Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to methods for producing sintered compacts suitable,
for example, for automobile high-strength sintered parts by powder metallurgy.
Background Art
[0002] Powder metallurgy, in which an iron powder or alloy steel powder is compacted in
a die under pressure and is then sintered to form a sintered compact, is widely used
for production of automobile parts, such as gears, which require high dimensional
accuracy. Sintered compacts for use as automobile parts are produced by charging a
mixture of a raw material powder (iron powder or alloy steel powder) with, for example,
a copper powder, a graphite powder, and a lubricant into a die, compacting the mixed
powder in the die under pressure, and sintering the compact, and typically have a
density of about 6.0 to 7.2 g/cm
3.
[0003] For production of parts requiring high strength among automobile parts (hereinafter
referred to as automobile high-strength sintered parts), techniques in which alloying
elements (such as nickel, copper, molybdenum, chromium, and manganese) are added to
an iron-based powder for use as a raw material powder have been put to practical use.
The procedure of mixing the raw material powder with, for example, a copper powder,
a graphite powder, and a lubricant into a die, compacting the mixed powder in the
die under pressure, and sintering the compact is similar to the procedure for typical
automobile parts as described above. For automobile high-strength sintered parts,
however, treatment such as bright quenching and tempering and carburizing is optionally
performed.
[0004] Examples of methods for adding alloying elements include alloying an iron-based powder
in advance (i.e., prealloying), mixing an iron-based powder with an alloying powder
containing desired alloying elements and a binder, mixing an iron-based powder with
an alloying powder (without a binder), and mixing an iron-based powder with an alloying
powder and maintaining the mixed powder at high temperature so that it bonds metallurgically
(i.e., diffusion bonding). Alloy steel powders (or mixed powders) prepared by these
methods differ in the properties thereof, the uniformity of the alloying elements,
and the state of diffusion of the alloying elements after sintering. Hence, the selection
of the alloying elements and the method for adding them is an important factor that
greatly affects the quality of a sintered compact.
[0005] For example, Patent Literature 1 discloses a technique using a raw material powder
prepared by diffusion bonding of metal powders such as nickel, copper, and molybdenum
powders to an iron powder. According to this technique, the raw material powder is
sintered after compaction (pressure compaction) so that alloying elements such as
nickel, copper, and molybdenum diffuse from the metal powders adhering to the surfaces
of the iron powder into the iron powder to alloy the iron powder. However, sufficiently
alloying the iron powder requires sintering over an extended period of time because
the diffusion of the alloying elements such as nickel, copper, and molybdenum takes
an extended period of time, thus decreasing the productivity of sintering. Furthermore,
large amounts of metal powders such as nickel, copper, and molybdenum powders must
be used to attain the strength required for automobile high-strength sintered parts,
thus increasing the raw material costs.
[0006] In addition, a sintered compact produced by the technique disclosed in Patent Literature
1 contains nickel and copper; nickel is harmful to the human body, and copper has
a problem in that it accumulates in scraps as a harmful element if the steel is recycled.
Accordingly, alloy steel powders containing no nickel or copper have been studied.
Patent Literature 2, for example, discloses an alloy steel powder containing 0.2%
to 1.4% by mass of molybdenum, 0.1% to 0.3% by mass of chromium, 0.10% by mass or
less of carbon, and 0.3% by mass or less of oxygen. A sintered compact produced from
the alloy steel powder has relatively high strength because chromium and molybdenum
have the effect of improving quench hardenability.
[0007] Patent Literature 3 discloses an alloy steel powder containing 0.1% by mass or less
of carbon, 0.08% by mass or less of manganese, 0.5% to 3% by mass of chromium, 0.1%
to 2% by mass of molybdenum, 0.01% by mass or less of sulfur, 0.2% by mass or less
of phosphorus, and 0.2% by mass or less of oxygen.
[0008] Patent Literature 4 discloses an alloy steel powder containing 1.3% to 1.7% by mass
of chromium, 0.15% to 0.3% by mass of molybdenum, 0.09% to 0.3% by mass of manganese,
0.01% by mass or less of carbon, and 0.25% by mass or less of oxygen.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0009]
PTL 1: Japanese Examined Patent Application Publication No. 45-9649
PTL 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 61-117201
PTL 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 5-287452
PTL 4: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication (Translation of PCT Application)
No. 2005-530037
Summary of Invention
Problems to be solved by the Invention
[0010] With the alloy steel powders disclosed in Patent Literatures 2 and 3, however, it
is not easy to attain the high strength required for automobile high-strength sintered
parts. For the alloy steel powder in Patent Literature 2, the above problem can be
solved by, for example, increasing the chromium and molybdenum contents, although
large amounts of chromium and molybdenum added decrease the compressibility of the
alloy steel powder and increase the raw material costs. For the alloy steel powder
in Patent Literature 3, the strength problem can be solved by, for example, increasing
the manganese content, although a large amount of manganese added results in formation
of oxide during sintering after compaction or during heat treatment after sintering
because manganese is a readily oxidizable element, thus decreasing the strength of
a sintered compact. For the alloy steel powder in Patent Literature 4, its high chromium
content decreases the compressibility of the alloy steel powder, thus decreasing the
density of a sintered compact. In addition, a large amount of chromium added results
in formation of oxide during sintering after compaction or during heat treatment after
sintering because chromium is a readily oxidizable element, thus decreasing the strength
of a sintered compact.
An object of the present invention is to solve the above problems in the conventional
art and to provide a method for producing a high-strength sintered compact by powder
metallurgy at low cost using an alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy containing
no nickel or copper.
Solution to Problem
[0011] The inventors have studied in detail the component conditions of alloy steel powders
for powder metallurgy and the production conditions of sintered compacts for solving
the above problems. As a result, the inventors have found that a high-strength sintered
compact that can be used as an automobile high-strength sintered part can be produced
at low cost using an alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy containing no nickel
or copper and containing a relatively small amount of molybdenum by optimizing the
chromium, manganese, and molybdenum contents of an alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
and subjecting the raw material powder to high-pressure compaction and high-temperature
sintering under particular conditions.
[0012] It has also been found that even an alloy steel powder having a fairly high oxygen
content can be used without a substantial decrease in the strength of a sintered compact
by adding a sufficient amount of graphite powder to the alloy steel powder so that
graphite reacts with oxygen to reduce the alloy steel powder in sintering. That is,
the above alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy, containing chromium and manganese,
which are readily oxidizable elements, must be subjected to reduction treatment in
a reduced-pressure atmosphere at a high temperature, namely, about 1,100°C, in order
to lower the oxygen content thereof. However, it has been found that even an alloy
steel powder having a fairly high oxygen content after low-cost reduction treatment
in a hydrogen gas atmosphere, rather than the above costly reduction treatment, can
be used without a substantial decrease in the strength of a sintered compact by adding
a sufficient amount of graphite powder so that graphite reacts with oxygen to reduce
the alloy steel powder, from which oxygen is removed, during sintering.
This technique, however, might cause variations in the amount of carbon remaining
in the sintered compact. As a result of a further study, it has been found that the
carbon content of the sintered compact, which significantly affects the strength of
the sintered compact, can be controlled by supplementarily adding the amount of graphite
determined from the chromium and manganese contents of the alloy steel powder and
the oxidation rates of these elements because the amount of graphite used for reduction
of oxygen in the alloy steel powder during sintering is mainly determined by the chromium
and manganese contents of the alloy steel powder and the oxidation rates of these
elements.
[0013] The present invention is based on these findings and is summarized as follows:
- [1] A method for producing a sintered compact by powder metallurgy, including compacting
an alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy or a mixed powder containing the alloy
steel powder at a pressure of 700 MPa or more and sintering the compact at a temperature
of 1,150°C to 1,300°C, wherein the alloy steel powder used contains 0.3% to 0.7% by
mass of chromium, 0.1% to 0.5% by mass of manganese, 0.1% to 0.5% by mass of molybdenum,
and 0.25% to 0.5% by mass of oxygen, the balance being iron and incidental impurities.
- [2] The method for producing a sintered compact according to Item [1] above, wherein
the mixed powder contains a graphite powder.
- [3] The method for producing a sintered compact according to Item [1] or [2] above,
wherein the mixed powder contains a graphite powder in an amount equivalent to the
sum of the amount of carbon allowed to remain in the sintered compact and the amount
of carbon that reacts with oxygen in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy
in the sintering.
[0014]
[4] The method for producing a sintered compact according to Item [2] above, wherein
the graphite powder is added to the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy in an
amount [%Gr] (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy)
satisfying the condition of equation (1):

wherein
[%Cr] is the chromium content of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy (% by
mass);
[%Mn] is the manganese content of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy (%
by mass);
[%C] is the amount of carbon, in the graphite powder, allowed to remain in the sintered
compact (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy);
α is the oxidation rate of chromium in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy;
β is the oxidation rate of manganese in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy;
γ is the amount of carbon, in the graphite powder, consumed by reaction with oxygen
adsorbed on the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and oxygen contained in a
sintering atmosphere (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder
metallurgy), wherein γ ≤ 0.2% by mass; and
t is 0.25 to 0.75.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0015] According to the present invention, a high-strength sintered compact that can be
used as an automobile high-strength sintered part can be produced at low cost by a
method for producing a sintered compact by powder metallurgy using an alloy steel
powder containing no nickel or copper and containing a relatively small amount of
molybdenum.
Brief Description of Drawing
[0016] [Fig. 1] Fig. 1 is a graph contrasting the relationships between compaction pressure
and tensile strength of Sample Nos. 2 and 5 to 7 in Example 2 with those of Sample
Nos. 8 to 11, which are existing high-strength materials.
Description of Embodiments
[0017] First, the chemical components of an alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy used
in the present invention (hereinafter also simply referred to as "alloy steel powder")
and the reasons for limitations thereon will be described.
Chromium: 0.3% to 0.7% by mass
[0018] Chromium, an element that improves quench hardenability, provides the effect of increasing
the strength of a sintered compact by causing martensitic transformation during quenching
after sintering. If the chromium content falls below 0.3% by mass, the effect is insufficient.
On the other hand, if the chromium content exceeds 0.7% by mass, the compressibility
in compaction is decreased because the hardness of the individual particles is increased
by solid solution hardening and the oxygen content of the alloy steel powder is increased.
In addition, it is impossible to attain a significant improvement in the strength
of a sintered compact due to improved quench hardenability because more oxidation
occurs in the atmosphere during quenching after sintering; rather, the decreased compressibility
significantly decreases the strength of a sintered compact. Accordingly, the chromium
content is 0.3% to 0.7% by mass.
Manganese: 0.1% to 0.5% by mass
[0019] Manganese, an element that improves quench hardenability, provides the effect of
increasing the strength of a sintered compact by causing martensitic transformation
during quenching after sintering. If the manganese content falls below 0.1% by mass,
the effect is insufficient. On the other hand, if the manganese content exceeds 0.5%
by mass, the compressibility in compaction is decreased because the hardness of the
individual particles is increased by solid solution hardening and the oxygen content
of the alloy steel powder is increased, thus decreasing the strength of a sintered
compact. In addition, for sintering in a weakly oxidizing atmosphere (such as a hydrocarbon-converted
gas atmosphere), if the manganese content is excessive, it is impossible to attain
a significant improvement in the strength of a sintered compact due to improved quench
hardenability because more oxidation occurs in the atmosphere during quenching after
sintering; rather, the decreased compressibility significantly decreases the strength
of a sintered compact. Accordingly, the manganese content is 0.1% to 0.5% by mass,
preferably 0.1% to 0.25% by mass.
Molybdenum: 0.1% to 0.5% by mass
[0020] Molybdenum provides the effect of increasing the strength of a sintered compact by
increasing the quench hardenability and facilitating solid solution hardening and
precipitation hardening. If the molybdenum content falls below 0.1% by mass, the effect
is insufficient. On the other hand, if the molybdenum content exceeds 0.5% by mass,
it is impossible to attain a significant improvement in the strength of a sintered
compact because the compressibility in compaction is decreased; rather, the raw material
costs are considerably increased with increasing amount of molybdenum added. Accordingly,
the molybdenum content is 0.1% to 0.5% by mass.
Oxygen: 0.25% to 0.5% by mass
[0021] Lowering the oxygen content to less than 0.25% by mass requires reduction treatment
in a very clean reducing atmosphere or reduced-pressure atmosphere, thus increasing
the production costs. On the other hand, if the oxygen content exceeds 0.5% by mass,
the strength of a sintered compact is decreased because the compressibility is decreased
and sintering is inhibited. Accordingly, the oxygen content is 0.25% to 0.5% by mass,
preferably 0.25% to 0.35% by mass.
In general, lowering the oxygen content of an alloy steel powder containing readily
oxidizable elements such as chromium and manganese requires reduction treatment in
a very clean reducing atmosphere or reduced-pressure atmosphere, thus increasing the
production costs. In contrast, the inventors have found that oxygen in an alloy steel
powder can be reduced in a subsequent sintering step even if the alloy steel powder
has a fairly high oxygen content after reduction treatment in a low-cost normal reducing
atmosphere. In the present invention, therefore, the oxygen content of the alloy steel
powder is 0.25% to 0.5% by mass, which is higher than those of common alloy steel
powders containing readily oxidizable elements.
The balance other than the components described above is iron and incidental impurities.
The alloy steel powder used in the present invention preferably has a carbon content
of 0.01% by mass or less, more preferably 0.005% by mass or less. If the carbon content
exceeds 0.01% by mass, the compressibility in compaction tends to be decreased because
the hardness of the individual particles of the alloy steel powder is excessively
increased, thus decreasing the strength of a sintered compact.
[0022] For example, the above alloy steel powder is produced as follows.
A molten alloy steel containing predetermined chemical components is prepared, and
an alloy steel powder is produced by water atomization. In water atomization, no particular
limitation is imposed on the operating conditions and the configuration of the equipment
used, and a known technique may be used. The alloy steel powder is then subjected
to reduction heat treatment. In the reduction heat treatment, no particular limitation
is imposed on the operating conditions and the configuration of the equipment used,
and a known technique may be used to perform the treatment in a reducing atmosphere
such as a hydrogen gas atmosphere or a vacuum atmosphere. In the present invention,
the reduction treatment can be performed in a low-cost hydrogen gas atmosphere because
a graphite powder optionally added to the alloy steel powder removes oxygen from the
alloy steel powder in a subsequent sintering step. The reduction treatment temperature
is exemplified by, but not limited to, about 800°C to 1,000°C. In view of cost, 950°C
or less is preferred.
[0023] Next, the production conditions of the present invention will be described.
In the present invention, a sintered compact is obtained by optionally mixing the
alloy steel powder described above with one or more of, for example, other metal powders,
a graphite powder, and a lubricant, charging the alloy steel powder or mixed powder
containing the alloy steel powder into a die, compacting the powder in the die under
pressure, and sintering the compact.
The lubricant used may be, for example, one or more known lubricants such as zinc
stearate, lithium stearate, oleic acid, stearic amides, and ethylenebisstearamide.
The amount of lubricant added is preferably 0.2% to 1% by mass based on the mass of
the alloy steel powder.
Examples of other metal powders include a copper powder and a nickel powder. That
is, although the present invention provides sufficient sintered compact strength without
such metals, such metal powders may each be mixed in an amount of about 4% or less
to achieve more advantageous properties.
It is also possible to mix, for example, alloying powders other than metal powders
and powders for improving machinability. An example of an alloying powder is an iron
phosphide powder, and an example of a powder for improving machinability is a manganese
sulfide powder.
[0024] When lowering the oxygen content of the alloy steel powder for higher sinterability
is desired, the graphite powder may be added in an amount equivalent to the sum of
the amount of carbon allowed to remain in the sintered compact and the amount of carbon
that reacts with oxygen in the alloy steel powder in sintering. That is, in the sintering
temperature range described later, oxygen in the alloy steel powder reacts more easily
with carbon than with chromium and manganese in the alloy steel powder; it binds to
the carbon supplied in the form of a graphite powder and is removed as CO gas as a
result of reduction. Because the amount of carbon remaining in the sintered compact
is correspondingly decreased, an excess of carbon equivalent to the decrease (that
is, the amount of carbon that reacts with oxygen in the alloy steel powder in sintering)
may be added in advance so that the desired amount of carbon remains in the sintered
compact.
[0025] It is very important to control the amount of carbon remaining in the sintered compact,
that is, to determine the amount of carbon that reacts with oxygen in the alloy steel
powder in advance, because the amount of carbon remaining in the sintered compact
greatly affects the strength of the sintered compact. Facing this challenge, the inventors
have found that the amount of graphite used for reduction of oxygen in the alloy steel
powder in sintering is mainly determined by the chromium and manganese contents of
the alloy steel powder and the oxidation rates of these elements, and therefore the
amount of carbon allowed to remain in the sintered compact can be controlled by supplementarily
adding the amount of graphite determined from the chromium and manganese contents
of the alloy steel powder and the oxidation rates of these elements.
[0026] Specifically, the carbon content of the sintered compact can be controlled to the
desired amount by determining the chromium content [%Cr] and the manganese content
[%Mn] of the alloy steel powder and the oxidation rate α of chromium and the oxidation
rate β of manganese in the alloy steel powder in advance, determining the amount of
graphite powder added [%Gr] (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder
for powder metallurgy) based on the amount of carbon [%C] allowed to remain in the
sintered compact from equation (1) below, and adding the graphite powder to the alloy
steel powder. In the present invention, therefore, the graphite powder is preferably
added to the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy in an amount [%Gr] (% by mass
based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy) satisfying the
condition of equation (1):

wherein
[%Cr] is the chromium content of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy (% by
mass);
[%Mn] is the manganese content of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy (%
by mass);
[%C] is the amount of carbon, in the graphite powder, allowed to remain in the sintered
compact (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy);
α is the oxidation rate of chromium in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy;
β is the oxidation rate of manganese in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy;
γ is the amount of carbon, in the graphite powder, consumed by reaction with oxygen
adsorbed on the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy and oxygen contained in the
sintering atmosphere (% by mass based on the mass of the alloy steel powder for powder
metallurgy), wherein γ ≤ 0.2% by mass; and
t is 0.25 to 0.75.
[0027] In equation (1) above, α × 0.46 × [%Cr] is the amount of carbon required for reduction
of oxygen combined with chromium contained in the alloy steel powder, whereas β ×
0.29 × [%Mn] is the amount of carbon required for reduction of oxygen combined with
manganese contained in the alloy steel powder; both are intrinsic to the alloy steel
powder containing chromium and manganese, which are readily oxidizable elements. Specifically,
the coefficient 0.46 is calculated from the relationship 2Cr + 30 = Cr
2O
3, where the atomic weight of chromium is 52 and the atomic weight of oxygen is 16,
whereas the coefficient 0.29 is calculated from the relationship Mn + O = MnO, where
the atomic weight of manganese is 55 and the atomic weight of oxygen is 16.
In equation (1) above, additionally, the upper limit of the coefficient t, namely,
0.75, is a value calculated from the mass ratio of carbon to oxygen (12:16 = 0.75:1)
in the case where all oxygen combined with chromium and manganese in the alloy steel
powder is reduced under the assumption that carbon reacts with oxygen as C + O = CO.
However, not all chromium oxide and manganese oxide may be reduced, depending on,
for example, the sintering conditions; thus, the range of 0.25 to 0.75 is assigned
to the coefficient t taking into account the amount of oxygen remaining without being
reduced. The coefficient t may be limited to a narrower numerical range or a value
within the range of 0.25 to 0.75 depending on the production conditions of the sintered
compact (for example, t = 0.4 to 0.75, t = 0.5 to 0.75, t = 0.5, or t = 0.75).
[0028] In addition, the oxidation rate α is (the amount of chromium contained as oxide in
the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy)/(the amount of chromium in the alloy
steel powder for powder metallurgy), whereas the oxidation rate β is (the amount of
manganese contained as oxide in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy)/(the
amount of manganese in the alloy steel powder for powder metallurgy). The amounts
of chromium and manganese contained as oxide can be measured by dissolving the alloy
steel powder for powder metallurgy into a halogen-alcohol solution prepared by dissolving,
for example, bromine or iodine in an alcohol and analyzing the metal contents of extracted
residue by atomic absorption spectrometry. Although no particular limitation is imposed
on the oxidation rates α and P of the alloy steel powder used, oxidation rates α and
β with which the value of (α × 0.46 × [%Cr] + β × 0.29 x [%Mn]) is 0.05% by mass or
more is preferred because a very clean reducing atmosphere or reduced-pressure atmosphere,
which results in a cost increase, is required to lower the value of (α × 0.46 × [%Cr]
+ β × 0.29 × [%Mn]) to less than 0.05% by mass.
[0029] In addition, γ is the amount of carbon, in the graphite powder added, consumed by
reaction with oxygen adsorbed on the surfaces of the particles of the alloy steel
powder for powder metallurgy (oxygen-containing gas and oxygen contained in the form
of moisture) and oxygen contained in the sintering atmosphere (oxygen-containing gas
and oxygen contained as moisture). The value of γ may be determined on the basis of
an empirical rule or by examining the amount of carbon consumed when a normal pure
iron powder is treated under similar compaction and sintering conditions. However,
γ is 0.2% by mass or less. If γ exceeds 0.2% by mass, it is preferable to take a measure
such as reducing oxygen adsorbed on the surfaces of the particles and oxygen contained
in the sintering atmosphere because the sintered compact is likely to be produced
under carbon-wasting conditions. On the other hand, it is generally preferable that
γ be 0.01% by mass or more because lowering γ to less than 0.01% by mass requires
strict oxidation control throughout the entire process to sintering, which affects
the production costs.
The tolerance of the amount of graphite powder actually added with respect to the
target [%Gr] may be set depending on the purpose. For example, the tolerance may be
[%Gr] ± 0.05% by mass. Alternatively, [%Gr] may be rounded in predetermined steps,
for example, in steps of 0.05% by mass or 0.1% by mass. On the other hand, it is also
possible to set [%Gr] in steps of 0.01% by mass or less.
With the amount of graphite powder determined by equation (1) above, the amount of
graphite-derived carbon remaining in the sintered compact can at least be controlled
approximately to the range of [%C] ± 0.05% by mass.
[0030] The "alloy steel powder or mixed powder containing the alloy steel powder" to be
compacted under pressure and sintered is hereinafter referred to as "raw material
powder" for convenience of description.
Although no particular limitation is imposed on, for example, the configuration of
the equipment used for compacting the raw material powder under pressure, it must
be compacted at a pressure of 700 MPa or more. If the compaction pressure falls below
700 MPa, a sintered compact having sufficient strength cannot be achieved. In addition,
because the resulting compact has insufficient density if the compaction pressure
falls below 700 MPa, carburizing and quenching treatment after sintering (generally,
treatment for heating a sintered compact in a carburizing gas atmosphere to dissolve
(carburize) carbon into the sintered compact and then quenching it in oil) involves
intergranular oxidation due to oxygen contained in the carburizing gas atmosphere
(intergranular oxidation occurring as oxygen contained in the carburizing gas atmosphere
combines with chromium and manganese, which are readily oxidizable elements, in the
sintered compact), thus decreasing the strength of the sintered compact (heat-treated
compact). In contrast, if the compaction is performed at a compaction pressure of
700 MPa or more, a compact having sufficient density can be achieved, and accordingly
a heat-treated compact having sufficient strength can be achieved because intergranular
oxidation is inhibited during carburizing and quenching treatment after sintering.
In addition, the compaction is preferably performed at room temperature (about 20°C)
to 160°C. For example, good compressibility is achieved by charging a raw material
powder at room temperature and compacting it under pressure while maintaining the
die temperature to 50°C to 70°C. It is also possible to apply a compaction technique
in which the die and the raw material powder are heated to 120°C to 130°C (so-called
warm compaction).
[0031] The sintering after the compaction must be performed at a temperature of 1,150°C
to 1,300°C. If the sintering temperature falls below 1,150°C, a sintered compact having
sufficient strength cannot be achieved because the powder particles are insufficiently
bonded by insufficient above-mentioned reduction reaction of oxygen. On the other
hand, if the sintering temperature exceeds 1,300°C, the crystal grains become coarse,
thus decreasing the strength. In particular, the sintering temperature is preferably
1,150°C to 1,200°C in view of production costs.
In addition, the sintering time for the above sintering temperature is preferably
about 20 to 120 minutes in view of sinterability and production costs.
[0032] In addition, the sintering atmosphere used is, for example, a reducing gas, an inert
gas, or a hydrocarbon-converted gas (i.e., RX gas). Alternatively, the atmosphere
may be in a vacuum. The alloy steel powder used in the present invention contains
reduced amounts of chromium and molybdenum, which are readily oxidizable elements,
so that intergranular oxidation is inhibited during sintering even in an RX atmosphere,
thus providing sufficient properties to serve as, for example, an automobile high-strength
sintered part.
Although no particular limitation is imposed on, for example, the sintering equipment
used, a mesh belt furnace or a pusher furnace is preferably used in view of reducing
the sintering costs because they offer mass production.
Although no particular limitation is imposed on the oxygen content of the resulting
sintered compact, it is generally preferable that the oxygen content be lowered to
0.1% by mass or less, more preferably 0.05% by mass or less. In addition, although
no particular limitation is imposed on the carbon content of the sintered compact,
the carbon content is generally about 0.1% to 0.9% by mass.
[0033] The sintered compact thus obtained can be used as-sintered as an automobile high-strength
sintered part. Optionally, however, heat treatment such as carburizing and quenching
(i.e., CQT), bright quenching (i.e., BQT), high-frequency quenching, or carbonitriding
heat treatment may be performed. If carburizing and quenching, bright quenching, or
high-frequency quenching is performed, that treatment is preferably followed by tempering.
Such heat treatment further improves the properties to serve as an automobile high-strength
sintered part. In the heat treatment, no particular limitation is imposed on the operating
conditions and the configuration of the equipment used, and a known technique may
be used.
EXAMPLES
EXAMPLE 1
[0034] The raw material powders used were mixtures of alloy steel powders having the compositions
shown in Table 1 and a graphite powder added in such amounts that the carbon content
after sintering (the carbon content of a sintered compact) was 0.3% by mass. These
raw material powders were compacted into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom
surface measuring 10 mm × 60 mm at a compaction pressure of 700 MPa and were sintered
at 1,200°C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere. After the rectangular compacts were subjected
to carburizing, quenching, and tempering, the tensile strengths and impact values
thereof were measured, and the metallographic structures thereof were observed. In
addition, the sintered compacts were analyzed for carbon content before the carburizing,
quenching, and tempering. The results are shown in Table 1.
[0035] In Table 1, the sintered compact of Sample No. 1 (comparative example), in which
the chromium content of the alloy steel powder was low, had low tensile strength because
the amount of martensite formed was small. On the other hand, the sintered compact
of Sample No. 4 (comparative example), in which the chromium content was excessive,
had low tensile strength because intergranular oxidation occurred. In contrast, the
sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 2 and 3, which are invention examples, had high tensile
strengths, namely, not less than 1,000 MPa, because sufficient quench hardenability
was ensured.
In addition, the sintered compact of Sample No. 5 (comparative example), in which
the manganese content of the alloy steel powder was low, had low tensile strength
because the amount of martensite formed was small. On the other hand, the sintered
compact of Sample No. 8 (comparative example), in which the manganese content was
excessive, had low tensile strength because intergranular oxidation occurred. In contrast,
the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 6 and 7, which are invention examples, had high
tensile strengths, namely, not less than 1,000 MPa, because sufficient quench hardenability
was ensured.
[0036] In addition, the sintered compact of Sample No. 9 (comparative example), in which
the molybdenum content of the alloy steel powder was low, had low tensile strength
because the amount of martensite formed was small. On the other hand, the sintered
compact of Sample No. 12 (comparative example), in which the molybdenum content was
excessive, had low tensile strength because the raw material compact had decreased
compressibility. In contrast, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 10 and 11, which
are invention examples, had high tensile strengths, namely, not less than 1,000 MPa,
because sufficient quench hardenability was ensured.
In addition, the sintered compact of Sample No. 16 (comparative example), in which
the oxygen content of the alloy steel powder was excessive, had low tensile strength
because the raw material compact had decreased compressibility. In contrast, the sintered
compacts of Sample Nos. 13 to 15, which are invention examples, had high tensile strengths,
namely, not less than 1,000 MPa.
[0037] [Table 1]
Table 1
Sample No. |
Composition of alloy steel powder (% by mass) |
Amount of graphite added (% by mass)*1 |
Carbon content of sintered compact (% by mass) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Impact value (J/cm2) |
Category |
Fe |
C |
Cr |
Mn |
Mo |
O |
1 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
700 |
11 |
Comparative example |
2 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.3 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1060 |
9 |
Invention example |
3 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.7 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1050 |
9 |
Invention example |
4 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.8 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
750 |
7 |
Comparative example |
5 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.05 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
710 |
10 |
Comparative example |
6 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1040 |
9 |
Invention example |
7 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.5 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1000 |
9 |
Invention example |
8 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.55 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
680 |
6 |
Comparative example |
9 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.05 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
630 |
12 |
Comparative example |
10 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1070 |
9 |
Invention example |
11 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
1080 |
9 |
Invention example |
12 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.55 |
0.3 |
0.60 |
0.30 |
850 |
7 |
Comparative example |
13 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.25 |
0.55 |
0.30 |
1060 |
10 |
Invention example |
14 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.65 |
0.30 |
1050 |
9 |
Invention example |
15 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.80 |
0.30 |
1000 |
9 |
Invention example |
16 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.6 |
0.90 |
0.30 |
860 |
7 |
Comparative example |
*1 % by mass based on mass of alloy steel powder |
EXAMPLE 2
[0038] The raw material powder used was a mixture of the alloy steel powder used for Sample
No. 2 in Example 1 (Table 1) (containing 0.3% by mass of chromium, 0.3% by mass of
manganese, 0.2% by mass of molybdenum, 0.004% by mass of carbon, and 0.3% by mass
of oxygen, the balance being iron and incidental impurities), a graphite powder added
in such an amount that the carbon content after sintering (the carbon content of a
sintered compact) was 0.3% by mass, and a compaction lubricant (zinc stearate). This
raw material powder was compacted into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom
surface measuring 10 mm × 60 mm and was sintered in a nitrogen gas atmosphere. After
the rectangular compacts were subjected to carburizing, quenching, and tempering,
the tensile strengths and densities thereof were measured. The results are shown in
Table 2 together with the compaction pressure and the sintering temperature. In addition,
Fig. 1 contrasts the relationships between compaction pressure and tensile strength
of Sample Nos. 2 and 5 to 7 with those of Sample Nos. 8 to 11, which are existing
high-strength materials.
[0039] In Table 2, the sintered compact of Sample No. 1 (comparative example), in which
the sintering temperature was insufficient, had low tensile strength because the particles
of the alloy steel powder were insufficiently bonded and intergranular oxidation occurred
during carburizing and quenching. On the other hand, the sintered compact of Sample
No. 4 (comparative example), in which the sintering temperature was excessive, had
low tensile strength because the crystal grains became coarse. Additionally, as shown
in Fig. 1, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 5 and 6 (comparative examples), in
which the pressure for compaction was insufficient, had significantly lower tensile
strengths than the existing high-strength materials (Sample Nos. 8 to 11) because
the low densities thereof resulted in intergranular oxidation occurred during carburizing
and quenching. In contrast, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 2, 3, and 7, which
are invention examples, had high tensile strengths, namely, not less than 1,000 MPa.
[0040] [Table 2]
Table 2
Sample No. |
Compaction pressure (MPa) |
Sintering temperature (°C) |
Density (g/cc) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Category |
1 |
700 |
1130 |
7.16 |
850 |
Comparative example |
2 |
700 |
1150 |
7.18 |
1050 |
Invention example |
3 |
700 |
1300 |
7.20 |
1070 |
Invention example |
4 |
700 |
1330 |
7.22 |
960 |
Comparative example |
5 |
500 |
1150 |
6.91 |
630 |
Comparative example |
6 |
600 |
1150 |
7.09 |
760 |
Comparative example |
7 |
800 |
1150 |
7.26 |
1140 |
Invention example |
8 |
500 |
1130 |
6.93 |
850 |
Conventional example *1 |
9 |
600 |
1150 |
7.12 |
935 |
Conventional example *1 |
10 |
700 |
1300 |
7.20 |
1005 |
Conventional example *1 |
11 |
800 |
1350 |
7.26 |
1100 |
Conventional example *1 |
*1 Existing high-strength material :Fe-0.5%Ni-0.5%Mo-0.3%C |
EXAMPLE 3
[0041] The raw material powders used were mixtures of alloy steel powders having the compositions
shown in Table 3 and a graphite powder. These raw material powders were compacted
into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom surface measuring 10 mm × 60 mm at
a compaction pressure of 700 MPa and were sintered at 1,200°C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
The tensile strengths of the rectangular compacts were measured, and they were analyzed
for carbon content. The results are shown in Table 3.
In Table 3, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 1 to 4, in which the amount of graphite
powder added was fixed at 0.60% by mass, had variations in carbon content and therefore
had large variations in tensile strength because the amount of carbon removed increased
with increasing oxygen content of the alloy steel powders. On the other hand, the
sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 5 to 7, in which the graphite powder was added taking
into account the amount of carbon that reacts with oxygen in sintering, had no substantial
variations in carbon content and tensile strength.
[0042] [Table 3]
Table 3
Sample No. |
Composition of alloy steel powder (% by mass) |
Amount of graphite added (% by mass)*1 |
Carbon content of sintered compact (% by mass) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Fe |
C |
Cr |
Mn |
Mo |
O |
1 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.25 |
0.60 |
0.34 |
348 |
2 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.60 |
0.24 |
305 |
3 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.45 |
0.60 |
0.16 |
260 |
4 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.60 |
0.11 |
220 |
5 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.70 |
0.34 |
347 |
6 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.45 |
0.80 |
0.34 |
345 |
7 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.34 |
342 |
*1 % by mass based on mass of alloy steel powder |
EXAMPLE 4
[0043] The raw material powders used were mixtures of alloy steel powders having the compositions
shown in Table 4 and a graphite powder added in amounts determined by equation (1)
above (t = 0.75, γ = 0.1% by mass) so that the carbon content after sintering (the
carbon content of a sintered compact) was 0.4% by mass. These raw material powders
were compacted into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom surface measuring
10 mm × 60 mm at a compaction pressure of 700 MPa and were sintered at 1,200°C in
a nitrogen gas atmosphere. After the rectangular compacts were subjected to carburizing,
quenching, and tempering, the tensile strengths and impact values thereof were measured,
and the metallographic structures thereof were observed. In addition, the sintered
compacts were analyzed for carbon content before the carburizing, quenching, and tempering.
The results are shown in Table 4.
According to Table 4, the carbon contents of all sintered compacts (excluding the
sintered compact of No. 16) measured by carbon content analysis were nearly 0.40%
by mass (±0.03% by mass), demonstrating that the amount of graphite powder added can
be accurately determined depending on the target carbon content of a sintered compact
by equation (1) above. The carbon content of the sintered compact of No. 16, in which
the oxygen content of the alloy steel powder was high, deviated largely from the targetααα
value (0.40% by mass) based on equation (1), probably because γ deviated considerably
from the value assigned to equation (1), namely, 0.1% by mass.
[0044] [Table 4]
Table 4
Sample No. |
Composition of iron-based alloy steel powder (% by mass) |
Amount of graphite added (% by mass)*1 |
Carbon content of sintered compact (% by mass) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Impact value (J/cm2) |
Category |
Fe |
C |
Cr |
Oxidation rate α |
Mn |
Oxidation rate β |
Mo |
O |
1 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.2 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.20 |
0.60 |
0.41 |
750 |
12 |
Comparative example |
2 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.3 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.26 |
0.63 |
0.40 |
1100 |
10 |
Invention example |
3 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.7 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.35 |
0.75 |
0.40 |
1090 |
10 |
Invention example |
4 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.8 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.51 |
0.78 |
0.39 |
790 |
8 |
Comparative example |
5 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.05 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.28 |
0.66 |
0.41 |
720 |
10 |
Comparative example |
6 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.1 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.29 |
0.67 |
0.41 |
1050 |
9 |
Invention example |
7 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.5 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.41 |
0.75 |
0.39 |
1010 |
9 |
Invention example |
8 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.55 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.51 |
0.76 |
0.38 |
690 |
6 |
Comparative example |
9 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.05 |
0.32 |
0.69 |
0.40 |
670 |
13 |
Comparative example |
10 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.1 |
0.32 |
0.69 |
0.40 |
1110 |
10 |
Invention example |
11 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.5 |
0.32 |
0.69 |
0.40 |
1020 |
10 |
Invention example |
12 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.95 |
0.55 |
0.32 |
0.69 |
0.40 |
890 |
8 |
Comparative example |
13 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.90 |
0.2 |
0.28 |
0.66 |
0.41 |
1100 |
11 |
Invention example |
14 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.90 |
0.2 |
0.97 |
0.2 |
0.33 |
0.70 |
0.40 |
1090 |
10 |
Invention example |
15 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.95 |
0.2 |
0.99 |
0.2 |
0.40 |
0.71 |
0.37 |
1040 |
10 |
Invention example |
16 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
0.60 |
0.72 |
0.19 |
890 |
8 |
Comparative example |
*1 % by mass based on mass of alloy steel powder |
EXAMPLE 5
[0045] The raw material powders used were mixtures of alloy steel powders having the compositions
shown in Table 5 and a graphite powder. These raw material powders were compacted
into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom surface measuring 10 mm x 60 mm at
a compaction pressure of 700 MPa and were sintered at 1,200°C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
The tensile strengths of the rectangular compacts were measured, and they were analyzed
for carbon content. The results are shown in Table 5.
In Table 5, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 1 to 4, in which the amount of graphite
powder added was fixed at 0.60% by mass, had variations in carbon content and therefore
had large variations in tensile strength because the amount of carbon removed increased
with increasing oxygen content of the alloy steel powders. On the other hand, the
sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 5 to 7, in which the graphite powder was added in
amounts determined taking into account the amount of carbon that reacts with oxygen
in sintering by equation (1) above (t = 0.75, γ = 0.1% by mass), had no substantial
variations in carbon content and tensile strength.
[0046] Table 5
Table 5
Sample No. |
Composition of iron-based alloy steel powder (% by mass) |
Amount of graphite added (% by mass)*1 |
Carbon content of sintered compact (% by mass) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Fe |
C |
Cr |
Oxidation rate α |
Mn |
Mn Oxidation rate β |
Mo |
O |
1 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.40 |
0.2 |
0.55 |
0.2 |
0.25 |
0.60 |
0.41 |
360 |
2 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.60 |
0.2 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.28 |
0.60 |
0.37 |
320 |
3 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
0.80 |
0.2 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.33 |
0.60 |
0.32 |
275 |
4 |
Bal. |
0.005 |
0.5 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
0.39 |
0.60 |
0.25 |
235 |
5 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.60 |
0.2 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.28 |
0.63 |
0.41 |
360 |
6 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.80 |
0.2 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.33 |
0.67 |
0.40 |
355 |
7 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
0.39 |
0.72 |
0.39 |
345 |
*1 % by mass based on mass of alloy steel powder |
EXAMPLE 6
[0047] The raw material powders used were mixtures of alloy steel powders having the compositions
shown in Table 6 and a graphite powder. These raw material powders were compacted
into rectangular-column compacts having a bottom surface measuring 10 mm × 60 mm at
a compaction pressure of 700 MPa and were sintered at 1,150°C in a nitrogen gas atmosphere.
The tensile strengths of the rectangular compacts were measured, and they were analyzed
for carbon content. The results are shown in Table 6.
In Table 6, the sintered compacts of Sample Nos. 1 to 3, in which the graphite powder
was added in amounts determined taking into account the amount of carbon that reacts
with oxygen in sintering by equation (1) above (t = 0.5, γ = 0.1% by mass) so that
the carbon contents of the sintered compacts were 0.5% by mass, had no substantial
variations in carbon content and tensile strength.
[0048] Table 6
Table 6
Sample No. |
Composition of iron-based alloy steel powder (% by mass) |
Amount of graphite added (% by mass)*1 |
Carbon content of sintered compact (% by mass) |
Tensile strength (MPa) |
Fe |
C |
Cr |
Oxidation rate α |
Mn |
Oxidation rate β |
Mo |
O |
1 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.60 |
0.2 |
0.70 |
0.2 |
0.28 |
0.70 |
0.51 |
350 |
2 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
0.80 |
0.2 |
0.85 |
0.2 |
0.33 |
0.72 |
0.50 |
345 |
3 |
Bal. |
0.004 |
0.5 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
1.00 |
0.2 |
0.39 |
0.73 |
0.49 |
345 |
*1 % by mass based on mass of alloy steel powder |
Industrial Applicability
[0049] According to the present invention, a high-strength sintered compact that can be
used as an automobile high-strength sintered part can be produced at low cost by a
method for producing a sintered compact by powder metallurgy using an alloy steel
powder containing no nickel or copper and containing a relatively small amount of
molybdenum.