State of the Art
[0001] The characteristics of a cast iron do not depend only on its chemical composition,
but also on its production process, both being factors which determine the shape in
which the carbon present (combined, lamellar, spheroidal, compact, etc.) precipitates
out during the solidification process.
[0002] The shape of the graphite defines the mechanical behavior of cast iron. In graphite
cast irons, most of what is produced is spheroidal graphite cast iron and lamellar
graphite cast iron, in which the graphites precipitate out in spheroidal and lamellar
shapes, respectively. The suitable material for manufacture is chosen depending on
the features that the pieces must comply with and taking into account economic factors.
Nevertheless, the properties of the material also depend on the perlite/ferrite ratio
of the matrix structure.
[0003] The pieces made of vermicular graphite cast iron (VGI) cover an intermediate field
between the properties offered by the pieces of the aforementioned types produced.
[0004] Thus, compared to cast iron lamellar, the vermicular graphite cast iron has greater
ductility and tensile strength, whereas compared to spheroidal cast iron, vermicular
graphite cast iron has greater thermal conductivity, a better response to vibration
and thermal shocks, as well as a lower shrinkage tendency during cooling.
[0005] In accordance with the stipulations of the ISO 16112 standard, type III (compact),
IV - V (intermediate) and VI (spheroidal) graphites, as they are classified in ISO
945, can coexist in VGI.
[0006] The percentage of vermicular graphite or degree of vermicularity in the metal produced,
hereinafter referred to as CGMet(%), is established by the proportion of each of these
groups of graphite. The determination of this percentage is what offers a clear idea
about the mechanical properties of the material.
[0007] Taking into account that each of the factors influencing the degree of vermicularity
is the cooling rate of the metal during its solidification process, hereinafter referred
to as CGMod(%) when the factors influencing the cooling rate, i.e., the thermal modulus,
are taken into account in the calculation of the percentage of vermicular graphite.
[0008] Different patents use the thermal analysis (TA) technique and the cooling curves
of the molten metal to obtain information relating to the CGMet(%) and distribution
of the precipitated graphites:
[0009] WO9206809 describes a method for knowing the amount of modifying agent that must be added to
the liquid metal to obtain the desired structure. Patent uses two cooling curves recorded
by means of thermocouples located in the thermal center and in the outer area in a
metal sample obtained of the cast iron to be treated.
[0010] Patent
EP0327237 describes a method in which a sample of cast iron treated with Mg is poured into
a vessel containing a certain amount of Te and S or Se. If the active Mg in the cast
iron is less than the amount that can be neutralized by the additions of S and Se,
the presence of Te will force carbidic solidification. If there is a larger amount
of active Mg than that with which the additions S and Se are neutralized, the solidification
of the metal will be graphitic despite the presence of the Te.
[0011] EP0327237 furthermore indicates that by means of thermal testing in cups with different amounts
of additions of S and Se, the Mg content necessary for the production of vermicular
graphite cast iron can be controlled.
[0012] Patent
WO9825133 describes a method for predicting the microstructure in which a graphite cast iron
will solidify, by means of cooling curves, without referring to the different CGMod(%)
that may occur in one and the same piece as a consequence of the different cooling
rates occurring therein.
[0013] Patent Ru2337973C2 explains a system for obtaining spheroidal and vermicular cast
iron, for single pieces or large-scale production by means of controlling the process
depending on the amount of liquid metal to be used, the concentration of sulphur and
oxygen and the time of the process.
[0014] Patent
WO2007017350 relates to a process for obtaining cast iron with vermicular graphite with high operational
security. For that purpose, a magnesium treatment alloy composed of magnesium and
another metal (to the exclusion of silicon) is added according to the invention to
an iron melt with a sulphur content of less than 0.05% by weight kept in a treatment
vessel in an inert atmosphere, until the magnesium content of the iron melt amounts
to 0.005-0.018 % by weight.
[0015] Patent
US6544359 describes a system for obtaining objects of vermicular cast iron from a cast iron
melt with a carbon content at the desired final level and a silicon content below
the desired final value, by means of adding magnesium compounds, for the purpose of
regulating the amount of oxygen in the material.
[0016] In any case, none of these processes is able to predict the behavior of the material
in specific areas of the piece. The result is always given in a generic manner without
taking into consideration the particular geometric or functional characteristics of
the pieces produced.
[0017] The patents available, therefore, are not able to predict the behavior that the material
produced has in very specific portions, and what factors such as the thickness or
high mechanical stressing, can be starting points of fracturing.
[0018] Therefore, an important step forward is provided in the invention described below
as it offers information about the resulting CGMod(%) in specific portions of a piece
as a result of studying data obtained from the thermal analysis (TA) of the treated
metal and the thermal modulus of the areas of the controlled piece.
[0019] Furthermore, none of the previously described processes offers the possibility of
obtaining a melt of the piece in which a specific area thereof has the desired percentage
of vermicular graphite, as will be possible by means of the use of the present invention.
[0020] The invention furthermore includes the opportunity to enter the necessary calculations
in a metallurgical quality management program, the result thus being obtained in a
simple and automated manner.
General Description of the Invention
[0021] The present document describes a system for the control, in real time, of the percentage
of vermicular graphite with which specific areas of pieces made of vermicular graphite
cast iron will solidify.
[0022] An important step forward is provided with this invention as the system can be applied
to those specific areas of the pieces which, due to greater mechanical requirements
or smaller thicknesses, are more exposed to being critical.
[0023] To that end, when providing the prediction, the system herein described takes into
consideration the effect of at least two factors: the metallurgical quality and the
cooling rate with which pieces solidify.
[0024] The control of the metallurgical quality is carried out by means of thermal analysis
and the subsequent treatment of the cooling curves recorded on an inoculated sample,
a sample without inoculation and a sample with the addition of tellurium.
[0025] The cooling rate is included in the calculations by means of the parameter: inverse
modulo. Its calculation is possible by means of applying reverse engineering. This
parameter includes in its calculation all those factors influencing the rate at which
the pieces cool.
Prediction of the percentage of vermicular graphite in the metal (CGMet)
[0026] Any agent which is added to the metal when it is in its liquid state and its purpose
is to force the precipitation of the carbon in any of the previously mentioned shapes
according to the ISO 945 standard is called a modifying agent. Ce, Mg and Ti have
traditionally been used as modifying agents. The first two are added for the purpose
of forcing the precipitation of the graphite in any of types III to IV, whereas the
third agent is added to control the modifying effect of the aforementioned agents.
[0027] A neutralizing agent is that agent which is combined with the modifying agents added,
preventing their modifying action.
[0028] The study of the cooling curves and of the thermal parameters recorded on samples
of standard thermal analysis offers reliable information about the shape in which
the graphites precipitate out and, accordingly, about the future in mechanical behavior
of the material.
[0029] The prediction of CGMet(%), the datum referring to the state in which the treated
metal will solidify, is done by means of the study of the thermal analysis cooling
curves recorded on inoculated samples, samples without inoculation and samples with
the addition of tellurium (Figure 1). The equation is generically expressed as follows:

[0030] The value given indicates the proportion of graphites in one mm
2 of sample and of types III, IV and V according to ISO 945 standard, compared to the
total number of graphite particles formed for the inoculated sample for thermal analysis.
Prediction of the percentage of vermicular graphite in specific areas of a piece (CGMod)
[0031] The proposed method uses the thermal modulus (Mt) concept for predicting the CGMod(%)
in specific portions of a piece. This parameter, associated with the cooling rate,
is obtained by means of classic methodology as the ratio between the volume of metal
and the surfaces thereof that are able to remove heat.
[0032] In isolated systems in which there are no factors influencing the cooling and solidification
process other than the actual geometry of the piece, it is possible to establish a
direct relationship between the CGMet(%) of the material and the Mt of the pieces
(Figure 2).
[0033] The equation is written as follows:

where Mt is the thermal modulus (cm) of the studied area and CGMet(%) is the prediction
of the percentage of vermicular graphite in the metal.
[0034] However, the actual cooling conditions of a piece do not correspond with those described
for an isolated system, so it is necessary to define a new concept, such as that the
inverse modulo (Mi). This concept is associated with the cooling rate of the piece,
external influence factors, such as coolants, molding variables, location of the piece
in the mold, proximity of other pieces, etc., being included therein.
[0035] The calculation of Mi is carried out from the actual CGMod(%) measured by means of
metallographic inspections and the CGMet(%)value according to the following methodology:
- 1.- The thermal modulus (Mt) is calculated by means of the classic methodology.
- 2.- A general percentage of vermicular graphite of the metal, CGMet(%), is obtained
depending on the data obtained by thermal analysis and the previous Mt.
- 3.- The actual CGMod(%) value is determined by means of metallographic analysis.
- 4.- The inverse modulo is calculated according to the GCMet(%) and CGMod(%) values
obtained in the previous steps.
[0036] The metallographic analysis carried out in step 3 above is based on an image analysis
program which, for each area of a piece intended to be studied, obtains five micrographs
magnified 100 times. The existing graphite particles are sub-divided into groups according
to the shape factor to which they belong. The final value obtained for the percentage
of vermicular graphite by means of metallographic inspection is given as the average
value obtained from the 5 measurements taken.
[0037] This value of the inverse modulo (Mi) is calculated for various qualities, i.e. for
different vermicular graphite density values, so the value which is finally obtained
is a mean value of those obtained in all the tests. It can generally be stated that
there is little difference among the values obtained.
[0038] Finally, Mt is replaced in the preceding equation with Mi, and the definitive expression
for the calculation of the percentage of vermicular graphite of the sample is as follows:

[0039] Therefore, the huge advancement of the described system is based on the possibility
of obtaining actual information about the degree of vermicularity in specific portions
of the pieces. The control of those areas intended for greater wear, mechanical requirements,
etc., can thus be assured, more useful and accurate information than that which is
offered by the other available methods thus being obtained.
[0040] Furthermore, the possibility that lamellar graphites are formed, which is very important
since their appearance, even though minor or in isolated cells, causes a drastic reduction
of the mechanical properties of fracture load or elongation in the material, is very
reliably predicted by means of the proposed system.
[0041] The importance of preventing the formation of lamellar graphites can be found in
the fact that the designers of pieces determine the minimum thicknesses thereof based
on the mechanical properties inherent to the material in which they will be manufactured.
When pieces are made of vermicular graphite cast iron, the formation of lamellar graphites
causes a reduction in the tensile strength of the material, whereby risking a fracture
of the piece while it is functioning.
[0042] The method has demonstrated its effectiveness for the control of the processes in
which the spheroidization treatments have been carried out by means of additions of
Ce or Mg (with or without the addition of Ti).
Description of the Drawings
[0043]
Figure 1 shows a recording of the cooling curves and solidification in an inoculated
sample, sample without inoculation and sample with the addition of tellurium.
Figure 2 shows the influence of the thermal modulus (Mt, in cm) on the percentage
of vermicular graphite (%).
Figure 3 shows a brake disc for a wind generator controlled in practical case 1.
Figure 4 shows selected control areas in the turbo manifold used in practical case
2
Detailed Description of Particular Embodiments
[0044] Two examples of applying the method for predicting the percentage of vermicular graphite
in specific areas of pieces made of vermicular graphite cast iron (CGMod(%)) are described
below.
Case 1. Manufacture of brake discs for wind generators of VGI and ferrite matrix.
[0045] Figure 3 shows an image of the brake disc in which the areas to be controlled are
indicated.
[0046] The steps that must be followed for applying the predictive method are:
- (1) Definition of the areas to be controlled.
Area 1: Area where it is fixed with the shaft.
Area 2: Area of the brake track.
- (2) Determination of the thermal modulus (Mt) of the areas defined in step 1 according
to the classic methodology.
Area 1: Mt = 2.20 cm.
Area 2: Mt = 1.35 cm.
- (3) Determination of the inverse modulo (Mi) of the areas defined in step 1 according
to the previously described methodology.
Area 1: Mi = 2.24 cm.
Area 2: Mi = 1.32 cm.
- (4) TA test on an inoculated sample, sample without inoculation and sample with the
addition of tellurium
The CGMet(%) is generically calculated for the treated and inoculated metal from the
results obtained in this test.
Area 1 and 2: CGMet(%) = 59
- (5) Calculation of CGMod(%) for each selected area from the results obtained in steps
3 and 4.
Area 1. CGMod1(%) = 88
Area 2. CGMod2(%) = 73
Case 2. Manufacture of turbo manifolds for automobiles of VGI and SiMo quality.
[0047] Figure 4 shows an image of the turbo manifold in which the areas to be controlled
are indicated.
[0048] The steps which must be followed for applying the predictive method are:
- (1) Definition of the areas to be controlled.
Area 1: Area of the turbine.
Area 2: Manifold mouths.
- (2) Determination of the thermal modulus (Mt) of the areas defined in step 1 according
to the classic methodology.
Area 1: Mt = 0.53 cm.
Area 2: Mt = 0.40 cm.
- (3) Determination of the inverse modulo (Mi) of the areas defined in step 1 according
to the previously described methodology.
Area 1: Mi = 0.55 cm.
Area 2: Mi = 0.43 cm.
- (4) TA test on an inoculated sample, sample without inoculation and sample with the
addition of tellurium.
The CGMet(%) is generically calculated for the treated and inoculated metal from the
results obtained in this test.
Area 1 and 2: CGMet(%) = 93
- (5) Calculation of CGMod(%) for each selected area from the results obtained in steps
3 and 4.
Area 1. CGMod1(%) = 76
Area 2. CGMod2(%) = 65