Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to methods for manufacturing aluminum alloy thick plates,
and the resulting aluminum alloy thick plates.
Background Art
[0002] Aluminum alloy materials such as aluminum alloy thick plates are generally used for
various applications including semiconductor-related devices such as base substrates,
transport devices, and vacuum chambers; electrical and electronic parts and their
manufacturing devices; household articles; and mechanical parts.
[0003] Such aluminum alloy materials are generally manufactured by melting aluminum alloy
ingots, and casting the molten material to give a slab, conducting a heat treatment
for homogenization, if necessary, and then rolling the slab to a predetermined thickness
(see, for example, Paragraphs 0037 to 0045 of Patent Document 1).
[0004] As mold materials used for press molds, steels and cast steel are typically used
for mass production, while zinc alloy cast materials and aluminum alloy cast materials
are used for prototype production. In recent years, there has been a trend of producing
multiple varieties in small amounts, and therefore ductile materials such as rolled
or forged aluminum alloys are widely spread for middle-to-small-scale production.
Patent Document 1: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (JP-A) No. 2005-344173
Disclosure of Invention
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0005] However, the method for manufacturing aluminum alloy materials by rolling has the
following problems:
- (1) In the method in which rolling is carried out after casting, control of the surface
condition and flatness (especially the flatness in the longitudinal direction) of
the rolled plate is carried out only by pressure rolls, and a thick oxide film is
generated on the surface of the rolled plate by hot rolling, and controlling the surface
condition and flatness is difficult.
- (2) Since it is difficult to control the thickness of the plate by pressure rolls,
it is difficult to improve the accuracy of plate thickness; the size of intermetallic
compounds increases at the center of the thickness direction of the plate, and thus
when anodization is conducted, the surface and cross section in the thickness direction
of the plate often suffer from unevenness. Additionally, when a slab is rolled, the
number of operation steps increases with an increasing number of rolling procedures,
whereby the cost is disadvantageously increased.
[0006] Under these circumstances, the present invention has been made and an object thereof
is to provide a method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, which method
enables improved accuracy of plate thickness with high productivity and good controllability
of surface condition and flatness, and to provide an aluminum alloy thick plate which
is manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method and excels in surface
condition, flatness, and accuracy of plate thickness.
Means for Solving the Problems
[0007] According to a first embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0. 3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness; and a heat treatment step of thermally treating
the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness by holding the same
at a temperature of 400°C or higher but lower than its melting point for one hour
or longer.
[0008] According to a second embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg in a content of
1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness; and a heat treatment step of thermally treating
the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness by holding the same
at a temperature of 400°C or higher but lower than its melting point for one hour
or longer.
[0009] According to a third embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by
mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 1.0 percent
by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of
0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in
a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes
in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas
removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing
the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 400°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
[0010] According to a fourth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0 percent by
mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Ti in
a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25 percent by mass
or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes
in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas
removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing
the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 350°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
[0011] In the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention, the following configurations
are preferred:
- (A) Subsequent to the heat treatment step, the surface of the aluminum alloy thick
plate is subjected to a surface smoothing treatment, as a surface smoothing treatment
step. In this configuration, the surface smoothing treatment is preferably carried
out by at least one process selected from the group consisting of cutting, grinding,
and polishing.
- (B) In the slicing step, a central portion in a thickness direction is removed from
the slab, in which the central portion has two substantially identical thicknesses
in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction to the both
surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and has a total thickness of from one-thirtieth
to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
[0012] According to a fifth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding
the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or
longer; and a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness.
[0013] According to a sixth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg in a content of
1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding
the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or
longer; and a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness.
[0014] According to a seventh embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by
mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 1.0 percent
by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of
0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in
a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes
in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas
removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a heat treatment step
of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer; and a slicing step of slicing the thermally
treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness.
[0015] According to an eighth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0 percent by
mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Ti in
a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25 percent by mass
or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes
in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas
removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a heat treatment step
of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 350°C for one hour or longer; and a slicing step of slicing the thermally
treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness.
[0016] In the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention, the following configurations
are preferred:
(C) Subsequent to the slicing step, the surface of the aluminum alloy thick plate
having a predetermined thickness is subjected to a surface smoothing treatment, as
a surface smoothing treatment step. In this configuration, the surface smoothing treatment
is preferably carried out by at least one process selected from the group consisting
of cutting, grinding, and polishing.
(D) In the slicing step, a central portion in a thickness direction is removed from
the slab, in which the central portion has two substantially identical thicknesses
in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction to the both
surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and has a total thickness of from one-thirtieth
to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
[0017] According to a ninth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness; and a heat treatment step of thermally treating
the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness by holding the same
at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
[0018] According to a tenth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg in a content of
1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, Zn in
a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or
less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes in the following order: a
melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas removal step of removing
hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration step of filtering the aluminum
alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum
alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been
removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness; and a heat treatment step of thermally treating
the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness by holding the same
at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
[0019] According to an eleventh embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a
method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the
aluminum alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent
by mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5 percent
by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group
consisting of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 1.0
percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content
of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti
in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by
mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method
includes in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen
gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing
the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
[0020] According to a twelfth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a method
for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy, the aluminum
alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0 percent by
mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.0 percent by
mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from the group consisting
of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content of 0.8 percent
by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of
0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Ti in
a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25 percent by mass
or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities. The method includes
in the following order: a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy; a hydrogen gas
removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy; a filtration
step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas has been removed, to
remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy; a casting step of casting the aluminum
alloy, from which inclusions have been removed, into a slab; a slicing step of slicing
the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thickplate having a
predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher but
lower than 350°C for one hour or longer.
[0021] In the ninth to twelfth embodiments of the present invention, the following configurations
are preferred:
(E) Subsequent to the heat treatment step, the surface of the aluminum alloy thick
plate is subjected to a surface smoothing treatment, as a surface smoothing treatment
step. In this configuration, the surface smoothing treatment is preferably carried
out by at least one process selected from the group consisting of cutting, grinding,
and polishing.
(F) In the slicing step, a central portion in a thickness direction is removed from
the slab, in which the central portion has two substantially identical thicknesses
in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction to the both
surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and has a total thickness of from one-thirtieth
to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
[0022] According to a thirteenth embodiment of the present invention, there is provided
an aluminum alloy thick plate which is manufactured by the method for manufacturing
an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of the first to twelfth embodiments
of the present invention, and includes crystal grains having an average grain size
of 400 µm or less.
Effects of the Invention
[0023] According to the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention, the resulting
aluminum alloy thick plate includes finer intermetallic compounds and has improved
strength, because the material aluminum alloy has contents of predetermined elements
controlled within predetermined ranges. The hydrogen gas removal step removes hydrogen
to thereby control the concentration of hydrogen in the slab. Therefore, even if crystal
grains in the slab become coarse, hydrogen is not accumulated or enriched at the grain
boundary near the surface of the slab. This suppresses blistering of the slab and
peeling of the aluminum alloy thick plate resulting from the blistering, and also
suppresses potential defects on the surface of the thick plates which appear as surface
defects of the thick plate. The aluminum alloy thick plate has improved strength.
The filtration step removes inclusions such as oxides and non-metals from the aluminum
alloy. Slicing the slab in the slicing step reduces the thickness of the oxide film;
improves the surface condition, flatness and accuracy of the plate thickness of the
aluminum alloy thick plate; and also improves its productivity. In addition, the heat
treatment step thermally treats the aluminum alloy thick plate to thereby remove the
internal stress of the aluminum alloy and uniformize its inner structure.
[0024] According to the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention, therefore,
the aluminum alloy thick plate can have improved strength. The aluminum alloy thick
plate is manufactured by slicing a slab, and this eliminates necessity to reduce its
thickness by hot rolling unlike in known aluminum alloy thick plates. This simplifies
operation steps and thereby improves the productivity. This also eliminates unevenness
(uneven color) of the surface and cross section of the thick plate; and improves the
flatness, surface condition after anodization, and accuracy of plate thickness. By
thermally treating the sliced aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness
at a temperature of 400°C (or 350°C) or higher but lower than its melting point, the
internal stress of the aluminum alloy thick plate can be removed and its inner structure
can be uniformized. Thus, the aluminum alloy thick plate can have good flatness and
satisfactory accuracy of plate thickness and can maintain its satisfactory strength.
[0025] The configuration (A) helps to further improve the surface condition and flatness
of the aluminum alloy thick plate and eliminates the gas accumulation of the surface
of the thick plate, because the surface is further smoothened. The resulting aluminum
alloy thick plate, if used as a vacuum chamber, can provide an improved degree of
vacuum.
[0026] The configuration (B) helps to provide an aluminum alloy thick plate excellent in
appearance quality even after anodization, because the central portion of the slab
is removed, which central portion will often cause unevenness in the surface and cross
section of the aluminum alloy thick plate after anodization. This configuration also
helps to reduce the within-lot variation.
[0027] According to the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention, the aluminum
alloy thick plate can include finer intermetallic compounds andhavehigher strength,
because the material aluminum alloy has contents of predetermined elements controlled
within predetermined ranges. The hydrogen gas removal step removes hydrogen gas to
thereby control the concentration of hydrogen in the slab. Therefore, even if crystal
grains in the slab become coarse, hydrogen is not accumulated or enriched at the grain
boundary near the surface of the slab. This suppresses blistering of the slab and
peeling of the aluminum alloy thick plate resulting from the blistering; suppresses
potential defects on the surface of the thick plates which appear as surface defects
of the thick plat; and improves the strength of the aluminum alloy thick plate. The
filtration step removes inclusions such as oxides and non-metals from the aluminum
alloy. The heat treatment step thermally treats the slab to eliminate the internal
stress and to uniformize the inner structure thereof. The slicing step slices the
slab so as to reduce the thickness of the oxide film and to improve the surface condition,
flatness and accuracy of the plate thickness of the aluminum alloy thick plate, as
well as its productivity.
[0028] According to the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention, therefore,
the aluminum alloy thick plate can have improved balance among its flatness, strength,
and cutting property. Specifically, the heat treatment at a temperature of 200°C or
higher but lower than 400°C (or 350°C) applied to the slab suppresses the increase
in ductility. This helps to remove the internal stress and to uniformize the inner
structure of the thick plate without adversely affecting the cutting property (chip
breakability). The resulting aluminum alloy thick plate can thereby have good flatness
and satisfactory accuracy of plate thickness and can maintain its satisfactory strength.
The aluminum alloy thick plate is manufactured by slicing a slab. This eliminates
necessity to reduce its thickness by hot rolling unlike in known aluminum alloy thick
plates; simplifies operation steps and improves the productivity; and also eliminates
surface unevenness (uneven color) of the cross section of the thick plate and improves
the flatness, quality of appearance after anodization, and accuracy of plate thickness.
[0029] The configuration (C) helps to further improve the surface condition and flatness
of the aluminum alloy thick plate and eliminates the gas accumulation of the surface
of the thick plate, because the surface is further smoothened. The resulting aluminum
alloy thick plate, if used as a vacuum chamber, can provide an improved degree of
vacuum.
[0030] The configuration (D) helps to provide an aluminum alloy thick plate excellent in
appearance quality even after anodization, because the central portion of the slab
is removed, which central portion will often cause unevenness in the surface and cross
section of the aluminum alloy thick plate after anodization. This configuration also
helps to reduce the within-lot variation.
[0031] According to the ninth to twelfth embodiments of the present invention, the aluminum
alloy thick plate includes finer intermetallic compounds and has improved strength,
because the material aluminum alloy has contents of predetermined elements controlled
within predetermined ranges. The hydrogen gas removal step removes hydrogen to thereby
control the concentration of hydrogen in the slab. Therefore, even if crystal grains
in the slab become coarse, hydrogen is not accumulated or enriched at the grain boundary
near the surface of the slab. This suppresses blistering of the slab and peeling of
the aluminum alloy thick plate resulting from the blistering; suppresses potential
defects on the surface of the thick plates which appear as surface defects of the
thick plate; and improves the strength of the aluminum alloy thick plate. The filtering
step removes inclusions such as oxides and non-metals from the aluminum alloy. Slicing
the slab in the slicing step reduces the thickness of the oxide film; improves the
surface condition, flatness and accuracy of the plate thickness of the aluminum alloy
thick plate; and improves the productivity of the aluminum alloy thick plate. In addition,
the heat treatment step thermally treats the aluminum alloy thick plate to thereby
remove the internal stress of the aluminum alloy and uniformize its inner structure.
[0032] According to the ninth to twelfth embodiments of the present invention, therefore,
the aluminum alloy thick plate can have improved strength. The aluminum alloy thick
plate is manufactured by slicing a slab, and this eliminates necessity to reduce its
thickness by hot rolling unlike in known aluminum alloy thick plates. This simplifies
operation steps; improves the productivity; eliminates unevenness (uneven color) of
the surface and cross section of the thick plate; and improves the flatness, quality
of appearance after anodization, and accuracy of plate thickness. Further, this also
improves the balance among the flatness, strength, and cutting property of the aluminum
alloy thick plate. The heat treatment at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower
than 400°C (or 350°C) applied to the sliced aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness suppresses the increase in ductility, whereby helps to remove the internal
stress and uniformize the inner structure of the aluminum alloy thick plate without
adversely affecting the cutting property (chip breakability). The resulting aluminum
alloy thick plate can thereby have good flatness and satisfactory accuracy of plate
thickness and maintain its satisfactory strength.
[0033] The configuration (E) helps to further improve the surface condition and flatness
of the aluminum alloy thick plate and eliminates the gas accumulation of the surface
of the thick plate, because the surface is further smoothened. The resulting aluminum
alloy thick plate, if used as a vacuum chamber, can provide an improved degree of
vacuum.
[0034] The configuration (F) helps to provide an aluminum alloy thick plate excellent in
appearance quality even after anodization, because the central portion of the slab
is removed, which central portion will often cause unevenness in the surface and cross
section of the aluminum alloy thick plate after anodization. This configuration also
helps to reduce the within-lot variation.
[0035] The aluminum alloy thick plates according to the thirteenth embodiment of the present
invention excel in surface condition, flatness, and accuracy of plate thickness. They
also have high quality, because their surface is smoothened and thereby is free from
gas accumulation. They can be used in a wide variety of applications and can be recycled
and used for other applications, because the surface appearance of them after anodization
is substantially free from unevenness.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0036]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a flow chart of methods for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick
plate, according to the first to fourth embodiments and the ninth to twelfth embodiments
of the present invention.
[Fig. 2] Fig. 2 is a schematic view showing a central portion in a thickness direction
of the slab to be removed in the slicing step.
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is a flow chart of methods for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick
plate, according to the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention.
Reference Numerals
[0037]
- S1
- melting step
- S2
- hydrogen gas removal step
- S3
- filtration step
- S4
- casting step
- S5
- slicing step or heat treatment step
- S6
- heat treatment step or slicing step
- S7
- surface smoothing treatment step
- A
- center of thickness direction
- B
- central portion in thickness direction
- T
- thickness
- 1
- slab
Best Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
[0038] Methods for manufacturing aluminum alloy thick plates and resulting aluminum alloy
thick plates, according to the present invention, will be illustrated in detail with
reference to the attached drawings. The present invention will be illustrated below
while being categorized as (A) the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention,
(B) the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention, (C) the ninth to twelfth
embodiments of the present invention, and (D) the thirteenth embodiment of the present
invention.
(A) Methods for Manufacturing Aluminum Alloy Thick Plates According to First to Fourth
Embodiments of the Present Invention
(1) Outline of Manufacturing Methods
[0039] With reference to Fig. 1, the methods for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate
(hereinafter also referred to as "thick plate" for the sake of convenience), according
to the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention, each include a melting
step (S1), a hydrogen gas removal step (S2), a filtration step (S3), a casting step
(S4), a slicing step (S5), and a heat treatment step (S6) in this order. The methods
may further include, where necessary, a surface smoothing treatment step (S7) subsequent
to the heat treatment step (S6).
[0040] In these manufacturing methods, initially, aluminum alloy ingots are melted in the
melting step (S1). Next, hydrogen gas is removed from the molten aluminum alloy in
the hydrogen gas removal step (S2), and inclusions such as oxides and non-metals are
removed therefrom in the filtration step (S3). Next, the resulting aluminum alloy
is cast into a slab in the casting step (S4). The slab is then sliced into an aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness in the slicing step (S5). The aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness is then subjected to a heat treatment
in the heat treatment step (S6) and, where necessary, subjected to a surface smoothing
treatment in the surface smoothing treatment step (S7).
(2) Aluminum Alloys
[0041] The manufacturing methods according to the first, second, third, and fourth embodiments
of the present invention use a 5000 series Al-Mg alloy, a 3000 series Al-Mn alloy,
a 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy, and a 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy, respectively, as a
raw material aluminum alloy. The details of them are as follows.
(2-1) First Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0042] According to the first embodiment of the present invention, a 5000 series Al-Mg alloy
is used. The aluminum alloy contains Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more
and 12.0 percent by mass or less, and further contains at least one member selected
from the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in
a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or
less, Mn in a content of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent
by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of
0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0. 3 percent by mass or less,
with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities.
[0043] The reasons why the contents of the respective components are specified will be described
below.
[Mg: 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0 percent by mass or less]
[0044] Magnesium (Mg) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Mg, if its content
is less than 1.5 percent by mass, may not exhibit the activity sufficiently. In contrast,
Mg, if its content is more than 12.0 percent by mass, may significantly adversely
affect the casting ability, and this may impede the manufacture of the product. Accordingly,
the Mg content should be 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0 percent by mass or less.
[Si: 0.7 percent by mass or less]
[0045] Silicon (Si) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Si is generally
contained in the aluminum alloy as an impurity in the ingot and forms an Al- (Fe)
- (Mn) -Si intermetallic compound together with Mn and Fe in the slab typically in
the casting step (S4). Si, if its content is more than 0.7 percent by mass, may cause
a coarse intermetallic compound in the slab to thereby often cause unevenness in the
surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Si content should be 0.7 percent
by mass or less.
[Fe: 0.8 percent by mass or less]
[0046] Iron (Fe) allows crystal grains of the aluminum alloy to be finer and more stabilized
and allows the aluminum alloy to have improved strength. Fe is generally contained
in the aluminum alloy as an impurity in the ingot and forms an Al-Fe- (Mn) - (Si)
intermetallic compound together with Mn and/or Si in the slab typically in the casting
step (S4). Fe, if its content is more than 0.8 percent by mass, may cause a coarse
intermetallic compound in the slab to thereby often cause unevenness in the surface
appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Fe content should be 0.8 percent by
mass or less.
[Cu: 0.6 percent by mass or less]
[0047] Copper (Cu) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. However, a Cu content
of 0.6 percent by mass is enough to ensure a sufficient strength to be used endurably
as a thick plate. Accordingly, the Cu content should be 0.6 percent by mass or less.
[Mn: 1.0 percent by mass or less]
[0048] Manganese (Mn) is solidly dissolved in the aluminum alloy and thereby serves to improve
the strength of the aluminum alloy. Mn, if its content is more than 1.0 percent by
mass, may cause a coarse intermetallic compound to thereby often cause unevenness
in the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Mn content should be
1.0 percent by mass or less.
[Cr: 0.5 percent by mass or less]
[0049] Chromium (Cr) serves to suppress the grain growth by depositing as a fine compound
in the casting step (S4) and heat treatment step (S6). Cr, if its content is more
than 0.5 percent by mass, may cause a coarse Al-Cr intermetallic compound as a primary
crystal to thereby often cause unevenness in the surface appearance after anodization.
Accordingly, the Cr content should be 0.5 percent by mass or less.
[Zn: 0.4 percent by mass or less]
[0050] Zinc (Zn) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. However, a Zn content
of 0.4 percent by mass is enough to ensure a sufficient strength to be used endurably
as a thick plate. Accordingly, the Zn content should be 0.4 percent by mass or less.
[Ti: 0.1 percent by mass or less]
[0051] Titanium (Ti) allows the slab to contain finer crystal grains. If the Ti content
is more than 0.1 percent by mass, the activity may be saturated. Accordingly, the
Ti content should be 0.1 percent by mass or less.
[Zr: 0.3 percent by mass or less]
[0052] Zirconium (Zr) allows the slab to contain finer crystal grains. If the Zr content
is more than 0.3 percent by mass, the activity may be saturated. Accordingly, the
Zr content should be 0.3 percent by mass or less.
[Al and inevitable impurities: the remainder]
[0053] The aluminum alloy contains the above-mentioned components, with the remainder being
aluminum and inevitable impurities. Exemplary inevitable impurities include V and
B. Each of such impurities, if its content is 0.01 percent by mass or less, will not
affect the characteristic properties of the aluminum alloy thick plates according
to the present invention.
(2-2) Second Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0054] According to the second embodiment of the present invention, a 3000 series Al-Mn
alloy is used. The aluminum alloy contains Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less, and further contains at least one member
selected from the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less,
Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by
mass or less, Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3
percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content
of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less,
with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities.
[0055] The reasons why the contents of the respective components are specified will be described
below.
The reasons why the Si, Fe, Cu, Cr, Zn, Ti, and Zr contents are specified and the
description on inevitable impurities are as with the Al-Mg alloy, and the description
thereof is herein omitted.
[Mn: 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less]
[0056] Manganese (Mn) is solidly dissolved in the aluminum alloy and thereby serves to improve
the strength of the aluminum alloy. Mn, if its content is less than 0.3 percent by
mass, maynot exhibit the activity sufficiently. In contrast, Mn, if its content is
more than 1.6 percent by mass, may cause a coarse intermetallic compound, to thereby
often cause unevenness in the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the
Mn content should be 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less.
[Mg: 1.5 percent by mass or less]
[0057] Magnesium (Mg) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. However, aMg
content of 1. 5percentbymass is enough to ensure a sufficient strength to be used
endurably as a thick plate. Accordingly, the Mg content should be 1.5 percent by mass
or less.
(2-3) Third Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0058] According to the third embodiment of the present invention, a 6000 series Al-Mg-Si
alloy is used. The aluminum alloy contains Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass
or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or more and 1.5 percent by mass or less, and further contains at least one member
selected from the group consisting of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less,
Cu in a content of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0.6 percent by
mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4
percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in
a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable
impurities.
[0059] The reasons why the contents of the respective components are specified will be described
below.
The reasons why the Fe, Mn, Cr, Ti, and Zr contents are specified and the description
on the inevitable impurities are as with the Al-Mg alloy, and the description thereof
is herein omitted.
[Si: 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less]
[0060] Silicon (Si) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Si is generally
contained in the aluminum alloy as an impurity in the ingot and forms an Al-(Fe)-Si
intermetallic compound and a Si intermetallic compound in the slab typically in the
casting step (S4). Si, if its content is less than 0.2 percent by mass, may not exhibit
the activity sufficiently. In contrast, Si, if its content is more than 1.6 percent
by mass, may cause a coarse Si intermetallic compound in the slab, to thereby often
cause unevenness in the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Si
content should be 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6 percent by mass or less.
[Mg: 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5 percent by mass or less]
[0061] Magnesium (Mg) forms Mg
2Si in the coexistence with Si to thereby serve to improve the strength of the aluminum
alloy. Mg, if its content is less than 0.3 percent by mass, may not exhibit the activity
sufficiently. In contrast, if the Mg content is more than 1.5 percent by mass, the
activity may be saturated. Accordingly, the Mg content should be 0.3 percent by mass
or more and 1.5 percent by mass or less.
[Cu: 1.0 percent by mass or less]
[0062] Copper (Cu) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Cu, if its content
is more than 1.0 percent by mass, may impair the corrosion resistance. Accordingly,
the Cu content should be 1.0 percent by mass or less.
[Zn: 0.4 percent by mass or less]
[0063] Zn serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Zn, if its content is more
than 0.4 percent by mass, may impair the corrosion resistance. Accordingly, the Zn
content should be 0.4 percent by mass or less.
(2-4) Fourth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0064] According to the fourth embodiment of the present invention, a 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg
alloy is used. The aluminum alloy contains Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass
or more and 4.0 percent by mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass
or more and 9.0 percent by mass or less, and further contains at least one member
selected from the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less,
Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by
mass or less, Mn in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5
percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in
a content of 0.25 percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable
impurities.
[0065] The reasons why the contents of the respective components are specified will be
described below.
The reasons why the Cr, Ti, and Zr contents are specified and the description of the
inevitable impurities are as with the Al-Mg alloy, whereby the descriptions thereof
are herein omitted.
[Mg: 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0 percent by mass or less]
[0066] Magnesium (Mg) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Mg, if its content
is less than 0.4 percent by mass, may not exhibit the activity sufficiently. In contrast,
Mg, if its content is more than 4.0 percent by mass, may often cause unevenness in
the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Mg content should be 0.4
percent by mass or more and 4.0 percent by mass or less.
[Zn: 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.0 percent by mass or less]
[0067] Zinc (Zn) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Zn, if its content
is less than 3.0 percent by mass, may not exhibit the activity sufficiently. In contrast,
Zn, if its content is more than 9. 0 percent by mass, may often cause unevenness in
the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Zn content should be 3.0
percent by mass or more and 9.0 percent by mass or less.
[Si: 0.7 percent by mass or less]
[0068] Silicon (Si) is generally contained in the aluminum alloy as an impurity in the ingot
and forms an Al-(Fe)-Si intermetallic compound in the slab typically in the casting
step (S4). Si, if its content is more than 0.7 percent by mass, may cause a coarse
Al- (Fe) -Si intermetallic compound in the slab, to thereby often cause unevenness
in the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Si content should be
0.7 percent by mass or less.
[Fe: 0.8 percent by mass or less]
[0069] Iron (Fe) is generally contained in the aluminum alloy as an impurity in the ingot
and forms an Al-Fe intermetallic compound in the slab typically in the casting step
(S4). Fe, if its content is more than 0.8 percent by mass, may cause a coarse Al-Fe
intermetallic compound in the slab, to thereby often cause unevenness in the surface
appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Fe content should be 0.8 percent by
mass or less.
[Cu: 3.0 percent by mass or less]
[0070] Copper (Cu) serves to improve the strength of the aluminum alloy. Cu, if its content
is more than 3.0 percent by mass, may impair the corrosion resistance. Accordingly,
the Cu content should be 3.0 percent by mass or less.
[Mn: 0.8 percent by mass or less]
[0071] Manganese (Mn) allows the crystal structure to be finer. Mn, if its content is more
than 0.8 percent by mass, may cause a coarse intermetallic compound, to thereby often
cause unevenness in the surface appearance after anodization. Accordingly, the Mn
content should be 0.8 percent by mass or less.
(3) Details of Manufacturing Methods
[0072] Next, the respective steps in the manufacturing methods according to the first to
fourth embodiments of the present invention will be described.
(3-1) Melting Step
[0073] The melting step (S1) is a step of melting the raw material aluminum alloy.
(3-2) Hydrogen Gas Removal Step
[0074] The hydrogen gas removal step (S2) is a step of removing hydrogen gas from the aluminum
alloy which has been melted in the melting step (S1).
[0075] Hydrogen gas is generated typically from hydrogen in a fuel and from water and organic
substances attached typically to the ingot. Hydrogen gas, if contained in a large
content, will cause the following disadvantages.
- [a] Pin holes are generated.
- [b] The product has insufficient strength.
- [c] Hydrogen is accumulated and enriched at the grain boundary in the vicinity of
the surface of the slab. This causes blistering of the slab and peeling of the aluminum
alloy thick plate resulting from the blistering; and also causes potential defects
on the surface of the thick plate which appear as surface defects of the thick plate.
[0076] Accordingly, the amount of hydrogen gas is preferably 0.2 ml or less and more preferably
0.1 ml or less per 100 g of the aluminum alloy. Removal of hydrogen gas can be suitably
carried out by subjecting a moltenmetal typically to a fluxing process, chlorine refining,
or in-line refining, and it can be more suitably carried out by using a SNIF (spinning
nozzle inert flotation) system and a porous plug (see
JP-ANo. 2002-146447) in a hydrogen gas removing apparatus.
[0077] The concentration of hydrogen gas in a slab can be determined typically in the following
manner. Specifically, a sample is cut out from the slab after the casting step; then
subj ected to ultrasonic cleaning with alcohol and acetone; and thereafter analyzed
typically according to the inert gas fusion thermal conductivity method (LIS A06-1993).
[0078] The concentration of hydrogen gas in an aluminum alloy thick plate can be determined
typically in the following manner. Specifically, a sample is cut out from the aluminum
alloy thick plate. Next, the sample is immersed in an aqueous NaOH solution; then
treated with nitric acid to remove an oxide film on the surface of the sample; and
the treated sample is subjected to ultrasonic cleaning with alcohol and acetone and
then analyzed according typically to the vacuum heat extraction capacitance method
(LIS A06-1993).
(3-3) Filtration Step
[0079] The filtration step (S3) is a step of removing mainly oxide and non-metal inclusions
from the aluminum alloy with a filtrating device. The filtrating device is provided
typically with a ceramic tube with alumina particles of about 1 mm. The inclusions
are removed by allowing a molten metal to pass through the ceramic tube.
[0080] The hydrogen gas removal step and the filtration step ensure high quality of the
aluminum alloy, and the resulting aluminum alloy is made into a high-quality slab
in the subsequent casting step (S4). These steps can suppress the generation of deposits
of oxides (dross), and this reduces the effort and time for removing the dross.
(3-4) Casting Step
[0081] The casting step (S4) is a step of producing a slab by forming a molten metal of
the aluminum alloy typically with a casting apparatus into a predetermined shape such
as a rectangular parallelepiped and solidifying the metal. Typically, a casting apparatus
equipped with a water-cooled mold is used. A semi-continuous casting process may be
employed as the casting process. In the semi-continuous castingprocess, a molten metal
of the aluminum alloy is injected from above into a water-cooled metallic mold having
an open bottom, and the solidified aluminum alloy is successively withdrawn from the
bottom of the water-cooled mold to give slabs having predetermined thickness. The
semi-continuous casting process may be carried out vertically or horizontally.
(3-5) Slicing Step
[0082] The slicing step (S5) is a step of producing an aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by slicing the slab produced in the casting step (S4). The
slab slicing process may be employed as a slicing process. The slab slicing process
is a process for cutting out the slab in the cast direction by slicing the slab produced
by the semi-continuous casting process typically with a band saw cutting apparatus,
to give an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness. The thickness
of the aluminum alloy thick plate is preferably 15 to 200 mm, but it is not particularly
limited, and can be varied suitably depending on the intended use of the aluminum
alloy thick plate.
[0083] A band saw is preferably used in the slicing process, but it is not particularly
limited, and cutting may be also performed typically with a circular saw cutting apparatus,
or by laser or water pressure.
[0084] Slicing the slab gives an aluminum alloy thick plate superior typically in surface
condition, flatness, and accuracy of the plate thickness to a rolled product. For
example, there can be obtained a thick plate having a flatness (amount of warpage)
per 1 m in the casting direction of 0.4 mm or less per 1 m length in the evaluation
of flatness, and the accuracy of the plate thickness of ±100 µm or less.
[0085] With reference to Fig. 2, a central portion B shaded with slanted lines is preferably
removed in the slicing step (S5). The central portion B has two substantially identical
thicknesses in a thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction A
to the both surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and has a total thickness
of from one-thirtieth to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab 1 (T/30 to T/5). The
central portion B in Fig. 2 is illustrated to have a thickness about one-fifth the
thickness T. The thicknesses b1 and b2 of the upper and lower portions of the central
portion B of the slab 1 are preferably equal to each other, but a difference between
them of about 30% is acceptable. As used herein "the center of the thickness direction
A" refers to a location which is the center of the slab 1 in the thickness direction
and is located about a half the thickness T of the slab 1, i.e., a location of the
slab 1 about T/2 deep.
[0086] The central portion B of the slab 1 is susceptive to unevenness in the surface and
cross section of the thick plate after anodization. However, when the central portion
B is removed by the slicing step (S5), and a thick plate excellent in quality of appearance
after anodization with less within-lot variation can be obtained. Removal of a central
portion having a thickness of less than T/30 (one-thirtieth the thickness T) may often
cause a thick plate suffering from unevenness in the surface appearance after anodization
and often cause a large within-lot variation. In contrast, if a central portion having
a thickness of more than T/5 (one-fifth the thickness T) is removed, an excessively
large amount of the portion is to be removed, and this may impair the productivity.
Accordingly, the central portion B of the slab 1 is preferably removed in such an
amount that the central portion has two substantially identical thicknesses in the
thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction A to the both surfaces
of the central portion, respectively, and has a total thickness of from one-thirtieth
to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab 1 (T/30 to T/5).
[0087] After slicing the slab in the slicing step (S5), the subsequent heat treatment step
(S6) is performed in which a heat treatment is conducted in order to remove the internal
stress and to uniformize the inner structure. The heat treatment improves the flatness,
accuracy of plate thickness, and quality of appearance after anodization.
(3-6) Heat Treatment Step
[0088] The heat treatment step (S6) is a step of carrying out a heat treatment (heat treatment
for homogenization) on the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness
produced in the slicing step (S5). The heat treatment may be carried out according
to a common procedure. Specifically, when the aluminum alloy is a 5000 series Al-Mg
alloy (the first embodiment of the present invention), a 3000 series Al-Mn alloy (the
second embodiment of the present invention), and a 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy (the
third embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment is performed by holding
the aluminum alloy thick plate at a temperature of 400°C or higher but lower than
its melting point for one hour or longer. When the aluminum alloy is a 7000 series
Al-Zn-Mg alloy (the fourth embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment
is performed by holding the aluminum alloy thick plate at a temperature of 350°C or
higher but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
[0089] The slicing process of the slab obtained in the casting step (S4) allows the internal
residual stress to be released, and this often causes warpage. According to the present
invention, however, the sliced aluminum alloy thickplate having a predetermined thickness
and subj ected to a heat treatment while being placed typically on a surface plate,
and the resulting aluminum alloy thick plate thereby has improved flatness.
[0090] In the first to third embodiments of the present invention, a heat treatment, if
conducted at a temperature of lower than 400°C, may not sufficiently help to remove
the inner stress and to uniformize a solute element, which is segregated during casting,
and the heat treatment may therefore not exhibit sufficient advantages. Accordingly,
the treatment temperature herein should be 400°C or higher. If a heat treatment is
conducted at a temperature equal to or higher than the melting point, part of the
surface of the slab is melted, to cause an internal defect and to impair the strength/ductility.
Accordingly, the treatment temperature should be lower than the melting point.
[0091] In the fourth embodiment of the present invention, a heat treatment, if conducted
at a temperature of lower than 350°C, may not sufficiently help to remove the inner
stress and to uniformize a solute element, which is segregated during casting, and
therefore may exhibit less advantages. Accordingly, the treatment temperature herein
should be 350°C or higher. If a heat treatment is conducted at a temperature equal
to or higher than the melting point, part of the surface of the slab ismelted, to
cause an internal defect and to impair the strength/ductility. Accordingly, the treatment
temperature should be lower than the melting point.
[0092] A heat treatment, if conducted for a time shorter than one hour, may not sufficiently
help intermetallic compounds to be solidly dissolved, and this may often cause the
intermetallic compounds to be deposited. Accordingly, the treatment time should be
one hour or longer. In contrast, a heat treatment, if conducted for a time of longer
than about 8 hours, may be saturated in its effect, and this may cause energy loss.
Accordingly, the treatment time is preferably controlled to be 8 hours or shorter.
[0093] The aluminum alloy thick plate after the heat treatment in the heat treatment step
(S6) may be subjected to a surface smoothing treatment according to necessity in order
to remove crystallized substances and oxides generated on the surface of the thick
plate or to eliminate gas accumulation in the surface of the thick plate.
(3-7) Surface Smoothing Treatment Step
[0094] The surface smoothing treatment step (S7) is a step of subjecting the surface of
the aluminum alloy thick plate produced in the heat treatment step (S6) to a surface
smoothing treatment. Exemplary surface smoothing treatments include, but are not limited
to, cutting such as end mill cutting and diamond bite cutting; grinding which faces
the surface typically with a grindstone; and polishing such as buff polishing.
[0095] When the aluminum alloy thick plate is used for a vacuum chamber (chamber for a vacuum
apparatus), it is especially effective to carry out a surface smoothing treatment.
The reason therefor is as follows. Specifically, a vacuum chamber suffers from a decrease
in the degree of vacuum therein caused by, when the chamber is decompressed to attain
high vacuum, releasing of adsorbed gas from the inner surface of the chamber and releasing
of gas atoms which are solidly dissolved in the thick plate onto the surface. This
elongates the time which takes to reach a target degree of vacuum and thereby lowers
production efficiency. Accordingly, the following conditions are required for the
aluminum alloy thick plate used for a chamber: the amount of gas which adsorbs onto
the surface of the thick plate positioned in an inner portion of the chamber is low;
and the gas atoms which are solidly dissolved in the thick plate are not released
even in high vacuum. The surface smoothing treatment herein satisfies these conditions.
(B) Methods for Manufacturing Aluminum Alloy Thick Plates According to Fifth to Eighth
Embodiments of the Present Invention
(1) Outline of Manufacturing Methods
[0096] With reference to Fig. 3, the methods for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate,
according to the fifth to eighth embodiments of the present invention, each include
a melting step (S1), a hydrogen gas removal step (S2), a filtration step (S3), a casting
step (S4), a heat treatment step (S5), and a slicing step (S6) in this order. The
methods may further include, where necessary, a surface smoothing treatment step (S7)
subsequent to the slicing step (S6).
[0097] In these manufacturing methods, initially, a raw material aluminum alloy is melted
in the melting step (S1). Next, hydrogen gas is removed from the molten aluminum alloy
in the hydrogen gas removal step (S2), and inclusions such as oxides and non-metals
are removed therefrom in the filtration step (S3). Next, the resulting aluminum alloy
is cast into a slab in the casting step (S4). The slab is subjected to a heat treatment
in the heat treatment step (S5) and is then sliced into an aluminum alloy thick plate
having a predetermined thickness in the slicing step (S6). Where necessary, the aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness is further subjected to a surface
smoothing treatment in the surface smoothing treatment step (S7).
(2) Aluminum Alloys
[0098] The manufacturing methods according to the fifth, sixth, seventh, and eighth embodiments
of the present invention use, as a raw material aluminum alloy, a 5000 series Al-Mg
alloy, a 3000 series Al-Mn alloy, a 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy, and a 7000 series
Al-Zn-Mg alloy, respectively. The details of them are as follows.
(2-1) Fifth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0099] A 5000 series Al-Mg alloy as in the first embodiment of the present invention is
used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the first embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-2) Sixth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0100] A 3000 series Al-Mn alloy as in the second embodiment of the present invention is
used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the second embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-3) Seventh Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0101] A 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy as in the third embodiment of the present invention
is used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the third embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-4) Eighth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0102] A 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy as in the fourth embodiment of the present invention
is used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the fourth embodiment
of the present invention.
(3) Details of Manufacturing Methods
[0103] Next, the respective steps in the manufacturing methods according to the fifth to
eighth embodiments of the present invention will be described.
(3-1) Melting Step
[0104] This step is the same as with the melting step (S1) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-2) Hydrogen Gas Removal Step
[0105] This step is the same as with the hydrogen gas removal step (S2) in the first to
fourth embodiments of the present invention.
(3-3) Filtration Step
[0106] This step is the same as with the filtration step (S3) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-4) Casting Step
[0107] This step is the same as with the casting step (S4) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
[0108] Before slicing the slab produced in the casting step (S4), a heat treatment is carried
out in the subsequent heat treatment step (S5), for the purpose of removing internal
stress and uniformizing the inner structure. The heat treatment of the slab helps
to improve the flatness, accuracy of plate thickness, and quality of appearance after
anodization.
(3-5) Heat Treatment Step
[0109] The heat treatment step (S5) is a step of subj ecting the slab produced in the casting
step (S4) to a heat treatment (heat treatment for homogenization). The heat treatment
is carried out according to a common procedure. Specifically, when the aluminum alloy
is a 5000 series Al-Mg alloy (the fifth embodiment of the present invention), a 3000
series Al-Mn alloy (the sixth embodiment of the present invention), and a 6000 series
Al-Mg-Si alloy (the seventh embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment
is performed by holding the slab at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than
400°C for one hour or longer. When the aluminum alloy is a 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy
(the eighth embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment is performed
by holding the slab at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 350°C for one
hour or longer.
[0110] In the fifth to seventh embodiments of the present invention, a heat treatment, if
conducted at a temperature of lower than 200°C, may not sufficiently help to remove
the inner stress and therefore may not exhibit satisfactory advantages. Accordingly,
the treatment temperature should be 200°C or higher. In contrast, a heat treatment,
if conducted at a temperature of 400°C or higher, may excessively increase the ductility
and lower the strength and cutting property. As used herein the term "cutting property"
refers to chip breakability. Chips (scraps) are preferably formed as small or short
pieces. This is because long chips become entangled with a working tool (blade) and
are rotated therewith, and this damages the surface of the thick plate and breaks
the tool. Accordingly, the treatment temperature should be lower than 400°C. A heat
treatment performed under above-specified temperature conditions helps to improve
the flatness and accuracy of plate thickness without adversely affecting the strength
and cutting property.
[0111] In the eighth embodiment of the present invention, a heat treatment, if performed
at a temperature of lower than 200°C, may not sufficiently help to remove the inner
stress and therefore may not exhibit satisfactory advantages. Accordingly, the treatment
temperature should be 200°C or higher. In contrast, a heat treatment, if conducted
at a temperature of 350°C or higher, may excessively increase the ductility and lower
the strength and cutting property. As used herein the term "cutting property" refers
to chip breakability. Chips (scraps) are preferably formed as small or short pieces.
This is because long chips become entangled with a working tool (blade) and are rotated
therewith, and this damages the surface of the thick plate and breaks the tool. Accordingly,
the treatment temperature should be lower than 350°C. A heat treatment performed under
above-specified temperature conditions helps to improve the flatness and accuracy
of plate thickness without adversely affecting the strength and cutting property.
[0112] A heat treatment, if conducted for a time shorter than one hour, may not sufficiently
help intermetallic compounds to be solidly dissolved, and this may often cause the
intermetallic compounds to be deposited. Accordingly, the treatment time shouldbe
one hour or longer. In contrast, a heat treatment, if conducted for a time of longer
than about 8 hours, may be saturated in its effect, and this may cause energy loss.
Accordingly, the treatment time is preferably controlled to be 8 hours or shorter.
(3-6) Slicing Step
[0113] The slicing step (S6) is a step of slicing the slab obtained in the heat treatment
step (S5) into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness. The
details of this step are as with the slicing step (S5) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
[0114] The aluminum alloy thick plate produced in the slicing step (S6) may be subjected
to a surface smoothing treatment according to necessity in order to remove crystallized
substances and oxides formed on the surface of the thick plate or to eliminate gas
accumulation in the surface of the thick plate.
(3-7) Surface Smoothing Treatment Step
[0115] The surface smoothing treatment step (S7) is a step of subjecting the surface of
the aluminum alloy thick plate produced in the slicing step (S6) to a surface smoothing
treatment. The details of this step are as with the surface smoothing treatment step
(S7) in the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention.
(C) Methods for Manufacturing Aluminum Alloy Thick Plates According to Ninth to Twelfth
Embodiments of the Present Invention
(1) Outline of Manufacturing Methods
[0116] With reference to Fig. 1, the methods for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate,
according to the ninth to twelfth embodiments of the present invention, each include
a melting step (S1), a hydrogen gas removal step (S2), a filtration step (S3), a casting
step (S4), a slicing step (S5), and a heat treatment step (S6) in this order. The
methods may further include, where necessary, a surface smoothing treatment step (S7)
subsequent to the heat treatment step (S6).
[0117] In these manufacturing methods, initially, a raw material aluminum alloy is melted
in the melting step (S1). Next, hydrogen gas is removed from the molten aluminum alloy
in the hydrogen gas removal step (S2), and inclusions such as oxides and non-metals
are removed therefrom in the filtration step (S3). Next, the resulting aluminum alloy
is cast into a slab in the casting step (S4). The slab is then sliced into an aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness in the slicing step (S5). The aluminum
alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness is then subjected to a heat treatment
in the heat treatment step (S6) and, where necessary, further subjected to a surface
smoothing treatment in the surface smoothing treatment step (S7).
(2) Aluminum Alloys
[0118] The manufacturing methods according to the ninth, tenth, eleventh, and twelfth embodiments
of the present invention use a 5000 series Al-Mg alloy, a 3000 series Al-Mn alloy,
a 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy, and a 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy, respectively, as a
raw material aluminum alloy. The details of them are as follows.
(2-1) Ninth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0119] A 5000 series Al-Mg alloy as in the first embodiment of the present invention is
used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the first embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-2) Tenth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0120] A 3000 series Al-Mn alloy as in the second embodiment of the present invention is
used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the second embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-3) Eleventh Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0121] A 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloy as in the third embodiment of the present invention
is used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the third embodiment
of the present invention.
(2-4) Twelfth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0122] A 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy as in the fourth embodiment of the present invention
is used in this embodiment. The composition and contents of components of the aluminum
alloy, and the reasons why the contents are specified are as in the fourth embodiment
of the present invention.
(3) Details of Manufacturing Methods
[0123] Next, the respective steps in the manufacturing methods according to the ninth to
twelfth embodiments of the present invention will be described below.
(3-1) Melting Step
[0124] This step is the same as with the melting step (S1) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-2) Hydrogen Gas Removal Step
[0125] This step is the same as with the hydrogen gas removal step (S2) in the first to
fourth embodiments of the present invention.
(3-3) Filtration Step
[0126] This step is the same as with the filtration step (S3) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-4) Casting Step
[0127] This step is the same as with the casting step (S4) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-S) Slicing Step
[0128] This step is the same as with the slicing step (S5) in the first to fourth embodiments
of the present invention.
(3-6) Heat Treatment Step
[0129] The heat treatment step (S6) is a step of carrying out a heat treatment (heat treatment
for homogenization) on the aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined thickness
produced in the slicing step (S5). The heat treatment may be carried out according
to a common procedure. Specifically, when the aluminum alloy is a 5000 series Al-Mg
alloy (the ninth embodiment of the present invention), a 3000 series Al-Mn alloy (the
tenth embodiment of the present invention), anda 6000 seriesAl-Mg-Si alloy (the eleventh
embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment is performed by holding the
aluminum alloy thick plate at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C
for one hour or longer. When the aluminum alloy is a 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloy (the
twelfth embodiment of the present invention), the heat treatment is performed by holding
the aluminum alloy thick plate at a temperature of 200°C or higher but lower than
350°C for one hour or longer. The details of the other conditions and procedures are
as with the heat treatment step (S6) in the first to fourth embodiments of the present
invention.
[0130] In the ninth to eleventh embodiments of the present invention, a heat treatment,
if conducted at a temperature of lower than 200°C may not sufficiently help to remove
the inner stress and therefore may not exhibit satisfactory advantages. Accordingly,
the treatment temperature should be 200°C or higher. In contrast, a heat treatment,
if conducted at a temperature of 400°C or higher, may excessively increase the ductility
and lower the strength and cutting property. As used herein the term "cutting property"
refers to chip breakability. Chips (scraps) are preferably formed as small or short
pieces. This is because long chips become entangled with a working tool (blade) and
are rotated therewith, and this damages the surface of the thick plate and breaks
the tool. Accordingly, the treatment temperature should be lower than 400°C. A heat
treatment performed under above-specified temperature conditions helps to improve
the flatness and accuracy of plate thickness without adversely affecting the strength
and cutting property.
[0131] In the twelfth embodiment of the present invention, a heat treatment, if conducted
at a temperature of lower than 200°C, may not sufficiently help to remove the inner
stress and therefore may not exhibit satisfactory advantages. Accordingly, the treatment
temperature should be 200°C or higher. In contrast, a heat treatment, if conducted
at a temperature of 350°C or higher, may excessively increase the ductility and lower
the strength and cutting property. As used herein the term "cutting property" refers
to chip breakability. Chips (scraps) are preferably formed as small or short pieces.
This is because long chips become entangled with a working tool (blade) and are rotated
therewith, and this damages the surface of the thick plate and breaks the tool. Accordingly,
the treatment temperature should be lower than 350°C. A heat treatment performed under
above-specified temperature conditions helps to improve the flatness and accuracy
of plate thickness without adversely affecting the strength and cutting property.
[0132] A heat treatment, if conducted for a time shorter than one hour, may not sufficiently
help intermetallic compounds to be solidly dissolved, and this may often cause the
intermetallic compounds to be deposited. Accordingly, the treatment time shouldbe
one hour or longer. In contrast, a heat treatment, if conducted for a time of longer
than about 8 hours, may be saturated in its effect, and this may cause energy loss.
Accordingly, the treatment time is preferably controlled to be 8 hours or shorter.
(3-7) Surface Smoothing Treatment Step
[0133] This step is the same as with the surface smoothing treatment step (S7) in the first
to fourth embodiments of the present invention.
(D) Thirteenth Embodiment of the Present Invention
[0134] Next, aluminum alloy thick plates according to the present invention will be described
below.
[0135] These aluminum alloy thick plates are manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing
method according to any one of the first to twelfth embodiments of the present invention
and have an average crystal grain size of 400 µm or less.
[0136] The aluminum alloy thick plates according to the present invention have an average
crystal grain size of 400 µm or less whereby can have improved quality of appearance
after anodization and show a smaller within-lot variation.
[0137] A thick plate, if containing intermetallic compounds having large sizes, suffers
from unevenness (uneven color) of the cross section and surface of the thick plate
upon anodization. The aluminum alloy thick plates according to the present invention,
however, contain intermetallic compounds with small sizes and are thereby resistant
to such unevenness.
[0138] The measurement of the crystal grain size may be carried out, for example, in the
following manner. Specifically, measurements are conducted in cross sections at four
points, i.e., at thicknesses of T/5, 2T/5, 3T/5, and 4T/5 ranging from one surface
of the slab to the other, wherein T represents the thickness of the slab, and the
four measured data are averaged. These measured data are determined typically according
to a cutting method. In the cutting method, cross sections of the aluminum alloy thick
plate are etched according to a Barker method and are observed with an optical microscope.
[0139] The control of the average crystal grain size to 400 µm or less may be carried out
typically in the following manner. Specifically, a cooling rate (average cooling rate
from the liquidus temperature to the solidus temperature) during casting is set to
be 0.2°C/second or more. Additionally, the aluminum alloy contains 0.1 percent by
mass or less of Ti or 0. 3 percent by mass or less of Zr and thereby the crystal grain
size can be more finer (smaller) in the manufacturing methods according to the first
to third embodiments, the fifth to seventh embodiments, and the ninth to eleventh
embodiments of the present invention. The aluminum alloy contains 0.1 percent by mass
or less of Ti or 0.25 percent by mass or less of Zr and thereby the crystal grain
size can be more finer (smaller) in the manufacturing methods according to the fourth,
eighth, and twelfth embodiments of the present invention.
[0140] The resulting aluminum alloy thick plates manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing
methods according to the first to twelfth embodiments of the present invention are
satisfactory in the surface condition, flatness, and accuracy of plate thickness as
described above and can be used for various applications including semiconductor-related
devices such as base substrates, transport devices, and vacuum chambers; electrical
and electronic parts and their manufacturing devices; household articles; and mechanical
parts. Additionally, they can be recycled and used for other applications.
[0141] There is not need of considering about the corrosion resistance of the aluminum alloy
thick plates. This is because thick plates for base substrates and for transport devices
are used in clean rooms, they are thereby not required to have generic corrosion resistance.
Even when the thick plates are used for vacuum chambers, high corrosion resistance
is unnecessary since the environment hardly causes the thick plate to be exposed to
a corrosive gas.
[0142] Preferred embodiments have been illustrated above, but the present invention is not
limited to these embodiments.
EXAMPLES
[0143] Some Examples (Experimental Examples) of the present invention will be illustrated
below.
(1) First Experimental Example
[0144] This experimental example relates to the first embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 5000 series Al-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0145] With reference to Table 1, Alloys 1A to 12A were used as example alloys; while Alloys
13A to 22A were used as comparative example alloys.
[0146]
[Table 1]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| |
Alloy 1A |
2.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 2A |
2.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 3A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 4A |
8.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 5A |
11.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 6A |
5.0 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 7A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 8A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 9A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.7 |
0.3 |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 10A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.3 |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 11A |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5052 alloy |
| |
Alloy 12A |
4.6 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
- |
0.6 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5083 alloy |
| |
Alloy 13A |
1.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| |
Alloy 14A |
14.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 15A |
5.0 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 16A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Fe content more than upper limit |
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 17A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Cu content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 18A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
1.2 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 19A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Cr content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 20A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Zn content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 21A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
5000 series |
Ti content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 22A |
5.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
0.4 |
5000 series |
Zr content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0147] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 1A to 22A to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 500°C for 4 hours
[0148] Accordingly, the resulting sliced samples are aluminum alloy thick plates manufactured
by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the first embodiment of
the present invention, but the resulting hot-rolled samples are not. Among them, only
the sliced samples using Alloys 1A to 22A correspond to examples according to the
first embodiment of the present invention.
[0149] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments. were tested
for their properties as below.
<Flatness Evaluation Test>
[0150] In the flatness evaluation, the sliced samples were tested to determine their amounts
of warpage (flatness) per 1 m in the casting direction, while the hot-rolled samples
were tested to determine their amounts of warpage (flatness) per 1 m in the rolling
direction. Samples having an amount of warpage of 0.4 mm or less per 1 m length were
evaluated as having accepted flatness (Accepted), while those having an amount of
warpage of more than 0.4 mm per 1 m length were evaluated as having unaccepted flatness
(Failed).
<Evaluation Test for Accuracy of Plate Thickness>
[0151] In the evaluation of accuracy of plate thickness, thicknesses at six positions of
each sample were measured with a micrometer. The six positions are the four corners
of the sample thickplate, and two positions each located at a half the length of the
long sides and 20 mm inside in the width direction of the thick plate. Samples having
thicknesses of 19.94 mm or more and 20.06 mm or less at all the six positions were
evaluated as having excellent accuracy of plate thickness (Excellent); and those having
thicknesses of 19.90 mm or more and 20.10 mm or less at all the six positions were
evaluated as having accepted accuracy of plate thickness (Accepted).
<Strength Test>
[0152] The strength test was conducted in the following manner. Specifically, JIS No. 5
test pieces were prepared from the aluminum alloy thick plates to perform tensile
test thereon, and their tensile strength and 0.2%-proof stress were measured. Samples
having a tensile strength of 180 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted) ; while those having
a tensile strength of less than 180 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
<Anodizability Evaluation Test>
[0153] The anodiz ability evaluation was carried out in the following manner. Anodized aluminum
films having a thickness of 10 µm were formed on surface and cross sections of the
aluminum alloy thick plates by sulfuric acid anodization under conditions of 15% sulfuric
acid, 20°C, and a current density of 2 A/dm
2. The appearances of surfaces and cross sections of the thick plates were observed.
Samples showing no unevenness (uneven color) in their appearances were evaluated as
having accepted anodizability (Accepted); while those showing unevenness in their
appearances were evaluated as having unaccepted anodizability (Failed).
[0154] Since the anodizability is affected by the crystal grain sizes of the thick plates,
the average crystal grain sizes of the thick plates were determined. The measurements
of the average crystal grain sizes were carried out in the following manner. Specifically,
measurements were conducted in cross sections at four points, i.e., at thicknesses
of T/5, 2T/5, 3T/5, and 4T/5 ranging from one surface of the slab to the other, wherein
T represents the thickness of the slab, and the four measured data were averaged.
These measured data were determined according to the cutting method. In the cutting
method, cross sections of the aluminum alloy thick plate were etched according to
the Barker method and were observed with an optical microscope.
[0155] The test results are shown in Tables 2 and 3.
[0156]
[Table 2]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size
(µm) |
| |
Example |
Alloy 1A |
0.16 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
196 |
91 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
180 |
| |
Alloy 2A |
0.16 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
205 |
100 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
180 |
| |
Alloy 3A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
290 |
137 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 4A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
316 |
161 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 5A |
0.22 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
368 |
175 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 6A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
290 |
141 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 7A |
0.18 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
287 |
137 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 8A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
287 |
139 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 9A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
301 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 10A |
0.21 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
285 |
135 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 11A |
0.17 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
205 |
102 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| Sliced Sample |
Alloy 12A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
288 |
136 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 13A |
0.15 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
155 |
62 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
220 |
| |
Alloy 14A |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
Alloy 15A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
292 |
143 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 16A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
290 |
142 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 17A |
0.21 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
305 |
156 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 18A |
0.21 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
308 |
155 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 19A |
0.20 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
305 |
152 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 20A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
287 |
138 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 21A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
292 |
142 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 22A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
294 |
148 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
[0157]
[Table 3]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size(µm) |
| |
|
Alloy 1A |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
212 |
105 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
170 |
| |
|
Alloy 2A |
0.42 |
Failed |
Excellent |
221 |
110 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 3A |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
303 |
144 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 4A |
0.61 |
Failed |
Accepted |
321 |
168 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 5A |
0.73 |
Failed |
Accepted |
388 |
202 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
130 |
| |
|
Alloy 6A |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
312 |
158 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 7A |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
304 |
155 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 8A |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
309 |
156 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 9A |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
321 |
162 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 10A |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
310 |
150 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 11A |
0.43 |
Failed |
Excellent |
232 |
133 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 12A |
0.47 |
Failed |
Accepted |
312 |
165 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 13A |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
178 |
92 |
Failed |
Accented |
Failed |
200 |
| |
|
Alloy 14A |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
|
Alloy 15A |
0.51 |
Failed |
Accepted |
305 |
145 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
170 |
| |
|
Alloy 16A |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
303 |
144 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 17A |
0.51 |
Failed |
Accepted |
314 |
158 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 18A |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
320 |
157 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
120 |
| |
|
Alloy 19A |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
316 |
155 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
120 |
| |
|
Alloy 20A |
0.51 |
Failed |
Accepted |
300 |
143 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 21A |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
306 |
147 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 22A |
0.51 |
Failed |
Accepted |
310 |
154 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
130 |
[0158] Table 2 shows the test results of the sliced samples, in which Alloys 1A to 12A correspond
to Examples, and Alloys 13A to 22A correspond to comparative examples. Table 3 shows
the test results of the hot-rolled samples, in which all Alloys 1A to 22A correspond
to comparative examples.
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0159] With reference to Table 2, the samples using Alloys 1A to 13A and 15A to 22A had
small processing strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactory flatness.
Additionally, they excelled in accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 14A contained Mg in a content of more than its upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, thereby suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13A contained Mg in a content of less than its lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and thereby had insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloys 1A to 13A, 17A, and 20A to 22A did not suffer fromunevenness
in their appearances of surfaces after anodization. The samples using Alloys 15A,
16A, 18A, and 19A contained Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively, in a content of more
than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, thereby caused a coarse intermetallic
compound, and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 1A to 13A and 15A to 22A did not suffer from unevenness in
their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 17A, 20A, 21A, and 22A contained Cu, Zn, Ti, and Zr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages
obtained therefrom were thereby saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0160] As is demonstrated in Table 3, the samples using Alloys 1A to 13A and 15A to 22A
had accumulated processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling direction.
Specifically, they showed inferior flatness. Many of them showed somewhat inferior
accuracy of plate thickness to the sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 14A contained Mg in a content of more than the upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13A contained Mg in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and showed insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloys 15A, 16A, 18A, and 19A contained Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The samples using Alloys 1A to 13A and 15A to 22A suffered from
unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(2) Second Experimental Example
[0161] This experimental example relates to the first embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used Alloy 3A in Table 1.
(Treatments)
[0162] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloy 3A to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step, and a
casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a slicing step to give sliced samples. The
sliced samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and
2000 mm long.
The sliced samples were then subjected to a heat treatment step. Specifically, the
sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment under conditions given in
Table 4.
[0163]
[Table 4]
| |
Category |
|
Number |
Heat treatment for uniformization |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
A1 |
Alloy 3A |
420°C for2 hr |
0.21 |
Excellent |
Excellent |
| A2 |
Alloy 3A |
500°C for4 hr |
0.19 |
Excellent |
Excellent |
| Comparative Example |
A3 |
Alloy 3A |
none |
0.30 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| A4 |
Alloy 3A |
380°C for 4 hr |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
| A5 |
Alloy 3A |
530°C for 2 hr |
unproducible due to the generation of burning |
[0164] Samples A1 and A2, whose heat treatment conditions satisfy the conditions according
to the first embodiment of the present invention, correspond to examples according
to the first embodiment of the present invention; whereas Samples A3 to A5, whose
heat treatment conditions do not satisfy the conditions according to the first embodiment
of the present invention, correspond to comparative examples.
[0165] Next, the sliced samples after the treatments were subjected to a flatness evaluation
test and an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness.
<Flatness Evaluation Test>
[0166] In the flatness evaluation, the samples were tested to determine their amounts of
warpage (flatness) per 1 m in the casting direction. Samples having an amount of warpage
of 0.4 mm or less per 1 m length were evaluated as having accepted flatness (Accepted),
and those having an amount of warpage of 0.25 mm or less per 1 m length were evaluated
as having excellent flatness (Excellent).
<Evaluation Test for Accuracy of Plate Thickness>
[0167] The evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness is as in First Experimental Example.
[0168] The test results are shown in Table 4.
[0169] As is demonstrated in Table 4, ExamplesAl andA2, whoseheat treatment conditions satisfy
the conditions specified in the first embodiment of the present invention, excelled
in flatness and accuracy of plate thickness. Comparative Example A3 did not undergo
a heat treatment and was thereby somewhat inferior in flatness and accuracy of plate
thickness to Examples A1 and A2. Comparative Example A4 underwent a heat treatment
at a temperature lower than the temperature range specified in the first embodiment
of the present invention (lower than 400°C) and was thereby somewhat inferior in flatness
to Examples A1 andA2. Comparative Example A5 underwent a heat treatment at a temperature
higher than the temperature range specified in the first embodiment of the present
invention (higher than the melting point), whereby suffered from internal partial
melting and resulting internal defects, and was unproducible.
(3) Third Experimental Example
[0170] This experimental example relates to the second embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 3000 series Al-Mn alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0171] With reference to Table 5, Alloys 23A and 24A were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 25A and 26A were used as comparative example alloys.
[0172]
[Table 5]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 23A |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Alloy 24A |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.9 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 25A |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.2 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 26A |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
1.7 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0173] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 23A to 26A to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 500°C for 4 hours.
[0174] Accordingly, the sliced samples after the treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the second
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 23A and 24A correspond to
examples according to the second embodiment of the present invention.
[0175] Next, the prepared sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to
a flatness evaluation test, an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness, a
strength test, and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0176] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 90 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted), whereas those having
a tensile strength of less than 90 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0177] The test results are shown in Table 6.
[0178]
[Table 6]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 23A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
92 |
36 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 24A |
0.21 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
99 |
37 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 25A |
0.19 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
82 |
36 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 26A |
0.24 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
114 |
52 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 23A |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
112 |
54 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 24A |
0.42 |
Failed |
Accepted |
116 |
57 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 25A |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
98 |
50 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 26A |
0.45 |
Failed |
Accepted |
138 |
70 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0179] As is demonstrated in Table 6, the samples using Alloys 23A to 26A had small processing
strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactoryflatness. Additionally,
theyexcelledin accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 25A contained Mn in a content less than the lower limit in
the material aluminum alloy and thereby had insufficient strength. The sample using
Alloy 26A contained Mn in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum
alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness
in its appearance of surface after anodization. The samples using Alloys 23A to 26A
did not suffer from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0180] As is demonstrated in Table 6, the samples using Alloy 23A to 26A suffered from accumulated
processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling direction. Specifically,
they showed inferior flatness. Many of them were somewhat inferior in accuracy of
plate thickness to the corresponding sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 25A contained Mn in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and was thereby somewhat inferior in strength to the
other hot-rolled samples. The sample using Alloy 26A contained Mn in a content of
more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic
compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surface after anodization.
The samples using Alloy 23A to 26A suffered from unevenness in their appearances of
cross sections after anodization.
(4) Forth Experimental Example
[0181] This experimental example relates to the third embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0182] With reference to Table 7, Alloys 27A and 28A were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 29A to 32A were used as comparative example alloys.
[0183]
[Table 7]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 27A |
1.0 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Alloy 28A |
0.5 |
1.0 |
0.2 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 29A |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 30A |
0.9 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| Alloy 31A |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 32A |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0184] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloy 27A to 32A to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 500°C for 4 hours.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 520°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 175°C for 8 hours.
[0185] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the third
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 27A and 28A correspond to
examples according to the third embodiment of the present invention.
[0186] Next, the sliced samples andhot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0187] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 200 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted), whereas those having
a tensile strength of less than 200 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0188] The test results are shown in Table 8.
[0189]
[Table 8]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 27A |
322 |
272 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 28A |
296 |
250 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 29A |
114 |
67 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 30A |
342 |
302 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy 31A |
178 |
125 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 32A |
210 |
124 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 27A |
346 |
276 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 28A |
318 |
276 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 29A |
138 |
88 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 30A |
365 |
323 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy 31A |
197 |
143 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 32A |
235 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0190] As is demonstrated in Table 8, the samples using Alloys 29A and 31A contained Si
and Mg, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30A contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surface
after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32A contained Mg in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained therefrom
were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples using Alloys
27A to 32A did not suffer fromunevenness in their appearances of cross sections after
anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0191] As is demonstrated in Table 8, the samples using Alloys 29A and 31A contained Si
and Mg, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30A contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surface
after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32A contained Mg in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained therefrom
were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples using Alloy
27A to 32A suffered from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(5) Fifth Experimental Example
[0192] This experimental example relates to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0193] With reference to Table 9, Alloys 33A and 34A were used as example alloys, while
Alloys 35A to 38A were used as comparative example alloys.
[0194]
[Table 9]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 33A |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
- |
0.2 |
5.5 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
|
| Alloy 34A |
3.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
- |
8.5 |
0.02 |
0.2 |
7000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 35A |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
4.0 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 36A |
5.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
5.0 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| Alloy 37A |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
2.4 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 38A |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
9.5 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0195] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 33A to 38A to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 500°C for 4 hours.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 470°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 120°C for 48 hours.
[0196] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the fourth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 33A and 34A correspond to
examples according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
[0197] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0198] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 250 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted), whereas those having
a tensile strength of less than 250 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0199] The test results are shown in Table 10.
[0200]
[Table 10]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 33A |
425 |
364 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 34A |
513 |
450 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 35A |
198 |
167 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 36A |
289 |
189 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy 37A |
210 |
132 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 38A |
605 |
526 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 33A |
442 |
380 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 34A |
535 |
474 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 35A |
212 |
174 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 36A |
305 |
203 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy 37A |
227 |
148 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 38A |
616 |
536 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0201] As is demonstrated in Table 10, the samples using Alloys 35A and 37A contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36A and 38A contained
Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in the material
aluminum alloy and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after
anodization. The samples using Alloys 33A to 38A did not suffer from unevenness in
their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0202] As is demonstrated in Table 10, the samples using Alloys 35A and 37A contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36A and 38A contained
Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in the material
aluminum alloy and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after
anodization. The samples using Alloys 33A to 38A suffered from unevenness in their
appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(6) Sixth Experimental Example
[0203] This experimental example relates to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 5000 series Al-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0204] With reference to Table 11, Alloys 1B to 12B were used as example alloys; while Alloys
13B to 22B were used as comparative example alloys.
[0205]
[Table 11]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| |
Alloy 1B |
2.6 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 2B |
2.6 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 3B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 4B |
7.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 5B |
10.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 6B |
4.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 7B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 8B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 9B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.7 |
0.3 |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 10B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.05 |
- |
0.3 |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| |
Alloy 11B |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5052 alloy |
| |
Alloy 12B |
4.6 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
- |
0.6 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5083 alloy |
| |
Alloy 13B |
1.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| |
Alloy 14B |
13.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 15B |
4.5 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 16B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Fe content more than upper limit |
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 17B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Cu content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 18B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
1.2 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 19B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.6 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Cr content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 20B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.5 |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Zn content more than limit |
| |
Alloy 21B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.15 |
- |
5000 series |
upper Ti content than limit |
| |
Alloy 22B |
4.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
0.4 |
5000 series |
more upper Zr content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0206] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 1B to 22B to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a treatment in a heat treatment step, in
which they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the thermally treated
slabs. The sliced samples were prepared by slicing the slabs in a slicing step, while
the hot-rolled samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to hot rolling. The sliced
samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick, 1000
mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
[0207] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the fifth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 1B to 22B correspond to
examples according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
[0208] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a flatness evaluation test, an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness,
a strength test, and an anodizability evaluation test. The procedures and criteria
of the respective tests are as in First Experimental Example.
[0209] The test results are shown in Tables 12 and 13.
[0210]
[Table 12]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size (µm) |
| |
Example |
Alloy 1B |
0.25 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
214 |
100 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 2B |
0.25 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
225 |
108 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 3B |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
308 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 48 |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
335 |
172 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 5B |
0.31 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
387 |
187 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 6B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
311 |
140 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 7B |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
307 |
147 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 8B |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
316 |
147 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 9B |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
320 |
156 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 10B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
305 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 11B |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
226 |
110 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| Sliced Sample |
Alloy 12B |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
309 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 13B |
0.25 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
175 |
72 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
210 |
| |
Alloy 14B |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
Alloy 15B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
310 |
152 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 16B |
0.30 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
309 |
152 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 17B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
324 |
167 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 18B |
0.30 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
328 |
165 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
130 |
| |
Alloy 19B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
327 |
161 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 20B |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
308 |
149 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 21B |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
315 |
150 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
130 |
| |
Alloy 22B |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
316 |
157 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
[0211]
[Table 13]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size (µm) |
| |
|
Alloy 1B |
0.42 |
Failed |
Excellent |
215 |
103 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 2B |
0.43 |
Failed |
Excellent |
224 |
108 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 3B |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
293 |
139 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
170 |
| |
|
Alloy 4B |
0.60 |
Failed |
Accepted |
312 |
162 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 5B |
0.71 |
Failed |
Accepted |
379 |
197 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 6B |
0.48 |
Failed |
Excellent |
302 |
154 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 7B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
295 |
150 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 8B |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
298 |
151 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 9B |
0.51 |
Failed |
Accepted |
310 |
157 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 10B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
299 |
145 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 11B |
0.42 |
Failed |
Excellent |
222 |
126 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
170 |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 12B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
303 |
160 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 13B |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
179 |
95 |
Failed |
Accented |
Failed |
210 |
| |
|
Alloy 14B |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
|
Alloy 15B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Excellent |
295 |
139 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
170 |
| |
|
Alloy 16B |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
294 |
139 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
170 |
| |
|
Alloy 17B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
302 |
154 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 18B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Excellent |
309 |
153 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
130 |
| |
|
Alloy 19B |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
306 |
150 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
120 |
| |
|
Alloy 20B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
290 |
139 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 21B |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
296 |
142 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 22B |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
299 |
150 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
[0212] Table 12 shows the test results of the sliced samples. In Table 12, the samples using
Alloys 1B to 12B correspond to examples according to the fifth embodiment of the present
invention, whereas the samples using Alloys 13B to 22B correspond to comparative examples.
Table 13 shows the test results of the hot-rolled samples. In Table 13, all the samples
using Alloys 1B to 22B correspond to comparative examples.
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0213] As is demonstrated in Table 12, the samples using Alloys 1B to 13B and 15B to 22B
had small processing strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactory
flatness. Additionally, they excelled in accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 14B contained Mg in a content of more than the upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, thereby suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13B contained Mg in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and showed insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloys 1B to 13B, 17B, and 20B to 22B did not suffer from unevenness
in their appearances of surfaces after anodization. The samples using Alloys 15B,
16B, 18B, and 19B contained Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively, in a content of more
than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse intermetallic compounds,
and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after anodization. The
samples using Alloys 1B to 13B and 15B to 22B did not suffer from unevenness in their
appearances of cross sections after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 17B, 20B, 21B, and 22B contained Cu, Zn, Ti, and Zr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages
obtained therefrom were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0214] As is demonstrated in Table 13, the samples using Alloys 1B to 13B and 15B to 22B
suffered from accumulated processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling
direction. Specifically, they showed inferior flatness. Many of them were somewhat
inferior in accuracy of plate thickness to the corresponding sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 14B contained Mg in a content of more than the upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13B contained Mg in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and showed insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloys 15B, 16B, 18B, and 19B contained Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The samples using Alloys 1B to 13B and 15B to 22B suffered from
unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(7) Seventh Experimental Example
[0215] This experimental example relates to the fifth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used Alloy 3B in Table 11.
(Treatments)
[0216] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloy 3B to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step, and a
casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a treatment in a heat treatment step, in
which they were further subjected to a heat treatment under conditions given in Table
14.
The thermally treated slabs were sliced in a slicing step to give sliced samples.
The sliced samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide,
and 2000 mm long.
[0217]
[Table 14]
| |
Category |
|
Number |
Heat treatment for uniformization |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Cutting property |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
(number of chips/10g) |
Evaluation |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
B1 |
Alloy 3B |
350°C for 2 hr |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
1030 |
Accepted |
| B2 |
Alloy 3B |
250°C for 4 hr |
0.36 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
1140 |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
B3 |
Alloy 3B |
none |
0.44 |
Failed |
Accepted |
1290 |
Accepted |
| B4 |
Alloy 3B |
420°C for 4 hr |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
920 |
Failed |
| B5 |
Alloy 3B |
150°C for 2 hr |
0.42 |
Failed |
Accepted |
1230 |
Accepted |
[0218] Accordingly, Samples B1 and B2, whose heat treatment conditions satisfy the conditions
specified in the fifth embodiment of the present invention, correspond to examples
according to the fifth embodiment of the present invention; whereas Samples B3 to
B5, whose heat treatment conditions do not satisfy the conditions specified in the
fifth embodiment of the present invention, correspond to comparative examples.
[0219] The sliced samples after the treatments were subjected to a flatness evaluation test,
an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness, and a cutting property evaluation
test.
<Flatness Evaluation Test>
[0220] In the flatness evaluation, the samples were tested to determine their amounts of
warpage (flatness) per 1 m in the casting direction. Samples having an amount of warpage
of 0.4 mm or less per 1 m length were evaluated as having accepted flatness (Accepted),
while those having an amount of warpage of more than 0.4 mm per 1 m length were evaluated
as having unaccepted flatness (Failed).
<Evaluation Test for Accuracy of Plate Thickness >
[0221] The evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness is as in First Experimental Example.
<Cutting Property Evaluation Test>
[0222] The evaluation of cutting property, i.e., chip breakability was performed by drilling
a sample and measuring the number of chips per unit mass. Specifically, the sample
was drilled with a drill having a diameter of 5 mm at a number of revolutions of 7000
rpm and a feed rate of 300 mm/minute, and the number of generated chips per 10 g was
measured. Samples having a number of chips of 1000 or more per 10 g were evaluated
as having accepted cutting property (Accepted) ; whereas those having a number of
chips of less than 1000 per 10 g were evaluated as having unaccepted cutting property
(Failed).
[0223] The test results are shown in Table 14.
[0224] As is demonstrated in Table 14, Examples B1 and B2, whose heat treatment conditions
satisfy the conditions specified in the fifth embodiment of the present invention,
excelled in flatness, accuracy of plate thickness, and cutting property. Comparative
Example B3 did not undergo a heat treatment, thereby show poor flatness, and was somewhat
inferior in accuracy of plate thickness to Examples B1 and B2. Comparative Example
B4, whose heat treatment had been performed at a temperature higher than the range
specified in the fifth embodiment of the present invention, was thereby inferior in
cutting property. Comparative Example B5, whose heat treatment had been performed
at a temperature lower than the range specified in the fifth embodiment of the present
invention, thereby showed poor flatness, and was somewhat inferior in accuracy of
plate thickness to Examples B1 and B2.
(8) Eighth Experimental Example
[0225] This experimental example relates to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 3000 series Al-Mn alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0226] With reference to Table 15, Alloys 23B and 24B were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 25B and 26B were used as comparative example alloys.
[0227]
[Table 15]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 23B |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Alloy 24B |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.9 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 25B |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.2 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 26B |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
1.7 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0228] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subj
ecting Alloys 23B to 26B to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration
step, and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a treatment in a heat treatment step, in
which they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the thermally treated
slabs. The sliced samples were prepared by slicing the slabs in a slicing step, while
the hot-rolled samples were prepared by subj ecting the slabs to hot rolling. The
sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick,
1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
[0229] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the sixth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 23B and 24B correspond to
examples according to the sixth embodiment of the present invention.
[0230] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a flatness evaluation test, an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness,
a strength test, and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0231] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 90 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted); whereas those having
a tensile strength of less than 90 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0232] The test results are shown in Table 16.
[0233]
[Table 16]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 23B |
0.23 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
95 |
38 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 24B |
0.23 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
101 |
39 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 25B |
0.22 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
85 |
38 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 26B |
0.24 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
118 |
50 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 23B |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
113 |
54 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 24B |
0.41 |
Failed |
Accepted |
116 |
56 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 25B |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
97 |
49 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 26B |
0.44 |
Failed |
Accepted |
140 |
71 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0234] As is demonstrated in Table 16, the samples using Alloys 23B to 26B had small processing
strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactory flatness. Additionally,
they excelled in accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 25B contained Mn in a content less than the lower limit in
the material aluminum alloy and thereby had insufficient strength. The sample using
Alloy 26B contained Mn in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum
alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness
in its appearance of surface after anodization. The samples using Alloys 23B to 26B
did not suffer from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0235] With reference to Table 16, the samples using Alloys 23B to 26B suffered from accumulated
processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling direction. Specifically,
they showed inferior flatness. Many of them were somewhat inferior in accuracy of
plate thickness to the corresponding sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 25B contained Mn in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and was thereby somewhat inferior in strength to the
other hot-rolled samples. The sample using Alloy 26B contained Mn in a content of
more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic
compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surface after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 23B to 26B suffered from unevenness in their appearances
of cross sections after anodization.
(9) Ninth Experimental Example
[0236] This experimental example relates to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0237] With reference to Table 17, Alloys 27B and 28B were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 29B to 32B were used as comparative example alloys.
[0238]
[Table 17]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 27B |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Alloy 28B |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 29B |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 30B |
0.9 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| Alloy 31B |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 32B |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0239] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subj
ecting Alloys 27B to 32B to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration
step, and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a treatment in a heat treatment step, in
which they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the thermally treated
slabs. The sliced samples were prepared by slicing the slabs in a slicing step, while
the hot-rolled samples were prepared by subj ecting the slabs to hot rolling. The
sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick,
1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 520°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 175°C for 8 hours.
[0240] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the seventh
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 27B and 28B correspond to
examples according to the seventh embodiment of the present invention.
[0241] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0242] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 200 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted) ; while those having
a tensile strength of less than 200 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0243] The test results are shown in Table 18.
[0244]
[Table 18]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 27B |
320 |
272 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 28B |
295 |
251 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 29B |
112 |
65 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 30B |
339 |
300 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy 31B |
175 |
122 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 32B |
212 |
126 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 27B |
346 |
273 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 28B |
319 |
274 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 29B |
135 |
86 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 30B |
362 |
322 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy 31B |
198 |
143 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 32B |
233 |
145 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0245] As is demonstrated in Table 18, the samples using Alloys 29B and 31B contained Si
and Mg, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30B contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, thereby caused
coarse intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of
surface after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32B contained Mg in a content of
more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained
therefrom were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples
using Alloys 27B to 32B did not suffer from unevenness in their appearances of cross
sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0246] As is demonstrated in Table 18, the samples using Alloys 29B and 31B contained Si
and Mg, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30B contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surfaces
after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32B contained Mg in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained therefrom
were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples using Alloys
27B to 32B suffered from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(10) Tenth Experimental Example
[0247] This experimental example relates to the eighth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0248] With reference to Table 19, Alloys 33B and 34B were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 35B to 38B were used as comparative example alloys.
[0249]
[Table 19]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 33B |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
- |
0.2 |
4.0 |
0.0 2 |
- |
7000 series |
|
| Alloy 34B |
3.5 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
- |
8.0 |
0.0 2 |
0.2 |
7000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 35B |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
4.0 |
0.0 2 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 36B |
5.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
5.0 |
0.0 2 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| Alloy 37B |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
2.4 |
0.0 2 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 38B |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
9.5 |
0.0 2 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0250] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subj
ecting Alloys 33B to 38B to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration
step, and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were further subjected to a treatment in a heat treatment step, in
which they were held at a temperature of 300°C for 4 hours.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the thermally treated
slabs. The sliced samples were prepared by slicing the slabs in a slicing step, while
the hot-rolled samples were prepared by subj ecting the slabs to hot rolling. The
sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick,
1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 470°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 120°C for 48 hours.
[0251] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the eighth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 33B and 34B correspond to
examples according to the eighth embodiment of the present invention.
[0252] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0253] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 250 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted) ; while those having
a tensile strength of less than 250 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0254] The test results are shown in Table 20.
[0255]
[Table 20]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 33B |
422 |
363 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 34B |
510 |
449 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 35B |
193 |
165 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 36B |
287 |
188 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy 37B |
209 |
130 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 38B |
602 |
525 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 33B |
441 |
380 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 34B |
533 |
472 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 35B |
210 |
172 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 36B |
303 |
202 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy 37B |
224 |
146 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 38B |
614 |
535 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0256] As is demonstrated in Table 20, the samples using Alloy 35B and 37B contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36B and 38B contained
Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in the material
aluminum alloy and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after
anodization. The samples using Alloys 33B to 38B did not suffer from unevenness in
their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0257] As is demonstrated in Table 20, the samples using Alloys 35B and 37B contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36B and 38B contained
Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in the material
aluminum alloy and thereby suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The samples using Alloys 33B to 38B suffered from unevenness in
their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(11) Eleventh Experimental Example
[0258] This experimental example relates to the ninth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 5000 series Al-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0259] With reference to Table 21, Alloys 1C to 12C were used as example alloys; while Alloys
13C to 22C were used as comparative example alloys.
[0260]
[Table 21]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 1C |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 2C |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 3C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 4C |
7.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 5C |
10.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 6C |
4.7 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 7C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.0 5 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 8C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.0 5 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 9C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.7 |
0.3 |
- |
0.01 |
0.1 |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 10C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.0 5 |
- |
0.3 |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
|
| Alloy 11C |
2.5 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
0.1 5 |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5052 alloy |
| Alloy 12C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
- |
0.6 |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
JIS 5083 alloy |
| |
Alloy 13C |
1.4 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| |
Alloy 14C |
13.0 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 15C |
4.7 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 16C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
- |
- |
-- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Fe content more than upper limit |
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 17C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.7 |
- |
- |
- |
0.01 |
- |
5000 series |
Cu content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 18C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
1.2 |
|
|
0.01 |
|
5000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 19C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
|
0.6 |
|
0.01 |
|
5000 series |
Cr content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 20C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
0.5 |
0.01 |
|
5000 series |
Zn content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 21C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.15 |
|
5000 series |
Ti content more than upper limit |
| |
Alloy 22C |
4.7 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
|
|
|
|
0.01 |
0.4 |
5000 series |
Zr content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0261] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 1C to 22C to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
[0262] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the ninth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 1C to 22C correspond to
examples according to the ninth embodiment of the present invention.
[0263] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a flatness evaluation test, an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness,
a strength test, and an anodizability evaluation test. The procedures and criteria
of the respective tests are as in First Experimental Example.
[0264] The average crystal grain sizes of the thick plates were determined in the same manner
as in First Experimental Example, because the crystal grain size of a thick plate
affects the anodizability thereof.
[0265] The test results are shown in Tables 22 and 23.
[0266]
[Table 22]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size (µm) |
| |
Example |
Alloy 1C |
0.24 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
218 |
103 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 2C |
0.24 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
229 |
112 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
170 |
| |
Alloy 3C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
309 |
147 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 4C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
336 |
173 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 5C |
0.29 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
384 |
185 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
140 |
| |
Alloy 6C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
315 |
142 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 7C |
0.25 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
310 |
148 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 8C |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
320 |
149 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 9C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
323 |
158 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 10C |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
308 |
149 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 11C |
0.25 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
228 |
113 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| Sliced Sample |
Alloy 12C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
310 |
147 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 13C |
0.24 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
176 |
72 |
Failed |
Accented |
Accepted |
220 |
| |
Alloy 14C |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
Alloy 15C |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
315 |
153 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 16C |
0.30 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
314 |
154 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 17C |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
327 |
169 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
| |
Alloy 18C |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
330 |
167 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
130 |
| |
Alloy 19C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
330 |
163 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
130 |
| |
Alloy 20C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
310 |
151 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
150 |
| |
Alloy 21C |
0.28 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
320 |
156 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
130 |
| |
Alloy 22C |
0.27 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
320 |
158 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
160 |
[0267]
[Table 23]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Cross section structure |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
Average crystal grain size (µm) |
| |
|
Alloy 1C |
0.43 |
Failed |
Excellent |
218 |
105 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 2C |
0.44 |
Failed |
Excellent |
227 |
110 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 3C |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
297 |
141 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 4C |
0.61 |
Failed |
Accepted |
314 |
163 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
120 |
| |
|
Alloy 5C |
0.70 |
Failed |
Accepted |
383 |
200 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 6C |
0.48 |
Failed |
Excellent |
304 |
157 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 7C |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
298 |
151 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 8C |
0.48 |
Failed |
Accepted |
297 |
150 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 9C |
0.52 |
Failed |
Accepted |
313 |
159 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 10C |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
303 |
146 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 11C |
0.43 |
Failed |
Excellent |
225 |
129 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
160 |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 12C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
306 |
161 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 13C |
0.42 |
Failed |
Excellent |
181 |
97 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
200 |
| |
|
Alloy 14C |
unproducible due to the generation of casting cracks |
| |
|
Alloy 15C |
0.50 |
Failed |
Excellent |
299 |
142 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 16C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
298 |
143 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
160 |
| |
|
Alloy 17C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
307 |
156 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 18C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Excellent |
312 |
156 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
140 |
| |
|
Alloy 19C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
310 |
152 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
130 |
| |
|
Alloy 20C |
0.49 |
Failed |
Accepted |
295 |
142 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 21C |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
299 |
144 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
| |
|
Alloy 22C |
0.50 |
Failed |
Accepted |
303 |
152 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
150 |
[0268] Table 22 shows the test results of the sliced samples, in which the samples using
Alloys 1C to 12C correspond to examples according to the ninth embodiment of the present
invention; while the samples using Alloys 13C to 22C correspond to comparative examples.
Table 23 shows the test results of the hot-rolled samples, in which all the samples
using Alloys 1C to 22C correspond to comparative examples.
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0269] As is demonstrated in Table 22, the samples using Alloys 1C to 13C and 15C to 22C
had small processing strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactory
flatness. Additionally, they excelled in accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 14C contained Mg in a content of more than the upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13C contained Mg in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and showed insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloys 1C to 13C, 17C, and 20C to 22C did not suffer from unevenness
in their appearances of surfaces after anodization The samples using Alloys 15C, 16C,
18C, and 19C contained Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively, in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse intermetallic compounds,
and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after anodization. The
samples using Alloys 1C to 13C and 15C to 22C did not suffer from unevenness in their
appearances of cross sections after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 17C, 20C, 21C, and 22C contained Cu, Zn, Ti, and Zr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages
obtained therefrom were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0270] As is demonstrated in Table 23, the samples using Alloys 1C to 13C and 15C to 22C
suffered from accumulated processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling
direction. Specifically, they showed inferior flatness. Many of them were somewhat
inferior in accuracy of plate thickness to the corresponding sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 14C contained Mg in a content of more than the upper limit
in the material aluminum alloy, suffered from casting cracks, and was unproducible.
The sample using Alloy 13C contained Mg in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and showed insufficient strength.
The samples using Alloy 15C, 16C, 18C, and 19C contain Si, Fe, Mn, and Cr, respectively,
in a content of more than the upper limit, caused coarse intermetallic compounds,
and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces after anodization. The
samples using Alloys 1C to 13C and 15C to 22C suffered from unevenness in their appearances
of cross sections after anodization.
(12) Twelfth Experimental Example
[0271] This experimental example relates to the ninth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used Alloy 3C in Table 21.
(Treatments)
[0272] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloy 3C to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step, and a
casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, the slabs were subjected to a slicing step to give sliced samples. The sliced
samples are aluminum alloy thick plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm
long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step, in which
they were subjected to a heat treatment under conditions given in Table 24.
[0273]
[Table 24]
| |
Category |
|
Number |
Heat treatment |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Chip breakability upon cutting |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
(number/ 10 g) |
Evaluation |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
C1 |
Alloy 3C |
350°C for 2 hr |
0.26 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
1040 |
Accepted |
| C2 |
Alloy 3C |
250°C for 4 hr |
0.34 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
1170 |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
C3 |
Alloy 3C |
none |
0.45 |
Failed |
Accepted |
1340 |
Accepted |
| C4 |
Alloy 3C |
420°C for 4 hr |
0.23 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
950 |
Failed |
| C5 |
Alloy 3C |
150°C for 2 hr |
0.42 |
Failed |
Accepted |
1280 |
Accepted |
[0274] Accordingly, Samples C1 and C2, whose heat treatment conditions satisfy the conditions
specified in the ninth embodiment of the present invention, correspond to examples
according to the ninth embodiment of the present invention; while Samples C3 to C5,
whose heat treatment conditions do not satisfy the conditions specified in the ninth
embodiment of the present invention, correspond to comparative examples.
[0275] The sliced samples after the treatments were subjected to a flatness evaluation test
and an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness.
<Flatness Evaluation Test>
[0276] In the flatness evaluation, the samples were tested to determine their amounts of
warpage (flatness) per 1 m in the casting direction. Samples having an amount of warpage
of 0.4 mm or less per 1 m length were evaluated as having accepted flatness (Accepted),
while those having an amount of warpage of more than 0.4 mm per 1 m length were evaluated
as having unaccepted flatness (Failed).
<Evaluation Test for Accuracy of Plate Thickness>
[0277] The evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness is as in First Experimental Example.
<Cutting Property Evaluation Test>
[0278] The cutting property evaluation test is as in Seventh Experimental Example.
[0279] The test results are shown in Table 24.
[0280] As is demonstrated in Table 24, Examples C1 and C2, whose heat treatment conditions
satisfy the conditions specified in the ninth embodiment of the present invention,
excelled in flatness, accuracy of plate thickness, and cutting property. Comparative
Example C3, which did not undergo a heat treatment, showed poor flatness, and had
somewhat inferior accuracy of plate thickness to Examples C1 and C2. Comparative Example
C4 had been thermally treated at a temperature higher than the range specified in
the ninth embodiment of the present invention and thereby showed poor cutting property.
Comparative Example C5 had been thermally treated at a temperature lower than the
range specified in the ninth embodiment of the present invention, thereby showed poor
flatness, and was somewhat inferior in accuracy of plate thickness to Examples C1
and C2.
(13) Thirteenth Experimental Example
[0281] This experimental example relates to the tenth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 3000 series Al-Mn alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0282] With reference to Table 25, Alloys 23C and 24C were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 25C and 26C were used as comparative example alloys.
[0283]
[Table 25]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy 23C |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
0.5 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Alloy 24C |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.9 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy 25C |
- |
0.1 |
0.4 |
- |
0.2 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content less than lower limit |
| Alloy 26C |
- |
0.1 |
0.3 |
- |
1.7 |
- |
- |
0.0 1 |
- |
3000 series |
Mn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0284] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subj
ecting Alloys 23C to 26C to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration
step, and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
[0285] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the tenth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 23C and 24C correspond to
examples according to the tenth embodiment of the present invention.
[0286] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a flatness evaluation test, an evaluation test for accuracy of plate thickness,
a strength test, and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0287] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 90 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted), whereas those having
a tensile strength of less than 90N/mm
2were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0288] The test results are shown in Table 26.
[0289]
[Table 26]
| |
Category |
Number |
Flatness |
Accuracy of plate thickness |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
| (mm/m) |
Evaluation |
Evaluation |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy23C |
0.22 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
98 |
40 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy24C |
0.22 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
102 |
39 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy25C |
0.22 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
86 |
38 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy26C |
0.23 |
Accepted |
Excellent |
121 |
51 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy23C |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
115 |
55 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy24C |
0.42 |
Failed |
Accepted |
118 |
57 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy25C |
0.41 |
Failed |
Excellent |
95 |
46 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy26C |
0.44 |
Failed |
Accepted |
142 |
72 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0290] As is demonstrated in Table 26, the samples using Alloys 23C to 26C had small processing
strain and showed little warpage, i.e., they had satisfactory flatness. Additionally,
they excelled in accuracy of plate thickness.
The sample using Alloy 25C contained Mn in a content less than the lower limit in
the material aluminum alloy and thereby had insufficient strength. The sample using
Alloy 26C contained Mn in a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum
alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness
in its appearance of surface after anodization. The samples using Alloys 23C to 26C
did not suffer from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0291] As is demonstrated in Table 26, the samples using Alloys 23C to 26C suffered from
accumulated processing strain and showed large warpage in the rolling direction. Specifically,
they showed inferior flatness. Many of them were somewhat inferior in accuracy of
plate thickness to the corresponding sliced samples.
The sample using Alloy 25C contained Mn in a content of less than the lower limit
in the material aluminum alloy and was thereby somewhat inferior in strength to the
other hot-rolled samples. The sample using Alloy 26C contained Mn in a content of
more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, thereby caused coarse intermetallic
compounds, and suffered from unevenness in its appearance of surface after anodization.
The samples using Alloys 23C to 26C suffered from unevenness in their appearances
of cross sections after anodization.
(14) Fourteenth Experimental Example
[0292] This experimental example relates to the eleventh embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 6000 series Al-Mg-Si alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0293] With reference to Table 27, Alloys 27C and 28C were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 29C to 32C were used as comparative example alloys.
[0294]
[Table 27]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy27C |
0.9 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Alloy28C |
0.5 |
0.9 |
0.2 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy29C |
0.9 |
0.1 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content less than lower limit |
| Alloy30C |
0.9 |
1.8 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Si content more than upper limit |
| Alloy31C |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy32C |
1.7 |
0.5 |
0.4 |
- |
0.1 |
- |
- |
0.02 |
- |
6000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0295] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subjecting
Alloys 27C to 32C to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration step,
and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subj ecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 350°C for 4 hours.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 520°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 175°C for 8 hours.
[0296] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the eleventh
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 27C and 28C correspond to
examples according to the eleventh embodiment of the present invention.
[0297] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0298] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 200 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted) ; while those having
a tensile strength of less than 200 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0299] The test results are shown in Table 28.
[0300]
[Table 28]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy27C |
317 |
269 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy28C |
290 |
247 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy29C |
110 |
64 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy30C |
335 |
298 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy31C |
172 |
120 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy32C |
209 |
123 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy27C |
343 |
272 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy28C |
316 |
272 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy29C |
132 |
84 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy30C |
359 |
319 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy31C |
197 |
142 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy32C |
228 |
141 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0301] As is demonstrated in Table 28, the samples using Alloys 29C and 31C contained Si
and Mg, respectively, in a content of less than its lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30C contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32C contained Mg in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained therefrom
were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples using Alloys
27C to 32C did not suffer from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after
anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0302] As is demonstrated in Table 28, the samples using Alloys 29C and 31C contain Si and
Mg, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy, and showed insufficient strength. The sample using Alloy 30C contained Si in
a content of more than the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, caused coarse
intermetallic compounds, and suffered from unevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The sample using Alloy 32C contained Mg in a content of more than
the upper limit in the material aluminum alloy, and advantages obtained therefrom
were saturated, resulting in inferior economical efficiency. The samples using Alloy
27C to 32C suffered from unevenness in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(15) Fifteenth Experimental Example
[0303] This experimental example relates to the twelfth embodiment of the present invention.
The experimental example used 7000 series Al-Zn-Mg alloys as the aluminum alloys.
[0304] With reference to Table 29, Alloys 33C and 34C were used as example alloys; while
Alloys 35C to 38C were used as comparative example alloys.
[0305]
[Table 29]
| Category |
Number |
Element (percent by mass) |
Alloy type |
Remarks |
| Mg |
Si |
Fe |
Cu |
Mn |
Cr |
Zn |
Ti |
Zr |
| Example Alloy |
Alloy33C |
2.4 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
1.8 |
- |
0.2 |
4.0 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
|
| Alloy34C |
3.6 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
- |
8.0 |
0.02 |
0.2 |
7000 series |
|
| Comparative Example Alloy |
Alloy35C |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
4.0 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content less than lower limit |
| Alloy36C |
5.2 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
5.0 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Mg content more than upper limit |
| Alloy37C |
2.4 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
2.2 |
- |
0.1 |
2.4 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn contentless than lower limit |
| Alloy38C |
3.0 |
0.2 |
0.2 |
2.0 |
- |
0.1 |
9.3 |
0.02 |
- |
7000 series |
Zn content more than upper limit |
(Treatments)
[0306] Initially, a series of slabs having a plate thickness of 500 mm was prepared by subj
ecting Alloys 33C to 38C to a melting step, a hydrogen gas removal step, a filtration
step, and a casting step sequentially in this order.
Next, sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were prepared from the slabs. The sliced
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a slicing step, while the hot-rolled
samples were prepared by subjecting the slabs to a heat treatment and subsequently
to hot rolling. The sliced samples and hot-rolled samples are aluminum alloy thick
plates each 20 mm thick, 1000 mm wide, and 2000 mm long.
Next, the sliced samples were further subjected to a heat treatment step in which
they were held at a temperature of 300°C for 4 hours.
The resulting sliced samples and hot-rolled samples were further subjected to a solution
treatment at 470°C and subsequently to an aging treatment at 120°C for 48 hours.
[0307] Accordingly, the sliced samples after these treatments are aluminum alloy thick plates
manufactured by the procedures of the manufacturing method according to the twelfth
embodiment of the present invention, whereas the hot-rolled samples after the treatments
are not. Among them, only the sliced samples using Alloys 33C and 34C correspond to
examples according to the twelfth embodiment of the present invention.
[0308] Next, the sliced samples and hot-rolled samples after the treatments were subjected
to a strength test and an anodizability evaluation test.
[0309] The procedures and criteria of the respective tests are as in First Experimental
Example.
However, the properties of thick plates vary depending on the type of alloy used,
and the criteria for the strength were modified as follows. Specifically, samples
having a tensile strength of 250 N/mm
2 or more were evaluated as having accepted strength (Accepted) ; while those having
a tensile strength of less than 250 N/mm
2 were evaluated as having unaccepted strength (Failed).
[0310] The test results are shown in Table 30.
[0311]
[Table 30]
| |
Category |
Number |
Strength |
Appearance after anodization |
Tensile strength
(N/mm2) |
Proof stress
(N/mm2) |
Evaluation |
Surface appearance |
Cross section appearance |
| Sliced Sample |
Example |
Alloy 33C |
418 |
360 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 34C |
520 |
453 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Comparative Example |
Alloy 35C |
189 |
162 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 36C |
290 |
190 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Alloy 37C |
208 |
131 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Accepted |
| Alloy 38C |
614 |
530 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Accepted |
| Hot-rolled Sample |
Comparative Example |
Alloy 33C |
437 |
378 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 34C |
549 |
478 |
Accepted |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 35C |
204 |
169 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 36C |
305 |
204 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
| Alloy 37C |
230 |
150 |
Failed |
Accepted |
Failed |
| Alloy 38C |
628 |
542 |
Accepted |
Failed |
Failed |
(Re: Sliced Samples)
[0312] As is demonstrated in Table 30, the samples using Alloys 35C and 37C contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy, and showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36C and 38C contained
Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in the material
aluminumalloy, and thereby suf fered fromunevenness in their appearances of surfaces
after anodization. The samples using Alloys 33C to 38C did not suffer from unevenness
in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
(Re: Hot-rolled Samples)
[0313] As is demonstrated in Table 30, the samples using Alloys 35C and 37C contained Mg
and Zn, respectively, in a content of less than the lower limit in the material aluminum
alloy, and thereby showed insufficient strength. The samples using Alloys 36C and
38C contained Mg and Zn, respectively, in a content of more than the upper limit in
the material aluminum alloy and thereby suffered from unevenness in their appearances
of surfaces after anodization. The samples using Alloys 33C to 38C suffered from unevenness
in their appearances of cross sections after anodization.
Industrial Applicability
[0314] Methods for manufacturing aluminum alloy thick plates, according to the present invention,
show superior productivity, can easily control the surface condition and flatness
to improve the accuracy of plate thickness, and are thereby industrially very useful.
1. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder
being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 400°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
2. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg
in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder
being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 400°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
3. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content
of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0. 6 percent by mass or less, Cr
in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 400°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
4. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0
percent by mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.
0 percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3. 0 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 350°C or higher
but lower than its melting point for one hour or longer.
5. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 1 to 4, further comprising, subsequent to the heat treatment step, a surface
smoothing treatment step of subjecting the surface of the aluminum alloy thick plate
to a surface smoothing treatment.
6. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to claim 5,
wherein the surface smoothing treatment is carried out by at least one process selected
from the group consisting of cutting, grinding, and polishing.
7. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 1 to 4, wherein the slicing step comprises removing a central portion in a
thickness direction from the slab, the central portion having two substantially identical
thicknesses in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction
to the both surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and having a total thickness
of from one-thirtieth to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
8. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one memberselected from the
group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainderbeing
aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature
of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer; and
a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness.
9. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg
in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder
being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature
of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer; and
a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness.
10. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content
of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0. 6 percent by mass or less, Cr
in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature
of 200°C or higher but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer; and
a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness.
11. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0
percent by mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.
0 percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the slab by holding the same at a temperature
of 200°C or higher but lower than 350°C for one hour or longer; and
a slicing step of slicing the thermally treated slab into an aluminum alloy thick
plate having a predetermined thickness.
12. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 8 to 11, further comprising, subsequent to the slicing step, a surface smoothing
treatment step of subjecting the surface of the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness to a surface smoothing treatment.
13. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to claim 12,
wherein the surface smoothing treatment is carried out by at least one process selected
from the group consisting of cutting, grinding, and polishing.
14. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 8 to 11, wherein the slicing step comprises removing a central portion in a
thickness direction from the slab, the central portion having two substantially identical
thicknesses in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction
to the both surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and having a total thickness
of from one-thirtieth to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
15. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or more and 12.0
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.6 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder
being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
16. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mn in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Mg
in a content of 1.5 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass
or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent
by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or less, with the remainder
being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
17. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Si in a content of 0.2 percent by mass or more and 1.6
percent by mass or less and Mg in a content of 0.3 percent by mass or more and 1.5
percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Fe in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content
of 1.0 percent by mass or less, Mn in a content of 0. 6 percent by mass or less, Cr
in a content of 0.5 percent by mass or less, Zn in a content of 0.4 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.3
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness; and
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 400°C for one hour or longer.
18. A method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate from an aluminum alloy,
the aluminum alloy containing Mg in a content of 0.4 percent by mass or more and 4.0
percent by mass or less and Zn in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or more and 9.
0 percent by mass or less, and further containing at least one member selected from
the group consisting of Si in a content of 0.7 percent by mass or less, Fe in a content
of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cu in a content of 3.0 percent by mass or less, Mn
in a content of 0.8 percent by mass or less, Cr in a content of 0.5 percent by mass
or less, Ti in a content of 0.1 percent by mass or less, and Zr in a content of 0.25
percent by mass or less, with the remainder being aluminum and inevitable impurities,
the method comprising in the following order:
a melting step of melting the aluminum alloy;
a hydrogen gas removal step of removing hydrogen gas from the molten aluminum alloy;
a filtration step of filtering the aluminum alloy, from which hydrogen gas have been
removed, to remove inclusions from the aluminum alloy;
a casting step of casting the aluminum alloy, from which inclusions have been removed,
into a slab;
a slicing step of slicing the slab into an aluminum alloy thick plate having a predetermined
thickness;
a heat treatment step of thermally treating the aluminum alloy thick plate having
a predetermined thickness by holding the same at a temperature of 200°C or higher
but lower than 350°C for one hour or longer.
19. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 15 to 18, further comprising, subsequent to the heat treatment step, a surface
smoothing treatment step of subjecting the surface of the aluminum alloy thick plate
to a surface smoothing treatment.
20. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to claim 19,
wherein the surface smoothing treatment is carried out by at least one process selected
from the group consisting of cutting, grinding, and polishing.
21. The method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy thick plate, according to any one of
claims 15 to 18, the slicing step comprises removing a central portion in a thickness
direction from the slab, the central portion having two substantially identical thicknesses
in the thickness direction from the center of the thickness direction to the both
surfaces of the central portion, respectively, and having a total thickness of from
one-thirtieth to one-fifth the thickness T of the slab (T/30 to T/5).
22. An aluminum alloy thick plate manufactured by the method for manufacturing an aluminum
alloy thick plate, according to any one of claims 1 to 4, claims 8 to 11, and claims
15 to 18, the aluminum alloy thick plate comprising crystal grains having an average
grain size of 400 µm or less.