[0001] The present invention relates to a process for the parallel isolation and/or purification
of RNA and DNA from the same fixed biological sample, the quantification and analysis
of the nucleic acids isolated by the process according to the invention, a kit for
the parallel isolation and/or purification of RNA and DNA from a fixed sample and
the use of this kit for the diagnosis, prognosis, decisions with respect to therapy
and/or the monitoring of the therapy of a disease.
[0002] If biological material, such as, for example, a tissue fragment or isolated cells,
is removed from a living organism, the cells die within a short period of time. Very
rapidly, the dead cells are broken down first by autolysis/fermentation and then bacterially,
so that the original cell and tissue structures are destroyed. If cells or tissue
fragments are to be removed from an organism for histological examination, it is therefore
recommended to fix the biological sample taken to prevent degradation. Ideally, fixation
leaves the structures of the sample substantially unchanged to allow histological
assessment thereof. Fixation furthermore allows long-term preservation and archiving
of the samples. For these reasons, many morphological examinations are only possible
based on fixed material.
[0003] Usually, fixation is achieved using protein-precipitating or protein-crosslinking
compounds such as, for example, acids, alcohols, ketones or aldehydes, in particular
glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde. Here, fixation with formaldehyde (employed in the
form of an aqueous solution referred to as "formalin") followed by embedding of the
fixed sample in paraffin is of major importance especially in pathology since cell
and tissue structures are preserved particularly well. Hereinbelow, material fixed
in this manner is referred to as "formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded material" or "FFPE
material".
[0004] However, fixation of a sample, in particular with formalin, has the disadvantage
that, owing to the crosslinking effect of the formaldehyde, not only proteins but
also various other biomolecules including the nucleic acids present in the sample
are covalently attached to one another, and as a consequence the isolation of the
nucleic acids (DNA or RNA) from such samples is very difficult. For numerous investigations
on a molecular level, however, isolation of the nucleic acids is of great importance.
[0005] One way of isolating nucleic acids from such fixed samples is described in
WO 2007/068764. The method described therein makes it possible to break the crosslinks formed by
fixation in the biological sample and to isolate one type of nucleic acid, that is
either DNA
or RNA, which may then be followed, for example, by PCR or RT-PCR analysis.
[0006] In the field of molecular pathology, for example for the diagnosis or prognosis of
tumour disorders, both DNA-based and RNA-based analysis are employed. To allow both
DNA- and RNA-based analyses on the same fixed samples, for example tumour samples,
a process is required which permits parallel isolation of DNA and RNA from one sample,
such as, for example, a tissue section from a biopsy. Such a parallel isolation of
DNA and RNA from a single sample is highly desirable, since, firstly, there is usually
available only a very small amount of sample material which is insufficient for a
plurality of separate purifications. Secondly, the composition of the sample material
is, in general, heterogeneous; for example, only very few tumour cells are present
in a matrix of healthy cells. In this case, it is not desirable to split the sample
as it is impossible to ensure that the ratio of the different cells to one another
is the same in each partial sample. Only the parallel isolation of DNA and RNA from
a single undivided sample ensures that all analytes to be studied are present in the
same ratio and originate from a sample of identical composition.
[0007] The process described in
WO 2007/068764 releases both types of nucleic acid, DNA and RNA, equally by breaking the crosslinks
introduced during fixation. This process therefore only permits the isolation either
of DNA or RNA or else of a mixture of both nucleic acids; it does not, however, allow
parallel isolation of DNA and RNA in separate fractions. To separate the two types
of nucleic acid (DNA and RNA),
WO 2007/068764 suggests, after isolation, selective precipitation or selective adsorption of one
of the two types of nucleic acid released simultaneously during purification. Alternatively,
it is possible to degrade the respective unwanted type of nucleic acid enzymatically.
[0008] One method for the parallel purification of DNA and RNA from a sample by selective
adsorption is known and can be carried out, for example, using the commercially available
Allprep DNA/RNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Here, the sample is initially lysed
in a chaotrope-containing lysis buffer without any alcohol, and the DNA present in
the lysate is bound to a silica matrix, whereas the RNA also present in the lysate
remains unattached in solution. After addition of an alcohol to the remaining lysate
the RNA can be attached to a further silica matrix. This process works well for non-fixed
samples. However, it has been found that it is still not optimally applicable to formalin-fixed
samples since here the DNA does not bind quantitatively to the first silica matrix,
but large amounts remain in the residual lysate and are purified together with the
RNA. Therefore, this process does not allow separate purification of RNA and DNA.
[0009] WO2005/075642 describes a method for simultaneous extraction of DNA and RNA from a biological sample,
including FFPE samples. The FFPE sample is deparaffinised and digested using a lysis
buffer comprising a chaotropic agent, an ionic detergent and a proteolytic enzyme.
The sample is digested for at least 5, preferably 10 hours to release the RNA and
DNA, phenol-chloroform is added and the phases are separated. The aqueous phase comprises
mainly RNA, the organic phase mainly DNA. RNA can then be recovered from the aqueous
phase using alcohol precipitation. The DNA is recovered from the organic phase. This
method has
inter alia the drawback that it requires the extraction of the released nucleic acids using
phenol in order to be able to separate the RNA from the DNA prior to isolating said
nucleic acids separately from the organic and the aqueous phase.
[0011] Commercially available kits for isolating mixtures of DNA and RNA or either DNA or
RNA from FFPE samples are likewise known. The FFPE RNA/DNA Purification Kit (Norgen,
Biotek Corp., Thorold, Canada) allows the isolation of a mixture of RNA and DNA in
one eluate. Here, to obtain either only DNA or only RNA, a particularly long protease
K digestion and a RNAse treatment may be carried out to isolate the DNA or a short
protease K digestion and a DNAse treatment may be carried out to isolate the RNA.
However, this kit does not allow simultaneous but separate purification of both types
of nucleic acid from the same sample.
[0012] The Agencourt FormaPure Kit (Beckman Coulter Genomics GmbH, Danvers, Massachusetts,
USA), too, allows the isolation of a mixture of RNA and DNA in one eluate or the isolation
of RNA after DNAse digestion, but not simultaneous but separate isolation of RNA and
DNA.
[0013] The option to obtain either DNA or RNA by corresponding nuclease digestion or by
a suitable heat incubation is also provided by the Ambion Recover All FFPE Kit (Applied
Biosystems, Inc., Foster City, California, USA) and the QuickExtract FFPE RNA Extraction
Kit (Epicentre Biotechnologies, Madison, Wisconsin, USA). However, none of these commercially
available kits allows the separate purification of both DNA and RNA from the same
fixed sample.
[0014] Furthermore,
WO 2005/075642 describes a process for the simultaneous extraction of both types of nucleic acids
(RNA and DNA) from the same sample, which may also be a fixed sample, inter alia.
This process comprises, after lysis of the sample and enzyme deaktivation using aromatic
alcohols, a separation of the two types of nucleic acid by a suitable extraction process.
However, from the two phases obtained in this process (an aqueous phase comprising
RNA, and an organic phase comprising DNA), the nucleic acids then have to be precipitated
by addition of suitable precipitating agents prior to further purification and/or
isolation. Firstly, this renders the process time-consuming, and secondly, because
of the precipitation, there is a risk of substance losses and/or of the nucleic acids
being contaminated by the precipitating agent.
[0015] Accordingly, it was an object of the present invention to provide a process allowing
separate purification of both DNA and RNA from the same sample fixed by crosslinking,
the separation of DNA from RNA requiring neither organic solvents nor solid matrices
for bindung the nucleic acids.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0016] The present invention is
inter alia based on the finding that the partial proteolysis of the protein-containing components
of a biological sample fixed by cross-linking using at least one proteolytically active
compound allows to selectively release the RNA into a dissolved fraction of the sample,
while the DNA predominantly remains in the undissolved residue of said sample. Said
partial digestion of the sample allows to obtain separate fractions, wherein the dissolved
fraction comprises mainly RNA and the undissolved residue comprises mainly DNA. The
mainly RNA containing dissolved fraction can be easily separated from the mainly DNA
containing undissolved residue e.g. using a centrifugation process.
[0017] After separation of the dissolved from the undissolved fraction, the fractions can
be separately processed as desired. E.g. the RNA can be isolated from the undissolved
fraction and the DNA can be isolated from the undissolved fraction. The separation
of the mainly RNA containing dissolved fraction from the mainly DNA containing undissolved
fraction prior to isolating the nucleic acids from the individual fractions allows
to efficiently isolate RNA and DNA from the same cross-linked sample with good yield.
It is also within the scope of the present invention to isolate the nucleic acid only
from one fraction and discard the other fraction. E.g. if the isolation of RNA is
in focus, the DNA containing undissolved fraction can be discarded after separation.
[0018] Other objects, features, advantages and aspects of the present application will become
apparent to those skilled in the art from the following description and appended claims.
It should be understood, however, that the following description, appended claims,
and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of the application,
are given by way of illustration only. Various changes and modifications within the
spirit and scope of the disclosed invention will become readily apparent to those
skilled in the art from reading the following.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0019] As discussed above it was one object of the present invention to provide a process
allowing separate purification of both DNA and RNA from the same sample fixed by crosslinking,
the separation of DNA from RNA requiring neither organic solvents nor solid matrices
for bindung the nucleic acids.
[0020] This object is achieved by a process obtaining RNA in a dissolved fraction and DNA
in an undissolved fraction from the same biological sample fixed by crosslinking ,
comprising the following steps:
- a) partial dissolution of the sample in an aqueous buffer solution with simultaneous
partial proteolysis of the protein-containing components of the sample using at least
one proteolytically active compound to obtain a dissolved fraction (fraction A) and
an undissolved residue (pellet; fraction B),
- b) separation of the dissolved fraction from the undissolved residue,
where the dissolved fraction comprises mainly RNA, based on the total amount of nucleic
acids in the dissolved fraction, and the undissolved residue comprises mainly DNA,
based on the total amount of nucleic acids in the undissolved residue,
and where the separation of the fraction comprising predominantly RNA from the fraction
comprising predominantly DNA requires neither precipitation nor extraction of one
or both types of nucleic acid with organic solvents nor selective binding of one or
both types of nucleic acid to a solid matrix.
[0021] In a preferred embodiment said process is used for the parallel isolation and/or
purification of ribonucleic acids (RNA) and deoxyribonucleic acids (DNA) from the
same biological sample fixed by crosslinking
[0022] For the purpose of the process according to the invention, parallel isolation and/or
purification is understood as meaning an isolation and/or purification where the isolation
and/or purification of the two types of nucleic acid, RNA and DNA, takes place spatially
separated from one another, where the treatment of the two fractions A and B, one
of which comprises predominantly RNA and the other of which comprises predominantly
DNA, can occur simultaneously or else at different points in time.
[0023] For the purpose of the invention, the same biological sample fixed by crosslinking
is understood as meaning the entire sample subjected to the partial lysis in step
a).
[0024] For the purpose of the invention, the terms "partial dissolution" and "partial proteolysis"
or "partial digestion" are understood as meaning the partial dissolution of the sample
or individual components of the sample and the partial degradation of the protein-containing
components of the sample, respectively, as illustrated in more detail below.
[0025] For the purpose of the invention, if a fraction is referred to as comprising predominantly
one type of nucleic acid, it comprises more than 50% by weight of this type of nucleic
acid, based on the total amount of nucleic acids (i.e. the sum of the two types of
nucleic acid) in this fraction. According to one embodiment, said fraction comprising
predominantly one type of nucleic acid comprises at least 60%, preferably at least
70%, more preferred at least 80% by weight of this type of nucleic acid, based on
the total amount of nucleic acids in this fraction.
[0026] The process according to the invention allows the parallel isolation of DNA and RNA
from the same fixed sample in separate fractions and their subsequent analysis by
sensitive, qualitative and/or quantitative methods, where even small amounts of sample
as obtained, for example, from microscopically analyzable sections of clinical biopsies
with hollow needles of a diameter of a few mm, are suitable as sample material. In
the process according to the invention, in contrast to the commercially available
Allprep DNA/RNA Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), the separation into a DNA-comprising
and an RNA-comprising fraction takes place before the actual purification of the nucleic
acids. From the fixed biological sample, the process according to the invention generates
two fractions, the dissolved fraction comprising predominantly RNA and the undissolved
fraction comprising predominantly DNA. In a further step, these fractions can be utilized
for further extraction and/or purification of the respective nucleic acid. The partial
digestion and subsequent separation of the RNA from the DNA into a mainly RNA containing
dissolved fraction and a mainly DNA containing undissolved fraction also differentiates
the method according to the present invention from prior art methods that are based
on a phenol/chloroform extraction for separating the DNA from the RNA. In respective
phenol/chloroform based methods, DNA and RNA are both released into the lysate and
and accordingly, are both present in the dissolved fraction. After phenol-chloroform
extraction and phase separation, the RNA is dissolved in the aqueous phase and the
DNA is present in a dissolved form in the organic phase. Thus, the prior art separation
principle fundamentally differs from the process according to the present invention
which does not require a phenol/chloroform extraction for separating the RNA from
the DNA but
inter alia relies on a partial digestion of the cross-linked sample to keep the DNA predominantly
in the undissolved fraction while the RNA is released into the dissolved fraction.
[0027] In a first step, the FFPE sample is preferably subjected to a protease treatment.
Surprisingly, it has been found that, by optimization of adjusting the conditions
of this proteolysis (the enzymatic "digestion") of the proteins by using a protease
in this first protease treatment, it is possible to release selectively only the RNA,
but not the DNA, from the sample. Using a suitable separation process, for example
centrifugation, it is possible to separate, after the incomplete "digestion" according
to the invention of the sample, a still undissolved fraction comprising DNA from the
RNA-comprising supernatant.
[0028] Here, the separation of the two fractions into a dissolved fraction (A) and an undissolved
fraction (B) can be carried out using any method known to the person skilled in the
art as being suitable for separating liquid and solid components, such as, for example,
filtration, sedimentation, decantation, centrifugation, etc. Hereinbelow, the undissolved
residue obtained in this step is also referred to as pellet, where, for the purpose
of the invention, this term is explicitly not limited to an undissolved residue separated
off from the liquid component of the sample by centrifugation, but also includes undissolved
residues separated off by other means, for example the solid material that remains
on the filter after a filtration.
[0029] Pelleting the undissolved fraction is advantageous because it allows the easy and
efficient separation of the two fractions.
[0030] For isolating the RNA, the RNA-comprising supernatant can be treated by a customary
process known from the state of the art, for example by the process described in the
application
WO 2007/068764, which comprises heat incubation in a nucleophile-comprising solution to remove remaining
crosslinks, where the RNA can then be isolated, for example, by binding to a silica
matrix using, for example, the RNeasy FFPE Kit (QIAGEN, Hilden, Germany).
[0031] The undissolved fraction, which comprises the DNA and other undissolved components
of the incompletely digested sample, is used for isolating the DNA. Here, it is possible
to use any methods suitable or according to the state of the art customary for isolating
DNA from fixed samples, since the pellet still has essentially the properties of a
fixed sample. In particular, the preceding incomplete protease digestion has not removed
any substantial amounts of DNA from the sample and/or has not removed DNA crosslinks
in any significant amount. To this end, another or an additional enzymatic protease
digestion is advantageously carried out to lyse the sample completely, followed by
heat incubation in a nucleophile-containing solution such as described, for example,
in
WO 2007/068764. The DNA released in this manner can then be purified further with the aid of any
suitable method, for example by binding to a silica matrix using, for example, the
QIAamp FFPE Kit (QIAGEN).
[0032] In this manner, both types of nucleic acid are pre-fractionated from a single sample
in one step and then isolated separately from one another and thus made available
to further analysis methods.
[0033] For the purpose of the invention, the term nucleic acids includes all nucleic acids
known to the person skilled in the art, for example natural or synthetic nucleic acids,
and also nucleic acids artificially introduced into the sample, single- and double-stranded
nucleic acids, straight-chain, branched or circular nucleic acids, RNA, in particular
mRNA, siRNA, miRNA, snRNA, tRNA, hnRNA or ribozyms, DNA, in particular genomic or
plastidic DNA or DNA from organelles, and also nucleic acids of infectious origin.
[0034] Suitable biological samples are all biological samples suitable for fixation, such
as, for example, cell-containing bodily fluids such as blood, sperm, cerebrospinal
fluid, saliva, sputum or urine, leukocyte fractions, buffy coats, faeces, surface
biopsies, aspirates, skin fragments, entire organisms, organs and tissue of Metazoa,
preferably of insects and mammals, in particular of humans, for example in the form
of autopsies, biopsies, fine-needle aspirates or tissue sections, isolated cells,
for example in the form of adherent or suspended cell cultures, plants, parts of plants,
plant tissue or plant cells, bacteria, viruses, yeast and fungi.
[0035] In a first step a) of the process according to the invention, the fixed sample is
brought into contact with a preferably aqueous solution which permits the activity
of a proteolytically active compound, and also with one or more proteolytically active
compounds.
[0036] For the purpose of the invention, proteolytically active compounds are all protein-cleaving
compounds, preferably proteolytically active enzymes such as proteases and heat-stable
proteases, particularly preferably proteinase K, trypsin, chymotrypsin, papain, pepsin,
pronase and endoproteinase Lys-C, in particular proteinase K and also non-enzymatic
substances suitable for cleaving proteins, such as cyanogen bromide, or mixtures of
these substances.
[0037] The concentration of the proteolytically active compound in the aqueous solution
generally depends on the nature of the proteolytically active compound and on the
nature and the amount of the biological sample and can be determined by the person
skilled in the art using simple routine experiments. The concentration of a protease
enzyme in the aqueous solution is preferably in a range of from 0.001 to 5% by weight,
particularly preferably 0.01-2.5% by weight and in particular 0.05-0.2% by weight,
in each case based on the total weight of the aqueous solution. Here, the amount or
the concentration of the proteolytically active compound to be used for a certain
sample depends on the nature of the proteolytically active compound and the chosen
reaction conditions, such as pH, cofactors, incubation temperature and incubation
time, something the person skilled in the art is familiar with. The suitable amount
or concentration of the proteolytically active compound can be determined in a simple
manner by routine experiments. It has furthermore been found that in the process according
to the invention it is in any case not critical that the amount or concentration of
the proteolytically active compound is specifically adjusted, but that it may be varied
over a certain band width without negatively affecting the yield of nucleic acid or
its integrity (Example 2).
[0038] The aqueous solution preferably contains further substances which promote the degradation
of the biological tissue and/or the lysis of cells, such as, for example, chaotropic
reagents and/or, preferably, surfactants.
[0039] Surfactants suitable for use in the process according to the invention are all surfactants
known to the person skilled in the art and suitable for lysing cells; preference is
given here to anionic or nonionic surfactants. Preferred surfactants are compounds
selected from the group comprising sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS), sodium deoxycholate,
3-(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonium-1-propanesulphonate (CHAPS), polyethylene glycol
phenyl ethers, such as, for example, the surfactants available under the trade names
Triton X-100, Tween or NP-40 or mixtures of these, preferred surfactants being SDS,
NP-40 and Triton X-100 (polyethylene glycol (1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl ether
having a degree of ethoxylation of from 9 to 10). The amount of surfactant employed
for supporting the lysis of the cells present in the biological sample depends on
the nature and the amount of the biological sample and can be determined by the person
skilled in the art using simple routine experiments.
[0040] The aqueous solution is furthermore preferably a buffer solution, the pH of which
is stabilized by at least one buffer substance present in the solution to a range
of from 6 to 9, preferably from 6.5 to 8.5 and particularly preferably from 6.8 to
7.5. Accordingly, the aqueous buffer solution preferably comprises at least one buffer
substance, preferably selected from the group comprising Tris, Hepes, Pipes, Mops,
alkali metal acetate/acetic acid etc. and/or preferably at least one surfactant, preferably
selected from the group comprising sodium dodecylsulphate (SDS), sodium deoxycholate,
3-(3-cholamidopropyl)dimethylammonium-1-propanesulphonate (CHAPS), polyethylene glycol
phenyl ethers or mixtures of these, particularly preferably sodium dodecylsulphate,
polyethylene glycol nonylphenyl ether having a degree of ethoxylation of 40, obtainable
under the trade name Tergitol-type NP-40, and/or polyethylene glycol (1,1,3,3-tetramethylbutyl)phenyl
ether having a degree of ethoxylation of 9-10.
[0041] The aqueous solution may furthermore comprise additional components which support
the lysis, protect the nucleic acids against decomposition constituents and/or stabilize
the aqueous solution, for example complexing agents, reducing agents or other buffer
substances, where the person skilled in the art is familiar with the nature and amount
of possible additives for lysis buffers or is able to determine them by simple routine
experiments. In a preferred embodiment, the aqueous buffer solution furthermore comprises
at least one substance selected from the group comprising
- complexing agents, preferably ethylenediamine-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EDTA), ethylene glycol bis(2-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA) sodium citrate or mixtures of these,
- chaotropic agents, preferably selected from the group comprising guanidine hydrochloride,
guanidine thiocyanate, guanidine isothiocyanate, perchlorates, Nal, Kl and urea, preferably
in a concentration of from 0.1 to 10 M,
- reducing agents, preferably selected from the group comprising dithiothreitol (DTT),
dithioerythritol (DTE), sodium thiosulphate, β-mercaptoethanol or mixtures of these,
and
- inorganic salts, preferably alkali metal halides, such as, for example, NaCl, KCl
or LiCl, alkaline earth metal halides, such as, for example, CaCl2 or MgCl2, ammonium salts, such as, for example, ammonium chloride or ammonium sulphate, lithium
sulphate or mixtures of these.
[0042] According to one embodiment, the aqueous buffer solution comprises a detergent, preferably
a non-ionic detergent such as SDS, and preferably a buffering agent, preferably TRIS.
The aqueous buffer solution may also comprise a chelating agent such as EDTA.
[0043] In process step a) of the process according to the invention, the biological sample
fixed by crosslinking is brought into contact with the aqueous solution comprising
at least one proteolytically active compound and incubated at a suitable temperature.
Here, the temperature generally depends on the nature of the proteolytically active
compound employed. In the case of enzymes, a temperature has to be chosen which permits
the enzyme to be active. In general, temperatures which are too low reduce the enzyme
activity up to the point of inactivity, whereas temperatures which are too high may
deactivate the enzyme by denaturation. The temperature range tolerated by the enzyme
in question or the optimum reaction temperature varies depending on the respective
enzyme and is known to the person skilled in the art or can be determined by simple
routine experiments. When using proteinase K, for example, the reaction can be carried
out at temperatures of up to about 95°C, preferably between 18°C and 80°C, particularly
preferably between 50 and 65°C.
[0044] As already described, it has surprisingly been found that, by optimization of the
adjustment of the conditions of the proteolytic "digestion" of the proteins in a fixed
sample using a proteolytically active compound, preferably a protease, it is possible
to remove selectively only the RNA, but not the DNA, from the sample. After this incomplete
(partial) digestion according to the invention of the sample, a still undissolved
fraction comprising the DNA may be separated from the RNA-comprising dissolved supernatant.
For a given proteolytically active compound, the quality of the separation into RNA
and DNA depends on their concentration and the incubation temperature and in particular
on the incubation time. If the proteolytically active compound is allowed to react
only for a very short time, not only the DNA but also the RNA are detached only insufficiently
from the sample and therefore in total only a low yield of nucleic acid in the soluble
fraction is obtained. In contrast, if the proteolytically active compound is allowed
to react for too long, the result will be (almost) complete dissolution of the RNA,
but also more DNA detached from the pellet. However, by properly adjusting the reaction
time of the proteolytically active compound, it is possible to achieve partial (incomplete)
lysis of the sample with substantial separation between RNA in the soluble fraction
and DNA in the undissolved fraction, that is a "prefractionation" of the two types
of nucleic acid prior to the actual purification.
[0045] Here, the optimal reaction time depends firstly on the proteolytically active compound,
its concentration in the aqueous solution and the incubation temperature. Secondly,
the amount and thickness of the biological sample and other sample-specific parameters,
for example the type and the duration of the fixation have an effect on the optimum
reaction time of the proteolytically active compound.
[0046] Preference is given to using samples fixed with formalin, in particular after the
sample has been embedded in paraffin. For relatively large tissue blocks, because
of the large quantity and thickness of the sample, a larger volume of the solution
comprising the proteolytically active compound, and advantageously also higher concentrations
of the proteolytically active compound and longer reaction times compared to smaller
samples are used. Using suitable cutting instruments, for example a microtome, tissue
sections are prepared from fixed samples, where the thickness for examinations with
a light microscope is generally from about 5 to 20 µm. Furthermore, the paraffinized
sample may also be divided into smaller sample fragments using other methods, for
example by punching with a hollow needle or by the laser capture method. Smaller tissue
fragments require smaller amounts of the proteolytically active compound and shorter
reaction times. Decisive here is in particular the thickness of the section, as this
is the limiting factor for complete contact of the tissue with the proteolytically
active compound. Preference is therefore given to using tissue sections having a thickness
of preferably from 5 µm to 50 µm or smaller tissue fragments which, if appropriate,
are obtained by dividing or homogenizing a larger sample.
[0047] The fixation time, i.e. the time the fixing agent acts on the biological sample,
affects the degree of covalent crosslinking of the biomolecules in the biological
sample, the degree of crosslinking increasing with longer fixation times. In samples
which have been fixed only briefly, there is thus only a small degree of crosslinking
of the biomolecules, which permits easier and faster dissolution of individual biomolecules.
In contrast, samples which have been fixed for a long period of time have a high degree
of crosslinking, which may delay the dissolution of larger biomolecules in particular.
Accordingly, for strongly fixed (overfixed) samples it may be advantageous to have
a longer reaction time of the proteolytically active compound. Here, the terms "fixed
briefly" and "fixed for a long period of time" are to be understood relatively, since
the optimum fixation time depends on the size of the piece of tissue. The diffusion
rate of formalin in tissue is initially about 1 mm/h, the rate decreasing with increasing
tissue depth. Thus, for a piece of tissue of a thickness of about 5 mm, about 8 h
are required for complete penetration of the sample with formalin (fixation time).
In practice, a fixation time of about 12-24 h is customary; very small samples require
a much shorter fixation time and would already be overfixed at a fixation time of
12 h.
[0048] The optimum reaction time thus depends on sample-specific parameters such as fixation
and fixation time, nature, amount and thickness of the biological sample and can be
adjusted optimally for each individual sample. Surprisingly, it is nevertheless also
possible to adjust the conditions such that for many possible sample parameters, i.e.
for many different individual samples they allow the separation of DNA and RNA into
undissolved and dissolved fraction. Here, the reaction time may be between 30 seconds
and a number of days, preferably between one minute and 5 hours and especially preferably
between 5 and 90 minutes and more preferably between 10 and 30 minutes. When 10 to
40 µl of a proteinase K solution of an activity of > 600 mAU/ml are used at an incubation
temperature of 56°C and a reaction time of about 15 to 90 min for FFPE tissue section
of a thickness from 10 to 20 µm, very good results are obtained for partial dissolution
of the sample for the purpose of the invention, i.e. the RNA has been dissolved (almost)
completely from the undissolved fraction and has passed into the dissolved fraction,
whereas the DNA is still (almost) completely in the undissolved fraction (Examples
2 and 3).
[0049] According to one embodiment, step a) comprises the partial dissolution of the sample
in an aqueous buffer solution comprising a detergent, preferably a non-ionic detergent,
with simultaneous partial proteolysis of the protein-containing components of the
sample using a proteolytically active enzyme, preferably a protease such as proteinase
K, wherein the reaction is carried out at a temperature between 18°C and 80°C, preferably
50 and 65°C for a reaction time between 10minutes and 5hours, preferably between 10
and 90 minutes, more preferred between 10 to 30 minutes. This embodiment has the advantage
that is is fast and effective in releasing the RNA into the dissolved fraction.
[0050] Here, fixation of the biological sample can be effected with any fixative known to
the person skilled in the art, in particular with acids, alcohols, ketones or other
organic substances, such as, in particular, glutaraldehyde or formaldehyde, wherein
biological samples fixed with formaldehyde being particularly preferred. According
to a particularly preferred embodiment of the process according to the invention,
a formaldehyde-fixed, paraffin-embedded biological sample (FFPE sample) is used.
[0051] If a biological sample embedded in paraffin is used, the paraffin is preferably initially
removed at least partially, preferably completely, from the sample. The deparaffinization
serves to selectively remove the paraffin used for embedding the biological sample
to make the sample accessible to efficient lysis in an aqueous medium. In general,
paraffin may interfere both during the dissolution and fractionation of the nucleic
acids and during further purification and analysis of the nucleic acids. The deparaffination
which is preferably carried out beforehand may have a marked effect on the quality,
in particular the solidity, of the pellet obtained in the process according to the
invention following the protease treatment, and thus on the separation of the nucleic
acids and the obtainable yields.
[0052] The removal of the paraffin from the biological sample may in principle take place
by any process for the deparaffinization of biological samples known to the person
skilled in the art. Preferably, the deparaffinization is carried out by initially
bringing the sample into contact with a hydrophobic organic solvent. Here, it may
also be advantageous to mix the mixture of the biological sample and the organic solvent
with agitation, for example by shaking on a laboratory shaker, employing a magnetic
stirrer etc. to ensure effective dissolution of the paraffin from the sample. Advantageously,
the sample is subsequently centrifuged to separate the paraffin dissolved in the organic
solvent from the pellet, i.e. the biological sample. If required, the step of dissolving
the paraffin from the biological sample may be repeated once, twice, three or up to
ten times. The deparaffinization may preferably be carried out by incubation in hydrophobic
organic solvents, with preference in an aromatic hydrocarbon, in particular in xylene,
followed by rehydration of the sample in ethanol, as described, for example, in the
application
WO 2007/068764. Other organic solvents, such as, for example, alkanes, preferably alkanes which
are liquid at room temperature of the general formula C
nH
2n+2 where 6 < n < 17 or mixtures of these, particularly preferably heptane, if appropriate
with addition of C
1-C
5-alcohols, i.e. methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, n-butanol, isobutanol, n-pentanol,
preferably methanol may also be used for deparaffinization. If straight-chain, i.d.
unbranched, alkanes are used, n is preferably more than 6 and less than 17, since
some of the alkanes of a chain length of six or less carbon atoms, some of them have
to be classified as toxic, are gaseous at room temperature and/or are too volatile,
and alkanes of a chain length of 17 and more carbon atoms are solid at room temperature.
It is furthermore also possible to use mixtures of alkanes, if appropriate also with
other compounds such as alkenes, aromatic compounds etc., as long as these are liquid
at room temperature and dissolve paraffin, such as, for example, mineral oil. Deparaffinization
by incubation in alkanes having a chain length of more than 6 and less than 17 carbon
atoms, particularly preferably in heptane, has been found to be particularly advantageous
for the subsequent separation of soluble and insoluble fractions A and B by the process
according to the invention. Addition of a C
1-C
5-alcohol, preferably methanol, in an amount of 1-25% by volume, preferably 5-10% by
volume, to the hydrophobic organic solvent may promote precipitation of the insoluble
residue, thus making the separation of soluble and insoluble fraction easier and more
efficient. In a preferred embodiment, the process therefore comprises, prior to the
partial dissolution according to step (a), a step (i) for the selective removal of
the paraffin, preferably by bringing the sample into contact with a hydrophobic organic
solvent, particularly preferably using an apolar aliphatic or aromatic hydrocarbon
of a chain length of more than 6 and less than 17 carbon atoms; in particular a hydrocarbon
selected from the group comprising xylene, heptane and mineral oil, if appropriate
with addition of a C
1-C
5-alcohol, preferably methanol, in an amount of 1-25% by volume, preferably 5-10% by
volume. According to one embodiment, depraffinization is achieved by incubation with
an alkane, preferably heptan, and an alcohol, preferably methanol. In addition to
the dissolution of the paraffin with a suitable organic solvent, other processes are
also suitable as processes for deparaffinization, such as, for example, melting the
paraffin, as described by
Banerjee et al. in Biotechniques, 18 (1995) pp. 768-773.
[0053] After the removal of the paraffin, it may be preferred to rehydrate the biological
sample, this rehydration preferably being effected by stepwise washing with aqueous
alcohol solutions of decreasing alcohol concentrations (descending alcohol series),
with C
1- to C
5-alcohols being preferred and methanol, ethanol and isopropanol being particularly
preferred. If the deparaffinization reagent used is xylene, the sample is usually
rehydrated in this manner prior to further processing, the necessity of this rehydration
for a subsequent nucleic acid isolation being disputed in the relevant literature.
If the deparaffinization reagent used is a straight-chain aliphatic alkane, rehydration
of the sample is not required. However, it is also possible to carry out deparaffinization
and rehydration with a single suitable reagent, for example with the commercially
available product EZ-DEWAX® from BloGEnex, California, USA.
[0054] Preferably the sample is, after deparaffinization and rehydration, initially dried,
for example by exposure to air or incubation in a drying oven. Furthermore, the optionally
deparaffinised and rehydrated biological sample may preferably be homogenised prior
to partial lysis, which is advantageous in particular in the case of relatively large
tissue samples. In contrast, tissue sections up to a thickness of 20 µm do not generally
require homogenization of the samples. This homogenization can be carried out using
any apparatus known to the person skilled in the art for comminuting a biological
sample, in particular a high-pressure cell digestion with the aid of a mechanical
comminuting apparatus, for example a mill, a rotor-stator homogeniser, an Ultra-Turrax
homogeniser or a fine cannula, or by ultrasound homogenisers.
[0055] In a preferred embodiment the process therefore comprises, after removal of the paraffin
according to step (i) and before the partial dissolution of the sample in the aqueous
buffer solution according to step (a), preferably at least one of the following steps:
(ii) rehydration of the sample, preferably by repeated washing of the sample with
aqueous C1-to C5-alcohol solutions of successively increasing water content,
(iii) drying of the sample and/or
(iv) homogenization of the sample.
[0056] Respective method steps to deparaffinise and work up the deparaffinised sample are
also well-known in the prior art and thus, need no further description here.
[0057] According to one embodiment, the sample fixed by cross-linking is obtained in form
of a pellet after deparaffinization. Preferably, the aqueous buffer solution is added
to said pellet for performing the partial dissolution step a). According to a further
embodiment, the deparaffinised sample comprising the deparaffinisation chemistry,
respectively the deparaffinisation solution, is mixed with the aqueous buffer solution
for use in step a), thereby forming an aqueous phase which is subjected in step a)
to partial proteolysis of the protein-containing components of the sample using at
least one proteolytically active compound to selectively release the comprised RNA
into an dissolved fraction, while the comprised DNA predominantly remains in the undissolved
fraction. Here, the proteolytically active compound, preferably the proteolytic enzyme,
can be added to the aqueous phase while the solution used for deparaffinization is
still on top of the aqueous phase that was formed due to the addition of the aqueous
buffer solution. If performing the separation step b) in this alternative e.g. by
centrifuging the partially digested cross-linked sample (see e.g. above and below),
the mainly DNA containing undissolved fraction will form a pellet within the aqueous
phase. To separate the dissolved from the undissolved fraction, the aqueous phase
is e.g. collected through the deparaffinization solution e.g. by using a pipette,
while leaving the undissolved, mainly DNA containing pellet behind. Alternatively,
the deparaffinisation solution can be separated from the aqueous phase that is obtained
after the addition of the aqueous buffer solution before adding the proteolytically
active compound and separating the undissolved fraction from the dissolved fraction.
[0058] In step b) of the process according to the invention, the different types of nucleic
acid present in the starting material, i.e. RNA and DNA, are then separated into a
dissolved fraction (A), which contains predominantly the RNA, and an undissolved fraction
(B), which contains predominantly the DNA. It is also possible to separate the entire
sample including the dissolved and undissolved components into at least two fractions
from which various biomolecules are then isolated or purified or in which various
biomolecules may then be detected or analyzed; however, the sample is, after step
a) of the process according to the invention, preferably separated into at least one
dissolved fraction (A) and at least one undissolved fraction (B). The advantage of
separating the two fractions is that from these two fractions in each case separately
essentially one type of nucleic acid can be isolated without any need for separating
the original biological sample, which would reduce the respective yield or result
in an uneven distribution of the various cell types of a sample.
[0059] The fractions obtained in this manner can then be subjected separately to nucleic
acid purification. It is also within the scope of the present invention to isolate
the nucleic acid only from one fraction and discard the other fraction (see e.g. examples
6 and 7). During the further processing of the sample(s) for isolation of the nucleic
acids, the sample(s) is/are preferably heated in the presence of a proteolytically
active compound to a temperature in the range of 50-100°C, preferably of 55 to 95°C,
particularly preferably of 60 to 90°C and in particular of 65 to 85°C.
[0060] The separation of the undissolved components from the aqueous solution preferably
is supported by cooling the mixture after the reaction time of the proteolytically
active compound, in particular if the proteolytically active compound is active at
elevated temperatures, i.e. temperatures above room temperature. Cooling is preferably
carried out by incubating the sample at a temperature below the temperature of the
protease digestion, preferably at room temperature, in particular at 4°C or at even
lower temperatures such as, for example, -20°C or -80°C, where cooling at these temperatures
is brief to avoid freezing of the entire aqueous solution. Thus, cooling is preferably
carried out at a temperature of 15°C or less, 10°C or less, 4°C or less or at even
lower temperatures such as, for example, -20°C or -80°C. Cooling can be performed
before and/or during the separation step. Cooling has the advantage that the separation
of the undissolved fraction, in particular the pelleting, is more efficient. This
is in particular advantageous because FFPE samples usually comprise undissolved components,
in particular DNA being cross-linked to proteins, rather than large amounts of solid
components. Said undissolved components are usually difficult to pellet. Cooling assists
the pelleting of the undissolved components and thus makes the separation more efficient.
Thus, cooling results in that the mainly DNA containing undissolved fraction comprises
more DNA and accordingly, the RNA containing dissolved fraction comprises less DNA
contamination due to the improved separation of the individual fractions. This is
particularly advantageous when processing cross-linked samples comprising little cell
material.
[0061] According to one embodiment, separation results in that the mainly DNA containing
undissolved fraction is obtained in form of a compact pellet. This allows to easily
separate the mainly DNA containing pellet from the mainly RNA containing dissolved
fraction.
[0062] In a third step, the dissolved fraction (A) and the undissolved fraction (B) obtained
in this manner can be used separately from one another to a purification of the biomolecules
present, preferably the nucleic acid(s). Here, the dissolved fraction (A) is preferably
used for isolating the RNA, and the undissolved fraction (B) is preferably used for
isolating the DNA. It is also within the scope of the present invention to isolate
the nucleic acid only from one fraction and discard the other fraction (see e.g. examples
6 and 7).
[0063] Here, the dissolved fraction (A) can be used directly, without further lysis, in
a suitable process for nucleic acid isolation. However, a further lysis, for example
with proteolytically active compounds, preferably proteases, may optionally be carried
out in the aqueous solution. Suitable processes are all processes and methods for
isolating nucleic acids, in particular RNA, known to the person skilled in the art.
Suitable are processes for isolating nucleic acids from fixed sample material, as
described in the applications
WO 2007/068764,
WO 2008/021419,
WO 2005/012523 or
WO 2005/054466, or else processes carried out with the aid of the commercial kits RNeasy FFPE and
miRNeasy FFPE (both from QIAGEN). In the latter case, fraction A is subjected to at
least one heating step before the nucleic acids are purified by chaotrope-mediated
binding to a silica membrane. Further extraction and purification of the RNA can preferably
be carried out with the aid of the process described in the application
WO 2007/068764. If a process as described in the application
WO 2007/068764 is used for the isolation of nucleic acids from the dissolved fraction, the sample
is heated in the presence of a nucleophilic reagent. This can be carried out in the
aqueous solution comprising at least one proteolytically active compound and the now
dissolved nucleic acids, where the nucleophilic reagent required for the process described
in the application
WO 2007/068764 can be added after step a) of the process according to the invention (action of the
proteolytically active compound) to the aqueous solution or even be present in the
aqueous solution before the addition to the sample according to step a). The separation
of the fractions can be carried out after heating of the samples as described in the
application
WO 2007/068764 or, preferably, directly after the action of the proteolytically active compound,
prior to further heating.
[0064] Suitable nucleophilic reagents are all Lewis bases capable of transferring electrons
into an empty orbital or into empty orbitals of a Lewis acid. From among these Lewis
bases, particular preference is given to reagents having at least one functional group
which carries a negative charge, is negatively polarized or has at least one free
electron pair.
[0065] Compounds comprising a functional group having a negative charge are, for example,
alkali metal or alkaline earth metal alkoxides, alkali metal or alkaline earth metal
hydroxides, alkali metal or alkaline earth metal halides, alkali metal or alkaline
earth metal cyanides and the like, without being limited thereto.
[0066] Reagents having at least one functional group which is negatively polarized are in
particular those reagents which have at least one functional group which contains
two atoms which are covalently attached to one another and whose electronegativity
according to Alfred and Rochow differs by at least 0.25, preferably by at least 0.5
and more preferably by at least 1.0.
[0067] However, particular preference according to the invention is given to nucleophilic
reagents having at least one functional group having one or two, particularly preferably
one, free electron pair(s), and from among these compounds most preference is in turn
given to those having at least one primary, secondary or tertiary amino group of the
structure I
in which R1 is a C1- to C20-hydrocarbon group, particularly preferably a C2- to C15-hydrocarbon group and more preferably a C2- to C10-hydrocarbon group, a C1- to C20-hydrocarbon group which has at least one heteroatom, a C2- to C15-hydrocarbon group which has at least one heteroatom and more preferably a C2- to C10-hydrocarbon group which has at least one heteroatom or an optionally heteroatom-substituted
aromatic ring system,
R2 is a C1- to C20-alkyl group, particularly preferably a C1- to C10-alkyl group and more preferably a C1- to C2-alkyl group, in particular a methyl group or an ethyl group, a C1- to C20-hydroxyalkyl group, particularly preferably a C1- to C10-hydroxyalkyl group and more preferably a C1- to C2-hydroxyalkyl group or a hydrogen atom, a hydrogen atom being most preferred, and
R3 is a C1- to C20-alkyl group, particularly preferably a C1- to C10-alkyl group and more preferably a C1- to C2-alkyl group, in particular a methyl group or an ethyl group, a C1- to C20-hydroxyalkyl group, particularly preferably a C1- to C10-hydroxyalkyl group and more preferably a C1- to C2-hydroxyalkyl group or a hydrogen atom, a hydrogen atom being most preferred.
[0068] According to the invention, particular preference is given to nucleophilic reagents
having a functional group of the structure I shown above which have in particular
at least one functional group of the structure I in which at least one of the radicals
R
2 and R
3, most preferably both radicals R
2 and R
3, is a hydrogen atom/are hydrogen atoms. In addition, particular preference is given
to those nucleophilic reagents which have at least one functional group of the structure
I in which the nitrogen atom is only covalently attached to sp
3-hybridized atoms in the radicals R
1, R
2 and R
3. In particular, none of the radicals R
1, R
2 or R
3 should be capable of delocalising the free electron pair at the nitrogen atom over
the radicals R
1, R
2 and R
3, respectively. Thus, particularly preferably, none of the radicals R
1, R
2 and R
3 should, for example, have the structure II.

[0069] Particular preference according to the invention is given to nucleophilic reagents
having at least one functional group of the structure I selected from the group comprising
methylamine, ethylamine, ethanolamine, n-propylamine,
n-butylamine, isobutylamine,
tert-butylamine, dimethylamine, diethylamine, diethanolamine, di-n-propylamine, diisopropylamine,
dibutylamine, trimethylamine, triethylamine, triethanolamine, hexamethylenetetramine,
2-ethylhexylamine, 2-amino-1,3-propanediol, hexylamine, cyclohexylamine, 1,2-dimethoxypropanamine,
1-aminopentane, 2-methyloxypropylamine, tri(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane, aminocarboxylic
acids, in particular glycine or histidine, or aminoguanidine, where the last mentioned
is possible, however, not preferred. Among these most preference is given to ethanolamine,
diethanolamine, triethanolamine, amino-1,3-propanediol and tri(hydroxymethyl)aminomethane.
Preferred nucleophilic reagents having at least one functional group of the structure
I are furthermore aromatic amines selected from the group comprising aniline, toluidine,
naphthylamine, benzylamine, xylidine, xylenediamines, naphthalenediamines, toluenediamines,
3,3'-dimethyl-4,4'-diphenyldiamine, phenylenediamines, 2,4'-methylenedianiline, 4,4'-methylenedianiline,
sulphonyldianiline and dimethylbenzylamine.
[0070] According to a particular embodiment of the process according to the invention where
the nucleophilic reagent has at least one primary amino group of the structure I,
the nucleophilic reagent is a C
1- to C
6-alkylamine, a C
1- to C
6-alkyldiamine, a C
1- to C
6-alkyltriamine, a C
1- to C
15-aminoalkohol, a C
1- to C
15-aminodiol or a C
1- to C
15-aminocarboxylic acid.
[0071] According to another particular embodiment of the process according to the invention
the nucleophilic reagent is a heterocyclic compound which comprises a nitrogen atom
and is selected from the group comprising pyrrole, pyridine, quinoline, indole, azacyclopentane,
azacyclohexane, morpholine, piperidine, imidazole or a derivative of these compounds,
where a derivative of these compounds is preferably understood as meaning a compound
having, instead of a hydrogen atom, a C
1- to C
3-alkyl group, particularly preferably a methyl or an ethyl group, attached at one
or more carbon atoms or at the nitrogen atom in the compounds mentioned above.
[0072] From among the nucleophilic reagents mentioned above, preference is given to those
which are watersoluble, in particular those which have a solubility of at least 1
g/l, particularly preferably at least 10 g/l and more preferably at least 100 g/l
in water at a temperature of 25°C and at a pH of 7.
[0073] The concentration of the nucleophilic reagent in the aqueous solution used is preferably
in a range of from 0.1 to 10 000 mmol/l, more preferably from 1 to 5000 mmol/l, even
more preferably from 5 to 2500 mmol/l and most preferably from 20 to 1000 mmol/l.
According to a particularly advantageous embodiment of the process according to the
invention, the concentration of the nucleophilic reagent in the aqueous solution is
more than 20 mmol/l, particularly preferably more than 50 mmol/l and most preferably
more than 100 mmol/l.
[0074] According to one embodiment, after performing the digest with the proteolytically
active compound, which preferably is a proteolytic enzyme, the cross-links in the
sample are at least partially reversed by heating, preferably to a temperature of
at least 70°C, more preferred at least 75°C, most preferred at least 80°C or at least
90°C for a time period of at least 5min, preferably at least 10min, most preferred
at least 15min. Heating to 80°C for at least 15min is particularly preferred for reversing
the cross-links in the RNA containing dissolved fraction of the degraded sample. Heating
to at least 85°C, preferably at least 90°C for at least 30min up to several hours,
preferably at least 1,5 or at least 2 hours, is preferred for reversing the cross-links
in DNA. As described above, heating is carried out in the presence of a nucleophilic
reagent. Suitable incubation times are also described in the cited prior art. This
additional heating step to reverse the cross-links can be performed before or after
separating the mainly RNA containing dissolved fraction from the mainly DNA containing
undissolved fraction. It is preferred, in particular if it is also intended to isolate
the DNA subsequently from the undissolved fraction, to perform said heating step after
separating the fractions because this heating step might result in that further DNA
is released from the undissolved fraction. If it is only intended to isolate the RNA,
said heating step may also be performed prior to separating the fractions, because
additionally released DNA can be degraded e.g. by performing a DNase digest. A preferred
embodiment for performing the DNase digest which also preserves small RNA molecules
is described in detail below.
[0075] According to one embodiment a DNase digest is performed on the separated, mainly
RNA containing dissolved fraction. Separating the undissolved fraction which comprises
the main amount of the DNA comprised in the cross-linked sample already removes the
main portion of the DNA comprised in said sample. Thus, the mainly RNA containing
dissolved fraction that is obtained after partial digestion and separation of the
fractions is already DNA depleted. Remaining amounts of DNA that might have been released
during the partial digestion in step a) can be efficiently degraded by performing
a DNase digest on the RNA containing dissolved fraction. Isolating the RNA from the
DNase digested sample provides pure RNA which comprises little to no DNA contaminations.
[0076] Thus, according to one embodiment, DNase is added to the separated, mainly RNA containing
dissolved fraction. It was very surprising that the DNase digest can be performed
efficiently prior to isolating the RNA. This, as it was assumed that the DNase could
not function efficiently as the common prior art methods isolate the RNA prior to
performing the DNase digest when purifying RNA. Furthermore, performing a DNase digest
prior to isolating the RNA also has considerably advantages because e.g. compared
to the common on-column DNase treatment, the amount of in particular small RNA is
increased when using the process according to the present invention. A respective
DNase digest is performed in examples 6 and 7. Preferably, the DNase digest is performed
after the cross-links were reversed by heating as is described above.
[0077] The term "DNase" refers to any enzyme which catalyses the hydrolytic cleavage of
phosphodiester linkages in the DNA. A wide variety of deoxyribonucleases are known,
which differ in their substrate specificities, chemical mechanisms, and biological
functions. The term "DNase" refers to exodeoxyribonucleases as well as endodeoxyribonucleases.
In particular, DNase I and DNase II can be used. DNase I is preferred.
[0078] The DNase digest is performed under conditions wherein the DNase is active to allow
an efficient degradation of the DNA. The efficency of the DNase digest can be e.g.
controlled by the amount of DNase added to the degraded sample and furthermore, by
the addition of additives which promote the activity of the DNase such as in particular
Mg and Ca ions. Furthermore, depending on the conditions used for achieving partial
digestion in step a), intermediate processing steps might be advantageous to ensure
that the DNase digest works with high efficiency on the separated, mainly RNA containing
dissolved fraction. E.g., components that could interfere with the DNase digest can
be removed or diluted to a concentration which does not inhibit the DNase digest.
The DNase digest is performed in the presence of Mg and Ca ions in concentrations
at which the DNase is active. E.g. for performing the DNase digest, Mg and Ca ions
can be added to the degraded sample e.g. in the form of MgCl
2 and CaCl
2 to establish suitable concentrations in the DNase digestion mixture. The suitable
concentrations of Mg and Ca ions depend on the sample and in particular the lysis
conditions used in degradation step a). E.g. if Ca and Mg ions are already provided
during digestion in step a) and thus, are present in the degraded sample, less amounts
of Mg and Ca ions must be added for the DNase digest or the addition of Mg and Ca
is not even necessary. The use of higher concentrations of Mg and Ca ions during the
DNase digest is advisable, if chelating agents such as e.g. EDTA were used during
step a). According to one embodiment, the Mg ions and the Ca ions are provided in
the reaction composition, preferably in the form of MgCl
2 and CaCl
2, in a concentration selected from the group consisting of at least 0,2mM each, at
least 2mM each, at least 5mM each, at least 7,5mM each and preferably at least 10mM
each. Furthermore, the Ca and Mg ions can be provided in a concentration range for
each ion that is selected from the group consisting of 0,2mM to 1M, 2mM to 100mM,
10mM to 50mM and 10mM to 25mM. The DNase digest reaction composition comprising the
DNase, the degraded sample and optionally, further additives that promote the DNase
digest is incubated for a suitable time to allow the DNA to be degraded. Preferably,
the incubation occurs for at least 5min, at least preferably 10min or at least 15
min. Suitable ranges include 1min to 6hours, 5 to 120min, 10 to 60min and 15 to 30min.
After performing the optional DNase digest, the RNA can be isolated from the sample.
As discussed herein, basically any RNA isolation method can be used.
[0079] According to one embodiment, the RNA is isolated from the dissolved, optionally DNase
treated fraction by establishing suitable binding conditions by adding appropriate
additives and binding the RNA to a nucleic acid binding solid phase. According to
one embodiment, isolation of the RNA comprises at least the following steps:
- i) adding at least one alcohol and/or at least one chaotropic agent and optionally
further additives to form a binding mixture and contacting the binding mixture with
a nucleic acid binding solid phase to bind the RNA to said solid phase;
- ii)optionally washing the RNA while it is bound to the solid phase; and
- iii) optionally eluting the RNA from the solid phase.
[0080] As nucleic acid binding solid phase, any material that is capable of binding nucleic
acids can be used and thus includes a variety of materials that are capable of binding
nucleic acids under suitable conditions. Exemplary solid phases that can be used in
conjunction with the present invention include, but are not limited to, compounds
comprising silica and siliceous solid phases, including but not limited to, silica
particles, silicon dioxide, diatomaceous earth, glass, alkylsilica, aluminum silicate,
and borosilicate; nitrocellulose; diazotized paper; hydroxyapatite (also referred
to as hydroxyl apatite); nylon; metal oxides; zirconia; alumina; polymeric supports,
diethylaminoethyl- and triethylaminoethyl-derivatized supports, hydrophobic chromatography
resins (such as phenyl- or octyl Sepharose) and the like. The term solid phase is
not intended to imply any limitation regarding its form or design. Thus, the term
solid phase encompasses appropriate materials that are porous or non-porous; permeable
or impermeable; including but not limited to membranes, filters, sheets, particles,
magnetic particles, beads, gels, powders, fibers, and the like. According to one embodiment,
the surface of the solid phase is not modified and is, e.g., not modified with functional
groups. According to a preferred embodiment, the nucleic acid binding solid phase
is comprised in a column. The term "column" as used herein in particular describes
a container having at least two openings. Thereby, a solution and/or sample can pass
through said column. The term "column" in particular does not imply any restrictions
with respect to the shape of the container which can be e.g. round or angular and
preferably is cylindrical. However, also other shapes can be used, in particular when
using multi-columns. The column comprises the nucleic acid binding solid phase. Said
solid phase that is comprised in said column should allow the passage of a solution,
respectively the sample when applied to the column. This means that if e.g. a centrifuge
force is applied to the column, a solution and/or the sample is enabled to pass through
the column in direction of the centrifuge force. As discussed above, when using a
respective column based nucleic acid isolation procedure, the sample is usually passed
through the column, e.g. assisted by centrifugation or vacuum, and the nucleic acids
bind to the comprised nucleic acid solid phase during said passage. The column can
be used in a single format or in a multi-format. Such multi-columns having a similar
format as multi-well plates and which comprise a nucleic acid binding solid phase
such as a membrane, are well-known in the prior art. Preferably, the column is a spin
column. As nucleic acid binding solid phase comprised in the column, any solid phase
can be used that is usually utilized in column based nucleic acid isolation procedures.
Preferably, a nucleic acid binding membrane, and thus a membrane that is capable of
binding nucleic acids is used. Suitable membranes include but are not limited to hydrophilic
membranes, hydrophobic membranes and membranes which bind nucleic acids via ion exchange.
Examples include but are not limited to silica membranes, glass fiber membranes, nylon
membranes, cellulose membranes such as nitrocellulose membranes, modified cellulose
membranes (e.g. acetyl- or hydroxy-), paper membranes, in particular modified papers.
Preferably, the membrane is porous. Furthermore, it is preferred to use a membrane
comprising or consisting of silica. A further common nucleic acid binding solid phase
comprised in a column is a fill of nucleic acid binding particles, such as silica
particles, or a layer of a nucleic acid binding material (e.g. a silica gel). E.g.
the silica particles can be arranged as a layer on an inert filter or membrane, thereby
forming a nucleic acid binding solid phase.
[0081] To digest the undissolved components of the sample and to break the remaining crosslinks
of the biomolecules, if appropriate, fraction (B), which comprises the undissolved
components, is preferably subjected to a further treatment. The dissolvable nucleic
acids, predominantly DNA, which are substantially still in the undissolved fraction
(B), can be isolated by this further treatment step. Any process known known for dissolving
nucleic acids from fixed tissue is suitable, for example the processes as described
in
WO 2007/068764,
WO 2008/021419,
WO 2005/012523 or
WO 2005/054466 or else the processes which can be carried out with the aid of commercially available
kits, for example the QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kits (QIAGEN), is suitable for isolating
the nucleic acids, in particular the DNA, from the undissolved fraction (B). In the
latter case, the undissolved components of fraction B are subjected to at least one
further treatment with a proteolytic agent, for example a protease, and a heating
step. The protease treatment effects efficient lysis and thus a release of the dissolvable
nucleic acids. Since the undissolved fraction B compared to the complete fixed sample
comprises in particular only the less readily dissolvable components, further optimization,
for example an extension of the further protease step and of the heating step, may
be advantageous and lead to markedly improved yields and results in subsequent (downstream)
analyses.
[0082] Thus, according to one embodiment, the DNA is obtained from the undissolved, mainly
DNA containing fraction after separation of the fractions. Obtaining the DNA from
the undissolved fraction comprises according to one embodiment the following steps:
- i) releasing the DNA from the undissolved, mainly DNA containing fraction by subjecting
said undissolved fraction to lysis with simultaneous enzymatic protease digestion,
wherein preferably, at least one detergent is used during lysis and optionally, further
additives and wherein the enzymatic digestion is preferably supported by heating (suitable
conditions are described abive);
- ii) heating the mainly DNA containing fraction to at least partially reverse the cross-links
preferably by heating the sample preferably after step i) to a temperature of at least
70°C, more preferred at least 80°C, most preferred at least 85°C, more preferred at
least 90°C in the presence of a nucleophilic reagent and
- iii) isolating the DNA after reversing the cross-links, preferably by establishing
binding conditions by adding appropriate additives and binding the DNA to a nucleic
acid binding solid phase. Preferably, a chaotropic agent and a detergent, preferably
a non-ionic detergent, and alcohol are added to establish the binding conditions.
Suitable DNA isolating procedures are also well known in the prior art.
[0083] Thus, preferably, the process according to the invention comprises, subsequent to
step b), further steps for the separate purification of the RNA obtained from fraction
A and/or the DNA obtained from pellet B, preferably by precipitation, binding of the
nucleic acids to suitable binding materials, electrophoresis and/or chromatography
or combinations thereof.
[0084] Furthermore, the process preferably comprises a step for the analysis/detection of
the isolated and/or purified nucleic acids.
[0085] All analysis methods known to the person skilled in the art, for example amplification
techniques such as PCR, qPCR, RT-PCR, qRT-PCR and amplification of the entire genomic
DNA (whole genome amplification), gel electrophoresis, blotting techniques, in particular
Southern blotting and Northern blotting, microarray analyses, restriction fragment
length polymorphism analyses (RFLP analyses), SAGE (serial analysis of gene expression),
sequencing including NextGeneration sequencing and RNA sequencing, single nucleotide
polymorphism analyses (SNP analyses), mutation analyses, epigenetic analyses, in particular
analyses of methylation patterns or combinations thereof can be used for analyzing
the nucleic acids isolated by the process according to the invention.
[0086] As becomes apparent from the above disclosure, the present invention provides a process
for obtaining RNA in a dissolved fraction and DNA in an undissolved fraction from
the same biological sample fixed by crosslinking, comprising the following steps:
- a) partial dissolution of the sample in an aqueous buffer solution with simultaneous
partial proteolysis of the protein-containing components of the sample using at least
one proteolytically active compound to obtain a dissolved fraction (fraction A) and
an undissolved residue (pellet; fraction B),
- b) separation of the dissolved fraction from the undissolved residue,
wherein the dissolved fraction comprises mainly RNA, based on the total amount of
nucleic acids in the dissolved fraction, and the undissolved residue comprises mainly
DNA, based on the total amount of nucleic acids in the undissolved residue and wherein
the separation of the fraction comprising predominantly RNA from the fraction comprising
predominantly DNA requires neither precipitation nor extraction of one or both types
of nucleic acid with organic solvents nor selective binding of one or both types of
nucleic acid to a solid matrix.
[0087] According to one embodiment, the separation of the fraction comprising predominantly
RNA from the fraction comprising predominantly DNA requires neither precipitation
nor extraction of one or both types of nucleic acid with organic solvents nor selective
binding of one or both types of nucleic acid to a solid matrix. According to one embodiment,
after separation of the fractions, the RNA is isolated from the mainly RNA containing
dissolved fraction and/or DNA is isolated from the mainly DNA containing undissolved
fraction. The mainly DNA containing undissolved fraction can be discarded after separation,
if e.g. only the isolation of RNA is intended.
[0088] Suitable and preferred embodiments as well as the advantages associated with the
partial digestion and separation steps according to the present invention as well
as suitable and preferred embodiments for the subsequent nucleic acid isolation were
discussed in detail above with respect to the process for the parallel isolation and/or
purification of RNA and DNA from the same cross-linked sample. It is referred to the
above disclosure which also applies here.
[0089] The invention furthermore refers to the use of a kit for carrying out the process
according to the invention, comprising at least (1) a proteolytically active compound,
preferably one of the proteolytically active compounds mentioned above, (2) at least
one buffer substance, preferably one of the buffer substances mentioned above and
(3) at least one surfactant, preferably one of the surfactants mentioned above, and
also preferably (4) instructions for carrying out the incomplete proteolysis according
to step (a).
[0090] In a particularly preferred embodiment, the kit according to the invention comprises
furthermore (5) at least one nucleic acid-binding material and also optionally (6)
buffers for nucleic acid isolation, preferably binding and/or elution buffers.
[0091] Suitable for use as nucleic acid-binding material (5) are all materials known to
the person skilled in the art for adsorption of DNA or RNA, with particular preference
being given to cellulose-based materials, in particular carboxy-funktional cellulose
materials or diethylaminoethylcellulose, agarose, mineral carriers such as silica,
glass, quartz, zeolites or metal oxides or ion exchanger material-coated carriers.
The materials mentioned can be present, for example, in the form of membranes or magnetic
or non-magnetic particles. The nucleic acid-binding material is preferably contained
in the kit as column material in pre-fabricated columns or else as a suspension. The
type of material depends crucially on the chemical structure of the nucleic acid to
be analyzed, the person skilled in the art being familiar with the adsorption materials
suitable in each case for the respective intended application, i.e. the analysis of
RNA or DNA.
[0092] As elution buffer (6), the kit according to the invention may comprise any buffer
known to the person skilled in the art and customarily used for elution of nucleic
acids from nucleic acid binding materials. The elution buffer is preferably an aqueous
salt solution, in particular an aqueous solution which comprises alkali metal halides,
such as, for example, NaCl, KCI or LiCI, alkaline earth metal halides, such as, for
example, CaCl
2 or MgCl
2, ammonium salts, such as, for example, ammonium chloride or ammonium sulphate, or
mixtures of at least two of these salts, where the elution buffer may optionally also
comprise buffer system on basis of, for example, alkali metal acetate/acetic acid
or buffer systems based on tris(hydroxylmethyl)aminomethane. If the kit is to be used
for isolating RNA from a fixed tissue and the matrix used is a silica membrane, it
is particularly preferred to use water, in particular RNase-free water, as elution
buffer.
[0093] As binding buffer (6), the kit according to the invention may comprise any buffer
known to the person skilled in the art and customarily used for attaching nucleic
acids to nucleic acid-binding materials, where the binding buffer has to be matched
to the respective nucleic acid-binding material used. If the nucleic acid-binding
material used is a silica matrix, the binding buffer preferably comprises chaotropic
agents and optionally additionally a C
1-C
5-alcohol.
Description of the figures
[0094]
Figure 1 shows the separation of RNA and DNA samples isolated by the process according
to the invention from the supernatant and the pellet, respectively, on TAE-agarose
gels (DNA) and formaldehyde-agarose gels (RNA), respectively, after staining with
ethidium bromide (Example 1). For size comparison, the size marker Lambda/HindIII
(Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California, USA) was applied in lane M.
Figure 2 shows the total yield of the nucleic acids isolated from fraction A (supernatant)
and fraction B (pellet) as a function of the reaction time of the proteolytically
active compound (Example 3).
Figure 3 shows the result of an analysis of the RNA content in fraction B on a TAE-agarose
gel as a function of the reaction time of the proteolytically active compound (Example
3).
Figure 4 shows the effect of the reaction time of the proteolytically active compound
on the amplification of the DNA obtained from fraction B by quantitative real-time
PCR as the change of the ct value (Example 3).
Figure 5 shows the yield of DNA, determined by UV spectroscopy, which could be isolated
using the process according to the invention from various types of tissue stored for
the time stated in each case, in comparison to the yield in a process carried out
using a commercially available kit (Example 5).
Figure 6 shows the analysis of the DNA obtained according to Example 5 on a TAE-agarose
gel. For size comparison, the size marker Lambda/HindIII (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California,
USA) was applied in lane M.
Figure 7 shows the analysis of the DNA obtained according to Example 5 by real-time
PCR analysis.
Figure 8 shows an Agilent Bioanalyzer analysis of isolated RNA. 1-5: Samples with
DNAse pretreatment using pretreatment buffer 1 - 5 described in example 1. oc: Samples
without DNAse pretreatment, but with on column DNAse treatment as it is common in
the prior art.
Examples:
Example 1: Separation of RNA and DNA by the process according to the invention
[0095] The samples used were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue samples (FFPE samples)
from rat liver which had been stored at room temperature for about 4 months after
embedding. With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness of about 20 µm were
prepared from these samples. In each case, one section per reaction was used. Components
of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were employed for the subsequent
isolation of DNA and RNA from the processed samples.
[0096] For deparaffinization, the tissues were initially incubated in 1 ml of xylene for
10 min. After pelletization by centrifugation of the sample and removal of the supernatant,
this treatment with xylene was repeated two more times. The samples were subsequently
treated in each case twice with anhydrous ethanol followed by aqueous ethanol solutions
(first 96% ethanol and then 70% ethanol) and dried at 37°C for 10 min.
[0097] The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated with 150 µl
of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (w/v) (pH 7)
and mixed with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically
active compound. The mixture obtained was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm
for 15 min. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the undissolved fraction (B),
the samples were centrifuged and the supernatant (fraction A) was removed from the
pellet which contained the undissolved components (fraction B).
[0098] To determine the distribution of the types of nucleic acid, RNA and DNA, in the two
fractions, the RNA from supernatant and pellet was isolated from in each case 4 samples
(samples 1-4), and from a further 4 samples (samples 5-8) the DNA from supernatant
and pellet was isolated.
[0099] To isolate the RNA from the supernatant (fraction A) of samples 1-4 (samples 1a to
4a), the supernatant was incubated at 80°C for 15 min. To adjust to conditions for
DNA binding, 320 µl of a chaotropic buffer, for example the RBC buffer from QIAGEN,
were added. The mixture was applied to a silica membrane, for example present in the
gDNA eliminator column from QIAGEN, and passed through the membrane by centrifugation
at 14 000 rpm for 1 min. Since the composition of the mixture leads to selective binding
of the DNA to the silica membrane, the RNA is in the eluate of the column. To adjust
to binding conditions for RNA, this eluate was mixed with ethanol and then once more
applied to a silica membrane, for example present in the RNeasy MinElute column from
QIAGEN, and passed through the membrane by centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 1 min.
The silica membrane was then washed twice with in each case 500 µl of the alcohol-containing
wash buffer RW2 (QIAGEN). The membrane was dried by 5 minutes of centrifugation at
14 000 rpm, and the RNA was, after a 1-minute incubation, eluted with 30 µl of water.
[0100] To isolate the RNA from the pellet (fraction B) of samples 1-4 (samples 1b to 4b),
the pellet was mixed with 150 µl of the PKD buffer from QIAGEN, which comprises a
surfactant and a nucleophilic reagent, and 10 µl of proteinase K from QIAGEN. After
15 minutes of incubation at 56°C and then 15 minutes of incubation at 80°C, the lysate
was treated with a chaotrope-containing binding buffer, for example the RBC buffer
from QIAGEN, and the mixture was applied to a silica membrane, for example present
in the RNeasy MinElute column from QIAGEN, and passed through the membrane by centrifugation
at 10 000 rpm for 1 min. As described above, the silica membrane was washed twice
with the wash buffer RW2, and the RNA was eluted.
[0101] To isolate the DNA from the supernatant (fraction A) of samples 5-8 (samples 5a to
8a), the supernatant was made up to a total volume of 180 µl with the surfactant-containing
lysis buffer ATL (QIAGEN), and 20 µl of proteinase K from QIAGEN were added. The samples
were incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for 1 hour and then heated at 90°C
for 1 hour. To degrade any RNA present, after the incubation 4 µl of a RNAse A solution
(100 mg/ml) were mixed into the sample. For further purification of the DNA, the samples
were mixed with in each case 200 µl of a chaotropic buffer, for example the AL buffer
from QIAGEN, and ethanol. The mixture was applied to a silica membrane, for example
present in the QIAamp MinElute column from QIAGEN, and passed though the membrane
by centrifugation at 10 000 rpm for 1 min. The silica membrane was then washed with
500 µl of the guanidine salt-comprising wash buffer AW1 and then with 500 µl of the
alcohol-containing wash buffer AW2 from QIAGEN. The membrane was dried by a two-minute
centrifugation at 14 000 rpm, and the DNA was, after a one-minute incubation, eluted
by centrifugation with 30 µl of a DNA elution buffer, for example the buffer ATE from
QIAGEN.
[0102] To isolate the DNA from the pellet (fraction B) of samples 5-8 (samples 5b to 8b),
the pellet was treated with a customary DNA lysis buffer, such as, for example, 180
µl of the surfactant-comprising buffer ATL from QIAGEN. Since the pellet only contained
components which had not yet been dissolved by the prior treatment, an additional
lysis with 20 µl of proteinase K from QIAGEN was carried out to dissolve these undissolved
components, too. After a one-hour incubation at 56°C and a subsequent one-hour incubation
at 90°C, the lysate was treated with a chaotrope-containing binding buffer, for example
the AL buffer from QIAGEN, and also ethanol. The mixture was applied to a silica membrane,
for example present in the QIAamp MinElute column from QIAGEN, and passed through
the membrane by centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 1 min. As described above, the silica
membrane was washed with the wash buffers AW1 and AW2, the membrane was dried and
the DNA was eluted.
[0103] To determine the distribution of the nucleic acids isolated in this manner from the
two fractions supernatant (A) and pellet (B), the nucleic acids of both fractions
were quantified using suitable methods. The determination of the yield and purity
of the DNA and RNA was carried out via the optical density (OD) by measuring the absorption
of the sample at 260/280 nm. The yield is in each case stated in per cent of the total
yield. Here, the total yield is the sum of the yield of one type of nucleic acid in
supernatant and pellet. Table 1 shows the mean values of four determinations.
Table 1:
| |
RNA (samples 1-4) |
DNA (samples 5-8) |
| |
yield % |
OD (260/280) |
yield % |
OD (260/280) |
| supernatant (fraction A) |
91.9% |
1.96 |
20.5 |
1.96 |
| pellet (fraction B) |
8.1% |
1.69 |
79.5 |
1.79 |
[0104] For further analysis, in each case 10 µl of the nucleic acids isolated from the respective
fractions were separated by customary methods on a TAE-agarose gel (Tris acetate/EDTA)
in the case of DNA or on a formaldehyde/agarose gel in the case of RNA and stained
with ethidium bromide. The result is shown in Figure 1.
[0105] The results show that, when the process according to the invention is applied, there
is a clear separation/fractionation of the nucleic acids prior to the subsequent purification.
The RNA is located predominantly in the supernatant, whereas the DNA is located predominantly
in the pellet fraction.
Example 2: Effect of the amount of proteolytically active compound used
[0106] The samples used for this experiment were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue
samples (FFPE samples) from rat liver which had been stored at room temperature for
about 7 months after embedding. With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness
of about 10 µm were prepared from these samples. In each case, two sections per reaction
were used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were
employed for the subsequent isolation of DNA and RNA from the processed samples.
[0107] For deparaffinization, the tissues were initially incubated in 1 ml of heptane each
for 10 min. After addition of 50 µl of methanol and mixing the sample was centrifuged,
the supernatant was removed and the residue was air-dried at room temperature for
5 min.
[0108] The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated with 150 µl
of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (pH 7) and mixed
with 10 µl, 20 µl or 40 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically
active compound. This mixture was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for 15
min. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the undissolved fraction (B), the
samples were initially cooled on ice for 5 min and then centrifuged at 4°C. For further
isolation of the RNA, the supernatant was removed and the pellet was discarded.
[0109] The supernatant was subsequently incubated at 80°C for 15 min. To adjust to binding
conditions, 320 µl of a chaotropic buffer, for example the RBC buffer from QIAGEN,
were then added, and the mixture obtained was mixed with ethanol, applied to a silica
membrane, for example present in the RNeasy MinElute column from QIAGEN, and passed
through the membrane by centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 1 min. The silica membrane
was then washed twice by passing through 500 µl of the alcohol-containing wash buffer
RW2. The membrane was dried by 5 minutes of centrifugation at 14 000 rpm. The RNA
was then, after a 1-minute incubation, eluted by centrifugation by applying 30 µl
of water.
[0110] To analyze the RNA isolated in this manner, the yield was determined by measuring
the absorption at 260 nm. The results are shown in Table 2.
[0111] The integrity of the RNA was determined using an Agilent Bioanalyzer and stated in
the form of the RIN value, where an RIN value of 10 represents completely intact RNA
and an RIN value of 0 represents completely degraded RNA. The results are likewise
shown in Table 2.
[0112] To examine the effect of different amounts of the proteolytically active compound
not only on the isolation of the nucleic acids in the process according to the invention,
but also on the subsequent analysis by amplification, the RNA was analyzed by quantitative
real-time RT-PCR. To this end, the isolated RNA was, in each case in two determinations,
used for detecting an amplicon of the madH7 transcript. The eluates were each diluted
in a ratio of 1:10 with water. In each case 5 µl of these diluted solutions were used
for the real-time-PCR. Amplification was carried out in a total volume of 25 µl with
a mastermix suitable for real-time RT-PCR, such as, for example, the QuantiTect SYBRGreen
RT-PCR kit from QIAGEN, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification
was carried out in a suitable real-time amplification instrument such as, for example,
the ABI PRISM® 7900HT Sequence Detection System from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad,
California, USA). The measured ct values were used to determine the mean values, which
are shown in Table 2.
Table 2:
| Amount of proteinase K [µl] |
RNA yield [µg] |
RIN value |
ct value |
| 10 |
14.77 |
7.2 |
25.7 |
| 20 |
14.09 |
7.6 |
25.2 |
| 40 |
13.42 |
7.3 |
25.1 |
[0113] The results show that all amounts of proteinase K used lead to comparable yields,
comparable RNA integrity and comparable results in real-time RT-PCR. The amount of
the proteolytically active compound in the process according to the invention can
thus be varied within a wide range.
Example 3: Reaction time of the proteolytically active compound
[0114] The samples used for this experiment were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue
samples (FFPE samples) from rat liver which had been stored at room temperature for
about 5 months after embedding. With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness
of about 20 µm were prepared from these samples. In each case, one section per reaction
was used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were
employed for the subsequent isolation of DNA and RNA from the processed samples.
[0115] Deparaffination, rehydration, and drying of the sections were performed as described
in Example 1. The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated
with 150 µl of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (pH
7) and mixed with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically
active compound. This mixture was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for up
to 3 hours. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the undissolved fraction (B),
the samples were centrifuged and the supernatant (fraction A) was removed from the
pellet which contained the undissolved components (fraction B). As described in Example
1, the RNA was isolated from the supernatant (fraction A) and the DNA was isolated
from the pellet (fraction B).
[0116] To analyze the nucleic acids isolated in this manner, the yield was determined by
measuring the absorption at 260 nm. The results are shown in Figure 2. With increasing
reaction time of the proteinase, the yield of nucleic acids decreases in the pellet
and increases correspondingly in the supernatant, as more nucleic acids are dissolved
from the pellet by the longer proteinase action.
[0117] However, this total distribution of nucleic acids does not provide any information
about the DNA and RNA content in the fractions. Therefore, in each case 10 µl of eluate
of the DNA-containing fractions (B) were analyzed on a TAE-agarose gel. The result
is shown in Figure 3.
[0118] It is clearly evident that after a proteinase K reaction time of only 5 min a large
part of the RNA still remains in the undissolved fraction, i.e. the pellet. With increasing
proteinase reaction time this amount is reduced, and from a reaction time of 15 min
onwards the undissolved fraction comprises only small amounts of RNA, or RNA is substantially
no longer detectable. In contrast, the DNA remains considerably longer (for at least
90 min) in the undissolved fraction B. By optimizing the reaction time of the proteolytically
active compound, it is thus possible to adjust the distribution of the types of nucleic
acid in the two fractions.
[0119] To examine the effect of the length of reaction time of the proteolytically active
compound in the process according to the invention, not only on the isolation of the
nucleic acids, but also on the analysis by amplification, the DNA was analyzed by
quantitative real-time PCR. To this end, in each case identical volumes of the isolated
DNA eluates were, in each case in two determinations, used for detecting an amplicon
of the pmp gene. Amplification was carried out in a total volume of 25 µl with a mastermix
suitable for real-time RT-PCR, such as, for example, the QuantiTect SYBRGreen PCR
kit from QIAGEN, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification was carried
out in a suitable real-time amplification instrument such as, for example, the ABI
PRISM® 7900HT Sequence Detection System from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, Califomia,
USA). The mean values determined from the ct values are shown in Figure 4.
[0120] The results show that with increasing reaction time the ct value increases, which
is due to the reduced amount of DNA in the eluate. With increasing reaction time,
not only the RNA but also the DNA passes increasingly into the supernatant, where,
however, the RNA is dissolved and encountered in the supernatant markedly more rapidly
than the DNA. While the gel shows that even after a reaction time of 15 min the RNA
is already dissolved virtually completely from the pellet and encountered in the supernatant,
the amount of DNA in the undissolved fraction B is, according to gel and real-time
PCR, significantly reduced only after more than 90 minutes.
Example 4: Use of different aqueous solutions in the process according to the invention
[0121] The samples used for this experiment were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue
samples (FFPE samples) from rat liver which had been stored at room temperature for
about 7 months after embedding. With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness
of about 20 µm were prepared from these samples. In each case, one section per reaction
was used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were
employed for the subsequent isolation of DNA and RNA from the processed samples.
[0122] Deparaffinization, rehydration and drying of the sections were carried out as described
in Example 2. The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated
with 150 µl of an aqueous solution 1 comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS
(pH 7), an aqueous solution 2 comprising 50 mM Tris, 25 mM EDTA, 1% SDS, 0.1% Nonidet
NP40 and 500mM NaCl (pH 7.4) or an aqueous solution 3 comprising 50 mM Tris, 100 mM
EDTA, 3% SDS and 10 mM NaCl (pH 8.2) and mixed with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution
(> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically active compound. The mixture was incubated at 56°C
with shaking at 1400 rpm for 15 min. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the
undissolved fraction (B), the samples were initially cooled on ice for 5 min and then
centrifuged at 4°C. The DNA was isolated from the pellet (fraction B) as described
in Example 1, the pellet being taken up in a buffer comprising 50 mM Tris, 25 mM EDTA,
1% SDS, 0.1% Nonidet P-40 and 500 mM NaCl (pH 7.4). The yield was determined by measuring
the absorption at 260 nm. The results are shown in Table 3.
Table 3:
| Aqueous solution |
Yield of DNA [µg] |
| 1 |
3.0 |
| 2 |
3.7 |
| 3 |
2.3 |
[0123] All three aqueous solutions used give a good yield of DNA, certain variations being
caused by the heterogeneity of the samples. The example shows that a large number
of different aqueous solutions can be used for the process according to the invention,
it being possible to vary both the ingredients and their concentration. It is thus
possible to adapt the aqueous solution to be used to the proteolytically active compound
employed.
Example 5: Isolation of DNA from different types of tissue with the aid of the process
according to the invention
[0124] The samples used were FFPE samples from rat which had been stored at room temperature
for different periods of time: kidney (storage time about 13 months), liver (storage
time about 6 months), spleen (storage time about 19 months), heart (storage time about
13 months) and lung (storage time about 6 months). With the aid of a microtome, sections
of a thickness of about 20 µm were prepared from each of these samples. In each case,
one section per reaction was used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp
FFPE kit from QIAGEN were employed for the subsequent nucleic acid isolation from
the processed samples with the aid of the process according to the invention.
[0125] To compare the isolation of DNA with the aid of the process according to the invention
with a process established specifically for the purification of DNA from FFPE samples,
sections of the same samples were in each case used for DNA isolation with the QIAamp
FFPE kit according to the manufacturer's (QIAGEN) instructions and used as control
samples.
[0126] Deparaffinization, rehydration and drying of the sections were carried out as described
in Example 2. The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated
with 150 µl of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (pH
7) and mixed with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically
active compound. This mixture was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for 15
min. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the undissolved fraction (B), the
samples were initially cooled on ice for 5 min and then centrifuged. The DNA was isolated
from the pellet (fraction B) as described in Example 1, with a two-hour incubation
at 90°C.
[0127] For the analysis of the DNA obtained, the yield was determined by measuring the absorption
at 260 nm. The mean values and standard deviations of the duplicate determinations
are shown in Figure 5. With the aid of the process according to the invention, DNA
could be isolated from all samples, the yield in all cases exceeding the yield obtained
in the control process.
[0128] Moreover, in each case 10 µl of the DNA eluate were separated on a TAE-agarose gel
and stained with ethidium bromide. The result is shown in Figure 6. In all cases the
DNA isolated with the aid of the process according to the invention showed approximately
the same molecular size distribution as the DNA isolated in the control process.
[0129] To examine the suitability of the DNA isolated by the process according to the invention
for amplification analyses, the DNA obtained in this manner was used in a quantitative
real-time PCR assay. Identical volumes of the isolated DNA eluates were used in duplicate
determinations for detecting a 465 base pair amplicon of the pmp gene.
[0130] In FFPE samples, the DNA is in principle present in fragmented form, the extent of
fragmentation and thus the spektrum of the DNA fragments that can be isolated depending
inter alia on the nature of the fixation and embedding, but also on the kind of sample
and the storage of the sample. Moreover, the extent of crosslinking in the DNA that
remains after the isolation of the nucleic acid limits the amplification and in particular
the possible size of the amplicon. To ensure efficient amplification in spite of this,
preference is in principle given to small amplicons. The amplicon size of 465 bp used
here is very big for FFPE samples and was chosen to test the quality and suitability
of the DNA isolated by the process according to the invention.
[0131] Amplification was carried out in a total volume of 25 µl with a mastermix suitable
for real-time RT-PCR, such as, for example, the QuantiTect SYBRGreen PCR kit from
QIAGEN, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification was carried out
in a suitable real-time amplification instrument such as, for example, the ABI PRISM®
7900HT Sequence Detection System from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, California, USA).
The measured ct values were used to determine the mean values and standard deviations
of the DNA isolated according to the invention, which are shown in Figure 7.
[0132] In all cases, the ct value is comparable to that of the control DNA or even lower,
which confirms better amplifiability and/or a higher yield.
[0133] In total, the results show that the process according to the invention allows the
isolation of DNA from FFPE samples which, with respect to yield, quality, fragment
size and suitability for amplification analyses, is at least as good or else better
than DNA isolated by a process known from the prior art for the specific isolation
of DNA from FFPE samples.
Example 6: Isolation of RNA from different types of tissue by the process according
to the invention
[0134] The samples used for this experiment were FFPE samples from rat which had been stored
at room temperature for different periods of time: kidney (storage time about 5 months),
liver (storage time about 24 months), heart (storage time about 24 months) and lung
(storage time about 24 months). With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness
of about 20 µm were prepared from these samples. In each case, one section per reaction
was used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were
employed for the subsequent nucleic acid isolation from the FFPE sections with aid
of the inventive process.
[0135] To compare the isolation of RNA with the aid of the process according to the invention
with a process established specifically for the purification of RNA from FFPE samples,
sections of the same samples were used for the isolation of RNA with the RNeasy FFPE
kit according to the manufacturer's (QIAGEN) instructions and used as control samples.
[0136] Deparaffinization, rehydration and drying of the sections were carried out as described
in Example 2. The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated
with 150 µl of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (pH
7) and mixed with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically
active compound. This mixture was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for 15
min. To separate the dissolved fraction (A) from the undissolved fraction (B), the
samples were initially cooled on ice for 5 min and then centrifuged. For further isolation
of the RNA, the supernatant (fraction A) was removed and the pellet was discarded.
[0137] The supernatant was subsequently incubated at 80°C for 15 min. The sample was cooled
at room temperature for five minutes, after which 20 µl of a conventional DNAse buffer
(comprising, for example, 0.46 M Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 114 mM NaCl, 114 mM MgCl
2, 114 mM CaCl
2), 15 µl of deionized water and 5 µl of DNAse I solution from QIAGEN were added, and
the mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. 400 µl of a chaotropic buffer,
for example RLT buffer from QIAGEN, were then added, the mixture was mixed with ethanol,
applied to a silica membrane, for example present in the RNeasy MinElute column from
QIAGEN, and passed through the membrane by centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 1 min.
The silica membrane was washed twice with 500 µl of the alcohol-containing wash buffer
RW2 (QIAGEN). The membrane was dried by 5 minutes of centrifugation at 14 000 rpm,
and the RNA was, after a 1-minute incubation, eluted by centrifugation by applying
with 30 µl of water.
[0138] To analyze the RNA isolated in this manner, the yield was determined by measuring
the absorption at 260 nm. The mean values of the duplicate determinations are shown
in Table 4.
Table 4:
| Tissue |
Yield [µg] |
| |
Sample |
Control |
| Lung |
9.1 |
8.2 |
| Liver |
2.7 |
2.6 |
| Kidney |
2.3 |
2.2 |
| Heart |
7.6 |
5.3 |
[0139] With the aid of the process according to the invention, it was possible to isolate
RNA from all samples, where in all cases the yields obtained with the process according
to the invention were comparable to or higher than those of the controls.
[0140] To examine the suitability of the RNA isolated by the process according to the invention
for amplification analyses, the RNA was used in quantitative real-time RT-PCR assays.
Identical volumes of the isolated RNA eluates were used in each case in duplicate
determinations for detecting an amplicon of the madH7 transcript and the c-jun transcript.
Amplification was carried out in a total volume of 25 µl with a mastermix suitable
for real-time RT-PCR, such as, for example, the QuantiTect SYBRGreen RT-PCR kit from
QIAGEN, according to the manufacturer's instructions. Amplification was carried out
in a suitable real-time amplification instrument such as, for example, the ABI PRISM®
7900HT Sequence Detection System from Applied Biosystems (Carlsbad, California, USA).
In addition, microRNA16 (miR16) was detected in the RNA eluates using the miScript
PCR system, according to the manufacturer's (QIAGEN) instructions by real-time RT-PCR.
The mean values obtained from the ct values measured are shown in Table 5.
Table 5:
| |
|
Lung (24 months) |
Liver (24 months) |
Kidney (6 months) |
Heart (24 months) |
| madH7 |
sample |
24.9 |
26.1 |
22.8 |
28.2 |
| |
control |
27.6 |
26.8 |
23.6 |
29.2 |
| c-jun |
sample |
26.1 |
26.9 |
26.6 |
28.7 |
| |
control |
28.2 |
27.2 |
26.7 |
29.7 |
| miR16 |
sample |
17.4 |
19.0 |
20.8 |
19.9 |
| |
control |
20.44 |
21.1 |
19.4 |
21.2 |
[0141] In all cases, the measured ct value of the sample processed according to the invention
is comparable to that of the control sample or even lower, which is due to better
amplifiability or a larger amount of RNA.
Example 7: DNAse treatment for efficient miRNA purification
[0142] For this experiment, FFPE samples from rat which had been stored at room temperature
for different periods of time were used: brain (storage time about 5 months) and heart
(storage time about 18 months). With the aid of a microtome, sections of a thickness
of about 20 µm were prepared from these samples. In each case, one section per reaction
was used. Components of the RNeasy FFPE kit and the QIAamp FFPE kit from QIAGEN were
employed for the subsequent nucleic acid isolation from the FFPE sections with aid
of the inventive process.
[0143] To compare the isolation of miRNA with the aid of the process according to the invention
with a process established specifically for the purification of miRNA from FFPE samples,
sections of the same samples were used for the isolation of miRNA with the miRNeasy
FFPE kit according to the manufacturer's (QIAGEN) instructions and used as control
samples.
[0144] The deparaffinized sample pellets obtained in this manner were treated with 150 µl
of an aqueous solution comprising 20 mM Tris, 2 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS (pH 7) and mixed
with 10 µl of a proteinase K solution (> 600 mAU/ml) as proteolytically active compound.
This mixture was incubated at 56°C with shaking at 1400 rpm for 15 min. To separate
the mainly RNA containing dissolved fraction (A) from the mainly DNA containing undissolved
fraction (B), the samples were initially cooled on ice for 3 min and then centrifuged.
For further isolation of the RNA including miRNA, the supernatant (fraction A) was
removed and the DNA containing pellet was discarded.
[0145] The supernatant was subsequently incubated at 80°C for 15 min to reverse the cross-links.
The sample was cooled at room temperature for five minutes, after which 20 µl of different
buffers for facilitating DNase-activity (pretreatment buffers 1 - 5, see below), 15µl
water and 5 µl of DNAse I solution from QIAGEN were added. The following buffers were
used for this experiment:
pretreatment buffer 1:0.46 M Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 114 mM NaCl, 114 mM MgCl2, 114 mM CaCl2
pretreatment buffer 2: 0.46 M Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 114 mM MgCl2, 114 mM CaCl2
pretreatment buffer 3:46 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 11,4 mM NaCl, 11,4 mM MgCl2, 11,4 mM CaCl2
pretreatment buffer 4:20 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 100 mM MgCl2, 10 mM CaCl2
pretreatment buffer 5:20 mM Tris-HCI (pH 7.5), 100 mM MgCl2, 2,5 mM CaCl2
[0146] The mixture was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. In order to isolate RNA
incl. small RNAs like micro RNAs from the DNase digested sample 400 µl of a chaotropic
buffer, for example RLT buffer from QIAGEN, were then added, the mixture was mixed
with 1400µl 96-100% ethanol, applied to a silica membrane, for example present in
the RNeasy MinElute column from QIAGEN, and passed through the membrane by centrifugation
at 14 000 rpm for 1 min. The silica membrane was washed twice with 500 µl of the alcohol-containing
wash buffer RPE (QIAGEN). The membrane was dried by 5 minutes of centrifugation at
14 000 rpm, and the RNA was, after a 1-minute incubation, eluted by centrifugation
by applying with 30 µl of water.
[0147] For comparison, the same samples were used for purification of RNA incl. small RNAs
without DNAse preatreatment but with a common on-column DNAse treatment after binding
the RNA onto the membrane. Deparaffinzation and proteinase K digestion were performed
as described above. After that, 320 µl of a chaotropic buffer, for example RLT buffer
from QIAGEN, were then added, the mixture was mixed with 1120µl 96-100% ethanol, applied
to a silica membrane, for example present in the RNeasy MinElute column from QIAGEN,
and passed through the membrane by centrifugation at 14 000 rpm for 1 min. The silica
membrane was washed with 350µl of a wash buffer containing chaotropic reagents and
ethanol, like buffer RWT (QIAGEN). 80µl of a mixture comprising 10µl DNase 1 and an
appropriate DNAse buffer (e.g. buffer RDD (QIAGEN)) was applied then onto the membrane
and incubated for 15 min at room temperature. After that the membrane was again washed
with buffer RWT and washed twice with 500 µl of the alcohol-containing wash buffer
RPE (QIAGEN). The membrane was dried by 5 minutes of centrifugation at 14 000 rpm,
and the RNA was, after an 1-minute incubation, eluted by centrifugation by applying
with 30 µl of water.
[0148] To analyze the RNA isolated in this manner, exemplary the RNA from brain was analyzed
using an Agilent Bioanalyzer, which separates the RNA molecules depending on size.
Fig. 8 shows the results of Bioanalyzer measurement. RNA from FFPE samples is always
partly degraded and the extent of degradation is dependent on multiple factors like
fixation, embedding and storage of the sample and the RNA extraction method. Therefore,
the gel-like visualization of the RNA shows in all cases partly degraded RNA (see
Fig. 8). The 28S rRNA is not and the 18S rRNA is only weekly visible. In addition,
a Iot of RNA fragments occur from the size of the 28srRNA band down to low molecular
weights. The common on column DNAse treatment results in very low yields of the smallest
RNA population incl. miRNA (see arrow). In contrast, DNAse pretreatment prior to column
loading according to the present invention allows isolation of high amounts of the
very low molecular weight RNAs.
[0149] In order to determine efficiency of miRNA purification in particular, the purified
RNA was analyzed for detection and quantitation of miRNA 16 using the miScript PCR
System, according to the manufacturer's (QIAGEN) instructions by real-time RT-PCR.
The mean values obtained from the ct values measured are shown in Table 1.
Table 6:
| DNAse treatment |
Brain |
heart |
| pretreatment buffer 1 |
18,30 |
20,03 |
| pretreatment buffer 2 |
18,17 |
19,39 |
| pretreatment buffer 3 |
18,17 |
20,43 |
| pretreatment buffer 4 |
18,25 |
20,06 |
| pretreatment buffer 5 |
18,63 |
19,91 |
| On-column DNase treatment |
20,33 |
21,49 |
[0150] In all cases, the ct values measured are lower in samples with DNAse pretreatment,
whereas on-column DNAse treatment gives significant higher ct values. Lower ct values
represent higher amounts of miRNA with a ct value difference of one indicating of
about the double amount of detected miRNA. Thus, DNAse pretreatment before isolating
the RNA significantly enhances miRNA purification efficiency over the on-column DNase
digest according to the state of art.
[0151] Overall, the results show that the process according to the invention allows the
isolation of RNA from FFPE samples which, with respect to yield, quality, fragment
size and suitability for amplification analyses, is at least as good as RNA isolated
by an isolation process known from the prior art and specific for the isolation of
RNA from FFPE samples.
1. Procédé visant à obtenir, à partir d'un même échantillon biologique fixé par réticulation,
de l'ARN dans une fraction dissoute et de l'ADN dans une fraction non-dissoute, lequel
procédé comporte les étapes suivantes :
a) dissolution partielle de l'échantillon dans une solution tampon aqueuse, et simultanément,
protéolyse partielle des composants de l'échantillon qui contiennent des protéines,
au moyen d'au moins un composé doté d'une activité protéolytique, de manière à obtenir
une fraction dissoute (fraction A) et un résidu non-dissous (culot, fraction B),
b) et séparation de la fraction dissoute d'avec le résidu non-dissous, dans lequel
procédé la fraction dissoute, sur la quantité totale d'acides nucléiques contenue
dedans, comprend principalement de l'ARN, et le résidu non-dissous, sur la quantité
totale d'acides nucléiques contenue dedans, comprend principalement de l'ADN,
et dans lequel procédé séparer la fraction comprenant de manière prédominante de l'ARN
de la fraction comprenant de manière prédominante de l'ADN ne nécessite ni précipitation
ni extraction d'un type ou des deux types d'acide nucléique à l'aide de solvants organiques,
ni liaison sélective d'un type ou des deux types d'acide nucléique à une matrice solide.
2. Procédé, conforme à la revendication 1, d'isolement et/ou de purification en parallèle
d'acides ribonucléiques (ARN) et d'acides désoxyribonucléiques (ADN), ou de séparation
d'ARN d'avec de l'ADN.
3. Procédé conforme à la revendication 2, dans lequel la solution tampon aqueuse comprend
au moins une substance tampon, de préférence choisie dans l'ensemble comprenant les
Tris, Hepes, Pipes et Mops et acide acétique / acétate de métal alcalin, et/ou de
préfé-rence au moins un tensioactif, de préférence choisi dans l'ensemble comprenant
les dodécyl-sulfate de sodium (SDS), désoxycholate de sodium, 3-(3-cholamido-propyl)-diméthyl-ammonium-1-propane-sulfonate
(CHAPS) et éthers phényliques de polyéthylèneglycol ou un mélange de ces composés,
avec une préférence particulière pour le dodécyl-sulfate de sodium, l'éther nonyl-phénylique
de polyéthylèneglycol présentant un degré d'éthoxylation de 40 et/ou l'éther (1,1,3,3-tétra-méthyl-butyl)-phénylique
de polyéthylèneglycol présentant un degré d'éthoxylation de 9 à 10, et comprend en
outre, en option, au moins une substance choisie dans l'ensemble comprenant :
- des agents de formation de complexes, de préférence l'acide éthylènediamine-N,N,N',N'-tétraacétique
(EDTA), l'acide éthylène-glycol-bis(2-amino-éthyl éther)-N,N,N',N'-tétraacétique (EGTA),
le citrate de sodium ou un mélange de ces composés,
- des agents chaotropiques, de préférence choisis dans l'ensemble comprenant chlorhydrate
de guanidine, thiocyanate de guanidine, isothiocyanate de guanidine, perchlorates,
iodure de sodium, iodure de potassium et urée, de préférence en une concentration
de 0,1 à 10 M,
- des agents réducteurs, de préférence choisis dans l'ensemble comprenant dithiothréitol
(DTT), dithioérythritol (DTE), thiosulfate de sodium et β-mercapto-éthanol, ou un
mélange de ces composés,
- et des sels inorganiques, de préférence halogénures de métal alcalin, avec une préférence
particulière pour les chlorures de sodium, de potassium ou de lithium, halogénures
de métal alcalino-terreux, avec une préférence particulière pour les chlorures de
calcium ou de magnésium, sels d'ammonium, avec une préférence particulière pour le
chlorure d'ammonium ou le sulfate d'ammonium, et sulfate de lithium, ou un mélange
de tels composés,
et présente en outre, de préférence, un pH valant de 6 à 9 et mieux encore de 6,5
à 8,5, avec une préférence particulière pour un pH valant de 6,8 à 7,5.
4. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 et 3, dans lequel le composé doté d'une
activité protéolytique est choisi dans l'ensemble comprenant les protéases et les
composés non-enzymatiques dotés d'une activité protéolytique, de préférence les protéinase
K, trypsine, chymotrypsine, papaïne, pepsine, pronase, endoprotéinase Lys-C et bromure
de cyanogène, ou un mélange de ces composés, en particulier la protéinase K, et la
proportion totale des composés dotés d'une activité protéolytique dans la solution
aqueuse se situe dans un intervalle allant de préférence de 0,001 à 5 % en poids,
mieux encore de 0,01 à 2,5 % en poids et en particulier de 0,05 à 0,2 % en poids,
par rapport au poids total de la solution aqueuse, et/ou dans lequel la dissolution
partielle de l'échantillon dans la solution tampon aqueuse est de préférence réalisée
par incubation de l'échantillon dans la solution tampon aqueuse à une température
valant de 18 à 80 °C, en particulier de 50 à 65 °C, de préférence durant un laps de
temps de 30 secondes à 5 jours, en particulier de 1 minute à 5 heures, mieux encore
de 5 à 90 minutes et surtout de 10 à 30 minutes.
5. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 4, dans lequel l'échantillon biologique
fixé par réticulation est un échantillon noyé dans de la paraffine, et de préférence,
un échantillon fixé avec de la formaline et noyé dans de la paraffine (échantillon
FFNP).
6. Procédé conforme à la revendication 5, lequel procédé comporte, avant la dissolution
partielle de l'étape (a), une étape (i) d'élimination sélective de la paraffine, qu'on
réalise de préférence en mettant l'échantillon en contact avec un solvant organique
hydrophobe, avec une préférence particulière pour l'utilisation d'un hydrocarbure
aliphatique ou aromatique apolaire, doté d'une chaîne longue de plus de 6 et moins
de 17 atomes de carbone, ou d'un mélange de tels composés, additionné en option d'un
alcool en C1-C5, et en particulier, avec un hydrocarbure ou un mélange d'hydrocarbures choisi(s)
dans l'ensemble comprenant xylène, heptane et huile minérale, additionné en option
de 1 à 25 % en volume de méthanol.
7. Procédé conforme à la revendication 6, lequel procédé comporte, après l'élimination
de la paraffine selon l'étape (i) et avant la dissolution partielle de l'échantillon
dans la solution tampon aqueuse selon l'étape (a), au moins l'une des étapes suivantes
:
ii) réhydratation de l'échantillon, de préférence opérée par lavages répétés de l'échantillon
avec des solutions aqueuses d'un alcool en C1 à C3 dont la teneur en eau augmente progressivement,
iii) séchage de l'échantillon,
iv) et/ou homogénéisation de l'échantillon.
8. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 7, dans lequel, pour libérer ensuite
l'ADN du résidu non-dissous obtenu, on fait subir au résidu non-dissous une lyse,
avec digestion enzymatique simultanée par protéase.
9. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 8, qui comprend en outre des étapes,
réalisées après l'étape (b) de la revendication 1, visant à purifier séparément l'ARN
obtenu à partir de la fraction dissoute A et/ou l'ADN obtenu à partir du culot (B),
de préférence par précipitation, liaison avec des matériaux de fixation d'acides nucléiques,
électrophorèse et/ou chromatographie.
10. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 9, dans lequel la fraction non-dissoute
contenant principalement de l'ADN est jetée après séparation, et/ou l'on soumet à
une digestion par ADNase la fraction dissoute contenant principalement de l'ARN, avant
d'isoler l'ARN de cette fraction.
11. Procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 10, lequel procédé comporte en outre
une étape de détection des acides nucléiques isolés et/ou purifiés, réalisée de préférence
au moyen d'une technique choisie parmi les techniques d'amplification, en particulier
PCR, PCR quantitative, PCR en temps réel, PCR quantitative en temps réel et amplification
d'ADN génomique entier (amplification de tout le génome), électrophorèse sur gel,
techniques de transfert, en particulier Southern blot et Northern blot, analyses en
microréseau, analyses de polymorphisme des longueurs des fragments de restriction,
(analyses RFLP), analyse sérielle de l'expression des gènes (analyses SAGE), séquençage,
y compris séquençage « NextGeneration » et séquençage d'ARN, analyses de polymorphisme
de nucléotide unique (analyses SNP), analyses de mutation(s), et analyses épigénétiques,
en particulier les analyses de schémas de méthylation, ou des combinaisons de ces
techniques.
12. Utilisation d'une trousse comprenant au moins
1) un composé doté d'une activité protéolytique, et de préférence, un composé doté
d'une activité protéolytique tel que défini dans la revendication 4,
2) au moins une substance tampon, et de préférence, une substance tampon telle que
définie dans la revendication 3,
3) au moins un tensioactif, et de préférence, un tensioactif tel que défini dans la
revendication 3,
4) en option, un mode d'emploi pour réaliser la protéolyse incomplète de l'étape (a),
5) en option, au moins un matériau fixant des acides nucléiques,
6) et en option également, des tampons pour purification d'acides
nucléiques, de préférence des tampons de fixation et/ou d'élution, pour la mise en
oeuvre d'un procédé conforme à l'une des revendications 2 à 11.
13. Utilisation d'une trousse conforme à la revendication 12 pour le diagnostic, le pronostic,
les décisions concernant le traitement et/ou le monitorage du traitement d'une maladie,
à l'aide d'échantillons utilisés à l'extérieur du corps d'un humain ou d'un animal.
14. Procédé conforme à la revendication 1, comportant au moins l'une des caractéristiques
suivantes :
1) après séparation des fractions, l'ARN est isolé à partir de la fraction dissoute
contenant principalement de l'ARN et/ou l'ADN est isolé à partir de la fraction non-dissoute
contenant principalement de l'ADN,
2) la fraction non-dissoute contenant principalement de l'ADN est jetée après séparation.