TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to an apparatus for wearing a wig that is bonded to
the inside of a wig base, to which imitation hairs such as artificial hairs or human
hairs are implanted, for easily and surely wearing a wig on a head of a wearer.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] The followings have been know, as an apparatus for mounting head accessories, such
as a wig, a hat and a hair band, onto a head of a wearer. An inversion clip that is
made of a metal or synthetic resin and fixed to the inside of a wig base, wherein
the inversion clip is so bent as to hold the hairs of a wig wearer with teeth of the
inversion clip (Patent Document 1); an apparatus on a back surface of a hair band
having a structure, like a male sheet of a hook-and-loop fastener, in which a great
number of monofilaments are disposed on a base sheet in the form of projection as
an anti-slip tape (Patent Document 2); an apparatus having an head accessory put on
a head such as a wig or a hat and a band-like member that elastically surrounds a
head, wherein the band-like member and the head accessory put on the head can be attached
to and detached from each other by means of attaching means such as a hook-and-loop
fastener, hook, or the like (Patent Document 3).
[0003] However, according to the apparatus using inversion clip disclosed in the Patent
Document 1, finger strength to some extent is necessary for inverting the inversion
clip, and thus an elderly person having a weak finger strength or a person who cannot
freely use his/her fingers cannot freely attach or detach a wig by himself/herself.
Further, the apparatus entails a problem that the clipped hairs of the wearer are
pulled since the inversion clip clips the natural hairs of the wearer, by which the
wearer feels pain. The Patent Document 2, which discloses the use of a male sheet
of a hook-and-loop fastener for fixing a hair band, describes preferable length and
width of a projecting member and its disposal density. This device is used only to
prevent a light head accessory put on a head, such as a hair band, from being slipped
off from hairs with the structure of the monofilaments by being inserting into the
hairs like teeth of a comb. Therefore, this device has weak fixing force to be used
as an apparatus for wearing a wig, thus technically insufficient.
[0004] According to an apparatus disclosed in the Patent Document 3, in which a head accessory
put on a head and the band-like member are combined, the band-lilce member is interposed
between the head of the wearer and the wig base. Therefore, the wig is not fitted
to the head of the wearer, but lifts up, and thus, other persons might notice that
a wig is worn. When the hoolc-and-loop fastener is used as the attaching means, both
of the male sheet and the female sheet are interposed between the head of the wig
wearer and the wig base to increase the thickness, resulting in that it is difficult
for the wig to be fitted to the head. Further, the band-like member is attached to
the head of the wig wearer with its elastic force, like a hair band. Therefore, if
the elastic force is weak, the wig is easily detached, while if the elastic force
is increased, the head of the wig wearer is tightened, which makes it difficult to
wear the wig for a long time.
Patent Document 1 : Japanese Utility Model Registration No. 1418657
Patent Document 2 : Japanese Utility Model Registration No. 2591881
Patent Document 3 : Japanese Unexamined Patent Application No. HEI11-286821
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
PROBLEM THAT THE INVENTION IS TO SOLVE
[0005] The present invention is accomplished in view of the foregoing circumstances, and
the object is to provide, with low cost, an apparatus for wearing a wig that can easily
and surely attach a wig only by lightly pressing the wig, which is put on a head of
a wig wearer, from above. Further, the apparatus for wearing a wig is excellent in
fitness, and that does not cause pain in the attaching/detaching operation or for
a long-time use.
MEANS TO SOLVE PROBLEMS
[0006] In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, an apparatus for wearing a wig according
to the present invention includes a base sheet, a plurality of monofilaments in the
form of projection disposed on a first side of the base sheet, each having a stalk
extending from the base sheet and a big head on the top of the stalk, and an adhesive
layer applied on a second side of the base sheet for bonding to the inside of the
wig base, whereby the plurality of monofilaments gets entangled and hooked with natural
hair of the wearer in wearing the wig and this state of entanglement is kept by hooking
force.
[0007] In the present invention, a film having a larger coefficient of friction as compared
with a material of the plurality of monofilaments may be applied on the surface of
the monofilaments. It is preferable that a peeling force in detaching the apparatus
for wearing a wig from the head of the wig wearer is in the range of not less than
0.29 N (30 gf) to not more than 0.98 N (100 gf), the deflecting force of the monofilaments
in the vicinity of their tops is in the range of not less than 1.91 N (195 gf) to
not more than 6.08 N (620 gf) and the deflecting force of the monofilaments in the
vicinity of their bottoms is in the range of not less than 3.73 N (380 gf) to not
more than 8.14 N (830 gf), and a disposal density of the monofilaments is in the range
of not less than 50 pieces/cm
2 to not more than 120 pieces /cm
2. Further, in the present invention, it is preferable that the height of the stalk
of each of the monofilaments is set to be not less than 3 mm and not more than 6 mm,
the diameter of the stalk of each of the monofilaments is set to be not less than
0.1 mm and not more than 0.5 mm, and the diameter of the big head of each of the monofilaments
is set to be not less than 0.2 mm and not more than 1 mm.
[0008] The apparatus for wearing a wig according to the present invention is bonded to the
inside of the wig base with the adhesive layer applied on the second side of the base
sheet, and the monofilaments project toward the head. When the wig is put on the head
of the wearer, and light pressing force is applied thereon, the natural hairs of the
wig wearer and the monofilaments are aligned in the inserting direction to each other.
The insertion is further advanced, the natural hairs are bent toward the lateral direction,
whereby the monofilaments deflect in the direction substantially parallel to the base
sheet or in the direction of the base sheet in the form of U shape or J shape to thereby
get entangled with the natural hair of the wearer. In this entanglement, the stalk
and the big head on the top of the stalk of each of the monofilaments get entangled
and hooked with natural hairs of the wearer, and the entanglement state between the
monofilaments and the natural hairs is kept by a force to keep the hooked state, which
is hooking force, whereby the wig is fixed to the head of the wig wearer.
[0009] The monofilaments may be surely entangled to prevent the entanglement from being
loosed or from being released by irregularly providing the monofilaments to the base
sheet, or applying a film having a larger coefficient of friction as compared with
a material of the monofilaments on the surface of the monofilaments. For example,
in case where the base sheet is made of nylon, and the monofilament is made of polypropylene,
the friction force may be increased to enhance a fixing strength by applying an elastomer
solution having a friction coefficient larger than that of the monofilament to form
a film. In forming a film, the thickness of the film covering the surface of the monofilament
is preferably not more than 10 µm. When the thickness of the film is 10 µm or more,
the film on the stalk and the film on the head of the stalk become too thick to decrease
the gap between the monofilaments. As a result, the natural hairs cannot go in between
the monafilaments, so that the natural hairs are pressed by the head of the stalk,
which makes it difficult for the monofilaments to entangle with the natural hair.
Thus, it is non-preferable. As the elastomer solution, a 5 wt% solution obtained by
dissolving a pellet of a styrene-based thermoplastic elastomer, specifically Quintac
QTCSL-125 by Zeon Corporation, into toluene can be applied to the monofilaments.
[0010] The monofilament of the apparatus for wearing a wig has flexibility to some extent
for getting entangled with the natural hairs of the wig wearer. Because of this flexibility,
the stalk of the monofilament suitably deflects, whereby the big head on the top of
the stalk get entangled and hooked with the stalk or the big head of other monofilaments,
and the natural hairs get entangled between the monofilaments. This entanglement is
kept. Accordingly, the monofilament of the apparatus for wearing a wig needs suitable
flexibility. When the flexibility is low, the monofilaments do not deflect, so that
the monofilaments might damage the head skin. When the flexibility of the monofilament
is too high, the monofilaments get entangled with the natural hairs more than necessary,
and thus the natural hair is pulled to cause pain in detaching the wig. Accordingly,
the monofilament needs appropriate flexibility.
[0011] The qualitative features of the apparatus for wearing a wig found by the present
inventors are as follows.
- (1) Compared to the aligned monofilaments, the monofilaments irregularly arranged
are more easily bent in U-shape or J-shape when the monofilaments come in contact
with hairs or head skin, whereby the monofilaments get entangled with each other and
with the hairs more easily. Accordingly, the peeling force and the fixing force tend
to increase. The reason for this can be given below. The aligned monofilaments cause
themselves to get entangled with other monofilaments and the hairs in one pattern.
Therefore, the state of the entanglement is easily released, whereby the monofilaments
return to I-shape (namely, original condition) from the U-shape or J-shape after a
long-time use. On the other hand, the irregularly arranged monofilaments cause themselves
to get entangled with other monofilaments and the hairs in several patterns. Therefore,
the latter can strongly keep each pattern due to the interaction between several patterns
as compared with me former, and thus the state of the entanglement can be kept for
a long time.
- (2) There is a tendency that, as the diameter of the stalk is large, the deflecting
force increases (the stalk becomes rigid), while as the diameter of the stalk is small,
the deflecting force decreases (the stalk becomes flexible). When the diameter of
the stalk is small, the stalks get entangled with each other or broken after the repeated
use, and the peeling force tends to decrease (the durability is reduced).
- (3) There is a tendency that, as the height of the stalk is large, the deflecting
force decreases, and thus the stalk easily get entangled with natural hairs, but the
wig is liable to lift up from the head. When the height of the stalk is small, the
deflecting force tends to increase, and thus it is difficult for the stalk to get
entangled with natural hairs. Further, the height required for getting entangled with
the natural hair is not achieved, whereby the sufficient entanglement is difficult
to be established.
- (4) When the diameter of the head of the stalk is increased, the power for keeping
the entanglement with the natural hair is enhanced, but the surface of the apparatus
becomes close to the flat plane, which result in that it is difficult for the head
of the stalk to come in the gap between the natural hairs. When the diameter of the
head of the stalk is decreased, the head of the stalk easily come in the gap between
the natural hairs, but if the diameter of the head of the stalk is too small, the
state of the entanglement cannot be kept.
- (5) When the disposal density of the monofilaments is high and the diameter of the
head of the stalk is large, the monofilaments cannot go in the gap between the natural
hairs, and hence, it is difficult for the monofilaments are to get entangled with
the natural hairs. When the disposal density of the monofilaments is high and the
diameter of the head of the stalk is small, the monofilaments go in the gap between
the natural hairs, and then the monofilaments tend to excessively get entangled with
the natural hairs. When the disposal density of the monofilaments is low, there is
a tendency that the state of the entanglement cannot be kept, even if the monofilaments
get entangled with the natural hairs, resulting in that the peeling force decreases.
- (6) When the deflecting force is low (flexible), the monofilaments tend to easily
get entangled with the natural hairs. When the deflecting force is high (rigid), the
monofilaments tend not to get entangled with the natural hairs.
EFFECT OF THE INVENTION
[0012] An apparatus for wearing a wig according to the present invention has a structure
in which a plurality of monofilaments, each having a predetermined shape, flexibility,
and size, are disposed on a base sheet in the form ofprojection, wherein a wig can
surely be attached to the head of the wig wearer only by lightly pressing the wig,
which is put on the head of the wig wearer, from above. Accordingly, the apparatus
is suitable for an elderly person having weak finger strength or a person who cannot
freely use his/her fingers, Further, the wig can be attached without being lifted
up from the head of the wearer, whereby the apparatus is excellent in fitness, and
does not cause pain in the attaching/detaching operation and for a long-time use.
BRIED EXPLANATION OF DRAWINGS
[0013]
[FIG. 1] FIG. 1 is a perspective view showing an apparatus for wearing a wig according
to an embodiment of the present invention.
[FIG. 2] FIG. 2 is a front view showing an apparatus for wearing a wig according to
the embodiment of the present invention.
[FIG. 3] FIG 3 is an inside view of a wig to which the apparatus for wearing a wig
according to the embodiment of the present invention is bonded.
[FIG. 4] FIG. 4 is a view for explaining a state of attaching a wig using the apparatus
for wearing a wig according to the embodiment of the present invention.
[FIG. 5] FIG. 5 is a view showing the state in winch the wig is attached according
to the embodiment of the present invention.
[FIG. 6] FIG. 6 is an enlarged view of FIG. 5 according to the embodiment of the present
invention.
[FIG. 7] FIG. 7 is a view for explaining a manner of a test for flexibility according
to the present invention.
[FIG. 8] FIG. 8 is a view for explaining a manner of a test for peeling according
to the present invention.
[FIG. 9] FIG. 9 is a view for explaining a manner of a test for peeling according
to the present invention.
EXPLANATION OF REFERENCE NUMBERS
[0014]
20...Apparatus for wearing a wig
21...Base sheet
22...Monofilament
22a ... Stalk of monofilament 22
22b...Head of monofilament 22
23...Adhesive layer
24...Releasing paper
25...Imitation hair
26...Wig
27...Wig base
30... Wearer
31...Natural hair of wearer 30
BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0015] A best mode of an apparatus for wearing a wig according to the present invention
will be explained below with reference to FIGS. 1 to 6. FIG. 1 is a perspective view
of the apparatus for wearing a wig, FIG. 2 is a front view of the apparatus for wearing
a wig, FIG. 3 is an inside view of a wig to which the apparatus for wearing a wig
is attached, FIG. 4 is a view for explaining the state of attaching the wig using
the apparatus for wearing a wig, FIG. 5 is a view showing the state in which the wig
is attached, and FIG 6 is an enlarged view of FIG. 5.
[0016] As shown in FIGS. 1 and 2, an apparatus for wearing a wig 20 is formed with a base
sheet 21 made of nylon and cut into a rectangle of 1.5 cm x 3.5 cm with a thickness
of 0.5 mm, for example, on a first side of which, a plurality of monofilaments 22
are irregularly implanted with a density of not less than 50 and not more than 120
pieces per square centimeters, on a second side of the base sheet 21, an adhesive
layer 23 is applied, and a releasing sheet 24 is bonded onto the outer face of the
adhesive layer 23.
[0017] As shown in detail in the enlarged view of A portion in FIG. 2, each of the monofilaments
22 is made of a synthetic resin same as or different from the base sheet 21, and is
formed in a velvet shank shape including a stalk 22a extending from the first side
of the base sheet 21 having a diameter of not less than 0.1 mm and not more than 0.5
mm and a length of not less than 3 mm and not more than 6 mm, and a big head 22b like
an umbrella on the top of the stalk 22a having a diameter of not less than 0.2 mm
to not more than 1 mm. The whole of the monofilament 22 is made of polypropylene,
and an elastomer solution having a friction coefficient larger than that of the polypropylene
is applied on its surface, for example.
[0018] The deflecting force of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 in the vicinity of the
top thereof is preferably set in the range of not less than 1.91 N (195 gf) to not
more than 6.08 N (620 gf), more preferably set in the range of not less than 2.96
N (302 gf) to not more than 5.51 N (562 gf), and further preferably set in the range
of not less than 4.01 N (409 gf) to not more than 4.94 N (504 gf). The deflecting
force of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 in the vicinity of the bottom thereof
is preferably set in the range of not less than 3.73 N (380 gf) to not more than 8.14
N (830 gf), more preferably set in the range of not less than 4.78 N (488 gf) to not
more than 7.82 N (798 gf), and further preferably set in the range of not less than
5.84 N (596 gf) to not more than 7.51 N (766 gf). The monofilament 22 gets entangled
and hooked with natural hair 31 of a wig wearer 30 by the deflecting force set to
the stalk 22a and the head 22b having the diameter larger than that of the stalk 22a.
[0019] As shown in FIG. 3, plural apparatuses for wearing a wig 20 thus configured are bonded
at equal intervals to the outer periphery of the inside of a wig base 27, winch composes
a wig 26 together with imitation hairs 25, by means of the adhesive layer 23 from
which the releasing sheets 24 are removed. As shown in FIG 4, the wig 26, to which
the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 is attached, is put on a desired portion of the
head with the monofilaments 22 facing the head of the wearer 30, and then, the wig
26 is lightly pressed from the outside.
[0020] The monofilaments 22 of the apparatus for wearing a wig 20, which project toward
the head from the outer periphery of the inside of the wig base 27, go into the natural
hairs 31 of the wearer 30, by putting the wig 26 on the head of the wearer 30 as shown
in FIG. 5. Then the natural hairs 31 and the monofilaments 22 get further inserted
into each other by lightly pressing the wig 26 from the outside. When the natural
hairs 31 and the monofilaments 22 get more further inserted, and hence, the natural
hairs 31 are brought into contact with the wig base 27 or the base sheet 21 of the
apparatus for wearing a wig 20, the natural hairs 31 are bent toward the lateral direction
before the monofilaments 22. Each of the monofilaments 22 is brought into contact
with or gets entangled with the head skin or the natural hairs 31 of the wearer 30
or the other monofilaments 22, whereby each of the monofilaments 22 deflects in the
direction generally parallel to the base sheet 21 or the direction in which the monofilaments
22 return toward the base sheet 21, in a U-shape or J-shape.
[0021] The monofilaments 22 that deflect and deform toward the base sheet 21 randomly get
entangled with each other, as the stalk 22a and the big head 22b on the top thereof
nip the natural hairs 31 of the wearer 30 between the stalk 22a or the head 22b of
other monofilaments 22. The head 22b having the diameter larger than the outer diameter
of the stalk 22a gets entangled and hooked with the stalk 22a and the head 22b of
other monofilaments 22, while nipping the natural hairs 31 between the big head 22b
and the other monofilaments 22. The state of the entanglement is kept by the force
that keeps this state of the entanglement, whereby the wig 26 is fixed onto the head
of the wig wearer 30.
[0022] The fixing force applied to the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 fixed onto the head
of the wig wearer 30 as described above is preferably set in the range of not less
than 1.27 N (130 gf) to not more than 1.96 N (200 gf), more preferably set in the
range of not less than 1.39 N (142 gf) to not more than 1.82 N (186 gf), and further
preferably set in the range of not less than 1.50 N (153 gf) to not more than 1.68
N (171 gf). When the fixing force is less than 1.27 N (130 gf), the entanglement between
the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 and the hairs is not sufficient, and thus the wig
is misaligned in the horizontal direction. When the fixing force exceeds 1.96 N (200
gf), the peeling force exceeds 0.98 N (100 gf), which makes it difficult to be used
by an elderly person having a weak finger strength or a person who cannot freely use
his/her fingers, thus non-preferable.
[0023] The peeling force applied to the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 in detaching the
wig 26 fixed onto the head of the wig wearer 30 as described above is preferably set
in the range of not less than 0.29 N (30 gf) to not more than 0.98 N (100 gf), more
preferably set in the range of not less than 0.46 N (47 gf) to not more than 0.89
N (91 gf), and further preferably set in the range of not less than 0.63 N (64 gf)
to not more than 0.79 N (81 gf). By setting the peeling force within the range described
above, the wig can easily be detached by an elderly person having a weak finger strength
or a person who cannot freely use his/her fingers.
EXAMPLES
[0024] Four Examples and nine Comparative Examples were prepared for the apparatus for wearing
a wig 20, and a test for attaching and detaching the wig 26 to and from the head of
the wearer was conducted with these apparatuses. The manner of the test is as follows.
Specifically, the wig 26 was actually attached and detached to evaluate the practicability,
and the flexibility of the monofilaments 22 and the peeling force of the apparatus
for wearing a wig 20 in detaching the wig 26 were measured by a tester. The peeling
force corresponds to the fixing strength in the vertical direction caused by the entanglement
between the monofilaments 22 of the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 or the hook between
the monofilaments 22 and the natural hairs of the wig wearer, i.e., the hooking force.
The fixing strength in the horizontal direction caused by the entanglement between
the monofilaments 22 of the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 or the hook between the
monofilaments 22 and the natural hairs of the wig wearer is defined as a fixing force.
FIGS. 7 to 9 show the manner of the test by the tester, wherein FIG. 7(a) and (b)
show the manner of the test for the flexibility of the monofilaments 22, and FIGS.
8 and 9 show the manner of the test of the peeling force of the monofilaments 22 in
detaching the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 using a mannequin.
(Examples 1 and 2)
[0025] The conditions described below were set for the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used
in Example 1.
- Base sheet 5 : A sheet made of synthetic resin, having a rectangular shape of 1.5
cm x 3.5 cm with thickness of 0.5 mm
- Arrangement of monofilaments 22 : Irregularly
- Film covering monofilament 22 : Provided (10µm)
- Diameter of stalk 22a of monofilament 22 : 0.3 mm
- Height of stalk 22a of monofilament 22 : 4 mm
- Diameter of head 22b of monofilament 22 : 0.5 mm
- Disposal density of monofilaments 22 : 80 pieces/cm2
The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Example 2 was the same as that of Example
1 except that the monofilaments 22 were aligned.
(Comparative Examples 1 to 4)
[0026] The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 1 was the same as
that of Example 1 except that the diameter of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22
was set to 0.6 mm, the height of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was set to 2
mm, the diameter of the head 22b of the monofilament 22 was set to 1.1 mm, the disposal
density of the monofilaments 22 was set to 40 pieces/cm
2, and the monofilaments 22 having comparatively low flexibility were used. The apparatus
for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 2 was the same as that of Example
1 except that the diameter of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was set to 0.08
mm, the height of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was set to 7 mm, the diameter
of the head 22b of the monofilament 22 was set to 0.1 mm, the disposal density of
the monofilaments 22 was set to 130 pieces/cm
2, and the monofilaments 22 having comparatively high flexibility were used. The apparatus
for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 3 was the same as that of Example
1 except that the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 was set to 130 pieces/cm
2. The apparatus used in Comparative Example 4 was the same as that of Example 1 except
that the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 was set to 40 pieces/cm
2.
(Examples 3 and 4)
[0027] The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Example 3 was the same as that of Example
1 except that the film was absent. The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Example
4 was the same as that of Example 2 except that the film was absent.
(Comparative Examples 5 to 9)
[0028] The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 5 was the same as
that of Comparative Example 1 except that the film was absent. The apparatus for wearing
a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 6 was the same as that of Comparative Example
2 except that the film was absent. The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative
Example 7 was the same as that of Comparative Example 3 except that the film was absent.
The apparatus for wearing a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 8 was the same as that
of Comparative Example 4 except that the film was absent. The apparatus for wearing
a wig 20 used in Comparative Example 9 was the same as that of Comparative Example
1 except that the thickness of the film was set to 15 µm.
[0029] The conditions in Examples 1 to 4 and Comparative Examples 1 to 9 are shown in Table
1.

[0030] As the flexibility of the monofilaments 22, the deflecting force in the vicinity
of the top and the deflecting force in the vicinity of the bottom were measured. As
shown in FIGS. 7(a) and (b), the test was carried out in such a manner that an pressure
equalizing plate 9 was placed on each test piece with its monofilaments 22 facing
upward, and pressure was applied from above the pressure equalizing plate 9 by the
tester 10 so as to measure the force when the monofilaments 22 were deflected. FIG
7(a) shows the case in which the portion in the vicinity of the bottom of the head
22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was deflected, while FIG. 7(b)
shows the case in which the portion in the vicinity of the bottom of the base of the
stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was deflected. The tester described below was used.
- Tester : Digital force gauge (DFG-1K) by Nidec-Shimpo Corporation
- Pressure equalizing plate : A plate made of synthetic resin with a weight of 1.3 g
having a size larger than the size of test pieces
[0031] The result of the test is as follows. As shown in Table 1, the force causing deflection
in the vicinity of the bottom of the head 22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament
22 was 4.01 N (409 gf), and the force causing deflection in the bottom of the base
of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 5.84 N (596 gf) in Example 1 of the present
invention. Example 1 exhibited the most satisfactory result in attaining the object
of the present invention. The force causing deflection in the vicinity of the bottom
of the head 22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 4.94 N (504
gf), and the force causing deflection in the bottom of the base of the stalk 22a of
the monofilament 22 was 7.51 N (766 gf) in Example 2 of the present invention. Example
2 exhibited the satisfactory result in attaining the object of the present invention.
[0032] Comparing to Example 1 and Example 2, the flexibility of the monofilament 22 in Comparative
Example 1 was lower than that of the monofilament 22 in Example 1 and Example 2, i.e.,
the monofilament 22 in Comparative Example 1 was more rigid. Therefore, the force
causing deflection in the vicinity of the bottom of the head 22b on the top of the
stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 6.19 N (632 gf), and the force causing deflection
in the bottom of the base of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 8.26 N (843
gf). Since the rigidity of the monofilaments 22 was too high, the monofilaments 22
might not sufficiently deflect when the monofilaments 22 were brought into contact
with the head skin of the wig wearer and thus, the monofilaments 22 might damage the
head skin. Further, the monofilaments 22 could not get sufficiently entangled with
the natural hairs, thereby entailing a problem that a predetermined fixing strength
could not be obtained. This is because the deflecting force is high, i.e., the monofilaments
22 are rigid, due to the large diameter and small height of the stalk.
[0033] The flexibility of the monofilament 22 in Comparative Example 2 was higher than that
of the monofilament 22 in Example 1 and Example 2, i.e., the monofilament 22 in Comparative
Example 2 was flexible. Therefore, the force causing deflection in the vicinity of
the bottom of the head 22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was
1.9 N (194 gf), and the force causing deflection in the bottom of the base of the
stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 3.71 N (379 gf). Since the monofilaments 22 were
too flexible, they got entangled with the natural hairs more than required. Therefore,
the peeling force in detaching the wig becomes high, whereby the wig could not be
detached easily. This is because the deflecting force is low, i.e., the monofilaments
22 are flexible, due to the small diameter and great height of the stalk.
[0034] In Comparative Example 3, the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 in Comparative
Example 1 was increased. Thus, the force causing deflection in the vicinity of the
bottom of the head 22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 7.16
N (731 gf), and the force causing deflection of the stalk 22a of the monofilament
22 was 9.25 N (944 gf). Since the flexibility was further low, i.e., more rigid than
that in Comparative Example 1, the satisfactory result could not be obtained.
[0035] In Comparative Example 4, the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 in Comparative
Example 2 was decreased. Thus, the force causing deflection in the vicinity of the
bottom of the head 22b on the top of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 was 1.56
N (159 gf), and the force causing deflection of the stalk 22a of the monofilament
22 was 3.37 N (344 gf). Since the flexibility was further high, i.e., more flexible
than that in Comparative Example 2, the satisfactory result could not be obtained.
[0036] The result of the influence given by the presence or absence of the film and the
thickness thereof to each force is as shown in Table 1. The comparison of Examples
1 and 2 and Comparative Examples 1 to 4 provided with the film and Examples 3 and
4 and Comparative Examples 5 to 8 having no film is described below.
- (1) The monofilaments were irregularly arranged both in Examples 1 and 3. However,
since Example 1 was provided with the film, a higher fixing strength could be obtained.
- (2) The monofilaments 22 were aligned in Examples 2 and 4. Therefore, the fixing strength
was lower than the same in Examples 1 and 3 in which the monofilaments were irregularly
arranged, but the fixing strength in Example 2 was 1.37 N (140 gf) and the fixing
strength in Example 4 was 1.28 N (131 gf), which were sufficient fixing strength.
- (3) In Comparative examples 1 and 5, the height of the stalk was small, and the disposal
density was low, and thus it was difficult for the monofilaments to get entangled,
the peeling force did not become 0.29 N (30 gf) or more, and the fixing force was
lower than 1.27 N (130 gf), whereby a sufficient fixing strength could not be obtained.
- (4) In Comparative examples 2 and 6, the diameter of the stalk was small, and the
disposal density was high. Therefore, the monofilaments easily get entangled with
the hairs, and thus the peeling force became not less than 0.98 N (100 gf), which
means that a strong force was necessary for detaching the apparatus. Moreover, since
the height of the stalk was large, the monofilaments were lifted up from the hairs
with the lapse of time, and hence, the apparatus is liable to be movable in the horizontal
direction together with the movement of the hairs. Therefore, the fixing strength
became not more than 1.27 N (130 gf), which means that sufficient fixing force could
not be obtained.
[0037] The film in Example 1 is in 10 µm, while the film in Comparative Example 9 is in
15 µm. Therefore, the friction coefficient increased, and thus the peeling force became
not less than 0.98 N (100 gf), which means that a strong force was needed to detach
the apparatus. Further, since the film applied on the stalk and the head was too thick,
the gap between the monofilaments to each other was reduced. Therefore, the natural
hairs could not go in between the monofilaments in attaching, but the natural hairs
were pressed by the head of the stalk, which results in that it is difficult for the
monofilaments to get entangled with the natural hairs.
[0038] The favorable order of Examples is as below.
- 1. Example 1 : "Monofilaments were irregularly arranged, and film was provided."
- 2. Example 3 : "Monofilaments were irregularly arranged, and film was not provided."
- 3. Example 2 : "Monofilaments were regularly arranged, and film was provided."
- 4. Example 4 : "Monofilaments were regularly arranged, and film was not provided."
[0039] From the result of the measurement, it was found that the deflecting force on the
top of the monofilaments of the apparatus for wearing a wig is preferably set in the
range of not less than 1.91 N (195 gf) to not more than 6.08 N (620gf), more preferably
set in the range of not less than 2.96 N (302 gf) to not more than 5.51 N (562 gf),
and further preferably set in the range of not less than 4.01 N (409 gf) to not more
than 4.94 N (504 gf). Further, it was found that the deflecting force in the vicinity
of the bottom is preferably set in the range of not less than 3.73 N (380 gf) to not
more than 8.14 N (830 gf), more preferably set in the range of not less than 4.78
N (488 gf) to not more than 7.82 N (798 gf), and further preferably set in the range
of not less than 5.84 N (596 gf) to not more than 7.51 N (766 gf).
[0040] Next, the peeling force of the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 was measured. As shown
in FIGS. 8 and 9, the test was carried out in such a manner that test pieces, respectively
having monofilaments 22 varying in height and diameter of the stalk, diameter and
shape of the head, flexibility, and disposal density, were attached to the hairs 14
of the mannequin 13 for getting the monofilaments 22 entangled with the hairs 14,
the tester 10 was coupled to test pieces in the vertical direction, and the tester
10 was pulled in the vertical direction with speed of 2 cm/second to 3 cm/second so
as to measure the maximum force in the period until test pieces are completely detached
from the hairs. The measurement was carried out five times for each test piece, and
the average value was obtained. Next, the fixing force of the apparatus for wearing
a wig 20 was measured. The test of the fixing force was carried out in the same manner
as in the test of the peeling force except that the tester was coupled to test pieces
in the horizontal direction and then pulled in the vertical direction.
[0041] The result of the test is as follows. As shown in Table 1, the peeling force in Example
1 in the present invention was 0.79 N (81 gf), which is the most satisfactory result
in attaining the object of the present invention. The peeling force in Example 2 was
0.63 N (64 gf), which is lower than the peeling force in Example 1 since the monofilaments
were aligned. However, this result was satisfactory in attaining the object of the
present invention. As shown in Table 1, the peeling force was 0.79 N (81 gf), and
the fixing force was 1.68 N (171 gf) in Example 1 provided with a film, which was
formed by applying solution. The peeling force was 0.74 N (75 gf), and the fixing
force was 1.50 N (153 gf) in Example 3 having no film, which means that the peeling
force was increased by 0.05 N (6 gf) and the fixing force was increased by 0.18 N
(18 gf) due to the application of the solution. As described above, the more satisfactory
range of the peeling force and the fixing force for attaining the object of the present
invention can be achieved by forming a film on the monofilament through the application
of the solution.
[0042] Compared to Example 1 and Example 2, the peeling forces in Comparative Example 1,
Comparative Example 3, and Comparative Example 4 were respectively 0.28 N (29 gf),
0.19 N (19 gf), and 0.21 N (21 gf), all of which were lower than those in Example
1 and Example 2. On the other hand, the peeling force in Comparative Example 6 was
0.99 N (101 gf), which was higher than those in Example 1 and Example 2.
[0043] From the result described above, when the peeling force applied to the apparatus
for wearing a wig 20 in detaching the wig from the natural hairs (hairs) 14 becomes
0.28 N (29 gf), the entanglement between the natural hairs (hairs) 14 and the monofilaments
22 is insufficient, whereby the wig on the head is easily misaligned. On the contrary,
when the peeling force applied to the apparatus for wearing a wig 20 becomes 0.99
N (101 gf) or more, the fixing strength of the wig is too strong, so that it is difficult
for an elderly person having a weak finger strength or a person who cannot freely
use his/her fingers to detach the wig. It is also found that the load more than required
is applied to the natural hairs (hairs) 14. Therefore, it is impractical when the
peeling force exceeds 0.99 N (101 gf).
[0044] From the above-mentioned result, it was found that the peeling force applied to the
apparatus for wearing a wig 20 in detaching the wig from the head of the wig wearer
is preferably set in the range of not less than 0.29 N (30 gf) to not more than 0.98
N (100 gf), more preferably set in the range of not less than 0.46 N (47 gf) to not
more than 0.89 N (91 gf), and further preferably set in the range of not less than
0.63 N (64 gf) to not more than 0.79 N (81 gf).
[0045] The disposal density of the monofilaments 22 of the apparatus for wearing a wig 20
is preferably set in the range of not less than 50 pieces/cm
2 to not more than 120 pieces/cm
2. When the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 is 130 pieces/cm
2 that exceeds 120 pieces/cm
2, the monofilaments 22 are densely arranged to reduce the gap between the monofilaments
22. Therefore, the natural hairs of the wig wearer cannot go in between the monofilaments,
whereby the fixing force is weakened, thus non-preferable. On the other hand, when
the disposal density of the monofilaments 22 is 40 pieces/cm
2 that is less than 50 pieces/cm
2, the number of the monofilaments is too small, whereby the natural hairs of the wig
wearer slip off the monofilaments 22. Therefore, the fixing force is weakened, thus
non-preferable. Accordingly, the suitable range of the disposal density of the monofilaments
22 is 50 pieces/cm
2 or more to 120 pieces/cm
2 or less.
[0046] The height of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 is preferably set in the range
of not less than 3 mm to not more than 6 mm. For example, when the height of the monofilament
22 is 7 mm that exceeds 6 mm, it is difficult for the monofilaments 22 are to closely
contact with the natural hairs or the head, and thus a great gap is formed between
the monofilaments and the natural hairs or the head. Therefore, the wig is liable
to lift up from the head, which might let other persons to notice the use of the wig.
On the contrary, when the length of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 is 2 mm that
is less than 3 mm, the length is insufficient for the monofilaments 22 to get entangled
with the natural hairs, and thus the sufficient entanglement cannot be established.
Accordingly, it is difficult to obtain a predetermined fixing strength.
[0047] The diameter of the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 is preferably set in the range
of not less than 0.1 mm to not more than 0.5 mm. For example, when the diameter of
the stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 is 0.6 mm that exceeds 0.5 mm, the rigidity of
the monofilament 22 is increased, and thus it is difficult for the monofilaments 22
to deflect. Therefore, it is difficult for the monofilaments to sufficiently get entangled
with the natural hairs of the wig wearer. On the contrary, when the diameter of the
stalk 22a of the monofilament 22 is 0.08 mm that is less than 0.1 mm, and that is
generally equal to the popular thickness of the Japanese hair, the monofilaments get
entangled with the natural hairs more than required. Therefore, the peeling force
in detaching the wig is increased, which result in that the natural hairs are pulled
to cause pain. Thus, it is not preferable.
[0048] When the diameter of the stalk 22a is less than 0.1 mm, the stalk 22a is folded due
to the long-time use, and thus the stalks get entangled with each other to reduce
the peeling force. Therefore, the predetermined fixing strength might not be obtained,
thus non-preferable. In order to prove this fact, the peeling test was repeated 100
times using Example 1, Comparative Example 1, and Comparative Example 2, and the force
before the test and the data after the test was repeated 100 times were compared.
Table 2 shows the result.
[0049]
[Table 2]
Example/ Comparative examples |
Example 1 |
Comparative example 1 |
Comparative example 2 |
Peeling force |
Before test |
0.79N(81gf) |
0.28N(29gf) |
1.20N(122gf) |
After test |
0.76N(78gf) |
0.27N(28gf) |
0.17N(17gf) |
Fixing force |
Before test |
1.68N(171gf) |
0.58N(59gf) |
1.25N(128gf) |
After test |
1.63N(166gf) |
0.54N(55gf) |
0.20N(20gf) |
Evaluation |
In attaching |
⊚ |
△ |
× |
In detaching |
⊚ |
△ |
× |
NOTE: ⊚ Excellent ○ Good △ Poor × Bad |
[0050] As shown in Table 2, in Example 1, only a very slight change was recognized, such
as from 0.79 N (81 gf) before the test to 0.76 N (78 gf), which was satisfactory result
in durability. On the other hand, in Comparative Example 2, an extreme change was
recognized, such as from 1.20 N (122 gf) to 0.17 N (17 gf), since the entanglement
between the stalks was caused due to the small diameter and large height of the stalk
22a, which means that the durability was remarkably deteriorated. On the contrary,
in Comparative Example 1, only a slight change was recognized, such as from 0.28 N
(29 gf) to 0.27 N (28 gf), since the diameter of the stalk 22a was large and the height
thereof was small. However, this test piece originally has a very small peeling force,
which means that the entanglement with the natural hairs is insufficient, which result
in that it cannot be put to practical use as described above. Accordingly, the diameter
and height affect durability, and thus the stalk 22a are required to be set to a predetermined
diameter and height.
INDUSTRIAL APPLICABILITY
[0051] According to the present invention, a wig can surely be worn on a head only by lightly
pressing the wig, which is put on the head of a wig wearer, from above, and a strong
force is not needed in detaching the wig. Therefore, the present invention can provide
an apparatus for wearing a wig suitable for use by an elderly person having weak finger
strength or a person who cannot freely use his/her fingers.