TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention generally relates to structural beams of the type having a
web between two flanges, in which the web is not continuous but has apertures therein,
and to a method of manufacturing such beam.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] Structural beams with openings located in their web, hereinafter also referred to
as castellated beams, are commonly used in construction works (buildings, multi-level
car parks, etc.).
[0003] As it is well known, castellated beams are typically made from universal beams, e.g.
hot rolled I- or H-sections that are cut along their web according to a specific pattern.
The resulting two T-beams are then re-assembled by welding. This technique is conventionally
used to produce beams with circular, hexagonal or octagonal opening as well as cambered
beams with such openings.
[0004] A well-known method for the manufacturing of a castellated beam is for example disclosed
in
GB 882 175. An H-section beam is separated into two T-beams by cutting into its web along a
predetermined cutting line, e.g. by means of a cutting torch. The cutting line describes
a substantially periodical undulation with peaks and bases, these peaks and bases
being flat and parallel to one another and to the flanges. One T-beam is then longitudinally
displaced so that the peaks of the upper and lower T-beams coincide and the abutting
peaks are finally welded together.
[0005] A method for manufacturing castellated beam with circular openings is described in
EP 0 324 206. In this method, a first continuous cut is made along the web of a universal beam
and a second continuous cut is made along the web on a path different from that of
the first cut. The cuts are such as to define rectilinear sections lying on alternate
sides of the centreline of the web and at least partly curvilinear sections joining
the closest ends of the rectilinear sections. The cut halves (two T-beams) of the
beam are separated and are then welded together in regions formed by juxtaposition
of rectilinear sections of the two halves.
[0006] A recurrent problem in the above-described methods is the difficulty of properly
aligning the opposite flat peaks (rectilinear segments) of the web edges in order
to proceed with the welding operation. Indeed, any shift or misalignment between two
flat peaks is easily perceptible to the eye in the case of circular or hexagonal due
to the regularity of the shapes. This problem of alignment of coinciding flat peaks
is even more important in the case of pre-cambered beams.
[0007] Hence there is a need for an alternative method of manufacturing such beams, wherein
alignment problems of coinciding summits are alleviated.
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0008] According to the present invention, a method for manufacturing a beam with openings
comprising the steps of:
- a) providing two T-beams, each having a flange and a web, the web of each of said
T-beams having a respective free edge describing an undulated line with peaks and
bases, the peaks being remote from the respective flange and the bases being close
to the respective flange, the peaks being further essentially flat and parallel to
a common axis;
- b) positioning the two T-beams in face-to-face relationship so that the peaks of their
web edges come into contact and substantially coincide;
- c) welding the two T-beams together along their coinciding peaks to form a beam with
openings located in its web.
[0009] According to an important aspect of the present invention, the undulated web edge
lines of said T-beams are designed in such a way as to comprise a curvilinear line
portion each side of each flat peak, this curvilinear line portion having a slope
progressively approaching the slope of the flat peak.
[0010] As expressed in a more mathematical way, the derivative of the curve described by
the curvilinear line portion at a point is the slope of the line tangent to the curve
at that point, expressing the rate of change of the curvilinear line portion. According
to the invention, the slope of the tangent to the curve varies progressively, in direction
of the peak, until the tangent is aligned with the direction of the flat peak.
[0011] In other words, in the vicinity of the peaks, the undulations of the web edge line
is designed such that its curvature varies until it becomes tangent to the flat peak
line. The practical consequence of this design is that there is no discontinuity of
the free edge profile in the vicinity of the flat peaks that will be abutted against
similar, coinciding peaks of the other T-beam, contrary to the well known beams with
circular, hexagonal or octagonal openings. The tangency and varying curvature of the
web edge about the peaks makes it difficult to notice the exact beginning and ending
locations of the flat peaks, so that slight shifting and misalignments will be less
perceptible to the eye and thus facilitates the alignment task during beam production.
Further, the welding operator may also weld together opposite web edge lines in the
region of the curvilinear lines portions to mask any misalignment and/or reinforce
the welding at the peaks. It thus appears that the use of such undulated design greatly
simplifies the assembly of the two T-beams and thus the manufacturing of the castellated
beam.
[0012] In one embodiment, the two T-beams are cut out from a single beam having a web extending
between two flanges, preferably a hot-rolled I- or H-section beam. The cutting may
be done according to a continuous cutting line along the web of such beam. In this
case, the cutting line will thus define the shape of the undulated line of the free
web edges of the resulting two T-beams.
[0013] In one embodiment based on manufacturing from a single H-beam (or I), the continuous
cutting line further defines flat end sections extending from each end of said undulated
line to the respective beam extremity, one of the flat end sections being closer to
one flange while the other is closer to the opposite flange. After cutting of the
H-beam along such continuous cutting line extending between both beam extremities,
one of the T-beams is turned over 180°, and the two T-beams are positioned according
to step b). It will be understood that such construction mode-facilitated by symmetry
of design-needs taking into account size and axial position of the peaks, as well
as the height of the peaks with respect to the flanges in order to obtain coinciding
peaks over the beam length upon rotation of one beam.
[0014] It may be appreciated that the presence of flat end sections at both ends of the
undulated line, opposed with respect to the beam centre line, permits to automatically
obtain a continuous web portion at one end of the beam. Indeed, when one of the beam
is rotated over 180°, due to the cutting line design, the flat end sections come into
abutment at one extremity of the beam whereas there is an opening at the other extremity.
The abutting flat end sections may thus be welded together while at the opposite beam
extremity the opening is preferably closed using welding and appropriate material,
thereby forming a castellated beam with continuous web sections at both ends. In addition,
undesired end beam portions may be cut off, in order to have end sections of similar
length.
[0015] In an alternative manufacturing method, the two T-beams, upon cutting along a continuous
cutting line, may simply be separated and shifted axially to bring the opposite peaks
into abutment.
[0016] Although manufacturing from one single beam is very convenient when working with
symmetric patterns, since it allows minimizing costs and scrap, the two T-beams to
be assembled can be cut out from two different beams. As long as the undulating shape
of their web edges is designed so that they may be joined by their peaks, a variety
of designs/patterns is possible.
[0017] To improve the quality of welding at the peaks and thus strengthen the joining between
the T-beams, one may advantageously weld together facing curvilinear line portions
over a given length, on the lateral sides of the peaks.
[0018] In one embodiment, the T-beams are cambered before welding in step c). A difficulty
in the manufacture of pre-cambered beams is that the length of coinciding peaks is
modified due to bending. However, due to the particular design of the undulating lines
at the peak sides providing tangency of the curvilinear line portions, there is no
discontinuity between the flat peaks and the edge line about the peaks. The slight
difference in peak length is thus visually imperceptible due to the design of the
openings about the peaks; again thereby avoiding long adjustment before welding and
need for additional matter to restore the shape of the edge lines. Further, tangency
and varying curvature of the web edge about the peaks make it possible for the operator
to easily extend the welding to the region of the curvilinear line portions in order
to weld together the opposite, proximate web edges.
[0019] According to another aspect of the present invention, there is proposed a beam with
openings having a web and two flanges and consisting of two assembled T-beams each
having a flange and a web. The web of each of the T-beams has a respective edge line
describing an undulated line with peaks and bases, the peaks being remote from the
respective flange and the lows being close to the respective flange. The peaks are
essentially flat and parallel to a common axis and the T-beams are joined by their
peaks that are welded together.
[0020] It is to be appreciated that the undulated web edge lines of the T-beams are designed
in such a way as to comprise a curvilinear line portion each side of each flat peak,
this curvilinear line portion having a slope progressively approaching the slope of
the flat peak.
[0021] The openings in the beam thus close longitudinally by regions where upper and lower
web edges meet at the adjoined peaks (that form the uprights of the beam) in a tangential
manner.
[0022] Such beam results from the construction of two T-beams having specific web edge design
that permits an easier assembly. This design proves even more interesting in the case
of pre-cambered beams, as already explained hereinabove.
[0023] In the vicinity of the peaks, the shape of the meeting web edge lines can be characterised
by the axial extent (or approaching distance) of the curvilinear line portion, as
measured by projection on a parallel to the beam axis. Preferably, for beams having
a length in the range of 10 to 20 meters, the approaching distance may range up to
200 mm, and is preferably in the range of 50 to 150 mm.
[0024] Another distinctive parameter is the distance between opposite (upper and lower)
web edge lines over the approaching distance. Preferably, for beams with a length
in the range of 10 to 20 meters, this distance does not exceed 20 mm over the approaching
distance, more preferably not more than 15 mm.
[0025] In one embodiment, both T-beams are cut out from a single H or I section beam so
that peaks and bases are flat, parallel and of same length. Alternatively, the two
T-beams can be prepared from two different beams, which allows more flexibility in
design and shapes, but is economically less interesting.
[0026] In one embodiment, the proportion of continuous web (i.e. extending continuously
between lower and upper flange) in one unitary pattern element (measured e.g. between
the middle of two consecutive peaks) is in the range of 5 to 20%, preferably 6 to
13%. These values are particularly suited for flooring applications, composite constructions
and the like.
[0027] As is conventional in the art, studs may be provided on a flange.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0028] The present invention will be more apparent from the following description of several
not limiting embodiments with reference to the attached drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1: is a schematic view of a preferred embodiment of a castellated beam in accordance
with the present invention;
FIG. 2: is an enlarged view of the beam of Fig.1;
FIG. 3 a) to f): are schematic views illustrating steps of a preferred manufacturing
method of the beam of FIG.1;
FIG. 4: is a schematic view comparing two opening designs;
FIG. 5: is a schematic view of another embodiment of a castellated beam;
FIG. 6: is an enlarged view of the beam of Fig.5; and
FIG.7: is a detail illustrating the closing region of an opening where the web edge
lines of opposite T-beams meet tangentially at a peak;
FIG. 8 a) to e): are schematic views illustrating steps of a preferred manufacturing
method of the present beam.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0029] FIG.1 illustrates a castellated beam 10 according to a preferred embodiment of the
present invention, having a web 12 extending between two parallel flanges, the lower
flange being indicated 14 and the upper 16. Located in the web 12 are a number of
openings 18 (7 openings in this embodiment).
[0030] The beam 10 is formed from two T-beams, designated 20
1 and 20
2, that are joined by welding. As can be understood from Fig.1, the web of each T-beam
20
1, 20
2 has a respective free edge describing an undulated line 22 with peaks 24 and bases
26. The peaks 24 are remote from the respective flange and the bases 26 are close
to the respective flange. In the present embodiment, peaks 24 and bases 26 are essentially
flat and extend parallel to the central axis 25 of the beam 10. The welding of the
two T-beams is carried out at their peaks 24. On each longitudinal side of the beam
10 is an end section with continuous web.
[0031] It shall be appreciated that the undulating line 22 of the web edges is designed
in such a way as to comprise a curvilinear line portion each side of each flat peak
24, the curvilinear line portion having a varying slope progressively approaching
the slope of the flat peak 24. In other words, the intermediate edge section connecting
a base 26 to a peak 24 in each T-beam 20
1, resp. 20
2, has a shape such that in the vicinity of the peak 24, its slope progressively varies
to become tangent to the flat peak 24. Since the web edge profile is similar on both
T-beams 20
1 and 20
2, the openings 18 have a specific shape where the junction point between the upper
and lower web edges at the peaks 24 is not readily distinguishable to the eye, thus
allowing some flexibility during the joining/welding operation, namely by reducing
the required efforts for alignment.
[0032] The shape of the openings 18 in the embodiment of Fig.1 can be more precisely seen
in Fig.2, where the longitudinal extent of each portion or section of the undulating
line 22 is indicated below the beam 10. Peaks 24 and bases 26, respectively indicated
p and
b, are flat sections of same length that are parallel to the beam centre line 25. Intermediate
sections connecting between peaks and bases are indicated s. The end portion of an
intermediate section s close to a peak that forms the curvilinear line portion becoming
tangent to the flat peak 24 is indicated w. The curvilinear line portion w is thus
a terminal part of the intermediate section s.
[0033] It may be noted that the intermediate section s could be given any shape, provided
that in the vicinity of each peak 24 it describes a curvilinear line portion
w that becomes tangent to the peak. If the two T-beams were not manufactured from a
single beam according to the below method (which implies that the shape of one peak
in one T-beam defines the shape of one base in the other T-beam), the bases would
not need be flat and of same length as the peaks.
[0034] A preferred method for manufacturing the beam of Fig.1 will now be explained in detail
with regard to Fig.3. A starting H-section beam 10a is illustrated in Fig.3 a). This
starting beam 10a is cut along its web 12a following a continuous cutting line 22a
by means of e.g. a laser or plasma cutting device, cutting torch or chip removing
device, thus creating the two T-beams 20
1 and 20
2. The respective free web edge profile 22 of the two T-beams 20
1 and 20
2 thus results from the shape of the continuous cutting line 22a.
[0035] The two T-beams 20
1 and 20
2 are then separated (Fig.3 b) and the lower T-beam 20
1 is rotated over 180° (Fig.3 c). Next the two T-beams 20
1 and 20
2 are positioned so as to bring coinciding peaks 24 of their web edges into contact.
It may be appreciated that in the present embodiment, the shape of the cutting line
22a, and thus of the edge lines 22 is such that upon rotation, the peaks 24 of the
lower and upper T-beams coincide. It thus suffices so bring the T-beams 20
1 and 20
2 into abutment and weld them together at the coinciding, adjoining peaks 24.
[0036] It will be understood that to enable such beam construction mode, the web edge design,
as defined by line 22 (and created by cutting line 22a) must meet several requirements.
In that respect, some of the important design parameters of the undulated line are:
- length of the peaks: coinciding peaks (i.e. peaks that will be adjoined upon rotation)
must be of same length;
- axial position of the peaks: the peak axial positions are designed so that peaks from
upper and lower T-beams coincide upon rotation of one T-beam;
- peak to flange distance: the sum of peak to flange distance of coinciding peaks must
correspond to desired beam height (whether unique or varying), for all peaks.
[0037] To illustrate how these preferred constructional parameters apply to the present
embodiment, let us attribute an order number to the peaks of each T-beam. In respect
of the upper T-beam 20
2 the peaks are numbered from right to left and for the lower T-beam 20
1 from left to right (see Fig.2 b).
[0038] As already stated, due to the particular design of the web edge line 22, upon rotation
of the lower T-beam 20
1 all peaks coincide, whereby peaks of order number
i are automatically facing each-other. It can be observed. Applying the above recommendation,
that the length of peak
i in the upper beam section 20
2 is equal to the length of peak
i in the lower beam 20
2, and in fact all peaks are of same length.
[0039] It can also be observed that the distance from the right-hand extremity of upper
beam 20
2 to peak
i is the same as the distance from the left-hand extremity of lower beam to peak
i. The peak to flange distance is the same for each peak nr.
i.
[0040] It may be further noted that the cutting line 22a ends at both extremities with a
flat end section. On the right-hand extremity, the flat end section 30 is closer to
the lower flange 14 while on the opposite beam extremity the flat end section 30a
is closer to the upper flange 16. Further, the flat end sections 30 and 30a are advantageously
of same length. The reason for this design is that a continuous web is automatically
obtained at one beam 10 extremity upon rotation of the lower T-beam 20
1, as can be seen in Fig.3 d).
[0041] In the configuration of Fig.3 e), all adjoining peaks 24 have been welded together
and the abutting flat end sections on the right-hand extremity of the beam have been
welded together, forming a continuous web end portion. Welded portions are materialised
in Fig.3 e) by dashes.
[0042] It is clear that due to the design of the edge line 22, at the extreme openings 18,
upper and lower web edge lines 22 meet towards the end sections e in the same way
as at the peaks 24, forming these portions with tangential lines.
[0043] To improve the quality of welding at the peaks 24 and thus strengthen the joining
between the T-beams, facing curvilinear line portions on the sides of the peaks are
advantageously welded together over a given length (not shown in the drawings).
[0044] In Fig.3 e) the web is open at the left beam extremity. This opening in the web 12
is preferably closed using welding and appropriate materials (as illustrated by the
grey area in Fig.3 f) so as to form a continuous web end portion. Undesired beam portions
on the left hand-side are cut out, so that the final beam 10 has two end portions
with a continuous web and of same length (indicated e in Fig.3 f).
[0045] Referring now to Fig.4, the opening defined by the continuous line is the same as
in Fig.2 whereas the opening defined by the dashed line is an alternative opening
shape even more adapted for pre-cambering and having an opening width closer to that
of rectangular cable guides to be passed through the opening. This second opening
design of course comprises curvilinear line portions indicated
wb that become tangent to the peak 24. As can be seen, the extent of the curvilinear
line portion wb is greater than for undulated line 22, whereby the beginning and ending
of the abutting flat segments of the peaks are even more difficult to perceive. The
greater length of curvilinear portion
wb also allows for welding in this region for reinforcement.
[0046] Fig.5 illustrates a further embodiment of a castellated beam 110 in accordance with
the present invention, where the undulated line comprises, on the sides of each peak
124, a curvilinear line portion (indicated
wc in Fig.6) the slope of which progressively approaches that of the peak 124. In Fig.5,
like elements are indicated by same reference numbers as in Figs. 1-4, however preceded
by 1. The welded flat segments of the peaks 124 are not represented and the reference
numeral only indicates their position.
[0047] As can be understood from the above description, there can be various designs for
the undulated lines 22 or 122, respectively cutting line 22a, provided that next to
the flat peaks a curvilinear line portion
w, wb or
wc, is formed that tangentially meets with the flat peaks 24, 124. As has been understood,
over the distance of the curvilinear line portion, the slope of the curvilinear line
portion continuously decreases until it reaches that of the flat peak, in this case
zero since the flat peak is horizontal.
[0048] It also clearly appears from Fig.4 that the shape of the curvilinear line portion
w or wb may differ. In Fig.4, portion wb is considered to be of greater axial extent
as portion w because its slope is closer to the tangent than for portion w over a
longer distance from the peak 24. These shapes condition the visual appearance and
for the design of the dashed line 22b, the meeting point of undulating lines at the
peak 24 is even more difficult to distinguish, which further facilitates the assembly
due to less stringent aligment requirements.
[0049] One may thus characterise the curvilinear line portions w, wb and wc by their axial
extent (as projected along the axis), combined with the spacing between the upper
and lower web edge lines meeting at a peak 24, 124. In Fig.7, letter wL illustrates
the measurement of the axial extent of a curvilinear line portion tangentially meeting
the peak 24; this corresponds to the measure of w, wb or wc. Letter DL indicates the
measurement of the distance between the upper and lower web edge lines 22 at the beginning
of the curvilinear line portion. Parameters wL and DL thus reflect the design of the
curvilinear lines portions and the way the openings appear in the vicinity of the
peaks 24, 124 that form the uprights in the final beam (continuous web portions between
two peaks).
[0050] For the sake of exemplification only, table 1 below presents numerical values of
several parameters of beams that are shown in the Figs.
Table 1
| |
Beam of Figs.1 &4; web edge design of line 22 |
Beam of Figs.1 &4; web edge design of line 22b |
Beam of Figs.5 &6; web edge design of line 122 |
| Starting beam type |
|
|
| Beam reference |
HD400x187 |
IPE330 |
| Height (h) |
h = 368mm |
h = 330mm |
| Flange width (fb) |
fb = 391 mm |
fb = 160mm |
| Web thickness (tw) |
tw =15mm |
tw =7,5mm |
| Flange thickness (tf) |
tf =24mm |
tf =11,5mm |
| Final beam |
|
|
| Length (L) |
17 m |
10m |
| Height (H) |
618 mm |
530 mm |
| Peak and base (p,b) |
250 mm |
150 mm |
| length |
840 mm |
1175 mm |
| Section (s) length |
995 mm |
1100 mm |
| End portion length (e) |
|
|
| Opening dimensions |
|
|
|
| Max. height (OH) |
500 mm |
500 mm¨ |
400 mm |
| Max width (OW) |
1930 mm |
1930 mm |
2500 mm |
| Base-flange distance(BF) |
35 mm |
35 mm |
54 mm |
| WL |
100 mm |
175 mm |
150 mm |
| DL |
17 mm |
15 mm |
15 mm |
[0051] It may be noted that although in the examples in Table 1 the peaks have a length
of 250 or 150 mm, their length can be reduced to a very small value. The length of
the peaks can indeed be varied depending on the application, and can be smaller where
the application requires less resistance from the beam.
[0052] Alternatively to the manufacturing method shown in Fig.3, a beam in accordance with
the present invention can be manufactured in a more traditional way, i.e. by simple
translation, as illustrated in Fig.8 a) to e). The two first steps a) b) are similar
to those of Fig.3. A starting H-section beam 210a is cut along its web 212a following
a continuous cutting line 222a, thus creating two T-beams 220
1 and 220
2. The respective free web edge profile 222 of the two T-beams 220
1 and 220
2 thus results from the shape of the continuous cutting line 222a. The two T-beams
220
1 and 220
2 are then separated, as shown in Fig.3 b, by distance sufficient to permit relative
shifting in the axial direction. The peaks 124 of the upper and lower beams are brought
into abutment as shown in Fig.8 c) and the coinciding peaks 224 may then be welded
together.
[0053] Contrary to the manufacturing method shown in Fig.3, the simple axial shifting of
the lower beam 220
1 to the right does not permit to obtain one beam extremity with continuous web. Excess
material at the beam extremities is cut.
[0054] In the configuration of Fig.8 e), all adjoining peaks 224 have been welded together
(materialised by dashes). Further, the openings in the web 212 at the beam extremities
have been advantageously closed using welding and appropriate materials (as illustrated
by the grey areas) so as to form a continuous web end portions. The resulting castellated
beam is then shown in Fig.8 e) having continuous beam end portions of same length.
1. Method for manufacturing a beam with openings comprising the steps of:
a) providing two T-beams, each having a flange and a web, the web of each of said
T-beams having a respective free edge describing an undulated line with peaks and
bases, said peaks being remote from the respective flange and said bases being close
to the respective flange, said peaks being further essentially flat and parallel to
a common axis;
b) positioning the two T-beams in face-to-face relationship so that the peaks of their
web edges come into contact and substantially coincide;
c) welding the two T-beams together along their coinciding peaks to form a beam with
openings located in its web;
characterised in that
the undulated web edge lines of said T-beams are designed in such a way as to comprise
a curvilinear line portion each side of each flat peak, said curvilinear line portion
having a slope progressively approaching the slope of the flat peak.
2. Method according to claim 1, wherein said two T-beams are cut out from a single H-
or I-section beam according to a continuous cutting line along the web thereof.
3. Method according to claim 2, wherein said continuous cutting line defines said undulated
line.
4. Method according to claim 3, wherein said continuous cutting line further defines
flat end sections extending from each end of said undulated line to the respective
beam extremity, one of the flat end sections being closer to one flange while the
other is closer to the opposite of said single beam.
5. Method according to claim 4, wherein upon cutting the two T-beams are separated, one
of the T-beams is turned over 180°, and the two T-beams are positioned according to
step b).
6. Method according to claim 5, wherein step c) further includes welding the abutting
flat end sections at one end of the formed beam and forming a continuous web portion
at the opposite end of the beam.
7. Method according to claim 6, comprising the step of cutting off excess beam material
so as to form beam end portions of same length and having a continuous web.
8. Method according to claim 1, wherein said two T-beams are cut out from two different
H- or I-section beams.
9. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein step c) further includes
soldering together facing curvilinear line portions over a given length.
10. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the T-beams are cambered
before welding in step c).
11. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the undulated web edge
lines are designed so that said curvilinear line portions extend over an approaching
distance of up to 200 mm from the peak ends, as projected along the beam axis, preferably
between 50 to 150 mm.
12. Method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the undulated web edge
lines are designed so that, upon welding, the distance between facing curved line
portions of two coinciding, joined peaks is not more than 20 mm over said approaching
distance, preferably not more than 15 mm.
13. Beam with openings having a web and two flanges, said beam consisting of two assembled
T-beams, said T-beams each having a flange and a web, wherein the web of each of said
T-beams has a respective free edge describing an undulated line with peaks and bases,
said peaks being remote from the respective flange and said bases being close to the
respective flange, said peaks being essentially flat and parallel to a common axis,
and wherein said T-beams are joined by their peaks that are welded together,
characterised in that the undulated web edge lines of said T-beams are designed in such a way as to comprise
a curvilinear line portion each side of each flat peak, said curvilinear line portion
having a slope progressively approaching the slope of the flat peak.
14. The beam according to claim 13, wherein the undulated web edge lines are designed
so that said curvilinear line portions extend over an approaching distance of up to
200 mm from the peak ends, as projected along the beam axis, preferably in the range
of 50 to 150 mm.
15. The beam according to claim 13 or 14, wherein the distance between facing curved line
portions of two coinciding, joined peaks is not more than 20 mm over said approaching
distance, preferably not more than 15 mm.
16. The beam according to claim 13, 14 or 15, comprising studs on one flange.
17. The beam according to any one of claims 13 to 16, wherein said bases are flat and
of same length as said flat peaks.
18. The beam according to any one of claims 13 to 17, wherein the proportion of continuous
web within one unit pattern of the beam lies in the range of 5 to 20 %, preferably
6 to 13 %.
19. The beam according to any one of claims 13 to 18, wherein said two T-beams originate
from a single beam or from two different beams.
20. The beam according to any one of claims 13 to 19, wherein said beam is pre-cambered.