Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a cut design of ornamental diamond and, more particularly,
to a novel cut design allowing a viewer of a diamond to sense more beauty.
Background Art
[0002] Diamond is cut for use in ornamentation to obtain a brilliant diamond and accessory
and there are the round brilliant cut ornamental diamond and accessory of a 58-faceted
body.
[0003] Mathematician Tolkowsky proposed a cut believed to be ideal, as a design to enhance
brilliance of the round brilliant cut ornamental diamond, which has the pavilion angle
of 40.75°, the crown angle of 34.50°, and the table diameter of 53% of the girdle
diameter. A design developed from it is one called the GIA (Gemological Institute
of America) system.
[0004] The inventors conducted study on cuts to enhance brilliance of ornamental diamonds
and proposed in Patent Document 1, the cut design wherein the pavilion angle p was
between 45° and 37.5° both inclusive and the crown angle (c) fell within the range
of -3.5×p + 163.6 ≥ c ≥ -3.8333×p + 174.232, as one permitting a viewer who views
a round brilliant cut diamond from above the table facet thereof, to simultaneously
view light emerging from the crown facets after incidence into the crown facets, light
emerging from the crown facets after incidence into the table facet, and light emerging
from the table facet after incidence into the crown facets. In the cut design, the
center value of the pavilion angle p is 38.5° and that of the crown angle (c) is 27.92°.
Since the round brilliant cut diamonds are designed with emphasis on the brilliance
of the crown facets as well as the brilliance of the table facet, the diameter of
the table facet is from 40 to 60% of that of the girdle, and it is from 33 to 60%
in the diamond proposed before by the inventors.
[0005] The brilliance of an ornamental diamond is sensed by a viewer in such a manner that
light is incident from the outside into the diamond and the incident light is reflected
inside the diamond to reach the viewer. The degree of brilliance of a diamond is determined
by a quantity of the reflected light from the diamond. The quantity of reflected light
is usually evaluated by a physical quantity of reflected light.
[0006] The human perception, however, is not determined by the physical quantity of reflected
light only. For letting a viewer sense beauty of a diamond, the diamond needs to provide
a large quantity of light to be sensed by the viewer, i.e., a large quantity of physiologically
or psychologically visually-perceived reflected light. There are the Fechner's law
and Stevens' law as to the quantity of light perceived by humans (cf. Non-patent Document
1). The Fechner's law states that the quantity of visually-perceived light is the
logarithm of the physical quantity of light. When the Stevens' law is applied on the
assumption that a light source is a point light source, the quantity of visually-perceived
light is the square root of the physical quantity of light. Based on either of the
Fechner's and Stevens' laws, many conclusions are considered to be substantially identical
without significant error though they are quantitatively different. Then the inventors
adopted the Stevens' law to evaluate the quantity of reflected light from the diamond
and thereby to determine the quantity of visually-perceived light, and evaluated the
brilliance of diamond, based on the quantity of visually-perceived reflected light
in the case of the visually-perceived light being the reflected light. We proposed
in Patent Document 2 that the quantity of reflected light from the diamond, though
it must be different depending upon illumination conditions, was to be evaluated in
such a practical condition that incident light to be blocked by the viewer and incident
light coming from sufficiently far distances were excluded from incident light from
a planar light source with uniform luminance and the quantity of effective visually-perceived
reflected light was evaluated using reflection of the remaining incident light, and
also proposed a design of brilliant cut diamond capable of increasing the quantity
of effective visually-perceived reflected light.
Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent No. 3,643,541
Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. 2003-310318
Non-patent Document 1: "Shichikaku" 2000, pp10-12, authored by Takao Matsuda and published by BAIFUKAN CO.,
LTD
Disclosure of the Invention
Problem to be Solved by the Invention
[0007] We studied how to further increase the quantity of effective visually-perceived reflected
light by modifying the round brilliant cut design of diamond and accomplished the
present invention. It is thus an object of the present invention to provide an ornamental
diamond having a two-stage pavilion with numerous reflection patterns, which allows
a viewer to sense extreme brightness when the diamond is viewed from above the table
facet and crown facets thereof.
Means for Solving the Problem
[0008] An ornamental diamond having a two-stage pavilion according to the present invention
comprises: a girdle of a round or polygonal shape having an upper horizontal section
surrounded by an upper periphery and, a lower horizontal section surrounded by a lower
periphery and being parallel to the upper horizontal section; a crown of a substantially
polygonal frustum formed above the upper horizontal section of the girdle and upward
from the girdle, the crown having a table facet of a regular octagon which forms a
top surface of the polygonal frustum; and a pavilion of a substantially polygonal
pyramid formed below the lower horizontal section of the girdle and downward from
the girdle and having a bottom apex. The pavilion comprises a first pavilion and a
second pavilion separated by a horizontal division plane parallel to the lower horizontal
section of the girdle.
[0009] The crown has eight bezel facets, eight star facets, and sixteen upper girdle facets,
as well as the table facet. The first pavilion has eight first pavilion main facets
and sixteen first lower girdle facets. The second pavilion has eight second pavilion
main facets and sixteen second lower girdle facets.
[0010] In the diamond of the present invention, a Z-axis is defined along a straight line
extending from the bottom apex of the polygonal pyramid pavilion through a center
of the table facet; first planes are defined as planes including the Z-axis and passing
eight respective vertexes of the table facet; an X-axis is defined along a straight
line passing a point where a first plane intersects with the girdle lower periphery,
and being perpendicular to the Z-axis; a Y-axis is defined along a straight line passing
a point where a first plane perpendicular to the Z-axis and the X-axis intersects
with the girdle lower periphery, and being perpendicular to the Z-axis and the X-axis;
and second planes are defined as planes each of which includes the Z-axis and bisects
an angle between two adjacent first planes.
[0011] In the crown, each bezel facet is a quadrilateral plane whose opposite vertexes are
a vertex of the table facet and a point where a first plane passing the mentioned
vertex intersects with the girdle upper periphery, and the quadrilateral plane has
the other two opposite vertexes on respective adjacent second planes and shares a
vertex out of the other two opposite vertexes with an adjacent bezel facet. Each star
facet is an isosceles triangle composed of the base of a side of the table facet and
the vertex shared by two adjacent bezel facets whose vertexes are at the two ends
of the base. Each upper girdle facet is a triangle composed of one side intersecting
at one end with the girdle upper periphery, out of the sides of each bezel facet,
and a point where a second plane passing the other end of the side intersects with
the girdle upper periphery.
[0012] In the first pavilion, each first pavilion main facet is an isosceles triangle having
the vertex at a point where a first plane intersects with the girdle lower periphery
and having the base perpendicular to the first plane, on the horizontal division plane.
Each first lower girdle facet is a quadrilateral plane surrounded by a portion of
the girdle lower periphery between a first plane and a second plane adjacent to each
other, an oblique side of the isosceles triangle of the first pavilion main facet
having the vertex on the first plane, a side on the second plane passing an end point
on the second plane of the portion of the girdle lower periphery, and a side on the
horizontal division plane passing a bottom vertex of the isosceles triangle.
[0013] In the second pavilion, each second pavilion main facet is a pentagonal plane having
a vertex at the bottom apex of the pavilion and the base which is common to the base
of the isosceles triangle of a first pavilion main facet, and being symmetric with
respect to a first plane, and the pentagonal plane has the other vertexes on respective
adjacent second planes and shares one side and two vertexes with a second pavilion
main facet adjacent thereto. Each second lower girdle facet is a triangle sharing
a vertex of a second pavilion main facet present on a second plane, an end of the
base of the second pavilion main facet, and a side of the second pavilion main facet
having the vertex and end as ends thereof, with the second main facet, and composed
of the mentioned side and a side of a first lower girdle facet on the horizontal division
plane, and shares a side on the second plane with an adjacent second lower girdle
facet.
[0014] In the ornamental diamond having the two-stage pavilion according to the present
invention, a first pavilion angle (p1) between the first pavilion main facet and the
lower horizontal section of the girdle is from 40° to 47°; in a graph with the first
pavilion angle (p1) on the horizontal axis and a crown angle (c) between the bezel
facet and the lower horizontal section of the girdle on the vertical axis, the crown
angle (c) falls within a region between a straight line connecting two points where
(p1, c) is (40, 27.8) and (47, 8.9) and a straight line connecting two points where
(p1, c) is (40, 32.8) and (47, 15.0); in a graph with the first pavilion angle (p1)
on the horizontal axis and a second pavilion angle (p2) between the second pavilion
main facet and the lower horizontal section of the girdle on the vertical axis, the
second pavilion angle (p2) falls within a region between two straight lines, one connecting
two points where (p1, p2) is (40, 36.7) and (44, 37.0) and the other connecting two
points where (p1, p2) is (44, 37.0) and (47, 38.1), and a straight line connecting
two points where (p1, p2) is (40, 38.7) and (47, 41.3).
[0015] When an X-axis coordinate of a point where the girdle lower periphery intersects
with the X-axis is 2.0, an X-axis coordinate (del) of a vertex of the regular octagon
of the table facet present on the X-axis is from 0.9 to 1.2.
Effect of the Invention
[0016] A reflection rating index of the ornamental diamond with the two-stage pavilion of
the present invention is far greater than that of the excellent-grade round brilliant
cut diamond, 400.
[0017] The number of reflection patterns of the ornamental diamond with the two-stage pavilion
of the present invention is nearly double that of the excellent-grade round brilliant
cut diamond, 67, and larger than that of the round brilliant cut diamond proposed
before by the inventors, 85.
[0018] As described above, the ornamental diamond with the two-stage pavilion of the present
invention shows the greater brilliance of reflection and the larger number of reflection
patterns than the conventional ones and is thus excellent for ornamental use.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0019]
Fig. 1 is a plan view of an ornamental diamond having a two-stage pavilion according
to the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a side view of the ornamental diamond having the two-stage pavilion according
to the present invention.
Fig. 3 is a bottom view of the ornamental diamond having the two-stage pavilion according
to the present invention.
Fig. 4 is an explanatory sectional view in the ZX plane of the ornamental diamond
with the two-stage pavilion shown in Figs. 1, 2, and 3.
Fig. 5 is a graph of first pavilion angle on the horizontal axis versus crown angle
on the vertical axis to show a region of the crown angle and first pavilion angle
in the ornamental diamond with the two-stage pavilion according to the present invention.
Fig. 6 is a graph of first pavilion angle on the horizontal axis versus second pavilion
angle on the vertical axis to show a region of the second pavilion angle and first
pavilion angle in the ornamental diamond with the two-stage pavilion according to
the present invention.
Fig. 7 is a graph showing a relation of reflection rating index and crown angle of
ornamental diamonds with the two-stage pavilion according to the present invention,
using the first pavilion angle as a parameter.
Fig. 8 is a graph showing a relation of reflection rating index and second pavilion
angle of ornamental diamonds with the two-stage pavilion according to the present
invention, using the first pavilion angle as a parameter.
Fig. 9 is a drawing showing reflection patterns of the ornamental diamond with the
two-stage pavilion according to the present invention.
Fig. 10 is a drawing showing reflection patterns of a conventional excellent-grade
round brilliant cut diamond.
Fig. 11 is a drawing showing reflection patterns of the round brilliant cut diamond
proposed before in Patent Document 1 by the inventors.
List of Reference Symbols
[0020]
- 100
- diamond
- 102
- first planes
- 104
- second planes
- 110
- crown
- 112
- table facet
- 114
- bezel facets
- 116
- star facets
- 118
- upper girdle facets
- 120
- girdle
- 122
- upper periphery
- 124
- upper horizontal section
- 126
- lower periphery
- 128
- lower horizontal section
- 130
- pavilion
- 132
- first pavilion
- 134
- horizontal division plane
- 136
- first pavilion main facets
- 138
- first lower girdle facets
- 142
- second pavilion
- 146
- second pavilion main facets
- 148
- second lower girdle facets
Best Mode for Carrying out the Invention
Structure of Diamond Having Two-stage Pavilion
[0021] Figs. 1 to 3 are drawings to show the appearance of a diamond 100 having a two-stage
pavilion according to the present invention and Fig. 4 is an explanatory sectional
view thereof, wherein Fig. 1 is a plan view, Fig. 2 a side view, and Fig. 3 a bottom
view. The top surface of the diamond 100 herein is a table facet 112 of a regular
octagon, and a girdle 120 is of a round or polygonal shape and is located between
an upper horizontal section 124 surrounded by a girdle upper periphery 122 and, a
lower horizontal section 128 surrounded by a girdle lower periphery 126 and being
parallel to the upper horizontal section 124. There is a crown 110 of a substantially
polygonal frustum formed above the girdle upper horizontal section 124 and upward
from the girdle 120, and the table facet 112 of the regular octagon forms the top
surface of the polygonal frustum. There is a pavilion 130 of a substantially octagonal
pyramid formed below the girdle lower horizontal section 128 and downward from the
girdle 120 and there is a portion called a culet at a center bottom apex G thereof.
In the periphery of the crown 110 there are usually eight bezel facets 114, eight
star facets 116 formed between the periphery of the table and the bezel facets 114,
and sixteen upper girdle facets 118 formed between the girdle 120 and the bezel facets
114. The pavilion 130 has a horizontal division plane 134 parallel to the girdle lower
horizontal section 128, approximately at the middle of the height thereof and it separates
the pavilion 130 into a first pavilion 132 above the horizontal division plane 134
and a second pavilion 142 below the horizontal division plane 134. In the periphery
of the first pavilion 132 there are eight first pavilion main facets 136 formed, and
sixteen first lower girdle facets 138 formed between the girdle 120 and the first
pavilion main facets 136. The outer surface of the girdle 120 is perpendicular to
the table facet 112. The second pavilion 142 has eight second pavilion main facets
146 and sixteen second lower girdle facets 148 in the periphery thereof.
[0022] Let us define a Z-axis along a straight line extending from the bottom apex G of
the octagonal pyramid pavilion 130 through the center of the table facet, first planes
102 as planes including the Z-axis and passing the respective vertexes of the octagon
of the table facet, and second planes 104 as planes each passing the Z-axis and bisecting
an angle between two adjacent first planes 102.
[0023] For convenience' sake of description, as shown in Figs. 1 to 4, orthogonal coordinate
axes (right-hand system) are set in the diamond 100 and the Z-axis thereof is made
coincident with the aforementioned straight line (Z-axis) extending from the bottom
apex G of the octagonal pyramid pavilion through the center of the table facet. The
X-axis is defined along a straight line passing a point where a first plane 102 intersects
with the girdle lower periphery 126, and being perpendicular to the Z-axis, and the
Y-axis is defined along a straight line perpendicular to the Z-axis and the X-axis.
The origin O of the X-axis, Y-axis, and Z-axis is located at the center of the girdle
lower horizontal section 128. The diamond 100 has eightfold symmetry around the Z-axis
and the Z-axis is perpendicular to the table facet 112, the girdle upper horizontal
section 124, the girdle lower horizontal section 128, and the pavilion horizontal
division plane 134. In Fig. 4 the Y-axis is not depicted because it is directed from
the origin O into the far side of the drawing.
[0024] The first planes are the ZX plane, the YZ plane, and planes obtained by rotating
those planes by 45° around the Z-axis, and are denoted by 102 in Figs. 1 and 3. The
second planes are planes obtained by rotating the first planes 102 by 22.5° around
the Z-axis and are denoted by 104 in Figs. 1 and 3.
[0025] With reference to Fig. 1, each bezel facet 114 is a quadrilateral plane having opposite
vertexes at one vertex (e.g., A in Fig. 1) of the regular octagon table facet 112
and at a point B where the first plane 102 passing the vertex A (e.g., the ZX plane)
intersects with the girdle upper periphery 122, and the quadrilateral plane has the
other two opposite vertexes C and D on respective second planes 104 adjacent thereto
and shares the vertex C or D with an adjacent bezel facet 114. Each star facet 116
is a triangle AA'C composed of one side AA' of the regular octagon table facet 112
and a vertex C shared by two bezel facets 114 a vertex of each of which is at either
of the two ends A and A' of the foregoing side. Each upper girdle facet 118 is a plane
composed of one side (e.g., CB) intersecting with the girdle upper periphery 122,
out of the sides of each bezel facet 114, and a point E where the second plane 104
passing the other end C of the foregoing side intersects with the girdle upper periphery
122.
[0026] With reference to Figs. 2 and 3, each first pavilion main facet 136 of the first
pavilion 132 is an isosceles triangle FKK' having the vertex at a point F where a
first plane 102 (e.g., the ZX plane) intersects with the girdle lower periphery 126,
and the base KK' perpendicular to the first plane 102, on the horizontal division
plane 134. Each first lower girdle facet 13 8 is a quadrilateral plane FJLK surrounded
by a portion FJ of the girdle lower periphery 126 located between a first plane 102
and a second plane 104 adjacent to each other, an oblique side FK of the isosceles
triangle FKK' of the first pavilion main facet 136 having the vertex F on the first
plane 102, a side JL on the second plane 104 where the portion FJ of the girdle lower
periphery 126 passes its end J on the second plane 104, and a side LK on the horizontal
division plane 134 passing a bottom vertex K of the isosceles triangle FKK'. The first
pavilion 132 is a portion of the pavilion 130 between the girdle lower horizontal
section 128 and the horizontal division plane 134 and the peripheral surface thereof
is composed of eight first pavilion main facets 136 and sixteen first lower girdle
facets 138.
[0027] In the second pavilion 142, each second pavilion main facet 146 is a pentagonal plane
symmetric with respect to a first plane 102, which has a vertex at the pavilion bottom
apex G and a base common to the base KK' of the isosceles triangle FKK' of the first
pavilion main facet 136, and the pentagonal plane has the other vertexes H, H' on
respective second planes 104 adjacent to each other, and shares one side GH and two
vertexes G, H with an adjacent second pavilion main facet 146. Each second lower girdle
facet 148 is a triangle HKL sharing the vertex H of the second pavilion main facet
146 on the second plane 104, the end K of the base of the second pavilion main facet
146, and the side HK of the second pavilion main facet 146 having those ends H, K,
with the second pavilion main facet 146, and composed of the side HK, and the side
LK on the horizontal division plane 134 which the first lower girdle facet 138 has,
and shares the side HL on the second plane 104 with an adjacent second lower girdle
facet 148. The second pavilion 142 is a portion of the pavilion 130 between the horizontal
division plane 134 and the pavilion bottom apex G and the peripheral surface thereof
is composed of eight second pavilion main facets 146 and sixteen second lower girdle
facets 148.
[0028] Each of the bezel facets 114 and each of the second pavilion main facets 146 are
located between two adjacent second planes 104. Each first pavilion main facet 136
is located between two adjacent second planes 104 and is perpendicular to a first
plane 102. The common side CE of two adjacent upper girdle facets 118, the common
side LJ of two adjacent first lower girdle facets 138, and the common side HL of two
adjacent second lower girdle facets 148 are on a second plane 104. Each star facet
116, two upper girdle facets 118 sharing the side CE, two first lower girdle facets
138 sharing the side LJ, and two second lower girdle facets 148 sharing the side HL
are located between two adjacent first planes 102. These two upper girdle facets 118
and these two first lower girdle facets 138 are located at positions approximately
opposite to each other with the girdle 120 in between.
[0029] Each of the first planes 102 divides the center of each bezel facet 114, the center
of each first pavilion main facet 136, and the center of each second pavilion main
facet 146. For this reason, each bezel facet 114 is approximately opposed to each
first pavilion main facet 136 and each second pavilion main facet 146 with the girdle
120 in between.
[0030] In the description hereinafter, the size of each part of the diamond will be expressed
based on the radius of the girdle as a reference. Namely, each part is expressed by
its X-axis coordinate based on the definition that the X-axis coordinate of a point
where the girdle lower periphery 126 intersects with the X-axis is defined as 2.0.
The girdle height (h) is a length in the Z-axis direction of the girdle 120 and is
expressed by a value based on the girdle radius of 2.0.
[0031] In the sectional view in the ZX plane shown in Fig. 4, the same portions as those
in Figs. 1 to 3 are denoted by the same reference symbols. An angle between the bezel
facet 114 of the crown 110 and the girdle lower horizontal section 128 (XY plane),
i.e., crown angle is represented by c and an angle between the first pavilion main
facet 136 of the first pavilion 132 and the girdle lower horizontal section 128 (XY
plane), i.e., first pavilion angle by p1. An angle between the second pavilion main
facet 146 of the second pavilion 142 and the girdle lower horizontal section 128 (XY
plane), i.e., second pavilion angle is represented by p2. In the present specification,
the bezel facets, star facets, and upper girdle facets in the crown are sometimes
called the crown facets together, and the first and second pavilion main facets and
the first and second lower girdle facets in the pavilion the pavilion facets together.
[0032] The girdle height (h), table radius (del), distance to the tip of the star facet
(fx), distance to the lower vertex of the second lower girdle facet (Gd), and position
of the horizontal division plane of the pavilion (ax) are indicated by their respective
X-axis coordinates, as shown in Figs. 1, 3, and 4. The table radius (del) is the X-axis
coordinate of the vertex of the regular octagon of the table facet 112 on the X-axis
as shown in Fig. 1, and is preferably within the range of 0.9 to 1.2. If the table
radius is smaller than 0.9, light reflected in the first pavilion will become less
likely to directly reach the table facet, so as to darken the table facet. If the
table radius is larger than 1.2 on the other hand, the crown facets will become dark.
If the table radius is off the range of 0.9 to 1.2, the number of reflection patterns
will become smaller. The table radius (del) is thus preferably from 0.9 to 1.2. The
distance to the tip of the star facet (fx) is the X-axis coordinate of the vertex
C which the bezel facet 114 intersecting with the first plane including the X-axis
shares with the adjacent bezel facet 114, and is a projection on the ZX plane of a
distance from the Z-axis to the tip of the star facet. The distance to the lower vertex
of the second lower girdle facet (Gd) in the second pavilion 142 is the X-axis coordinate
of the vertex H on the pavilion bottom apex G side of the second lower girdle facet
148 in the second pavilion 142, and is a value obtained by multiplying a distance
from the center axis (Z-axis) to the vertex H by cos22.5°. An X-axis coordinate (ax)
of an intersecting point between the periphery of the horizontal division plane and
the first plane including the X-axis is used for expressing the place of the horizontal
division plane 134 which separates the pavilion 130 into the first pavilion 132 and
the second pavilion 142.
[0033] For defining the dimensions (size) of the diamond, the crown height, pavilion depth,
and total depth are sometimes used in addition to the table radius, pavilion angle,
and crown angle, but these are not adopted in the present specification because they
are uniquely determined once the table radius, first pavilion angle (p1), second pavilion
angle (p2), and crown angle (c) are given.
Introduction of Reflection Rating Index
[0034] In the study below, the diamond is set so that the Z-axis of the diamond becomes
vertical, and the diamond is observed from above the Z-axis while being illuminated
with light from light sources uniformly distributed over a horizontal ceiling. Light
incident at angles of less than 20° relative to the Z-axis into the table facet and
crown facets of the diamond is highly likely to be blocked by a viewer. Light incident
at angles of more than 45° relative to the Z-axis has low illuminance because of attenuation
by distance and is highly likely to be blocked by obstacles; therefore, it has little
contribution to reflection. Therefore, the light quantity of reflection patterns shall
be determined with consideration to contribution rates according to angles of incidence
of incident light relative to the Z-axis.
[0035] The visual perception of human is to sense the intensity of a small light spot as
an amount of stimulus. Therefore, the quantity of light of reflection patterns physically
obtained also needs to be converted into an amount of visual perception sensed as
a stimulus. According to the Stevens' law, the amount of visual perception as the
intensity of stimulus sensed by a man in the case of a small light spot is proportional
to the square root of the physical quantity of light.
[0036] By applying this law, a reflection rating index is introduced as an index obtained
by using an aesthetically-perceivable minimum physical reflection quantity as a unit,
calculating a square root of a quantity of light per reflection pattern represented
as a multiple of the unit, and taking the sum thereof. For determining the physical
reflection quantity, the radius of the diamond is cut into 200 equal meshes, a quantity
of reflected light taking account of the contribution rates is determined for each
mesh, and the sum of quantities for an identical pattern is defined as a physical
quantity of reflected light in that pattern. Since a diamond has the radius of about
several mm, each mesh has several hundred µm
2. The amount of visual perception was calculated for only patterns having the area
of not less than 100 meshes with consideration to the level of human discrimination,
and the sum thereof was defined as the reflection rating index.
[0037] Namely, the reflection rating index = Σ{(physical quantity of reflected light with
consideration to contribution rates per pattern of not less than 100 meshes) / unit
of quantity of perceivable minimum physical reflection}
1/2. In this equation Σ is the summation for reflection patterns.
Reflection Rating Index
[0038] The ornamental diamonds having the two-stage pavilion according to the present invention
were prepared with the girdle radius: 2.0 and the table radius (radius to a vertex
of the octagon) (del): 1.0, with the first pavilion angle (p1) of 40°, 41°, 43°, 44°,
46°, or 47°, and with the crown angle (c) varying from 8° to 33°, and the reflection
rating index was determined for each of the diamonds; Fig. 7 shows a graph of a relation
of reflection rating index versus crown angle (c), using the first pavilion angle
(p1) as a parameter. As apparent from Fig. 7, the crown angle range where the reflection
rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 40° is from 27.8 to 32.8°;
the crown angle range where the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first
pavilion angle (p1): 41° is from 23.0 to 30.0°; the crown angle range where the reflection
rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 43° is from 17.0 to 25.2°;
the crown angle range where the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first
pavilion angle (p1): 44° is from 16.1 to 23.9°; the crown angle range where the reflection
rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 46° is from 11.3 to 17.8°;
the crown angle range where the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first
pavilion angle (p1): 47° is from 8.9 to 15.0°. Fig. 5 is a graph showing the ranges
of the crown angle (c) where the reflection rating index exceeds 430, against the
first pavilion angle (p1). It is seen that the region of the first pavilion angle
(p1) and the crown angle (c) is so determined that the first pavilion angle (p1) is
in the range of 40 to 47° and that it is between a straight line connecting points
where coordinates of (p1, c) are (40, 27.8) and (47, 8.9), and a straight line connecting
points where (p1, c) are (40, 32.8) and (47, 15.0) on the graph shown in Fig. 5. As
shown in Fig. 5, it is seen that the preferred range of the crown angle where the
reflection rating index exceeds 430 varies depending upon values of the first pavilion
angle.
[0039] Next, the ornamental diamonds having the two-stage pavilion according to the present
invention were prepared with the girdle radius: 2.0 and the table radius (del): 1.0,
with the first pavilion angle (p1) of 40°, 41°, 43°, 44°, 46°, or 47°, and with the
second pavilion angle (p2) varying from 36.7° to 41.4°, and the reflection rating
index was determined for each of them; Fig. 8 shows a graph of a relation of reflection
rating index against second pavilion angle (p2), using the first pavilion angle (p1)
as a parameter. As apparent from Fig. 8, the range of the second pavilion angle where
the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 40° is
from 36.7 to 38.7°; the range of the second pavilion angle where the reflection rating
index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 41° is from 36.8 to 39.2°; the
range of the second pavilion angle where the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with
the first pavilion angle (p1): 43° is from 37.0 to 39.9°; the range of the second
pavilion angle where the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion
angle (p1): 44° is from 37.0 to 40.4°; the range of the second pavilion angle where
the reflection rating index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 46° is
from 37.6 to 41.0°; the range of the second pavilion angle where the reflection rating
index exceeds 430 with the first pavilion angle (p1): 47° is from 38.1 to 41.3°. Fig.
6 is a graph showing the ranges of the second pavilion angle (p2) where the reflection
rating index exceeds 430, against the first pavilion angle (p1). It is seen that the
region of the first pavilion angle (p1) and the second pavilion angle (p2) is so determined
that the first pavilion angle (p1) is from 40 to 47° and that it is located above
two straight lines, one connecting points where coordinates of (p1, p2) are (40, 36.7)
and (44, 37.0) and the other connecting points where (p1, p2) are (44, 37.0) and (47,
38.1), and below a straight line connecting points where (p1, p2) are (40, 38.7) and
(47, 41.3) on the graph shown in Fig. 6.
[0040] When the conventional excellent-grade round brilliant cut diamond has the pavilion
angle: 41.4°, the crown angle: 32.8°, the girdle radius: 2.0, the table radius (del):
1.14, the star facet tip distance (fx): 1.454, the lower girdle facet lower tip distance
(Gd): 0.4, and the girdle height (h): 0.12, the reflection rating index thereof obtained
is about 370 and no excellent-grade round brilliant cut diamond has the maximum index
over 400. As shown in Figs. 7 and 8, the ornamental diamonds having the two-stage
pavilion according to the present invention have the reflection rating index over
430 in the range of the first pavilion angle of 40 to 47°. In Figs. 7 and 8, the solid
line represents the reflection rating index level: 400 of the conventional example
and the dashed line does the lower limit of the reflection rating index in the present
invention which is 430 higher than the conventional level, with some margin for various
conditions. For achieving the reflection rating index higher than 430 by an appropriate
combination of the first pavilion angle, the second pavilion angle, and the crown
angle, it is necessary to set the second pavilion angle and the crown angle to values
within the regions shown in Figs. 5 and 6, in the range of the first pavilion angle
of 40 to 47°.
Number of Reflection Patterns
[0041] Fig. 9 shows a drawing in which reflection patterns with the area of not less than
100 meshes are depicted on the table facet and crown facets between the X-axis and
the Y-axis, in the case where the ornamental diamond having the two-stage pavilion
according to the present invention has the first pavilion angle: 43°, the second pavilion
angle: 39°, the crown angle: 20°, the girdle radius: 2.0, and the table radius (del):
1.0. The number of reflection patterns was 116. Fig. 10 shows a drawing in which reflection
patterns with the area of not less than 100 meshes are depicted on the table facet
and crown facets between the X-axis and the Y-axis, in the case of the conventional
excellent-grade round brilliant cut diamond described above. The number of reflection
patterns was 67. Fig. 11 shows a drawing in which reflection patterns with the area
of the not less than 100 meshes are depicted on the table facet and crown facets between
the X-axis and the Y-axis, in the case where the round brilliant cut diamond proposed
in Patent Document 1 by the inventors has the parameters described above. The number
of reflection patterns was 85.
Industrial Applicability
Industrial Applicability
[0042] The ornamental diamond having the two-stage pavilion according to the present invention
has the number of reflection patterns approximately twice that in the case of the
conventional excellent-grade round brilliant cut diamond and 1.2 times that of the
brilliant cut proposed before by the inventors. For this reason, the ornamental diamond
having the two-stage pavilion according to the present invention is applicable to
ornamental use.