Technical Field
[0001] This invention relates to a case hardening steel tube (a steel tube made from case
hardening steel) having a high strength and a high toughness and exhibiting a high
fracture load after carburizing and quenching, and to a process for its manufacture.
In particular, this invention relates to a case hardening steel tube having improved
workability and a process for its manufacture.
Background Art
[0002] From in the past, case hardening steel has been used for the manufacture of various
types of structural parts for use in automobile or industrial machinery and particularly
surface-hardened parts typified by shafts, CVJs (constant velocity joints), CVTs (continuously
variable transmissions), and gears. Case hardening steel which is a material to be
worked is formed into a part having a desired shape by hot or cold forging and machining,
for example. The part which has been formed is then subjected to surface hardening
treatment such as carburizing or carbo-nitriding in order to increase its wear resistance
and fatigue strength.
[0003] The level of performance demanded of such structural parts for machinery are becoming
increasingly higher. Namely, they are demanded to have, in addition to high surface
hardness and high bending fatigue strength after carburizing and quenching which were
demanded in the past, further improvement in wear resistance and rolling fatigue properties
as well as a still higher level of resistance to impact fracture and toughness when
an impact load is applied.
[0004] Case hardening steel sometimes has problems such as a decrease in impact fracture
strength, a decrease in fatigue properties, and a decrease in dimensional accuracy
due to abnormal growth of crystal grains during carburizing and quenching treatment.
In particular, if so-called high temperature carburizing which is carried out in the
temperature range of 990 - 1090 °C is employed in order to shorten the carburizing
time from the viewpoint of rationalization of carburizing treatment, the problem occurs
that coarse grains develop, thereby making it impossible to obtain the desired fatigue
properties such as rolling fatigue properties.
[0005] JP 2005-240175 A1 (Patent Document 1) proposes suppressing the formation of coarse grains during high
temperature carburizing of case hardening steel by controlling the steel composition
and the formation of Ti-containing precipitates.
[0006] A steel which can form a carburized layer having a high strength and good wear resistance
by carburizing and quenching under relatively mild conditions without employing high
temperature carburizing has also been studied.
JP H09-53150 A1 (Patent Document 2) discloses a high-strength, high-toughness case hardening steel
exhibiting a sufficiently high impact fracture load even when a notch is present in
the carburized surface and a process of manufacturing a high-strength, high-toughness
case hardening steel tube exhibiting improved workability and improved impact fracture
strength after carburizing and quenching from this steel.
[0007] According to Patent Document 2, one of the causes of the problems of the prior art
is the formation of an imperfect hardened structure. The major cause of the formation
of this imperfect hardened structure is the precipitation of carbides along austenite
grain boundaries which occurs at the time of quenching of a carburized steel. Therefore,
a steel composition design is employed in which B is added in order to prevent the
above-described precipitation of carbides while N is reduced as much as possible so
that B can adequately exhibit its effects.
[0008] The high-strength, high-toughness case hardening steel tube disclosed in Patent Document
2 has excellent properties particularly in the form of seamless steel tube of case
hardening steel. However, since it has a relatively high hardness, problems sometimes
develop with respect to workability, for example, at the time of forging by a user.
[0009] With respect to a process of manufacturing a case hardening steel tube, Patent Document
2 discloses (i) a process in which a steel tube obtained by hot tube forming is subjected
to cold working followed by stress relief annealing (Example 3), and (ii) a process
in which a steel tube obtained by hot tube forming is subjected to initial annealing
followed by cold working and subsequent stress relief annealing (secondary annealing)
(Examples 4 and 5).
Patent Document 1: JP 2005-240175 A1
Patent Document 2: JP H09-53150 A1
Disclosure of Invention
[0010] The present invention provides a case hardening steel tube which has good workability
or more specifically an HRB hardness (Rockwell B scale hardness) of 72 - 80 and which
can form a carburized layer of high strength and good wear resistance as well as sufficiently
improved resistance to impact fracture when it is formed into a final product by working
for forming followed by carburizing and quenching under relatively mild conditions,
along with a process for its manufacture.
[0011] The present invention is based on the following findings.
- (1) By the heat treatment methods described in Patent Document 2 which are performed
after hot tube forming, notwithstanding annealing which is carried out after cold
working, the hardness of the tube often reaches at least 85 HRB, which is too high
to enable the user to easily fabricate parts therefrom by forming or working.
- (2) Particularly in above-described process (ii) disclosed in Patent Document 2 in
which initial annealing is carried out prior to cold working, if the temperature at
this annealing stage is around 700°C, even if secondary annealing is carried out under
the conditions described in Patent Document 2 after cold working, it is difficult
to soften the steel. In this case, if the secondary annealing temperature is around
730 °C, a bainite structure is formed.
- (3) In the process described in (2) above, if the heat treatment temperature in the
secondary annealing after cold working is increased to around 930 °C and then gradual
cooling is performed, the steel can be softened to around 75 HRB.
However, under such temperature condition, the effect of cold working disappears due
to the phase transformation in a region higher than the Ac3 point. Thus, the hardness can no longer be freely controlled within the range of
72 - 80 HRB by appropriately selecting the degree of cold working and the heat treatment
conditions in secondary annealing. In addition, the high temperature heating after
cold working causes a decrease in dimensional accuracy and sometimes surface decarburization.
The steel structure is a ferrite + pearlite structure, and coarsening of crystal grains
easily occurs.
- (4) Patent Document 2 gives 870 °C as a specific temperature for initial annealing
before cold working. In this heat treatment condition, the steel is once heated to
a temperature higher than the Ac3 point, so the steel structure after initial annealing becomes a ferrite + pearlite
structure. However, because the initial annealing temperature is low, softening of
the steel cannot be expected in secondary annealing after cold working if the annealing
is carried out by gradual cooling over a sufficient length of time.
- (5) In contrast to the process disclosed in Patent Document 2, if heat treatment before
cold working is carried out by normalizing at a temperature of at least 880 °C (with
a cooling rate of 70 °C per minute or lower) followed by cold working preferably with
a reduction in area of 20 - 50% and subsequent annealing at a temperature of 700 -
820 °C, pearlite is partially spheroidized. "Spheroidizing of pearlite" as used herein
means that cementite phases present in pearlite are spheroidized. As a result of the
spheroidizing, a desired decrease in hardness can be achieved. In addition, the hardness
can be controlled by adjusting the cooling rate after heating for normalizing and
the temperature of secondary annealing, and preferably by also adjusting the reduction
in area during cold working.
[0012] Thus, in the present invention, a steel tube manufactured by hot tube forming and
having a steel composition which makes it possible to carburizing and quenching to
perform thereon is subjected initially to normalizing, then to cold working and subsequently
to stress relief annealing. During the annealing, at least a portion of the pearlite
in the ferrite + pearlite structure resulting from normalizing is spheroidized (namely,
cementite in the pearlite is spheroidized), leading to softening of the steel, and
a case hardening steel tube having excellent workability is manufactured in this manner.
[0013] In the present invention, a ferrite + pearlite structure is formed during normalizing,
and this structure is subjected to subsequent steps of cold working and annealing.
By adjusting the reduction ratio in cold working and the heat treatment conditions
in annealing, the proportion of pearlite which is spheroidized during annealing can
be varied. In this manner it is possible to perform fine adjustment of the steel hardness.
[0014] According to one aspect, the present invention is a process for manufacturing a case
hardening steel tube characterized by forming a tube from a steel having a steel composition
comprising, in mass percent, C: 0.1 - 0.25%, Si: 0.2 - 0.4%, Mn: 0.3 - 0.9%, P: at
most 0.02%, S: 0.001 - 0.15%, Cr: 0.5 - 0.9%, Mo: 0.15 - 1%, A1: 0.01 - 0.1%, B: 0.0005
- 0.009%, N: less than 0.006%, and a remainder essentially of Fe, subjecting the resulting
steel tube to normalizing by holding at a temperature of 880 - 980 °C followed by
cooling at a cooling rate of at most 70 °C per minute in a temperature range of 880
- 400 °C, performing cold working on the normalized steel tube, and then annealing
the cold worked steel tube at a temperature of 700 - 820 °C.
[0015] From another standpoint, the present invention is a cold finished, case hardening
steel tube characterized by having a steel composition comprising, in mass percent,
C: 0.1 - 0.25%, Si: 0.2 - 0.4%, Mn: 0.3 - 0.9%, P: at most 0.02%, S: 0.001 - 0.15%,
Cr: 0.5 - 0.9%, Mo: 0.15 - 1%, A1: 0.01 - 0.1%, B: 0.0005 - 0.009%, N: less than 0.006%,
and a remainder essentially of Fe, and having a steel structure which is a mixed ferrite
+ pearlite + spheroidized cementite structure or a mixed ferrite + spheroidized cementite
structure.
[0016] The above-described steel composition may further contain one or more elements selected
from the following (1) and (2):
- (1) in mass percent, Ni: 0.3 - 4.0%
- (2) in mass percent, one or more elements selected from Ti: 0.01 - 0.3%, Nb: 0.01
- 0.3%, V: 0.01 - 0.3%, and Zr: 0.01 - 0.3%.
[0017] In the above-described steel composition, the B content is preferably B: 0.0005 -
0.003%.
[0018] "Case hardening steel" and "case hardening steel tube" refer to steel and steel tube
which undergo working to form a prescribed shape of a product (such as the above-described
structural part of machinery) and finally carburizing and quenching to form a harder
surface skin layer (carburized layer) before being used as a product. Of course, the
above-described hardness is the hardness of the case hardening steel, i.e., the hardness
before the steel undergoes working to be formed into the shape of a part (of course,
the hardness prior to carburizing and quenching). Forming into the prescribed shape
of a product and carburizing and quenching are normally carried out by the customer
(by the user).
[0019] "A remainder essentially of Fe" means that the remainder may contain unavoidable
impurities.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0020]
Figure 1 is a photograph showing the microstructure of a case hardening steel tube
according to the present invention produced in an example.
Best Mode for Carrying out the Invention
[0021] The reasons why the steel composition of a case hardening steel tube according to
the present invention is limited as described above will be explained together with
the effect of each element. In this description, percent with respect to the steel
composition means mass percent.
C:
[0022]
C is a basic element for steel to develop its hardness and strength. A hardness of
at least 250 Hv is necessary in order to provide steel with such a strength that it
will not deform during use of a carburized and quenched product. In order to obtain
this necessary hardness, the C content is made at least 0.1 %. If C is contained in
excess of 0.25%, the toughness of the central portion of steel deteriorates. Accordingly,
the C content is 0.1 - 0.25% and preferably 0.12 - 0.20%.
Si:
[0023]
The effect of Si of increasing the hardenability of steel is positively utilized in
order to achieve a high resistance to impact fracture by hardening of a carburized
layer. If the Si content is less than 0.2%, it is not possible to provide a carburized
layer with the desired high hardenability. On the other hand, if Si is contained in
excess of 0.4%, embrittlement of grain boundaries due to oxidation of Si in the vicinity
of the grain boundaries at the time of carburizing becomes marked. Therefore, the
Si content is 0.2 - 0.4%.
Mn:
[0024]
Mn is also added in order to increase the hardenability of a carburized layer and
realize a high resistance to impact fracture. If the Mn content is reduced to less
than 0.3%, the hardenability of a carburized layer decreases, and the desired high
resistance to impact fracture cannot be achieved. It has been found that embrittlement
of grain boundaries due to oxidation of Mn in the vicinity of grain boundaries at
the time of carburizing is not a problem from a practical standpoint even if the Mn
content exceeds 0.9%. However, if Mn is contained in excess of 0.9%, a deterioration
in blankability and grindability becomes marked. Properties such as blankability and
grindability are particularly important for efficient processing of CVJs and the like.
Accordingly, the Mn content is 0.3 - 0.9%.
P:
[0025]
P markedly accelerates embrittlement of grain boundaries due to precipitation of cementite
on austenite grain boundaries at the time of carburizing and quenching. Therefore,
it is an extremely harmful impurity in case hardening steel. Accordingly, the P content
is preferably reduced as much as possible. However, because reducing P increases the
cost of raw materials and the cost of refining processes, the permissible level of
P is determined by balancing the desired properties and cost. Taking into consideration
the below-described effect of B, the upper limit on the allowable P content in the
present invention is 0.02%.
S:
[0026]
S causes a deterioration in the toughness of steel, but at the same time it improves
machinability (grindability and blankability). From this standpoint, it is an element
which is preferably deliberately added. If the S content is less than 0.001 %, its
effect on improving machinability is not significant, while if S is contained in excess
of 0.15%, the deterioration in the toughness of steel becomes marked. Therefore, the
S content is 0.001 - 0.15%. In applications where a high level of machinability is
not required, it is advantageous to suppress the S content to a low value.
Cr:
[0027]
Cr is an indispensable element for providing the base metal of steel (the steel in
the portion excluding the carburized layer on the surface) with hardenability and
for achieving the carbon concentration necessary in the carburized layer in a short
length of time. For this purpose, it is necessary for the Cr content to be at least
0.5%. At the same time, Cr markedly promotes embrittlement of grain boundaries due
to precipitation of cementite on austenite grain boundaries at the time of carburizing
and quenching. Therefore, its content is restricted to at most 0.9%. However, if the
Cr content is limited to at most 0.9%, the hardenability of steel and particularly
the hardenability of a carburized layer having an increased C content becomes inadequate.
Therefore, in the present invention, hardenability is supplemented by adding B, Mo,
and Ni which do not lead to embrittlement of grain boundaries. Thus, the Cr content
is 0.5 - 0.9% but preferably it is adjusted to 0.5 - 0.65%.
Mo:
[0028]
Mo is an essential element for increasing the strength and toughness of the steel
base metal and a carburized layer and for achieving a carbon concentration necessary
in the carburized layer in a short length of time. The effect of Mo on increasing
hardenability is almost unaffected by the C content of the steel base metal. Therefore,
its effect of increasing hardenability can be stably exhibited even with a carburized
layer having an increased carbon content.
[0029] As described above, in the present invention, the Cr content is limited in order
to suppress embrittlement of grain boundaries resulting from carburizing, and hardenability
is supplemented by the addition of B. In such a steel, hardenability markedly decreases
even if the carbon content reaches a high level, so supplementing hardenability of
a carburized layer by addition of Mo is extremely important. If the Mo content is
less than 0.15%, not only can hardenability not be adequately supplemented, but the
amount of carbon which penetrates into the surface layer during carburizing treatment
performed in a short length of time also decreases. From the standpoint of imparting
the above-described effect, it is preferable for the Mo content to be large. However,
a sufficient effect is obtained with addition of up to 1% of Mo, and addition of Mo
in excess of this amount is inadvisable from the standpoint of economy. Accordingly,
the Mo content is 0.15 - 1%, preferably 0.2 - 0.7%, and more preferably 0.2 - 0.6%.
A1:
[0030]
A1 is an element which is effective for deoxidation and crystal grain refinement of
steel. Its effects are inadequate if its content is less than 0.01%. On the other
hand, if A1 is contained in excess of 0.1%, the amount of inclusions which are harmful
to toughness increases. Accordingly, the A1 content is 0.01 - 0.1 %.
B:
[0031]
B suppresses precipitation of carbides (Cr carbides and the like) on austenite grain
boundaries which form at the time of hardening of a carburized material, thereby preventing
the formation of an imperfectly hardened structure in the resulting carburized layer
and also preventing grain boundary embrittlement. Therefore, it is an indispensable
element for achieving adequate properties in terms of resistance to impact fracture,
wear resistance and rolling fatigue properties in a carburized and quenched steel.
In particular, in the present invention, the Cr content is restricted in order to
prevent the adverse effect of Cr of markedly promoting embrittlement in grain boundaries
due to precipitation of carbides on grain boundaries at the time of carburizing and
quenching. B also serves to compensate for the decrease in hardenability of the steel
base metal caused by decreasing the Cr content and thereby provide the central portion
of steel with sufficient hardenability.
If the B content is less than 0.0005%, the above-described desired effects of B are
not achieved. On the other hand, if B is contained in excess of 0.009%, it ends up
causing grain boundary embrittlement. Therefore, the B content is 0.0005 - 0.009%.
[0032] In the present invention, as described above, heat treatment (normalizing) is carried
out before cold working at a temperature of at least the Ac
3 point and specifically at a temperature of at least 880 °C. This heat treatment is
contemplated that B is once solutionized in order to achieve the object of decreasing
hardness by annealing which is carried out after cold working. If the amount of B
is too large, a long time is required for solutionize B and accordingly a long time
is required in heat treatment for normalizing. Therefore, the B content is preferably
on the lower side of the above-described range. Specifically, it is particularly desirable
for the B content to be at most 0.003% (namely, in the range of 0.0005 - 0.003%).
N:
[0033]
As stated in Patent Document 2, the amount of N in steel is extremely important in
making the effect of B significant. Namely, the effect of preventing carbide precipitation
on grain boundaries during quenching of a carburized steel which is achieved by the
addition of B becomes marked only when the amount of N in steel is reduced to a range
of less than 0.006%. In this range, not only is a sufficient resistance to impact
fracture achieved, but rolling fatigue properties are also markedly improved. The
N content in steel is preferably as low as possible, but in industrial production
in air, it is extremely difficult to make the N content less than 0.001 % with current
steel manufacturing technology.
Ni:
[0034]
When a case hardening steel tube according to the present invention is used as an
inner race or a ball cage or the like of a common drive shaft joint for automobiles,
it has adequate strength and toughness even if addition of Ni or below-described Ti,
Nb, V, or Zr does not take place. However, when it is used in applications having
more severe conditions, addition of one or more of these elements is effective at
increasing the strength and toughness of steel.
Ni is an element which is effective at increasing the strength and toughness of the
steel base metal. In addition, it acts together with Mo to greatly contribute to an
increase in strength and toughness of a carburized layer. If the Ni content is less
than 0.3%, the above-described effects are inadequate. On the other hand, ifNi is
contained in excess of 4.0%, its effects saturate. Accordingly, when Ni is added,
its content is 0.3 - 4.0%.
Ti, Nb, V, and Zr:
These elements have the effect of refining the crystal grains of steel and increasing
its toughness. Accordingly, preferably one or more of these elements are added when
severe conditions of use are expected. If the content of any of these elements which
is added is less than 0.01 %, the above-described effect is inadequate. On the other
hand, if any of these elements is contained in excess of 0.3%, it leads to worsening
in the toughness and rolling fatigue properties of steel. Accordingly, the content
of any of Ti, Nb, V, and Zr, when added, is 0.01 - 0.3%.
Next, the manufacturing conditions for a case hardening steel tube according to the
present invention will be explained in the order in which the steps are performed.
Tube forming:
A mother tube is manufactured from steel (case hardening steel) having the above-described
steel composition using a suitable tube forming process. The mother tube is preferably
a seamless steel tube prepared by hot tube forming. However, as stated below, at the
time of normalizing, heat treatment is performed at a temperature which is equal to
or higher than the Ac3 point of the steel, so the working history in prior steps has no influence of the
tube product. Accordingly, there is no particular limitation on the tube forming process.
For example, it is possible to use an electric resistance welded steel tube as a mother
tube. When a seamless steel tube is used, there is no particular restriction on hot
tube forming of the seamless steel tube. For example, a seamless steel tube can be
manufactured from steel having the above-described steel composition by preparing
a billet from a bloom by means of hot forging, and subjecting the billet sequentially
to Mannesmann piercing rolling, elongation rolling with a mandrel mill, and sizing
rolling.
Normalizing:
A steel tube (mother tube) which is manufactured by the above-described process or
other process is subjected to normalizing prior to cold working instead of to initial
annealing as disclosed in Patent Documents 1 and 2. Normalizing is carried out by,
for example, heating the steel tube in a suitable heating furnace to hold it at a
prescribed temperature for heat treatment (soaking or isothermal heating) followed
by cooling. The object of this normalizing treatment is to transform the structure
of the steel into a mixed structure of ferrite + pearlite. If the steel structure
is once made ferrite + pearlite, it is possible to develop properties desirable for
a case hardening steel tube by cold working and subsequent annealing in a specified
temperature range.
The heat treatment temperature for normalizing is at least 880 °C and at most 980
°C. If the heat treatment temperature exceeds 980 °C, decarburization may proceed.
The lower limit of 880 °C is the temperature necessary for dissolving B in solid solution
(i.e., for solutionizing B) into austenite in a short period of time so as to obtain
a uniform structure. The hardness of the steel base metal can be decreased by dissolving
B in solid solution. If the heat treatment temperature at the time of normalizing
is lower than 880 °C, adequate dissolving of B in solid solution cannot be achieved,
and a decrease in the hardness of the steel base metal is not obtained even if the
heat treatment temperature is maintained for a long period.
The duration of soaking may be as short as 30 seconds if the entire part of the steel
tube can reach the above-described temperature. However, at least one minute is preferable
from the standpoint of minimizing variations in properties. If the duration of soaking
exceeds 30 minutes, decarburization may proceed, so it is preferably at most 30 minutes.
Cooling after heat treatment (soaking) may be air cooling, but in the range from the
heat treatment temperature to 400 °C (and accordingly at least in the range of 800
- 400 °C), the cooling rate is made at most 70 °C per minute. A cooling rate higher
than this causes bainite to form, and the effects of the present invention can no
longer be obtained. There is no particular lower limit on the cooling rate as long
as it is at least the rate achieved by air cooling in view of the type of heat treatment
which is normalizing. Taking into consideration the efficiency such as the treatment
time, the cooling rate is preferably at least 20 °C per minute.
Cold working:
The steel tube obtained by hot tube forming undergoes cold working after it has been
subjected to normalizing. Cold working is generally necessary in order to provide
a steel tube with prescribed dimensions and dimensional accuracy. In the present invention,
cold working is also effective at causing spheroidizing of the cementite present in
pearlite (and accordingly spheroidizing of pearlite) in a secondary heat treatment
stage by annealing which is carried out after the cold working.
There is no particular limitation on a means for carrying out cold working, and cold
drawing, cold rolling, and the like can be used. The reduction ratio at the time of
cold working is preferably such that the reduction in area is 20 - 50% and more preferably
25 - 50%. If the reduction ratio is less than 20%, it becomes difficult to spheroidize
a portion of pearlite in the next step. If the reduction ratio exceeds 50%, seizing
may occur at the time of working between the tools used and the material being worked.
In addition, due to an increase in the accumulation of strains in the steel base metal,
abnormal growth of austenite crystal grains occurs at the time of carburizing heat
treatment, thereby causing the resulting hardened structure to be coarsened and become
a mixed grain structure. Furthermore, if the reduction ratio of cold working exceeds
50%, the steel tube after working has a markedly increased hardness due to work hardening,
and during subsequent annealing it is difficult to be softened adequately, leading
to worsening in the workability.
Annealing:
Annealing after cold working is commonly carried out in order to release strains which
accumulated in the steel base metal due to cold working and soften the steel base
metal and achieve the workability demanded by the user. In the present invention,
it also has the object of spheroidizing at least a portion of the cementite in pearlite.
With this object, the annealing temperature after cold working is in the range of
700 - 820 °C. If the annealing temperature is less than 700 °C or if it exceeds 820
°C, spheroidizing of pearlite does not adequately proceed.
[0035] If all of the pearlite (the cementite in the pearlite) is spheroidized by annealing,
the steel structure becomes a mixed structure of ferrite + spheroidized cementite.
On the other hand, when only a portion of the pearlite is spheroidized, the steel
structure becomes a mixed structure of ferrite + pearlite + spheroidized cementite.
A case hardening steel tube according to the present invention can be characterized
by this steel structure and the above-described steel composition.
[0036] Spheroidizing at least a portion of pearlite in this manner results in a decrease
in the hardness of the steel tube. By combining this effect with the softening produced
by annealing, a case hardening steel tube having good workability in the form of a
hardness of 72 - 80 HRB can be manufactured according to the present invention. The
hardness can be adjusted to a desired value by varying the proportion of pearlite
which is spheroidized during annealing by controlling the reduction ratio at the time
of cold working and the annealing conditions.
[0037] As stated above, when a part is manufactured from a case hardening steel by a user,
carburizing and quenching are normally carried out by the user after fabrication of
the part by working or forming. There is no restriction on the conditions for part
fabrication or carburizing and quenching when manufacturing a part from a case hardening
steel tube according to the present invention. However, since it is possible to employ
relatively mild carburizing and quenching conditions, it is preferable to do so. By
way of example, carburizing and quenching conditions are carburizing by soaking at
920 °C for 2 hours and then quenching from 870 °C.
[0038] The following examples are intended to illustrate the present invention and not intended
to limit the present invention in any way. One skilled in the art can make various
modifications within the scope of the present invention.
Examples
[0039] One-ton blooms having the steel compositions shown in Table 1 were produced by casting
molten steel obtained by vacuum melting. The blooms underwent hot forging to obtain
round billets, which were then underwent hot tube forming by piercing rolling, elongation
rolling in a mandrel mill, and sizing rolling in a stretch reducer to produce mother
tubes (steel tubes) with an outer diameter of 80 mm and a wall thickness of 6.1 mm.
[0040] The steel tubes were subjected to initial heat treatment (normalizing) under the
conditions shown in Table 2 followed by cooling, and they then underwent cold drawing
with a reduction in area of 28.4% to provide finished seamless steel tubes having
dimensions of an outer diameter of 66.2 mm and a wall thickness of 5.3 mm. These steel
tubes were then subjected to annealing under the conditions shown as secondary heat
treatment in Table 2. Test pieces were cut from the steel tubes after the completion
of the secondary heat treatment (annealing), and the Rockwell B scale hardness (HRB)
of tube cross sections was measured for each tube. The results are shown in Table
2.
Table 1
| |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
A1 |
Cr |
Mo |
Ti |
V |
B |
Ni |
Nb |
Zr |
| Steel A |
0.16 |
0.27 |
0.53 |
0.012 |
0.013 |
0.020 |
0.56 |
0.34 |
0.027 |
0.01 |
0.0013 |
|
|
|
| Steel B |
0.17 |
0.29 |
0.57 |
0.008 |
0.004 |
0.020 |
0.58 |
0.34 |
0.026 |
|
0.0027 |
0.33 |
0.02 |
|
| Steel C |
0.17 |
0.28 |
0.58 |
0.011 |
0.002 |
0.023 |
0.55 |
0.32 |
0.024 |
0.02 |
0.0018 |
|
|
0.03 |
Table 2
| No. |
Steel |
Initial heat treatment and its cooling conditions |
Secondary heat treatment |
Hardness HRB |
Remarks |
| Initial heat treatment |
Cooling rate ( °C/min) |
| 1 |
A |
700 °C x 15 min |
10 |
730 °C x 20 min |
87 |
Comparative |
| 2 |
A |
700 °C x 15 min |
55 |
730 °C x 20 min |
88 |
Comparative |
| 3 |
A |
870 °C x 10 min |
10 |
730 °C x 20 min |
77 |
Comparative |
| 4 |
A |
870 °C x 10 min |
55 |
730 °C x 20 min |
83 |
Comparative |
| 5 |
A |
870 °C x 10 min |
68 |
730 °C x 20 min |
84 |
Comparative |
| 6 |
A |
870 °C x 10 min |
80 |
730 °C x 20 min |
88 |
Comparative |
| 7 |
A |
870 °C x 10 min |
55 |
730 °C x 40 min |
82 |
Comparative |
| 8 |
A |
880 °C x 10 min |
55 |
730 °C x 20 min |
79 |
Invention |
| 9 |
A |
880 °C x 10 min |
80 |
730 °C x 20 min |
85 |
Comparative |
| 10 |
A |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
730 °C x 20 min |
78 |
Invention |
| 11 |
A |
930 °C x 10 min |
68 |
730 °C x 20 min |
78 |
Invention |
| 12 |
A |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
730 °C x 40 min |
76 |
Invention |
| 13 |
C |
930 °C x 10 min |
80 |
730 °C x 40 min |
85 |
Comparative |
| 14 |
C |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
680 °C x 20 min |
87 |
Comparative |
| 15 |
C |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
800 °C x 20 min |
79 |
Invention |
| 16 |
C |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
840 °C x 20 min |
84 |
Comparative |
| 17 |
B |
930 °C x 10 min |
68 |
730 °C x 20 min |
79 |
Invention |
| 18 |
B |
930 °C x 10 min |
55 |
800 °C x 20 min |
79 |
Invention |
[0041] No. 1 and No. 2 in Table 2 had a heat treatment temperature in normalizing before
cold working of 700 °C which was lower than the Ac
1 point, and they were finished to a hardness of at least 87 HRB. In Nos. 3 - 7 for
which the heat treatment temperature before cold working exceeded the Ac
3 point, when the heat treatment temperature was lower than 880 °C, except for No.
3, the hardness was at least 82 HRB, and the object of softening to a value of at
most 80 HRB could not be achieved. In No. 3 for which the cooling rate after heat
treatment (soaking) was made a slow value of 10 °C per minutes, the hardness was 77
HRB and the object of softening could be achieved. However, the heat treatment time
including the cooling step became long, and temperature holding equipment in the case
of continuous treatment would become elongated, so this cooling rate is clearly not
economical.
[0042] Nos. 8 - 18 are examples in which heat treatment prior to cold working was soaking
at 880 °C or 930 °C. For Nos. 9 and 13 in which the cooling rate after soaking exceeded
70 °C per minute and for Nos. 14 and 16 in which the annealing temperature after cold
working was too low or high, the hardness exceeded 80 HRB and sufficient softening
could not be achieved. In contrast, for the examples of the present invention in which
the cooling rate after soaking was at most 70 °C per minute and the annealing temperature
after cold working was in the range of 700 - 820 °C, the object of softening to a
hardness of at most 80 HRB could be achieved in each case.
[0043] When the microstructure of the steel tube which had been subjected to secondary heat
treatment (annealing) was observed, No. 1 and No. 2 had a bainite structure, and Nos.
3 - 7 had a ferrite + pearlite structure. In No. 3, a tendency for coarsening of grains
was observed.
[0044] On the other hand, among Nos. 8 - 18, for the examples of the present invention in
which the hardness was at most 80 HRB, a ferrite + pearlite + spheroidized cementite
structure was obsereved, and it was ascertained that a portion of the cementite in
the pearlite structure was spheroidized. However, among Nos. 8 - 18, for those in
which the hardness exceeded 84 HRB, spheroidized cementite was not observed. For Nos.
9 and 13 in which the cooling rate was 80 °C per minute, bainite was observed locally.
[0045] Accordingly, it is thought that as a result of a process in which a steel tube is
subjected to normalizing by previously soaking it at 880 °C or above followed by cooling
at a cooling rate of at most 70 °C per minute and then annealing is carried out after
cold working at a temperature of 700 - 820 °C, transformation from a mixed structure
of pearlite + ferrite to a mixed structure of pearlite + ferrite + spheroidized cementite
proceeds to achieve the object of softening.
[0046] When a punching test (material of punching tool: high speed steel, punch diameter:
15.7 mm, punching speed: 2.5 mm per second) was carried out on the steel tubes of
examples of the present invention in Table 2, there were no particular problems with
respect to surface irregularities in the punched surface or dimensional accuracy.
Also satisfactory results were obtained in an impact tensile test with a test specimen
simulating a ball cage. In addition, their properties after carburizing and quenching
were satisfactory.
[0047] Figure 1 shows a photomicrograph of a steel tube obtained by No. 11 of Table 2. It
can be seen that carbides (cementite) were spheroidized in the ferrite + pearlite
structure.
1. A process for manufacturing a case hardening steel tube characterized in that the process comprises producing a tube from a steel having a steel composition comprising,
in mass percent, C: 0.1 - 0.25%, Si: 0.2 - 0.4%, Mn: 0.3 - 0.9%, P: at most 0.02%,
S: 0.001 - 0.15%, Cr: 0.5 - 0.9%, Mo: 0.15 - 1%, Al: 0.01 - 0.1%, B: 0.0005 - 0.009%,
N: less than 0.006%, and a remainder essentially of Fe, subjecting the resulting steel
tube to normalizing by holding at a temperature of 880 - 980 °C and then cooling at
a cooling rate of at most 70 °C per minute in a temperature range of 880 - 400 °C,
performing cold working of the normalized steel tube, and then annealing the cold
worked steel tube at a temperature of 700 - 820 °C.
2. A process as set forth in claim 1 wherein the steel composition contains at least
one element selected from the following (1) and (2):
(1) in mass percent, Ni: 0.3 - 4.0%
(2) in mass percent, at least one element selected from Ti: 0.01 - 0.3%, Nb: 0.01
- 0.3%, V: 0.01 - 0.3%, and Zr: 0.01 - 0.3%.
3. A process as set forth in claim 1 or claim 2 wherein the B content in the steel composition
is B: 0.0005 - 0.003%.
4. A cold worked, case hardening steel tube characterized by having a steel composition comprising, in mass percent, C: 0.1 - 0.25%, Si: 0.2 -
0.4%, Mn: 0.3 - 0.9%, P: at most 0.02%, S: 0.001 - 0.15%, Cr: 0.5 - 0.9%, Mo: 0.15
- 1%, A1: 0.01 - 0.1 %, B: 0.0005 - 0.009%, N: less than 0.006%, and a remainder essentially
of Fe, and by having a steel structure selected from (a) a mixed structure of ferrite
+ pearlite + spheroidized cementite and (b) a mixed structure of ferrite + spheroidized
cementite.
5. A case hardening steel tube as set forth in claim 4 wherein the steel composition
contains at least one element selected from the following (1) and (2):
(1) in mass percent, Ni: 0.3 - 4.0%
(2) in mass percent, at least one element selected from Ti: 0.01 - 0.3%, Nb: 0.01
- 0.3%, V: 0.01 - 0.3%, and Zr: 0.01 - 0.3%.
6. A case hardening steel tube as set forth in claim 4 or claim 5 wherein the B content
in the steel composition is B: 0.0005 - 0.003%.
7. A case hardening steel tube as set forth in any of claims 4 - 6 wherein the tube has
a Rockwell B scale hardness (HRB) of 72 - 80.