Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to a scale removing method and scale removing apparatus
wherein the internal surface of a steel pipe is subjected to blasting process where
abrasive particles are ejected through a high-pressure jet nozzle and hit the internal
surface of the steel pipe.
Background Art
[0002] Steel pipes are often subjected to heat treatment depending on the usage purpose
thereof. For improving the quality of steel pipe, it is important to remove scale
(descaling) formed on the inner and outer surfaces of steel pipe at the time of heat
treatment. A blasting has been known as the method for removing scale from the internal
surface of steel pipe. In the blasting, scale formed on the inner surfaces of steel
pipe is removed by impacts of an abrasive particle such as iron, stainless steel,
alumina, or quartz sand. The blasting involves, for example, sand blasting, shot blasting,
and grit blasting. A high-pressure jet system, a negative-pressure suction system,
or a combination of these two systems is adopted as the abrasive particle ejecting
method.
[0003] In the blasting apparatus of high-pressure jet system, for example, a steel pipe
is placed on turnable rollers, and while the steel pipe is rotated, a high-pressure
jet nozzle is inserted from an end part of the steel pipe and is moved in the longitudinal
direction with an abrasive particle blown onto the internal surface of steel pipe
through the high-pressure jet nozzle, whereby scale is removed by impacts of the abrasive
particle to the internal surface of steel pipe. Dust particles after blasting are
usually collected by a dust collector provided in an end part on the opposite side
to the end part of steel pipe from which the high-pressure jet nozzle is inserted.
[0004] In the blasting apparatus of negative-pressure suction system, for example, a suction
machine is installed at one end of a steel pipe, and while the interior of steel pipe
is maintained at a negative pressure by the suction machine, abrasive particles are
charged from the other end in the state, whereby scale is removed by the impacts of
the abrasive particle, moving in the steel pipe, to the internal surface of the steel
pipe.
[0005] The blasting apparatus of high-pressure jet type has a disadvantage that a large
equipment space is required because a pipe for transporting the abrasive particles
to the nozzle (transportation pipe) has a long length. The blasting apparatus of negative-pressure
suction type has a disadvantage that the scale removing capability is low because
the impact angle of abrasive particles is low.
[0006] In order to compensate for these disadvantages of the blasting apparatuses, in Patent
Document 1, the present applicant disclosed an invention relating to scale removing
equipment wherein: a first high-pressure jet blasting section for subjecting the internal
surface of one pipe end part of a steel pipe to blasting; a second high-pressure jet
blasting section for subjecting the internal surface of the other pipe end part of
the steel pipe to blasting; and a negative-pressure suction blasting section for subjecting
the internal surface of the overall length of steel pipe to blasting are arranged
in juxtaposition, and steel pipe transfer devices are provided between these blasting
sections. In this invention, scale formed near the end part of steel pipe, which is
less liable to be removed by the negative-pressure suction blasting, is removed by
the high-pressure jet blasting.
Disclosure of the Invention
Problems to be Solved by the Invention
[0008] As a blower used for the dust collector for high-pressure jet blasting, a blower
having a low capacity (usually, about 40 kW or lower) is used as compared with the
blower used for the suction machine for negative-pressure suction blasting (90 kW
or higher). The reason for this is as described below. The suction machine for negative-pressure
suction blasting must create a negative pressure in the steel pipe to produce an air
flow sufficient to transport the abrasive particles, whereas in the high-pressure
jet blasting, the abrasive particles are transported by the high-pressure jet nozzle,
so that the purpose of the dust collector therefor is merely to collect dust particles
(abrasive particles and chips thereof, removed scales, etc.).
[0009] Figure 4 shows a problem with a conventional high-pressure jet blasting method. As
shown in Figure 4, in the high-pressure jet blasting, for example, compressed air
is sent from a compressor (not shown), and abrasive particles are supplied from an
abrasive particles tank (not shown) to an abrasive particles transfer pipe 1, whereby
high-pressure abrasive particles (not shown) is ejected through a nozzle 2. In the
case where the gap between the outside diameter of the abrasive particles transfer
pipe 1 and the inside diameter of a steel pipe 3, a blasted material, is small or
sufficiently large, , a blower having a capacity corresponding to the flow rate at
the nozzle 2 can be used. However, in the case where the above-described gap is in
a fixed range, the amount of air flowing into the steel pipe 3 increases beyond expectation,
exceeding the suction capability of the dust collector 4, and dust particles 5 may
scatter into the atmosphere.
[0010] The reason for this is that during the blasting, the flow of abrasive particles and
air are produced in the steel pipe 3 by the abrasive particles ejected through the
high-pressure jet nozzle 2, and due to the ejector effect thereof, air of about several
times the flow rate of the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 flows into the steel pipe 3
from a portion near an end part of steel pipe (the left end part in the figure).
[0011] It can be thought that the capacity of the dust collector is increased to solve the
above-described problem,. However, since the ejector effect is increased or decreased
depending on the inside diameter of the steel pipe, it is not preferable from the
viewpoint of energy saving that the suction capability of dust collector be designed
so as to match the case where the ejector effect is great.
[0012] The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and accordingly
an object thereof is to provide a scale removing method and scale removing apparatus
wherein the ejector effect is reduced, and dust particles do not scatter into the
atmosphere even with a low-capacity dust collector in high-pressure jet blasting.
Means of Solving the Problems
[0013] The present invention has been made to solve the above problems, and the gist thereof
is a scale removing method shown in item (1) and a scale removing apparatus shown
in item (2).
[0014]
- (1) A method for removing a scale formed on an internal surface of a steel pipe by
subjecting the internal surface of the steel pipe to a blasting process wherein abrasive
particles are ejected through a high-pressure jet nozzle and collide with the internal
surface of the steel pipe, wherein the blasting process is performed while air is
restrained from flowing into the steel pipe from an end part of the steel pipe due
to the flow (motion) of the abrasive particle.
[0015]
(2) An apparatus for removing a scale formed on an internal surface of a steel pipe
by subjecting the internal surface of the steel pipe to a blasting process wherein
abrasive particles are ejected through a high-pressure jet nozzle and collide with
the internal surface of the steel pipe, wherein the apparatus has: the high-pressure
jet nozzle for ejecting the abrasive particles;
a dust collector for collecting dust particles after blasting; and restraining means
for restraining air from flowing into the steel pipe from an end part of the steel
pipe due to the flow of the abrasive particles.
[0016] As the scale removing apparatus shown in the above item (2), for example, any mode
of items (a) to (c) described below is preferably adopted.
[0017]
- (a) The dust collector is installed so as to be capable of collecting dust particles
from a pipe end on the opposite side to a nozzle insertion end of the steel pipe,
and the restraining means is formed of a plate material having a size capable of covering
the nozzle insertion end of the steel pipe and has a through hole where the high-pressure
jet nozzle can be slid.
[0018]
(b) The dust collector is installed so as to be capable of collecting dust particles
from a pipe end on the opposite side to a nozzle insertion end of the steel pipe,
and the restraining means is attached to the outer periphery of the high-pressure
jet nozzle and is formed of a disc-shaped plate material having an outside diameter
equivalent to an inside diameter of the steel pipe so as to be capable of sliding
in the steel pipe.
[0019]
(c) The restraining means, which is formed of a plate material having a size capable
of covering the end part of the steel pipe, is installed at a pipe end on the opposite
side to a nozzle insertion end of the steel pipe, and the dust collector is installed
so that dust particles can be collected from the same pipe end as the nozzle insertion
end of the steel pipe.
Effects of the Invention
[0020] According to the present invention, dust particles do not scatter into the atmosphere
even with a low-capacity dust collector in high-pressure jet blasting, so that energy
can be saved, and at the same time, the work environment can be improved.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0021]
Figure 1 is a perspective view showing one example of a scale removing apparatus in
accordance with the present invention;
Figure 2 is a perspective view showing another example of a scale removing apparatus
in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 3 is a perspective view showing still another example of a scale removing apparatus
in accordance with the present invention;
Figure 4 is a perspective view of a conventional scale removing apparatus;
Figure 5 is a graph showing the relationship between pipe inside diameter and in-pipe
air flow rate in an experiment conducted while changing the pipe inside diameter and
a nozzle pressure variously;
Figure 6 is a graph showing the relationship between pipe inside diameter and in-pipe
air flow rate in example embodiment of the present invention and comparative example;
Figure 7 is a perspective view showing experimental conditions;
Figure 8 is a sectional view showing measurement positions of in-pipe flow rate; and
Figure 9 is a graph showing the relationship between position index X and flow rate
index Y.
Best Mode for Carrying Out the Invention
[0022] An embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to Figures
1 to 3. As shown in Figure 1, a scale removing apparatus 7 in accordance with the
present invention is a scale removing apparatus that performs blasting on the internal
surface of a steel pipe 3 by causing abrasive particles (not shown) ejected through
a high-pressure jet nozzle 2 to collide with the internal surface of the steel pipe
3. The scale removing apparatus 7 has the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 for ejecting
the abrasive particles, a dust collector 4 for collecting dust particles after blasting,
and restraining means 6 for restraining air from flowing into the steel pipe 3 from
an end part thereof due to the flow of abrasive particles ejected through the high-pressure
jet nozzle 2.
[0023] Thereby, during blasting, air can be restrained from flowing into the steel pipe
3 from the end part (the left end part in the figure) of the steel pipe 3. Therefore,
dust particles produced by blasting can be collected even if the capacity of the dust
collector is not increased.
[0024] An example of a scale removing apparatus 7 in accordance with the present invention
is shown in Figure 1. In the apparatus, for example, the dust collector 4 is installed
so that dust particles can be collected from a pipe end (the right end part of the
steel pipe 3 in Figure 1) on the opposite side to a nozzle insertion end (the left
end part of the steel pipe 3 in Figure 1) of the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 of the
steel pipe 3, and the restraining means 6 is formed of a plate material having a size
capable of covering the nozzle insertion end (the left end part of the steel pipe
3 in Figure 1) of the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 of the steel pipe 3 and has a through
hole where the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 can be slid.
[0025] The other example of a scale removing apparatus 7 in accordance with the present
invention is shown in Figure 2. The apparatus is the same as that shown in Figure
1 in that a dust collector 4 is installed so that dust particles can be collected
from a pipe end (the right end part of a steel pipe 3 in Figure 2) on the opposite
side to a nozzle insertion end (the left end part of the steel pipe 3 in Figure 2)
of a high-pressure jet nozzle 2 of the steel pipe 3. In the apparatus, however, restraining
means 6 is attached to the outer periphery of the high-pressure jet nozzle 2, and
is formed of a disc-shaped plate material having an outside diameter equivalent to
the inside diameter of the steel pipe 3 so as to be capable of sliding in the steel
pipe 3.
[0026] The other example of a scale removing apparatus 7 in accordance with the present
invention is shown in Figure 3. In the apparatus, for example, restraining means 6
is installed at a pipe end (the right end part of a steel pipe 3 in Figure 3) on the
opposite side to a nozzle insertion end (the left end part of the steel pipe 3 in
Figure 3) of a high-pressure jet nozzle 2 of the steel pipe 3, a dust collector (not
shown) is installed so that dust particles can be collected from the same pipe end
as the nozzle insertion end (the left end part of the steel pipe 3 in Figure 3) of
the high-pressure jet nozzle 2 of the steel pipe 3, and the restraining means 6 is
formed of a plate material having a size capable of covering the end part of the steel
pipe 3.
[0027] An expandable material such as rubber is desirably used as the restraining means.
The restraining means is not subject to any special restriction if it is configured
so as to be capable of restraining air from flowing into the steel pipe from the end
part of the steel pipe. For example, in the example shown in Figure 2, in the case
where the size of the steel pipe differs greatly, the size of the restraining means
must be changed. Therefore, in the case where the size of steel pipe subjected to
blasting changes frequently, it is desirable to use a plate material having a size
far larger than the outside diameter of steel pipe as in the examples shown in Figures
1 and 3. Also, in the examples shown in Figures 1 and 2, two dust collectors must
be provided at the pipe end on the opposite side to the nozzle insertion end to collect
dust particles. However, in the example shown in Figure 3, only one dust collector
may be provided to collect dust particles from the same pipe end as the nozzle insertion
end. Therefore, the example shown in Figure 3 is desirable, because the configuration
of apparatus is simple and the number of consumable parts can be reduced and a repair
cost can be decrease.
[0028] In the case where scale is removed throughout the overall length of steel pipe by
using the high-pressure jet nozzle, the length of the transportation pipe must inevitably
be increased, and also the amount of abrasive particles to be ejected must be increased.
Therefore, the abrasive particles remain easily in the pipe. If the remaining amount
of abrasive particles increases, the work for moving the transportation pipe is sometimes
difficult to do. For this reason, the scale removing apparatus of the present invention
is especially effective in removing scale at the pipe end of steel pipe by using the
high-pressure jet nozzle.
Embodiment 1
[0029] In order to verify the effects of the present invention, an experiment was conducted
where pipes having different inside diameter is prepared the high-pressure jet nozzle
was first inserted from one end of each pipe, and then air was ejected while the nozzle
jet pressure (nozzle pressure) was changed variously, whereby the flow rate of air
at the pipe end on the opposite side to the nozzle insertion side was examined. In
this experiment, the inside diameter of the abrasive particles transfer pipe was set
at 5.27 mm, and the amount of air discharged from the pipe end part when air is blown
into the steel pipes having different inside diameters by using the high-pressure
jet nozzle (nozzle pressure: 4.9 to 39.2 N/cm
2) was measured. The measurement results are shown in Figure 5.
[0030] If the in-pipe air flow rate is 2 Nm
3/min or lower, all dust particles produced at the time of blasting can be removed
even with a low-capacity blower of 14.0 kW (diameter: 100 mm, 1750 rpm, -5000 mmAq).
However, if the in-pipe air flow rate exceeds 5 Nm
3/min, the above-described low-capacity blower is insufficient to collect dust, and
dust particles are liable to scatter into the atmosphere. Therefore, the in-pipe air
flow rate must be controlled so as to be 5 Nm
3/min or lower, preferably 2 Nm
3/min or lower.
[0031] As shown in Figure 5, with an increase in the nozzle pressure, the in-pipe air flow
rate increases. For example, as is apparent from the example where the pipe inside
diameter is 55 mm, in the examples where the nozzle pressure is 4.9 N/cm
2 and 9.8 N/cm
2, the in-pipe air flow rate can be kept at 5 Nm
3/min or lower. However, in the example where the nozzle pressure is 19.6 N/cm
2 or higher, the in-pipe air flow rate exceeds 5 Nm
3/min. On the other hand, in the case where the pipe inside diameter is large, the
in-pipe air flow rate increases. For example, as is apparent from the example where
the nozzle pressure is 29.4 N/cm
2, in the examples where the pipe inside diameter is 31 mm and 44 mm, the in-pipe air
flow rate can be kept at 5 Nm
3/min or lower. However, in the example where the pipe inside diameter is 55 mm or
larger, the in-pipe air flow rate exceeds 5 Nm
3/min.
Embodiment 2
[0032] Next, an experiment was conducted where pipes having different inside diameter is
prepared, the restraining means of the present invention shown in Figure 1 was used,
the high-pressure jet nozzle was inserted into one end of each pipe, and air having
a nozzle pressure of 39.2 N/cm
2 was ejected in the state where the pipe end on the nozzle insertion side was closed,
whereby the flow rate of air at the pipe end on the opposite side to the nozzle insertion
side was examined as in the embodiment 1. The experimental results are shown in Figure
6. A comparative example in Figure 6 is the example where the nozzle pressure is 39.2
N/cm
2 in the embodiment 1.
[0033] As shown in Figure 6, in the example embodiment of the present invention, even when
air having a pressure as high as 39.2 N/cm
2 was ejected, the in-pipe air flow rate did not increase so much, and in any examples,
the in-pipe air flow rate could be kept at 5 Nm
3/min or lower.
[0034] Successively, the same experiment as the above-described one was conducted by using
the restraining means shown in Figures 2 and 3. In this experiment, the in-pipe air
flow rate could be kept at 5 Nm
3/min or lower as in the example embodiment of the present invention shown in Figure
6.
Embodiment 3
[0035] Next, to study the conditions where dust particles are not produced, steel pipes
each having an outside diameter of 88.9 mm, 114.3 mm, and 177.8 mm were prepared,
the high-pressure jet nozzle (nozzle diameter: 10.0 mm) was inserted into the steel
pipe from one end of steel pipe, and the abrasive particles were blown (jet flow rate:
5.9 Nm
3/min) and was sucked by the dust collector connected to the other end of steel pipe
(suction flow rate: 11.9 Nm
3/min), whereby the production state of dust particles and the in-pipe flow rate at
this time were examined. The ratio of suction flow rate to jet flow rate (hereinafter,
referred to as "Yc") was 2. As shown in Figure 7, the experiment was conducted by
providing a restraining plate, serving as the restraining means, having a size larger
than the inside diameter of steel pipe at a position near the pipe end on the nozzle
insertion side and by variously changing a distance "a" between the pipe end and the
restraining plate. The in-pipe flow rate is an average value of flow rates at one
point at the circle central portion at the pipe end on the dust collector connection
side and at four points in the circumferential portion, that is, at five points indicated
by black dots in Figure 8.
[0036] Figure 9 shows the relationship between the ratio of distance "a" to nozzle diameter
(hereinafter, referred to as a "position index X") and the ratio of in-pipe flow rate
to jet flow rate (hereinafter, referred to as a "flow rate index Y"). As shown in
Figure 9, for any of the steel pipes, with an increase in the value of position index
X, the value of flow rate index Y increases. This tendency becomes remarkable with
an increase in steel pipe size. On the other hand, for any of the steel pipes, if
the flow rate index Y exceeded 2, that is, exceeded Yc, dust particles were produced.
Therefore, in order to prevent dust particles, it is important that the flow rate
index Y do not exceed Yc. In order for the in-pipe flow rate not to exceed the suction
flow rate of dust collector, the distance X must be set in a proper range in relation
to the nozzle diameter.
Industrial Applicability
[0037] According to the present invention, dust particles do not scatter into the atmosphere
even with a low-capacity dust collector in high-pressure jet blasting, so that energy
can be saved and the work environment can be improved.
Description of Symbols
[0038]
- 1. abrasive particles transfer pipe
- 2. high-pressure jet nozzle
- 3. steel pipe
- 4. dust collector
- 5. dust particles
- 6. restraining means
- 7. scale removing apparatus