(19)
(11) EP 2 371 665 A2

(12) EUROPEAN PATENT APPLICATION

(43) Date of publication:
05.10.2011 Bulletin 2011/40

(21) Application number: 11158565.9

(22) Date of filing: 16.03.2011
(51) International Patent Classification (IPC): 
B61L 27/00(2006.01)
(84) Designated Contracting States:
AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR
Designated Extension States:
BA ME

(30) Priority: 17.03.2010 GB 1004421

(71) Applicant: Westinghouse Brake and Signal Holdings Limited
London Greater London SW1X 7AW (GB)

(72) Inventor:
  • Chadwick, Simon
    Devizes, Wiltshire SN10 3JP (GB)

(74) Representative: Emerson, Peter James et al
Page Hargrave Whitefriars Lewins Mead
Bristol BS1 2NT
Bristol BS1 2NT (GB)

   


(54) Condition monitoring


(57) A condition monitoring system for a railway comprises a sensor for producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of equipment; consolidation means for processing the data produced by the sensor to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values which relate to the condition monitoring data; and output means for outputting the consolidated data set.




Description


[0001] This invention relates to a condition monitoring system for a railway network, a railway network comprising such a condition monitoring system, and a method of condition monitoring of railway equipment.

[0002] More particularly, this invention relates to arranging for local compression or consolidation in condition monitoring systems, in order to reduce the communications bandwidth required to transmit condition monitoring or measuring data to a central system.

Background



[0003] There is an increasing desire to gather condition management data from across the various different systems deployed within railway systems, in order to construct condition management systems, with the ultimate aim of improving reliability and availability of the railway.

[0004] Typically, this is achieved using either extra measuring or monitoring equipment, or else building such measuring or monitoring equipment into the railway systems themselves. Whichever method is used, there are potentially large amounts of data generated. As examples which can generate large amounts of data may be mentioned:
  1. i) Points condition monitoring equipment, which measure current drawn by points motors during movement of the points. Typically these will require some hundreds of current values each time a point moves.
  2. ii) Track circuit condition monitoring equipment, which measures current and/or voltage within the track circuit, to enable the profile of shunting of track circuits by trains to be examined.
  3. iii) Signal lamp condition monitoring equipment, which measures inrush current as a signal lamp is turned on.
  4. iv) Points condition monitoring equipment, which measures air pressure used to drive pneumatically-operated points during points movement.


[0005] A typical architecture with separate condition monitoring is shown in the accompanying drawing, in which blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations, and block 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from each field location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations. Although two field locations 1 and 1' are shown in Fig. 1, such systems may include any practical number of such field locations. In the field location 1, remote equipment 3, such as a points machine, track circuit equipment, signal lamp equipment is controlled by a remote equipment controller 4, which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at the office location 2. Also in the field location 1 there is a condition monitoring unit 6, for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with the remote equipment 3 and which sends data to a condition management facility 7 at the office location 2. Each additional field location 1' may have similar equipment and connectivity to office location 2. The condition management facility 7 is operable to collate and process the condition monitoring data received from the condition monitoring unit 6, to assess functioning of the equipment 3 and to determine if there are any errors occurring or maintenance issues to be addressed. Depending on the type of error detected by condition management system 7, the system 7 may instigate maintenance activities on the equipment, in order to pre-empt failures.

[0006] A problem with this system is the need for a relatively large communications bandwidth, to transmit the condition monitoring data, which as noted above may be large, from the remote field location 1 to the office location 2.

[0007] In many instances, there may not be a readily available communications system from remote field locations to the office location, as the only current communications system is for the vital controlling of the railway equipment, and it would not be practicable or acceptable to superimpose non-vital condition monitoring data on this system.

Description of the invention



[0008] It is an aim of the present invention to overcome this problem. This aim is achieved by consolidating the condition monitoring or measuring data remotely, to a relatively small number of discrete values, and then transmitting these to the central office location.

[0009] This will have two effects:
  1. i) There will be a degradation of the condition monitoring or measuring data available in the central office location; and
  2. ii) There will be a reduction in the bandwidth requirements to transmit the condition monitoring or measuring data from the remote field locations to the central office location.


[0010] The ideal solution consolidates the data just enough so that it can be carried by the available bandwidth. As long as relatively minor consolidation is performed, then adequate monitoring may still be achieved.

[0011] In accordance with a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a condition monitoring system suitable for a railway network comprising:

a sensor for producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of equipment;

consolidation means for processing the data produced by the sensor to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values which relate to the condition monitoring data; and

output means for outputting the consolidated data set.



[0012] In accordance with a second aspect of the present invention there is provided a railway network comprising the condition monitoring system of the first aspect.

[0013] In accordance with a third aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of condition monitoring of railway equipment, comprising the steps of:
  1. a) producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of the equipment;
  2. b) processing the produced condition monitoring data to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values which relate to the condition monitoring data; and
  3. c) outputting the consolidated data set.


[0014] Accordingly, the present invention enables:
  1. a) A process or system for the consolidation of data representing a waveform to a series of discrete values which still permit the necessary condition management processing, thus permitting the gathering of data even when there is low bandwidth available, without providing an additional communications system.
  2. b) Application of such a process or system to the railway domain, to enable wider condition management.
  3. c) A system or process in which condition monitoring or measuring data from condition monitoring or measuring means at a remote location is consolidated to a number of discrete values and these are transmitted to a central location at a bandwidth less than necessary for transmitting all of said condition monitoring or measuring data.


[0015] The present invention is suitable for both for retrofitting to existing installations, or for implementation in new installations.

Detailed description



[0016] The invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures, of which:

Fig. 1 schematically shows a typical conditioning monitoring system;

Fig. 2 schematically shows a condition monitoring system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention; and

Fig. 3 shows a typical waveform of a measured variable.



[0017] Fig. 2 schematically shows a condition monitoring system in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. As far as possible, similar components to those of Fig. 1 are denoted with similar reference numerals.

[0018] As shown, as in Fig. 1, blocks 1, 1' are field locations, for example trackside locations, and block 2 is an "office" location, i.e. a centralised location, which may be remote from each field location 1, 1', and which houses complex or expensive equipment, and which may oversee operations at a number of different field locations. Although two field locations 1 and 1' are shown in Fig. 2, such systems may include any practical number of such field locations. In the field location 1, remote equipment 3, such as a points machine, track circuit or signal lamp is controlled by a remote equipment controller 4, which in turn is coupled with an interlocking 5 at the office location 2. Also in the field location 1 there is a condition monitoring unit 6, for example a points machine current monitoring unit, coupled with the remote equipment 3. Linked with condition monitoring unit 6, and adapted to receive condition monitoring data from condition monitoring unit 6, is a data consolidation unit 8 for consolidating said data, the functioning of which will be described in more detail below.

[0019] Data consolidation unit 8 sends consolidated condition monitoring data to a condition management facility 7 at the office location 2. Each additional field location 1' may have similar equipment and connectivity to office location 2. In Fig. 2, field locations are shown as having separate, individual connections to office location 2, however it is alternatively possible to use bus communication instead, such that each field location communicates with office location 2 via a common communications bus.

[0020] The condition management algorithms at the office location 2 are adapted to process the consolidated data, and raise any necessary alarms and warnings.

Data consolidation



[0021] As mentioned above, data consolidation unit 8 performs consolidation of the condition monitoring data received from condition monitoring unit 6, to produce a number of discrete values representative of the waveform, such that the original waveform could be at least partially reconstructed from those discrete values. Various different types of consolidation are possible. For example, Fig. 3 schematically shows a waveform representing the variation of a parameter ("A") over time ("t") during a discrete event. In practice, such parameters may comprise the current drawn by points motors during movement of the points, or the current / voltage measured within a particular track circuit during passage by a train. For simplicity, the waveform shown is exemplary only, and generally the waveform will be dependent upon the parameter in question.

[0022] The waveform can, for example, be characterised by the following values:
  1. i) Average value of the parameter over the duration of the discrete event - A
  2. ii) Duration of event (t2-t1)
  3. iii) Maximum value of the parameter during the event - "Apeak"
  4. iv) Parameter value after specific time interval(s) from the start of the event - At
  5. v) Average value of the parameter in specific time frame(s) (Δt) - AΔt
It will be recognised that there are other ways of describing the waveform of A, for example the time taken for A to reach its peak value Apeak or the time taken to return to its base level.

[0023] It will be noted that various of these values depend upon identifying the start and / or conclusion of a discrete event. There are various ways of doing this, dependent on the type of event in question. For example, processing means, which may be located within condition monitoring unit 6, may be set to identify the start and conclusion of the event by analysing the sensor data directly, e.g. by detecting a statistically significant change in the sensed value of the parameter, and correlating this to either the start or conclusion of an event. Alternatively, the event may be detected by other means, for example point movement may be correlated with sensors mounted on the points to directly determine movement, or by synchronising the event duration with the application of current to the points motors.

[0024] The exact consolidation methods applied will be determined by the condition management processing required in the office location, noting that there will always be a compromise between high detail (i.e. a closer representation of the waveform) leading to a correspondingly high volume of data to be sent to office location 2, and low detail (i.e. a "sparser" representation of the waveform) leading to a correspondingly low volume of data to be sent to the office location 2.

[0025] Whichever consolidation technique is used however, the basic functioning is similar - the full condition monitoring data is passed from condition monitoring unit 6 to data consolidation unit 8, which analyses the incoming data, and consolidates it to produce as many representative values as required, such as those values set out above.

[0026] The consolidated data are then transmitted to the condition management facility 7 at the office location 2. This requires less bandwidth than transmission of original, unconsolidated data. Since the data is consolidated rather than compressed, no additional equipment / functionality is required at office location 2, although the algorithms employed by office location 2 must be adapted to process the consolidated data.

[0027] Although the consolidated data does not contain all the information of the original data obtained from the sensors provided at remote equipment 3, by suitable selection of the consolidation technique employed, sufficient information may be received by condition management facility 7 to enable adequate monitoring, fault detection / diagnosis and control of the remote equipment 3. Furthermore, in the case where the inventive methodology is retrofitted to an existing installation, the transmission may still be enabled over the existing communications system.

[0028] The above-described embodiment is exemplary only, and various alternatives within the scope of the claims will be apparent to those skilled in the art. For example, Fig. 2 shows data consolidation unit 8 being a separate component to condition monitoring unit 6. Rather than having a separate unit 8, it is possible to include consolidation means, e.g. circuitry, within condition monitoring unit 6 itself. In this case, each data consolidation means may be retro-fitted to existing condition monitoring units 6/6'. In other embodiments, the controlling software for condition monitoring unit 6 may be adapted to include data consolidation capabilities.

[0029] Although the above embodiments have been described with respect to a railway condition monitoring system, the invention is applicable to other condition monitoring systems in diverse fields and applications.


Claims

1. A condition monitoring system suitable for a railway network comprising:

a sensor for producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of equipment;

consolidation means for processing the data produced by the sensor to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values which relate to the condition monitoring data; and

output means for outputting the consolidated data set.


 
2. A condition monitoring system according to claim 1, further comprising a condition management facility for processing the consolidated data set, and transmission means for transmitting the output consolidated data set to the condition management facility.
 
3. A condition monitoring system according to either of claims 1 and 2, wherein the sensor, consolidation means and output means are located at a trackside location.
 
4. A condition monitoring system according to claims 3 when dependent on claim 2, wherein the condition management facility is located at a location remote from the trackside location.
 
5. A condition monitoring system according to any preceding claim, wherein the condition monitoring data describes a waveform of a parameter, and the discrete values are selected from the group comprising: the average value of the parameter over the duration of a discrete event, the duration of said discrete event, the maximum value of the parameter during said discrete event, the parameter value after a specific time interval from the start of said discrete event, and the average value of the parameter during a specific time frame.
 
6. A condition monitoring system according to claim 5, comprising means for determining the start and conclusion of the discrete event.
 
7. A condition monitoring system according to any preceding claim, for monitoring the condition of railway points.
 
8. A condition monitoring system according to any of claims 1 to 6, for monitoring railway track circuits.
 
9. A railway network comprising the condition monitoring system of any preceding claim.
 
10. A method of condition monitoring of railway equipment, comprising the steps of:

a) producing condition monitoring data relating to the operation of the equipment;

b) processing the produced condition monitoring data to produce a consolidated data set which comprises a plurality of discrete values which relate to the condition monitoring data; and

c) outputting the consolidated data set.


 
11. A method according to claim 10, wherein the condition monitoring data describes a waveform of a parameter, and the discrete values are selected from the group comprising: the average value of the parameter over the duration of a discrete event, the duration of said discrete event, the maximum value of the parameter during said discrete event, the parameter value after a specific time interval from the start of said discrete event, and the average value of the parameter during a specific time frame.
 
12. A method according to claim 11, comprising the step of determining the start and conclusion of the discrete event.
 
13. A method according to any of claims 10 to 12, for monitoring the condition of railway points.
 
14. A method according to any of claims 10 to 12, for monitoring railway track circuits.
 




Drawing