TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The invention concerns atomised iron based powders having good high temperature oxidation
resistance, more particular powders which are pre-alloyed with chromium and aluminium.
BACKGROUND
[0002] Conventional iron based alloys containing typically Fe and 10-30% Cr and 1-10% A1,
so-called FeCrAl-alloys, have been found highly useful in various high temperature
applications, due to their good oxidation resistance and can be used at temperatures
as high as 1200-1400 DEG C. Thus, such materials have been used in the production
of electrical resistance elements and as carrier materials in motor vehicle catalysts.
As a result of its aluminium content, the alloy is able to form at high temperatures
and in the majority of atmospheres an impervious and adhesive surface oxide consisting
substantially of A1203. This oxide protects the metal against further oxidation and
also against many other forms of corrosion, such as carburization, sulphuration etc.
[0003] A problem in powder metallurgy however is that that FeCrAl-powders are difficult
to sinter, due to the fact that the aluminium oxide is harder to reduce than the chromium
oxide. The formation of sintering necks through diffusion is impaired by the aluminium
oxide layer and it would be advantageous if this problem could be overcome.
[0004] US5970306 describes a method for manufacturing high temperature resistant shaped parts from
a FeCrAl-powder by hot isostatically pressing (HIP).
[0005] DE4235141 descibes a method of producing a part made from hot pressed powder based on a FeCrAl-alloy
in which the powder is initially exposed to an oxygen-contg. atmos. to produce an
chromium oxide protective layer around the particles.
[0006] US6761751 describes a method of producing an FeCrAl material by gas atomization, wherein in
addition to containing iron (Fe), chromium (Cr) and aluminium (Al) the material also
contains minor fractions of one or more of the materials molybdenum (Mo), hafnium
(Hf), zirconium (Zr), yttrium (Y), nitrogen (N), carbon (C) and oxygen (O).
[0007] US6569221 describes a powder metallurgical FeCrAl alloy comprising, in weight %, less than
0.02% carbon; greater than 0.0 and <=0.5% silicon; greater than 0.0 and <=0.2% manganese;
10.0-40.0% chromium; <=0.6% nickel; <=0.01% copper; 2.0-10.0% aluminum; one or more
of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Ti, Zr, Hf, V, Nb and Ta in an amount of 0.1-1.0; remainder iron
and unavoidable impurities.
[0008] JP8120435 relates to a thermal spray material/powder comprising by weight 1 -15% of Cu, 4-10
% Al, 7-20 % of Cr and 0.02-2 % of at least one rare earth element and the balance
Fe with inevitable impurities, for spraying the inner face of glass moulds for providing
heat resistance.
OBJECTS OF THE INVENTION
[0011] It is an object of the invention to provide a method for producing a sintered compound
having a good sintered structure when sintered in conventional sintering processes,
e.g. loose sintering, cold compaction or warm compaction, and which sintered components
have good high temperature oxidation properties. More specific it is an object of
the invention to provide a stainless iron powder comprising more than 10,5 wt% chromium
and 3-15 wt% aluminium, but which powder is easier to sinter than what is known in
the prior art.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0012] This object is to provide a method of producing a sintered component comprising providing
an atomised iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt% Cr, 3-15 wt% Al and 5-20
wt% Cu. By pre-alloying the powder with Cu it is possible to sinter a component in
conventional sintering processes and maintaining satisfactory material properties
of the sintered component which component also have excellent high temperature oxidation
resistance.
[0013] Further in a second embodiment an iron based powder pre-alloyed with 10,5-30 wt%
Cr, 3-15 wt% All, 5-20 wt% Cu and 8-20 wt% Ni is proposed.
[0014] The powders of the invention are preferably produced by providing a melt of iron
and the alloying elements, water atomizing the melt whereby the powder forms from
atomized droplets upon solidification.
[0015] A sintered component can be produced from the powders of the invention by a) providing
a sintering material comprising the powder of the invention; b) forming a green body
from the sintering material; and c) sintering the green body in a reducing or neutral
atmosphere, at an atmospheric pressure or below, and at a temperature above 1100°C.
[0016] The sintering material could e.g. be loose sintered, cold compacted or warm compacted.
[0017] Concerning cold compaction or warm compaction the sintering material is a mixture
between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of the invention.
[0018] Cold compaction is performed at temperatures below 100°C, preferably at a compaction
pressure within the range of 100 -1000 MPa.
[0019] Warm compaction is performed at temperatures within the range of 100-200 °C, preferably
at a compaction pressure within the range of 300 -1000 MPa.
[0020] Loose sintering is performed without compacting the green body. Here the sintering
material could be a mixture between a binder and/or a lubricant with the powder of
the invention, but also the powder it self i.e. without mixing the powder with a binder
and/or a lubricant. E.g. when not using a binder the sintering material could be poured
into a form where after the form containing the sintering material is inserted into
the sintering furnace. For instance filters having excellent high temperature oxidation
resistance can be produced by loose sintering the powder of the invention.
[0021] Further, it has been shown that a sintered component which exhibits excellent high
temperature oxidation resistance may be produced from the powder of the invention
which sintered component has a sintered density above 6,5 g/cm
3, a tensile strength above 500 MPa and a yield strength above 400 MPa.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0022]
FIG.1 shows a Fe-Cu phase diagram, and
FIG 2A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Cu and Fe, and
FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al and Fe, and
FIG 3A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Cu, Ni and Fe,
and
FIG 3B shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising Cr, Al, Ni and Fe.
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0023] The invention concerns pre-alloyed iron based powders comprising more than 10,5 wt%
chromium, as well as certain amounts of aluminium and copper. As described above FeCrAl-alloys
have been shown to exhibit excellent oxidation resistance at high temperatures, but
are unfortunately difficult to sinter under atmospheric pressure or below (vacuum).
That is the reason why compounds based on FeCrAl powders are produced by the HIP-
process (as described in e.g.
US5970306). By also pre-alloying with copper the problems with the sintering was reduced with
an improved sintered structure as the outcome - compared to a reference material without
copper. The copper content is shown to facilitate the formation of sintering necks
as can be seen from the accompanying metallographic pictures. We believe that this
effect occurs due to a break-up of the aluminium oxide layer by iiquidised copper.
Admixing copper and a FeCrAl-powder were also tested but sintering did not significantly
improve in that case.
[0024] The powders of the invention are made by making a melt of iron and the desired alloying
elements. The melt is thereafter atomised whereby the powder is formed from the atomized
droplets upon solidification. The atomization is performed according to conventional
technology, e.g. gas or water atomization. In fact it is highly preferred that the
melt blend is water atomized, since a water atomised powder is easier to compact than
a gas atomized powder. When the powder forms due to the water atomization the powder
is oxidized and thin chromium and aluminium oxide layers forms on the surface of the
powder particles.
[0025] The effective range of the aluminium content was tested, as described below, an it
was concluded that the aluminium content should be above 3%, preferably the aluminium
content should be above 5%, in order to obtain the desired oxidation resistance. However,
if the aluminium content becomes too high the melting point is depressed and the material
looses strength at elevated temperatures. Further it can be assumed that above a certain
amount of aluminium the oxidation resistance is not drastically increased and further
increase of the aluminium content would only slightly improve the oxidation resistance.
Therefore according to the invention the upper limit for the aluminium content is
set to 15 wt%, and in fact it is preferred to have the aluminium content below 12
wt%.
[0026] The boundaries for the copper content were derived from the tests described below.
Accordingly it the copper content should be above 5 wt% to facilitate the formation
of sintering necks and providing a sintered component having good high temperature
oxidation resistance. Further the Cu-content should be below 20 wt%, powders having
higher Cu-content may very well be useful for certain applications, but they are not
within the scope of the present invention.
[0027] Figure 1 shows the Fe-Cu phase diagram, but it is believed that that Cu will influence
a system in a similar way. To reduce/break-up the aluminium oxide layer it is believed
that a certain amount of liquid phase must be formed, i.e. the area of (γFe +L) is
of interest. Since the diagram is for the pure Fe-Cu system the information retrieved
from it can only be used as a guideline. Of particular interest is the amount of liquid
phase formed during the sintering. Formation of liquid phase is required to break
up the aluminium oxides but excess amounts of liquid phase collapses the structure
during sintering. The amount of liquid phase formed is related to the chemical composition
and the sintering temperature. The element having the strongest influence of the formation
of liquid is copper. That is why different sintering temperatures depending of copper
content of the samples were applied before the oxidation test.
[0028] Of course other alloying elements could also be of interest. In particular if an
austenitic structure is desired the powder can also be pre-alloyed with austenite-foming
elements in particular nickel, but also the nickel equivalent manganese. Besides being
an austenite forming element nickel is also known to have a beneficial effect on the
oxidation resistance which of course is desirable in the applications intended for
the powders of the invention. If nickel is to be included in the powder it is preferred
that the nickel content is in the interval of 8-20 wt%. Manganese can also be an additional
austenite forming alloying element, preferably the manganese content is below 3 wt%.
[0029] Cobalt is normally not used since it is comparably expensive.
[0030] It is further preferred to keep the carbon content low, since carbon has a tendency
to cause intergranular corrosion why preferably the carbon content should be less
than 0,1 wt% carbon. In the tested specimens the carbon content was about 0,02 wt%
or lower. It is also preferred to keep the nitrogen content as low as possible, preferably
the nitrogen content is below 0,2 wt%.
EXAMPLE 1
[0031] Seven different water atomised powders having the compositions of Table 1 were made
by making a melt of iron and the desired alloying elements. The melt was thereafter
water atomised whereby the powder formed from the atomized droplets upon solidification.
The atomization was performed according to conventional water atomization technology.
The resulting powders were extracted through a grid providing a maximum diameter of
75 µm.
[0032] For each powder sintered test samples were prepared. The sintered test samples and
a reference sample having a 310B composition (25 wt% Cr + 20 wt% Ni + 2,5 wt% Si +
bal. Fe) were subjected to a high temperature oxidation test described below. The
material 310B was chosen as reference since it is known to possess good high temperature
oxidation resistance.
[0033] The test samples and the reference sample were produced by filling a form (10mm diameter
and 2mm thickness) with the powder of interest, followed by smoothing out the surface
without compacting the powder. This procedure provides samples with high specific
area (ca 45% porosity).
[0034] The test samples were sintered in a 100 % hydrogene atmosphere for 30 minutes at
a temperature depending of the Cu content according to the following table:
| 5 % Cu |
1150 °C |
| 10 % Cu |
1320 °C |
| 15%Cu |
1350 °C |
| 20 % Cu |
1320 °C |
[0035] The reference sample was sintered in a 100% hydrogen atmosphere for 30 minutes at
1320 °C.
[0036] The prepared test and reference samples where thereafter ready for the high temperature
oxidation test.
[0037] The oxidation tests were carried out in a laboratory furnace, a Lenton 12/50/300,
at a temperature of 800 °C in air. A scale, Mettler Toledo AE260, was linked to a
computer in order to save the data automatically. Six samples could be tested at the
same time by placing them on a sample holder and at each test run two of the samples
were reference samples.
[0038] The samples were weighted before they were introduced in the furnace. Short term
cycles were performed, each cycle consisting of 2 min heating and 30 sec cooling,
which is sufficient for the samples to cool down below 150 °C. This cycle was repeated
15 times, resulting in 30 minutes in the furnace. After every 30 minutes in the heating
zone, the samples were weighted and the gain-in-weight for each of them was saved.
The tests were stopped after 20 hours in the heating zone.
TABLE 1
| Powder |
chemical comp. [wt%], bal. Fe |
Weight gain [g] |
Weight gain ref. [g] |
Increase in weight relative to reference [%] |
| No |
Al |
Cu |
Cr |
|
|
|
| 1 |
10 |
15 |
22 |
0,3 |
1,25 |
24 |
| 2 |
5,5 |
15 |
22 |
0,3 |
1,15 |
26 |
| 3 |
10 |
10 |
22 |
0,6 |
1,75 |
34 |
| 4 |
5,5 |
10 |
22 |
0,7 |
1,75 |
40 |
| 5 |
5,5 |
20 |
22 |
0,5 |
1,25 |
40 |
| 6 |
5,5 |
5 |
22 |
1,3 |
1,15 |
113 |
| 7 |
1 |
10 |
22 |
1,9 |
1,3 |
146 |
[0039] The results show that the oxidation resistance of powder 6 and 7 were worse than
the reference powder 8. Looking at the samples having an Al content of 5,5 wt%, i.e.
powder 2, 4, 5 and 6, it can be see that increasing the Cu content from 5 wt% (sample
6) to 10wt%, (powder 4) drastically improved the oxidation resistance and at a Cu
content of 15wt%, (powder 2) the highest oxidation resistance was achieved. Increasing
the Cu content further to 20wt% (powder 5); the oxidation resistance results was as
of the powder having 10wt% Cu (powder 4).
[0040] As can be seen a Cu-content of 15% provided the best results with regards to high
temperature oxidation resistance.
[0041] However, during sintering the powder 5 shrank considerably indicating that at Cu-content
above around 20 wt% too much liquid phase was formed.
[0042] Comparing powder 4 to powder 3 and powder 2 to powder 1 it can be seen that increasing
the Al content from 5, 5 wt% increases the oxidation resistance slightly.
EXAMPLE 2
[0043] Powder 2 and 3 were further tested at different oxidation temperatures. The following
table shows the increase in weight relative to the reference 310B.
TABLE 2
| |
Powder 3 |
Powder 2 |
|
| Test temperature |
Increase in weight relative reference |
Increase in weight relative reference |
REMARKS |
| [°C] |
(%) |
(%) |
|
| 800 |
46 |
24 |
|
| 850 |
43 |
22 |
|
| 900 |
21 |
21 |
|
| 950 |
14 |
14 |
|
| 1000 |
20 |
13 |
Terminated after 16 hours |
[0044] Table 2 shows that difference in oxidation resistance between samples containing
Cu and Al and reference samples is further pronounced at temperatures above 800 degree
Celcius. Furthermore, the composition having a Al content of 5,5 % and a Cu content
of 15 % seems to have better oxidation resistance compared to the composition having
10 Al and 10 % Cu.
EXAMPLE 3
[0045] In order to evaluate the effect of added Cu-content with regard to sintered density,
tensile strength and yield strength, four different powders having were compared.
The powders were as in example 1 and 2 water atomized powders. The powders were mixed
with 1% of Acrawax®. The mixes were compacted at a compacting pressure of 600 MPa
into tensile test bars. The test bars were sintered for 30 minutes at 1320 degrees
Celsius in an atmosphere of 100 % hydrogen. Sintered density, tensile strength and
yield strength were measured. The results are shown in table 3.
TABLE 3
| Chemical composition wt%, balance Fe |
Sintered density |
Tensile Strength |
Yield strength |
| [g/cm3] |
[MPa] |
[MPa] |
| 22Cr + 5,5Al + 10Cu |
6,87 |
582 |
522 |
| 22Cr + 5,5Al (ref.) |
5,74 |
295 |
259 |
| 22Cr + 18Ni + 5,5Al + 8Cu |
6,70 |
507 |
412 |
| 22Cr + 18Ni + 5,5Al (ref.) |
4,96 |
87 |
69 |
[0046] The table 3 shows that the density and the mechanical properties of Al- containing
Cr or Cr-Ni stainless steel powders increases considerably if the powder are pre-alloyed
with Cu. This indicates much improved sintering activity.
[0047] Metallic examination was further performed on the tensile test bars. The metallographic
pictures, see FIG. 2A, 2B and FIG 3A, 3B, clearly show that incorporation of Cu to
Al- containing Cr- or Cr- Ni based stainless steel powders considerably enhance the
sintering of the material. FIG 2A shows metallographic picture of a test bar comprising
22Cr + 5,5Al +10Cu+ bal. Fe and FIG 2B shows metallographic picture of a corresponding
reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ bal. Fe. FIG 3A shows metallographic picture
of a test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al + 18Ni + 8Cu+ bal. Fe and FIG 2B shows metallographic
picture of a corresponding reference test bar comprising 22Cr + 5,5Al+ 18Ni + bal.
Fe.
1. Verfahren zur Herstellung eines gesinterten Bauteils, bei dem man:
a) ein Sintermaterial, umfassend ein wasserzerstäubtes vorlegiertes Pulver auf Eisenbasis,
umfassend in Gew.-%:
10,5-30 Cr
3-15 Al
5-20 Cu
max. 0,1 C
max. 0,2 N
max. 3,0 Mn
max. 2,5 Si
max. 3,0 Mo
gegebenenfalls 8-20 Ni
Rest im wesentlichen nur Eisen und unvermeidliche Verunreinigungen,
bereitstellt und
b) aus dem Sintermaterial einen Grünkörper formt und
c) den Grünkörper in einer reduzierenden oder neutralen Atmosphäre bei Normaldruck
oder darunter und bei einer Temperatur von mehr als 1100°C sintert.
2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem in a) das bereitgestellte Sintermaterial eine Mischung
zwischen einem Gleitmittel und/oder einem Bindemittel mit dem wasserzerstäubten vorlegierten
Pulver auf Eisenbasis ist.
3. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, bei dem man in b) den Grünkörper durch Kaltkompaktieren
der Mischung formt, wobei der Kompaktierungsdruck vorzugsweise im Bereich von 100-1000
MPa liegt und die Temperatur vorzugsweise unter 100°C liegt.
4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2, bei dem man in b) den Grünkörper durch Warmkompaktieren
der Mischung formt, wobei der Kompaktierungsdruck vorzugsweise im Bereich von 300-1000
MPa liegt und die Temperatur vorzugsweise im Bereich von 100-200°C liegt.
5. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, bei dem in a) das bereitgestellte Sintermaterial nur das
wasserzerstäubte vorlegierte Pulver auf Eisenbasis ist.
6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2 oder Anspruch 5, bei dem man den Grünkörper formt, ohne
den Grünkörper zu kompaktieren.
1. Procédé de production d'un composant fritté, comprenant les étapes suivantes:
a) prévoir une matière de frittage contenant une poudre à base de fer pré-alliée atomisée
à l'eau, contenant en % en poids:
10,5 à 30 de Cr,
3 à 15 d'Al,
5 à 20 de Cu,
au maximum 0,1 de C,
au maximum 0,2 de N,
au maximum 3,0 de Mn,
au maximum 2,5 de Si,
au maximum 3,0 de Mo,
optionnellement 8 à 20 de Ni,
le reste étant essentiellement constitué de fer et d'impuretés inévitables; et
b) former un corps vert à partir de la matière de frittage; et
c) fritter le corps vert dans une atmosphère réductrice ou neutre, à une pression
égale à la pression atmosphérique ou inférieure à celle-ci, et à une température supérieure
à 1100°C.
2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel à l'étape a), la matière de frittage
fournie est un mélange entre un lubrifiant et/ou un liant avec la poudre à base de
fer pré-alliée atomisée à l'eau.
3. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel à l'étape b), le corps vert est formé
par un compactage à froid du mélange, dans lequel la pression de compactage est de
préférence comprise à l'intérieur de la gamme de 100 MPa à 1000 MPa, et la température
est de préférence inférieure à 100°C.
4. Procédé selon la revendication 2, dans lequel à l'étape b), le corps vert est formé
par un compactage à chaud du mélange, dans lequel la pression de compactage est de
préférence comprise à l'intérieur de la gamme de 300 MPa à 1000 MPa, et la température
est de préférence comprise dans la gamme de 100°C à 200°C.
5. Procédé selon la revendication 1, dans lequel à l'étape a), la matière de frittage
fournie est uniquement la poudre à base de fer pré-alliée atomisée à l'eau.
6. Procédé selon la revendication 2 ou la revendication 5, dans lequel le corps vert
est profilé sans compacter le corps vert.