[Technical Field]
[0001] The present invention relates to a DR (Double Reduced) steel sheet for EOE (Easy
Open End) which enables an easy-opening by hand of a portion of a can cover that is
widely used for a drink can, a food can and the like, and to a manufacturing method
thereof.
The present application is based on Japanese Patent Application No.
2006-219066, and the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference.
[Background Art]
[0002] A can cover having an easy-open function is being widely used for a metal can. Such
a can cover generally includes a partial-open type can cover that is mainly used for
a drink can, and a full-open type can cover that is mainly used for a food can. Both
types of can covers generally employ an easy-open function in which an opening formed
in a can cover panel is broken by pulling up a tab fixed by a rivet.
[0003] In a body of an easy-open can cover are formed with a rivet and an opening guide
groove, which are not provided on a can cover having no easy-open function.
[0004] The opening guide groove is formed to a depth of above 1/2 of thickness of a can
cover plate by pressing a surface of the can cover with high load using a working
tool having a knife-shaped projection formed in a predetermined opening contour.
[0005] The rivet is formed by a combined process of stretching and drawing. The formed rivet
is inserted in a hole provided in the tab, and then, a rivet mechanism is formed by
performing a caulking process to a resultant structure.
[0006] As a material for the aforementioned easy-open can cover, a tine, a surface-treated
steel sheet, such as an electrolytic chromium coat steel sheet, and an aluminum steel
sheet are used. Typically, a coated material is used to protect contents in a can,
although an uncoated tin may be used for, for example, a fruit can.
[0007] In recent years, it has been considered to use a thin hard material for the purpose
of reducing material costs for easy-open can covers, as same as previous can bodies
and common can covers. For example, as disclosed in the following Patent Document
1 for example, when the thickness of a steel sheet is limited to equal to or more
than 0.15 mm and less than 0.23, bending resistance in opening an easy-open cover
may be reduced, thereby improving can cover openability. In addition, as disclosed
in the following Patent Document 2, low carbon steel is advantageous over extra-low
carbon steel in terms of component of an easy-open can cover, and the can cover openability
can be improved by subjecting a box annealing method to the easy-open can cover at
a high reduction rate of 2 to 10%.
[0008] These documents aim to improve the can openability but have a problem of poor cover
manufacturability. The following Patent Document 3 discloses a technique in which
B oxide is used to realize achieving both of the can openability and the cover manufacturability.
The following Patent Document 3 states that: a starting point of a void in a steel
sheet facilitates opening of a can; and rivet formability is not deteriorated by limiting
a size of B oxide. However, since impurities such as oxide existing in steel may be
a starting point of breakage due to working, Patent Document 3 does not present a
substantial solution for this problem. The above-mentioned suggestions have not been
put into practical use since a thin hard material has cracks produced in a rivet forming
process. On the other hand, the following Patent Document 4 discloses a complex stretching
process using bending and bending-back with three or more steps. The hard material
has bee put into practical use in combination with such a multi-step complex stretching
process.
[Patent Document 1] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No.
S63-109121
[Patent Document 2] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No.
S64-015326
[Patent Document 3] Japanese Unexamined Patent Application, First Publication No.
H10-251799
[Patent Document 4] French Patent, Publication No.
FR9004264
[Disclosure of the Invention]
[Problems to be Solved by the Invention]
[0009] As described above, the use of the thin hard material is likely to produce cracks
in stretching in the typical rivet forming process. It could be estimated that this
is due to insufficient material stretchability. In order to make up for the insufficient
material stretchability, the rivet forming process including the complex stretching
using the multi-step bending and bending-back was required. It is believed that the
multi-step bending and bending-back gives the effect of increasing a limitative drawing
ratio and stretching a material by the bending and bending-back, and thereby enabling
the rivet forming.
[0010] However, the conventional production facilities have only a two-step working space.
Accordingly, a pressing machine and a mould have to be newly established for a three
or more step working, and thereby requiring high expenses.
[0011] The present invention was made in view of the above-mentioned circumstances and has
an object of providing a DR steel sheet with excellent rivet workability which enables
EOE working even with the conventional production facility used for a two step rivet
forming process, and a manufacturing method of the DR steel sheet at low costs. [Means
for Solving the Problems]
[0012] As a result of inventors' studies for resolving the aforementioned problems, the
present invention provides a DR steel sheet and a manufacturing method thereof, which
are inexpensive and are capable of restricting an average Lankford value after an
aging process by limiting a steel component and securing total stretchability in a
rolling direction and a sheet width direction after the aging process. The gist of
the present invention is as follows.
- (1) A DR steel sheet of the present invention includes the following steel components:
C: 0.02 to 0.06 mass%, Si: equal to or less than 0.03 mass%, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5 mass%,
P: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%, S: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%, Al: 0.02
to 0.10 mass%, and N: 0.008 to 0.015 mass%. The amount of solute N (Ntotal-NasAlN)
in the steel sheet containing a residual iron and inevitable impurities, is equal
to or more than 0.006%; and the total stretchability in a rolling direction after
aging is equal to or more than 10%, total stretchability in a sheet width direction
after aging is equal to or more than 5%, and an average Lankford value after aging
is equal to or less than 1.0.
- (2) A manufacturing method of a DR steel sheet of the present invention including
the following steel components: C: 0.02 to 0.06 mass%, Si: equal to or less than 0.03
mass%, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5 mass%, P: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%, S: equal to or
less than 0.02 mass%, Al: 0.02 to 0.10 mass%, and N: 0.008 to 0.015 mass%, wherein:
the amount of solute N (Ntotal-NasAlN) in the steel sheet containing a residual iron
and inevitable impurities, is equal to or more than 0.006%; and the total stretchability
in a rolling direction after aging is equal to or more than 10%, total stretchability
in a sheet width direction after aging is equal to or more than 5%, and an average
Lankford value after aging is equal to or less than 1.0. The manufacturing method
includes: heating a steel work piece at equal to or more than 1200 °C, and then hot-rolling
the steel work piece at a finishing temperature of equal to or more than an Ar3 transformation
point; forming a winding hot-rolled steel sheet at a winding temperature of equal
to or less than 600 °C; subjecting a cold rolling to the wind hot-rolled steel sheet
with a rolling rate of equal to or more than 80% after acid washing; subjecting annealing
to the cold-rolled steel sheet at a temperature of equal to or more than a recrystallization
temperature and equal to or less than an Ac1 transformation point; and subjecting
DR rolling to the annealed steel sheet with a tempering rolling rate of 6% to 15%.
[Effects of the Invention]
[0013] While the conventional thin continuous annealed DR steel sheets require a rivet forming
process in three steps or more, the DR steel sheet of the present invention enables
a rivet forming process in two steps by: improving the steel components and the manufacturing
method thereof; and specifying the total stretchability in the rolling direction and
in the rolling sheet width direction after aging, and specifying the Lankford value
after stretching after aging.
As a result, it is possible to use materials with saved resources and energy without
requiring additional expensive facilities, which results in energy saving in an EOE
manufacturing process, thereby exerting the extremely useful effects in the industrial
applicability.
[Brief Description of the Drawings]
[0014]
FIG. 1 is a sectional view after a first step of rivet forming.
FIG. 2 is a sectional view after a second step of rivet forming.
FIG. 3 is a sectional view after rivet caulking, where the reference symbol t denotes
a tab while the reference symbol d represents a rivet diameter.
FIG. 4 is a graph showing a relationship between a solute N and a Lankford value.
[Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention]
[0015] An embodiment of a DR steel sheet and a manufacturing method thereof according to
the present invention will be explained below.
The present invention relates to a DR steel sheet and a manufacturing method thereof,
which are inexpensive and are capable of restricting an average Lankford value after
an aging process by limiting steel components and securing the total stretchability
in a rolling direction and a sheet width direction after the aging process.
(About Mechanical Property)
[0016] The present invention is on the assumption that rivet formation is achieved in two
steps. A section in a forming process is shown as follows. That is, FIG 1 shows a
sectional view after stretching at a first step, FIG. 2 shows a sectional view after
rivet forming by drawing at a second step, and FIG. 3 shows a sectional view of a
rivet mechanism obtained by the caulking.
[0017] To begin with, the rivet forming requires a characteristic that follows processing.
The inventors have found that the total stretchability of equal to or more than 10%
in a rolling direction after an aging process and stretchability of equal to or more
than 5% in a sheet width direction after the aging process follow the rivet forming
smoothly. The reason why it could follow the rivet forming is unclear in spite of
the smaller total stretchability in the rolling direction comparing to the total stretchability
in the sheet direction. However, it is believed that drawing included in the rivet
forming has an effect on a Lankford value. In other words, it is known that the Lankford
value in the sheet width direction increases over that in the rolling direction in
a steel sheet having the Lankford value of less than 1.0. Accordingly, processing
in the sheet width direction may have the same possibility as working in the rolling
direction as total stretchability interacts with the Lankford value complementarily.
On the other hand, if the total stretchability in the rolling direction after the
aging process is less than 10% or the total stretchability in the sheet width direction
after the aging process is less than 5%, a material will be broken at the time of
stretching at a first step or drawing at a second step.
[0018] In addition, a rivet diameter is important in caulking with a tab. If the rivet diameter
is small, the tab may be detached. The inventors have found that a steel sheet with
a caulked tab is different in an average Lankford value after an aging process from
a steel sheet with a detached tab. If the average Lankford value exceeds 1.0, the
rivet diameter becomes small. On the contrary, if the average Lankford value is equal
to or less than 1.0, the rivet diameter becomes large and the tab is not detached.
Although the reason for this is unclear, it is believed that a uniform large rivet
diameter is obtained as a Lankford value in a rolling direction having high stretchability
becomes small and a Lankford value in a sheet width direction having low stretchability
becomes large, thereby making plastic mobility of a steel sheet equal, if the average
Lankford value is equal to or less than 1.0. The inventors have made the present invention
based on the above, although the Lankford values in the rolling direction and the
sheet width direction are empirically estimated because measurement for the Lankford
value of a thin hard steel sheet shows only an average Lankford value calculated based
on a Young's modulus of the steel sheet.
[0019] In addition, an aging process, which is generally carried out at 180 to 220°C (200
to 210°C) for 7 to 30 minutes, is carried out at 210°C for 30 minutes in an evaluation
test.
[0020] The important thing is to provide a method of achieving the aforementioned material
property in a continuous annealing DR steel sheet which can be inexpensively manufactured
using a thin steel sheet material. Next, components of the DR steel and a manufacturing
method thereof will be described.
(About Steel Components)
<C: 0.02 mass% to 0.06 mass%>
[0021] C is one of factors that dominate crystalline grain growth. As the addition amount
of C decreases, coarsening of crystalline grains of a hot rolling steel sheet and
grain growth in annealing are accelerated, thereby raising the average Lankford value
(r value) of the steel sheet. Accordingly, the lower limit of the amount of C needs
to be less than 0.02% in order to make an r value equal to or less than 1.0. On the
other hand, as the amount of C increases, the crystalline grains become refined and
much cementite is extracted from steel. The refined grains and the extracted cementite,
which are the starting point of void generation in a tensile test, facilitate propagation
of cracks, thereby making the total stretchability of a product sheet small. Accordingly,
the upper limit of the amount of C is set to be 0.06%.
<Si: equal to or less than 0.03 mass%>
[0022] Since the large addition amount of Si may cause plating and abrasion-resistance deterioration,
it is preferable that the addition amount of Si is small. However, since Si is an
element to be inevitably mixed in a refining process and since no practical problem
occurs if Si is small in amount. Therefore, the upper limit of the amount of Si is
set to be 0.03%. In case of need for excellent abrasion-resistance, it is preferable
to set the upper limit of the amount of Si to be equal to or less than 0.02%.
<Mn: 0.05 mass% to 0.5 mass%>
[0023] Mn is an element useful for preventing red brittleness in a hot rolling with S fixed.
To achieve this effect, Mn is necessarily added by double or more of the addition
amount of S. Accordingly, when the addition amount of S is equal to or less than 0.02%,
the lower limit of the amount of Mn has to be less than 0.05%. On the other hand,
crystalline grains are apt to be granulized in a steel sheet that contains a quantity
of Mn, which may result in hardness and deterioration of stretchability. In addition,
since Mn is enriched on a surface of a steel sheet by a heat treatment, which may
result in deterioration of abrasion-resistance, the upper limit of the amount of Mn
is set to be 0.5%.
<P: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%>
[0024] Like Mn, P makes a steel sheet hard to thereby deteriorate the total stretchability
and abrasion-resistance. In particular, if the amount of P exceeds 0.02%, segregation
of crystalline grains is remarkable, which may result in brittleness of a steel sheet
and difficulty in obtaining the required total stretchability. Accordingly, the upper
limit of the amount of P is set to be 0.02%.
<S: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%>
[0025] S exists as an intervenient and is a useless element causing deterioration of the
total stretchability and abrasion-resistance. Accordingly, the less amount of S is
more preferable. However, since S is an element to be inevitably mixed in a refining
process and since no practical problem occurs if S is small in amount, the upper limit
of the amount of S is set to be 0.02%.
<Al: 0.02 mass% to 0.10 mass%>
[0026] Al is an element which is required as a deoxidizer in producing a solution and is
preferably used to increase purity of a steel sheet. Accordingly, the addition amount
of Al has to be sufficient to exclude oxygen from steel. If the amount of Al is small,
deoxidization is insufficient, which may result in increase of an intervenient in
steel and hence deterioration of total stretchability like cementite. Accordingly,
the lower limit of the amount of Al is set to be 0.02%. On the other hand, if the
amount of Al is large, excessive Al after deoxidization is combined with N in steel
to be AlN extract, which may decrease the total stretchability and cause surface defects
due to alumina cluster or the like. Accordingly, the upper limit of the amount of
Al is set to be 0.10%.
<N: 0.008 mass% to 0.015 mass%>
[0027] In the present invention, N is the most important factor in manufacturing a steel
sheet and exerts the effect of the present invention by acting on the steel sheet
as solute N. The solute N is defined by the amount of solute N = Ntotal - NasAIN,
that is, a value obtained by subtracting the amount of extracted N (=AIN) measured
using a melting method by bromide ester from the total amount ofN (=Ntotal) included
in the steel sheet. N is a solid solution-reinforced element, which is superior to
P, and does not deteriorate abrasion-resistance unlike P. In addition, N reduces the
average Lankford value of a product sheet by acting on an aggregate important in the
present invention. However, since the effect of solute N can not be expected if the
amount of solute N is less than 0.006%, the lower limit of the total amount of N (=Ntotal)
is set to be less than 0.008%. On the other hand, if the amount of solute N exceeds
0.015%, brittleness of the steel sheet becomes remarkable, which may result in alleviation
of total stretchability and porosity defect due to slab cracks or gas produced in
a continuous casting process. Accordingly, the upper limit of the amount ofN is set
to be 0.015%, but in consideration of material stability and good yield in a series
of manufacturing processes, it is preferable that the upper limit of the amount of
N is set to be 0.010%.
<Other Chemical Components>
[0028] As described above, the EOE DR steel sheet contains the following components: C:
0.02 to 0.06 mass%, Si: equal to or less than 0.03 mass%, Mn: 0.05 to 0.5 mass%, P:
less than 0.02 mass%, S: equal to or less than 0.02 mass%, Al: 0.02 to 0.10 mass%,
and N: 0.008 to 0.015 mass%. However, the steel sheet may contain elements commonly
existing in a known DR steel sheet for a welded can. For example, the steel sheet
may contain the following components: Cr; equal to or less than 0.10 mass%, Cu: equal
to or less than 0.20 mass%, Ni: equal to or less than 0.15 mass%, Mo: equal to or
less than 0.05 mass%, B: less than 0.0020 mass%, one or two or more of Ti, Nb, Zr,
V and so on: less than 0.3 mass%, Ca: equal to or less than 0.01 mass%, and the like,
depending on its purpose.
<Manufacture Conditions>
[0029] A steel work piece as a rolling material is not particularly limited, but is preferably
obtained using a continuous casting method in order to minimize macro segregation.
Since the continuous work piece does not always need cooling before being hot-rolled,
the continuous steel work piece is preferably cast, hot-rolled and directly inserted
into a heating furnace. This is for preventing available solute N from decreasing
due to cooling of the steel work piece. Although a detailed mechanism is unclear,
it is proved that if a steel work piece is cooled and re-heated, the amount of solute
N decreases in accordance with decreasing temperature. Accordingly, when a cooled
steel work piece is re-heated, it is preferable to apply heating temperature of the
process capability upper limit to close to situation of a casting process. In the
present invention, it is necessary to re-heat the cooled steel work piece with heating
temperature of at least equal to or more than 1200°C.
[0030] Finishing hot rolling is carried out with temperature of the steel work piece keeping
at above an Ar3 transformation point. By performing rolling process at above the transformation
point enables obtaining a uniform and fine hot rolling structure. Furthermore, by
suppressing the distortion induced extraction of AlN, it is possible to easily secure
a quantity of stable solute N in a hot rolling step.
[0031] After the finishing the hot rolling, the AlN extraction is reduced by forcedly water-cooling
the steel work piece. In the present invention, since it is necessary to secure a
quantity of solute N in the hot rolling step, the cooling after the finishing hot
rolling is carried out as quickly as possible, and winding temperature is set to be
equal to or less than 600°C. The reason for this is that the solute Al not used for
deoxidization in steel is likely to combine with N in a temperature range from a point
immediately before an Ar3 transformation point to a point exceeding 600°C, and it
is very preferable that the steel sheet passes through this temperature range in a
short time to prevent the solute N from being reduced due to increased generation
of AlN.
[0032] The hot-rolled steel sheet obtained as above is subjected to a descaling step using
acid washing, and then to a cold rolling step. If a cold rolling rate is less than
80%, the average Lankford value may exceed 1.0 due to remarkable grain growth in a
continuous annealing step. Accordingly, the cold rolling rate is preferably somewhat
equal to or more than 80%, more preferably 80% to 95%.
[0033] A recrystallizing step after the cold rolling is carried out in an annealing furnace.
If annealing temperature exceeds an Ac1 transformation point, the average Lankford
value of a product plate exceeds 1.0 due to remarkable grain growth. Accordingly,
the upper limit of the annealing temperature is set to be 700°C. On the other hand,
a cold rolling structure remains at below recrystallization temperature, thereby making
it impossible to secure total stretchability. Accordingly, the lower limit of the
annealing temperature is set to be equal to or more than the recrystallization temperature.
[0034] A secondary cold rolling after the annealing is a important factor in manufacturing
the steel sheet of the present invention, next to the solute N. A reduction rate of
6% to 15% is applied to the continuous annealed steel sheet including the solute N
of equal to or more than 0.006% of the present invention. This condition allows suppression
of deterioration of the total stretchability due to work strengthening and secure
of anisotropy of stretchability of a steel sheet, that is, secure of stretchability
of equal to or more than 10% in a rolling direction and equal to or more than 5% in
a sheet width direction. Although a detailed mechanism is unclear, if the solute N
in steel is equal to or more than 0.006%, there is a possibility in that it acts on
the density and the movement of dislocations generated by rolling, thereby preventing
forming cells. The lower limit of the optimal reduction rate is 6%. In rolling at
less than this lower limit of the optimal reduction rate, a stable property of rolling
is lost while the total stretchability increases, thereby making it impossible to
secure steel sheet flatness required for coating and continuous manufacture of can
covers. On the other hand, if the reduction rate exceeds 15%, anisotropy of stretchability
of the steel sheet increases to turn the dislocations into cells, thereby making the
stretchability in the sheet width direction less than 5%. Accordingly, the upper limit
of the reduction rate has to be 15%. The steel sheet subjected to the above-mentioned
processes is taken as a final product. Sheet thickness of the final product is not
particularly limited. However, since the stretchability is in proportion to the sheet
thickness, the upper limit of the sheet thickness is preferably 0.20 mm in consideration
of the costs of a can body after manufacture of a can. If the sheet thickness is less
than 0.14 mm, the workability and the strength of a can cover are likely to be insufficient.
Accordingly, the practical lower limit of the sheet thickness is preferably 0.14 mm.
A surface treatment for the steel sheet is not particularly limited as long as it
can be applied to a steel sheet for typical cans. That is, a surface treatment may
be carried out for the steel sheet using a tin plating, a chromium plating, a nickel
plating, combinations thereof, or the like. In addition, the present invention is
also applicable to a precoating steel sheet manufactured by attaching a coat or an
organic resin film to any of the aforementioned plated steel sheet.
[Examples]
[0035] Hereinafter, examples of the present invention will be described in comparison to
comparative examples. Table 1 shows components, properties, and rivet workability
of steel sheets, and Table 2 shows manufacture conditions, properties, and rivet workability
of steel sheets. The manufacturing conditions for the steel materials shown in Table
1 are as follows; heating temperature of a steel work piece: 1211°C to 1248°C, finishing
temperature of hot rolling: 851°C to 896°C, winding temperature: 546°C to 599°C, cold
rolling rate: 88.2% to 92.6%, continuous annealing temperature: 642°C to 686°C, tempering
rolling rate: 6% to 15%, and product sheet thickness: 0.160 mm to 0.200 mm. The steel
materials shown in Table 2 are manufactured using the same steel work pieces as Example
2 shown in Table 1. An Ar3 transformation point of Example 2 is obtained by putting
steel components; C: 0.041 mass%, Mn: 0.28 mass%, P: 0.012 mass% and Al: 0.059 mass%,
into an equation: Ar3=850-660C-120Mn+1770P+400Al. The obtained Ar3 transformation
point of the Example 2 is 834°C. Comparative Examples 23 to 28 are SR (Single Reduce)
materials, other comparative examples and examples are DR steel sheets having product
sheet thickness of 0.168 mm to 0.200 mm. Surfaces of these steel sheets are subjected
to an electrolytic chromium process or a Sn plating process and then a chemical treatment.
Subsequently, outer and inner surfaces are in turn coated (at dry film thickness of
10 µm) and then baked (at 190°C for 10 minutes).
[0036] In addition, for the rivet workability, a full-open EOE having φ301 (a can having
an inner diameter of 74.1 mm) is prepared through two-processes of rivet forming.
Cracks in the rivet forming process are evaluated by naked eyes and a rivet diameter
in a caulking process is measured. Results of general evaluation for the rivet workability
are listed in Tables 1 and 2. FIG. 4 is a graph showing the relationship between the
solute N and the Lankford value.
[0037] It was confirmed that the examples satisfying the conditions of the present invention
have good rivet workability and exert the effects of the present invention. In addition,
as shown in FIG. 4, when the solute N included in the steel sheet is equal to or more
than 0.006%, it strongly acts on an aggregate, thereby making the average Lankford
value of the steel sheet equal to or less than 1.0. The average Lankford value further
decreases in combination with a high DR rolling rate.
[0038]
Table 1
| |
Chemical components (mass%), Solute N (ppm) |
Property after aging |
Product Sheet thickness (mm) |
Rivet workability |
DR rate (%) |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
Product Solute N |
Stretchability in rolling direction (%) |
Stretchability in sheet width direction (%) |
Average r value |
HR30T |
Rivet forming process |
Rivet caulking process |
General evaluation |
| Example 1 |
0.022 |
0.007 |
0.07 |
0.005 |
0.009 |
0.027 |
0.0082 |
66 |
16 |
14 |
0.866 |
68 |
0.168 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 2 |
0.041 |
0.019 |
0.28 |
0.012 |
0.013 |
0.059 |
0.0110 |
67 |
13 |
7 |
0.915 |
69 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 3 |
0.059 |
0.024 |
0.54 |
0.020 |
0.019 |
0.099 |
0.0143 |
68 |
15 |
7 |
0.89 |
72 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 4 |
0.046 |
0.027 |
0.25 |
0.020 |
0.006 |
0.038 |
0.0086 |
67 |
16 |
8 |
0.87 |
73 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 5 |
0.038 |
0.006 |
0.05 |
0.014 |
0.007 |
0.044 |
0.0113 |
82 |
16 |
10 |
0.96 |
68 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
6 |
| Example 6 |
0.038 |
0.008 |
0.52 |
0.017 |
0.015 |
0.046 |
0.0111 |
88 |
17 |
8 |
0.94 |
67 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
6 |
| Example 7 |
0.045 |
0.005 |
0.25 |
0.024 |
0.006 |
0.040 |
0.0120 |
84 |
17 |
8 |
0.86 |
69 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 8 |
0.037 |
0.007 |
0.22 |
0.016 |
0.024 |
0.046 |
0.0108 |
79 |
12 |
8 |
0.81 |
70 |
0.160 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 9 |
0.043 |
0.007 |
0.31 |
0.013 |
0.014 |
0.024 |
0.0088 |
67 |
12 |
8 |
0.927 |
70 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
6 |
| Example 10 |
0.041 |
0.008 |
0.28 |
0.012 |
0.003 |
0.095 |
0.0102 |
77 |
16 |
13 |
0.965 |
68 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
6 |
| Example 11 |
0.044 |
0.008 |
0.31 |
0.013 |
0.015 |
0.026 |
0.0083 |
64 |
14 |
10 |
0.883 |
70 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
10 |
| Example 12 |
0.049 |
0.010 |
0.24 |
0.013 |
0.012 |
0.050 |
0.0147 |
92 |
12 |
5 |
0.75 |
70 |
0.190 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
15 |
| Example 13 |
0.041 |
0.009 |
0.28 |
0.012 |
0.003 |
0.059 |
0.0102 |
64 |
12 |
5 |
0.958 |
70 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
15 |
| Example 14 |
0.044 |
0.008 |
0.31 |
0.013 |
0.015 |
0.024 |
0.0080 |
69 |
11 |
6 |
0.885 |
71 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
15 |
| Example 15 |
0.043 |
0.008 |
0.51 |
0.013 |
0.014 |
0.026 |
0.0087 |
65 |
13 |
5 |
0.925 |
71 |
0.183 |
NO crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
15 |
| Example 16 |
0.040 |
0.007 |
0.21 |
0.011 |
0.003 |
0.047 |
0.0087 |
72 |
17 |
9 |
0.987 |
68 |
0.168 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
6 |
| Comparative Example 1 |
0.019 |
0.006 |
0.22 |
0.016 |
0.007 |
0.043 |
0.0054 |
11 |
11 |
3 |
1.05 |
72 |
0.200 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 2 |
0.066 |
0.008 |
0.22 |
0.012 |
0.009 |
0.049 |
0.0091 |
78 |
13 |
2 |
0.894 |
71 |
0.168 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
10 |
| Comparative Example 3 |
0.038 |
0.038 |
0.22 |
0.016 |
0.015 |
0.045 |
0.0149 |
87 |
16 |
4 |
0.90 |
68 |
0.168 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
6 |
| Comparative Example 4 |
0.037 |
0.007 |
0.21 |
0.012 |
0.009 |
0.047 |
0.0097 |
76 |
14 |
4 |
0.894 |
70 |
0.168 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
10 |
| Comparative Example 5 |
0.003 |
0.001 |
0.56 |
0.012 |
0.005 |
0.056 |
0.0022 |
1 |
5 |
2 |
1.25 |
72 |
0.183 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 6 |
0.045 |
0.011 |
0.23 |
0.025 |
0.013 |
0.053 |
0.0109 |
59 |
1 |
3 |
0.67 |
74 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 7 |
0.045 |
0.012 |
0.23 |
0.014 |
0.025 |
0.054 |
0.0114 |
50 |
1 |
1 |
0.70 |
73 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 8 |
0.041 |
0.006 |
0.24 |
0.011 |
0.005 |
0.013 |
0.0019 |
8 |
14 |
4 |
0.99 |
69 |
0.168 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
10 |
| Comparative Example 9 |
0.042 |
0.005 |
0.22 |
0.015 |
0.007 |
0.141 |
0.0059 |
13 |
20 |
12 |
1.01 |
69 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Rivet diameter small |
Bad |
6 |
| Comparative Example 10 |
0.044 |
0.006 |
0.22 |
0.015 |
0.007 |
0.042 |
0.0058 |
13 |
18 |
9 |
1.09 |
69 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Rivet diameter small |
Bad |
6 |
| Comparative Example 11 |
0.046 |
0.011 |
0.23 |
0.014 |
0.014 |
0.053 |
0.0156 |
63 |
1 |
1 |
0.69 |
74 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| 1 Comparative Example 12 |
0.046 |
0.011 |
0.23 |
0.014 |
0.013 |
0.053 |
0.0118 |
53 |
1 |
1 |
1.01 |
72 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| comparative Example 13 |
0.044 |
0.006 |
0.22 |
0.016 |
0.007 |
0.043 |
0.0059 |
10 |
8 |
5 |
1.10 |
72 |
0.200 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
10 |
| Comparative Example 14 |
0.018 |
0.004 |
0.23 |
0.012 |
0.006 |
0.036 |
0.0019 |
5 |
12 |
4 |
0.99 |
69 |
0.183 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 15 |
0.004 |
0.001 |
0.54 |
0.013 |
0.006 |
0.062 |
0.0018 |
1 |
5 |
1 |
1.36 |
70 |
0.168 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
15 |
| Comparative Example 16 |
0.034 |
0.014 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.048 |
0.0062 |
40 |
29 |
20 |
0.88 |
62 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Comparative Example 17 |
0.034 |
0.014 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.048 |
0.0062 |
35 |
27 |
22 |
0.86 |
62 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Comparative Example 18 |
0.034 |
0.014 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.048 |
0.0062 |
37 |
25 |
16 |
0.87 |
63 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Comparative Example 19 |
0.032 |
0.013 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.047 |
0.0061 |
39 |
26 |
17 |
0.80 |
65 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Comparative Example 20 |
0.032 |
0.013 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.047 |
0.0061 |
34 |
26 |
25 |
0.82 |
64 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Comparative Example 21 |
0.032 |
0.013 |
0.27 |
0.015 |
0.014 |
0.047 |
0.0061 |
33 |
25 |
11 |
0.86 |
64 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
1 |
| Note: Underlined ones indicate departing from the scope of the present invention. |
[0039]
Table 2
| |
Hot rolling |
Cold rolling |
Continuous annealing |
DR rolling |
Product Sheet thickness (mm) |
Rivet workability |
Remarks |
| Heating temperature (°C) |
Finishing temperature (°C) |
Winding temperature (°C) |
Rolling rate (%) |
Annealing temperature (°C) |
Tempering rolling rate (%) |
Rivet forming process |
Rivet caulking process |
General evaluation |
| Example 17 |
1201 |
872 |
559 |
91.9 |
628 |
10 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 18 |
1239 |
853 |
559 |
91.9 |
628 |
10 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 19 |
1247 |
862 |
597 |
88.2 |
645 |
15 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 20 |
1247 |
875 |
568 |
81.9 |
647 |
15 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 21 |
1237 |
881 |
576 |
92.2 |
719 |
10 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 22 |
1237 |
890 |
564 |
91.9 |
678 |
6 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Example 23 |
1237 |
878 |
589 |
91.9 |
674 |
15 |
0.183 |
No crack |
Good caulking |
Good |
|
| Comparative Example 16 |
1137 |
887 |
558 |
93.3 |
651 |
13 |
0.200 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 17 |
1238 |
833 |
600 |
88.2 |
650 |
15 |
0.200 |
Crack in second process |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 18 |
1238 |
888 |
766 |
88.2 |
649 |
8 |
0.200 |
No crack |
Rivet diameter small |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 19 |
1237 |
924 |
580 |
78.6 |
677 |
15 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 20 |
1265 |
922 |
598 |
91.3 |
754 |
15 |
0.183 |
No crank |
Rivet diameter small |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 21 |
1238 |
866 |
598 |
88.2 |
646 |
5 |
0.200 |
No crack |
diameter small |
Bad |
Bad shape |
| Comparative Example 22 |
1237 |
912 |
505 |
88.2 |
667 |
20 |
0.200 |
Crack in first process |
Bad |
|
| Comparative Example 23 |
1137 |
887 |
558 |
93.3 |
651 |
1.3 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
| Comparative Example 24 |
1137 |
886 |
562 |
|
658 |
1.4 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
| Comparative Example 25 |
1137 |
899 |
567 |
|
614 |
1.2 |
0.200 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
| Comparative Example 26 |
1137 |
912 |
541 |
93.3 |
648 |
1.1 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
| Comparative Example 27 |
1137 |
909 |
566 |
|
650 |
0.9 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
| Comparative Example 28 |
1137 |
899 |
567 |
|
653 |
1.3 |
0.204 |
|
|
Bad |
SR material |
Note: Underlined ones indicate departing from the scope of the present invention.
Note: Steel work piece of Example 2 is used. |
[Industrial Applicability]
[0040] While the conventional continuous annealed DR steel sheets require a rivet forming
process in three steps or more, the DR steel sheet of the present invention enables
a rivet forming process in two steps by improving the component composition and the
manufacturing method, that ism by specifying the stretching in rolling direction and
in the width direction after aging, and the Lankford value after aging.
While preferred embodiments of the invention have been described and illustrated above,
it should be understood that these are exemplary of the invention and are not to be
considered as limiting. Additions, omissions, substitutions, and other modifications
can be made without departing from the spirit or scope of the present invention. Accordingly,
the invention is not to be considered as being limited by the foregoing description,
and is only limited by the scope of the appended claims.