Technical Field
[0001] The present invention relates to steel sheets for cans that can be made thinner while
maintaining good workability and methods for manufacturing such steel sheets.
Background Art
[0002] Recently, some approaches to reducing can manufacturing costs have been taken to
boost demand for steel cans. One such approach to reducing can manufacturing costs
is to reduce material costs, and the thickness of steel sheets is being reduced for
application to three-piece cans, which mainly involve cylinder forming, as well as
to two-piece cans, which involve drawing.
[0003] Three-piece cans, which are manufactured by forming a cylindrical can body by welding
and joining a bottom and a lid to the can body by seaming, are formed of single-reduced
(SR) materials, which are manufactured by a single cold rolling process followed by
annealing and temper rolling, and steel sheets about 0.175 mm thick are used for beverage
cans such as coffee cans.
[0004] Another approach to reducing the thickness of steel sheets is to use double-reduced
(DR) materials, which are manufactured by performing cold rolling again after annealing.
The thickness of DR materials can be more easily reduced than that of SR materials.
As steel sheets for cans, DR materials are mainly used, for example, for drawn cans.
[0005] If DR materials are used for three-piece cans, a problem arises with the workability
of steel sheets. To seam a lid and a bottom, a three-piece can body is flanged such
that each end is widened after cylinder forming. Cylinder forming is mainly performed
by rolling up and electrically welding a rectangular steel sheet. If a DR material
is used, the steel sheet may crack near the weld in flange forming. In particular,
welding can bodies along the rolling direction of steel sheets is a prevailing method
for manufacturing three-piece beverage cans nowadays. In flange forming, therefore,
elongation occurs mainly in a direction perpendicular to the rolling direction of
steel sheets; thus, the workability in this direction is important.
[0006] In addition, some beverage cans, such as coffee cans, undergo a retort sterilization
process after being filled with the contents thereof. This retort sterilization process
exposes the cans to the pressure of steam above 100°C, thus requiring can body strength
sufficient to withstand the external pressure. In this case, the can body strength
depends on the strength of the steel sheets in the circumferential direction of the
can bodies. If the can bodies are welded along the rolling direction of the steel
sheets, the strength of the steel sheets in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction is important.
[0007] Under the above circumstances, PTL 1 discloses a method for improving workability
at a weld by adding boron to an ultralow-carbon steel in the amount depending on the
carbon content and thickness.
[0008] PTL 2 discloses a method for manufacturing a steel sheet having excellent weldability
equivalent to temper grade T3 by appropriately controlling the weight ratio of boron
to nitrogen in an ultralow-carbon steel.
[0009] PTL 3 discloses a method for manufacturing a steel sheet having high workability
by controlling the forms, types, and amounts of nitride and sulfide in a boron-containing
ultralow-carbon steel to appropriate ranges.
Citation List
Patent Literature
[0010]
PTL 1: Japanese Patent No. 3379375
PTL 2: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2001-247917
PTL 3: Japanese Unexamined Patent Application Publication No. 2003-231948
Summary of Invention
Technical Problem
[0011] The above known techniques, however, have the following problems.
[0012] The steel sheet disclosed in PTL 1 is unsuitable as a steel sheet for three-piece
beverage cans because it has insufficient ductility in the direction perpendicular
to the rolling direction due to a high second rolling reduction. Even if the steel
sheet is acceptable for welding along the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction,
it probably cracks in flange forming after being welded into a can body along the
rolling direction.
[0013] The steel sheet manufactured by the method for manufacturing a steel sheet disclosed
in PTL 2 has insufficient steel sheet strength for use as a thinner steel sheet for
three-piece beverage cans because the hardness thereof is equivalent to temper grade
T3. In addition, the specified rolling reduction in second rolling, namely, 3.5% to
6%, is excessive for temper rolling equipment, which is usually operated with a rolling
reduction of 1% to 2%, thus overloading the equipment. Meanwhile, the rolling reduction
is insufficient for second rolling equipment, which uses large amounts of lubricant,
thus probably causing a problem with rolling, such as chattering.
[0014] The steel sheet manufactured by the method disclosed in PTL 3 lacks high-temperature
ductility because it contains a large amount of sulfur, thus possibly suffering a
crack in continuous casting of steel slabs.
[0015] An object of the present invention, which has been made in light of the above circumstances,
is to provide a high-workability steel sheet for three-piece welded cans that is practical
as a steel sheet for three-piece beverage cans with a tensile strength of 400 MPa
or more in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction and excellent flange formability,
and a method for manufacturing such a steel sheet.
Solution to Problem
[0016] The inventors have conducted an intensive study to solve the above problems. As a
result, the inventors have obtained the following findings.
[0017] DR materials are harder than SR materials because they are cold-rolled again after
annealing. To have good workability, therefore, the steel sheets require sufficient
fracture elongation, that is, softness. From this viewpoint, ultralow carbon steels
are used in the present invention because carbon steels become softer with decreasing
carbon content.
[0018] In addition, a DR material, which is strained after second cold rolling, is recrystallized
by heat given during welding in a region near a weld. In flange forming, strain concentrates
in the recrystallized region because it is softer than the other region, thus causing
a crack. To prevent this, the steel sheet needs to be given hardenability. An appropriate
amount of boron added increases hardenability in welding, thus preventing softening
near the weld. If the second rolling reduction is low, however, strain concentrates
in the base metal near the weld in flange forming because the hardening effect makes
the strength of the weld higher than that of the surrounding base metal, thus causing
a crack. Hence, the rolling reduction in second cold rolling needs to be limited to
an appropriate range.
[0019] The present invention, based on the above findings, is summarized as follows:
- [1] A high-workability steel sheet for three-piece welded cans, containing, in percent
by mass, more than 0.0015% to 0.0030% of carbon, 0.10% or less of silicon, 0.20% to
0.80% of manganese, 0.001% to 0.020% of phosphorus, 0.001% to 0.020% of sulfur, more
than 0.040% to 0.100% of aluminum, 0.030% or less of nitrogen, and 0.0002% to 0.0050%
of boron, the balance being iron and incidental impurities, the steel sheet having
a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in a direction perpendicular to a rolling direction
and a fracture elongation of 15% or more in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction.
- [2] A method for manufacturing a high-workability steel sheet for three-piece welded
cans, the method including forming a steel into a slab by continuous casting, the
steel containing, in percent by mass, more than 0.0015% to 0.0030% of carbon, 0.10%
or less of silicon, 0.20% to 0.80% of manganese, 0.001% to 0.020% of phosphorus, 0.001%
to 0.020% of sulfur, more than 0.040% to 0.100% of aluminum, 0.030% or less of nitrogen,
and 0.0002% to 0.0050% of boron, the balance being iron and incidental impurities;
hot-rolling the slab at a finish rolling temperature of the Ar3 transformation temperature to 960°C and a coiling temperature of 560°C to 750°C;
subjecting the steel sheet to first cold rolling at a rolling reduction of 89% to
93%; annealing the steel sheet at 600°C to 790°C; and subjecting the steel sheet to
second cold rolling at a rolling reduction of more than 6.0% to less than 10.0%.
The percentages showing the steel compositions herein are all percentages by mass.
Advantageous Effects of Invention
[0020] According to the present invention, a high-workability steel sheet for three-piece
welded cans is provided that has a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in a direction
perpendicular to a rolling direction and excellent flange formability.
[0021] Specifically, according to the present invention, a thin steel sheet with excellent
workability for three-piece welded cans can be reliably manufactured through second
cold rolling by adding boron to an ultralow carbon steel and setting an appropriate
second cold rolling reduction.
[0022] As a result, the base sheet (steel sheet) with improved workability enables can forming
using thin DR materials without causing a crack in flange forming of three-piece cans,
thus achieving a significant reduction in the wall thickness of three-piece cans.
Description of Embodiments
[0023] The present invention will now be described in detail.
[0024] A high-workability steel sheet of the present invention for three-piece welded cans
is characterized by a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in a direction perpendicular
to a rolling direction and a fracture elongation of 15% or more in the direction perpendicular
to the rolling direction. The high-workability steel sheet of the present invention
for three-piece welded cans is manufactured as an ultrathin steel sheet through second
cold rolling with sufficient flange formability at a weld by adding boron to an ultralow
carbon steel to impart hardenability while maintaining its softness and setting an
appropriate second cold rolling reduction.
[0025] The composition of the high-workability steel sheet of the present invention for
three-piece welded cans will now be described.
Carbon: more than 0.0015% to 0.0030%
[0026] In the present invention, the material needs to be a soft steel to ensure sufficient
workability after second cold rolling. Because steels having higher carbon contents
are generally harder, the upper limit of the carbon content is 0.0030%. A carbon content
exceeding 0.0030% impairs the workability of the steel sheet, thus making it difficult
to perform can forming processes such as flange forming. On the other hand, the lower
limit of the carbon content is more than 0.0015% because reducing the carbon content
to 0.0015% or less undesirably increases decarburization cost in a refining process.
Silicon: 0.10% or less
[0027] The silicon content is 0.10% or less because a silicon content exceeding 0.10% causes
problems such as degraded surface treatment properties and corrosion resistance.
Manganese: 0.20% to 0.80%
[0028] Manganese, which has the effects of preventing red brittleness due to sulfur during
hot rolling and refining crystal grains, is an element necessary to ensure the desired
material properties. To achieve these effects, at least 0.20% of manganese needs to
be added. On the other hand, the upper limit is 0.80% because an excessive amount
of manganese added degrades the corrosion resistance and also degrades flange formability
and neck formability by hardening the steel sheet.
Phosphorus: 0.001% to 0.020%
[0029] The upper limit of the phosphorus content is 0.020% because phosphorus is a harmful
element that degrades the flange formability and neck formability by hardening the
steel sheet and also degrades the corrosion resistance. On the other hand, reducing
the phosphorus content to less than 0.001% involves excessive dephosphorization cost.
Accordingly, the lower limit of the phosphorus content is 0.001%.
Sulfur: 0.001% to 0.020%
[0030] Sulfur, present as inclusions in the steel, is a harmful element that decreases the
ductility and degrades the corrosion resistance. In addition, an excessive sulfur
content results in insufficient high-temperature ductility, thus leading to slab cracking
in continuous casting. The sulfur content is limited to 0.020% because a sulfur content
exceeding 0.020% causes those adverse effects. On the other hand, reducing the sulfur
content to less than 0.001% involves excessive desulfurization cost, and the steel
sheet hardly suffers the above adverse effects at any lower sulfur content. Accordingly,
the lower limit of the sulfur content is 0.001%.
Aluminum: more than 0.040% to 0.100%
[0031] Aluminum is an element necessary as a deoxidizing agent in steelmaking. An aluminum
content of 0.040% or less results in insufficient deoxidization, thus increasing inclusions
and degrading the flange formability. On the other hand, an aluminum content exceeding
0.100% results in an increased frequency of occurrence of surface defects due to,
for example, alumina clusters. Accordingly, the aluminum content is more than 0.040%
to 0.100%.
Nitrogen: 0.030% or less
[0032] A large amount of nitrogen added degrades hot ductility, thus causing slab cracking
in continuous casting. Accordingly, the upper limit of the nitrogen content is 0.030%.
Boron: 0.0002% to 0.0050%
[0033] Boron, which is an element essential for preventing softening at a weld, fails to
provide sufficient performance if the content thereof falls below 0.0002%. Accordingly,
the lower limit of the boron content is 0.0002%. On the other hand, a boron content
exceeding 0.0050% provides no further improvement in performance and only increases
the cost. Accordingly, the upper limit of the boron content is 0.0050%, preferably
0.0011% to 0.0020%.
[0034] The balance is iron and incidental impurities.
[0035] Next, a method for manufacturing the high-workability steel sheet of the present
invention for three-piece welded cans will be described.
[0036] The high-workability steel sheet of the present invention for three-piece welded
cans is manufactured using a steel slab manufactured by continuous casting and having
the above composition by hot rolling, first cold rolling, annealing, and second cold
rolling. The steel sheet manufactured by the present invention is assumed to be used
as a thinner steel sheet for three-piece beverage cans. Accordingly, the steel sheet
is required to have a smaller product thickness than those used conventionally and
therefore needs to be rolled to a thickness of about 0.15 mm or less. It is usually
difficult to achieve a thickness of 0.15 mm or less by a single cold rolling process.
That is, cold rolling to such a small thickness overloads a rolling mill. It is also
possible to roll the steel slab to a smaller thickness than usual in hot rolling to
reduce the thickness after cold rolling. However, a higher rolling reduction in hot
rolling results in a greater decrease in the temperature of the steel sheet in the
rolling, thus making it impossible to achieve a predetermined finish rolling temperature.
In addition, a steel sheet having a smaller thickness before annealing is more likely
to have problems such as fracture and deformation in continuous annealing. For these
reasons, second cold rolling is performed after annealing in the present invention.
Finish rolling temperature: Ar3 transformation temperature to 960°C
[0037] If the finish rolling temperature in hot rolling falls below the Ar
3 transformation temperature, the size of recrystallized grains after annealing becomes
uneven. If the finish rolling temperature in hot rolling exceeds 960°C, the size of
recrystallized grains after annealing becomes larger than necessary. Accordingly,
the finish rolling temperature in hot rolling is the Ar
3 transformation temperature to 960°C, more preferably 890°C to 930°C.
Coiling temperature: 560°C to 750°C
[0038] If the coiling temperature after hot rolling falls below 560°C, the size of recrystallized
grains after annealing becomes extremely small. On the other hand, a coiling temperature
exceeding 750°C is undesirable because it results in uneven material properties over
the entire steel sheet and formation of an excessive amount of scale. Accordingly,
the coiling temperature after hot rolling is 560°C to 750°C, more preferably 600°C
to 720°C.
[0039] First cold rolling at rolling reduction of 89% to 93% The first cold rolling reduction
affects the grain size after annealing; the size of recrystallized grains becomes
extremely large if the rolling reduction falls below 89% and becomes extremely small
if the rolling reduction exceeds 93%. Accordingly, the first cold rolling reduction
is 89% to 93%, more preferably 90% to 92%.
Annealing at 600°C to 790°C
[0040] The annealing temperature affects the recrystallization rate and the grain size.
Specifically, if the annealing temperature falls below 600°C, an excessive number
of unrecrystallized grains remain, thus impairing the workability. If the annealing
temperature exceeds 790°C, the grain size becomes extremely large, thus making it
difficult to ensure sufficient strength. Accordingly, the annealing temperature is
600°C to 790°C, more preferably 610°C to 700°C. It should be noted that some unrecrystallized
grains may remain after annealing.
Second cold rolling at rolling reduction of more than 6.0% to less than 10.0%
[0041] If the second cold rolling reduction is 6.0% or less, the required steel sheet strength
cannot be achieved because of insufficient work hardening in second cold rolling.
In addition, a hardening effect in welding results in a great difference in strength
between the weld, which has increased strength, and the base metal, thus causing a
crack near the weld in flange forming. On the other hand, if the second cold rolling
reduction is 10.0% or more, sufficient fracture elongation cannot be achieved because
of excessive work hardening in second cold rolling. In addition, the proportion of
crystal grains recrystallized near the weld (recrystallization rate) increases because
large strain accumulates in second cold rolling, and the strength near the weld decreases
accordingly, thus making the steel sheet prone to cracking in flange forming. Accordingly,
the second cold rolling reduction is more than 6.0% to less than 10.0%.
[0042] The subsequent steps, such as coating, are performed in a conventional manner to
complete a steel sheet for cans.
[0043] Thus, the high-workability steel sheet of the present invention for three-piece welded
cans is produced. This high-workability steel sheet for three-piece welded cans has
a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction and a fracture elongation of 15% or more in the direction perpendicular
to the rolling direction. For application to a three-piece beverage can body welded
along the rolling direction, the strength in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction is important for withstanding external pressure in a retort sterilization
process. With a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in the direction perpendicular
to the rolling direction, the steel sheet does not dent or buckle when exposed to
a retort environment.
For application to a three-piece beverage can body welded along the rolling direction,
additionally, the fracture elongation in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction is important for preventing a crack in flange forming. With a fracture elongation
of 15% or more in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction, flange forming
can be performed without causing a crack.
EXAMPLES
[0044] Steels having the compositions shown in Table 1, with the balance being iron and
incidental impurities, were prepared in an actual converter and were continuously
cast into steel slabs. The resulting steel slabs were then reheated at 1,250°C and
were subjected to hot rolling, first cold rolling, continuous annealing, and second
cold rolling under the conditions shown in Table 2 to a thickness of 0.14 to 0.15
mm. The hot rolling was followed by pickling. The steel sheets thus manufactured were
continuously coated with tin on both sides to form tinplates having 2.8 g/m
2 of tin deposited on each side.
[0045]
[Table 1]
Steel |
Composition (% by mass) |
C |
Si |
Mn |
P |
S |
Al |
N |
B |
1 |
0.0019 |
0.01 |
0.38 |
0.011 |
0.014 |
0.049 |
0.0023 |
0.0013 |
2 |
0.0022 |
0.01 |
0.31 |
0.010 |
0.011 |
0.050 |
0.0024 |
0.0009 |
3 |
0.0021 |
0.01 |
0.30 |
0.016 |
0.015 |
0.055 |
0.0028 |
0.0010 |
4 |
0.0019 |
0.01 |
0.41 |
0.013 |
0.018 |
0.043 |
0.0020 |
0.0015 |
5 |
0.0018 |
0.01 |
0.35 |
0.011 |
0.010 |
0.049 |
0.0022 |
0.0012 |
6 |
0.0025 |
0.01 |
0.33 |
0.015 |
0.012 |
0.048 |
0.0023 |
0.0016 |
7 |
0.0023 |
0.01 |
0.40 |
0.014 |
0.012 |
0.056 |
0.0024 |
0.0011 |
8 |
0.0211 |
0.01 |
0.30 |
0.010 |
0.010 |
0.044 |
0.0021 |
0.0010 |
9 |
0.0022 |
0.01 |
0.32 |
0.019 |
0.013 |
0.058 |
0.0025 |
- |
10 |
0.0021 |
0.01 |
0.31 |
0.015 |
0.013 |
0.045 |
0.0028 |
0.0014 |
11 |
0.0024 |
0.01 |
0.28 |
0.013 |
0.014 |
0.051 |
0.0031 |
0.0024 |
12 |
0.0017 |
0.01 |
0.30 |
0.012 |
0.015 |
0.039 |
0.0025 |
0.0018 |
13 |
0.0020 |
0.01 |
0.29 |
0.008 |
0.017 |
0.061 |
0.0022 |
0.0015 |
[0046]
[Table 2]
Steel |
Finish rolling temperature (°C) |
Coiling temperature (°C) |
First cold rolling reduction |
Annealing temperature (°C) |
Second cold rolling reduction (%) |
1 |
910 |
650 |
91.8 |
610 |
8.5 |
2 |
910 |
670 |
92.0 |
630 |
6.5 |
3 |
910 |
690 |
91.9 |
610 |
7.0 |
4 |
915 |
650 |
91.7 |
630 |
9.5 |
5 |
915 |
670 |
91.8 |
610 |
8.0 |
6 |
920 |
690 |
91.8 |
630 |
9.0 |
7 |
920 |
650 |
92.0 |
610 |
6.5 |
8 |
910 |
650 |
91.8 |
610 |
8.0 |
9 |
910 |
650 |
91.7 |
610 |
9.5 |
10 |
910 |
650 |
90.6 |
610 |
20 |
11 |
910 |
650 |
91.7 |
610 |
10 |
12 |
910 |
650 |
92.0 |
610 |
6.0 |
13 |
910 |
650 |
92.3 |
610 |
2.0 |
[0047] The resulting coated steel sheets (tinplates) were subjected to heat treatment equivalent
to coat baking at 210°C for 20 minutes before a tensile test. In the tensile test,
JIS No. 5 tensile test pieces were used to measure the tensile strength (fracture
strength) and the fracture elongation in the direction perpendicular to the rolling
direction according to JIS Z2241.
[0048] The steel sheets subjected to the heat treatment equivalent to coat baking were formed
into can bodies having an outside diameter of 52.8 mm by seam welding, and the ends
thereof were necked in to an outside diameter of 50.4 mm and were flanged to an outside
diameter of 55.4 mm before they were evaluated for flange cracks. The steel sheets
were evaluated as being "poor" if the flanges cracked and as being "good" if the flanges
did not crack.
[0049] The can bodies had a size equivalent to that of 190 g beverage cans and were welded
along the rolling direction of the steel sheets. The necking-in was performed by die
necking, and the flanging was performed by spin flanging.
A paneling test was conducted for evaluation of can body strength. Hollow can bodies
were formed by the above processes and lid and bottom seaming and were externally
pressurized by air pressure in a sealed chamber to measure the pressure at which the
can bodies collapsed. The steel sheets were evaluated as being "poor" if the collapse
pressure fell below 1.7 kg/cm
2and as being "good" if the collapse pressure was 1.7 kg/cm
2 or more. This criterion was set as the strength with which a steel sheet can withstand
the pressure of common retort treatment. Before necking-in, 15 beads were formed in
the centers of the can bodies. The beads had a spacing of 4 mm and a depth of 0.5
mm.
[0050] The results thus obtained are shown in Table 3.
[0051]
[Table 3]
Steel |
Tensile strength in direction perpendicular to rolling direction (MPa) |
Fracture elongation in direction perpendicular to rolling direction |
Flange |
Can body strength (paneling test) |
Remarks |
1 |
415 |
15.9 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
2 |
405 |
17.2 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
3 |
409 |
16.5 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
4 |
421 |
15.0 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
5 |
410 |
16.0 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
6 |
418 |
15.2 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
7 |
407 |
17.1 |
Good |
Good |
Invention example |
8 |
422 |
2.8 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
9 |
421 |
15.2 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
10 |
425 |
4.1 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
11 |
421 |
13.5 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
12 |
393 |
15.8 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
13 |
385 |
17.0 |
Poor |
-* |
Comparative example |
*Steels 8 to 13 were unable to be subjected to the paneling test because the flanges
cracked and could not be seamed. |
[0052] According to Table 3, Nos. 1 to 7, which are examples of the present invention, achieved
excellent strength, that is, a tensile strength of 400 MPa or more in the direction
perpendicular to the rolling direction, which is required to reduce the wall thickness
of three-piece can bodies by several percent. In addition, the fracture elongation
in the direction perpendicular to the rolling direction was 15% or more. Furthermore,
these steels had excellent workability and did not crack in flanging. The can body
strength after can forming was also sufficient.
[0053] In contrast, No. 8, which is a comparative example, lost its ductility after second
cold rolling and had poor workability because the carbon content was excessive.
In addition, No. 9, which is a comparative example, became extremely soft in the welding
heat-affected zone and cracked in flanging because it contained no boron.
Nos. 10 and 11, which are comparative examples, lacked workability because the second
cold rolling reduction was extremely high.
Nos. 12 and 13, which are comparative examples, lacked strength because the second
cold rolling reduction was extremely low. In addition, these steels cracked in flanging
because of the great difference in strength between the weld, which hardened after
welding, and the base metal.
Industrial Applicability
[0054] A steel sheet of the present invention for three-piece welded cans has high workability
and excellent flange formability and is suitable for applications such as beverage
cans including coffee cans. In addition, a thin high-workability steel sheet for cans
can be provided, thus enabling a significant reduction in the wall thickness of three-piece
cans.