(19)
(11) EP 2 103 307 B9

(12) CORRECTED EUROPEAN PATENT SPECIFICATION
Note: Bibliography reflects the latest situation

(15) Correction information:
Corrected version no 1 (W1 B1)
Corrections, see
Description

(48) Corrigendum issued on:
01.03.2017 Bulletin 2017/09

(45) Mention of the grant of the patent:
07.12.2016 Bulletin 2016/49

(21) Application number: 09164379.1

(22) Date of filing: 09.10.2001
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): 
A61K 31/4458(2006.01)
A61K 9/50(2006.01)

(54)

Methylphenidate modified release formulations

Methylphenidatformulierungen mit modifizierter Freisetzung

Formulations de libération modifiée de méthylphénidate


(84) Designated Contracting States:
AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE TR

(30) Priority: 27.10.2000 US 697803

(43) Date of publication of application:
23.09.2009 Bulletin 2009/39

(60) Divisional application:
10183368.9 / 2269605

(62) Application number of the earlier application in accordance with Art. 76 EPC:
01977934.7 / 1328251

(73) Proprietor: Shire Pharmaceuticals Ireland Limited
Dublin 24 (IE)

(72) Inventors:
  • Bettman, Marie J
    Brookville, Ohio 45309 (US)
  • Hensley, Dan L
    Huber Heights, OH 45424 (US)
  • Percel, Phillip J
    Troy, OH 45373 (US)
  • Venkatesh, Gopi M
    Ohio 45377-3190 (US)
  • Vishnupad, Krishna S
    Dayton, OH 45440 (US)

(74) Representative: Atkinson, Jonathan David Mark et al
HGF Limited 1 City Walk
Leeds LS11 9DX
Leeds LS11 9DX (GB)


(56) References cited: : 
WO-A-00/25752
WO-A-00/35450
WO-A-99/03471
WO-A-00/35426
WO-A-00/59479
   
       
    Note: Within nine months from the publication of the mention of the grant of the European patent, any person may give notice to the European Patent Office of opposition to the European patent granted. Notice of opposition shall be filed in a written reasoned statement. It shall not be deemed to have been filed until the opposition fee has been paid. (Art. 99(1) European Patent Convention).


    Description

    BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION



    [0001] Methylphenidate Hydrochloride, a scheduled II controlled substance, is currently marketed as a mild central nervous system (CNS) stimulant and the drug of choice for treatment of ADD and ADHA in children. The drug is well absorbed throughout the gastrointestinal tract. However, it has an extremely short half-life, which necessitates a multi-dose treatment regimen for conventional (immediate release) dosage forms such as currently available 5, 10, and 20 mg tablets. Due to high Cmax, oral administration of 10 and 20 mg Ritalin® is reported to result in notable side effects such as anorexia, weight loss, dizziness, etc. Furthermore, it requires the hyperactive children to be dosed in school thus causing hardship to school authorities as well as parents. The drawback of Methylphenidate is that it also produces a euphoric effect when administered intravenously or through inhalation, thus presenting a high potential for substance abuse. Sustained release formulations for once-a-day dosing, such as 20 mg Ritalin SR® tablets currently available from Novartis and Geneva (generic version), were developed with the objective of providing efficacy for 8 hours, thereby improving compliance and reducing the incidence of diversion. However, there are reports which strongly suggest that the sustained release formulations exhibit a slower onset of action/efficacy compared to the immediate release dosage forms (W.E. Pelham et al., "Sustained Release And Standard Methylphenidate Effects On Cognitive And Social Behavior In Children With Attention Deficit Disorder," Pediatrics, Vol. 80, pp 491-501 (1987).

    [0002] Recently, OROS® (Methylphenidate HCl) has been approved by FDA. It is a new osmotic controlled release once-a-day oral dosage form with a drug overcoat, that is designed to deliver a portion of the dose for rapid onset of action and deliver the remainder of the dose in a controlled manner for about 10 hours. The manufacturing cost of this complicated dosage form is expected to be very high and hence resulting in a high cost of treatment. Hence, there is a dire need to develop modified release dosage forms with moderate cost of goods and having not only a rapid onset of action but also with a significantly longer duration of action.

    [0003] U.S. Patent No. 5,908,850 assigned to Celgene Corporation discloses a method for treating children with the above disability to be treated using a sustained release dosage form containing d-threo-methylphenidate or pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof thus minimizing hyperactivity and side effects. However, it does not address how it avoids dosing in school, thereby minimizing potential drug abuse.

    [0004] WO 00/35426 discloses an oral controlled release formulation of methylphenidate hydrochloride based on a gelatine capsule containing multiple methylphenidate beads which have immediate release and controlled release properties.

    [0005] It has been amply demonstrated that by administering two-bead capsule dosage forms manufactured in accordance with the present invention, therapeutically efficacious plasma concentrations can be achieved for rapid onset of action and maintained for over a 12-hour period, thus eliminating the need to dose children in the school.

    SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION



    [0006] The present invention provides a modified release methylphenidate hydrochloride capsule drug delivery system comprising a multitude of IR (immediate release) and ER (extended release) beads filled into capsules at a ratio of 10 IR/90 ER to 50 IR/50 ER beads each of said IR and ER beads containing about 5 to 20% w/w methylphenidate hydrochloride, wherein the IR bead is an inert sugar core particle layered with methylphenidate containing a binder at a concentration of 0.5 to 5 weight %, said layered particle further being coated with a seal coat in an amount up to 4% w/w, and wherein the ER bead comprises an IR bead coated with a dissolution rate controlling polymeric coating in an amount from 5 to 25% by weight based on the total weight of the coated particle, the ER bead being seal coated in an amount up to 4% w/w, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC).

    [0007] An object of the present invention is to provide a method for manufacturing pharmaceutically elegant multi-particulate dosage forms based on the Difficaps® technology, having two types of bead populations - one immediate release (IR) Bead and the other extended release (ER) Bead. The IR Bead is designed to release all of the dose over a short period of time, preferably within 30 minutes to act as a bolus dose for rapid onset of action. In contrast, the ER Bead is designed to release the remainder of the total dose as a desired profile over a 12-hour period when dissolution tested in water by USP Apparatus 2 (Paddles @ 50 rpm). Testing to determine in vitro/in vivo correlations can be conducted to predict desirable profiles which can be expected to maintain blood levels of the active agent within a desired therapeutic range over an extended period of time. Another objective is to provide a novel multi-particulate dosage form in order to minimize side effects and eliminate the need to dose children with ADD and ADHD in the school, the release rates from ER Beads and the ratio of IR to ER Beads being determined based on the in vitro/in vivo correlations and efficacy study results obtained.

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS



    [0008] 

    Fig. 1 is a graph showing the mean plasma concentration profile for various dosage forms described in example 2;

    Fig. 2 is a graph showing the mean methylphenidate plasma concentrations versus time profiles for the dosage forms described in example 4;

    Fig. 3 is a graphical representation of the stability data for modified release methylphenidate hydrochloride capsules, 20 mg (30 IR/70 ER Beads) at 30° C/60% RH; and

    Fig. 4 is a graphical representation of the stability data for modified release methylphenidate hydrochloride capsules, 20 mg (30 IR/70 ER Beads) at 40°C/75% RH.


    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION



    [0009] The active core of the novel dosage form of the present invention may be comprised of an inert particle such as a commercially available non-pareil sugar sphere. Methylphenidate is layered on the sugar spheres from an aqueous solution of the drug and a binder such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP). "Methylphenidate" as used herein includes all optical isomers of the compound and all pharmaceutically acceptable salts thereof. The drug layered beads are provided with up to 4%, preferably up to 2% w/w seal coat using the film-former hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) (e.g., Opadry Clear) to produce IR Beads.

    [0010] ER Beads are produced by coating IR Beads with a solution or an aqueous dispersion of a dissolution rate controlling polymer thereby forming an extended release membrane coating on the IR bead. Examples of dissolution rate controlling polymers include, but are not limited to, ethylcellulose (e.g., Aquacoat® ECD-30), neutral copolymers based on ethylacrylate and methylmethacrylate, and copolymers of acrylic and methacrylic acid esters having quaternary ammonium groups. The membrane coated beads are also typically seal coated with HPMC to produce Extended Release (ER) Beads. The IR and ER Beads are filled into hard gelatin capsules at predetermined ratios to produce modified release (MR) Beads. Ratios found to provide desirable release profiles ranges from about 10IR/90ER to 50IR/50ER, preferably from 20IR/80ER to 40IR/60ER, and most preferably at a ratio of 30IR/70ER.

    [0011] The amount of drug layered on the core (sugar sphere) can be varied widely. A typical dose is expected to be from about 10 to 40 mg of active drug. IR beads typically will account for about 20 to 40% of the dose. Due to limitations in accurately dosing small fill weights into capsules in a two-bead capsule filling equipment, the drug content in the drug layered beads may range from 5 to 20% w/w. Those skilled in the art will be able to select an appropriate amount of drug for coating onto the core to achieve the desired dosage. Generally, the dissolution rate controlling polymeric coatings on the active core particle vary from 5 to 25%, preferably from 5 to 20% and more preferably from 5 to 10% by weight based on the total weight of the coated particle, depending on the coating materials and solves selected.

    [0012] The thickness of the membrane layer or the type of polymer selected depends on the desired release profile, and is optimized for achieving a desired in vitro release profile, which is predicted based on the in vitro/in vivo correlations and efficacy study results. Preferably, the release profile provides an immediate bolus of drug and extended release of the drug at a relatively constant rate for an extended period of time (over 12 hours or more). The unit dosage form according to the present invention may comprise one bead population, which provides only an extended release profile. Alternately, it may consist of an IR bead population that provides a short-duration (sustained release) bolus component of the dose by optionally coating IR Beads with a mixture of water insoluble and water soluble polymers at a ratio of 95/5 to 70/30.

    [0013] The invention also provides a method of manufacturing a modified release methylphenidate dosage form having a mixture of two bead populations which comprises the steps of:
    1. 1. coating an inert particle such as a non-pareil seed with methylphenidate and a polymeric binder and coating said drug layered core particle with a seal coat to form IR beads, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), to form IR Beads, which may be present in the unit dosage form to act as a bolus dose;
    2. 2. coating said particle with a plasticized solution or suspension of a water insoluble polymer or a mixture of water soluble and water insoluble polymers, coating said beads with a seal coat, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) and curing at high temperatures (e.g., 50° - 70°C) for 4 to 12 hours, to form extended release (ER) Beads; and
    3. 3. filling into hard gelatin capsules beads of (1) and/or (2) at a ratio of 20IR/80SR to 40IR/60SR Beads, each capsule containing 10 to 40 mg methylphenidate hydrochloride.


    [0014] An aqueous or a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent medium may be used for preparing drug containing core particles. The type of film forming binder that is used to bind the water soluble drug to the inert sugar sphere is not critical but usually water soluble, alcohol soluble or acetone/water soluble binders are used. Binders such as polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), polysaccharides such as dextran, corn starch may be used at concentrations of 0.5 to 5 weight %. The drug substance may be present in this coating formulation up to 55 weight %, preferably up to about 40% weight %, and most preferably up to about 20% weight, depending on the viscosity of the coating formulation.

    [0015] Dissolution rate controlling polymers suitable for incorporating in the formulation for producing ER Beads are selected from the group consisting of ethylcellulose (or e.g., Aquacoat® ECD-30), neutral copolymers based on ethylacrylate and methylmethacrylate, copolymers of acrylic and methacrylic acid esters having quaternary ammonium groups, polyvinyl acetate/crotonic acid copolymer and combinations thereof.

    [0016] Dissolution rate controlling polymers used in forming the membranes are usually plasticized. Representative examples of plasticizers that may be used to plasticize the membranes include triacetin, tributyl citrate, trimethyl citrate, acetyl tri-n-butyl citrate diethyl phthalate, castor oil, dibutyl sebacate, acetylated monoglycerides and the like or mixtures thereof. The plasticizer may comprise about 3 to 30 wt. % and more typically about 10 to 25 wt% based on the polymer. The plasticizer is selected based on the total solids in the coating system (dissolved or dispersed) and depends on the polymer or polymers and the nature of the coating medium. Generally, this will be between 5 and 40 weight percent based on the total weight of the coating system.

    [0017] The release characteristics of the IR Beads can optionally be further modified to provide a short duration (sustained release) bolus dose. The IR Beads in this embodiment are coated with a mixture of a water insoluble polymer such as ethylcellulose and a water soluble polymer such as low molecular weight HPMC, HPC, methylcellulose, polyethylene glycol (PEG) at a thickness of from 1 weight % up to 5 weight % depending on the solvent or latex dispersion based coating formulation used. The water insoluble polymer to water soluble polymer ratio may typically vary from 95:5 to 70:30.

    [0018] The following non-limiting examples illustrate the dosage formulations in accordance with the invention.

    Examples



    [0019] Modified Release (MR) Capsules of Methylphenidate Hydrochloride, a ADD or ADHD drug, consist of a mixture of two sets of beads: The first set is referred to as immediate release (IR) Beads. IR Beads are designed to provide a loading or bolus dose by releasing all of the methylphenidate hydrochloride within the first hour, preferably within the first 30 minutes. The second set is referred to as the Extended Release (ER) Beads. ER Beads are designed to release methylphenidate slowly over a period of 10-12 hours.

    [0020] In a preferred embodiment, IR Beads are prepared by adding Methylphenidate HCl to an aqueous binder solution, preferably a PVP solution. Sugar spheres are coated with the drug solution and then dried. The drug containing particles are coated with a sealcoat of HPMC (Opadry Clear) to form IR Beads in accordance with the invention. Release characteristics of the IR Beads can be modified by optionally coating IR Beads with a blend of a water soluble polymer such as HPMC and a water insoluble polymer such as ethylcellulose.

    [0021] The ER Beads are produced by applying a layer of extended release membrane coating (with a dissolution rate controlling polymer such as ethylcellulose) and then a seal coat on IR Beads. The two sets of beads when filled into capsule shells at an appropriate ratio will produce the target in vitro release profile which in turn will result in plasma concentrations required to provide rapid onset of action and efficacy over several hours in school going children with ADD or ADHD.

    Example 1:



    [0022] Methylphenidate HCl (200 g) was slowly added to an aqueous solution (about 15 % solids) of polyvinylpyrrolidone (10 g Providone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (770 g) were coated with the drug solution in a Versa Glatt fluid bed granulator. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a sealcoat of Opadry Clear (20 g) was first applied to produce IR Beads. ER Beads are produced by taking IR Beads and coating with the dissolution rate controlling polymer. A plasticized ethylcellulose coating was applied to the methylphenidate particles (893 g) by spraying Aquacoat® ECD-30(233 g) and dibutyl sebacate (16.8 g). An outer seal coating formulation (20 g) of Opadry was sprayed onto the coated active particles. The coated particles were cured at 60°C for 12 hours so that polymer particles coalesce to form a smooth membrane on ER Beads.

    [0023] The IR and ER Beads were then filled into hard gelatin capsules using an MG Capsule Filling Machine with dual bead filling hoppers Three clinical batches, Methylphenidate HCl MR Capsules, 25 mg (20 IR/80 ER Beads), 25 mg (30 IR/70 ER Beads) and 25 mg (40 IR/60 ER Beads), were manufactured, tested, and released for pilot biostudies. The dissolution profiles of these capsules are presented in Table 1 showing increasing release rates with increasing IR Bead fraction in the finished capsule.
    Table 1: Dissolution Data for Example 1
    Time, Hours (20 IR/80 ER Beads) (30 IR/70ER Beads) (40 IR/60 ER Beads)
    0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
    1.0 24.5% 31.6% 42.1%
    2.0 29.8% 37.4% 48.3%
    4.0 57.8% 59.0% 66.3%
    8.0 79.2% 76.3% 83.5%
    12.0 89.1% 84.6% 88.2%

    Example 2:



    [0024] In order to evaluate the bioavailability of the pilot clinical supplies manufactured as described in Example 1 and to establish in vitro/in vivo correlations, a randomized, open-labelled, six-period crossover biostudy was conducted in 24 healthy subjects, of which 18 subjects completed the study. Treatment regimens included a single oral dose of (A) one 10 mg Ritalin® IR tablet, (B) one 10 mg Ritalin IR tablet at 0 and 4 hours, (C) one 20 mg Ritalin® SR tablet, (D) one 25 mg MR Capsule (20 IR/80 ER Beads), (E) one 25 mg MR Capsule (30 IR/70 ER Beads), and (F) one 25 mg MR Capsule (40 IR/60 ER Beads). Pharmacokinetic assessments were made by measuring serial plasma methylphenidate concentrations after administration of each formulation. Each of the treatments administered resulted in a unique mean plasma concentration profile (Figure 1). Treatments A, B, and C appeared to have similar elimination rate processes. In contrast, treatments D, E, and F appeared to have similar but slower elimination rate processes, implying that the methylphenidate elimination following the administration of Treatments D, E, and F is limited by the release rate from the MR capsule. Based on the study results, the Treatment F met the bioequivalence confidence interval requirements with Treatment C, the 20 mg methylphenidate SR formulation, suggesting the need for a faster release rate from the dosage form manufactured in accordance with the present invention.

    Example 3:



    [0025] Methylphenidate HCl (1,168.4 g) was slowly added to a solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (58.4 g Providone K-30) in 7,536 g of purified water and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (4,500 g) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator GPCG 5. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a sealcoat of Opadry Clear (121.7 g) in 1,400 g purified water was first applied. The dissolution rate controlling polymer coating was applied to the active particles (4,500 g) by spraying a dispersion of Aquacoat ECD (1,187.4 g) and dibutyl sebacate (85.5 g) in 199.5 purified water. An outer seal coating formulation (Opadry)(101.8 g) in 1,170.7 g purified water was sprayed onto the coated active particles. The coated particles were cured at 60°C for 12 hours so that the polymers were coalesced to produce ER Beads.

    [0026] An IR Bead batch (Batchsize: 5,535.6 g) at 10% drug load was also prepared by following the above procedure. Methylphenidate MR Capsules, 20 mg (30 IR/70 ER) Batch (6000 size #3 capsules), containing 6.0 mg of IR Beads and 14 mg of ER Beads were manufactured using MG2 Futura capsule filling equipment. Similarly, Methylphenidate HCl MR Capsules, 20 mg (40 IR/60 ER Beads) Batch, were manufactured.
    Table 2: Dissolution Data for Example 3
    Time, Hours (30 IR/70ER Beads) (40 IR/60 ER Beads)
    0.0 0.0 0.0
    1.0 33.4% 41.3%
    2.0 44.9% 50.9%
    4.0 66.2% 69.6%
    8.0 87.1% 89.2%
    12.0 97.1% 98.0%

    Example 4:



    [0027] A randomized six-way crossover study in 24 healthy children with ADHD (Protocol MAI 1001-02) was performed using 20 mg MR Capsules (30 IR/70 ER Beads and 40 IR/60 ER Beads of Example 3) and 2 x 20 mg dosed to children in the fed condition in comparison with Ritalin IR 10 mg dosed twice. The plasma profiles were obtained in a randomized, two-double-blind, crossover comparison of IR bid and placebo in stage 1 and two doses of two MR capsules in stage 2 in 24 healthy children. Children received MR capsules (30 IR/70 ER and 40 IR/60 ER Beads of Example 3, single and double doses) and one dosing regimen of Ritalin IR tablets (10 mg bid). Mean methylphenidate Plasma concentrations versus Time profiles are presented in Figure 2. A level A correlation was established between the in vitro release and in vivo absorption with a correlation coefficient of r2 = 0.98 and a slope of almost 1, as per the FDA guidelines, Guidance for Industry: Extended Release Oral Dosage Forms.

    Example 5:



    [0028] Methylphenidate HCl (11.7 kg) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (500 g Providone K-30) and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (38.5 kg) were coated with the drug solution in a fluid bed equipment, Fluid Air FA 0300. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a sealcoat of Opadry Clear (2% w/w) in purified water was first applied. The dissolution rate controlling polymer coating was applied to the active particles (8.6% w/w) by spraying a dispersion of Aquacoat ECD and dibutyl sebacate. An outer seal coat of Opadry Clear (2% w/w) was applied onto the coated active particles. The coated particles were cured at 60°C for 12 hours so that the polymers were coalesced to produce ER Beads. An IR Bead batch (Batchsize:50.4 kg) at about 10% drug load was also prepared by following the above procedure. Methylphenidate MR Capsules, 20 mg in size #3 capsules, containing 6.0 mg of IR Beads and 14 mg of ER Beads were manufactured using an MG Futura capsule filling equipment. Similarly, Methylphenidate HCl MR Capsules, 10 mg (30 IR/70 ER Beads) and 30 mg (30 IR/70 ER Beads), were also manufactured. The initial and up to 18-month stability data at 30°C/60% RH and up to 6-month stability data at 40°C/75% RH for MR Capsules, 20 mg, are presented, respectively, in Figures 3 and 4. Both 10 and 30 mg capsule products at the ratio of 30 IR/70 ER Beads have also demonstrated to be physically and chemically stable.

    Example 6:



    [0029] Methylphenidate HCl (2,336.8 g) was slowly added to an aqueous solution of polyvinylpyrrolidone (116.8 g Povidone K-30) in 14,072 g of purified water and mixed well. 25-30 mesh sugar spheres (9,000 g) were coated with the drug solution in a Glatt fluid bed granulator GPCG 5. The drug containing pellets were dried, and a sealcoat of Opadry Clear (243.4 g) in 2,800 g purified water was first applied. The dissolution rate coutrolling polymer coating was applied to the active particles (9,500 g) by spraying a solution of ethylcellulose and diethyl phthalate in 98/2 acetone/water. The coated ER Beads were cured at 60°C for 4 hours. IR Beads were prepared by following above procedure. The IR and ER Beads were filled into capsules at a ratio of 30 IR/70 ER Beads.


    Claims

    1. Modified release methylphenidate hydrochloride capsule drug delivery system comprising a multitude of IR (immediate release) and ER (extended release) beads filled into capsules at a ratio of 10 IR/90 ER to 50 IR/50 ER beads each of said IR and ER beads containing about 5 to 20% w/w methylphenidate hydrochloride, wherein the IR bead is an inert sugar core particle layered with methylphenidate containing a binder at a concentration of 0.5 to 5 weight %, said layered particle further being coated with a seal coat in an amount up to 4% w/w, and wherein the ER bead comprises an IR bead coated with a dissolution rate controlling polymeric coating in an amount from 5 to 25% by weight based on the total weight of the coated particle, the ER bead being seal coated in an amount up to 4% w/w, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC).
     
    2. The drug delivery system according to claim 1, wherein the dissolution rate controlling polymeric coating on the ER bead is in an amount from 5 to 10% w/w.
     
    3. The drug delivery system of claim 1 or 2, wherein the dissolution rate controlling polymer on the ER bead is selected from the group consisting of ethylcellulose, neutral copolymers based on ethylacrylate and methylmethacrylate, and copolymers of acrylic and methacylic acid esters having quaternary ammonium groups.
     
    4. The drug delivery system of claim 3, wherein the dissolution rate controlling polymer is ethylcellulose.
     
    5. The drug delivery system of any one of claims 1 to 4, wherein the dissolution rate controlling polymer is plasticized.
     
    6. The drug delivery system of claim 5, wherein the dissolution rate controlling polymer comprises about 3 to 30 wt % plasticizer based on the polymer.
     
    7. The drug delivery system of any preceding claim, wherein the binder is selected from the group comprising: polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), polyethylene oxide, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropyl cellulose (HPC), dextran and corn starch.
     
    8. The drug delivery system of claim 5 or 6, wherein the ER beads are manufactured by membrane coating methylphenidate containing IR beads with a plasticized dissolution rate controlling water insoluble ethylcellulose formulation as a solution or an aqueous dispersion for a weight gain of not more than 10% w/w.
     
    9. The drug delivery system of any one of claims 5 to 8, wherein the plasticizer is selected from the group consisting of dibutyl sebacate, trimethyl citrate, diethyl phthalate, tributyl citrate, triacetin and mixtures thereof.
     
    10. The drug delivery system of any of claims 1 to 9, wherein said capsule comprises 10 to 40 mg methylphenidate as a hydrochloride salt consisting of IR and ER beads at a ratio of 20/80 to 40/60.
     
    11. The drug delivery system of claim 10, wherein the IR and ER beads are at a ratio of 30/70.
     
    12. A method of making a drug delivery system for methylphenidate hydrochloride as defined in claim 1 which comprises:

    a. preparing a drug layered core particle comprising a water soluble methylphenidate containing film forming composition;

    b. coating said drug layered core particle with a seal coat to form IR beads, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC);

    c. coating IR beads with a water insoluble dissolution rate controlling polymer from an aqueous dispersion or a solution in acetone/water to form ER beads;

    d. coating ER beads with a seal coat, wherein the sealcoat is hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC); wherein the weight of dissolution rate controlling polymer coating is from 5 to 25% by weight based on the total weight of the ER beads; and

    e. producing MR capsules by filling capsules at a ratio from about 20 IR/80 ER to 40 IR/60 ER to provide a dose per MR capsule of from about 10 mg to 40 mg.


     
    13. The method of claim 12 wherein said dissolution rate controlling polymer is a plasticized ethylcellulose formulation.
     
    14. The method of any one of claims 12 to 13 wherein said ratio is about 30 IR/70 ER.
     


    Ansprüche

    1. Methylphenidathydrochloridkapsel-Arzneimittelabgabesystem mit modifizierter Freisetzung, umfassend eine Vielzahl von IR- (sofortige Freisetzung) und ER- (verlängerte Freisetzung) Kügelchen, die mit einem Verhältnis von 10 IR-/90 ER- bis 50 IR-/50 ER-Kügelchen in Kapseln gefüllt werden, wobei jedes der IR- und ER-Kügelchen ungefähr 5 bis 20 Gew.-% Methylphenidathydrochlorid enthält, wobei das IR-Kügelchen ein inertes Teilchen mit Zuckerkern ist, das mit Methylphenidat geschichtet ist, enthaltend ein Bindemittel mit einer Konzentration von 0,5 bis 5 Gew.-%, wobei das Schichtteilchen ferner mit einer Versiegelungsbeschichtung in einer Menge von bis zu 4 Gew.-% beschichtet ist und wobei das ER-Kügelchen ein IR-Kügelchen umfasst, das mit einer die Auflösungsrate regulierenden polymeren Beschichtung in einer Menge von 5 bis 25 Gew.-% auf Grundlage des Gesamtgewichts des beschichteten Teilchens beschichtet ist, wobei das ER-Kügelchen in einer Menge von bis zu 4 Gew.-% versiegelungsbeschichtet ist, wobei die Versiegelungsbeschichtung Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) ist.
     
    2. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 1, wobei die die Auflösungsrate regulierende polymere Beschichtung an dem ER-Kügelchen in einer Menge von 5 bis 10 Gew.-% vorliegt.
     
    3. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, wobei das die Auflösungsrate regulierende Polymer an dem ER-Kügelchen aus der Gruppe ausgewählt wird, bestehend aus: Ethylcellulose, neutralen Copolymeren auf der Grundlage von Ethylacrylat und Methylmethacrylat und Copolymeren von Acryl- und Methacrylsäureestern, aufweisend quaternäre Ammoniumgruppen.
     
    4. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 3, wobei das die Auflösungsrate regulierende Polymer Ethylcellulose ist.
     
    5. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, wobei das die Auflösungsrate regulierende Polymer plastifiziert ist.
     
    6. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 5, wobei das die Auflösungsrate regulierende Polymer auf Grundlage des Polymers ungefähr 3 bis 30 Gew.-% Weichmacher umfasst.
     
    7. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei das Bindemittel aus der Gruppe ausgewählt wird, umfassend: Polyvinylpyrrolidon (PVP), Polyethylenoxid, Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC), Hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), Dextran und Maisstärke.
     
    8. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 5 oder 6, wobei die ER-Kügelchen durch eine Membranbeschichtung von Methylphenidat enthaltenden IR-Kügelchen mit einer plastifizierten die Auflösungsrate regulierenden wasserunlöslichen Ethylcelluloseformulierung als eine Lösung oder eine wässrige Dispersion für eine Gewichtszunahme von nicht mehr als 10 Gew.-% hergestellt werden.
     
    9. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach einem der Ansprüche 5 bis 8, wobei der Weichmacher aus der Gruppe ausgewählt wird, bestehend aus Dibutylsebacat, Trimethylcitrat, Diethylphthalat, Tributylcitrat, Triacetin und Gemischen davon.
     
    10. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 9, wobei die Kapsel 10 bis 40 mg Methylphenidat als ein Hydrochloridsalz umfasst, bestehend aus IR- und ER-Kügelchen mit einem Verhältnis von 20/80 bis 40/60.
     
    11. Arzneimittelabgabesystem nach Anspruch 10, wobei die IR- und ER-Kügelchen mit einem Verhältnis von 30/70 vorliegen.
     
    12. Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Arzneimittelabgabesystems für Methylphenidathydrochlorid nach Anspruch 1, das Folgendes umfasst:

    a. Präparieren eines Teilchens mit einem Kern aus geschichtetem Arzneimittel, umfassend eine wasserlösliche Methylphenidat enthaltende filmbildende Zusammensetzung;

    b. Beschichten des Teilchens mit einem Kern aus geschichtetem Arzneimittel mit einer Versiegelungsbeschichtung, um IR-Kügelchen zu bilden, wobei die Versiegelungsbeschichtung Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) ist;

    c. Beschichten von IR-Kügelchen mit einem wasserunlöslichen die Auflösungsrate regulierenden Polymer aus einer wässrigen Dispersion oder einer Lösung in Aceton/Wasser, um ER-Kügelchen zu bilden;

    d. Beschichten von ER-Kügelchen mit einer Versiegelungsbeschichtung, wobei die Versiegelungsbeschichtung Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose (HPMC) ist; wobei das Gewicht der die Auflösungsrate regulierenden Polymerbeschichtung auf Grundlage des Gesamtgewichts der ER-Kügelchen von 5 bis 25 Gew.-% reicht; und

    e. Herstellen von MR-Kapseln durch das Befüllen von Kapseln mit einem Verhältnis von ungefähr 20 IR/80 ER bis 40 IR/60 ER, um pro MR-Kapsel eine Dosis von ungefähr 10 mg bis 40 mg bereitzustellen.


     
    13. Verfahren nach Anspruch 12, wobei das die Auflösungsrate regulierende Polymer eine plastifizierte Ethylcelluloseformulierung ist.
     
    14. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 12 bis 13, wobei das Verhältnis ungefähr 30 IR/70 ER entspricht.
     


    Revendications

    1. Système d'administration de médicament par capsule de chlorhydrate de méthylphénidate à libération modifiée comprenant une multitude de billes IR (à libération immédiate) et ER (à libération prolongée) remplies dans des capsules à un rapport de 10 billes IR/90 billes ER à 50 billes IR/50 billes ER, chacune desdites billes IR et ER contenant environ 5 à 20 % en p/p de chlorhydrate de méthylphénidate, ladite bille IR étant une particule centrale inerte en sucre recouverte de méthylphénidate contenant un liant à une concentration de 0,5 à 5 % en poids, ladite particule recouverte étant en outre enrobée d'un revêtement étanche en une quantité représentant jusqu'à 4 % en p/p, et ladite bille ER comportant une bille IR enrobée d'un enrobage polymère contrôlant la vitesse de dissolution en une quantité allant de 5 à 25 % en poids par rapport au poids total de la particule enrobée, la bille ER étant enrobée de manière étanche en une quantité représentant jusqu'à 4 % en p/p, ledit revêtement étanche étant de l'hydroxypropylméthylcellulose (HPMC).
     
    2. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 1, ledit enrobage polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution sur la bille ER étant présent en une quantité allant de 5 à 10 % en p/p.
     
    3. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 1 ou 2, ledit polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution sur la bille ER étant choisi dans le groupe constitué par l'éthylcellulose, les copolymères neutres à base d'acrylate d'éthyle et de méthacrylate de méthyle, et les copolymères d'esters d'acides acrylique et méthacrylique comportant des groupes ammonium quaternaires.
     
    4. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 3, ledit polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution étant l'éthylcellulose.
     
    5. Système d'administration de médicament selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 4, ledit polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution étant plastifié.
     
    6. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 5, ledit polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution comprenant environ 3 à 30 % en poids sur la base du polymère.
     
    7. Système d'administration de médicament selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, ledit liant étant choisi dans le groupe constitué par : la polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP), l'oxyde de polyéthylène, hydroxypropylméthylcellulose (HPMC), hydroxypropylcellulose (HPC), le dextrane et l'amidon de maïs.
     
    8. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 5 ou 6, lesdits billes ER étant fabriquées par enrobage à membrane des billes IR contenant du méthylphénidate avec une formulation plastifiée d'éthylcellulose régulant la vitesse de dissolution insoluble dans l'eau sous forme de solution ou de dispersion aqueuse pour un gain de poids inférieur ou égal à 10 % en p/p.
     
    9. Système d'administration de médicament selon l'une quelconque des revendications 5 à 8, ledit plastifiant étant choisi dans le groupe constitué par le sébacate de dibutyle, le citrate de triméthyle, le phtalalte de diéthyle, le citrate de tributyle, la triacétine et les mélanges de ceux-ci.
     
    10. Système d'administration de médicament selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 9, ladite capsule comprenant 10 à 40 mg de méthylphénidate sous forme de sel de chlorhydrate consistant en des billes IR et ER dans un rapport de 20/80 à 40/60.
     
    11. Système d'administration de médicament selon la revendication 10, lesdites billes IR et ER étant dans un rapport de 30/70.
     
    12. Procédé de fabrication d'un système d'administration de médicament pour chlorhydrate de méthylphénidate tel que défini dans la revendication 1 qui comprend :

    a. la préparation d'une particule centrale recouverte de médicament comprenant une composition formant un film contenant du méthylphénidate soluble dans l'eau ;

    b. l'enrobage de ladite particule centrale recouverte de médicament avec un revêtement étanche pour former des billes IR, ledit revêtement étanche étant de l'hydroxypropylméthylcellulose (HPMC) ;

    c. l'enrobage des billes IR avec un polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution insoluble dans l'eau à partir d'une dispersion aqueuse ou d'une solution dans le mélange acétone/eau pour former des billes ER ;

    d. l'enrobage des billes ER avec un revêtement étanche, ledit revêtement étanche étant de l'hydroxypropylméthylcellulose (HPMC) ; ledit poids de l'enrobage polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution représentant de 5 à 25 % en poids par rapport au poids total des billes ER ; et

    e. la production de capsules MR en remplissant les capsules dans un rapport d'environ 20 IR/80 ER à 40 IR/60 ER pour fournir une dose par capsule MR d'environ 10 mg à 40 mg.


     
    13. Procédé selon la revendication 12, ledit polymère régulant la vitesse de dissolution étant une formulation d'éthylcellulose plastifiée.
     
    14. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 12 à 13, ledit rapport étant d'environ 30 IR/70 ER.
     




    Drawing

















    Cited references

    REFERENCES CITED IN THE DESCRIPTION



    This list of references cited by the applicant is for the reader's convenience only. It does not form part of the European patent document. Even though great care has been taken in compiling the references, errors or omissions cannot be excluded and the EPO disclaims all liability in this regard.

    Patent documents cited in the description




    Non-patent literature cited in the description