[0001] A process for stripping solvent from solvent-laden fibers in a solution-spun fiber
web is disclosed.
Background
[0002] The process of solution spinning involves dissolving a desired polymer into a suitable
solvent, and spinning fibers from the polymer/solvent solution. Often, the solvent
is an organic solvent which has undesirable properties in use of the so-formed fabric,
such as adverse health effects, undesired odor and the like.
[0003] Solution spinning processes are frequently used to manufacture fibers and nonwoven
fabrics, and in some cases have the advantage of high throughputs, such that the fibers
or fabrics can be made in large, commercially viable quantities.
[0004] In paper making processes, such as those disclosed in
U.S. Patent Nos. 3,503,134 and
6,986,830, dewatering of the wet laid cellulose fibers which form the paper is performed by
passing the wet laid cellulose web over a vacuum-assisted porous drum, and the excess
water from the forming process is drawn through and away from the paper web.
U.S. Patent 3,503,134 discloses the use of hot air, superheated steam or a steam-air mix to enhance the
drying effect of the vacuum assist.
U.S. Patent No. 6,986.830 discloses positioning the wet laid paper web between two soft, porous cloth webs,
wherein the porous cloths on either side of the paper web pull additional water from
the paper by capillary action.
[0005] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2002/0092423 discloses a solution spinning process for forming a nonwoven polymer web, in particular
an electrospinning process, wherein polymeric microfibers or nanofibers are produced
from a polymer solution exiting an electrically-charged rotating emitter and directed
toward a grounded collector grid. The solvent is evaporated from the fibers "in flight"
between the emitter and the collector grid.
[0006] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2004/016143 discloses a process for drying/heat-treating nonwoven webs in which the web is partially
dried under tension in a first drying zone and further heat treated under low tension
or in a substantially tensionless state a second drying zone. The process significantly
reduces the occurrence of stretch-type defects in the nonwoven webs.
[0007] Fine diameter fibers, namely nanofibers having diameters in the range from several
hundred nanometers down to only a few nanometers, are known from International Publication
Number
WO2003/080905.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0008] In a first embodiment, the invention is a process for stripping chemically bonded
spinning solvent from a solution-spun nonwoven web comprising the steps of providing
a nonwoven web comprising solvent-laden polymeric fibers having average fiber diameters
of less than about 1 micrometer, and transporting the nonwoven web through at least
one infrared solvent stripping station wherein infrared radiation irradiates the nonwoven
web in the absence of a solvent stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web in order
to reduce the solvent concentration of the fibers to less than 1,000 ppmw.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0009] The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this
specification, illustrate the presently contemplated embodiments of the invention
and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Fig. 1 is a schematic of a prior art electroblowing apparatus for preparing a nanofiber
web according to the invention.
Fig. 2 is a schematic of an infrared solvent stripping station according to the present
invention.
Fig. 3 is a schematic of a fluid/vacuum solvent stripping station according to the
present invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0010] The present invention relates to solvent-spun webs and fabrics for a variety of customer
end-use applications, such as filtration media, energy storage separators, protective
apparel and the like, including at least one nanofiber layer, and a process for removing
excess spinning solvent from the solution-spun nanofiber webs or fabrics.
[0011] There is a need for fibrous products made from a wide variety of polymers to suit
various customer end-use needs. Many polymeric fibers and webs can be formed from
melt spinning processes, such as spun bonding and melt blowing. However, the ability
to use melt spinning is limited to spinning fibers from polymers which are melt processable,
i.e. those which can be softened or melted and flow at elevated temperatures. Still,
in many end-uses, it is desirable to utilize polymers which are not melt process able
to form fibrous materials, fabrics and webs. In order to form these non-melt-processable
polymers into fibrous materials, the technique of solution spinning is used. Also,
solution spinning of melt process able polymers can sometimes form fibrous materials,
fabrics and webs with different characteristics.
[0012] As discussed above, solution spinning processes, such as wet spinning, dry spinning,
flash spinning, electrospinning and electroblowing, involve dissolving a desired polymer
into a suitable solvent, and spinning fibers from the polymer/solvent solution. Often,
the solvent is an organic solvent which has undesirable properties in use of the so-formed
fabric, such as adverse health effects, undesired odor and the like.
[0013] Unfortunately, when solution spinning large quantities of fabric at high throughput
through the spinning dies, such as to form nonwoven webs having basis weights of greater
than about 2 grams/square meter (gsm), significant quantities of residual solvent
can be entrained in the collected fabrics or fibers, due to either or both of high
physical or chemical affinities of the solvent for the polymer so spun, and the lack
of sufficient time or space between fiber formation and fiber collection for complete
evaporation of the spinning solvent. In many cases, the solvents used in the solution
spinning processes demonstrate various levels of toxicity, or present negative environmental
effects or cause adverse chemical reactions in particular end-uses. As such, it is
preferred to remove as much residual solvent from the solution spun fibrous materials
as possible.
[0014] In conventional nonwoven fabric spinning processes, the fabric is spun and wound
into a large roll in an essentially continuous operation, such that even if the solvent
were amenable to evaporation upon sitting, only the solvent entrained in the fabric
on the outside of the roll is effectively evaporated, since the underlying fabric
within the roll is not exposed to the atmosphere. Detrimentally, even if the fabric
were to be provided sufficient time in the unrolled state to permit the spinning solvent
to evaporate, an exceedingly long area would be necessary to provide room for the
unrolled fabric, and recovery of the evaporated solvent would be difficult and expensive.
It would be desirable to strip the unwanted solvent from the fibers or fabric during
the production process, prior to shipping to the customer.
[0015] Solvent removal is often complicated by the fact that any particular polymer/solvent
spinning system is chosen based upon a strong affinity of the solvent for the polymer,
in order to effect complete dissolution of the polymer in the solvent during the spinning
operation. In some cases, the fiber polymer is swollen by the solvent; i.e. the solvent
molecules are absorbed and dispersed within the polymeric fibers. In other cases the
solvent chemically bonds to the polymer molecules making up the fiber, such as by
hydrogen bonding, Van der Waals forces, or even ionically via salt formation.
[0016] In some conventional solvent spinning processes, such as dry spinning, removal of
high affinity solvents is accomplished by spinning the fibers into a hot gas "chimney"
of as much as 30 feet (9 metres) in length, and passing high temperature gas (as high
as 500°C) through the chimney to drive off the unwanted solvent. As can be imagined,
this process involves an expensive apparatus and is an energy-intensive process.
[0017] It has been discovered that one manner of enhancing unwanted solvent removal from
solution spun fibers is to reduce the diameter of the fibers themselves, since the
diffusion de-volatilization mechanisms follow a 1/diameter
2 relationship. That is, entrained solvent will diffuse more readily out of fibers
having smaller diameters than out of fibers having larger diameters. According to
the present invention, it is preferred that solution spun fibers have diameters less
than about 1 micrometer (nanofibers) to optimize the diffusion de-volatilization mechanism
of solvent removal.
[0018] The term "nanofibers" refers to fibers having diameters varying from a few tens of
nanometers up to several hundred nanometers, but generally less than about one micrometer,
even less than about 0.8 micrometer, and even less than about 0.5 micrometer.
[0019] The solution spun fabrics and webs to be subjected to the process of the present
invention include at least one layer of polymeric nanofibers. The nanofibers have
average fiber diameters of less than about 1 µm, preferably between about 0.1 µm and
about 1 µm, and high enough basis weights to satisfy a variety of commercial end-uses,
such as for air/liquid filtration media, energy storage separators, protective apparel
and the like.
[0020] The process for making commercial quantities and basis weights of nanofiber layer(s)
is disclosed in International Publication Number
WO2003/080905. Figure 1 is a schematic diagram of an electroblowing apparatus useful for carrying
out the process of the present invention using electroblowing (or "electro-blown spinning")
as described in International Publication Number
WO2003/080905. This prior art electroblowing method comprises feeding a solution of a polymer in
a solvent from mixing chamber 100, through a spinning beam 102, to a spinning nozzle
104 to which a high voltage is applied, while compressed gas is directed toward the
polymer solution in a blowing gas stream 106 as it exits the nozzle to form nanofibers,
and collecting the nanofibers into a web on a grounded collector 110 under vacuum
created by vacuum chamber 114 and blower 112.
[0021] The moving collection apparatus is preferably a moving collection belt positioned
within the electrostatic field between the spinning beam 102 and the collector 110.
After being collected the nanofiber layer is directed to and wound onto a wind-up
roll on the downstream side of the spinning beam. Optionally, the nanofiber web can
be deposited onto any of a variety of porous scrim materials arranged on the moving
collection belt 110, such as spunbonded nonwovens, meltblown nonwovens, needle punched
nonwovens, woven fabrics, knit fabrics, apertured films, paper and combinations thereof.
[0022] Due to the high throughput of the electroblowing apparatus, typically between about
0.1 to 5 mL/hole/min, and the large number of spinning nozzles (holes) 104 distributed
across the spinning beam 102, a single nanofiber layer having a basis weight of between
about 2 g/m
2 and about 100 g/m
2, even between about 10 g/m
2 and about 90 g/m
2, and even between about 20 g/m
2 and about 70 g/m
2, as measured on a dry basis, i.e., after the residual solvent has evaporated or been
removed, can be made by depositing nanofibers from a single spinning beam in a single
pass of the moving collection apparatus. However, also due to the high throughput
of the process, significant quantities of residual spinning solvent, especially those
solvents with strong affinities for the fiber polymers, can remain in the nanofiber
webs so-formed.
[0023] It has been discovered that reducing fiber diameter, even to below 1 micrometer,
or even to below about 0.8 micrometer, or even below about 0.5 micrometer, is alone
insufficient to reduce or eliminate residual solvent from the nanofiber web merely
by vacuum-assisted collection.
[0024] Accordingly, the infrared solvent stripping process and apparatus of the present
invention, Fig. 2, which is disposed downstream of the collection belt 110 of the
prior art apparatus (Fig. 1), acts to effect reduction or elimination of unwanted
residual solvent from solution spinning processes in a continuous manner, prior to
wind-up of the fabric or web. Alternatively, the infrared solvent stripping process
and apparatus of the present invetion can be used "off-line" or in a separate process
after the as-spun nanofiber web has been collected.
[0025] The infrared solvent stripping apparatus comprises an optional continuous moving
belt 14 for supporting the solvent spun nanofiber web and its optional supporting
scrim 10 and directing it through one or more infrared solvent stripping stations
11, each of which comprise an infrared radiation source 12. The infrared solvent stripping
stations 11 can be positioned on either or both sides of the plane of the solvent
spun nanofiber web. Fig. 2 shows two infrared solvent stripping stations 11 on opposite
sides of the plane of the solvent spun nanofiber web.
[0026] U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2008/0146698 describes a process for using infrared solvent stripping stations in the presence
of a solvent stripping fluid impinging on a nonwoven web. In contrast, the present
invention does not utilize a fluid producing device or a vacuum source to impinge
the nonwoven with solvent stripping fluid during the solvent stripping step.
[0027] Without wishing to be bound by theory, it is believed that the presence of a stripping
fluid, even when heated, can cool the nonwoven web making solvent removal more difficult.
In order to counteract this effect, either more infrared energy must be applied or
a higher temperature solvent stripping fluid must be employed. Also, as the infrared
energy is increased or the temperature of the solvent stripping fluid is increased,
the risk of thermally degrading the polymer is increased.
[0028] Unexpectedly, it was discovered that using no solvent stripping fluid impinging on
the nonwoven web was about as effective or better at removing solvent as using a solvent
stripping fluid, as disclosed in
U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2008/0146698. Thus, the present invention eliminates the cost of providing and heating a solvent
stripping fluid.
[0029] Utilizing infrared radiation without solvent stripping fluid impinging the nonwoven,
it is possible to reduce the solvent concentration in the fiber polymer to less than
1000 ppmw, or even less than 300 ppmw. The infrared (IR) radiation source can be either
a medium wavelength (1.5-5.6 microns) or a short wavelength (0.72-1.5 microns) source,
and can be varied in intensity to heat the solvent-laden nanofiber webs to temperatures
up to just below the decomposition temperature of the web polymer. We have found that
suitable web temperatures can vary from about 120 °C to as high as about 340 °C, without
decomposition of the web polymer, depending upon the residence time of web exposure
to the IR source.
[0030] Polymer/solvent combinations which can benefit from the present invention are those
in which the polymer exhibits a strong affinity for the solvent, particularly those
in which chemical bonding occurs between the polymer and the solvent, such as hydrogen
bonding and the like. Some combinations of polymer/solvent which are difficult to
separate are polyamide/formic acid and polyvinyl alcohol/water.
[0031] Depending on the affinity of the particular spinning solvent for the fiber polymer,
it may be advantageous to incorporate more than one infrared solvent stripping station
into the solvent stripping apparatus, so as to reduce the residual solvent concentration
in multiple steps In addition, a fluid/vacuum solvent stripping station, as disclosed
in
U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2008/0146698, can also be used.
[0032] A fluid/vaccum solvent stripping process and apparatus, Fig. 3, can be disposed downstream
of the collection belt 110 of the prior art apparatus (Fig. 1) and disposed either
before or after the infrared solvent stripping apparatus, which can further act to
effect reduction or elimination of unwanted residual solvent from solution spinning
processes in a continuous manner, prior to wind-up of the fabric or web.
[0033] The fluid/vacuum solvent stripping apparatus comprises an optional continuous moving
belt 14 for supporting the solvent spun nanofiber web and its optional supporting
scrim 10 and directing it through one or more solvent stripping stations 20, each
of which comprise a fresh solvent stripping fluid heating apparatus 16, disposed on
one side of the moving belt 14, and a vacuum apparatus 18, disposed on the opposite
side of moving belt 14. The fresh solvent stripping fluid 17, typically air, is impinged
upon the moving solution spun web, and the vacuum apparatus helps to draw the stripping
fluid through the solution spun web to effect solvent stripping. Preferably, a spent
solvent stripping fluid collector (not shown) is disposed downstream of the vacuum
apparatus to scrub the excess spinning solvent from the spent stripping fluid for
recycling or disposal. The temperature, vacuum pressure and even the fresh solvent
stripping fluid itself can be individually controlled within each solvent stripping
station.
EXAMPLES
[0034] The examples below were prepared from a polymer solution having a concentration of
24 wt% of nylon 6,6 polymers, Zytel® FE3218 (available from E. I. du Pont de Nemours
and Company, Wilmington, Delaware) dissolved in formic acid solvent at 99% purity
(available from Kemira Oyj, Helsinki, Finland) that was electroblown to form a nonwoven
web containing some residual solvent.
[0035] The residual formic acid content in the nonwoven sheets of nylon was determined using
standard wet chemistry techniques and ion chromatography analysis. In a typical determination,
a sample of known mass was placed in caustic solution. An aliquot of the resulting
solution was analyzed by ion chromatography and the area under the peak corresponding
to neutralized formic acid (formate anion) was proportional to the quantity of formic
acid in the sample.
Comparative Example A
[0036] Comparative Example A was prepared as set forth above and was transported into a
fluid/vacuum solvent stripping station on a moving porous screen. A solvent stripping
fluid of air at a temperature of 120°C was impinged onto the nonwoven web from one
side while a vacuum was applied to the other side of the nonwoven web. The vacuum
was measured at approximately 180 mm H
2O. The air pressure and the vacuum were coupled to yield a near constant atmospheric
pressure in the solvent stripping station. The nonwoven web remained in the solvent
stripping station for 4.3 seconds. The nonwoven web was not subjected to the solvent
stripping process of the present invention. The final solvent level was 1820 ppm measured
prior to preparing Comparative Example B and Example 1.
Comparative Example B
[0037] Comparative Example B was prepared in the same manner as Comparative Example A except
it was additionally transported through an infrared solvent stripping station with
solvent stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web, according to the process of
U.S. Published Patent Application No. 2008/0146698. This stripping station consisted of a stainless steel belt, a windup station, an
infrared heater, a stationary vacuum source located beneath the belt below the infrared
heater and two sources of heated air, one impinging normal to the nonwoven web before
the infrared heater and one impinging normal to the nonwoven web after the infrared
heater. The infrared heater was a Radiant Energy heater, a 3 phase shortwave heater,
rated at 12 kW at 240 volts, and was set at a level high enough to heat the web to
180 °C. Hot air at a temperature of 100°C was swept above the web. A vacuum source
was located on the opposite side of the nonwoven web from the infrared heaters with
a vacuum of 114.3 mm H
2O. The web was fed through the dryer at a speed 1.016 meters per minute, corresponding
to a total residence time of approximately 15 seconds. The sheet temperature in the
oven was measured to be on average 153°C. The final solvent level was 1431 ppm.
Example 1
[0038] Example 1 was prepared in the same manner as Comparative Example A except it was
additionally transported through an infrared solvent stripping station without solvent
stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web. The stripping station consisted of
a stainless steel belt, a windup station and an infrared heater. The infrared heater
was a Radiant Energy heater, a 3 phase shortwave heater, rated at 12 kW at 240 volts,
and was set at a level high enough to heat the web to 180 °C. No impingement fluid
was utilized on either side of the web. The web was fed below the heater at a rate
of 1.016 meters per minute, resulting in a residence time of 15 seconds. The final
solvent level was 696 ppm.
[0039] Comparative Example A shows the effect of a fluid/vacuum solvent stripping station
with solvent stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web, which removed residual
solvent to levels suitable for some commercial uses.
[0040] Comparative Example B shows the effect of an infrared based solvent stripping with
solvent stripping fluid impingement on the nonwoven web, which removed additional
residual solvent.
[0041] Example 1 shows the effect of an infrared based solvent stripping without solvent
stripping fluid impingement on the nonwoven web, which removed additional residual
solvent to an extremely low residual solvent level in the nonwoven web.
Comparative Example C
[0042] Comparative Example C was prepared as set forth as in the Examples section above
and was transported into a fluid/vacuum solvent stripping station on a moving porous
screen. A solvent stripping fluid of air at a temperature of 65°C was impinged onto
the nonwoven web from one side while a vacuum was applied to the other side of the
nonwoven web. The vacuum was measured at approximately 100 mm H
2O. The air pressure and the vacuum were coupled to yield a near constant atmospheric
pressure in the solvent stripping station. The nonwoven web remained in the solvent
stripping station for 20 seconds. The nonwoven web was not subjected to the solvent
stripping process of the present invention. The final solvent level was 7501 ppm.
Comparative Examples D, E and F
[0043] Comparative Examples D, E and F were prepared in the same manner as Comparative Example
C except they were additionally transported through an infrared solvent stripping
zone with solvent stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web. This additional step
consisted in transporting the web through a floatation dryer. The dryer consists of
three sections composed of two banks of infrared heaters each, both above and below
the web. The infrared heaters used were Radplane Series 80 Heaters rated at 31.4 kW,
480 volts, 1 phase, medium wavelength available from GlenRo. Hot air at a temperature
of 49°C, 107°C and 205°C, for Comparative Examples D, E and F respectively, was swept
above and below the web countercurrent to the web motion. The web was fed through
the dryer at a speed of 12.2 meters per minute, corresponding to a total residence
time of approximately 12 seconds. The final solvent levels were 2624 ppm, 596 ppm
and 235 ppm, respectively.
Example 2
[0044] Example 2 was prepared in the same manner as Comparative Example C except it was
additionally transported through an infrared solvent stripping station without solvent
stripping fluid impinging on the nonwoven web. This additional step consisted in transporting
the web through a floatation dryer. The dryer consists of three sections composed
of two banks of infrared heaters each, both above and below the web. The infrared
heaters used were Radplane Series 80 Heaters rated at 31.4 kW, 480 volts, 1 phase,
medium wavelength available from GlenRo. Unlike Comparative Examples D, E and F, hot
air was not swept above and below the web countercurrent to the web motion. The web
was fed through the dryer at a speed of 12.2 meters per minute, corresponding to a
total residence time of approximately 12 seconds. The final solvent levels were 337
ppm.
[0045] Comparative Examples D, E and F show the effect of an infrared based solvent stripping
with solvent stripping fluid impingement on the nonwoven web, which removed additional
residual solvent. The amount of residual solvent removed is strongly dependent on
the temperature of the solvent stripping fluid.
[0046] Example 2 shows the effect of an infrared based solvent stripping without solvent
stripping fluid impingement on the nonwoven web, which removed additional residual
solvent to an extremely low residual solvent level in the nonwoven web. The residual
solvent level in the material was almost as low as for Comparative Example F, but
the possibility of having polymer degradation was significantly reduced when not using
the hot stripping fluid. The data from Comparative Examples D, E and F and Example
2 are summarized in Table 1,
Table 1
| Sample |
Speed |
Blower Output |
Air Temperature |
FA |
| |
m/min |
% |
°C |
ppm |
| Comparative Example C |
- |
- |
- |
7501 |
| Comparative Example D |
12.2 |
75 |
49 |
2624 |
| Comparative Example E |
12.2 |
75 |
107 |
596 |
| Comparative Example F |
12.2 |
75 |
205 |
235 |
| Example 2 |
12.2 |
Off |
- |
373 |
[0047] These examples demonstrate that the infrared based solvent stripping station of the
present invention can prepare a solution spun nonwoven web that is substantially free
of spinning solvent.