BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
Field of the Invention
[0001] This invention relates to lubricating oil compositions suitable for use in internal
combustion engines. More particularly, this invention relates to a low ash, sulfur,
and phosphorous lubricating oil composition.
Background
[0002] Many means have been employed to reduce overall wear and friction as well as to control
oxidation/cleanliness in modern engines, particularly automobile engines. The primary
reasons include prolonging engine life by reducing engine wear and increasing the
resistance to oxidation by reducing the engine's sludge/deposit through degradation.
Many of the solutions to reducing wear have been strictly mechanical including building
engines with wear resistant parts, modifying the contact geometry and adding special
coating materials. Other solutions to improve cleanliness involve the use of metal
containing detergents. Recently, considerable work has also been done with lubricating
oils to enhance their anti-wear/anti-oxidation properties by modifying them with ashless
antioxidants and anti-wear components.
[0003] Contemporary lubricants such as engine oils use mixtures of additive components.
Examples of additives components include, anti-wear and extreme pressure components,
fuel economy improving components, friction reducers, dispersants, detergents, inhibitors
and viscosity index improving additive. These additives provide energy conservation,
engine cleanliness and durability and high performance levels under a wide range of
performance conditions including temperature, pressure and lubricant service life.
[0004] Throughout the world, legislation aimed at reducing automotive emissions is pushing
down the level of sulfur in fuels. Recently, lubricants are coming under scrutiny
as a source of air pollution and emission catalyst deactivation. Phosphorus is known
to be poisonous to automotive three-way HC conversion catalysts. Sulfur is known to
be poisonous to deNox catalysts and zinc/moly phosphates are key contributors to cause
plugging of the exhaust particulate filters. The sulfur, ash and phosphorous components
are commonly referred to as "SAP" or "SAPS" in the art. Accordingly, there is a need
for a low sulfur, ash, and phosphorous component additive for lubricating oils that
provides favorable performance properties.
[0005] Conventional engine oil technology relies heavily on zinc dithiophosphate ("ZnDTP"
or "ZDDP"). ZnDTP is a versatile, anti-wear/anti-oxidant component that provides extremely
low cam and lifter wear and favorable oxidation protection under severe conditions.
ZnDTP is disadvantageous, especially at high treat rates. The major problem with ZnDTP
is the poisoning effects to after-treatment devices that may aggravate emission problems.
In addition, ZnDTP has strong interactions with dispersants, detergents, other anti-wear
components and MoDTC causing antagonistic effects on friction, sludge and deposit,
if inappropriate concentrations are utilized. Replacing ZnDTP additives is not a simple
endeavor since the wear protection demand for today's engine is extremely high and
extremely rigorous chemical limits on ZnDTP.
[0006] Based on the above, there is a need for the development of a low phosphorus, low
sulfur and low ash lubricating oil and additive with low levels of ZDNTP. Accordingly,
this invention satisfies that need.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0007] In a first embodiment, a lubricating oil composition is disclosed. This composition,
comprises a lubricating oil basestock, an alkylated aromatic additive of at least
0.01 and less than 20 weight percent of the composition, a dispersant—detergent-inhibitor
system of less than 15 percent weight percent of the composition, a zinc dithiophosphate
additive of at least 0.1 weight percent of the composition and no more than 1.0 weight
percent of the composition. The composition having less than 630 PPM phosphorus, less
than 710 PPM zinc, less than 5,000 PPM sulfur, less than 8 TBN, less than 1.0 weight
percent ash.
[0008] In a second embodiment, an additive composition for lubricating oils is disclosed.
This composition comprises an alkylated aromatic additive of less than 20 weight percent
of the composition, a dispersant—detergent-inhibitor system of less than 15 percent
weight percent of the composition, a zinc dithiophosphate additive of at least 0.1
weight percent of the composition and no more than 1.0 weight percent of the composition.
[0009] In a third embodiment, a method of obtain a favorable lubricating properties is disclosed.
This method, comprises obtaining a composition comprising a lubricating oil basestock,
an alkylated aromatic additive of at least 0.01 and less than 20 weight percent of
the composition, a dispersant-detergent-inhibitor system of less than 15 percent weight
percent of the composition, zinc dithiophosphate additive of at least 0.1 weight percent
of the composition and no more than 1.0 weight percent of the composition, wherein
the composition has less than 630 PPM phosphorus, less than 710 PPM zinc, less than
5,000 PPM sulfur, less than 8 TBN, less than 1.0 weight percent ash and a lubricating
an engine with the composition to achieve favorable anti-wear properties, oxidation
resistance and cleanliness.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING
[0010] Figure 1 illustrates the viscosity increase profiles for a Group V base stock with
different additive embodiments.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0011] This invention relates to engine lubricants formulated with functional fluids and/or
additives and compositions. One embodiment is a low ash, sulfur, phosphorus engine
lubricant compositions comprising oils of lubricant viscosity containing a minor amount
of multi-functional anti-wear/anti-oxidation additive. The anti-wear/anti-oxidation
additive may be a functional fluid of certain sulfur-containing alkylated aromatics
or mixtures of sulfur and non-sulfur alkylated aromatics.
[0012] In a second embodiment, the lubricating oils maintain low frictional properties of
film under various operating conditions. This embodiment favorably maintains sufficiently
high film thickness at high operating temperatures to provide a minimum lubricant
film to protect against wear at a variety of temperatures.
[0013] In a third embodiment, the lubricating oil maintains cleanliness over the entire
range of operating conditions while reducing wear to an absolute minimum. In a fourth
embodiment, the lubricating oil provides favorable oxidation and corrosion control,
under the most severe operating conditions.
[0014] Traditionally, antiwear and extreme pressure additives have been chosen from zinc
dithiophosphates, phosphites, sulfurized olefins/esters, sulfur-nitrogen additives
and similar components. Friction reducers have been chosen from molybdenum additives
including Moly dithiocarbamates ("MoDTC"), Molydithiophosphates ("MoDTP"), and other
organic moly-containing compounds), amines, amides and similar components. Metal detergents
have been chosen from calcium or magnesium phenates, sulfonates, salicylates, carbonates
and similar components. Antioxidants have been chosen from hindered phenols, arylamines,
dihydroquinolines, phosphites and thiol/thiolester/disulfide/trisulfide compounds.
These additives are rich in sulfur, phosphorus and/or ash content as they form strong
chemical films to the metal surfaces.
[0015] Diphenyl sulfide, diphenyl oxide, biphenyl, diphenylmethane, and many other related
analogs are utilized as heat transfer fluids since they are stable materials that
can resist thermal stress under severe conditions. However, the direct use of the
non-alkylated aromatics in lubricants are relatively limited to low concentrations
due to the limited compatibility with other hydrocarbon base stocks.
[0016] Alkylated aromatics, especially sulfur containing alkylated aromatics have been developed
by applying alkylation technique to functional or non-functional aromatics providing
good thermal-oxidative stability while maintaining good compatibility. These alkylated
aromatics have excellent compatibility with other base oils and superb solvency and
stability making them unique synthetic oils including Group V or functional fluids.
U.S. Patent Nos. 5,105,042, and
5,177,284 disclose the process conditions of making alkylated naphthalenes.
US. Patent Nos. 5,372,734,
5,552,071,
5,371,248, and
5,286,396 disclose the preparation of alkylated benzothiophene-derived lubricants, alkylated
diphenyl ether lubricants, alkylated benzofuran-derived lubricants and alkylated phenoxathins
for lubricants.
[0017] The prior art literature referenced above fails to disclose the use of alkylated
aromatics in a low SAP environment with high quality base stocks. In addition, the
prior art fails to disclose the favorable anti-wear/anti-oxidation properties and
unexpected, superb cleanliness features which make the alkylated aromatics functional
fluids suitable for low ash and low phosphorus engine oils. In different embodiments
the preferred degree of alkylation varies ranging from mono- to di- to multiple alkylates.
However, mono-alkylates are more desirable than others. The desired carbon to sulfur
and oxygen ratio is in a range from 10:1 to 400:1 on atomic basis with a more preferred
range of 20:1 to 200:1 and an even more preferred range of 25:1 to 100:1.
[0018] In one embodiment, lubricating oils, especially synthetic oils, when blended with
low level of zinc dithiophosphates and/or optionally molybdenum friction modifiers
can provide substantial reductions in wear and oxidation. These combinations provide
improvements in engine service life and durability with excellent overall performance
benefits. In addition, these combinations typically minimize deleterious effects such
as instability, undesirable high viscosity, high friction, deposits and the like,
when added to lubricating oils. Combinations of alkylated aromatics with low level
of sulfur-free detergents such as, salicylates, ashless phenols and arylamines, and
boron containing additives, and any combination thereof further provide synergies.
[0019] In another embodiment, novel highly stable, sulfur containing, alkylated aromatics
have been synthesized and evaluated as functional fluids and/or additives for lubricants
including low ash, sulfur, phosphorus engine lubricants. The novel compositions possess
multi-functional anti-wear/anti-oxidation/cleanliness/friction reducing-fuel economy
properties. In addition, these combinations can improve the wear protection of most
lubricants used in both automotive and commercial diesel engine applications, while
maintaining desirable viscometrics. In this embodiment, the composition is favorable
suited for low ash passenger car engine oils. When used as Group V base stocks including
functional fluids or co-base stocks, the typical alkylated aromatic concentration
is in the range of 0.1 to 20 wt%, preferably 0.5 to 8 wt%. When used as lubricant
additives, the typical treat, sometimes referred to as treat rate, is in the range
of 0.01 to 4 wt% with a more preferred range of 0.02 to 2 wt% and an even more preferred
range of 0.1 to 1 wt%. The treat for an additive is based on the weight percent of
the active ingredient in the desired lubricant.
[0020] In a preferred embodiment, this invention is referred to as a low ash, sulfur and
phosphorus engine oil formulated with extremely stable, sulfur functional fluids.
However, this invention is not limited to sulfur functional fluids. Other suitable
functional fluids include alkylated diphenyl sulfides, alkylated diphenyl disulfides/polysulfides,
alkylated naphthalenes, alkylated benzenes, alkylated diphenyl ether, alkylated diphenylmethanes,
alkylated phenothiazines, alkylated phenoxazines, alkylated benzothiazines, alkylated
benzothiophenes, alkylated thiophenol, alkylated thianthrene, similar and related
components, and any combinations thereof.
[0021] Preferably, the highly stable engine oil fluids has a very low viscosity of less
than 20 cSt at 400°C, with fully saturated structures with an Iodine value less than
1, low volatility of less than 15 wt% loss in Noack and even more preferably high
resistance to oxidation/thermal breakdown. The most preferred embodiment provides
favorable viscometrics for engine oils since fuel economy is heavily influenced by
viscometrics. A variety of alkylated aromatics are suitable for different embodiments
of this invention. For example, ADPS-1 is an experimental synthetic fluid made by
the alkylation of diphenyl sulfide with long chain alkenes over the USY catalyst.
[0022] In a preferred embodiment, the lubricant compositions, besides being built around
the unique sulfur containing alkylated aromatics, also contain low levels of zinc,
phosphorus and sulfur components. Persons skilled in the art will recognize the ability
to include additives that favorably enhances lubricant performance including anti-friction,
anti-oxidation and anti-wear performance while successfully meeting the stringent
wear, oxidation and cleanliness performance requirements in modern engines. Examples
of suitable additives include but are not limited to contemporary zinc dithiophosphates,
borated or non-borated dispersants, phenolic and aminic ashless anti-oxidants, high
and low levels of metal detergents, molybdenum or organic friction modifiers, defoamants,
seal swell additives, pour point depressants including contemporary DDI additive packages,
and any combination thereof.
[0023] In some embodiments, we have discovered that these new synergistic combination has
favorably improved lubricant performance parameters while maintaining excellent compatibility
to exhaust after-treatment devices. The core of the preferred embodiment comprises
stable sulfur containing functional fluid and a significantly reduced amount of ZnDTP
and metal detergents, and enhanced amount of ashless anti-oxidants and friction modifiers.
The resulting formulation provides an engine oil lubricant with less than 630 PPM
phosphorus, less than 710 PPM zinc, less than 5,000 PPM sulfur, less than 8 TBN, less
than 1.0 wt% ash and high nitrogen/zinc or nitrogen/phosphorus ratios. In one embodiment,
the general formulation of the low SAP engine oil containing the alkylated aromatics
is summarized in Table 1.
Table 1
| Component Type |
Wt% |
Elements in Formulated Oils (ppm) + Other Restrictions |
| Sulfur aromatic functional fluid/additive |
0.01 - 20.0% |
< 4500 ppm sulfur, volatility <10 wt% |
| Zinc dithiophosphate additive |
0.1 - 1.0% |
100 - 630 ppm phosphorus, 105-710 ppm zinc |
| Dispersant-detergent-inhibitor system |
<15.0% |
<1800 ppm nitrogen, <1.0 wt ash, TBN <8, N/P >1 (wt/wt) N/Zn >1 (wt/wt) |
| Molybdenum additive |
0 -2.0% |
<210 ppm molybdenum |
| Boron additive |
0 -8.0% |
<400 ppm boron |
[0024] These components can be used with a variety of base stocks, including group I, II,
III, IV, and V, and GTL as well as a variety of mixtures thereof. However, due to
other performance requirements including volatility, stability, viscometrics, and
cleanliness feature, premium engine oils prefer to use group II and higher ("Group
II+") base oils to ensure that they can achieve desirable overall performance levels
as well as maximizing the full potential of the unique synergies among additives.
Additional significant synergies were identified among alkylated aromatics and Group
II+ high performance base stocks including Group II, III, IV, V, VI or GTL base stocks.
[0025] Base stocks having a high paraffinic/naphthenic and saturation nature (>90 wt%) can
often be used advantageously in certain embodiments. Such base stocks include Group
II and/or Group III hydroprocessed or hydrocracked base stocks, or their synthetic
counterparts such as polyalphaolefin oils, GTL or similar base oils or mixtures of
similar base oils.
[0026] In a preferred embodiment, at least about 20% of the total composition should consist
of such Group II or Group III base stocks or GTL, with at least about 30% being preferable,
and more than about 80% on being most preferable. Gas to liquid base stocks can also
be preferentially used with the components of this invention as a portion or all of
the base stocks used to formulate the finished lubricant. We have discovered, favorable
improvement when the components of this invention are added to lubricating systems
comprising primarily Group II, Group III and/or GTL base stocks compared to lesser
quantities of alternate fluids.
[0027] Suitable dispersants include borated and non-borated succinimides, succinic acid-esters
and amides, alkylphenol-polyamine coupled Mannich adducts, other related components
and any combination thereof. In some embodiment, it can often be advantageous to use
mixtures of such above described dispersants and other related dispersants. Examples
include additives that are borated, those that are primarily of higher molecular weight,
those that consist of primarily mono-succinimide, bis-succinimide, or mixtures of
above, those made with different amines, those that are end-capped, dispersants wherein
the back-bone is derived from polymerization of branched olefins such as polyisobutylene
or from polymers such as other polyolefins other than polyisobutylene, such as ethylene,
propylene, butene, similar dispersants and any combination thereof.
[0028] Suitable detergents include but are not limited to calcium phenates, calcium sulfonates,
calcium salicylates, magnesium phenates, magnesium sulfonates, magnesium salicylates,
metal carbonates, related components including borated detergents, and any combination
thereof. The detergents can be neutral, mildly overbased, or highly overbased.
[0029] The antioxidants include hindered phenols, arylamines, low sulfur peroxide decomposers
and other related components. Inhibitors and antirust additives may be used as needed.
Seal swell control components and defoamants may be used with the mixtures of this
invention. Various friction modifiers may also be utilized. Examples include but are
not limited to amines, alcohols, esters, diols, triols, polyols, fatty amides, various
molybdenum phosphorodithioates (MoDTP), molybdenum dithiocarbamates (MoDTC), sulfur/phosphorus
free organic molybdenum components, molybdenum trinuclear components, and any combination
thereof.
[0030] ZnDTP is widely utilized for providing anti-wear protection to modern engine oils
with few other components sharing similar functions. As the levels of ZnDTP are reduced,
the wear protection must rely on a new anti-wear system. Preferably, that new anti-wear
system will be low in ash, sulfur and substantially free of phosphorus components
to provide favorable performance with the new exhaust systems. Typically, the sulfur-containing
alkylated aromatics possess moderate level of highly stable, less volatile sulfur,
that is different from the volatile sulfur liberated from zinc dithiophosphates. Therefore,
these sulfur-containing alkylated aromatics are harmless to exhaust after-treatment
devices but effective in protecting engine parts against wear mechanism.
[0031] In one embodiment, the principle advantage of this new invention is the synergistic
combination of multi-functional, alkylated sulfur aromatics and small amount of zinc
dithiophosphate additives that favorably provides oxidation, corrosion, seal stability
and frictional properties. Even more important is the ability to provide anti-wear
protection with lower levels of sulfur, phosphorus and zinc in the engine oil formulations
are significantly less than that typically used in today's engine oils. Another principle
advantage of this invention is the unique combination of alkylated sulfur aromatics
with boron-containing additives for superb cleanliness features, such as the effective
control of undercrown deposit formation. Another principle advantage in one embodiment
is the synergistic combination of alkylated sulfur aromatics and low level of sulfur-free
metal detergents including calcium and magnesium salicylates and carbonates. An additional
synergistic combination is an alkylated sulfur aromatics with ashless anti-oxidants
to improve oxidation protection and extended drain intervals. Another potential advantage
is the unique combination embodiment of alkylated sulfur aromatics with friction reducers
to improve fuel economy.
Examples
[0032] Table 2 below discloses bench and tribology testing data for alkylated diphenyl sulfide
(experimental sample "ADPS-1") in Passenger Vehicle Engine Oils.
Table 2
| Lubricant Example |
|
1 |
2 |
3 |
| ADPS-1 =93-59386 |
|
|
|
4% ADPS-1 |
| |
|
1.0% ZnDTP |
0.5% ZnDTP |
0.5% ZnDTP |
| 01-60665 = 0% P EO |
|
99% 01-60665 |
99.5% 01-60665 |
95.5% 01-60665 |
| Phosphorus, % |
|
0.10 |
0.05 |
0.05 |
| Sample Number |
|
02-713 |
02-714 |
02-33611 |
| Solubility Appearance |
|
C&B |
C&B |
C & B |
| 4 Ball Wear |
WSD (mm) |
0.44 |
0.48 |
0.42 |
| 40Kg/ 1200rpm/60min./200 F |
K Factor |
1.11 |
1.62 |
0.78 |
| 4 Ball EP (D2783) |
LNS (Kg) |
80 |
80 |
100 |
| 30C/10sec./1760rpm |
Weld Ld (Kg) |
200 |
200 |
200 |
| |
LWI |
35.1 |
34.5 |
41.7 |
| Cu Corrosion (D130-9) |
24 hrs/250F |
1A |
1A |
1A |
| PDSC (Ramp 10C/min) |
Onset T (C) |
232 |
229.7 |
235.1 |
| 288° C, 16hrs. Tube Rating (1 = Clean) |
|
3.8 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| HFRR |
|
|
|
|
| 0.7K.g/60Hz/0.5mm/ |
Scar X/Y (mm) |
0.317/0.7 |
0.3/0.767 |
0.26/0.70 |
| 60min./75C |
Calc. Sc. Area |
0.174 |
0.181 |
0.747 |
| |
|
|
|
|
| D2896 |
TBN |
4.27 |
4.23 |
- |
| D874 (wt%) |
Sulfated Ash |
0.53 |
0.38 |
0.35 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Phosphorus |
0.1003 |
0.0507 |
0.0497 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Zinc |
0.1118 |
0.0577 |
0.0572 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Calcium |
0.0329 |
0.0332 |
0.0317 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Magnesium |
0.0595 |
0.0496 |
0.0482 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Copper |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Chlorine |
0.0047 |
0.0049 |
0.0048 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Sulfur |
0.2799 |
0.1783 |
0.4761 |
[0033] The base formulation (01-60665) is a phosphorus-free, partially formulated engine
oil with Group III base stocks, ashless antioxidants, ashless dispersants, metal detergents,
defoamants, viscosity modifiers and other performing components.
[0034] As illustrated in the above Table 2, very good anti-wear, anti-oxidation and corrosion
control can be achieved with sulfur-derived alkylated aromatics in the low P passenger
vehicle lubricants ("PVL"). As shown in the High Frequency Reciprocating Rig ("HFRR")
and Four-Ball EP wear test, the functional fluids formulated low SAPS engine oils
can help to improve anti-wear properties evidenced by the low wear scar areas and
wear coefficients ("K Factor") measured.
[0035] In addition, there are synergistic benefits of low SAP additives with Group II and
higher base stocks. The synergistic benefits include favorable cleanliness, wear properties,
catalyst compatibility and oxidation.
[0036] Comparing lubricant example 1 by adding 1000 ppm phosphorus and lubricant example
2 by adding 500 ppm phosphorus, noticeable anti-wear performance differences can be
seen, which are believed to be directly affected by ZnDTP concentrations. Typically,
the more ZnDTP, the better anti-wear protection. However, when 4% alkylated diphenyl
sulfide was added to make lubricant example 3, which has the same level of 500 ppm
phosphorus as lubricant example 2, a significant 19% reduction of wear scar areas
and an observed 52% reduction in wear coefficients was measured.
[0037] The Table 2 results for lubricant example 3 are even better when compared to lubricant
example 1. In the presence of more ZnDTP, for example 1000 ppm P in lubricant example
1 versus 500 ppm P in lubricant example 2, a reduction of calculated scar area from
0.18 mm
2 to 0.174 mm
2 is expected. However, a significant reduction to 0.147 mm
2 range for lubricant example 3 is an unexpected result.
[0038] In the Four-Ball EP test, lubricant example 3 also demonstrated superb load carrying
property as evidenced by the higher last non-seizure load of 100 kg and a greater
Load Wear Index of 41.7 when compared to lubricant examples 1 and 2. The improvement
in Load Wear Index from lubricant examples 2 to lubricant examples 3 is almost 21%.
The high temperature stability of lubricant example 3 is also shown by the Pressured
differential Scanning Calorimetry ("PDSC") data on ramping method. Comparing lubricant
examples 2 to 3, the onset temperature is raised from 229.7°C to 235.1°C respectively
providing 54% better oxidation control, assuming the oxidation rates doubled with
every 10 °C increase in temperature. Therefore, lubricant example 3 could provide
54 % better oxidation resistance than lubricant 2 if we quantify the control by viscosity
or acid value increases or any other measurements.
[0039] The hot tube test is also used to assess cleanliness features of engine oils under
high temperature oxidation conditions. As exhibited in Table 2, lubricant example
3 has slightly better cleanliness result than both lubricant examples 1 and 2 as the
lower the rating, the better the cleanliness. This data illustrates that more ZnDTP
reduces lubricant cleanliness as lubricant example 1 has the worst result as ZnDTP
is known to decompose to various species at elevated temperatures. The copper corrosion
results indicated that adding ADPS to the engine oil formulations causes no adverse
impact to their copper corrosivity. Adding ADPS will certainly increase the sulfur
content of the engine oil. However, the final sulfur level of 0.476 wt% for lubricant
example 3 is still under the current ILSAC GF-4 standard of 0.5 wt%. In conclusion,
exceptionally good oxidative stability and low wear in low phosphorous engine oils
can be achieved by using alkylated sulfur aromatics such as, ADPS thus providing favorable
performance properties suitable for modern engine oils.
[0040] The outstanding anti-oxidation/anti-wear performance is further verified by another
set of Four-ball EP and hot tube tests. Table 3 is a Table similar to Table 2 comparing
lubricant examples 1 and 2 from Table 2 with additional lubricant example tests. As
shown in the Table 3 data, when the low phosphorus engine oil was formulated with
extremely low level of ZnDTP such as, 0.025 wt% phosphorous, the last non-seizure
load dropped to 63 kg and the load wear index also dropped to 28.2 comparing table
4 lubricant example 4 versus lubricant examples 2 and 1. This is clearly not desirable
as poor EP performance indicates weak load carrying property. Adding a conventional
sulfur EP additive, Rhein-Chemie's RC-2411™, could not improve the load carrying property
significantly as shown in lubricant example 5. However, as shown in example 6, adding
2 wt% of ADPS to the base engine oil formulation provides significant improvement.
Table 3
| Lubricant Example |
|
1 |
2 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
| Funct'lized fluids or cobase oil |
|
|
|
|
|
2% ADPS-1 |
| |
|
1% ZnDTP |
0.5% ZnDTP |
0.25% ZnDTP |
0.25% ZnDTP |
0.25% ZnDTP |
| 0 1-60665 = 0% P EO |
|
99% 01-60665 |
99.5% 01-60665 |
99.75%01 -60665 |
99.5%01-60665 |
97.5%01-60665 |
| |
|
|
|
|
.25%RC24 11 |
.25%RC2 411 |
| |
|
(0.10% P) |
(0.05% P) |
0.025% P |
0.025% P |
0.025% P |
| Sample Number |
|
02-713 |
02-714 |
02-31205 |
02-35335 |
02-35333 |
| Solubility/ Appearance |
|
C & B |
C&B |
C&B |
C&B |
C & B |
| 4 Ball EP (D2783) |
LNS (Kg) |
80 |
80 |
63 |
63 |
80 |
| .30C/10sec./17 60rpm |
Weld Ld (Kg) |
200 |
200 |
200 |
200 |
250 |
| |
LWI |
35.1 |
34.47 |
28.21 |
28.41 |
36.16 |
| Cu Corrosion (D 130-8) |
3hrs/ 210F/H2O |
1A |
1B |
1A |
1B |
1B |
| Cu Corrosion (D 130-9) |
24 hrs/250F |
1A |
1A |
2A |
2B |
2A |
| 288° C, 16hrs Tube Rating (1 = Clean) |
|
3.8 |
3.5 |
|
2.8 |
2.8 |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| D2896 |
TBN |
4.27 |
4.23 |
5.45 |
4.11 |
5.59 |
| D874 (wt%) |
Sulfated Ash |
0.53 |
0.38 |
0.33 |
0.33 |
0.32 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Phosphorus |
0.1003 |
0.0507 |
0.0244 |
0.0245 |
0.0246 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Zinc |
0.1118 |
0.0577 |
0.0287 |
0.0278 |
0.028 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Calcium |
0.0329 |
0.0332 |
0.0331 |
0.0331 |
0.0325 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Magnesium |
0.0595 |
0.0496 |
0.0505 |
0.0501 |
0.0514 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Copper |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
<0.002 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Chlorine |
0.0047 |
0.0049 |
0.0048 |
0.005 |
0.0049 |
| D6443 (wt%) |
Sulfur |
0.2799 |
0.1783 |
0.124 |
0.1463 |
0.2988 |
[0041] RC-2411™ is an aliphatic sulfur additive, which has even higher sulfur content than
the ADPS used in lubricant example 6 of table 3. Some sulfur-containing additives,
including,aliphatic sulfur species, could provide equivalent favorable antiwear/extreme
pressure performance as alkylated sulfur aromatics providing that they are thermally
stable and non-corrosive. However, many sulfur-containing aliphatic sulfur additives,
used by themselves alone, are not sufficient to provide anti-wear protection while
maintaining satisfactory anticorrosion properties as demonstrated in example 4 and
5 of table 3. Lubricant example 6 (with levels of 0.025 wt% phosphorus) of table 3
illustrates the last non-seizure load and the load-wear index improved to be equivalent
to or better than the lubricant example 1 with levels of 0.1 wt% phosphorus engine
oil. In addition, the weld load increased to 250 kg when comparing lubricant example
6 to lubricant example 1. Lubricant example 6 shows a synergistic benefits of using
an ADPS aliphatic sulfur compound with group II and higher base stock.
[0042] These results are exceptional favorable in the presence of additive treat level of
ADPS. As stated before, the hot-tube test is used to measure the relative cleanliness
of engine oils with the higher the rating on the scale form 1 to 9, the dirtier the
lubricant. Lubricant example 6, ADPS formulated oil, demonstrated better cleanliness
than oils with higher levels of ZnDTP including lubricant examples 1 and 2. As shown
in table 3 for lubricant example 5, the total sulfur of the ADPS containing formulation
is below the ILSAC GF-4 requirements.
[0043] Figure 1 illustrates the viscosity increase profiles for a Group V base stock with
different additive embodiments. Reference numerals 11 and 12 represent viscosity increase
profiles for two runs for 7 wt% alkylated naphthanates additives. Reference numeral
13 represents viscosity increase profiles for 7 wt% of TMP ester and 14 represents
a viscosity increase profile for 7% dibasic acid ester (adipate ester). Finally, the
reference numerals 15 and 16 represent viscosity increase profiles for 7 wt% and 1
wt% ADPS additive respectively.
[0044] Figure 1 demonstrates that alkylated sulfur aromatics 15 and 16 can provide favorable
performance advantages in oxidation control versus other group V synthetic fluids
in the presence of equal amount of ashless anti-oxidants. This performance benefit
was shown using the ExxonMobil Research Catalytic Oxidation Test ("ERCOT"). In the
ERCOT test, 50 ppm of soluble iron is added to 100g of test fluid. The fluid is heated
at 165°C while air is bubbled through the sample at a rate of 1L/hour. The kinematic
viscosity at 40°C of the catalyzed oil is monitored as a function of time. When the
antioxidants in the fluid are consumed, a significant increase in viscosity is observed.
The base engine oil formulation has about 450 ppm phosphorus from reduced ZnDTP, and
a total of 1.0 wt% hindered phenol and alkylated arylamine ashless anti-oxidants.
In the presence of 7 wt% experimental ADPS-1, the oil induction time has been increased
by 70-80 hours in the ERCOT test. Even present in just 1 wt% ADPS, the oil induction
time can still be 40-50 hours longer than synthetic esters or alkylated naphthalenes.
Therefore, Figure 1 illustrates the strong synergy of ADPS with an ashless anti-oxidant.
[0045] Another important performance feature of the current invention is after-treatment
compatibility. To measure after-treatment compatibility, a series of engine oil samples
were prepared where each sample contained a single sulfur containing species as shown
in Table 4. Thus, the fully formulated engine oils studied contained only the single
source of sulfur listed in Table 4. Secondary ZDDP, Primary ZDDP, Thiadiazole, Sulfur-phenol,
sulfurized olefin, and ADPS were studied. These fully formulated engine oils contain
typical non-sulfur containing performance additives such as hindered phenols, alkylated
arylamines, ashless dispersants, metal and ashless detergents, friction modifiers,
defoamants, corrosion inhibitors, copper passivators, pour point depressants and seal
swell agents. The single sulfur containing species in Table 4 were the last components
added. Samples were volatilized at 250°C for 15 minutes using D 5800 and a comparison
of the percent sulfur lost between the new oil and the oil remaining at the end of
the volatilization test was made. In a direct comparison of Table 4, primary and secondary
zinc dithiophosphates volatized at 12.0% and 37.0% respectively. Commercial sulfur-containing
antioxidants volatized at 6.1%, thiadiazole at 21.8%, molybdenum dithiocarbamate at
12.7%, and sulfurized olefin additive at 10.5%. ADPS exhibited extraordinarily low
volatility at 2.0%. This data provides strong evidence for the favorable low emission
performance benefit of using ADPS in engine oils. In this embodiment, the invention
provides favorable benefit in sustaining the useful life of the after-treatment system
by identifying a method to reduce volatile sulfur species to the exhaust system.
Table 4
| 15 Minute D5800 Sulfur Volatilization Study |
| |
Sulfur Volatilized, % |
| 2° ZDDP |
37.0 |
| Thiadiazole |
21.8 |
| Moly Dithiocarbamate |
12.7 |
| 1° ZDDP |
12.0 |
| Sulfurized Olefin |
10.5 |
| Sulfur Phenol* |
6.1 |
| ADPS |
2.0 |
[0046] All alkylated aromatics dissolved easily in engine oils and remained clear and bright
on the shelf at ambient temperatures over period of six months or longer. Apparently,
the stability of alkylated sulfur aromatics-containing oils is satisfactory and they
cause no adverse effects to compatibility in the presence of other commonly used additives
in engine oil compositions.
[0047] Besides unique, synergistic additive effects, it is evidenced that other highly refined,
low sulfur Group II/III based oils including both hydro-processed oils and HDP as
well as other Group IV/V synthetic base oils can be used to achieve favorable lubricant
performance.
[0048] In summary, in one embodiment, we have discovered a new class of low sulfur, low
ash and low phosphorous ("SAP") engine oils with favorable oxidation and wear protection
based on alkylated sulfur-containing aromatics. This offers an effective way to reduce
the amount of ZnDTP for contemporary engine oils while maintaining excellent wear,
friction and oxidation performance as well as meeting stringent emission requirements.
This embodiment further provides favorable synergisms to similar formulations comprising
alkylated sulfur aromatics, base oils of less than 300 ppm sulfur, low levels of ZnDTP
wherein the ZnDTP contributes less than 630 ppm phosphorus and/or less than 710 ppm
zinc, sulfur containing additives and molybdenum containing additives.