Technical field
[0001] This invention generally relates to access control; in one aspect to a new method
for turning mechanic access control to "EAC" (Electronic Access Control) by converting
existing mechanical cylinder lock keys to "smart" EAC keys without affecting their
mechanic locking property and/or changing their respective existing lock cylinder;
assisted by means of specifically designed and working credential readers, lending
such keys and other new key devices, such credentials. The invention also relates
to associated reader devices and key devices; one aspect is moreover for providing
general EAC access for staff, e.g. home-care providers, as well as beside also maintaining
individually defined EAC access for e.g. residents.
Background of the invention
[0002] The most common way to lock and unlock an access-controlling object such as a lock-provided
door, is probably by using a mechanical key to both "decode" and "motor" the lock.
This solution is cost-efficient and familiar to use: and sophisticated mechanical
locks, esp. high security pin tumbler cylinder locks such as biaxial ones, are hard
to force or pick, why such locks are recommended by authorities and often are granted
incentives by insurance companies etc.. There is so all reason to keep this format;
esp., of course, where already installed.
[0003] However, there are also drawbacks with this solution, some of them serious. Mainly,
the key doesn't have any restriction other then that it fits in its lock, i.e. it
always work in that lock. This means that that a lost key cannot be incapacitated,
other than by changing its belonging lock, which is costly and disturbing, esp. if
many persons use that lock. The key also does not have any separate identity, so key
abuse etc. becomes anonymous, thus untraceable to a specific source or incident; and
thus corrective measures hardly be taken. If a large number of users, esp. staff,
are involved, some sort of key administration is often needed.
[0004] To overcome such and other disadvantages and still being able to keep the mechanical
locks intact, mechanical keys' encodings have been substituted by EAC means such as
cards and codes; and the "motor" action of the keys by motor means such as in e.g.
WO 2006/098690, or "motoring" by the handle as e.g. in
SE 529017. These are complicated and costly, though; and if then not all mechanical keys are
abandoned, retains many above-mentioned drawbacks and risks.
[0005] There are in the art lock systems that open by combined mechanic and electronic so
called hybrid keys; and where the the electronic part most often is in the key's bow
as a circuit or at it as an RFID "tag". However, these systems cannot upgrade/retrofit
most already in use locks/keys, which must be altogether newly purchased/installed;
and the few locks that can be upgraded/retrofitted will have to change at least the
essential active part, the cylinder, and also most often all keys, in order to be
employed; and which all is costly and extensive. Prior art patents in this area are
i.a.: (all US)
3,889,501;
4,277,962;
4,393,672;
4,788,859;
4,924,686;
4,988,552;
5,003,801;
5,311,757;
5,351,042;
5,771,722;
5,775,148;
5,848,541;
6,318,137;
6,418,763;
6,442,985;
6,927,670;
7,140,214;
7,316,140 and
7,397,343.
[0006] It is object of the present invention to overcome such as above problems by, without
changing the existing cylinders/keys, lending existing cylinder locks/keys both restriction
and identity, i.e. credentialing them, by specifically equipping them; and in doing
so, by the actions/influence of specifically designed reader devices, thus giving
the keys/locks full EAC-capability as well as keeping the original keys' mechanical
capability to actuate, "motor", their lock, thus eliminating the need for e.g. an
electric motor. It is still object of the present invention to provide service staff
with EAC-capable, universally usable, advantageous and facile to manage "motoring"
key/reader devices for existing cylinder locks, while still offering like capacities
also for individual, already existing mechanical keys for same locks.
Brief description of the drawings: all illustrative, exemplary and/or schematic.
[0007]
Fig. 1 shows a pin tumbler cylinder lock key in side and top view.
Fig. 2 shows a custom pin tumbler cylinder for rim and mortise locks.
Fig. 3 shows a custom pin tumbler cylinder for key-in-knob(or lever) locks.
Fig. 4 shows a custom pin tumbler cylinder mostly for mortise locks.
Fig. 5 shows a custom arrangement for a cam of a cylinder for mortise locks.
Fig. 6 shows custom fittings to a, here "oval", cylinder lock.
Fig. 7 shows new contrivances to a cylinder lock according to the invention.
Fig. 8 shows a custom arrangement for a driver bar, "tailpiece", of a cylinder.
Fig. 9 shows a for this invention modified individual key device in side view.
Fig. 10 shows a generic key device according to one aspect of the invention.
Fig. 11 shows a with a key device of Fig. 10 associated reader device(-part).
Description of preferred embodiments
[0008] With reference to the drawings, preferred embodiments of the present invention will
hereinafter be nearer explained, by means of example.
[0009] The model key drawn in side and top view in Fig. 1 shows a (pin tumbler) cylinder
lock standard key with bow (1), shoulder (2), blade (3), keyway groves (4), mechanical
encoding, "cuts" (5) and tip (6). In specific addition is at/in the bow of this here
version put an RFID (or other code carrier format) circuit, here as a clip at the
bow and through which the key is given individually programmable credentials (7).
This can be done also as retrofit, and keys keeps their mechanical properties.
[0010] Also other cordless/proximity "card"/reader formats, e.g. Wiegand, can be employed;
and key circuits included - in manufacture or by an authorized party at retrofit -
in such a way that attempts to remove or replicate it, destroys it, thus in all making
it impossible to unauthorizedly make or use duplicate (or pick) keys.
[0011] The credentialing (cordless) code-carrier of/to a key can also be an external accessory,
e.g. key holder, badge, Bluetooth/NFC(Near Field Communication)-enabled cellphone
etc., still and in cooperation with a reader device of the present invention enabling
only valid keys to open and/or lock; and all in a traceable way.
[0012] A reader device according to herein described aspects and embodiments of this invention,
is partly a reader (electronic) for e,g. RFID (or other employed code-carrier format)
and partly a contrivance (electro-mechanical) for allowing key devices according to
this invention to carry through a lock/unlock operation; and which not (as distinguished
from prior art) in any way calls for changing a cylinder.
[0013] With modem keys and locks; and most commonly pin tumbler cylinder locks, which here
(not excluding other models) are chosen for non-limiting describing exemplary versions,
highly secure, yet generic, uncomplicated, cost-efficient and advantageous rearrangements
are realized through the present invention.
[0014] These modern locks are quite modular and standardized so that the key accepting modules,
in this here described case the lock cylinders, mechanically are very similar; and
to move the lock bolt have a standard coupling arrangement (Figs. 2-6 examples) linked
thus to the lock bolt that when a cylinder rotates, bolt moves along (Fig. 6 exemplifies,
among others, a common such ). The cylinder rotates by the key turn, not requiring,
nor is the key capable of, much power.
[0015] However, to move the bolt from the inside (since a key cannot be inserted in the
lock from that side) a so called lock knob is usually provided, which functions also
when the cylinder stands still, by virtue of various arrangements whereof one is exemplary
illustrated in Fig. 6. Now, if according to one preferred embodiment of this invention
the cylinder is rotationally caught by a contrivance as exemplified in Fig. 7A, an
inserted, even mechanically correct, non-credentialed key is blocked from rotating
the cylinder and thus operate the lock. At the same time, the lock knob can operate
unaffected, as is also the case with a version exemplified below.
[0016] In such version, an example of which is rendered in Fig. 7B, the cylinder can rotate,
but only at command will such rotation be transfered to move the bolt. It can however
in both these versions be sensed/alarmed etc. if an unauthorized party is attempting
to enter; and an event log can be kept of all authorized entries.
[0017] The below nearer described embodiments, are electromechanical parts of a reader device
embodiment, exemplary and non limiting herein disclosed; and are external to the cylinder
and thus implementable without changing same. They are preferably always in catch
respective disengagement by constructions as in Fig. 7 A/B and release/catch by order
of a reading part of the present invention when an according to this invention credentialed
key inserts in the keyway of the cylinder.
[0018] Figs. 2-5 are schematic and will just show/illustrate appearance etc. of some here
employed locks. Of special interest here is the so called tailpiece 21 (64), which
transfers the rotation of the cylinder via the coupling device to the lock bolt.
[0019] Also Fig. 6 provides general background for herein described embodiments. In top
view is seen a standard coupling device 61, and also how it can move a bolt 62 upon
rotating. From rear of the lock cylinder, "plug" 63, seen (with its "case") in front/back
(a1/a2) and side (b1/b2) views, a bar, "tailpiece" 64, inserts halfway deep in the
hole 65. From the other side of the door a, here cross-shaped, bar-end (66) from a
lock knob inserts, also halfway deep. When plug turns (here 90°; other angles and
thus other 61 constructions exist, but this description is intended to be exemplary
also for such; and with from case to case dependent design variation), 61 will rotate,
moving 62 along. Object and design of a coupling device, as 61, is, as noted in the
art, to allow plug and door knob to actuate lock independently.
[0020] Matters as per above are according to hereinafter described embodiments, used for
either deadlocking the plug, or uncoupling it from 61, for not credentialed keys.
It should be stated that the in Fig. 7 A/B illustrated electromechanical parts of
a reader device embodiment according to the invention, are construed primarily for
mortise locks and for simplicity (also to describe), yet demonstrating intended working
to show and affirm the method's validity; and that other construction may be contrived,
esp. for different types of locks, e.g. rim locks, "key-in-knob" locks.
[0021] Among the standard accessories to cylinder locks of here nearer described types,
is a so called cylinder lengthener, which does merely what it is called. It is in
Fig. 6 indicated as 67 till the dotted line 68 which indicates where attached. It
is inserted between the cylinder and the coupling device 61, due to thick doors etc.;
is about 10 mm thick and contains just an extension to/of 64. If the cylinder then
gets so long that its front, with "keyway" 60, stretches out of the door, there are
other standard accessories to envelope it, so called cylinder rings, 69, of various
depths, which can cover any protruding (caused by insertion of 67; also then 69 can
house a possible reader antenna, as well as later herein described galvanic contact
points). These and other standard accessories or parts herein accounted for, are standardized
and easy to insert and/or mount, also for an end user.
[0022] The described preferred embodiments A, 71 and B, 72 of Fig. 7, are shown in side
view and axial top-to-bottom mid section; and are shown inserted in lieu of a lengthener
67 to a cylinder also shown, with key and cylinder ring (69). They are shown in states
a: lock operable and
b: lock inoperable; for a mechanically correct key. The drawings are exemplary, schematic
and illustrative; and dimensionally not exact, esp. 71/72 are greatly length exaggerated
to facilitate illustrating their working. Whereas in these illustrated embodiments,
the true length should be about 10 mm to correspond to a standard lengthener, a standard
door aperture for a cylinder lock allows for much more radial (when rim locks also
more longitudinal) space, which can be used to house parts of for these embodiments
for mortise locks needed mechanisms, whereof two (71/72) are below nearer described.
[0023] A cylindrical rod or plunger, 73, here (as in all drawings) cut open through its
vertical middle, enclasps a here shown divided and so lengthened (a whole long bar
is here also possible) tailpiece/bar 64, thus rotationally reuniting it (Fig. 7 A).
In
b state, 73 is here shown having a hole 74 checked (filled) by a ferromagnetic rod
75 kept out by a spring 76 and released when, on command, a solenoid, 77, draws in
75; and which then allows rotation of the cylinder cum tailpiece (state
a).
[0024] In 7 B, 73 is (ferromagnetic and) axially slideable along and over a gap in 64 and
by spring 76 normally (
b) in a position off the 64 rear extension thus, that even if the plug rotates, 64
won't. Only when (
a), on command, - e.g. on reading a credentialed (and mechanically correct) key - solenoid
77 draws, that can happen.
[0025] Although solenoids here have been chosen for moving the parts, it is seen that other
effectors and linkage, such as electric motors, bi/memory metal on impulse and heat,
hydraulics, pneumatics etc., can work well also.
[0026] These versions of the mechanically active parts of a reader device according to this
invention, are to be placed at the cylinder side of a lock house and thus for space
reasons preferably in a distributed installation, separate from other parts of the
reader device, just needing impulse and power, e.g. electric, to work.
[0027] Which of these versions (or possibly other constructions which will perform equivalent
functions, e.g. a cam instead of a tailpiece to move the lock bolt; in 7B alter from,
on activation, embracing the cylinder tailpiece part instead, e.g. by also then shifting
solenoid's etc position towards the cylinder side; tailpiece's sectional view and
thus also the sleeve's cavity of different shape; etc.) to chose, may be a matter
of fitness; it is by above description seen and shown that functionality is as meant
and that a lock knob will work well in both cases; and that any switch closure causation,
such as e.g. sensing a credentialed key, may enact the device.
[0028] More complicated and thus not preferred, would be to place functionally similar arrangements
at the lock knob side of the (mortise) lock house. Still, they are possible and there
might be instances where they will fit; and thus a brief on two such versions will
be given. There are in the market standard cylinders with extra long tailpiece; and
also tailpieces are very easy to change by just loosening a clip (Fig. 8). A long
bar can pass 65 and be checked/released at the other side. For a lock knob, some fork-like
arrangement can be contrived.
[0029] To disengage from the cylinder is also possible. One version could be to remove the
ordinary tailpiece and (from other side of the lock) make a matching tap go into or
out of the, typically, slot in the cylinder rear end that is for holding the ordinary
tailpiece (Fig 8). For a lock knob can be arranged as per above.
[0030] Whereas the disclosed key enabling mechanisms just need an on/off command to act,
the logical checking of credentialed keys, i.a. for giving relevant such command,
is done by the sensing/evaluating/steering part(s) of the reader device according
to the present invention. By an antenna (and adequate design, program etc.) it can
read the credentials of a key cordlessly, when key is inserting. The keys can however
be wanted encoded in other digital formats than cordlessly transferable, then bound
to have galvanic contact points to electronic/logic parts, preferably at the key bow;
and also here the method of this invention will work.
[0031] When an existing key is to be exchanged for a credentialed one, one can start from
a key blank; and then keep same mechanical pattern, cuts, whereas a needed variance
for putting galvanic contact points can be done at key shoulder.
[0032] With reference to Fig. 9, an exemplary preferred embodiment will now be described.
Key 91 has a longer shoulder (92) than usual and continues then in ordinary way. On
it needed contact point(s), 94, is (the metal of the blade can be another lead) /are
put. Any needed number of points; and side of key is possible. (It could be noted
that in Figs. 7 and 9-11 also a cordless clip (7) is shown on the key, because to
the mechanical operation, the electronic code format is all one).
[0033] Since according to described embodiments of this invention, a (mechanically correct)
key isn't hindered from inserting, but, if not credentialed, hindered from operating
the lock, the contact point(s) can make contact with the reader upon full insert.
Thus, the keyway can be outwardly extended by two lips or a slot, wherein the corresponding
contact leads, points etc. (610) from the electronic part of the reader device can
reside. These parts (610) are preferably included in a cylinder ring (and rotate along
with a key) rather than be put on the cylinder.
[0034] The galvanic contact allows then for digital encoding formats not suitable for cordless
transfer, as well as it can provide the possibly needed electric power (in lieu of
batteries in the key) to the digital circuits of the key, preferably located in its
bow. Needed power is very less and thus the reader device can supply, even if it self
is battery powered (RFID/Wiegand on the other hand, don't need own power).
[0035] When, in any version (the parts indicated as 610 in he cylinder ring 69, can stand
for leads for corded formats; and as antenna for cordless formats), a correct code
has been conventionally read, processed and approved, a mechanism such as e.g. A of
Fig. 7 is ordered to act. All of this can be done by distributed parts, but can also
be included in e.g. a compound reader embodiment residing on the inside of the door,
e.g. when rim locks and/or long range cordless formats are employed.
[0036] In systems such as
WO 2006/098690 and
SE 529017, aimed at substituting mechanically coded and 'motoring' keys by remote control,
motor etc., the present invention can completely secure a retained cylinder lock by
credentialing those keys that still remain with residents, relatives, house personell
etc.; and if a mentioned motor/handle-mechanism is to be steered by some cord/cordtess
"card" reader device, it is realized that a reader device of this invention can serve
also that purpose; empowering a key for this code; and a motor, handle etc. for that.
Same code carrier can be used for both systems and combinations/hybrids are possible,
where a motor/handle mechanism employes one format, e.g. card/code, biometry, IR/RF,
Blutooth/NFC, and a credentialed key employs other, corded/cordless (or both as in
the drawings); or (also when used alone) has its own on board code carrier(s), complemented
by exterior carrier(s), e.g. a Bluetooth/ NFC cellphone.
[0037] To be able to eliminate a need for expensive and complicated motor/handle etc. devices
and overall rely on the 'motoring' of a mechanical key, would be a great advantage.
But motive for systems like
WO 2006/098690 is to eliminate need for complex key administration and handling which staff, like
e.g. home-care nurses, meet when visiting a number of residences with between themselves
different locks; and thus, absent such systems, have to carry a lot of different keys.
[0038] One object of the present invention is to here provide a new, universally useable
and "motoring" key device (10) for all the according to this embodiment of the invention
reader-equipped locks, while at same time letting the locks' ordinary and individual
as per the present invention credentialed keys work as before.
[0039] To move a lock cylinder mechanicly, its key must have the right cuts. One for different
locks working key, though, cannot possibly have the cuts to be able to move those
different cylinders. Thus it must be able to work over a static cylinder.
[0040] By slight modification of the reader device embodiments of Fig. 7, one exemplary
preferred reader device embodiment is rendered, which will accept both generic and
individual as per this invention credentialed keys. With reference to Fig.11 and a
separate key device, Fig.10, one will be nearer described later below.
[0041] A such key device (10) of this invention, one preferred embodiment of which is illustrated
in Fig.10 and shown equipped for both corded and cordless formats, works on the fact
that the keyway of esp a pin tumbler cylinder lock (and other types, such as disc
tumbler ones, here meant included, alhough construction then may differ) is going
all through the plug, ending by an arrangement, as e.g. and typically the one indicated
in Fig.8, for retaining a tailpiece, other driver bar or cam; and that, non with standing
its folds, it is readily penetrated all through by a suited thin e.g. metal/plastic
blade and/or an about 1 mm thick (cylindric) shaft.
[0042] In a key's way are the pins (or discs etc.) which are passed by the beveled key tip/cuts;
and thus to allow all-through passage, all pins (etc.) must be able to go up and away
enough from the keyway, although, as well known in he art, they typically won't allow
the cylinder to rotate when they all are in such position.
[0043] Thus, as can be seen in side wiew (a) in Fig. 10, the there exemplified and preferred
embodiment of a key device according to this invention, has eliminated all cuts, thus
making it universal for all locks of a kind. Since pin tumbler locks are practically
the only type now installed at residencies etc.; and moreover are of very similar,
almost standardized proportions, one or very few key devices of this here described
type should suffice for an area, district, province etc., just having to (with some
tolerance) fit into a keyway and work in spite of that a cylinder won't rotate.
[0044] According to described embodiment the tip (16) is separated from the blade (13) and
instead like an arrow-head merged in an about 1 mm thick peg or shaft (15) which in
its turn is fixed to the bow (11) while rotate-able going through the shoulder (12),
thus rotating when 11 turns while 12 and its blade (13) stand still.
[0045] Shaft 15 should be made from very strong material: metal, reinforced plastic, ceramics
etc. (a one mm insex-key comes to mind for high torque); blade 13 is divided into
two, supporting 11 and keeping the lock pins up for taking out the key.
[0046] Length of a cylinder depends on number of pins (discs etc.), predominantly 5 or 7
pins (a difference of about 8 mm). Since this difference isn't discernible from the
outside, a preferred key device embodiment should have such long blade that it can
be fully inserted in the 7 pins (longest) cylinder, while being property stopped from
further insert into the shortest one (as will be later herein expounded; Fig 10, however,
will just illustrate a key device proportioned to a 5 pins lock). For the corded code
transfers contact points 94, this will have some design consequences (solvable, but
not further herein treated), while cordless formats stay unaffected.
[0047] Fig. 6 shows the all-pervading bottom L(+ inversion)-profiles of keyways, discernible
from the outside. Taking that into account, two versions of a key device 10 can be
provided, one for each "L-course", which makes for a thicker and thus steadier blade
bottom, better supporting the shaft and maybe eliminating need for a top blade part;
the cylinder pins just slightly lifted when a here polled 16 goes in and out. Such
variation is not here nearer described, just mentioned as example of possible variants
which all are meant included in the present inventive thought.
[0048] The front view (Fig. 10b.) of tip and blade, shows the thinner blade and thicker
shaft. The arrow-head tip is forged in one solid piece whereas blade and peg are separate
parts; the blade's two toungues flanking and supporting the peg. Behind, the thicker
shoulder and the even thicker bow with clip are indicated.
[0049] To further explain the working, reference is now made to Fig. 11
a,
b and
c. Fig. 8 shows how a tailpiece usually looks and is held to the cylinder. It is thus
perpendicular to the key and detach-ably held by a dip, thus replaceable by a to Fig.
7 similar contrivance and plunger device. In a version resembling Fig. 7A, rod 75
is filling out hole 74 of plunger 73, thus preventing both rotation and length movement,
until activation. Instead of held by a clip (if clip also held the cylinder, a clip
with just such function should substitute), 73 is pressed against it by spring 76;
and entering its holding slot 8 in the cylinder preferably just by two spikes 9, thus
leaving its rear center area free for a slot formed after the "arrow-head" 16 and
(with some tolerance) accepting its insertion to a predefined point. Bar 64 has just
a hind part and 73 can slide along over it, always transferring any axial turn.
[0050] As (Fig.11
c) an approved and individual as per this invention credentialed key, having also the
right mechanical code cuts, enters, a thereafter withdrawn 75 allows transfer of the
cylinder's rotation (if hole 74 instead is a fittingly long groove in 73's periphery,
it is seen that a mechanically correct, but not credentialed key can actuate instead,
if so is desired); and when (
a,
b) an approved and generic according to this invention credentialed key device as of
Fig 10 (not having any mechanical code cuts) wants to actuate the lock, a withdrawn
75 (a) also allows this, without any rotation of the cylinder, following procedures
as below explained.
[0051] The shoulder could have (not shown in Fig. 10 and apart from herein earlier disclosed
features such as contact points) an enlarged portion facilitating holding it when
inserting the key device into the lock. When the key blade stops at the cylinder end
(when 73 still is not released), the "arrow-head" tip becomes fully inserted in the
slot in 73 and thus, being flat, able to axially rotate same upon key (bow) turn,
should not 73 be blocked. (If a for varying number of pin tumblers version, as earlier
herein discussed, is employed, shoulder would in shorter cylinder versions not be
fully inserted and measures as indicated earlier may be taken; functionality remains,
though; and in Figs. 10-11 full insertion is assumed.)
[0052] The bow with rod has now an axial play vis-a-vis the shoulder the few mm:s it takes
to free the e.g. spikes of 73 from the hold in the cylinder's holding slot; and is
furthermore turnable vs. the shoulder but is blocked from utilizing these features
by rod 75 (Fig.11
b). If however being credentialed for the lock, by own or separate means, e.g. a cellphone
with NFC, 77/75 on proper command will release 73 and thus allow it to slide off its
hold and transfer rotation to bar 64 upon pressing in and turning the key-bow; and
this, then, without rotation of the cylinder (Fig.11
a).
[0053] If a latchbolt lock is present, the key most often revolves back automatically and
can be immediately taken out; if a deadbolt lock is present, the key will have to
be turned back for being taken out and also the lock has to be actively relocked;
in all cases, 73 and its slot (and door knob) will come right for any next operation.
[0054] To be able - and esp. with mortise and key-in-knob locks - to work within an actual,
likely restrained longitudinal room - about 10 mm for a standard cylinder lengthener
and possible cylinder ring further extension - may in some respects call for precision
"clockwork" techniques and strong materials, however in relation to to-day's nano
technology still in a macro format and fully achievable/available. To avoid over-stress
on a shaft 11, for instance, it can be attached to its key bow per a friction coupling,
if an enough strong material for it unlikely isn't found. Also, a cylinder lock should
not need much force to actuate; if obstructing, the problem is normally in the door,
and the familiar remedy is to treatlpush/pull/etc. the same. A shaft 11 can be freed
for rotation (on 73 release) e.g. by sliding in vs. the key shoulder (as in in Fig
10), or further insert whole (not slideable vs. 12) key device. For emergency exits
etc., reverse function, i. e. obstruction on power, is possible.
[0055] The preceding disclosure is for practical reasons held in relation mostly to tailpieces/bars
for driving the bolt and allow for a door knob (esp. with mortise locks; most rim-
and key-in-knob locks will have arrangements for a such inbuilt); and it is from Figs.
2-6 seen that a tailpiece/driver bar (with case-to-case measure modification) is being
commonly employed for rim, mortise as well as key-in-knob locks. Some mortise locks
use a cam in lieu of a tailpiece (Fig. 5) to move the bolt. It is seen, but not herein
nearer unfolded, that arrangements analogous and/or similar to earlier herein explained
contrivances can be made also for a cam, being in effect merely a form/shape variant
of an ordinary tailpiece/driver bar.
[0056] For i.a. such reasons, the here presented drawings, nearer description etc. have
been done in most general terms. The disclosed methodology allows, and variety of
custom locks calls, for much variance in exact (electro)mechanical and electronic
construction. Parts of or whole lock devices can be factory ready-made, or retrofits
by parts effected at site. It is thus to be understood that the disclosure herein,
apart from providing a base for the pending claims, is of a non limiting, for the
skilled person explaining and illustrating, nature mostly; and that based on this
disclosure and given insight, at least the skilled person is enabled to range quite
much, but without so departing from the present inventive thought and claims.