REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application claims priority to commonly-owned copending United States Provisional
Patent Application Serial No.
60/572,080 entitled "Small Wave-Guide Radiators For Closely Spaced Feeds on Mufti-Beam Antennas"
filed May 18, 2004, which is incorporated herein by reference; and United States Provisional
Patent Application Serial No.
60/571,988 entitled "Circular Polarization Technique for Elliptical Horn Antennas" filed May
18, 2004, which is also incorporated herein by reference.
TECHNICAL HELD
[0002] The present invention is generally related to antenna systems designed to receive
broadcast signals with circular polarity and, more particularly, is directed to digital
video broadcast satellite (DVBS) antenna systems.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] An increasing number of applications, such as digital video satellite broadcast television
systems, utilize elliptical antenna reflectors to improve gain and interference rejection
in desired direction. This is particularly true for ground-based antenna systems designed
to receive from and/or transmit to geo-stationary satellites when other potential
interfering are closely for example on the order of two degrees away. Simply increasing
a circular antenna's reception improve gain and interference rejection in all directions.
Increasing the antenna size should also be balanced against cost and aesthetic tradeoffs.
Elliptical antenna reflectors strike a better balance between these competing design
objectives by the size of the antenna reflector more in the direction in which gain
and interference rejection is most critical. The resulting elliptical antennas maintain
a relative small reflector size (collection area) while providing improved of unwanted
in the direction This is typically accomplished usually by the long axis of the antenna
the geostationary arc. Elliptical can be designed to improve the antenna's performance
when multiple feeds are used to receive from or transmit to multiple locations (such
as multiple satellites).
[0004] In general, elliptical antenna feed horns should be used in connection with elliptical
reflectors in order to achieve optimum performance on elliptical reflectors. Although
elliptical antenna feed horns are somewhat more complex than ordinary circular feeds
feed horns, there are a number of established design approaches for elliptical beam
feeds. In addition many applications are now using circular polarity. This is where
the challenge arises. It is difficult to achieve good circular polarity cross polarization
isolation (also referred to as x-poiarization or x-pol isolation) when using an elliptical
beam feed with circular polarity polarizer (also referred to as a CP polarizer) approaches.
The problem arises because an elliptical horn (or most any non-axially symmetric horn)
introduces a differential phase shift between orthogonal electric fields that are
parallel (or near parallel) to either the wide or narrow sides of the horn. The result
is that when circular polarity is received by an elliptical horn the asymmetries in
the horn introduce a phase differential between the orthogonal fields, changing the
circular polarity into elliptical polarity at the output of the horn. Simply attaching
a conventional CP polarizer to a feed horn with an elliptical portion results in poor
cross-polarization performance due to the differential phase and amplitude characteristics
imparted by the elliptical portion of the feed horn.
[0005] The following additional background information will facilitate a more detailed discussion
of CP polarizers and elliptical antenna feed horn. First it should be appreciated
that that circular polarity can be expressed as the vector sum of two orthogonal linear
components that are 90 degrees out of phase. For example, the orthogonal linear components
can be referred to as +45FV0P (+45 degrees from vertical and 0 degrees phase reference)
and -45FV+90P (-45 degrees from vertical and +90 degrees phase). A typical CP polarizer
lined up with the -45LP+90P component and that 45FV±90P component by 90 degrees so
that it in phase with the +45FV0P component. When this occurs the result is a theoretically
lossless of the received power conversion from circular polarity to linear polarity
(vertical polarity in this case). This linear can be easily picked up with simple
linear or wave-guide slot etc. If both right hand circular polarity and left hand
circular polarity LHCP beams are present, then the conversion produces both vertical
and horizontal linear polarity components.
[0006] Now consider a theoretically perfect circular polarity beam impinging on an elliptically
shaped receiving horn as shown in FIG. 1a. Again, recall that circular polarity can
be expressed as the vector sum of 2 orthogonal linear components that are 90 degrees
out of phase. For simplicity in this case, the orthogonal linear components will be
taken to be H (horizontal) and V (vertical), where H is aligned (parallel) to the
x-axis and V is aligned to the y-axis in a conventional Cartesian coordinate system.
As the circular polarity beam enters the horn, the elliptical shape of the horn causes
the H and V components to travel at different phase velocities through the horn so
the H and V components are no longer 90 degrees out of phase when they reach the end
of the horn (at the start of the polarizer section). So elliptical polarity now exists
at the start of the polarizer section. So a polarizer designed to convert circular
polarity to linear polarity will have poor CP cross polarization (cross polarization)
performance as shown in FIG. 1b.
[0007] As a design compromise, many elliptical reflector systems simply use circular beam
feeds with conventional CP polarizers in an attempt to preserve good circular polarity
cross polarization isolation. This approach is easy to implement but results in significant
compromise (degradations) in efficiency, gain noise temperature, beam width, and side
lobe performance of the reflector system, because the circular beam feeds do not properly
illuminate the elliptical reflector. This situation is shown in FIG. 2, in which the
antenna horn illumination level along the short axis of the reflector is too high
resulting in large amounts of wasted spillover energy that degrades gain, efficiency,
and noise temperature. In addition, the antenna horn illumination level along the
long axis of the reflector is too low resulting in degraded taper efficiency and gain.
In addition, this improper illumination makes it very difficult to achieve desired
beam width and side lobe performance. That is, the high illumination along the short
axis of the antenna degrades (raises) side lobes while the low illumination along
the long axis of the antenna degrades (widens) beam widths. In addition, for multi-beam
applications where a single reflector is used to from multiple beam sources (typically
satellites) that are closely spaced, use of a circular feed increases the physical
spacing required between the feeds required to obtain acceptable gain and interference
rejection characteristics.
[0008] There has been some work in the area of elliptical beam feed horns that provide circular
polarization.
U.S. Patent No. 6,570,542 gives a vague description of an antenna horn that includes a divided elliptical horn
section including a phase compensator in the form an "arc structure metal" that spans
the entire major axis of the elliptical horn. It is not clear whether or not the "arc
structure metal" is used to remove the phase differential introduced by the horn such
that a conventional CP polarizer can be attached to it or if the "arc structure metal"
is used in conjunction with the horn to achieve the proper phase differentials needed
for CP polarizer there by eliminating the need for a separate CP polarizer. Regardless,
this metal structure complicates the manufacturability of the horn making it more
difficult to die cast or machine. Also adding the arc through the middle of the horn
might require the horn to be wider that desired for many applications.
[0009] Accordingly, there is an ongoing need for single and multi-beam elliptical antenna
systems that exhibit improved efficiency, gain, interference rejection, gain noise
temperature, beam width, side lobe, size and cost and other characteristics.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention meets the needs described above in antenna feed horns and associated
antenna systems for receiving circular polarity beams. This type of antenna system,
which may be implemented with a single horn or one or more multiple-horn antenna feed
blocks, are designed to achieve good circular polarity performance over broad and
multiple frequency bands.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011]
FIG. 1a is a front view of a prior art antenna feed horn with an elliptical transition
section and a conventional CP polarizer.
FIG. 1b is a perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 1a, which shows a Cartesian
coordinate system that serves as a frame of reference .
FIG. 1c is a cross-sectional perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 1a.
FIG 1d is a graphical illustration of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation
characteristic of the antenna of FIG. 1a.
FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of a prior art configuration illustrating the
improper illumination that results the use of a circular antenna feed horn with an
elliptical reflector.
FIG. 3a is a top view of an antenna system including an elliptical deflector, a centrally
located three-horn antenna feed block, and an off-center or outrigger two-horn antenna
feed block.
FIG 3b is a front view of the antenna system of FIG. 3a.
FIG 3c is a perspective view of the feed horn structures of the antenna system of
FIG. 3a.
FIG 3d is a rear perspective view of the antenna system of FIG. 3a.
FIG. 4a is a perspective view of an elliptical antenna feed horn that functions as
a CP polarizer.
FIG. 4B is a cross-sectional perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 4a.
FIG 4c is a graphical illustration of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation
characteristic of the antenna horn of FIG. 4a.
FIG. 5a is front view of an antenna horn with an elliptical transition section and
an additive phase differential section.
FIG. 5b is a perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 5a.
FIG. 5c is a cross-sectiohal perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 5a.
FIG 5d is a graphical illustration of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation
characteristic of the antenna horn of FIG. 5a.
FIG. 6a is perspective view of an antenna horn with an elliptical transition section
and an oppositely sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 6b is a cross-sectional perspective view of the antenna horn of FIG. 6a.
FIG 6c is a graphical illustration of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation
characteristic of the antenna horn of FIG. 6a.
FIG. 7 is a phase differential versus frequency plot for a typical CP polarizer illustrating
the a phase differential slope across a frequency band.
FIG. 8 is a phase differential versus frequency plot for the antenna horn shown in
FIGS. 6a-c illustrating the broad band response improvement resulting form the oppositely
sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 9a shows various of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with a circular
reception section, an initial phase differential section, a frequency diplexer, and
an second additive phase differential section.
FIG. 9b shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with an
elliptical transition section, an initial oppositely sloped phase differential sections,
a frequency diplexer, and a second additive phase differential section.
FIG. 9c shows various of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn witch an integral
elliptical reception cup polarizer section, a frequency diplexer, and an additive
phase differential section.
FIG. 9d shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with an
elliptical transition section, an initial additive phase differential section, a frequency
diplexer, and a second additive phase differential section.
FIG. 9e shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with a circular
transition section, an initial phase differential section, a frequency diplexer, and
an second oppositely sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 9f shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with an
elliptical transition section, an initial oppositely sloped phase differential section,
a frequency diplexer, and a second oppositely sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 9g shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with an
integral elliptical reception and CP polarizer, a frequency diplexer, and an oppositely
sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 9h shows various views of a multi-band, multi-port antenna feed horn with an
elliptical transition section, an initial additive phase differential section, a frequency
diplexer, and an oppositely sloped phase differential section.
FIG. 10a shows a perspective of a three-horn antenna feed block.
FIG. 10b shows a cross-section of the perspective view of a three-horn antenna feed
block of FIG. 10a.
FIG. 11a shows a cross-section of the perspective view of an antenna horn with an
elliptical transition section, a CP polarizer, and phase compensation section.
FIG. 11b is a graphical illustration of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation
characteristic of the antenna horn of FIG. 11a.
FIG. 12a is a top of a three-horn antenna feed block with an elliptical feed horn
located between two circular feed horns.
FIG. 12b is a perspective view of the three-horn antenna feed of FIG. 12a.
FIG. 12c is a front of the three-horn antenna feed of FIG. 12a.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0012] The present invention may be embodied in antenna feed norns and associated circular
polarity antenna systems for or multiple-beam antennas designed to achieve good circular
polarity performance over broad and multiple frequency bands. In general, several
methods of introducing the needed phase differential between orthogonal linear components
can be used in the opposite slop phase differential section described for embodiment
2 including but not limited to using sections of elliptical, rectangular or oblong
waveguides, septums, irises, ridges, screws, dielectrics in circular, square, elliptical
rectangular, or oblong waveguides. In addition the needed phase differential could
be achieved by picking up or splitting off the orthogonal components via probes as
in an LNBF or slots as in an OMT (or other means) and then delaying (via simple length
or well establish phase shifting methods) one component the appropriate amount relative
to the other component in order to achieve the nominal desired total 90° phase differential
before recombining.
[0013] Elliptically shaped horn apertures are described in the examples in this disclosure,
however this invention can be applied to any device that introduces phase differentials
between orthogonal linear components that needs to be compensated for in order to
achieve good CP conversion and cross polarization (Cross polarization) isolation including
but not limited to any non-circular beam feed, rectangular feeds, oblong feeds, contoured
corrugated feeds, feed radomes, specific reflector optics, reflector radomes, frequency
selective surfaces etc.
[0014] To simplify the discussions, examples in this disclosure primarily refer to reception
or signals and generally referred to a single circular polarity. However reciprocity
applies to all of these embodiments given they are generally low loss passive structures.
Furthermore the horns, CP polarizers and phase compensation sections obviously support
both senses of CP (RHCP and LHCP). If both senses are impinging on the horn then they
will be converted to 2 orthogonal linear polarities that can be easily picked up with
2 orthogonal probes and/or slots etc. So the approaches described in embodiments 1
and 2 can uses for systems transmitting and/or receiving in any of circular polarities:
single CP or Dual CP for each band implemented including multiple widely spaced bands
for embodiment 5.
[0015] It be pointed out four simplicity, specific phase values were often given in the
examples, but the phase compensation concepts explained above are general.
[0016] For example, the following to embodiment #2: If the elliptical horn introduces X
degrees phase differential then the opposite slop phase differential section should
introduce 90-X degrees so that the total introduced phase differential is 90 degrees
= X - (90-X).
[0017] For simplicity the inventor provides examples using a nominal 90 degrees phase differential
between orthogonal linear components as the target for achieving CP conversion however
it is understood that a nominal -90 degrees or any odd integer multiple of -90 or
90 degrees will also achieve good CP (...-630, -450, -270, -90, 90, 270, 450, 630
etc.) and this invention covers those cases as well. As an example for embodiment
2 the horn could introduce a 470 degrees phase differential and the opposite phase
slop section could introduce a -200 degrees phase differential resulting in a total
270 degrees phase differential.
[0018] In addition, a skilled antenna designer will understand that the term "CP polarizer"
is not limited to a device achieving a theoretically perfect conversion from circular
polarity to linear polarity, but instead includes devices that achieves a conversion
from circular polarity to linear polarity within acceptable design constraints for
its intended application.
[0019] Referring now to the FIGS., FIGS. 1a-c is a front view of a prior art antenna feed
horn
100 with an elliptical receiving cone and transition section
102 feeding into a conventional CP polarizer
104. The transition section
102 extends from an aperture
106 at the from of the horn to the front of the front of the CP polarizer
104, which extends to a waveguide port
108 where linear polarity pickups are located. As a result, this configuration is intended
to produce a linear polarity signal at the waveguide port
108 but fails to take into account a 30 degree differential phase shift imparted by the
transition section
102. This results in poor cross-pole (x-pol) isolation, as shown FIG. 1d, which is graphical
illustration
120 of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation characteristic of the antenna
horn
100.
[0020] FIG. 2 is a graphical representation
200 of a prior art configuration illustrating the improper illumination that results
from the use of a circular antenna feed horn with an elliptical reflector. The mismatched
areas
202a-b represent areas of wasted energy in the receive mode caused by under-illumination
along the long axis of the elliptical reflector by the circular feed horn. Similarly,
the mismatched areas
204a-b represent areas of wasted illumination by the circular feed horn in areas the short
axis of the elliptical reflector that extend beyond the physical of the reflector.
This is also referred to as over-illumination spill-over energy.
[0021] FIG. is a top of an antenna system
300 including an elliptical reflector
302, a centrally located three-horn antenna feed block
304, and an off-center or outrigger two-horn antenna feed block
306. Any of the horns described in this specification can be used in any of these locations.
For example, the integral three-horn feed block
1600 described with reference to FIG 10a may serve as the centrally located three-horn
antenna feed block
304, and the outrigger horns
306 may be a conventional corrugated feed horn.
[0022] FIG. 4a-c show an elliptical antenna feed horn
400 that includes an elliptical reception cone and transition section
402 extending from the aperture
404 to a circular throat section
406, which leads to the waveguide port
408, where the linear polarity pickups are located. The transition section
402 functions as a 90 degree CP polarizer, whereas the throat section
406 does not impart any differential phase shift on the propagating signal. As a result,
the feed horn
400 functions as a CP polarized without the need for any internal polarizing elements.
This is accomplished by carefully selecting the height, width, length, flare angle
and internal profile of the transition section
402. Note that the flare angle need not be constant or smooth, and that the transition
section could include flared or circular stages and other types of steps so long as
the end result is a 90 degree differential phase shift as the incident CP bam travels
through the transition section. FIG 4c is a graphical illustration
420 of the circular polarity cross-polarization isolation characteristic of the antenna
horn
400. Comparing this result to the graphical illustration
120 for the prior art antenna horn
100 shows the greatly improved x-pol isolation characteristic achieved by the horn
400.
[0023] FIGS. 5a-c show an antenna horn
500 with an elliptical reception cone and transition section
502 from an aperture
504 to an additive phase differential section
506, which leads to the waveguide port
508, where the linear polarity pickups are located. In this embodiment, the transition
section
502 imparts a less-than-need differential phase shift of 35 degrees and the additive
phase differential section
506 imparts a differential phase of 55 in the same direction (i.e., +55 degrees additive)
as the transition section.. Thus, the end result is a 90 degree differential phase
shift through the horn
500, which produces good x-pol isolation at the linear polarity pickups, as shown by the
graphical illustration
520 shown in FIG. 5d. Again, comparing this result to the graphical illustration
120 for the prior art antenna horn
100 shows the greatly improved x-pol isolation characteristic achieved by the horn
500.
[0024] FIGS. 6a-c show an antenna horn
600 with an elliptical reception cone and transition section
602 leading from an aperture
604 to an oppositely slopes phase differential section
606, which leads to the waveguide port
608, where the linear polarity pickups are located. In this embodiment, the transition
section
602 imparts a greater-that needed differential phase shift of 130 degrees and the oppositely
slopes phase differential section
606 imparts a differential phase shift of 40 degrees in the opposite direction (i.e.,
-40 degrees subtractive) as the transition section.. Thus, the end result is a 90
degree differential phase shift through the horn
600, which produces good x-pol isolation at the linear polarity pickups, as shown by the
graphical illustration
620 shown in FIG. 6c. Importantly, comparing this result to the graphical illustration
420 and
520 for the prior art antenna horns
400 and
500 show the greatly improved x-pol isolation characteristic achieved by the horn
600 over a much wider frequency bandwidth.
[0025] FIG. 7 is a phase differential versus frequency plot
700 for a typical CP polarizer illustrating its phase differential slope across its intended
frequency band. FIG. 8 is a phase differential versus frequency plot
800 for the antenna feed horn
600. The curve
802 represents the phase differential characteristic for the transition section
602 and the curve
804 represents the phase differential characteristic for the oppositely sloped phase
differential section
606. The combination of these two differential phase characteristics produces the total
phase differential curve
806 through the horn
600, shows the greatly improved CP polarization performance achieved by this horn (i.e.,
nearly 90 degrees differential phase shift) over a much wider frequency bandwidth.
[0026] FIG. 9a, which includes FIGS. 9a.1 through 9a.5, various views of a multi-band, multi-port
antenna feed horn
900 with a circular reception section
902 feeding an initial phase differential section which in turn feeds a frequency diplexer
906 that separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the The frequency
diplexer delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
908 a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also the high-band to a second additive phase
differential section
910, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
912. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set or waveguide port
908a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
912.
[0027] The circular reception section
902 does not impart any differential phase shift on the propagating signal. The initial
phase differential section
904 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 90 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of 50 degrees. Then the second additive phase differential section
910 imparts an additive 40 degree differential phase shift to the high-band signal. As
a result, low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide port
908a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
912.
[0028] FIG. 9b, which includes FIGS. 9b.1 through 9a.4, show various views of a multi-band,
multi-port antenna feed horn
920 with an elliptical reception section
922 feeding an initial phase differential section
924, which in turn feeds a frequency diplexer
926 that separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer. The
frequency diplexer delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
928 a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also delivers the high-band signal to a second
additive phase differential section
930, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
932. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
928a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
932.
[0029] The elliptical reception section
922 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 130 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of 70 degrees. The initial phase differential section
924 imparts a tow-band differential phase shift of-40 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of -25 degrees. Then the second additive phase differential section
910 an additive 45 degree differential phase shift to the high-band signal. As a result,
low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide part
928a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
932. In addition, improved x-pol isolation is accomplished for the low-band signal due
to the -40 degrees oppositely slopped differential phase of the initial phase differential
section
924. Similarly, improved x-pol isolation is also for the high-band signal to the -25 degrees
oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the initial phase differential
section
924.
[0030] FIG. 9c, which includes FIGS. 9c.1 through 9c.3, shows an antenna feed horn
940 with an integral elliptical reception and CP polarizer section
942, a frequency diplexer
944, and an additive phase differential section
948. The frequency diplexer
944 separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer and delivers
the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
946a-b (one for each linear polarity). The frequency diplexer
944 also delivers the high-band signal to the additive phase differential section
948, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
949. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
948a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
949.
[0031] The elliptical reception section
942 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 90 and a high-band differential phase
shift 50 degrees. The additive phase differential section
948 imparts an additive 40 degree differential phase shift to the high-band signal. As
a result, low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide port
946a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
949.
[0032] FIG. 9d, which includes FIGS. 9d.1 through 9d.4, shows various views of a multi-band,
multi-port antenna feed horn
950 with an elliptical transition section
952, an initial additive phase differential section
954, a frequency diplexer
956, and a second additive phase differential section
958. The frequency diplexer
956 separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer. The frequency
diplexer delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
957 a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also delivers the high-band signal to the second
additive phase differential section
958, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second port
359. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
957a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
959.
[0033] The elliptical reception section
952 a low-band differential phase shift of 60 degrees and a high-band differential phase
shift of 35 degrees. The initial phase differential section
954 imparts a low-hand additive differential phase shift of 30 degrees and a high-band
differential phase shift of 20 degrees, Then the second additive phase differential
section
958 imparts an additive 35 degree differential phase shift to the high-band As a result,
low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide port
967a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
959.
[0034] FIG. 9e, which includes FIGS, 9e.1 through 9e.5, shows various views of a multi-band,
multi-porfi antenna feed horn
960 with a circular reception section
961 feeding an initial phase differential section
962, which in turn feeds a frequency diplexer
964 that separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer. The
frequency diplexer delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
966a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also delivers the high-band signal to an oppositely
sloped phase differential section
968, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
969. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
966a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
969.
[0035] The circular reception section
961 does not impart any differential phase shift on the propagating signal, The initial
phase differential section
962 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 90 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of 50 degrees. Then the oppositely sloped differential section
968 imparts a -140 degree differential phase shift to the high-band signal. As a tow-band
CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide port
966a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
969. In addition, improved x-pol isolation is accomplished for the high-band signal due
to the -140 degrees oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the phase
differential section
968.
[0036] FIG. 9f, which includes FIGS. 9f.1 through 9f.4, shows various views of a multi-band,
mufti-port antenna feed horn
970 with an elliptical transition section
971, an initial oppositely sloped phase differential section
972, a frequency diplexer
974, and a second oppositely sloped phase differential section
The frequency diplexer
974 separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the The frequency diplexer
delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
976 a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also delivers the high-band to to the second
additive phase differential section
978, which is turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
979. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located the first set of waveguide port
976a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located art the second waveguide port
979.
[0037] The elliptical reception section
971 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 130 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of 70 degrees. The initial phase differential section
972 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of -40 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of -25 degrees. Then the second phase differential section
978 imparts an oppositely sloped -135 degree differential phase shift to the high-band
signal. As a result, low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of
waveguide port
976a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
979. In addition, improved x-pol isolation is accomplished for the low-band signal due
to the -40 degrees oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the initial
phase differential section
972. Similarly, improved x-pol isolation is also accomplished for the high-band signal
due to the -25 degrees oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the
first phase differential section
972 and the -135 degrees oppositely slopped differential phase characteristic of the
second phase differential section
978.
[0038] FIG. 9g, which includes FIGS. 9g.1 through 9g.4, shows various views of a multi-band,
mufti-port antenna feed horn
980 with art integral elliptical reception and CP polarizer
982, a frequency diplexer
984, and an oppositely sloped phase differential section. The frequency diplexer
984 separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer and delivers
the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
986a-b (one for each linear polarity). The frequency diplexer
984 also delivers the high-band signal to the additive phase differential section
988, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to the second waveguide port
989. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
986a-b and the high-band linear polarity are at the second waveguide port
989.
[0039] The elliptical reception sections
982 imparts a lovi-band differential phase shift of 90 and a high-band differential phase
shift 50 The additive phase differential section
988 an oppositely sloped -160 degree differential phase shift to the high-band signals.
As a result, low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of waveguide
port
986a-b, whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
989. In addition, improved x-pol is accomplished for the high-band signal due the -160
degrees oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the -135 degrees oppositely
slopped differential phase characteristic of the phase differential section
988.
[0040] FIG. 9h, which includes FIGS. 9h.1 through 9h.4, shows various views of a multi-band,
multi-port antenna feed horn
990 with an elliptical transition section
991, an initial additive phase differential section
992, a frequency diplexer
994, and an oppositely sloped phase differential section
998. The frequency diplexer
994 separates low-band and high band signals propagating through the diplexer, The frequency
diplexer delivers the low-band signal to a first set of waveguide ports
996 a-b (one for each linear polarity), and also delivers the high-band signal to the oppositely
sloped phase differential section
998, which in turn delivers the high-band signal to a second waveguide port
999. The low-band linear polarity pickups are located at the first set of waveguide port
996a-b and the high-band linear polarity pickups are located at the second waveguide port
999.
[0041] The elliptical reception section
991 imparts a low-band differential phase shift of 60 degrees and a high-band differential
phase shift of 35 degrees. The initial phase differential section
992 imparts a low-band additive differential phase shift of 30 degrees and a high-band
additive differential phase shift of 20 degrees. Then the oppositely sloped phase
differential section
998 imparts an oppositely sloped -145 degree differential phase shift to the high-band
signal. As a result, low-band CP polarization is accomplished at the first set of
waveguide port
996a-b, whereas high-band CP ' polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
999. In addition, improved x-pol isolation is accomplished for the high-band signal due
to the -145 degrees oppositely slopped phase differential characteristic of the phase
section
998.
[0042] FIG. 10a-b shows a three-horn antenna feed block
1000 including a substantially rectangular center feed horn
1002 located between a first elliptical feed horn
1002 and a second elliptical feed horn
1004. The feed block
1000 is an integral structure that includes the feed horns
1002,
1003 and
1004 along with a composite LNB to form a three-horn integral LNBF within a single Any
of the feed horns described in this specification, as potentially modified to a substantially
rectangular feed horn profile for the center horn (or to any other profile for any
of the horns) may be as alternative embodiments. In a particular embodiment, the center
feed horn
1002 receives a beam in the frequency band of 12.7-12.7 GHz (Ku BSS band) from a satellite
located at 101 degrees west longitude. The left feed horn
1004 receives a beam in the frequency band of 18.3-18.8 and 19.7-20.2 GHz (Ka band) from
a satellite located at 102.8 degrees west longitude, The right feed horn
1006 receives a beam in the frequency band of 18.3-18.8 and 19.7-20.2 GHz (Ka band) from
a satellite located at 99.2 degrees west longitude.
[0043] FIGS. 11a-b show an antenna horn
1100 with an elliptical transition section
1102, a phase compensation section
1104, and a CP polarizer
1106, which delivers the propagating signal to a waveguide port
1108 where the linear polarity pickups are located. The elliptical reception section
1102 imparts a differential phase shift of 35 degrees, the phase compensation section
1104 imparts a differential phase shift of 35 degrees of -35 degrees, and the CP polarizer
1106 imparts a differential phase shift of 90 degrees, Thus, CP polarization is accomplished
at waveguide port
1108 whereas high-band CP polarization is accomplished at the second waveguide port
999. In addition, improved x-pol isolation is accomplished due to the -35 degrees oppositely
slopped phase differential characteristic of the phase compensation section
1104, as shown in FIG, 11b.
[0044] FIGS, 12a-c show a three-horn antenna feed structure
1200 with an elliptical feed horn
1202 located between two circular feed horns
1204 and
1206. In this embodiment, each antenna horn feed block
1002,
1204 and
1206 is an integral structure that includes an LNBF to form a single-horn integral LNBF
within a single casting. All three horns are mounted on a common feed support bracket
1208. Any of the feed horns described in this specification, as potentially modified to
a substantivally to any other profile for any of the horns, may be used as alternative
embodiments. In a particular embodiment, the center feed horn
1002 receives signals from two satellites that are located close together (from the perspective
of the horn). The first satellite transmits in the frequency band of 12.7-12.7 GHz
(Ku BSS band) from a location at 119 degrees west longitude, and the second satellite
transmits in the frequency band of 11.7-12.2 (Ku BSS band) from a location at 118.7
degrees west longitude to produce an 11.7 to 12.2 CP broadband signal. Accordingly,
the broad band antenna feed horn
600 described with reference to FIG. 6 is suitable for this application. The left feed
horn
1004 receives a beam in the frequency band of 12.2-12.7 GHz (Ku BSS band) from a satellite
at at 129 degrees west longitude, The right feed horn
1006 receives a beam in the frequency band of 112.2-12.7 GHz (Ku BSS band) from a satellite
located at 110 degrees west longitude.
[0045] Additional description of the advantages, functions and configurations of the embodiments
of the invention with reference to certain prior art configurations is set for the
below.
Current Compromised Approach #1 (CCA#1):
[0046] FIGS. 1a-d illustrate a first current compromised approach (CCA#1). Many elliptical
reflector systems simply use circular beam feeds with conventional CP polarizers in
order to preserve good circular polarity cross polarization isolation. This approach
is easy to implement but results in significant compromise (degradations) in efficiency,
gain noise temperature, beam width, and side lobe performance of the reflector system,
because the circular beam feeds do not properly illuminate the elliptical reflector.
[0047] As shown in FIG 2, the illumination level along the short axis of the reflector is
to high resulting in large amounts of wasted spillover energy that degrades gain,
efficiency, and noise temperature, and/or the illumination level along the long axis
of the reflector is to low resulting in degraded taper efficiency and gain. In addition
this improper illumination makes it very difficult to achieve desired beam width and
side lobe performance. The high illumination along the short axis of the antenna degrades
(raises) side lobes. The low illumination along the long axis of the antenna degrades
(widens) beam widths. In addition for multi-beam applications where a single reflector
is required to receive from and/or transmit to multiple sources (satellites) that
are closely spaced a circular feeds are often to wide to allow the close physical
spacing required between the feeds.
[0048] Several of embodiments of the invention (i.e., all embodiments except those shown
on FIGS, 9a and 9e) solve the fundamental performance and implementation limitations
of CCA#1 through the use of elliptical beam feed horns to optimize the elliptical
reflector performance (efficiency, gain, noise temperature, side lobes, and beam width),
while achieving good or excellent circular polarity performance including acceptable
cross polarization isolation. Using an elliptical beam feed provides proper illumination
of the entire elliptical reflector (along ails axis) reducing spillover while maintaining
good taper effic-ency and gives the designer the freedom to illuminate the elliptical
reflector in manor to best optimize performance for a application and customer requirements.
In fact for some applications, this elliptical beam feed could be used on circular
reflectors as a means of improving (narrowing) beam widths while maintaining reasonable
efficiency, gain, and noise temperature. Specifically an elliptical illumination on
circular reflector can the illumination only in the direction (typically along the
satellite belt) needed to improve (narrow) the beam width in that direction while
maintaining relatively low illumination in the orthogonal direction (perpendicular
to the satellite belt) which helps maintain reasonable gain and noise temperature
performance. In addition these elliptical feeds can be made considerably narrower
than circular feeds which accommodates the closely spaced feed requirements for many
multi-beam single reflector applications.
Current Compromised Approach #2 (CCA#2):
[0049] There have been other prior art approaches that use elliptical (or oblong) beam horns
on elliptical (or oblong) reflectors. However, these prior art configurations result
in poor x-pol isolation when a CP polarizer is simply attached to the elliptical feed
horn section, as shown in FIGS 1a-d. Consider a perfect circular polarity beam impinging
on an elliptically shaped receiving horn as shown in these FIGS.. Recall that circular
polarity can be expressed as the vector sum of 2 orthogonal linear components that
are 90 degrees out of phase. For simplicity these orthogonal linear components may
be referred to as H (horizontal) and V(vertical), where H is aligned (parallel) to
the x-axis and V is aligned to the y-axis. As the circular polarity enters the horn
the elliptical shape of the horn causes the H and V components to travel at different
phase velocities through out the horn so the H and V components are no longer 90 degrees
out of phase when they reach the end of the horn (at the start of the polarizer section).
The H and V components might now be for example either 60 or 120 degrees out of phase
depending upon the CP polarizer orientation and if the initial CP was RHCP or LHCP.
So elliptical polarity now exists at the start of the polarizer section. Simply using
a circular polarity polarizer will result in poor cross polarization isolation as
shown in figure 1b because conventional circular polarity polarizers are designed
to convert perfect circular polarity (not elliptical polarity) to linear polarity
by delaying one linear component 90 degrees relative to the other linear component.
[0050] Furthermore, as show in FIGS. 1a-c, many applications orient the CP polarizes at
45 degrees so that the linear probes or wave-guide slots are vertically and/or horizontally
oriented in the or OMT that is connected to the polarizer. This is convenient for
mechanical packaging. However, with an elliptical horn this presents a problem because
the horn has already introduced a phase differential in the vectors aligned with the
wide or narrow walls of the feed (not in the vectors oriented at 45 degrees where
the CP polarizer is oriented). So the total phase differential from the horn and polarizer
is more than the desired 90 degrees and the horns 30 phase differential is acting
on orthogonal components that are not aligned with the orthogonal components that
the polarizers 90 degrees phase differential is acting on. Both the improper amount
and improper alignment of the phase differentials will seriously limit CP cross polarization
performance.
Advantages of certain embodiments of this Invention over CCA#2:
[0051] All of the embodiments of the present invention overcome the fundamental performance
shortcomings of CCA#2 caused by improper orientation and improper phase differential
of the CP polarizer.
Current Compromised Approach #3 (CCA#3):
[0052] A third compromised approach referred to as CCA#3 is described in
US Patent No. 6,570,542. The embodiments of the present invention include an undivided elliptical antenna
feed horn section to improve over the divided elliptical horn section of CCA#3.
Advantages of certain embodiments of this Invention over CCA#3:
[0053] In particular, the first embodiment of the invention shown in FIGS. 4a-b includes
an elliptical beam horn with integral CP polarizer functionality. To enable this embodiment,
the inventor recognized that an elliptical antenna feed horn can be designed to receive
circular polarity and provide good cross polarization isolation without the need for
a separate polarizer section or a divided elliptical feed horn section, such as one
including a septum that spans across elliptical horn section. This is monumental step
forward because it greatly reduces the size and complexity of the elliptical horn
polarizer, This is because the elliptical horn section and polarizer are now integrally
formed into the same structure, which eliminates unnecessary components and thereby
makes this embodiment easier and less costly to manufacture via die-casting, machining
or other means. In addition, the internal dimensions of this embodiment can have angular
drafts that are all in the same direction, meaning that the internal cross section
gets larger from the input waveguide out towards the horn opening or aperture. This
is very convenient for integrating the horn into a die-cast LNBF, OMT, diplexer or
other device.
[0054] The horn transition section as shown in FIGS. 4a-b transitions smoothly, and in this
particular example linearly, from an elliptical shape to a circular waveguide. However
for all embodiments of this invention the horn transition section could be done non-linearly
and/or in multiple sections that change (transition) at various rates, and in fact
can include abrupt steps as well as a means to control performance and length of the
horn. The inventor also recognized that if the dimensions of the sections and step
are carefully chosen so that unwanted modes can be limited in order to maintain excellent
illumination, match, and CP cross polarization performance.
[0055] The different height and width of an elliptical horn (major and minor axis) introduces
a phase differential between the 2 orthogonal linear components as they propagate
through the horn. The inventor recognized that by choosing the horn transition section
dimensions (H, W and length) appropriately the phase differential "X" can be made
almost exactly 90° or any odd integer multiple of 90° (... -630°, -450°,-270°, -90°,
90°, 270°, 450°. 630°) at a given frequency. So near center band the nominal phase
differential "X" introduced by the horn transition section can simply be described
by X= 90°*n where n is an odd integer. This results in excellent power conversion
from CP to LP and excellent cross polarization isolation performance at a single frequency
and good cross polarization isolation over a modest bandwidth.
[0056] This first embodiment shown in FIGS. 4a-b works best when the linear polarity probes,
slots etc. are oriented at 45 deg. However the principles of the invention are also
applicable to any alternative embodiment constructed by orienting the probes/slots
at other angles.
[0057] The second as illustrated by the antenna feed horn
600 described with to FIGS, 6a-b is a broadband high performance elliptical beam circular
polarity design that an elliptical beam horn deliberately designed to work in conjunction
with an additional opposite slope phase differential section to greatly improve performance
over very broad frequency bands as shown in FIG. 6C. To enable this embodiment, the
inventor recognized that the phase differential introduced by most circular polarizers
and the elliptical horn of embodiment 1 is not a constant over the desired bandwidth.
It is generally sloped vs. frequency as shown in FIG. 7. So for the elliptical horn
of embodiment 1 and for most circular polarity polarizers the desired 90 degrees total
phase differential needed for complete CP conversion only occurs at a single frequency.
This slope in phase differential vs. frequency fundamentally limits the CP Cross polarization
performance over bandwidth.
[0058] For this embodiment, the inventor also recognized that an elliptical aperture receiving
device can be designed consisting of an elliptical transition section and an oppositely
sloped phase differential section that introduce phase differentials (between orthogonal
linear modes) in the opposite direction of the elliptical transition section. Specifically
if one of these components (transition section or opposite slope phase differential
section) introduces a phase lag between orthogonal components, then the other can
be designed to introduce a phase lead between those same orthogonal components. The
sections are cooperatively designed so that the total phase differential is 90° or
an odd integer multiple. The combination of leading and lagging phase differential
components, imparting their opposing differential phase slope effects, allows the
combined sections of the antenna horn to introduce a total phase differential between
the orthogonal linear components is 90° over a wide frequency band. In other words,
the resulting cross polarization isolation is better and more constant over the desired
frequency band.
[0059] In this particular example, the horn transition section introduces a nominal phase
differential "X" (X= 130 at center band for example) and an opposite slope phase differential
section positioned after the transition section introduces an opposite phase differential
"Y" (Y= -40° for example) at a desired nominal frequency, such that the resulting
total phase differential through the horn transition section and opposite slope phase
differential section is the desired 90° for CP polarization. This may be accomplished
with any combination of oppositely sloped differential phase compensation (130°-40°
in this example) or an odd integer multiple of 90° (e.g., -630°, - 450°, -270°, -90°,
90°, 270°, 450°, 630° etc.). In other words, near center band the phase differentials
introduced by the 2 sections can be described by:

[0060] In this equation, X is the nominal center band phase differential between orthogonal
linear components introduced by of the horn transition section and Y is the nominal
center band phase differential introduced by the opposite phase slope section, wherein
Y and X have opposite slope (i.e., one is positive and the other is negative).
[0061] Importantly the phase differential vs. freq response for the "opposite slope phase
differential section" is oppositely sloped from the phase differential vs. freq response
of horn transition, so the resulting total (sum of) phase differential vs. frequency
is relatively flat maintaining values close to 90° or an odd integer multiple of 90°
over a much greater band width. As shown in FIG. 8 for example, at 11.2 GHz the phase
differential is 93° = 149-56, at 12.2 GHz it is 90° =130-40, and at 13.2CHz it is
90° = 114-24). This results in excellent CP conversion and excellent CP cross polarization
performance over a wide bandwidth as shown in FIG. 6c.
[0062] As another example the elliptical horn transition section could introduce a nominal
70 degrees of phase differential and the opposite phase slope section could introduce
a nominal -160 degrees resulting in a nominal -90 degrees total phase differential.
This also means the elliptical horn transition section could for example introduce
a nominal 470 degrees of phase differential and the opposite phase slope section could
introduce a nominal -200 degrees resulting in a nominal 270 degrees total phase differential.
[0063] This embodiment
600 described with reference to FIGS. 6a-c is typically slightly longer than the first
embodiment
400 described with reference to FIGS. 4a-c, but is still relatively easy and cost effective
to manufacture (die-cast, machine, etc.) and integrate into an LNBF die cast housing.
The embodiment
600 works best if the opposite slope phase differential section is aligned vertically
with the ridges aligned with the long axis of the elliptical horn aperture and the
linear polarity probes, slots etc. are oriented at 45 deg. However this patent should
be construed to cover any alternative designed by orienting the polarizer and or probes/slots
at other angles. The principles of the invention are also applicable to any alternative
embodiment that breaks up the phase compensated polarizer function/section up further
into multiple sections.
[0064] The 3rd embodiment 500 shown FIGS. 5a-c is a elliptical beam circular polarity design
that employs an elliptical beam horn with an additive phase differential section to
achieve CP polarization conversion over modest bandwidths. For this the inventor that
the phase differential "X" introduced between orthogonal linear components by the
elliptical horn is often something other than 90° (X = 35° for example) and that an
additive phase differential section can be added to provide the additional phase differential
Y (Y=55° in this example) to obtain a total phase differential of 90° or an odd integer
multiple of 90° (...-630°, -450°, -270°, -90°, 90°, 270°, 450°, 630°....) near center
band. The nominal phase differentials from the horn transition section and the additive
phase differential section are indeed additive or in the same direction (if one introduces
a phase lag between distinct orthogonal linear components the other also introduces
a phase lag between those same components). So near center band the phase differentials
introduced by the 2 sections can be described by:

[0065] In this equation, X is the nominal center band phase differential between orthogonal
linear components introduced by of the horn transition section and Y is the nominal
center band phase differential introduced by the additive phase differential section,
and Y must have the same sign as X.
[0066] Typically the phase differential vs. frequency from the horn transition section and
the additive phase differential section are sloped in the same direction so the resulting
total (sum) is sloped and the phase differential is not 90 degrees at the band edges.
So this embodiment provides excellent CP conversion and CP cross polarization performance
near center band and good performance at band edges. Although this embodiment #3 is
not as broadband as embodiment #2 it can be used as an alternative and specifically
for designs where there are limits on physical dimensions (length in particular) and
bandwidth requirements are modest.
[0067] The third embodiment illustrated by the antenna feed horn
500 described with reference to FIGS. 5a-c, works best if the additive phase differential
section is aligned horizontally with the ridges aligned with the short axis of the
elliptical horn aperture as shown in FIGS. 5a-c, and the linear polarity probes, slots
etc, are oriented at 45 deg, However the principles of the invention are also applicable
to any alternative embodiment constructed by orienting the polarizer and or probes/slts
at other angles, The principles of the invention are also applicable to any alternative
embodiment constructed by breaking up the phase compensated polarizer function/section
further into multiple sections.
[0068] Embodiment 4, including illustrative antenna feed horns
900-990 shown in FIGS 9a-h, employs multiple phase differential sections to achieve multi-band
circular polarity performance in elliptical (or oblong), or circular beam receiving
and/or transmitting devices. Many applications are requiring multiple frequency bands
to be received and/or transmitted through the same feed horn on a reflector antenna
system. For example the receive band might be at 19.7-20.2 Ghz while the transmit
band might be at 29.5-30 GHz. Circular polarity polarizers that perform well over
both bands are difficult to design, and if an elliptical illumination is also required
of the horn the phase differential introduced by the horn (discussed above) adds to
the difficulties. The methods used in embodiments 1, 2,3 can be employed to improve
circular polarity performance with the elliptical feed, but for applications with
multiple bands separated widely in frequency, even using embodiment #2 alone may not
provide adequate performance.
[0069] To enable these embodiments, the inventor recognized that multiple stages of phase
differential sections in combination with diplexing sections to extract and isolate
bands, can be used in such cases. For simplicity the case of only 2 bands widely separated
in frequency will be described here as an example (however the technique could be
used for multiple bands). The inventor also recognized that phase differential sections
or horn transition sections introduce more phase differential at lower frequencies
than at higher frequencies and understood that this could be exploited to achieve
excellent CP performance over multiple bands.
[0070] Specifically, for antenna feed horn
900 described with reference to FIG. 9a, the inventor recognized that the horn transition
section (HTS) and initial phase differential section (IPDS) can be used to introduced
the desired nominal 90 phase differential at the lowest frequency band (12.2-12.7
GHz for example), but not at the higher frequency band (only 50degrees nominally at
18.3-20.2 GHz for example) so the lower band (LB) has been completely converted from
CP to LP (either single or dual polarities) and can be separated from the center wave-guide
via a typical OMT or Co-polarity diplexer (or other means), allowing the upper band
to pass through. The upper freq band continues on through another second phase differential
section (SPDS) that the remaining additive phase differential (40 degrees nominally
for this example) needed for high band so that the total phase differential is nominally
90 (50 +40) at the center of the upper frequency band. For this case the phase differential
introduced at high band by the SPDS (40deg) is additive and the ridges in the SPDS
are aligned with the ridges in the IPDS (unless the elliptical horn transition section
introduces more phase differential than the IPDS). FIGS. 9b,c,d illustrates additional
implementations of this concept for Elliptical Horns with the understanding that the
elliptical horn transition section introduces part of the phase differential needed
at both the high and low bands.
[0071] As another example, the antenna feed horn
920 described with reference to FIG, 9b includes an elliptical transition section that
introduces a nominal 130° of low band phase differential and 70° of high band phase
differential. The IPDS introduces a nominal -40° of low band opposite slop phase differential
and -25° of high band phase differential. So at the input to the diplexer 90° (= 130°-40°)
of phase differential has been introduced at low band providing excellent low band
CP to LP conversion performance so that the diplexer can extract the resulting low
band linear polarity signals into the side ports and pass the high band signals that
only have 45° (= 70°-25°) of phase differential. The SPDS then introduces a nominal
45° of additive high band phase differential needed so that the total high band phase
differential of 90° (= 70°-25°+45°) results and good CP to LP conversion occurs at
high band as well
[0072] For the antenna feed horn
940 described with reference to FIG. 9c, the elliptical Horn introduces a nominal 90°
of low band phase differential and 50° of high band phase differential. There is no
need for an IPDS in this case because the elliptical horn introduced the entire nominal
90° of low band phase differential providing good low band CP to LP conversion performance
so that the diplexer can extract the resulting low band linear polarity signals into
the side ports and pass the high band signals that only have 50° of phase differential.
The SPDS then introduces a nominal 40° of additive high band phase differential needed
so that the total high band phase differential of 90° (= 50°-40°) results and good
CP to LP conversion occurs at high band as well.
[0073] For the antenna feed horn
950 described with reference to FIG. 9d, the elliptical Horn introduces a nominal 60°
of low band phase differential and 35° of high band phase differential. The IPDS introduces
a nominal 30° of low band additive phase differentials and 20° of high band phase
differential. So at the input to the diplexer 90° (= 60°+30°) of phase differential
has been introduced at low band providing good low band CP to LP conversion performance
so that the diplexer can extract the resulting low band linear polarity signals into
the side ports and pass the high band signals that only have 55° (=35°+20°) of phase
ditterential. The SPDS then introduces an nominal 35° of additive high band phase
differential needed so that the total high band phase differential of 90° (= 35°+
20°+35°) results and good CP to LP conversion occurs at high band as well
[0074] The antenna feed horn
960 described with reference to FIG. 9e provides an example where the SPDS introduces
a nominal -140 degrees and is oppositely sloped from the phase differential introduced
by the HTS and IPDS in the upper frequency band. So as in embodiment 2 this opposite
slope results in a total phase differential of very close to -90 degrees across the
entire upper band (for example: -92 = 60-152 at the bottom of the upper band, -90=
50-140 at center of the upper band, -88 = 40-128 at the top of the upper band) and
improved CP cross polarization isolation performance over the entire upper band. For
this case ridges in the SPDS or IPDS will be perpendicular to the ridges of the IPDS
(unless the elliptical horn transition section introduces more phase differential
than the IPDS). FIGS. 9f, g, h illustrates additional implementations of this concept
for Elliptical Horns with the understanding that the elliptical horn transition section
introduces part of the phase differential needed at both the high and low bands.
[0075] For antenna feed horn
970 described with reference to FIG. 9f, the elliptical transition section
971 introduces a nominal 130° of low band phase differential and 70° of high band phase
differential. The IPDS introduces a nominal -40° of low band opposite slop phase differential
and -25° of high band phase differential. So at the input to the diplexer 90° (= 130°-40°)
of phase differential has been introduced at low band providing excellent low band
CP to LP conversion performance so that the diplexer can extract the resulting low
band linear polarity signals into the side ports and pass the high band signals that
only have 45° (= 70°-25°) of phase differential. The SPDS then introduces a nominal
-135° of opposite slope high band phase differential needed so that the total high
band phase differential of -90° (= 70°- 25°-135°) results and good CP to LP conversion
occurs at high band as well
[0076] For antenna feed horn
980 described with reference to FIG. 9g, the elliptical transition section
982 introduces a nominal 90° of low band phase differential and 50° of high band phase
differential, There is no need for an IPDS in this case because the elliptical horn
introduced the entire nominal 90° of low band phase differential providing good low
band CP to LP conversion performance so that the diplexer can extract the resulting
low band linear polarily signals into the side ports and pass the high band signals
that only have 50° of phase differential. The SPDS then introduces a nominal - 160°
of opposite slope high band phase differential needed so that the total high band
phase differential of -90° (= 50°-160°) results and good CP to LP conversion occurs
at high band as well.
[0077] For the antenna feed horn
990 described with reference to FIG. 9g the elliptical transition section
981 introduces a nominal 60° of low band phase differential and 35° of high band phase
differential. The IPDS introduces a nominal 30° of low band additive phase differential
and 20° of high band phase differential. So at the input to the diplexer 90° (= 60°+30°)
of phase differential has been introduced at low band providing good low band CP to
LP conversion performance so that the diplexer can extract the resulting low band
linear polarity signals into the side ports and pass the high band signals that only
have 55° (=35°+20°) of phase differential. The SPDS then introduces an nominal - 145°
of opposite slope high band phase differential needed so that the total high band
phase differential of
-90° (= 35°+ 20°-145°) results and good CP to LP conversion occurs at high band as
well.
[0078] It should again be noted that the phase IPDS and SPDS can be designed such that the
resulting nominal phase differentials for the low band and the high band are integer
multiples of 90 deg. It is also easy to see how the same principles could continue
on and on for improving performance not only across 2 bands but multiple frequency
bands, by simply adding more phase compensation sections between each successive section
where different bands are split off. Furthermore, it is also easy to see how any of
these bands could be linear polarity by simply aligning the pick up probes, slots
etc. with the polarizer and/or phase compensation section.
[0079] Embodiment 5, the antenna feed horn
1100 described with reference to FIG. 11 is an elliptical (or oblong) beam horn with phase
compensation section for use with conventional CP Polarizers. Toe enable this embodiment,
the inventor recognizes that a phase compensation section can be designed and placed
between the elliptical horn and CP polarizer such that a conventional CP polarizer
oriented in the more traditional 45 degrees plane as shown in FIGS. 11a-c can be used.
This is convenient for mechanical packaging purposes for some applications because
the pick up probes sand or slots (in OMTs and/or diplexing components) can be oriented
vertically or horizontal.
[0080] The phase compensation section
1104 introduces a phase differential (30 degrees for example) between the 2 orthogonal
components (H and V in this example) that is equal and opposite to the phase differential
already introduced by the elliptical horn (30deg). So the total phase differential
introduced by the horn and phase compensation section is 0 degrees = (30-30deg). In
theory this re-establishes perfect CP between the phase compensation section and CP
polarizer, so a conventional CP polarizer oriented at 45 degrees can be used and results
in vertically or horizontally oriented linear polarity pick up probes slots, etc which
is convenient for some LNBs, LNBF, OMTs and other waveguide or other feed assemblies
etc. In fact the conventional CP can be oriented at any angle in order to orient the
pick probes/slots at any number of orientations.
[0081] This fifth embodiment
1100 works best if the phase compensation section is aligned vertically as shown in FIG.
11 a. However the principles of the invention are also applicable to any alternative
embodiment constructed by orienting the phase compensation section at other angles.
The principles of the invention are also applicable to any alternative embodiment
constructed by breaking up the phase compensation section/function further into multiple
sections or to brake up the CP polarizer into multiple sections/functions.
[0082] For this embodiment #5 the total length of the horn, phase compensation section and
conventional polarizer will in general be slightly longer and more difficult to make
than embodiment #1 and significantly longer and moderately more difficult to make
than embodiment #2. However the phase compensation section of this third embodiment
could be easily and cost effectively integrated into the horn casting.
[0083] Referring now to FIGS10a-b and 12a-c, all of thel embodiments can be used in single-feed
or multi-feed reflector systems where the feeds are mounted separately or integrated
in one or more housings that are mounted on an antenna dish to generate multiple receive
and/or transmit beams for receiving from or transmitting to multiple nominal sources
and/or receiver locations such as multiple satellite locations that can be separated
by as little 1 degrees and as much as 180 deg. FIGS. 3a-d illustrate a system that
has three of these feeds integrated into a LNBF housing (triple LNBF = Low Noise Block
Down Converter with integrated Feeds) near the center of the reflector as well as
two other more conventional feeds integrated into another LNBF housing (dual LNBF)
that is significantly displaced from the reflector center. The horns on the triple
LNBF are relatively tightly spaced to provide reflector beams to receive signals from
three satellites that are spaced about 1.8 degrees apart. The dual LNBF feeds are
spaced much further apart for receiving satellites spaced about nine degrees apart.
[0084] More specifically, for the centrally located triple-horn block, the LNBF the outer
2 feeds are for the Ka Satellite Band (downlink frequencies of 18.3-18.8 and 19.7-20.2
GHz) at nominal satellite locations of 99.2 and 102.8 west longitude. The center feed
is for the Ku BSS (Broadcast Satellite Service) Band (downlink frequencies of 12.2-12.7GHz)
at a nominal satellite location of 101degrees West longitude.
[0085] For the dual LNBF attached with the out rigger antenna feed block, the 2 feeds are
for the Ku BSS (Broadcast Satellite Service) Band (downlink frequencies of 12.2-12.7GHz)
at a nominal satellite location of 110 and 119 degrees West longitude.
[0086] FIG. 12 a,b,c illustrate a system that has 1 of these feeds (attached to an LNB and
covered in a shroud) that is mounted near the center of the reflector as well as 2
other conventional circular feed LNBFs (low noise block down converters with integrated
feed horns) that are significantly displaced from the reflector center. The center
feed is designed to receive circular polarity from two satellites that are very close
together. One satellite is for the Ku BSS band and is nominally located at 119° west
longitude, and the other is for Ku FSS band is nominally located at 118.7° west longitude.
The center feed is an elliptical beam circular polarity broadband feed as described
in embodiment 2 and illustrated in FIG. 6. This maximize performance of the elliptical
reflector system by improving gain, noise temperature, adjacent satellite rejection
and cross polarity isolation over the required broad frequency range. The outer feeds
are displaced with outrigger brackets to receive Ku BSS band services from 110° west
longitude and 128° west longitude.
[0087] All of these services require and feeds support both Right Hand Circular Polarity
and Left Hand Circular Polarity simultaneously. Of course this a specific geometry
but as discussed in the disclosures the invention can be used for many combinations
of frequencies, polarities and satellite locations.
[0088] For single polarity applications it is worth noting that the transition section could
simply transition from an elliptical radiating aperture to a rectangular or other
oblong waveguide (including ridged waveguide) instead of circular or square waveguide,
The rectangular waveguide would typically be oriented at 45 degrees relative to the
major or minor axis of the elliptical radiating aperture.
[0089] The inventor further recognized that all embodiments discussed above could also include
additional metal or plastic ridges, slabs, posts or other structures protruding out
of or placed against the major axis walls and/or the minor axis walls such that they
protrude into the throat of the horn transition section. This is done to better control
the physical lengths for general product size requirements/ constraints and/or for
ease of integration into single die cast parts of multi-feed LNBF assemblies and possibly.
This could also be employed to better control the specific amount and slope of the
phase differential vs. frequency of the transition section. As an example the center
feed in FIG. 10 illustrates an embodiment with a square antenna feed horn with, in
this example ridges in the top and bottom walls. Adding the ridges in these wall forces
the horn transition section (from oblong to square waveguide) to become longer in
order to provide the desired amount of phase differential (somewhat greater than 90°
in this case) which in turn caused the opposite slope phase differential section to
lengthen as well so that the resulting total phase differential is 90°. It was necessary
to make this center feed longer in order to match the length of the outer feeds so
that they could be easily die-cast as a single unit. If ridges are placed in the two
side walls, or in all four walls, instead of only in the top and bottom walls, then
the feed can be shorter.
[0090] Therefore, it will be understood that various embodiments of the invention have the
features and exhibit the advantages described below,
- 1. An elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
device comprising either detachable or integrated electronics (such as low noise block
down converters, amplifiers, transmitters, or transceivers), any necessary waveguide
interface components and a simple horn that transitions abruptly and/or smoothly in
one or more sections from a circular, or square waveguide to an elliptical, rectangular
or other elongated radiating aperture where the aperture size (height and width),
circular waveguide and transition section dimensions (lengths, heights, widths, flare
angles and step are chosen to achieve good circular polarity performance (match and
cross polarization isolation), and the desired radiation pattern characteristics without
using cumbersome metal or dielectric septums or structures stretching across the inside
of the horn for phase compensation. These dimensions are chosen to achieve a phase
differential between orthogonal linear modes that are lined up with the wide (major)
and narrow (minor) axis of the oblong horn. The phase differential is typically designed
to be either +90 degrees or -90 degrees at a nominally frequency and varies across
the frequency band to some degree, but can be any odd integer multiple of 90°, such
as -630°, -450°, -270°, -90°, 90°, 270°, 450°, 630° and so forth.
- 2. An elliptical (or other oblong) circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
device comprising of either detachable or integrated electronics (low noise block
down converters, amplifiers, transmitters, or transceivers), any necessary waveguide
interface components, a simple horn that transitions abruptly and/or smoothly in one
or more sections from a circular, or square waveguide to an elliptical, rectangular
or other elongated radiating aperture, and an opposite slope phase differential section.
- 3. An elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
device comprising of either detachable or integrated electronics (low noise block
down converters, amplifiers, transmitters, or transceivers), any necessary waveguide
interface components, a simple horn that transitions abruptly and/or smoothly in one
or more sections from a circular, or square waveguide to an elliptical, rectangular
or other elongated radiating aperture, and an additive phase differential section.
- 4. An elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
device of that includes additional metal or plastic ridges, slabs, posts or other
structures protruding out of or placed against the side walls of major axis and/or
the side walls of the minor axis such that they protrude into the throat of the horn
transition section for the purpose of
- a) better controlling the physical lengths for general product size requirements/constraints
and/or for ease of integration into single die cast parts of multi-Teed LNBF assemblies,
and
- b) and better controlling the specific amount and slope of the phase differential
vs. frequency of the transition section.
- 5. The elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
device mounted on an antenna dish to generate a receive beam and/or transmit beam
for receiving from or transmitting to a nominal source and/or receiver location such
as a nominal geostationary satellite location that has several satellites at that
location, where in one or more frequency bands and/or one or more polarities can be
received from and/or transmitted to the location.
- 6. Multiple elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or transmitting
devices mounted separately or integrated in one or more housings that are mounted
on an antenna dish to generate multiple receive and/or transmit beams for receiving
from or transmitting to multiple nominal sources and/or receiver locations such as
multiple satellite locations, where in the locations can be separated by as little
1 degrees and as much as 180 deg. and where in one or more frequency bands and/or
one or more polarities can be received from and/or transmitted to each location.
- 7. One or more elliptical (or other oblong) beam circular polarity receiving and/or
transmitting devices of the type described in advantages 1 and/or 2 and/or 3 and/or
4 as described above with one or more circular and/or linear polarity circular aperture
receiving devices and/or one or more linear polarity elliptical (or other oblong)
linear polarity devices mounted on an antenna dish to generate multiple receive and/or
transmit beams for receiving from or transmitting to multiple nominal source and/or
receiver locations such as multiple satellite locations, where in the locations can
be separated by as little 1 degrees and as much as 180 deg.