut down of the drive.
[0015] There is therefore a need for a method of controlling the voltage ripple on the DC
link to address this potential instability. In accordance with embodiments of the
present invention, the foregoing disadvantages of known drive systems are overcome
in a reliable and cost-effective manner.
[0016] The present invention is defined in the accompanying independent claims. Preferred
features of the invention are recited in the claims respectively dependent thereon.
[0017] Other aspects and advantages of the invention will become apparent upon reading the
following detailed description of exemplary embodiments of the invention and upon
reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic drawing of a prior art switched reluctance drive;
Figure 2 is a prior art excitation circuit for the switched reluctance machine of
Figure 1;
Figure 3(a) is a phase voltage waveform for the circuit shown in Figure 2;
Figure 3(b) is the phase current waveform corresponding to Figure 3(a);
Figure 3(c) is the supply current waveform corresponding to Figure 3(a);
Figure 4(a) shows a prior art motoring current waveform;
Figure 4(b) shows a prior art generating current waveform;
Figure 5(a) shows a phase current in the chopping mode;
Figure 5(b) shows the supply current corresponding to Figure 5(a);
Figure 6(a) shows a phase current in the chopping mode with freewheeling;
Figure 6(b) shows the supply current corresponding to Figure 6(a);
Figure 7 shows a generating system supplying a single motor;
Figure 8 shows a generating system supplying several motors;
Figure 9(a) shows a waveform of DC link voltage for the operation of the system of
Figure 7;
Figure 9(b) shows a waveform of motor phase current for the system of Figure 7;
Figure 10(a) shows a waveform of DC link voltage where the current demand collapses
the link;
Figure 10(b) shows the corresponding motor phase current;
Figure 11 shows phase current according to an embodiment; and
Figure 12 shows a flow chart depicting an embodiment of the invention.
[0018] The illustrations below refer to a system configured as shown in Figure 7 with 3-phase
machines. However, machines with any number of phases could be used in accordance
with the invention and the phase number of the generator and motor(s) need not be
the same. Control of the respective machines 72 and 78 is implemented in software
loaded in the memory 81 of controls 75 and 79. According to their respective control
algorithms the power converter switches are actuated. In this embodiment, the technique
is implemented in the software. Figure 7 also shows a monitoring device 83 which is
arranged to monitor the DC link voltage. This is used for general system monitoring
purposes, but is also used in relation to an embodiment disclosed herein. The monitoring
device can take a number of different forms that will be known to the person of ordinary
skill in the art and will not be elaborated on here.
[0019] Figure 9 shows the operating characteristics of a system as shown in Figure 7 but
which is conventionally controlled. The motor is accelerating from a very low load
at low speed to full load at higher speed. This could correspond to a vehicle operating
under full acceleration demand, where the demand has a ramp to avoid exciting resonances
in the drive train. The DC link voltage is shown as a function of time in Figure 9(a)
and the current waveform for one phase of the motor is shown in Figure 9(b). The other
phase currents are not shown, but will be interleaved with the waveform of Figure
9(b) at the appropriate spacing. In Figure 9(a) it will be seen that the voltage is
essentially constant until the phase current begins to rise. The large periodic dips
in the voltage correspond to the switch-on point for each incoming phase of the motor,
indicating that the DC link capacitor cannot supply sufficient energy to maintain
the voltage. The smaller perturbations on the waveform are due to a combination of
the switching of the phases in the generator (which is at a much higher frequency)
and the chopping action in the phases of the motor. In this particular example, the
nominal voltage of 600V dips to 250V as the motor moves the load from rest, though
the system survives this and recovers to successfully accelerate the load up to speed.
[0020] Figure 10 shows the same system of Figure 7 operating under slightly different conditions.
The DC link voltage is shown as a function of time in Figure 10(a) and the current
waveform for one phase of the motor is shown in Figure 10(b). In this example, the
switching operations in the motor have coincided to produce a demand on the DC link
that suddenly drags the voltage below the point where it is unable to supply sufficient
excitation to the generator. The output of the generator fails to provide enough output
to meet the system demand, so the link "stalls" to zero volts and the motor current
collapses. This would represent a failure of the system to start and accelerate to
the required speed. To address these stall conditions, the DC link needs to be stabilised
against the random disturbances.
[0021] An embodiment, implemented in the control software, includes monitoring the DC link
voltage using the monitoring device 83. A predetermined DC link voltage threshold
is set at a level below which operation is considered to be hazardous because the
risk of the system stalling is unacceptably high. The control system monitors the
DC link voltage, switching the phases as normal. When the predetermined DC link voltage
threshold is reached, it forces one or more of the conducting phases into a freewheel
condition by opening one of the phase switches in response to a signal from the monitoring
device 83. This immediately reduces the current demand from the DC link for that phase
to zero (as previously shown in Figure 6(b)) yet maintains a significant level of
current in the phase. The overall effect on the output of the motor is therefore relatively
small. The control system continues to monitor the DC link voltage and, when it recovers
to a value above the threshold, the phase(s) are put back into full conduction by
re-closing the switch in response to a further signal from the monitoring device.
Those skilled in the art will realise that a simple hysteresis band can be put around
the threshold to avoid switching in and out of the stall prevention mode too frequently
(commonly known as "chatter"). This is illustrated in Figure 11, where the control
system has sensed a voltage dip as the first full block of phase conduction has begun,
and a period of freewheeling has been inserted in the rising edge of the block to
allow the DC link to recover. The flow chart for implementing this embodiment is illustrated
in Figure 12.
[0022] This embodiment has the advantage that no action is taken until absolutely necessary,
and even then the impact on the motor output is small, while the DC link is held in
a stable and safe condition at all times. Effectively, this embodiment makes full
use of the capacitance in the DC link by maintaining it at or just above the point
of instability during conditions of high demand. Because of this, the capacitance
on the link can be reduced to levels below that normally considered safe, so that
a more economical system can be produced. The threshold voltage is predetermined,
taking account of such factors as the number of machines in the system, the size of
the generator relative to the motors, the speeds of the machines and their coupled
inertias, the amount of capacitance, the reliability required from the system, etc.
In one system operating on a nominal 650V bus, a threshold voltage of 320V is chosen,
with a hysteresis band of 30V sitting above the 320V.
[0023] An alternative version of the above embodiment is to detect when the voltage threshold
has been reached and then to put the phase(s) into full energy return by opening both
phase switches. While this will force the flux and current down at a much faster rate
and hence reduce the torque of the machine more, it has the benefit that the current
being returned to the DC link will assist in recovering from the voltage dip. The
system designer can therefore choose between the freewheel method giving smoother
torque or the energy return method giving faster recovery. It is possible to combine
these two variants to firstly put the phase(s) into freewheeling in the expectation
that the voltage will recover, but secondly put the phase(s) into energy return if
the recovery does not take place within a predetermined time. This predetermined time
will be set principally in relation to the generator phase conduction period, which,
for a machine with 12 rotor poles operating at 2000 rev/min, will typically be of
the order of 2.5msec.
[0024] Embodiments include the computer program product stored on a computer readable medium
as used in the system controllers. The medium may be solid state memory or other storage
device enabling processing for controlling the machine to implement the control regime
according to the disclosed embodiments. The controller may be a general purpose processor
or other computer means running under the command of the program. Equally well, the
embodiments can use a dedicated device, such as an application specific integrated
circuit (ASIC).
[0025] The skilled person will appreciate that variation of the disclosed arrangements are
possible without departing from the invention which is defined in the following claims.
1. A method of operating a plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) from a DC link,
each machine (72, 78) having at least one phase winding (16), the method comprising
monitoring the DC link voltage and, in the event that the DC link voltage decreases
to a predetermined threshold, controlling the current in at least one phase winding
(16) in at least one of the electrical machines (72, 78) to modify the current in
the DC link, thereby to control the magnitude of disturbances in the DC link voltage
caused by the combined load of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78),
characterised in that at least one of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) is a switched reluctance
machine and in that the current in the DC link is modified by freewheeling the current in at least one
of the phase windings (16) of the switched reluctance machine.
2. A method of operating a plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) from a DC link,
each machine (72, 78) having at least one phase winding (16), the method comprising
monitoring the DC link voltage and, in the event that the DC link voltage decreases
to a predetermined threshold, controlling the current in at least one phase winding
(16) in at least one of the electrical machines (72, 78) to modify the current in
the DC link, thereby to control the magnitude of disturbances in the DC link voltage
caused by the combined load of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78),
characterised in that at least one of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) is a switched reluctance
machine and in that the current in the DC link is modified by returning current from the at least one
phase winding (16) of the switched reluctance machine to the DC link.
3. A method as claimed in claim 1 or claim 2 in which the DC link is supplied by a further
electrical machine (72, 78) running as a generator.
4. A method as claimed in claim 3 in which the further electrical machine (72, 78) is
a reluctance machine.
5. A method as claimed in claim 1 and claim 2, the method including freewheeling the
said current and, subsequently, returning current from the at least one phase winding
if the DC link voltage has not recovered after a predetermined period.
6. A computer program product stored on a computer readable medium which when installed
on a processing device executes the method as claimed in any of claims 1 to 5.
7. A system for operating a plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) comprising: a power
converter (74, 77) including a DC link to which the electrical machines (72, 78) are
connected, each machine (72, 78) having at least one phase winding (16), means (83)
for monitoring the DC link voltage; and means (75, 79) for operating the power converter
(74, 77) to control the current in the at least one phase winding (16) in response
to a signal from the means (83) for monitoring when the DC link voltage decreases
to a predetermined threshold, thereby to control the magnitude of disturbances in
the DC link voltage caused by the combined load of the plurality of electrical machines
(72, 78), characterised in that at least one of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) is a switched reluctance
machine and in that the means (75, 79) for operating the power converter (74, 77) are arranged to control
the current in the at least one phase winding (16) by freewheeling the said current
in response to the signal.
8. A system for operating a plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) comprising: a power
converter (74, 77) including a DC link to which the electrical machines (72, 78) are
connected, each machine (72, 78) having at least one phase winding (16), means (83)
for monitoring the DC link voltage; and means (75, 79) for operating the power converter
(74, 77) to control the current in the at least one phase winding (16) in response
to a signal from the means (83) for monitoring when the DC link voltage decreases
to a predetermined threshold,
thereby to control the magnitude of disturbances in the DC link voltage caused by
the combined load of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78), characterised in that at least one of the plurality of electrical machines (72, 78) is a switched reluctance
machine and in that the means (75, 79) for operating the power converter (74, 77) are arranged to control
the current in the at least one phase winding (16) by returning current from at least
one of the phase winding (16) of the switched reluctance machine to the DC link in
response to the signal.
9. A system as claimed in claim 7 or claim 8 including a further electrical machine (72,
78) connected to the DC link and arranged to be run as a generator.
10. A system as claimed in claim 9 in which the further electrical machine (72, 78) is
a reluctance machine.
11. A system as claimed in claim 7 and claim 8, the means (75, 79) for operating the power
converter being arranged to freewheel the said current and, subsequently, to return
current from the at least one phase winding (16) if the DC link voltage has not recovered
after a predetermined period.
1. Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72,78) von einem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis
(DC link), wobei jede Maschine (72, 78) wenigstens eine Phasenwicklung (16) hat, wobei
das Verfahren das Überwachen der
Zwischenkreisspannung umfasst, und wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung auf einen vorgegebenen
Schwellenwert abnimmt, das Regeln des Stroms in wenigstens einer Phasenwicklung (16)
in wenigstens einer der elektrischen Maschinen (72, 78), um den Strom in dem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis
zu ändern, um dadurch das Ausmaß von Störungen in der Zwischenkreisspannung, die von
der kombinierten Last der Vielzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) verursacht werden,
zu regeln,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
wenigstens eine der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) eine geschaltete Reluktanzmaschine
ist, und dass der Strom in dem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis durch Freilaufen des Stroms
in wenigstens einer der Phasenwicklungen (16) der geschalteten Reluktanzmaschine geändert
wird.
2. Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Mehrzahl von elektrischen Maschinen (72, 78) von einem
Gleichspannungszwischenkreis, wobei jede Maschine (72, 78) wenigstens eine Phasenwicklung
(16) hat, wobei das Verfahren das Überwachen der
Zwischenkreisspannung umfasst, und wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung auf einen vorgegebenen
Schwellenwert abnimmt, das Regeln des Stroms in wenigstens einer Phasenwicklung (16)
in wenigstens einer der elektrischen Maschinen (72, 78), um den Strom in dem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis
zu ändern, um dadurch das Ausmaß von Störungen in der Zwischenkreisspannung, die von
der kombinierten Last der Vielzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) verursacht werden,
zu regeln,
dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass
wenigstens eine der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) eine geschaltete Reluktanzmaschine
ist, und dass der Strom in dem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis durch Zurückführen von
Strom von der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) der geschalteten Reluktanzmaschine
zum Gleichspannungszwischenkreis geändert wird.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder Anspruch 2, wobei der Gleichspannungszwischenkreis
durch eine weitere elektrische Maschine (72, 78) versorgt wird, die als Generator
läuft.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 3, wobei die weitere elektrische Maschine (72, 78) eine Reluktanzmaschine
ist.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 und Anspruch 2, wobei das Verfahren das Freilaufen des Stroms
und nachfolgend das Zurückführen des Stroms von der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung
umfasst, wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung nach einem vorgegebenen Zeitraum nicht wiederhergestellt
wurde.
6. Computerprogrammprodukt, das auf einem computerlesbaren Medium gespeichert ist, welches,
wenn es auf einer Verarbeitungsvorrichtung installiert ist, das Verfahren nach einem
der Ansprüche 1 bis 5 durchführt.
7. System zum Betreiben einer Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78), das aufweist:
einen Leistungsumsetzer (74, 77) mit einem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis, mit dem die
elektrischen Maschinen (72, 78) verbunden sind, wobei jede Maschine (72, 78) wenigstens
' eine Phasenwicklung (16) hat, eine Einrichtung (83) zum Überwachen der Zwischenkreisspannung,
und Einrichtungen (75, 79) zum Betreiben des Leistungsumsetzers (74, 77), um den Strom
in der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) zu regeln im Ansprechen auf ein Signal
von der Einrichtung (83) zum Überwachen, wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung auf einen
vorgegebenen Schwellenwert abnimmt, um dadurch das Ausmaß von Störungen in der Zwischenkreisspannung,
die von der kombinierten Last der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) verursacht
werden, zu regeln, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass wenigstens eine der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) eine geschaltete Reluktanzmaschine
ist, und dass die Einrichtungen (75, 79) zum Betreiben des Leistungsumsetzers (74,
77) dazu ausgelegt sind, den Strom in der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) durch
Freilaufen des Stroms im Ansprechen auf das Signal zu regeln.
8. System zum Betreiben einer Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78), das aufweist:
einen Leistungsumsetzer (74, 77) mit einem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis, mit dem die
elektrischen Maschinen (72, 78) verbunden sind, wobei jede Maschine (72, 78) wenigstens
eine Phasenwicklung (16) hat, eine Einrichtung (83) zum Überwachen der Zwischenkreisspannung,
und Einrichtungen (75, 79) zum Betreiben des Leistungsumsetzers (74, 77), um den Strom
in der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) zu regeln im Ansprechen auf ein Signal
von der Einrichtung (83) zum Überwachen, wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung auf einen
vorgegebenen Schwellenwert abnimmt, um dadurch das Ausmaß von Störungen in der Zwischenkreisspannung,
die von der kombinierten Last der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) verursacht
werden, zu regeln, dadurch gekennzeichnet, dass wenigstens eine der Mehrzahl elektrischer Maschinen (72, 78) eine geschaltete Reluktanzmaschine
ist, und dass die Einrichtungen (75, 79) zum Betreiben des Leistungsumsetzers (74,
77) dazu ausgelegt sind, den Strom in der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) durch
Zurückführen von Strom von wenigstens einer der Phasenwicklungen (16) der geschalteten
Reluktanzmaschine zum
Gleichspannungszwischenkreis im Ansprechen auf das Signal zu regeln.
9. System nach Anspruch 7 oder Anspruch 8, das eine weitere elektrische Maschine (72,
78) aufweist, die mit dem Gleichspannungszwischenkreis verbunden und dazu ausgelegt
ist, als Generator betrieben zu werden.
10. System nach Anspruch 9, wobei die weitere elektrische Maschine (72, 78) eine Reluktanzmaschine
ist.
11. System nach Anspruch 7 und Anspruch 8, wobei die Einrichtungen (75, 79) zum Betreiben
des Leistungsumsetzers dazu ausgelegt sind, den Strom freilaufen zu lassen und nachfolgend
Strom von der wenigstens einen Phasenwicklung (16) zurückzuführen, wenn die Zwischenkreisspannung
nach einem vorgegebenen Zeitraum nicht wiederhergestellt ist.
1. Procédé de commande d'une pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) à partir d'une
liaison CC, chaque machine (72, 78) ayant au moins un enroulement de phase (16), le
procédé comprenant la surveillance de la tension de la liaison CC et, en cas de baisse
de la tension de la liaison CC à un seuil prédéterminé, le contrôle du courant d'au
moins un enroulement de phase (16) d'au moins une des machines électriques (72, 78)
pour modifier le courant de la liaison CC, afin de limiter l'ampleur des perturbations
de la tension de la liaison CC provoquées par la charge cumulée de la pluralité de
machines électriques (72, 78),
caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) est une machine à réluctance
commutée et en ce la modification du courant de la liaison CC comprend la mise en
roue libre du courant dans au moins un des enroulements de phase (16) de la machine
à réluctance commutée.
2. Procédé de commande d'une pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) à partir d'une
liaison CC, chaque machine (72, 78) ayant au moins un enroulement de phase (16), le
procédé comprenant la surveillance de la tension de la liaison CC et, en cas de baisse
de la tension de la liaison CC à un seuil prédéterminé, le contrôle du courant d'au
moins un enroulement de phase (16) d'au moins une des machines électriques (72, 78)
pour modifier le courant de la liaison CC, afin de limiter l'ampleur des perturbations
de la tension de la liaison CC provoquées par la charge cumulée de la pluralité de
machines électriques (72, 78),
caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) est une machine à réluctance
commutée et en ce la modification du courant de la liaison CC comprend le renvoi du
courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) de la machine à réluctance commutée
à la liaison CC.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, dans lequel la liaison CC
est alimentée par une machine électrique supplémentaire (72, 78) fonctionnant comme
un générateur.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 3, dans lequel la machine électrique supplémentaire
(72, 78) est une machine à réluctance.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 1 ou la revendication 2, le procédé comprenant la mise
en roue libre dudit courant, suivie du renvoi du courant de l'au moins un enroulement
de phase si la tension de la liaison CC n'est pas revenue à l'issue d'un délai prédéterminé.
6. Produit-programme informatique stocké sur un support lisible par ordinateur et qui,
lorsqu'il est installé sur un dispositif de traitement, exécute le procédé selon l'une
quelconque des revendications 1 à 5.
7. Système de commande d'une pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) comprenant :
un convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) comprenant une liaison CC à laquelle sont connectées
les machines électriques (72, 78), chaque machine (72, 78) ayant au moins un enroulement
de phase (16), des moyens (83) pour surveiller la tension de la liaison CC ; et des
moyens (75, 79) pour commander au convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) de contrôler
le courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) en réponse à un signal émanant
des moyens (83) de surveillance lorsque la tension de la liaison CC baisse à un seuil
prédéterminé, afin de limiter l'ampleur des perturbations de la tension de la liaison
CC provoquées par la charge cumulée de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78),
caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) est une machine à réluctance
commutée et en ce que les moyens (75, 79) de commande du convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) sont conçus
pour contrôler le courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) en laissant ledit
courant circuler librement en réponse au signal.
8. Système de commande d'une pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) comprenant :
un convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) comprenant une liaison CC à laquelle sont connectées
les machines électriques (72, 78), chaque machine (72, 78) ayant au moins un enroulement
de phase (16), des moyens (83) pour surveiller la tension de la liaison CC ; et des
moyens (75, 79) pour commander au convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) de contrôler
le courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) en réponse à un signal émanant
des moyens (83) de surveillance lorsque la tension de la liaison CC baisse à un seuil
prédéterminé, afin de limiter l'ampleur des perturbations de la tension de la liaison
CC provoquées par la charge cumulée de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78),
caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une de la pluralité de machines électriques (72, 78) est une machine à réluctance
commutée et en ce que les moyens (75, 79) pour commander le convertisseur de puissance (74, 77) sont conçus
pour contrôler le courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) en renvoyant
du courant de l'au moins un des enroulements de phase (16) de la machine à réluctance
commutée à la liaison CC en réponse au signal.
9. Système selon la revendication 7 ou la revendication 8, comprenant une machine électrique
supplémentaire (72, 78) connectée à la liaison CC et conçue pour fonctionner comme
un générateur.
10. Système selon la revendication 9, dans lequel la machine électrique supplémentaire
(72, 78) est une machine à réluctance.
11. Système selon la revendication 7 et la revendication 8, les moyens (75, 79) pour commander
le convertisseur de puissance étant agencés pour mettre ledit courant en roue libre
et pour renvoyer ensuite le courant de l'au moins un enroulement de phase (16) si
la tension de la liaison CC n'est pas revenue à l'issue d'un délai prédéterminé.
REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION
This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only.
It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has
been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and
the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.
Non-patent literature cited in the description
- TJE MILLERElectronic Control of Switched Reluctance Machines19930621 [0002]
- STEPHENSONBLAKEThe characteristics, design and application of switched reluctance motors and drivesPCIM'93,
Nürnberg, 1993, [0002]
- Generating with the switched reluctance motorProceedings of the IEEE 9th Applied Power
Electronics Conference, 1994, 41-47 [0006]