Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a Cr-containing steel and, specifically, relates
to a ferritic stainless steel having high heat resistance (thermal fatigue resistance
and oxidation resistance) and being excellent in toughness of the base material, which
can be suitably applied to exhaust system members that are used under high-temperature
environments, such as exhaust pipes of automobiles and motorcycles, exhaust air ducts
of converter cases and thermal electric power plants, and so on.
Background Art
[0002] Exhaust system members that are used under exhaust system environments of automobiles,
such as exhaust manifolds, exhaust pipes, converter cases, and mufflers, are required
to be excellent in thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance (hereinafter,
both properties are collectively called "heat resistance"). In such purposes that
require high heat resistance, at present, Cr-containing steels including Nb and Si
therein, such as Type 429 (14Cr-0.9Si-0.4Nb), are widely used. However, the thermal
fatigue resistance of Type 429 has been insufficient, since the exhaust gas temperature
is raised to higher than 900°C along with improvement in engine performance.
[0003] Against this problem, for example, a Cr-containing steel that has been improved in
high-temperature proof stress by adding Nb and Mo thereto, SUS444 (19Cr-0.5Nb-2Mo)
in conformity with JIS G4305, and a ferritic stainless steel including Nb, Mo, and
W therein have been developed (for example, see Japanese Unexamined Patent Application
Publication No.
2004-018921). However, since prices of rare metal materials such as Mo and W have escalated considerably
nowadays, development of materials having heat resistance equivalent to that of those
containing Mo, W, or the like, using inexpensive raw materials has been required.
[0004] As raw materials excellent in heat resistance not including expensive elements such
as Mo and W, for example,
WO2003/004714 discloses a ferritic stainless steel as an automobile exhaust gas path member where
Nb: 0.50 mass% or less, Cu: 0.8 to 2.0 mass%, and V: 0.03 to 0.20 mass% are added
to a 10 to 20 mass% Cr steel; Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No.
2006-117985 discloses a ferritic stainless steel excellent in thermal fatigue resistance where
Ti: 0.05 to 0.30 mass%, Nb: 0.10 to 0.60 mass%, Cu: 0.8 to 2.0 mass%, and B: 0.0005
to 0.02 mass% are added to a 10 to 20 mass% Cr steel; and Japanese Unexamined Patent
Application Publication No.
2000-297355 discloses a ferritic stainless steel for automobile exhaust gas system parts where
Cu: 1 to 3 mass% is added to a 15 to 25 mass% Cr steel. These steels are all characterized
in that thermal fatigue resistance is increased by adding Cu to steels.
[0005] However, according to studies by the present inventors, it has been found that the
addition of Cu, as in the techniques of the above-mentioned Patent Documents increases
thermal fatigue resistance but decreases the oxidation resistance of steel itself
and, as a whole, the heat resistance is deteriorated. Furthermore, SUS444 contains
Cr in an amount larger than that of Type 429 and also contains a large amount of Mo.
Therefore, it remains a problem that the toughness of the base material is low.
[0006] Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to provide a ferritic stainless
steel that is excellent in thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance and
also has toughness being equivalent to or higher than that of Type 429 without containing
expensive elements such as Mo and W by developing a technique that can prevent a decrease
in oxidation resistance due to addition of Cu. In the present invention, the term
"excellent in thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance" means that having
characteristics that are equivalent to or higher than those of SUS444 and, specifically,
that the oxidation resistance at 950°C and the thermal fatigue resistance in a cyclic
thermal load between 100°C to 850°C are equivalent to or higher than those of SUS444.
In addition, the term "toughness that is equivalent to that of Type 429" means that
the brittle fracture surface ratio of a cold-rolled steel sheet with a thickness of
2 mm is equivalent to that of Type 429 in a Charpy impact test at -40°C.
Disclosure of Invention
[0007] The present invention provides a ferritic stainless steel including C: 0.015 mass%
or less, Si: 0.5 mass% or less, Mn: 0.5 mass% or less, P: 0.04 mass% or less, S: 0.006
mass% or less, Cr: 16 to 20 mass%, N: 0.015 mass% or less, Nb: 0.3 to 0.55 mass%,
Ti: 0.01 mass% or less, Mo: 0.1 mass% or less, W: 0.1 mass% or less, Cu: 1.0 to 2.5
mass%, Al: 0.2 to 1.2 mass%, and the balance of Fe and inevitable impurities.
[0008] The ferritic stainless steel of the present invention can further include one or
more selected from the group consisting of B: 0.003 mass% or less, REM: 0.08 mass%
or less, Zr: 0.5 mass% or less, V: 0.5 mass% or less, Co: 0.5 mass% or less, and Ni:
0.5 mass% or less, in addition to the above-mentioned component composition.
[0009] According to the present invention, a ferritic stainless steel that has heat resistance
(thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance) being equivalent to or higher
than that of SUS444 and also toughness being equivalent to or higher than that of
Type 429 (refer to the steel No. 29 in Table 1 for its representative components)
can be obtained inexpensively without containing expensive Mo or W therein. Therefore,
the steel of the present invention can be suitably applied to automobile exhaust system
members.
Brief Description of Drawings
[0010]
[Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a view illustrating a thermal fatigue test specimen.
[Fig. 2] Fig. 2 is a diagram illustrating temperature and restraining conditions in
a thermal fatigue test.
[Fig. 3] Fig. 3 is a graph showing an effect of Cu content on thermal fatigue resistance.
[Fig. 4] Fig. 4 is a graph showing an effect of Al content on oxidation resistance
(weight gain by oxidation).
[Fig. 5] Fig. 5 is a graph showing an effect of Al content on oxidation resistance
(spalling amount of scale).
[Fig. 6] Fig. 6 is a graph showing an effect of Si content on oxidation resistance
(spalling amount of scale).
[Fig. 7] Fig. 7 is a graph showing an effect of Mn content on toughness (brittle fracture
surface ratio).
[Fig. 8] Fig. 8 is a graph showing an effect of Al content on toughness (brittle fracture
surface ratio).
[Fig. 9] Fig. 9 is a graph showing an effect of Ti content on toughness (brittle fracture
surface ratio).
Best Modes for Carrying Out the Invention
[0011] The present inventors have intensively investigated to develop a ferritic stainless
steel being excellent in thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance and also
excellent in toughness, without including expensive elements such as Mo or W therein,
while preventing a decrease in oxidation resistance due to addition of Cu, which is
a problem in conventional techniques. As a result, it has been found that high high-temperature
strength is obtained in a broad temperature range and thermal fatigue resistance is
increased by combined addition of Nb in the range of 0.3 to 0.55 mass% and Cu in the
range of 1.0 to 2.5 mass%; that the decrease in oxidation resistance due to the addition
of Cu can be prevented by addition of Al in the range of 0.2 mass% or more; and that,
therefore, heat resistance (thermal fatigue resistance and oxidation resistance) being
equivalent to or higher than that of SUS444 can be obtained by controlling the amounts
of Nb, Cu, and Al to the appropriate ranges mentioned above. Furthermore, it has been
found that scale spalling resistance in a cyclic oxidation test of steels containing
Cu and Al can be improved by optimizing the Si addition amount (0.5 mass% or less);
and that toughness can be increased to a level being equivalent to or higher than
that of Type 429 by optimizing the addition amounts of Mn, Al, and Ti (Mn: 0.5 mass%
or less, Al: 1.2 mass% or less, Ti: 0.01 mass% or less). Thus, the present invention
has been accomplished.
[0012] First, basic experiments leading to the development of the present invention will
be described.
[0013] Steels prepared by adding Cu in different amounts to a base having a component composition
consisting of C: 0.005 to 0.007 mass%, N: 0.004 to 0.006 mass%, Si: 0.3 mass%, Mn:
0.2 mass%, Cr: 17 mass%, Nb: 0.45 mass%, and Al: 0.35 mass% were laboratory-ingoted
to give 50 kg steel ingots. The steel ingots were heated to 1170°C and then hot-rolled
into sheet bars with a thickness of 30 mm and a width of 150 mm. Then, the sheet bars
were forged into bars having a cross section of 35x35 mm. The bars were annealed at
1030°C and then machined to produce thermal fatigue test specimens having a size shown
in Fig. 1. Then, as shown in Fig. 2, the specimens were applied with cyclic heat treatment
in which heating and cooling were repeated between 100°C to 850°C at a restraint ratio
of 0.35 and were measured for their thermal fatigue lives. Incidentally, the thermal
fatigue life was determined as the smallest number of cycles until a stress, which
was calculated by dividing a load detected at 100°C by the cross section of a soaking
parallel portion of the test specimen shown in Fig. 1, starts to continuously decrease
relative to the stress of a previous cycle. This is equivalent to the number of cycles
until cracks occur in the test specimen. For comparison, SUS444 (steel containing
Cr: 18 mass%, Mo: 2 mass%, and Nb: 0.5 mass%) was subjected to the same test.
[0014] Fig. 3 shows the results of the thermal fatigue test. From this figure, it is confirmed
that by adding Cu in an amount of 1.0 mass% or more, a thermal fatigue life equivalent
to or higher than the thermal fatigue life (about 1100 cycles) of SUS444 is obtained,
and, therefore, that the addition of Cu in an amount of 1 mass% or more is effective
for improving the thermal fatigue resistance.
[0015] Next, steels prepared by adding Al in different amounts to a base having a component
composition consisting of C: 0.006 mass%, N: 0.007 mass%, Mn: 0.2 mass%, Si: 0.3 mass%,
Cr: 17 mass%, Nb: 0.49 mass%, and Cu: 1.5 mass% were laboratory-ingoted to give 50
kg steel ingots. The steel ingots were subjected to hot-rolling, hot-rolled sheet
annealing, cold-rolling, and finishing annealing to be formed into cold-rolled annealed
sheets having a thickness of 2 mm. 30x20 mm test specimens were cut out from the thus
obtained cold-rolled steal sheets. Then, the test specimens were each provided with
a 4 mmϕ hole in the upper portion thereof. Then, the front surface and the end surface
of each specimen were polished with #320 emery paper, and the specimen was degreased
and subjected to the following tests.
<Continuous oxidation test in air>
[0016] The test specimen was held for 300 hours in an atmospheric air furnace heated to
950°C. Then, the difference in mass of the test specimen between before and after
the heating test was measured to determine the weight gain by oxidation per unit area
(g/m
2).
<Cyclic oxidation test in air>
[0017] The test specimen was subjected to 600 cycles of cyclic heat treatment in which heating
at 950°C for 25 minutes and cooling at 100°C for 1 minute were conducted in the air.
Then, the scale amount (g/m
2) of spalls detached from the test specimen surface was determined from the difference
in mass between before and after the test. Incidentally, the heating rate and the
cooling rate in the test were 5°C/sec and 1.5°C/sec, respectively.
[0018] Fig. 4 shows the measurement results of weight gain by oxidation. Fig. 5 shows the
measurement results of spalling amount of scale. It is confirmed from these results
that oxidation resistance being equivalent to or higher than that of SUS444 (weight
gain by oxidation: 27 g/m
2 or less, spalling amount of scale: less than 4 g/m
2) is obtained by adding Al in an amount of 0.2 mass% or more.
[0019] Next, steels prepared by adding Si in different amounts to a base having a component
composition consisting of C: 0.006 mass%, N: 0.007 mass%, Mn: 0.2 mass%, Al: 0.45
mass%, Cr: 17 mass%, Nb: 0.49 mass%, and Cu: 1.5 mass% were laboratory-ingoted to
give 50 kg steel ingots. Then, cold-rolled annealed sheets having a thickness of 2
mm were prepared as in above and subjected to a cyclic oxidation test as in above
and measured for spalling amounts of scale. The results are shown in Fig. 6. It was
confirmed from the results that when the amount of Si is higher than 0.5%, even if
Al is added in an appropriate amount, scale adhesion is decreased thereby to increase
the spalling amount, resulting in that heat resistance equivalent to that of SUS444
cannot be obtained.
[0020] Lastly, steels prepared by adding Mn, Al, and Ti in different amounts to a base having
a component composition consisting of C: 0.006 to 0.007 mass%, N: 0.006 to 0.007 mass%,
Si: 0.3 mass%, Cr: 17 mass%, Nb: 0.45 mass%, and Cu: 1.5 mass% were laboratory-ingoted
to give 50 kg steel ingots. The steel ingots were subjected to hot-rolling, hot-rolled
sheet annealing, cold-rolling, and finishing annealing to be formed into cold-rolled
annealed sheets having a thickness of 2 mm. Charpy impact test specimens with a sub-size
were sampled from the cold-rolled annealed sheets and were subjected to a Charpy impact
test at -40°C for measuring brittle fracture surface ratio to evaluate toughness.
[0021] Fig. 7 shows effects of Mn contents on toughness when the amounts of Al and Ti are
0.25 mass% and 0.006 mass%, respectively; Fig. 8 shows effects of Al contents on toughness
when the amounts of Mn and Ti are 0.1 mass% and 0.005 mass%, respectively; and Fig.
9 shows effects of Ti contents on toughness when the amounts of Al and Mn are 0.25
mass% and 0.1 mass%, respectively. It was confirmed from these results that in order
to obtain toughness being equivalent to or higher than that of Type 429, the amounts
of Mn: 0.3 mass% or less, Al: 1.2 mass% or less, and Ti: 0.01 mass% or less are necessary.
[0022] The present invention has been accomplished by further investigation based on the
above-described findings.
[0023] Next, the component composition of the ferritic stainless steel of the present invention
will be described.
C: 0.015 mass% or less
[0024] C is an element effective for increasing the strength of a steel, but an amount higher
than 0.015 mass% significantly decreases toughness and formability. Therefore, in
the present invention, the amount of C is 0.015 mass% or less. Incidentally, from
the viewpoint of ensuring formability, a lower amount of C is preferred, and an amount
of 0.008 mass% or less is desirable. On the other hand, in order to ensure strength
required in exhaust system members, the amount of C is preferably 0.001 mass% or more.
Therefore, more preferred amount is in the range of 0.002 to 0.008 mass%.
Si: 0.5 mass% or less
[0025] Si is added as a deoxidizing material. It is preferable to add in an amount of 0.05
mass% or more. In addition, Si has an effect improving oxidation resistance, which
is the focus of the present invention, but the effect is not high compared to that
of Al. On the other hand, as shown in Fig. 6, the addition of Si in an excess amount
higher than 0.5 mass% decreases scale spalling resistance thereby not to give oxidation
resistance being equivalent to or higher than that of SUS444. Therefore, the upper
limit of the Si amount is determined to be 0.5 mass%.
Mn: 0.5 mass% or less
[0026] Mn is an element that increases the strength of a steel and also has an effect as
a deoxidizing material. It is preferable that the addition amount be 0.05 mass% or
more. However, an excess addition tends to generate a γ phase at high temperature
and decreases heat resistance. In addition, as shown in Fig. 7, when the addition
amount is higher than 0.5 mass%, toughness being equivalent to or higher than that
of Type 429 is not obtained, and the object of the present invention cannot be achieved.
Therefore, the amount of Mn in the present invention is determined to be 0.5 mass%
or less.
P: 0.04 mass% or less
[0027] P is a harmful element that decreases toughness, and it is desirable that the amount
be as low as possible. Therefore, in the present invention, the amount of P is determined
to be 0.04 mass% or less and is preferably 0.03 mass% or less.
S: 0.006 mass% or less
[0028] S is a harmful element that decreases elongation and r value and adversely affects
formability and also decreases corrosion resistance, which is a basic property of
stainless steels. Therefore, it is desirable to reduce the amount as far as possible.
Therefore, in the present invention, the amount of S is 0.006 mass% or less and preferably
0.003 mass% or less.
Cr: 16 to 20 mass%
[0029] Cr is an important element effective for improving corrosion resistance and oxidation
resistance, which are characteristic properties of stainless steels, but sufficient
oxidation resistance cannot be obtained when the amount is less than 16 mass%. On
the other hand, Cr is an element providing high hardness and low ductileness to a
steel by solid-solution strengthening of the steel at room temperature. In particular,
an addition amount of higher than 20 mass% makes the above-mentioned adverse effects
significant, resulting in that workability and toughness that are equivalent to or
higher than those of Type 429 cannot be obtained. Therefore, in the present invention,
the amount of Cr is in the range of 16 to 20 mass%, preferably, in the range 16 to
19 mass%.
N: 0.015 mass% or less
[0030] N is an element that decreases the toughness and the formability of a steel, and
an addition amount of higher than 0.015 mass% makes the decreases significant. Therefore,
the amount of N is determined to be 0.015 mass% or less. Furthermore, in the case
of requiring a higher toughness, the amount of N is further decreased and is preferably
lower than 0.010 mass%.
Nb: 0.3 to 0.55 mass%
[0031] Nb is an element having effects of increasing corrosion resistance and formability
and intergranular corrosion resistance of a weld zone by forming a carbonitride with
C and N to fix them and also improving thermal fatigue resistance by increasing the
high-temperature strength. These effects are recognized when the amount is 0.3 mass%
or more. On the other hand, when the addition amount is higher than 0.55 mass%, a
Laves phase tends to precipitate to decrease the toughness. Therefore, the amount
of Nb is determined in the range of 0.3 to 0.55 mass% and is preferably in the range
of 0.4 to 0.5 mass%.
Ti: 0.01 mass% or less
[0032] Ti is an element that bonds to N easier than Nb does and tends to form coarse TiN.
The coarse TiN act as a notch to significantly decrease the toughness. In particular,
as shown in Fig. 9, when the content of Ti is higher than 0.01 mass%, such adverse
effects become significant. Therefore, in the present invention, the amount of Ti
is limited to 0.01% or less.
Mo: 0.1 mass% or less
[0033] Mo is an expensive element and is not willingly added on the basis of the purpose
of the present invention. However, it may be mixed from the raw materials such as
a scrap in an amount of 0.1 mass% or less. Therefore, the amount of Mo is determined
to be 0.1 mass% or less.
W: 0.1 mass% or less
[0034] W is an expensive element similar to Mo and is not willingly added on the basis of
the purpose of the present invention. However, it may be mixed from the raw materials
such as a scrap in an amount of 0.1 mass% or less. Therefore, the amount of W is determined
to be 0.1 mass% or less.
Cu: 1.0 to 2.5 mass%
[0035] Cu is an element that is very effective for increasing thermal fatigue resistance.
As shown in Fig. 3, in order to obtain thermal fatigue resistance that is equivalent
to or higher than that of SUS444, a Cu addition amount of 1.0 mass% or more is necessary.
However, if the addition amount is larger than 2.5 mass%, ε-Cu is precipitated during
the cooling after heat treatment thereby to harden the steel and readily cause embrittlement
during hot-working. More importantly, though the thermal fatigue resistance is increased
by the addition of Cu, the oxidation resistance of steel itself is rather decreased.
Therefore, the overall heat resistance may be decreased. The reason thereof is not
sufficiently clear, but it may be because that Cu is concentrated in a de-Cr layer
just below the generated scale to prevent Cr, which is an element that increases intrinsic
oxidation resistance of stainless steels, from being rediffused. Therefore, the amount
of Cu is determined in the range of 1.0 to 2.5 mass%, more preferably in the range
of 1.1 to 1.8 mass%.
Al: 0.2 to 1.2 mass%
[0036] Al is, as shown in Figs. 4 and 5, an indispensable element for increasing the oxidation
resistance of a Cu-containing steel. In particular, in order to obtain oxidation resistance
that is equivalent to or higher than that of SUS444, which is an object of the present
invention, an addition amount of 0.2 mass% or more is necessary. On the other hand,
as shown in Fig. 8, an addition amount of higher than 1.2 mass% hardens the steel
not to obtain toughness equivalent to or higher than that of Type 429. Therefore,
the upper limit is determined to be 1.2 mass%, and, preferably, the amount is in the
range of 0.3 to 1.0 mass%.
[0037] The ferritic stainless steel of the present invention can include, one or more selected
from the group consisting of B, REM, Zr, V, Co, and Ni in the following ranges, in
addition to the above-mentioned components as essential elements.
B: 0.003 mass% or less
[0038] B is an element effective for improving workability, in particular, second workability.
This noticeable effect can be obtained when the addition amount is 0.0005 mass% or
more, but a large amount of higher than 0.003 mass% precipitates BN to reduce workability.
Therefore, when B is added, the amount is 0.003 mass% or less, more preferably in
the range of 0.0005 to 0.002 mass%.
REM: 0.08 mass% or less, Zr: 0.5 mass% or less
[0039] Rare-earth element (REM) and Zr are each an element increasing oxidation resistance
and, in the present invention, can be added according to need. In order to obtain
the effect, the addition amount of each is 0.01 mass% or more, 0.05 mass% or more
respectively. However, the addition of REM in an amount of higher than 0.08 mass%
embrittles the steel, and the addition of Zr in an amount of higher than 0.5 mass%
precipitates Zr intermetallics to embrittle the steel. Therefore, when REM is added,
the amount is limited to 0.08 mass% or less, and when Zr is added, the amount is limited
to 0.5 mass% or less.
V: 0.5 mass% or less
[0040] V is an element effective for increasing workability and oxidation resistance. In
particular, the amount for obtaining the effect increasing oxidation resistance is
preferably 0.15 mass% or more. However, the addition in an excess amount of higher
than 0.5 mass% precipitate coarse V(C, N) to deteriorate surface properties. Therefore,
when V is added, the amount is preferably 0.5 mass% or less, preferably in the range
of 0.15 to 0.4 mass%.
Co: 0.5 mass% or less
[0041] Co is an element effective for increasing toughness, and the addition amount is preferably
0.02 mass% or more. However, Co is an expensive element, and the effect is saturated
when the addition amount is higher than 0.5 mass%. Therefore, when Co is added, the
amount is preferably 0.5 mass% or less, more preferably, in the range of 0.02 to 0.2
mass%.
Ni: 0.5 mass% or less
[0042] Ni is an element increasing toughness. In order to obtain the effect, the amount
is preferably 0.05 mass% or more. However, Ni is expensive and a strong γ-phase-forming
element. Therefore, a γ-phase is formed at high temperature to decrease oxidation
resistance. Therefore, when Ni is added, the amount is preferably 0.5 mass% or less
and more preferably in the range of 0.05 to 0.4 mass%.
[0043] Next, a method of manufacturing the ferritic stainless steel of the present invention
will be described.
[0044] The method of manufacturing the stainless steel of the present invention may be any
known method of manufacturing a ferritic stainless steel and is not particularly limited.
Preferably, for example, a sheet is ingoted in a known melting furnace such as a converter
furnace or an electric furnace or is further subjected to secondary refining such
as ladle refining or vacuum refining so as to have the above-described component composition
of the present invention. Then, the molten steel is formed into a billet (slab) by
continuous-casting or ingot-casting-blooming. The slab is hot-rolled to a hot-rolled
sheet, and, according to need, the sheet is subjected to hot-rolled sheet annealing.
The hot-rolled sheet is further subjected to a process such as pickling, cold-rolling,
finishing annealing, and pickling to give a cold-rolled annealed sheet. The cold-rolling
may be performed once or twice having middle annealing therebetween, and each step
of the cold-rolling, the finishing annealing, and the pickling may be performed repeatedly.
Furthermore, in some cases, the hot-rolled sheet annealing may be omitted. When the
steel sheet is required to have surface gloss, skin pass may be conducted after the
cold-rolling or the finishing annealing. In addition, it is preferable that the slab-heating
temperature before the hot-rolling be in the range of 1000 to 1250°C, the hot-rolled
sheet annealing temperature be in the range of 900 to 1100°C, and the finishing annealing
temperature is in the range of 900 to 1120°C.
[0045] The thus obtained ferritic stainless steel of the present invention is then subjected
to processing such as cutting, bending work, or press work, according to the respective
purposes, to obtain various types of exhaust system members that are used under high
temperature environments, such as exhaust pipes of automobiles and motorcycles and
exhaust air ducts of converter cases and thermal electric power plants. Furthermore,
the stainless steel of the present invention used in the above-mentioned members is
not limited to cold-rolled annealed sheets and may be used as a hot-rolled sheet or
a hot-rolled annealed sheet and, further, may be used after descale treatment according
to need. In addition, the welding method for assembling the above-mentioned members
is not particularly limited, and, for example, common arc welding such as metal inert
gas (MIG), metal active gas (MAG), or tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding, electric resistance
welding such as spot welding or seam welding, and a method used in electric resistance
welding, such as high-frequency resistance welding, high-frequency induction welding,
or laser welding, can be used.
Example 1
[0046] Steels Nos. 1 to 27 having component compositions shown in Table 1 were ingoted in
a vacuum melting furnace to give 50 kg steel ingots. Each steel ingot was divided
into two steel ingots by forging. Then, one steel ingot of the two was heated to 1170°C
and then hot-rolled into a hot-rolled sheet having a thickness of 5 mm. The sheet
was subjected to hot-rolled sheet annealing at 1020°C, pickling, cold-rolling at a
draft of 60%, finishing annealing at 1030°C, cooling at an average cooling rate of
20°C/sec, and pickling to be formed into a cold-rolled annealed sheet having a thickness
of 2 mm. The resulting sheet was subjected to the following oxidation resistance test
and impact test. Incidentally, as reference, cold-rolled annealed sheets were produced
as in above from SUS444, Type 429, and steels disclosed in
WO2003/004714 and Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication Nos.
2006-117985 and
2000-297355, shown as Nos. 28 to 32 of Table 1, and were subjected to the same evaluation tests.
<Continuous oxidation test in air>
[0047] Test specimens of 30x20 mm were cut out from the thus obtained different cold-rolled
annealed sheets and were each provided with a 4 mmϕ hole in the upper portion thereof.
Then, the front surface and the end surface of each specimen were polished with #320
emery paper, and the specimen was degreased and then suspended in an atmospheric air
furnace heated to 950°C and held for 300 hours. After the test, the mass of the specimen
was measured, and the difference from the mass previously measured before the test
was determined to calculate the weight gain by oxidation (g/m
2). Incidentally, the test was performed twice, and the average value was used for
evaluating the continuous oxidation resistance.
<Cyclic oxidation test in air>
[0048] Test specimens of 30×20 mm were cut out from the different cold-rolled annealed sheets
and were each provided with a 4 mmϕ hole in the upper portion thereof. Then, the front
surface and the end surface of each specimen were polished with #320 emery paper,
and the specimen was degreased and then subjected to an oxidation test in which heating
and cooling were repeated between 100°C and 950°C in the air. The heating rate and
the cooling rate were 5°C/sec and 1.5°C/sec, respectively, and the holding times were
1 minute at 100°C and 25 minutes at 950°C, and this was repeated 600 cycles. In the
evaluation of cyclic oxidation resistance, the mass of the specimen after the test
was measured, and the difference from the mass previously measured before the test
was determined to calculate the spalling amount of scale (g/m
2). Incidentally, the test was performed twice, and the average value was used for
evaluating the cyclic oxidation resistance.
<Charpy impact test>
[0049] Three Charpy impact test specimens each provided with a V-notch perpendicular to
the rolling direction were sampled from each of the different cold-rolled annealed
sheets and were subjected to a Charpy impact test at -40°C. The brittle fracture surface
ratios of the three were measured, and the average value thereof was determined for
evaluating the toughness.
Example 2
[0050] The remaining steel ingot of the two that was obtained by dividing the 50 kg steel
ingot in Example 1 was heated to 1170°C and then hot-rolled to a sheet bar having
a thickness of 30 mm and a width of 150 mm. Then, the sheet bar was forged into a
bar of 35 mm square. The bar was annealed at 1030°C and then machined to produce a
thermal fatigue test specimen having a size shown in Fig. 1. Then, the specimen was
subjected to the following thermal fatigue test. As in Example 1, specimens were produced
similarly from SUS444, Type 429, and steels disclosed in
WO2003/004714 and Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication Nos.
2006-117985 and
2000-297355, as reference, and were subjected to the thermal fatigue test.
<Thermal fatigue test>
[0051] In a thermal fatigue test, heating and cooling were repeated between 100°C and 850°C
at a restraint ratio of 0.35, and the thermal fatigue life was measured. In this test,
the heating rate and the cooling rate were each 10°C/sec, and the holding times were
2 minutes at 100°C and 5 minutes at 850°C. Incidentally, the thermal fatigue life
was determined as the smallest number of cycles until a stress, which was calculated
by dividing a load detected at 100°C by the cross section of a soaking parallel portion
of the test specimen, started to continuously decrease relative to the stress of a
previous cycle.
[0052] The results of the continuance oxidation test in air, the cyclic oxidation test in
air, and the Charpy impact test in Example 1 and the results of the thermal fatigue
test in Example 2 are shown together in Table 2. As obvious from Table 2, all the
steels adapted to the present invention have oxidation resistance properties and thermal
fatigue resistance properties being equivalent to or higher than those of SUS444 and
toughness being equivalent to or higher than that of Type 429 and therefore satisfy
the purpose of the present invention. On the other hand, any of the steels of comparative
examples that are out of the scope of the present invention and the steels of reference
examples according to known technology is not simultaneously excellent in all the
oxidation resistance properties, the thermal fatigue resistance properties, and the
toughness of the base material and is not provided with properties that are the purpose
of the present invention.
Industrial Applicability
[0053] The steel of the present invention can be suitably used in not only exhaust system
members of, for example, automobiles but also exhaust system members of thermal electric
power systems and fuel cell members of solid-oxide fuel cells, which are required
to have similar properties.
Table 1-1
| Steel No |
Chemical Component (mass%) |
Notes |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
Al |
P |
S |
Cr |
Cu |
Nb |
Ti |
Mo |
W |
N |
Others |
| 1 |
0.006 |
0.19 |
0.13 |
0.37 |
0.032 |
0.004 |
17.5 |
1.35 |
0.43 |
0.006 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.008 |
- |
Example |
| 2 |
0.005 |
0.35 |
0.28 |
0.51 |
0.026 |
0.002 |
17.3 |
1.56 |
0.41 |
0.002 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.007 |
- |
Example |
| 3 |
0.005 |
0.27 |
0.33 |
0.48 |
0.022 |
0.001 |
17.7 |
1.46 |
0.48 |
0.006 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.011 |
- |
Example |
| 4 |
0.008 |
0.28 |
0.11 |
0.44 |
0.032 |
0.001 |
17.4 |
1.92 |
0.49 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.005 |
- |
Example |
| 5 |
0.005 |
0.07 |
0.42 |
0.84 |
0.022 |
0.002 |
16.3 |
1.32 |
0.41 |
0.003 |
0.01 |
0.04 |
0.006 |
- |
Example |
| 6 |
0.003 |
0.38 |
0.28 |
0.61 |
0.029 |
0.004 |
17.8 |
1.55 |
0.37 |
0.004 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.007 |
- |
Example |
| 7 |
0.006 |
0.22 |
0.44 |
0.47 |
0.022 |
0.002 |
18.2 |
1.91 |
0.46 |
0.007 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.007 |
- |
Example |
| 8 |
0.007 |
0.17 |
0.23 |
0.47 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
17.2 |
1.39 |
0.45 |
0.004 |
0.01 |
0.01 |
0.008 |
B/0.0009 |
Example |
| V/0.051 |
| 9 |
0.008 |
0.39 |
0.18 |
0.35 |
0.026 |
0.002 |
17.9 |
1.42 |
0.44 |
0.001 |
0.03 |
0.01 |
0.004 |
Co/0.13 |
Example |
| B/0.0011 |
| 10 |
0.004 |
0.27 |
0.26 |
0.55 |
0.031 |
0.002 |
17.7 |
1.39 |
0.43 |
0.003 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.006 |
Zr/0.08 |
Example |
| 11 |
0.006 |
0.29 |
0.39 |
0.31 |
0.027 |
0.005 |
18.9 |
1.46 |
0.46 |
0.002 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.003 |
Ni/0.21 |
Example |
| Zr/0.10 |
| 12 |
0.008 |
0.17 |
0.08 |
0.41 |
0.021 |
0.002 |
17.4 |
1.38 |
0.41 |
0.003 |
0.02 |
0.03 |
0.004 |
Co/0.09 |
Example |
| REM/0.031 |
| 13 |
0.006 |
0.31 |
0.35 |
0.14 |
0.030 |
0.002 |
17.1 |
1.46 |
0.44 |
0.006 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.009 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
0.008 |
0.23 |
0.66 |
1.62 |
0.028 |
0.004 |
17.7 |
1.61 |
0.49 |
0.004 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.008 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
0.006 |
0.32 |
0.55 |
0.69 |
0.028 |
0.003 |
17.4 |
0.87 |
0.51 |
0.004 |
0.02 |
0.01 |
0.009 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
0.011 |
0.82 |
0.41 |
0.72 |
0.020 |
0.002 |
17.1 |
1.21 |
0.44 |
0.009 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.004 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
0.007 |
0.34 |
0.15 |
1.19 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
17.4 |
1.58 |
0.42 |
0.095 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.005 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
0.005 |
0.21 |
0.37 |
1.24 |
0.031 |
0.002 |
17.3 |
1.45 |
0.44 |
0.002 |
0.02 |
0.04 |
0.007 |
- |
Comparative Example |
Table 1-2
| Steel No |
Chemical Component (mass%) |
Notes |
| C |
Si |
Mn |
Al |
P |
S |
Cr |
Cu |
Nb |
Ti |
Mo |
W |
N |
Others |
| 19 |
0.007 |
0.71 |
0.11 |
0.38 |
0.027 |
0.001 |
17.5 |
1.28 |
0.48 |
0.007 |
0.04 |
0.02 |
0.006 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
0.008 |
0.14 |
0.71 |
0.47 |
0.031 |
0.003 |
17.1 |
1.66 |
0.39 |
0.003 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.007 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
0.006 |
0.33 |
0.22 |
0.57 |
0.025 |
0.001 |
18.1 |
0.72 |
0.41 |
0.002 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
0.005 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 22 |
0.005 |
0.29 |
0.28 |
0.44 |
0.030 |
0.002 |
17.9 |
1.54 |
0.44 |
0.11 |
0.03 |
0.03 |
0.008 |
- |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
0.007 |
0.23 |
0.25 |
0.47 |
0.027 |
0.002 |
17.6 |
1.18 |
0.44 |
0.003 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.008 |
V:0.18 |
Example |
| 24 |
0.003 |
0.09 |
0.12 |
0.46 |
0.025 |
0.003 |
17.5 |
1.26 |
0.42 |
0.008 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.007 |
V:0.22 |
Example |
| 25 |
0.006 |
0.32 |
0.34 |
0.46 |
0.024 |
0.002 |
17.7 |
1.22 |
0.46 |
0.005 |
0.06 |
0.02 |
0.005 |
V:0.38 |
Example |
| 26 |
0.007 |
0.27 |
0.15 |
0.53 |
0.027 |
0.003 |
19.1 |
1.28 |
0.45 |
0.004 |
0.05 |
0.02 |
0.007 |
V:0.20 |
Example |
| 27 |
0.005 |
0.03 |
0.11 |
0.51 |
0.024 |
0.002 |
18.2 |
1.19 |
0.45 |
0.006 |
0.05 |
0.03 |
0.006 |
V:0.23 |
Example |
| 28 |
0.008 |
0.31 |
0.42 |
0.019 |
0.031 |
0.003 |
18.7 |
0.02 |
0.52 |
0.003 |
1.87 |
0.02 |
0.008 |
- |
SUS444 |
| 29 |
0.007 |
0.87 |
0.33 |
0,028 |
0.029 |
0.004 |
14.5 |
0.03 |
0.45 |
0.007 |
0.03 |
0.02 |
0.008 |
- |
Type429 |
| 30 |
0.008 |
0.32 |
0.05 |
0.01 |
0.028 |
0.002 |
17.02 |
1.93 |
0.33 |
0.002 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.010 |
Ni/0.10 |
Reference Example 1 |
| V/0.10 |
| 31 |
0.009 |
0.46 |
0.54 |
0.002 |
0.029 |
0.003 |
18.90 |
1.36 |
0.35 |
0.08 |
0.01 |
0.02 |
0.007 |
Ni/0.10 |
Reference Example 2 |
| V/0.03 |
| B/0.0030 |
| 32 |
0.006 |
0.22 |
0.05 |
0.052 |
0.005 |
0.0052 |
18.8 |
1.65 |
0.42 |
0.09 |
0.02 |
0.02 |
0.006 |
Ni/0.15 |
Reference Example3 |
Notes Reference Example 1: Steel No. 3 of WO2003/004714
Reference Example 2: Steel No. 7 of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 2006-117985
Reference Example 3: Steel No. 5 of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 2000-297355 |
Table 2
| Steel No |
Heat Resistance |
Thermal fatigue life (cycle) |
Brittle fracture surface ratio at -40°C (%) |
Notes |
| Weight gain by oxidation (g/m2) |
Spalling amount of scale (g/m3) |
| 1 |
21 |
3 |
1230 |
<5 |
Example |
| 2 |
20 |
2 |
1330 |
<5 |
Example |
| 3 |
21 |
2 |
1300 |
<5 |
Example |
| 4 |
21 |
2 |
1500 |
<5 |
Example |
| 5 |
17 |
<0.1 |
1230 |
<5 |
Example |
| 6 |
20 |
1 |
1320 |
<5 |
Example |
| 7 |
21 |
2 |
1510 |
<5 |
Example |
| 8 |
21 |
2 |
1260 |
<5 |
Example |
| 9 |
22 |
3 |
1280 |
<5 |
Example |
| 10 |
20 |
1 |
1250 |
<5 |
Example |
| 11 |
22 |
3 |
1290 |
<5 |
Example |
| 12 |
21 |
2 |
1250 |
<5 |
Example |
| 13 |
80 |
10 |
1290 |
<5 |
Comparative Example |
| 14 |
11 |
<0.1 |
1400 |
50 |
Comparative Example |
| 15 |
14 |
1 |
820 |
<5 |
Comparative Example |
| 16 |
18 |
5 |
1210 |
<5 |
Comparative Example |
| 17 |
15 |
<0.1 |
1350 |
15 |
Comparative Example |
| 18 |
15 |
<0.1 |
1300 |
15 |
Comparative Example |
| 19 |
21 |
10 |
1210 |
<5 |
Comparative Example |
| 20 |
21 |
2 |
1380 |
15 |
Comparative Example |
| 21 |
20 |
1 |
700 |
<5 |
Comparative Example |
| 22 |
21 |
2 |
1320 |
20 |
Comparative Example |
| 23 |
15 |
1 |
1200 |
<5 |
Example |
| 24 |
15 |
1 |
1230 |
<5 |
Example |
| 25 |
14 |
0.9 |
1210 |
<5 |
Example |
| 26 |
15 |
1 |
1240 |
<5 |
Example |
| 27 |
15 |
1 |
1210 |
<5 |
Example |
| 28 |
27 |
4 |
1120 |
10 |
SUS444 |
| 29 |
51 |
25 |
500 |
<5 |
Type429 |
| 30 |
>100 |
>100 |
1480 |
<5 |
Reference Example 1 |
| 31 |
>100 |
>100 |
1240 |
<10 |
Reference Example 2 |
| 32 |
>100 |
>100 |
1400 |
<10 |
Reference Example 3 |
Notes Reference Example 1: Steel No. 3 of WO2003/004714
Reference Example 2: Steel No. 7 of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 2006-117985
Reference Example 3: Steel No. 5 of Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication
No. 2000-297355 |