[0001] The present finding concerns a tubular radiator for a central heating system, according
to the general part of claim 1.
[0002] It is known that most central heating systems use radiators made up of a plurality
of elements placed alongside one another; each of said elements has two manifolds,
arranged below and above respectively, mutually connected together by a plurality
of columns within which the heating fluid flows.
[0003] This constructive configuration is particularly known and used; however, constructive
and functional solutions able to make the use of these radiators more practical and
effective are continuously sought.
[0004] It is also currently known that tubular radiators of the previously described type
are made so that the configuration of each of the elements which are placed alongside
one another is identical, for both the elements arranged on the side, and for the
elements arranged centrally. Currently, in practice, the elements that make up the
radiator are identical not only in terms of the number of columns used, but also in
terms of the configurations thereof.
[0005] The purpose of the present finding is that of making a tubular radiator for a central
heating system which has a greater thermal efficiency compared to similar radiators
of the known type.
[0006] This is obtained, according to the finding, by adapting the radiator according to
the characteristics of the characterizing part of claim 1.
[0007] The present finding shall now be illustrated and described in detail, with reference
to some of its particular embodiments, given as an example and not for limiting purposes,
with the help of the attached drawing tables, where:
- figs. 1 and 2 represent two global perspective views of an element, made according
to a first embodiment of the finding, arranged at the side end of the radiator and
of an element arranged centrally in the aforementioned.
- figs. 3 and 4 represent two front views of the aforementioned elements.
- figs. 5-8, as well as 9-12, and 13-16 illustrate, two perspective views of an element
made according to a second, third and a fourth embodiment of the finding, respectively,
arranged at the side ends of the radiator and of an element arranged centrally in
the aforementioned, as well as the corresponding front views of said elements.
- figs. 17-24 represent perspective views in which the elements of the odd-numbered
figures are arranged at the side ends of the radiator, whereas the elements of the
even-numbered figures are located centrally in the aforementioned; all these figures
are relative to a further embodiment of the finding, that has a different column configuration
from that of the previous figures.
[0008] In fig. 1 it can be seen that the device according to the finding comprises an element
A which has above and below it, in a
per se known way, two manifolds 1 and 2, which are connected together through a plurality
of columns 3, within which the heating fluid flows. In this first embodiment of the
finding it is foreseen that there are three such columns at the side ends of the element.
Vice versa, in the central part of the element, two columns are foreseen; in practice
the central column 3' is missing, and it is only present at the end(s) visible from
outside of the element A.
[0009] Indeed, tests carried out have made it possible to verify that the heat exchange
between the radiator and the air that surrounds it is substantially improved in the
case in which there is a certain amount of space between the various columns. However,
the users would find the absence of the columns arranged centrally at the visible
end of the elements A difficult to accept, essentially for aesthetic reasons. In practice
the presence of the central column 3', at the side ends of the element A visible from
outside, ensures that the latter looks identical to similar known type devices, whilst
still allowing the heat exchange and thermal efficiency improvements that are found
when adopting the constructive configuration according to the finding to be obtained.
[0010] It should also be considered that sometimes in a radiator, especially if it has substantial
thermal power, a single element is not foreseen, but rather a set of elements arranged
side by side. It is obvious that the intermediate elements will have an identical
configuration along their entire longitudinal projection, since in this case there
is no aesthetic motivation to "fill" their side ends. In practice, the number of columns
in the side end(s) visible from outside of the elements arranged at the two side ends
of the set of elements which forms the radiator is greater than the number of columns
foreseen in the other elements, as well as in the remaining part of the elements themselves.
[0011] Of course, it is also possible to foresee the case of a radiator with limited thermal
power in which there is a single element, in this case there will be a greater number
of columns at the two ends of the element itself compared to the number of columns
at the central part of said element.
[0012] Of course, such a constructive configuration can be applied to any type of radiator,
whatever its shape and configuration may be.
[0013] For example, figs. from 1 to 4 illustrate the case of a radiator of the type that,
at least aesthetically, appears to have three columns but which, in reality, foresees
only two columns;
- figs. from 5 to 8 illustrate the case of a radiator aesthetically appearing to have
four columns, but also in reality only having two columns;
- figs. from 9 to 12 illustrate the case of a radiator aesthetically of the type appearing
to have five columns, but also having in reality only two columns.
[0014] Vice versa, figs. from 13 to 16 illustrate the case of a radiator aesthetically appearing
to have six columns, but in reality it is of the four column type. In practice, according
to the finding, the central columns of the radiator do not necessarily have to be
two in number; vice versa, it is foreseen that centrally there is a lower number of
columns than in the visible side parts of the elements themselves.
[0015] Finally, also the configuration of the columns can be different from that previously
illustrated. As an example, the radiators illustrated in figs. from 17 to 24 refer
to the so called "rolled head" form, of the
per se known type and widespread on the market. Vice versa, radiators of the previous type,
also of a
per se known shape, concern the so-called "moulded head" form.
[0016] Of course, different embodiments from those illustrated in the figures may be foreseen,
without for this reason departing from the scope of the patent.
1. TUBULAR RADIATOR FOR A CENTRAL HEATING SYSTEM, of the type having one or more elements
placed alongside one another, each of said elements having two manifolds (2), arranged
below and above respectively, connected to each other by a plurality of columns (3),
within which the heating fluid flows, said radiator being characterized in that the number of columns foreseen at the end(s) visible from outside is greater than
the number of columns (3) present in the other elements, as well as in the remaining
parts of the elements themselves.
2. TUBULAR RADIATOR, according to claim 1, characterized in that there are two columns (3) foreseen at the central part of the radiator.
3. TUBULAR RADIATOR, according to claim 1, characterized in that there are more than two columns (3) foreseen in the non-visible parts of the elements
which form the radiator.
4. TUBULAR RADIATOR, according to claim 1, characterized in that it has one or more elements in the central position, that are not visible from outside
and which have an equal number of columns both at their central parts, and at their
side parts.