[0001] This invention relates to cast explosive compositions, their preparation and use.
In particular, the invention relates to polymer-bonded explosive compositions.
[0002] Explosives compositions are generally shaped, the shape required depending upon the
purpose intended. Shaping can be by casting, pressing, extruding or moulding; casting
and pressing being the most common shaping techniques. However, it is generally desirable
to cast explosives compositions as casting offers a greater design flexibility than
pressing.
[0003] Polymer-bonded explosives (also known as plastic-bonded explosives and PBX) are typically
explosive powders bound into a polymer matrix. The presence of the matrix modifies
the physical and chemical properties of the explosive and often facilitates the casting
and curing of high melting point explosives. Such explosives could otherwise only
be cast using melt-casting techniques. Melt casting techniques can require high processing
temperatures as they generally include a meltable binder. The higher the melting point
of this binder, the greater the potential hazard. In addition, the matrix can be used
to prepare polymer-bonded explosives which are less sensitive to friction, impact
and heat; for instance, an elastomeric matrix could provide these properties. The
matrix also facilitates the fabrication of explosive charges which are less vulnerable
in terms of their response to impact, shock, thermal and other hazardous stimuli.
Alternatively, a rigid polymer matrix could allow the resulting polymer-bonded explosive
to be shaped by machining, for instance using a lathe, allowing the production of
explosive materials with complex configurations where necessary.
[0004] US 6,893,516 describes an explosive mixture in which the crystalline explosive is coated with
polysiloxanes to produce a granular product. The application of this coating to each
crystal smoothes the surface of the crystals eliminating fine pores which could otherwise
trigger unwanted reaction of the explosive. As such, the polysiloxane coating reduces
the sensitivity of the granular explosive, improving safety in handling and during
any subsequent shaping steps.
[0005] Conventional casting techniques often result in a solidified composition which retains
air bubbles introduced during mixing of the material and by the placing of the composition
into the mould. Typically such placing of the composition into the mould will be by
pouring of the composition. These voids can reduce the performance of the composition
as less explosive is present per unit volume. In addition, porosity or voids, where
present in sufficient quantity, can affect the shock sensitivity of the composition,
making the composition less stable to impact or ignition from a shock wave.
[0006] US 3 260 631 and
US 3 245 849 disclose cured cast propellant compositions comprising 45-95 wt.% of an oxidizer
such as ammonium nitrate or ammonium perchlorate, 5-55 wt.% of a binder, up to 0.01
wt.% of a silicone oil as a defoaming agent and up to 1 wt.% of a silicone free wetting
agent as a processing aid for improving castability and processability.
DE 14 46 902 discloses a cured cast propellant composition comprising ammonium perchlorate, an
organic explosive, a binder and up to 0.01 wt.% of a silicone oil as a defoaming agent.
[0007] The invention seeks to provide a cast explosive composition in which the stability
of the composition is improved through the reduction of the number and/or total volume
of voids. Such a composition would not only offer improved stability, but also a reduced
sensitivity to factors such as friction, impact and heat. Thus, the risk of inadvertent
initiation of the explosive is diminished.
In one aspect of the invention there is provided a cast explosive composition comprising
a polymer-bonded explosive wherein the polymer-bonded explosive comprises in the range
about 75 - 95 wt% RDX and in the range about 5 - 25 wt% polyurethane binder, and 0.05
- 2 wt% of a silicone free defoaming agent, wherein the defoaming agent is a combination
of polymers.
[0008] The presence of the defoaming agent may reduce or substantially eliminate the voids
which would often remain in the composition. Accordingly, where used herein the term
"defoaming agent" is intended to mean an additive with surface active properties which
acts to eliminate voids from within the polymeric binder of the cast explosive composition.
Any additive which does not perform this function is not regarded as constituting
a defoaming agent within the meaning of the invention. In the art, such additives
are also known as "anti-foaming agents", "deaerating agents" and "air release agents".
[0009] The voids are typically found within the body of the binder component of the polymer-bonded
explosive, rather than at the interface between the binder and the explosive component.
Removal of these voids is particularly desirable where the intended use of the explosive
will result in exposure to high g-forces, such as would be the case in an artillery
shell, mortar bomb or missile. It is believed that under such conditions, adiabatic
compression of the voids occurs making the region around the void more prone to premature
ignition. Another application where the removal of voids is of particular importance
is where the intended use of the explosive will result in rapid deceleration on impact
with a target but where penetration of the target is required before the munition
is detonated. This would be the case with bombs and missiles. Where voids are present,
adiabatic compression of these may result in ignition on impact, before penetration
of the target has occurred.
[0010] In addition, the defoaming agent reduces the viscosity of the composition, allowing
the casting process to be carried out more rapidly than in the absence of this additive.
Further, compositions containing the defoaming agent have been seen in some instances
to have a higher density in terms of %TMD achieved than when this additive is absent.
This increase in density has also been linked to an improved stability and reduction
in sensitivity of the explosive. In many cases, the reduction of voids will correlate
with an increase in density; however as the compositions of the invention are complex,
an increase in density can only be taken as an indication that the number of voids
has been reduced. In many instances other methods, such as X-radiography are used
to directly visualise the voids and to determine the effect of the defoaming agent.
[0011] In an additional aspect of the invention there is provided a process for reducing
the number and/or total volume of voids in a cast explosive composition comprising
the steps of:
combining a polymer-bonded explosive as defined in claim 1 and 0.05 - 2 wt% of a silicon
free defoaming agentwherein the defoaming agent is a combination of polymers; and
casting the explosive composition.
[0012] Another aspect not forming part of the invention relates to the use of a cast explosive
composition as described herein in an explosive product, and a further aspect not
forming part of the invention relates to an explosive product comprising a cast explosive
composition as described herein.
[0013] In a further aspect there is provided the use of 0.05 - 2 wt% of a silicon free defoaming
agentwherein the defoaming agent is a combination of polymers for reducing the number
and/or total volume of voids in a cast explosive composition according to claim 1.
[0014] Polymer-bonded explosives include a polymeric binder which forms a matrix bonding
explosive particles within. The binder will comprise at least partly polyurethane
(5-25 wt.% of the composition), often the binder will comprise 50 - 100 wt% polyurethane,
in some instances, 80 - 100 wt%. In some embodiments the binder will consist of polyurethane.
Polyurethanes derived from MDI (methylene diphenyl diisocyanate) and TDI (toluene
diisocyanate) and IPDI (isophorone diisocyanate) may be used. IPDI is generally preferred
as it is a liquid and hence easy to dispense; it is relatively slow to react, providing
a long pot-life and slower temperature changes during reaction; and it has a relatively
low toxicity compared to most other isocyanates. It is also preferred that the polyurethane
binder includes a hydroxyterminated polybutadiene.
[0015] The explosive component of the polymer-bonded explosive may be in admixture with
a metal powder which may function as a fuel or which may be included to achieve a
specific terminal effect. The metal powder may be selected from a wide range of metals
including aluminium, magnesium, tungsten, alloys of these metals and combinations
thereof. Often the fuel will be aluminium or an alloy thereof; often the fuel will
be aluminium powder.
[0016] The polymer-bonded explosive comprises RDX. The polymer-bonded explosive may comprise
RDX as the only explosive component, or in combination with a secondary explosive
component, such as HMX. Preferably, RDX comprises 50 - 100 wt% of the explosive component.
[0017] In many cases the binder will be present in the range about 5 - 20 wt% of the polymer-bonded
explosive, often about 5 - 15 wt%, or about 8 - 12 wt%. The polymer-bonded explosive
may comprise about 88 wt% RDX and about 12 wt% polyurethane binder. However, the relative
levels of RDX to polyurethane binder may be in the range about 75 - 95 wt% RDX and
5 - 25 wt% polyurethane binder. Polymer-bonded explosives of this composition are
commercially available, for example, Rowanex 1100™.
[0018] The defoaming agent is a combination of silicone-free surface active polymers. Such
silicone-free polymers include alkoxylated alcohols, triisobutyl phosphate, and fumed
silica. Commercially available products which may be used include, BYK 088, BYK A500,
BYK 066N and BYK A535 each available from BYK Additives and Instruments, a subdivision
of Altana; TEGO MR2132 available from Evonik; and BASF SD23 and SD40, both available
from BASF. Of these, BYK A535 and TEGO MR2132 are often used as they are solventless
products with good void reduction properties.
[0019] The defoaming agent may be added to the composition in a solvent carrier. However,
it is generally preferred that solvents be absent. It has been found that the use
of defoaming agents which are not carried in a solvent, or even the use of entirely
solventless systems, is advantageous as there are fewer (or substantially no) volatile
components present during processing of the composition, reducing the safety precautions
and/or plant modifications needed. Further, the exclusion of solvents eliminates the
risk of residual volatiles separating (for instance by evaporation or leaking) from
the composition during storage resulting in unpredictable modifications of the properties
of the compositions such as the creation of voids as a result of volatile evaporation.
[0020] The defoaming agent is present in the range 0.05 - 2 wt%, in many cases about 0.25
or 0.5 - 1 wt%. At levels below this (i.e. below 0.01 wt%) there is often insufficient
defoaming agent in the composition to significantly alter the properties of the polymer-bonded
explosive, whereas above this level (i.e. above 2 wt%) the viscosity of the cast solution
may be so low that the composition becomes inhomogeneous as a result of sedimentation
and segregation processes occurring within the mixture.
[0021] Without being bound by theory, it is believed that the defoaming agent not only acts
to reduce viscosity, facilitating the casting process and the egress of voids from
the composition during casting, but that the defoaming agents are surface active at
the void-composition interfaces, causing the void bubbles to coalesce and hence be
expelled from the composition as a result of the greater buoyancy of the larger bubbles
produced. This results in compositions with fewer visible voids, which are more stable
than known explosive compositions.
[0022] The explosive composition may include a solvent, any solvent in which at least one
of the components is soluble and which does not adversely affect the safety of the
final product may be used, as would be understood by the person skilled in the art.
However, it is preferred, for the reasons described above, that in some embodiments
that solvent be absent.
[0023] Where present, the solvent may be added as a carrier for the defoaming agent or another
component of the composition. The solvent will typically be removed from the explosive
composition during the casting process, however some solvent residue may remain due
to imperfections in the processing techniques or where it becomes uneconomical to
remove the remaining solvent from the composition. Accordingly, in some embodiments
the polymer-bonded explosive and the defoaming agent are combined in the presence
of a solvent. Often the solvent will be selected from diisobutylketone, polypropylene
glycol, isoparaffins, propylene glycol, cyclohexanone, butyl glycol, ethylhexanol,
white spirit, isoparaffins, xylene, methoxypropylacetate, butylacetate, naphthenes,
glycolic acid butyl ester, alkyl benzenes and combinations thereof. In some instances,
the solvent is selected from diisobutylketone, polypropylene glycol, isoparaffins,
propylene glycol, isoparaffins, and combinations thereof.
[0024] Although melt casting processes are compatible with the invention, typically the
inventive composition will be cast using "cast and curing" techniques. Accordingly,
where the components of the cast explosive composition are not inherently curable
(for instance, where all polymer components are thermoplastic polymers) a curative
may optionally be present. In many embodiments the casting technique used is vacuum
casting as the resulting product is generally of greater density and no visible voids
compared with the equivalent air-cast product. In general, the curing step will take
place after the casting step has occurred.
[0025] The composition may also contain minor amounts of other additives commonly used in
explosives compositions. Examples of these include microcrystalline wax, energetic
plasticisers, non-energetic plasticisers, antioxidants, catalysts, curing agents,
metallic fuels, coupling agents, surfactants, dyes and combinations thereof. Energetic
plasticisers may be selected from eutectic mixtures of alkylnitrobenzenes (such as
dinitro- and trinitro-ethyl benzene), alkyl derivatives of linear nitramines (such
as an N-alkyl nitratoethyl-nitramine, for instance butyl-NENA), and glycidyl azide
digomers.
[0026] Casting the explosive composition offers a greater flexibility of process design
than can be obtained with pressing techniques. This is because the casting of different
shapes can be facilitated through the simple substitution of one casting mould for
another. In other words, the casting process is backwards-compatible with earlier
processing apparatus. Conversely, where a change of product shape is required using
pressing techniques, it is typically necessary to redesign a substantial portion of
the production apparatus for compatibility with the mould, or the munition to be filled,
leading to time and costs penalties. Further, casting techniques are less limited
by size than pressing techniques which depend upon the transmission of pressure through
the moulding powder to cause compaction. This pressure falls off rapidly with distance,
making homogeneous charges with large length to diameter ratios (such as many shell
fillings) more difficult to manufacture.
[0027] In addition, the casting process of the invention offers a moulded product (the cast
explosive compositions described) with a reliably uniform fill regardless of the shape
required by the casting. This may be partly attributed to the use of a casting technique,
and partly to the presence of the defoaming agent. The defoaming agent substantially
reduces the number of voids within the binder and hence the cast explosive composition.
In some instances, the voids are substantially eliminated. Casting can occur in situ
with the housing (such as a munition) to be filled acting as the mould; or the composition
can be moulded and transferred into a housing in a separate step. Often casting will
occur in situ.
[0028] Further, compositions including polymer-bonded explosives and hydroxyterminated polybutadiene
binders in particular, are more elastomeric when cast than when pressed. This makes
them less prone to undergoing a deflagration-to-detonation transition when exposed
to accidental stimuli. Instead, such systems burn without detonating, making them
safer to use than pressed systems.
[0029] Additionally, the shapes that pressing processes can be reliably applied to are more
limited. For instance, it is often a problem achieving a complete fill of a conical
shape using pressing techniques as air is often trapped at or towards the tip of the
cone. Casting processes, being intrinsically "fluid" processes, are not limited in
this way.
[0030] The process of the invention may be a continuous or batch process as appropriate.
Many known casting processes will be compatible for use with the invention as modification
of these processes to allow for the addition of the defoaming agent to the polymer-bonded
explosive and to allow the defoaming agent to perform its defoaming function during
casting, is within the capabilities of the person skilled in the art. Where a continuous
process is used this may make use of static mixing technology such as the technology
described in
EP 1485669.
[0031] The process may utilise a premix or precure as a starting material, although these
are not essential. A premix will typically be a mixture of an explosive component
and a binder component, usually a plasticiser. In some instances the explosive component
is desensitized with water prior to formation of the premix, a process known as wetting
or phlegmatization. However, as retention of water within the premix is generally
undesirable it will typically be removed from the premix prior to further processing,
for instance by heating during the mixing of the explosive component and the plasticiser.
[0032] In some cases the plasticiser will be absent; however the plasticiser will typically
be present in the range 0 - 10 wt% of the plasticiser and explosive premix, often
in the range 0.01 - 8 wt%, on occasion 0.5 - 7 wt% or 4 - 6 wt%. The plasticiser will
often be a non-energetic plasticiser, many are known in the art; however energetic
plasticisers may also be used in some instances. A precure will typically be a combination
of the premix and the other components of the composition with the exception of the
catalyst and the curing agent. In some instances the defoaming agent will also be
absent from the precure.
[0033] The cast explosive composition of the invention has utility both as a main charge
or a booster charge in an explosive product. Often the composition will be the main
charge. The composition of the invention may be used in any "energetic" application
where the presence of voids causes safety or functional problems. Such uses include
mortar bombs and artillery shells as discussed above. Additionally, the inventive
composition may be used to prepare explosives for gun-launch applications, explosive
filings for bombs and warheads, propellants, including composite propellants, base
bleed compositions, gun propellants and gas generators.
[0034] Except in the examples, or where otherwise explicitly indicated, all numbers in this
description indicating amounts of material or conditions of reaction, physical properties
of materials and/or use are to be understood as modified by the word "about." All
amounts are by weight of the final composition, unless otherwise specified. Further,
the cast explosive composition may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of
any of the possible combinations of components described above and in the claims except
for where otherwise specifically indicated. The process for reducing the voids in
the composition may comprise, consist essentially of, or consist of the steps specified
above and in the claims.
[0035] The following non-limiting examples illustrate the invention.
Examples
Example 1
[0036] A series of commercially available defoaming agents were cast and cured with Rowanex
1100 (88 wt% RDX and 12 wt% polyurethane agent). Curing occurred over 5 days at 65°
C. 105mm and 155mm shells prepared using the resulting composition were found to have
no detectable voids, and no adverse effect on the chemical or mechanical properties
of the polymer-bonded explosive were observed. Table 1 below illustrates the effect
of binder type and level on the viscosity and density of the composition.
[0037] Only the compositions comprising silicone free combinations of polymers as defoaming
agents constitute examples according to the present invention.
TABLE 1
| 1. Defoaming Agent* |
Dosage (wt%) |
Viscosity (cps)# |
Density - Vacuum Cast (g/cm3) |
Density - Air Cast (g/cm3) |
% TMD§ (air cast) |
| No Additive |
- |
0.12 |
1.608 |
1.608 |
99.3 |
| Solution of foam-destroying polymers and polysiloxanes in isoparaffin solvent (BYK
088)@ |
1.0 |
0.035 |
1.608 |
1.602 |
99.6 |
| Solution of silicone-free foam-destroying polymers in Alkylbenzene/ methoxypropylacetate
12/1 (BYK A500) |
1.0 |
0.033 |
1.612 |
1.606 |
99.9 |
| Solution of foam-destroying polysiloxanes in diisobutylketone (BYK 066N)@ |
0.1 |
0.12 |
1.614 |
1.619 |
99.6 |
| Solution of foam-destroying polysiloxanes in diisobutylketone (BYK 066N)@ |
0.5 |
0.063 |
1.618 |
1.608 |
99.6 |
| Solution of foam-destroying polysiloxanes in diisobutylketone (BYK 066N)@ |
1.0 |
0.04 |
1.620 |
1.605 |
99.8 |
| Solvent free mixture of foam-destroying polymers silicone free (BYK A535) |
0.1 |
0.076 |
1.6 |
1.6 |
98.9 |
| Solvent free mixture of foam-destroying polymers silicone free (BYK A535) |
0.5 |
0.07 |
1.612 |
1.608 |
99.6 |
| Solvent free mixture of foam-destroying polymers silicone free (BYK A535) |
1.0 |
0.034 |
1.59 |
1.597 |
99.3 |
| Concentrate based on organosiloxanes plus fumed silica (TEGO MR2132)@ |
0.1 |
0.12 |
1.605 |
1.622 |
100 |
| Concentrate based on organosiloxanes plus fumed silica (TEGO MR2132)@ |
0.5 |
0.073 |
1.613 |
1.609 |
99.7 |
| Concentrate based on organosiloxanes plus fumed silica (TEGO MR2132)@ |
1.0 |
0.047 |
1.594 |
1.561 |
97.1 |
| Solvent free, silicone free alkoxylated alcohol (BASF SD23) |
0.1 |
0.133 |
1.611 |
1.612 |
99.6 |
| Solvent free, silicone free alkoxylated alcohol (BASF SD23) |
0.5 |
0.09 |
1.597 |
1.597 |
98.9 |
| Solvent free, silicone free alkoxylated alcohol (BASF SD23) |
1.0 |
0.28 |
1.623 |
1.623 |
100 |
| Solvent free, silicone free triisobutyl phosphate (BASF SD40) |
0.1 |
0.08 |
1.609 |
1.610 |
99.5 |
| Solvent free, silicone free triisobutyl phosphate (BASF SD40) |
0.5 |
0.06 |
1.598 |
1.603 |
99.3 |
| Solvent free, silicone free triisobutyl phosphate (BASF SD40) |
1.0 |
0.07 |
1.596 |
1.598 |
99.4 |
| Dibutylketone only |
1.0 |
-- |
1.599 |
1.598 |
99.4 |
| Dibutylketone only |
0.5 |
-- |
1.597 |
1.602 |
99.2 |
* defoaming agents were procured from BYK Additives and Instruments, a subdivision
of Altana; Evonik or BASF
# Viscosity determined at 60°C
§ TMD is the Theoretical Maximum Density of the composition calculated to allow for
the intrinsic density lowering effect arising when additives are added. The TMD is
the sum of the relative volume of each component as determined from their relative
mass within the composition and known density. As a result, the TMD gives a true indication
of the density modification arising as a result of a change in the number of voids.
@ No longer form part of the invention |
[0038] As can be seen, the presence of each of the defoaming agents at levels above 0.1
wt% reduces the viscosity of the composition making it easier to cast. Further, as
the level of defoaming agent is increased to 1.0 wt%, the viscosity of the composition
is further reduced.
[0039] The presence of defoaming agent also increases the density, providing an indicator
that the number of voids has been reduced. Calculation of the TMD provides a further
indicator, as an increase in the TMD relative to that obtained where no additive is
present shows that the number of voids in the sample has been reduced relative to
the additive free composition.
[0040] It is clear that it is the defoaming agent having a density increasing effect as
the addition of dibutylketone only (i.e. solvent only), reduces the density of the
composition whether prepared by a vacuum or an air casting technique.
[0041] The data above shows that vacuum casting generally produces compositions of a higher
relative density than air casting techniques where defoaming agents are present. Further,
vacuum casting techniques generally have a more marked effect upon the density of
compositions containing defoaming agents when compared to additive free or solvent
only compositions.
[0042] However, even where air casting techniques are used, it is clear that the defoaming
agents are acting to reduce the number of voids in the compositions tested as each
defoaming agent provides a composition which is either of higher density, or has a
higher TMD, than the control compositions including either no additive, or solvent
only.
Example 2
[0043] The compatibility of the defoaming agents with the Rowanex 1100 was also tested,
and the results set out in Table 2 below.
[0044] Only the compositions comprising silicone free combinations of polymers as defoaming
agents constitute examples according to the present invention.
TABLE 2
| 1. Defoaming Agent |
Compatibility |
| BYK 066N*@ |
Pass |
| Solution of foam-destroying polysiloxanes in propylene glycol (BYK 088A) *@ |
Pass |
| BYK 088*@ |
Pass |
| BYK A500* |
Pass |
| BYK A535* |
Pass |
| TEGO MR2132#@ |
Pass |
| BASF SD23§ |
Pass |
| BASF SD40§ |
Pass |
* Procured from BYK Additives and Instruments, a subdivision of Altana
# Procured from Evonik
§ Procured from BASF
@ no longer form part of the invention |
[0045] Compatibility was measured following STANAG 4147 Test 1: Procedure B, at a temperature
of 100°C for 40 hours. All of the defoaming agents tested were found to meet the requirements
of this test, and hence to be compatible with the Rowanex 1100 PBX product, as illustrated
by the results in the table above which indicate that each of the materials tested
evolved less than 1 ml/g of gas for a 5g sample. No adverse reaction was observed
with any of the defoaming agents, although a particularly good compatibility was observed
between Rowanex 1100 and BYK A535. Indeed, the use of BYK A535, a solventless defoaming
agent, has been found to provide a particularly stable product with acceptable activity
in terms of void removal.
Example 3
[0046] The sensitivity of the Rowanex 1100 and defoaming agent mixtures was tested for sensitivity
to mechanical impact (Rotter Impact) to determine the relative hazard associated with
using the mixture as opposed to the pure PBX product. The results are set out in Table
3.
[0047] Only the compositions comprising silicone free combinations of polymers as defoaming
agents constitute examples according to the present invention.
TABLE 3
| 1. Additive |
Concentration (wt%) |
F of I |
| None |
- |
100 |
| BYK 088@ |
1 |
130 |
| BYK A500 |
1 |
130 |
| BYK 066N@ |
1 |
130 |
| BYK A535 |
0.5 |
102 |
| TEGO MR2132@ |
1 |
109 |
| BASF SD23 |
1 |
112 |
| BASF SD40 |
1 |
121 |
| @ No longer forms part of the invention |
[0048] The test determines the 50% drop height for the test sample. This examines the whole
probability of ignition versus stimulus-level relationship. Seven test heights equally
spaced on a logarithmic scale are chosen and caps are tested to see if ignitions take
place. Results are expressed in terms of Figures of Insensitiveness (F of I) relative
to standard RDX. All tests are carried out on samples of ground up material. The Rotter
Impact Test method was used to determine the F of I using an LSM Rotter machine.
[0049] The F of I value for all of the Rowanex 1100/defoaming agent samples was found to
be greater than or equal to the F of I value for Rowanex 1100 alone. This indicated
that the presence of the defoaming agent has no adverse effect on the sensitivity
of the PBX to mechanical impact and that as a result the combination products are
no more hazardous, and in some cases less hazardous, to use than Rowanex 1100 alone.
Without being bound by theory, this may be due to the marginal increase in binder,
and resultant reduction in nitramine content because of the presence of the defoaming
agent. It is further indicated that the Rowanex 1100/defoaming agent samples are likely
to be no more sensitive to ignition than untreated Rowanex 1100.
Example 4
[0050] A series of compositions including RDX were prepared, three of these compositions
included defoaming agents.
TABLE 4: Examples of Polymer-bonded Explosive (PBX) Compositions containing Defoaming
Agents
| Abbreviation |
Full name |
Function |
PBX (wt%) |
PBX with 0.1% BYK-A500 Defoamer (wt %) |
PBX with 0.5% BYK-A535 Defoamer (wt%) |
PBX with 1%BYK-066N@ Defoamer (wt% |
| DOA |
Dioctyl Adipate |
Plasticiser |
7.00 |
6.99 |
6.96 |
6.93 |
| HTPB |
Hydroxyterminated Polybutadiene |
Prepolymer |
4.28 |
4.28 |
4.26 |
4.24 |
| Lecithin |
|
Surfactant |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
0.30 |
| AO2246 |
2,2'-methylenebis-(4-methyl-6-tertiary - butyl phenol) |
Antioxidant |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
0.10 |
| IPDI |
Isophorone Diisocyanate |
Curing Agent |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
0.42 |
| DBTDL |
dibutyltin dilaurate |
Catalyst |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
| Additive |
|
|
0.00 |
0.10 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
| RDX* |
Hexogen |
Explosive Filler |
QS |
QS |
QS |
QS |
* May be present as pure RDX or combined with a plasticiser, for instance in the ratio
94:6 RDX:plasticiser.
@ No longer forms part of the invention |
[0051] The compositions were prepared using cast and curing processes as described in Example
1 and no voids were detected. No adverse effect on chemical and mechanical properties
was observed relative to the defoaming agent free RDX composition.
Example 5
[0052] The following example illustrates a method of preparing PBX compositions of the invention,
such as the compositions of Example 4, using a premix. The techniques used would be
well known to the person skilled in the art.
[0053] A water-jacketed, vertical mixer fitted with a rotating stirrer blade was used for
the preparation of the composition. All mixing was carried out under vacuum at a pressure
of less than 10 mm Hg. The compositions of this example were prepared on a 5 Kg scale
using the relative proportions of components set out in Example 4 above.
[0054] The premix was prepared from RDX desensitised with water. The water was then driven
off using techniques common in the art. The desensitised RDX (94 wt%) was then mixed
with DOA plasticiser (6 wt%) to form the premix.
[0055] The mixer was preheated to 60 ± 2°C and the following ingredients weighed into the
mixer in sequential order in relative amounts as described in Example 2 above:
- 1. HTPB
- 2. DOA
- 3. Lecithin
- 4. AO 2246
- 5. Premix (first quarter portion, i.e. 25 wt% of total premix to be added)
[0056] The composition was mixed for 15 minutes. The second, third and final quarter portions
of premix were then added with 10 minutes of mixing between each addition and after
the final addition. The mixer blades and bowl were scraped down to ensure that any
unmixed material was transferred to the mixing zone of the bowl and the composition
mixed for a further 60 minutes.
[0057] Defoaming agent was then added and the composition mixed until the maximum reduction
in viscosity upon addition of the defoaming agent to the composition was observed.
In this case mixing was for 25 minutes and viscosity reduction was measured using
a torque meter fixed to the mixer, when the torque required to complete the mixing
stabilised at a lower level than before the addition of the defoaming agent, the maximum
reduction in viscosity is regarded as having been observed.
[0058] The DBTL was added and the composition mixed for 15 minutes, then the IPDI added
and the composition mixed for a further 15 minutes. After mixing the viscosity of
the composition was recorded using a Brookfield viscometer (60°C).
[0059] The composition was cast and any excess mixture removed from the shell housings.
The shells were placed onto a vibrating table and allowed to vibrate for 5 minutes.
The charges were cured for 5 days at 65 ± 2°C.
Example 6
[0060] The following example illustrates a method of preparing PBX compositions of the invention,
such as the compositions of Example 4, from a precure. The techniques used would be
well known to the person skilled in the art.
[0061] Mixing conditions were as for Example 5. The precure was prepared from the premix
described in Example 5 above. To this premix was added all of the components of the
composition of Example 5 except for the defoaming agent, catalyst and curing agent.
[0062] The mixer was preheated to 60 ± 2°C and the components of the precure added and heated
for 15 minutes. The precure was then mixed for 30 minutes and the mixer blades and
bowl scraped to ensure that any unmixed material was transferred to the mixing zone
of the bowl. Defoaming agent was added and the composition mixed until the viscosity
reducing effect of the defoaming agent is observed, this was measured as described
in Example 5 and in this example required stirring for 25 minutes. The DBTL was added
and the composition mixed for 15 minutes, then the IPDI added and the composition
mixed for a further 15 minutes. The mixer blades and bowl were scraped to ensure that
any unmixed material was transferred to the mixing zone of the bowl. After mixing
the viscosity of the composition was recorded using a Brookfield viscometer (60°C).
[0063] The composition was cast and any excess mixture removed from the shell housings.
The charges were cured for 5 days at 65 ± 2°C.
[0064] It should be appreciated that the compositions of the invention are capable of being
incorporated in the form of a variety of embodiments, only a few of which have been
illustrated and described above.
1. A cured cast explosive composition comprising a polymer-bonded explosive which comprises
a binder and an explosive wherein the polymer-bonded explosive comprises in the range
about 75 - 95 wt% RDX and in the range about 5 - 25 wt% polyurethane binder,
and 0.05 - 2 wt% of a silicone free defoaming agent, wherein the defoaming agent is
a combination of polymers.
2. A cast explosive composition according to claim 1 wherein the binder is selected from
polyurethane, cellulosic materials such as cellulose acetate, polyesters, polybutadienes,
polyethylenes, polyisobutylenes, PVA, chlorinated rubber, epoxy resins, two-pack polyurethane
systems, alkyd/melanine, vinyl resins, alkyds, self-crosslinking acrylates, butadiene-styrene
block copolymers, polyNIMMO, polyGLYN, GAP, and blends, copolymers and/or combinations
thereof.
3. A cast explosive composition according to any preceding claim additionally comprising
a metal powder selected from aluminium, magnesium, tungsten, alloys of these metals
and combinations thereof in admixture with the polymer-bonded explosive.
4. A cast explosive composition according to any preceding claim wherein the binder is
present in the range of from 5 % to 15%.
5. A cast explosive composition according to claim 4, wherein the binder is present in
the range of from 8 % to 12%.
6. A cast explosive composition according to any preceding claim, wherein the defoaming
agent is present in the range 0.5 - 1 wt%.
7. A process for reducing the number and/or total volume of voids in a cast explosive
composition comprising the steps of:
combining a polymer-bonded explosive as defined in claim 1 to 6, and 0.05 - 2 wt%
of a silicon free defoaming agent, wherein the defoaming agent is a combination of
polymers;
and
casting the explosive composition.
8. A process according to claim 7, wherein the cast explosive composition is cured.
9. A process according to any of claims 7 to 8, wherein the casting comprises vacuum
casting.
10. Use of 0.05 - 2 wt% of a silicon free defoaming agent, wherein the defoaming agent
is a combination of polymers for reducing the number and/or total volume of voids
in a cast explosive composition as defined in any one of claims 1 to 6.
1. Gehärtete Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung, die einen polymergebundenen Sprengstoff
umfasst, umfassend ein Bindemittel und einen Sprengstoff, wobei der polymergebundene
Sprengstoff im Bereich von ungefähr 75 bis 95 Gew.-% RDX und im Bereich von ungefähr
5 bis 25 Gew.-% Polyurethanbindemittel umfasst,
und 0,05 bis 2 Gew.-% eines silikonfreien Entschäumers, wobei der Entschäumer eine
Kombination von Polymeren ist.
2. Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 1, wobei das Bindemittel aus Polyurethan,
cellulosehaltigen Materialien wie z. B. Celluloseacetat, Polyestern, Polybutadienen,
Poylethylenen, Polyisobutylenen, PVA, chloriertem Kautschuk, Epoxidharzen, 2-Komponenten-Polyurethansystemen,
Alkyd/Melanin, Vinylharzen, Alkyden, selbstvernetzenden Acrylaten, Butadien-Styrol-Blockcopolymeren,
PolyNIMMO, PolyGLYN, GAP und Vermengungen, Copolymeren und/oder Kombinationen davon
ausgewählt ist.
3. Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach einem vorstehenden Anspruch, die außerdem ein
Metallpulver, das aus Aluminium, Magnesium, Wolfram, Legierungen dieser Metalle und
Kombinationen davon ausgewählt ist, in einer Beimengung mit dem polymergebundenen
Sprengstoff umfasst.
4. Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach einem vorstehenden Anspruch, wobei das Bindemittel
im Bereich von 5 % bis 15 % vorhanden ist.
5. Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach Anspruch 4, wobei das Bindemittel im Bereich von
8 % bis 12 % vorhanden ist.
6. Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach einem vorstehenden Anspruch, wobei der Entschäumer
im Bereich von 0,5 bis 1 Gew.-% vorhanden ist.
7. Verfahren zum Verringern der Anzahl und/oder des Gesamtvolumens von Hohlräumen in
einer Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung, das die Schritte umfasst:
Kombinieren eines polymergebundenen Sprengstoffs nach Anspruch 1 bis 6 und 0,05 bis
2 Gew.-% eines siliciumfreien Entschäumers, wobei der Entschäumer eine Kombination
von Polymeren ist;
und
Gießen der Sprengstoffzusammensetzung.
8. Verfahren nach Anspruch 7, wobei die Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung gehärtet wird.
9. Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 7 bis 8, wobei das Gießen Vakuumgießen umfasst.
10. Verwendung von 0,05 bis 2 Gew.-% eines siliciumfreien Entschäumers, wobei der Entschäumer
eine Kombination von Polymeren zum Verringern der Anzahl und/oder Gesamtvolumens von
Hohlräumen in einer Gusssprengstoffzusammensetzung nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis
6 ist.
1. Composition explosive coulée durcie comprenant un explosif lié par polymère qui comprend
un liant et un explosif, dans laquelle l'explosif lié par polymère comprend dans la
plage d'environ 75 à 95 % en poids de RDX et dans la plage d'environ 5 à 25 % en poids
de liant de polyuréthane,
et 0,05 à 2 % en poids d'un agent antimousse sans silicone, l'agent antimousse étant
une combinaison de polymères.
2. Composition explosive coulée selon la revendication 1 dans laquelle le liant est choisi
parmi le polyuréthane, des matériaux cellulosiques tels que l'acétate de cellulose,
des polyesters, des polybutadiènes, des polyéthylènes, des polyisobutylènes, le PVA,
un caoutchouc chloré, des résines époxy, des systèmes de polyuréthane à deux composants,
alkyde/mélanine, des résines vinyliques, des alkydes, des acrylates autoréticulés,
des copolymères à blocs butadiène-styrène, polyNIMMO, polyGLYN, GAP, et des mélanges,
des copolymères et/ou des combinaisons de ceux-ci.
3. Composition explosive coulée selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes
comprenant en outre une poudre métallique choisie parmi l'aluminium, le magnésium,
le tungstène, des alliages de ces métaux et des combinaisons de ceux-ci en mélange
avec l'explosif lié par polymère.
4. Composition explosive coulée selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
dans laquelle le liant est présent dans la plage de 5 % à 15 %.
5. Composition explosive coulée selon la revendication 4, dans laquelle le liant est
présent dans la plage de 8 % à 12 %.
6. Composition explosive coulée selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes,
dans laquelle l'agent antimousse est présent dans la plage de 0,5 à 1 % en poids.
7. Procédé de réduction du nombre et/ou du volume total de vides dans une composition
explosive coulée comprenant les étapes de :
combinaison d'un explosif lié par polymère tel que défini dans les revendications
1 à 6, et de 0,05 à 2 % en poids d'un agent antimousse sans silicone, dans lequel
l'agent antimousse est une combinaison de polymères ; et
la coulée de la composition explosive.
8. Procédé selon la revendication 7, dans lequel la composition explosive coulée est
durcie.
9. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 7 à 8, dans lequel la coulée comprend
la coulée sous vide.
10. Utilisation de 0,05 à 2 % en poids d'un agent antimousse sans silicone, dans laquelle
l'agent antimousse est une combinaison de polymères pour réduire le nombre et/ou le
volume total de vides dans une composition explosive coulée telle que définie dans
l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 6.