TECHNICAL FIELD
[0001] The present invention relates to a technology for determining a quantity of particulate
matter (PM) trapped in a particulate filter arranged in an exhaust system of an internal
combustion engine.
BACKGROUND ART
[0002] In the structure, in which the particulate filter is arranged in the exhaust system
of the internal combustion engine, the technology is known such that when the quantity
of the particulate matter (PM) trapped in the particulate filter exceeds a certain
quantity, the particulate filter is heated, thereby the PM trapped in the particulate
filter is oxidized and removed (PM regeneration process).
[0003] For the method of determining whether or not the quantity of PM trapped in the particulate
filter exceeds a certain quantity, there has been proposed a method which determines
that the PM trapped quantity has exceeded a certain quantity when a differential pressure
between the upstream and the downstream of the particulate filter (hereinafter will
be referred to as the "fore-and-aft differential pressure") has exceeded a predetermined
value (see, for example, the Patent Document 1).
PRIOR ART DOCUMENTS
Patent Documents
[0004]
Patent Document 1: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2008-106698
Patent Document 2: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2008-190470
Patent Document 3: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2008-082199
Patent Document 4: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 08(1996)-028248
Patent Document 5: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 05(1993)-026029
Patent Document 6: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2009-512814
Patent Document 7: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2009-513870
Patent Document 8: Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open Publication No. 2009-197718
DISCLOSURE OF THE INVENTION
Problem To Be Solved By The Invention
[0005] It should be noted that the above-mentioned fore-and-aft pressure varies according
to a temperature and a flow rate of the exhaust gas. To deal with this, a method of
correcting a detected value of the fore-and-aft differential pressure by using the
exhaust gas temperature and the exhaust gas flow rate as parameters, can be considered.
However, there may be a possibility that the correlation between the corrected fore-and-aft
differential pressure and the actual PM trapped quantity becomes low.
[0006] Further, the Patent Document 2 proposes a method in which a PM sensor which detects
a PM quantity flowing into the particulate filter is mounted on the exhaust system,
and the PM trapped quantity of the particulate filter is obtained from a detected
value of the PM sensor. However, there is a possibility that the PM trapped quantity
differs between the central portion and the peripheral portion of the particulate
filter in a radial direction thereof. Because of this, when the timing of the PM regeneration
process is determined based on the detected value of the PM sensor, there may possibly
occur such situation where the PM has not been removed but remains in the central
portion or the peripheral portion of the particulate filter, or the situation where
the PM regeneration process would be continued even after removing the PM.
[0007] The present invention has been made in view of the above-described various circumstances,
and its object is to provide a technology that can specify the deviation in the PM
trapped quantity between the central portion and the peripheral portion of the particulate
filter in the radial direction thereof.
Means For Solving The Problem
[0008] In order to solve the above-described problems, the present invention is to measure
a quantity of particulate matter (PM) contained in the exhaust gas flowing out from
the central portion of the particular filter in the radial direction thereof and a
quantity of PM contained in the exhaust gas flowing out from the peripheral portion
of the particulate filter in the radial direction thereof, by a PM sensor, and the
PM trapped quantity of the central portion and the PM tapped quantity of the peripheral
portion are obtained from the results of these measurements.
[0009] In detail, the exhaust gas purification system for an internal combustion engine
of the present invention comprises:
a particulate filter which is arranged in an exhaust passage of the internal combustion
engine and traps particulate matter in an exhaust gas;
a PM sensor which is arranged in the exhaust passage at the downstream of the particulate
filter and measures a quantity of particulate matter contained in the exhaust gas;
a switching mechanism for switching between a first mode in which the quantity of
particulate matter contained in the exhaust gas flowing out from the central portion
of the particulate filter in the radial direction thereof is measured by the PM sensor,
and a second mode in which the quantity of particulate matter contained in the exhaust
gas flowing out from the peripheral portion of the particulate filer in the radial
direction thereof is measured by the PM sensor; and
a calculation unit for calculating a first trapped quantity which is the PM trapped
quantity of the central portion from the value measured by the PM sensor when the
switching mechanism is in the first mode, and also calculating a second trapped quantity
which is the PM trapped quantity of the peripheral portion from the value measured
by the PM sensor when the switching mechanism is in the second mode.
[0010] When the quantity of PM trapped in the particulate filter is large, the PM trapping
ability of the particulate filter becomes high, as compared to when the quantity of
PM trapped in the particulate filter is small. This is due to the fact that when the
quantity of PM trapped in the particulate filer is large, a cross-sectional area of
a flow passage in the particulate filter becomes small as compared to when the quantity
of PM trapped in the particulate filter is small.
[0011] According to the above-described characteristics, when the PM trapped quantity of
the particulate filter is large, the quantity of PM flowing out from the particulate
filter (namely, the quantity of PM that passes through the filter) is small as compared
to when the PM trapped quantity is small. Consequently, when the PM quantity detected
by the PM sensor is small, it means that the PM trapped quantity of the particulate
filer is large, as compared to when the PM quantity detected by the PM sensor is large.
Thereby, the PM trapped quantity of the particulate filter can be calculated from
the value detected by the PM sensor.
[0012] Further, according to the present invention, the quantity of PM flowing out from
the central portion of the particulate filer in the radial direction thereof, and
the quantity of PM flowing out from the peripheral portion of the particulate filter
in the radial direction thereof, can be detected individually. As a result, the PM
trapped quantity of the central portion (first trapped quantity) and the PM trapped
quantity of the peripheral portion (second trapped quantity) can be specified, respectively.
[0013] When the first trapped quantity and the second trapped quantity are specified respectively,
the PM trapped in the central portion and the PM trapped in the peripheral portion
can be oxidized and removed properly, that is, neither too much nor too little. For
example, the exhaust gas purification system for the internal combustion engine of
the present invention may further comprises a regeneration processing unit for performing
a PM regeneration process which is the process of raising the temperature of the particulate
filter for oxidizing and removing the PM trapped in the particulate filter. And, the
regeneration processing unit may finish the PM regeneration process when the first
trapped quantity and the second trapped quantity becomes equal to or less than a target
quantity. The target quantity is a quantity determined by the specifications of the
internal combustion engine and the specifications of the particulate filter. Such
the target quantity may be zero or a value which is larger than zero.
[0014] When the PM regeneration process is executed by such method, it is possible to avoid
a situation where the quantity of PM un-oxidized at the central portion or the peripheral
portion of the particulate filter becomes large, and a situation where the PM regeneration
process will be continued even after the first trapped quantity and the second trapped
quantity become equal to or less than the target quantity. As a result, the PM trapped
at the central portion and the peripheral portion can be oxidized and removed properly.
[0015] Further, the exhaust gas purification system for the internal combustion engine of
the present invention may further comprises a regeneration processing unit for performing
the PM regeneration process which is the process of raising the temperature of the
particulate filter in order to oxidize and remove the PM trapped in the particulate
filter, and a heater for heating the peripheral portion locally. And, if a decreasing
rate of the second trapped quantity is low as compared to a decreasing rate of the
first trapped quantity during execution of the PM regeneration process, the heater
may be operated.
[0016] When the heater is controlled in this manner, an oxidation rate of the PM at the
central portion and an oxidation rate of the PM at the peripheral portion become substantially
uniform. Thus, a period of time of execution of the PM regeneration process can be
shortened. Further, it is possible to avoid a situation where the heater is operated
unnecessarily when the PM oxidation rate at the peripheral portion is equal to or
greater than the PM oxidation rate at the central portion.
[0017] Even when the decreasing rate of the second trapped quantity is low with respect
to the decreasing rate of the first trapped quantity, the heater may be adapted to
be not operated if the second trapped quantity is less than the first trapped quantity.
Preferably, the heater may be adapted to be not operated even when the decreasing
rate of the second trapped quantity is low with respect to the decreasing rate of
the first trapped quantity, if the regeneration at the periphery portion is predicted
to be finished by the time of finishing the regeneration at the central portion. When
the heater is controlled in this manner, the PM trapped at the central portion and
the peripheral portion can be oxidized and removed, without operating the heater unnecessarily.
[0018] Here, as a method for predicting whether or not the regeneration of the peripheral
portion will finish by the time of finishing the regeneration of the central portion,
the regeneration finishing time (or a period of time required for regeneration) at
the central portion is calculated from the PM oxidation rate at the central portion
and the first trapped quantity, and also the regeneration finishing time (or a period
of time required for regeneration) at the peripheral portion is calculated from the
PM oxidation rate at the peripheral portion and the second trapped quantity, and to
compare these calculations.
[0019] In the present invention, for the switching mechanism, a mechanism, which switches
between a mode wherein the flow of the exhaust gas flowing out from the central portion
is directed to the PM sensor, and a mode wherein the flow of the exhaust gas flowing
out from the peripheral portion is directed to the PM sensor, may be used. For such
a switching mechanism, a valve mechanism having a butterfly type valve body, may be
used. In that case, when the state of the valve body is in parallel to a virtual straight
line connecting the central portion of the particulate filter and the PM sensor, the
exhaust gas flowing out from the central portion is led to the PM sensor by the valve
body. Further, when the state of the valve body is in parallel to a virtual straight
line connecting the peripheral portion of the particulate filter and the PM sensor,
the exhaust gas flowing out from the peripheral portion is lead to the PM sensor by
the valve body. By switching the state of the valve body in this manner, the first
trapped quantity and the second trapped quantity can be obtained by a single PM sensor.
[0020] When the valve body is parallel to the virtual line connecting the central portion
of the particulate filter with the PM sensor or when the valve body is parallel to
the virtual line connecting the peripheral portion of the particulate filter with
the PM sensor, the PM sensor may be arranged so that the degree of opening of the
valve body is fully open. In this case, the valve body is fully open either in the
first mode or in the second mode, increase of a pressure loss caused by providing
the valve body can be kept to a minimum.
[0021] Further, for the switching mechanism of the present invention, a mechanism which
changes the position of the PM sensor may be used. In more detail, the switching mechanism
may be a mechanism which switches between a mode wherein the PM sensor is moved onto
the path of the exhaust gas flowing out from the central portion, and a mode wherein
the PM sensor is moved onto the path of the exhaust gas flowing out from the peripheral
portion.
Effects Of The Invention
[0022] According to the present invention, it is possible to accurately obtain the PM trapped
quantity of the particulate filter arranged in the exhaust system of the internal
combustion engine
Brief Description Of The Drawings
[0023]
Fig. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of an internal combustion engine
to which the present invention is applied and an exhaust system thereof.
Fig. 2 is a diagram showing the relationship between the PM trapped quantity of the
particulate filter and the PM outflow quantity.
Fig. 3 is a diagram showing a state of a valve body when detecting the quantity of
PM flowing out from the central portion of the particulate filter.
Fig. 4 is a diagram showing a state of the valve body when detecting the quantity
of PM flowing out from the peripheral portion of the particulate filter.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart showing a PM trapped quantity calculation process routine in
a first embodiment.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart showing a PM regeneration process routine in the first embodiment.
Fig. 7 is a diagram showing a structure of an exhaust gas purification apparatus in
a second embodiment.
Fig. 8 is a flowchart showing the PM regeneration process routine in the second embodiment.
Fig. 9 is a diagram showing another structural example of the switching mechanism
according to the present invention.
Fig. 10 is a diagram showing still another structural example of the switching mechanism
according to the present invention.
The Best Mode For Carrying Out The Invention
[0024] Hereinafter, a description will be made of specific embodiments of the present invention
with reference to the accompanying drawings. Regarding the dimensions, materials,
shapes and relative arrangements, etc. of the components to be described in the embodiments
are not intended to limit the technical scope of the present invention unless specifically
described.
<Embodiment 1>
[0025] First, a description will be made of a first embodiment of the present invention
based on Fig. 1 to Fig. 6. Fig. 1 is a diagram showing a schematic structure of an
internal combustion engine to which the present invention is applied and an exhaust
system thereof. An internal combustion engine 1 shown in Fig. 1 is a compression ignition
internal combustion engine (diesel engine).
[0026] The internal combustion engine 1 includes cylinders 2. A piston 3 is slidably mounted
in the cylinder. The internal combustion engine 1 comprises an intake port 4 for guiding
new air (air) into the cylinder 2, a fuel injection valve 5 for injecting fuel into
the cylinder 2, and an exhaust port 6 for discharging gas (burnt gas) from the cylinder
2. The exhaust port 6 is connected to an exhaust pipe 7.
[0027] A casing 8 of the exhaust gas purification apparatus is provided at the middle of
the exhaust pipe 7. A particulate filter 9, which traps particulate matter (PM) in
the exhaust gas, is provided inside the casing 8. Inside the casing 8, a PM sensor
10 is provided at the downstream of the particulate filter 9. The PM sensor 10 is
a sensor which outputs an electric signal corresponding to a quantity of PM contained
in the exhaust gas.
[0028] A valve mechanism 11 is provided between the particulate filter 9 and the PM sensor
10 in the casing 8. The valve mechanism 11 includes a butterfly valve body 11 a and
an actuator 11 b for changing an opening degree of the valve body 11 a.
[0029] Further, an ECU 12 is provided as an annex to the internal combustion engine 1. The
ECU 12 is an electronic control unit comprising CPU, ROM, RAM, back-up RAM, etc. In
addition to the above-mentioned PM sensor 10, output signals from an accelerator position
sensor 13 and a crank position sensor 14 are inputted into the ECU 12. The ECU 12
controls the fuel injection valve 5 and the actuator 11 b based on output signals
from the above-mentioned various sensors.
[0030] For example, the ECU 12 performs controlling (fuel injection control) of a valve
opening timing (fuel injection timing) of the fuel injection valve 5 and a period
of time of valve opening (fuel injection quantity) of the fuel injection valve 5 by
using output signals from the accelerator position sensor 13 and the crank position
sensor 14, as parameters. Moreover, the ECU 12 executes the PM trapped quantity calculation
process and the PM regeneration process which are the gist of the present invention,
by using the output signal of the PM sensor 10 as the parameter.
[0031] Hereinafter, a description will be made of the PM trapped quantity calculation process
and the PM regeneration process in the present embodiment. First, in the PM trapped
quantity calculation process, the ECU 12 calculates the quantity of PM trapped in
the particulate filter 9 (PM trapped quantity) from the output signal of the PM sensor
10.
[0032] Here, the particulate filter 9 has the property that its PM trapping ability is increased
when the PM trapped quantity is large, rather than when the PM trapped quantity is
small. As a result, when the PM trapped quantity of the particulate filter 9 is large,
the quantity of PM flowing out from the particulate filter 9 (hereinafter referred
to as "the PM outflow quantity") decreases in comparison to when the PM trapped quantity
of the particulate filter 9 is small.
[0033] Accordingly, the output signal (the PM outflow quantity) of the PM sensor 10 becomes
a smaller value as shown in Fig. 2, when the PM trapped quantity of the particulate
filter 9 is large, rather than when it is small. Hence, by obtaining the correlation
as shown in Fig. 2 experimentally in advance, it is possible to convert the output
signal value of the PM sensor 10 into the PM trapped quantity. According to this method,
the PM trapped quantity of the particulate filter 9 can be obtained more accurately.
[0034] When the PM trapped quantity of the particulate filter 9 is specified, the starting
time and the finishing time of the PM regeneration process can be determined based
on the specified PM trapped quantity. For example, the ECU 12 can start the PM regeneration
process when the PM trapped quantity becomes equal to or exceeding the upper limit
quantity. Further, the ECU 12 can finish the PM regeneration process when the PM trapped
quantity, which is sought during the execution of the PM regeneration process, becomes
equal to or less than the lower limit quantity.
[0035] Note that the above-mentioned upper limit quantity corresponds to the PM trapped
quantity, for which it is thought that the magnitude of a back pressure caused by
increase of the pressure loss of the particulate filter 9 exceeds the acceptable value.
Further, the above-mentioned lower limit quantity is the PM trapped quantity, for
which it is thought that an interval between the PM regeneration process finishing
time and the starting time of the next PM regeneration process does not become excessively
short. Preferably, the lower limit quantity is zero.
[0036] Note that there may be a case where the degree of increase of the PM trapped quantity
while the PM regeneration process is not executed, or the degree of decrease of the
PM trapped quantity while the PM regeneration process is executed, may differ depending
on the part of the particulate filter 9. For example, in the radial direction of the
particulate filter 9, the degree of change in the PM trapped quantity of the central
portion and the degree of change in the PM trapped quantity of the peripheral portion
may differ from one another.
[0037] In the above-mentioned case, if the PM regeneration process is carried out based
on the PM trapped quantity of either at the central portion or the peripheral portion
of the particulate filter 9, there may occur a situation where the PM quantity remaining
in the particulate filter 9 at the time of finishing the PM regeneration process becomes
excessive, or a situation where the PM regeneration process is continued even after
the PM quantity remaining in the particulate filter has been decreased to less than
the lower limit quantity.
[0038] Thus, in the PM trapped quantity calculation process of the present embodiment, the
ECU 12 calculates the PM trapped quantity at the central portion and the PM trapped
quantity at the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 respectively, thereby
to determine the starting timing and the finishing timing of the PM regeneration process
based on these calculation results.
[0039] Here, a method of obtaining the PM trapped quantity at the central portion and the
PM trapped quantity at the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 will be
described, based on Figs. 3 and 4. A measuring part 10a of the PM sensor 10 is disposed
on the path of the exhaust gas flowing out from the central portion of the particulate
filter 9. That is, the measuring part 10a of the PM sensor 10 is located on a line
extending from the central portion in the direction of the flow of the exhaust gas.
[0040] According to this arrangement, when the valve body 11 a of the valve mechanism 11
is fully opened (when the valve body 11 a is parallel to the direction of the flow
of the exhaust gas flowing out from the particulate filter 9), the exhaust gas flowing
out from the central portion of the particulate filter 9 is to flow via the measuring
part 10a of the PM sensor 10, as shown in Fig. 3. Hence, the ECU 12 can calculate
the quantity of PM trapped at the central portion of the particulate filter 9 (first
trapped quantity), using a measured value of the PM sensor 10 at the time of fully
open of the valve body 11 a, as the parameter.
[0041] Further, in the case where the quantity of PM trapped at the peripheral portion of
the particulate filter 9 (second trapped quantity) is obtained, the ECU 12 controls
the valve mechanism 11 so that the valve body 11 a is caused to rotate counter-clockwise
in Fig. 3. At that time, the valve body 11 a is to rotate until the opening degree
of the valve body 11 a becomes substantially parallel to the virtual straight line
connecting the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 and the measuring part
10a (hereinafter will be called "the reference opening degree"). When the valve mechanism
11 is controlled in this manner, the exhaust gas flowing out from the peripheral portion
of the particulate filter 9 is to flow via the measuring part 10a of the PM sensor
10. Hence, the ECU 12 can calculate the second trapped quantity by using the measured
value of the PM sensor 10 at the time when the opening degree of the valve body 11
a is made the reference opening degree, as the parameter.
[0042] Note that the second trapped quantity obtained by the above-mentioned method is the
PM trapped quantity of a specified area (the area located in the lower part of Figs.
3 and 4) of the peripheral portion. Consequently, in the case where the PM trapped
quantity of the entire area of the peripheral portion is specified, the second trapped
quantity may be corrected based on a ratio (proportion) of the specified area to the
entire area of the peripheral portion. However, with the present embodiment, it is
sufficient that a relative relation (ratio or deviation) between the PM trapped quantity
at the central portion and the PM trapped quantity at the peripheral portion is specified.
Hence, there is no need to obtain the PM trapped quantity of the entire area of the
peripheral portion.
[0043] Here, procedures for obtaining the PM trapped quantity at the central portion and
the PM trapped quantity at the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 will
be described with reference to Fig. 5. Fig. 5 is a flowchart showing a PM trapped
quantity calculation process routine. This routine is a routine is stored in the ROM
of the ECU 12 in advance, and executed at intervals by the ECU 12.
[0044] Firstly, in the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine, the ECU 12 controls,
in S101, the valve mechanism 11 so that the opening degree of the valve body 11a is
fully opened. Note that the opening degree of the valve body 11 a is preferably maintained
fully opened, except the case where the second trapped quantity is obtained. However,
this is not a limitation to the case where the valve mechanism 11 also has the function
as the known exhaust gas throttle valve.
[0045] In S102, the ECU 12 reads the measured value of the PM sensor 10. Subsequently the
ECU 12 proceeds to S103 where the ECU 12 calculates the first trapped quantity ΣPM1
from the measured value read in the S102 and the map as shown in Fig. 2.
[0046] In S104, the ECU 12 controls the valve mechanism 11 so that the opening degree of
the valve body 11 a becomes the reference opening degree. Subsequently, the ECU proceeds
to S105 where the ECU 12 reads the measured value of the PM sensor. In S106, the ECU
12 calculates the second trapped quantity ΣPM2 from the measured value read in the
S105 and the above-mentioned map shown in Fig. 2.
[0047] In S107, the ECU 12 stores the first trapped quantity ΣPM1 and the second trapped
quantity ΣPM2 calculated in the S103 and the S105 in the backup RAM. In S108, the
ECU 12 controls the valve mechanism 11 so as to return the opening degree of the valve
body 11 a to fully open.
[0048] As described above, the calculation unit according to the present invention is implemented
by the execution of the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine by the ECU12.
As result, the distribution of the PM trapped quantity in the radial direction of
the particulate filter 9, in other words, the deviation between the PM trapped quantity
at the central portion and the PM trapped quantity at the peripheral portion can be
specified.
[0049] Also, the process of the S102 and the process of the S105 are preferably performed
under the same engine operation state as much as possible. This is because the PM
quantity discharged from the internal combustion engine 1 varies according to the
engine operation state. Further, when the process of the S104 is executed, the back
pressure acting on the internal combustion engine 1 rises. Because of this, it is
preferable that the process of the S104 is performed at the time of low load operation
state. Hence, the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine is executed when
the internal combustion engine 1 is in the stationary operation state, preferably
in the idling operation state.
[0050] Next, procedures for execution of the PM regeneration process will be described with
reference to Fig. 6. Fig. 6 is a flowchart showing the PM regeneration process routine
in the present embodiment. This routine is stored in the ROM of the ECU 12 in advance,
and executed at intervals by the ECU12.
[0051] Firstly, in the PM regeneration process routine, the ECU 12 determines, in S201,
whether or not the conditions for execution of the PM regeneration process have been
established. As the conditions for execution of the PM regeneration process, the fact
that the PM trapped quantity of the entire particulate filter 9 is equal to or more
than the upper limit quantity may be exemplified. However, with the present embodiment,
the PM regeneration process is executed under the condition that the above-stated
first trapped quantity ΣPM1 is equal to or more than the upper limit quantity. This
is due to the fact that the magnitude of the pressure loss of the particulate filter
9 mainly depends on the PM trapped quantity of the central portion. Hence, the ECU
12 reads the first trapped quantity ΣPM1 obtained by the above-mentioned PM trapped
quantity calculation process routine, and determines whether the read out first trapped
quantity ΣPM1 is equal to or more than the upper limit quantity.
[0052] When the negative determination is made in the S201, the ECU 12 terminates temporarily
the execution of this routine. On the other hand, when the affirmative determination
is made in the S201, the ECU 12 proceeds to S202.
[0053] In S202, the ECU 12 executes the PM regeneration process. In detail, the ECU 12 raises
the temperature of the particulate filter 9 up to the temperature region where the
PM is oxidized. For the method of raising the temperature of the particulate filter
9, a method of raising the temperature of the exhaust gas flowing into the particulate
filter 9, or a method of generating heat of oxidation reaction in the particulate
filter 9, may be used.
[0054] For the method of raising the temperature of the exhaust gas, a method which oxidizes
the fuel in the exhaust gas, by injecting the fuel (secondary injection) from the
fuel injection valve 5 during a period from the latter half of the expansion stroke
to the first half of the exhaust stroke, may be used. For the other method of raising
the temperature of the exhaust gas, a method wherein an oxidization catalyst is disposed
at the upstream of the particulate filter 9 thereby the fuel injected from the fuel
injection valve 5 during the exhaust stroke is oxidized by the oxidization catalyst,
may be used. Note that, in the case where the reducing agent adding valve is disposed
at the upstream of the oxidization catalyst, it is possible to use a method in which
the reducing agent added into the exhaust gas from the reducing agent adding valve
is oxidized in the oxidization catalyst.
[0055] For the method of generating heat of oxidation reaction in the particulate filer
9, a method in which the particulate filter 9 carries thereon the oxidization catalyst,
and the fuel or the reducing agent supplied to the exhaust gas from the fuel injection
valve 5 or the reducing agent adding valve is oxidized in the particulate filter 9,
may be used.
[0056] When the process of S202 is executed using the above-mentioned various methods, the
ECU 12 proceeds to S203. In S203, the ECU 12 reads out from the backup RAM the latest
first trapped quantity ΣPM1 and the second trapped quantity ΣPM2 which were calculated
by the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine.
[0057] In S204, the ECU 12 determines whether or not the first trapped quantity ΣPM1 and
the second trapped quantity ΣPM2 which were read out in the S203 are equal to or less
than the lower limit quantity. When the negative determination is made in S204, the
ECU 12 returns to S203. On the other hand, when the affirmative determination is made
in S204, the ECU 12 proceeds to S205 where the ECU 12 terminates the PM regeneration
process.
[0058] When the PM regeneration process of the particulate filter 9 is executed according
to the PM regeneration process routine in such manner as described above, occurrence
of the situation in which the PM quantity remaining at the central portion or at the
peripheral portion is excessive at the time of termination of the PM regeneration
process, and occurrence of the situation in which the PM regeneration process is continued
even after the PM quantity remaining in the particulate filter 9 has been decreased
to equal to or less than the lower limit quantity, can be avoided.
<Embodiment 2>
[0059] Next, a second embodiment of the present invention will be described based on Fig.
7 and Fig. 8.
Here, a description will be made of the structures which are different from that of
the above-described first embodiment, and regarding the same structures, the description
will be omitted.
[0060] The point of difference between the present embodiment and the above-described first
embodiment is that the PM oxidization rate at the central portion and the PM oxidation
rate at the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 are made uniform during
the execution of the PM regeneration process in the present embodiment.
[0061] Fig. 7 is a cross-sectional diagram showing a structure of an exhaust gas purification
apparatus in a second embodiment. In Fig. 7, a cylindrical shape heater 90 is provided
between the inner wall of the casing 8 and the outer wall of the particulate filter
9. The heater 90 heats the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 by, for
example, converting the electric energy supplied from a battery (not shown) into the
heat energy. The switching between an operation state and a non-operation state of
the heater 90 is controlled by the ECU 12.
[0062] Fig. 8 is a flowchart showing the PM regeneration process routine in the second embodiment.
The same reference numerals are used for denoting the same processes as the PM regeneration
process routine of the above-described first embodiment.
[0063] In the PM regeneration process routine of Fig. 8, the ECU 12 proceeds to S301 after
having executed the process of S202. In S301, the ECU 12 calculates the decreasing
rate v1 of the first trapped quantity ΣPM1 and the decreasing rate v2 of the second
rapped quantity ΣPM2.
[0064] For example, the ECU 12 obtains the decreasing rate v1 of the first trapped quantity
ΣPM1 by dividing the difference ΣPM1 (= ΣPM1old - ΣPM1) between the latest first trapped
quantity ΣPM1 obtained in the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine and
the previously obtained first trapped quantity ΣPM1old by the execution interval t
of the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine, that is, v1 (= ΔΣPM1/t).
[0065] Similarly, the ECU 12 obtains the decreasing rate v2 of the second trapped quantity
ΣPM2 by dividing the difference ΔΣPM2 (= ΣPM2old - ΣPM2) between the latest second
trapped quantity ΣPM21 obtained in the PM trapped quantity calculation process routine
and the previously obtained second trapped quantity ΣPM2old by the execution interval
t, that is, v2 (= ΔΣPM2/t).
[0066] Note that the ECU 12 may use the above-mentioned difference ΔΣPM1 as a substitute
value of the decreasing rate v1 of the first trapped quantity ΣPM1, and the ECU 12
may also use the above-mentioned difference ΔΣPM2 as a substitute value of the decreasing
rate v2 of the second trapped quantity ΣPM2.
[0067] In S302, the ECU 12 compares the decreasing rates v1 and v2 obtained in the S301.
Specifically, the ECU 12 determines whether or not the decreasing rate v2 of the second
trapped quantity ΣPM2 is lower than the decreasing rate v1 of the first trapped quantity
ΣPM1.
[0068] When the affirmative determination (v2 < v1) is made in the S302, the ECU 12 proceeds
to S303 to operate the heater 90. In that case, the temperature of the peripheral
portion of the particulate filter 9 rises, thereby the PM oxidation rate at the peripheral
portion is increased. As a result, the PM oxidation rate at the peripheral portion
and the PM oxidation rate at the central portion become uniform. On the other hand,
when the negative determination (v2 ≥ v1) is made in the S303, the ECU 12 proceeds
to S304 to stop operation of the heater 90. Then, execution of the process of the
S303 or the S304 has been finished, the ECU 12 executes the process of S203 and the
subsequent processes.
[0069] When the PM regeneration process is executed according to the PM oxidation process
routine in such manner as described above, the PM oxidation rate at the central portion
and the PM oxidation rate at the peripheral portion of the particulate filter 9 become
substantially uniform. Consequently, the period of time of execution of the PM regeneration
process can be shortened. Further, it is possible to avoid occurrence of the situation
where the heater 90 is operated unnecessarily when the PM oxidation rate at the peripheral
portion is equal to or greater than the PM oxidation rate at the central portion.
[0070] With the above-described first and the second embodiments, the valve mechanism 11
including the butterfly valve body 11 a was exemplified as the switching mechanism
according to the present invention. However, any mechanism, so long as it enables
to perform measurement individually of the quantity of PM flowing out from the central
portion and the quantity of PM flowing out from the peripheral portion of the particulate
filter 9.
[0071] For example, as shown in Fig. 9, a flap 110 which is rotatably supported on the inner
wall surface of the casing 8, may be used. Further, as shown in Fig. 10, a driving
mechanism 100 which displaces the measurement part 10a of the PM sensor 10 to be in
parallel to the radial direction of the particulate filter 9, may be used. Still further,
PM sensors may be disposed respectively on the path of the exhaust gas flowing out
from the central portion and on the path of the exhaust gas flowing out from the peripheral
portion of the particulate filter 9.
[0072] Moreover, with the above-described first and the second embodiments, the internal
combustion engine of the compression ignition engine was exemplified as the internal
combustion engine to which the present invention is applied, but the present invention
can be applied also to the internal combustion engine of the spark ignition type (gasoline
engine).
Description Of The Reference Numerals And Symbols
[0073]
- 1.
- internal combustion engine
- 2.
- cylinder
- 3.
- piston
- 4.
- intake port
- 5.
- fuel injection valve
- 6.
- exhaust port
- 7.
- exhaust pipe
- 8.
- casing
- 9.
- particulate filter
- 10.
- PM sensor
- 10a
- measurement part
- 11.
- valve mechanism
- 11a
- valve body
- 11b
- actuator
- 13.
- accelerator position sensor
- 14.
- crank position sensor
- 90.
- heater
- 100.
- driving mechanism
- 110.
- flap