[0001] The present invention relates to a method for producing an aluminum strip (or hoop)
required to have good degree of flatness for use as lithographic plates.
[0002] Aluminum strips or aluminum alloy strips are usually transported and stored in the
form of coil or flat sheet if they are thin. (The term "aluminum strips" used in this
specification embraces aluminum alloy strips.) The aluminum strip in the form of coil
or sheet is required to be excellent in degree of flatness if it is to be used as
lithographic plates. Therefore, it usually undergoes stretch-leveling by a stretch-leveler
after rolling so that it is freed of surface irregularities due to uneven stress it
receives at the time of rolling.
[0003] The applications for aluminum strips requiring good degree of flatness include, for
example, the substrate for lithographic plates. The aluminum strip to be used as the
substrate for lithographic plates is usually one which is 0.1-0.5 mm in thickness
and 500-1600 mm in width and is made of so-called 1052 aluminum (which is aluminum
conforming to JIS A1050, A1100, A3003, or A1050, incorporated with Mg). Such an aluminum
strip is produced usually by the steps of preparing an ingot of the above-mentioned
alloy composition, subjecting the ingot to facing, homogenizing, hot rolling, cold
rolling, optional intermediate annealing, final cold rolling, and optional temper
annealing to attain a desired thickness, passing the rolled strip through a stretch-leveler
to attain desired degree of flatness, and then coiling the finished strip. The thus
produced aluminum strip in the form of coil or flat sheet is delivered to a factory
for surface treatment.
[0004] There has recently been a demand for making the coil of aluminum strip larger than
before. This demand has arisen to improve efficiency in production of lithographic
plates and the like by reducing time required to replace coils and carrying out surface
treatment under stable conditions. One way to meet these requirements is by enlarging
the size of the coil. Unfortunately, large coils pose another problem with degree
of flatness. That is, aluminum strips are often found to have deteriorated in degree
of flatness when unpacked and uncoiled in a lithographic plate manufacturer after
storage and transportation for a long period of time even though they were made flat
immediately after production by passage through a stretch-leveler.
[0005] A conceivable cause for deterioration in degree of flatness is discussed as follows.
As the coil becomes larger in diameter, the number of windings increases. An aluminum
strip wound many times forms a large number of layers, so that even a slight difference
in thickness (due to thicker center and edges than other portion) across the width
accumulates. Thus the presence of thicker portions in an aluminum strip results in
an uneven distribution of winding tension even though the aluminum strip is given
a uniform winding load when it is coiled originally. In other words, thicker portions
receive a large tension and hence undergo creep deformation with time after coiling.
When an aluminum strip with such defects is uncoiled at a user, those portions under
a large tension appear with center buckle and edge buckle due to their superfluous
length. The foregoing problem is more serious when the coil (wound on a core 20 inches
in inside diameter) is larger than 1200 mm, particularly larger than 1500 mm, in outside
diameter.
[0006] In order to tackle the foregoing problem, there have been proposed several methods
for improving degree of flatness by controlling the winding tension in the final winder
according to the crown height of the strip. See Japanese Patent Laid-open Nos.
Hei-10-71425,
2003-81504, and
2004-298947. Another method for improving degree of flatness includes rolling a strip twice as
wide as the intended product, dividing the strip into two halves, and adequately controlling
the crown ratio of each half. See Japanese Patent Laid-open No.
Hei-9-202063. The aluminum strip produced in this manner retains good degree of flatness when
it is unpacked at a user even after an extended period of storage.
[0007] However, another problem has recently arisen in users of aluminum strips. Such users
as lithographic plate manufacturers are running their production line faster than
before in order to improve productivity. The fast-running production line requires
high-temperature drying that follows surface treatment, and this in turn makes it
necessary to increase tension to ensure the smooth passage of aluminum strips. The
increased coil tension deteriorates degree of flatness after surface treatment in
the production of lithographic plates even though the aluminum strip has no sign of
deterioration in degree of flatness when it is uncoiled at the lithographic plate
manufacturer.
[0008] The present invention was completed in view of the foregoing. It is an object of
the present invention to provide a method for producing aluminum strips, which method
includes: rolling an aluminum strip at least twice as wide as the final product, dividing
the rolled strip into two halves, and winding up each of the divided strips into a
coil. The resulting aluminum strip excels in degree of flatness and hardly deteriorates
in degree of flatness even when the coil tension is increased for its efficient processing.
[0009] According to the present invention, the method for producing aluminum strips includes
the following steps.
A step of heat treatment to homogenize an ingot of aluminum or aluminum alloy.
A step of hot rolling to be performed on the heat-treated ingot in such a way that
the hot-rolled strip has a crown ratio no larger than 1.5% (as an absolute value)
in the widthwise direction.
A step of primary cold rolling to be performed on the hot-rolled strip in such a way
that the cold-rolled strip has at least twice the width of the final product.
A step of dividing the cold-rolled strip into two or more portions in the widthwise
direction.
A step of secondary cold rolling to be performed on the divided portions.
A final step of stretch-leveling, trimming, and winding to be performed on the divided
portions which have undergone secondary cold rolling.
[0010] The primary and secondary cold rolling may be accomplished in one pass or more than
one pass.
[0011] The final step may be performed in the order of stretch-leveling, trimming, and winding,
or trimming, stretch-leveling, and winding.
[0012] The present invention produces the effect of eliminating deterioration in degree
of flatness because the aluminum strip is divided into narrow strips after primary
cold rolling and the narrow strips undergo secondary cold rolling so that edge burrs
resulting from division disappear.
Fig. 1 is a sectional view in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip which
has just undergone primary cold rolling in the first embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is an ideal sectional view in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip
which has just been divided into two halves.
Fig. 3 is a sectional view in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip which
has just been divided into two halves in the first embodiment of the present invention.
Figs. 4A to 4C are sectional views in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip
which has just undergone secondary cold rolling and trimming in the first embodiment
of the present invention.
Figs. 5A and 5B are sectional views in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip
which has just undergone trimming and stretch-leveling in the second embodiment of
the present invention.
Fig. 6 is a schematic diagram showing the aluminum strip wound around a core.
Fig. 7 is a schematic diagram showing the edge waving.
Fig. 8 is a sectional view in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip having
burrs.
Fig. 9 is a diagram showing quarter buckles.
Fig. 10 is a diagram illustrating the definition of the crown ratio for the positive
crown.
Fig. 11 is a diagram illustrating the definition of the crown ratio for the negative
crown.
Figs. 12A to 12D are sectional views illustrating the definition of the crown ratio
for the one-side crown.
[0013] The embodiment of the present invention will be described in more detail with reference
to the accompanying drawings. Figs. 1, 3, and 4 are sectional views in the widthwise
direction showing the steps of producing the aluminum strip according to the first
embodiment of the present invention. These sectional views exaggerate the thickness
relative to the width in order to clearly show the difference in shape among products.
Fig. 1 shows an aluminum strip 1 (wide strip) with a positive crown at the center
in the widthwise direction. The aluminum strip 1 is obtained from an aluminum ingot
or aluminum alloy ingot by facing, hot rolling, optional intermediate annealing, and
primary cold rolling. It is at least twice as wide as the final product. In other
words, it is wide enough to be divided into two or more than two portions (in the
widthwise direction) after hot rolling. The one shown in Fig. 1 is to be divided into
two portions. For the sake of brevity, the following description is based on an assumption
that the aluminum strip 1 (which has undergone hot rolling) will be divided into two
portions.
[0014] Usually, there are the following additional steps between hot rolling and primary
cold rolling. In the case of a material, like H14 to H18, which undergoes intermediate
annealing, the ingot (continuously cast slab) is hot-rolled into a strip 3 mm in thickness,
followed by winding into a coil. The strip is uncoiled and cold-rolled for thickness
reduction to 1.7 mm, followed by winding into a coil. The strip is uncoiled and cold
rolled for thickness reduction to 1.1 mm, followed by winding into a coil. The strip
is uncoiled and subjected to intermediate annealing, followed by winding into a coil.
The strip is uncoiled and cold-rolled for thickness reduction to 0.6 mm. On the other
hand, in the case of a material, like H19, which does not undergo intermediate annealing,
the hot-rolled strip (3 mm thick) is cold-rolled for thickness reduction to 1.6 mm
and then, e.g., to 1.0 mm. The cold-rolled strip undergoes cold rolling again, without
intermediate annealing preceding it, for thickness reduction to 0.6 mm. That is, the
hot-rolled strip is made as thin as 0.6 mm by three passes of cold rolling. In this
case, therefore, the primary cold rolling is composed of three passes of cold rolling.
Also, a material, like H19, which does not undergo intermediate annealing, may undergo
the primary cold rolling by a tandem rolling mill. In this case the hot rolling is
carried out so that the thickness is reduced to 5 mm, followed by winding into a coil.
After uncoiling, the strip undergoes tandem cold rolling for thickness reduction to
0.33 mm. In this case, therefore, the primary cold rolling is accomplished by one
pass. Incidentally, the intermediate annealing mentioned above may be accomplished
batchwise or continuously in the usual way. According to the present invention, one
pass of cold rolling by the above-mentioned tandem rolling mill is defined as the
steps of uncoiling, cold rolling repeated twice, and coiling.
[0015] Then, the aluminum strip 1 which has undergone the primary cold rolling is uncoiled
and cut in its lengthwise direction into two halves by a slitter. This step yields
a pair of aluminum strips 3, each being as wide as the final product, as shown in
Fig. 3. Each of the halved strips is wound into a coil. Incidentally, according to
Japanese Patent Laid-open No.
Hei-9-202063, the halved strips should have a smooth cross section (free of burrs) as shown Fig.
2; in actual, however, they have burrs 4 at the cut edges as shown in Fig. 3, and
these burrs 4 result in an uneven thickness in the widthwise direction. The burrs
4 at the side edges of the aluminum strip 1, as shown in Fig. 3, are due to trimming
to cut off cracked edges resulting from rolling. In other words, slitting is accomplished
by using two slitting blades arranged 5-10 mm apart in the widthwise direction, so
that the central part (5-10 mm wide) is removed from the aluminum strip 1. At the
same time as slitting, the aluminum strip 1 undergoes edge trimming to remove its
edges (5-10 mm wide). The removal of the central part is not always necessary; slitting
may be accomplished by using a single blade instead of two.
[0016] The halved aluminum strip 3 having burrs 4 at the cut edge poses a problem when it
is coiled around a core 13 as shown in Fig. 6. The problem is that the thick parts
11 originating from the crown of the aluminum strip 1 (which has not yet been slit)
is tightly coiled and the thin parts 12 are loosely coiled. The present inventors'
investigation into the deterioration in degree of flatness that occurs in conventional
aluminum strips revealed that the thick parts 11 frequently cause edge waving 14 and
this edge waving 14 makes the aluminum strip poor in degree of flatness.
[0017] The thick parts 11 (shown in Fig. 6) have burrs 4 as shown in Fig. 3, and these burrs
4 accumulate as the aluminum strip 3 is coiled in many layers. Therefore, the thick
parts 11 (of half-crown with burrs) experience an uneven tension in proportion to
the number of coiled layers. The uneven tension causes creep deformation and edge
waving 14 with the lapse of time after winding. Even in the case where no creep deformation
is noticed after storage for 6 months, the uneven tension due to the thick parts 11
gives rise to a latent internal stress. The internal stress releases itself, thereby
causing the edge waving 14, when the aluminum strip is heated for drying (that follows
surface treatment), exposed to high temperatures for heat treatment, or subjected
to high tension for stable passage through the production line. The foregoing results
of investigation led the present inventors to a conclusion that deterioration in degree
of flatness, such as edge waving 14, that occurs in the aluminum strip results from
the burrs 4 that spring from the cut edges of the center (crown) of the aluminum strip
to increase the thickness further. The present invention is based on the investigation
mentioned above.
[0018] According to the present invention, the aluminum strip 3 which has burrs 4 as shown
in Figs. 3 and 4A undergoes cold rolling again as shown in Fig. 4B. This step is referred
to as the secondary cold rolling. In other words, the aluminum strip 3, which has
undergone the primary cold rolling, undergoes slitting for division into two halves
and the secondary cold rolling, so that the aluminum strip 5 as shown in Fig. 4B is
obtained. The aluminum strip 3 shown in Fig. 4A has the thickest part at the cut edge
from which the burr 4 has sprung. The cut edge is rolled first by the secondary cold
rolling, so that the aluminum strip 5 which has undergone the secondary cold rolling
slightly decreases in thickness at 6b which has been the cut edge, as shown in Fig.
4B. In other words, the aluminum strip 5 which has undergone the secondary cold rolling
becomes slightly thinner at 6b and thickest at 6a in the neighborhood of 6b.
[0019] The secondary cold rolling is accomplished as follows if the aluminum strip (as the
final product having a thickness of 0.30 mm) is to be produced by using a single rolling
mill for the primary cold rolling. The aluminum strip formed from an ingot undergoes
slitting and the resulting halved strip 3 (0.6 mm thick) is uncoiled and subjected
to cold rolling (down to 0.45 mm), followed by coiling. The aluminum strip is uncoiled
and then cold-rolled down to a thickness of the final product (or the aluminum strip
5). The cold-rolled strip is coiled.
[0020] On the other hand, the secondary cold rolling is accomplished as follows if the aluminum
strip (as the final product having a thickness of 0.30 mm) is to be produced by using
a tandem rolling mill for the primary cold rolling. The aluminum strip formed from
an ingot undergoes slitting and the resulting halved strip 3 (0.33 mm thick) is uncoiled
and subjected to cold rolling to give the strip 5 which has a thickness of the final
product. The thus obtained strip is wound up into a coil.
[0021] In other words, the secondary cold rolling includes one to three passes if the primary
cold rolling is accomplished by using a single rolling mill, and the second cold rolling
includes only one pass if the primary cold rolling is accomplished by using a tandem
rolling mill.
[0022] Incidentally, the secondary cold rolling should preferably be carried out in such
a way that the draft is less than 5%. The secondary cold rolling usually includes
four or less passes. The secondary cold rolling is carried out such that the finishing
thickness is 0.30 mm, for example. The nominal thickness of lithographic plates is
0.15 mm, 0.20 mm, 0.24 mm, 0.30 mm, 0.40 mm, and 0.50 mm. Of these thicknesses, 0.24
mm and 0.30 mm are most popular.
[0023] In the stretch-leveling step that follows the secondary cold rolling, the aluminum
strip 5 passes through a roller leveler with stretch for improvement in degree of
flatness. The leveled aluminum strip 7 undergoes trimming so that the width after
trimming equals that of the final product, as shown in Fig. 4C. This trimming step
causes burrs 8b to spring from both edges of the aluminum strip 7. It is to be noted
that the burrs 8b do not spring from the thickest part 8a of the aluminum strip 7.
[0024] Therefore, when the aluminum strip 7 is wound up into a coil, it is not the burrs
8b but the part 8a where its upper and lower layers come into contact with each other.
Thus the aluminum strip 7 is free of edge waving 14 when it is uncoiled after storage.
[0025] The aluminum strip in the form of coil is packed, stored, and finally shipped to
the customer (lithographic plate manufacturer), where it undergoes surface treatment.
[0026] The above-mentioned method for producing the aluminum strip includes the steps of
making an ingot into a strip by hot rolling, cold-rolling the hot-rolled strip (followed
by optional annealing), cold-rolling the cold-rolled strip again, cutting the cold-rolled
strip into two halves in the lengthwise direction, and cold-rolling each half of the
strip. The advantage of this method is that the cutting into two halves causes burrs
4 to spring at the cut edges but the secondary cold rolling that follows the cutting
makes the cut edge 6b (where burrs 4 spring) slightly thin and makes its neighboring
part 6a thickest. This means that the cut edge is not the thickest part and hence
it is not subject to creep deformation during storage in the coiled form. In addition,
the secondary cold rolling eliminates the adverse effect of burrs 4 and hence the
uncoiled aluminum strip is not subject to edge waving due to released internal stress
which would otherwise exist when the aluminum strip is heated at high temperatures
for drying that follows surface treatment and experiences high tension for stable
line passage in the lithographic plate manufacturing process.
[0027] Incidentally, the burrs that spring after cutting into two halves take on various
shapes as indicated by 4a, 4b, and 4c in Figs. 8A, 8B, and 8C, respectively, in addition
to the one shown in Fig. 3. The secondary cold rolling suppresses any burrs, thereby
preventing the aluminum strip from deteriorating in degree of flatness (due to edge
waving) in the lithographic plate manufacturing process.
[0028] The following section deals with the second embodiment of the present invention.
The method according to the second embodiment is composed of two stages. The first
stage is identical with the first embodiment, and the second stage is an addition
to the first embodiment. The first stage includes the steps of making an ingot of
aluminum or aluminum alloy into a strip by hot rolling, cold-rolling the hot-rolled
strip (followed by optional annealing), cold-rolling the cold-rolled strip again,
cutting the cold-rolled strip into two halves in the lengthwise direction, and cold-rolling
each half of the strip. The second stage includes the steps of trimming the aluminum
strip (obtained in the first stage), passing the trimmed strip through a leveler for
improvement in degree of flatness, and winding up the leveled strip into a coil.
[0029] That is, the first embodiment is
characterized in that the secondary cold rolling is followed by stretch-leveling, trimming, and coiling,
whereas the second embodiment is
characterized in that the secondary cold rolling is followed by trimming, stretch-leveling, and coiling.
[0030] The second embodiment offers the advantage of reducing burrs 6c, which spring in
the trimming step as shown in Fig. 5A, in the stretch-leveling step as shown in Fig.
5B. In other words, the thickness at the cut edge is slightly decreased and the thickest
part 6a is shifted inward from the cut edge as the result of the secondary cold rolling
as shown in Fig. 5B, and trimming to achieve the width of the final product causes
burrs 6c to spring from the trimmed edge. In the subsequent stretch-leveling step,
the trimmed aluminum strip is passed through a roller leveler. This stretch-leveling
imparts a tensile stress to the aluminum strip in contact with leveling rolls under
stretch. As the result, the aluminum strip 9 that has passed through the leveler has
very few burrs 6c as shown in Fig. 5B, and the cut edge 9b close to the thickest part
9a becomes almost free of burrs.
[0031] Thus, the second embodiment makes it possible to produce the aluminum strip 9 which
is free of burrs which spring at the time of trimming and which does not have the
cut edge as the thickest part 9a. The aluminum strip 9 produced in this manner does
not suffer edge waving but keeps good degree of flatness when it is delivered after
storage and uncoiled for lithographic plate manufacturing.
[0032] According to the present invention, the aluminum strip which has undergone hot rolling
should preferably have a crown ratio no larger than 1.5% (in terms of absolute value)
in the widthwise direction. The present inventors investigated how degree of flatness
is affected by the crown ratio in the widthwise direction of the aluminum strip which
has undergone hot rolling. The result of the investigation revealed that the aluminum
strip having a thickness of 0.14-0.5 mm and a width of 570-1050 mm exhibits good degree
of flatness if it has a crown ratio no larger than 1.5% (in terms of absolute value).
It also revealed that, with a crown ratio larger than 1.5%, the aluminum strip tends
to have large quarter buckles 15 as shown in Fig. 9. The quarter buckles are surface
irregularities exceeding 2.0 mm in height that appear at the thickest part in the
widthwise direction of the strip, and they aggravate the degree of flatness of the
strip. Therefore, it is desirable that the aluminum strip that has undergone hot rolling
should have a crown ratio no larger than 1.5% (in terms of absolute value) in its
widthwise direction.
[0033] The crown ratio in the widthwise direction of the hot-rolled strip can be controlled
by any known method. This object is achieved by, for example, adjusting the force
of work roll bending according to the difference between the set crown ratio and the
actual crown ratio.
[0034] Incidentally, the crown ratio in the present invention is defined as shown in Figs.
10 to 12. Fig. 10 is a diagram showing a positive crown which has the maximum thickness
at the center in the widthwise direction. The thickness at the thickest part is represented
by Tmax and the thicknesses at the edges are represented by T1 and T2, respectively.
Hmax is represented by:

[0035] If Tave represents the average value of the thickness in the widthwise direction,
the crown ratio of the positive crown is represented by:

[0036] After all, the crown ratio is represented by the following formula 1.

[0037] Incidentally, the average thickness Tave is measured in the following manner. First,
a sample is cut out of the long strip in the direction perpendicular to the direction
in which the strip is passed. (The sample is 35 mm wide and has a length equal to
the width of the finished aluminum strip.) This sample is examined for thickness continuously
by using an automatic thickness measuring apparatus of contact type. The average thickness
(Tave) is an average value of the continuously measured thicknesses. Incidentally,
the measurement is performed at intervals of 1 mm in the widthwise direction of the
strip (or in the lengthwise direction of the sample). However, no measurement is taken
in the regions within 5 mm from the edges (in the lengthwise direction of the sample)
so as to avoid the influence of burrs.
[0038] Likewise, the negative crown shown in Fig. 11 also has its crown ratio defined by
the formula 2 below.

where Tmax is the maximum thickness and Tmin is the minimum thickness. The crown ratio
in this case is a negative value. In the case of the so-called half-crown that appears
after cutting into two halves, as shown in Figs. 12A to 12D, Hmax is defined as Hmax
= (Tmax·Tmin)/2, where Tmax is the maximum thickness and Tmin is the minimum thickness.
Thus, the crown ratio (%), which is (Hmax/Tave) × 100, is represented by the following
formula 3.

[0039] Incidentally, the crowns shown in Figs. 12B and 12D are also called quarter crowns.
[0040] The method according to the present invention can be applied to not only the production
of aluminum strips for lithographic plates but also the production of any aluminum
strips that require good degree of flatness.
EXAMPLES
[0041] The following deals with Examples which are intended to prove the effect of the present
invention and Comparative Examples which are outside the scope of the present invention.
[0042] In each example, an aluminum ingot was prepared, which measures 600 mm thick, 2200
mm wide, and 5000 mm long, and has a composition (equivalent to JIS 1050) containing
0.06% Si, 0.33% Fe, 0.02% Cu, and 0.01% Ti, with the remainder being Al and inevitable
impurities. The ingot underwent facing, homogenizing, and hot rolling in the usual
way, so that the resulting hot-rolled strip has a thickness and crown ratio as shown
in Tables 1-1 to 1-5 for examples and comparative examples in the first embodiment
and Tables 2-1 to 2-5 for examples and comparative examples in the second embodiment.
The hot-rolled strip was coiled temporarily. Each hot-rolled strip underwent primary
cold rolling, width slitting, secondary cold rolling, and finish processing (which
includes stretch-leveling → trimming → coiling or trimming → stretch-leveling → coiling),
according to any one of the manufacturing patterns A to L shown in Tables 1 and 2.
Thus there was obtained a coiled aluminum strip having a thickness of 0.3 mm. Coiling
was carried out with a tension of 1.0 kg/mm
2. Width slitting was accomplished in such a way that the strip was divided into two
strips (1000 mm wide each) or three strips (680 mm wide each). Incidentally, the strips
in Comparative Example 1 and Examples 2, 10, and 17 have their central part (10 mm
wide) removed at the time of width slitting. The thus obtained strip was coiled around
a core (20 inches in inside diameter), so that the resulting coil had an outside diameter
of 1700 mm.
[0044] The coiled strip prepared as mentioned above was coiled again, and a sample (1.5
m long and as wide as the product) was cut out of the periphery of the coil. The sample
was examined for degree of flatness. In addition, each coil was allowed to stand at
room temperature (from 0°C to 40°C) for 6 months. Then, a sample (1.5 m long and as
wide as the product) was cut out of the periphery of the coil. The sample was examined
for degree of flatness again. The coiled aluminum strip was coated and heated for
drying in an oven at 130°C for 2 minutes. During heating, the strip was stretched
with a tension of 2.0 kg/mm
2. After drying, the coated aluminum strip was coiled, and a sample (1.5 m long and
as wide as the product) was cut out of the periphery of the coil. The sample was examined
for degree of flatness three times. The degree of flatness examined immediately after
coiling, after storage for 6 months, and after coating and drying is shown in Tables
1 and 2.
[0045] Degree of flatness was rated in terms of difference between the peak and the trough
of surface irregularities of the aluminum strip which are measured according to the
method described in Aluminum Handbook (7th edition), p.232. In Tables 1 and 2, the
rating of degree of flatness is indicated by any of three symbols -- ○, Δ, and ×,
with the former two meaning acceptable and the last one meaning unacceptable. Samples
are given ○, Δ, or × depending on whether their edge waving is none, smaller than
0.5 mm, or larger than 0.5 mm, respectively. Samples are also given ○, Δ, or × depending
on whether their center buckle or quarter belly is smaller than 2.0 mm (maximum),
from 2.0 to 3.0 mm, or larger than 3.0 mm, respectively.
[0046] Examples 1 to 18 (shown in Table 1) demonstrate the samples which underwent secondary
cold rolling, stretch-leveling, and trimming, sequentially, as shown in Figs. 4A to
4C. Examples 19 to 33 (shown in Table 2) demonstrate the samples which underwent secondary
cold rolling, trimming, and stretch-leveling, sequentially, as shown in Figs. 5A and
5B. Comparative Example 1 demonstrate the sample which underwent cold rolling and
division into two halves but did not undergo subsequent rolling, as described in Japanese
Patent Laid-open No.
Hei-9-202063. The sample (coiled aluminum strip) in Comparative Example 1 shown in Table 1 had
burrs 4 as shown in Fig. 3. These burrs cause edge waving after coating and drying,
thereby deteriorating degree of flatness. By contrast, the samples in Examples 1 to
18 had burrs 8b after trimming as shown in Fig. 4C, but these burrs did not significantly
affect degree of flatness. Therefore, these samples were given the rating of ○ or
Δ. The samples (coiled aluminum strip as finished product) in Examples 19 to 33 had
no burrs as shown in Fig. 5B, and they were given the rating of ○ for degree of flatness.
Incidentally, in Table 1, the column with a caption of "Product crown pattern" indicates
"similar to Fig. 1" for Examples 16, 17, 18, 32, and 33.
This wording means that when the strip is divided into three portions, the central
portion has a bulge (or crown) as shown in Fig. 1. Although it has burrs (due to cutting)
at its edges, it has no burrs at its thickest part, and hence it has good degree of
flatness.
[0047] Incidentally, the samples in Examples 1, 2, 3, 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 14, 16, and 17 have
a crown ratio smaller than 1.0% (as absolute value) after hot rolling, and hence they
have a low crown ratio of product and were given a good rating for degree of flatness.
The samples in Examples 4, 5, 8, 10, 13, 15, 19, 23, and 27 have a crown ratio exceeding
1.0% after hot rolling, and hence they are slightly poor in degree of flatness (in
the column "Others").
[0048] Comparative Examples 2 to 8 demonstrate the samples prepared by the process shown
in Fig. 4A to 4C. Comparative Examples 9 to 11 demonstrate the samples prepared by
the process shown in Fig. 5A and 5B. It is noted from Comparative Examples 2 to 11
that the samples are rated poor in degree of flatness (with many occurrences of center
buckle or quarter belly) if their crown ratio exceeds 1.5% (as absolute value) after
hot rolling even though they are produced according to the process of the present
invention.