BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0002] The subject invention relates to a palladium-containing electroplating solution and
a method for preparing a palladium or palladium alloy membrane on a porous metal support
by electroplating. The method produces a palladium or palladium alloy membrane that
is strongly adhered to the porous metal support, thereby, providing a palladium membrane
tube fitting useful for the catalytic reactor during hydrogen purification or synthesis.
Descriptions of the Related Art
[0003] A palladium or palladium alloy membrane can be prepared using the electroless plating
method, the vacuum sputtering method, or the cold-rolled method. For plating a palladium
or palladium alloy membrane on a porous metal support, the electroless plating method
is conventionally used, such as that disclosed in Taiwan Patent Publication No.
1232888 and
U.S. Patent No. 6152987. However, with the electroless plating method, the adhesion to the membrane is dependent
on the physical adsorption of the chemically reduced metal particles on the substrate.
As a result, the temperature variation can exfoliate the palladium or palladium alloy
membrane from the porous metal support. Moreover, in preparing a palladium membrane,
the electroless plating method requires multiple depositions (more than 6 to 7 times)
to obtain a palladium membrane with the desired thickness. Furthermore, the resulting
membrane is subjected to an annealing treatment for homogenization to complete the
preparation process. In addition, it is difficult to control the reducing rates of
the different cations (e.g., Pd ion, Cu ion, and Ag ion) and the depositing rates.
Therefore, multiple steps are required for reducing a single ion and depositing the
individual metal layers, and then, an annealing step is carried out at a high temperature
for a long time to obtain an alloyed metal layer comprising two or more metals. In
other words, the electroless plating method is slow and results in poor adhesion.
[0004] As mentioned above, the palladium membrane can be electroless plated on a porous
metal support. The palladium or palladium alloy membrane has also been electroless
plated on a porous ceramic support as disclosed in Japan Laid-Open Patent Application
No.
2002-119834 and
No. 2002-153740. Because the porous ceramic or glass support has a compact surface with nano-sized
pores (10-200 nm), the palladium or palladium alloy membrane can easily block the
pores, and thus, create a better plated membrane. However, the porous support materials
with nano-sized pores are expensive and their manufacturing costs keep this product
noncompetitive in the market.
[0005] In the vacuum sputtering method for preparing a palladium or palladium alloy membrane,
the expensive vacuum apparatus and sputtering targets involved therein also drive
the manufacturing costs high and are thus, undesirable in the market.
[0006] As for the use of the cold-rolled method for preparing a palladium or palladium alloy
membrane, the resulting membrane needs to adhere onto the porous support in a specific
way. Therefore, the procedures are complicated, and the membrane suffers from poor
adhesion and a low manufacturing yield. Such a method is also unattractive.
[0007] The technology known at present for electroplating a palladium or palladium alloy
membrane is primarily applied to common supports with a smooth surface mainly for
the purpose of processing or decoration. For example, the technology of electroplating
a palladium or palladium alloy membrane on a smooth surface is typically applied to
ornaments such as jewelry to prevent the decoloration due to the oxidation on their
surfaces or electronic components to improve the weldability. This technology decreases
the contact resistance, and enhances the anti-oxidation properties. The resulting
membrane has a thickness ranging from about 0.3 mm to about 2 mm, such as that disclosed
in
U.S. Patent No. 4486274. However, when the formulation of the palladium salt electroplating solution employed
in such known technology is applied to the electroplating of porous metal supports,
it is impossible to obtain a compact palladium or palladium alloy membrane free of
defects. In fact, the resulting plated membrane has some pinholes thereon, rendering
it unsuitable for purifying elements used for supplying H
2 with high purity.
[0008] As a result, there is a common desire in the industry to provide a method for preparing
a palladium or palladium alloy membrane, with the desired compactness and H
2 permeability, on a porous metal support in a more simple, timesaving and economical
way.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0009] One objective of the subject invention is to provide a palladium-containing electroplating
solution, which comprises palladium sulfate, a reactive conductive salt, a complexing
agent, and a buffering agent.
[0010] Another objective of the subject invention is to provide a method for providing a
palladium or palladium alloy membrane on a porous metal support, which comprises providing
a porous metal support; and electroplating a palladium or palladium alloy membrane
onto the porous metal support with a palladium-containing electroplating solution.
Said palladium-containing electroplating solution comprises a palladium salt, a reactive
conductive salt, a complexing agent, and a buffering agent.
[0011] Yet a further objective of the subject invention is to provide a composite with a
palladium or palladium alloy membrane, which comprises a porous metal substrate; a
medium layer coated on a surface of the substrate; and a palladium or palladium alloy
membrane coated on the medium layer. The palladium or palladium alloy membrane is
substantially free from exfoliation under the condition that the pressure at the substrate
side of the composite is up to about 3 absolute atmospheres higher than the pressure
at its palladium or palladium alloy membrane side.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012]
FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of a method for electroplating a palladium membrane onto a porous
metal support in accordance with the subject invention;
FIG. 2 shows electron microscopic photographs of the palladium membranes electroplated at
different rotational speeds of the support (A: 10 rpm, B: 20 rpm, C: 50 rpm, D: 100
rpm, E: 500 rpm) in accordance with the subject invention;
FIG. 3A shows an electron microscopic photograph of an electroplated palladium alloy membrane
in accordance with the subject invention;
FIG. 3B shows the composition analysis result of an electroplated palladium alloy membrane
in accordance with the subject invention;
FIG 4 shows an electron microscopic photograph of a palladium membrane electroplated using
a two-stage electroplating treatment in accordance with the subject invention; and
FIG. 5 is a schematic view of a palladium membrane shell and tube reactor;
FIG. 6 is a photograph showing the result of a hydrogen embrittlement test on a conventional
electroless plated palladium membrane;
FIG. 7 is a photograph showing the result of a hydrogen embrittlement test on an electroplated
palladium membrane of the subject invention; and
FIG. 8 is a schematic view of a reactor utilizing the palladium membrane of the subject
invention.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0013] The subject invention provides a palladium-containing electroplating solution, which
comprises palladium sulfate, a reactive conductive salt, a complexing agent, and a
buffering agent. In the electroplating solution, there is about 2 g/L to about 200
g/L of palladium in the palladium sulfate and preferably about 5 g/L to about 50 g/L.
There is also about 10 g/L to about 200 g/L of the reactive conductive salt and preferably,
about 70 g/L to about 150 g/L. There is about 10 g/L to about 150 g/L of the complexing
agent and preferably, about 30 to about 70 g/L. There is enough buffering agent to
render the electroplating solution to have a pH of about 9 to about 12, preferably
about 10 to about 11.
[0014] In the palladium-containing electroplating solution of the subject invention, the
reactive conductive salt can provide conductive ions to enhance the conductivity of
the electroplating solution, so as to improve the deposition efficiency and the quality
of the palladium or palladium alloy membrane. The reactive conductive salts suitable
for the subject invention comprise SO
42- ion-providing compounds, and can also be selected from a group consisting of salts
of Group IA metals, ammonium salts, and combinations thereof. When the SO
42- ion-providing compound is used as the reactive conductive salt, it can not only enhance
the conductivity of the electroplating bath, but also facilitate the dissolution of
palladium sulfate with a low solubility. Then, the palladium concentration in the
electroplating bath is increased to further enhance the conductivity. For example
(but not limited thereto), the reactive conductive salt used in the subject invention
can be selected from a group consisting of sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium
sulfate, ammonium sulfate, ammonium chloride, sodium thiosulfate, ammonium thiosulfate,
ammonium citrate, and combinations thereof. The preferred reactive conductive salt
is ammonium sulfate.
[0015] As known by those skilled in the art, the main purpose of the complexing agent is
to improve the stability of the electroplating system. In general, the complexing
agent useful for the subject invention can be selected from a group consisting of
boric acid, phosphate salts, hypophosphate salts, nitrate salts, tartrate salts, citrate
salts, salts of ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA), and combinations thereof.
The salts of EDTA typically used are Group IA metal salts and/or Group IIA metal salts
of EDTA. For example (but not limited thereto), the complexing agent can be selected
from a group consisting of the following: boric acid, sodium phosphate, sodium hydrogen
phosphate, sodium hydrogen hypophosphate, sodium nitrate, potassium nitrate, sodium
potassium tartrate, sodium citrate, potassium citrate, ammonium citrate, ethylene
diamine tetracetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-Na
2), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid tetrasodium salt (EDTA-Na
4), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid dipotassium salt (EDTA-K
2), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid tripotassium salt (EDTA-K
3), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid magnesium salt (EDTA-Mg), and combinations thereof.
The complexing agent is preferably selected from a group consisting of potassium nitrate,
ammonium citrate, EDTA-Na
2, EDTA-Na
4, and combinations thereof.
[0016] The buffering agent in the palladium-containing electroplating solution of the subject
invention serves to decrease the deposition rate of palladium. More specifically,
as a noble metal, palladium has a standard reduction potential of up to 0.997 V (i.e.,
the reducing reaction occurs very quickly). Therefore, to control the entire electroplating
process, a buffering agent is normally added to the electroplating solution to slow
down the reducing reaction of the palladium metal, so that a uniform palladium or
palladium alloy membrane can be formed onto the support. Generally, the OH
- ion itself can yield the desired buffering effect, so any suitable hydroxide can
be used in the subject invention as a buffering agent. For example (but not limited
thereto), the hydroxide selected from a group consisting of the following can be employed
as the buffering agent in the palladium-containing electroplating solution of the
subject invention: sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide, and
combinations thereof. The preferred electroplating solution of the subject invention
is ammonium hydroxide.
[0017] In addition to the components described above, sulfuric acid may be optionally added
to the palladium-containing electroplating solution of the subject invention to facilitate
the dissolution of palladium sulfate. The amount of sulfuric acid added depends on
the amount of palladium sulfate. Normally, the amount of sulfuric acid renders the
concentration of SO
42- in the electroplating solution to be about 0.2 mole to about 4 moles, and preferably,
about 0.5 mole to 2 moles per liter.
[0018] The palladium-containing electroplating solution of the subject invention can also
be used to deposit a palladium alloy membrane. The palladium-containing electroplating
solution further comprises a corresponding metal (a second metal) salt, for example,
a copper salt, a silver salt, a gold salt, a nickel salt, a platinum salt, an indium
salt, and combinations thereof. The content of the second metal salt varies with the
species of the second metal. In one embodiment of the subject invention, the palladium-containing
electroplating solution further contains a copper salt to form a palladium-copper
alloy membrane. In this case, a copper salt such as copper sulfate or copper chloride
can be employed in an amount ranging from about 0.2 g to 100 g of copper per liter
of the electroplating solution. In the case of the addition of the second metal, the
above complexing agent, in addition to increasing the stability of the electroplating
solution, can also form a complex with a metal that has a higher (or lower) reduction
potential to decrease (or increase) the standard reduction potential thereof. In this
way, the reduction potentials of the two metals are adjusted closer, so as to be deposited
together onto a surface of the support to form a uniform palladium alloy membrane.
[0019] The subject invention further provides a method for providing a palladium or palladium
alloy membrane on a porous metal support, comprising the following steps:
providing a porous metal support; and
electroplating a palladium or palladium alloy membrane on the metal support with a
palladium-containing electroplating solution, wherein said palladium-containing electroplating
solution comprises:
2 g/L to 200 g/L of palladium in a palladium salt;
10 g/L to 200 g/L of a reactive conductive salt;
10 g/L to 150 g/L of a complexing agent; and
enough buffering agent to give the electroplating solution a pH of about 9 to 12.
[0020] In accordance with the method of the subject invention, any porous metal supports
can be used, such as (but not limited thereto) iron, an iron alloy, copper, a copper
alloy, nickel, a nickel alloy, and combinations thereof. The iron alloy is preferred.
Economically, the porous stainless steel cataloged as the iron alloy is the electroplating
support of choice.
[0021] In the method of the subject invention, the electroplating step is carried out under
a current density ranging from about 0.01 A/dm
2 to about 1.5 A/dm
2 and preferably, about 0.2 A/dm
2 to about 1.0 A/dm
2. The electroplating bath temperature ranges from about 40°C to about 90°C, and preferably,
about 40°C to about 60°C. Moreover, the metal support can be optionally rotated during
the electroplating step at a speed of not higher than 1000 rpm.
[0022] In addition to the palladium sulfate, the method of the subject invention can also
employ a palladium salt selected from a group consisting of palladium tetrammine chloride
(Pd(NH
4)
4Cl
2), palladium ammonium chloride (Pd(NH
4)
2Cl
4), palladium chloride, and combinations thereof. The content of the palladium salt
in the electroplating solution ranges from about 2 g/L to about 200 g/L (as palladium),
and preferably, about 5 g/L to about 50 g/L. The details of the species and amount
of reactive conductive palladium, complexing agent and buffering agent can be found
in the above description regarding the palladium-containing electroplating solution
of the subject invention, and thus, are not further described herein.
[0023] In the method of the subject invention, the electroplating of the palladium or palladium
alloy membrane can be done by one electroplating treatment using an electroplating
solution with a single palladium salt or through multiple electroplating treatments
using an electroplating solution containing two or more palladium salts. Moreover,
for the multiple electroplating treatments, the electroplating solution of each treatment
can contain the same or different palladium salts. For example, the first electroplating
treatment may be carried out with an electroplating solution containing palladium
sulfate as the palladium salt to electroplate a thin palladium membrane on the support,
followed by a subsequent electroplating treatment with an electroplating solution
containing palladium chloride as the palladium salt to provide a palladium membrane
with the desired total thickness. In this case, due to the relatively cheap price
of palladium chloride, the preparation of the desired plated membrane using the aforesaid
two-stage electroplating manner saves costs for electroplating of a palladium or a
palladium alloy membrane. Alternatively, the first electroplating treatment can be
carried out using an electroplating solution containing palladium chloride as the
palladium salt, followed by a subsequent electroplating treatment using an electroplating
solution containing palladium sulfate as the palladium salt. Additionally, the second
plating treatment can be carried out with any appropriate methods, such as the electroplating
method, the electroless plating method, the vacuum sputtering method, or the cool-rolled
method.
[0024] During the electroplating process of a palladium or palladium alloy membrane, the
palladium ions accept the electrons at the cathode to deposit onto the support as
the metal Pd. Simultaneously, H
2 is generated at the cathode. Both the H
2 deposits and the metal Pd on the support cause an embrittlement susceptibility of
the palladium-containing membrane. To avoid such embrittlement susceptibility incurred
by the H
2, it is possible to generate turbulence during the palladium or palladium alloy electroplating
process to mitigate or prevent the disturbance from H
2. Any appropriate means may be employed to generate the turbulence, for example (but
not limited thereto), rotating the porous metal support as described above, and/or
producing a desired turbulence through water flow agitation, air agitation, cathode
agitation, or ultrasonic agitation. It has been found that when a porous metal support
is rotated to produce the turbulence, the faster the support is rotated under the
same current density, the better the resulting palladium or palladium alloy membrane
(that is, the membrane exhibits a more compact lattice structure). In accordance with
the subject invention, the rotational speed of the metal support is generally not
higher than about 1000 rpm, and is preferably controlled within a range from about
100 rpm to about 500 rpm.
[0025] In the method of the subject invention, the porous metal support can optionally be
treated with some preprocesses before the electroplating step, such as degreasing,
welding, and leveling. In particular, almost all porous metal supports commercially
available at present are stained with greasiness thereon, which will isolate the electroplating
solution from the support and adversely affect the electroplating effect. This isolation
eventually leads to blistering, peeling or chipping of the resulting membrane. Generally,
to avoid such an adverse phenomenon, an organic solvent such as toluene or acetone
was used for cleaning the greasiness both inside and outside the porous metal support.
Subsequent to the degreasing process, the porous metal support can also be mechanically
polished, using for example sandpaper No. 600, to remove the work-hardening layer
formed in the powder metallurgy procedure and the oxidized layer formed in the sintering
procedure involved in the preparation of the metal support.
[0026] Moreover, the medium layer can be optionally plated onto the porous metal support
prior to electroplating the palladium or palladium alloy membrane of the subject invention.
Specifically, the medium layer can shrink the pores of the porous metal support (i.e.,
filling the pores to gradually form a smooth support surface), which is effective
in providing a compact palladium or palladium alloy membrane. Additionally, the medium
layer can improve the adhesion between the palladium or palladium alloy membrane and
the porous metal support to prevent exfoliation and thereby, prolong the service life
of the palladium or palladium alloy membrane. For example (but not limited thereto),
the medium layer can be composed of a material selected from a group consisting of
nickel, copper, silver, gold, platinum, and combinations thereof. The preferred material
for the medium layer is nickel. Here, the medium layer can be electroplated two or
more times as desired. Meanwhile, the turbulence can be optionally introduced into
the electroplating solution during the electroplating process to prevent the disturbance
from the H
2 generated therein. The techniques of using a medium layer are described in the articles
by the following authors:
Renouprez, 1 J. F. et al in Journal of Catalysis, 170, 1997, p. 181,
Seung-Eun Nam in Journal of Membrane Science, 153, 1999, p. 163,
Seung-Eun Nam in Journal of Membrane Science, 170, 2000, p. 91, and
Journal of Membrane Science, 192, 2001, p. 177; all of which are incorporated herein for reference.
[0027] The embodiment of the medium-layer electroplating procedure used in the subject invention
is described hereinafter with nickel used as the medium layer. In this case, after
preprocessing, the porous metal support is placed into a plating vessel for pre-plating
the nickel. Here, the temperature of the electroplating bath ranges from about 30°C
to about 50°C. The rotational speed of the support is about 500 rpm. The current density
ranges from about 5 A/dm
2 to about 10 A/dm
2, preferably from about 7 A/dm
2 to about 10 A/dm
2. The electroplating duration ranges from about 3 minutes to about 6 minutes, preferably
from about 4 minutes to about 5 minutes. Thereafter, the porous metal support which
has been pre-plated with nickel is washed (e.g. by ultrasonic water rinsing), followed
by a second nickel-plating procedure in the nickel-plating vessel. In the second nickel-plating
procedure, the temperature of the electroplating bath ranges from about 30°C to about
50°C. The rotational speed of the support is about 500 rpm. The current density ranges
from about 2 A/dm
2 to about 6 A/dm
2, preferably from about 4 A/dm
2 to about 6 A/dm
2. The electroplating duration ranges from about 3 minutes to about 7 minutes, preferably
from about 5 minutes to about 7 minutes. Finally, following multiple cycles of water
rinsing and drying, a porous metal support plated with a medium layer is obtained.
[0028] When the electroplating method of the subject invention is used to provide a tube
for H
2 purification, the porous metal support is optionally jointed with other metal fittings
of the purification equipment at both ends, subsequent to the degreasing process,
using an appropriate method such as argon arc welding. Then, the surface of the porous
metal support is mechanically polished as described above to remove the work-hardening
layer formed in the powder metallurgy procedure and the oxidized layer formed in the
sintering procedure during the preparation of the metal support. The residual imprint
of the previously mentioned welding process is also removed. In this way, the porous
metal support is guaranteed to have a smooth surface to enhance the effect of the
subsequent electroplating procedure. Then, after the smooth metal support is rinsed
with water, it is ready for subsequent electroplating.
[0029] FIG. 1 shows an embodiment of the method for preparing a palladium or palladium alloy
membrane on a porous metal support in accordance with the subject invention. As shown
in FIG. 1, subsequent to the preprocesses such as degreasing, tube welding and surface
leveling, the porous metal support is rinsed with water and optionally dried, followed
by a nickel pre-plating, a water rinsing, a nickel plating, a water rinsing, and an
optional drying step. Finally, the metal support is electroplated by palladium, washed
with water, and dried to provide a metal tube formed from both the porous metal support
and palladium membrane.
[0030] Hence, the subject invention further provides a composite with a palladium or palladium
alloy membrane, comprising:
a porous metal substrate;
a medium layer coated on the surface of the substrate; and
a palladium or palladium alloy membrane coated on the medium layer,
wherein the palladium or palladium alloy membrane is substantially free from exfoliation
under the condition that the pressure at the substrate side of the composite is up
to about 3 absolute atmospheres, preferably about 5 absolute atmospheres, and more
preferably about 10 absolute atmospheres, higher than the pressure at its palladium
or palladium alloy membrane side.
[0031] In the composite of the subject invention, as described above, the porous metal substrate
can be composed of a material selected from a group consisting of iron, an iron alloy,
copper, a copper alloy, nickel, a nickel alloy, and combinations thereof. The preferred
material is an iron alloy. Economically, the stainless steel cataloged as an iron
ally is most preferred. The medium layer interposed between the substrate and the
palladium or palladium alloy membrane can be composed of a material selected from
a group consisting of nickel, copper, silver, gold, platinum, and combinations thereof.
If the stainless steel is employed as the substrate, nickel is preferred as the material
for the medium layer.
[0032] In comparison to the prior art with the time-consuming electroless plating method,
the palladium-containing electroplating solution and the electroplating method for
preparing a palladium or palladium alloy membrane on a porous metal support in accordance
with the subject invention can eliminate the heat treatment and reduce the preparation
time by a factor of 10. Moreover, compared to those prepared by the electroless plating
method, the palladium or palladium alloy membrane prepared by the electroplating method
of the subject invention exhibits compact crystal grains, and when used in H
2 purification components, it is not inferior to those prepared by the electroless
plating method in terms of H
2 permeability. Furthermore, the conventional palladium or palladium alloy membranes
are vulnerable to hydrogen embrittlement. In contrast, it has been found that the
palladium or palladium alloy membrane of the subject invention is free of hydrogen
embrittlement at both low and high temperatures, and therefore has a higher applicability.
The hydrogen embrittlement of the conventional palladium or palladium alloy membrane
is related to the phase change between the palladium and H
2. The details can be found in the articles written by the following authors:
F. A. Lewis in Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 461-464, 1996,
Tea-Hyun Yang et al in Electrochimica Acta., Vol. 41, No. 6, pp. 843-844, 1996, and
E. Nowicka et al in Progress in Surface Science, Vol. 48, Nos. 1-4, pp. 3-14, 1995; all of which are incorporated herein for reference.
[0033] Exemplary embodiments are provided as follows to further illustrate the subject invention.
Examples
Example 1 (A palladium sulfate electroplating solution system)
A. Preprocessing a porous stainless steel support
[0034] A porous stainless steel tube was rinsed and degreased with toluene and acetone,
and then a 15 cm long section was sliced therefrom and put into an automatic rotational
welding machine in alignment with a common metal tube. Argon gas was injected into
the tubes at a rate of 8 ml/min to weld them together by the argon arc welding process
to obtain a support for electroplating a palladium membrane. Following the welding
process, the porous stainless steel support and its welding joint with the common
tube were mechanically polished using sandpaper No. 600 for leveling, followed by
an ultrasonic water rinsing and a subsequent drying process in an oven at a temperature
of 150°C. Then, an He stream at 1 absolute atmosphere was injected into the support
to test the gas permeation rate out of the support. The resulting gas permeation rate
was 20 L/min.
B. Electroplating of a medium layer
[0035] The pre-plated portion of the support had an exposed area of 50 cm
2. The preprocessed support was put into a nickel pre-plating vessel (with a radius
of 120 cm and a height of 200 cm) containing 2 liters of an electroplating solution
therein. The composition of the electroplating bath and the electroplating parameters
were shown in Table 1. The support was pre-plated to form a nickel coating thereon,
and then washed by an ultrasonic water rinsing process. Thereafter, the pre-plated
support was again put into a nickel-plating vessel (with a radius of 120 cm and a
height of 200 cm) containing 2 liters of an electroplating solution therein. The composition
of the electroplating bath and the electroplating parameters were shown in Table 2.
Following multiple times of water rinsing, the support was put into an oven for drying
at a temperature of 150°C, and then an He stream at 1 absolute atmosphere was injected
into the support to test the gas permeation rate out of the support. The resulting
gas permeation rate was 4 L/min.
Table 1
Composition of electroplating bath |
Amount (per liter) |
Electroplating parameters |
nickel chloride |
220 g |
temperature |
50 °C |
boric acid |
40 g |
duration |
5 min |
concentrated |
60 ml |
current density |
10A/dm2 |
hydrochloric acid |
|
rotational speed of the support |
500 rpm |
Table 2
Composition of electroplating bath |
Amount (per liter) |
Electroplating parameters |
Nickel sulfate |
350 g |
temperature |
50 °C |
ammonium sulfate |
100 g |
duration |
7 min |
boric acid |
40 ml |
current density |
6 A/dm2 |
concentrated |
50 ml |
rotational speed |
500 rpm |
sulfuric acid |
|
of the support |
|
C. Electroplating of a palladium membrane
[0036] The resulting support with a nickel medium layer was put into a palladium electroplating
vessel (with a radius of 120 cm and a height of 200 cm) containing 2 liters of an
electroplating bath therein. The composition of the electroplating bath and the electroplating
parameters were shown in Table 3. Following the electroplating process, the support
was rinsed with water many times and then dried in an oven at a temperature of 150°C
to finally form a palladium membrane with a compact lattice structure on the porous
stainless steel support.
Table 3
Composition of electroplating bath |
Amount (per liter) |
Electroplating parameters |
palladium sulfate |
5 g |
temperature |
50 °C |
ammonium sulfate |
100 g |
duration |
2-2.5 hours |
concentrated |
70 ml |
current density |
0.3 A/dm2 |
sulfuric acid |
|
|
|
potassium nitrate |
20 g |
rotational speed of the support |
500 rpm |
EDTA-Na2 |
30 g |
|
|
ammonium |
sufficient for |
|
|
hydroxide |
adjusting pH |
|
|
|
value to 10-11 |
|
|
Example 2 (Test of rotational speed of the support)
[0037] Steps A to C of Example 1 were repeated under the same conditions but at a current
density of 1 A/dm
2 and rotational speeds of 10 rpm, 50 rpm, 100 rpm, 200 rpm, and 500 rpm,. Upon the
formation of the palladium membrane, the scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used
to observe the structure of the resulting palladium membrane. FIG. 2 shows the SEM
photographs of the palladium membranes obtained at rotational speeds of 10 rpm (A),
50 rpm (B), 100 rpm (C), 200 rpm (D) and 500 rpm (E), respectively. It can be seen
that under the same current density, a higher rotational speed results in a more compact
palladium membrane.
Example 3 (A palladium chloride electroplating solution system)
[0038] A palladium membrane was electroplated through steps as the same as steps A to C
of Example 1, but using the composition of the electroplating bath and the electroplating
parameters listed in Table 4.
Table 4
Composition of electroplating bath |
Amount (per liter) |
Electroplating parameters |
palladium chloride |
5 g |
temperature |
50 °C |
ammonium sulfate |
100 g |
duration |
2-2.5 hours |
concentrated sulfuric acid |
70 ml |
current density |
0.3 A/dm2 |
potassium nitrate |
20 g |
rotational speed of the support |
50 rpm |
EDTA-Na2 |
30 g |
|
|
ammonium |
sufficient for |
|
|
hydroxide |
adjusting pH |
|
|
|
value to 10-11 |
|
|
Example 4 (Preparation of a palladium-copper alloy membrane)
[0039] A palladium alloy membrane was electroplated similarly through A to C of Example
1, but using the composition of the electroplating bath and the electroplating parameters
shown in Table 5. Upon the formation of the palladium alloy membrane, the scanning
electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the structure of the resulting palladium
alloy membrane, as shown in FIG. 3A. Additionally, the composition of the palladium
alloy membrane was analyzed with an energy dispersive X-ray (EDX) spectrometer, as
shown in FIG. 3B.
Table 5
Composition of electroplating bath |
Amount (per liter) |
Electroplating parameters |
palladium sulfate |
5 g |
temperature |
40 °C |
copper sulfate |
2 g |
duration |
2-2.5 hours |
ammonium citrate |
100 g |
current density |
0.5 A/dm2 |
concentrated sulfuric acid |
70 ml |
rotational speed of the support |
100 rpm |
EDTA-Na2 |
30 g |
|
|
ammonium |
sufficient for |
|
|
hydroxide |
adjusting pH |
|
|
|
value to 10-11 |
|
|
Example 5 (Electroplating with different plating solutions in sequence)
[0040] Steps A to C of Example 1 were repeated using the composition of the electroplating
bath and conditions shown in Table 3 to electroplate a palladium membrane on a porous
metal support. The only difference is that the electroplating lasted for 30 minutes
instead. Next, the support was taken out and rinsed with deionized water several times,
and then was electroplated with the composition of the electroplating bath and the
electroplating conditions shown in Table 4. Upon the formation of the palladium membrane,
the scanning electron microscope (SEM) was used to observe the structure of the resulting
palladium membrane, as shown in FIG. 4.
Example 6 (Test on He permeability)
[0041] At room temperature, the porous metal support tube with a palladium membrane (referred
to as the "membrane tube" hereinafter) obtained from Example 1 was filled with He
at 4 absolute atmospheres, and put into a water bath to observe the compactness of
the membrane tube. It was found that the He could not penetrate through to the outside
of the membrane tube. This meant that the membrane tube could withstand a 4-absolute
internal pressure of He.
Example 7 (Test on Ar permeability)
[0042] An apparatus shown in FIG. 5 was utilized in this example. The membrane tube (2)
obtained from Example 1 was placed into a shell and tube reactor (3). At room temperature,
Ar was introduced into the reactor (3) via a gas inlet (1). The outside outlet (5)
of the membrane tube was opened so the reactor could be filled with Ar. Then, the
outside outlet (5) was closed to build up a backpressure inside the reactor. When
the backpressure reached 10 absolute atmospheres, an observation was made in the inside
outlet (4) of the membrane tube to check if any Ar had permeated through the pores
of the membrane tube into the interior thereof. The test results showed that no Ar
from the reactor (3) had permeated through the membrane tube (2) into the interior
thereof. This meant that the membrane tube (2) could withstand an external Ar pressure
of 10 absolute atmospheres safely.
Example 8 (Test on H2 permeability)
[0043] Similarly, the apparatus shown in FIG. 5 and the membrane tube (2) obtained from
Example 1 were used in this example. At room temperature, Ar was introduced into the
reactor (3) via the gas inlet (1). The outside outlet (5) of the membrane tube was
opened so that the reactor (3) could be filled with Ar. Then, the temperature of the
reactor (3) was increased from room temperature to 380°C at a rate of 2.5 °C/min,
while the inlet gas was replaced with H
2 of industrial level. When the residual Ar was purged completely from the reactor
(3) by H
2, a regulating valve (7) on the outside outlet (5) was adjusted to maintain a pressure
of 5 absolute atmospheres inside the reactor. Under such a pressure difference, H
2 was driven to permeate through the membrane-plated tube (2) to the inside outlet
(4) of the membrane tube, where a permeation ratio of H
2 was measured to be 727 ml/min. Then, the regulator valve (7) on the outside outlet
(5) was adjusted to maintain a pressure of 10 absolute atmospheres inside the reactor
(3), in which case the permeation ratio of H
2 was measured to be 1481 ml/min. These results demonstrated that the palladium membrane
prepared by the subject invention exhibited an excellent H
2 permeability.
Example 9 (Hydrogen embrittlement test)
[0044] A welded porous stainless steel tube was mechanically polished using sandpaper No.
600, and then was dipped into 10 moles of hydrochloric acid for 3 to 5 minutes and
rinsed with deionized water. Subsequently, the resulting tube was immersed into a
tin chloride sensitizing solution for 5 minutes, and then was immersed into deionized
water for 2 minutes. The tube was then immersed into a palladium chloride activator
for 5 minutes and again into deionized water for another 2 minutes. Such a cycle was
repeated ten times, after which the activated tube was immersed into an electroless
plating solution (comprising palladium ammonium chloride and a reducer hydrazine)
to obtain a porous stainless steel tube with a palladium membrane prepared by the
electroless plating method (referred to as the "electroless-plated palladium membrane
tube" hereinafter).
[0045] Then, the electroless-plated palladium membrane tube and the tube obtained from Example
1 were subjected to the hydrogen embrittlement test at room temperature. At first,
H
2 was injected into the electroless-plated palladium membrane tube to attain a pressure
of 3 absolute atmospheres. As shown in FIG. 6, the hydrogen embrittlement and chipping
phenomena occurred in the electroless plated palladium membrane. Then, H
2 was injected to the electroplated palladium membrane tube of the subject invention
to attain a pressure of 3, 5, and 10 absolute atmospheres, respectively. No hydrogen
embrittlement was found.
[0046] Next, the operation temperature was increased until the phase change temperature
of palladium, i.e., about 250°C to 300°C, was reached. The electroplated palladium
membrane tube of the subject invention was tested again by introducing H
2 to attain a pressure of 3, 5, and 10 absolute atmospheres, respectively. After six
hours under the phase change temperature, slow gas leakages were observed in the electroplated
palladium membrane tube, but still no chipping occurred, as shown in FIG. 7.
Example 10 (H2 purifying test)
[0047] Similarly, the apparatus shown in FIG. 5 and the membrane tube (2) obtained from
Example 1 were used in this example. At first, the regulating valve (7) on the outside
outlet (5) of the membrane tube was adjusted to maintain a normal pressure inside
the reactor (3), and a gas mixture comprising 75% of H
2 and 25% of CO
2 was used as the feeding gas to test the H
2 purity which could be obtained by the membrane tube (2). With a continuous injection
of the gas mixture into the reactor (3), the regulating valve (7) on the outside outlet
(5) was further adjusted to maintain a pressure of 5 absolute atmospheres inside the
reactor (3). Under the resulting pressure differential, H
2 in the reactor (3) permeated through the membrane tube (2) to the inside outlet (4)
of the membrane tube. In this case, an H
2 flow rate of 326 ml/min was measured on the outside outlet of the membrane tube (2)
with a purity higher than 99.997% (CO, CO
2 and CH
4 in concentrations of lower than 10 ppm). The H
2 flow rate measured on the outside outlet (5) of the membrane tube was 465 ml/min
and the content of H
2 was decreased from 57.5% to 75%, which represented a recovery rate of 55%.
[0048] Subsequently, the regulating valve (7) on the outside outlet (5) was further adjusted
to maintain a pressure of 10 absolute atmospheres inside the reactor (3). Under the
resulting pressure differential, the H
2 in the reactor (3) permeated through the membrane tube (2) to the inside outlet (4)
of the membrane tube. In this case, the H
2 flow rate of 649 ml/min was measured from the outlet of the membrane tube with a
purity higher than 99.997% (all CO, CO
2 and CH
4 in a concentration of lower than 10 ppm). The H
2 flow rate measured on the outside outlet (5) of the plated tube was 794 ml/min and
the content of H
2 was reduced from 54.6% to 75%, which represented a recovery rate of 60%.
Example 11
[0049] As shown in FIG. 8, a steam reforming reactor (8) and a palladium membrane tube reactor
(9) (including the membrane tube obtained from Example 1) were connected in series.
At a rate of 2.5°C/min, the temperature of the steam reforming reactor (8) was increased
from room temperature to 280°C, while that of the palladium membrane tube reactor
(9) was increased from room temperature to 350°C. When the temperature rose, Ar was
injected into the reactor as a protective gas. Once the temperature settings were
reached, a liquid mixture of methanol and water was supplied by a pump (10) so that
the methanol reacted with water in the steam reforming reactor (8) to produce H
2 and CO
2. Then, the resulting gas mixture was subjected to an H
2 purifying process for separation by passing through the palladium membrane tube reactor
(9). A regulating valve (12) was adjusted to maintain a pressure of 10 absolute atmospheres
inside the palladium membrane tube reactor (9). As a result, an H
2 permeation rate of 30 liters per hour was measured with an H
2 purity of 99.95%.
[0050] The above examples are intended to exemplify the embodiments of the subject invention
and illustrate the technical features thereof, but not to limit the scope of protection
of the subject invention. Any modifications or equivalent replacements that can be
easily accomplished by persons skilled in the art are within the scope of the subject
invention. The scope of the protection of the subject invention is based on the following
claims as appended.
1. A palladium-containing electroplating solution, comprising:
about 2 g/L to about 200 g/L of palladium in palladium sulfate;
about 10 g/L to about 200 g/L of a reactive conductive salt;
about 10 g/L to about 150 g/L of a complexing agent; and
enough buffering agent to give the electroplating solution a pH of about 9 to about
12.
2. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, comprising about 5 g/L to about 50 g/L of
palladium in palladium sulfate, about 70 g/L to about 150 g/L of the reactive conductive
salt, about 30 g/L to about 70 g/L of the complexing agent, and enough buffering agent
to give the electroplating solution a pH of about 10 to about 11.
3. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, wherein the reactive conductive salt is a
SO42- ion-providing compound.
4. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, wherein the reactive conductive salt is selected
from the group consisting of salts of Group IA metals, ammonium salts, and combinations
thereof.
5. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, wherein the reactive conductive salt is selected
from the group consisting of sodium chloride, potassium chloride, sodium sulfate,
ammonium sulfate, ammonium chloride, sodium thiosulfate, ammonium thiosulfate, ammonium
citrate, and combinations thereof.
6. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, wherein the complexing agent is selected from
the group consisting of boric acid, phosphate salts, hypophosphate salts, nitrate
salts, tartrate salts, citrate salts, salts of ethylene diamine tetracetic acid (EDTA),
and combinations thereof, or
wherein the complexing agent is selected from a group consisting of boric acid, sodium
phosphate, sodium hydrogen phosphate, sodium hydrogen hypophosphate, sodium nitrate,
potassium nitrate, sodium potassium tartrate, sodium citrate, potassium citrate, ammonium
citrate, ethylene diamine tetracetic acid disodium salt (EDTA-Na2), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid tetrasodium salt (EDTA-Na4), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid dipotassium salt (EDTA-K2), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid tripotassium salt (EDTA-K3), ethylene diamine tetracetic acid magnesium salt (EDTA-Mg), and combinations thereof,
or
wherein the complexing agent is selected from a group consisting of potassium nitrate,
ammonium citrate, EDTA-Na2, EDTA-Na4, and combinations thereof.
7. The electroplating solution of Claim 1 or Claim 7, wherein the buffering agent is
a hydroxide.
8. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, wherein the buffering agent is selected from
the group consisting of sodium hydroxide, potassium hydroxide, ammonium hydroxide,
and combinations thereof.
9. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, further comprising sulfuric acid.
10. The electroplating solution of Claim 9, wherein the sulfuric acid is in an amount
sufficient for rendering the concentration of SO42- in the electroplating solution to be about 0.2 mole to about 4 moles per liter.
11. The electroplating solution of Claim 1, further comprising a second metal salt other
than palladium sulfate.
12. The electroplating solution of Claim 11, wherein the second metal salt is selected
from the group consisting of: a copper salt, a silver salt, a gold salt, a nickel
salt, a platinum salt, an indium salt, and combinations thereof.
13. The electroplating solution of Claim 11, wherein the second metal salt is a copper
salt selected from a group consisting of copper sulfate, copper chloride, and combinations
thereof.
14. The electroplating solution of Claim 12 or Claim 13, wherein the copper salt is in
an amount sufficient for rendering the electroplating solution to contain about 0.2
g to about 100 g of copper per liter.
15. A method for providing a palladium or palladium alloy membrane on a porous metal support,
comprising:
providing a porous metal support; and
electroplating a palladium or palladium alloy membrane onto the metal support with
a palladium-containing electroplating solution, wherein said palladium-containing
electroplating solution comprises:
about 2 g/L to about 200 g/L of palladium in a palladium salt;
about 10 g/L to about 200 g/L of a reactive conductive salt;
about 10 g/L to about 150 g/L of a complexing agent; and
enough buffering agent to give the electroplating solution a pH of about 9 to about
12.
16. The method of Claim 15, wherein the porous metal support is composed of a material
selected from a group consisting of iron, an iron alloy, copper, a copper alloy, nickel,
a nickel alloy, and combinations thereof.
17. The method of Claim 15, wherein the porous metal support is composed of stainless
steel.
18. The method of Claim 15, wherein the electroplating step is carried out at an electroplating
bath temperature ranging from about 40°C to about 90°C.
19. The method of Claim 15, wherein the electroplating step is carried out under a current
density ranging from about 0.01 A/dm2 to about 1.5 A/dm2 or wherein the electroplating step is carried out under a current density ranging
from about 0.2 A/dm2 to about 1.0 A/dm2.
20. The method of Claim 15, wherein the metal support is rotated during the electroplating
step.
21. The method of Claim 20, wherein the metal support is rotated at a speed of not higher
than about 1000 rpm, or wherein the metal support is rotated at a rate ranging from
about 100 rpm to about 500 rpm.
22. The method of Claim 15, wherein the palladium salt is selected from a group consisting
of palladium sulfate, palladium tetrammine chloride (Pd(NH4)4Cl2), palladium ammonium chloride (Pd(NH4)2Cl4), palladium chloride, and combinations thereof.
23. The method of Claim 15, further comprising coating a medium layer on the metal support
prior to the step of electroplating the palladium or palladium alloy membrane.
24. The method of Claim 23, wherein the medium layer is coated onto the metal support
by an electroplating method and is composed of a material selected from a group consisting
of nickel, copper, silver, gold, platinum, and combinations thereof.
25. The method of Claim 24, wherein the medium layer is a nickel layer.
26. The method of Claim 15, wherein the electroplating step is a two-stage electroplating
step.
27. The method of Claim 26, wherein one stage of the two-stage electroplating step uses
palladium sulfate as the palladium salt and the other uses palladium chloride as the
palladium salt.
28. A composite with a palladium or palladium alloy membrane, comprising:
a porous metal substrate;
a medium layer coated on a surface of the substrate; and
a palladium or palladium alloy membrane, coated on the medium layer,
wherein the palladium or palladium alloy membrane is substantially free from exfoliation
under a condition that the pressure at the substrate side of the composite is up to
about 3 absolute atmospheres higher than the pressure at its palladium or palladium
alloy membrane side.
29. The composite of Claim 28, wherein the porous metal substrate is composed of a material
selected from a group consisting of iron, an iron alloy, copper, a copper alloy, nickel,
a nickel alloy, and combinations thereof, or wherein the porous metal substrate is
composed of stainless steel.
30. The composite of Claim 28, wherein the medium layer is composed of a material selected
from a group consisting of nickel, copper, silver, gold, platinum, and combinations
thereof.
31. The composite of Claim 30, wherein the medium layer is composed of nickel.
32. The composite of Claim 28, wherein the palladium or palladium alloy membrane is substantially
free from exfoliation under a condition that the pressure at the substrate side of
the composite is up to about 5 absolute atmospheres higher than the pressure at its
palladium or palladium alloy membrane side, or wherein the palladium or palladium
alloy membrane is substantially free from exfoliation under a condition that the pressure
at the substrate side of the composite is up to about 10 absolute atmospheres higher
than the pressure at its palladium or palladium alloy membrane side.