FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0001] The present invention relates to electrical contacts for flowing and interrupting
a current in a vacuum or in the air.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0002] Circuit breakers and electrical current switches, which are protective units in electric
power reception and distribution systems, are required to be compact and inexpensive
and to offer high performance, making it necessary to simplify these units. Accordingly,
when the electrical contacts for flowing and interrupting a current are melted due
to joule heat, they are preferably separated with a small force; the small force enables
an operating mechanism for opening and closing the electrical contacts to be compact.
It is also preferable that the electrical contacts can flow and interrupt a current
correctly not only in a vacuum but also in a gas atmosphere, for example, in the air.
Then, a vacuum chamber and the like become unnecessary. The structure can be simplified
and deterioration in functionality due to atmospheric abnormalities and other problems
can be avoided.
[0003] Electrical contacts need to have superior current-carrying performance. Accordingly,
conventional electrical contacts made of metal materials have been densified by using
a melting process so that the contacts can be separated with a force reduced by, for
example, dispersing fine particles of a metal with a high melting point.
[0004] Conventional electrical contacts employed in switchgears for electric power have
been using Cr-Cu as the main component, which is obtained by combining Cr, which is
an arc resistant component, with Cu, which is a superior conductor. The dominant method
of manufacturing the electrical contacts has been the melted-infiltration process,
in which high densification can be easily carried out, as disclosed in Japanese Patent
Laid-open No.
Hei 10(1998)-241512 and Japanese Patent Laid-open No.
2000-173415.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] When closed, electrical contacts of this type have large contact resistance due to
their density and high strength. If the contacts are melted due to joule heat, a large
force is needed to separate them, making the operating mechanism large. To reduce
the force with which the contacts are separated, the electrical contacts have been
improved by, for example, dispersing fine particles of a hard metal with a high melting
point. However, reduction in current-carrying performance, an accompanying increase
in joule heat, and other problems have been caused, so such an improvement has not
been a basic countermeasure.
[0006] An object of the present invention is to provide an electrical contact that can achieve
both low strength, which results in a reduction in force with which a contact bridge
formed by melting is broken, and high density for ensuring current-carrying and interruption
performance by using a refractory metal appropriate as the arc resistant component,
and thereby enables the electrical current switch and other elements to be compact.
[0007] In one aspect of the electrical contact according to the present invention, the electrical
contact comprises a refractory metal, a highly conductive metal, and an inevitable
impurity; the content V (percent by volume) of the refractory metal is within the
range obtained from equations (1) and (2) shown below, in which M represents the atomic
weight of the refractory metal; a boundary between the refractory metal and highly
conductive metal has a cross sectional texture that is physically separated over at
least 70% of the length of the boundary.

[0008] In another aspect of the electrical contact according to the present invention, the
refractory metal of the electrical contact is made of one of C, Mo, or W, the highly
conductive metal is Cu, and the diameters of particles of the refractory metal are
within the range of 10 µm to 104 µm.
[0009] In still another aspect of the electrical contact according to the present invention,
a boundary between the refractory metal and highly conductive metal has a cross sectional
texture that is physically separated over at least 70% of the length of the boundary,
and the electrical contacts has porosity within the range of 0.2 to 5 percent by volume.
[0010] In one aspect of the electrical contact manufacturing method according to the present
invention, refractory metal powder and highly conductive metal powder are mixed together,
the resulting mixture is pressurized to form a complex pressed body with a relative
density of 65% or higher, and the complex pressed body is heated to a temperature
not higher than the melting point of the highly conductive metal to sinter the complex
pressed body.
[0011] A preferred embodiment of the present invention can provide an electrical contact
that can achieve both low strength, which results in a reduction in force with which
a contact bridge formed by melting is broken, and high density for ensuring current-carrying
and interruption performance by using a refractory metal appropriate as the arc resistant
component, and thereby enables the electrical current switch and other elements to
be compact.
[0012] Other objects and features of the present invention will be clarified in embodiments
described below.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0013]
FIG. 1 is an electric microscopic image showing an example of the texture of an electrical
contact material in a first embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view showing the structure of an electrode manufactured
in a second embodiment of the present invention.
FIG. 3 shows the structure of a vacuum interrupter manufactured in a third embodiment
of the present invention.
FIG. 4 shows the structure of a vacuum circuit breaker manufactured in a fourth embodiment
of the present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0014] The inventors considered that causing physical separation on a boundary between a
refractory metal particle and a Cu matrix is an effective way to have an electrical
contact material achieve both high density and low strength, and found refractory
materials having textures that cause physical separation of this type as well as the
content of the refractory metal. In general, refractory metal components used in electrical
contacts have a melting point higher than about 1800°C.
[0015] On the basis of this finding, an electrical contact was manufactured, which comprised
a refractory metal, a highly conductive metal, and an inevitable impurity, and the
content V (percent by volume) of the refractory metal was set within the range obtained
from equations (1) and (2) shown below, in which M represents the atomic weight of
the refractory metal. When the refractory metal was included within this range, both
superior current-carrying and interruption performance and superior resistance to
adhesion due to melting can be achieved. When the content of the refractory metal
was smaller than this range, a reduction in strength due to physical separation between
the refractory metal particles and highly conductive metal matrix was insufficient.
When the content of the refractory metal exceeded the range, the resistance to adhesion
due to melting and the current-carrying performance were lowered due to an insufficient
density, an increase in electric resistance, and other factors.

[0016] When the refractory metal used in the electrical contact that embodies the present
invention is one of C, Mo, or W and the highly conductive metal is Cu, the effect
described above can be adequately obtained. This is because, out of the refractory
metals, C, Mo, and W are particularly superior in that they cause neither reactions
with Cu nor solid solution and cause boundary separation with relative ease. The diameters
of particles in the refractory metal used are preferably within the range of 10 µm
to 104 µm. Residual stress was caused on a boundary between the refractory metal and
highly conductive metal matrix due to a difference in thermal expansion between them.
When the particle diameter of the refractory metal was smaller than this range, the
residual stress was small and separation between the refractory metal and highly conductive
metal matrix was insufficient. When the particle diameter exceeded this range, dispersion
of the refractory metal became uneven, making the electrical performance of the contact
unstable.
[0017] With the cross sectional texture of the electrical contact that embodies the present
invention, a boundary between the refractory metal and highly conductive metal on
an arbitrary cross section is physically separated over at least 70% of the length
of the boundary. Accordingly, the porosity of the electrical contact material falls
within the range of 0.2 to 5 percent by volume. When the electrical contact has textures
of this type, it can achieve both the high density and low strength described above.
[0018] In a preferable method of manufacturing the novel electrical contact, refractory
metal powder and highly conductive metal powder are mixed together, the resulting
mixture is pressurized to form a complex pressed body with a relative density of 65%
or higher, and the complex pressed body is heated to a temperature not higher than
the melting point of the highly conductive metal to sinter the complex pressed body.
By this method, textures in which the refractory metal and highly conductive metal
are evenly mixed together are obtained and a separation state in which voids are formed
on a boundary between the refractory metal and highly conductive metal can also be
obtained, enabling a greatly reduced force to be sufficient for separation after melting.
The voids can be thought to have been formed in the boundary due to a difference in
contraction between the refractory metal and highly conductive metal during cooling
in the sintering process, the difference in contraction being caused by a difference
in the coefficient of thermal expansion therebetween. That is, since the highly conductive
metal has a larger coefficient of thermal expansion than the refractory metal, the
highly conductive metal largely contracts during the cooling, causing tensile stress
in the highly conductive metal matrix near the boundary. When the sintered complex
pressed body is cut in this state to observe its cross section, the stress is relieved
and separation occurs on the boundary, forming voids. When tensile strength is applied,
stress is also relieved from the highly conductive metal due to cutting in the same
way. Cracks then proceed along the separated boundary, forming voids. It is effective
to cause residual tensile stress in the highly conductive metal matrix near the boundary
in the sintering process as described above. To cause residual tensile stress, the
cooling rate in the sintering process is preferably 6°C/min to 35°C/min. In this method,
a metal mold having a final shape of the electrical contact can be used to obtain
a complex pressed body by near net shape forming. Accordingly, machining after the
sintering process can be eliminated and thereby the electrical contact can be manufactured
at a low cost.
[0019] In the switchgear for electric power that embodies the present invention, a pair
of electrical contacts of the type described above are oppositely disposed to have
a function for flowing and interrupting a current. Therefore, a compact, inexpensive
switchgear for electric power can be provided, which is superior in interruption performance
and current-carrying performance, needs only a small force for separating the melted
electrical contacts, and has a compact operating mechanism.
[First embodiment]
[0020] Electrical contact materials having compositions shown in Table 1 were manufactured
and their performance was evaluated in simple tests. Each electrical contact material
was manufactured as described below. First, C powder, Mo powder, or W powder with
particle diameters shown in Table 1 and Cu powder with particle diameters of 60 µm
or less was mixed together with a V-type mixer at a compounding ratio at which a composition
shown in Table 1 was obtained. The mixed powder was then loaded in a disk-shaped metal
mold, and molded by a hydraulic press under a pressure of 294 MPa. The density of
the resulting complex pressed body was about 72%. The complex pressed body material
was heated in a vacuum at about 10
-2 Pa for two hours at 1060°C, after which the complex pressed body was cooled at a
rate of about 13°C per minute to form an electrical contact material. A contact material
made of only Cu powder was also manufactured in the same way for use as a criterion.
The porosity of the obtained contact material was measured by the in-water Archimedes
method.
[0021] Electrical contacts with a diameter of 20 mm and a thickness of 20 mm were obtained
from the obtained contact material by machining. The electrical contacts then underwent
a performance evaluation test in the air (atmosphere). In the test, a simplified apparatus
having a pair of oppositely disposed current-carrying rods, which can be brought into
contact and separated, was used. The obtained electrical contacts were brazed to the
ends of the current-carrying rods. After an electric power of 50 kV·kA (voltage ×
current) was applied, the force needed to separate the contacts (separation force)
was measured. It was also verified whether a current of 1250A could be interrupted.
Electrical conductivity (current-carrying ease) was measured by using an electrical
conductivity measuring instrument based on the eddy current method. Table 1 also shows
the evaluation results.
[Table 1]
Class |
No. |
Composition (percent by volume) |
Particle diameter of refractory metal (µm) |
Porosity (percent by volume) |
Performance test results |
Remarks |
Cu |
Refractory metal |
Electrical conductivity (relative value) |
Separation force * (relative value) |
Interruption of 1250A (○: possible, ×; Not possible) |
C |
Mo |
w |
Present invention |
1 |
Rest |
1 |
- |
- |
10-22 |
0.2 |
1.0 |
0.75 |
○ |
|
2 |
2.5 |
- |
- |
2.6 |
0.95 |
0.6 |
○ |
|
3 |
4 |
- |
- |
4.1 |
0.9 |
0.55 |
○ |
|
4 |
- |
8 |
- |
45-75 |
1.3 |
0.9 |
0.7 |
○ |
|
5 |
- |
20 |
- |
2.3 |
0.75 |
0.35 |
○ |
|
6 |
- |
32 |
- |
2.9 |
0.65 |
0.5 |
○ |
|
7 |
- |
- |
15.5 |
45-104 |
2.4 |
0.85 |
0.5 |
○ |
|
8 |
- |
- |
38 |
3.9 |
0.7 |
0.55 |
○ |
|
9 |
- |
- |
61 |
5.0 |
0.65 |
0.4 |
○ |
|
Comparative examples |
10 |
- |
- |
- |
- |
0.1 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
○ |
Values on which relative values are based |
11 |
0.5 |
- |
- |
10-22 |
0.1 |
1.0 |
0.9 |
○ |
The content of the refractory metal was out range. |
12 |
4.5 |
- |
- |
4.4 |
0.9 |
0.5 |
× |
13 |
- |
7 |
- |
45-75 |
1.1 |
0.95 |
0.8 |
○ |
14 |
- |
33.5 |
- |
3.3 |
0.55 |
0.4 |
○ |
15 |
- |
- |
14.5 |
45-104 |
2.1 |
0.9 |
0.8 |
○ |
16 |
- |
- |
62.5 |
5.6 |
0.5 |
0.35 |
× |
17 |
- |
20 |
- |
<5 |
3.6 |
0.55 |
0.7 |
○ |
The particle diameter of the refractory metal was out of range. |
18 |
- |
20 |
- |
>147 |
1.2 |
0.85 |
0.8 |
○ |
* Separation force after an electric power of 50 kV·kA (voltage × current) was applied |
[0022] The electrical conductivity and separation force in Table 1 are indicated by values
relative to measurements of the electrical contact No. 10 made only of Cu.
[0023] The electric conductivities of the electrical contacts Nos. 1 to 9 in the experimental
examples in the present invention were 0.65 or higher, indicating superior current-carrying
performance. Their separation forces were 0.75 or less, indicating that they were
adequately reduced. All these electrical contacts could interrupt a current of 1250A.
The porosity fell within the range of 0.2 to 5.0 percent by volume.
[0024] Now the comparative materials will be considered for comparison. The separation force
of electrical contact No. 11, with a C content lower than the range in the present
invention, was not adequately reduced. The current interruption performance of electrical
contact No. 12, with a C content higher than the range in the present invention, was
low. The separation force of electrical contact No. 13, with an Mo content lower than
the range in the present invention, was not adequately reduced. The electrical conductivity
(current-carrying performance) of electrical contact No. 14, with an Mo content higher
than the range in the present invention, was low. The separation force of electrical
contact No. 15, with a W content lower than the range in the present invention, was
not adequately reduced. The electrical conductivity of electrical contact No. 16,
with a W content higher than the range in the present invention, was significantly
reduced, and its interruption performance was also low. The electrical conductivity
of electrical contact No. 17, with Mo particle diameters smaller than the range in
the present invention, was inadequate. The separation force of electrical contact
No. 18, with Mo particle diameters larger than the range in the present invention,
was not adequately reduced. A possible reason why electrical contact No. 11 had a
large separation force is that separation between C and Cu was inadequate due to a
porosity smaller than the range of the present invention. For electrical contact No.
16, since the porosity was larger than the range of the present invention and thereby
the electrical conductivity was substantially reduced, the interruption performance
can be considered to become inadequate.
[0025] The textures in the cross sections of the electrical contacts Nos. 1 to 9 in the
experimental examples in the present invention were observed with a scanning electron
microscope.
[0026] FIG. 1 is a photo of the cross section of electrical contact No. 5 in Table 1, which
was taken with the scanning electron microscope as an example of an electrical contact
that embodies the present invention. As the photo shows, there are voids with a width
of less than 1 µm in a boundary between a refractory metal particle and a Cu matrix,
physically separating them. In measurements obtained from electron microscopic images,
the ratio of the voids to the boundary was in the range of 70% to 90% for all electrical
contacts. As for the electrical contacts in this embodiment, the force with which
contacts were separated was reduced due to these voids.
[0027] It was confirmed that the electrical contacts in this embodiment have superior performance
as contacts used in the air. In an evaluation test in a vacuum chamber at about 10
-1 Pa, a similar tendency was obtained.
[Second embodiment]
[0028] Electrodes used in a switchgear for electric power was manufactured by using an electrical
contact material obtained in the first embodiment.
[0029] FIG. 2 is a cross sectional view showing the structure of an electrode manufactured
in a second embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the electrode
comprises an electrical contact 1 with slits 2 for giving a driving force to an arc,
a reinforcing plate 3 made of stainless steel, an electrode rod 4, and a brazing material
5. The electrode was manufactured as described below. The electrode rod 4 and reinforcing
plate 3 were prepared in advance from oxygen-free copper and SUS304, respectively,
by machining. A brazing material 5 was placed between the electrical contact 1 and
reinforcing plate 3 and between the reinforcing plate 3 and electrode rod 4. The resulting
assembly was heated for 10 minutes at 970°C in a vacuum at 8.2 × 10
-4 Pa or lower to obtain the electrode shown in FIG. 2. If the strength of the electrical
contact 1 is adequate, the reinforcing plate 3 may be omitted. When this electrode
is integrally joined to an air circuit breaker in an electrical current switch by
a metallurgical method, the electrode can be used as an air contact. The reference
numeral 44 indicates a central hole.
[0030] The electrical contact 1 having a complex shape as described above can also be manufactured
by loading mixed powder into a metal mold that can form a final shape and then performing
sintering. In this method, post-processing such as machining is not necessary, so
the electrical contact 1 can be easily manufactured.
[Third embodiment]
[0031] A pair of electrodes manufactured in the second embodiment were oppositely disposed
in a vacuum chamber to manufacture a vacuum interrupter.
[0032] FIG. 3 shows the structure of a vacuum interrupter manufactured in a third embodiment
of the present invention. The fixed electrode 6a in FIG. 3 comprises a fixed electrical
contact 1a, a reinforcing plate 3a, and fixed electrode rod 4a. Similarly, the movable
electrode 6b comprises a movable electrical contact 1b, a reinforcing plate 3b, and
movable electrode rod 4b. The movable electrode 6b is brazed to a movable holder 12
through a movable-side shield 8 for preventing metal vapor and the like from spattering
during interruption. These members are hermetically sealed in a high vacuum by a fixed-side
end plate 9a, a movable-side end plate 9b, and an insulating cylinder 13, the fixed
electrode 6a being brazed to the fixed-side end plate 9a, the movable holder 12 being
brazed to the movable-side end plate 9b. The fixed electrode 6a and movable holder
12 are connected to external conductors through their threads. A shield 7 for preventing
metal vapor and the like from spattering during interruption is provided on the internal
surface of the insulating cylinder 13. A guide 11 for supporting a sliding part is
provided between the movable-side end plate 9b and movable holder 12. A bellows 10
is provided between the movable-side shield 8 and movable-side end plate 9b so that
the movable holder 12 is moved upward and downward with the inside of the vacuum chamber
kept in a vacuum to open and close the fixed electrode 6a and movable electrode 6b.
[0033] As described above, electrical contacts manufactured in the first embodiment were
used as the electrical contacts 1a and 1b shown in FIG. 3 to manufacture a vacuum
interrupter.
[Fourth embodiment]
[0034] A vacuum circuit breaker in which the vacuum interrupter manufactured in the third
embodiment was mounted was manufactured.
[0035] FIG. 4 shows the structure of a vacuum circuit breaker in a fourth embodiment of
the present invention.
[0036] The vacuum circuit breaker is structured so that an operation mechanism is provided
on the front and three epoxy cylinders 15, which support the vacuum interrupter 14
and integrally form three phases, are provided on the back. The vacuum interrupter
14 is opened and closed by the operation mechanism through an isolated operation rod
16.
[0037] When the vacuum circuit breaker is closed, a current flows through an upper terminal
17, the electrical contact 1, a current corrector 18, and a lower terminal 19. The
contact force between the electrodes is maintained by a contact spring 20 loaded in
the isolated operation rod 16. The contact force between the electrodes and a magnetic
force generated by a short-circuit current are maintained by a support lever 21 and
a prop 22. When a coil 30 is energized in an open circuit state, a plunger 23 raises
a roller 25 through a knocking rod 24 and thereby a main lever 26 is turned, closing
the electrodes. The closed circuit is maintained by the support lever 21.
[0038] When the vacuum circuit breaker is in a trip-free state, a trip coil 27 is energized
and a trip lever 28 disengages the prop 22. The main lever 26 then turns, opening
the electrodes.
[0039] When the vacuum circuit breaker is in an open circuit state, the link is restored
by a reset spring 29 after the electrodes open, and the prop 22 engages. When a coil
30 is energized in this state, the circuit is closed. The reference numeral 31 indicates
an exhaust cylinder.
1. An electrical contact, comprising:
a refractory metal;
a highly conductive metal; and
an inevitable impurity; wherein
the content V (percent by volume) of the refractory metal is within a range obtained
from equations (1) and (2) shown below, in which M represents the atomic weight of
the refractory metal; and
a boundary between the refractory metal and the highly conductive metal on an arbitrary
cross section is physically separated over at least 70% of the length of the boundary.


2. The electrical contact according to claim 1, wherein:
the refractory metal is any one of C, Mo, or W; and
the highly conductive metal is Cu.
3. The electrical contact according to claim 1, wherein the diameter of a particle of
the refractory metal is within a range of 10 µm to 104 µm.
4. The electrical contact according to claim 1, wherein the electrical contact has a
porosity of 0.2 to 5 percent by volume.
5. A switchgear for electric power, comprising:
a pair of electrical contacts described in claim 1; and
a mechanism for closing and opening the pair of electrical contacts.
6. A method of manufacturing an electrical contact, comprising the steps of:
mixing refractory metal powder and highly conductive metal powder together;
pressurizing the resulting mixture to form a complex pressed body with a relative
density of 65% or higher; and
heating the complex pressed body to a temperature not higher than the melting point
of the highly conductive metal to sinter the complex pressed body.
7. The method according to claim 6, wherein the refractory metal powder is any one of
a powder of C including particles with a diameter of 10 µm to 22 µm, Mo including
particles with a diameter of 45 µm to 75 µm, or W including particles with a diameter
of 45 µm to 104 µm.