Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a forging steel ingot and a solid type crankshaft
produced from the forging steel ingot. The forging steel ingot and solid type crankshaft
according to the present invention: are used widely and effectively in the industrial
areas of machines, ships, electrical generators, and others; and are suitable particularly
for parts requiring high fatigue strength such as rotational movement parts.
Background Art
[0002] Patent Document 1 (
JP-A No. 336092/2006) describes a forging steel ingot wherein, with the aim of improving the hydrogen
cracking resistance of a crankshaft for a ship: the average of roundness (hereunder
referred to as an average roundness) of the inclusions contained in steel having a
maximum chord length of 1 µm or more is 0.5 or more; the number of inclusions having
a maximum chord length of 20 µm or more is less than 40 pieces per 100 mm
2 and the average roundness thereof is 0.25 or more; and the number of inclusions having
a maximum chord length of 1 to 10 µm is 100 pieces or more per 100 mm
2
[0003] Patent Document 2 (
JP-ANo. 194502/2002) describes a steel, with the aim of improving the machinability and wear resistance
of a crankshaft: comprising C: 0.62 to 0.80%, Si: 0.60% or less, Mn: 0.30 to 1.80%,
S: 0.04 to 0.35%, Cr: 0.05 to 0.50%, Al: less than 0.005%, and O: 0.0020% or less,
with the remainder composed of Fe and unavoidable impurities; after hot forging, being
mainly composed of pearlite having a pro-eutectoid ferrite fraction of 3% or less;
and containing sulfide-type inclusions 20 µm or less in thickness.
Disclosure of the Invention
[0004] Recent problems of parts for ships are hydrogen cracking caused by hydrogenous defects
and the deterioration of fatigue strength caused by inclusion-type defects. By the
aforementioned conventional technologies however, even though a forging steel ingot
excellent in machinability and wear resistance can be produced, a forging steel ingot
having a fatigue strength enough to hardly fracture even under a harsh usage environment
and a sufficiently good hydrogen cracking resistance has not been produced. The present
invention has been established in view of the above circumstances and an object of
the present invention is to provide a forging steel ingot and a solid type crankshaft
excellent in both fatigue properties and hydrogen cracking resistance.
[0005] As a usual measure for preventing hydrogen cracking, MnS-type inclusions to trap
hydrogen in a steel are distributed in the steel. The MnS-type inclusions however
deteriorate the fatigue strength of the steel although they improve hydrogen cracking
resistance. Consequently, it is very difficult to simultaneously improve both the
hydrogen cracking resistance and fatigue strength having the relationship of tradeoff.
[0006] Under such circumstances, the present inventors have found that the content of hydrogen
in steel causing hydrogen cracking is higher at the upper portion than at the lower
portion in a steel ingot. As a result of additional studies, the present inventors:
have ascertained that the hydrogen cracking of a forging steel ingot can be prevented
without deteriorating the fatigue strength of the steel ingot when the ratio of a
number density of inclusions at a steel ingot upper portion to a number density of
inclusions at a steel ingot lower portion and the content of S (sulfur) closely related
to the forming of inclusions satisfy a certain relationship; and have established
the present invention.
[0007] A forging steel ingot according to the present invention that attains the aforementioned
object is a forging steel ingot cast with a mold wherein: the number density D
BOT of inclusions 5 to 10 µm in longest diameter observed on a steel cross-section is
10 to 80 pieces/cm
2 at the steel ingot lower portion ranging from the bottom end of the steel ingot to
the bottom 20% of the total height of the steel ingot in the direction of the gravity;
the number density D
TOP of inclusions 5 to 10 µm in longest diameter observed on the steel cross-section
is 20 to 90 pieces/cm
2 at the steel ingot upper portion ranging from the top end of the steel ingot to the
top 20% of the total height of the steel ingot; the number density of inclusions 40
µm or more in longest diameter observed on the steel cross-section is 5 pieces/cm
2 or less at both the steel ingot lower portion and the steel ingot upper portion;
and the following expression (1) is satisfied.
[0008] 
here, [S] represents the content (in mass ppm) of S in steel.
[0009] It is recommended that the above forging steel ingot comprises
C: 0.2 to 0.6% (in mass %, the same is applied hereunder),
Si: 0.05 to 0.5%,
Mn: 0.2 to 1.2%,
Ni: 0.1 to 3.5%,
Cr: 0.9 to 2.5%,
Mo: 0.1 to 0.7%,
V: 0.005 to 0.2%,
Al: 0.01 to 0.1%,
S: 0.005% or less,
Ti: 0.005% or less, and
O: 0.0015% or less,
with the remainder composed of iron and unavoidable impurities.
[0010] A solid type crankshaft according to the present invention that attains the aforementioned
object is produced by hot-forging the aforementioned forging steel ingot.
[0011] The present inventionmakes it possible to produce a forging steel ingot excellent
in fatigue properties and hydrogen cracking resistance by: adjusting the number density
of fine inclusions at a steel ingot lower portion, the number density of fine inclusions
at a steel ingot upper portion, and the number density of coarse inclusions at both
the steel ingot lower portion and the steel ingot upper portion; and satisfying the
ratio of the number density of inclusions between the steel ingot upper portion and
the steel ingot lower portion and an S content in steel with a certain relationship.
Then, by hot-forging the forging steel ingot, it is possible to produce a solid type
crankshaft excellent in fatigue properties and hydrogen cracking resistance.
[0012] For example, although a current crankshaft is supposed to undergo a load corresponding
to an output of 2,000 kW per a cylinder, a future crankshaft for a large vessel is
required to have fatigue properties withstanding the downsizing and weight reduction
of an engine aiming at the improvement of fuel efficiency. An endurance limit ratio
(fatigue strength/tensile strength) of 0.45 or more is required in order to meet with
the above requirements regardless of the size of the crankshaft. The present invention
makes it possible to provide a crankshaft satisfying the above requirements.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0013]
Fig. 1 is a view showing the state of the solidification of a steel ingot produced
by an ingot-making method.
Fig. 2 is a view showing a steel ingot produced by an ingot-making method.
Fig. 3 is an SEM photograph of a steel cross-section observed at a magnification of
2,000.
Fig. 4 is an SEM photograph of a steel cross-section observed at a magnification of
200.
Fig. 5 is an SEM photograph of a steel cross-section observed at a magnification of
200.
Fig. 6 is a graph showing hydrogen contents at steel ingot upper portions and steel
ingot lower portions.
Fig. 7 is a graph showing the evaluation results on the hydrogen cracking and endurance
limit ratios of steel ingots; the ratio of fine inclusions between a steel ingot upper
portion and a steel ingot lower portion is shown along the vertical axis, and an S
content in steel is shown along the horizontal axis.
Figs. 8 comprise graphs showing the evaluation of the endurance limit ratios of steel
ingots and the occurrence of hydrogen cracking;
Fig. 8(a) shows the results at steel ingot upper portions and Fig. 8(b) shows the
results at steel ingot lower portions.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0014] In a steel ingot produced by an ingot-making method, the number density of inclusions
increases at a steel ingot lower portion that is a precipitation crystal zone and
at a steel ingot upper portion that is a final solidification site as shown in Fig.
1. Consequently, the steel ingot lower portion and the steel ingot upper portion:
are the portions that markedly affect the hydrogen cracking resistance and fatigue
properties of a steel ingot; and are suitable as the portions for specifying the characteristics
of the steel ingot.
[0015] Here in the present invention, as shown in Fig. 2: a steel ingot lower portion is
defined as the portion ranging from the bottom end of a steel ingot to the bottom
20% of the total height of the steel ingot in the direction of the gravity (when a
precipitation crystal zone appears, inclusions existing at the precipitation crystal
zone are also taken into consideration in the above portion); and a steel ingot upper
portion is defined as the portion ranging from the top end of the steel ingot to the
top 20% of the total height of the steel ingot, respectively.
[0016] (Number density of fine inclusions at a steel ingot lower portion (D
BOT): 10 to 80 pieces/cm
2)
It is possible to improve hydrogen cracking resistance by dispersing fine inclusions
in steel as stated above but, in order to exhibit the effect effectively, it is necessary
to control the fine inclusions (5 to 10 µm in longest diameter) observed on a steel
cross-section at a steel ingot lower portion to not less than 10 pieces/cm
2 (preferably not less than 20 pieces/cm
2, and yet preferably not less than 30 pieces/cm
2) . In contrast, even fine inclusions, if they are contained excessively, as shown
in the scanning electron micrographs in Figs. 3 to 5, inclusion clusters are formed
and act as the origins of fatigue fracture in the same way as coarse inclusions. Consequently,
it is necessary to control the fine inclusions observed on the steel cross-section
to not more than 80 pieces/cm
2 (preferably not more than 70 pieces/cm
2, and yet preferably not more than 60 pieces/cm
2).
[0017] In fact, inclusions of less than 5 µm also have hydrogen cracking resistance and
hence the inclusions of less than 5 µm may be counted as fine inclusions. Since the
inclusions of less than 5 µm have nearly the same distribution characteristic as the
inclusions of 5 to 10 µm however, it is enough to count the number of inclusions of
5 to 10 µm in order to evaluate hydrogen cracking resistance. Consequently, the inclusions
of less than 5 µm are excluded from an object of the count and thereby the convenience
of additional tests is improved.
(Number density of fine inclusions at a steel ingot upper portion (DTOP): 20 to 90 pieces/cm2)
[0018] At a steel ingot upper portion, it is necessary to control the fine inclusions (5
to 10 µm in longest diameter) observed on a steel cross-section to not less than 20
pieces/cm
2 (preferably not less than 30 pieces/cm
2, and yet preferably not less than 40 pieces/cm
2). In contrast as stated above, even fine inclusions, if they are contained excessively,
inclusion clusters are formed and act as the origins of fatigue fracture in the same
way as coarse inclusions. Consequently, it is necessary to control the fine inclusions
observed on the steel cross-section to not more than 90 pieces/cm
2 (preferably not more than 80 pieces/cm
2, and yet preferably not more than 70 pieces/cm
2).
(Number density of coarse inclusions: 5 pieces/cm2 or less)
[0019] Coarse inclusions act as origins of fatigue fracture and hence it is necessary to
control the coarse inclusions (not less than 40 µm in longest diameter) observed on
a steel cross-section to not more than 5 pieces/cm
2 (preferably not more than 4 pieces/cm
2, and yet preferably not more than 3 pieces/cm
2) at both the steel ingot upper portion and the steel ingot lower portion.
[0020] 
The present inventors investigated the hydrogen content in a steel ingot and found
that the hydrogen content was higher at the steel ingot upper portion than at the
steel ingot lower portion as shown in Fig. 6. Further, the hydrogen cracking resistance
and the endurance limit ratio at the steel ingot upper portion were also investigated.
The results are shown in Fig. 7. In Fig. 7, (D
TOP) / (D
BOT) is shown along the vertical axis and [S] is shown along the horizontal axis, and
a case where a hydrogen cracking resistance and an endurance limit ratio satisfy certain
criteria is rated as the symbol "•" and a case where they do not satisfy the certain
criteria is rated as the symbol "×", and the cases are shown in the figure. The criteria
for the judgment are the same as the judgment criteria of the "comprehensive evaluation"
in Tables 1 to 3 described later.
[0021] [S] represents the content (mass ppm) of S in steel. It is understood from Fig. 7
that, interposing the straight line defined by the expression (D
TOP)/(D
BOT) = [S]/18 in between, the cases of the symbol "•" appear on the upper side of the
straight line and the cases of the symbol "×" appear on the lower side of the straight
line, respectively.
[0022] Fig. 7 shows that, in the region where an S content in steel is high, when a value
(D
TOP) / (D
BOT) increases, namely when a fine inclusion content increases at a steel ingot upper
portion in comparison with at a steel ingot lower portion, hydrogen cracking occurs
at the steel ingot upper portion. It is noteworthy however that, in the region where
an S content in steel is low, the hydrogen cracking does not occur even when a value
(D
TOP)/(D
BOT) is not' high. For example, the hydrogen cracking does not occur even when the value
(D
TOP)/(D
BOT) is less than one.
[0023] For example, whereas the allowable value of hydrogen in steel is 1.5 ppm in the case
where an S content in the steel is 0.003%, the allowable hydrogen value is as very
low as 1.0 ppm in the case where an S content is 0.001%. Generally, when one crankshaft
is produced from one steel ingot, the range of hydrogen value is roughly from 0.5
to 1.8 ppm.
[0024] As it will be stated later, the present inventors have made it possible to control
the hydrogen value to not more than 1.2 ppm and hence it is possible to produce a
forging steel ingot without causing hydrogen cracking even when the S content is 0.003%
or less. As a result, there arises room for further reducing the S content.
[0025] Generally hydrogen cracking tends to occur when the S content is reduced in order
to improve fatigue properties but, from Fig. 7, the hydrogen cracking resistance and
the fatigue properties can be maintained even when the S content is reduced as long
as the condition (D
TOP)/(D
BOT) ≥ [S]/18 is satisfied. Thereby, it is estimated that the balance between the fatigue
properties and the hydrogen cracking resistance in a steel ingot can be improved better
than ever.
(Hot forging)
[0026] A forging steel ingot obtained through the above ingot-making process is successively
formed into a shape of an intermediate product such as a round bar by hot forging.
After the forming, intermediate inspections on compositions, defects, cleanliness,
and others are carried out and thereafter, by applying hot forging again, the intermediate
product is formed into the shape of a large product such as a solid type crankshaft,
a journal, or the like. Successively, after heat treatment is applied in accordance
with required product properties, finishing treatment is applied by machining and
a final product is produced.
[0027] The following processes are quoted as a concrete procedure for producing a solid
type crankshaft from the above forging steel ingot. That is, a completely solidified
steel ingot is taken out from a mold and, as preparation for applyinghot forging,
heated to preferably 1,150°C or higher, yet preferably 1,180°C or higher, and yet
still preferably 1,200°C or higher. Successively, the steel ingot is hot-forged into
a round bar or a stepped shape at a forging ratio of 3 or more. On the occasion of
the steel ingot forging, the steel ingot may be upset in the direction of the steel
ingot height and thereafter subjected to extend forging to a prescribed length in
order to compress internal defects. After hot forging, the intermediate product is
processed into the shape of a solid type crankshaft. Here, in the event of the forging
for forming of the solid type crankshaft, either throws may be formed one by one or
a plurality of throws may be formed simultaneously by blocking the whole body. After
the forging forming, a solid type crankshaft of a prescribed size is produced by machining
for finishing. Otherwise a solid type crankshaft may be produced by forming into a
stepped shape through hot forging and thereafter applying machining. Still otherwise
the solid type crankshaft maybe structured so as to have a flange on one end of the
crankshaft or flanges on both the ends thereof. The number of throws is 3 to 12 for
example.
(Chemical compositions in steel ingot)
[0028] Although the present invention is characterized by controlling the size and number
density of inclusions existing in a steel as explained above and the basic composition
of the steel is not particularly limited, in order to satisfy strength, toughness,
and moreover fatigue properties required of a crankshaft for example, it is desirable
to satisfy the following basic composition in consideration of the general technological
level on steel.
(C: 0.2 to 0.6%)
[0029] C is an element contributing to the improvement of strength and, in order to give
sufficient strength to a crankshaft, C may be contained, for example, by: 0.2% or
more; preferably 0.25% or more; and yet preferably 0.3% or more. If the C content
is excessive however, the toughness of the crankshaft deteriorates, and hence C is
controlled, for example, to: 0.6% or less; preferably 0.55% or less; and yet preferably
0.5% or less.
(Si: 0.05 to 0.5%)
[0030] Si functions as a strength improving element and, in order to give sufficient strength
to a crankshaft, Si may be contained, for example, by: 0.05% or more; preferably 0.1%
or more; and yet preferably 0.15% or more. If Si is excessive however, inverted-V-shaped
segregation becomes marked and a clean steel ingot is hardly obtained, and hence Si
is controlled, for example, to: 0.5% or less; preferably 0.45% or less; and yet preferably
0.4% or less.
(Mn: 0.2 to 1.2%)
[0031] Mn is an element enhancing hardenability and also contributing to the improvement
of strength and, in order to secure both sufficient strength and hardenability, Mn
is desirably contained, for example, by: 0.2% or more; preferably 0.5% or more; and
yet preferably 0.8% or more. If Mn is excessive however, inverted-V-shaped segregation
may be furthered in some cases, and hence Mn is controlled, for example, to: 1.2%
or less; preferably 1.1% or less; and yet preferably 1% or less.
(Ni: 0.1 to 3.5%)
[0032] Ni is useful as a toughness improving element and it is recommended to contain Ni,
for example, by: 0.1% or more; and preferably 0.2% or more. If the Ni amount is excessive
however, the cost increases, and hence Ni is controlled to: 3.5% or less; and preferably
3% or less.
(Cr: 0.9 to 2.5%).
[0033] Cr is an element effective in enhancing hardenability and improving toughness and,
in order to exhibit such functions, Cr is contained, for example, by: 0.9% or more;
preferably 1.1% or more; and yet preferably 1.3% or more. If Cr is excessive however,
inverted-V-shaped segregation may be furthered and a high cleanliness steel is hardly
produced in some cases, and hence Cr is controlled, for example, to: 2.5% or less;
preferably 2.3% or less; andyetpreferably 2.1% or less.
(Mo: 0.1 to 0.7%)
[0034] Mo is an element effectively functioning for the improvement of hardenability, strength,
and toughness and, in order to exhibit such functions effectively, Mo is contained,
for example, by: 0.1% or more; preferably 0.2% or more; and yet preferably 0.25% or
more. Mo has a small equilibrium distribution coefficient and is likely to form microsegregation
(normal segregation) however, and hence Mo is controlled, for example, to: 0.7% or
less; preferably 0.6% or less; and yet preferably 0.5% or less.
(V: 0.005 to 0.2%)
[0035] V has the effects of precipitation hardening and structure fractionation and is an
element useful for enhancing the strength of steel. In order to exhibit such functions
effectively, it is recommendedto containV, for example, by: 0.005% or more; and preferably
0.01% or more. When V is contained excessively however, the above effects are saturated
and that is inefficient economically, and hence V is controlled to: 0.2% or less;
and preferably 0.15% or less.
(Al: 0.01 to 0.1%)
[0036] Al is effective as a deoxidizing element in a steel making process and also effective
for the cracking resistance of steel. Consequently, it is recommended to contain Al,
for example, by: 0.01% or more; and preferably 0.015% or more. In contrast, Al fixes
N in the form of AlN or the like, hinders the strengthening function of steel by the
blend of N, V, and others, combines with various other elements, yields nonmetallic
inclusions and intermetallic compounds, and deteriorates the toughness of steel in
some cases, and hence Al is controlled, for example, to: 0.1% or less; and preferably
0.08% or less.
(S: 0.005% or less)
[0037] S is likely to form coarse inclusions in a forging steel and hence may deteriorate
the fatigue strength of a forging steel ingot or a crankshaft in some cases. Consequently,
the S content in steel is controlled, for example, to: 0.005% or less; preferably
0.0045% or less; yet preferably 0.004% or less; and yet still preferably 0.0035% or
less.
[0038] Meanwhile, when fine S-type inclusions are contained by a certain number density
or more in a forging steel, many stress fields are formed in the steel, and thus the
fine S-type inclusions are likely to trap excessive hydrogen exceeding a solid solubility
limit in the steel and have the effect of improving the hydrogen cracking resistance
of the steel.
[0039] In order to secure such S-type inclusions, the S content in steel is controlled to:
0.0002% or more; preferably 0.0004% or more; yet preferably 0.0006% or more; and yet
still preferably 0.0008% or more.
[0040] An S content can be adjusted by controlling the composition of slag during melt refining.
More specifically, the S content in steel can be reduced by raising the ratio of a
CaO content to an SiO
2 content (CaO/SiO
2, hereunder referred to as "C/S" occasionally) in slag. Further, as a complimentary
means, the S content in steel can be reduced by raising the ratio of a CaO content
to an Al
2O
3 content (CaO/Al
2O
3, hereunder referred to as "C/A" occasionally). Inversely, when the S content is wanted
to be increased, the slag composition is adjusted so that C/S and/or C/A may be reduced.
(Ti: 0.005% or less)
[0041] Ti forms coarse nitrides in steel and deteriorates the fatigue strength of a forging
steel ingot or a crankshaft in some cases. Consequently, the Ti content in steel is
controlled, for example: to 0.005% or less; preferably 0.004% or less; and yet preferably
0.003% or less. Here, Ti makes fine inclusions such as TiN, TiC, and Ti
4C
2S
2, disperses in steel, occludes and traps excessive hydrogen exceeding a solid solubility
limit in the steel, and has the effect of improving the hydrogen cracking resistance
of the steel. When such Ti-type inclusions are secured, the Ti content in steel is
controlled, for example, to: 0.0002% or more; preferably 0.0004% or more; and yet
preferably 0.0006% or more.
[0042] A Ti content can be adjusted by regulating the ratio between a used amount of an
alloy having a high impurity Ti content (a low grade alloy) and a used amount of an
alloy having a low impurity Ti content (a high grade alloy) in auxiliary materials.
(O: 0.0015% or less)
[0043] O (oxygen) is an element that forms oxides such as SiO
2, Al
2O
3, MgO, CaO, and others, turns into inclusions, and deteriorates the fatigue strength
of a steel ingot. Consequently, it is desirable to reduce O to the utmost and the
total oxygen amount is controlled to: 0.0015% or less; and preferably 0.001% or less.
[0044] The basic compositions of a forging steel used in the present invention are preferably
as stated above and the remainder comprises Fe substantially but unavoidable impurities
may be contained in the steel. As the unavoidable impurities, for example P and N
are quoted and for example the content of P is: preferably 0.03% or less; and yet
preferably 0.02% or less. Further, it is also possible to use a forging steel further
containing another element intentionally within the range not adversely affecting
the aforementioned functions of the present invention.
[0045] The examples of another element that can be added intentionally are B having a hardenability
improving effect, and W, Nb, Ta, Cu, Ce, Zr, Te, and others that are solid solution
strengthening elements or precipitation strengthening elements. The elements can be
added independently or in combination of two or more kinds. A desirable addition amount
of the elements is, for example, about 0.1% or less in total.
Examples
[0046] The present invention is hereunder explained more concretely with examples. However,
the present invention is substantially not limited to the examples and may be modified
appropriately within the range conforming to the aforementioned and after-mentioned
gists, and all of those modifications are included in the technological scope of the
present invention.
[0047] It is recommended to refine steel by the method explained below in order to: increase
the cleanliness of molten steel poured into a mold; thereby control the number density
(D
BOT) of inclusions 5 to 10 µm in longest diameter observed on a steel cross-section to
about 10 to 80 pieces/cm
2 at a steel ingot lower portion, the number density (D
TOP) of inclusions 5 to 10 µm in longest diameter observed on a steel cross-section to
about 20 to 90 pieces/cm
2 at a steel ingot upper portion, and the number density of inclusions 40 µm or more
in longest diameter to about 5 pieces/cm
2 or less; and satisfy the expression (1).
[0048] The refining method is a method for producing high cleanliness steel by:applying
first secondary-refining to molten steel tapped from a converter or an electric furnace;
applying degassing treatment to the molten steel after subjected to the first secondary-refining;
and applying second secondary-refining to the molten steel after subjected to the
degassing treatment.
[0049] That is, in order to produce high cleanliness steel having a small amount of inclusions
caused by slag inclusion and a high cleanliness, it is effective to apply secondary-refining
twice in the order of secondary-refining treatment, degassing treatment, and then
secondary-refining treatment again to molten steel produced with a converter.
[0050] The first secondary-refining treatment is a treatment to adjust molten steel compositions
to prescribed values and the degassing treatment is a treatment to remove gas components
such as hydrogen existing in the molten steel. Hence it is necessary to increase an
agitation power density at both the treatments while suppressing the inclusion of
slag floating on the surface of the molten steel to the minimum.
[0051] Meanwhile, the function of surfacing and separating the slag once included in the
molten steel during the degassing treatment is given to the second secondary-refining
treatment and it is necessary to agitate the molten steel at a low agitation power
density so as not to cause additional slag inclusion while the molten steel is heated
and retained.
[0052] More specifically, at the first secondary treatment, the flow rate of injected gas
is adjusted so that the agitation power density may be 5 W'/ton or more (preferably
10 W/ton or more) and 60 W/ton or less (preferably 50 W/ton or less) and slag conditioning
is carried out so that the slag composition after the degassing treatment may satisfy
the expressions CaO/SiO
2 ≥ 3.5, CaO/Al
2O
3 = 1.5 - 3.5, and T. Fe + MnO ≤ 1.0, in terms of mass%. Here, T.Fe means the total
amount of iron atoms.
[0053] At the degassing treatment, the flow rate of injected gas is adjusted so that the
agitation power density may be 50 W/ton or more and preferably 60 W/ton or more and
200 W/ton or less and preferably 180 W/ton or less up to the midterm (the halfway)
of the degassing treatment and the flow rate of injected gas is adjusted so that the
agitation power density may be 140 W/ton or less and preferably 120 W/ton or less
(excluding 0 W/ton) at the succeeding degassing treatment (after the midterm).
[0054] At the second secondary treatment, the flow rate of injected gas is adjusted so that
the agitation power density may be 25 W/ton or less and preferably 20 W/ton or less
(excluding 0 W/ton).
[0055] More specifically, the following procedures are taken.
[0056] Firstly, molten steel tapped from a converter or an electric furnace to a ladle is
conveyed to a secondary-refining apparatus and first secondary-refining treatment
(hereunder referred to as LF-I occasionally) is applied. Stillmore specifically, whilemolten
steel is heated to T
L = about 1,600°C by generating arc discharge, flux is added by a flux supply means
and further the molten steel is agitated by injecting Ar gas by a gas injection means.
With regard to strength for agitating the molten steel, the flow rate of Ar gas is
adjusted so that the agitation power density ε computed with the expression (2) below
may be 5 to 60 W/ton.
[0057] Here, in the computation of the agitation power density ε, the temperature of bottom
blow gas before injection To (the temperature of Ar gas before injected) is set at
room temperature (298K) and the temperature of bottom blow gas after injection Tg
(the temperature of Ar gas after injected) is set at the molten steel temperature
T
L.
[0058] The main purposes of LF-I where molten steel tapped from a converter or an electric
furnace to a ladle is primarily refined are to heat the molten steel and to adjust
the compositions of the molten steel. The molten steel compositions and the molten
steel temperature cannot be homogenized unless appropriate agitation is applied on
this occasion. Excessive agitation of the molten steel however tends to entangle slag
even when the compositions and the temperature are homogeneous and the slag inclusionmay
act as the origins of defects afterward. Consequently, the agitation power density
ε is set at 5 to 60 W/ton. By so doing, it is possible to homogenize the compositions
and temperature of the molten steel while slag inclusion is prevented.
[0059] 
[0060] ε: Agitation power density (W/ton)
T
0: Temperature of bottom blow gas before injection (room temperature (298K))
T
L: Molten steel temperature (K)
M
L: Molten steel quantity (ton)
ρ
L: Molten steel density (kg/m
3)
Q
g: Flow rate of bottom blow gas (Nl/min)
T
g: Temperature of bottom blow gas after injection (K)
P: Atmospheric pressure (torr)
H
0: Molten steel depth (m)
[0061] For example, in the first secondary-refining treatment (LF-I), even though some conditions
such as the size of the ladle and the actually charged molten steel quantity M
L are different, the agitation power density ε takes a value of 4.7 to 67.2 W/ton by
adjusting Q
g/ M
L to 0.30 to 3.75 Nl/min·ton.
[0062] Here, in LF-I, with regard to the type and the quantity of flux, the heating temperature
is controlled and the charging amount of an auxiliary material (flux) is adjusted
so that the slag composition may simultaneously satisfy the following three conditions
after the finish of vacuum degassing treatment that will be stated later (in other
words, at the start of the second secondary-refining treatment) ;
- (1) the mass of CaO is 3.5 times or more the mass of SiO2,
- (2) the mass of CaO is 1.5 to 3.5 times the mass of Al2O3, and
- (3) the summation of the mass of T. Fe and the mass of MnO in the slag composition
is 1.0% or less of the total slag mass.
[0063] After finishing the first secondary-refining treatment, the molten steel is conveyed
together with the ladle to a vacuumdegassing apparatus and vacuum degassing treatment
(hereunder referred to as VD occasionally) is applied to the molten steel. More specifically,
the atmospheric pressure P in the ladle is reduced close to a vacuum of about 0.5
Torr by activating an exhaust system and thereby evacuating the gas existing above
the molten steel in the ladle through an exhaust pipe. In addition, the molten steel
is agitated by injecting Ar gas through a gas injecting means. By the above method,
the gas component such as hydrogen existing in the molten steel is removed.
[0064] The time for VD is about 20 minutes in total and, during the former half time (before
the midterm in the treatment time, the former half 10 minutes), the bottom blow gas
flow rate Q
g is adjusted so that the agitation power density ε may be 50 to 200 W/ton and, during
the latter half time (after the midterm in the treatment time, the latter half 10
minutes), the bottom blow gas flow rate Q
g is adjusted so that the agitation power density ε may be 140 W/ton or less (excluding
0 W/ton).
[0065] In VD, hydrogen is removed from the molten steel the composition adjustment of which
is almost finished and, on this occasion too, it is desirable to adopt an agitation
power density ε that can prevent slag from being included in the molten steel and
can attain dehydrogenation at the same time. To that end, by controlling the agitation
power density ε to 50 to 200 W/ton during the former half of the VD treatment time,
dehydrogenation can be attained efficiently while suppressing slag inclusion to the
minimum. In addition, by controlling the agitation power density ε to 140 W/ton or
less during the latter half time of VD, the surfacing and separation of the entangled
slag can be accelerated.
[0066] Further, in the case of the present embodiment, a high cleanliness steel can be produced
by applying the second secondary-refining (hereunder referred to as LF-II occasionally)
to the molten steel after subjected to VD. That is, after the vacuum degassing treatment
is finished, the molten steel is conveyed to the secondary-refining treatment apparatus
together with the ladle and the second secondary-refining treatment is applied to
the molten steel. More specifically, while the molten steel is heated to T
L = about 1, 600°C by generating arc discharge, the molten steel is agitated by injecting
Ar gas by a gas injection means. With regard to the strength for agitating the molten
steel, the Ar gas flow rate Q
g is adjusted so that the agitation power density ε computed with the expression (2)
may be 25 W/ton or less (excluding 0 W/ton).
[0067] By applying the LF treatment (LF-II) again in this way, it is possible to further
promote "the surfacing and separation of entangled slag and deoxidation products"
occurring from the midterm of VD. On this occasion, the agitation power density ε
in LF-II must be 25 W/ton or less in order to prevent additional slag inclusion. By
heating and retaining the molten steel at the agitation power density ε, the surfacing
and separation of the slag and the deoxidation products can be attained without fail.
[0068] Here as stated above, the slag composition in LF-II satisfies the following conditions;
- (1) basicity, namely CaO/SiO2 ≥ 3.5,
- (2) CaO/ Al2O3 = 1.5 - 3.5, and
- (3) T.Fe + MnO ≤ 1.0 mass %,
and hence the reoxidation of the molten steel compositions caused by oxides in the
slag can be prevented without fail.
[0069] By adopting the production method of a high cleanliness steel as stated above, it
is possible to produce a high cleanliness steel having a small amount of inclusions
caused by slag inclusion.
[0070] A steel ingot is produced by pouring the obtained high cleanliness molten steel into
a mold of 10 to 90 tons class (2 to 4 m in total height) through a bottom pouring
ingot-making method. The solidified steel ingot is demolded, thereafter heated to
about 1, 300°C, hot-forged, and produced into a forged material with 150 to 700 mm
in cross-sectional diameter. The hot forging is applied by elongating the steel ingot
with a pressing machine and thereafter forming into a round cross-section with a special
purpose tool.
[0071] In Tables 1 to 3, shown are: the conditions (Conditions 1 to 20) that the agitation
power density ε in LF-I, the agitation power density ε during the former half time
of VD, the agitation power density ε during the latter half time of VD, and the agitation
power density ε in LF-II are variously changed; moreover various conditions of the
tests (Test numbers 1 to 59) carried out by changing the basicity (CaO/SiO
2) and the values of CaO/ Al
2O
3 and T.Fe + MnO (mass %); and the data of the physical properties of the test pieces
cut out from the upper portions and the lower portions of the obtained steel ingots.
[0072] Here, in Tables 1 to 3, in the row "Composition and temperature homogenization",
when the variation of the C content is defined as ΔC and the variation of temperature
is defined as ΔT from the beginning to the end of the casting of the steel ingot,
a case satisfying the expressions ΔC ≤ 0.01% and ΔT ≤ 20°C is rated as the symbol
○ and the other cases are rated as the symbol ×.
In the row "Hydrogen removal", the hydrogen content [H] is measured immediately before
the end of refining, and a case satisfying the expression [H] ≤ 1.2 ppm is rated as
the symbol ○ and a case satisfying the expression [H] > 1.2 ppm is rated as the symbol
×.
In the row "Slag inclusion", a case where the number of inclusions 5 µm or more in
longest diameter in the microscopic surface observation of a molten steel sample having
a Ca content of 5% or more is 30 pieces/cm
2 or less is rated as the symbol ○ and a case where the number exceeds 30 pieces/cm
2 is rated as the symbol ×.
[0073] In Tables 1 to 3, the S content (mass ppm) in steel, the number density of fine inclusions
(5 to 10 µm in longest diameter) at a portion corresponding to the upper portion of
a steel ingot (D
TOP), the number density of fine inclusions (5 to 10 µm in longest diameter) at a portion
corresponding to the lower portion of a steel ingot (D
BOT). the number density of coarse inclusions (40 µm or more in longest diameter) at
a portion corresponding to the upper portion of a steel ingot, and the number density
of coarse inclusions (40 µm or more in longest diameter) at a portion corresponding
to the lower portion of a steel ingot are shown for each of the test pieces. The number
of inclusions is obtained by examining the number of inclusions per 1 cm
2 on a microscopic surface of a test piece with an EPMA (JXA-8900L made by JEOL Ltd.).
[0074] Here, the chemical compositions in steel of the test pieces are C: 0.3%, Si: 0.25%,
Mn: 0.55%, Ni: 1.6%, Cr: 1.6%, Mo: 0.25%, V: 0.01%, Al: 0.03%, S: 0.002%, Ti: 0.003%,
O: 0.0013%, and P: 0.01%.
[0075] Further, the value of (D
BOT)/(D
TOP) × S content in steel (mass ppm) (the expression (1) is satisfied when the value
is 18 or less), the size of the largest inclusion (the symbol ○ represents the case
of the largest size (φ: sphere diameter conversion) < 0.5 mm, the symbol △ represents
the case of 0.5 mm < the largest size ≤ 1.0 mm, and the symbol × represents the case
of the largest size > 1.0 mm), and cleanliness are measured and the obtained results
are also shown in Tables 1 to 3. Here, the results in a case where the upper portion
(T) or the lower portion (B) of a steel ingot is not distinctively identified mean
the test results of the upper portion of a steel ingot.
[0076] Note that, in the row "Cleanliness", a case of DIN K(3) ≤ 15 is rated as the symbol
○ and a case of DIN K(3) > 15 is rated as the symbol × as the DIN K3 standards, and
the cleanliness is rated as the symbol ○ in a case where a steel ingot upper portion
is rated as the symbol ○ and also a steel ingot lower portion is rated as the symbol
○, the cleanliness is rated as the symbol Δ in a case where either of a steel ingot
upper portion or a steel ingot lower portion is rated as the symbol ○ and the other
thereof is rated as the symbol ×, and the cleanliness is rated as the symbol × in
a case where both of a steel ingot upper portion and a steel ingot lower portion are
rated as the symbol ×.
[0077] Further, in Tables 1 to 3, the endurance limit ratios at the upper portion and the
lower portion of a steel ingot and the test results of hydrogen cracking at the upper
portion and the lower portion of a steel ingot are described.
(Endurance limit ratio)
[0078] An endurance limit ratio = fatigue strength/tensile strength is obtained from the
results of a tensile strength test and a fatigue strength test that are described
later. The endurance limit ratios of a steel ingot upper portion (T) and a steel ingot
lower portion (B) are separately shown in Tables 1 to 3.
[0079] Then, the results of judging the endurance limit ratio are also shown in Tables 1
to 3 showing with the symbol ○ in a case of Endurance limit ratio ≥ 0.45, the symbol
Δ in a case of 0.40 ≤ Endurance limit ratio < 0.45, and the symbol × in a case of
Endurance limit ratio < 0.40.
(Tensile strength)
[0080] Tensile test pieces 6 mm in diameter and 30 mm in gauge length (two test pieces for
each) are: sampled from the vicinity of the center of a round bar steel after forging;
and subjected to tensile tests (JIS Z 2204 and 2241) at room temperature. The test
results of a steel ingotupperportion (T) anda steel ingot lowerportion (B) are separately
shown with the unit of MPa in Tables 1 to 3.
(Fatigue strength)
[0081] Rotating bending fatigue tests are carried out with the test pieces shown below.
The test results of a steel ingot upper portion (T) and a steel ingot lower portion
(B) are separately shown with the unit of MPa in Tables 1 to 3.
Test piece: smooth test piece 10 mm in diameter,
Test method: rotating bending fatigue test (stress ratio = -1, revolutions: 3,600
rpm),
Fatigue strength evaluation method: step method,
Step stress: 20 MPa,
Number of test pieces: five pieces each, and

(Hydrogen cracking resistance)
[0082] Ultrasonic detection test (UT) is carried out at a frequency of 4 MHz (more specifically,
"
Defects of Forged Steel Products", edited by Forged Steel Study Section, Japan Steel
Castings and Forgings Association, P32-33). A case where a defect echo showing hydrogen cracking is detected at the intermediate
portion (1/3 to 1/5R) of a steel ingot is represented with the symbol × regarding
the steel ingot as being inferior in hydrogen cracking resistance and a case where
a defect echo is not detected is represented with the symbol ○ regarding the steel
ingot as being superior in hydrogen cracking resistance. Here, when the side face
(surface layer) in the steel ingot width direction is represented by 0R and the center
is represented by 1/2R, the center portion is defined as a portion located in the
range of 1/2 to 1/3R, the intermediate portion is defined as a portion located in
the range of 1/3 to 1/5R, and the surface layer portion is defined as a portion located
in the range of 0R to 1/5R.
[0083] In the row "Comprehensive evaluation", a case where all of the endurance limit ratios
at a steel ingot upper portion and a steel ingot lower portion and the test results
of hydrogen cracking at a steel ingot upper portion and a steel ingot lower portion
are rated as the symbol ○ is rated as the symbol •, and the other cases are rated
as the symbol ×.
[0085] Here, in Test numbers 41, 49, and 55 in Table 3, the reason why the endurance limit
ratios (B) are rated as the symbol × even though the numbers of coarse inclusions
at the steel ingot lower portions are smaller than the standard value is that the
hydrogen cracking occurs in the test pieces and the fatigue strength deteriorates
due to the cracking.
[0086] Further, in Fig. 8(a), the number density (D
TOP) of fine inclusions (5 to 10 µm in longest diameter) at the portion corresponding
to a steel ingot upper portion is shown along the vertical axis, and the number density
of coarse inclusions (40 µm or more in longest diameter) at the portion corresponding
to a steel ingot upper portion is shown along the horizontal axis. Then a case where
the comprehensive evaluation is rated as the symbol • is shown with the symbol •,
and a case where either of the endurance limit ratio or the test result of hydrogen
cracking is rated as the symbol × is shown with the symbol ×. In a case where the
value (D
TOP) is lower than 20 pieces/cm
2, hydrogen cracking occurs and the case is rated as the symbol ×.
[0087] Yet further, in a case where the value (D
TOP) exceeds 90 pieces/cm
2 and a case where the number density of inclusions 40 µm or more in longest diameter
exceeds 5 pieces/cm
2, a prescribed endurance limit ratio is not obtained and the cases are rated as the
symbol ×.
[0088] Furthermore, in Fig. 8(b), the number density (D
BOT) of fine inclusions (5 to 10 µm in longest diameter) at the portion corresponding
to a steel ingot lower portion is shown along the vertical axis, and the number density
of coarse inclusions (40 µm or more in longest diameter) at the portion corresponding
to a steel ingot lower portion is shown along the horizontal axis. Then a case where
the comprehensive evaluation is rated as the symbol ● is shown with the symbol ●,
and a case where either of the endurance limit ratio or the test result of hydrogen
cracking is rated as the symbol × is shown with the symbol ×. In a case where the
value (D
BOT) is lower than 10 pieces/cm
2, hydrogen cracking occurs and the case is rated as the symbol ×.
[0089] In addition, in a case where the value (D
BOT) exceeds 80 pieces/cm
2 and a case where the number density of inclusions 40 µm or more in longest diameter
exceeds 5 pieces/cm
2, a prescribed endurance limit ratio is not obtained and the cases are rated as the
symbol ×.