TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present disclosure relates generally to steam turbine overspeed protection and
more specifically to the control of overspeed in the case of a steam turbine unloading
event.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
[0002] Typically, steam turbines are equipped with trip systems to ensure that the steam
turbine speed does not exceed a defined overspeed value. Overspeed may occur following
steam turbine unloading events and result in a transient rotational speed spike caused
by the delay in system dynamics and control system lag as the turbine's control system
assumes new control positions. The event may be an undetectable load shedding event,
such as a sudden drop in power demand, or else a detectable event, such as the opening
of a power breaker.
[0003] Power grid codes typically pre-define operating bands that limit operation above
nominal speeds. The overspeed trip setpoint is thus determined by adding the expected
overspeed resulting from a load shedding event to the peak overspeed within an operating
band.
[0004] Following an unloading event, it is generally preferable that the power plant is
available to be brought on line as soon as possible. As it may take long to bring
a plant on line after a trip is preferable to limit the number of trips.
[0005] Machine damage may also occur below the maximum rotor designed overspeed if, for
example, resonance build-up occurs within the blading. While damaging resonance build-up
in the blading typically occurs only if a particular system specific overspeed is
sustained and so does not occur during transient overspeed events such as unloading
events, it is nonetheless preferable to minimise the exposure of blades to overspeed
in order to reduce potential blade stressing.
SUMMARY
[0006] An objective of the invention is to overcome the problem of steam turbine overspeed
exposure during upset conditions..
[0007] The disclosure attempts to address this problem by means of the subject matters of
the independent claims. Advantageous embodiments are given in the dependent claims.
[0008] The disclosure is based on the general idea of varying the trip setting based on
the monitoring of an intermediate steam turbine control system parameters. If the
intermediate control parameter has neither started nor completed its expected action
within a predetermined time an alert is raised. The underlying presumption is that
in such a case a control fault has occurred which means the control system will not
be able to prevent the tripping of the steam turbine on overspeed. A further aspect
therefore provides a steam turbine trip thus limiting the overspeed exposure of the
steam turbine.
[0009] An aspect therefore provides a steam turbine compromising an overspeed control system
for responding to the deloading of the steam turbine. The control system comprises:
a control system fault alert for identifying a fault in the control system; a trigger
event that defines the point of deloading of the steam turbine; a control feature
configured to achieve a control states in respond to the deloading; and a predetermined
control time defined as the expected time interval between the trigger event and the
point at which the control feature has achieved the control state. In this arrangement
the control system fault alert is configured to initiate if, in response to the deloading
of the steam turbine, the control states is not achieved with the control time.
[0010] Another aspect provides a method of generating a steam turbine overspeed control
system fault alert comprising providing a steam turbine with the overspeed control
system wherein the control system has a trigger event that defines the point of deloading
of the steam turbine. A control feature, configured to achieve a control state in
response to the trigger event within a control time, is provided to the control system.
The method further includes initiating a fault alert if the control state is not achieved
within the control time.
[0011] Other aspects and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from
the following description, taken in connection with the accompanying drawings, which
by way of example illustrate exemplary embodiments of the present invention
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0012] By way of example, an embodiment of the present disclosure is described more fully
hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
Figure 1 is a schematic of an exemplary steam plant ;
Figure 2 is an exemplary correlation, for the steam plant of Fig. 1 of overspeed to
control time; and
Figure 3 -5 are various embodiments of control logic of the steam plant of Fig. 1
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0013] Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are now described with references
to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals are used to refer to like elements
throughout. In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific
details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the disclosure. However,
the present disclosure may be practiced without these specific details, and is not
limited to the exemplary embodiments disclosed herein.
[0014] In an exemplary embodiment, applied to a steam turbine 10 shown in Fig. 1, an overspeed
control system 16 for preventing or at least minimising overspeed OS of a steam turbine
10 in both normal and upset conditions is provided.
[0015] In an exemplary embodiment shown in Fig. 1, a steam turbine 10 compromises an overspeed
control system 16 for responding to the deloading of the steam turbine 10. In order
to control the overspeed OS and provide an alert of a potential control system 16
fault, the control system 16, as shown in Fig. 3, has: a control system fault alert
FA for identifying a fault in the control system 16; a trigger event TE used to identify
of the steam turbine 10 is deloading; a control feature 12 configured to achieve a
control state CS in response to the deloading; and a control time CT defined as the
estimated time it takes between first initiation of the trigger event TE and the point
in time at which the control feature 12 achieves the control states CS. By evaluating
if the control state CS has been achieved within the control time CT following a trigger
event TE, it is possible to determine if a control system fault has occurred. In such
as case a fault alert FA maybe provided. The fault alert FA maybe used simply as a
fault indicator or alternatively as a means to initiate a steam turbine trip.
[0016] A trigger event TE may be any indication that identifies that a steam turbine 10
unloading event has occurred. For example, the trigger event TE may be a predefined
overspeed OS or alternatively, when the steam turbine 10 is a component of a power
plant, a signal that a breaker 18 of the power plant, as shown in Fig. 1, is open.
[0017] A control feature 12, as shown in Fig. 1, may be a steam control valve for controlling
the amount of steam fed to the steam turbine 10 by means of changing the control states
CS of the control valve. Alternatively, a control feature 12 may be an extraction
control valve (not shown) for controlling steam extraction from the steam turbine
10. Examples of control states CS include predefined valve positions, such as partially
open or closed, and valve position ranges, such as "less than 80% open".
[0018] Within the control system 16, it takes a finite time from initiation of the trigger
event TE before the control state CS is reached. This time is defined in this disclosure
at the control time CT. The consequence of this time is that the steam turbine 10
will continue to do work following a trigger event TE, resulting in overspeed OS.
As system dynamics maybe estimated, it is possible, using known techniques, to estimate
the turbine overspeed OS for a known control time CT. The result, as shown in Fig.
2, is that it is possible to correlate overspeed OS with control time CT such that
overspeed OS maybe used as a pseudo control time CT. Using this principle, as shown
in Fig. 4, an exemplary embodiment uses overspeed OS as a measure of control time
CT in the overspeed control system 16 in order to provide a fault alert FA. As control
time CT is also directly related to a trigger event TE as it forms the basis for the
measurement, in a further exemplary embodiment shown in Fig. 5, overspeed OS is further
used as an indication of the trigger event TE. In this way, a fault alert FA is configured
to initiate if the steam turbine 10 achieves an overspeed OS if the control feature
12 has not achieved the control states CS.
[0019] Each of these exemplary embodiments may comprise control features 12 that each comprise
several control actions resulting in either as final control states CS or intermediate
control states CS. A final control state CS is a state of the control feature 12 that
has the longest control time CT of all the control states CS of that control feature
12. An example of a final control state CY is the closed state a valve control feature
12 that is normally open. In this example, an intermediate control state CS is a partially
open valve position or alternative a range of partially open valve position above
a certain value.
[0020] In an exemplary embodiment, arranged as shown in FIG. 1, the control feature 12 is
a steam control valve for controlling the amount of steam fed to a steam turbine 10
and the control state CS is the closing of the control valve below an estimated value
that is estimated based on nominal full load steam turbine 10 operation.
[0021] In another exemplary embodiment arranged as shown in FIG. 1, the control feature
12 is also a steam control valve for controlling the steam flow to a steam turbine
10 but the control action is the full closure of the steam control valve.
[0022] In a further exemplary embodiment, which may be applied to any exemplary embodiment,
the control feature 12 includes a control measurement device for determining the control
states CS of the control feature 12. An example is a proximity switch located on an
exemplary control valve.
[0023] In an exemplary embodiment, the control system 16 includes a plurality of control
features 12 wherein the by means of a voting system, the status of the control system
16 is determined. For example, in an embodiment with two control features 12, a fault
alert FA may be initiated if either one or both of the control features 12 does not
achieve the expected control state CS. With further control features 12 other redundant
voting systems maybe used, for example, one out of three, two out of three, three
out of three etc.
[0024] In a not shown exemplary embodiment, the control state CS is determined by means
of a measurement device. In another not shown exemplary embodiment the control state
CS is determined by means of the command to the control feature 12.
[0025] It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the present invention can
be embodied in other specific forms. The presently disclosed embodiments are therefore
considered in all respects to be illustrative and not restricted. The scope of the
invention is indicated by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description
and all changes that come within the meaning and range and equivalences thereof are
intended to be embraced therein.
REFERENCE NUMBERS
[0026]
- 10
- Steam turbine
- 12
- Control feature
- 16
- Control system
- 18
- Breaker
- FA
- Fault alert
- OS
- Overspeed
- CT
- Control time
- T
- Time
- TE
- Trigger Event
- CS
- Control state
1. A steam turbine (10) compromising:
an overspeed control system (16) for responding to the deloading of the steam turbine
(10),
the control system (16) comprising:
a control system fault alert (FA) for identifying a fault in the control system (16);
a trigger event (TE) that defines the point of deloading of the steam turbine (10);
a control feature (12) configured to achieve a control state (CS) in response to the
deloading; and
a predetermined control time (CT) providing an expected time interval between the
trigger event (TE) and the point in time at which the control feature (12) achieves
the control state (CS),
wherein the control system fault alert (FA) is configured to initiate if, in response
to the deloading of the steam turbine (10), the control state (CS) is not achieved
within the control time (CT).
2. The steam turbine (10) of claim 1 wherein the control time (CT) is the steam turbine
(10) overspeed (OS) correlated to the control time (CT) such that the control system
fault alert (FA) is configured to initiate if, in response to the deloading of the
steam turbine (10) the control state (CS) is not achieved before a predefined overspeed
(OS).
3. The steam turbine (10) of claim 2 wherein control (CT) and trigger event (TE) are
correlated to the overspeed (OS) such that the fault alert (FA) is configured to initiate
if the steam turbine (10) achieves an overspeed (OS) and the control feature (12)
has not achieved the control state (CS).
4. The steam turbine (10) of claim 2 wherein the control feature (12) has a plurality
of control of states (CS), each with a different calculated control time (CT), wherein
the control state (CS) with the longest control time (CT) defines a final control
state (CS), and
the or each other control states (CS) define one or more intermediate control states
(CS),
wherein the alert is configured to initiate based on an intermediate control state
(CS).
5. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 4 comprising a plurality of control
features (12) wherein the alert is configured to initiate based on a voting system
of control features (12).
6. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the control feature (12)
is a steam control valve for controlling the amount of steam fed to or from the steam
turbine (10) and the control state (CS) is a valve position of the steam control valve.
7. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 6 wherein the control states (CS)
is substituted by a control state (CS) command of the control feature (12).
8. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the steam turbine (10)
is a component of a power plant and the trigger event (TE) is a signal that a breaker
(18) of the power plant is open.
9. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 7 wherein the trigger event (TE)
is a predefined overspeed (OS).
10. The steam turbine (10) of any one of claims 1 to 9 further comprising a trip system
for tripping the steam turbine (10) based on the fault alert (FA).
11. A method of generating a steam turbine (10) overspeed control system fault alert (FA)
comprising:
providing a steam turbine (10) with an overspeed control system (16)
providing the control system (16) with
a trigger event (TE) that defines the point of deloading of the steam turbine (10);
and
a control feature (12) configured to achieve a control state (CS) in response to the
trigger event (TE) within a control time (CT) as measured from the trigger event (TE);
initiating a fault alert (FA) if the control state (CS) is not achieved within the
control time (CT).
12. The method of claim 11 further comprising correlating the control time (CT) with steam
turbine (10) overspeed (OS) in the event of a trigger event (TE),
wherein overspeed (OS) is used to approximate either the control time (CT) or the
control time (CT) and trigger event (TE), by means of the correlation.
13. The method of claim 11 or 12 wherein the steam turbine (10) is component of a power
plant and the trigger event (TE) is an indication that a breaker (18) of the power
plant has opened.
14. The method of claim 11 or 12 wherein the trigger event (TE) is a predetermined overspeed
(OS).